Podcasts about patent law

Genius doesn't come with a price tag until someone tries to take it from you. When brilliant minds create groundbreaking innovations during employment, who truly owns these inventions? This fascinating legal arena pits creators against corporations in battles that can span decades and result in multi-million-dollar verdicts.Meet John Peterson, the engineer who refused to surrender his weekend projects to a convenience store chain that claimed everything he created, even off the clock. His story of fighting Bukies' overreaching employment contract offers a masterclass in standing up for your intellectual property rights. Then there's Professor Shanks, whose glucose biosensor technology earned his employer £24 million. In comparison, he received nothing until a twenty-year legal battle culminated in a £2 million award and a landmark UK Supreme Court decision on "outstanding benefit."From patent grammar wars where a single verb tense determined ownership of HIV diagnostic technology to post-employment clauses that tried to claim an inventor's future ideas, we explore the fine print that can make or break inventor fortunes. We'll take you around the globe from Germany's sophisticated formulas for inventor compensation to China's statutory minimum payouts, revealing how different legal systems value creative minds. Whether you're sketching brilliance on napkins or developing prototypes in corporate labs, understanding your rights as an inventor has never been more crucial. As workplace innovation drives the modern economy, the law is finally catching up to ensure the minds behind the magic receive their fair share.Send us a text

Send us a textShownotes can be found at https://www.profitwithlaw.com/480.He started with just a fax machine and a phone line.Listen to this episode of the Profit with Law Podcast, where host Moshe Amsel sits down with Daniel Scola, managing partner of Hoffman and Baron, who reveals his unique path from chemist to patent attorney, inspired by witnessing his father's inventions stolen and fueled by a desire to protect ideas. Together, Moshe and Daniel dive into the nuts and bolts of law firm growth—including landing those critical first clients through relationship-building, managing the financial realities of hiring and training in a highly specialized field, and the mindset necessary for long-term success in a competitive market.Tune in now for honest, practical advice and powerful storytelling from an attorney whose journey will inspire anyone looking to take their law firm to the next level!Chapters:[00:00] Who is Daniel Scola?[04:27] The Inspiration Behind Daniel's Legal Career[08:23] Early Career and Entry into Patent Law[10:26] Founding the New Jersey Office: Taking the Leap[15:04] The Power of Leveraging Personal Networks for Growth[17:34] Realizing the Need for a Team: When to Hire and How[20:35] Training New Talent and Creating a Reward System[24:04] Approaching Financial Stress During Early Growth[26:09] Hiring Experienced Attorneys vs. Training New Talent[27:44] Parting WisdomResources mentioned:Book your FREE strategy session today!: profitwithlaw.com/strategysessionTake the Law Firm Growth Assessment and find out how you rate as a law firm owner! Check out our Profit with Law YouTube channel!Learn more about the Profit with Law Elite Coaching Program here$100M Offers: How To Make Offers So Good People Feel Stupid Saying No by Alex HormoziConnect with Daniel Scola: Website | EmailJoin our Facebook Community: https://www.facebook.com/groups/lawfirmgrowthsummit/To request a show topic, recommend a guest or ask a question for the show, please send an email to info@dreambuilderfinancial.com.Connect with Moshe on:Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/moshe.amselLinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/mosheamsel/

Episode: 1355 Major General George Squire, Muzak, and struggling to be generous.  Today, a story about altruism and Muzak.

Send me a messageIn this episode of the Climate Confident podcast, I spoke with Ryan Schermerhorn, a US-based patent attorney who's been helping clean tech innovators navigate the IP maze - until recently with the help of a now-suspended fast-track programme.We discussed the United States Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO) Climate Change Mitigation Pilot Program, which allowed inventors of emissions-reducing technologies to get patents approved in months rather than years, at no cost. Ryan explained how it worked, why it was a big deal for clean tech startups, and how it quietly disappeared earlier this year following a political shift.We also unpacked what this means for innovators now. Ryan shared practical alternatives - like using international patent offices with similar climate fast-track schemes and leveraging the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) to speed things up globally.We also covered the balance between IP protection and open innovation, why patents still matter in the climate crisis, and how to protect ideas early without blowing the budget.If you're working in climate tech, clean energy, or emissions monitoring and need to protect or scale your innovation, this episode is for you.Support the showPodcast supportersI'd like to sincerely thank this podcast's amazing supporters: Lorcan Sheehan Jerry Sweeney Andreas Werner Stephen Carroll Roger Arnold And remember you too can Support the Podcast - it is really easy and hugely important as it will enable me to continue to create more excellent Climate Confident episodes like this one.ContactIf you have any comments/suggestions or questions for the podcast - get in touch via direct message on Twitter/LinkedIn. If you liked this show, please don't forget to rate and/or review it. It makes a big difference to help new people discover the show. CreditsMusic credits - Intro by Joseph McDade, and Outro music for this podcast was composed, played, and produced by my daughter Luna Juniper

Are you risking your million-dollar invention by using ChatGPT to draft your patent application? In today's rapidly evolving AI landscape, entrepreneurs and inventors are seeking cost-effective ways to protect their intellectual property, but using public AI tools could unknowingly expose your groundbreaking ideas to potential legal and security risks. In this episode, we welcome Jodie Spade a lawyer/engineer at Ference and Associates with top insights on using and not using AI to secure your IP. Listen and: Discover the hidden dangers of using AI for patent drafting that could invalidate your intellectual property rights Learn insider strategies from a patent attorney with engineering expertise on navigating AI-assisted innovation Understand how to leverage AI technology while maintaining the critical legal protections for your inventions Hit that pretty PLAY button to learn how to safeguard your intellectual property and avoid costly mistakes in the AI-driven innovation ecosystem. Produced by the Pittsburgh Technology Council, this is a podcast for tech and manufacturing  entrepreneurs exploring the tech ecosystem, from cyber security and AI to SaaS, robotics, and life sciences, featuring insights to satisfy the tech curious.

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 454. I interviewed/had a discussion with my first IP law boss today, William C. (Bill) Norvell, Jr., about our time together when I was a new lawyer, his love of opera and so on, and his views on politics, war, Trump, and his views on the patent and IP system based on his years of experience as a patent prosecutor and patent ligitator. Bill, previously a parter with my former firm Jackson Walker, is now retired from Akerman. He was unable to connect via video on our Zoom call so his part is audio only. https://youtu.be/dfpn3KWnh2Q I've mentioned before there are very few anti-patent IP attorneys (see Pro-IP “Anarchists” and anti-IP Patent Attorneys). It turns out Bill, the guy who taught me patent law, is mostly of that sentiment. In response to my question about whether abolishing the patent system would mean the end of innovation and inventions, go to about 1:26:00, for this interchange: Kinsella: If the patent system disappeared tomorrow, do you think this this would mean that innovation would stop? Norvell: No, absolutely not. I think it's in the mind in the civilized man and woman mind to move forward and advance society, and we've done this since the caveman and the development of fire and the wheel and so forth. Absolutely not. I think the people that I have known and worked with in my career had brilliant minds;  they were creative people people, and they didn't they didn't really didn't give a damn about the patents. You know another point on this, and in direct answer to your question, is that patents are are applications a lot of times are approved to be pursued in corporations to be “warm fuzzies” for engineers and designers and so forth—"oh this man has three patents etc etc etc”—and there's there's not any care about about protectionism and going into the market and so forth. Mankind, in our entire society, the development of the Industrial Revolution, the evolution of that, is in the in the genes, so to speak, of humanity. I don't think it would affect it a bit. I am reminded of the words of an email to me from a patent attorney (Miracle–An Honest Patent Attorney!): Stephan, Your letter responding to Joe Hosteny's comments on Patent Trolls nicely states what I came to realize several years ago, namely, it is unclear that the U.S. Patent System, as currently implemented, necessarily benefits society as a whole. Certainly, it has benefited [Hostey] and his [partners] and several of their prominent clients, and has put Marshall, Texas on the map; but you really have to wonder if the “tax” placed on industry by the System (and its use of juries or lay judges to make the call on often highly complex technical issues that the parties' technical experts cannot agree on) is really worth it. Of course, anyone can point to a few start-up companies that, arguably, owe their successes to their patent portfolios; but over the last 35 years, I have observed what would appear to be an ever increasing number of meritless patents, issued by an understaffed and talent-challenged PTO examining group, being used to extract tribute from whole industries. I have had this discussion with a number of clients, including Asian clients, who have been forced to accept our Patent System and the “taxes” it imposes on them as the cost of doing business in the USA. I wish I had the “answer”. I don't. But going to real opposition proceedings, special patent courts with trained patent judges, “loser pays attorney fees” trials, retired engineers/scientists or other experienced engineers/scientists being used to examine applications in their fields of expertise by telecommuting from their homes or local offices throughout the Country, litigating patent attorneys providing regular lectures to the PTO examiners on problems encountered in patent infringement cases due to ineffective or careless examination of patent applications, and the appointment of actually qualified patent judges to...

Speaker: Professor Margo Bagley, Emory University School of Law Abstract: 2024 was a year for multilateral IP like no other. WIPO Member states adopted two new treaties last year: the WIPO Treaty on IP, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge and the Riyadh Design Law Treaty. Both were groundbreaking in their mention of one or more of genetic resources, traditional knowledge, traditional cultural expressions, and indigenous peoples and local communities, none of which are standard IP topics and all of which have been controversial additions to the normative work at WIPO. Moreover, both treaties address disclosure of origin for one or more of these controversial areas, another first for a WIPO treaty. I will discuss how these two treaties came to fruition and their ramifications for future multilateral IP treaty-making.Biography: Margo A. Bagley is Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Law at Emory University School of Law. She returned to Emory in 2016 after ten years at the University of Virginia School of Law, where she held the Hardy Cross Dillard chair. She was the Hieken Visiting Professor in Patent Law at Harvard Law School in Fall 2022. Her scholarship focuses on comparative issues relating to patents and biotechnology, pharmaceuticals and access to medicines, and IP and social justice issues. Professor Bagley served on two National Academies Committees on IP matters, is a technical expert to the African Union in World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) matters, and has served as a consultant to several United Nations organizations. She has served as a US Department of Commerce Commercial Law Development Program advisor and currently serves as a member of the U.S. DARPA ELSI Team for the BRACE project. She is an elected member of the American Law Institute and a faculty lecturer with the Munich Intellectual Property Law Center at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, and also has taught patent related courses in China, Cuba, Israel, and Singapore. She has published numerous articles, book chapters, and monographs as well as two books with co-authors with a third on the way. She is registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, practiced patent law with both Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, and Smith, Gambrell and Russell, and has been an expert witness in several patent cases. A chemical engineer by training, Professor Bagley worked in industry for several years before attending law school at Emory where she was a Woodruff Fellow. She is a co-inventor on patents on peanut butter and bedding technology. For more information see: https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-seminars

Speaker: Professor Margo Bagley, Emory University School of Law Abstract: 2024 was a year for multilateral IP like no other. WIPO Member states adopted two new treaties last year: the WIPO Treaty on IP, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge and the Riyadh Design Law Treaty. Both were groundbreaking in their mention of one or more of genetic resources, traditional knowledge, traditional cultural expressions, and indigenous peoples and local communities, none of which are standard IP topics and all of which have been controversial additions to the normative work at WIPO. Moreover, both treaties address disclosure of origin for one or more of these controversial areas, another first for a WIPO treaty. I will discuss how these two treaties came to fruition and their ramifications for future multilateral IP treaty-making.Biography: Margo A. Bagley is Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Law at Emory University School of Law. She returned to Emory in 2016 after ten years at the University of Virginia School of Law, where she held the Hardy Cross Dillard chair. She was the Hieken Visiting Professor in Patent Law at Harvard Law School in Fall 2022. Her scholarship focuses on comparative issues relating to patents and biotechnology, pharmaceuticals and access to medicines, and IP and social justice issues. Professor Bagley served on two National Academies Committees on IP matters, is a technical expert to the African Union in World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) matters, and has served as a consultant to several United Nations organizations. She has served as a US Department of Commerce Commercial Law Development Program advisor and currently serves as a member of the U.S. DARPA ELSI Team for the BRACE project. She is an elected member of the American Law Institute and a faculty lecturer with the Munich Intellectual Property Law Center at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, and also has taught patent related courses in China, Cuba, Israel, and Singapore. She has published numerous articles, book chapters, and monographs as well as two books with co-authors with a third on the way. She is registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, practiced patent law with both Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, and Smith, Gambrell and Russell, and has been an expert witness in several patent cases. A chemical engineer by training, Professor Bagley worked in industry for several years before attending law school at Emory where she was a Woodruff Fellow. She is a co-inventor on patents on peanut butter and bedding technology. For more information see: https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-seminars

Kindred Label founder Cassidy Caulk built a patented luxury shoe brand from scratch, mastering everything from cobbling to engineering. Get actionable tips for product development, manufacturing partnerships, and protecting your invention.For more on Kindred Label and show notes click here. 

Is it usefulness, accidental genius, or sheer dumb luck that produces inventions? Well, after this episode, we at least know for sure what Batman's answer would be. As for the rest of it, you'll just have to listen along while we dive into one of Ceri's dream topics: Inventions!SciShow Tangents is on YouTube! Go to www.youtube.com/scishowtangents to check out this episode with the added bonus of seeing our faces! Head to www.patreon.com/SciShowTangents to find out how you can help support SciShow Tangents, and see all the cool perks you'll get in return, like bonus episodes and a monthly newsletter! A big thank you to Patreon subscriber Garth Riley for helping to make the show possible!And go to https://store.dftba.com/collections/scishow-tangents to buy some great Tangents merch!Follow us on Twitter @SciShowTangents, where we'll tweet out topics for upcoming episodes and you can ask the science couch questions! While you're at it, check out the Tangents crew on Twitter: Ceri: @ceriley Sam: @im_sam_schultz Hank: @hankgreen[This or That]Pacemakerhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3232561/https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/jul/11/from-viagra-to-valium-the-drugs-that-were-discovered-by-accidentSnow globehttps://www.bbc.com/news/business-25298507https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/how-an-experiment-to-amplify-light-in-hospital-operating-rooms-led-to-the-accidental-invention-of-the-snow-globe-180985742/Stethoscope https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1570491/https://www.thoughtco.com/rene-laenecc-stethoscope-1991647[The Scientific Definition]Pigeon Vesthttps://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/stories/pigeons-bras-go-warBat Bombhttps://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/1090bats/https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-almost-perfect-world-war-ii-plot-to-bomb-japan-with-batshttps://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/04/old-weird-tech-the-bat-bombs-of-world-war-ii/237267/Chicken Eyeglasseshttps://gizmodo.com/thousands-of-chickens-once-wore-glasses-to-stop-them-ki-1700343874https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1989/11/27/entrepreneur-wants-a-lens-in-every/https://extension.psu.edu/poultry-cannibalism-prevention-and-treatmenthttps://patents.google.com/patent/US730918Experiment (patent in category “Boats to ascend rivers”)https://books.google.com/books?id=K1YdAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA120#v=onepage&q&f=falsehttps://liberalarts.tamu.edu/nautarch/nwl/lake-champlain-projects/hoofbeats-over-the-water-ina-research-on-horse-powered-ferryboats/https://books.google.com/books?id=z0Avt3ruFx0C&pg=PA294#v=onepage&q&f=falsehttps://www.uspto.gov/blog/the-search-for-lost-x[Ask the Science Couch]“Ahead of their time” inventions (Undersea cables, Antikythera mechanism, electric cars) https://www.nps.gov/caco/learn/historyculture/french-transatlantic-cable.htmhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-84310-whttps://www.youtube.com/@clickspringhttps://guides.loc.gov/chronicling-america-early-electric-carsPatreon bonus: Patent law and whether you can apply without a prototypehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/100https://www.legal.uillinois.edu/services/legal_guidance/inventions_and_patentshttps://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2109.htmlhttps://improbable.com/2014/02/21/the-blonsky-centrifugal-birthing-device-in-dublin/[Butt One More Thing]John Henry Kellog's vibratory dining chair for bowel movementshttps://www.museumofquackery.com/devices/k-chair.htmhttps://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/health-nutrition-history-quackery/enigmatic-dr-kellogg

How is the rise of AI going to affect the intellectual property field and patents? What are some common mistakes that GCs make when setting up a patent strategy? Or tips that our guest has learned from years as a patent examiner?Join Matt Veale, European Patent Attorney and UPC at PatSnap, as he leads us into this podcast's first-ever deep dive into all things patents and IP, sharing expert advice on the best way to work with examiners to bring your innovations to the world.Listen as Matt discusses why he thinks IP is the most important thing in the world, the importance of data analytics, bridging the gap between lawyers and R&D, building a strong patent strategy, the future of IP law, and much more.Read detailed summary: https://www.spotdraft.com/podcast/episode-79Topics:Introduction: 0:00What inspired Matt to be a lawyer: 1:48What does intellectual property law mean?: 3:40Starting your legal career at the UK Intellectual Property Office: 5:11Tips for people filing their first patent: 6:42Interesting patent applications Matt has seen: 8:47Tips for GCs who inherit corporate patents: 9:39Looking for outside patent counsel: 11:55Patent analytics at PatSnap: 13:44The future of IP law: 16:38AI as a tool for patent lawyers: 20:55Contacting Matt: 25:23Rapid-fire questions: 25:37Book recommendations: 26:46What Matt wishes he knew as a young lawyer: 27:17Connect with us:Matt Veale - https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-veale-ip/Tyler Finn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/tylerhfinnSpotDraft - https://www.linkedin.com/company/spotdraftSpotDraft is a leading contract lifecycle management platform that solves your end-to-end contract management issues. Visit https://www.spotdraft.com to learn more.

Dalinar learns dark secret upon dark secret, Adolin gets hit hard, Szeth fights with his sister and Shallan learns how she met her mother. Okay not really on the last one but I wanted to make the joke. We talk about: Warframe, F1,Dark Souls 2, LUKE WATCHED TOTALLY SPIES, Sea of Thieves, Romeo + Juliet, Bazaar, Earthsea, Too Human, What Is The Listener Plot Really, Darkest Before The Dark, Eye Spikes, Shardpen, Listener Homophobic Moment, Lying Windrunner, Men Have Problems Too, Talm Smokes Too Tough, Kaladin Is Racist, Adolin Edgedancer, Lifting Up, Debate Me Bro, Odium's Champion, Dalinar Is So Good At Trauma, Non Political Army, Unmade, #NotAllLightEyes, Shallan's Special Mom, Ashley Fujos Out, Patent Law, Uniting Them,

Part 4 of 4: In this episode, Jon Chee hosts Kate Neville, PhD, Partner at Marshall Gerstein—a law firm with over 60 years of expertise in delivering sophisticated intellectual property advice and legal services to leading businesses, research institutions, universities, and entrepreneurs worldwide. Kate is an accomplished attorney with a doctoral background in microbiology and immunology who specializes in global patent prosecution and strategic management. She has over a decade of experience, and works with a wide range of clients, from biotech startups to big pharma to non-profits. Kate has been recognized as a "World's Leading Patent Practitioner" by IAM magazine since 2013, an Illinois Super Lawyer since 2018, and is included in The Best Lawyers in America© for Patent Law.

Part 3 of 4: In this episode, Jon Chee hosts Kate Neville, PhD, Partner at Marshall Gerstein—a law firm with over 60 years of expertise in delivering sophisticated intellectual property advice and legal services to leading businesses, research institutions, universities, and entrepreneurs worldwide. Kate is an accomplished attorney with a doctoral background in microbiology and immunology who specializes in global patent prosecution and strategic management. She has over a decade of experience, and works with a wide range of clients, from biotech startups to big pharma to non-profits. Kate has been recognized as a "World's Leading Patent Practitioner" by IAM magazine since 2013, an Illinois Super Lawyer since 2018, and is included in The Best Lawyers in America© for Patent Law.

Part 2 of 4: Jon Chee hosts Kate Neville, Partner at Marshall Gerstein—a law firm with over 60 years of expertise in delivering sophisticated intellectual property advice and legal services to leading businesses, research institutions, universities, and entrepreneurs worldwide. Kate, an accomplished attorney with a doctoral background in microbiology and immunology, specializes in global patent prosecution and strategic management. With over a decade of experience, she works with biotech startups, big pharma, and non-profits. Kate has been recognized as a "World's Leading Patent Practitioner" by IAM magazine since 2013, an Illinois Super Lawyer since 2018, and is included in The Best Lawyers in America© for Patent Law.

Part 1 of 4: Jon Chee hosts Kate Neville, Partner at Marshall Gerstein—a law firm with over 60 years of expertise in delivering sophisticated intellectual property advice and legal services to leading businesses, research institutions, universities, and entrepreneurs worldwide. Kate, an accomplished attorney with a doctoral background in microbiology and immunology, specializes in global patent prosecution and strategic management. With over a decade of experience, she works with biotech startups, big pharma, and non-profits. Kate has been recognized as a "World's Leading Patent Practitioner" by IAM magazine since 2013, an Illinois Super Lawyer since 2018, and is included in The Best Lawyers in America© for Patent Law.

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 448. This is my discussion with European patent attorney David Pearce, of the Tufty the Cat European IP blog (twitter). He and I were co-founders and members of the Advisory Council for the Open Crypto Alliance (2020–22). We discuss Craig Wright, nChain and bitcoin related patents, and so on (see video below). https://youtu.be/3B1R_aTdQ0I https://youtu.be/AJmPrbQ4NQU?si=yAGKMU590r6Vac4i  

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 448. This is my discussion with European patent attorney David Pearce, of the Tufty the Cat European IP blog (twitter). He and I were co-founders and members of the Advisory Council for the Open Crypto Alliance (2020–22). We discuss Craig Wright, nChain and bitcoin related patents, and so on (see video below). https://youtu.be/3B1R_aTdQ0I https://youtu.be/AJmPrbQ4NQU?si=yAGKMU590r6Vac4i

Artificial intelligence will not replace lawyers. It will replace the lawyers that don't know how to use AI. Part Two of our roundtable discussion highlights ways AI can make your practice 30-80% more efficient and introduces us to a fascinating new area of law…artificial intelligence litigation.

Artificial intelligence will not replace lawyers. It will replace the lawyers that don't know how to use AI. Part Two of our roundtable discussion highlights ways AI can make your practice 30-80% more efficient and introduces us to a fascinating new area of law…artificial intelligence litigation.

The rapid growth of generative AI is transforming innovation and intellectual property law, particularly through the creation of AI-generated prior art, which complicates patent applications and litigation. AI tools can flood the patent space with numerous variations of technical disclosures, challenging the novelty and non-obviousness of new inventions. This shift necessitates new legal frameworks and strategies to address issues of enablement, public accessibility, and the authenticity of AI-generated evidence in the patent process.

In this episode, we examine the key provisions of the Japanese Patent Act, Article 102, covering the three main methods for determining damages: lost profits, the infringer's profits, and reasonable royalties. We also discuss recent legislative amendments aimed at enhancing patent protection, including the 2020 revisions, as well as significant rulings by the Intellectual Property High Court. This episode is essential listening for patent professionals and anyone interested in the evolving framework of Japanese patent litigation. We invite you to tune in and stay informed on these critical developments. - Statistics by the Intellectual Property High Court of Japan https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/vc-files/ip/2024/j_sintoukeiH26_R5.pdf - 2022(R2) (Ne) No.10024 https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/vc-files/ip/2022/Re2ne10024-zen.pdf - Japan Patent & Trademark Update Issue24 https://www.tmi.gr.jp/uploads/2023/07/24/jptu_issue24.pdf

Software and AI have become a significant part of today's patent litigation landscape. Our round table of expert patent attorneys explains the ongoing impact of the 2014 Alice decision and examines the fuzzy lines of “significant advances” and “inventive concept” in current patent law.

Software and AI have become a significant part of today's patent litigation landscape. Our round table of expert patent attorneys explains the ongoing impact of the 2014 Alice decision and examines the fuzzy lines of “significant advances” and “inventive concept” in current patent law.

Choosing the Right Law School Courses for Your Career Goals This session reviews key themes and information from the provided excerpt of "Choosing the Right Law School Courses for Your Career Goals." It aims to guide law students in strategically selecting courses to align with their career aspirations and develop necessary skills. Main Themes: Self-Assessment and Career Exploration: Students must clearly understand their strengths, interests, and long-term goals to choose relevant courses. Reflecting on 1L experiences, practical experiences like internships, and desired career paths are crucial. Matching Courses to Specific Legal Careers: Different legal careers require specific knowledge and skills. The guide details core and elective courses tailored to paths like Litigation, Corporate/Transactional Law, Public Interest Law, Intellectual Property Law, and Environmental Law. Importance of Practical Skills: Beyond doctrinal knowledge, practical skills gained through clinical programs, externships, and advanced legal writing courses are vital for any legal career. Post-Graduate Opportunities: Strategic course selection can enhance applications for judicial clerkships, fellowships, and public interest positions. Key Ideas and Facts: Understanding Your Aspirations: The guide stresses the importance of introspection, urging students to consider: Enjoyed 1L Subjects: "If you enjoyed Criminal Law and Torts, you might be interested in litigation or criminal defense." Practical Experience: "Consider any internships or externships you've done... Did you prefer client-facing roles, research, or drafting documents?" Long-Term Goals: "Think about where you see yourself in five to ten years. Do you want to work in a big law firm, serve as a government attorney, or work for a nonprofit?" Course Recommendations: The guide provides specific course recommendations for each career path, including examples: Litigation: Evidence, Civil Procedure II, Trial Advocacy, Pre-Trial Practice, Appellate Advocacy. Corporate/Transactional Law: Business Organizations, Contract Drafting, Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A), Securities Regulation. Public Interest Law: Administrative Law, Constitutional Law II, Civil Rights Litigation, Immigration Law. Intellectual Property Law: Intellectual Property Law, Patent Law, Trademark Law, Copyright Law. Environmental Law: Environmental Law, Natural Resources Law, Energy Law. Practical Skill Development: The document emphasizes real-world experience: Clinical Programs: "Clinical programs offer students the chance to work on real cases with actual clients under faculty supervision." Externships: "Externships allow students to gain practical experience in law firms, government agencies, or nonprofit organizations while earning academic credit." Preparing for the Future:Clerkships: "Judges look for students with strong legal research, writing, and analytical skills." Courses like Federal Courts and Appellate Advocacy are recommended. Fellowships: Courses like Civil Rights Litigation and Immigration Law, coupled with practical experience, can strengthen fellowship applications. Quotes: "It's not just about following your interests but strategically aligning your academic path with the legal practice area you aim to enter." "While substantive knowledge is essential, law students should also prioritize building practical skills through experiential learning." "Choosing the right courses is one of the most important steps in shaping your legal career." Overall, this document serves as a valuable roadmap for law students navigating course selection. By carefully considering their aspirations and utilizing the provided recommendations, students can build a strong foundation for a successful legal career. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Don Dubuc in for Tommy. Don talks with John Rizvi, The Patent Professor. He's an Adjunct Professor of Patent Law at Nova Southeastern Law School in Florida and the author of two books on patents

Episode #98 featuring Tom Stanton, Partner at Bochner Law. Bochner is an Intellectual Property Advisory and Consulting Law firm. After spending 10 years in the IT field, at the age of 35 Tom decided to make a career change and become an attorney. Since then, Tom has become a licensed patent attorney in both New York and Florida with focus on cutting edge computer technologies and related intellectual property protection. Listen to James Ontra and Tom Stanton discuss how influential the Tampa community has been towards their careers. With James being an alumni member of Leadership Tampa Bay and Tom being a member of the Tampa Bay Business Journal's 30 Under 30, they share insights on how the Tampa Bay Community continues to inspire and drive their success.This Podcast is Sponsored by Shufflrr, Shufflrr is AI for Presentations

A conversation with Matthew Veale, a European Patent Attorney and UPC Representative at PatSnap, an app that provides users with a comprehensive and user-friendly platform to conduct patent searches. Matthew discusses his experiences from work as an attorney in private practice and a stint at the UK Patent Office before joining PatSnap. Matthew will discuss: The future of AI in patent searches: How PatSnap's new AI component is transforming years of knowledge into a 10-second search. AI's capabilities in analyzing and classifying images: Why AI can outperform humans in these tasks. The impact of AI on legal practice: Assisting attorneys in understanding patent data and improving client communication. The role of AI in due diligence: Enhancing efficiency without replacing human expertise. Want to keep up to date about new episodes? Technically Legal Update List. Want to learn more about Percipient (percipient.co)? Follow Chad on Linkedin: Chad Main | LinkedIn Follow the podcast on LinkedIn: Technically Legal | LinkedIn Follow the podcast on Instagram: Technically Legal | Instagram Follow the podcast on X: Technically Legal | X

Florian Mueller shares his remarkable journey from leading a major fight against pro-software patent legislation in Europe to becoming one of the most influential voices in the IP world. For over a decade, his FOSS Patents blog became the go-to destination for anyone who wanted to follow developments related to standard-essential patents (SEPs). After a brief hiatus, Florian recently reemerged as the publisher of ip fray, which is quickly starting to play the role for all of IP that FOSS previously played for SEPs.Drawing on his extensive background, Florian provides fascinating insights about what led to the European Union's controversial SEP proposal, the potential outcomes, and the burgeoning influence of AI on patent law. He also shares the story of why and how Real Madrid came to him asking for help along the way.Key Topics:* How German court decisions and other alleged dynamics led to EU's pending SEP proposal* Problems with EU's pending SEP proposal* How the rest of the process is likely to play out at the EU & related strategies* Why innovators are at a disadvantage in the debate* Shifting views of different tech companies regarding SEPs over time* Role of patent pools/platforms in the SEP battles* Impact of AI This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.voiceofip.com

Put on your best suit and step into the world of TV legal dramas with podcast co-hosts, IP attorneys, and shareholders Michael Snyder and Joseph Gushue, as they guide you through the realities, quirks and possible departures from reality depicted in the TV show Suits. Whether you're a seasoned fan of Suits or have never watched an episode, this installment of IP Goes Pop!® has something for everyone. Michael and Joe lead off the episode by discussing TV shows that have focused on intellectual property law issues, such as Canada's The IP Section and HBO's Silicon Valley, which demonstrate the rare combination of comedy and law in practice together. The episode continues with an exploration of when and how they each discovered Suits and their initial impressions of its portrayal of the legal practice in general. Beyond the often-outrageous legal tactics that would surely never occur if Pearson-Specter were a real law firm, Michael and Joe break down the “how it would happen” scenarios in four different episodes of Suits that use intellectual property law cases to steer the plot. From unrealistic portrayals of the patent application process to the depiction of characters as legal experts in every area of law, Michael and Joe dissect IP-related inaccuracies and offer insight into IP attorneys' real-world expertise in securing protections for ideas. The hosts conclude with a reminder not to rely on fictional TV shows for legal advice and stress the importance of hiring licensed and experienced attorneys who actually specialize in the area of law where you may require assistance. Whether you're a legal enthusiast, a pop culture junkie, or just curious about how TV legal dramas stack up against real life, this episode delves into the intriguing world of Suits. Michael and Joe reveal the truth behind the fiction with humor and insights, providing a take on the legal realities often glossed over by Hollywood. Key Moments: 02:48 Television Shows that Focus on IP Law -- IP Goes Pop!® Season 2 EP 7 - Down in the (Silicon) Valley 6:53 Suits TV Show 11:44 Patent Law in Suits Season 1 Episode 1 16:29 IP Dispute and Infringement in Suits Season 3 Ep 13   20:44 Patent and Fair Use in Suits Season 6 Ep 16 27:48 Copyright Case, Suits Season 8 EP 12 29:30 TV Show Legal Fictions (Suits and Beyond) 36:39 Final Thoughts For full show notes and to explore more episodes, please visit www.vklaw.com/newsroom-podcasts. You can stay connected with us on Facebook, Linkedin or Twitter, and Instagram using the handle @volpeandkoenig.

In this insightful episode, we sit down with Robert Plotkin, a distinguished AI patent lawyer renowned for his expertise in the legal intricacies of AI technologies and patents. As we delve into the intersection of artificial intelligence, legal frameworks, and marketing, Robert shares his unique perspective on what will drive AI's evolution in the coming years.According to Robert, while software often captures the spotlight, it is the advancements in hardware that will significantly propel AI forward. With a backdrop of increasing competition in hardware manufacturing—a 'war' that underscores the critical role of infrastructure in AI's capabilities—Robert explains how these technological strides are pivotal. He discusses the high stakes and the immense potential that improved hardware holds for the future of AI, from enhancing processing speeds to enabling more complex computations and beyond.Join us as Robert also navigates through the legal landscapes that companies and innovators must consider as they develop and deploy AI technologies. Whether you're an AI enthusiast, a tech professional, or just curious about the future of technology, this conversation offers a deep dive into how hardware innovations are set to redefine the capabilities of AI and the legal battles that might shape this progress.Subscribe to the Backstory on Marketing and AI for more updates on market trends and AI updates. Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?...Website: https://prorelevant.com/What's your backstory?

O que é propriedade intelectual? O que são patentes? Para que servem as patentes? Podemos patentear qualquer coisa ou ideia? Como fazer uma patente?          Patronato do SciCast: Patreon SciCast Padrim SciCast Sua pequena contribuição ajuda o Portal Deviante a continuar divulgando Ciência! PIX: contato@scicast.com.br Contatos: contato@scicast.com.br https://twitter.com/scicastpodcast https://www.facebook.com/scicastpodcast https://instagram.com/scicastpodcast Fale conosco! E não esqueça de deixar o seu comentário na postagem desse episódio! Expediente: Produção Geral: Tarik Fernandes Equipe de Gravação: André Trapani, Tiago Protti Spinato, Fernanda Spinato, Ramon Carollo Sarabia Neto, Marcelo de Matos Edição: TalknCast Citação ABNT: Scicast #587: Patentes. Locução: André Trapani, Tiago Protti Spinato, Fernanda Spinato, Ramon Carollo Sarabia Neto, Marcelo de Matos. [S.l.] Portal Deviante, 12/04/2024. Podcast. Disponível em: https://www.deviante.com.br/podcasts/scicast-587 Arte: Referências e Indicações: Sugestões de literatura: [1] http://www.inovacao.unicamp.br/report/news-patentesinpi.shtml [2] Colucci, G.; AIM Magazine; vol. 52; n°1; 1998; pp. 29-31. [3] Iudici, N.; Patents as a source of competitive intelligence for analyzing the R&D strategy of Basell main competitors; Master of Science Technologies and Management - MaSTeM 2005; Università degli Studi di Ferrara. [4] Merges, R.P.; On the Origins of Patent Law; Boston University School of Law; 1991. [5] Rippe, K.D.; Gough, D.; European and International Patent Applications – A Practical Guide; Ed Carl Heymanns Verlag KG; Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Munich; Germany, 2002. [6] Amernick, B.A.; Patent Law for the non lawyer – A Guide for the Engineer Technologist and Manager; ed. Van Nostrand Reinhold; New York; second edition; 1991; cap 8; pp 91-98 [7] http://www.patentlens.net/daisy/adjuvants/ext/navaggregator/navaggregator [8] The International Patent System in 2008 - PCT Yearly Review: Developments and Performance; http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/ipstats/en/statistics/pct/pdf/yearly_review_09.pdfSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Your patent application can be rejected because your so-called invention is "obvious." But how is obviousness determined? What's the difference between "prior art" that can be cited to reject your invention for lack of novelty, and "analogous art" which is the requirement to reject your invention based on obviousness?  Listen to this episode and find out! --- Links:   E-mail: adiament@nolanheimann.com Website: https://www.nolanheimann.com/legal-team/adam-diament Phone/Text: (424)281-0162 YouTube Channel LinkedIn

I am honored to welcome Peter back to the show!  He's launching a bootcamp for content creators that you need to do if you create any courses, blogs, videos, and so forth online or off…especially with AI technology. Be sure to catch SCB episodes 103 & 104 to get more intel from Peter.JOIN the FREE Content Creators Legal Bootcamp:http://SpiritCenteredBusiness.com/protectBIO:Peter is a nationally recognized leader in the field of intellectual property (IP), whose unique practice focuses on the many aspects of IP, both domestically and internationally.Peter is a Global IP Portfolio Manager, Patent and Trademark Prosecutor, Patent Litigator, Adjunct Professor of Patent Law, Business Advisor, Copyright and Trade Secret Attorney, and his practice includes management of IP portfolios, patent licensing, IP legal opinions, counseling on IP strategies, and IP due diligence in connection with mergers and acquisitions.He has extensive knowledge of the requirements and procedures for procurement of intellectual property and enforcement of rights and a complete understanding of how such intangible assets affect a corporation and strategies for best capitalizing on such assets globally. LINKS:Peter's Content Creators Legal Bootcamp: http://SpiritCenteredBusiness.com/protectThe rest of Peter's stuff: PeterNieves.comGet Bralynn's Book! Discover Your Business Destiny: Co-Creating, Stewarding and Standing to Manifest God's Divine Planhttp://SpiritCenteredBusiness.com/bookBralynn's Declaration of Trade Course: https://bralynn.groovepages.com/declarationCopyright 2024 - Bralynn Newby Int'l, LLC. All rights reserved.

 The MacVoices Live! panel of Chuck Joiner, David Ginsburg, Brian Flanigan-Arthurs, Jim Rea, Eric Bolden, Jeff Gamet, Mark Fuccio Web Bixby and special switcher guest James Baraniak have some doubts about one of Masimo's latest claims in the Apple Watch dispute. A discussion about alternatives and pricing to Apple Watch-based pulse oximeters, patent disputes, and patent realities ensues. This edition of MacVoices is supported by Coda, your all-in-one collaborative workspace. Get started with Coda for free and get a $1,000 credit at: https://Coda.io/macvoices. Show Notes: Chapters: 0:02:20 Apple's Legal Battle and the Merits of the Case 0:06:52 Apple's Controversial $100 Million Decision 0:09:17 Discrepancy in determining Apple's infringement without court decision 0:13:11 Similarities between Engineering and Science Patents 0:15:32 Curiosity about Apple's Claims and Patent Strategy 0:17:07 The Watches Removed from Sale without Trial 0:20:12 The Impact of ITC Ruling on Apple and Masimo 0:28:07 The Evolution of the Apple Watch band controversy Links: Masimo has spent $100 Million In Its Legal Battle With Apple https://appleworld.today/masimo-has-spent-100-million-in-its-legal-battle-with-apple/ The Entrepreneur Who Bet His Company on a Fight With Apple  https://www.wsj.com/tech/joe-kiani-entrepreneur-apple-warning-52eb09a9?st=9mwwi6y1k48bwtb&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink Apple Watch ban will boost Biden mega-donor whom president calls ‘one of my closest friends' https://nypost.com/2023/12/28/news/apple-watch-ban-will-boost-joe-biden-mega-donor-joe-kiani/   Guests: Support:      Become a MacVoices Patron on Patreon      http://patreon.com/macvoices      Enjoy this episode? Make a one-time donation with PayPal Connect:      Web:      http://macvoices.com      Twitter:      http://www.twitter.com/chuckjoiner      http://www.twitter.com/macvoices      Mastodon:      https://mastodon.cloud/@chuckjoiner      Facebook:      http://www.facebook.com/chuck.joiner      MacVoices Page on Facebook:      http://www.facebook.com/macvoices/      MacVoices Group on Facebook:      http://www.facebook.com/groups/macvoice      LinkedIn:      https://www.linkedin.com/in/chuckjoiner/      Instagram:      https://www.instagram.com/chuckjoiner/ Subscribe:      Audio in iTunes      Video in iTunes      Subscribe manually via iTunes or any podcatcher:      Audio: http://www.macvoices.com/rss/macvoicesrss      Video: http://www.macvoices.com/rss/macvoicesvideorss 00:00:00 Apple Watch Ban and Reversal 00:02:19 Apple's Legal Battle and the Merits of the Case 00:06:52 Apple's Controversial $100 Million Decision 00:09:17 Discrepancy in determining Apple's infringement without court decision 00:13:10 Similarities between Engineering and Science Patents 00:15:31 Curiosity about Apple's Claims and Patent Strategy 00:17:07 The Watches Removed from Sale without Trial 00:20:11 The Impact of ITC Ruling on Apple and Masimo 00:28:06 The Evolution of the Apple Watch band controversy

In this episode we talk about artificial intelligence in the world of invention. My guest recently co-wrote an article for the Journal of Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Law about a recent decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that expounded on the principle that only human beings -- not machines -- can be named as inventors under U.S. patent law. The decision applies a straightforward interpretation of patent statutes, our guest says. Beyond invention, what about that initial spark of innovation? What about the decision might make it difficult to obtain intellectual property protection for inventions generated by advanced AI systems? Isn't AI kind of like using computer modeling? Don't inventors already get considerable assistance from technology? What did the court say about all that? Joining me to answer these questions is Robert A. McFarlane, an intellectual property litigator and registered patent attorney and partner with Hanson Bridgett LLP in San Francisco. Rob chairs the firm's technology practice, co-chairs its IP practice, litigates and advises on a variety of IP matters in the U.S. and abroad, and teaches patent law at the University of California College of the Law San Francisco (formerly Hastings College of the Law). Rob earned his J.D. from the University of California College of Law San Francisco and his B.A.S. with departmental honors, in Industrial Engineering & Political Science from Stanford University. I hope you enjoy the episode. I mean, we get to talk about everything from Tom Jefferson to monkeys with cameras.  That's five-star material right there!***********This podcast is the audio companion to the Journal of Emerging Issues in Litigation. The Journal is a collaborative project between HB Litigation Conferences and the vLex Fastcase legal research family, which includes Full Court Press, Law Street Media, and Docket Alarm.If you have comments, ideas, or wish to participate, please drop me a note at Editor@LitigationConferences.com.Tom HagyLitigation Enthusiast andHost of the Emerging Litigation PodcastHome PageLinkedIn

Leaving an established corporate gig to branch out on your own can seem daunting, and for many, the risk remains too high.  In today's episode of The Greatness Machine, Darius chats with Jeffrey Schox, general partner at Trucks Venture Capital, and the founder of Schox Patent Group, a boutique patent firm focused on startups. Jeffrey started his career as an engineer on the original electric vehicle at General Motors before becoming a patent attorney for two of the largest patent law firms and eventually founding his own firm. You'll learn about Jeffrey's unusual background, from following his parents in the automotive industry to eventually striking out on his own as a patent attorney. You'll discover the power of giving and accepting help, and why passing a potential client to a more-qualified friend resulted in a flood of much-needed business for his struggling new firm. You'll learn why timing is an essential tool in determining the viability of an investment, whether it be in an invention or a company.  You'll also discover Jeffrey's knack for taking a complicated idea, product, etc. and teasing out the differences to determine its future value. Join Darius and Jeffrey as they discuss the entrepreneurial path, timing and the power of giving and receiving. Topics include: A little of Jeffrey's background, including his work on the original electric car at General Motors and his eventual shift to patent law How handing over a potential client to a more qualified friend ended up being paid back in spades for his struggling firm Why an understanding of timing is vital when assessing a company / product to invest your resources in And other topics… Connect with Jeff: Website: https://www.schox.com/  LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jschox Twitter: https://twitter.com/jschox Connect with Darius: Website: https://therealdarius.com/ Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dariusmirshahzadeh/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/whoompdarius/ YouTube: https://therealdarius.com/youtube Book: The Core Value Equation https://www.amazon.com/Core-Value-Equation-Framework-Limitless/dp/1544506708 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A fire in 1836 wiped out nearly every patent on file in the United States. How did the patent office rebuild, and how did a second fire in 1877 change things even more?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

US founding father Thomas Jefferson gets the credit for establishing the first process in the US for filing and granting patents. But how did patent law change in those early years, and why does Jonathan say the patent office was like the Game of Thrones? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What important lessons can be learned from patent lawsuits?On the Blackletter podcast this week, host Tom Dunlap is joined again by guest Anthony Brown, a former lawyer and President of Cascades Ventures, as they continue his three-episode interview series. Anthony is a patent monetization expert who has joined the show to discuss his insights on patent litigation. On this episode, Anthony shares stories from his career on the patent litigation front, including one of his initial significant cases involving patent infringement claims, bankruptcy proceedings, supreme court appeals, and more. He discusses what he learned through the experience and how the publicity surrounding the case helped launch his company. Anthony also discusses one of his early patent cases involving undivided ownership interest between an inventor and the widow of the other inventor. He shares the steps he took to help the widow earn money from the invention, enabling him to acquire the rights to the patent.Check out this episode to hear more about Anthony's career experiences with patent monetization. And tune in for the final segment in this interview series of The Blackletter Podcast, where Anthony tells listeners about the three crucial pieces of information they should know before engaging in patent monetization.

Bree's Personal Story My roots lie on a corn, soybean, potato, and onion farm in Southeastern North Dakota, where I had the opportunity to manage crop variety and chemistry test plots. Occasionally, I even got behind the wheel of a tractor or combine. Growing up in this environment, I witnessed the remarkable impact of biotechnological, chemical, mechanical, and electrical innovations as they completely transformed not only my family's commercial agriculture operation but also our entire rural community. As an academic scientist, my journey has taken me on kayaking adventures across the lakes of Minnesota, living and working in the captivating landscapes of Iceland, picking cotton under the blazing Texas sun, and collaborating closely with regulatory officials in Kenya. I attended law school part-time and worked in various roles throughout the past four years. First, I served as a policy advisor on Capitol Hill. Then, I managed global business development for an antibody discovery contract research organization. Concurrently, my journey in patent prosecution began at an IP boutique firm and then most recently continued in big law. Outside of work, my rescue dog, Kai, and rescue horse, Rico, keep me active outdoors. I also enjoy engaging in various forms of physical activity, including yoga, [solid core], and Pure Barre. My love for holistic personal and professional development continuously drives me to keep learning and growing. I am also passionate about studying nutrition, and during COVID, I completed my Integrative Nutrition Health Coach Certificate. https://www.linkedin.com/in/breevculek/    

No field is being upended as much as the legal profession. We're all confused about how content generated by AI will be protected under the law and many lawyers are also asking how relevant they'll be in a world where large language models can pass the bar and do legal research.Robert Plotkin is a luminary in the software patent space having been in the field for 25 years and having been involved in important IP cases related to everything from AI to quantum computing to autonomous vehicles and speech recognition.Robert also published the book Genie in the Machine back in 2009 which amazingly foreshadowed the legal implications of AI on IP. Robert has lectured at the Boston University School of Law and received his undergrad in Computer Science and Engineering from MIT.Listen and learn...How we should regulate LLMs... from an expertWhat entrepreneurs most often don't understand about IP lawWho has the rights to the inputs to LLMs?Can work derived from LLMs be patented?Is AI-generated work subject to copyright laws?What surprised Bill Gates when he saw GPT-4Is there an AI winter up ahead?References in this episode...Harvey raises $5M to be the AI co-pilot for lawyersAndy Clark's Natural-Born CyborgsBob Rogers, AI pioneer, on AI and the Future of WorkThe Blueshift IP whitepaper about how AI is automating the inventive process

Talking Patent Law with Satellite GirlAbout Arlyn AlonzoArlyn Alonzo is an intellectual property attorney (patents, trademarks, copyright). She has a special concentration on the preparation and prosecution of patent applications as well as support for technically complex patent infringement litigation cases. Arlyn has worked with clients in a variety of high-tech industries, including wireless communication systems and networks, optoelectronics, digital storage media, medical devices, and other electrical and mechanical inventions. Arlyn has also been influential in helping many litigation attorneys find their “super” expert witnesses to win their cases. Arlyn AlonzoIntellectual Property Attorney(310) 853-382700:00 Talking Patent Law with Satellite Girl01:33  How did Arlyn get the nickname of "Satellite Girl"?02:54  How did Arlyn transition from engineering to Intellectual Property Law?04:28  What types of Patents does Arlyn work on as a result of her engineering background?07:35 What are the types of intellectual property and what does Arlyn works on?08:51 How essential are referrals from other Intellectual Property Attorneys?10:35 What is the difference between a Utility Patent, a Design Patent, and a Plant Patent?13:12 Could someone apply for both a utility and a design patent if their idea is unique?14:24 What is a patent attorney's step-by-step approach in their client?18:04 What exactly is an Office Action?22:00 How often does Arlyn come across the same folks for the same type of invention?24:13 Who is Arlyn's ideal client?  25:47 What should the client have in order to contact Arlyn?26:56 Why you need a Patent Litigation expert involved in a LPatent Litigation Case?30:33 How did Arlyn become fluent in four languages?

Ready to unleash your inner child and discover the fascinating world of toy invention? Join us for an exciting conversation with Matt Nuccio, a talented inventor and toy designer, who shares his secrets to navigating the complex and playful toy industry. From balancing work and play to discussing his family business and favorite projects, we dive into the joy of invention and the power of play, along with our joke of the week and some fun insights about life in the world of toys.But it's not all fun and games – we delve into the critical aspects of sales, marketing, and intellectual property protection, including Matt's thoughts on the differences between ideas and inventions, licensing, and self-publishing a toy concept. We also dive deep into the complexities of patent law, the role of reputable patent attorneys, and the challenges independent inventors face in today's ever-changing landscape. Don't miss this chance to peek behind the curtain of the toy industry with Matt Nuccio, your toy company for hire!Matt Nuccio, CEO of Design Edge, has served as co-chair of the Toy Industry Association (TIA) representing all inventors and designers in the toy industry. Matt also sits on the United Inventors Association (UIA) board of directors lobbying for patent reforms and inventors' rights. He has worked as a consultant and on-air personality for the Science Channel's hit TV show "All-American Makers". He will share how he helps other makers play for a living! Learn more at https://www.designedge.net/(0:00:22) - Playing for a LivingMatt Nuccio discusses balancing work and play, his favorite projects, and his family business in the toy industry.(0:08:30) - Toy Sales and Marketing ImportanceMatt discusses differences between ideas and inventions, nuances of the toy industry, licensing/self-publishing, having a built-in audience, and the importance of packaging.(0:21:18) - Toy Industry Patent ChallengesMatt and I discuss patent reform, protecting intellectual property, injunctive relief, AI, and first-to-market value.Support the showSupport the Playful Humans mission to help adults rediscover the power of play: Subscribe to the YouTube channel Subscribe to the Podcast Book a playshop for your team Support our sponsors

Join co-hosts Michael Snyder and Joseph Gushue on a new episode of "IP Goes Pop!" that will leave you wondering "You can patent that?!". This episode focuses on a variety of curious and/or unusual patents, demonstrating the wide range of ideas that can result in an issued patent. From the surprising to the peculiar, this episode provides an overview of the “usefulness” threshold in United States patent law. “Listeners will learn about existing patents that are as bizarre as they are “useful,” and how anyone might have an idea that has “utility” and is therefore worthy of a patent. The episode begins with a discussion on the United States Patent Act, the cornerstone of patent law in the United States. Michael and Joseph break down some of the Patent Act's key provisions, focusing on the “utility” or “usefulness” requirement for patentability. The hosts then explore a series of unusual patents, each serving as a case study of this requirement. From a self-inflicted kicking device to an apparatus that allows one to simulate a high-five, to a banana case, listeners will marvel at the odd range of inventions that have been awarded patents. This episode also features patents that highlight the importance of protecting even the simplest of items and serves as a reminder that patent law is not just about groundbreaking technology, but also about practical solutions to everyday problems. The reach of patent law protection is broader than one might think. This episode of "IP Goes Pop!" is not just an exploration of the quirky side of patents. It's a celebration of human creativity and innovation, demonstrating that no idea is too outlandish or too trivial to be considered for patent protection. Whether you're an IP enthusiast, a pop culture aficionado, or just someone who enjoys the world of the bizarre, this episode is a must-listen. Tune in to be entertained, enlightened, and inspired to think outside the box- or perhaps patent the box itself. For full show notes and to explore more episodes, please visit www.vklaw.com/newsroom-podcasts. You can stay connected with us on Facebook, Linkedin or Twitter, and Instagram using the handle @volpeandkoenig. Links to Patents Mentioned in this episode: “User-operated amusement apparatus for kicking the user's buttocks” US6293874B1 “Apparatus for simulating a ‘high five'” US5356330A “In-Car Coffee Maker" US5233914A “Graffiti prevention apparatus” US5675318A “Banana Protective Device US6612440B1 “Beerbrella” US6637447B2 “Safety system for removing rider from vehicle by deploying a parachute” US5593111A “Method of Swinging on a Swing” - US6368227B1 “Hypodermic syringes and attachments thereto pleasing to children” US3299891A “Barrier Device for Children” US5255958A 

This show is made possible by you!  To become a sustaining member go to LauraFlanders.org/donate  Thank you for your continued support!Pharmaceutical prices in the US are astronomically high and many vulnerable people can't afford the drugs they need. Public ownership of drug manufacturing can break the private monopolies and save lives, but it's going to take a lot of public pressure to make change. Today, we look at the progress that's being made to tackle America's killer drug price problem at the state, national and global level. The Biden administration's agreement with manufacturer Eli Lilly to cap insulin prices at $35/dose is a step, but what would really make a difference would be to get private profit and monopoly patents out of the health business altogether. In the US, California is taking the lead. Advocates Dana Brown, Luis Gil Abinader and Kevin Wren join Laura to bring us an update –  and in her closing, Laura shares some news about the impact of our investigative series from North Carolina.“This has economic and social benefits for all of us . . . Having the public sector take a bigger role in the production of distribution of medicine historically starts to shift the balance of power.” - Dana Brown“Our current model for vaccine research development and distribution globally is colonial in many ways, because big pharmaceutical companies have the ability to decide who gets vaccines, treatments, insulin and other pharmaceutical products, and when and at which prices.” - Luis Gil Abinader“10% of the population has a chronic illness, and [pharmaceutical companies] are exploiting and extorting our need for this drug. It's coming to an end because people like me are rising up and talking about it and sharing our stories.” - Kevin Wren Guests:Dana Brown: Director, Health & Economy, The Democracy CollaborativeLuis Gil Abinader: Legal Scholar; Fellow, Georgetown University Law O'Neill Institute; Board Member, Universities Allied for Essential Medicines (UAEM)Kevin Wren: Queer Activist & Patient Advocate Chapter Leader, California #insulin4all; T1 International; Queer Activist & Patient Advocate, MA Evans School of Public Policy & Governance, University of Washington Full Show Notes are located HERE.  They include related episodes, articles, and more to dive deeper.Music In the Middle:   “Class War” by Grammy Award winners Zion Train from their latest album Dissident Sound released on Universal Egg.

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 412. As noted in KOL409 (Part 1: Patent Law) and KOL411 (Part 2: Copyright Law), although I've done dozens of speeches and interviews over the past 20 or so years on libertarian aspects of intellectual property, or IP, that is, on IP policy, I've never done any in depth lectures for libertarians on IP law itself. In KOL409, I did a brief overview of various types of IP law, and then focused on the patent law and patent application process itself. KOL411 was a tutorial on copyright law. This episode covers other types of IP, including trademark and trade secret, and argues that defamation law should be considered a type of IP law as well. (Recorded May 11, 2023.) The slides I used are streamed below and here (powerpoint) and streamed below. https://youtu.be/DQ0MXbBn264

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 412. As noted in KOL409 (Part 1: Patent Law) and KOL411 (Part 2: Copyright Law), although I've done dozens of speeches and interviews over the past 20 or so years on libertarian aspects of intellectual property, or IP, that is, on IP policy, I've never done any in depth lectures for libertarians on IP law itself. In KOL409, I did a brief overview of various types of IP law, and then focused on the patent law and patent application process itself. KOL411 was a tutorial on copyright law. This episode covers other types of IP, including trademark and trade secret, and argues that defamation law should be considered a type of IP law as well. (Recorded May 11, 2023.) Others in the series: KOL409 | IP Law Tutorial, Part 1: Patent Law KOL411 | IP Law Tutorial, Part 2: Copyright Law The slides I used are streamed below and here (powerpoint) and streamed below. https://youtu.be/DQ0MXbBn264

Former Patent Commissioner Robert Stoll joins the Clause 8 podcast to talk about working his way up from being an examiner to being the commissioner over his 30+ year-long career at the USPTO.  As commissioner, Bob helped former USTPO Director David Kappos implement the American Invents Act (AIA) and transform how the USPTO's patent examiners operate.  Before that, he served as USPTO's head of the Office of Legislation and International Affairs under Director John Dudas.  Now out of government, he freely shares what he thought about what happened at the USPTO during his time there as an executive, why he stayed, and what he thinks about the current state of America's patent system. He also talks about what it's like to be part of the “first family” of IP law, which includes Federal Circuit Judge Kara Stoll. In this episode, Eli and Bob also discuss: How so many of Bob's family members ended up serving in senior IP roles in every branch of US government and internationally Bob's secrets for longevity & success at the USPTO How he became Commissioner Relationship with David Kappos Whether the USPTO Director is really in charge of an administration's patent policy Creation of the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) and post-grant proceedings Role of “patent troll” narrative Whether there is a “patent quality” problem Director Vidal's exercise of her Director review power Proposals to record examiner interviews Importance of IP bar organizations in shaping policies