POPULARITY
3 episodes with ivy leaguers
2 episodes with ivy leaguers
2 episodes with ivy leaguers
2 episodes with ivy leaguers
2 episodes with ivy leaguers
3 episodes with ivy leaguers
6 episodes with ivy leaguers
2 episodes with ivy leaguers
2 episodes with ivy leaguers
He wasn't just a nose tackle: Original Texan Seth Payne has lived a vibrant life on and off the gridiron, and the Ivy Leaguer went in depth with the Texans Radio Crew about his journey to, in, and after, the NFL.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Luigi Mangione, the 26-year-old former Ivy Leaguer who allegedly murdered UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, is facing increasing legal troubles as state and federal prosecutors continue to up the charges against him as new evidence comes to light. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Why is social media celebrating Luigi Mangione? And why did Mangione, a privileged Ivy Leaguer, murder a CEO? ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
The FULL Bob Rose Show for Wednesday 12-11-24 examining what caused an intelligent Ivy Leaguer from a wealthy family to boldly murder a healthcare CEO on the streets of NY. In depth on the biggest stories, plus the morning's breaking news on the Bob Rose Show
On today's why. Why would an Ivy Leaguer and valedictorian turn into a killer?
UnitedHealth CEO Brian Thompson killed by an Ivy Leaguer?
Anybody think Donald Trump had time to come up with a few ideas while he was on his 4-year hiatus. The Dept of Govt Efficiency? Democrats are reeling, and they don't even know why. The cabal is the most unhappy. And they are the most dangerous. The average American will be pleased FAST as Trump makes wholesale changes to the bureaucracy. I like most of his appointments. Some are out of the box. We will discuss these more down the line. Pete Hegseth is the one I found most interesting. Let's go ahead and play the Lawrence O'Donnell attempt to ridicule Elon Musk on his appointment. [X] SB – MSNBC Lawrence O'Donnell on Elon Musk appointment https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1856109761420247164 Mark Cuban deleted ALL his Kamala Harris tweets. Democrats still don't get it. They won't embarrass us into quitting. We aren't like them. I ask for your indulgence this segment, as I want to play a series of audio where the Democrats guaranteed victory, repeated… [X] SB – Various people on Trump will lose We've won the election, and there are still those among you who really haven't changed. You're happy for the win, but you can't speak freely. With us in control, you still won't tell people who you voted for, and your cryptic when asked. [X] SB – 60 Minutes ask Democrat who voted for Trump why Democrats are crying at work, [X] SB – Black woman voted for celebs to leave The View hasn't changed. They unhappily sharing their grief, and you refuse to celebrate. Compassion be danged, these people rode us hard and put us up wet, and we still want to show compassion. They derided us in about every way possible, with name-calling, isolation, ostracized us, and even tried to kill the This is a great piece that highlights why we should be thankful for Democrats. Because they are actually mostly responsible for the MASSIVE MAGA WIN. Yes, we did our parts and certainly Trump did his. But what drove Trump into the race? Dear https://www.newsweek.com/topic/democratic-party, and its allies and accomplices, Donald Trump supporters I know have asked me to dedicate some space to thank you for all you did to make their momentous win on November 5 a reality. They insist they couldn't have done it without your help. Here's a partial list of the many people and things Trump voters told me they believe fueled their victory. First of all, thank you for not listening to us or trying to understand us over the past 8 years. Thank you for choosing to call us names like "fascist," "bigot," and "racist" whenever we disagreed with you. Thank you, liberal media sources, for giving Never Trumpers a platform—for proving, finally, that there are conservatives you'll give equal airtime. Thank you for running with Fusion GPS and the https://www.newsweek.com/topic/democrats' fake Russian Dossier story. Thank you to the former 51 former intelligence officials who signed a letter in 2020 falsely claiming the https://www.newsweek.com/topic/hunter-biden laptop story was Russian disinformation. A special thanks to former https://www.newsweek.com/topic/twitter CEO Jack Dorsey for removing it from your platform and for banning President Trump's account. [X] SB – One of the 51 intel officers committing treason [X] SB – JD Vance on firing people who lied Fire the people who censored. 50 intelligence officers Strip them of security clearances. [X] SB – Sly Stallone says Trump is a mythical creature Thank you to https://www.newsweek.com/topic/anthony-fauci and the public officials, experts, and media figures who scolded and threatened Americans who didn't agree with mask mandates or universal compulsory vaccines. You started a movement. Thank you to the mayors and governors who locked down our schools, churches, and businesses without concern for the damage you did to our way of life and our kids' mental health—and all in the name of protecting us. Thank you, Democratic Party, for impeaching President Trump not once but twice. Thanks, https://www.newsweek.com/topic/jack-smith, https://www.newsweek.com/topic/alvin-bragg, Letitia James, and https://www.newsweek.com/topic/fani-willis, for using your legal power and discretion to prosecute President Trump. Thank you, NCAA leadership, for using your rulemaking power to allow biological men to compete in women's sports. And thanks for calling us "transphobes" for standing up for the rights of our sisters, daughters, and wives to not share locker rooms with people with male genitals. Thanks, Justice https://www.newsweek.com/topic/ketanji-brown-jackson for your answer to a question about what defines a woman during your https://www.newsweek.com/topic/senate confirmation hearing. "I am not a biologist" was the perfect response. Thank you, President https://www.newsweek.com/topic/joe-biden, for signing the Inflation Reduction Act, which increased inflation. Thank you for imposing electric vehicle mandates on auto manufacturers that drove up the price of gas-powered cars and left American manufacturers with mountains of EV losses. Thank you for your commitment to put American coal miners out of their jobs—while China continues to build coal-powered plants fueled by dirtier coal from Russian and Indonesian mines. Thanks for your student debt cancellation, which infuriated those of us who paid our student loans, and others who never went to college in the first place. That sure was unifying. And thank you for doubling down on https://www.newsweek.com/topic/hillary-clinton's "basket of deplorables" comment with your description of us as "garbage." Thank you, whoever you are, for coming up with the term "Bidenomics." Thank you, https://www.newsweek.com/topic/janet-yellen, for insisting that inflation was "transitory" for months on end, while grocery, electric, gas, and housing bills skyrocketed. And thank you, Democratic Party, for blaming that inflation on price gouging and greedy business owners. Keep that tired old talking point going! Thanks to the DEI officers across the country for not including conservatives and Christians in your diversity and inclusion regimes. Thanks to the Defund the Police movement for making our streets less safe and letting us know what you think about the 750,000 men and women in law enforcement who protect us. Thank you especially to donors like https://www.newsweek.com/topic/george-soros for funding progressive district attorneys who turned their cities into open shooting ranges. Thank you, college presidents, especially Ivy Leaguers like Claudine Gay of Harvard, for finally defending free speech on your campuses—for Israel haters and antisemites. What courage! Thank you, college professors, for teaching our kids that all white people are racists and privileged, that socialism is good and capitalism is bad, and that Israel is an oppressor. Thanks, President Biden, for seeking a second term. Thanks to everyone who concealed the president's cognitive impairments until you couldn't. Thanks, Democratic Party, for installing an unproven candidate rather than letting Democratic voters choose their own. And thank you, https://www.newsweek.com/topic/kamala-harris, for accepting the coronation. Thank you to all the celebrities—Beyoncé, Bruce Springsteen, Harrison https://www.newsweek.com/topic/ford, Robert De Niro, Will Ferrell, Meryl Streep, Julia Roberts, https://www.newsweek.com/topic/oprah-winfrey, and more—for being so self-important that you actually believed your endorsements would change the outcome of an election. Thanks for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaCPck2qDhk our marriages and our values in your campaign ads. Thank you for your ominous https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/oprah-winfrey-harris-trump-election-rally-b2641577.html that "it is entirely possible that we will not have the opportunity to cast a ballot again." Now we know what you really think about us! Thanks, Kamala Harris, for telling two college students who shouted out the words "Christ is Lord" that they were at "the wrong rally"—to cheers from your adoring fans. And thank you for fully embracing war hawks like Dick and https://www.newsweek.com/topic/liz-cheney. Those moments really showed us what you mean by "inclusivity." Thank you, Democratic Party and its allies, for continuing to push the "Democracy is at risk" narrative. Thank you for continuing to blame your problems on messaging and messengers and not your product offerings. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-kevin-jackson-show--2896352/support.
Ivy Leaguers Need Not Apply! www.watchdogonwallstreet.com
You don't have to be an Ivy Leaguer to make Forbes' billionaires list—but it sure helps. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
As the college campuses are being swept of the bigoted, privileged Ivy Leaguer encampments - the media has spent the week back on the Trump trial. But the real news just keeps stacking up and media folks are positively panicked. Hear CNN, the New York Times, and fellow Democrats tear into Biden on a host of fronts that will make your jaw drop. Dr. Ben Carson joins Stigall to discuss a potential future with Trump? His new book "The Perilous Fight: Overcoming Our Culture's War on the American Family." The Kristi Noem book tour has collapsed. Stigall suspected she didn't write a lot of the book to begin with and now he has proof as his old friend Jack Cashill came forward to say he was approached to be her "ghost writer." If you're not familiar with the term, prepare to have your mind blown. Plus, you'll hear a call to the radio show this week from a Marine who is stirred with emotion as his town disrespects June 6th, D-Day with a Pride parade instead. -For more info visit the official website: https://chrisstigall.com/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chrisstigallshow/Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChrisStigallFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/chris.stigall/Listen on Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/StigallPodListen on Apple Podcasts: https://bit.ly/StigallShowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
1. The imminent invasion of America through US Campuses - Is the Left in the US so strong and powerful that it can set the agenda in campuses? 2. How come smart and bright students (Ivy Leaguers) can't see the reason for the latest conflict between Israel and Hamas? 3. Has Social Media caused the silo-ification of the world? Echo chambers that people don't want to get out of? #Israel #Gaza #Wokeism #Left #Islam #Hamas #Palestine #Toolkit #CampusProtest #UniversityProtest #GeorgeSoros #USCampusProtest #ivyleague #FreePalestine
Stopping the slaughter in Gaza is more important than your feelings. Your feelings don't matter. Stopping the slaughter in Gaza is more important than playing along with the persecution-LARPing of Zionist university students. Stopping the slaughter in Gaza is more important than some privileged Ivy Leaguers pretending to feel "unsafe" or "unwelcome" on campus. Reading by Tim Foley.
The Ivy Leaguers are at it again. Once these students gain a year of higher education, they think they know so much more than the people running long-standing institutions. This time, the urban terrorists have formed an encampment on the campus of Columbia University in New York.
"Apart from that I love it, and in a lot of ways it was the first album that I fell in love with without influence from my family, it also feels weirdly “too close” in the current political climate. John Colapinto of Rolling Stone wrote about the album that it "gives voice to the disenfranchised suburban underclass of Americans who feel wholly unrepresented by the current leadership of oilmen and Ivy Leaguers, and who are too smart to accept the "reality" presented by news media who sell the government's line of fear and warmongering." And If that's not the world we are living in now…It was an album that changed me as a person, a freshman in high school in a lot of ways discovering who I was for the first time, this album became my anthem for a time and was the soundtrack behind a new version of myself and my departure from youth." -Abby Thank you so much for listening to this episode of the Album Files! We will be back in two weeks to discuss the latest round of listener picks: Japanese Breakfast's Jubilee (suggested by jlb1705), Alt-J's An Awesome Wave (suggested by Brooke Lendvay), and Camp Cope's How to Socialise and Make Friends (suggested by Andy Gerrie). We'd love to hear your thoughts, if you want to send us a voice memo to include in the show you can find our social media links below. What we've been listening to lately... Matt: Green Day - Bobby Sox, Green Day - Saviors (full album), Green Day in the NYC subway Iain: Olhava, Violet Cold, Mono Abby: René Rapp - SNL Snow Angel, Boygenius - Not Strong Enough, The Last Dinner Party - Caesar on the TV Screen You can find a playlist of the music we discussed in episode 23 of The Album Files here. You can find us on social media @abimickey, @iaintreloar and @climbingcyclist.
Welcome to the Instant Trivia podcast episode 1089, where we ask the best trivia on the Internet. Round 1. Category: O, How Entertaining. With O in quotation marks 1: Called the "most influential work in the American musical theatre", it opens with "Oh, What A Beautiful Mornin"'. Oklahoma!. 2: In 2011 Elizabeth, kid sister in this celebrated family, gave a breakout performance in "Martha Marcy May Marlene". the Olsen family. 3: This actor's familiar TV face can now be seen on "Modern Family". (Ed) O'Neill. 4: This film about guy and girl musicians making a connection in Dublin has become a stage musical. Once. 5: Young Walt Disney felt constricted by live-action film, and created this lucky rabbit, his first major animated character. Oswald. Round 2. Category: Tv Moms And Dads 1: In 2010 Entertainment Weekly named this dad the greatest character of the last 20 years--D'oh!. Homer Simpson. 2: This dad had a rather large extended family but only 2 kids, Meadow and A.J.. Tony Soprano. 3: Minnie Driver plays Fiona, mom to young Marcus on this series based on a novel and movie. About a Boy. 4: On Showtime this Oscar winner plays Ray Donovan's charismatic ex-con father, Mickey. Jon Voight. 5: In the '80s Vicki Lawrence was the matriarch on "Mama's Family", based on a skit from this variety show. The Carol Burnett Show. Round 3. Category: Negative Thoughts 1: 9-letter optimist opposite. pessimist. 2: To void or close out, like a network does to a failing TV show. cancel. 3: John Donne tells Death this because "One short sleep past, we wake eternally". be not proud. 4: This presidential option is Latin for "I forbid". veto. 5: The phrase "Ask no" this "and give none" refers to mercy, not a coin. quarter. Round 4. Category: College Vocabulary 1: Russet and tan are shades of this Ivy Leaguer. Brown. 2: A botanist might call this Houston school Oryza sativa. Rice. 3: In Britain this Southern school would have a peerage and rank just below prince. Duke. 4: In Wisconsin, it's a yellow cheese; in Maine, it's a 2,000-student college. Colby. 5: A Portland liberal arts college, or part of an oboe's mouthpiece. a reed. Round 5. Category: Y Is The Only Vowel 1: It's a place to find dumbbells. a gym. 2: Until the 1500s these songs were mostly sung in Latin--everybody! "Sancti, venite". hymns. 3: It's another word for a pigpen. sty. 4: A traditional story in a culture. a myth. 5: It replaces "your" in the Lord's Prayer. thy. Thanks for listening! Come back tomorrow for more exciting trivia!Special thanks to https://blog.feedspot.com/trivia_podcasts/ AI Voices used
Country singer John Rich of Big and Rich joins Charlie, not to discuss music, but to talk about how banks act hand-in-hand with the government to track and flag conservative spending. They also hit the threat of digital currencies, problems at the RNC, and more. Charlie also talks to Steve Moore about a new poll exposing the shocking hostility of Ivy Leaguers to ordinary Americans.Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The daughter of immigrant parents, Sabrina was the consummate high achiever growing up. An Ivy Leaguer with her sights on law school, she did a summer internship at a prestigious firm that changed her plans. She took a role as a fixed income analyst on Wall Street. She was young and curious; she was great at her job. By all measures, Sabrina was a success, but she wanted more from life. As she considered her options, the music stopped. In 2008, Sabrina had a front row seat to the downward spiral that was the financial crisis. If she ever needed a sign to define a new career path, this was it. She traded her pin stripes for sneakers and became an entrepreneur. She hasn't looked back. Fifteen years later, Sabrina has successfully launched several consumer brands. Her journey has been anything but smooth or “balanced”. She's had moments of doubt, regret, and feelings of failure, but she is enjoying the ride! Sabrina is also the proud mother of three young sons. Motherhood has provided some unvarnished challenges and fresh opportunities for triumph at home and in her business ventures. This perspective has fueled her passion for creating healthy work environments where people feel appreciated and valued.Forbes Magazine, How To Create Your Best Real Life on the Non-Linear Path to Career Success Support this podcast by subscribing and reviewing!Music is considered “royalty-free” and discovered on Audio Blocks.Technical Podcast Support by: Jon Keur at Wayfare Recording Co.© 2023 Silver Linings Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Today the Chicks chat about the absolute dumpster fire debate, why McCarthy is stepping down, and Dave Portnoy's beautiful ego-check to ivy league terrorist sympathizers.Visit https://www.AMAC.us/CHICKS to sign up for your FREE one-year membership. No Credit Card required, sign up today!Visit https://www.omahasteaks.com and enter code CHICKS at Checkout to save an extra $30 during our Semi-Annual Sale! Minimum purchase may apply.Visit https://4patriots.com/chicks to check out this week's discounts and deals. Receive Free shipping on orders over $97Visit https://www.genucel.com/chicks now, enter Promo Code CHICKS for additional 10% offyour entire order! Every order today is instantly upgraded to Free Express Shipping!Visit https://Mypillow.com/CHICKS - Enjoy all the great savings – Code CHICKS.
Today the Chicks chat about the absolute dumpster fire debate, why McCarthy is stepping down, and Dave Portnoy’s beautiful ego-check to ivy league terrorist sympathizers.
Ivy Leaguers don't have the smartest presidents… democrats in Congress still don't know what a woman is… the southern border is catastrophic… and the presidential election could be tragic. Michele is joined by Mock and Daisy — Chicks on the Right — to talk common sense.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Ivy Leaguers don't have the smartest presidents… democrats in Congress still don't know what a woman is… the southern border is catastrophic… and the presidential election could be tragic. Michele is joined by Mock and Daisy — Chicks on the Right — to talk common sense.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
9 P.M. HourTuesday on Capitol Hill, the presidents of Harvard University, MIT, and the University of Pennsylvania testified over concerns about rising antisemitism on college campuses since the Israel-Hamas War began. During the hearing members of Congress cited pro-Palestinian protests where students used antisemitic rhetoric, vandalism on Hillel buildings, and threatening emails to Jewish faculty. Why has antisemitism blossomed at these elite schools?
Welcome to the Instant Trivia podcast episode 1002, where we ask the best trivia on the Internet. Round 1. Category: Quick Moby-Dick 1: Of the Monica, the Rachel or the Phoebe, the rescue ship at the tale's end. the Rachel. 2: Melville's subtitle for the first American edition. The Whale. 3: The harpooner from Kokovoko with the rad tats. Queequeg. 4: Salem, Massachusetts author to whom the 1851 novel is dedicated. Nathaniel Hawthorne. 5: The biblical prophet who's the subject of chapter 83. Jonah. Round 2. Category: Souvenirs 1: This curved throwing club of the Aborigines is an excellent souvenir--it'll always come back to you. a boomerang. 2: A green foam crown with 7 points is a popular souvenir of this national monument. the Statue of Liberty. 3: Many snow globes feature this clock tower of London's Houses of Parliament. Big Ben. 4: Many souvenirs from Gibraltar feature these "apes" that call the peninsula home. the Barbary apes. 5: When you visit the country just south of Kenya, you can bring home some of this mineral named for it. tanzanite. Round 3. Category: Bible Book Shorthand 1: Salacious serpent dispenses bad dietary advice. Genesis. 2: Big fish puts the bite on a reluctant prophet. Jonah. 3: Brother's bovine effigy bothers big boy. Exodus. 4: Writing on the wall breaks up party. Daniel. 5: Loyal daughter-in-law is betrothed in Bethlehem. Ruth. Round 4. Category: College Vocabulary 1: Russet and tan are shades of this Ivy Leaguer. Brown. 2: A botanist might call this Houston school Oryza sativa. Rice. 3: In Britain this Southern school would have a peerage and rank just below prince. Duke. 4: In Wisconsin, it's a yellow cheese; in Maine, it's a 2,000-student college. Colby. 5: A Portland liberal arts college, or part of an oboe's mouthpiece. a reed. Round 5. Category: Movie By Song Lyrics 1: "Springtime for Hitler, and Germany, Deutschland is happy and gay". The Producers. 2: "Big bottom drive me out of my mind, how could I leave this behind?". This Is Spinal Tap. 3: "I gave my love a chicken, that had no bones, I gave my love a story, that had no end, I gave..." (Bluto smashes guitar). Animal House. 4: 1979:"Always look on the bright side of life... for life is quite absurd, and death's the final word". Monty Python's Life of Brian. 5: "Blame Canada, blame Canada, it seems that everything's gone wrong since Canada came along". South Park. Thanks for listening! Come back tomorrow for more exciting trivia! Special thanks to https://blog.feedspot.com/trivia_podcasts/
No longer can we call the students at Harvard or Stanford the smartest kids on earth, as they have now proven otherwise. Grace shares the insane scenes coming out of colleges in response to the war in Israel as well as the big donors who have pulled their funding.
Not only was BLM the headquarters of mass financial fraud. It's also the evil organization that some, like Grace, always warned us of. BLM came out in defense of Palestinian "freedom-fighters," a.k.a. Hamas-sympathizers, and the sheep don't know where to Baaa next.
Grant Achilles is in his 11th year, 10th season, as the head coach of Brown Baseball in 2024. Achilles spent two seasons as an assistant coach for the Bears before taking over the head coaching duties midway through the 2014 season. He was named the program's 17th head coach since 1900 on June 23, 2014, while the program was founded in 1863.The 2023 season saw three Bears earn All-Ivy honors, with freshman Mika Petersen and outfielder Derian Morphew both earning First Team accolades. Petersen led all Ivy Leaguers with a .424 batting average in league play, and rank fourth overall at .353. Pitcher Jack Seppings earned Second Team honors while also being named ot the taxi/reserve squad for Great Britain for the 2023 World Baseball Classic. Achilles also welcomed to the program and coached Olivia Pichardo, the first female to make an NCAA Division I baseball roster.
Listen to Zooming In at The UnPopulist in your favorite podcast app: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | RSSAaron Ross Powell: Welcome to The UnPopulist Editor's Roundtable at Zooming In. I'm Aaron Ross Powell. It's our birthday. The UnPopulist is now in its terrible twos, and so today I'm joined by my colleagues Shikha Dalmia and Akiva Malamet to give a progress report on what we've accomplished in these last two years and where we see the current state of liberalism.A transcript of today's podcast appears below. It has been edited for flow and clarity. Also our five favorite posts of the last 12 months.Aaron Ross Powell: Shikha, why don't you take us away?Shikha Dalmia: Thank you, Aaron. And thanks to Akiva and both of you for being here. It's an important milestone in The UnPopulist's life. As you mentioned, we are beginning our terrible twos, but I'm hoping that instead of throwing tantrums, we are going to make the “right kind of trouble” in the immortal words of John Lewis. But to give our audience a bit of a progress report: Two years ago, The UnPopulist was founded with a singular mission, and that was to defend liberal democracy from the rise of the illiberal populist right. And it was going to do so by using classical liberal thought. Classical liberalism, in my view, and I think I can speak for the two of you, offers the richest intellectual resources to fight tyranny and authoritarianism in all its forms. And I felt like it was being completely underutilized, if not misused in many, many ways. And so the idea was to both defend liberal democracy and also kind of re-articulate classical liberalism itself to make it relevant for this new threat that we were confronting. It was also my very firm belief that just like socialism in some ways was the defining threat of our times after World War II, this liberal populism of the right was going to be the threat of our generation or well, I'm very old, but future generations. And why is that? In my view, populism in some ways, or illiberal populism, poses even a more fundamental threat to liberal democracy than socialism. And the reason is it kind of changes the relationship between the government and the governed. A liberal democratic framework is centered around the power of keeping political authority in check. And one crucial part of the check are the people. I mean, “throw the bums out” when they get too tyrannical. The premise over there is that people are going to guard their freedom. They are going to be a bulwark against authoritarianism and an authoritarian. But that changes in a populist framework where the people actually join forces with the strongman populist figure. And instead of guarding freedom, their motive becomes to use the levers of power to attack their political enemies. And so in a fundamental sense, the whole relationship in a populist polity between all the various checks and balances and institutions of liberal democracy kind of changes. And to me, there is therefore no greater threat to liberal democracy than populism. “The premise over there is that people are going to guard their freedom. They are going to be a bulwark against authoritarianism and an authoritarian. But that changes in a populist framework where the people actually join forces with the strongman populist figure. And instead of guarding freedom, their motive becomes to use the levers of power to attack their enemies, their political enemies.” — Shikha DalmiaAnd so with that understanding The UnPopulist, as the name suggests, was incubated at the Mercatus Center two years ago, and it was on a two-year grant. And after that, it needed a new home. And so I'm happy to report that even as our audience has grown, we started with 650 subscribers. We are nine times bigger now and growing rapidly every day. You guys have been an invaluable part of it. Aaron, you almost from the inception and Akiva, you a little bit later. And as we grew, we felt like we needed a new home and we've created one and it's called the Institute for the Study of Modern Authoritarianism — ISMA. It is no physical building, there's nothing bricks and mortar, but it's a platform which will give us an operational base to expand ourselves and our activities as we go forward. The UnPopulist, let me mention, is just going to be one element of this new center. We are going to do other things. We have a new editorial partnership with Persuasion which is an awesome sister Substack publication founded by Yascha Mounk, a Johns Hopkins professor. He comes from the progressive side of the spectrum and he's worried about some of the progressive excesses and threats to liberal democracy. So just as we, or at least I, see myself as an internal reformer on the right, he sees himself as an internal reformer on the progressive end of things. So we have a editorial partnership with Persuasion and we'll be promoting content and each other's work. Another element of ISMA, the Institute for the Study of Modern Authoritarianism is going to be a polling project that Tom Shull, our editor at large, is launching to study the appeal of strongman politics in the United States. That's something that isn't very well understood or tracked. And we feel we should be able to pick up trends when people are getting more attracted to strongmen figure. And another element is going to be a liberalism conference. So our readers will be familiar with the national conservative movement and other illiberal movements on the right. And they host their own conference every year. And we think we need a conference to make a strong and strenuous and vigorous case for liberalism. In the last two years since The UnPopulist was founded, I don't think our work [load] has diminished. I think it's actually increased because the state of the world has become, in my view, decidedly worse. Here in America, the Republican Party seems to reach new lows every few weeks. Jan. 6th was not a shocking enough event for the party and it didn't awaken it. After the event, Trump is still the favorite to win the nomination of the party. There are 91 indictments against him and instead of being embarrassed, the Republican Party seems to think that the problem is actually with the system that's trying to hold a rogue president accountable. You know, it's been the law and order party all this long except for when it applies to its own favorite politicians. Even if Trump were in jail, that would not necessarily be a barrier to his election. But if he were to somehow not be the nominee, the two people who are waiting in the wings are Florida Governor DeSantis and neophyte Vivek Ramaswamy. And both of them represent two different styles of populism within the GOP. De Santis has this nasty statist side where he wants to use the government to reign terror on his woke political opponents. And Vivek Ramaswamy has a different, what I call, paleo-libertarian style of populism where he wants to selectively withdraw agencies and curtail the federal governmentt so that that hurts his political opponents. Now, many of us are not opposed to reducing the size of the federal government, but the selective way in which he [Vivek] wants to do it to promote right-wing causes and diminish left-wing causes is very concerning. Add to that his kookiness and his conspiracy theory mindset, and his border hawkishness. And he is in my view and reincarnation of Ron Paul in many ways, who, the difference is that Ron Paul was an outlier when he ran in the Republican party, whereas Vivek Ramaswamy in fact speaks for the party. Meanwhile, if you look at, look around the world in India, my home, my native country. Modi, Narendra Modi, a Hindu nationalist and a strongman, populist figure, is a hands down favorite to win elections again for the third time next year. And then if you go around the rest of the world, things are not looking a whole lot better. In Turkey, Erdogan won again, even though the opposition put up a pretty valiant fight. He still prevailed and everybody now thinks Turkey is on sort of an irreversible path to certain kind of religious illiberalism. Gone are its secular commitments. And then if you go down the list, whether it is Italy, it is Hungary, Poland, the same thing is happening. In Germany, the Alternative to Germany which is a far right outfit, is the second largest party. It may well be in the governing coalition in the next elections. In France, even though Emmanuel Macron [who is considered a moderate] won, he's now in trouble and the National Rally and Eric Zemmour, two very far right figures, are gaining ground. In Italy, you have Giorgia Meloni. And to me, the most ominous sign that things are on a very bad track is that the European Union itself seems to be succumbing to far-right priorities and policies. Take its position on immigration. I mean, we care about immigration, but it's also sort of a bellwether issue. And the European Commission, which used to be very opposed to stiff border controls around Europe, has now succumbed. Its [annual] border control budget, just to throw out one figure at you, has increased from $85 million to $754 million in less than a decade. Whereas earlier it used to talk about how we don't need to control Europe's border, now they are talking about “collective border security” and are doubling down on it. So given all these trends, I think The UnPopulist and ISMA have their work cut out for them. And so we are going to be doing this over the next few years and hopefully getting more support from our audience and our viewers and everyone else.Akiva Malamet: So I really appreciate what you said there, Shikha, and I think particularly the international focus that The UnPopulist takes is a unique emphasis in combining focus not just on America and on the West, but on the world in general. One country that wasn't discussed as much in your catalog of horrors is Israel. And I think of Israel as quite an important country because it serves as a kind of cultural social bridge between the West and the East. It has elements of both Eastern and Western culture within it. And geographically as being on the Mediterranean, it serves that function as well. The shift in Israel towards where very worrying judicial reforms in which the far right in Israel is essentially attempting to hobble the power of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court's ability to protect its citizens from majoritarian rule and from authoritarian attempts to remove women's rights, remove LGBT rights, to install — a wish, I think, of a less likely but still consistent wish for part of Netanyahu's coalition — is to install a theocracy in Israel, although I see that as a little bit less likely. And all of those pieces are coming together to make Israel, which was historically considered a great American ally and a great sign of democracy in the Middle East, Israeli democracy is no longer looking quite as good and in fact may be crumbling in some very critical places. The installation of the first line of these judicial reforms, which was getting rid of the reasonableness clause, is now undergoing hearings by the Supreme Court. We will see whether the Supreme Court allows for and passes something to amend its own power, and whether they will consider that legally valid or not. I think the reasonableness clause is a fairly minor clause because it's an administrative declaration that says that you can't pass certain laws that don't take account of certain reasonable variables. So for example, the reasonableness clause was used to get rid of people from being ministers who had been indicted for corruption. So Aryeh Deri, the minister from the Shas party, which is the Sephardic ultra-Orthodox party in Israel was removed from his post and being minister because he had served time in jail. Those kinds of considerations that the reasonableness clause is meant to curtail to prevent corruption in government. And so while it's a relatively minor clause, there are other ways to prevent corruption in government. There are other powers that the Supreme Court has of judicial review. It represents a significant move towards curtailing the power of the Supreme Court, both to uphold good standards and best practices in government and prevent corruption. But also to be able to balance the power of the Knesset, the parliament, against the framework, against the protection of individual rights. It's important to remind people that Israel, which has no formal written constitution, is dependent on the Supreme Court to protect the liberties of citizens, which it does through its interpretation of the Basic Laws, which declare certain fundamental rights but are not themselves equivalent to a constitution. Absent these judicial review powers, there really is no block or check and balance to the power of the Knesset to enact all kinds of majoritarian tyrannies that severely violate the rights of Israeli citizens as well as Palestinians. And so the judicial reforms, as I see them, are a significant blow to one of the more important democracies in the world today.Shikha: Thank you for correcting my omission over here. Israel is obviously a super important country for both geopolitical reasons and as well as, as you mentioned, an important liberal democracy at least. Some of us think it's liberal enough that we should be worried about its more draconian turn. But one of the things I want to emphasize is that this is — sometimes when we talk about liberal democracy, it sounds arid. It sounds very abstract, but it has actually like real consequences on real people. And it's not simply about, in Israel, for instance, it's not simply about things like judicial review and curbing the power of the executive, all clinical terms. It has impact on the, you know, on human rights, right? I mean, the Palestinian fate to some extent depends upon what happens in Israel. The Muslim faith in India depends upon whether the Hindu nationalist government is able to run roughshod over them. And so when we talk about liberal democracy, it's not simply about maintaining a system, it is about maintaining a system that protects life and liberty of actual, breathing, living human beings. And that's kind of why to me it's such an important cause. You know, if liberal democracy fails, it's not just going to fail and be replaced by something else that's less good. There will be many lives destroyed, decimated, and major upheaval if we don't get things back in order.“When we talk about liberal democracy, it's not simply about maintaining a system, it is about maintaining a system that protects life and liberty of breathing, living human beings. And that's kind of why to me it's such an important cause. If liberal democracy fails, it's not just going to fail and be replaced by something else that's less good. There will be many lives destroyed, decimated, and major upheaval if we don't get things back in order.”— Shikha DalmiaAaron: Yes, that's absolutely critical. So I'll just quickly say it has been, it's been a real privilege and honor to get to be a part of this project for, for the last couple of years. And I think I agree with everything that's been said that the mission of The UnPopulist mattered a lot when it launched. It matters at least as much now in part, because I think that a lot of the threats to liberalism have become in many ways more subtle and easier to ignore, easier to dismiss. I think probably in my mind, and maybe I'm being naive about this, but I think that the immediate threat of Donald Trump himself has lessened a lot compared to where it was two years ago. I think the path to reelection for him is exceedingly narrow if not effectively gone, barring extraordinary circumstances. I just don't see a way that he wins back the suburban white voters who flipped to Biden after everything that's been happening in the indictments and all of that. And I think that a lot of what we've seen is electorally a lot of the really hardcore of Trumpism doesn't seem to do very well at the national level. DeSantis, even if he won the nomination, I don't think would would win the presidency because he's just not terribly popular. He can't even beat out the kind of rando Pharma bro who's running against him in the primaries. So at the national level, that kind of real Trumpism was, I mean, was never popular, it never got majorities. It seems to be less so now, especially as it becomes more shrill. But the threats, as I said, have become more subtle. And so one of the things that really worries me is threats to liberalism from within the liberal coalition. And a lot of that is the way that the pivot to the culture war being the dominant force in American politics, that we don't really argue so much over policy anymore, or policy is not centered in our political debates. to the extent that it used to be, it is now culture war issues dominate the conversation. And the real extreme versions of the right's views on the culture war are not, again, terribly popular. They don't have widespread purchase and that shifting as demographics and particularly age demographics change and so on, like which generations are ascendant and which are shrinking. One of the things that really worries me is the way that edge concerns in the culture war are getting used as justification for kind of broader reactionary attitudes that were present in the larger liberal coalition, but were kind of kept on the down low. And so we're seeing this in reactions to LGBT rights or trans rights where people will point to smaller issues, women's sports, or some kids getting certain kind of medical interventions, and use that as a way to broaden out a critique of essentially the dynamism of culture and privileged groups, underprivileged groups becoming more privileged, formerly heavily privileged groups maybe dropping in their privilege. Cancel culture concerns are also this way. We see a lot of, there are genuine instances of like cancel culture run amok. But often what you see is concerns about that providing cover for general concerns of like people with higher status not really liking it that kind of the lower status people are now challenging them, pushing back on their ideas, that they're not as they're not as centered in the conversation as they used to be. And what I think a lot of this has exposed is that even in the broader liberal coalition, there was there's always been a tension between conservative values and the social dynamism that is a necessary part of a liberal society or a necessary consequence of a liberal society. “Edge concerns in the culture war are getting used as justification for kind of broader reactionary attitudes that were present in the larger liberal coalition, but were kind of kept on the down low. And so we're seeing this in reactions to LGBT rights or trans rights where people will point to smaller issues, women's sports, or some kids getting certain kind of medical interventions, and use that as a way to broaden out a critique of essentially the dynamism of culture and privileged groups, underprivileged groups becoming more privileged, formerly heavily privileged groups maybe dropping in their privilege.”—- Aaron Ross PowellAnd so I think that's where we really need to maintain a check on taking concerns seriously, but not allowing them to provide cover for basically, I'm in favor of liberalism as long as it doesn't like destabilize my own position, my own status, my own prestige, my own preferences, because as you said, like these things, we can talk about them in this clinical sense of the function of various institutions and the laws that govern them or the laws by which they govern themselves, but ultimately this is about people. It's about their lives and the reason that liberalism matters. The reason that I think all three of us have dedicated our careers to defending and advancing it is because it is the best system that we have found yet for enabling diverse dynamic people to not just live together in peace but live together in mutually beneficial ways. ut that cuts against these natural tendencies for hierarchy and class. and categorizing people and then seeing their dignity as of differing values depending on where they fall into these categorizations. And, and that's, that's been the challenge liberalism has faced since it started, is liking it in the abstract, but then disliking it when the kind of the effects of freedom become real to us. And so that's where I think the tremendous value of The UnPopulist is in making those values clear and defending them and calling out where they're in retreat, especially as it moves into the less cartoony flamboyant threats of a Donald Trump and into what I see as these more subtle avenues for backsliding into particularly kind of social illiberalisms and then the inevitable political illiberalisms that follow.Shikha: Aaron, I couldn't agree with you more, and yet, I mean, in a very fundamental sense about the value of liberalism and what we are fighting for here, I couldn't agree with you more. But I would say that precisely because of some of what you said, I'm less sanguine about the threat that Donald Trump and the Republican Party pose even now. Part of what we are seeing right now with the rise of the illiberal populist right in the United States especially, is that the gains of the civil rights and the women's movement are only beginning to be felt now in the sense that these groups have now moved into positions of power. And they don't believe that the previous norms of patriarchy and a certain kind of white articulation of the world work for them anymore and they are demanding change. Now as they demand change, these things never happen neatly. There are going to be excesses, which is why I appreciate what Yascha Mounk is doing and Persuasion are doing. There will be excesses. But the backlash from the right is far bigger in my view than the excesses on the left. And that backlash is not going to be contained anytime soon. What's spooky to me is that the Republican party has not, like I said, woken up from its Trumpist stupor yet. That fever is still continuing to, if not grow, but retain its hold on the Republican brain. But look at the new populist figures that have emerged in the GOP. Vivek Ramaswamy, he's a double Ivy Leaguer and yet he issues purple condemnations of the elite and what have you. But he himself is the son of immigrants. He's a practicing Hindu and he's a son of immigrants. And yet, there is a certain political entrepreneurship that this Trumpist style of populist politics has opened, which is going to continue to play out in the Republican Party. And when you have a duopoly, when you have a country with only two parties, when one party is in such a bad place, it can continue to pull down liberalism in many ways. And I would have to say that, you know, Democrats, the rap against them is that they are too much in the pockets of progressives, right? And they're allowing the extreme progressives to set the agenda for the party. My opposite fear is, as is yours, is that in response to this backlash from Republicans, Democrats will actually succumb on their commitments to defending minority groups and what have you. I don't think that has happened yet and I think they are not doing it smartly. I think they do need to listen to concerns about the other side—and at least remove some of the obvious causes. on those grounds where the backlash is justified, they ought to keep that in mind, but they have to do it in a way that doesn't weaken their commitments to the little guy, to the underdog. And I think that's kind of, if Republicans continue to make political gains the way they are doing, I think Democrats may well follow suit just to keep themselves politically relevant.“My opposite fear, as is yours, is that in response to this backlash from Republicans, Democrats will actually succumb on their commitments to defending minority groups . I don't think that has happened yet and I think they are not doing it smartly. I think they do need to listen to concerns about the other side and at least remove some of the obvious causes. On those grounds where the backlash is justified, they ought to keep that in mind, but they have to do it in a way that doesn't weaken their commitments to the little guy, to the underdog.”— Shikha DalmiaAkiva: So I really appreciated, Shikha, what you said about this being, to some extent, the coming to fruition of certain liberation movements. And so we're seeing a backlash as a result of this dismantling of patriarchy, the dismantling of prejudice against LGBTQ people and so on. And I think this speaks to a fundamental impetus in liberalism, which is that nobody's free until everybody's free. And the move within liberalism to be continually looking for who are the edge groups, who are the groups that are not yet in our circle of equality, who are not yet in our circle of liberty, continues to create backlash. I always think it's interesting that you have periods of liberalization followed by a backlash. So you have, I think it's interesting that you have the Me Too movement and then you have Trump in a chronologically related section. Similarly, you have a lot of the accomplishments in the original classical age of fascism. You had all these feminist accomplishments of the 1920s that were then followed by the age of fascism. And you had a thriving gay scene in Berlin that was then followed by fascism, in the 1920s. And so, in a way, this illiberal populism is predictable because there's always a response to the status of some groups being disrupted in society because other groups are demanding their place at the table. But the fact that backlash is almost inevitable shouldn't give us cause for despair, rather it should give us reason to be aware of what will happen culturally and to find the resources to push back against it. “I think this speaks to a fundamental impetus in liberalism, which is that nobody's free until everybody's free. And the move within liberalism to be continually looking for who are the edge groups, who are the groups that are not yet in our circle of equality, who are not yet in our circle of liberty, continues to create backlash…illiberal populism is predictable because there's always a response to the status of some groups being disrupted in society because other groups are demanding their place at the table. But the fact that backlash is almost inevitable shouldn't give us cause for despair, rather it should give us reason to be aware of what will happen culturally and to find the resources to push back against it.”— Akiva MalametAaron: And that's where we can get back to, I think, the clinical, institutional side of things. I think liberalism at its core is a set of social values about how we view each other and our interactions with them and what it means to live together in beneficial peace. But if there's this baked in cycle of, some people are more committed to that vision than others, and some people are committed to it so long as it doesn't mean things get too weird for them, and then they have the backlash, or their status lowers, and then they have the backlash. That's where protecting these institutions, which has also been a big part of The UnPopulist's mission, because those liberal institutions exist to essentially defang those inevitable backlashes that people can get — they can get frustrated about changes in the world around them.They can not like it that their town looks different today than it did when they were kids or that popular music sounds funny or there's these people who speak foreign languages or the children are up to weird playing with their identities that makes me a little uncomfortable. We can't we can't undo that, but what we can do is ensure there are political institutions can't be co-opted by the people caught up in the backlash in order to advance actual political oppression in order to stop it. That instead they can kind of rage against it, or they can use their associational rights to find parts of the country that were better reflect their values or whatever. But what we saw with Trump and the ongoing threat is that backlash can if liberal institutions aren't strong, can grab the mechanisms of power, can grab the very heights of power. And then, fortunately, Trump turned out to be wildly inept in doing it, but can attempt to re-oppress the people who liberalism is freeing, re-marginalize the people that it has unmarginalized. And that's where I see, if we can't, that the link between social values and the institutions and the need to keep an eye on both.“What we saw with Trump and the ongoing threat is that the backlash can, if liberal institutions aren't strong, grab the mechanisms of power, can grab the very heights of power. And then, fortunately, Trump turned out to be wildly inept in doing it, but can attempt to re-oppress the people who liberalism is freeing, re-marginalize the people that it has unmarginalized. And that's where I see, if we can't, that the link between social values and the institutions and the need to keep an eye on both.”— Aaron Ross PowellShikha: Yeah, just to add to that, Aaron, you know, what spooks me about this backlash is precisely its attack on liberalism, right? The populist right understands that the impediment to its designs to roll back the clock is precisely liberalism, because groups that have now been empowered can fight back. You know, they can use those same institutions and those same rights to fight back and maintain their gains. So the reversal of those gains requires precisely attacking liberalism. It is not a coincidence that Trump called the press the enemy of the people and attacked the background of a Mexican judge who felt he wouldn't rule in his favor for his fake university or whatever it is that he was doing with that. And so that's why the backlash is so dangerous. A lot of my conservative friends who are not even sort of part of the Trumpist right, they've catastrophized, they have catastrophized the left so much. This argument that the left controls all the commanding heights of the culture and American society. And so, to take back those heights, we can't play by the normal liberal rules. you know, we've got to play by some other illiberal rules is very much part of the right. The only thing I would exhort the left to do is that as it pushes back against the right is… that part of the problem with the left is that in order to make more gains for people, you know, for marginalized groups, as you mentioned Aaron, was that they were claiming too many innocent victims, right? Or too many people who could be better reached by some kind of persuasive rather than coercive or punitive strategies. And they overplayed their hand in that respect. I've alluded to this piece in Vox before Trump came on the scene where this liberal professor wrote a piece anonymously about how his liberal students terrify him because you know, anything he says in class, no matter how innocuous, can and will be used against him, if it doesn't somehow advance their agenda or it ruffles some feathers. But there was already a corrective current in our politics against that. And we could have come to a pretty good place where we advanced more rights for more people while preventing innocent victims of that you know, of that particular cause. But the right came along the scene and it doesn't want to have anything to do with these corrective mechanisms. It doesn't want to, you know, have anything to do with using liberalism. It's in it for the power. And my fear is when one side becomes so wholly devoted to using the levers of power to advance its agenda, it's not inconceivable that the other side will also do the same at some point. I think for the center left side of the spectrum there are two dangers it has to worry about. One, it has to worry about imbibing too many of these sort of regressive right-wing policies and agenda and giving up on some of its progressive causes. On the other hand, it may also succumb to the twin temptation of just simply seeking power to advance its agenda and forgetting about liberalism. So all of that is kind of part of the mix in our very fluid tumultuous political world. And now The Unpopulist firmly believes that at this moment in time, the right is the far bigger threat than the left. The left is a mixed bag, it has some good causes, but its means are occasionally questionable. But liberalism could have handled that. But we will also occasionally keep an eye on that kind of stuff.“I think for the center-left side of the spectrum there are two dangers it has to worry about. One, it has to worry about imbibing too many regressive right-wing policies and agenda and giving up on some of its progressive causes. On the other hand, it may also succumb to the twin temptation of just simply seeking power to advance its agenda and forgetting about liberalism. So all of that is kind of part of the mix in our very fluid tumultuous political world.”— Shikha DalmiaAkiva: I really appreciated what you said there, Shikha, especially about the value of protecting liberalism as an institutional framework. Speaking to the mistakes made by the left as it tries to oppose the right, one of the things that gets underappreciated is the mistake of conflating democracy and liberalism with each other. And often there's this idea on the left that if we failed to protect our values, it's because the people weren't really speaking. Were misled and needed to be guided by us instead of by some other force. And what we really need to do is have is not have democratic fundamentalism and we also don't want to have a kind of protection of rights with or without any response or check and balance with respect to democratic accountability. But it's important to recognize that rights need to be protected independently of whether or not they're democratically sanctioned. And this is also a really important time for the left to double down on some of the things that maybe it's become a little softer on in comparison to how it's been historically, such as free speech when you decide that an institution can be manipulated for your own end…So for example, the expansion of let's say, different things to the category of hate speech or incitement, those same instruments can be used by the right to manipulate and then go after let's say, Disney's woke behavior becoming a problem for the discourse just as much as whatever the left may perceive to be a problem in terms of hate speech. And so there's an important need to not let whatever “the people” want become the equivalent of a liberal society. And there's also a need to defend liberal institutions because more often than not, someone that you don't like is going to then be in charge of them if you start to abandon those principles.“There's an important need to not let whatever “the people” want become the equivalent of a liberal society. And there's also a need to defend liberal institutions because more often than not, someone that you don't like is going to then be in charge of them if you start to abandon those principles.”— Akiva MalametShikha: I'm actually curious as to what, Aaron, you think about what Akiva just said. You feel passionately about trans rights, right? And so the question is, what are the legitimate means to advance those rights? What are the limits? Is using the power of the state to advance them acceptable? Are there means that trans activists have used to advance their rights that would give us pause from a liberal framework? What are the limits for advancing any crusade for anybody's rights?Aaron: There are always limits. We could certainly draw them at, “don't advance your rights in a way that violates the rights of others who aren't themselves violating yours.” So what I mean by that is say, in the abolitionist movement, anti-slavery, was clearly about advancing a set of rights that were being heavily violated, like absolutely violated. And that entailed often doing violence to slaveholders, taking away what they wrongfully imagined to be their property and so on. I don't see that as “don't violate others' rights when advancing your own” limits, clearly. But you can certainly, in trying to move yourself from the margins more towards the center of society in trying to undo oppression, it is possible to do that in ways that are rights violating to others. You know, appropriating their rightly held property, which is a fairly common thing of we're going to just, we've gotten our power back, now we're going to seize everything from everyone who's we see as wronging us. But I don't see that really playing that playing out much in the current situation.I mean, one of the interesting things about the trans rights concerns right now is this isn't actually an example of a group of people suddenly using the power of the state to rapidly advance their interests. Rather, most of the rights that we talk about now, that trans people are worried about losing are things that they've had for quite a long time, that the state has protected for quite a long time. And what's happening now is a rolling back, an attempt to roll back existing rights. They're not claiming a whole bunch of new ones. Rather, these were things that they had been doing forever. And suddenly it became, especially with the shift to the culture war, the victory of gay marriage. And so the need for it accelerated after changes in abortion and that becoming not the kind of driving thing that was motivating the right. The culture warriors on the right looked for a new thing to rile up, and we have Chris Rufo explicitly saying he's doing this. And then targeting this group that no one had really been concerned about. There hadn't been worries about any of this stuff until people decided it was a big problem. And now you see scaling back of it. “One of the interesting things about the trans rights concerns right now is this isn't actually an example of a group of people suddenly using the power of the state to rapidly advance their interests. Rather, most of the rights that we talk about now, that trans people are worried about losing are things that they've had for quite a long time, that the state has protected for quite a long time. And what's happening now is a rolling back, an attempt to roll back existing rights. They're not claiming a whole bunch of new ones. Rather, these were things that they had been doing forever.”— Aaron Ross PowellSo I don't see a lot of this as over-exertion in terms of claiming new rights and privileges, but rather, please stop taking away the ones that we have had and then being very vocal in demanding that they not be taken away. But I think, to Akiva's broader point. Yes, there is a need to distinguish democracy and liberalism. They are obviously very interrelated. Democracy is the best system that we have found for achieving and maintaining liberalism compared to institutional alternatives that we've seen in practice. Democracy also is a system that really puts at its core the equal dignity and participation of all citizens, except in those times when democracy tries to deny some citizens' democratic participation. But it is absolutely the case that majorities can be illiberal, and majorities can disrespect rights, and majorities can want to see underprivileged people remain at the margins of society. And so we need to be careful to not see majority rule, democracy as majority rule as synonymous with liberalism, but rather liberalism is a set of values that will inform what the majority sees as its goals in the political sphere. And so I think If we're gonna look forward to, how do we defend this thing we call liberalism, this thing that The UnPopulist has spent the first two years of its life defending and, and we'll spend the next many, many years continuing that fight. For me, a lot of it is, is keeping an eye on the ball when it comes to those values and keeping an eye on who is actually advancing them and who isn't and not allowing these subtle forms of illiberalism to gain purchase and respect and prominence within circles that ought to know better. But instead to call them out, even if it means, and this is, we've all been through this, even if it means calling out our friends and our allies, people that we have associated with. Because illiberalism is not concentrated among people who just wear hats that say, I am illiberal, but it's been a constant presence throughout the history of liberal democracies. It's always pushing back. It's always coming from every direction. Liberalism has been fighting against illiberalism as long as it's been around. And, so paying attention to that and asking ourselves, if I'm caught up in, oh, here's an instance where liberalism has gone too far, here's an instance where the behaviors become dangerous to it or corrosive of its values to really put effort into thinking about what's driving those motivations. And is it just cover for of reactionary preferences or is there something genuine there and then stand our ground when it comes to talking about those values and fighting for them.Aaron: Thank you for listening to Zooming In at The UnPopulist. If you enjoy this show, please take a moment to review us in Apple Podcasts. Also check out ReImagining Liberty, where I explore the emancipatory and cosmopolitan case for radical, social, political, and economic freedom. Zooming In is produced by Landry Ayres and is a project of The UnPopulist.Here are our favorite pieces from the past year. Tell us yours in the comments: “Jordan Peterson: Putin's Useless Idiot” by Tom Palmer“A Typology of the New Right” by Shikha Dalmia“Israel's Internal Divisions Are Its Mortal Enemy Now” by Akiva Malamet“Joe Biden and Walter Russell Mead Deserve an "F" on India” by Salil Tripathi“How to Defuse Nativism in America: An Interview with Justin Gest” by Aaron Ross Powell© The UnPopulist 2023Follow The UnPopulist on Twitter (@UnPopulistMag), Facebook (The UnPopulist) and Threads (@UnPopulistMag). This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.theunpopulist.net
Wall Street is the omnipotent Scorpion and the public is the frog. BOA rips off its customers. Break up the too big to fail firms! Indexing is NOT the way to go. You need a fund that is based on you. Wall Street is confused and bewildered. How the overly watched CPI number does not reflect the reality on the ground. Bidenomics=Chinanomics Command and control economies fail every single time they are tried. Elon Musk scammed New York. Another left-wing Ivy-Leaguer strikes out! Lina Khan and the FTC are the biggest losers. Trump and the art of pandering.
Chris and Brent discuss the MLB debut of Logan Allen (LHP, CLE) against the Marlins and provide scouting reports on Tanner Bibee (RHP, CLE) and several Yankess High-A prospect, including Spencer Jones (OF, NYY), Zach Messinger (RHP, NYY), Drew Thorpe (RHP, NYY), Antonio Gomez (C, NYY) & Dartmouth's own Ben Rice (C, NYY).
Brendan Moriarty, who comes from a respectable line of Ivy Leaguers, chose to pursue the art of filmmaking because he not only had the talent for it but also the drive to balance it with business. Was raised dirt biking through Cambodia despite being originally from New England. After visiting the Tomb Raider movie set, he was motivated to pursue his dream of becoming a filmmaker. We talked about what equality really meant, the American psyche, and how China is slowly taking over Cambodia.
Locked On Boston College - Daily Podcast On Boston College Eagles Football & Basketball
Boston College football continues to have a huge offseason in the transfer portal as they add two more transfers, from Harvard and NC A&T. On today's show we look at Bhayshul Tuten a running back from a HCBU at NC A&T who chose the Eagles over offers from Georgia, Florida, Virginia Tech and more. We discuss why even though he is coming from a smaller program, this is a big get for Jeff Hafley and his staff. Also we talk about the second commitment from Alex Washington a cornerback from Harvard. The first team Ivy Leaguer also chose BC over offers from some other big P5 programs. Finally we discuss the coaching staff's change in philosophy as they look to add more transfers. Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors! LinkedIn LinkedIn jobs helps you find the candidates you want to talk to, faster. Post your job for free at Linkedin.com/lockedoncollege Terms and conditions apply. Built Bar Built Bar is a protein bar that tastes like a candy bar. Go to builtbar.com and use promo code “LOCKEDON15,” and you'll get 15% off your next order. BetOnline BetOnline.net has you covered this season with more props, odds and lines than ever before. BetOnline – Where The Game Starts! NHTSA Drive sober or get pulled over. Click HERE to learn more. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Locked On Boston College - Daily Podcast On Boston College Eagles Football & Basketball
Boston College football continues to have a huge offseason in the transfer portal as they add two more transfers, from Harvard and NC A&T. On today's show we look at Bhayshul Tuten a running back from a HCBU at NC A&T who chose the Eagles over offers from Georgia, Florida, Virginia Tech and more. We discuss why even though he is coming from a smaller program, this is a big get for Jeff Hafley and his staff. Also we talk about the second commitment from Alex Washington a cornerback from Harvard. The first team Ivy Leaguer also chose BC over offers from some other big P5 programs. Finally we discuss the coaching staff's change in philosophy as they look to add more transfers.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!LinkedInLinkedIn jobs helps you find the candidates you want to talk to, faster. Post your job for free at Linkedin.com/lockedoncollege Terms and conditions apply.Built BarBuilt Bar is a protein bar that tastes like a candy bar. Go to builtbar.com and use promo code “LOCKEDON15,” and you'll get 15% off your next order.BetOnlineBetOnline.net has you covered this season with more props, odds and lines than ever before. BetOnline – Where The Game Starts!NHTSADrive sober or get pulled over. Click HERE to learn more. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
The University of Penn outfielder was a three-year letterman with the Quakers. He was the 2010 Ivy League player of the year and was an all-academic Ivy Leaguer. In October2018, Grandieri was inducted to the University of Penn Hall of Fame finishing his career with a .360 average. He is currently the head baseball coach at Episcopal Academy in Newtown Square, PA and also serves as a Financial Services Professional with Montgomery Insurance Services, Inc.In this episode, Grandieri discusses balancing athletics and academics at a very prominent university on how student-athletes can maintain excellence on the field and in the classroom while coaching today's athletes on the baseball field.Support the showhttps://www.facebook.com/RACPodcast1/https://twitter.com/rac_podcast1https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnboruk/
Watch the video interview on YouTube: https://youtu.be/mDCv0sx30E0 Also available on YouTube, Apple podcasts, Amazon podcasts, and all other podcast streaming sites Welcome back to another episode of From Dropout to J.D.! In this episode you'll meet Elliot, a high school dropout turned Ivy Leaguer. I had such an informative, yet thoughtful conversation with Elliot. I wish her all the best on her law school journey at Yale! If you, or someone you know, would like to be interviewed or featured on the podcast please send an email to info@fromdropouttojd.com or fill out this inquiry form: https://forms.gle/Q69ueXDJGTBiWiY66 SUBSCRIBE FOR $0.99/mo. Law school is so incredibly expensive. If you want to help support me on my law journey please subscribe! A little goes a long way! Thank you ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For 10% off 1 month of online therapy use promo-code: DROPOUTTOJD BetterHelp is an online portal that provides direct-to-consumer access to mental health services. The online counseling and therapy services are provided through web-based interaction as well as phone and text communication. Go to betterhelp.com/dropouttojd or use promo-code DROPOUTTOJD ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Info on the podcast host Name: Adesuwa Pronounced: Ah-day-Sue-wa Location: Dallas, TX SMR: Aquarius, Sagittarius, Aries Thank you for listening! Follow my YouTube channel for new episodes, vlogs, and more!
Looking to land a competitive internship or research opportunity? Having a hard time finding an opportunity that will take you one while you are younger than the eligibility rules allow? Rather than giving up on the opportunity to connect with experts in the world because you can't 'find an opportunity', learn how to create the kind of opportunities that will help you grow and develop your admissions profile. In this episode, I'll explain what my peers at Harvard did to create opportunities, and how I teach my students to do the same in the Ivy League Challenge. -----To register for the Ivy League Challenge, visit our website.To follow on Instagram: @TheIvyLeagueChallengeJoin Facebook group: Parents of Ambitious Teens: Personal Growth & Healthy College PrepOr schedule a meeting with Steve here
Some unspeakable truths ... Are comics now afraid to speak their minds onstage? ... The difference between telling the truth and getting a laugh ... Can jokes actually do harm? ... Nikki Jax on comedy and trans issues ... Who actually “cancels” comics, audiences or corporations? ... Sam Jay on artistic freedom and mob mentality ... Q&A: I'm worried people won't understand that my one-woman show is satire. What should I do? ... Q&A: Does comedy have real power or is it ‘just jokes'? ... Q&A: Do comics sometimes inadvertently reinforce wrongheaded points of view? ... Q&A: Why are Ivy Leaguers so unfunny? ... Q&A: Are college campuses inhospitable environments for comedy? ... Q&A: What got Roland suspended at Harvard? ... Q&A: Does the general public need social media training? ... Q&A: Is there a way to stop corporations from folding to social media pressure campaigns? ...
Some unspeakable truths ... Are comics now afraid to speak their minds onstage? ... The difference between telling the truth and getting a laugh ... Can jokes actually do harm? ... Nikki Jax on comedy and trans issues ... Who actually “cancels” comics, audiences or corporations? ... Sam Jay on artistic freedom and mob mentality ... Q&A: I'm worried people won't understand that my one-woman show is satire. What should I do? ... Q&A: Does comedy have real power or is it ‘just jokes'? ... Q&A: Do comics sometimes inadvertently reinforce wrongheaded points of view? ... Q&A: Why are Ivy Leaguers so unfunny? ... Q&A: Are college campuses inhospitable environments for comedy? ... Q&A: What got Roland suspended at Harvard? ... Q&A: Does the general public need social media training? ... Q&A: Is there a way to stop corporations from folding to social media pressure campaigns? ...
Over the last couple years, I’ve been in communication with Noam Dworman, the owner of the Comedy Cellar in New York, which is one of the most influential comedy clubs in the country. He suggested that we collaborate and put together a show that would explore the relationship between truth, free speech, and comedy. After a lot of back and forth, we came up with the idea of putting non-comedian intellectuals into conversation with professional stand-up comics. We weren’t quite sure what would happen, but we both sensed the idea had great potential.And so, last month, The Glenn Show held its first live event. Roland Fryer, Coleman Hughes, and I served as the “serious” participants, and Noam invited the comics Andrew Schulz, Judy Gold, Shane Gillis, T.J., and Rick Crom to come up and offer their thoughts. The event also included special appearances from Nikki Jax and the stellar Sam Jay. Noam and I wanted to know, are there certain truths that only comics can get away with telling? Can delivering a potentially unsettling idea in comedic form make people more receptive to it? The place was packed—tickets sold out in just a few days. The atmosphere was electric. After I introduced the event and kicked things off with an opening provocation, the show took on a life of its own. As you’ll see, the comics took the idea and ran with it. There are moments of chaos, moments of profundity, and a lot of laughs. I couldn’t have asked for a better live debut for TGS, and I am excited to be able to share with all of you who made it possible through your support.We’re planning on doing more of these events in the future, so let us know what you think!Many, many thanks to Noam Dworman for his hard work, generosity, and for providing video and audio of the event. The title sequence was created by our own Nikita Petrov. This post is free and available to the public. To receive early access to TGS episodes, an ad-free podcast feed, Q&As, and other exclusive content and benefits, click below.0:00 Some unspeakable truths 8:07 Are comics now afraid to speak their minds onstage? 19:38 The difference between telling the truth and getting a laugh 28:42 Can jokes actually do harm? 36:50 Nikki Jax on comedy and trans issues 43:34 Who actually “cancels” comics, audiences or corporations? 50:26 Sam Jay on artistic freedom and mob mentality 55:55 Q&A: I’m worried people won’t understand that my one-woman show is satire. What should I do? 58:42 Q&A: Does comedy have real power or is it ‘just jokes’? 1:06:35 Q&A: Do comics sometimes inadvertently reinforce wrongheaded points of view? 1:10:23 Q&A: Why are Ivy Leaguers so unfunny? 1:13:13 Q&A: Are college campuses inhospitable environments for comedy? 1:16:45 Q&A: What got Roland suspended at Harvard? 1:20:20 Q&A: Does the general public need social media training? 1:22:31 Q&A: Is there a way to stop corporations from folding to social media pressure campaigns? This is a public episode. Get access to private episodes at glennloury.substack.com/subscribe
It's Casual Friday! Sam and Emma host Alex Pareene, Contributing Editor at the New Republic and proprietor of the AP newsletter on Substack, to round up the week in news, as they dive into Breyer's retirement and the role of the judicial branch moving forward, as well as look at the state of Omicron and COVID stances on the left. They begin with Breyer's announcement and the emphasis he puts on the continuation of the American “experiment” that he's so graciously ruled over in a lifetime position, walking through the fetishization of US governance and processes that has been stunting any material change for ages, and the central role liberals have had to play in it. Next, they get into the politics of replacing Breyer's seat, particularly within the context of the Right's obstructionism and Biden's decision to solely consider Black women for the seat (but don't worry, they'll still be Ivy Leaguers), before this lovely conversation leads to one on the future of Democratic leadership, and whether they'll decide to move away from bipartisan fetishization, and towards getting things passed. Alex, Emma, and Sam wrap up the interview looking at the US's COVID restrictions (or lack thereof) in comparison with much of the rest of the West, and the incredible (and endangering) freedoms we've enjoyed amidst nonstop whining from libertarians and liberals alike. They also touch on the judicial decision to cancel Biden's gas and oil leases, and a Tennessee school board's banning of Art Spiegelman's holocaust graphic novel “Maus.” And in the Fun Half: Micah from CA calls in to discuss promoting leftist candidacies, Ronald Raygun tears Sam a new one over not holding his kids to account, and Biden decides to leave another campaign promise up to the filibuster, with Jen Psaki shirking the responsibility over to the ever-productive Congress. The FL Senate Minority Leader is reminded by Florida's Surgeon General that science doesn't have yes and no answers, Joe Rogan and Jordan Peterson revel in the ability of people to do things that they know are bad, and Emma and Sam unpack the overwhelming response to Sam's debate with off-brand philosophy bro Jackson Hinkle, to the point that countless Hinklers on Twitter happened to have identical responses, plus, your calls and IMs! Purchase tickets for the live show in Boston on May 15th HERE: https://thewilbur.com/artist/majority-report/ Become a member at JoinTheMajorityReport.com: https://fans.fm/majority/join Subscribe to the AMQuickie newsletter here: https://madmimi.com/signups/170390/join Join the Majority Report Discord! http://majoritydiscord.com/ Get all your MR merch at our store: https://shop.majorityreportradio.com/ Check out today's sponsors: sunsetlakecbd is a majority employee owned farm in Vermont, producing 100% pesticide free CBD products. Great company, great product and fans of the show! Use code Leftisbest and get 20% off at http://www.sunsetlakecbd.com. And now Sunset Lake CBD has donated $2500 to the Nurses strike fund, and we encourage MR listeners to help if they can. Here's a link to where folks can donate: https://forms.massnurses.org/we-stand-with-st-vincents-nurses/ Support the St. Vincent Nurses today! https://action.massnurses.org/we-stand-with-st-vincents-nurses/ Check out Matt's show, Left Reckoning, on Youtube, and subscribe on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/leftreckoning Subscribe to Matt's other show Literary Hangover on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/literaryhangover Check out The Nomiki Show on YouTube. https://www.patreon.com/thenomikishow Check out Matt Binder's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/mattbinder Subscribe to Brandon's show The Discourse on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/ExpandTheDiscourse Check out The Letterhack's upcoming Kickstarter project for his new graphic novel! https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/milagrocomic/milagro-heroe-de-las-calles Check out Jamie's podcast, The Antifada. https://www.patreon.com/theantifada, on iTunes, or at https://www.twitch.tv/theantifada (streaming every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday at 7pm ET!) Subscribe to Discourse Blog, a newsletter and website for progressive essays and related fun partly run by AM Quickie writer Jack Crosbie. https://discourseblog.com/ Subscribe to AM Quickie writer Corey Pein's podcast News from Nowhere. https://www.patreon.com/newsfromnowhere Follow the Majority Report crew on Twitter: @SamSeder @EmmaVigeland @MattBinder @MattLech @BF1nn @BradKAlsop Subscribe to Alex's podcast, "The Politics of Everything" here. The Majority Report with Sam Seder - https://majorityreportradio.com/
Often called the ‘new' Orange Is the New Black, Chandra Bozelko is an award-winning writer and thought leader on matters related to criminal justice reform. As a magna cum laude graduate of Princeton University who was in the middle of postgraduate study (law and public health), Chandra was an unlikely inmate. She was arrested on identity theft charges that remain on appeal, and served more than six years at the York Correctional Institution, Connecticut's only state women's prison. Chandra was the first inmate to write a regular newspaper column from behind bars which was called “Prison Diaries.” Prison Diaries is now a weekly blog of columns written by Chandra while she was still incarcerated. She also has an award-winning syndicated column called The Outlaw, which appears in over 150 daily and weekly newspapers around the country. “We're all outlaws because an outlaw simply is someone who's “excluded from the benefit or protection of the law.” She says she's here to spark transformation because “changing one person's mind is a revolution.” GUEST LINKS: WEB: http://prison-diaries.com/ COLUMN: https://www.creators.com/features/the-outlaw FB: https://www.facebook.com/chandra.bozelko IG: https://www.instagram.com/prisondiaries Twitter: https://twitter.com/chandrabozelko To find more about Jeffrey's work, go to: https://thecourageousmessenger.com/ If you like this show, please leave us a review here - even a one-sentence review helps!
Welcome to Enriched, a podcast dedicated to parents and caregivers who care about education. Today we embark on our Ivy League Admissions series, where we interview current Ivy League students and hear about their educational journeys right to the top. We start at the very beginning - those early childhood years - and hear about the pivotal experiences with family, friends, and, of course, school, that helped shaped these young people into successful young adults. Today's guest is Leyla Giordano, a “survivor” of the Trinity School, an elite prep school located on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. BUT lest you think this story is one of privilege, listen closely. Leyla talks about the elbow grease she put in to her academics, her true passion for helping children learn the Classics, and having to make sacrifices with extracurriculars to keep her head in the game. Take a listen to hear Leyla's journey and the personal qualities that shepherded her through her 12 year journey to Brown University. Want to learn more about how you can support your child during their educational journey? Consider enlisting Enrichednyc as your school consultants. Email us for more information at info@enrichednyc.com. Find out more at www.enrichednyc.com or check us out on Instagram @enrichednyc
Avoid the Fluff & Get Clients NOW!!It's easy to slide down the "rabbit hole" of doing, doing, doing. . .Doing more social postsDoing more to our graphics (or getting new headshots)Doing more edits on our websiteThere is a time and a place for those activities…But NOT if you are wondering where your next client is coming from or if you are struggling to pay the mortgage this month.After starting and scaling two successful businesses (an ISO and a beverage company) I took 5 years off, became a yoga teacher,and 100% focused on becoming a mom, finally having our baby and raising him until he went to school.One day, I bought a book off of Amazon and on the back was a website. The website had me fill out my name and email in exchange for a download that went along with the book. The next few weeks I started getting emails from a coach.This was my first foray into doing business virtually in a global economy.I started going into Facebook groups and connecting with other women business owners. Some were virtual assistants, freelance writers and many were starting their coaching businesses. I got on the phone with a few and was horrified at what I heard. They had beautiful branding and gorgeous websites but they were going out of business.I even tried to hire a few of them but they would talk and talk and talk about themselves and NEVER ask specific questions. They would drone on about what they did but NEVER establish their value. It was straight out of a sales training nightmare. They were smart and great at their work but STARVING because they were trying to live off of referrals. They believed that MORE marketing was the answer. Spoiler alert: it's not.The biggest problem I saw everyone making (those who were complaining that they had no clients or customers) was that they were doing all of the steps OUT OF ORDER.They were focusing on "getting headshots" and "branding their website" but had ZERO money coming in the front door. These were smart, highly experienced business women from ALL types of industries: Lawyers who became Life Coaches, Engineers who became Authors, Medical Doctors who became Health Coaches, Harvard Professors who became Business Coaches and Ivy Leaguers who became Email Marketers.They understood business. They were wicked smart. I kept asking myself "How were they missing this???".Then I started to realize that the online space can play on your worst fears and press on your self-doubt like no other space. With custom-made news feeds that show you exactly what you've expressed interest in, you only see your LACK and it can feel like EVERYONE else has already DONE what you are just setting out to do and ... they are doing it better (or at least it can FEEL that way).It's not your fault if you feel defeated.There is so much PRESSURE to do more, show up more, be more visible that the actual REASON you wanted to start your business in the first place can get lost. You wanted to SHARE. You wanted to SERVE. You wanted to SUPPORT. But all you are getting is exhausted trying to KEEP UP.There IS a better way.You can AVOID all of the fluff and get clients NOW. This week.I shared an example of yet another client who did it AGAIN just this PAST week. Yes, even in the midst of ALL that is going on in the world right now.This is the drum I have been beating for YEARS!!No list, no website, no problem: get clients now.Grab my free Sales training and START TODAY at www.reneehribar.co/zerotosales*********************************************Renee Hribar has been a sales professional since 1994 in New York. She has sold millions of dollars in products and services and trained thousands to sell for the first time. She is known in her industry as a fun, energetic executive sales coach who leads with heart. A TEDx speaker who offers training sessions at global conferences, boardrooms and most recently through virtual programs, she skillfully breaks down her decades of sales expertise with a flair that makes listening to her joy and if you take action, extremely profitable. With her one-of-a-kind "laugh & learn" teaching style, you will certainly walk away with a new view on the "softer side of sales". Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Ivy Leaguer gets to practice more. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/tim-huwe/support
Start of our journey! Dafan & Sue talk a little bit about their personal and professional backgrounds. Two well accomplished professionals and entrepreneurs with very humble beginnings. Psychotherapist, HBCU Entrepreneurship Professor, Attorney, Professor, Ivy Leaguer, Business Owner, Motorcycle Racer, and a baby-girl deliverer! These and more are the titles and hats they have. But they were once uneducated immigrants without much. PREVIEWWe will be launching a COWORKING SPACE, a MEDIA STUDIO and an ENTREPRENEUR INCUBATOR this spring/summer! Subscribe and stay updated to more details in the coming weeks!- Like this video for inspiration and support!- Subscribe to keep hearing our stories and our opinions on everything! (We try to do it all...)- Follow us: Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/dafanz.venture/https://www.instagram.com/4evrsue/LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/dafanzhanghttps://www.linkedin.com/in/sueellenzhangFacebookhttps://www.facebook.com/DafanProfessorZTwitterhttps://twitter.com/hightechcounselEmailspark@opbworks.com------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Music Credits––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Tropical Traveller by Del. https://soundcloud.com/del-soundCreative Commons — Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported — CC BY-SA 3.0 Free Download / Stream: http://bit.ly/2Putju2Music promoted by Audio Library https://youtu.be/wfyUZvXo7p4––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Are California Girls truly something to sing about? Is a Southern Gentleman really what you want? The Debate Team returns to Charlotte to take on all your regional biases and perceived preferences, and breaks down the truth about brainy Ivy Leaguers, farmer's daughters, southern girls, midwestern guys, rugged cowboys, nice Jewish girls, and all your other dream guys and fantasy gals! Plus - a sneak peak at what's ahead for the GLD!
Time for Fan Mail Friday, where we'll be answering your questions and dropping some knowledge and feedback to help you kick the weekend off right. Let's cut to it! In this episode: How do you deal with a toxic co-worker who happens to be related to the owner of the company? How does public speaking differ between salespeople and teachers? Listener thoughts on destigmatizing misophonia. Finding the right fit when changing jobs is always a gamble, but you always have this option. Feedback from our IRS agent friend from FMF 125: "Listening instead of thinking ahead" is a work in progress. What do you tell the family of judgmental Ivy Leaguers about the break you took from college when you were pretending to be there all along? Documentary of the Week: The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz Quick shoutouts to Ian Fischer in Senegal and Kyle Schaffer in China! Have any questions, comments, or stories you'd like to share with us? Drop us a line at friday@theartofcharm.com! Check out Jordan's (@TheArtofCharm) other show: The Forbes List, and Jason's (@jpdef) other show: Grumpy Old Geeks. Full show notes at https://theartofcharm.com/fmf129/ Find out more about the team who makes The Art of Charm podcast here! Catch season two of Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath on A&E! Does your business have an Internet presence? Now save a whopping 50% on new webhosting packages here with HostGator by using coupon code CHARM! Take the Art of Charm Challenge by clicking here, or text AOC to 38470. We'll take you step by step to becoming better at making personal and professional connections, becoming a better networker, increasing your personal social capital and charisma. This is for both men and women! HELP US SPREAD THE WORD! If you dig the show, please subscribe in iTunes and write us a review! This is what helps us stand out from the crowd and help people find the credible advice they need. Review the show in iTunes! We rely on it! http://www.theartofcharm.com/mobilereview Stay Charming!
6 AM - 1 - Michaelangelo brought in his Super Bowl Cheese Dip; Openings. 2 - ; MailBag. 3 - The News with Marshall Phillips. 4 - The 21 books every Ivy Leaguer is reading.
1 - Michaelangelo brought in his Super Bowl Cheese Dip; Openings. 2 - ; MailBag. 3 - The News with Marshall Phillips. 4 - The 21 books every Ivy Leaguer is reading.
Unbought historian F. William Engdahl visits for the first time. Brooke MacDonald of Cornerstone Capital revisits for an update. Most intellectuals are owned by the CFR or related elitist think tanks that richly reward scholars in exchange for propaganda used to brainwash the masses Bernaysian style. Bernays' idea was that to have an orderly democracy, people must all be programmed to think alike. Engdahl is one Ivy Leaguer who escaped the satanic clutches of the small ruling elite. Much like G. Edward Griffin, William provides evidence of how the elite have succeeded in destroying peace, prosperity and meritorious-based middle class success into a war mongering parasitic empire and in the process turning the world backward toward a new dark age. At the heart of this decline is dishonest money that enables the elite to clandestinely redistribute wealth from those who produce it to incestuous corporate and government partners. Time permitting M. Oliver will opine on key markets.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
