POPULARITY
2 episodes with intelligible
2 episodes with intelligible
2 episodes with intelligible
“What Does it Mean for Intellect and Intelligible to be Identical?”, a lecture by Dr. Therese Cory
Episode Summary:In this episode, Pastor Jeff Long explores the question of the clarity of scripture. He addresses three common arguments that people use to call into question the clarity of the Bible: the belief that it is too hard to understand, the idea that it is irrelevant due to its ancient origins, and the postmodern thinking that questions the meaning of words. Pastor Jeff counters these arguments by emphasizing that God's word is intelligible, relevant, and understandable to anyone. He highlights the importance of humbling ourselves under the clear word of God and choosing life by obeying His voice.Key Takeaways:The clarity of scripture: Pastor Jeff addresses three common arguments against the clarity of scripture - the belief that it is too hard to understand, the idea that it is irrelevant due to its ancient origins, and the postmodern thinking that questions the meaning of words.Intelligible and relevant: Pastor Jeff emphasizes that God's word is intelligible and can be clearly understood in all things necessary for salvation and daily living. He also highlights that God's word is relevant and speaks into every era of humanity.Understanding God's will: Pastor Jeff encourages listeners to open their Bibles and find out what God has clearly said. By humbling ourselves under the clear word of God, we can choose life and love the Lord our God.The choice to obey: Pastor Jeff quotes Moses in Deuteronomy 30, emphasizing the importance of choosing life by loving the Lord, obeying His voice, and holding fast to Him. This choice can only be made when we find out what God has clearly said.The effectiveness of God's word: Pastor Jeff quotes Isaiah 55, highlighting that God's word will not return empty. It is effective and accomplishes the purposes for which it is sent.Notable Quotes:"The Bible is so clear, we know what it has said.""Claiming irrelevance is an attempt to avoid what God has clearly said.""God does not leave us to guess what He wants or thinks. He has revealed and communicated His will for His people in His own words.""The law of the Lord is perfect, reviving the soul. The testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple.""Choose life, that you and your offspring may live, loving the Lord your God, obeying His voice, and holding fast to Him."To listen to the full episode and gain a deeper understanding of the clarity and relevance of scripture, tune in to the podcast. Stay tuned for more enlightening content from Pastor Jeff Long.
S9E243: Crackly & Indistinct, but Intelligible? Ken passes the latest TikTok challenge, we discuss who is named the singer with the best vocal range, random facts, sleep over stories, and heavy metal for your filthy earballs! Special Thanks To: (00:00:00) - Intro (00:00:57) - Algid, SONG: Fearless Souls Favor None (00:06:50) - Inertia, SONG: Pink Mist (00:09:45) - Conversation, Ken passes the latest TikTok challenge. (00:17:13) - Torrefy, SONG: Eye of the Swarm (00:28:18) - Diadhánach, SONG: Feast of the Witch - Under a Sinister Moon (00:30:29) - The Band Repent, SONG: A Bad Place (00:34:16) - Conversation, the singer with the best vocal range. (00:44:57) - Grandma's Pantry: Organism, SONG: Picturesque (00:50:26) - Conversation, sleepover stories. (01:10:29) - Litosth, SONG: Whipping Bottles (01:16:07) - A Pretext to Human Suffering, SONG: Archonic Corruption (01:20:00) - Bloodshot, SONG: Sacramental Gore
Church can be both beautiful and messy at the same time. Much of the mess came into the church through the surrounding culture and the incredible diversity. The believers misunderstood what it meant to be free in Christ. There were divisions, squabbles, leadership crises, arrogance, and little love! This all threatened to destroy the beautiful church Paul had planted. In his letter, Paul confronts these divisions with the truth of the gospel in the hope of producing beauty out of a mess! In this series, we will find many parallels to our own culture and will find that God's word is incredibly relevant to our modern world.
François Denis, Directeur Général de Geotab et en gestion du périmètre français, nous raconte son parcours professionnel et le chemin parcouru jusqu'à son arrivée dans l'entreprise. Geotab est numéro 1 mondial. Ils sont présents dans 153 pays.
In this episode, Logos discusses the relationship between The Seal of Confession and Civil law. With the recent sex abuse scandals and many other issues in the Church: why grants the Church the ability to practice its right? Where does this authority to "forgive sins" come from anyways? Civil justice over divine justice, many chant.In order to cover this topic more comprehensively, we invited Deacon. Harrison Garlick, a civil lawyer, to help us out. #politics #liberal #conservative #God #Catholic #Christian #sacraments #religion #academics #love #life #podcast #technology #goodness #truth #beautyTo support us or checkout our other platforms, check out the links below:Website: www.logos-podcast.com Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3PCPWBv...Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@logospodcast YouTube: / @logospodxast Instagram: https://instagram.com/logos.pod?igshi...Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/logospodcastTimecode:0:00 - Intro2:50 - Who is our guest?13:50 - Why this topic?16:20 - Attacks on Confession 19:50 - What is the Seal?27:00 - US and Confession29:40 - Confession and Non-Catholics32:30 - Public Relations and Confession36:00 - 1st Amendment37:40 - Religious Freedom and Confession40:00 - Church as Society43:55 - Rhetoric around Confession44:30 - Do Priests have to absolve?47:00 - America is Threatened?48:30 - What is Liberalism?50:45 - Natural Law52:15 - Reality is Intelligible 53:00 - Liberalism Has Taken over56:30 - Founding Fathers58:00 - Does Power Exist outside of Contract?1:00:00 - Liberalism and Relativism 1:08:30 - Antagonism of Religion and State1:13:35 - Intellect Vs. Will1:14:50 - Future of these attacks....Support the show
有多名听众都来信询问单词 “intelligent、intellectual” 和 “intelligible” 之间的区别。从拼写上看，它们都以 “intel-” 开头。形容词 “intelligent” 和 “intellectual” 可以用来形容人是 “有才智的”，那如何区分它们？形容词 “intelligible” 的意思是 “可以理解的”。听节目，学习这三个词的含义和用法。
1 Corinthians 14:1-25 - Speaker: Lukus Counterman - The church at Corinth was riddled with factions and plagued by divisions. People were boasting in their spiritual gifts and stratifying themselves. Those with public and spectacular manifestations of the Spirit were supposedly better than others. The prized people of Corinth were those who spoke in tongues or worked miracles, whereas the lower caste Christians were those who were hospitable or merciful. Paul went to great lengths to correct this error. In 1 Corinthians 12 he outlined a theology of spiritual gifts and explained how each member of the body is indispensable. Different gifts are required for the proper functioning of the church, and they should be seen as an advantage not an opportunity for division. Christians should care for one another and find unity in their diversity. In 1 Corinthians 13 Paul went on to explain that rather than boasting in a public spiritual gift, believers should pursue a particular spiritual grace, namely love. Genuine spirituality is marked by leveraging gifts for the common good. It's seen in care for others rather than competition. So, by the time we get to 1 Corinthians 14, Paul is ready to address the case study that was troubling Corinth. The believers were emphasizing the gift of tongues, clamoring for airtime, and creating a disorderly, incomprehensible worship service. Love was absent and edification was a mere afterthought. Into the chaos of that situation, Paul stressed the importance of intelligible worship that both edifies believers and evangelizes the lost. May the Lord teach us those same truths as we gather together this weekend.
Ryan struggles with his blower motors, Chris has discovered twins (not the Minnesota ones), Ben watched The Bear, and Thomas comes ready to share a new Swedish delicacy.
Today's meditation comes from The Book Of First Corinthians in The New Testament and from the writings of Nelson Mandela, with music by The Stolen Orchestra.
In this reading group episode, we discuss Gary Watson's paper on Intelligible Moral Demand being a way to view the debate on moral responsibility. That paper is his Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme. Here's any links you'll need to dive deeper: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.101515!/file/watson-responsibility-limits-of-evil.pdf Twitter: @JordanCMyers You can also get in contact by emailing me at platoscavepodcast@gmail.com Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true Plato's Cave Website: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Special Guests: Adam (Reading Group Discussions) and Giffin (Reading Group Discussions).
In this episode of "In the Word, On the Go," author and podcaster, Mark Ward talks about 1 Corinthians 14:9. Mark says, "Edification requires intelligibility. If you want to build people up, you've got to use words they can understand." Special Guest: Mark Ward.
Église réformée baptiste de la Capitale Pasteur Jacques Pelletier Re: 1 Corinthiens 14, 1-4
In their open-access publication, Making AI Intelligible: Philosophical Foundations (Oxford University Press, 2021), Herman Cappelen and Josh Dever argue that philosophers of language can contribute to a deeper understanding of artificial intelligence. AIs known as “neural nets” are becoming commonplace and we increasingly rely on their outputs for action-guidance, as when an AI like Siri hears your question and says, “There's a pizza shop on the corner.” Our use of words like “says” suggests an important question: do AIs literally say anything? Should we understand their outputs as utterances with meaningful content? And if so, what makes that content meaningful, and how is it related to the processes which result in that output? Cappelen and Dever take up these questions and propose a framework for answering them, abstracting from existing externalist approaches to develop a “de-anthropocentrized” externalism for AI. The book introduces readers not only to issues in AI surrounding its content and interpretation, but also to concepts in philosophy of language which may be relevant to these issues, serving as an invitation for further investigation by philosophers and programmers alike. Malcolm Keating is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Yale-NUS College. His research focuses on Sanskrit philosophy of language and epistemology. He is the author of Language, Meaning, and Use in Indian Philosophy (Bloomsbury Press, 2019) and host of the podcast Sutras (and stuff).
In their open-access publication, Making AI Intelligible: Philosophical Foundations (Oxford University Press, 2021), Herman Cappelen and Josh Dever argue that philosophers of language can contribute to a deeper understanding of artificial intelligence. AIs known as “neural nets” are becoming commonplace and we increasingly rely on their outputs for action-guidance, as when an AI like Siri hears your question and says, “There's a pizza shop on the corner.” Our use of words like “says” suggests an important question: do AIs literally say anything? Should we understand their outputs as utterances with meaningful content? And if so, what makes that content meaningful, and how is it related to the processes which result in that output? Cappelen and Dever take up these questions and propose a framework for answering them, abstracting from existing externalist approaches to develop a “de-anthropocentrized” externalism for AI. The book introduces readers not only to issues in AI surrounding its content and interpretation, but also to concepts in philosophy of language which may be relevant to these issues, serving as an invitation for further investigation by philosophers and programmers alike. Malcolm Keating is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Yale-NUS College. His research focuses on Sanskrit philosophy of language and epistemology. He is the author of Language, Meaning, and Use in Indian Philosophy (Bloomsbury Press, 2019) and host of the podcast Sutras (and stuff). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science-technology-and-society
In their open-access publication, Making AI Intelligible: Philosophical Foundations (Oxford University Press, 2021), Herman Cappelen and Josh Dever argue that philosophers of language can contribute to a deeper understanding of artificial intelligence. AIs known as “neural nets” are becoming commonplace and we increasingly rely on their outputs for action-guidance, as when an AI like Siri hears your question and says, “There's a pizza shop on the corner.” Our use of words like “says” suggests an important question: do AIs literally say anything? Should we understand their outputs as utterances with meaningful content? And if so, what makes that content meaningful, and how is it related to the processes which result in that output? Cappelen and Dever take up these questions and propose a framework for answering them, abstracting from existing externalist approaches to develop a “de-anthropocentrized” externalism for AI. The book introduces readers not only to issues in AI surrounding its content and interpretation, but also to concepts in philosophy of language which may be relevant to these issues, serving as an invitation for further investigation by philosophers and programmers alike. Malcolm Keating is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Yale-NUS College. His research focuses on Sanskrit philosophy of language and epistemology. He is the author of Language, Meaning, and Use in Indian Philosophy (Bloomsbury Press, 2019) and host of the podcast Sutras (and stuff). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/language
In their open-access publication, Making AI Intelligible: Philosophical Foundations (Oxford University Press, 2021), Herman Cappelen and Josh Dever argue that philosophers of language can contribute to a deeper understanding of artificial intelligence. AIs known as “neural nets” are becoming commonplace and we increasingly rely on their outputs for action-guidance, as when an AI like Siri hears your question and says, “There's a pizza shop on the corner.” Our use of words like “says” suggests an important question: do AIs literally say anything? Should we understand their outputs as utterances with meaningful content? And if so, what makes that content meaningful, and how is it related to the processes which result in that output? Cappelen and Dever take up these questions and propose a framework for answering them, abstracting from existing externalist approaches to develop a “de-anthropocentrized” externalism for AI. The book introduces readers not only to issues in AI surrounding its content and interpretation, but also to concepts in philosophy of language which may be relevant to these issues, serving as an invitation for further investigation by philosophers and programmers alike. Malcolm Keating is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Yale-NUS College. His research focuses on Sanskrit philosophy of language and epistemology. He is the author of Language, Meaning, and Use in Indian Philosophy (Bloomsbury Press, 2019) and host of the podcast Sutras (and stuff). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/technology
In their open-access publication, Making AI Intelligible: Philosophical Foundations (Oxford University Press, 2021), Herman Cappelen and Josh Dever argue that philosophers of language can contribute to a deeper understanding of artificial intelligence. AIs known as “neural nets” are becoming commonplace and we increasingly rely on their outputs for action-guidance, as when an AI like Siri hears your question and says, “There's a pizza shop on the corner.” Our use of words like “says” suggests an important question: do AIs literally say anything? Should we understand their outputs as utterances with meaningful content? And if so, what makes that content meaningful, and how is it related to the processes which result in that output? Cappelen and Dever take up these questions and propose a framework for answering them, abstracting from existing externalist approaches to develop a “de-anthropocentrized” externalism for AI. The book introduces readers not only to issues in AI surrounding its content and interpretation, but also to concepts in philosophy of language which may be relevant to these issues, serving as an invitation for further investigation by philosophers and programmers alike. Malcolm Keating is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Yale-NUS College. His research focuses on Sanskrit philosophy of language and epistemology. He is the author of Language, Meaning, and Use in Indian Philosophy (Bloomsbury Press, 2019) and host of the podcast Sutras (and stuff). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/philosophy
In their open-access publication, Making AI Intelligible: Philosophical Foundations (Oxford University Press, 2021), Herman Cappelen and Josh Dever argue that philosophers of language can contribute to a deeper understanding of artificial intelligence. AIs known as “neural nets” are becoming commonplace and we increasingly rely on their outputs for action-guidance, as when an AI like Siri hears your question and says, “There's a pizza shop on the corner.” Our use of words like “says” suggests an important question: do AIs literally say anything? Should we understand their outputs as utterances with meaningful content? And if so, what makes that content meaningful, and how is it related to the processes which result in that output? Cappelen and Dever take up these questions and propose a framework for answering them, abstracting from existing externalist approaches to develop a “de-anthropocentrized” externalism for AI. The book introduces readers not only to issues in AI surrounding its content and interpretation, but also to concepts in philosophy of language which may be relevant to these issues, serving as an invitation for further investigation by philosophers and programmers alike. Malcolm Keating is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Yale-NUS College. His research focuses on Sanskrit philosophy of language and epistemology. He is the author of Language, Meaning, and Use in Indian Philosophy (Bloomsbury Press, 2019) and host of the podcast Sutras (and stuff). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
In their open-access publication, Making AI Intelligible: Philosophical Foundations (Oxford University Press, 2021), Herman Cappelen and Josh Dever argue that philosophers of language can contribute to a deeper understanding of artificial intelligence. AIs known as “neural nets” are becoming commonplace and we increasingly rely on their outputs for action-guidance, as when an AI like Siri hears your question and says, “There's a pizza shop on the corner.” Our use of words like “says” suggests an important question: do AIs literally say anything? Should we understand their outputs as utterances with meaningful content? And if so, what makes that content meaningful, and how is it related to the processes which result in that output? Cappelen and Dever take up these questions and propose a framework for answering them, abstracting from existing externalist approaches to develop a “de-anthropocentrized” externalism for AI. The book introduces readers not only to issues in AI surrounding its content and interpretation, but also to concepts in philosophy of language which may be relevant to these issues, serving as an invitation for further investigation by philosophers and programmers alike. Malcolm Keating is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Yale-NUS College. His research focuses on Sanskrit philosophy of language and epistemology. He is the author of Language, Meaning, and Use in Indian Philosophy (Bloomsbury Press, 2019) and host of the podcast Sutras (and stuff). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/book-of-the-day
( To see the video of this show, click here >> https://youtu.be/qhljADQFrkg ) Cristina's Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and More > https://beacons.page/cristinagomez Patreon Club for Extras & Behind the Scenes: https://www.patreon.com/paradigm_shifts In this episode, Cristina is joined by Fade to Black Radio Host Jimmy Church for a look at a mystery that touches on all aspects of a possible afterlife, other realms and dimensions of existence, and a consciousness outside of the body. What is Astral Projection..? Consciousness outside of the physical body, according to the classical, medieval, renaissance Hermeticism, Neoplatonism, and later Theosophist and Rosicrucian thought, the astral body is an intermediate body of light linking the rational soul to the physical body while the astral plane is an intermediate world of light between Heaven and Earth, composed of the spheres of the planets and stars. These astral spheres were held to be populated by angels, demons, and spirits. The subtle bodies, and their associated planes of existence, form an essential part of the esoteric systems that deal with astral phenomena. In the neo-platonism of Plotinus, for example, the individual is a microcosm ("small world") of the universe (the macrocosm or "great world"). "The rational soul...is akin to the great Soul of the World" while "the material universe, like the body, is made as a faded image of the Intelligible". Each succeeding plane of manifestation is causal to the next, a world-view known as emanationism; "from the One proceeds Intellect, from Intellect Soul, and from Soul - in its lower phase, or that of Nature - the material universe". ( *From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astral_projection ) What is the truth..?? Join Cristina Gomez and Jimmy Church as we look at this fascinating Mystery with a History.
Improve your English skills by listening to today's conversations episode, where I am joined with Luke from Improve your Accent, where we chat about: How to improve your English accent to be intelligible? Download the full transcript in my Fluency Academy (also known as the WhatsApp Speaking Club). Click here to join: https://www.englishteacheradriana.com/the-fluency-academy/ Connect with Luke below: Website: https://improveyouraccent.co.uk/learn/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-hCDkqRIsHF0OqSJeJFzVw Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/improveyouraccent/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/improveaccent Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ImproveYourAccent/ Thank you for listening! -Your English Speaking Coach, Adriana!
If Native English Speakers don't understand your English, here are 7 things you can do to become more easily understood. Using these communication strategies, you'll be more intelligible to the listener. It doesn't matter if you have an accent or if your grammar is confusing, you can still be intelligible using these strategies. Are you ready to improve your speaking skills? If people don't understand your English, what do YOU usually do? Sometimes people might not understand each other in communication. It happens, but it's nothing to feel embarrassed about! I teach you ways to overcome this communication barrier so that people can understand your English. Video and Podcast: https://advancedenglish.co/blog/427gt4og/if-native-english-speakers-don't-understand-your-english-do-these-7-things-to-become-intelligible ENROLL IN OUR WEB COURSES (FREE trial included):
Visit SpeakEnglishWithTiffani.com/Episode166 for show notes for this podcast episode.In today's episode, you will learn new English vocabulary words and expressions related to the topic of communication. You will also hear tons of real-life stories that will help you understand the words and expressions more. This episode will give you the vocabulary and expressions you need to speak fluently in English about this topic.TODAY'S ENGLISH RESOURCEMaster English Tips PackTODAY'S ENGLISH VOCABULARY WORDS======================================Direct Meaning: Extending or moving from one place to another by the shortest way without changing direction or stopping.Sentence 1: Tom is direct and always gets straight to the point.Sentence 2: When sending an email, it is better to be direct and concise.Sentence 3: Harry's wife was direct in conversation which sometimes made him uncomfortable.Intelligible Meaning: Able to be understood; comprehensible.Sentence 1: Gene was drunk and slurred his words making his speech hardly intelligible.Sentence 2: Although he spoke a different language and had a thick accent, his presentation was intelligible and interesting.Sentence 3: His argument was barely intelligible and was difficult to understand.TODAY'S ENGLISH EXPRESSIONS======================================Beat around the bush Meaning: to avoid talking about what is important:Sentence 1: Kevin do not beat around the bush. Tell me the story of how you got fired from work.Sentence 2: I hate to beat around the bush, but I don't want to tell you the whole story.Sentence 3: Often Cliff would beat around the bush to avoid confrontation.Off one's chest Meaning: To tell someone about something that has been making one upset or unhappySentence 1: Grace decided to tell the truth and get the guilt off her chest.Sentence 2: Emmanuel was frustrated and chose to get his feelings out into the open and off his chest.Sentence 3: Relieved that he had gotten the news off his chest, David could finally get a good night's rest.GET YOUR Resource | Master English Tips Pack
On the show today, Micaiah puts together "mostly intelligible ramblings" that haven't made it onto the podcast yet. Join the conversation here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/321938265648106 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/the-life-given/message
Revolutionizing the way websites are developed, designed, and optimized is Alex Belding. Alex is the co-founder and mad growth officer at WebriQ. Let's just say these guys aren't a big fan of WordPress, as I awkwardly time this on that exact platform. They are here to embrace the phrase ‘website as a service', helping customers go beyond what a website can achieve. Engage, rank, and convert! On a mission to change the way businesses approach their websites, Alex is focusing on educating prospects in a way that is comprehensible with clear value-messaging content. By providing prospects with appropriate content that suits their use case, is intelligible, and clearly states the value can generate the clients WebriQ is looking for. This is a challenge that Alex is focused on beating, as communicating product value to the customers is communicating problem solutions and product benefits that can generate high-quality and converted leads. Value messaging is essential to capturing the benefits of your product without overwhelming and boring them. Nobody wants that. Alex offers us insights into the world of developing impactful converting websites. Listen in for some inspiration and a dash of passion.
@John Vervaeke is using the latest findings from cognitive science and psychology to integrate science and spirituality to alleviate the ongoing Meaning Crisis. Dr. Vervaeke is an award-winning lecturer at the University of Toronto in the departments of psychology, cognitive science and Buddhist psychology, and the creator of Awakening from the Meaning Crisis series, in which he distils years of research and thinking from the cutting edge of cognitive science, psychology, history, philosophy and religion, all geared towards understanding and showing the way out from our current Meaning Crisis, through the cultivation of meaning, wisdom and self-transcendence, which John proposes are intimately tied-up with one another. John searches for a solution to this crisis by reaching deeply into the past to salvage the wisdom of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, Plotinus, Jesus, and the Buddha, just to name a few, and modern figures like Jung, Nietzsche, Heidegger. Combining the best of the past with the best work being done currently by contemporary psychologists, cognitive scientists, philosophers, neuroscientists. In the series John goes deep into topics like shamanism, altered states of consciousness, mystical and psychedelic experiences. Existentialism. Nihilism. Artificial Intelligence. Neuroenlightenment. Just to give you a little taste. The series ultimately projects the audacious, promethean goal of “systematically creating psycho-technologies that transform consciousness, cognition, character and culture in a way that religions have [in the past],” which we'll need “if we're going to address the current meaning crisis.” Oh, and as a by-product he proposes what may just amount to a comprehensive psychological theory of enlightenment. But John provides no easy answers, instead he helps us get clear about the problem and clear about what a potential solution might look like. So we together, can awaken from the meaning crisis. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
In this episode, we discuss Frankfurt's famous paper, Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss Frankfurt's famous paper, Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss Gary Watson's paper on Intelligible Moral Demand being a way to view the debate on moral responsibility. That paper is his Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss Gary Watson's paper on Intelligible Moral Demand being a way to view the debate on moral responsibility. That paper is his Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
Is kindness intelligible apart from the gospel? For Fredrick Nietzsche, virtues like grace, mercy, and kindness are “merely an honorable form of stupidity.” Those who practice them simply “project their own honorable stupidity and goodness into the heart of things.” The “things” to which Nietzsche refers is the mystery of the universe - God, namely. A loving God is the work of fiction produced by the sentimental pining of a kind person. Our internal kindness simply gets reflected back onto the external world - next thing you know, there is a God willing to forgive sins.
La philosophie de Platon est fondée sur la distinction entre le monde sensible et le monde intelligible. Pour lui, la vérité n'appartient pas au monde sensible, qui est le monde de l'apparence, du mouvement et l'instabilité. Mais alors, la vérité nous est-elle inaccessible ? Réponse dans ce podcast! Si cet épisode vous a plu, alors je vous encourage à soutenir le podcast : En faisant un don ponctuel sur PayPal : http://paypal.me/leprecepteurpodcast Ou en donnant une petite somme régulière sur Patreon : https://www.patreon.com/leprecepteurpodcast Pensez à laisser une note et un avis sur Apple Podcast/iTunes ou Spotify. Cela prend quelques secondes, et c’est un geste très utile pour le référencement du podcast ! Et bien sûr, continuez à partager les émissions que vous préférez sur vos réseaux sociaux. Le Précepteur Podcast a été créé pour vous et continuera d’exister grâce à vous. Du fond du cœur : Merci ! (Pour toute demande, vous pouvez contacter l’équipe du Précepteur Podcast ici : leprecepteurpodcast@gmail.com)
Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.10.02.324509v1?rss=1 Authors: Ritz, H., Wild, C., Johnsrude, I. S. Abstract: Speech is often degraded by environmental noise or hearing impairment. People can compensate for degradation, but this is subjectively effortful. Previous research has identified frontotemporal networks involved in effortful perception, but so far has been unable to distinguish domain-general involvement in cognitive control from domain-specific involvement in speech perception. We overcame these limitations by measuring brain responses (via fMRI) to clear and degraded spoken sentences matched for intelligibility. On each trial, participants either attended to a sentence, or to a concurrent multiple object tracking task that imposed parametric cognitive load. Whereas the anterior insulae tracked domain-general task demands, anterior temporal cortex was selective to speech, with cognitive load revealing categorically different responses to clear speech and intelligibility-matched degraded speech. The results demonstrate that cognitive control is required to understand even very mildly degraded speech, underscoring the importance of interactions between perceptual and control systems for real-world speech comprehension. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info
Five Intelligible Words-1 Corinthians 14:1-40 Sermon by Tim Harris, Senior Pastor Woodburn Baptist Church, Woodburn, KY www.woodburnbaptist.org
Five Intelligible Words-1 Corinthians 14:1-40 Sermon by Tim Harris, Senior Pastor Woodburn Baptist Church, Woodburn, KY www.woodburnbaptist.org
Sam Wyner and Sal Ternullo, cryptoasset services co-leads at KPMG, join the show to talk about KPMG's newly-released analytics capabilities dubbed Chain Fusion. Chain Fusion is a patent pending suite of advanced analytics capabilities built on leading cryptoasset data and infrastructure products, to streamline the ability for financial services companies, FinTechs, and organizations across industries to deliver institutional quality cryptoasset capabilities and services. In this episode: KPMG's historical engagement with the crypto industry How audit/consulting firms are engaging with crypto financial institutions The choice to have a crypto specific team at KPMG (rather than simply focusing on blockchain) The reason why formal financial statement audits for crypto companies are not occuring in the US today Why an asset taxonomy from regulators matters to auditors What Chain Fusion is and what it's designed to solve The intersection of Chain Fusion and Proofs of Reserves for exchanges Why audit standards still don't take into account the notion of cryptographic signatures to prove ownership of an asset Why the FATF travel rule is so difficult to implement Check out the press release for Chain Fusion which provides a high-level overview of the accelerator suite and contact information to get in touch with Sam and Sal. Learn more about KPMG's Blockchain initiatives to explore recent thought leadership including Cracking Crypto Custody which describes four pillars for winning institutional crypto custody models.
Scott Belsky on Product Love, Beth Long on Maintainable, Mark Schell on Agile Uprising, Daniel Mintz on Product Love, and Kelsey Hightower on On Call Nightmares. I’d love for you to email me with any comments about the show or any suggestions for podcasts I might want to feature. Email podcast@thekguy.com. And, if you haven’t done it already, don’t forget to hit the subscribe button, and if you like the show, please tell a friend or co-worker who might be interested. This episode covers the five podcast episodes I found most interesting and wanted to share links to during the two week period starting December 23, 2019. These podcast episodes may have been released much earlier, but this was the fortnight when I started sharing links to them to my social network followers. SCOTT BELSKY ON PRODUCT LOVE The Product Love podcast featured Scott Belsky with host Eric Boduch. Scott founded Behance in 2005, which he calls a “LinkedIn for the creative world.” They were acquired by Adobe in 2012. He is now Chief Product Officer there. He wrote two books: Making Ideas Happen and The Messy Middle. Scott founded Behance because his designer and artist friends felt a sense of frustration at how their careers were at the mercy of circumstance. He pitched them on the idea of a social network for creatives and they hated it. So he asked what problem they wanted to solve. Many said that their portfolio sites were always out of date and hard for clients to find, they never got attribution for their work, their potential clients found it hard to look them up if they saw their work for another client, and there was a lack of software that catered to the business aspects of being a professional designer or artist. This was a community of customers who didn’t realize that what they needed is what they didn’t want. Behance needed to pull their customers through their first mile of doubt. When they put out a beta, they asked customers to put their portfolio on it and the customers said no because they had a portfolio site already. So they asked their customers if they could interview and write a blog post about them and they said yes. So Behance made a blog of leading designers and asked them for portfolio images. Customers agreed and let them put the images in Behance. They found a backdoor way to get some of the most beautiful portfolios into Behance upon launch. People who now looked up their favorite designers found them on Behance and thought, “I should be on there.” This taught Scott the lesson that, while the science of business is scaling, the art of business is the things that don’t scale. The best businesses find the non-scalable things to prime the pump for their products. Scott says businesses need to nail it before they scale it. In other words, they should aim for high product-market fit with a hundred or so users. Eric asked where the average product leader struggles in making the transition from being hands-on to more strategic. Scott says a common struggle is not empowering design sufficiently. You want to find the right design leaders and empower them sufficiently at the right point in the process. Great product leaders don’t say much at all. They are conduits that are working behind the scenes to get people aligned and to get designers and engineers working together. Apple Podcasts link: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/scott-belsky-joins-product-love-to-talk-about-exploring/id1343610309?i=1000458667222 Website link: https://www.spreaker.com/user/casted/belsky-edited-audio-mp3 BETH LONG ON MAINTAINABLE The Maintainable podcast featured Beth Long with host Robby Russell. Beth is a software engineer at New Relic. She says that maintainable code is code that prioritizes intelligibility and is oriented to the way humans interact with it. It is simple, clear, and emphasizes readability over conciseness. The infrastructure the code deploys to and the deployment mechanisms themselves should also prioritize intelligibility and clarity to be considered maintainable. Intelligible code is code that tends to make sense even to those that aren’t intimately familiar with it. This might be someone who hasn’t worked extensively in the codebase or someone who worked in it two months ago and has just now come back to it. Robby asked about technical debt. Working at New Relic, Beth has had opportunities to talk with Ward Cunningham, the originator of the term. When Ward coined the term, he was working on a financial system and he described technical debt, like financial debt, as something you deliberately take on. You sacrifice some maintainability in the short term and pay it back over time. Robby asked how developers can bring up maintainability concerns with stakeholders. Stakeholders are often focused on velocity, so they says things like, “Can we have the person who is on call due the sustainability engineering work?” This doesn’t work. What works is giving the team focused, protected time. Developers need to step out of their own experience of the world enough to understand the pain and pressure that their stakeholders live under and make a compelling case to them. Beth has seen it work. She has seen New Relic customers make slide decks to present to stakeholders about the value of doing the work to add observability to their systems and getting executive buy-in as a result. Robby asked about second system syndrome. She says it comes from the book The Mythical Man-Month and refers to the tendency to replace small, elegant systems that work well with bloated, over-engineered systems. You have a system that works well enough but people want more features and there is a temptation to replace the old system with something new. The old system is full of known flaws and, in the potential new system, the flaws are not yet known and you can pretend they are not there. This is why she recommends against rewrites. Apple Podcasts link: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/beth-long-maintainable-code-prioritizes-how-humans/id1459893010?i=1000458429284 Website link: https://maintainable.fm/episodes/beth-long-maintainable-code-prioritizes-how-humans-interact-with-it-XHdDZOQF MARK SCHELL ON AGILE UPRISING The Agile Uprising podcast featured Mark Schell with host Andy Cleff. Mark started out working at an organization that had reached CMMI (that is, Capability Maturity Model Integration) level 5 (that is, the highest level: optimizing) but he struggled to see the worth of it. Eventually, a friend of his introduced him to Extreme Programming or XP and this got him energized about Agile. They got into a discussion about a talk Mark attended at the Philly XP conference that was given by Ryan Lockard. Ryan described the benefits of cleaning up old code. Mark says that the less you clean up after yourself, the more stuff you have to step around. This also means being careful not to add too much complexity, as this makes things more complicated for the user and for the developers. Andy asked Mark where he starts in such a situation where you inherit a system where there hasn’t been a great deal of taking out the trash. Mark referenced Foot and Yoder’s paper on the big ball of mud. He says you start with the smallest pieces you can find. Don’t be afraid to delete things; that’s what we have code repositories for. If you are using a compiled language and you have tools like Resharper, make use of them. Mark talked about tools like OpenGrok for making code files more searchable. He says there are going to be cases where you have to take a leap of faith; you have to delete something that you know you may need to revert if you discover a previously unknown use. If you never take that risk and you’re always afraid of that code, you’ll never get to a cleaner state. Andy asked about how things get this way. Mark says that most developers’ passion is often around the building of new things. Combined with schedule pressure, doing chores like code cleanup becomes a low priority. Mark says that, ideally, it should be baked into the red-green-refactor cycle. Andy asks how we can push back as craftspeople when the business says, “More, more, more.” Mark says you need to find a way to tie this retirement of complexity to revenue. Apple Podcasts link: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/clean-code-refactoring-and-deleting-w-mark-schell/id1163230424?i=1000459008564 Website link: http://agileuprising.libsyn.com/clean-code-refactoring-and-deleting-w-mark-schell DANIEL MINTZ ON PRODUCT LOVE The Product Love podcast featured Daniel Mintz with host Eric Boduch. The work Daniel did in politics informed everything he does everyday. It helped him understand how people interact with products, how to scale and grow, how data can inform product decisions, how data can mislead product decisions, and how tools get built. When you’re running a giant volunteer political organization, that’s the lowest-attachment user you can imagine. Your product has to be good at grabbing users and getting them in the door or else it’s not going to work. Daniel says we often fall into the trap of being data-driven. He thinks of the episode of The Office where Michael Scott drives into the lake because the GPS tells him to turn right. There is a difference between being data-driven and data-informed and when data conflicts with your intuition, your qualitative research, and your experience, you should interrogate that. Eric asked how Daniel ended up at Looker. Daniel described his first experience with their sales team. After the salesperson struggled to describe what Looker was, he eventually asked Daniel to let him show off Looker by connecting to Daniel’s database and letting Daniel ask Looker any question about his own data. In ten minutes, the salesperson had shown him things about his data he had never seen before. Seeing Looker in this way, Daniel felt like he did when first encountered the power of SQL, but this time it was something that anybody could use. Just as any good product manager would try to get to the real problem when a customer comes to them with a solution like, “I want to make this button blue,” when a customer asks a data analyst to show them sales by salesperson by region for the last six months, a good analyst will ask them why. They might say, “I want to see if there is a big difference in how salespeople ramp over different regions.” The analyst might then respond, “What if we narrow that down and only look at people recently hired?” Product managers need to do the same thing when thinking about how they use data. For example, if you are trying to understand where people get stuck in the on-boarding path, then usage data may be useful. If you are trying to understand whether people’s impression of the product has changed over time, net promoter score might be what you need. Start with the question instead of saying, “This is the data I have available and here is what I can make of it.” Daniel says that good operational metrics are ones that, upon looking at them, you immediately know what you should do in response to them. Alternatively, dashboards of vanity metrics can be disempowering for people: if you are a product manager who isn’t working on a revenue-creating part of the product yet, a dashboard tracking a vanity metric like revenue is not something you can do anything about. Daniel gave an example of vanity and operational metrics for a company like Uber or Lyft. A vanity metric might be rides taken or cities served. It is the kind of metric that might be valuable to investors, not for the people that work there. An operational metric might be percentage of rides cancelled and that is only operational if you dig a level deeper to find out why they were cancelled. Eric asked Daniel for his take on net promoter score. From the consumer perspective, Daniel says, NPS is a great innovation because it is so simple and easy to administer that your response rate is going to be higher than any other survey question. Being a single question survey makes it easy to ask in-product rather than in a survey email and thereby increase response rate even further. He says that tracking NPS over time makes it even more useful. When it is used to just ask if something is good or bad, however, it just becomes another vanity metric. Apple Podcasts link: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/daniel-mintz-joins-product-love-to-talk-about-data/id1343610309?i=1000459282754 Website link: https://www.spreaker.com/user/casted/daniel-mintz-joins-product-love-to-talk- KELSEY HIGHTOWER ON ON CALL NIGHTMARES The On Call Nightmares podcast featured Kelsey Hightower with host Jay Gordon. Kelsey talked about what he calls “learning in public”, in which you share things as you learn them. He says that when you learn in public, you tend to not skip over the interesting bits from zero to getting started. A lot of times, we’re afraid to share that because we want to be seen as experts. Kelsey talked about his truest introduction to on call. He described how his CTO made it clear just how important their work was to customers. Hearing about the consequences for customers of system downtime put things in perspective for Kelsey. Kelsey says that if you fail to explain it, on call can feel like you’re overtaxing your employees. It is less like on call and more like glorified overtime. Another lesson Kelsey learned about on call at that company happened when he took on all of the on call work for two months. His goal was to find the patterns and make it go away. Over the two months, he made sure the issues were documented and the documentation was made consistent. The rest of the team saw Kelsey as “taking one for the team”. The team was able to do work in their areas of expertise to improve the on call experience. The number of incidents dropped from 1-2 per week every week to having weeks without any incidents. They had been in a cycle in which on call pain was spread out enough that nobody did anything about it. Stepping up and showing leadership by doing changed things. Apple Podcasts link: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/episode-45-kelsey-hightower-google/id1447430839?i=1000460193573 Website link: https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/oncallnightmares/episodes/2019-12-19T08_16_15-08_00 LINKS Ask questions, make comments, and let your voice be heard by emailing podcast@thekguy.com. Twitter: https://twitter.com/thekguy LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/keithmmcdonald/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thekguypage Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the_k_guy/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheKGuy Website:
Freedom for Hong Kong! :) If we don’t focus on what ails us, in terms of developmental trauma, we’ll tend to relive it. So, it’s vital to recognize and be mindful of the impact of...
We begin talking about running the London Marathon and the motivations behind doing so. Then moving on to talks about nutrition, allergies and IBS. These talks then move to responsibility, Logos and the 4 Agreements. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/pif-podcast/message
Gautam Tejas Ganeshan is a musician with a BA in Philosophy from the University of Austin Texas. Gautam recently felt compelled to write about the “Anti-Vaxx” movement, in an attempt to bring clear thinking and highlight big picture and more philosophical implications.Gautam’s article “Is There An Intelligible ”Anti-Vaxx” Position“ has gotten some high profile attention, including a retweet from Charles Eisenstein, which is how I found the article. in Gautam‘s words: “This article has been retweeted by the co-founder of Wikipedia, by an ivy league university press, by the scientist with the relevant TED talk, and by the author of a NYT bestselling book on depression.”While Gautam “steel-manned” the “anti-vaxx” argument, he is clear that this is not his pet issue and he does not consider himself an “anti-vaxxer”, but more attempting to contribute to more open minded and reasonable discussion about a very contentious topic.Gautam and I had a long and engaging discussion about his article and much more. Enjoy!Connect with Gautam:ArticleWebsiteConnect with Jacob:InstagramFacebookWebsiteSupport AAA:ListenSubscribe / ReviewDonate PayPal / VenmoShop through our Amazon PortalSubscribe on PatreonMusic by Jacob Gossel / DPLV
Better to understand a speaker than trying to impress them with words that they cannot understand.
February 10, 2019 by Pastor Jeff Alexander Visit us at moconnect.org!
The episode first aired in May, 2018.In the world of machine learning, there’s been a notable trade-off between accuracy and intelligibility. Either the models are accurate but difficult to make sense of, or easy to understand but prone to error. That’s why Dr. Rich Caruana, Principal Researcher at Microsoft Research, has spent a good part of his career working to make the simple more accurate and the accurate more intelligible.Today, Dr. Caruana talks about how the rise of deep neural networks has made understanding machine predictions more difficult for humans, and discusses an interesting class of smaller, more interpretable models that may help to make the black box nature of machine learning more transparent.
Brett and Nazim cover sex offenders and Separation of Powers in the form of Gundy v. U.S., a case that asks whether Congressional delegation regarding sex offender registration to the attorney general violates the Constitution. The law starts at (06:15), but there's a fair amount of tangents, including some solid Jeopardy talk.
Guest Speaker Bronwyn James. Topic: Becoming An Intelligible Writer
"Myths make reality intelligible" Are you a "sucker" for myths in photography that are holding you back from being .... great?
In the world of machine learning, there’s been a notable trade-off between accuracy and intelligibility. Either the models are accurate but difficult to make sense of, or easy to understand but prone to error. That’s why Dr. Rich Caruana, Principal Researcher at Microsoft Research, has spent a good part of his career working to make the simple more accurate and the accurate more intelligible. Today, Dr. Caruana talks about how the rise of deep neural networks has made understanding machine predictions more difficult for humans, and discusses an interesting class of smaller, more interpretable models that may help to make the black box nature of machine learning more transparent.
1 Corinthians 14:1-25
1 Corinthians Pt 11: We should come together ready to give the gifts God has given us, not expecting only to receive.
In Book VI of the Republic we begin to discover the deeper metaphysics of Plato, where geometry and mathematics provide the means by which the truth of the higher realms can be seen by analogy. Socrates engages in a bitter critique of the sophists and their pseudo-philosophy of crowd-pleasing and beastly, herd-like nonsense, lacking any real philosophical education. Rather, the true philosopher is spoken of as grasping the Noetic Light of the Good, the true Sun of the Intelligible realm. This is the free half of the audio lecture that can be obtained by subscribing to jaysanalysis.com at the PayPal links at JaysAnalysis.com http://www.jaysanalysis.com
This talk explores Paul's discussion differentiating the public gift of tongues and the private gift of praying in the Spirit. Paul's exhortation to desire the greater gifts should not infer levels of superiority of inherent value; for all gifts of the Spirit are of not inherently measurable as such. The greater gifts are referring to the context of public worship involving intelligibility. Intelligible gifts are greater for the purpose of the gathered community. This in no way depreciates the private gift of tongues in one's private devotional life. Prophecy speaks to the Body while tongues speaks to God. Paul's desire is that everyone should speak in tongues ... pray in the Spirit in their private devotions ... for he speaks in tongues more than the Corinthians! But in public worship , intelligible gifts, such as prophecy, best serve the building up of the gathered body. The aim of the talk is to encourage all to eager desire ... God, Grace, Gifts, Building up the Church ... for the common good and to pursue the release of praying in the Spirit for private, intercession, warfare and praise to God. Here, the horizontal and vertical come into play and reciprocate.
Lectures on Formal Analysis by M Twist Lecture 1: The position taken is that artworks are self-intelligible wholes in contrast to other possible philosophical positions, namely context understood as a historical epoch, as an immediate antecedent events(immediate cause) and as a subjective experience of the reader. Lecture delivered on February 7th, 2014.
Paul now deals with the specifics of the abuse of tongues in the church at Corinth. As we look at his instruction though, we see principles for how we should approach corporate worship.
Terrified of Twitter? Afraid of apps? Evert Verhagen, sports scientist and academic from de Vue University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, guides us through everything sports clinicians need to know about social media and apps, and how they can aid clinical practice and health promotion. As well as being able to have references and guidance on your phone or tablet, these can help you stay bang up up to date in your field, and keep an eye on your athletes' wellbeing. See also: Evert's blog: Social media 101 http://bit.ly/VjNnye
A deeper look at speaking in tongues and why it must make sense plus the beauty and benefit of saying 'Amen.'
1 Corinthians 14:1 – 14:25File DownloadsPower PointPDFMP3
Four past winners of the Independent Foreign Fiction Prize gathered in the Paul Hamlyn Library to discuss the difficulties of selling translated literature, the cultural resources available to translators, working on dead authors, translating dialect, and a host of other tricky areas involved in literary translation. The panel was chaired by the Arts Council's Kate Griffin. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
