POPULARITY
Categories
432 episodes with Arm
90 episodes with Arm
57 episodes with Arm
71 episodes with Arm
49 episodes with Arm
62 episodes with Arm
94 episodes with Arm
83 episodes with Arm
55 episodes with Arm
59 episodes with Arm
53 episodes with Arm
37 episodes with Arm
45 episodes with Arm
49 episodes with Arm
26 episodes with Arm
23 episodes with Arm
37 episodes with Arm
50 episodes with Arm
24 episodes with Arm
33 episodes with Arm
22 episodes with Arm
29 episodes with Arm
36 episodes with Arm
22 episodes with Arm
25 episodes with Arm
61 episodes with Arm
32 episodes with Arm
28 episodes with Arm
35 episodes with Arm
53 episodes with Arm
101 episodes with Arm
24 episodes with Arm
36 episodes with Arm
22 episodes with Arm
26 episodes with Arm
17 episodes with Arm
9 episodes with Arm
18 episodes with Arm
13 episodes with Arm
30 episodes with Arm
12 episodes with Arm
15 episodes with Arm
15 episodes with Arm
18 episodes with Arm
20 episodes with Arm
39 episodes with Arm
24 episodes with Arm
53 episodes with Arm
18 episodes with Arm
16 episodes with Arm
14 episodes with Arm
10 episodes with Arm
25 episodes with Arm
25 episodes with Arm
durée : 00:01:57 - La coprésidente de Place publique Aurore Lalucq affirme que les conditions de travail en France sont "très mauvaises" et qu'elles sont "en-dessous de l'Albanie". - réalisation : Armêl Balogog, La cellule Vrai ou faux Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France
The back episodes finally make it online, this is number 4 in a series of episodes - wait - this IS the current episode!Brett is back, so the episodes are getting posted almost on time! Windows is starting to support ARM more, RAM pricing hysterics, Windows 11 CPU boost, Intel improves with iBOT, Microsoft 365 brings the CoPilot, and bots surpass humans on the network. On with the show, enjoy!0:00 Intro1:15 Patreon2:09 Food Stories with Josh (just words, no photos)3:54 3DMark adds native Arm Windows support6:55 Josh talks about the latest Arm developments9:43 Memory prices may double this year (and related discussion)16:45 Windows 11 performance boost?19:05 Intel expands iBOT with 7 more games23:31 AMD reaches almost 45 percent CPU share on Steam25:23 Office 365 Copilot auto-install returns33:59 Bots take over the Internet36:59 Apple iOS 27 has an "agentic" solution for compromised passwords39:42 (in)Security Corner54:15 Gaming Quick Hits1:01:32 Picks of the Week1:10:02 Outro ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
A Shot in the Arm Media launches a new nine-part series produced in partnership with the UCSF Institute for Global Health Sciences, built around the book Redefining Global Health in the 21st Century, co-authored by Dr. mike Reid (UCSF Institute for Global Health Sciences) and Ambassador Eric Goosby (former U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and former PEPFAR Chief Medical Officer). In this prologue episode, Reid and Goosby explain why they wrote the book, what defined the “golden era” of global health since the early 2000s—the Global Fund, PEPFAR, Gavi—and why that progress now feels at risk under the Trump administration's cuts to USAID and PEPFAR. They introduce the book's central metaphor, borrowed from Cory Doctorow's concept of “enshittification,” to ask whether global health institutions are on the brink of decay, and argue that decline is a choice, not a destiny. The conversation previews the arc of the series—covering the old order, governance, financing, climate, technology and AI, and self-care for health workers—and closes with a call for honesty, bipartisanship and accountability, grounded in the legacies of Nelson Mandela and Steve Biko. 00:00 Introduction: Is the Greatest Threat to Global Health... Us? 00:49 Launching the Series: Redefining Global Health in the 21st Century 02:06 Meet the Authors: Dr. Mike Reid and Ambassador Eric Goosby 02:32 Why They Wrote This Book 03:28 Writing Through the Trump Transition 05:28 The Golden Era of Global Health 08:04 Shared Responsibility and Its Roots 10:21 What's Unraveling Now 11:34 Vancouver 1996 and the Roots of the Reckoning 12:18 Honoring Health Workers and Naming the Moral Injury 14:18 What Would Have to Change, Structurally and Politically 17:50 “Enshittification” and the Risk of Global Health Decline 20:30 Kuhn, Paradigm Shifts, and a New Vision for Global Health 22:17 Goosby's 38,000-Foot View: Aligning Need, Access and Governance 25:16 Reid on Financing, Governance, Science and New Tools 28:06 Mapping the Series and the Book's Chapters 32:11 Reform Agenda or Transformation Agenda? 35:19 Letters to My Daughters: Making Global Health Personal 37:31 Why Global Health Matters at Home 41:12 Does the Field Still Reflect Why We Got Into It? 43:18 Bipartisanship, Nelson Mandela and Steve Biko 46:18 Toward a Reckoning: Truth, Reconciliation and Accountability 51:02 “Not on Our Watch” 53:27 Holding the Administration to Account 56:32 The Book, Its Price, and Where to Find It 58:23 Sign-Off and What's Coming in Episode Two Learn more about the book: https://bit.ly/redefining-global-health More from UCSF Institute for Global Health Sciences: https://globalhealthsciences.ucsf.edu Check Out mike Reid's Substack: https://substack.com/@reimaginingglobalhealth Check Out Ben's Substack: https://substack.com/@benplumley1 Join the Conversation! What would it take for global health to avoid decline? Share your thoughts in the comments! Subscribe & Stay Updated: Listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or your favorite podcast platform. Watch on YouTube & subscribe for more in-depth global health — and look out for a dedicated sub channel for Redefining Global Health in the 21st Century under A Shot in the Arm's YouTube home. Redefining Global Health in the 21st Century (Playlist on Youtube) https://bit.ly/rgh-podcast A Shot in the Arm Podcast Youtube (Main Channel) https://youtube.com/@shotarmpodcast
Die einen schwimmen im Wohlstand, sie können fast alles erreichen. Andere kommen gerade so durch, und ihre Chancen sind viel schlechter. Die Schere zwischen Arm und Reich wird größer, sie ist nicht zuletzt auch eine Klassenfrage. Welche Bedeutung hat die Klasse in unserer Gesellschaft? Gast: Hanno Sauer, Philosoph Moderation: Jürgen Wiebicke Von WDR 5.
Espanha, depois de uma semana de trégua política para receber o Papa e as legislativas na Arménia, que deram maioria absoluta ao partido do atual Primeiro-Ministro pró-europeu. Edição de José Guerreiro.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
durée : 00:09:33 - Le sept neuf - par : Benjamin Duhamel - La ministre déléguée auprès de la ministre des Armées et des Anciens combattants, Alice Rufo, réagit à l'accord annoncé dimanche entre les États-Unis et l'Iran. Elle appelle à une réouverture "rapide" du détroit d'Ormuz et affirme que la France se tient prête à participer au déminage de la zone. - invités : Alice Rufo ministre déléguée auprès de la ministre des Armées et des Anciens combattants Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France
durée : 00:09:33 - Les interviews d'Inter - par : Benjamin Duhamel - La ministre déléguée auprès de la ministre des Armées et des Anciens combattants, Alice Rufo, réagit à l'accord annoncé dimanche entre les États-Unis et l'Iran. Elle appelle à une réouverture "rapide" du détroit d'Ormuz et affirme que la France se tient prête à participer au déminage de la zone. - réalisation : Clémentine Sabrié - invités : Alice Rufo ministre déléguée auprès de la ministre des Armées et des Anciens combattants Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France
De slotkoers van de grootste beursgang ooit is bekend. 160 dollar en 95 cent. SpaceX is 2.1 biljoen dollar waard en Elon Musk is biljonair. Bij OpenAI en Anthropic kunnen ze rustig ademhalen, want de markt is niet stuk. Integendeel: beleggers hebben opnieuw betaald voor de mythe van Musk en tonen zich bereid om verregaande bedragen te steken in de bizarre waarderingen van AI-bedrijven die dit jaar naar de beurs gaan. Tijdens het laatste uur van de beursdag maakten Donner Bakker, Jochem Visser en hun gasten een extra uitzending richting die laatste koers op de borden. Gast Johannes Smit, portfoliomanager bij het Centive Global Equity Fund van IBS, legt uit wat dit betekent voor de markt en voor beleggers. Hij bespreekt het verdere verloop van de koers nu er aandelen kunnen worden verkocht door insiders, terwijl indexen juist gedwongen gaan kopen. En hij legt uit waarom de verregaande zorgen van indexbeleggers wat hem betreft onterecht zijn. Gasten Joe van Burik en Ben van der Burg, techcommentatoren van BNR en makers van De Grote Tech Show, bespreken hoe dit bizarre bedrijf nu in elkaar steekt en hoe dat zo is gekomen. Natuurlijk moet Musk zelf ook nog even langs de lat worden gelegd. Is zijn effect op het universum nou netto positief, of negatief? Hint: er is een goeie discussie over te voeren. BNR Beurs is een journalistiek onafhankelijke productie, mede mogelijk gemaakt door Saxo. Over de makers: Jelle Maasbach is presentator van BNR Beurs en freelance financieel journalist. Zijn favoriete aandeel om over te praten is Disney, maar daar lijkt hij de enige in te zijn. Sinds de eerste uitzending van BNR Beurs is 'ie er bij. Maxim van Mil is presentator van BNR Beurs en journalist bij BNR, waar hij zich focust op de financiële markten en ontwikkelingen in de tech-wereld. Je krijgt hem het meest enthousiast als hij kan praten over ASML, of oer-Hollandse bedrijven zoals Ahold of ABN Amro. Jorik Simonides is presentator van BNR Beurs, economieredacteur en verslaggever bij BNR. Hij wordt er vooral blij van als het een keer níet over AI gaat. Je hoort hem ook in de BNR-podcast Moerdijk: dorp van de rekening. Milou Brand is presentator van BNR Beurs, freelance podcastmaker en columnist bij het Financieele Dagblad. Jochem Visser is presentator van BNR Beurs, maakt Beursnerd XL en is redacteur bij de podcast Onder Curatoren. Vraag hem naar obscure zaken op financiële markten en hij vertelt je waarom het eigenlijk nóg leuker is dan je al dacht. Over de podcast: Met BNR Beurs ga je altijd voorbereid de nieuwe beursdag in. We praten je in een kleine 25 minuten bij over alle laatste ontwikkelingen op de handelsvloer. We blijven niet alleen bij de AEX of Wall Street, maar vertellen je ook waar nog meer kansen liggen. En we houden het niet bij de cijfers, maar zoeken ook iedere dag voor je naar duiding van scherpe gasten en experts. Of je nu een ervaren belegger bent of net begint met je eerste stappen op de beurs, de podcast biedt waardevolle inzichten voor je beleggingsstrategie. Door de focus op zowel de korte termijn als de lange termijn, helpt BNR Beurs luisteraars om de ruis van de markt te scheiden van de essentie. Van Musk tot Microsoft en van Ahold tot ASML. Wij vertellen je wat beleggers bezighoudt, wie de markten in beweging zet en wat dat betekent voor jouw beleggingsportefeuille.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Recebemos novamente nosso amigo Heitor Loureiro para comentar as eleições na Armênia, além de observamos o movimento das peças no sempre complicado tabuleiro do Grande Oriente Médio.Também cobrimos as notícias políticas relacionas à Copa do Mundo, sediada na América do Norte, destacando as polêmicas ações do governo Trump em relação a alguns convidados.No mais, demos aquele tradicional pião pela nossa quebrada latino-americana, repercutindo o 2º Turno das eleições presidenciais peruanas, que deve se arrastar pelos próximos dias.Use o código XADREZ na Você Europeu para ter condições exclusivas: https://voceeuropeu.com.br/xadrez/Se inscreva na XXIII Conferência de Segurança Internacional do FORTE: https://app.pipefy.com/public/form/bx-2GrbLConheça a Carta Global de Fernanda Simas: https://www.cartaglobal.com.br/Campanha e comunicado sobre nosso amigo Pirulla: https://www.pirulla.com.br/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
An in-depth examination of how the United States can build more effective partner militaries. Military assistance has a bad reputation. Large-scale attempts to build partner militaries in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam cost the United States billions of dollars and ended ignominiously, with the collapse of local forces as American troops withdrew. Arms transfers of sophisticated, American-made weapons often appear to do more harm than good. Yet military assistance and support—operating indirectly through partners—when done right, can deliver remarkable strategic results for the United States and its partners. Working effectively with partner militaries is one of the most pressing national security challenges for the United States today. In their latest book, War at Arm's Length: How America Can Build Effective Partners Through Military Assistance (Yale University Press, 2026), Richard Bennet and Alexander Noyes offer a systematic look at military assistance in the twenty-first century, examining a frequently deployed but often misunderstood set of tools that allows the United States to leverage partner militaries to achieve national security objectives. Bennet and Noyes posit that two main factors—the degree of interest alignment on security issues and the level of institutional capacity of the receiving force—will be the most important variables in Washington's ability to build militarily effective partners. Our guests today are Doctor Richard Bennet, who is a senior research associate at the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, and Doctor Alexander Noyes, who is a fellow in the Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology at the Brookings Institution. Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of Volatile States in International Politics (Oxford University Press, 2023). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
An in-depth examination of how the United States can build more effective partner militaries. Military assistance has a bad reputation. Large-scale attempts to build partner militaries in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam cost the United States billions of dollars and ended ignominiously, with the collapse of local forces as American troops withdrew. Arms transfers of sophisticated, American-made weapons often appear to do more harm than good. Yet military assistance and support—operating indirectly through partners—when done right, can deliver remarkable strategic results for the United States and its partners. Working effectively with partner militaries is one of the most pressing national security challenges for the United States today. In their latest book, War at Arm's Length: How America Can Build Effective Partners Through Military Assistance (Yale University Press, 2026), Richard Bennet and Alexander Noyes offer a systematic look at military assistance in the twenty-first century, examining a frequently deployed but often misunderstood set of tools that allows the United States to leverage partner militaries to achieve national security objectives. Bennet and Noyes posit that two main factors—the degree of interest alignment on security issues and the level of institutional capacity of the receiving force—will be the most important variables in Washington's ability to build militarily effective partners. Our guests today are Doctor Richard Bennet, who is a senior research associate at the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, and Doctor Alexander Noyes, who is a fellow in the Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology at the Brookings Institution. Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of Volatile States in International Politics (Oxford University Press, 2023). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/military-history
An in-depth examination of how the United States can build more effective partner militaries. Military assistance has a bad reputation. Large-scale attempts to build partner militaries in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam cost the United States billions of dollars and ended ignominiously, with the collapse of local forces as American troops withdrew. Arms transfers of sophisticated, American-made weapons often appear to do more harm than good. Yet military assistance and support—operating indirectly through partners—when done right, can deliver remarkable strategic results for the United States and its partners. Working effectively with partner militaries is one of the most pressing national security challenges for the United States today. In their latest book, War at Arm's Length: How America Can Build Effective Partners Through Military Assistance (Yale University Press, 2026), Richard Bennet and Alexander Noyes offer a systematic look at military assistance in the twenty-first century, examining a frequently deployed but often misunderstood set of tools that allows the United States to leverage partner militaries to achieve national security objectives. Bennet and Noyes posit that two main factors—the degree of interest alignment on security issues and the level of institutional capacity of the receiving force—will be the most important variables in Washington's ability to build militarily effective partners. Our guests today are Doctor Richard Bennet, who is a senior research associate at the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, and Doctor Alexander Noyes, who is a fellow in the Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology at the Brookings Institution. Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of Volatile States in International Politics (Oxford University Press, 2023). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science
An in-depth examination of how the United States can build more effective partner militaries. Military assistance has a bad reputation. Large-scale attempts to build partner militaries in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam cost the United States billions of dollars and ended ignominiously, with the collapse of local forces as American troops withdrew. Arms transfers of sophisticated, American-made weapons often appear to do more harm than good. Yet military assistance and support—operating indirectly through partners—when done right, can deliver remarkable strategic results for the United States and its partners. Working effectively with partner militaries is one of the most pressing national security challenges for the United States today. In their latest book, War at Arm's Length: How America Can Build Effective Partners Through Military Assistance (Yale University Press, 2026), Richard Bennet and Alexander Noyes offer a systematic look at military assistance in the twenty-first century, examining a frequently deployed but often misunderstood set of tools that allows the United States to leverage partner militaries to achieve national security objectives. Bennet and Noyes posit that two main factors—the degree of interest alignment on security issues and the level of institutional capacity of the receiving force—will be the most important variables in Washington's ability to build militarily effective partners. Our guests today are Doctor Richard Bennet, who is a senior research associate at the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, and Doctor Alexander Noyes, who is a fellow in the Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology at the Brookings Institution. Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of Volatile States in International Politics (Oxford University Press, 2023). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/world-affairs
In der heutigen Folge sprechen die Finanzjournalisten Lea Oetjen und Nando Sommerfeldt über einen weiteren Rekord für Elon Musk, einen unerwarteten Dämpfer für Adobe und eine beispiellose Vorfreude-Rallye. Außerdem geht es um JP Morgan, Eli Lilly, Tesla, KLA Corporation, Lam Research, Micron Technology, Arm, Applied Materials, Marvell Technology, ASML, AMD, Intel, SanDisk, Viasat, Firefly Aerospace, Intuitive Machines, Planet Labs, EchoStar, Rocket Lab, OHB, Siemens Energy, Infineon, SAP, Oracle, Kontron, Porsche AG, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, Alphabet, Nvidia, Deutsche Telekom, Ennoconn, Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (WKN: A1JX52), SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF (WKN: A1JJTD) und Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF (WKN: 801498). Meldet Euch hier zum kostenlosen AAA-Newsletter an: https://www.businessinsider.de/informationen/newsletter/alles-auf-aktien/ Und mit dem Code „AAAFRIENDS“ spart ihr jetzt 50 Prozent auf Eure Tickets beim Finance Summit am 2. Oktober – aber nur unter diesem Link: https://veranstaltung.businessinsider.de/event/financesummit26/summary?rp=c6dc55d6-6f4f-4fb4-b75f-3f3501d84859 Wir freuen uns an Feedback über aaa@welt.de. Noch mehr "Alles auf Aktien" findet Ihr bei WELTplus und Apple Podcasts – inklusive aller Artikel der Hosts. Hier bei WELT: https://www.welt.de/podcasts/alles-auf-aktien/plus247399208/Boersen-Podcast-AAA-Bonus-Folgen-Jede-Woche-noch-mehr-Antworten-auf-Eure-Boersen-Fragen.html. Hier könnt ihr den AAA-Newsletter abonnieren: https://www.welt.de/newsletter/article232797673/Alles-auf-Aktien-Der-taegliche-Boersen-Newsletter-fuer-WELTplus-Abonnenten.html Und - ganz neu: AAA gibt es jetzt auch auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/alles_auf_aktien/ Disclaimer: Die im Podcast besprochenen Aktien und Fonds stellen keine spezifischen Kauf- oder Anlage-Empfehlungen dar. Die Moderatoren und der Verlag haften nicht für etwaige Verluste, die aufgrund der Umsetzung der Gedanken oder Ideen entstehen. Hörtipps: Für alle, die noch mehr wissen wollen: Holger Zschäpitz können Sie jede Woche im Finanz- und Wirtschaftspodcast "Deffner&Zschäpitz" hören. +++ Werbung +++ Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? Hier findest du alle Infos & Rabatte! https://linktr.ee/alles_auf_aktien Impressum: https://www.welt.de/services/article7893735/Impressum.html Datenschutz: https://www.welt.de/services/article157550705/Datenschutzerklaerung-WELT-DIGITAL.html
An in-depth examination of how the United States can build more effective partner militaries. Military assistance has a bad reputation. Large-scale attempts to build partner militaries in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam cost the United States billions of dollars and ended ignominiously, with the collapse of local forces as American troops withdrew. Arms transfers of sophisticated, American-made weapons often appear to do more harm than good. Yet military assistance and support—operating indirectly through partners—when done right, can deliver remarkable strategic results for the United States and its partners. Working effectively with partner militaries is one of the most pressing national security challenges for the United States today. In their latest book, War at Arm's Length: How America Can Build Effective Partners Through Military Assistance (Yale University Press, 2026), Richard Bennet and Alexander Noyes offer a systematic look at military assistance in the twenty-first century, examining a frequently deployed but often misunderstood set of tools that allows the United States to leverage partner militaries to achieve national security objectives. Bennet and Noyes posit that two main factors—the degree of interest alignment on security issues and the level of institutional capacity of the receiving force—will be the most important variables in Washington's ability to build militarily effective partners. Our guests today are Doctor Richard Bennet, who is a senior research associate at the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, and Doctor Alexander Noyes, who is a fellow in the Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology at the Brookings Institution. Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of Volatile States in International Politics (Oxford University Press, 2023). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies
ぬるぽ放送局おたより投稿フォーム https://forms.gle/6tbmBzK6wbyavJG47 2026年6月パワープレイ 「Phantasmagoria mystical expectation」 アレンジ・ギター・ベース ARM ボーカル 悠 杏李 作詞 kiku 夕野ヨシミ 原曲：風神少女 音楽ジャンル：ミクスチャーポップ 収録アルバム：東方風櫻宴 2006・5・21 Release https://www.iosysos.com/discographyportal.php?cdno=IO-0090 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOmaLZDp3y0 番組時間：86分22秒 出演者：夕野ヨシミ、たくや VOICEVOX:ずんだもん VOICEVOX:四国めたん ---- 2026/6/11に公開録音したものを配信いたします。 ラジオ記事はリスナーのEEチャンピオンさんが書いてくれているので楽してます。 ＜オープニング＞ ・札幌も夏が始まりました ・外は、暑いんでしょうね ・喉の肉離れ ・VDONinjaの調子が悪い ・今日はアイドリングがないから事故っちゃう ・ポッドキャストの人は待ってないよ ・イオシスくんの活動をあれしますか ・かつ丼と活動って似てますよね ・＜楽曲提供＞ カバー楽曲 「天ノ弱」／ドラゴンブラッド：スレイヤーズ学院 歌唱：花たん 作詞・作曲：164 編曲：コバヤシユウヤ(IOSYS) ギター：三浦公紀 ベース：john=hive(IOSYS) ・ドラゴンブラッドを始めるなら今！ ・正解はじゃがポックル ・じゃがポおじさん ・楽曲提供のお知らせ 「私たちは、花になる／イロドリミドリ｜HaNaMiNa｜S.S.L.」 作詞：七条レタス 作曲：D.watt 編曲：fu_mou(Hifumi,inc.) ・楽曲提供のお知らせ 「きゅんキラ☆ネバギバ行進曲／あぴゃりちゃん」 作編曲：コバヤシユウヤ 作詞：john=hive Guitar：三浦公紀 ・トピックチャンネルとは ・やはり、かわいいキャラは必要 ・自由の女神を女性枠ととらえるとは ・ガワだけのwiki ・追加されたよ Nintendo Switch『グルーヴコースター フューチャーパフォーマーズ』 2026/6/11 無料アップデート 「HG魔改造ポリビニル少年」 作詞・作編曲：IOSYS TRAX 歌：さきぴょ ・YouTubeタイトーチャンネルにて試聴動画が公開されました 「DX超性能フルメタル少女」 作詞・作編曲：IOSYS TRAX 歌：ちよこ 「HG魔改造ポリビニル少年」 作詞・作編曲：IOSYS TRAX 歌：さきぴょ ・もう、12,3年前 ・アメリカニキは現金を持ってきてください ・ありったけのキャッシュをかき集め ・何をやります？ ・1分将棋を盤面もなく初心者が？ ・歩が8枚集まってキング歩 ・マイクラ将棋 ・ムダ話を雑談力って言いました？ ・新日本将棋連盟作ろう ＜Aパート＞ ・ふつおたです ・歯医者で引き分け ・ぬるぽもギネスいけるのでは？ ・急なニンテンドーダイレクト ・強引に同意を求める ・ビールおかわりした直後にワインを飲む ・生ビール放送 ・東方projectすげーな ・ニュークラだとキャバクラになっちゃうな ・ぴっちりした服はみんな好きだから ・歯って欠けませんか？ ・吉野家がタッチパネルに ・梅干しとチーズと炭酸水しかない冷蔵庫 ・え？ネットスーパーで2万も？何を？ ・ウイスキーは普通1本で済むから ・お便り1通で何分やってるのか ・ホラー映画をご所望 ・ミーガン ・女性Vならホラーゲームは映えますよね ・英語のタイトルなら自信がない ・東方アレンジっぽい単語を組み合わせる ・穴からは離れてほしい ・マスパ音頭はありそう ・バニーガーデンを買ってしまいました ・重い過去のキャラに定評のあるキュリエイトさん ・今日は漫才をやりますか ・そのお店がグレーだったとしても？ ・片玉から紹介されました ・バター犬牧場ってなんだよ ＜Bパート＞ ・みつをたです ・水道管が壊れたので送ります ・おっきなゴンってなんだよ ・シアンさんどうしたの？ ・減った骨は食べちゃったの？ ・暗殺の母のＣＶが柴田理恵さん ・ばんちょーがせくちーな件について ・豆柴でごまかせる ・供給の多いブルアカ ・ブルアカ始めるなら今！ ・にじさんじピックアップニュース ・にじさんじストーンズ ・小ジョッキで水を飲みましょう ・でび様の新曲 ・カラオケでオケツブンブンフェスティバル ・ほな、エンドラ討伐がええんじゃないかな ・ボーイは食べ物じゃないんだよな ・ホロピックアップニュース ・しぐれういだから ・75万円のエレキギター ・イオシスは1万日ですけどね（マウント ・100万円のＰＣも使ったことない ・合体してもスペックは大したことはない ・お家で核融合発電 ・Ｖピックアップニュース ・ローソンのVTuber ・いろんなＶがいるんだね ・ガッツ石松さんご冥福をお祈りします ・ロリ3人組 ・今はフローラ ・ポロって出るゆうじ ・おにぎりスライムとは ・ゲーム実況をやる曜日が足りない ・冥曜日 ・朝配信でおやすみなさーい ・お便りお待ちしてます ＜エンディング＞ ・Forza Horizon 6やりますか ・あまりテクテクライク知識は生かせない ・梅雨はやる気あるんですか？ ・もう、ほぼ水 ・キリン5番絞り ・体内で石の錬成しないようにしましょう
durée : 00:02:14 - Un message très relayé sur les réseaux sociaux affirme que l'IA de Meta peut lire les messages des utilisateurs de la messagerie WhatsApp. Mais c'est faux. - réalisation : Armêl Balogog, La cellule Vrai ou faux Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France
An in-depth examination of how the United States can build more effective partner militaries. Military assistance has a bad reputation. Large-scale attempts to build partner militaries in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam cost the United States billions of dollars and ended ignominiously, with the collapse of local forces as American troops withdrew. Arms transfers of sophisticated, American-made weapons often appear to do more harm than good. Yet military assistance and support—operating indirectly through partners—when done right, can deliver remarkable strategic results for the United States and its partners. Working effectively with partner militaries is one of the most pressing national security challenges for the United States today. In their latest book, War at Arm's Length: How America Can Build Effective Partners Through Military Assistance (Yale University Press, 2026), Richard Bennet and Alexander Noyes offer a systematic look at military assistance in the twenty-first century, examining a frequently deployed but often misunderstood set of tools that allows the United States to leverage partner militaries to achieve national security objectives. Bennet and Noyes posit that two main factors—the degree of interest alignment on security issues and the level of institutional capacity of the receiving force—will be the most important variables in Washington's ability to build militarily effective partners. Our guests today are Doctor Richard Bennet, who is a senior research associate at the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, and Doctor Alexander Noyes, who is a fellow in the Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology at the Brookings Institution. Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of Volatile States in International Politics (Oxford University Press, 2023). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/national-security
An in-depth examination of how the United States can build more effective partner militaries. Military assistance has a bad reputation. Large-scale attempts to build partner militaries in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam cost the United States billions of dollars and ended ignominiously, with the collapse of local forces as American troops withdrew. Arms transfers of sophisticated, American-made weapons often appear to do more harm than good. Yet military assistance and support—operating indirectly through partners—when done right, can deliver remarkable strategic results for the United States and its partners. Working effectively with partner militaries is one of the most pressing national security challenges for the United States today. In their latest book, War at Arm's Length: How America Can Build Effective Partners Through Military Assistance (Yale University Press, 2026), Richard Bennet and Alexander Noyes offer a systematic look at military assistance in the twenty-first century, examining a frequently deployed but often misunderstood set of tools that allows the United States to leverage partner militaries to achieve national security objectives. Bennet and Noyes posit that two main factors—the degree of interest alignment on security issues and the level of institutional capacity of the receiving force—will be the most important variables in Washington's ability to build militarily effective partners. Our guests today are Doctor Richard Bennet, who is a senior research associate at the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, and Doctor Alexander Noyes, who is a fellow in the Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology at the Brookings Institution. Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of Volatile States in International Politics (Oxford University Press, 2023). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/book-of-the-day
Wie immer diskutieren wir im ersten Teil unseres Programms aktuelle Ereignisse der Woche. Wir beginnen mit einer Analyse der Verhandlungen im Nahen Osten, wobei wir die unterschiedlichen Interessen der Regierungschefs der USA und Israels näher betrachten. Anschließend sprechen wir über Deutschlands Wiederaufrüstung und Verteidigungsausgaben, die in Frankreich offenbar Besorgnis ausgelöst haben. In unserem Wissenschafts- und Technologiethema sprechen wir über einen Bericht der Universität der Vereinten Nationen, der davor warnt, dass die Umweltauswirkungen von KI-Rechenzentren mittlerweile eine Größenordnung erreicht haben, die mit der von ganzen Ländern vergleichbar ist. Und zum Abschluss des ersten Teils des Programms diskutieren wir über das Finale der French Open. Der Rest des Programms ist der deutschen Sprache und Kultur gewidmet. Die heutige Grammatiklektion konzentriert sich auf The Passive Voice – Part 3. Viele Deutsche lieben ihren Balkon. Er ist eine Wohlfühloase, wo man sich wie zu Hause fühlt – wo man ja auch tatsächlich ist. Meistens wird er gemütlich und individuell eingerichtet. Manche verbringen sogar gerne ihren Sommerurlaub dort. Doch es gibt auch Regeln zu beachten. Außerdem sprechen wir über Hape Kerkeling, einen deutschen Komiker, der seit Jahrzehnten wirklich alles und jeden auf den Arm nimmt. Und genau das ist auch die Redewendung dieser Woche: Auf den Arm nehmen. Unterschiedliche Interessen von Trump und Netanjahu erschweren die Verhandlungen im Nahen Osten Frankreich ist besorgt über die Aufrüstung und die Verteidigungsausgaben Deutschlands KI-Rechenzentren verbrauchen so viel Energie wie ganze Länder Viele Überraschungen bei den French Open 2026 Urlaub auf Balkonien Hape Kerkeling
Mindy Diamond on Independence: A Podcast for Financial Advisors Considering Change
With the Co-Authors of The Greater Game and Dan Sullivan of Strategic Coach and John Bowen of CEG Insights Louis Diamond speaks with Dan Sullivan of Strategic Coach® and John Bowen of CEG Insights about founder dependency, enterprise value, and the architecture behind scalable businesses. In Summary Many advisory firms grow successfully while remaining highly dependent on their founders. Dan Sullivan and John Bowen argue that the difference between a successful practice and a valuable enterprise comes down to architecture. Louis sits down with the co-authors of The Greater Game to discuss founder dependency, enterprise value, intellectual property, and why some businesses scale beyond their owners while others do not. The conversation offers advisors a framework for thinking differently about growth, succession, and long-term optionality. The Storyline Many advisors spend their careers helping clients build valuable businesses. Far fewer stop to ask whether their own firms are being built the same way. That tension sits at the center of Louis Diamond's conversation with Dan Sullivan, co-founder of Strategic Coach®, and John Bowen, founder of CEG Elevate Group and CEG Insights. Their new book, The Greater Game, challenges a common assumption about growth: that bigger businesses are simply the result of working harder, adding more clients, or improving existing systems. Instead, they argue that enterprise value is created through architecture—the deliberate design of a business that can scale, transfer, and thrive without its founder at the center. The discussion introduces a framework for understanding why some entrepreneurs remain trapped in optimization while others build enterprises that compound in value over time. Along the way, Dan and John explore founder dependency, intellectual property, succession planning, strategic partnerships, and the role advisors can play in helping entrepreneurial clients navigate each stage of growth. For advisors, the framework creates an important mirror. The same forces that limit enterprise value for entrepreneurial clients often exist inside advisory firms themselves. The result is a conversation that extends well beyond business growth and into questions of optionality, transferability, and what ultimately makes a firm valuable. Topics Covered Enterprise Value Creation Founder Dependency Risk Business Architecture vs. Optimization Intellectual Property & Scalability Strategic Partnerships & Leverage Succession Planning & Optionality Legacy, Impact & the “Greater Game” Mindset > Download a transcript of this episode… Listen and Learn Highlights for Advisors What is The Greater Game—and why does it matter to advisors? (17:57) Dan and John introduce the framework behind their new book and explain why advisors should think about it both for entrepreneurial clients and for their own businesses. Why do only a small percentage of entrepreneurs create exponential enterprise value? (22:24) The discussion explores the difference between “architects” and “optimizers” and why most business owners remain focused on improving what exists rather than designing what comes next. Why is founder dependency such a significant valuation risk? (35:00) John explains how businesses that depend on a single individual often struggle to scale, transfer, or command premium valuations. How does expertise become intellectual property—and why does that matter? (35:00) The transition from expertise to transferable systems may be the most important bridge in the entire framework, creating leverage that extends beyond the founder. What prevents many advisors from fully serving entrepreneurial clients? (18:00) The conversation examines why most advisors are well-equipped for traditional planning needs but less prepared for the governance, succession, and enterprise-value challenges entrepreneurs eventually face. What does the next game look like after you've already “won”? (50:00) Dan and John discuss why many successful entrepreneurs and advisors eventually shift their focus from accumulation to significance, impact, and legacy. What's the single most important move an entrepreneur can make? (52:30) Dan shares the concept of Unique Ability® and explains why simplifying around your highest-value strengths often creates the greatest multiplier effect. Key Takeaways Enterprise value is created through architecture, not effort. Many successful businesses continue to grow while remaining highly dependent on their founders. The firms that command premium valuations are often built differently from the start. Founder dependency acts as a hidden valuation discount. The more a business depends on one person, the more difficult it becomes to scale, transfer, or sell at a premium. Intellectual property is often the bridge between a practice and an enterprise. When expertise becomes codified, transferable, and repeatable, value begins to exist independently of the founder. Advisors and entrepreneurs often face the same challenge. The same founder-dependency issues advisors help clients solve frequently exist within their own firms. Strategic partnerships create leverage that expertise alone cannot. Many of the most successful entrepreneurs grow through collaboration, ecosystems, and coordinated expertise rather than attempting to solve every challenge themselves. Most advisors are trained to solve early-stage problems. Entrepreneurial clients eventually require guidance around succession, governance, scalability, and enterprise value—areas that extend beyond traditional planning. The next stage of growth is often not about growth at all. For many successful entrepreneurs, the question eventually shifts from accumulation to significance, impact, and the legacy they want their business to create. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JY5xOB8GTQY Quotable Moments “The exit multiple is downstream of the architecture.” “The difference between a three-times and a fifteen-times multiple is often whether the business depends on the founder.” “You have to simplify in order to multiply.” “We're not talking about a 10x game anymore. We're talking about a 100x game.” FAQs Why do some advisory firms command higher valuation multiples than others? Dan Sullivan and John Bowen argue that valuation is often determined long before a transaction occurs. Firms that reduce founder dependency, codify intellectual property, and build transferable systems typically command higher multiples than those built around a single rainmaker. What is founder dependency and how does it impact enterprise value? Founder dependency occurs when clients, revenue, and decision-making remain concentrated around one individual. While those businesses can be highly successful, advisors find they are often more difficult to scale, transfer, or sell. What is the difference between an architect and an optimizer? An optimizer focuses on improving an existing business model. An architect builds systems, intellectual property, and structures designed to create leverage, scalability, and long-term enterprise value. What does Dan Sullivan mean when he says “100x is easier than 2x”? The concept challenges entrepreneurs to stop thinking incrementally. Rather than working harder within the current model, transformational growth often comes from redesigning the model itself through better leverage, collaboration, and systems. How can advisors better serve entrepreneurial clients? Many entrepreneurial clients eventually need guidance beyond investment management, including succession planning, governance, intellectual property strategy, and enterprise value creation. Understanding where a client sits in their business journey can help advisors provide more relevant advice and coordination. What is the expertise trap and why does it matter for advisory firms? The expertise trap occurs when critical knowledge, relationships, and processes remain inside the founder's head. Until that expertise becomes transferable and repeatable, enterprise value often remains limited regardless of growth. Dan Sullivan and John Bowen argue that valuation is often determined long before a transaction occurs. Firms that reduce founder dependency, codify intellectual property, and build transferable systems typically command higher multiples than those built around a single rainmaker. Founder dependency occurs when clients, revenue, and decision-making remain concentrated around one individual. While those businesses can be highly successful, advisors find they are often more difficult to scale, transfer, or sell. An optimizer focuses on improving an existing business model. An architect builds systems, intellectual property, and structures designed to create leverage, scalability, and long-term enterprise value. The concept challenges entrepreneurs to stop thinking incrementally. Rather than working harder within the current model, transformational growth often comes from redesigning the model itself through better leverage, collaboration, and systems. Many entrepreneurial clients eventually need guidance beyond investment management, including succession planning, governance, intellectual property strategy, and enterprise value creation. Understanding where a client sits in their business journey can help advisors provide more relevant advice and coordination. The expertise trap occurs when critical knowledge, relationships, and processes remain inside the founder's head. Until that expertise becomes transferable and repeatable, enterprise value often remains limited regardless of growth. Related Resources The Greater Game by Dan Sullivan and John Bowen Strategic Coach® CEG Elevate Group The Greater Game Dashboard Diamond Consultants Advisor Transition Report Dan Sullivan The world's foremost expert on entrepreneurship in action, Dan Sullivan has spent the past five decades empowering business owners to reach their full potential in both their professional and personal lives. His strong belief in and commitment to the power of the entrepreneur is evident in all areas of his company, Strategic Coach®, and its successful membership community. Dan is married to Babs Smith, his partner in business and in life. They jointly own and operate The Strategic Coach Inc., with offices in Toronto, Chicago, and the UK Dan and Babs reside in Toronto. John Bowen John J. Bowen Jr. is the founder and CEO of CEG Elevate Group, the holding company that includes CEG Worldwide and CEG Insights. Through these companies, he helps elite financial advisors serve fewer, wealthier clients exceptionally well while building more valuable and scalable businesses. Before founding CEG, John spent 26 years as a financial advisor and built a $2 billion wealth management business. That firsthand experience grounds CEG’s work today across advisor coaching, enterprise programs, empirical research through CEG Insights, and practical frameworks for advisors who want to move beyond practice growth to enduring enterprise value. John is the author of 21 books on wealth management, entrepreneurship, and success. His newest book, The Greater Game: Your 100x Blueprint for Exponential Growth, Freedom, and Legacy, co-authored with Dan Sullivan of Strategic Coach, will be published by Hay House Business in May 2026. Today, John and the CEG team work with leading advisors and enterprise firms — including some of the largest advisor organizations in the United States — to help advisors deepen relationships with affluent clients, build scalable practices, and design lives of greater significance. NOTE: The views and opinions expressed by the guests on this podcast are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Diamond Consultants. Neither Diamond Consultants nor the guests on this podcast are compensated in any way for their participation. View the transcript of this episode… Architecting 100x Growth: A “How-To” From Legends Dan Sullivan and John Bowen A conversation with Louis Diamond and Co-Authors of The Greater Game, Dan Sullivan of Strategic Coach and John Bowen of CEG Insights. Louis Diamond: Welcome to the latest episode of our podcast series for financial advisors. Today’s episode is Architecting 100x Growth: A “How-To” From Legends Dan Sullivan and John Bowen, a conversation with the industry’s top coaches and co-authors of The Greater Game. I’m Louis Diamond, and this is the Diamond Podcast for Financial Advisors. Mindy Diamond: At Diamond Consultants, we help elite advisors identify the right environment for their businesses to thrive, whether that’s at a wirehouse, boutique, or independent firm. With nearly three decades of experience, we’ve guided thousands of advisors and represented more than a quarter of a trillion dollars in assets transitioned. And each year, one in four advisors managing a billion dollars or more who change firms are our clients. Our process is education-driven and based on building relationships, starting as your strategic partner well before you’re even thinking of a move. To schedule a confidential conversation, call us at 908-879-1002. Wondering why advisors change firms and where they’re headed? Are transition deals going up or down? Those very questions and more inspired us to create our annual Advisor Transition Report. It’s the award-winning data-driven resource designed for advisors that connects the dots between the motivations around movement and the firm’s appetite for top talent. Arm yourself with the knowledge you need to make smart decisions. Download your copy at diamond-consultants.com/transitionreport. Louis Diamond: Most entrepreneurs and many advisors spend years optimizing for growth without realizing they’re building a business that still depends entirely on them. Revenue and complexity grow; enterprise value, transferability, and freedom often lag far behind. Dan Sullivan and John Bowen argue that the issue isn’t effort or intelligence; it’s architecture. No doubt these are familiar names in the wealth management industry, but just to set the stage, Dan is the co-founder of Strategic Coach, and John is the founder of CEG Elevate Group and CEG Insights. Together, they spent decades coaching and studying high-performing entrepreneurs and advisory firms. Their latest book, one they joined forces on, The Greater Game, lays out a very different framework for thinking about growth, one built around scalability, transferrable value, and long-term leverage rather than incremental optimization. What makes this conversation especially relevant for advisors is that the framework cuts both ways. It applies to the entrepreneurial clients that advisors serve, as well as to the advisory firms themselves. And in many cases, the same founder dependency and expertise trap that limits a client’s enterprise value is quietly limiting the advisor’s business too. We talk about the difference between operators and architects, why 100 times growth can actually be easier than two times growth, where businesses tend to stall as they scale and how advisors can start thinking differently about their own firms, particularly when it comes to enterprise value, succession, and long-term optionality. It’s rare access to a conversation with two of our industry’s legends whose advice and counsel has not only helped to transform the business lives of many of our listeners, but also my own. So let’s get to it. Dan and John, thank you both for joining us today. Dan Sullivan: Thank you, Lou. It’s a real pleasure. John Bowen: I’ve had the privilege of joining you before, but never with my co-author, Dan Sullivan, and I’m excited to share what we’re doing because I think it can make a big impact in our advisor industry. Louis Diamond: No doubt about it. Yeah, this has been an interview I’ve been very excited to host. So let’s jump right in. Dan Sullivan, I think you are a man that needs little introduction. So many advisors in the industry are fans or clients of your firm, Strategic Coach, but for those who aren’t as familiar or need a refresh, can you just give some quick context into why you started Strategic Coach and what the company does today? Dan Sullivan: Yeah. Well, it goes back to 1974. I was a copywriter at BBDO, the Canadian branch of BBDO, big global advertising agency. It still is. But I’ve been sort of a lifetime coach. I remember once when my mother finally caught up with what I was doing in life and I was describing what I was doing, she says, “Well, you were doing that when you were a child. You were talking to adults and you were asking adults about their experiences.” And I said, “Yeah, I could do this when I was eight or nine years old, but it took me a long time to get a business model wrapped around it.” But I jumped out in 1974 and started coaching anybody, but it actually turned out that entrepreneurs were the best people to coach because they would write a check on the spot and they would make a decision on the spot and I needed cashflow and I did it. So I’ve been personally, as a Strategic Coach, which was named by someone else. You’re just out there trying to get cashflow to pay for the rent. So I started in ’74, and I was lucky and it really relates to your target audience, Lou. Right off the bat, I got what are called top-of-the-table life insurance agents. And that was really, really great because life insurance agents are purely a conceptual business. So someone can get a new idea at breakfast and they can have a new business by dinnertime just because they can change their mindset. And that moved on. And I did that for 15 years, just one-on-one, 1970s, 1980s. And then, I’d had enough experience that we turned it into a workshop program in 1989. We’ve been at it ever since. So I was at a talk. Joe Polish is a great friend of ours, Joe Polish with Genius Network. And he had a speaker there, and he says, “You’re one of the original gangsters, aren’t you? You’re one of the first people.” And I said, “I don’t know if I’m the original, but I think I’m the only surviving one.” So it’s 52 years that I’ve been doing what I’m doing. And I had the good fortune to meet John in around 2009. John, was that the year? 2009? John Bowen: Yeah, in the little economic downturn that everybody knows about here. Dan Sullivan: Yeah. And John had a great coaching program and we had a great coaching program. And over the years, we’ve talked a lot about what makes a entrepreneur exponential in their thinking. And finally, about two years ago, we decided, let’s write a book about this. And that’s the new book, which is called The Greater Game. That’s where this all started. It’s just been a great pleasure because we sync very well. Louis Diamond: Amazing. And Dan, I think a lot of people likely know you either from Strategic Coach. I know I’m personally a big fan of two of your books and I know of others, The Gap and The Gain and Who Not How. We’re going to talk about your new book, but I think it’d just be helpful. Can you talk about the key premise of some of your prior books, The Gap and The Gain and Who Not How? Dan Sullivan: As a result of my membership, I’m a member in other groups. And so Joe Polish of Genius Network fame, he’s been in my program for 28 years, and I’ve been in his program for 15 years. And there was a writer who was in one of the first Genius Network workshops, and he approached me. And I created a lot of books, but I create small books and they’re self-published. I do a book a quarter. I’m 82 in about three weeks. So when I was 70, I said, “I’m going to give myself a 25-year project. I’ll write 100 books in 100 quarters.” And this is quarter number 47, and I’m writing my 47th book. But they’re little books. They’re 60, 70 pages. They’re one-idea books. And Ben Hardy, who was, at that time, the number one writer on Medium, which is a blogging type medium, he approached me, and he said, “I know you don’t write big books and you don’t have publisher books. But,” he said, “if you ever did,” he said, “I’d like to collaborate.” And that was a great good fortune on my part. So we produced three books in five years. The first book was Who Not How. Who Not How basically says when you have a goal, the biggest problem with the goal, you’re excited about the goal, but you’re not excited about doing it. So you find “Whos” who help you and you build teamwork around it. And that was a big seller. And then, we had another concept which was called The Gap and The Gain that entrepreneurs, depending on how they measure their progress, can be perpetually unhappy or they can be perpetually motivated. And it all depends on how they measure their progress, how they measure their goal setting and their goal achievement. And then the third book, which has really turned out to be the big one, up until this book, this book will be bigger. It’s called 10x Is Easier Than 2x. So hence, Coach, everybody has a 10x game plan. Whatever number they want to choose, revenues, personal net worth, whatever, you have a framework of 10x, which is sometime in the future, but you use that future framework for deciding what you’re going to do today that will end up as a 10x result. I thought that was going to be our formula for the rest of my life until I met John. And then John is a great AI practitioner. And I began to realize that that 10x is now becoming 100x for really top-notch entrepreneurs, but the 10x is easier than 2x. And we just crossed the million mark with the three books, which is really good. And it’s great for lead… we’re having people show up and they’ve really bought into what Strategic Coach is. We have a good size company. We’re not a small company. We have 120 team members. We’re in five centers: Los Angeles, Vancouver, Chicago, Toronto and London, England. But it’s been really great because we’ve really grown with technological change and it’s basically, we teach people how to think about their thinking. And Lou, you were in for three years, both in-person and virtual. So you know what the starting structure of it is, but I’m in love with entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs are crucial characters on the planet, but mostly they operate alone and what we’ve done is create a community for them. Louis Diamond: Fantastic. Thank you, Dan. And John, I think perfect segue to you, because I know you’ve spent your career serving and helping entrepreneurs as well, mostly within financial services or within wealth management. And you’ve been very kind to share some of your amazing research on advisors serving entrepreneurial clients in the past. But for anyone who’s missed those episodes, similar question for you, can you share what your companies do? CEG Elevate, CEG Insights, your new research, and then we’ll dive into your exciting new book. John Bowen: Thank you, Louis. And Dan and I are very excited about just entrepreneurs in general. Dan is, because he’s working with them directly. The best clients for financial advisors are entrepreneurs, largely, if you’re going to go high net worth, ultra-high net worth. So we have a company, CEG Elevate, which is our parent company. Two of the companies that are really interesting for this podcast is CEG Insights and this is our research arm. And we’ll study about 20,000 high net worth, ultra-high net worth clients this year in depth and 6,000 up to 7,000 we’ll do just of entrepreneurs. And this is in the partnership. Lou, I invited you up to… We were skiing two years ago in Park City and you couldn’t join us. But Dan and I made a deal to do a 25-year partnership studying entrepreneurship, one for Strategic Coach and his coaching clients, but really the opportunity for financial advisors. And it’s probably just as well because I came down, and I think, Dan, you were 80 at the time and I was 69. I’m 70 now. And I was skiing with a whole bunch of 40-year-olds, and they’re all going, “You guys are way too optimistic.” And Dan and I are just getting started on this. And the other company that’s applicable is CEG Worldwide, where we have the privilege of coaching and training some of the top financial advisors, those aspiring, and also working with the enterprises to really help move up market and do this great experience. Louis Diamond: Fantastic. Dan, question for you. What was the core problem you and John were trying to solve in your new book, The Greater Game? What is it that existing frameworks weren’t touching? And then John, I’ll have a follow-up question for you after that. Dan Sullivan: Yeah. Well, by the very nature of what we do, we’re not going for wannabes. We’re not going for entrepreneurs who hope to be really successful someday. We’re engaging with and we’re registering into both of our communities, people who, they’re already great. They’re already doing so many things right, but they’re kind of doing it unconsciously. They just have a unique ability for growth. They have a unique ability for networking and expansion, but the very, very core is they’ve done it on their own. And they’ve done it out of intuition and they’ve done it out of ambition and motivation. But their biggest problem is that they’re really lonely. I’m in my sixth decade now of coaching entrepreneurs, and people say, “Well, what’s the number one problem that entrepreneurs face?” And I said, “Loneliness.” They can’t explain themselves to the family they grew up with. They can’t explain themselves with their lifetime friends. They have thoughts about how they’re operating. And they take enormous pride in their ability to transform difficulties into breakthroughs, but they don’t have anybody to talk to. So what we’ve created is a community where when you walk in the room, everybody in that room immediately understands you. Everybody immediately applauds what you’ve done. Everybody is inspired by you. So my framework is I call, “What you’ve done on your own, you’re great. You’re a winner already, but who do you talk to?” You have to hide a lot of your success because they just won’t understand what it is that actually motivates you. And the beauty of the partnership with John is the vast majority of our clients are in 70 or 80 different industries, so they’re not peculiar. We start off with financial services, especially life insurance. But what I notice is that all the difficulty they get into life is they’re trying to communicate with people who don’t understand them. And what we’re saying is, “Stage one, you did it on your own, you’re great by any standard whatsoever. You check all the boxes for being a successful person, but you don’t really have any way to actually check out how other people are doing this.” And so we’ve created a community, and John has created a community where people, immediately, there’s understanding. And not only that, but there’s opportunity because they’re unique in their own ways. Every one of our entrepreneurs has created a very, very unique pattern of success that if they were with 10 other people, they could learn from this. If they were with 30 other people, they would learn even more. So that’s what we’ve done. So stage two is now joining a community where everybody gets you. Louis Diamond: Interesting. And that’s the premise of the book. We don’t want to have people not buy it, but what is the greater game? What’s the game that folks are playing and pursuing and how do you make it greater? Dan Sullivan: I tell you, what I’ve always been lacking, I’m sort of intuitive like most entrepreneurs are. We’ve done about 300 times growth since we started the program. But it’s intuitive. I don’t have any research to back this up. I’m low on fact finder. I find, generally speaking, the best facts are just the facts that I make up, but at a certain point, you’d like to have some actual research to back me up. So I’ve gone as far as I can go with our company without real research. Then John comes into the picture, and now we got some real research. And I will say this, this is generally true. It’s not just a problem with me that I don’t have research. I find that entrepreneurism is one of the least researched subjects on the planet. And John comes along and he’s done all the backfill for how entrepreneurs actually perform and I’ve got research to prove it. Louis Diamond: Perfect. Yeah, John, question for you. So what is The Greater Game? And then, how do you think it relates to what financial advisors have been missing? John Bowen: One of the things that we as financial advisors all want to work with people who have already won. And there’s no better group than entrepreneurs, successful entrepreneurs. If we look at people with 25 million or more of investible assets across all households in the US, 90% are entrepreneurs. And at the 5 to 25 million of investible assets, it’s three out of four. So at CEG Worldwide, we’ve always wanted to really understand advisors. And we said we’ll partner with Dan and his passion with entrepreneurs, we’ll go ahead and study them so that we can bring insights on how we can better serve them. And the very first thing we want to do is understand, yeah, there’s very different stages that we see of entrepreneurs and we talk about the whole concept of The Greater Game. And the idea here is we wanted to identify… And I’ll share some PowerPoint slides. I know a lot of us are listening and I just want to walk through this, but Louis will have it in show notes, his team will. We really saw four areas. The first one was level one, stage one was foundation for freedom. They had ambition, the vision, but they really needed security. And Dan calls this, and I love this term, “cash confidence.” But it’s really using a financial advisor to have security. And one of the things, the last time I was on with you, Louis, we talked about there’s 59.2% of entrepreneurs who want to switch advisors because they don’t believe they have that security. And that’s kind of the foundation. And this is why you’re never going to read a more friendly financial advisor book for entrepreneurs than this because in our coaching program, we’re developing workshops and so on to bring this message out. And then the second level is where now we saw… and there were four levels. Dan and I identified 5.4% of these entrepreneurs that were just killing it and they were going through all four levels. The second level was energy for expansion. They were very motivated, they were excited about getting up and really the intellectual property, and Dan’s been one of the big leaders in this, is so much of what we know… And as I go through this too, I want every one of the advisors to think about it’s not only your entrepreneurial clients, this is for you too, is having this intellectual property, getting it out of your head so that your business is not founder-dependent or personality-dependent. You’ve got this enterprise. And then, the third level where it really took off was collaboration and multiplication. And Dan talked about the power of community and this is so big. And for advisors, the community is often working with other professionals, the accountants, the attorneys, the investment bankers. Matter of fact, when we survey, we found that 40% of the people with 25 million or more that they invest with an advisor came through an investment banker. So creating that community, teamwork, having the right team and then autonomy. Can you step away from your practice? The entrepreneurs step away 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, making that independence, moving from the founder-dependent to the enterprise. And the last level was exponential. And this is all along the way, the AI opportunities to accelerate this and augment this is really real, but the agency where the blue ocean, creating new markets, then getting the commitment and courage. And at each of these levels, we saw different entrepreneurs just really taking off. And one of the things that’s so important, Louis, for what we’re talking about today is advisors all are ready to treat stage one, the foundation for freedom, but they don’t really understand the other stages, and that’s really what entrepreneurs want. So if you want to work in this market, it’s very important for you to understand what you can do to help. The difference is often for an entrepreneur, a three to five multiplier versus 15, the level one or stage one to stage four. And this is where it gets really exciting. Louis Diamond: This would be a question for John. You found, and he’s mentioned it, that only 5.4% of entrepreneurs operate as architects versus optimizers. Can you explain the difference between those two personas? John Bowen: Well, I’m going to set up the research and let Dan really bring it home. But Dan and I came up with this framework, The Greater Game and the 10 Multipliers, and we’ve got that and we’re putting it in order and we wanted to really confirm. And everything we do is empirical research. So we reached out to 1,000 very successful entrepreneurs, 1,016. And it became very clear that the 5.4% of them were actually executing on all these levels and they were just distancing everyone else. And what we came up with, and Dan mentioned it earlier, that his book, 10x Is Easier Than 2x, but we said, what we’re seeing… and we’ve got a whole bunch, I think it’s 26 stories in the book of entrepreneurs, we’re seeing so many people blow this out that 100x is easier than 2x, and it forces a whole different mindset where if you’re optimizing, you’re kind of looking incrementally. But when you step back as an architect, big picture, wow, huge opportunity, both for entrepreneurs and advisors that are entrepreneurs to make a real big difference. This is something you’ve really coached to and had the privilege of working with thousands of entrepreneurs helping them on that journey. Dan Sullivan: Yeah. One of the things that was confusing for me, Lou, when I first started coaching, because everybody who came in to coach, you remember when you came into your first Chicago workshop, that everybody in the room was motivated. I’m not a motivational speaker. I don’t have to motivate the entrepreneurs who are in Coach. They’re already motivated. The problem is the focus of their ambition and focus. And what we discovered was that there were two types that showed up. I didn’t really understand it, but they’re what I call status-oriented entrepreneurs. And what they are when they were a kid, they didn’t have anything. Their family wasn’t at the top of the pole. When they were born, they grew up in a certain community, but there were certain people who lived in the right part of town and they had really big houses and everything about their lifestyle was way above everybody else in the lifestyle. And they saw the lack of what they had, because of the way they were born, that they were going to match it. But the matching was based in not only what the big home looks like. They’ve got other homes, they’ve got vacation homes. They belong to clubs. There’s clubs for the winners, and the losers aren’t part of those clubs, golf courses and boating clubs and everything else. And what I noticed was their motivation was simply to get to that point where they had the same sort of status. And they’re interesting for a while, but once they’ve gotten to that level of status, they’re not interesting anymore. They go on cruise control at that point and they just want to stay within that framework. But the really interesting entrepreneurs, and we really highlight them in the book, it’s just about growth. So when they get to one level, they say, “That’s great. Okay, now I’ve got a new baseline and now I want to grow even further.” And we have one story, very, very interesting. When he came into my Chicago workshop, I met him and he said, “I’ve got a big engineering company.” This is Paul VanDuyne. He’s out of the Quad City area of Iowa. And he says, “My ambition for your program is for three years, I’m just going to plan my retirement.” And I said, “Well, we’ve got some thoughts about that.” So I said, “Just do your first workshop and we’ll talk about it 90 days from now.” And he came back and he had an entirely different game plan, and he’s grown basically 250 times in his last 13 years. He’s completely transformed the industry that he’s in and he had this growth. So what we’re looking for in The Greater Game, we’re looking for those entrepreneurs who are already successful, but they don’t see any stopping point. They’ll grow to one level and then they say, “Okay, that’s the new baseline. Now I grow to another level.” Meanwhile, three years ago, what happened is the world got a new capability called AI. AI, you’re not talking 10x. If you use it properly… a lot of people are in the very early stages here, but we can see the ones who are applying it for growth. John has set up an entire research structure just to measure the people, and what are the people who are just motivated by growth? They don’t see any stopping point. They don’t see any retirement age. They’re just growing. They’re in better health now than they were when they started their ambition. One of the great breakthroughs we’re having now is the impact of AI on physical fitness and health right now. And so you have 70-year-olds now who are way more ambitious at 70 than they were at 50. So we think a whole new world is being created in front of us, but there isn’t the research to measure what the real winners of this new game are actually doing. And The Greater Game is a lot of Strategic Coach thinking tools, but it’s also the phenomenal research that John is doing, and we’re measuring exactly what are these people who just constantly grow, what are they actually doing? John Bowen: Louis, if I can jump in, I want to go back to Paul just for a second because he was going to do something classical, and Dan is also my coach and I was going to do something similar. Paul told Dan that he was going to retire at 65, and his wife. And he were going to open up a little mom-and-pop coffee shop. And the reason so many of the entrepreneurs are caught in the 2x optimization is they’re grinding it out. They’re working harder to be more successful and the desire to do that isn’t very high. That’s why you retire. On the other hand, what we found, the ones working on 100x are building platforms and ecosystems. They’re architected. And as we were writing the book, CEG grew by 58%. I’m going to give a lot of credit to the book, because as Dan and I were working on the processes, I wanted to walk all the talks. This is where the world is changing. I want everybody to think as a financial advisor, you’re being served twice, one with The Greater Game, they don’t care about a few basis points on returns. That’s table stakes. So much of the level one is taking care of the investment side, mitigating taxes, taking care of the areas, protecting the assets, some charitable planning, maybe shoot in some succession planning. I can tell you only 6% of the entrepreneurs actually feel they’re getting that from you, but that’s only level one. If you can help them from each of the stages, stage one through four, and help them create that vision, they’re going to love you to death. Because many of them want to continue in this path and create tremendous value, bigger impact, not creating legacies in the sense of enduring legacies, but active legacies. Last year, my wife and I set up a private foundation. I called it The Greater Game Foundation. I just love this so much, the difference that you can make, and I want to do it while I’m living, not while I’m gone type of thing. I think that’s one Dan and I very much share. Louis Diamond: Awesome. You wrote the book 10x Is Easier Than 2x, but now you’re claiming 100x is easier than 2x. How can that be the case? Dan Sullivan: The interesting thing, one of my points of proof on the original idea, the 10x Mind Expander, I use a lot of what the entrepreneurs have already done to prove the future. In other words, I said… You’ll remember the exercise, Lou. And I said, “I want you to pick your best number.” Everybody’s got a best number. It’s revenue, it’s net worth, whatever. And I said, “I just want you to multiply by 10.” And immediately there’s this reaction. He says, “You know how hard it was to get to just where I am 10 times?” And I said, “Well, you’ve already done 10 times. You’ve probably done 10 times twice. So let’s go back to the beginning. When were you 1/10 of where you are right now?” And they can nail it. They can tell you the year, they can tell you the month when they were 1/10 of where they were. And I said, “Let’s write the actual structure that got you from 1/10 to where you are right now.” And there’s five stages, and usually it’s an event, it’s a new relationship and all of a sudden they get a big check. And we measure, as entrepreneurs, size of check is a good scorecard. When you’re first starting, you got a $10,000 check, that was the biggest check. But about five years later, you get a $100,000 check, and all of a sudden it seems strange at breakfast, but by dinner you’ve normalized the idea, “Well, I know what it’s like to get a much bigger check, a 10 times check.” And so I have them create five growth stages that took them from where they were 1/10 to where they are right now, and I said, “Now let’s go back and talk about doing 10 times more.” And what they recognize, 80% who’ve got them 10 times the first time is going to be the same. It’s relationship, it’s having a great team, it’s having a simple approach that always works and it’s about the kind end customer. It’s not about them. It’s about who is it that you’re being a hero to in the marketplace. Because the truth is people don’t want to have a lot of relationships as they grow. They’d like to have one relationship to grow. They’d like to have an advisor who’s growing with them. But then John introduced me to the whole world of AI and I said, “We’re not talking 10 times anymore. We’re talking 100 times.” I said, “If you apply this new form of thinking, because it is an entirely new form of thinking, to what you’re doing right now, you can see that 10 times is going to happen just by doing three or four things where you’re eliminating waste, you’re eliminating things that just don’t work anymore, changing relationships, changing teamwork, changing collaborations in the marketplace.” But meanwhile, this new world of thinking is making you healthier. It’s making you more fit. So where before you thought you wouldn’t have the energy at 70, you now have more energy at 70 than you had at 50. So you’re the only one who says when it’s going to stop. I’m 82 in three weeks. We’re having this… I’m 82 and I’m way more ambitious at 82 than I was at 52. And the world is, because the world outside in terms of technological capability and access is way, way bigger in my 82nd year than it was in my 52nd year, and I love the growth. I have to tell you that the greatest point where AI is going to have the impact is going to be making money. The big titans, the Metas, the Googles, the Nvidias, what do they have in common? It’s about the money and where AI is being applied most is how you do new things with money. So that’s where the 100 times now comes from. I’ve normalized it. I said, “We’re not talking a 10x game anymore. We’re talking 100x game.” But the number on the scoreboard isn’t the issue. The scoreboard is, are you actually having fun? Louis Diamond: Yeah, we call it living your best business life. That’s our major barometer in charge. John, I don’t know if you could pull up your slides again, but I want to talk about the bridge between stage two in your pyramid to stage three. So that’s from expertise into scalable property. Can you explain how this relates to a financial advisor or an independent business owner and why this concept is so important for the valuation of a business? John Bowen: The book, it’s written for entrepreneurs, but I wanted to create some bridges while we’re together with Louis on really what’s going on for financial advisors and how you can help them. So if they’re at our stage one, Dan and my stage one of The Greater Game, and they want to go to two, they’re kind of dreaming oftentimes, and we want to help them begin creating the architectural structure. And as an advisor, this is really going to encourage everybody to read chapter two, The Greater Security. It talks about really the VFO, Virtual Family Office structure that they want, and you got to help them get financially solid, building personal wealth outside of the business, tax, estate, insurance, business structure. That’s what we all do today. Then though, if they want to move from level two to three, what we find over and over again, advisors are not equipped to do this, because what we’re taking is that founder where everything’s in its head, we’re now helping them move from just having that expertise to having scalable property. This is that codifying the process of building IP that’s transferable. And this is where the real valuation changes. Now, I’m not asking financial advisors to be the IP experts, but what the entrepreneurs want is they want somebody to help them curate and then coordinate between each of these levels. We go from three to four that the founder is indispensable, oftentimes at three. Now we want the team there to be invincible. And it’s not just the individual team as Dan was talking about. It’s the community. The collaboration is where this really takes off. The noise of AI is making it harder to market, but by partnering, particularly as financial advisors, we can very quickly have groups. One of the reasons why I’m collaborating with Dan, I want to help our financial advisors to work with entrepreneurs. Dan wants that research. So this is the natural collaboration. But they’re interested here in governance, self-managing teams. One of the things that Strategic Coach is brilliant at, the pre-transaction they want. And what we find so often is the indispensable discount. So many businesses sell, if they sell at all, they’re selling for three to five times multiplier, not advisory, but traditional businesses. Well, if you can make it to four, all of a sudden you’re now talking to 10 to 15 times multipliers. And think of it as if I’m a buyer and I’ve been involved in 50-some transactions, what happens is if the business is the guy, the gal, they’re the business, then you’re buying a very expensive job type thing. So let’s just keep a simple one. They’re having a couple million dollars of EBITDA. And let’s say the high range of that, five times EBITDA is $10 million. Well, the difference at 15 times two million is 30. Now, a few basis points I don’t really care about. I really care about capturing that difference. And because there’s a machine working without, I can buy that machine and generate that cash flow and it’s also taking advantage of the vision. And then when we get to level four, this is where most advisors make the biggest mistake is, “I’ve won. I’m at level four. I’ve got tremendous wealth.” Okay, but I’m now looking at significance. And I do want to go, “It’s not enduring legacy I’m looking for. I’m looking for active legacy. I’m looking for family governance.” Do I want to continue to build it like Dan and I’m doing at 70? I’m building the business so I can continue doing it as long as I want to do it. At the same time, and I love the impact we have and I know you do too, Louis, for the impact you have. Why not build the platform that’s going to allow you to do that as long as you want to do that? And if you don’t want to do it, let’s create the most value to transfer. When you start having conversations like that with families, entrepreneur families, it just changes, and very few advisors can do that. And that’s what we’re finding. We have a coaching company, training company, we train those things. They’re winning, quite honestly, almost 100% of the time because entrepreneurs didn’t know that was available to them. Louis Diamond: Interesting. It seems like the difference between stage two in your pyramid, to leap to stage three or four, that seems like a pretty massive pivot point for valuation for building a scalable business, having a self-managing company, et cetera. Do you find or have you seen that advisors or entrepreneurs that are in stage two themselves, they kind of pattern-match when they’re working with their own clients and kind of manage their own clients into stage two, or is it not really connected? John Bowen: I think that once you get the bigger picture and see the greater game, you can help your clients. That is a very small percentage. Remember, it was only 5.4 of when we surveyed successful entrepreneurs were actually playing the greater game, all four levels, the 10 greater multipliers. So I think what we tend to do is we get stuck on what we can do. And all the training is for level one for financial advisors. We don’t know how to guide them through the other levels. And really, the big difference from two to three, Dan and I’ve talked about this a lot, and I think Dan’s one of the biggest champions of this, is collaboration, putting together strategic partnerships. It could be with your competitors. This is for entrepreneurs, competitors, it could be various vendor partnerships. But the ability to open up markets that way when you have now put together in level two your IP, value creation’s huge. For advisors, it’s putting together partnerships with centers of influence. When we survey top financial advisors, 70% of their best clients came through COI, Centers of Influence with accountants, attorneys, investment bankers, and so on. Well, let’s do it on purpose, be successful on purpose. Louis Diamond: Dan, question for you. In all your experience working with successful financial advisors, insurance producers, probably any entrepreneur, what do you feel are the most common things that folks do unintentionally to really hurt their enterprise value even long before, or if ever, they decide to sell their business? Dan Sullivan: Yeah, I think the biggest thing is they stay entirely within their industry. One of the first questions that we ask our entrepreneurs when they come into the program and where you see it most is in the professions: lawyers, accountants, engineers, architects. I’ll say, “Well, what is it that you are?” And they’ll say, “Well, I’m a lawyer. I’m a tax lawyer.” And I said, “Are you a tax lawyer or are you an entrepreneur who has a specialty in tax law?” Okay. It makes a big difference, because if you see yourself as a tax lawyer, then you’re saying that you’re a better paid factory worker. You’re a manual laborer. But if you’re an entrepreneur, it’s a fairly recent idea in human history. There’s always been entrepreneurs, but it wasn’t until about the beginning of the 1800s that you start seeing this really different class of people in the marketplace, who, it didn’t matter how they were born, they were taking advantage of some new multiplier technology. Steam power being a great example. Around 1800, steam power came on. And anybody who had a bright vision for themselves and had the wherewithal to figure out what needs could be satisfied with a new technology, all of a sudden they became rich. They became rich. And it was very disruptive, because up until then it was based on aristocracy and you were born into wealth or you were born into poverty. There was no crossover. So what we’re saying is anybody who comes into Strategic Coach, I said, “I’m not going to tell you anything about your particular industry.” I said, “You know all the best practice people in your industry and they have workshops and they have conferences and you go to them, but they don’t know how to be entrepreneurs. You know how to create a really well-paying job, but you haven’t created a company.” A company is a totally different realm and I would say the vast majority of entrepreneurs, 95% of entrepreneurs haven’t really created a company. They’ve just created a really well-paying job which requires their presence and their attendance. I said, “You don’t get any payout for your company. If you’re the company, you need to have a structure.” I’ll give you an example. We started the company in 1989, and we’re about 270 times what our first year revenues were, and that was a great year. I was very happy for the first year, but we’re about 270 times. Along the way, what I did is I created other coaches so it wasn’t just Dan, the coach. So we have 16 other coaches. And I’ll give you a little example. In 1994, that year our company did 144 workshop days, 36 per quarter. One coach: me. Last year we did 600 workshop days and I did 12. 588 were done by other coaches. And our coaches are great. They’re clients who have coaching instincts and they do it. So about four years ago, I met one of our clients who’s an M&A specialist, and I laid out all the facts just in conversation, “This is our revenues. We have no debt. It’s repeatable income, around 70% is repeatable for one year.” I put the whole structure together. And I said, “So right off the top, I don’t have any relatives on staff.” The first thing they look for, “Any relatives working for you?” And he gave me a number. It was a big number. It was probably four times revenue for that year. He said, “We got a lot of structures.” Then something happened in the marketplace, and this is a great breakthrough that the US Patent Office sometime in the last 10 years recognized that up until about 10 years ago, to get a patent, you had to have a technological component for what you were doing. Sometime in the last 10 years, the patent bureaus decided that the internet is the technological component. So they’ve introduced education and entertainment as patentable processes. So in the last three years, we’ve gotten 82 patents. 82 patents. And these are our thinking tools, Lifetime Extender, Free Focus and Buffer Days. You know the routine that you learn in the first three days, and we’ve got 82 of them. We’re averaging about 25. I get a new patent about every two weeks. So I saw this M&A specialist, and I said, “This has happened in the last three years.” And he said, “Immediately it doubles the valuation of your company.” So what John’s saying here, as you go through the four stages, more and more you get paid for your creativity, retail, you get paid for your retail. But if you structure it, you record it, you package it, it is even greater than what you got paid for your creativity. Louis Diamond: Super interesting personal anecdote, and I appreciate you sharing that because that definitely did drive the point home for me. I see the applicability to probably any industry, but especially to any financial advisor. Dan Sullivan: Oh, yeah. Louis Diamond: The best RIA firms, the best advisors, they pretty much all start off with a cult of personality founder who’s the rainmaker. And then the practices that really grow and scale and are valuable are more platforms. That’s what private equity wants to invest in. And those are the firms that get the higher multiples. Dan Sullivan: Yeah. So the big thing is there’s a really, really great IP lawyer. He’s in our program and he’s made the breakthrough, and he’s the first IP lawyer that doesn’t charge by the hour. He charges by the patent. If the IP lawyer charges by the hour, it’s a very slow patent. If he charges by the patent, it’s a very fast patent. But the big thing, he showed a slide that in just big corporations, 1980, you took big corp, Fortune 500, the S&P 500, more than 80% of their valuation was tangible. It was property, it was real estate, it was fleets, it was equipment. Last year, more than 80% were intangibles. It was your ideas, intellectual. If you look at Elon Musk, it’s all intellectual capital. If you look at Meta, you look at anything, it’s intellectual. It’s not tangibles. So we’ve entered into that new world and AI has introduced us to that new world. It’s new processes, new structures, new approaches and it’s really interesting. It’s hard for entrepreneurs to get their idea that your creativity is actually property. Louis Diamond: It sounds like the ultimate challenge for anyone listening is translate your process, your ideas, the stuff that you’re doing by instinct as you both had said, and turn it into something patentable or something repeatable that another advisor, another executive, another owner can pick up and deploy and scale. John Bowen: We share the process in chapter four. It’s the fourth greater multiplier. And we actually share Caldwell, the attorney that Dan’s talking about, his story and the value creation. He’s now the major player in that space. And this is where we as advisors, we’re given a twofer, Dan and Louis, is that you can help your clients, but you can do this yourself too. You’ve been involved in a number of large transactions. The difference, I had a $2 billion advisory practice I sold in ’98, and we sold for 16 times earnings. And a big part of it, we were in that blue ocean. We had agents that we created and strategic process that would run without me, and it did type thing. And it continued to grow and went for about 10 fold what I sold for a number of years later. This is something that’s very real. Louis Diamond: Absolutely. I got two more questions for you guys because I know you’re both busy. For an advisor who feels like they’ve won the growth game, they grow 10, 15, 20% per year, they’re charged up, they’re on the Barron’s list, the Forbes list, they’re hitting their AUM milestones, they built an amazing team, they have a family member in the business. They have everything that anyone could want. What does the next game look like for them? What’s the next frontier once you’ve achieved all those things that from the outside looking in, seems like you have it all? What’s the next game to play? John Bowen: Well, we’re going to both say The Greater Game, but the- Dan Sullivan: Well, tell them about the dashboard, John, because the book is just part of the deal here. It gives you the landscape. There’s a great tool that comes with the book. So tell them about the dashboard. John Bowen: Really what we wanted to do is to create kind of a community just around the book. Dan and I and team built a dashboard. We were very creative on naming, thegreatergamedashboard.com. You can go in and we’re now studying every month over 500 successful entrepreneurs. We have that data in here. You’ll be able to see how you compare at each of these stages, the four stages, the 10 multipliers. And you’re going to get specific recommendations. This is for entrepreneurs. But again, you should do it. If you’re a financial advisor, you have an equity ownership, you should definitely be doing it as well. And one of the things that we see over and over again, and Louis, you probably see this a lot in the conversations. They have advisors who have already won. They don’t know what the next game is. And it’s easy to check out at that point. It’s easy to frustrate the next generation of leaders and so on. If you take the time to really see what the opportunities are and architect to realize that vision, you can create, whether it’s selling the practice, creating tremendous value there or designing a role for yourself, maybe it’s executive chairman type for that business that you can guide it with the vision and what you’ve brought and strategy. But bring that team up. That’s going to create so much value, so much impact and you can design it for the life that you want. And that’s where I get very excited. Louis Diamond: I can hear the passion in your voice. Dan, let’s finish with you. Given all of your experience working with entrepreneurs, advisors, business owners, et cetera, what’s the one move that you’ve seen the most successful entrepreneurs in your orbit make that’s changed the trajectory of their firms and their life more than anything else? Dan Sullivan: I’ll answer it in a little roundabout way. Periodically, I have a thinking tool. I said, “If everything was taken away from you as an entrepreneur and they moved you 1,000 miles away, what’s the one thing that you would take with you? It has to be portable. So what is the most portable thing that you have that you would start over again with the greatest value that you had created previously? What would it be? And then you would rebuild what you’ve already created, but you would do it much faster. What would be the one thing?” It’s an interesting thought. But in our concept, it’s called unique ability, that there’s something about you, as an individual, that first of all gave you enough confidence to become an entrepreneur because it’s risky. It’s a risky proposition. It’s guessing and betting and it’s risky business and it’s unique ability. So the starting point for all growth in Strategic Coach is that there’s something about you that’s absolutely unique. You don’t have any competitors on this and it has two qualities. One is that you’re so good at it, you don’t take it seriously. You’ve done this since you were a child and it just comes to you naturally and you don’t see the significance of it. When you’re in Coach, you start seeing the significance of it. And the second thing is you just absolutely love doing it. It’s what you love doing most of all. It comes to you naturally. You don’t even have to think about it. And then you begin to realize that anything else you’re doing as the founder and the owner of your company, probably somebody else can do. So you’re doing 20 things, but really you should be doing three things. The other 17 things still need to be done but not by you. And that’s the breakthrough. You have to simplify in order to multiply. Louis Diamond: I absolutely love that. I know when I was in Coach, that was my biggest takeaway or realization was figuring out what my unique ability was because I think the two components,
Innovation isn't about funding, it's about how organisations are built and led. Progress comes from cutting bureaucracy, empowering mission-led teams, and asking the right questions to unlock bold breakthroughs. This week, Dave, Esmee and Rob are joined again by André Loesekrug-Pietri, Chair and Scientific Director of the Joint European Disruptive Initiative (JEDI, Europe's ARPA) to explore how Europe can turn moonshot ambitions into reality by building the right people, culture and operating models for future-shaping organisations. TLDR00:41 – Introduction01:14 – Hang out: Esmee returns and the missing API has been found!05:14 – Dig in: Staying in step with global innovation12:57 – Conversation with André Loesekrug-Pietri1:02:26 – Roland Garros tennis, and unlocking creative energy GuestAndre Loeskrug-Petri: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrepietri/X: @eurojediwww.jedi.foundation HostsDave Chapman: https://www.linkedin.com/in/chapmandr/Esmee van de Giessen: https://www.linkedin.com/in/esmeevandegiessen/Rob Kernahan: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rob-kernahan/ ProductionMarcel van der Burg: https://www.linkedin.com/in/marcel-vd-burg/Dave Chapman: https://www.linkedin.com/in/chapmandr/ SoundBen Corbett: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ben-corbett-3b6a11135/Louis Corbett: https://www.linkedin.com/in/louis-corbett-087250264/ 'Realities Remixed' is an original podcast from Capgemini
The launch of the Arm AGI CPU marks one of the most significant milestones in Arm's history. In this episode of Arm Viewpoints, Brian Fuller sits down with Arm VP Eddie Ramirez to explore why Arm made the leap from IP and compute subsystems to deployment-ready silicon, and what that means for the future of AI infrastructure. They discuss the rise of agentic AI, the growing importance of CPUs in orchestrating AI workloads, the power and efficiency challenges facing modern data centers, and how Arm is positioning itself to help organizations deploy AI at unprecedented scale. Along the way, Eddie shares behind-the-scenes insights from the AGI CPU launch event and offers a glimpse into how AI, cloud infrastructure, and physical intelligence may evolve over the next five years.
Wie immer diskutieren wir im ersten Teil unseres Programms aktuelle Ereignisse der Woche. Wir beginnen mit einer Analyse der Verhandlungen im Nahen Osten, wobei wir die unterschiedlichen Interessen der Regierungschefs der USA und Israels näher betrachten. Anschließend sprechen wir über Deutschlands Wiederaufrüstung und Verteidigungsausgaben, die in Frankreich offenbar Besorgnis ausgelöst haben. In unserem Wissenschafts- und Technologiethema sprechen wir über einen Bericht der Universität der Vereinten Nationen, der davor warnt, dass die Umweltauswirkungen von KI-Rechenzentren mittlerweile eine Größenordnung erreicht haben, die mit der von ganzen Ländern vergleichbar ist. Und zum Abschluss des ersten Teils des Programms diskutieren wir über das Finale der French Open. Der Rest des Programms ist der deutschen Sprache und Kultur gewidmet. Die heutige Grammatiklektion konzentriert sich auf The Passive Voice – Part 3. Viele Deutsche lieben ihren Balkon. Er ist eine Wohlfühloase, wo man sich wie zu Hause fühlt – wo man ja auch tatsächlich ist. Meistens wird er gemütlich und individuell eingerichtet. Manche verbringen sogar gerne ihren Sommerurlaub dort. Doch es gibt auch Regeln zu beachten. Außerdem sprechen wir über Hape Kerkeling, einen deutschen Komiker, der seit Jahrzehnten wirklich alles und jeden auf den Arm nimmt. Und genau das ist auch die Redewendung dieser Woche: Auf den Arm nehmen. Unterschiedliche Interessen von Trump und Netanjahu erschweren die Verhandlungen im Nahen Osten Frankreich ist besorgt über die Aufrüstung und die Verteidigungsausgaben Deutschlands KI-Rechenzentren verbrauchen so viel Energie wie ganze Länder Viele Überraschungen bei den French Open 2026 Urlaub auf Balkonien Hape Kerkeling
durée : 00:02:10 - Comme chaque grand événement avant elle, la Coupe du monde de football 2026 est ciblée par des fausses informations, parfois dans un but économique, parfois dans un but politique. - réalisation : Armêl Balogog, La cellule Vrai ou faux Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France
A Computex 2026 trouxe uma série de anúncios importantes para o mercado de tecnologia, mas poucos chamaram tanta atenção quanto o RTX Spark, a nova plataforma da NVIDIA voltada para computação acelerada por IA em dispositivos locais. Neste episódio do Diocast, discutimos o que exatamente é o RTX Spark, quais problemas ele pretende resolver e como ele se posiciona em um mercado que já conta com soluções como Snapdragon X Elite, Ryzen AI e os novos processadores Intel com aceleração dedicada para inteligência artificial.Mais do que simplesmente lançar um novo chip, a NVIDIA parece estar ampliando sua presença para além das placas de vídeo tradicionais. O RTX Spark combina CPU baseada em arquitetura ARM, GPU com tecnologias derivadas do ecossistema RTX e recursos dedicados para cargas de trabalho envolvendo inteligência artificial. Na prática, isso pode abrir espaço para computadores mais eficientes, capazes de executar modelos de IA localmente, reduzindo a dependência de serviços em nuvem e melhorando aspectos como privacidade, latência e disponibilidade.---https://diolinux.com.br/podcast/lancamento-da-nvidia-rtx-spark.html
Join The Full Nerd gang as they offer level-headed takes about the latest PC building news. In this episode the gang unpacks the ramifications of the ARM news coming out of Computex, and what we can expect for the next 12 months of PC building based off what was shown. And of course we answer questions live! Timecodes: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:16:06 - The ARM Revolution 00:52:48 - Next 12 Months 01:24:55- Q&A Links: - TAP interview: https://www.pcworld.com/article/3159455/watch-intels-tom-petersen-talks-arc-g3-and-handheld-gaming-at-computex.html - RTX Spark: https://www.pcworld.com/article/3157185/nvidias-rtx-spark-just-turned-arm-into-a-real-pc-threat.html - 5800X3D returns: https://www.pcworld.com/article/3151734/amd-brought-the-ryzen-7-5800x3d-back-because-am4-refuses-to-die.html Podcast feeds: - Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-full-nerd-podcast/id1113193062 - Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/71KPlf1jOh1Z0KHZrHjir2?si=5fab3e7943ec4214 - Pocket Casts: https://pca.st/ggAZ - YouTube: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLiZwoK8DQiwyP-kiDdsO3PD2_dmEkVKeT&si=7306D5CMDC2rU-aO - RSS: https://feeds.megaphone.fm/IDG8935300959 Join the PC related discussions and ask us questions on Discord: https://discord.gg/UWhjwg778a Follow the crew on X and Bluesky: @AdamPMurray @BradChacos @MorphingBall Some links may contain affiliate links, which means if you buy something PCWorld may receive a small commission. ============= Read PCWorld! Website: http://www.pcworld.com Newsletter: http://www.pcworld.com/newsletters/signup ============= Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
CELÝ DÍL NAJDETE NA https://herohero.co/studion A V RÁMCI KLUBOVÉHO PŘEDPLATNÉHO DENÍKU N https://denikn.cz/podcast-studio-n/ „Rusové potřebovali, aby to v Arménii přinejmenším zůstalo tak, jak to je. Snažili se, aby proruské strany dohromady měly dostatek křesel v parlamentu, a mohly tak zabránit radikálním ústavním změnám,“ říká ve Studiu N reportérka zahraniční redakce Petra Procházková. „Putinova největší noční můra je Trump v Jerevanu,“ dodává v rozhovoru. Arménský premiér Nikol Pašinjan sice vyhrál volby a na první pohled by se zdálo, že země potvrdila proevropské směřování. Výsledek je ale složitější. Proruská opozice nečekaně posílila, premiér nedosáhne na ústavní většinu a čísla ukazují, že skoro čtyřicet procent Arménů chce dobré vztahy s Moskvou. „Pro Armény je určující pragmatismus a touha přežít – a to ne v úplné nuzotě. Oni podřídí zahraniční politiku tomu, co bude pro Arménii prospěšné, ne co bude hodnotové,“ vysvětluje v podcastu Procházková. Jak se stalo, že Pašinjan politicky přežil porážku v Náhorním Karabachu? Proč tolik Arménů pořád věří Rusku? A dokáže Evropa kavkazské zemi nabídnout skutečné bezpečnostní garance? Podívejte se na celý rozhovor. Celé díly Studia N najdete na platformě Herohero, na webu Deníku N jsou přístupné předplatitelům a předplatitelkám Klubu N. Bezplatné části zveřejňujeme v podcastových aplikacích Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Podbean či na YouTube. Sledovat nás můžete také na Instagramu.
Nvidia's RTX Spark Targets Apple's M-Series as a New AI Laptop Super ChipThe script argues Nvidia has escalated competition with Apple by unveiling the RTX Spark, an ARM-based “super chip” combining Blackwell GPU architecture with Grace, positioned for on-device AI agents. Citing reports from The Telegraph and Mac Rumors, it claims RTX Spark can run 120B-parameter local LLMs, handle 12K video editing, and play AAA games at 1440p with ray tracing, and will appear in a Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra plus high-end HP, Dell, and Lenovo systems. It frames this as a direct threat to Apple's M-series efficiency advantage and Mac “walled garden,” while noting Apple is banking on an N5 chip and rumored “Project Q” to build data-center-class AI chips to reduce reliance on Nvidia. The script highlights Nvidia's ~86% AI accelerator share and urges viewers to watch adoption over the next six months.00:00 Nvidia Challenges Apple00:29 Meet RTX Spark01:22 Three Big Advantages01:51 Windows Laptops Get It02:39 Apple Plays Defense03:04 Project Q Rumors03:45 Market Share And Bets04:41 Stay Winning Mindset05:02 Subscribe And Wrap Up________________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME ON X: https://twitter.com/staywinningusdFOLLOW ME ON INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/staywinningusd/SUBSCRIBE ON YOUTUBE: www.youtube.com/@staywinningusdDOWNLOAD ON SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/2lPyA19keI2fpr0xZrEKxMNEWSLETTER SIGNUP: https://stay-winning-wealth.kit.com/806fb337d7SUBSCRIBE TO THE BLOG: https://medium.com/@staywinningusd________________________________________________________________
durée : 00:02:03 - La députée socialiste Céline Thiébault-Martinez a affirmé mardi que "1% des auteurs de viols" sont condamnés, en pleine polémique sur les manques de moyens et les défaillances de la justice dans l'affaire Lyhanna. - réalisation : Armêl Balogog, La cellule Vrai ou faux Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France
出演者： miko、quim 配信ペース： 隔週 番組時間：126分10秒 ♯本番組はリモート収録です。 ♯収録時環境の影響により、全体的に聴き取り辛くなっております。 申し訳ございません。 隔週に1回お届け。mikoラジ、第399回です。 記念すべき400回まで、あと1回！ そんな収録だったのですが、まさかの収録開始時にまさかの事態が?! ほぼほぼ収録開始前のトークのような雰囲気からの、ロングロングトーク！ ……ハプニングが起きると、収録って長引きますよね（遠い目）。 最後までごゆるりとお楽しみくださいませ。 ♯途中で色々とノイズ等入りますが、収録時のものです。 ご安心ください、お手持ちの機器は正常です。 大切なお知らせ https://x.com/quim/status/2064306767971180693?s=20 大変な絵 https://x.com/radio_4649/status/2064723321288380804?s=20 ・おとらってRECORD 公式サイト n-remix.com/otolatte/ ↑『おとらって10thライブ KUWANA』に参加予定の方は、 「来場予約はこちらから」からご予約を！ 開催日／2026.8.23(日) 第一部 OP11:30 ST12:00 第二部 OP14:40 ST15:00 //////////////////// VOICEVOX:ずんだもん VOICEVOX:四国めたん //////////////////// -------------------- ●お便り募集中！ mikoラジでは以下の内容でお便りを募集中です！ ・ふつおた ／普通のお便り、お待ちしています！ ・mikoは大変な絵を描いていきました ／miko画伯に描いて欲しいお題をお待ちしています！ ・メシヲコエテ ／料理人・mikoに教えて欲しいレシピをお待ちしています！ bit.ly/2GAWjyv 投稿フォームからラジオに投稿が出来ます！ コーナー名を選び、メッセージ・ラジオネーム・お所を入力して、 どんどん送ってください！ お待ちしています！！ ------------ 本ラジオのメインパーソナリティーである「チーム我等(miko/quim)」、 それぞれ以下個人サークルにて活動中です。 ・miko：miko ・quim：SHIGANAI RECORDS（ shiganai.com/ ） 活動詳細については、上記HPの他 各人のブログ/twitter等にて随時告知しておりますので、チェックしてみてください！ ・みころぐ。(mikoのブログ)（ ameblo.jp/miko-nyu/ ） ・@ mikonyu(mikoのtwitter)（ twitter.com/mikonyu ） ・@ quim(quimのtwitter)（ twitter.com/quim ） --- その他の活動については、以下のとおりです！ -- チーム我等がメインクルーとして活動していた「アルバトロシクス（ albatrosicks.com/ ）」、 これまでリリースしたCDは、イオシスショップ（ iosys.booth.pm/ ）にて頒布しております。ご興味ある方は是非！ ---------- ☆2026年6月IOSYSはいてない.comパワープレイ楽曲 「Phantasmagoria mystical expectation」 アレンジ・ギター・ベース ARM ボーカル 悠 杏李 作詞 kiku 夕野ヨシミ 原曲：風神少女 音楽ジャンル：ミクスチャーポップ 収録アルバム：東方風櫻宴 2006・5・21 Release https://www.iosysos.com/discographyportal.php?cdno=IO-0090 MV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOmaLZDp3y0
Ukrainas prezidents Volodimirs Zelenskis publiski aicina uz miera procesu, Putins noraida viņa tikšanās piedāvājumu. Tramps cer panākt mieru ar Irānu, bet atsākusies tieša karadarbība starp Irānu un Izraēlu. Armēnijā parlamenta vēlēšanās uzvarējusi premjera Nikola Pašinjana partija "Pilsoniskais līgums". Aktualitātes analizē Latvijas Transatlantiskās organizācijas ģenerālsekretāre Sigita Struberga un Latvijas ārpolitikas institūta pētnieks Marts Eduards Ivaskis. Mēģinot pārliecināt Kremļa apsēsto Pagājušās ceturtdienas, 4. jūnija, vakarā Ukrainas prezidents Volodimirs Zelenskis nāca klajā ar publisku vēstuli agresorvalsts vadonim Putinam. Liela daļa no teksta veltīta pašreizējās situācijas raksturojumam, uzskaitot argumentus, kāpēc kara turpināšana nav Krievijas un arī tās valdnieka interesēs, un aicinot viņu sēsties pie sarunu galda. Tonis ir tiešs, pat skarbs, taču Ukrainai nepārprotami ir uz tādu tiesības, ievērojot, ka tās īstenotais lidrobotu karš šobrīd liek runāt par iespējamu lūzumu karadarbības gaitā. Melnu dūmu mutuļi pār Sanktpēterburgu tieši starptautiskā ekonomikas foruma norises dienā, pamatīgi zaudējumi Krievijas Baltijas flotes munīcijas krājumiem un no ierindas izsista korvete, lielā mērā paralizētas autotransporta un dzelzceļa komunikācijas ar Krimu, kas jau izpaužas kā ass degvielas deficīts okupētajā pussalā. Tomēr tas viss joprojām nav pietiekami pārliecinošs arguments Kremļa saimniekam, kurš, atbildot uz vēstījumu no Kijivas, paziņoja, ka šobrīd neredzot jēgu tikties ar prezidentu Zelenski, un atkārtoja jau labi zināmās prasības par Krievijas vēl neieņemtu Ukrainas teritoriju atdošanu. Prezidenta Zelenska vēstulē piesaukta arī Savienoto Valstu praktiskā atteikšanās no miera centieniem Ukrainas sakarā un Eiropas iespējamā iesaistīšanās. Kā apliecinājums tam bija Ukrainas vadītāja svētdienas vizīte Londonā, tiekoties ar Lielbritānijas premjeru Kīru Stārmeru, Francijas prezidentu Emanuelu Makronu un Vācijas kancleru Frīdrihu Mercu. Četrinieks deklarēja piecus priekšnoteikumus taisnīgam un ilgstošam mieram: tūlītējs un pilnīgs pamiers, karadarbības apturēšana pie esošās saskares līnijas, stingras un juridiski saistošas drošības garantijas Ukrainai, ko nodrošinātu starptautisku spēku klātbūtne, Ukrainai nodarīto zaudējumu kompensēšana, no kā būs atkarīga Krievijas aktīvu atsaldēšana, kā arī Eiropas drošības interešu ievērošana un Eiropas Savienības un NATO līdzdalība ikvienā sarunu aspektā, kas skar šīs struktūras. Savukārt vakar, 9. jūnijā, Tallinā Ukrainas līderis tikās ar Ziemeļvalstu un Baltijas valstu astotnieka premjerministriem. Partneri izteica atbalstu Ukrainas uzņemšanai NATO un Eiropas Savienībā, taču galvenais samita akcents bija sadarbība pretstāvē Krievijai, sevišķi – pēdējā laikā aktuālajā pretgaisa aizsardzības aspektā. Kā nozīmīgs solis šai ziņā tiek atzīmēti Tallinā noslēgtie Ukrainas aizsardzības sadarbības līgumi ar Igauniju un Latviju. Miera optimists Tramps Vakar, runājot ar reportieriem Ņujorkā, prezidents Donalds Tramps paziņoja, ka vienošanās par mieru ar Irānu tikšot panākta tuvāko divu trīs dienu laikā. Tā būšot ļoti laba vienošanās, pauda Baltā nama saimnieks, pēc kam tikšot atbloķēts Hormuza šaurums un Irāna izdošot savus bagātinātā urāna krājumus. No vienas puses, pēdējās nedēļās medijos tiešām parādījās signāli par to, ka sarunās starp Vašingtonu un Teherānu, kas notiek ar Pakistānas, Kataras un Omānas starpniecību, izstrādāts zināms mierlīguma ietvars. Taču tikuši minēti arī vairāki aspekti, kuros Irāna paliek striktās pozīcijās, proti – tā nevēlas principā atteikties no urāna bagātināšanas iespējas nākotnē, vēlas saglabāt kontroli Hormuza šaurumā arī pēc karadarbības beigām un vēlas, lai daļa no vienošanās būtu arī karadarbības pārtraukšana pret kustību „Hezbollah” Libānā. Pie tam tieši pēdējās dienās notikusi karadarbības eskalācija. Svētdien Izraēlas gaisa spēki deva triecienu „Hezbollah” objektiem Beirutā, uz ko reaģēja Irāna, raidot pret Izraēlu lidrobotu vilni. Atbilde bija Izraēlas aviācijas uzlidojumi aizsardzības infrastruktūras objektiem Irānā. Tādējādi pirmo reizi kopš aprīļa Irāna un Izraēla apmainījās savstarpējiem triecieniem. Pirmdien pēcpusdienā, pēc Donalda Trampa paustās nepatikas par notiekošo, pretinieki aktīvu apšaudīšanos pārtrauca, taču vakar Izraēlas aviācija jau atkal bombardēja „Hezbollah” objektus Libānā – šoreiz Tīras pilsētā, no kurienes bēga tūkstošiem iedzīvotāju. Visbeidzot vakar savstarpējiem triecieniem apmainījās Irāna un Savienoto Valstu spēki Persijas līča rajonā. Viss sākās ar to, ka Irānas lidrobots virs līča notrieca amerikāņu helikopteru; apkalpe tika sekmīgi izglābta. Atbildot uz to notika Savienoto Valstu gaisa spēku uzlidojums pretgaisa aizsardzības iekārtām, savukārt Irāna raidīja lidrobotus pret amerikāņu bāzēm Kuveitā un Bahreinā. Pēc visa notikušā nākas šaubīties, vai no aprīlī panāktās ugunspārtraukšanas kaut kas vairs ir palicis pāri, taču Donalda Trampa optimismu drīza miera sakarā tas, vismaz šķietami, nespēj mazināt. Armēnijas vēlēšanu ģeopolitiskās likmes Svētdien, 7. jūnijā, notikušās Armēnijas parlamenta vēlēšanas pamatoti tika uzlūkotas kā šīs Aizkaukāza valsts ģeopolitiskās izšķiršanās moments. Apstākļu spiesta, Armēnija līdz nesenam laikam paļāvās uz Krieviju kā savu galveno stratēģisko partneri, taču rūgti vīlās, kad Maskava neko nopietnu nepasāka, lai novērstu Kalnu Karabahas jeb Arcahas reģiona nonākšanu Azerbaidžānas kontrolē. Tā nu Erevānai nācās norīt krupi un slēgt vienošanos ar spēcīgāko kaimiņvalsti, kur starpnieka lomā iejutās nevis Kremļa saimnieks Putins, bet gan ASV prezidents Donalds Tramps. Daudziem Armēnijā tā joprojām ir sāpīga un nepieņemama piekāpšanās, un varēja lēst, ka premjerministram Nikolam Pašinjanam nebūs viegli aizlāpīt šo plaisu savā reputācijā. Tomēr viņa izvēle – ciešāku saišu būvēšana ar Eiropas Savienību, distancējoties no līdzšinējā sabiedrotā Krievijas – izrādījās pareiza. Vēlēšanās Pašinjana vadītā partija „Pilsoniskais līgums” ieguva gandrīz pusi vēlētāju balsu un līdz ar to – parlamenta vairākumu. Kremlis, protams, darīja visu iespējamo, lai to nepieļautu. Pagājušā gada beigās tika nodibināta partija „Stiprā Armēnija”, kuru vada miljardieris Samvels Karapetjans – Gruzijas oligarha Bidzinas Ivanišvili līdzinieks, kurš arī savu bagātību sarūpējis pamatā Krievijā. Partijas kampaņa tēloja premjeru Pašinjanu kā nodevēju, kurš vainojams pie Arcahas zaudēšanas un tagad velk savu dzimteni uz pagrimušajiem Rietumiem, prom no tradicionālajām kristīgajām vērtībām. „Stiprajai Armēnijai” ir ciešas saiknes ar tām Armēņu Apustuliskās baznīcas aprindām, kuras pēdējā laikā aktīvi iesaistījušās politiskajos procesos opozīcijas pusē. Karapetjana sekotāji uztur vēstījumu, ka vienīgā Armēnijas cerība ir draudzība ar Krieviju, savukārt Pašinjana piedāvātā eiropeiskā orientācija draudot ar pakļaušanu Turcijai. Šādi motīvi, protams, rod dramatisku atbalsi armēņu tautas vēsturiskajā atmiņā. Ar līdzīgu vēstījumu startēja vēl viens opozīcijas bloks „Armēnijas alianse” un tās līderis Roberts Kočarjans. Krievija pamatīgi ieguldījās, lai panāktu Pašinjana sakāvi. Dezinformācijas kampaņa, kuru īstenoja gan apmaksāti mediji, gan botu tīkli, tiek raksturota kā otrs jaudīgākais Kremļa īstenotais vēlēšanu ietekmēšanas mēģinājums, atpaliekot tikai no pagājušā gada Moldovas parlamenta vēlēšanām. Vēl viens paņēmiens bija Krievijā dzīvojošo Armēnijas pilsoņu nogādāšana dzimtenē, lai viņi nobalsotu par promaskaviskajiem spēkiem. Kā redzams, pūles izrādījušās teju veltas. „Stiprā Armēnija” ieguva apmēram 23,5 procentus, „Armēnijas alianse” – nepilnus desmit procentus balsu. Tiesa, „Pilsoniskajam līgumam” pietrūkst mandātu konstitucionālajam vairākumam, un tas var apgrūtināt galīgo izlīgumu ar Azerbaidžānu. Armēnijas konstitūcijas preambulā ir atsauces uz pagājušajā gadsimtā tapušiem tiesiskiem aktiem, kuros piesauktas pretenzijas uz šo reģionu, un Azerbaidžāna pieprasa šo fragmentu izslēgšanu no pamatlikuma. Sagatavoja Eduards Liniņš.
Click to Text Thoughts on Today's EpisodeWhen a friend described drooping eyes, slurred words, and fuzzy thinking at brunch — and then brushed it off as anxiety — I knew something wasn't right. That conversation sparked this important Common Sense episode on recognizing the warning signs of stroke, TIA, and heart attacks, and why acting fast can make all the difference. I hope this episode gives you a little more confidence and a little less hesitation if you ever need it. Share it with someone you love. It might matter more than you know.In This Episode:Why women are more likely to dismiss their symptoms — and the cost of waitingThe FAST acronym for stroke and TIA: F — Face droopingA — Arm weaknessS — Speech difficultyT — Time to call 911What a TIA (transient ischemic attack) is and why feeling better doesn't mean you're in the clearAdditional stroke warning signs beyond FASTHow heart attacks present differently in women — including jaw pain, back pain, nausea, fatigue, and shortness of breath with no chest pain at allWhy you should call 911 instead of driving yourselfA personal reflection on loss and the what-ifs we carryEpisodes Discussed:500th Episode: 5 Uncomfortable Lessons from 500 EpisodesFor more information on heart attacks and stroke visit:American Heart Association — heart.org — covers both heart attack and stroke, very thorough, well-organized for general audiencesAmerican Stroke Association — stroke.org — technically a division of AHA but has its own dedicated stroke content including FAST informationMy latest recommended ways to nourish and move your body, mind and spirit: Nourished Notes Bi-Weekly Newsletter30+ Non-Gym Ways to Improve Your Health (free download)Connect with Amy: GracedHealth.com Instagram: @GracedHealthYouTube: @AmyConnell
Blodfläckar och jordrester undersöks för att få reda på mer om de historiska slagfälten i Europa. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. I Sverige finns en av världens största samlingar av militära fanor. Flera tusen stora målade sidendukar, med högt symboliskt värde, som togs som troféer på de olika slagfälten i Europa – framför allt under 16- och 1700-talet. Troféer som skulle visas upp för folket hemma i Sverige. Länge hänge de färggranna fanorna i Riddarholmskyrkan i Stockholm. Men sen drygt 100 år är fanorna nerpackade i olika magasin, tills nu när smutsen på fanorna ska undersökas.Följ med till ett labb där de sköra fanorna med smuts- och blodfläckar undersöks och till Riddarholmskyrkan, mitt i det historiska Stockholm, där fanorna förr hängde till allmän beskådan.Medverkande: Karin Tetteris, forskningssamordnare vid Armémuseum och Johanna Nilsson, Göteborgs universitet. Reporter: Joacim Lindwalljoacim.lindwall@sr.seProducent: Lars Broströmlars.brostrom@sr.se
durée : 00:02:25 - Le patron des Républicains Bruno Retailleau dénonce le manque de sanctions envers les magistrats, alors qu'une enquête administrative se penche sur d'éventuels manquements dans les procédures judiciaires qui ont visé Jérôme Barella, suspecté d'avoir tué la petite Lyhanna. - réalisation : Armêl Balogog, La cellule Vrai ou faux Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France
Mit Emmanuel ist endlich mal wieder ein Mann zu Gast, und was für einer! Er berichtet, dass er und seine Freunde zusammen weinen und sich in den Arm nehmen, aber trotzdem ist auch er schon mal in einer Beziehung mit einer Frau gelandet, bei der seine Kumpel sich fragen mussten. Ja, wo ist er denn hin? Eine Folge über gesunde Männlichkeit und das Finden der richtigen Beziehung. Sein Instagramhandle ist übrigens https://www.instagram.com/Pennedhaus/ Lust auf die besten Pflegeprodukte für deine Vulva? Dann empfehle ich sehr dringend (und ja, es gibt einen Rabatt) https://drvivienkarl.com/discount/PAULA5?redirect=/pages/paula-lambert
SpaceX is heading toward one of the most anticipated IPOs in market history, but the challenge is whether a company already valued in the trillions can still deliver the kind of explosive returns investors expect from an Elon Musk-led business.Chuck Zodda and Mike Armstrong break down the hype surrounding SpaceX, from Starlink and space-based data centers to the massive expectations already built into the stock before it begins trading. They also discuss why IPO investors should be prepared for major volatility, what past high-profile IPOs like Palantir, CoreWeave, Arm, and Rivian can teach investors, whether working from home is hurting careers and mental health, how retirees may be underspending out of fear, and why banks are training tellers to spot scams before customers lose thousands of dollars.
durée : 00:02:16 - Le député LFI Bastien Lachaud assure que des "influenceurs" travaillant avec la cellule French Response du ministère des Affaires étrangères critiquent La France insoumise et travaillent pour des "intérêts étrangers". - réalisation : Armêl Balogog, La cellule Vrai ou faux Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France
Microsoft Build 2026 announced an end-to-end agentic AI stack. COMPUTEX Taipei confirmed heterogeneous AI infrastructure across ARM, Marvell, Intel, Qualcomm, and NVIDIA. Alphabet raised $80 billion. Cisco Live repositioned the network as the AI platform. Patrick Moorhead and Daniel Newman break it all down alongside earnings from Broadcom, HPE, Palo Alto Networks, and CrowdStrike, plus the token cost conversation, the edge AI push, and what Palantir and Oracle are saying about proprietary data as the real AI moat. The handpicked topics for this week are: Microsoft Build 2026 Announced an End-to-End Agentic AI Stack: Microsoft shipped MAI-Thinking-1, its first homegrown thinking model, alongside Scout, Microsoft IQ, Project Solara, and a Majorana 2 quantum update targeting a 2029 commercial timeline with claims of a 1,000x reliability gain. Pat describes MAI-Thinking-1 as likely better than Sonnet 4.6 in blind testing and delivering close to GPT 5.5 quality at a far lower cost. Scout is Microsoft's first autopilot agent, anchoring the M365 Agent Suite with Office Pilot Agent Mode and Agent 365. Microsoft IQ serves as the context layer, integrating M365, business data, boundary IQ, and web IQ with GitHub Copilot, Foundry, and Copilot Studio. Project Solara is a new Android-based platform built for agent-first devices across transportation, retail, and hospital settings. Microsoft also added 83 Unix commands to the Windows stack. Dan frames Microsoft's real play as distribution, not frontier model development, noting that the open model ecosystem being pulled into the platform will matter more to CFOs managing token costs at scale. (The Decode) The AI Stack Goes Multi-Silicon — COMPUTEX Taipei 2026 Confirms Heterogeneous AI Infrastructure: ARM's AGI CPU is in production with Google moving its TPU head node to ARM, and adding Oracle and ByteDance as new customers. ARM also introduced a new switch, the TT100, and put the 51T CPO switch on stage. Marvell received a trillion-dollar company endorsement from Jensen Huang, adding $90 billion in market cap on the comment alone. Intel announced disaggregated inference details and Xeon 6+ Clearwater Forest, its first 18A data center processor. Vista Equity and Cambium Capital announced a NeoCloud called Vector Core Compute, with Xeon 6 handling orchestration, Salmonova RUs handling decode, and Blackwell GPUs handling pre-fill. Qualcomm's Cristiano Amon announced the Dragonfly data center brand with Snapdragon C details coming at their June investor day. The WSTS raised the 2026 semiconductor TAM forecast by 90% to $1.51 trillion, with Pat noting the market could hit a trillion dollars if memory is excluded entirely. (The Decode) NVIDIA RTX Spark and the Edge AI Push: NVIDIA coordinated with ARM and Microsoft around the RTX Spark at COMPUTEX, with the shared message being that the future of Windows is here. Signal65's Ryan Shrout asked Jensen directly why NVIDIA wants to be in the PC business, given low margins and diminishing returns. Dan frames the answer in the context of devices increasingly becoming mobile data centers, capable of running models at much greater efficiency than cloud delivery. The edge AI conversation is also directly tied to token cost economics: as intelligence delivery moves closer to the device, the cost per token drops significantly. The jury is still out on whether NVIDIA will meaningfully disrupt the PC market, but its influence over OEMs like Lenovo and Dell that depend on it for data center gives it real leverage over SKUs. (The Decode) Token Economics and Frontier Model Cost Pressure: Dan and Pat discuss a substantive shift in how enterprises are thinking about AI consumption costs. Dan argues that "token maxing," the practice of defaulting to the most powerful frontier model for every task, has now effectively peaked, as bills have come due at scale. Companies paying for tokens in volume are starting to question whether they can afford the prices that frontier models actually cost to deliver. Pat pushes back, saying the dynamic is still present, but both analysts agree that the market is moving toward a model where token selection is matched to the job, with Microsoft's MOE approach and thinking models positioned to help CFOs manage that economics story. (The Decode) Continuum Goes Public at Highest Valuation for an AI Platform: Dan notes that Continuum, the Honeywell-spawned quantum company, went public this week at what he calls the highest valuation for an AI platform to date. He flags that IonQ will likely contest that characterization. The broader context is Microsoft entering the quantum conversation with Majorana 2 at Build, a name that has largely been absent from the quantum race, while IBM has received most of the attention. (The Decode) AI CapEx Has Outgrown Cash Flow — Alphabet's $80 Billion Equity Raise: On June 1, Alphabet announced an $80 billion equity capital raise, upsized to $85 billion, structured as $40 billion ATM, $30 billion underwritten, and a $10 billion private placement with Berkshire Hathaway anchoring. Pat frames the questions over CapEx returns as entirely dependent on whether you are an AI boomer or a doomer: if the payback comes, the raise is the right move. If it does not, the math doesn't close. Dan argues the investment is existential, drawing parallels to how infrastructure-first companies have always spent ahead of monetization, and notes that Google's equity is being used as a capital engine that may be more efficient than the debt markets right now. Both analysts flag the downstream implications for Broadcom, MediaTek, and Marvell given the TPU connection. (The Decode) The Network Becomes the AI Platform: Cisco Live 2026: Cisco launched Silicon One P200, the Secure AI Factory with NVIDIA and Spectrum X, AgenticOps, MCP-native automation, Cisco IQ, LiveProtect, and folded Astrix Security and Galileo into Splunk under one control plane. Pat identifies Cisco Cloud Control as the biggest announcement of the entire show, pulling together Catalyst, Meraki, Nexus, Firewall, and WebEx under agentic ops that run natively through MCP, with code running directly on smart switches that have x86 processors. Pat also credits Cisco for establishing Silicon One as a credible chip alternative for hyperscalers capable of taking on Tomahawk and Jericho. Dan frames the long-term opportunity as campus and branch enablement when industrial AI and robotics deployments accelerate, arguing that the numerator of AI's economic impact has barely started, as edge deployment spending has not yet begun. (The Decode) The Flip: Did Microsoft Build 2026 Effectively End the OpenAI Partnership? Pat argues the divorce decree has been filed. MAI-Thinking-1 was built with zero distillation from third-party models offering clean enterprise data lineage, with Maia 200 in production plus Anthropic chip supply, which signals vendor hedging. OpenAI is going all-in on AWS, which means you cannot be married to two people, and the full Build stack covering model, OS containment via MXC, agents via Scout and Agent 365, and context via Microsoft IQ removes every architectural dependency on OpenAI. Dan counters that Microsoft is hedging rather than leaving and predicts the partnership will run through the decade. Enterprise Copilot customers are explicitly showing in data that they demand GPT 5.5, internal benchmarks have not been independently validated, and Microsoft stands to make meaningful money from the OpenAI IPO. (The Flip) Broadcom Q2 FY26 Earnings: Broadcom posted revenue of $22.19 billion, a narrow miss depending on which consensus data set is used, with EPS of $2.44 beating estimates and AI semis at $10.8 billion. Hock Tan declined to raise the $100 billion full-year AI chip target, and the stock dropped 13% in premarket trading. Q3 guide came in at $29.4 billion. Pat calls the miss a timing issue driven by Google's multi-sourcing across Marvell, MediaTek, and Broadcom rather than a fundamental problem. Dan flags that Hock Tan opened the earnings call by accidentally reading from the 2025 print, calling it "not the best moment." Sell-side re-ratings held in the 500s across Jefferies, Mizuho, and Deutsche Bank despite the drop, with Futurum Equities having it at 600. (Bulls and Bears) Hewlett Packard Enterprise Q2 FY26 Earnings: HPE delivered revenue of $10.68 billion, up 40% year over year, and EPS of $0.79, up 100%. Juniper integration and AI servers both outperformed, and all FY26 guides were raised. The stock jumped 19% after hours before settling into a roughly 15% gain, with HPE up 68% over the last month. Pat frames HPE as a value play rather than a volume play, methodically targeting enterprise and sovereign cloud deals where it can maintain profitability, rather than competing for massive NeoCloud volume. Antonio Neri was clear on the call that the profitability pull-forward is a one-shot deal. Pat and Dan will both be at HPE Discover the week after next to interview Neri and the C-suite. (Bulls and Bears) Palo Alto Networks Q3 FY26 Earnings: Palo Alto posted revenue of $3.0 billion, up 31% year over year, beating the $2.94 billion estimate, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.85, beating the $0.79 to $0.81 range. NGS ARR reached $8.1 billion, up 60% year over year, including $1.6 billion from CyberArk and Chronosphere. RPO hit $18.4 billion, up 36%. Both FY26 revenue and EPS guides were raised. Adjusted FCF margin came in at 38.5% TTM, up 430 basis points. The stock jumped 11% immediately after hours, then drifted lower. Pat points to 2,200 platformized customers and 120% net retention as the most important metrics. Dan notes the SaaSpocalypse thesis continues to be wrong. (Bulls and Bears) CrowdStrike Q1 FY27 Earnings and the Proprietary Data Moat Argument: CrowdStrike posted revenue of $1.39 billion with EPS of $1.10 and ARR of $5.51 billion. Net new ARR of $255.8 million set a Q1 record, up 32% year over year. FY27 net new ARR guide was raised by $52 million to a $1.29 billion midpoint, and FY27 revenue was raised to $5.915 to $5.959 billion. A 4-for-1 stock split was announced effective July 2nd. The stock dropped 11% despite the beat after a 64% year-to-date run into earnings. Dan uses the results to make a broader argument against the software disruption thesis, referencing Palantir CEO Alex Karp daring customers to build without him using Anthropic or OpenAI, and Larry Ellison's argument that the real AI value unlock sits in proprietary enterprise data that is not accessible to frontier models. Enterprises with governed, secure, proprietary data will continue to need platforms like CrowdStrike regardless of what frontier models can do. (Bulls and Bears) Six Five Summit is coming. Salesforce CEO Mark Benioff will kick off the event. Register and stay current at sixfivemedia.com/summit. Watch the full video at sixfivemedia.com, and be sure to subscribe to our YouTube channel so you never miss an episode. The Decode Microsoft Declares Independence — Build 2026 Ships an End-to-End Agentic AI Stack (MAI-Thinking-1 + Scout + Microsoft IQ + Project Solara + Majorana 2) https://www.theverge.com/tech/941738/microsoft-build-2026-biggest-announcements The AI Stack Goes Multi-Silicon — Computex 2026 Confirms a Heterogeneous AI Infrastructure (ARM + Marvell + Intel ASIC + Qualcomm + RTX Spark); WSTS Raises 2026 Semi TAM Forecast 90% to $1.51T https://www.tomshardware.com/tag/computex AI Capex Has Outgrown Cash Flow — Alphabet's $80B Equity Raise Is the Largest in U.S. Corporate History; Berkshire Anchors $10B https://abc.xyz/investor/news/news-details/2026/Alphabet-Announces-Proposed-80-Billion-Equity-Capital-Raise-to-Expand-AI-Infrastructure-and-Compute-2026-b0myAMewCa/default.aspx The Network Becomes the AI Platform — Cisco Live 2026 Launches Silicon One P200, Secure AI Factory (with NVIDIA), AgenticOps, Astrix Security + Galileo https://www.cisco.com/site/us/en/about/whats-new/index.html The Flip Did Microsoft Build 2026 Effectively End the OpenAI Partnership? MAI-Thinking-1 Beats Sonnet 4.6 in Blind Testing, Microsoft Claims GPT-5.5 Parity at 10x Cost Efficiency — Will MS Quietly Wind Down OpenAI Exclusivity by FY28, or Is OpenAI Still the Frontier Anchor Microsoft Needs? FOR: MAI-Thinking-1 beating Sonnet 4.6 in blind preference + GPT-5.5 parity at 10x cost efficiency is a frontier-model independence proof point https://www.latent.space/p/ainews-microsoft-build-mai-thinking Build 2026: Accumulating Evidence of Microsoft's AI Independence — EDN (June 4) — https://www.edn.com/build-2026-accumulating-evidence-of-microsofts-ai-independence/ Maia 200 in production + Anthropic-Maia chip talks signal Microsoft is hedging its inference vendor stack https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2026/01/26/maia-200-the-ai-accelerator-built-for-inference/ Microsoft canceled Anthropic's internal software licenses + pivoted to chip-supply pursuit — customer-not-competitor positioning https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/21/anthropic-microsoft-maia-200-ai-chip.html AGAINST: Enterprise Copilot customers explicitly demand GPT-5.5 — internal benchmarks don't replace the brand https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/copilot/release-notes?tabs=all MAI-Thinking-1 benchmarks haven't been third-party verified — Microsoft is the only source https://www.latent.space/p/ainews-microsoft-build-mai-thinking The MS-OpenAI partnership is contractual through 2030+ — unwinding it is impractical and expensive https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2026/04/27/the-next-phase-of-the-microsoft-openai-partnership/ Microsoft's actual strategic risk is OpenAI leaving, not MS leaving — Anthropic + OpenAI IPOs make OpenAI exit risk the real concern https://www.anthropic.com/news/confidential-draft-s1-sec Bulls & Bears Broadcom (AVGO) Q2 FY26 ACTUALS — Rev $22.19B (Narrow Miss) + EPS $2.44 (Beat); AI Semis $10.8B; Hock Tan Refuses to Raise the $100B Full-Year AI Chip Target — Stock −13% Premarket; Q3 Guide $29.4B https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/03/broadcom-avgo-earnings-report-q2-2026.html Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Q2 FY26 ACTUALS — Blowout: Rev $10.68B (+40%), EPS $0.79 (+100%); Juniper Integration + AI Servers Both Outperform; FY26 Guides All Raised; Stock +19% AH https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260601866494/en/HPE-Reports-Fiscal-2026-Second-Quarter-Results Palo Alto Networks (PANW) Q3 FY26 ACTUALS — Beat-and-Raise: Rev $3.0B (+31% YoY, Beat $2.94B), Non-GAAP EPS $0.85 (Beat $0.79-0.81); NGS ARR $8.1B (+60% YoY, $1.6B from CyberArk + Chronosphere); RPO $18.4B (+36%); FY26 Revenue + EPS Guides BOTH RAISED; Adj FCF Margin 38.5% TTM (+430 bps); Stock +11% Immediate AH, Then Drifted Lower https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/company/press/2026/palo-alto-networks-reports-fiscal-third-quarter-2026-financial-results CrowdStrike narrowly beats estimates on AI tailwinds, but stock falls 9% — CNBC (June 3) — https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/03/crowdstrike-crwd-q1-2027-earnings.html
Computex happened this week, and there was enough to talk about to devote this week's episode to rounding up the high points, including Nvidia's attempt to dominate the consumer Windows market with RTX Spark, the first RGB mini-LED monitors, 8GB laptops becoming common again, PC hardware production shifting back to DDR4 and old CPU sockets, Intel's entry into the handheld gaming market, the (unsurprising) absence of any news about Zen 6 and Nova Lake, and other stuff! Show notes and links: https://tinyurl.com/techpod-342-computex-26 Support the Pod! Contribute to the Tech Pod Patreon and get access to our booming Discord, a monthly bonus episode, your name in the credits, and other great benefits! You can support the show at: https://patreon.com/techpod
Cet épisode a été enregistré à un an de l'élection présidentielle de 2027, à laquelle Édouard Philippe est candidat.Génération Do It Yourself n'est pas un média politique et ne soutient aucun candidat.L'objectif est simple : comprendre comment celles et ceux qui veulent diriger le pays raisonnent sur les grands sujets.Nous recevrons d'autres voix dans le même esprit.Voici les grands principes que nous suivrons pour ces épisodes : https://taap.it/jXv1WOQDepuis 1974, la France n'a plus voté un seul budget à l'équilibre.52 ans de déficit.Et un accord tacite pour ne surtout pas en parler.Édouard Philippe a décidé de le faire.Maire du Havre depuis 2010, Premier ministre d'Emmanuel Macron de 2017 à 2020, il a accepté notre invitation à venir sur Génération Do It Yourself à un an de la présidentielle.Pendant deux heures, nous passons au crible ses grands chantiers pour le pays : l'école, l'intelligence artificielle, la dette, les retraites, l'immigration, l'Europe.Sur l'école, son constat est brutal : non, l'éducation ne fonctionne pas comme elle le devrait aujourd'hui.Selon lui, la France est le pays de l'OCDE où le système scolaire reproduit le plus les inégalités. Le niveau baisse, en maths comme en orthographe. Et on forme 40 000 ingénieurs par an quand il en faudrait au moins 100 000.Sa réponse : rendre leur liberté aux établissements, mieux payer les profs et trancher les questions qu'on préfère enterrer.Sur l'intelligence artificielle, il avoue l'utiliser à peine.Mais il refuse de détourner le regard. Il voit la rupture arriver, et admet ne pas savoir où elle nous mène.Nous n'avons épargné aucun sujet :Pourquoi reporter la réforme des retraites frappe d'abord les plus modestesSa méthode pour réparer l'État : supprimer et remplacer, plutôt que simplifierPourquoi il refuse la taxe Zucman et le retour de l'ISFCe qu'il a appris en transformant Le HavreTrump, Poutine, la Chine, l'immigration : ses réponses sans détourDeux heures avec un candidat qui préfère exposer clairement les problèmes plutôt que promettre des solutions faciles. À chacun de décider si c'est ça, gouverner.Vous pouvez contacter Édouard sur X (Twitter) et Instagram.TIMELINE:00:00:00 - Un Rouennais élu maire du Havre 00:10:51 - Ce que le conservatoire apprend que l'école a oublié 00:16:38 - La vérité que personne n'ose dire sur le niveau des Français 00:24:45 - Le vieux principe oublié d'éducation 00:31:32 - Comment réparer l'Éducation nationale 00:45:15 - Pourquoi la France ne forme pas assez d'ingénieurs 00:53:39 - Parler d'IA comme d'une bombe atomique 01:05:29 - Le coût du travail qui nous sépare de l'Allemagne 01:12:03 - La vérité que personne n'assume sur l'âge de la retraite 01:20:12 - Ce que la dette française fera vraiment à nos enfants 01:28:12 - Vers un DOGE à la française ? 01:39:23 - L'addiction française à la dépense publique 01:51:23 - Transformer une ville que tout le monde fuyait 02:00:24 - Pourquoi tous les autres pays ont supprimé leur ISF 02:07:59 - Parler à la France et non aux Français 02:13:22 - Est-ce qu'on peut faire confiance à Donald Trump ? 02:13:55 - Est-ce qu'il faut dialoguer avec Vladimir Poutine ? 02:16:29 - Est-ce que la France a un problème avec l'immigration ? 02:19:13 - Est-ce que l'Europe fonctionne ? 02:19:59 - Le livre à 670 millions d'euros 02:27:52 - Ce qu'on ne dit pas avant une nominationLes anciens épisodes de GDIY mentionnés : #543 - Yann Le Cun - AMI Labs - Rendre l'IA plus humaine#515 - Pierre de Villiers - Ancien Chef d'État-major des Armées - "Nous ne sommes pas prêts pour la guerre"#401 - Emmanuel Macron - Président de la République - Les décisions les plus lourdes se prennent seul#397 - Yann Le Cun - Chief AI Scientist chez Meta - L'Intelligence Artificielle Générale ne viendra pas de Chat GPTNous avons parlé de :Conservatoire national des arts et métiersSelon Bill Gates, l'intelligence artificielle pourrait mettre fin au travail humain dès 2035Avec l'IA, la semaine de travail de 2 jours n'est plus une utopie… d'après Bill GatesLa Google I/O 2026 aura lieu les 19 et 20 mai pour Android 17 et l'IAGoogle I/O 2026 : les dernières nouvelles sur Android, l'IA GeminiComment le coût du travail plombe-t-il la France ?Le duel entre François Hollande et Edouard Philippe lance le début de la campagne présidentielle 2027 devant les GracquesNotre docu sur la Chine : Comment la Chine est devenue imbattable ?Les recommandations de lecture :Vingt ans après, d'Alexandre DumasLes Trois Mousquetaires, d'Alexandre DumasLe Vicomte de Bragelonne, d'Alexandre DumasVoyage au bout de la nuit, de Louis-Ferdinand CélineL'Étrange Défaite, de Marc BlochLes Faux-Monnayeurs, d'André GideLes Contemplations, de Victor HugoLa Légende des siècles, de Victor HugoCyrano de Bergerac, d'Edmond RostandL'Homme qui aimait les chiens, de Leonardo PaduraUn grand MERCI à nos sponsors : Squarespace : https://squarespace.com/doitQonto: https://qonto.com/r/2i7tk9 Brevo: brevo.com/doit eToro: https://bit.ly/3GTSh0k Payfit: payfit.com Club Med : clubmed.frCuure : https://cuure.com/product-onely (code DOIT)Vous pouvez retrouver la liste de tout le matériel utilisé pour enregistrer nos épisodes sur cette page.Vous souhaitez sponsoriser Génération Do It Yourself ou nous proposer un partenariat ?Contactez mon label Orso Media via ce formulaire.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.
Come explore the Galloway Hoard with me, a Viking era treasure hoard found buried beneath a field in Galloway, Scotland back in 2014. Silver Viking arm bands, a rock crystal jar dating back to ancient Rome, a silver vessel from 4,000 miles away in present day Iran - these treasures hidden around the year 900 are incredible. But, upon closer inspection, they raise more questions than answers. Is this actually Viking treasure? Arm bands are very Viking. But then why do they have inscriptions on them written in Anglo-Saxon runes, a form of Old English? Why is there a Christian cross? Reference to a Bishop? And what does the mysterious inscription "DIS IS IIGNA F" mean? We'll uncover all of this and more to reveal a tumultuous time in an ever changing world. Support the show! Join the Patreon (patreon.com/historyfixpodcast)Buy some merchBuy Me a CoffeeVenmo @Shea-LaFountaineSources:National Museums Scotland "Discover the Galloway Hoard"Smithsonian Magazine "A Proposed Translation Hints at the Origins of the Mysterious Galloway Hoard"NorthLink Ferries "The Galloway Hoard - an interview with Martin Goldberg"Wikipedia "Galloway Hoard"Shoot me a message! Support the show
In this episode of The Wrap, Chris Whalen reveals an "explosive" John Dizard interview dropping next week on rationing of synthetic lubricants for turbines and hybrid cars before the midterms, while the Trump administration stays blind to the supply crisis from destroyed Persian Gulf refineries. Markets are already processing the damage, but the Trump admin lacks the organization to prepare Americans for coming energy rationing and diesel shortages. Whalen argues the Fed is "powerless" against external war-driven shocks, yet double-digit inflation is "locked in" for certain categories. He's taking profits on AI stocks (AMD, ARM) after 150-200% gains, bought back into Chevron, and declares Bitcoin "toast" as the crypto bubble bursts. He warns communities blocking data center projects will become "very significant negatives" for AI, and describes the current market as "manic"—driven purely by Fed Covid cash into AI stocks as people chase shiny objects rather than value. Monetary-Metals.com/julia Links: The Institutional Risk Analyst: https://www.theinstitutionalriskanalyst.com/ The Wrap: https://www.theinstitutionalriskanalyst.com/post/theira852Inflated book (2nd edition): https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/inflated-r-christopher-whalen/1146303673Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/rcwhalen Use the code TheWrap2026 for 25% off your first year of The Institutional Risk Analyst https://www.theinstitutionalriskanalyst.com/plans-pricingTimestamps:0:00 Intro and welcome 01:00 Markets this week - Tech hit hard, gold erased gains, Bitcoin crushed4:02 John Dizard interview - Rationing synthetic lubricants before midterms5:30 Trump admin blind to crisis, needs WWII-level mobilization7:58 Suppliers already rationing, July/August shortages pronounced10:41 Double-digit inflation locked in, Fed powerless against external shocks11:58 Taking profits on AI - Sold AMD, ARM, back into Chevron13:19 Fed doesn't understand financial markets or mortgage servicing14:40 Bond spreads tight - Scarcity of quality assets17:28 Bill Pulte as Acting Director of National Intelligence - Political payback20:20 Trump shoots from hip, alienating Republicans, can't get anything done21:02 Kevin Warsh quote - 3% inflation destroys economies22:10 Gold erased 2026 gains - Higher rates, Bitcoin collapse23:48 Bitcoin toast - BlackRock selling, crypto bubble burst25:19 Manic market not driven by value, chasing AI26:00 Communities blocking data center projects - Politics killing AI27:07 Bubble driven by Fed Covid cash flood28:43 Parting thoughts - Fishing in Maine, Dizard interview next week
(00:00:00) Xadrez Verbal #463 Primeiro Turno na Colômbia (00:05:35) Giro de Notícias #01 Abelardo de la Espriella, da oposição, foi o candidato mais votado nas eleições colombianas, mas a diferença para o governista Ivan Cepeda foi pequena. Projetamos os cenários do 2º Turno, assim como no Peru que volta às urnas no próximo domingo (07).Observamos o movimento das peças no sempre complicado tabuleiro do Oriente Médio, com destaque para a situação no Líbano, e demos uma volta pelo Velho Continente, fazendo a prévia das eleições na Armênia.Conheça a Carta Global de Fernanda Simas: https://www.cartaglobal.com.br/Campanha e comunicado sobre nosso amigo Pirulla: https://www.pirulla.com.br/
This week, we discuss NVIDIA going consumer, Microsoft Build, and the Anthropic/OpenAI IPO race. Plus, does credit card insurance work? Watch the YouTube Live Recording of Episode 575 Runner-up Titles Who Wins AI? Models vs. Middleware Jensen After Dark Once again, robots Why is this something you talk about in a keynote? Could this have been an app? Defeating Apple, the sword in the stone Your tokens are my margin Prisons, schools and military - what is the Venn diagram? Every enterprise is unhappy in their own way Rundown Nvidia NVIDIA and Microsoft Reinvent Windows PCs for the Age of Personal AI Nvidia's N1X Apple Silicon rival is two years behind Nvidia, Microsoft, and Arm are all teasing Nvidia's new N1X laptop processors Blackstone and Google launch $5B TPU cloud venture with 500MW of AI capacity AI server demand drives staggering revenue growth for Dell and its stock soars Microsoft Build Microsoft Build 2026: Be yourself at work Microsoft Build Live Blog Microsoft admits its "infuriating" floating AI button was a mistake OpenAI and Anthropic Go Public Anthropic Files to Go Public, Setting Stage for Huge I.P.O. OpenAI Prepares to File to Go Public in Coming Weeks How Anthropic Got So Big, So Fast Anthropic and SpaceX compute OpenAI launches new Codex tools for white-collar work OpenAI Hires ServiceNow CMO Colin Fleming to Lead Business Marketing Push Wiz + Anthropic: Claude Enterprise Meets the Security Graph Relevant to your Interests Grafana breach caused by missed token rotation after TanStack attack GitHub Got Hacked. The AI Security Arms Race is Here Hackers Simply Asked Meta AI to Give Them Access to High-Profile Instagram Accounts. It Worked SpaceX not the behemoth everyone thought Spotify adds AI-powered Q&A and briefing generation features to podcasts Amazon Web Services - Four Years and Out + AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn Introducing UniFi 5G Backup AI Generated Summaries WSJ: How I Choose Which Cloudflare Employees to Replace with AI Microsoft open-sources the earliest DOS source code discovered to date Audio-generation app Huxe, founded by former NotebookLM developers, shuts down Bill Gates Spent Years Crafting His Image. Now It's Cracking. How do AI Layoffs Work? Some Speculation. Snowflake to Acquire Natoma to Bring Governed Agentic Access to the Enterprise U.S. companies have an AI problem. Indian IT wants to be the solution Meta to start testing AI subscription services, cheapest plan at $7.99/month Sponsors Sentry - Quit Buggin': use code sdt26 for $100 in credit for new customers Nonsense What Is a Dickover? Listener Feedback Henning corrects Coté's pronunciation of León. Conferences VMware User Group, Dallas, June 9-11, 2026 WeAreDevelopers Europe, July 8-10, 2026 Berlin, Coté speaking. DevOpsDays Graz, Sept 4-5, 2026 DevOpsDays Rockies, Sept. 22 – 23, 2026, Discount Code: 26DODSWEDEFTALK WeAreDevelopers NA, Sept 23-25, 2026, Discount Code: DEVPOD26 25 Free Tickets DevOpsDays Dallas, Sept 28-29, 2026 DevOpsDays Vilnius, Sep 30 - Oct 1, 2006 DevOpsDays Istanbul, Oct 24th, 2026, Coté keynoting. VMware User Group, Orlando, Oct 20-22, 2026 SDT News & Community Join our Slack community Email the show: questions@softwaredefinedtalk.com Free stickers: Email your address to stickers@softwaredefinedtalk.com Follow us on social media: Twitter, Threads, Mastodon, LinkedIn, BlueSky Watch us on: Twitch, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok Book offer: Use code SDT for $20 off "Digital WTF" by Coté Sponsor the show Sponsor more podcasts with Failover Media Recommendations Brandon: The spelled-out intro to neural networks and backpropagation: building micrograd Matt: Boards of Canada: Inferno Aphex Twin - Live in Houston Coté: ElevenLabs, for example Coté's learning Dutch podcast.
Brock and Salk go through some of the Mariners’ stats that make them confident this team has finally caught their stride, and there may not be many weak points left. In Need to Know, late night Mariners texts are a little more optimistic than usual. The Mariners’ continue their hot streak with an 8-3 win over the Mets and Derrick Hall’s extension may end up being a steal, especially considering the contract Boye Mafe got with the Bengals. Do the Seahawks need to make a move to combat the Myles Garrett trade by the Rams, or are the Seahawks staying out of this Arm’s Race?
Microsoft dominated Build with Scout, an always-on Teams agent, the Surface RTX Spark Dev Box, its first reasoning model MAI-Thinking-1 aimed squarely at Anthropic, and Project Solara for agent-first devices. Trump signed a scaled-back AI executive order on cybersecurity. Microsoft announces Scout, an always-on enterprise AI agent built on OpenClaw that appears as a Microsoft Teams contact to automate tasks such as scheduling (Wired) Microsoft unveils a Surface RTX Spark Dev Box, featuring Nvidia's Arm-based RTX Spark, 128GB of unified memory, and a 100W thermal envelope, for local AI tasks (The Verge) Microsoft debuts MAI-Thinking-1, its first advanced reasoning AI model, trained "from the ground up on clean data, without distillation from third-party models" (The Verge) Microsoft unveils Project Solara, an Android-based platform for agent-first devices, with concept hardware and pilots planned at Best Buy, Target, and others (GeekWire) Microsoft unveils Microsoft Execution Containers, a Windows-level sandbox for AI agents, and says partners OpenAI, Nvidia, Manus, and Nous Research are using it (VentureBeat) President Trump signs a scaled-back AI EO that seeks to address AI's cybersecurity threats; sources say it imposes less scrutiny on AI than the scrapped version (Politico) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Build 2026 is underway in San Francisco this week, and it started with a big, overly-long keynote as always. And Computex is this week, too. There's a lot going on, and some of it is fascinating. Plus, WWDC is next week because you cannot relax. Also, Microsoft GA's WinApp CLI, announces the Windows Platform Skills plug-in for native app creation, and you're not going to believe what Paul did next. OK, you will believe itBuild + Computex = OHMYGODOHMYGODOHMYGOD NVIDIA finally announces Arm-based N1X as the RTX Spark RTX Spark is an Arm-based portable workstation chip for Windows 11 Microsoft announces Surface Laptop Ultra - It and other RTX Spark-based PCs will appear in late 2026 Some of this leaked earlier, including a lower-end N1 chipset Microsoft continues to optimize and evolve Windows 11 for developers Windows Developer Configuration, Windows Developer Skills + WinApp CLI, Terminal, more Linux, and more on-device ("unmetered") AI - Tied to this, Copilot+ PC features are coming to more PCs, with CPU/GPU support - this, plus the RTX Spark stuff hints at answers to some obvious questions but there's nothing concrete from Microsoft Microsoft Edge is getting three new on-AI features Scout is a personal work agent powered by OpenClaw GitHub Copilot app arrives on desktop for your agentic coding and management needs Microsoft AI announces seven new foundation models Stevie Bathiche is back, baby! And he's talking about those AI app structures and how they've led to Project Solara Windows Microsoft discusses the progress it's made on Windows 11 pain points You can now test the new Start menu in Experimental - Paul did so along with the new Taskbar Qualcomm announces low-cost Snapdragon C for $300+ PCs to take on MacBook Neo And Acer is the first to announce a Snapdragon C laptop New Surface Pro with Snapdragon X2 leaks for June release (!) Dell XPS 13 is coming soon with Intel Wildcat (also to take on MacBook Neo) Dell revenues are through the roof, but not because of PCs HP revenues are up, and it is because of PCs AI and dev Anthropic gets a new valuation exceeding OpenAI and then it files for an IPO OpenAI adjusts GPT5.5-Instant for less sucking-up and releases computer use in Codex on Windows Flutter takes the lead on Flutter desktop development XBOX and gaming Asha Sharma says you can't please everyone and then immediately jumps the shark trying to please everyone XBOX delays Fable reboot because of GTA VI New titles coming to Game Pass in early June across platforms XBOX starts early testing of new console features ASUS announces ROG Xbox Ally X20 with OLED display and XReal R1 glasses Intel announces Arc G-series for gaming handhelds Call of Duty Modern Warfare 4 is next and it's the COD we've been begging for Tips and picks Tip of the week: Now you can vibe code a native Windows app from the CLI App pick of the week: iA Writer RunAs Radio this week: Data API Builder and SQL MVP with Jerry Nixon Brown liquor pick of the week: Old Malt Casking of Longmorn 20 These show notes have been truncated due to length. For the full show notes, visit https://twit.tv/shows/windows-weekly/episodes/986 Hosts: Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Richard Campbell Sponsors: joindeleteme.com/twit promo code TWIT threatlocker.com/twit cachefly.com/twit
This week on Market Mondays, we break down Anthropic's IPO plans, record-high market valuations, ARM's rise, Micron's massive run, IBM's comeback, and what could trigger the next great buying opportunity in the stock market.We also discuss Trump's impact on the markets, Michael Saylor's Bitcoin strategy, new IPO rule changes, potential opportunities in HPE and IBM, and answer your questions on stocks, ETFs, trading, and portfolio management.Plus, we share advice for graduating students, the best ways to invest in yourself, and close with our popular Yes or No segment.#MarketMondays #Investing #StockMarket #Bitcoin #Nvidia #ARM #Micron #IBM #Anthropic #Trading #Finance #EYL #EarnYourLeisure #WealthBuilding #StocksAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
