Hate Watching with Dan and Tony

Send us a textTake a journey into the sumptuous yet flawed world of Anne Rice's vampires as Tony and Dan sink their teeth into "Interview with the Vampire," the 1994 adaptation that tantalized audiences but left many fans of the novel bloodthirsty for more.The hosts explore how this gothic tale suffers from its reluctance to embrace the passionate relationships at its core. While Tom Cruise goes full throttle as the flamboyant Lestat and Brad Pitt broods intensely as the tortured Louis, their chemistry never ignites the screen with the intensity described in Rice's prose. But amidst these missed opportunities shines Kirsten Dunst, whose haunting portrayal of the child vampire Claudia steals every scene—a remarkable achievement considering her young age and the Hollywood heavyweights surrounding her.With their trademark humor, Tony and Dan pick apart the film's logical inconsistencies while appreciating its sumptuous visual aesthetic and practical effects. They examine how the 1990s cultural context limited the film's willingness to explore its queer subtext, creating a strange dissonance where characters who should be deeply connected barely seem to like each other.The discussion ventures into fascinating territory as they consider the nature of immortality, the horror of eternal stasis, and how the film's portrayal of vampirism differs from both its source material and other vampire stories that followed. Whether you're a devoted fan of Rice's vampires or just curious about this influential piece of 90s cinema, this episode offers bloody good insights into what makes "Interview with the Vampire" both memorable and frustrating.What vampire films do you think better capture the sensuality and horror of immortality? Share your thoughts in the comments and join us next week when we'll be reviewing the 2025 adaptation of "Snow White."Written Lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textAdventure films are a delicate balance of charm, wonder, and heart—which is why "Fountain of Youth" is such a fascinating disappointment to dissect. What should have been a thrilling revival of a beloved genre instead becomes a masterclass in missed opportunities.The frustration comes not from the film being terrible (we've seen worse), but from how tantalizingly close it comes to greatness before veering off course. With John Krasinski, Natalie Portman, and stunning locations around the world, all the ingredients were there. Yet something vital is missing: soul.Great adventure protagonists care deeply about something—Indiana Jones respects artifacts even while stealing them, Benjamin Gates in National Treasure risks everything to protect historical treasures while pursuing them. Krasinski's Luke, by contrast, moves through the story with curious detachment, displaying impressive combat skills without explanation and making quips that never land with the intended charm.The supporting cast fares no better, with potentially interesting characters reduced to exposition machines. The chemistry between leads is nonexistent despite the script insisting otherwise. Even the central mystery—the Fountain of Youth itself—operates on confusing, inconsistent rules that change to serve the plot rather than create a coherent mythology.What makes this analysis worthwhile is recognizing how "Fountain of Youth" illuminates exactly what makes adventure films work by doing the opposite. It's a reminder that spectacle without heart falls flat, that heroes need vulnerability alongside capability, and that audiences want to feel wonder alongside the characters discovering ancient secrets.If you love adventure cinema and want to understand why some attempts work brilliantly while others fail, join us for this deep dive into a film that might just kill the genre it hoped to revitalize. Subscribe, share your thoughts in the comments, and let us know what adventure classics you'd recommend instead!Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textRemember the 90s, when superhero movies were still figuring out what they wanted to be? Before the sleek, unified vision of X-Men or the cultural juggernaut of the MCU, there was "The Phantom" (1996) – a fascinating relic that demonstrates exactly why superhero cinema needed a complete overhaul.In our latest episode, we venture deep into the jungle of Bengala with Billy Zane's purple-spandexed hero as he pursues magical skulls, fights pirates, and somehow manages to keep a straight face while doing it all. The Phantom originated in comic strips back in 1936 – predating Superman and Batman – as the first true costumed hero. But what works on the newspaper page doesn't always translate to the big screen, and this film struggles mightily with that translation.Treat Williams steals every scene as villain Xander Drax, delivering deliciously campy line readings and creative murder methods (microscope eye-stabbing, anyone?) that suggest he understood exactly what kind of movie this should have been. Meanwhile, the rest of the cast – including a young Catherine Zeta-Jones – seems trapped in a more serious adventure that never quite takes flight. We analyze the film's curious place in superhero movie evolution, sitting awkwardly between the camp of Batman Forever and the more grounded approach that would soon revolutionize the genre.The Phantom provides an unintentionally hilarious time capsule of mid-90s filmmaking choices, from its Indiana Jones aspirations to its baffling mythology involving skull lasers and a wolf that can apparently communicate with horses. What went wrong? What occasional moments work? And why can't we stop talking about that purple costume? Listen as we unpack this bizarre superhero curiosity that reminds us how far the genre has come.Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textMinecraft: The Movie had all the ingredients for disaster - a video game with no story, a director known for divisive comedies, and the challenge of bringing blocky visuals to life. Yet somehow, this cubic adventure emerges as one of the most genuinely entertaining family films of the year.Jack Black brings manic energy as Steve, a doorknob salesman who discovers a portal to the Minecraft world and builds his own cubic paradise. When the evil Malgosia (played with delightful villainy) threatens to conquer this realm, Steve teams up with Garrett (Jason Momoa in what might be his most enjoyable role yet), a washed-up gamer who stumbles upon a mysterious artifact. What makes Minecraft work isn't its plot - which is paper-thin - but its commitment to embracing absurdity with open arms. Night comes every twenty minutes, characters craft elaborate structures with a single bang on a table, and physics operates on game logic rather than reality. Director Jared Hess (Napoleon Dynamite) fills every frame with visual gags and references that will delight fans without alienating newcomers.The film's standout moments include a flying sequence where Momoa instructs Black to "let my hips be your guide" while soaring through canyons, a wrestling match featuring the rare "chicken jockey" enemy, and perhaps the funniest villain death scene in recent memory involving multiple hidden knives. Jennifer Coolidge provides perfect comedic relief as a recently divorced school administrator who falls for one of the blocky villagers, believing his inability to speak means "he's Swedish."Unlike many video game adaptations that struggle with their source material, Minecraft leans fully into what makes the game special - creativity, discovery, and the joy of building something from nothing. It's a rollercoaster ride that prioritizes fun over logic, and it's all the better for it.Have you played Minecraft or watched the film? We'd love to hear your thoughts! Subscribe to the podcast for more discussions about surprising cinematic adventures that defy expectations.Written Lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhen the Coen brothers parted ways after decades of collaboration, film fans wondered what their individual work might reveal about their creative dynamic. Drive Away Dolls, Ethan Coen's first solo directorial effort, provides a fascinating if frustrating answer to that question.This deep-dive episode explores how the absence of Joel's balancing influence results in a film where Ethan's stylistic tendencies become exaggerated to the point of self-parody. We analyze how the film's inconsistent tone, from Margaret Qualley's baffling Southern accent to the cartoon sound effects that punctuate scenes, creates a disjointed viewing experience where characters seem to exist in entirely different movies.Through our conversation, we unpack why character relationships fall flat despite talented performers, how scenes lack proper setup and payoff, and why the film's attempts at madcap comedy often miss their mark. We highlight Beanie Feldstein's standout performance as the one consistently enjoyable element in an otherwise chaotic film.Beyond mere criticism, our discussion examines the creative alchemy of successful partnerships and what happens when that balance is disrupted. We explore how the screenplay (reportedly written around 2000 and never updated) feels anachronistic in both humor and sensibilities, raising questions about creative decisions throughout production.Whether you're a Coen brothers aficionado curious about their separate trajectories or simply interested in the dynamics of creative collaboration, this episode offers thoughtful analysis on how even talented filmmakers sometimes need the right partnership to bring out their best work. The conversation serves as both a critique of Drive Away Dolls and a celebration of what made the Coen brothers' joint filmography so special.Written Lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat happens when a self-referential slasher comedy can't quite figure out what it wants to be? "Hell of a Summer," the directorial debut from Finn Wolfhard and Billy Bryk, promised to do for summer camp slashers what "Scream" did for the entire genre – but stumbles in its execution despite some genuine bright spots.This week, we dive into this curious $3 million indie horror comedy that follows Jason, a dedicated 24-year-old camp counselor who returns to Camp Pineway rather than pursuing a responsible legal career. When counselors start getting picked off by a killer in a devil mask, the film attempts to balance humor, horror, and character work with varying degrees of success. While the cinematography impresses throughout – especially considering the challenges of night shooting on a limited budget – the narrative and character development leave much to be desired.The true revelation of the film is co-director Billy Bryk's performance as Bobby, whose scene-stealing comedic moments provide the film's biggest laughs and most memorable sequences. We break down why his character works so well while others (including Wolfhard's own character) fail to make an impression. From puzzling killer motivations to inconsistent death scenes, we unpack where this promising concept went wrong while celebrating the moments where it actually delivers.Whether you're a horror fan curious about this new addition to the slasher comedy subgenre or just enjoy our dissections of films that don't quite reach their potential, this episode offers plenty to sink your teeth into. Join us for a thoughtful, funny conversation about "Hell of a Summer" – a film that might not be great, but certainly gave us more to talk about than we expected.Lovingly written by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat makes a psychological thriller truly captivating? In this episode, we crack open the vault to examine "The In Crowd," a largely forgotten gem from 2000 that perfectly captures the post-Cruel Intentions era of teen psychological thrillers.From the moment Adrian steps out of a psychiatric institution and into the pristine world of an exclusive country club, we're drawn into a world of wealth, privilege, and deeply disturbing secrets. The film's queen bee, Brittany, takes a suspicious interest in Adrian that goes far beyond simple friendship. As we discover, Adrian bears an uncanny resemblance to Brittany's mysteriously absent sister – a coincidence that proves increasingly sinister as the story unfolds.We unpack the film's most memorable moments – from Adrian casually handling a venomous snake to the hilariously over-dramatic scooter accident that sends Kelly flying. While "The In Crowd" never reaches the erotic thriller heights of its contemporaries, it delivers surprising moments of genuine entertainment amid its predictable plot. The golf club murder scene, Simple Wayne's disturbingly decorated mannequin, and Brittany's masterful manipulation tactics provide fascinating glimpses into a thriller that could have been truly great with a few different creative choices.What fascinated us most was the film's missed opportunity to create genuine suspense by never making the audience question which character is truly unstable. Despite presenting Adrian as potentially unreliable due to her psychiatric history, the film immediately establishes Brittany as the true villain, removing any possible ambiguity that might have elevated the story.Whether you're revisiting this forgotten thriller or discovering it for the first time, join us for a deep dive into a movie that, despite its flaws, stands as a perfect time capsule of early 2000s psychological thrillers – complete with all the questionable fashion choices, flat lighting, and country club melodrama you could possibly want.Written lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textEver wondered what happens when a $55 million budget collides with an incoherent script? Welcome to our horrified exploration of "In the Lost Lands," quite possibly one of the worst movies ever committed to film.Based on a George R.R. Martin short story (though you'd never guess it), this fantasy disaster stars Mila Jovovich as Gray Alice—an "illusionist witch" with unexplained face tattoos—and Dave Bautista as Boyce, a mysterious traveler with a cool two-headed snake that disappears from the plot almost immediately. We're told there's only one human city left after some apocalyptic event, yet somehow there's a fully functional train, random barrels of oil, and endless nonsensical plot developments.The film's world-building crumbles under even the lightest scrutiny. Why are slaves mining rocks? How does the economy work? Why does everyone abandon executions before they're complete? Nothing adds up, and the movie never bothers explaining itself. Meanwhile, characters develop romantic feelings out of nowhere, powers work differently in every scene, and the big twist—that Bautista's character is actually the werewolf they're hunting—is both obvious from the start and poorly executed.What truly stuns us is how the film wastes its talented cast. Both Bautista and Jovovich have proven themselves capable actors, but here they deliver wooden performances with dialogue so bad that no performer could salvage it. One particularly egregious scene features Bautista's painfully delivered line "What kind of God is this?"—a moment so poorly executed it becomes unintentionally hilarious.If you enjoy dissecting cinematic disasters or have a high tolerance for absolute nonsense dressed up as fantasy, join us for this brutal breakdown of a film that somehow manages to fail at every fundamental aspect of storytelling. We promise you'll never look at werewolves, illusionists, or two-headed snakes the same way again.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textAn astronaut floating alone six months into a year-long mission. A mysterious alien spider that appears out of nowhere. A marriage crumbling across the vast emptiness of space. Netflix's "Spaceman" promised profound cosmic revelations but delivered a beautiful yet frustratingly hollow meditation on human connection.Adam Sandler stars as Jakob, a Czech astronaut studying a mysterious cloud near Jupiter while his pregnant wife Lenka (Carey Mulligan) contemplates leaving him back on Earth. When a giant talking spider named Hanuš (voiced by Paul Dano) materializes on his spacecraft, Jakob embarks on a psychological journey through memories and regrets rather than the stars. The film tantalizes with visual splendor – the zero-gravity sequences alone showcase remarkable technical achievement – but ultimately fails to answer its own existential questions.What makes "Spaceman" so frustrating is how close it comes to profundity. Adapted from Jaroslav Kalfař's novel "Spaceman of Bohemia," the film strips away crucial context that would have heightened the stakes. In the book, Jakob's mission is explicitly suicidal, a redemptive sacrifice to restore his family's honor after his father's disgrace as a government informant. Without this framework, Jakob's journey feels aimless, his relationship problems trivial compared to the cosmic scale of his surroundings.The film's greatest strength lies in its willingness to embrace ambiguity – is the spider real or a manifestation of Jakob's lonely mind? Does the mysterious cloud contain universal wisdom or merely reflect our own projections? Yet this same ambiguity becomes its downfall when extended to character motivations and narrative purpose. By the time Jakob reaches his emotional epiphany, we've spent too little time understanding who he was before to appreciate who he's become.Have you ever felt disconnected from someone you love despite being physically close? How would that feeling magnify across millions of miles of empty space? Watch "Spaceman" for its visual poetry and committed performances, but prepare for an emotional journey that, like its protagonist, never quite reaches its destination.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhen Joey, a seemingly ordinary window cleaner played by Daisy Ridley, reports for her night shift at a towering London skyscraper, she has no idea she's about to be thrust into a deadly game of survival. As she dangles precariously outside the building's glass exterior, a sophisticated group of eco-terrorists infiltrates a corporate gala inside, taking hostages and making demands that blur the line between justice and vengeance.Cut off from help and with only her wits and climbing skills to rely on, Joey becomes the unexpected wild card in a high-stakes confrontation that grows more morally complex by the minute. The terrorists, led by a charismatic activist played briefly by Clive Owen, aren't just seeking ransom – they're exposing horrific environmental crimes committed by the very executives now held hostage. As corporate secrets bubble to the surface, Joey must decide whether she's fighting to save the innocent or protecting the guilty."Cleaner" delivers heart-pounding vertical action sequences while forcing viewers to question their own moral compasses. When the terrorists reveal that the corporation has silenced whistleblowers through murder, the traditional lines between hero and villain begin to dissolve. Joey's struggle isn't just about physical survival – it's about navigating an ethical minefield where doing the right thing becomes increasingly unclear.The film challenges conventional action thriller formulas by presenting antagonists with legitimate grievances and protagonists with questionable motives. As Joey fights to protect her vulnerable brother caught in the chaos, she must also confront uncomfortable truths about the powerful people she's trying to save. In a world where corporate crimes often go unpunished, "Cleaner" asks: Who are the real terrorists, and what price are we willing to pay for justice?Written Lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textDan is out sick so we go back into the vaults to release one of our favorite episodes! Enjoy!Professional wrestling blurs the lines between reality and entertainment, but 1989's "No Holds Barred" obliterates them completely. We journey into the bizarre world of Hulk Hogan's first starring film role and discover a movie that doesn't just feature wrestling—it creates an entire universe where wrestling is the world.The premise seems straightforward: Hulk plays Rip, a wrestling superstar pursued by unscrupulous network executive Brill (Kurt Fuller) who creates his own violent wrestling program featuring the monstrous Zeus (Tiny Lister) after Rip rejects his blank check offer. But what unfolds is a baffling cinematic experience where normal societal rules don't apply, character motivations make no sense, and the primary trait identifying villains is their mistreatment of women.We analyze the strange production choices throughout—from awkward ADR and slow fight choreography to confusing scene transitions and inexplicable character decisions. Yet amidst the chaos, certain moments achieve an accidental brilliance, like the infamous bathroom scene featuring a chained dog that provides one of the film's few genuine laughs. The movie culminates with Hulk essentially murdering two people on live television to audience applause, cementing our view that Rip might actually be the villain of his own story.What makes "No Holds Barred" particularly fascinating is its behind-the-scenes story. Vince McMahon and Hulk Hogan themselves reportedly rewrote the entire script over a brief period, explaining why Brill seems modeled after McMahon's own public persona. The result is a film that serves as both a bizarre cultural artifact and a cautionary tale about wrestling's difficult transition to conventional narrative filmmaking.Whether you're a wrestling fan curious about this strange chapter in Hulkamania history or a bad movie enthusiast looking for your next bewildering watch, join us as we bodyslam this cinematic oddity and somehow find genuine entertainment in its spectacular failure.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textIn the fog-shrouded valley where two superpowers meet, a deeply human story unfolds against the backdrop of Cold War tensions and ancient mysteries. The Gorge brilliantly pairs Miles Teller and Anya Taylor-Joy as elite snipers stationed on opposite sides of a mysterious chasm, creating one of the most unique and compelling on-screen relationships of recent cinema.What begins as strict isolation—American and Soviet guards forbidden from contact—evolves through ingenious long-distance communication. Giant notepads, makeshift signals, and music played across the divide become the foundation of a connection that defies their orders and national identities. The chemistry between the leads is palpable even when separated by hundreds of feet of empty space, making their eventual face-to-face meeting (via a dangerous homemade zip line) all the more powerful.The film's first half excels at building both the mystery of what lurks in the foggy depths below and the tender romance developing above. Small gestures carry enormous weight—a toast across the gorge, a game of chess played at impossible distance, poetry shared in fragments. These moments of genuine human connection stand in stark contrast to the occasional monster attacks that remind us of the ever-present danger.Where The Gorge stumbles is in its third act, when our protagonists find themselves trapped in the depths they've been guarding. The revelation of what caused the gorge and its inhabitants—a joint Soviet-American research facility gone catastrophically wrong—feels rushed and underwhelming compared to the cosmic horror teased earlier. The "hollow men" monsters, while effectively creepy in glimpses, lose impact when fully revealed.Despite these shortcomings, the film remains compelling thanks to its central relationship and the performances that bring it to life. Teller brings depth to his tortured sniper, haunted by his past kills, while Taylor-Joy imbues her character with both steely resolve and vulnerability. Their journey from isolated guards to partners willing to risk everything resonates emotionally even when the plot mechanics falter.The Gorge ultimately asks what connections matter most—duty to country, scientific discovery, or the rare human bond that transcends boundaries. For anyone who appreciates character-driven stories with elements of horror, romance, and Cold War tension, this haunting tale of what lurks both within the mist and within ourselves offers a uniquely satisfying experience.Written lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat happens when a big-budget blockbuster has all the right ingredients but still fails to fully satisfy? That's the puzzle at the heart of our deep dive into 2010's Prince of Persia: Sands of Time, a film that cost hundreds of millions to make but couldn't capture the magic of its video game source material.The conversation kicks off with an examination of Jake Gyllenhaal's bewildering accent and lack of charisma as the titular prince – a critical misstep that creates a void at the center of this action-adventure. "It's the worst accent of any leading man in a movie," we conclude, comparing his performance unfavorably to the natural charm of Brendan Fraser in The Mummy or the cast of Pirates of the Caribbean.The film's salvation arrives about 40 minutes in with Alfred Molina's scene-stealing performance as a tax-evading ostrich racer. His character breathes life into a previously lifeless movie, demonstrating exactly what was missing from the start: humor, heart, and genuine entertainment value. We discuss how supporting characters often make or break these big adventure films, and how Prince of Persia failed to understand this crucial dynamic.We also break down the disappointing direction choices that plague the action sequences – the choppy editing and shaky camerawork that obscure rather than showcase the parkour stunts that made the video games so special. For a franchise known for fluid movement and graceful acrobatics, the film's inability to properly capture these elements represents a fundamental misunderstanding of its appeal.Join us for this entertaining analysis of blockbuster filmmaking gone awry, and why some adventure films become beloved classics while others remain forgotten curiosities. And don't forget to tune in next week for our take on "The Gorge" starring Miles Teller and Anya Taylor-Joy!Written lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textIn "The Electric State," Netflix's visually stunning but narratively bewildering $300 million sci-fi adventure, we're transported to an alternate 1990s America recovering from a robot war that never quite makes sense. What begins as a promising exploration of technology addiction and human-robot relations quickly devolves into a confusing rescue mission with emotional stakes that never land.The Russo Brothers clearly poured resources into creating a visually distinctive world based on Simon Stålenhag's artwork, but neglected to fill this beautiful shell with meaningful substance. Millie Bobby Brown portrays Michelle, a young woman searching for her brother in this post-war landscape, yet her performance lacks the emotional range needed to carry such a high-concept story. Chris Pratt as her reluctant companion Keats similarly struggles to bring depth to his character, with their on-screen chemistry noticeably absent throughout.What makes "The Electric State" particularly frustrating is its squandered potential. The premise—humans splitting their consciousness between robot bodies and virtual fantasies—raises fascinating questions about identity, addiction, and reality that remain largely unexplored. Instead, we're treated to a third act that collapses under its own illogic, culminating in an ending that contradicts the very world the film has established. The robot characters, ironically, demonstrate more personality than most of their human counterparts.For all its flaws, the film does deliver impressive visual spectacle and some standout voice performances from its supporting cast. However, these elements only highlight what might have been had the same care been applied to the screenplay. "The Electric State" ultimately stands as a cautionary tale about prioritizing aesthetics over substance—a beautiful but hollow experience that, like its virtual reality users, remains disconnected from anything meaningful.Written Lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textStep into the shadowy world of "Pathfinder," Marcus Nispel's forgotten 2007 action film that stands as a fascinating study in missed opportunities. Released in the same week as Zack Snyder's "300" with a comparable budget, this Karl Urban-starring vehicle attempted similar visual flair but stumbled where "300" soared.The premise holds genuine intrigue: a Viking child, abandoned and raised by Native Americans in 800 AD North America, must later defend his adoptive people when his bloodthirsty biological culture returns to pillage and destroy. It's a setup ripe with potential for exploring identity, belonging, and choosing one's own path—yet "Pathfinder" reduces these rich themes to a straightforward revenge tale drowning in murky cinematography.Throughout our discussion, we unpack the film's fundamental flaws: characters without names or development, confusing action sequences where you can barely distinguish one Viking from another, and logical inconsistencies that break immersion. The Viking villains pursue destruction for destruction's sake, forgoing more historically accurate and compelling motivations like resource acquisition or taking slaves. Even the special edition's reportedly excised sex scene becomes a curious footnote in a film already struggling with basic storytelling coherence.What makes "Pathfinder" particularly fascinating is comparing it to Nispel's later work on "Conan the Barbarian," revealing a director who seemed to learn some lessons while repeating others. For fans of Karl Urban, we recommend skipping this misfire and heading straight to "Dredd" for a masterclass in how to use the actor's talents effectively. Whether you're a student of film looking to understand what makes a movie work (by examining one that doesn't) or simply curious about this forgotten chapter in action cinema history, our deep dive into "Pathfinder" offers both entertainment and insight into how even promising concepts can lose their way in execution.Written lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textStep into the chaotic realm of *Conan the Barbarian* (2011) as we dissect the questionable choices that left audiences bewildered. With Jason Momoa at the forefront, the film boasted a hefty budget but struggled to deliver more than spectacular visuals. We explore how the plot muddied character arcs, particularly in the lackluster relationship dynamics, leaving viewers puzzled and unsatisfied. The podcast dives into memorable moments, such as the infamous human catapult scene, while lamenting the potential that was never fully realized. As we meander through the highs and lows, we reflect on the lessons learned from its shortcomings, solidifying *Conan* as a case study in fantasy film misfires. Tune in for our humorous analysis and decide for yourself whether it's worth a watch! Don't forget to subscribe and share your thoughts with us!Written Lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textJoin us as we dissect the highs and lows of the acting profession while humorously critiquing the “so-bad-it's-good” flick, “Flight Risk.” In this engaging episode, we dive into the core of what drives actors to pursue their dream careers, highlighting their desperate need for recognition and the hurdles they face along the way.Through laughter and insightful commentary, we unravel the absurdities of the film, from plot inconsistencies to thoroughly miscast roles, revealing how its failures mirror real-life struggles within the profession. Explore the impact of character development and scene structure on audience engagement, and discover why even the most dreadful movies can generate unexpected joy and shared moments of humor.We invite you to engage in the conversation—whether you've felt the passion of performance, grappled with your own creative endeavors, or simply revel in the absurdity of life's narratives, your insights matter! Leave us a review, subscribe for more entertaining critiques, and join the community of fans navigating the colorful, chaotic world of cinema.Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textRemember those childhood days of panning for gold at Knott's Berry Farm? We do, and it sets the stage for our throwback review of the 2013 sci-fi flick "Oblivion," featuring Tom Cruise. Does Cruise's undeniable charisma salvage a film riddled with clichés and predictability? We banter back and forth, questioning the originality—or lack thereof—of the movie as it borrows liberally from other sci-fi tales without adding fresh twists. Plus, our new segment "Themes" wonders aloud if the film genuinely probes meaningful concepts or merely plays in the kiddie pool of profundity.Tom Cruise's dedication to his craft shines through even in a script that's less than stellar. His commitment is a beacon, transforming what could've been a forgettable movie into something bearable, albeit not groundbreaking. We tackle the evolution of CGI, comparing past and modern techniques, and marvel at the film's visual grandeur, wishing its script had the same level of detail. The film's amazing visuals juxtapose with a narrative tapestry of familiar tropes, leaving us to ponder how it could have been elevated with a more nuanced story.Our conversation meanders through the movie's narrative quirks and character dynamics, peppered with humor as we tackle the absurdity of clones, drones, and dystopian themes. From the peculiar storyline of superfluous gum-in-machine tropes to the absurdity of drones programmed to destroy library books, we engage in a light-hearted exploration of Hollywood's storytelling choices. Wrapping up, we nostalgically compare past cinematic experiences with today's content, laughing through plot inconsistencies and dreaming of what could have been. Join us for this blend of analysis, banter, and a touch of nostalgia.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat happens when a notorious villain tries to play the hero? The answer might leave you scratching your head as we untangle the cinematic web of "Kraven the Hunter." Imagine a film with all the ambition of "John Wick" but none of the coherence or thrill—yep, that's Kraven. We kick off with a side-splitting chat about voice impersonations before launching into our critique of this ambitious yet flawed film. Spoiler alert: CGI doesn't always cut it, especially when practical stunts could have put some much-needed bite into this toothless tale.Our conversation takes a detour into the strange world where wildebeests have a "Hakuna Matata" moment in Russia and robots drop candy like it's hot at the movie theater. We also couldn't resist poking fun at a comic book character named Tony, a.k.a. the Foreigner, whose hypnotic abilities left us both baffled and amused. Along the way, we sprinkle in our excitement for upcoming films like "Ballerina" with Ana de Armas and the next "Knives Out" installment, which we hope won't leave us craving more like Kraven did.Finally, we dissect the chaos of mismatched characters and plot holes big enough to trap a rhino—literally. From a forgettable family dynamic led by Russell Crowe to the surreal transformation of a character into the Chameleon, the absurdities keep piling up. As we wrap up our thoughts on this peculiar entry into the cinematic universe, we ponder how Kraven's legacy could have been salvaged with a touch more humor, chemistry, and a dash less CGI. So, if you're ready for a wild ride through the jungle of Kraven's missteps, grab your popcorn and join us for this candid and entertaining exploration.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat happens when memories of a mediocre film collide with contemporary reflections on identity and time travel? Join us as we navigate the tangled narratives and bizarre performances of "Free Jack,” where past meets future in the most unusual ways. The episode dives into nostalgia, societal commentary, and the innate humor tied to exploring what makes this film a curious relic.• The discovery of "Free Jack" leads to deeper reflections on cinematic value • Character analysis of Emilio Estevez and the intricacies of time travel • Discussion of the social implications tied to the film's narrative • Humor interspersed through commentary on Mick Jagger's villain role • An invitation for listeners to rethink past cinematic experiences and memoriesWritten lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textRemember those carefree days of the 90s, when our biggest worry was catching our favorite movie on VHS? We take you on a trip down memory lane as we hilariously unpack the quirks and absurdities of "Milk Money," starring Melanie Griffith and Ed Harris. As we reminisce about our youthful adventures pedaling through suburban streets, we can't help but chuckle over our past misconceptions about the film's plot and the bizarre misadventures of its characters. Get ready for a laughter-filled discussion as we debate the merits of 90s cinema and the surprising mix-ups involving Anne Heche's roles.Our curiosity doesn't stop with the big screen; we dive into the classic myth of a deadly penny drop from the Empire State Building, only to debunk it with a nod to science. There's also an exciting detour into a fictional movie narrative, complete with treehouses and mysterious time capsules. Through playful banter and a touch of comedic genius, we explore character backstories, such as Frank's battle with grief, and sprinkle in some hilariously relatable suburban oddities, like clogged drains and household plumbing fiascos.In a rollercoaster of plot twists, we dissect the peculiar family dynamics and comedic chaos in "Milk Money," questioning everything from steering wheel removals to quirky character motivations. Our critique is lighthearted yet insightful as we ponder the strange romantic entanglements and questionable parenting choices that defined 90s teen flicks. With a nod to magazine nostalgia and the anticipation of watching "Freejack" next, we keep the laughs coming and invite you to join us for another trip into classic 90s film territory. Don't forget to like, subscribe, and prepare for more entertaining nostalgia in our upcoming episodes!Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textAn exploration of the whimsical chaos and humor present in Venom 3, showcasing its characters, plot confusion, and comedic elements that spark intrigue. The hosts share their thoughts on the film's relationship dynamics and the inconsistent storytelling while still managing to entertain.• Dissection of Venom 3's plot and character development • Initial reactions highlight confusion and enjoyment • Exploration of relationship between Eddie Brock and Venom • Discussion on the concept of the Codex and its implications • Reflection on comedic moments that broke the chaos • Engaging questions posed to listeners about their own perspectivesAI now gives us options! We picked option 2. Still written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textCan a Christmas movie truly capture the spirit of the season without a hint of originality? That's the question we're asking as we unravel our mixed emotions about "Red One," the festive film that left us scratching our heads. We pit it against holiday heavyweights like "Planes, Trains and Automobiles" and "Die Hard," diving into the nostalgia that shapes our love for Christmas classics. As we sift through the film's recycled Marvel-esque ideas, we ponder how it fares as a holiday flick versus a superhero adventure, and question if familiar tropes overshadow its potential to spark genuine festive cheer.Picture this: Chris Evans as a magically gifted character named Jack, caught in a whirlwind of candy theft and snowy antics. We explore the movie's over-the-top symbolism and humor, wondering if it's meant for kids or a more mature audience. Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson's portrayal as a Santa-like bodyguard further adds to our critique, as we muse over his acting choices and the missed comedic gems from John Rudnitsky and Lucy Liu. Our journey through this whimsical film takes a detour into absurdity with Eddie Murphy's mythical Christmas creatures, unleashing a cascade of nonsensical plot twists and magical mayhem.Ever wondered what happens when Santa's sleigh gets a high-tech makeover? Join us as we dissect the film's curious take on Santa's world, complete with towering reindeer and a North Pole that feels more like a bustling metropolis than a winter wonderland. From Santa-Satan mix-ups to Krampus snow globe antics, we question the logic of these festive narratives while reminiscing about quirky holiday folklore. Amidst the chaos, we find joy in the simpler delights these films offer young viewers, all while gearing up for our next episode's cinematic escapades. Happy holidays, and don't forget to bring your snow globe!Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textEver wondered what happens when the Joker tries to sing a courtroom ballad? We tackle this and more as we dissect "Joker: Folie à Deux," grappling with the movie's audacious blend of courtroom drama and musical elements. While our feelings are mixed about the film's narrative execution, we find ourselves pondering Lady Gaga's standout performance as Harley, whose presence demands attention despite limited character development. Our discussion opens up new narrative possibilities, imagining a plot where Harley's influence on Arthur could change the game entirely.The character dynamics are a hot topic, especially when it comes to Arthur's transformation, or lack thereof, into the Joker. We express our frustration with the film's failure to comment meaningfully on societal issues, leaving us yearning for deeper storytelling. But it's not all critique; we laugh about the quirky portrayal of awkward prison love scenes and consider how a reversed Harley-Joker dynamic could make for a much more intriguing storyline. As we explore these themes, we find ourselves questioning the film's missed opportunities and the potential richness of these iconic characters.In lighter news, we chat about the upcoming Hallmark reality series and muse on the rapid production of feel-good films like "Happy Howlidays." Creative endeavors aren't limited to the screen, as we share excitement over Alex Melton's musical YouTube series and nostalgic reflections on performances in "Black Doves." As we wrap things up, we leave you with a playful thought about eternal friendship, promising more laughter and camaraderie in the episodes to come. Don't miss out on this blend of humor, critique, and cinematic analysis that'll have you both entertained and thoughtful.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat do a Christmas werewolf film and a PG-13 family comedy have in common? They both challenge our perception of traditional holiday movies and leave us with a head-scratching blend of humor and horror. In this episode, we unpack the strange timing of a werewolf film's December release and imagine the hilarity of a festive lycanthrope tale. We then confront the perplexing narrative of the Farrelly brothers' "Dear Santa," where Jack Black's devilish charm collides with a dyslexic boy's Satan-summoning error. The film's bizarre plot twists—ranging from arm wrestling with Beelzebub to the peculiar Swedish Fish product placements—leave us questioning the filmmakers' comedic intent and their audience's amusement.Our conversation takes a turn as we critique the film's mishandling of profound themes like grief. Parents' emotional arcs are abruptly dismissed, and the soundtrack, which usually shines in Jack Black's projects, disappoints with its lack of coherence. We chuckle and groan over an ill-conceived subplot about a missing angel tree topper and the unrealistic portrayal of lying without consequence. The cross-eyed narrative even dares to include Post Malone playing beer pong with a kid—a misguided attempt at humor that skews the film's demographic even further.Amongst this chaos, Keegan-Michael Key stands out, proving that a handful of nuts and his improvisational prowess can inject life into even the flattest scenes. We discuss how humor can sometimes be uncomfortable and how it can resonate emotionally, albeit awkwardly, with the audience. As we wrap up, we express our appreciation for Jack Black's commitment, despite this misadventure, and tease future explorations of more promising cinematic ventures like "Alien: Romulus" and the quirky Coen Brothers' "The Hudsucker Proxy." Join us for this wild ride as we dissect the bizarre blend of holiday cheer, comedy, and questionable narrative choices.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textRemember the time when Madonna was more than just a pop icon and Sean Penn was her real-life partner in crime? Join us on a rollicking journey back to the 80s as we unpack the notorious film "Shanghai Surprise," a movie that leaves us surprised for all the wrong reasons. From explosive opium smuggling scenes to bizarre mothball twists, this movie promises an unexpected ride. We chuckle through the pitfalls of this peculiar narrative and share our bewilderment at how George Harrison's music ended up amidst this chaotic plot. Unravel the layers of this mess with us, as we attempt to make sense of the chaotic storylines and oddball characters like Willie and Crunk.Our playful banter continues as we tackle Sean Penn and Madonna's on-screen chemistry—or lack thereof—while wandering through the film's peculiar romantic entanglements. Was it a screwball comedy or a noir mixed with misplaced sound effects and stereotypes? You'll hear us scratching our heads at Madonna's wardrobe changes and a scene with ceramic hands that will have you asking, "Who thought this was a good idea?" As if that wasn't puzzling enough, we also hop on a nostalgic train to the days of Black Friday frenzy, juxtaposing the film's unpredictable antics with our own holiday shopping memories.And just when you think the madness ends, we toy with the quirks of memory and how it plays into gaslighting in relationships. Our tales of forgetfulness blend humor with reality, inviting listeners to connect with our shared experiences. As we wrap up with thoughts on the upcoming Minecraft movie starring the ever-entertaining Jack Black, we promise a blend of chaos, laughter, and 80s nostalgia that will leave you both entertained and perplexed. Let's just say, this episode is a wild ride from start to finish, much like the movie itself.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat do you get when you mix a Scottish honeymoon burglary, a Nintendo DS heist, and Chris Pine's directorial ambitions? A rollercoaster episode of "Hey Watch It with Dan and Tony!" We kick off with Dan's personal tale of a honeymoon gone awry in the scenic lands of Scotland, leading us into a chat about Chris Pine's debut, "Poolman." Critics may have thrown shade, but we stir the pot by suggesting it might just outshine the Coen Brothers' classics, even the sacred cow, "The Big Lebowski" (which we might call overrated). From Pine to Coen, our discussion zigzags through the beloved filmography of Fargo's creators. Tony can't help but throw some shade on "Fargo" itself—blame those Minnesotan roots! We exchange blows over our favorites, from the hilarity of "Burn After Reading" to the misfires like "Hail Caesar." Amidst this cinematic battlefield, "Poolman" emerges as a breath of fresh air, free from cynicism, much like the joyous "Fired Up." We can't help but celebrate those films that whisk us away from life's daily grind.As we cruise through L.A.'s filmmaking maze, we scrutinize the narrative potholes in "Poolman," from perplexing plot twists to character motivations that take a wrong turn. But fear not, as we lighten the mood with quirky password anxieties and a nod to Melissa McCarthy's comedic ventures. It's a smorgasbord of film critique, personal tidbits, and future episode sneak peeks—all wrapped up in our usual banter. So grab your metaphorical popcorn and join us for another wild ride!Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textEver tried a Kool-Aid pickle? We kick off this unexpectedly wild ride with some strange culinary adventures that will tickle your taste buds and your funny bone. Join us as we wade through the colorful waters of bizarre food trends, before diving into a lively debate: are movies still the reigning American art form, or have video games stolen the spotlight? Our personal tales of creating a quirky Mr. Toast app, marked by a year of creativity and financial hiccups, add a nostalgic touch to our chat about passion projects and their unpredictable journeys.Shifting gears, we get caught up in the peculiar world of M. Night Shyamalan's latest brain-bender, "Trap." With Josh Hartnett in the spotlight, we unravel a film that mixes serial killers with concert chaos, leaving us scratching our heads at its odd twists and turns. From TV throwbacks with "Head of the Class" to dissecting the movie's quirks—like Shyamalan's daughter rocking the stage as Lady Raven—we critique its narrative puzzles and ponder if the lack of a typical twist is the twist itself. Our analysis keeps the conversation rolling, questioning everything from the killer's tactics to the eyebrow-raising role of social media.As the episode winds down, we lighten the mood with some holiday cheer and a touch of nostalgia. Picture a sitcom set in a Christmas store or get hyped for "Finding Mr. Christmas"—a reality show that's as heartwarming as a holiday movie. Sprinkled with a dash of laughter, our chatter about past cinematic gems like "Dungeons and Dragons" and a thrilling Kim Basinger classic keeps the spirit of entertainment alive. Whether it's pondering Josh Hartnett's character arc or teasing our upcoming episode on "Pool Boy," we promise more humor and intriguing discussions are on the horizon.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textEver wondered what might happen if an alderman accidentally finds himself in the race for the presidency? On this episode of "Hate Watching with Dan and Tony," we tackle that very scenario as Chris Rock hilariously navigates the political landscape in "Head of State." We kick things off with a bold statement: Bernie Mac steals the show, and we're not even mad about it. Our colorful commentary comes packed with laughs, as we dissect the film's premise, debating its resemblance to Eddie Murphy's "Distinguished Gentleman" and celebrating the comedic genius of Mac despite his limited screen time.We're not just here to praise Bernie Mac, though. The film's clunky moments and awkward casting choices, like Robin Givens as Rock's ex-girlfriend, give us plenty to chew on. We poke fun at the movie's love subplot and those bizarre rap interludes that try to bridge the narrative gaps but fall short. There's a playful back-and-forth comparing Chris Rock's comedic chops to Eddie Murphy's, and musings on how “Head of State” attempts to blend satire with slapstick, sometimes missing the mark. Yet, we can't deny the film's entertaining value, especially with memorable scenes like the electric slide and a demo CD joke that still tickles our funny bone.And just when you think we're done, we throw a curveball with broader themes of politics and humor. Think about a presidential candidate hopping on a bus without a care in the world. We share our own tales of glancing at Target Tuesdays and the nostalgic dynamics of familial loyalty. As we wrap things up, there's chatter about the show "Detroiters" and a teaser for M. Night Shyamalan's upcoming flick, "Trap." Join us for this rollicking ride through political comedy, where nothing is off the table, and everything is ripe for a laugh.Written Lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat if living in dorms until the age of 16 and undergoing surgery to become "pretty" was the societal norm? Join us as we humorously unravel the perplexing world of "Uglies," the movie adaptation of the beloved book series. With a dystopian society fueled by poppy flowers and devoid of parents, our critique pinpoints the peculiarities of this bizarre universe. We draw parallels with "The Hunger Games," questioning the execution of the film's plot and its inexplicable elements, all while laughing along the way.As we navigate through the story, we challenge the logic behind the brain-altering processes aimed at compliance and attractiveness, scrutinizing Dr. Cable's seemingly unfathomable motivations. With witty banter, we expose the irony of the characters looking less appealing after their transformation and the absurdity of beauty-centric societal norms. Our exploration doesn't stop there, as we also delve into unrelated but entertaining topics like our recent obsession with Nintendo's Pokemon TCG Pocket and the comedic intrigue of Chris Rock's "Head of State."Amidst our roller-coaster discussion, we share whimsical critiques of movie tropes, such as a blood pact between friends and a far-fetched thriller involving a paralyzed woman communicating by blinking. Whether it's imagining fantastical hoverboard adventures or poking fun at storyline absurdities, our episode promises a lively, thought-provoking ride. Packed with laughs and personal anecdotes, this episode offers a playful yet critical examination of the storytelling choices in "Uglies" and beyond.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat happens when a film's chaotic AI plot leaves us more bemused than entertained? Join us as we humorously dissect the Blumhouse movie "Afraid," pondering whether a title like "Slightly Cautious AI" might have been more fitting. With an AI that seems more interested in wreaking havoc than creating suspense, we muse about missed opportunities for a coherent narrative, all while relishing in the absurdity of the film's awkward character interactions and isolated subplots.Ever wondered about the legal and ethical implications of AI in our daily lives? Our conversation veers into unexpected territories as we explore the growing role of AI, from content creation to a familial lawsuit over AI-assisted homework. The debate heats up with questions about the ownership of AI-generated content, touching on everything from music to personal writing skills. Personal anecdotes and a touch of humor guide us through the increasingly blurred lines between creativity, education, and technology.In a world where privacy feels more like a myth than a reality, we discuss the chilling parallels between fiction and real life, touching on themes of surveillance and manipulation in both media and family dynamics. Amidst quirky family banter and workplace oddities, we question reality versus perception in a tech-influenced world. Wrapping up with reflections on romance novels, teenage drama, and the ever-entertaining world of scary movie reviews, we promise a fun ride filled with laughter, thought-provoking debate, and perhaps a bit of nostalgia for those awkward AI encounters.Written lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textEver found yourself squinting at a screen, not because you need glasses, but because the movie is just that dimly lit? That's exactly where we found ourselves with the "Slender Man" movie, a film that left us fumbling with our remote to adjust the brightness just to see if there was anything worth watching. We've all heard of Slender Man, but how did a character with such a nonsensical origin become an internet horror icon? Join us as we navigate the murky waters of this film's lackluster attempt at horror, and ponder what actually makes a story spine-chilling.Remember the first time you watched "Halloween" or "Friday the 13th"? We're diving back into those horror classics, and let's just say it was a revelation compared to our "Slender Man" struggle. We even took a mid-movie detour to "Below Deck" just to cleanse the palate. Our conversation meanders through the highs and lows of horror cinema, from appreciating the tension-building genius of "Halloween" to chuckling over the quirky narrative of "Mikey." We also spare a thought for talented actresses like Joey King, musing over how even her skills couldn't save this sinking ship.But the horror doesn't stop there. We've got ghost-hunting escapades planned, a hopeful future as YouTube stars, and a hilarious take on sneeze etiquette that you won't want to miss. We round off the episode with some light-hearted banter on dating dynamics, and a teaser for our next critique featuring a familiar face from "Harold and Kumar" and "Star Trek." Whether it's puzzling over confusing character names or laughing at bizarre plot decisions, we promise you an episode full of humor, horror, and a sprinkle of the supernatural.Written lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textCould a child really be a serial killer? In this spine-tingling episode, we grapple with that chilling question as we unravel the twisted tale of "Mikey," a 1992 thriller that sends shivers down our spines. We kick things off with a laugh over a webcam mishap and a laughable scheduling mix-up that mistakenly featured a non-horror movie during Halloween. Determined to keep the thrills alive, we extend our horror theme into November, dissecting Mikey's unsettling antics and comparing them with other notorious bad-seed flicks like "The Good Son."Nostalgia takes center stage as we wander through our pasts, reminiscing about the '90s horror films that packed more fun than fright. Movies like "I Know What You Did Last Summer" offered campy thrills, but today's darker horrors, like "Talk to Me," leave us more disturbed than entertained. We share our love for films that master the blend of scares and laughs, praising hidden gems like "Barbarian" and "The Babysitter" that deliver both chills and chuckles. Along the way, we share childhood memories of Goosebumps books and the quirky reward systems that made school days a little more bizarre.Our conversation takes a thrilling turn as we explore fears of water and heights, spurred by personal stories of near-drowning and daring rescues. We challenge the ethics of real versus artificial skeletons, delve into the absurdities of childhood games, and recount a suspenseful tale of mouth-to-mouth resuscitation gone awry. To wrap things up, we muse on Creepypasta's influence in horror films, celebrating the potential for fresh and unique storytelling in niche content. Join us for a wild ride through nostalgia, fear, and the darker side of childhood memories.Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat happens when you mix the supernatural with a touch of humor and a sprinkle of personal anecdotes? You get our intriguing exploration of "The Mothman Prophecies," a film that has haunted minds since 2002. This episode promises to whisk you away on a journey through eerie atmospheres and unsettling phone calls, while we share our own eerie encounters and discuss the fascinating world of cryptids, insects, and the thin line between imagination and reality. Prepare for a fun ride as we uncover how Richard Gere's gripping performance shines amid perplexing dialogue and some outdated transitions.Ever wondered why moths and mosquitoes are so different from each other? Or how butterflies actually sleep? We bring these questions to life, blending them with a film analysis that critiques fear, suspense, and the peculiarities of supernatural events. Our conversation touches on government transparency and the quest for proof of extraterrestrial life, all while navigating car crashes and ghostly phone calls. We even touch on the fascinating character of Indrid Cold, whose chilling phone calls unfold with eerie knowledge and unsettling predictions.To round things off, we lighten the mood with a discussion on comedy specials and TV shows, from Ellen DeGeneres' farewell stand-up to the new season of "Bake Off." We reflect on nostalgic moments and share recommendations for your Halloween watchlist. It's a whirlwind of suspense, humor, and the supernatural, perfect for listeners who love a mix of mystery and laughter. Don't miss this captivating episode that's bound to keep you on the edge of your seat—and maybe even the edge of the supernatural.Written Lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat's worse than a movie that doesn't live up to its trailer? This week on "Hey, Watchin' with Dan and Tony," we tackle the disappointment that is Eli Roth's "Borderlands." Despite the vibrant and promising trailer, the actual film left us yearning for something more fun and entertaining. We break down the forced performances from Jamie Lee Curtis and the actress portraying Tiny Tina, and can't help but express our regret over choosing this film. Spoiler: the stark contrast between expectation and reality is staggering.Ever wondered how dynamite relates to the Nobel Prize, or laughed at the absurdity of an action sequence? We certainly did as we dissected a movie featuring a quirky, bomb-loving character and his baffling escape from a glass prison. From improbable loyalty born of shared fruit to inexplicable plot holes, we analyze the quirky logistics and historical tidbits about dynamite with equal parts humor and critique. The action sequences might leave your head spinning, but our take on them will leave you chuckling.From illogical character decisions to robots with 36-year waits, we review some of the most perplexing plot holes and scenes in recent memory. We discuss the bizarre choices made by characters, the robot's odd behavior, and humorous moments like a robot scanning while singing. Moving on, we share nostalgic anecdotes, compare big-budget films, and give our latest TV recommendations, including a Halloween pick to get you into the spooky spirit. All this and more, so tune in and enjoy the ride with Dan and Tony!Written Lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat happens when a movie starring Nicholas Cage as a flame-headed biker fails to ignite the same excitement as Iron Man? This week, we roll up our sleeves and prepare for Halloween with a critical and comedic review of the 2007 Marvel superhero film, Ghost Rider! We kick off by pitting Ghost Rider against Iron Man, marveling at the stark differences in quality, execution, and impact, even though they were released just a year apart. We take you through the wild ride of Johnny Blaze's transformation, the lackluster portrayal of the Devil by Peter Fonda, and the baffling transition from young Johnny Blaze to Nicholas Cage. Prepare for some laughs as we highlight the absurdity of the plot and characters—from Johnny's implausible discovery of his father's cancer diagnosis to the daredevil's contradictory stunts. We dive into the film's few redeeming moments, like the high-octane motorcycle jump set to "Crazy Train" and the introduction of quirky characters like Blaze's manager, Mac, and the rain-emerging villain, Dark Duskman. We don't shy away from scrutinizing the dynamics of the elemental villains and poking fun at the odd interactions and props, such as Johnny Blaze's “swagger stick” and Eva Mendez's character, Roxy's, lost demeanor.As we bring our analysis to a close, we take a hilarious journey through Johnny Blaze's epic motorcycle chases, his playful banter with Roxy, and the quirky elements Nicolas Cage brought to the character. We also touch on the film's chaotic narrative, jarring pacing, and the peculiar logic behind Ghost Rider's abilities. Finally, we wrap up with some chatter about TV shows and movies, including the latest season of "Only Murders in the Building" and the new "Borderlands" movie. Join us for a rollercoaster of an episode filled with critiques, laughter, and reflections on this chaotic Marvel film.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat happens when Hollywood's relentless production machine churns out both cinematic gold and forgettable flops? Join us for a spirited episode of Hate Watching with Dan and Tony, where we put the spotlight on Paul Feig's "Lady Ghostbusters" and "Bridesmaids" before diving headfirst into the action comedy "Jackpot" starring Awkwafina, John Cena, and Simu Liu. We debate whether Simu Liu's career choices, particularly his roles in "Shang-Chi" and "Barbie," have hit the mark and compare "Jackpot" to Mark Wahlberg's less adventurous "The Union". Expect no-holds-barred opinions and plenty of laughs as we dissect these films.Ever wondered how a dystopian lottery in 2030 California would play out? Spoiler: it's bizarre. Our next discussion tackles the perplexing plot of "Me Time," where lottery winners must survive attempts on their lives without guns. From implausible rules to societal acceptance of this deadly game, we break down the many logical gaps and absurdities that make this film a head-scratcher. We even brainstorm alternative plot ideas, debating whether altruistic stakes could have saved this narrative disaster.As we wrap things up, we explore unexpected plot twists and character dynamics in various films, including one where a sweet old lady is revealed to be a thief and potential killer. John Cena's Ninja Turtle fandom and a humorous escape room scenario add layers to our critique. We also revisit memorable celebrity cameos and crude jokes, analyzing how these elements contribute to—or detract from—the films' entertainment value. Whether it's chaotic museum fights or missed opportunities for stronger character development, this episode is packed with insightful commentary and comedic banter that you won't want to miss.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textEver wondered how Mark Wahlberg and Halle Berry would fare in a spy romance? Buckle up as we dissect the Netflix movie "The Union" in our latest episode! We kick things off with some laughs and a bit of personal reflection on productivity before diving into the film's production quality, character dynamics, and the broader landscape of streaming content. From the highs of successful series like "Ted Lasso" to the sustainability of mid-tier productions, we leave no stone unturned. And yes, we're just as excited as you are about the possible return of Rebecca Ferguson in the "Mission Impossible" franchise!But wait, there's more! We get downright critical about the love story between Wahlberg and Berry's characters. Is it believable? Spoiler alert: not really. We also touch on some casting choices that left us scratching our heads (Lorraine Bracco as Wahlberg's mom, anyone?) and point out the comedic elements that missed the mark. Whether it's the emotional depth of the characters or Wahlberg's character using a screwdriver to start his truck, we dissect it all with our signature blend of humor and candor.And if you think that's the end of our rant, think again. We scrutinize the chaotic action scenes and convoluted spy plots, comparing them to classics like Jason Bourne. From thrilling chase sequences to implausible plot devices like the BT Tower's secret location, we break it all down. Plus, we chat about some recent TV shows and movies worth your time, including the Netflix series "Chaos" and the action-comedy film "Jackpot." So join us for a wild ride through the wacky world of "The Union" and beyond—you're in for a treat!Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat if you could revisit a 90s film in a way that reveals its most unsettling elements? Join us on this wild ride as we dissect "My Father the Hero," starring Gerard Depardieu and a young Katherine Heigl. We expose the problematic and cringe-worthy portrayal of Heigl's character, a 14-year-old girl uncomfortably sexualized throughout the movie. Reflecting on the golden hits of the 90s like "Shawshank Redemption" and "Jurassic Park," we argue that "My Father the Hero" is far from a classic. Embrace the generational clash as we explore how outdated norms in filmmaking clash with modern sensibilities.Ever wondered how confusing character dynamics can derail a film? We break down Gerard Depardieu's enigmatic relationship with his on-screen daughter, Nikki, and dissect the perplexing plot choices. From a mysterious five-year absence to the bewildering addition of Emma Thompson as his girlfriend, we leave no stone unturned in our critique. And let's not forget the film's laughably poor music choices—because nothing says "awkward" like a misplaced soundtrack.Prepare for some serious head-scratching as we navigate through bizarre romantic subplots, unnecessary jealousy, and awkward jokes about underwear. We highlight the absurdity of the resort's single-bedroom suite arrangement and the chaotic talent show drama. Through all this madness, we humorously recount our own personal anecdotes and critique the unrealistic depiction of teenage romance and parental involvement. Stick around for a sneak peek at our next movie review, and join us in questioning the baffling decisions that make "My Father the Hero" a perplexing watch.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textWhat happens when one of us misplaces a phone and the other can't stop laughing about it? It sets the perfect stage for a lively discussion on the 2009 Nicolas Cage film, "Knowing." One host is captivated by the disaster sequences, while the other can't get past Nicolas Cage's unlikeable character. We dissect the thematic elements, character arcs, and question the emotional depth of the film, keeping the conversation engaging and humorous throughout.Travel back to 1959 with us as we unravel the mystery of Lucinda's ominous numbers in a time capsule, which resurface in 2009. We follow Caleb and his astrophysicist father John's journey to decode these numbers, analyzing foreshadowing elements, character development, and the film's narrative choices. From Caleb's unexamined intelligence to his father's puzzling protective nature, we critically and comically examine the film's execution and storytelling inconsistencies.We also cover dramatic and suspenseful scenes like a traumatic plane crash aftermath and a misunderstood subway station attack, discussing the film's balance between realism and spectacle. We even touch on foreign film reviews, reality TV, and tease our next movie pick, the 1994 comedy “My Father the Hero.” Join us for a blend of critical insight, humor, and a call to support the show with your likes, comments, and subscriptions.Written lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a textEver thought a street luge scene could leave you both laughing and scratching your head? Join us in this episode where we kick off with some light-hearted banter about the art of mid-day naps before diving into Tony's pick for the week—the 2002 remake of "Rollerball." We humorously dissect the film, focusing on Rebecca Romijn's enigmatic scar and the baffling character choices. Along the way, Dan shares some entertaining celebrity sightings, featuring his encounters with Rebecca Romijn and Owen Wilson right in his neighborhood, adding a fun twist to our movie critique.As we navigate through the chaotic production history of "Rollerball," you'll get a front-row seat to our analysis of the film's jarring deviation from the original's social commentary to a focus on mindless action and nudity. We also recount amusing run-ins with celebrities like Owen Wilson and Freddie Prinze Jr., emphasizing their unexpected charms. From high-stakes street racing scenes to absurd character decisions, we break down why this remake missed the mark, making for an engaging and thought-provoking discussion.Finally, we bring nostalgia into play by reminiscing about the original "Rollerball" while humorously critiquing the modern elements in sports movies. We touch on everything from the illogical border chase scenes to a humorous exchange about the extended cut of "Rebel Moon" and even the intrigue surrounding Olympic breakdancing. Prepare for laughs, head-scratching moments, and a good dose of nostalgia as we navigate through a cinematic misstep and appreciate the quirks that come with it.Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a Text Message.What happens when you combine "Mad Max" with roller-skating orphans and a dash of Mel Brooks' production magic? You get the 1986 cult classic "Solar Babies," a movie so bizarre it had us questioning everything from the logic of "skateball" to the mystifyingly named characters. We kick off this roller-coaster critique with some laughs about a painful hike and sunburns, setting the stage for our deep dive into the chaotic creation and puzzling narrative of this curious film. It's a blend of missed opportunities and hilarious missteps, all set in a world where misfit kids try to escape their captors through the power of... roller skates?In our detailed breakdown, we examine the lack of character development, the strange setting of an orphanage filled with amnesiac kids, and Jason Patrick's inexplicable awkwardness in a rain scene. We even explore the potential of "skateball" as a sport and the baffling setting of Tire Town. From the bridge crossing and Chikani camp attack to the magical elements and characters like "Darstar," we leave no stone unturned as we humorously critique these scenes. Mel Brooks' involvement and the film's many chaotic elements spark a lively discussion on what could have been if only the movie had a coherent vision.Finally, we take on the film's confusing themes and unresolved questions. Why does Jason Patrick struggle to experience joy? What's the deal with Charles Durning's role as the warden? And how did a movie with such a promising concept end up so scattered and nonsensical? We also share thoughts on other sci-fi movies and our plans to revisit the classic "Rollerball." Join us for a fun, entertaining, and sometimes baffling critique of "Solar Babies," a film that's as unique as it is perplexing.Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a Text Message.What happens when a guy who used to make crates for an art handling company in 1997 starts a podcast? You get hilarious stories, like Dan reminiscing about his crate-making days with staple guns and glue, and Tony suggesting he should shift to making custom jigsaw puzzles. And wait till you hear the mix-up involving Tony's aunt's name! Before we know it, we're back in Hollywood, with Tony unveiling the movie of the week, setting the stage for a wild ride through disaster movie land.Our critique session kicks off with a bang as we compare the classic disaster flicks "Towering Inferno" and "The Poseidon Adventure" with modern hits like "Deep Impact" and "Twister." Then, we dive headfirst into the chaotic waters of "Speed 2: Cruise Control." We dissect its lack of tension, shoddy writing, and bizarre action sequences, all while sprinkling in intriguing tidbits about Jason Patrick's high school days and his enigmatic persona. Get ready for our final verdict on why "Speed 2" sunk harder than the Titanic, from its illogical plot points to its almost comically bad scenes.But hold onto your life vests, because it gets even crazier. We chew through the baffling nonsense of "Speed 2," from a boat rescue gone wrong to a deaf girl improbably escaping an elevator. We'll have you laughing as we recount the chainsaw-wielding heroics and near-death propeller escapades. And just when you think it couldn't get any more outlandish, we wrap up with some YouTube channel highlights and a disappointing Olympic event. Don't miss our take on "Solar Babies" next week—it's going to be a roller-skating sci-fi riot!Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Send us a Text Message.Is "John Carter" really the worst science fiction movie ever made? Join us as Dan and Tony go head-to-head on this polarizing film from 2012, dissecting its categorization as a science fiction western adventure. We'll delve into Taylor Kitsch's lackluster performance and James Purefoy's standout role, while also tackling the film's problematic title and baffling marketing campaign. Whether you think "John Carter" is a cinematic disaster or just a misunderstood gem, our heated debate is sure to entertain and provoke thought.We also dig into the movie's narrative and character development flaws, examining how and why the adaptation veered so far from its beloved source material. From John Carter's inexplicable powers to the bizarre Martian reproduction concepts, we leave no stone unturned. Our discussion highlights the film's inconsistencies, such as the abrupt mastery of the Martian language and the failure to create a compelling foreign world. Comparing it to other sci-fi triumphs like "Avatar," we point out where "John Carter" missed the mark and speculate on what could have been done differently.As we wrap up, we tackle the perplexing plot choices that plague the film, including repetitive escape sequences and illogical character decisions. We reflect on the impact of the movie's failure on the careers of its stars, while also speculating on upcoming films like "Twisters" and "Rebel Moon." To add some levity, we share quirky movie recommendations and highlight some entertaining YouTube content. Don't miss our engaging and humorous dissection of "John Carter" and more in this week's episode!Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Ever wondered if you could turn a piece of paper into a whistle? We kick off our latest episode with a fun and quirky experiment that sets the stage for a comprehensive critique of the Marvel Universe, focusing on the Fox Marvel movies. From an in-depth look at "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" to a lively discussion about the upcoming Deadpool and Wolverine crossover, we cover it all. You'll get the scoop on the notorious work print leak of "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" that led to over 10 million downloads – all thanks to Rupert Murdoch's slip-up.Remember the thrill and disappointment of watching "X-Men Origins: Wolverine"? We do too. Join us as we share our personal experiences of watching the film, from midnight movie screenings to the complications of downloading content back in the day. We dissect the plot, performances, and execution, highlighting Hugh Jackman's standout moments and comparing them to the more successful "Logan." Our analysis tears into the film's narrative flaws, character inconsistencies, and those infamous adamantium claws, ultimately reflecting on what could have been a much stronger movie.To wrap up, we take a critical look at Wolverine's interactions with characters like Sabretooth and Gambit, questioning the logic behind certain plot points and decisions. We break down key fight scenes, analyze Wolverine's peculiar abilities, and even dive into absurd costume choices and misguided character portrayals. Plus, we sprinkle in our thoughts on recent media hits like "Crimetastic" on YouTube and share our excitement for nostalgic upcoming films like "Bad Boys Ride or Die" and the new "Beverly Hills Cop" movie. Don't miss our teaser for next week's review of "John Carter" – it promises to be a blast!Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Ever wondered how a movie so absurd can become a cult classic? Celebrate our 200th episode with a side-splitting critique of the 1987 oddity, "The Garbage Pail Kids Movie." We'll walk you through everything from holiday schedules to whimsical dream workweeks, providing a hilarious backdrop to our disbelief and amusement at this film's bizarre plot and over-the-top performances. Did you know Sean Astin's brother had a role in this chaos and faced strange contractual hurdles? Join us for genuine reactions, quirky trivia, and a nostalgic dive into the world of Garbage Pail Kids cards.Get ready for a heavy dose of 80s nostalgia as we reminisce about collecting those iconic cards and laugh about not saving them for future value. We'll share wild quotes from the film's director and discuss ethically questionable practices during filming, including a possible Peter Dinklage cameo. From the wacky world of Oliver and the Artful Dodger to the Miami Vice-inspired antagonists Juice and Tangerine, our humorous critique covers every angle. And yes, we dig into the real-life drama behind the casting and breakups during production—spilling all the behind-the-scenes tea.Buckle up as we navigate through the chaotic adventures of the Garbage Pail Kids, from improbable rescues to biker bar antics and nonsensical fashion shows. We'll question the film's intended audience and marvel at the plot inconsistencies—like the whimsical imprisonment of "ugly" characters—and hint at our upcoming review of "X-Men Origins: Wolverine." Whether it's analyzing the characters' bizarre dynamics or laughing at the outrageous storyline, our lighthearted banter promises to keep you entertained. Don't forget to subscribe, rate, and share your feedback—your support keeps this madness alive!Be our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Have you ever wondered what happens when a sequel tries too hard to replicate its predecessor's magic? Join us as we explore the curious case of "Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd" and dissect what went wrong in this prequel to a beloved comedy classic. Tony kicks off with the fascinating story behind why he chose this movie, setting the stage for a deep dive into the film's casting choices, including Eric Christian Olsen's valiant yet hollow attempt at emulating Jim Carrey's iconic character. We touch on the emotional beats that went missing and the pivotal creative decisions, such as the Farrelly Brothers' refusal to participate and the film landing in the hands of the "Jack Frost" director.We scrutinize some of the film's most absurd plot points, like Eugene Levy and Sherry Oteri's cartoonish villainy and their impractical school scam. Laugh with us as we recount the peculiar dinner at Harry's mom's house and the chaotic construction of a George Washington float, while lamenting the lack of grounded reality and coherent narrative that made the original so successful. From unnecessary birth scenes to awkward makeout sessions with jet packs, we critique the film's inconsistent comedic attempts and disjointed scenes, all while reflecting on broader comedic themes and the challenges of engaging an audience.To top it off, we highlight the talents of performers like Martin Short and recommend some alternatives, including Eric Christian Olsen's "Fired Up." Stay tuned for our musings on DVD digitization and a sneak peek into our upcoming 200th milestone episode featuring the infamous Garbage Pail Kids movie. Whether you're a die-hard fan or a casual viewer, this episode promises to give you an entertaining and critical perspective on a comedy that missed its mark.Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

What if a beloved character from your childhood suddenly felt like a stranger? Brace yourself as we unpack the enigma that is "Lightyear," the supposed origin story of Buzz Lightyear from "Toy Story." We'll dissect everything from the film's box office performance to its emotional resonance—or lack thereof—and illuminate the logical inconsistencies that left us scratching our heads. And yes, we can't help but gush over Sox, the robotic cat, who stole the show despite the film's many shortcomings.Ever wondered why some father-son moments in movies hit you right in the gut? We journey back to the heart-wrenching loss of Mufasa in "The Lion King" and discuss the pitfalls of Pixar's modern approach to storytelling. By contrasting characters like the classic Daffy Duck with today's animated personas, we reveal why "Lightyear" missed the mark. From character inconsistencies to baffling plot twists, we explore every nook and cranny of this ambitious yet flawed film.Time travel movies have always been a Pandora's box of perplexing paradoxes. We tackle the mind-boggling narrative leaps in "Lightyear," examining how the film's portrayal of Buzz Lightyear deviates from the iconic, confident hero we all know and love. From absurd futuristic concepts like "juicy fingers" to the mishandling of time travel logic, we cover it all with a humorous yet critical eye. Join us for a nostalgic trip through the highs and lows of animation, and don't forget to share your thoughts with us!Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Ever wondered what would happen if a mischievous kid tried to outsmart his ex-con dad with stolen money? Join us for a belated but heartwarming Father's Day special as we revisit the 1994 classic "Getting Even with Dad." We reminisce about Macaulay Culkin's rise to stardom post-"Home Alone" and explore Ted Danson's journey from "Cheers" to "The Good Place." Our discussion touches on how this quirky movie attempts to blend father-son bonding with comedy, comparing its kid-centric charm to other nostalgic hits like "Blank Check" and "Richie Rich."Hold on tight as we navigate through the movie's more fragmented and bizarre elements. From a criminal protagonist's fixation on a plant to a chaotic heist sequence filled with bumbling security guards, there's no shortage of confusing narrative choices to critique. We dissect the odd backstories, erratic behaviors, and laugh-out-loud moments that make this film a peculiar yet memorable ride. And let's not forget the father-son reunion scene, complete with pre-made itineraries and morbid photographs, which adds another layer of chaos to the storyline.Finally, we stroll down memory lane, sharing our own childhood movie memories and debating the lasting impressions of films like "Blank Check" and "Richie Rich." Our playful banter about Ted Danson's evolving appeal, humorous misadventures in San Francisco's culinary scene, and quirky character dynamics bring a light-hearted end to this nostalgic episode. Don't miss out on our entertaining critique and the whimsical tales that capture the essence of childhood movie magic and the complexities of screen relationships.Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Why settle for lackluster sci-fi when there's a world of iconic classics? Join us as we tackle Netflix's latest misfire, "Atlas," starring Jennifer Lopez. Dan and Tony tear into the movie's chaotic plot and questionable character arcs, drawing sharp contrasts with masterpieces like "Aliens," where every detail serves a purpose. Tony's especially fired up about J-Lo's character flip-flopping between unhinged and rational, leaving us all scratching our heads in disbelief. Get ready for a heaping dose of laughter and bewilderment as we dissect this sci-fi train wreck.Ever wondered how Hollywood botches AI concepts? We break down the absurdity of "Beyond a Human," from improbable chess match-ups to AI distrust that makes zero sense. We laugh at the film's ironic inconsistencies, such as the anti-AI protagonist surrounded by AI devices. We question the logic behind the film's convoluted plot and share some hilarious personal anecdotes, drawing unsettling but entertaining parallels between on-screen AI manipulation and real-life tactics. Trust us, you'll want to hear our take on these baffling sci-fi decisions.In a whirlwind of sci-fi oddities, we scrutinize everything from flawed planetary defenses to nonsensical character motivations. We poke fun at the misuse of neural links and the bizarre tech depicted in these films. And for a touch of nostalgia, we reminisce about childhood favorites like "Getting Even With Dad," contrasting their cheesy charm with today's sci-fi blunders. Tune in for a rollercoaster of critiques, laughter, and nostalgic reflections as we wrap up an episode packed with thought-provoking and hilarious discussions on the good, the bad, and the downright confusing in sci-fi storytelling.Written Lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Could a clone ever truly understand who they are? Journey with us as we tackle the mind-bending complexities of "Gemini Man" and unravel the layers of this action-packed film. We start with a dose of humor, engaging in some playful banter about personal interests, from Dan's unexpected opinion on trains to Tony's quest for the perfect climate. Our light-hearted chatter even leads us to hilariously debunk the Goldilocks story, touching on quirky habits and cultural practices that add a unique twist to our conversation.As we go deeper, we meticulously dissect the plot of "Gemini Man" and the moral dilemmas it presents. You'll hear a thorough critique of Henry's assassination mission on a Belgian bullet train and the bizarre intersections of his professional and personal life. We leave no stone unturned as we scrutinize the black-and-white moral framework, the mysterious Project Gemini, and the perplexing decisions made by the shadowy organization behind it all. Our discussion brings to light the confusion and questions that arise from the protagonist's journey and the film's portrayal of secretive operations and cloning.Finally, we examine the technical aspects of the film, including the use of CGI and high frame rates, while also critiquing the emotional depth of Will Smith's character. From the intense action scenes to the unexpected father-son dynamics, we offer a humorous analysis that questions the movie's logic and coherence. So, tune in for critical insights, humorous observations, and engaging commentary that promises to keep you entertained from start to finish.Written lovingly with AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT