Podcast appearances and mentions of prince andrew

Ghislaine Maxwell is getting closer and closer to a jury deciding her fate. Could she have any other cards to play before that point to cut time off her what appears to be a very lengthy sentence if convicted?Join me as I dive in!To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1480243/Prince-Andrew-name-shame-Ghislaine-Maxwell-deal-paedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein

In 2019, footage allegedly capturing Jeffrey Epstein's first suicide attempt in his New York jail cell (between July 22–23) was reportedly lost or destroyed. Prosecutors later admitted that the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) “inadvertently preserved video from the wrong tier,” meaning the camera recordings outside the correct cell were never retained.  According to filings, a backup system intended to archive all Special Housing Unit video failed due to “technical errors,” and the preserved recordings showed a different section than requested, such that no footage from the immediate area outside Epstein's cell existsThe disappearance of that footage fueled intense speculation and conspiracy theories about what really happened to Epstein in jail. The loss raised questions about institutional competence and potential suppression of evidence, especially given the high-stakes nature of his case and the scrutiny it attracted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Goga Ashkenazi, the Kazakh businesswoman and socialite, is known for her close friendship with Prince Andrew. She defended him publicly when scrutiny over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein intensified, saying he was “very, very upset” by how he was being portrayed in the press. Ashkenazi insisted that while Andrew may have exercised poor judgment by associating with controversial figures, she believed he was fundamentally kind-hearted, honourable, and unaware of any illegal activity. She argued that his work as a trade envoy and his character were being unfairly overshadowed by the scandal.Their relationship has also drawn attention due to high-profile financial dealings. Ashkenazi introduced Andrew to Timur Kulibayev, a Kazakh oligarch who purchased Andrew's former home, Sunninghill Park, for £15 million — significantly above the asking price. The transaction sparked speculation about whether Ashkenazi acted as a facilitator or “fixer,” though she has denied receiving any financial benefit beyond making the introduction. The sale and her staunch defense of Andrew highlight how their friendship has been both personal and entangled in business and controversy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Watch our Juliette Bryant Podcast    • Epstein Survivor's Story & Virginia Giuffr...  Watch EPSTEIN'S BABY FARM EXPOSED BY SURVIVOR AUDRA LYNN https://youtube.com/live/uiaRPEoFEZ0 Sarah & Juliette's book is available for pre-order at TrineDay.com: https://trineday.myshopify.com/produc... Juliette on X: https://x.com/JulietteBryant BOOK LINKS: Shaun's Clinton Bush and CIA Conspiracies Book: UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07ZFXR8M5 USA: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07ZFXR8M5 Who Killed Epstein? Prince Andrew or Bill Clinton by Shaun Attwood UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B093QK1GS1 USA: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B093QK1GS1 Worldwide: https://books2read.com/u/bQjGQD All of Shaun's books on Amazon UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/stores/Shaun... All of Shaun's books on Amazon USA: https://www.amazon.com/stores/Shaun-A... Shaun Attwood's social media: TikTok:   / shaunattwood1  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/shaunattwoo... Twitter:   / shaunattwood  Facebook:   / shaunattwood1  Patreon:   / shaunattwood  Odysee: https://odysee.com/@ShaunAttwood:a #podcast #truecrime #news  #youtube  #people #uk #princeandrew #royalfamily #royal

Watch Andrew Lownie part 1 here    • King Charles' Mentor Lord Mountbatten Expo...  Watch Andrew Lownie part 2 here https://youtube.com/live/oN_ujrE8d9M BUY Andrew's book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York UK Amazon: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Entitled-Hou... For the rest of the world visit: https://amzn.to/3Hi8QYG Andrew Lownie on X: https://x.com/andrewlownie Andrew's new biography claims startling insight into the private lives of the Duke of York and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson. From relationships with women to Andrew's mysterious finances, Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, by the historian Andrew Lownie, also dives into the prince's ill-advised friendship with the disgraced US financier Jeffrey Epstein. Watch Who Is Ghislaine Maxwell? From Prince Andrew to Epstein's Baby Farm - John Sweeney - Podcast    • Who Is Ghislaine Maxwell? From Prince Andr...  Lauren on YT:    / @laurentheinsider  Lauren on Insta:   / laurenlunnfarrow  Lauren on X https://x.com/laurenKLfarrow All of Shaun's books on Amazon UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/stores/Shaun... All of Shaun's books on Amazon USA: https://www.amazon.com/stores/Shaun-A... BOOK LINKS: Who Killed Epstein? Prince Andrew or Bill Clinton by Shaun Attwood UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B093QK1GS1 USA: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B093QK1GS1 Worldwide: https://books2read.com/u/bQjGQD Shaun Attwood's social media: TikTok:   / shaunattwood1  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/shaunattwoo... Twitter:   / shaunattwood  Facebook:   / shaunattwood1  Patreon:   / shaunattwood  Odysee: https://odysee.com/@ShaunAttwood:a #podcast #truecrime #news  #youtube  #people #uk #princeandrew #royalfamily #royal #australia

One of Australia's most iconic couples have called it quits. We are of course talking about Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban. Holly sits down with Amelia and Jessie to unpack what we know and to decode what's fact, what's fiction and what's plain ol' scurrilous gossip. Plus, when was the last time you changed your makeup routine? If it's been a hot minute, it's highly likely you're doing it all wrong. Amelia talks us through the latest TikTok tips that may turn everything you thought you knew about makeup upside down. And, why everybody needs to climb 'Cringe Mountain' to get to the sunny land of 'cool'. But why do some generations find it harder than others? Support independent women's media What To Listen To Next: Listen to our latest episode: An Emergency Meeting About Nicole & Keith Listen: Vanessa Amorosi, Emma Watson & The Problem When Kids Earn More Than Their Parents Listen: Victoria Beckham’s Version & Jessie’s Very Big News Listen: “Tough It Out”. The Announcement That Upset Us More Than We Expected Listen: Everything You Need To Know About Writing A Book, With Holly & Jessie Listen: The Jimmy Kimmel Fallout & The Internet’s Biggest Cheating Scandal Listen:The Questionable Brilliance Of The 'Lemon Law' Listen: Every Thought We Had After Watching Netflix's 'Unknown Number' Listen to Parenting Out Loud: Stealth Mums, The Roblox Controversy & A Tiny Internet Feud Connect your subscription to Apple Podcasts Discover more Mamamia Podcasts here Watch Mamamia Out Loud: Mamamia Out Loud on YouTube What to read: Nicole Kidman just filed for divorce from Keith Urban. This is what we know. OPINION: 'Everyone's saying the same thing about Nicole and Keith's divorce. They're wrong.' Two daughters and a rehab stint: A look back at Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban's 19-year marriage. There's still an insatiable interest in Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman's divorce. This story proves it. 'I’m an over-50s beauty writer. I use these 6 glowy products when I don’t feel like a full face of makeup.' The only makeup products you need after 40, according to beauty experts. THE END BITS: Check out our merch at MamamiaOutLoud.com Mamamia studios are styled with furniture from Fenton and Fenton GET IN TOUCH: Feedback? We’re listening. Send us an email at outloud@mamamia.com.au Share your story, feedback, or dilemma! Send us a voice message. Join our Facebook group Mamamia Outlouders to talk about the show. Follow us on Instagram @mamamiaoutloud and on Tiktok @mamamiaoutloud Mamamia acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the Land we have recorded this podcast on, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present, and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures. Become a Mamamia subscriber: https://www.mamamia.com.au/subscribeSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jeffrey Epstein was effectively let off the hook in New Mexico, where he owned the sprawling Zorro Ranch outside Santa Fe. Despite allegations from survivors that abuse took place there, he was never indicted in the state, and authorities never conducted a raid on the property like they did at his Manhattan townhouse or Virgin Islands estate. What made matters worse was that New Mexico's weak sex-offender registration laws meant Epstein didn't even have to register there after his 2008 Florida conviction. That loophole gave him the freedom to move in and out of the state largely unnoticed, shielded from the kind of scrutiny that should have followed him everywhere.The New Mexico Attorney General's office did open inquiries and even pushed to cancel questionable state land leases Epstein had secured for the ranch, but these efforts never translated into criminal charges. Instead, the combination of statutory gaps, lack of enforcement, and jurisdictional hesitation allowed Epstein to keep operating freely in the state. The failure to act decisively in New Mexico has since become a glaring example of how systemic loopholes and institutional inaction enabled Epstein to escape accountability and continue abusing his power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

At the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, the impact statements read by her victims painted a stark portrait of lifelong harm, trauma, and betrayal. They described how Maxwell's grooming and facilitation of abuse destroyed their trust in their own judgment, left them wracked with shame and guilt, and haunted them with nightmares, panic attacks, and suicidal thoughts. One victim spoke of how Maxwell “lulled” her into a false sense of safety before abuse, triggering waves of shame and anxiety for decades; others recounted how their lives were derailed, their sense of safety permanently shattered, and their voices suppressed over years of silence.The lawsuit by Epstein survivors against the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) originated from the territory's own legal efforts to hold accountable those who allegedly enabled Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise there. In January 2020, the USVI's then–Attorney General, Denise George, filed suit in the Virgin Islands Superior Court, accusing Epstein, his estate, and related entities of operating a decades-long sex trafficking conspiracy on his private islands, using a network of shell companies and concealing crimes through financial and legal maneuvers.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Bill Clinton's relationship with the Fanjul brothers—sugar barons from Florida and one of the wealthiest and most politically connected families in America—has long been a matter of public scrutiny. The Fanjuls, Alfonso and José “Pepe” Fanjul, built a sugar empire worth billions, aided in large part by U.S. government subsidies and favorable trade policies. Clinton, during his presidency, was known to have cultivated ties with the brothers, reportedly even taking phone calls from Alfonso Fanjul while in the Oval Office. This relationship raised eyebrows because the Fanjuls were major political donors and lobbyists for the sugar industry, one of the most protected and subsidized sectors in the U.S. economy, despite persistent criticism about labor practices, environmental damage in the Everglades, and anticompetitive monopolistic power.Steve Scully, a former telecommunications contractor who worked extensively on Little Saint James, claimed in the Netflix documentary Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich that he saw Bill Clinton sitting alone with Epstein on the porch of the island's main house. Scully, who said he had been to the island over a hundred times between 1999 and 2005, insisted there were no other guests present during that moment. His account added fuel to speculation about the former president's connections to Epstein and the time he may have spent on the island.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Epstein scandal exposed how deep corruption runs, but higher academia mostly slipped away untouched. Despite Epstein having offices at Harvard, donations to MIT, and close ties with professors, universities escaped the same scrutiny that crushed others. They played dumb, claimed ignorance, and hid behind words like “research” while pocketing predator money. Meanwhile, they still preach ethics and morality to the rest of us, acting like they're society's conscience while proving they'll side with cash over principle every single time.For working-class folks, the double standard is glaring. Ordinary people get hammered for the smallest mistakes, while billion-dollar institutions with political connections remain untouchable. Justice isn't blind; it looks straight at the bank account before moving. The universities knew what they were doing, yet faced no real punishment. Until someone has the guts to drag academia into the same light as everyone else, it's on us to keep the pressure on, to not forget, and to make sure their role in this rotten system never gets buried.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Harvard might get most of the heat for cozying up to Jeffrey Epstein, but the truth is they weren't the only ones. Yale and other elite universities had no problem taking his money either, despite his reputation being no secret. These schools, the so-called moral authorities of the nation, were happy to look the other way because Epstein gave them access to wealth, prestige, and connections they craved. They didn't care about ethics or victims—they cared about the checks clearing and the glow of being tied to “high society.” They polished up his image, let him act like a respected patron of science and learning, and in doing so, helped him regain legitimacy after his first arrest.Now they play dumb, acting shocked and appalled, pretending they didn't know who he was. But it's a performance. These universities weren't fooled—they were complicit. Harvard, Yale, Princeton, all of them chased Epstein's money, banking on silence and prestige to protect them. And the worst part is, they only “review” donor policies after they've been caught, not when it mattered. The mask is off now, and the hypocrisy of the Ivy League is plain as day: they weren't just negligent, they were partners in giving Epstein cover.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein's 2003 birthday album signed by three former Yale professors - Yale Daily News

Bill Barr's deposition before Congress on Jeffrey Epstein was a masterclass in calculated deflection. While Barr insisted that Epstein's death was “absolutely” suicide, he conceded that the prison surveillance system had “blind spots”—a detail that conveniently leaves just enough room for speculation without providing definitive answers. His reliance on flawed or incomplete camera footage, combined with his dismissal of alternative forensic perspectives, came off less like transparency and more like institutional damage control. Instead of holding the Bureau of Prisons accountable, Barr's narrative positioned the failures as unfortunate but inconsequential, a stance that fails to satisfy the public demand for clarity.Just as troubling was Barr's evasiveness when pressed about Donald Trump's knowledge of Epstein. He admitted to having spoken with Trump about Epstein's death but couldn't recall when one of those conversations occurred—an astonishing lapse considering the gravity of the matter. His reasoning that “if there were more to it, it would have leaked” was not only flippant but dismissive of the very real history of suppression, obstruction, and selective disclosure that has defined the Epstein saga. By leaning on institutional trust in a case defined by betrayal of that very trust, Barr's testimony did little more than reinforce suspicions that the Department of Justice has long been more concerned with containment than accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Barr-Transcript.pdf

Bill Barr's deposition before Congress on Jeffrey Epstein was a masterclass in calculated deflection. While Barr insisted that Epstein's death was “absolutely” suicide, he conceded that the prison surveillance system had “blind spots”—a detail that conveniently leaves just enough room for speculation without providing definitive answers. His reliance on flawed or incomplete camera footage, combined with his dismissal of alternative forensic perspectives, came off less like transparency and more like institutional damage control. Instead of holding the Bureau of Prisons accountable, Barr's narrative positioned the failures as unfortunate but inconsequential, a stance that fails to satisfy the public demand for clarity.Just as troubling was Barr's evasiveness when pressed about Donald Trump's knowledge of Epstein. He admitted to having spoken with Trump about Epstein's death but couldn't recall when one of those conversations occurred—an astonishing lapse considering the gravity of the matter. His reasoning that “if there were more to it, it would have leaked” was not only flippant but dismissive of the very real history of suppression, obstruction, and selective disclosure that has defined the Epstein saga. By leaning on institutional trust in a case defined by betrayal of that very trust, Barr's testimony did little more than reinforce suspicions that the Department of Justice has long been more concerned with containment than accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Barr-Transcript.pdf

Newly surfaced Bloomberg-obtained emails show that Jeffrey Epstein maintained close contact with several Harvard professors after his 2006 indictment for soliciting prostitution. Faculty like Stephen Kosslyn, Howard Gardner, and Mark Tramo corresponded with him about dinners, research funding, and even offered encouragement after his guilty plea. Kosslyn arranged meetings with Harvard scholars, Gardner sent him book lists and advice, and Tramo wrote messages of solidarity. Emails also revealed discussions about Epstein funding projects like a “pleasure genome initiative” and Harvard's Personal Genome Project.The revelations underscore how deeply Epstein was embedded in Harvard's academic network. He had already donated at least $9.1 million to Harvard programs and cultivated personal ties with influential figures, including former deans and prominent professors. The emails show professors turning to him as a financial “patron,” while others like Alan Dershowitz defended his character in messages. Though many now claim ignorance of his crimes, the correspondence paints a damning picture of how Epstein's money and influence bought him legitimacy inside one of the world's most prestigious universities.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein's Emails Reveal Close Correspondence With Harvard Professors, Bloomberg Reports | News | The Harvard Crimson

As we learn more about Prince Andrew and the struggle behind the scenes with the royal family, one thing has become very apparent. Charles and William have now taken control of the situation and have made it clear that Andrew has no part in the future of the royal family. (commercial at 9:07)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10929427/Prince-Andrew-misses-Ascot-giving-Royals-hope-stepping-away-public-life.html

In lawsuits filed beginning in 2022–2023, the central allegation is that Leon Black sexually assaulted a then-teenage girl inside Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan townhouse in 2002. The plaintiff, referred to as “Jane Doe,” claims she was trafficked by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell—and that Epstein directed her to provide Black with a “massage” that escalated into rape in a third-floor massage room. She further contends she was autistic and born with Mosaic Down Syndrome, vulnerabilities that the complaint says were exploited; she alleges Black used force, sex toys, and violence, inflicting physical injuries and psychological trauma.Black's legal team forcefully denies the accusations, calling them baseless and “frivolous.” He has sought to dismiss the case on procedural grounds, challenging the statute of limitations, the revival of old claims under New York law, and jurisdictional issues. A federal judge declined to dismiss one version of the claim, ruling that the victim's pleading under New York City's Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Law could proceed, while other lawsuits—such as one by Cheri Pierson making similar claims—have been withdrawn or dismissed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Prince Andrew is still under the impression, according to reports, that he might have a pathway back to civil society. Unfortunately for him, this is not a reality. Prince Andrew might as well accept the fact that his days of being swooned over are finished and that he will spend the rest of his life in shame.To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.tatler.com/article/the-uneasy-reality-of-prince-andrews-grand-exile

Jes Staley, the former JPMorgan Chase executive and later CEO of Barclays, has been deeply entangled in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal due to his long personal and professional relationship with the disgraced financier. Court filings and released communications show Staley exchanged more than a thousand emails with Epstein between 2008 and 2012—many sent after Epstein's conviction for sex crimes. These emails included references to young women, cryptic language, and even visits to Epstein's residences, fueling suspicion about Staley's awareness of and proximity to Epstein's trafficking activities. The U.S. Virgin Islands and Epstein's survivors have both pointed to Staley as a key JPMorgan figure who allegedly enabled Epstein to maintain banking access, despite his notoriety.The fallout for Staley has been significant. In 2021, he abruptly resigned as Barclays' CEO amid ongoing regulatory probes into the extent of his ties to Epstein. JPMorgan itself has faced billion-dollar lawsuits over its Epstein connections, with Staley frequently cited as a central figure in decisions to retain Epstein as a client. Allegations suggest he provided cover and access that allowed Epstein to continue exploiting financial networks after his conviction. Though Staley denies knowledge of Epstein's crimes, the legal and reputational damage has been severe, leaving him portrayed as one of the highest-profile executives caught in the web of Epstein's influence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The official narrative states that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide in August 2019, with the New York City Medical Examiner citing hanging as the cause of death. Authorities pointed to Epstein's earlier suicide attempt, his looming trial, and his isolation as supporting factors. Surveillance footage, though partially compromised, showed no outsiders entering the secure unit where Epstein was housed. The Department of Justice and FBI ultimately concluded there was no evidence of criminal activity, framing Epstein's death as the result of personal despair combined with catastrophic lapses in prison oversight.Yet, a powerful counter-narrative argues Epstein was murdered. Forensic anomalies, including neck fractures more common in strangulation than hanging, drew expert skepticism. Security protocols collapsed simultaneously: guards failed to check on him, cameras malfunctioned, his cellmate was removed, and excess bedding provided the means for ligatures. Combined with Epstein's alleged fears for his life, his ties to powerful figures, and the explosive release of documents naming high-profile associates just a day earlier, many see his death as too convenient to be coincidence. These factors have left the public divided, with compelling reasons to doubt the official suicide conclusion and to suspect Epstein's demise was the result of foul play.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Streaming services played an outsized role in rekindling public interest and scrutiny in the Jeffrey Epstein case by making documentaries about his life, network, and crimes widely accessible. Projects like Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich on Netflix showcased survivors' stories alongside investigative reporting, exposing the broader systems of power and complicity that helped shield Epstein from accountability.  Other streaming platforms similarly offered exposés—such as Who Killed Jeffrey Epstein? on Hulu and Prince Andrew, Maxwell & Epstein on Discovery+/Prime Video—which helped sustain media momentum, push archival material into public view, and keep pressure on law enforcement and institutions tied to Epstein.The cultural influence of these streaming documentaries also amplified the voices of survivors and shifted public discourse, creating renewed demand for transparency and legal accountability. For example, Surviving Jeffrey Epstein on Lifetime reportedly triggered a 34 % jump in calls to a U.S. sexual‐assault hotline, showing how media exposure mobilized public attention to issues of sexual abuse and institutional failure.   In many ways, streaming allowed the Epstein story to transcend news cycles—embedding it into ongoing popular awareness and pressuring institutions and legal actors to respond more aggressively.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In December 2010, Prince Andrew was photographed taking a casual stroll through New York's Central Park alongside Jeffrey Epstein—just days after Epstein had completed a 13-month jail sentence for soliciting sex from a minor. The image, captured by a paparazzo and later published globally, showed the Duke of York walking shoulder-to-shoulder with a convicted sex offender, deep in conversation. The timing of the meeting and the relaxed nature of their interaction sent shockwaves through Buckingham Palace and ignited a public firestorm, as it contradicted any attempt to downplay the depth of Andrew's relationship with Epstein. Far from a mere social encounter, this post-prison rendezvous strongly implied that Andrew maintained ties with Epstein even after his crimes were widely known.The photograph became a defining symbol of the scandal surrounding Prince Andrew, undercutting any narrative that he had distanced himself from Epstein after the latter's conviction. The optics were damning: a senior member of the British royal family publicly associating with a man now globally recognized as a serial predator. What made it even more damaging was that the meeting wasn't a brief, unavoidable encounter—it reportedly took place over several days, during a stay at Epstein's $77 million Manhattan townhouse. That visit, combined with the Central Park stroll, cemented suspicions that Andrew either underestimated the gravity of Epstein's crimes or simply didn't care, both of which would later contribute to his disastrous BBC Newsnight interview and eventual withdrawal from royal duties.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/jeffrey-epstein-wanted-park-pic-28051494Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein's relationship with Les Wexner, the longtime CEO of L Brands and the architect of Victoria's Secret's rise, was a slow-acting poison that ultimately helped unravel both the man and the brand. Epstein gained extraordinary control over Wexner's finances in the 1990s, wielding power that allowed him to cultivate influence far beyond what his background should have permitted. By embedding himself so deeply in Wexner's inner circle and finances, Epstein's presence tainted Wexner's empire. When Epstein's predatory behavior and sex trafficking network came to light, questions inevitably turned to how he had managed to accumulate such wealth and power. Wexner's long-standing ties to him made it impossible to avoid scrutiny, and the public began to see Victoria's Secret not only as a lingerie company but as part of a much darker web of manipulation and exploitation.The damage didn't stop at Wexner's personal reputation. Victoria's Secret, once a symbol of glamour and unattainable beauty standards, began to collapse under mounting scandals and changing cultural tides. Epstein's alleged use of Victoria's Secret branding to lure and groom young women into his orbit cast an especially damning shadow over the company. As survivors and investigators pointed out these links, the brand's image of empowerment and fantasy shattered, accelerating its decline in an already shifting retail landscape. Wexner ultimately stepped down from L Brands, leaving behind a legacy forever stained by his association with Epstein. The downfall of both the mogul and his lingerie empire was not simply about changing tastes—it was about exposure, complicity, and the corrosive impact of having Epstein at the center of power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein's relationship with Les Wexner, the longtime CEO of L Brands and the architect of Victoria's Secret's rise, was a slow-acting poison that ultimately helped unravel both the man and the brand. Epstein gained extraordinary control over Wexner's finances in the 1990s, wielding power that allowed him to cultivate influence far beyond what his background should have permitted. By embedding himself so deeply in Wexner's inner circle and finances, Epstein's presence tainted Wexner's empire. When Epstein's predatory behavior and sex trafficking network came to light, questions inevitably turned to how he had managed to accumulate such wealth and power. Wexner's long-standing ties to him made it impossible to avoid scrutiny, and the public began to see Victoria's Secret not only as a lingerie company but as part of a much darker web of manipulation and exploitation.The damage didn't stop at Wexner's personal reputation. Victoria's Secret, once a symbol of glamour and unattainable beauty standards, began to collapse under mounting scandals and changing cultural tides. Epstein's alleged use of Victoria's Secret branding to lure and groom young women into his orbit cast an especially damning shadow over the company. As survivors and investigators pointed out these links, the brand's image of empowerment and fantasy shattered, accelerating its decline in an already shifting retail landscape. Wexner ultimately stepped down from L Brands, leaving behind a legacy forever stained by his association with Epstein. The downfall of both the mogul and his lingerie empire was not simply about changing tastes—it was about exposure, complicity, and the corrosive impact of having Epstein at the center of power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein's relationship with Les Wexner, the longtime CEO of L Brands and the architect of Victoria's Secret's rise, was a slow-acting poison that ultimately helped unravel both the man and the brand. Epstein gained extraordinary control over Wexner's finances in the 1990s, wielding power that allowed him to cultivate influence far beyond what his background should have permitted. By embedding himself so deeply in Wexner's inner circle and finances, Epstein's presence tainted Wexner's empire. When Epstein's predatory behavior and sex trafficking network came to light, questions inevitably turned to how he had managed to accumulate such wealth and power. Wexner's long-standing ties to him made it impossible to avoid scrutiny, and the public began to see Victoria's Secret not only as a lingerie company but as part of a much darker web of manipulation and exploitation.The damage didn't stop at Wexner's personal reputation. Victoria's Secret, once a symbol of glamour and unattainable beauty standards, began to collapse under mounting scandals and changing cultural tides. Epstein's alleged use of Victoria's Secret branding to lure and groom young women into his orbit cast an especially damning shadow over the company. As survivors and investigators pointed out these links, the brand's image of empowerment and fantasy shattered, accelerating its decline in an already shifting retail landscape. Wexner ultimately stepped down from L Brands, leaving behind a legacy forever stained by his association with Epstein. The downfall of both the mogul and his lingerie empire was not simply about changing tastes—it was about exposure, complicity, and the corrosive impact of having Epstein at the center of power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a recent interview on the podcast Pod Force One, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick described Jeffrey Epstein as “the greatest blackmailer ever,” basing this claim largely on his personal observations from when he lived next to Epstein. He says Epstein showed him and his wife the “massage room” inside his townhouse, claiming he got massages “every day” — a detail Lutnick interpreted as suggestive of a blackmail mechanism involving filmed encounters. He further speculated that Epstein may have traded such footage with authorities or influential individuals to secure lenient legal outcomes, pointing to Epstein's unusually favorable plea deal in 2008 as possible evidence of bargaining with powerful figures.Lutnick also implicated Epstein's high-profile associates, suggesting they either participated in or turned a blind eye to the alleged blackmail scheme. He asserted that Epstein's modus operandi involved offering massages that he assumed were videotaped, and that these recordings could have been used as leverage against elites.   At the same time, Lutnick acknowledges he has no direct proof of such extortion, framing much of his claim as assumption grounded in his own impressions and suspicions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Exclusive | Howard Lutnick calls ex-neighbor Jeffrey Epstein 'greatest blackmailer ever'Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Wall Street Journal has uncovered that Epstein maintained accounts with more than 20 banks even in the years leading up to his 2019 death—among them, Wells Fargo, TD Bank, and FirstBank Puerto Rico. The documents show Epstein moved at least $60 million into Honeycomb Partners, received $13.5 million from a hedge fund tied to Paul Tudor Jones, and sold $15 million in private company shares to a crypto investor, among other large transactions. Although major banks like JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank say they cut ties (JPMorgan in 2013; Deutsche Bank in 2018), the Journal's reporting suggests their associations with Epstein ran deeper than previously disclosed.Beyond banks, the reporting points to a broader financial network: hedge funds, private equity, venture capital firms, and prominent individuals who moved money to or from Epstein‐controlled entities. Previously unknown payments also emerged: $1 million to Joi Ito, $85,000 to Alan Dershowitz, $250,000 to Terje Rod-Larsen, and reimbursements to former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers (about $1,232.25). In response, legislators are now pushing for hearings—ten Democratic senators recently urged JPMorgan executives and others to testify under oath about their knowledge of Epstein and any “ignored warnings.”to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:The Wall Street Firms That Kept Ties With Jeffrey Epstein Until the EndBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The official narrative states that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide in August 2019, with the New York City Medical Examiner citing hanging as the cause of death. Authorities pointed to Epstein's earlier suicide attempt, his looming trial, and his isolation as supporting factors. Surveillance footage, though partially compromised, showed no outsiders entering the secure unit where Epstein was housed. The Department of Justice and FBI ultimately concluded there was no evidence of criminal activity, framing Epstein's death as the result of personal despair combined with catastrophic lapses in prison oversight.Yet, a powerful counter-narrative argues Epstein was murdered. Forensic anomalies, including neck fractures more common in strangulation than hanging, drew expert skepticism. Security protocols collapsed simultaneously: guards failed to check on him, cameras malfunctioned, his cellmate was removed, and excess bedding provided the means for ligatures. Combined with Epstein's alleged fears for his life, his ties to powerful figures, and the explosive release of documents naming high-profile associates just a day earlier, many see his death as too convenient to be coincidence. These factors have left the public divided, with compelling reasons to doubt the official suicide conclusion and to suspect Epstein's demise was the result of foul play.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Harvard might get most of the heat for cozying up to Jeffrey Epstein, but the truth is they weren't the only ones. Yale and other elite universities had no problem taking his money either, despite his reputation being no secret. These schools, the so-called moral authorities of the nation, were happy to look the other way because Epstein gave them access to wealth, prestige, and connections they craved. They didn't care about ethics or victims—they cared about the checks clearing and the glow of being tied to “high society.” They polished up his image, let him act like a respected patron of science and learning, and in doing so, helped him regain legitimacy after his first arrest.Now they play dumb, acting shocked and appalled, pretending they didn't know who he was. But it's a performance. These universities weren't fooled—they were complicit. Harvard, Yale, Princeton, all of them chased Epstein's money, banking on silence and prestige to protect them. And the worst part is, they only “review” donor policies after they've been caught, not when it mattered. The mask is off now, and the hypocrisy of the Ivy League is plain as day: they weren't just negligent, they were partners in giving Epstein cover.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein's 2003 birthday album signed by three former Yale professors - Yale Daily NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

 It may be the end of Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson's public presence within the royal family, as King Charles reportedly has made the decision to keep both the Duke and Duchess of York at “arm's length” following the emergence of emails suggesting that Sarah Ferguson maintained contact with Epstein long after publicly disavowing him in 2011. While Andrew's own connection to the disgraced financier has long dogged the monarchy, this new detail has reignited scrutiny.

Bill Clinton's relationship with the Fanjul brothers—sugar barons from Florida and one of the wealthiest and most politically connected families in America—has long been a matter of public scrutiny. The Fanjuls, Alfonso and José “Pepe” Fanjul, built a sugar empire worth billions, aided in large part by U.S. government subsidies and favorable trade policies. Clinton, during his presidency, was known to have cultivated ties with the brothers, reportedly even taking phone calls from Alfonso Fanjul while in the Oval Office. This relationship raised eyebrows because the Fanjuls were major political donors and lobbyists for the sugar industry, one of the most protected and subsidized sectors in the U.S. economy, despite persistent criticism about labor practices, environmental damage in the Everglades, and anticompetitive monopolistic power.Steve Scully, a former telecommunications contractor who worked extensively on Little Saint James, claimed in the Netflix documentary Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich that he saw Bill Clinton sitting alone with Epstein on the porch of the island's main house. Scully, who said he had been to the island over a hundred times between 1999 and 2005, insisted there were no other guests present during that moment. His account added fuel to speculation about the former president's connections to Epstein and the time he may have spent on the island.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Epstein scandal exposed how deep corruption runs, but higher academia mostly slipped away untouched. Despite Epstein having offices at Harvard, donations to MIT, and close ties with professors, universities escaped the same scrutiny that crushed others. They played dumb, claimed ignorance, and hid behind words like “research” while pocketing predator money. Meanwhile, they still preach ethics and morality to the rest of us, acting like they're society's conscience while proving they'll side with cash over principle every single time.For working-class folks, the double standard is glaring. Ordinary people get hammered for the smallest mistakes, while billion-dollar institutions with political connections remain untouchable. Justice isn't blind; it looks straight at the bank account before moving. The universities knew what they were doing, yet faced no real punishment. Until someone has the guts to drag academia into the same light as everyone else, it's on us to keep the pressure on, to not forget, and to make sure their role in this rotten system never gets buried.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

After revelations surfaced of his close ties and supportive messages to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Lord Peter Mandelson was dismissed as the UK's ambassador to the United States by Prime Minister Keir Starmer. However, despite being “removed with immediate effect,” reports indicate that the government has not yet formally severed his employment status. As a result, he remains on the payroll and is said to be eligible for compensation, possibly a six-figure package, pending legal or contractual settlement.Separately, the advisory firm Global Counsel, which Mandelson co-founded, has moved to strip him of voting rights and dividends tied to his 21 % stake in the firm, effectively cutting off his financial benefits while it seeks to divest his holdings entirely. While public attention has focused on whether the state will continue paying him, significant steps have already been taken internally to limit his income streams from his private ventures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource: Lord Mandelson is STILL being paid his six-figure salary despite being sacked as Britain's US Ambassador more than two weeks ago | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson have found themselves scratched off the guest list for this year's royal family Christmas at Sandringham, and the reason isn't exactly a mystery. Andrew's ties to Jeffrey Epstein continue to poison whatever's left of his reputation, and the royal household clearly doesn't want that shadow hanging over their holiday gathering. Even though Sarah isn't directly connected to the scandal, her long-running closeness with Andrew—still living together, still tied at the hip—makes her guilty by association in the court of public perception. The message is plain enough: they're not welcome, because their presence would remind the world of a scandal the monarchy would rather bury under the rug.For Andrew, it's another step in his slow-motion exile. He's already been stripped of titles, sidelined from public life, and reduced to a background figure who occasionally pops up to embarrassment. Now, even the family dinner table is out of reach. Ferguson, despite her own efforts to stay in the public's good graces, is paying the price for her connection to him. To be told “don't come to Christmas” by your own family says everything about how far Andrew has fallen—and how desperate the royals are to keep him, and anyone standing next to him, out of sight during their most visible traditions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Harvard might get most of the heat for cozying up to Jeffrey Epstein, but the truth is they weren't the only ones. Yale and other elite universities had no problem taking his money either, despite his reputation being no secret. These schools, the so-called moral authorities of the nation, were happy to look the other way because Epstein gave them access to wealth, prestige, and connections they craved. They didn't care about ethics or victims—they cared about the checks clearing and the glow of being tied to “high society.” They polished up his image, let him act like a respected patron of science and learning, and in doing so, helped him regain legitimacy after his first arrest.Now they play dumb, acting shocked and appalled, pretending they didn't know who he was. But it's a performance. These universities weren't fooled—they were complicit. Harvard, Yale, Princeton, all of them chased Epstein's money, banking on silence and prestige to protect them. And the worst part is, they only “review” donor policies after they've been caught, not when it mattered. The mask is off now, and the hypocrisy of the Ivy League is plain as day: they weren't just negligent, they were partners in giving Epstein cover.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein's 2003 birthday album signed by three former Yale professors - Yale Daily NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bill Barr's deposition before Congress on Jeffrey Epstein was a masterclass in calculated deflection. While Barr insisted that Epstein's death was “absolutely” suicide, he conceded that the prison surveillance system had “blind spots”—a detail that conveniently leaves just enough room for speculation without providing definitive answers. His reliance on flawed or incomplete camera footage, combined with his dismissal of alternative forensic perspectives, came off less like transparency and more like institutional damage control. Instead of holding the Bureau of Prisons accountable, Barr's narrative positioned the failures as unfortunate but inconsequential, a stance that fails to satisfy the public demand for clarity.Just as troubling was Barr's evasiveness when pressed about Donald Trump's knowledge of Epstein. He admitted to having spoken with Trump about Epstein's death but couldn't recall when one of those conversations occurred—an astonishing lapse considering the gravity of the matter. His reasoning that “if there were more to it, it would have leaked” was not only flippant but dismissive of the very real history of suppression, obstruction, and selective disclosure that has defined the Epstein saga. By leaning on institutional trust in a case defined by betrayal of that very trust, Barr's testimony did little more than reinforce suspicions that the Department of Justice has long been more concerned with containment than accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Barr-Transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

BAD THIELOGY - 09.29.2025 - #880 Take the Survey: https://tiny.cc/cc880 BestPodcastintheMetaverse.com Canary Cry News Talk #880 - 09.29.2025 - Recorded Live to 1s and 0s Deconstructing World Events from a Biblical Worldview Declaring Jesus as Lord amidst the Fifth Generation War! CageRattlerCoffee.com SD/TC email Ike for discount https://CanaryCry.Support   Send address and shirt size updates to canarycrysupplydrop@gmail.com   Join the Canary Cry Roundtable This Episode was Produced By:   Executive Producers Dame Sarah of the Shadows*** Sir LX Protocol V2 Baron of the Berrean Protocol*** Gingah*** Sir Jamey Not the Lanister*** Ostrichbutter***   Producers of TREASURE (CanaryCry.Support) Robert S, Sir Kullen Anderson Hobo of the America's, Cage Rattler Coffee, Sir Darrin Knight of the Hungry Panda's, Dame Frogge, Malik   Producers of TIME Timestampers: Jade Bouncerson, Morgan E Clankoniphius Links: JAM   GUN CONTROL (mention) 4:08 What we know about the Michigan church shooting and fire that killed 4 people (NBC News) → rolling updates   BUILD BACK BETTER 15:17 us news: More than 100,000 federal workers to quit; US set for largest mass resignation in history - The Economic Times Video | ET Now   BEAST SYSTEM/THIEL 24:33 Peter Thiel wants everyone to think more about the antichrist (WSJ) Notes: Daniel 8:23–25, Daniel 11:36–37, 1 John 2:18, 2 John 1:7   EPSTEIN/ELON 1:30:50 Elon Musk and Prince Andrew named in latest Epstein files release (SkyNews) → Elon Response → Elon retweeting Erika Kirk “go to church” (X)    ADL labels Christian Identity as hate (X)   TRUMP/ISRAEL 1:40:15 Netanyahu vows to ‘finish job' in Gaza during UN speech as delegates walk out (Guardian) → Trump's 21-point plan to end the Gaza war and how it could unravel (Telegraph)   NEPHILIM UPDATE 1:56:24 Seven deadly sins wiki, character of Nephilim (wiki)   EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS 2:06:45 TALENT/TIME END 2:33:20

While Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban’s separation has stunned fans, the chatter linking Tom Cruise to the split is pure fantasy. Jay-Z personally fought for Bad Bunny to headline halftime, pushing the NFL to embrace diversity in its biggest spotlight. Prince William has finally won the family war, convincing King Charles to permanently sideline Prince Andrew from all public-facing royal duties. Don't forget to vote in today's poll on Twitter at @naughtynicerob or in our Facebook group. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Rumors that Robert Maxwell bankrolled Jeffrey Epstein have been circulating for decades, not just in fringe corners but among journalists, investigators, and intelligence veterans who find Epstein's rise too abrupt and too secretive to be explained by normal finance. Epstein's jump from a failed high-school teacher to a Bear Stearns trader with instant entrée to billionaires has long looked like a manufactured career rather than a natural one. That's where Maxwell enters the picture: a man who himself plundered pension funds, operated in and around intelligence services, and maintained a global network of fixers and financiers. People close to the Epstein story, including Julie K. Brown, have acknowledged the plausibility of such a connection precisely because Maxwell had both the resources and the covert reach to set someone like Epstein up as a front. This theory is attractive because it connects two figures who both thrived in the same murky world of secret deals, intelligence ties, and shadow wealth.What remains unknown is not the plausibility but the paper trail. No bank records, verified wire transfers, or sworn testimony have surfaced that explicitly show Maxwell funding Epstein's early career. That doesn't erase the pattern; it highlights how carefully such an arrangement, if it existed, would have been hidden. The absence of a smoking gun does not make the suspicion baseless — it reflects the very nature of covert patronage. In this light, the rumors about Maxwell's money fueling Epstein's rise are not some idle conspiracy—they're a working hypothesis about how Epstein's wealth materialized and why it remains so difficult to trace.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Deutsche Bank became Jeffrey Epstein's financial sanctuary after JPMorgan dropped him in 2013. Despite Epstein's 2008 conviction and reputation as a sex offender, Deutsche's private-banking division eagerly onboarded him, chasing the fees his wealth could generate. Over the next five years, the bank processed a staggering volume of transactions that screamed red flags: hundreds of thousands of dollars routed to women with Eastern European surnames, large cash withdrawals structured below reporting thresholds, and steady payments to co-conspirators like Ghislaine Maxwell. Internal compliance staff repeatedly raised concerns, but senior executives pushed them aside. The result was predictable: Epstein's abuse network kept running smoothly, in part because Deutsche's systems let him move money as if he were any other wealthy client. Regulators later blasted the bank for these “serious compliance failures,” and Deutsche paid $150 million in fines and a $75 million civil settlement with survivors who accused the bank of enabling Epstein's trafficking empire.Separately, Deutsche Bank has faced a string of law enforcement raids at its offices in Frankfurt, largely tied to money-laundering probes and tax-evasion scandals, not Epstein. German prosecutors stormed its headquarters in November 2018 during the Panama Papers fallout, investigating billions laundered through offshore accounts. Another raid followed in 2019 tied to Danske Bank's $200 billion money-laundering scandal. These raids hammered home Deutsche's reputation as a bank of choice for criminals, oligarchs, and shadow networks. The fact that Epstein was comfortably housed within its client roster during the same era only makes the picture darker: a bank repeatedly caught facilitating dirty money was also the place where Epstein found a financial home. The raid stories underline a systemic truth — Deutsche wasn't just careless, it was a repeat offender in global financial crime, and Epstein's presence there was symptomatic of a much larger problem.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Lady Victoria Hervey has voiced deep skepticism about the Maxwell trial and its fallout, framing Maxwell not solely as a villain but also as a victim turned scapegoat. She's claimed publicly that Maxwell used people—including Hervey herself—as “bait” to further Epstein's operations, suggesting Hervey was “naïve” and manipulated in those circles. Simultaneously, Hervey has cast doubt on the narrative pushed by prosecutors and media, contending that Maxwell is being unfairly punished as “there is no one else to blame.”Hervey has also challenged the authenticity of some key evidence, most notably a photograph depicting Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre, which Maxwell's allies—and Hervey—have insisted was doctored or manipulated. She uses these claims to further argue that Maxwell's prosecution is tainted by bias, selective narrative control, and a lack of full transparency.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Prince Andrew was caught off guard when Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) filed her lawsuit in August 2021, accusing him of sexually assaulting her when she was 17 under Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking network. The filing in U.S. federal court blindsided Andrew, who had long denied any involvement and believed that distance from Epstein might shield him. Instead, the case forced him into the spotlight with renewed scrutiny, intensifying his public disgrace and sparking demands for accountability at the highest levels.His legal team tried to derail the lawsuit by citing Roberts' 2009 settlement with Epstein, but a judge rejected this strategy, allowing the case to move forward. The mounting pressure was swift and severe: Andrew was stripped of royal titles and patronages, cut off from official duties, and isolated within the monarchy. With a trial looming and the reputational damage mounting, he agreed to a multimillion-dollar settlement in February 2022, underscoring how blindsided he truly was by the lawsuit's sudden and devastating impact.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Jeffrey Epstein's relationship with Gwendolyn Beck wasn't some distant, chance crossing of paths—it was financial, political, and deeply troubling. Epstein pumped money directly into Beck's 2014 run for Congress as an independent in Virginia, contributing beyond the federal limits to the point of breaking campaign finance rules. The fact that a disgraced financier and convicted sex offender was willing to bankroll her political ambitions shows the way Epstein used donations as leverage: not just to buy influence with powerful men like Clinton and Trump, but also to keep lesser-known candidates tethered to his orbit. Beck didn't reject his help, didn't distance herself, and instead allowed Epstein's cash to seep into her campaign. That raises hard questions—what was he buying, and why did she think it was acceptable to take his support at all?Worse, Beck's ties to Epstein weren't confined to a few checks. Flight logs and photographs put her in Epstein's company alongside Prince Andrew, raising the specter of far deeper involvement. She's been described as having once managed Epstein's money at Morgan Stanley, which—if true—meant she had direct proximity to his financial dealings, the very machinery that allowed him to operate with impunity for decades. And yet, when pressed, Beck insisted she never saw anything wrong, never suspected a thing, as if the world's most notorious predator just looked like a normal client and travel companion. That's the kind of willful blindness that kept Epstein protected: people in finance and politics who were willing to cash the checks, sit on the planes, pose for the photos, and later claim ignorance when the house of cards finally collapsed. Beck's story is a perfect microcosm of Epstein's reach—dirty money propping up ambition, and ambition willing to overlook the filth behind it.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

After revelations surfaced of his close ties and supportive messages to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Lord Peter Mandelson was dismissed as the UK's ambassador to the United States by Prime Minister Keir Starmer. However, despite being “removed with immediate effect,” reports indicate that the government has not yet formally severed his employment status. As a result, he remains on the payroll and is said to be eligible for compensation, possibly a six-figure package, pending legal or contractual settlement.Separately, the advisory firm Global Counsel, which Mandelson co-founded, has moved to strip him of voting rights and dividends tied to his 21 % stake in the firm, effectively cutting off his financial benefits while it seeks to divest his holdings entirely. While public attention has focused on whether the state will continue paying him, significant steps have already been taken internally to limit his income streams from his private ventures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource: Lord Mandelson is STILL being paid his six-figure salary despite being sacked as Britain's US Ambassador more than two weeks ago | Daily Mail Online

The fight over the Epstein files has erupted into a raw political brawl that exposes Washington's deep fractures. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene lit the fuse with a fiery post claiming she's “not suicidal” and warning that “foreign governments or powerful people” might silence her for pushing to release Epstein's secrets. Sen. Ted Cruz quickly branded her “crazy,” accusing her of antisemitic undertones, while Greene hit back, calling his charge “disgusting” and painting him as beholden to donors. Their feud became a sideshow to the larger push in Congress, where survivors and lawmakers alike are demanding the full, unredacted release of documents that could reveal just how deep Epstein's network ran.Meanwhile, Rep. Robert Garcia joined survivor Annie Farmer in Long Beach to call out the DOJ's “sham” 33,000-page dump of mostly recycled records. Together with bipartisan sponsors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, they are pushing a discharge petition to force a floor vote requiring full disclosure of all unclassified files. Democrats are united, but Republicans remain divided, torn between protecting power and exposing it. For survivors like Farmer, this isn't politics—it's about justice, closure, and breaking decades of silence. And for the public, the battle has become a test of whether Washington will finally confront the truth or bury it once more under redactions, excuses, and self-preservation.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The U.S. Supreme Court is currently weighing whether to hear an appeal from Ghislaine Maxwell, the longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein who is serving a 20-year federal sentence for sex trafficking and related crimes. Maxwell's legal team argues that her trial was tainted by juror misconduct—specifically pointing to one juror, Scotty David, who failed to disclose his own history as a survivor of sexual abuse during jury selection. Her lawyers claim this omission undermined her right to a fair trial and should warrant either a retrial or a reduced sentence. The Supreme Court has not yet decided whether it will take up the case, but even the possibility has reignited public scrutiny of the Epstein network and the broader failures that allowed it to exist.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Supreme Court meets to discuss Ghislaine Maxwell appeal and other pending cases

According to sources Ghislaine Maxwell was melancholy when first arriving at the Prison in Florida but now, after having time to settle in, she is also participating in activities such as interdormitory competitions such as checkers. She has also found a group of friends to pal around with. Let's take a look! to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11412785/Ghislaine-Maxwell-seen-walking-galpal-cushy-regimen-Florida-prison-revealed.html#comments

Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson have found themselves scratched off the guest list for this year's royal family Christmas at Sandringham, and the reason isn't exactly a mystery. Andrew's ties to Jeffrey Epstein continue to poison whatever's left of his reputation, and the royal household clearly doesn't want that shadow hanging over their holiday gathering. Even though Sarah isn't directly connected to the scandal, her long-running closeness with Andrew—still living together, still tied at the hip—makes her guilty by association in the court of public perception. The message is plain enough: they're not welcome, because their presence would remind the world of a scandal the monarchy would rather bury under the rug.For Andrew, it's another step in his slow-motion exile. He's already been stripped of titles, sidelined from public life, and reduced to a background figure who occasionally pops up to embarrassment. Now, even the family dinner table is out of reach. Ferguson, despite her own efforts to stay in the public's good graces, is paying the price for her connection to him. To be told “don't come to Christmas” by your own family says everything about how far Andrew has fallen—and how desperate the royals are to keep him, and anyone standing next to him, out of sight during their most visible traditions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Previously unreleased photographs show Jeffrey Epstein holding a young girl who had fallen asleep on his private jet after a 2004 trip to Disney World. The pictures, which remained hidden for years, unsettled the girl's father once he became aware of them, raising concerns about Epstein's frequent and often unmonitored access to minors. The images highlight how he repeatedly placed himself in situations that blurred the boundaries between acceptable behavior and troubling conduct.While the photographs themselves don't directly prove criminal activity, they fit into the broader context of longstanding allegations against Epstein and illustrate the pattern of questionable associations that surrounded him. Their delayed emergence also raises questions about why such material was kept out of sight for so long, contributing to the perception that evidence tied to Epstein was often buried or ignored rather than confronted openly.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Steve Scully, a former telecommunications contractor who worked extensively on Little Saint James, claimed in the Netflix documentary Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich that he saw Bill Clinton sitting alone with Epstein on the porch of the island's main house. Scully, who said he had been to the island over a hundred times between 1999 and 2005, insisted there were no other guests present during that moment. His account added fuel to speculation about the former president's connections to Epstein and the time he may have spent on the island.Steve Scully, a former telecommunications contractor who worked extensively on Little Saint James, claimed in the Netflix documentary Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich that he saw Bill Clinton sitting alone with Epstein on the porch of the island's main house. Scully, who said he had been to the island over a hundred times between 1999 and 2005, insisted there were no other guests present during that moment. His account added fuel to speculation about the former president's connections to Epstein and the time he may have spent on the island.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Christina Oxenberg has offered unflattering and revealing commentary about Ghislaine Maxwell, describing her as manipulative, attention-seeking, and keen on shaping others' perceptions. Oxenberg recounts being “pulled into” posed photographs with Maxwell—despite not wanting to be—that Maxwell orchestrated to appear close to prominent people, thus rehabilitating her social status. She alleges Maxwell used social scenes as a tool for influence, demanding physical closeness and trying to control how others were framed with her in public imagery.Oxenberg also claims to have turned down Maxwell's request to ghostwrite her autobiography, and she recalls odd, disturbing conversations in private settings with Maxwell in the 1990s. In one instance, Oxenberg says Maxwell made strange remarks such as, “Jeffrey and I have everyone on videotape,” which Oxenberg found deeply unsettling and “creepy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.