Podcasts about keats

Poetry, butterflies, and original music oh my! With some help from poets Emily Dickinson, Robert Frost, William Wordsworth, and John Keats, along with original music by composer Gabriel Ruiz-Bernal, Jacke tackles the topic of butterflies. Yes, yes, we all know that butterflies are symbols of beauty and transformation - but can great poets get beyond the clichés? Why did Keats imagine himself as a butterfly in his love letters? Did Robert Frost mansplain poetry to Emily Dickinson (and do we agree)? In this episode, we flit and float and fleetly flee and fly through literature, life, music, and poetry - like a butterfly, maybe? (Maybe so!) Additional listening: John Keats  More John Keats 700 Butterflies at Rest The music in this episode is by Gabriel Ruiz-Bernal. Learn more at gabrielruizbernal.com . "Two Butterflies" performed by Gabriel Ruiz-Bernal and Allison Hughes. Help support the show at patreon.com/literature or historyofliterature.com/donate . The History of Literature Podcast is a member of Lit Hub Radio and the Podglomerate Network. Learn more at thepodglomerate.com/historyofliterature . Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today in 1940, Life Magazine published a series of photos of a little boy in Liberty County, Georgia - photos that, two decades later, would inspire one of the most famous picture books ever published. Plus: this Saturday in South Bend, Indiana, it's the Donut & Beer Festival. The Enduring Footprints of Peter, Ezra Jack Keats, and The Snowy Day (The Horn Book)Donut & Beer Festival Help inspire our future stories as a backer on Patreon

Bara den som gör sig till ett öga kan bli sedd. Kristoffer Leandoer ser hur en romantisk poet blev stor genom att försvinna. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna.Tidigt på morgonen lördagen den 26 oktober 1816 vandrar den tjugoårige romantiske poeten och läkarstudenten John Keats tvärs genom London från Warner Street till sin bostad intill Guy's Hospital i Southwark – enligt kartan i min dator en 53 minuters promenad söderut över Themsen. Det är en vacker höstmorgon, solen förgyller Londons spiror och tak och han har mycket att tänka på efter en natt tillbringad med läsning ur en lånad dyrgrip, folioutgåvan av George Chapmans klassiska Homerosöversättning.Chapman var Shakespeares samtida och hans ambition var att göra Homeros på engelska till ett diktverk i egen rätt, att som han själv sade ”öppna Poesin med Poesi”.Chapman ville besvara dikten, med andra ord, och medan han promenerar börjar Keats i sin tur formulera ett eget gensvar på nattens läsning. Vad är det han varit med om? Det känns som han varit ute på en mycket lång resa: Jag färdats kring i mången gyllne traktoch skådat månget praktfullt kungarikeoch öar västerut förutan likedär barder böjt sig för Apollos makt. Så börjar, i Gunnar Hardings svenska tolkning, den sonett som Keats komponerar i huvudet under sin vandring och skyndar sig att fästa på papper vid hemkomsten – fjorton rader som han genast skickar till föregående kvälls värd, som får den innan klockan ens hunnit bli tio på förmiddagen. Keats skrev alltid snabbt: vid ett tillfälle åstadkom han i vittnens närvaro en regelmässig sonett på mindre än en kvart.Men vad är det för resor han talar om?Visserligen skulle han bara några år senare dö vid Spanska trappan i Rom, men vid det här tillfället har Londonpojken ännu aldrig varit utomlands, de praktfulla kungariken och gyllne trakterna har han bara sett i sitt eget huvud, de är vad som brukar kallas läsefrukter, det vill säga samarbeten mellan den egna fantasin och orden man läser. Ingen har skildrat den komplicerade mentala process som läsandet innebär lika målande som Keats i denna dikt, ”On First Looking into Chapman's Homer”, som på svenska fått namnet ”Min första blick i Chapmans Homerosöversättning”. Med några få ord visar han hur läsaren blir medskapande genom att bära med sig sin förkunskap och sin förväntan till mötet med texten. Och mången skön berättelse jag hördeom mörkögde Homeros och hans länder,men fick först andas doften av hans strändernär Chapmans starka stämma dit mig förde. Till denna subtila växelverkan, där läsaren skriver boken och boken skriver läsaren, bidrar att det är en översättning, det är alltså inte alls Homeros egna ord som står i centrum för upplevelsen utan främst vilka signalsubstanser de frigör inne i John Keats. Det landskap som breder ut sig för den tjugoårige skaldens inre syn är varken homeriskt eller londonskt, det boken skriver i honom är något tredje, helt nytt; en värld som inte funnits förrän nu. Det är också som upptäckare han beskriver sig, det hans blick mött i den gamla folieutgåvan var inte dammiga bokstäver utan nya världar och en ny ocean: Det var som när en stjärnskådare fårsyn på en ny planet på himmelen,eller som Cortez när hans örnblick nårut över Stilla havet, och hans mäni vild förväntan runt kring honom ståri tystnad på ett berg i Darien. Strax efter att ha författat denna rymdodyssé på bara fjorton rader bestämmer sig Keats för att hoppa av sina läkarstudier, slänga bort fyra års utbildning och döma sig själv till ett liv i ekonomisk osäkerhet. Han förklarar beslutet med att han ”besitter Förmågor som är större än de flesta människors”.Det är ett nyktert konstaterande, inte det minsta skrytsamt. Keats hade en ovanligt klar syn på sig själv och visste hur dessa Förmågor bäst skulle sättas i arbete. Hans egen term för detta var ”negative capability”, negativ förmåga.Det vill säga att göra sig själv till ingen, tömma sig själv och uppgå i en annan varelse: ”Om en sparv visar sig utanför mitt fönster tar jag del i dess existens och börjar picka i gruset … på ytterst kort tid tillintetgörs mitt eget jag.”Hans orubbliga självförtroende som poet grundade sig i vetskapen om denna förmåga till självförglömmelse. ”Det slog mig genast”, förklarar han, ”vilken egenskap som krävs för att skapa en Framstående Människa & som Shakespeare besatt i så enormt hög grad – jag menar Negativ Förmåga, det vill säga när en människa har förmågan att vara kvar i osäkerhet, Gåtor, tvivel, utan att göra något irriterande försök att sträcka sig efter fakta & förnuft.”Sinnesintryck hellre än ideologi och tankar. Se hellre än veta. Se med andras ögon hellre än sina egna, eftersom de egna är inställda på det de redan känner till.”Låt oss öppna våra blad som blommor och bli passiva och mottagliga”, säger han. ”Jag lever i ögat, och min egen fantasi erkänner sig överträffad och får vila.”Keats säger det gång på gång: det viktiga är att inte ha någon personlighet, att inte ta plats själv. Man skriver inte, man blir skriven. Man läser inte, man blir läst. Bara den som gör sig till ett öga kan bli sedd. Han väljer de minsta och gråaste varelserna för att förklara skapandets processer, en sparv eller en spindel:”Det tycks mig att nästan varje Människa likt Spindeln utifrån sitt eget inre kan spinna sitt eget rymliga Citadell”, säger han. ”Jag tänker inte inbilla mig att en Människa kan vara jämlik med Jupiter, utan tänker att hon borde vara riktigt nöjd som ett slags köks-Merkurius, eller till och med som ett enkelt Bi.”Poeten är den mest opoetiska varelsen i hela skapelsen, eftersom poeten saknar egen Identitet och måste fyllas av någon annan Kropp. Solen, Månen, Havet är poetiska och äger egna oföränderliga attribut – poeten äger ingenting eget. Livet är ett högst tillfälligt lån, det vet han bättre än någon. Existensen är så overklig att tanken på dess overklighet gör honom full i skratt.I sitt allra sista brev sörjde han den sinnliga världen. Men det är en yrkesmans och hantverkares sorg över all omsorgsfullt förvärvad kunskap som nu går förlorad, kunskapen om ”kontrastverkan, ljus och skugga, all denna information som är nödvändig för en dikt.”Det Keats visste var att vägen till sinnevärlden faktiskt går genom orden, om man nu råkar vara försedd med en mänsklig hjärna. Vi vet för mycket. Att läsa och skriva är det sätt vi har att befrias från det vi vet och möta det vi inte vet.Bara ord kan kortsluta ord och öppna nya världar, nya gyllne trakter.Kristoffer Leandoerförfattare, kritiker och översättareLitteraturGunnar Harding: Där döda murar står – Lord Byron och hans samtida. Wahlström och Widstrand, 2002.

From Restaurant Owner to Tea Entrepreneur with Nicole KeatsJoin hosts Phil and Kenny as they sit down with Nicole Keating, founder of The Newfoundland Tea Company. In this candid and energetic conversation, Nicole shares her remarkable journey from running a fine-dining bistro in Gander to building a premium organic tea brand that's rapidly expanding beyond Newfoundland's shores.Nicole opens up about weathering personal and professional challenges—including a divorce, health struggles, and the devastating impact of the pandemic on her restaurant business—before finding unexpected success in the tea industry. Learn how her distinctive moose logo came to be, why premium tea is finding its market in a coffee-dominated world, and the creative ways she's incorporated tea into everything from cocktails to merchandise.This episode showcases an entrepreneur whose resilience, gut instincts, and commitment to quality have helped her navigate career transitions while staying true to her roots. Whether you're a tea lover, an aspiring entrepreneur, or simply enjoy stories of reinvention, Nicole's authentic and spirited take on building a business from the heart offers inspiration and practical insights for the commerce life. check out Nicole's product here: https://www.thenewfoundlandteaco.com/Find Nicole here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicole-keats-084444266/Thank you to Field Agent Canada for sponsoring the podcast https://www.fieldagentcanada.com/ 

Nathan Keates is a lecturer, improvisation teacher and performer. Like many of us, Nathan became addicted to improv studying in diverse forms and even clowning. He found that his interests drew him to teaching improv. Nathan Keats has delved into researching improv, one major project being with autistic people. He is an expert on autistic people, and we discussed the terms that have been use for autistic people that does not honor their individuality. We spoke several years ago, and I was delighted to connect with him again. He is a Lecturer in Health and Social Care at the University of Sunderland in London. Nathan is involved in research in Applied Social Sciences, Critical Autism Studies, Social and Positive Psychology, Organizational Culture and Improvisation. He has many research articles on neurodiversity including his recent "Inclusive Improv Pedagogy" https://keatesresearchblog.wordpress.com/2025/04/25/inclusive-improv-pedagogy/ “The Experience of Participating in Improv Comedy for Autistic Adults” https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/27546330251323154 And his 2017 book is especially worthwhile! "University Improv Comedy Society Manual" https://www.amazon.co.uk/University-Improv-Comedy-Society-Manual/dp/1549662694 You can contact Nathan at: Nathan.keates@sunderland.ac.uk

Welcome to Episode 199 of Good Humans Podcast!In this inspiring episode, I'm joined by Cory Keats—founder of Ampd Bros Electric Bikes, a rapidly growing Aussie brand leading the way in innovation, quality, and customer care.Cory's journey is one of grit, risk-taking, and resilience. From the fear of not being able to cover rent to now owning multiple warehouses and building one of Australia's most exciting electric mobility brands, this conversation is a raw and honest look into the rollercoaster of entrepreneurship.We unpack the sacrifices, the wins, and the mindset shifts that helped Cory turn his passion into a thriving business. Whether you're building a brand, chasing a dream, or just love hearing about what's possible when you go all-in—this one is for you.What We Cover in This Episode:✅ Cory's journey from struggling to pay rent to building Ampd Bros✅ The early sacrifices and lessons of starting a business✅ How to build a brand with community and customer care at its core✅ The mindset required to navigate uncertainty and growth✅ What's next for Cory and Ampd BrosConnect with Cory & Ampd Bros:

Welcome to Episode 199 of Good Humans Podcast!In this inspiring episode, I'm joined by Cory Keats—founder of Ampd Bros Electric Bikes, a rapidly growing Aussie brand leading the way in innovation, quality, and customer care.Cory's journey is one of grit, risk-taking, and resilience. From the fear of not being able to cover rent to now owning multiple warehouses and building one of Australia's most exciting electric mobility brands, this conversation is a raw and honest look into the rollercoaster of entrepreneurship.We unpack the sacrifices, the wins, and the mindset shifts that helped Cory turn his passion into a thriving business. Whether you're building a brand, chasing a dream, or just love hearing about what's possible when you go all-in—this one is for you.What We Cover in This Episode:✅ Cory's journey from struggling to pay rent to building Ampd Bros✅ The early sacrifices and lessons of starting a business✅ How to build a brand with community and customer care at its core✅ The mindset required to navigate uncertainty and growth✅ What's next for Cory and Ampd BrosConnect with Cory & Ampd Bros:

Welcome to Episode 199 of Good Humans Podcast!In this inspiring episode, I'm joined by Cory Keats—founder of Ampd Bros Electric Bikes, a rapidly growing Aussie brand leading the way in innovation, quality, and customer care.Cory's journey is one of grit, risk-taking, and resilience. From the fear of not being able to cover rent to now owning multiple warehouses and building one of Australia's most exciting electric mobility brands, this conversation is a raw and honest look into the rollercoaster of entrepreneurship.We unpack the sacrifices, the wins, and the mindset shifts that helped Cory turn his passion into a thriving business. Whether you're building a brand, chasing a dream, or just love hearing about what's possible when you go all-in—this one is for you.What We Cover in This Episode:✅ Cory's journey from struggling to pay rent to building Ampd Bros✅ The early sacrifices and lessons of starting a business✅ How to build a brand with community and customer care at its core✅ The mindset required to navigate uncertainty and growth✅ What's next for Cory and Ampd BrosConnect with Cory & Ampd Bros:

Rev. Dr. Carl Gregg (April 13, 2025)

It's the final countdown for the Detroit Red Wings. Tune in as we open by discussing their two most recent wins, including a victory over Jamie Benn and the Dallas Stars that included Dylan Larkin organizing an honorary stick-lift for John Keating, Albert Johansson, Alex DeBrincat, Jonatan Berggren, Lucas Raymond, Moritz Seider, and Vladimir Tarasenko contributing, & more. Also, their win in New Jersey, including Marco Kasper reaching 19 goals, Lucas Raymond reaching the 80 point mark (first Red Wings player since Henrik Zetterberg to do it), Dylan Larkin reaching 30 goals for the 4th straight year, Simon Edvinsson using his body, Compher's snipe, a chat about the draft lottery standings & more (3:45). Next, we're joined by Prashanth Iyer to discuss Steve Yzerman's options for the Hockeytown team this offseason, Todd McLellan's impact & their underlying numbers, whether bringing back Patrick Kane, adding Mitch Marner, Gavrikov, or other free agents would be a boost, and how far away they are from the Wild Card playoff spots (15:00). Next, our 2025 NHL Stanley Cup Playoff predictions for every series: Toronto Maple Leafs vs. Ottawa Senators, Tampa Bay Lightning vs. Florida Panthers, Washington Capitals vs. Montreal Canadiens, Carolina Hurricanes vs. New Jersey Devils, Winnipeg Jets vs. St. Louis Blues, Dallas Stars vs. Colorado Avalanche, Vegas Golden Knights vs. Minnesota Wild, and Los Angeles Kings vs. Edmonton Oilers. (46:05) After that, our NHL Draft Prospect Profile on Caleb Desnoyers and how he compares to Marco Kasper and Nico Hischier (1:10:05) & more before we take your questions and comments in our Overtime segment (1:18:30) - enjoy! Head over to wingedwheelpodcast.com to find all the ways to listen, how to support the show, and so much more! Go to TempoMeals.com/WINGEDWHEEL for 60% off your first box! #ad Go to KoffeeKult.com and use code WWP for 10% off your order! #ad Support the Jame Daniels Foundation through Wings Money on the Board: https://www.wingedwheelpodcast.com/wingsmotb Buy PLAY F*****G HOCKEY Merch: https://www.wingedwheelpodcast.com/shop

From begging to play the trumpet to becoming first chair; from older cousins putting him on to Toonami, to making rap videos in Tokyo... Keats has built himself from the ground up, to become one of the most well known rappers and creators in the blerd community. Hear about his journey with music, anime, and his creativity on this latest episode of Life With Anime Podcast!RECORDED: 2/17/2025Join this channel to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgQkn1FWODdRULH_F-BTYUQ/joinMERCH: https://sakugaapparel.com/collections/life-with-anime-podcast/BLACK FOLK IN TOKYO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGOw3OKgV4g------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Send us a textJoin Rachel Hill and Liz Wilson on Two Babes and a Book! Today we discuss the book The Courting of Bristol Keats by Mary E. Pearson. Chapters to skip if you want to skip the spice: (sorry if I missed one!)Chapter 68Chapter 87 (pages 436-438)End of last chapter of book-----------Want to check other episodes out about Mary E. Pearson's books?Episode 60: Dance of ThievesEpisode 64: Vow of ThievesEpisode 72: The Remnant ChroniclesEpisode 76: Interview with Mary E. Pearson Follow us on instagram @twobabesandabook. Make a comment there and tell us if you read this book. Make sure to leave us a review!  Thanks to those friends who have already shared the podcast!! It means the WORLD to us! As Holbrook Jackson said, "Never put off till tomorrow the book you can read today."Now go stick your nose in a book!

Send us a text欢迎收听第331期大话说电影节目，这是我们三月的第二次加更的节目，本期老章和包主播要聊的是高成本差评的人与机器人主题电影电幻国度 The Electric State，节目后半段会讨论这周漫威复联5的演员公布大会。导演: 乔·罗素 / 安东尼·罗素编剧: 克里斯托弗·马库斯 / 斯蒂芬·麦克菲利主演: 米莉·波比·布朗 / 克里斯·帕拉特 / 关继威 / 杰森·亚历山大 / 伍迪·诺曼 / 更多...类型: 剧情 / 喜剧 / 动作 / 科幻 / 冒险制片国家/地区: 美国语言: 英语上映日期: 2025-03-14(美国网络)片长: 128分钟又名: 电力之州IMDb: tt7766378剧情简讯：在一场人类与机器人的世界生存冲突中，年轻的米雪儿失去了唯一的亲人弟弟，她自己也在战后的世界里变成了托养孤儿。一天一位突然到访的机器人让她意识到自己的弟弟仍然有下落，米雪儿决定跟着小机器人出走，进入机器人的领域世界寻找弟弟的线索。在历险的路途上，她与走私商人Keats组队，并得到机器人世界的领袖花生先生帮助，并得知人类世界的科技公司利用弟弟的天生能力的事实。她们要团结摆脱公司派出的对他们的追杀，并返回公司的总部，揭起一场机器与人类机械军团的大战。大话说电影的群，欢迎你的加入，请加包主播：bobby8816 并回答第一期节目讨论的影片名称。

Find the 9 Points Rating System here: https://www.alostplot.com/9-points/ In this episode of 'A Lost Plot', hosts Maverick and Avalon review the Netflix film 'The Electric State', directed by the Russo brothers. They discuss their initial impressions, ratings, and the film's plot, which follows a girl named Michelle on a journey to find her brother in a dystopian world. The hosts analyze the character development, particularly of Michelle and the supporting cast, and critique the motivations and depth of the characters. Overall, they express disappointment in the film's execution despite its high production value.  They explore the themes of sentience and reality, discussing the moral dilemmas faced by the characters. ----------Highlights:0:00 ‘The Electric State' Introduction5:57 Opening Scene8:30 Michelle Greene13:10 Keats, Herman, and Mr Peanut17:35 Christopher and the Cosmo Bot20:51 The Villains: Bradbury and Ethan Skate25:59 The Climax30:27 Themes on Sentience and Reality32:23 Lasting Impact of The Electric State#theelectricstate #netflixorignal #milliebobbybrown #chrispratt #alostplot #filmthoughts #netflix #electricstate #simonstalenhag #stalenhag #technology #dystopian #themes #film 

Send us a textIn "The Electric State," Netflix's visually stunning but narratively bewildering $300 million sci-fi adventure, we're transported to an alternate 1990s America recovering from a robot war that never quite makes sense. What begins as a promising exploration of technology addiction and human-robot relations quickly devolves into a confusing rescue mission with emotional stakes that never land.The Russo Brothers clearly poured resources into creating a visually distinctive world based on Simon Stålenhag's artwork, but neglected to fill this beautiful shell with meaningful substance. Millie Bobby Brown portrays Michelle, a young woman searching for her brother in this post-war landscape, yet her performance lacks the emotional range needed to carry such a high-concept story. Chris Pratt as her reluctant companion Keats similarly struggles to bring depth to his character, with their on-screen chemistry noticeably absent throughout.What makes "The Electric State" particularly frustrating is its squandered potential. The premise—humans splitting their consciousness between robot bodies and virtual fantasies—raises fascinating questions about identity, addiction, and reality that remain largely unexplored. Instead, we're treated to a third act that collapses under its own illogic, culminating in an ending that contradicts the very world the film has established. The robot characters, ironically, demonstrate more personality than most of their human counterparts.For all its flaws, the film does deliver impressive visual spectacle and some standout voice performances from its supporting cast. However, these elements only highlight what might have been had the same care been applied to the screenplay. "The Electric State" ultimately stands as a cautionary tale about prioritizing aesthetics over substance—a beautiful but hollow experience that, like its virtual reality users, remains disconnected from anything meaningful.Written Lovingly by AIBe our friend!Dan: @shakybaconTony: @tonydczechAnd follow the podcast on IG: @hatewatchingDAT

Apoya al Podcast como FAN de Terraescribiente en IVOOX o en PATREON y escucha todos los audios sin Restricción! Bienvenidos a otro podcast de "Aventura Sonora" aquí en TERRAESCRIBIENTE. En esta ocasión vamos a escuchar: "CRONICA DEL ULTIMO AMANECER: El Estado Eléctrico" ¡LA BATALLA POR EL ALMA DE LA HUMANIDAD HA COMENZADO! En un futuro devastado por la guerra entre humanos y máquinas, la salvación llegó con el Neurocaster, una tecnología que permitió a la humanidad transferir sus mentes a drones mecánicos. Pero lo que parecía un milagro se convirtió en una maldición: millones cayeron en un letargo digital, mientras el mundo real se desmoronaba. En este caos, Michelle, una joven rebelde que se niega a rendirse, descubre un secreto aterrador: su hermano Christopher, un genio dado por muerto, sigue vivo… atrapado dentro de la red del Neurocaster. Con la ayuda del enigmático robot Cosmo, el guerrero Keats y el titán cambiante Herman, se embarca en una odisea a través de las ruinas del mundo, enfrentando ejércitos de drones, la despiadada corporación Sentre y su líder, el implacable Ethan Skate. Traiciones, batallas épicas y un sacrificio que cambiará el destino de la humanidad. ¿Podrá Michelle liberar a su hermano y destruir el Neurocaster antes de que el mundo quede atrapado para siempre en una prisión digital? Descubre el fin de la ilusión. Despierta a la verdad. LA REVOLUCIÓN COMIENZA AHORA. Maquetación: MAC (Terraescribiente) Por favor sigue y suscríbete a las siguientes redes: Canal de Whatsapp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaCcO2s1NCrQqLpfFR3u Escucha la aventura sonora completa en: patreon.com/Terraescribiente Twitter: https://twitter.com/TerraEscriba Telegram: https://t.me/+62_TRJVg-3cxNDZh Instagram: www.instagram.com/terraescribiente/ Tik tok: www.tiktok.com/@terraescribiente Youtube: www.youtube.com/@Terraescribiente También subscríbete a TERRAESCRIBIENTE en ITUNES Y SPOTIFY! Dale me gusta a cada Podcast y coméntalos! Ayuda mucho! Gracias!

Agradece a este podcast tantas horas de entretenimiento y disfruta de episodios exclusivos como éste. ¡Apóyale en iVoox! Apoya al Podcast como FAN de Terraescribiente en IVOOX o en PATREON y escucha todos los audios sin Restricción! Bienvenidos a otro podcast de "Aventura Sonora" aquí en TERRAESCRIBIENTE. En esta ocasión vamos a escuchar: "CRONICA DEL ULTIMO AMANECER: El Estado Eléctrico" En un mundo postapocalíptico marcado por la guerra entre humanos y máquinas, la invención del Neurocaster, una tecnología desarrollada por Ethan Skate y la corporación Sentre, permitió a la humanidad volcar sus conciencias en drones mecánicos. Esta innovación aseguró la victoria humana, pero a costa de sumergir a la sociedad en una existencia virtual, dejando el mundo real en decadencia. Michelle, una joven que rechaza el Neurocaster, descubre que su hermano Christopher, dado por muerto tras un accidente, sigue vivo, pero atrapado dentro de la red que sustenta la tecnología. Acompañada por Cosmo, un robot con conciencia propia, y aliados como el exsoldado Keats y el metamorfo mecánico Herman, Michelle se adentra en la Zona de Exclusión, donde descubre que la mente de Christopher fue la clave para el desarrollo del Neurocaster. La corporación Sentre, temiendo la verdad, lanza una ofensiva para eliminar a Michelle y sus aliados. En un acto de sacrificio, Michelle desconecta a Christopher, lo que provoca el colapso del sistema Neurocaster, destruyendo el control de Sentre. La humanidad despierta de su letargo digital y la resistencia abre un nuevo capítulo en la historia, mientras el destino de la inteligencia artificial sigue en disputa. Maquetación: MAC (Terraescribiente) Por favor sigue y suscríbete a las siguientes redes: Canal de Whatsapp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaCcO2s1NCrQqLpfFR3u Escucha la aventura sonora completa en: patreon.com/Terraescribiente Twitter: https://twitter.com/TerraEscriba Telegram: https://t.me/+62_TRJVg-3cxNDZh Instagram: www.instagram.com/terraescribiente/ Tik tok: www.tiktok.com/@terraescribiente Youtube: www.youtube.com/@Terraescribiente También subscríbete a TERRAESCRIBIENTE en ITUNES Y SPOTIFY! Dale me gusta a cada Podcast y coméntalos! Ayuda mucho! Gracias! Escucha este episodio completo y accede a todo el contenido exclusivo de TERRAESCRIBIENTE. Descubre antes que nadie los nuevos episodios, y participa en la comunidad exclusiva de oyentes en https://go.ivoox.com/sq/747547

Analizamos sin spoilers Estado Eléctrico, la adaptación del libro de Simon Stålenhag que nos lleva a una versión alternativa de los años 90, donde una joven y un robot cruzan un país devastado en busca de respuestas. Dirigida por los hermanos Russo. Millie Bobby Brown (Stranger Things, Enola Holmes, Damsel) interpreta a Michelle, una adolescente huérfana que sobrevive como puede en una sociedad en la que un conjunto de robots con aspecto de dibujos y mascotas, que en su día sirvieron a los seres humanos, viven ahora en el exilio tras un alzamiento fallido. Todo lo que Michelle cree saber sobre el mundo cambia repentinamente una noche cuando recibe la visita de Cosmo, un robot dulce y misterioso aparentemente controlado por Christopher, el hermano pequeño de Michelle quien ella creía muerto. Decidida a encontrar al hermano que supuestamente había perdido, Michelle recorre el suroeste de Estados Unidos junto a Cosmo y acaba uniendo fuerzas de mala gana con Keats (Chris Pratt, Guardianes de la Galaxia, Jurassic World), un contrabandista de poca monta, y con Herman (con el doblaje en su versión original de Anthony Mackie), el ocurrente robot que lo acompaña. Cuando se adentran en la Zona de Exclusión, una región amurallada en el desierto donde los robots campan a sus anchas, Michelle y Keats se topan con un extraño grupo de aliados animatrónicos y descubren que las fuerzas que se ocultan tras la desaparición de Christopher son más siniestras de lo que esperaban. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

"I have no rituals when it comes to writing. I don't want to think something can go wrong if things aren't set up the right way," says James McGovern of The Murder Capital. Indeed, that's the downside of a ritual: a fixed routine can limit your productivity when that routine isn't available. But McGovern does have one tiny "ritual" that I wholeheartedly endorse: writing the bad stuff before he gets to the good stuff.And as an aside, any songwriter who references Yeats, Keats, and Heaney in one podcast is forever my hero.The Murder Capital's latest album is BlindnessSend us a text

Den unga döden skapar teologiska problem, samtidigt dras vi till korta konstnärliga liv. Michael Azar funderar över livets och dödens längd. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna.Vi vet inte, säger kyrkofader Augustinus, varför goda människor så ofta rycks bort av en förtidig död, medan de som inte alls borde ha fått födas tvärtom får leva ett långt och behagligt liv.Nej, konstaterar han. Vi människor kan aldrig riktigt förstå varför så är fallet. För Gud däremot finns det en mening bakom allt – också med det som för människorna framstår som grymt och orättvist. Utifrån den evige och allvetande gudens blickpunkt finns det nämligen ingenting sådant som en nyckfull död. Ingen träder in i dödsriket utan att Han vet om det. Det tycks rentav följa ur Guds själva väsen att han inte bara har förutsett, utan också förutbestämt hur och när var och en av oss ska lämna jordelivet.För Augustinus finns det uppenbarligen någonting trösterikt i tanken att döden inte slår blint, utan lyder som ett viljelöst redskap under den Evige Faderns nådiga plan. Ändå kan kyrkofadern inte undvika att – här och var – uttrycka sin oro över alla de svårigheter som en sådan gudsbild ger upphov till. Om Gud verkligen är allsmäktig och allvetande framträder ju människan som inte mer än en simpel marionett, utan fri vilja och förmåga att bestämma över sitt liv, sin död och sitt postuma öde.Så här skulle den engelske 1600-tals poeten John Milton säga om en sådan slutsats: ”Må jag hamna i helvetet för det, men en sådan Gud kan aldrig vinna min aktning”.Den som inkallar Gud som ett värn mot döden hamnar förr eller senare i frågan om hur vi istället ska skydda oss mot den makt som håller döden i sin hand. Man kan förvisso undra vad det finns för poäng med att tro på en Gud som låter till synes oskyldiga spädbarn gå bort i de mest plågsamma sjukdomar – medan skoningslösa tyranner får leva friska, tills de blir mätta på både dagar och nätter.Den inflytelserike muslimske tänkaren Abu al-Hasan al-Ashari – verksam i Irak några hundra år efter Augustinus – är inte lika pessimistisk vad gäller människans förmåga att förstå Guds avsikter. När Gud låter barn och ynglingar gå ur tiden, så är det i själva verket för att rädda dem från ett än värre öde.”Låt oss föreställa oss”, säger han, ”ett barn och en vuxen som båda dog i den sanna tron – men att den vuxne fått en högre plats i himlen än barnet.Barnet kommer därför att fråga Gud: 'Varför gav du den mannen en högre plats?' 'Han har gjort många goda gärningar', kommer Gud att svara.Och då kommer barnet att upprört invända: 'Men varför lät du mig dö så tidigt att jag hindrades från att göra gott?'På vilket Gud i sin tur kommer att svara: 'Jag visste att du skulle växa upp till en syndare; det var därför bättre att du dog redan som barn.'” Det är inte så att man direkt avundas Guds arbetsbörda. Tänk att behöva räkna ut det moraliska värdet av alla människors ännu inte genomförda synder – och sedan med alla upptänkliga medel, inklusive barmhärtighetsmord, försöka säkerställa att dessa synder inte ytterligare belastar våra skuldkonton.Abu al-Hasan al-Asharis resonemang för tankarna till en rad berömda exempel från västerlandets kulturhistoria. Jag tänker till exempel på kung Oidipus som uttryckligen förbannar den fåraherde som räddade Oidipus från döden när han var ett spädbarn. Om han hade låtit mig dö, klagar Oidipus, hade jag ju sluppit det fruktansvärda öde som väntade mig i livet.Men vad för slags tröst – om man nu inte nöjer sig med de himmelska makternas – kan vi annars uppbåda när vi står inför dem som ryckts ifrån oss i blomman av sin ålder?Jag tänker kanske särskilt på dem som vi idag betraktar som mänsklighetens befrämjare på grund av de djupa avtryck de satt i de sköna konsternas historia. En Masaccio, en Caravaggio, en Mozart, en Edith Södergran eller en Charlie Parker.Sorgen över deras alltför tidiga bortgång handlar inte bara om att de aldrig fick möjligheten att skapa allt det som de fortfarande bar inom sig när döden stal deras lyra från dem. Utan också om att många av dem tvingades lämna världen med känslan att deras namn var skrivna i vatten, ovetande som de ofta var om den enastående betydelse de skulle komma att få för eftervärlden.Somliga finner viss tröst i ett estetiskt perspektiv på dödens verk. Som när den danske tonsättaren Carl Nielsen skriver att Mozart ”måste dö tidigt, för att bilden av honom skulle kunna fullkomnas”. I en sådan vision är det just det intensivt levda och hastigt utbrända livet som möjliggör den förevigade skönheten. I samma anda har många säkert svårt att tänka sig Alexander den store, Arthur Rimbaud, James Dean, Janis Joplin, Che Guevara eller Bob Marley som gamla, modfällda och kraftlösa.Likt Akilles måste de möta den svarta gudinnan just när de befinner sig på höjden av sin skaparkraft.Eller tänk bara på den förkroppsligade – och mycket unga gudom – som Augustinus ständigt sjunger lovsånger till. Hur skulle vi ha förhållit oss till Jesus om han i stället hade dött på korset i samma höga ålder som den Job som lämnade jordelivet som 140-åring?En variation på samma tema finner vi i föreställningen om det så kallade romantiska geniet. Här antas den förmodade genialiteten just vara intimt förbunden med den snabbt framskridande liemannens gärningar. Varken Novalis, Schubert, Lord Byron, Keats, Shelley, Chopin, Stagnelius eller systrarna Brontë hann fylla fyrtio innan ödesgudinnorna klippte av deras livstrådar. Genikulten tillåter oss kanske att för ett ögonblick glömma deras dödsvåndor. Genikulten tillåter oss för ett ögonblick att glömma deras dödsvåndor. Livet må vara kort, men bara på villkor att konsten är lång – eller som det ibland heter: evig.”Den som gudarna älskar dör ung”, säger Lord Byron mot al-Ashari.Kanske är detta rentav en ganska vanlig fantasi bland unga musiker, skalder och konstnärer. Det sägs till exempel att Kurt Cobain redan i barndomen såg framför sig att han en dag skulle bli medlem i den så kallade ”Club 27” – det vill säga, att han skulle dö i samma unga ålder som till exempel Brian Jones, Jim Morrison, Jimi Hendrix och Janis Joplin.Det var tragiskt nog en föraning som kom att besannas.Så stark är den estetiska myten om den ungdomliga dödens skönhet, att den en dag också lyckades infiltrera mitt eget medvetande. För det var med all säkerhet den som låg bakom min förvåning när jag en dag vaknade och insåg att jag fortfarande var vid liv, trots att jag hade hunnit fylla hela fyrtio år. Mitt i glädjen över att ha fått leva så länge, kunde jag faktiskt ana en obehaglig strimma av narcissistisk missräkning.Det var som om min nyvunna ålder förvandlats till ett hånfullt tecken på att jag hade gått miste om chansen att höra till de unga dödas utvalda skara – som om jag hade låtit livet segra till priset av förlorad odödlighet.Michael Azaridéhistoriker och författareMusikMy my hey hey (akustisk) samt Hey hey my my av Neil Young med Crazy Horse, från ”Rust never sleeps”, 1979.

'It was not easy to find a poet in the United States in my reading,who wrote with the clarity and intelligence that Larkin possessed. I found him to be full of surprises..'My guest today is writer David Biespiel who was born in Texas and who is now Poet in residence at Oregan state university. He has written for numerous publications and reviewed poetry for the Washington Post and the New York Times. He has taught creative writing at university across the US., has won many awards and published several books of his own poetry. In preparation for talking to David, he recommended that I have a look at his book A Long High Whistle: Selected Columns on Poetry, published in 2015, which is a collection of his pithy and fascinating articles on poets and poetry.‘I love that they are slender, I love that they are pocket sized, the whole texture of them- the Faber books.'Larkin poems mentioned:Church Going, This Be The Verse, I Remember, I Remember, Dockery and Son, Talking In Bed, Sad Steps, Friday Night In the Royal Station Hotel, Broadcast, An Arundel Tomb, The MowerPoets:John Ashberry, Walt Whitman, TS Eliot, Thom Gunn, Keats, Chaucer, Donne, Elizabeth Bishop, Herbert, Sylvia Plath, Robert Frost, William Stafford, Henry Allenhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1989/06/03/philip-larkins-everyday-poetry/1a53b1df-d319-43fc-9249-af52238ced60/The Paris Review, Archie Burnett, Martin Amis and Anthony Thwaite collections, US/UK poetry, railway journeys, rhyme schemes, literary tours of UK/Italyhttps://www.amazon.co.uk/Long-High-Whistle-David-Biespiel/dp/1938308107“The past is never dead. It's not even past.”  William Faulkner, Requiem for a Nun (1950)For more about Larkin's Coventry, please watch: Philip Pullen's fantastic 2022 talk at the PLS AGM in Coventry at Larkin's school King Henry VII School.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDOqZ4N_fUk&t=3106s

In this episode, James Marriott and I discuss who we think are the best twenty English poets. This is not the best poets who wrote in English, but the best British poets (though James snuck Sylvia Plath onto his list…). We did it like that to make it easier, not least so we could base a lot of our discussion on extracts in The Oxford Book of English Verse (Ricks edition). Most of what we read out is from there. We read Wordsworth, Keats, Hardy, Milton, and Pope. We both love Pope! (He should be regarded as one of the very best English poets, like Milton.) There are also readings of Herrick, Bronte, Cowper, and MacNiece. I plan to record the whole of ‘The Eve of St. Agnes' at some point soon.Here are our lists and below is the transcript (which may have more errors than usual, sorry!)HOGod Tier* Shakespeare“if not first, in the very first line”* Chaucer* Spenser* Milton* Wordsworth* Eliot—argue for Pope here, not usually includedSecond Tier* Donne* Herbert* Keats* Dryden* Gawain poet* Tom O'Bedlam poetThird Tier* Yeats* Tennyson* Hopkins* Coleridge* Auden* Shelley* MarvellJMShakespeareTier* ShakespeareTier 1* Chaucer* Milton* WordsworthTier 2* Donne* Eliot* Keats* Tennyson* Spencer* Marvell* PopeTier 3* Yeats* Hopkins* Blake* Coleridge* Auden* Shelley* Thomas Hardy* Larkin* PlathHenry: Today I'm talking to James Marriott, Times columnist, and more importantly, the writer of the Substack Cultural Capital. And we are going to argue about who are the best poets in the English language. James, welcome.James: Thanks very much for having me. I feel I should preface my appearance so that I don't bring your podcast and disrepute saying that I'm maybe here less as an expert of poetry and more as somebody who's willing to have strong and potentially species opinions. I'm more of a lover of poetry than I would claim to be any kind of academic expert, just in case anybody thinks that I'm trying to produce any definitive answer to the question that we're tackling.Henry: Yeah, no, I mean that's the same for me. We're not professors, we're just very opinionated boys. So we have lists.James: We do.Henry: And we're going to debate our lists, but what we do agree is that if we're having a top 20 English poets, Shakespeare is automatically in the God Tier and there's nothing to discuss.James: Yeah, he's in a category of his own. I think the way of, because I guess the plan we've gone for is to rather than to rank them 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 into sort of, what is it, three or four broad categories that we're competing over.Henry: Yes, yes. TiersJames: I think is a more kind of reasonable way to approach it rather than trying to argue exactly why it should be one place above Shelly or I don't know, whatever.Henry: It's also just an excuse to talk about poets.James: Yes.Henry: Good. So then we have a sort of top tier, if not the first, in the very first line as it were, and you've got different people. To me, you've got Chaucer, Milton, and Wordsworth. I would also add Spenser and T.S. Eliot. So what's your problem with Spenser?James: Well, my problem is ignorance in that it's a while since I've read the Fairy Queen, which I did at university. Partly is just that looking back through it now and from what I remember of university, I mean it is not so much that I have anything against Spenser. It's quite how much I have in favour of Milton and Wordsworth and Chaucer, and I'm totally willing to be argued against on this, but I just can't think that Spenser is in quite the same league as lovely as many passages of the Fairy Queen are.Henry: So my case for Spenser is firstly, if you go through something like the Oxford Book of English Verse or some other comparable anthology, he's getting a similar page count to Shakespeare and Milton, he is important in that way. Second, it's not just the fairy queen, there's the Shepherd's Calendar, the sonnets, the wedding poems, and they're all highly accomplished. The Shepherd's Calendar particularly is really, really brilliant work. I think I enjoyed that more as an undergraduate, actually, much as I love the Fairy Queen. And the third thing is that the Fairy Queen is a very, very great epic. I mean, it's a tremendous accomplishment. There were lots of other epics knocking around in the 16th century that nobody wants to read now or I mean, obviously specialists want to read, but if we could persuade a few more people, a few more ordinary readers to pick up the fairy queen, they would love it.James: Yes, and I was rereading before he came on air, the Bower of Bliss episode, which I think is from the second book, which is just a beautifully lush passage, passage of writing. It was really, I mean, you can see why Keats was so much influenced by it. The point about Spenser's breadth is an interesting one because Milton is in my top category below Shakespeare, but I think I'm placing him there pretty much only on the basis of Paradise Lost. I think if we didn't have Paradise Lost, Milton may not even be in this competition at all for me, very little. I know. I don't know if this is a heresy, I've got much less time for Milton's minor works. There's Samuel Johnson pretty much summed up my feelings on Lycidas when he said there was nothing new. Whatever images it can supply are long ago, exhausted, and I do feel there's a certain sort of dryness to Milton's minor stuff. I mean, I can find things like Il Penseroso and L'Allegro pretty enough, but I mean, I think really the central achievement is Paradise Lost, whereas Spenser might be in contention, as you say, from if you didn't have the Fairy Queen, you've got Shepherd's Calendar, and all this other sort of other stuff, but Paradise Lost is just so massive for me.Henry: But if someone just tomorrow came out and said, oh, we found a whole book of minor poetry by Virgil and it's all pretty average, you wouldn't say, oh, well Virgil's less of a great poet.James: No, absolutely, and that's why I've stuck Milton right at the top. It's just sort of interesting how unbelievably good Paradise Lost is and how, in my opinion, how much less inspiring the stuff that comes after it is Samson Agonistes and Paradise Regained I really much pleasure out of at all and how, I mean the early I think slightly dry Milton is unbelievably accomplished, but Samuel Johnson seems to say in that quote is a very accomplished use of ancient slightly worn out tropes, and he's of putting together these old ideas in a brilliant manner and he has this sort of, I mean I guess he's one of your late bloomers. I can't quite remember how old he is when he publishes Paradise Lost.Henry: Oh, he is. Oh, writing it in his fifties. Yeah.James: Yeah, this just extraordinary thing that's totally unlike anything else in English literature and of all the poems that we're going to talk about, I think is the one that has probably given me most pleasure in my life and the one that I probably return to most often if not to read all the way through then to just go over my favourite bits and pieces of it.Henry: A lot of people will think Milton is heavy and full of weird references to the ancient world and learned and biblical and not very readable for want of a better word. Can you talk us out of that? To be one of the great poets, they do have to have some readability, right?James: Yeah, I think so, and it's certainly how I felt. I mean I think it's not a trivial objection to have to Milton. It's certainly how I found him. He was my special author paper at university and I totally didn't get on with him. There was something about his massive brilliance that I felt. I remember feeling like trying to write about Paradise Lost was trying to kind of scratch a huge block of marble with your nails. There's no way to get a handle on it. I just couldn't work out what to get ahold of, and it's only I think later in adulthood maybe reading him under a little less pressure that I've come to really love him. I mean, the thing I would always say to people to look out for in Milton, but it's his most immediate pleasure and the thing that still is what sends shivers done my spine about him is the kind of cosmic scale of Paradise Lost, and it's almost got this sort of sci-fi massiveness to it. One of my very favourite passages, which I may inflict on you, we did agree that we could inflict poetry on one another.Henry: Please, pleaseJames: It's a detail from the first book of Paradise Lost. Milton's talking about Satan's architect in hell Mulciber, and this is a little explanation of who or part of his explanation of who Mulciber is, and he says, Nor was his name unheard or unadoredIn ancient Greece; and in Ausonian landMen called him Mulciber; and how he fellFrom Heaven they fabled, thrown by angry JoveSheer o'er the crystal battlements: from mornTo noon he fell, from noon to dewy eve,A summer's day, and with the setting sunDropt from the zenith, like a falling star,On Lemnos, th' Aegaean isle. Thus they relate,ErringI just think it's the sort of total massiveness of that universe that “from the zenith to like a falling star”. I just can't think of any other poet in English or that I've ever read in any language, frankly, even in translation, who has that sort of scale about it, and I think that's what can most give immediate pleasure. The other thing I love about that passage is this is part of the kind of grandeur of Milton is that you get this extraordinary passage about an angel falling from heaven down to th' Aegean Isle who's then going to go to hell and the little parenthetic remark at the end, the perm just rolls on, thus they relate erring and paradise lost is such this massive grand thing that it can contain this enormous cosmic tragedy as a kind of little parenthetical thing. I also think the crystal battlements are lovely, so wonderful kind of sci-fi detail.Henry: Yes, I think that's right, and I think it's under appreciated that Milton was a hugely important influence on Charles Darwin who was a bit like you always rereading it when he was young, especially on the beagle voyage. He took it with him and quotes it in his letters sometimes, and it is not insignificant the way that paradise loss affects him in terms of when he writes his own epic thinking at this level, thinking at this scale, thinking at the level of the whole universe, how does the whole thing fit together? What's the order behind the little movements of everything? So Milton's reach I think is actually quite far into the culture even beyond the poets.James: That's fascinating. Do you have a particular favourite bit of Paradise Lost?Henry: I do, but I don't have it with me because I disorganised and couldn't find my copy.James: That's fair.Henry: What I want to do is to read one of the sonnets because I do think he's a very, very good sonnet writer, even if I'm going to let the Lycidas thing go, because I'm not going to publicly argue against Samuel Johnson.When I consider how my light is spent,Ere half my days, in this dark world and wide,And that one Talent which is death to hideLodged with me useless, though my Soul more bentTo serve therewith my Maker, and presentMy true account, lest he returning chide;“Doth God exact day-labour, light denied?”I fondly ask. But patience, to preventThat murmur, soon replies, “God doth not needEither man's work or his own gifts; who bestBear his mild yoke, they serve him best. His stateIs Kingly. Thousands at his bidding speedAnd post o'er Land and Ocean without rest:They also serve who only stand and wait.”I think that's great.James: Yeah. Okay. It is good.Henry: Yeah. I think the minor poems are very uneven, but there are lots of gems.James: Yeah, I mean he is a genius. It would be very weird if all the minor poems were s**t, which is not really what I'm trying… I guess I have a sort of slightly austere category too. I just do Chaucer, Milton, Wordsworth, but we are agreed on Wordsworth, aren't we? That he belongs here.Henry: So my feeling is that the story of English poetry is something like Chaucer Spenser, Shakespeare, Milton, Wordsworth, T.S. Eliot create a kind of spine. These are the great innovators. They're writing the major works, they're the most influential. All the cliches are true. Chaucer invented iambic pentameter. Shakespeare didn't single handedly invent modern English, but he did more than all the rest of them put together. Milton is the English Homer. Wordsworth is the English Homer, but of the speech of the ordinary man. All these old things, these are all true and these are all colossal achievements and I don't really feel that we should be picking between them. I think Spenser wrote an epic that stands alongside the works of Shakespeare and Milton in words with T.S. Eliot whose poetry, frankly I do not love in the way that I love some of the other great English writers cannot be denied his position as one of the great inventors.James: Yeah, I completely agree. It's funny, I think, I mean I really do love T.S. Eliot. Someone else had spent a lot of time rereading. I'm not quite sure why he hasn't gone into quite my top category, but I think I had this—Henry: Is it because he didn't like Milton and you're not having it?James: Maybe that's part of it. I think my thought something went more along the lines of if I cut, I don't quite feel like I'm going to put John Donne in the same league as Milton, but then it seems weird to put Eliot above Donne and then I don't know that, I mean there's not a very particularly fleshed out thought, but on Wordsworth, why is Wordsworth there for you? What do you think, what do you think are the perms that make the argument for Wordsworth having his place at the very top?Henry: Well, I think the Lyrical Ballads, Poems in Two Volumes and the Prelude are all of it, aren't they? I'm not a lover of the rest, and I think the preface to the Lyrical Ballads is one of the great works of literary criticism, which is another coin in his jar if you like, but in a funny way, he's much more revolutionary than T.S. Eliot. We think of modernism as the great revolution and the great sort of bringing of all the newness, but modernism relies on Wordsworth so much, relies on the idea that tradition can be subsumed into ordinary voice, ordinary speech, the passage in the Wasteland where he has all of them talking in the bar. Closing time please, closing time please. You can't have that without Wordsworth and—James: I think I completely agree with what you're saying.Henry: Yeah, so I think that's for me is the basis of it that he might be the great innovator of English poetry.James: Yeah, I think you're right because I've got, I mean again, waiting someone out of my depth here, but I can't think of anybody else who had sort of specifically and perhaps even ideologically set out to write a kind of high poetry that sounded like ordinary speech, I guess. I mean, Wordsworth again is somebody who I didn't particularly like at university and I think it's precisely about plainness that can make him initially off-putting. There's a Matthew Arnold quote where he says of Wordsworth something like He has no style. Henry: Such a Matthew Arnold thing to say.James: I mean think it's the beginning of an appreciation, but there's a real blankness to words with I think again can almost mislead you into thinking there's nothing there when you first encounter him. But yeah, I think for me, Tintern Abbey is maybe the best poem in the English language.Henry: Tintern Abbey is great. The Intimations of Immortality Ode is superb. Again, I don't have it with me, but the Poems in Two Volumes. There are so many wonderful things in there. I had a real, when I was an undergraduate, I had read some Wordsworth, but I hadn't really read a lot and I thought of I as you do as the daffodils poet, and so I read Lyrical Ballads and Poems in Two Volumes, and I had one of these electrical conversion moments like, oh, the daffodils, that is nothing. The worst possible thing for Wordsworth is that he's remembered as this daffodils poet. When you read the Intimations of Immortality, do you just think of all the things he could have been remembered for? It's diminishing.James: It's so easy to get into him wrong because the other slightly wrong way in is through, I mean maybe this is a prejudice that isn't widely shared, but the stuff that I've never particularly managed to really enjoy is all the slightly worthy stuff about beggars and deformed people and maimed soldiers. Wandering around on roads in the lake district has always been less appealing to me, and that was maybe why I didn't totally get on with 'em at first, and I mean, there's some bad words with poetry. I was looking up the infamous lines from the form that were mocked even at the time where you know the lines that go, You see a little muddy pond Of water never dry. I've measured it from side to side, 'Tis three feet long and two feet wide, and the sort of plainness condescend into banality at Wordsworth's worst moments, which come more frequently later in his career.Henry: Yes, yes. I'm going to read a little bit of the Intimations ode because I want to share some of this so-called plainness at its best. This is the third section. They're all very short Now, while the birds thus sing a joyous song,And while the young lambs boundAs to the tabor's sound,To me alone there came a thought of grief:A timely utterance gave that thought relief,And I again am strong:The cataracts blow their trumpets from the steep;No more shall grief of mine the season wrong;I hear the Echoes through the mountains throng,The Winds come to me from the fields of sleep,And all the earth is gay;Land and seaGive themselves up to jollity,And with the heart of MayDoth every Beast keep holiday;—Thou Child of Joy,Shout round me, let me hear thy shouts, thou happy Shepherd-boy.And I think it's unthinkable that someone would write like this today. It would be cringe, but we're going to have a new sincerity. It's coming. It's in some ways it's already here and I think Wordsworth will maybe get a different sort of attention when that happens because that's a really high level of writing to be able to do that without it descending into what you just read. In the late Wordsworth there's a lot of that really bad stuff.James: Yeah, I mean the fact that he wrote some of that bad stuff I guess is a sign of quite how carefully the early stuff is treading that knife edge of tripping into banality. Can I read you my favourite bit of Tintern Abbey?Henry: Oh yes. That is one of the great poems.James: Yeah, I just think one of mean I, the most profound poem ever, probably for me. So this is him looking out over the landscape of Tinton Abbey. I mean these are unbelievably famous lines, so I'm sure everybody listening will know them, but they are so good And I have feltA presence that disturbs me with the joyOf elevated thoughts; a sense sublimeOf something far more deeply interfused,Whose dwelling is the light of setting suns,And the round ocean and the living air,And the blue sky, and in the mind of man:A motion and a spirit, that impelsAll thinking things, all objects of all thought,And rolls through all things. Therefore am I stillA lover of the meadows and the woodsAnd mountains; and of all that we beholdFrom this green earth; of all the mighty worldOf eye, and ear,—both what they half create,And what perceive; well pleased to recogniseIn nature and the language of the senseThe anchor of my purest thoughts, the nurse,The guide, the guardian of my heart, and soulOf all my moral being.I mean in a poem, it's just that is mind blowingly good to me?Henry: Yeah. I'm going to look up another section from the Prelude, which used to be in the Oxford Book, but it isn't in the Ricks edition and I don't really know whyJames: He doesn't have much of the Prelude does he?Henry: I don't think he has any…James: Yeah.Henry: So this is from an early section when the young Wordsworth is a young boy and he's going off, I think he's sneaking out at night to row on the lake as you do when you with Wordsworth, and the initial description is of a mountain. She was an elfin pinnace; lustilyI dipped my oars into the silent lake,And, as I rose upon the stroke, my boatWent heaving through the water like a swan;When, from behind that craggy steep till thenThe horizon's bound, a huge peak, black and huge,As if with voluntary power instinct,Upreared its head. I struck and struck again,And growing still in stature the grim shapeTowered up between me and the stars, and still,For so it seemed, with purpose of its ownAnd measured motion like a living thing,Strode after me. With trembling oars I turned,And through the silent water stole my wayBack to the covert of the willow tree;It's so much like that in Wordsworth. It's just,James: Yeah, I mean, yeah, the Prelude is full of things like that. I think that is probably one of the best moments, possibly the best moments of the prelude. But yeah, I mean it's just total genius isn't it?Henry: I think he's very, very important and yeah, much more important than T.S. Eliot who is, I put him in the same category, but I can see why you didn't.James: You do have a little note saying Pope, question mark or something I think, don't you, in the document.Henry: So the six I gave as the spine of English literature and everything, that's an uncontroversial view. I think Pope should be one of those people. I think we should see Pope as being on a level with Milton and Wordsworth, and I think he's got a very mixed reputation, but I think he was just as inventive, just as important. I think you are a Pope fan, just as clever, just as moving, and it baffles me that he's not more commonly regarded as part of this great spine running through the history of English literature and between Milton and Wordsworth. If you don't have Pope, I think it's a missing link if you like.James: I mean, I wouldn't maybe go as far as you, I love Pope. Pope was really the first perch I ever loved. I remember finding a little volume of Pope in a box of books. My school library was chucking out, and that was the first book of poetry I read and took seriously. I guess he sort of suffers by the fact that we are seeing all of this through the lens of the romantics. All our taste about Shakespeare and Milton and Spenser has been formed by the romantics and hope's way of writing the Satires. This sort of society poetry I think is just totally doesn't conform to our idea of what poetry should be doing or what poetry is. Is there absolutely or virtually nobody reads Dryden nowadays. It's just not what we think poetry is for that whole Augustine 18th century idea that poetry is for writing epistles to people to explain philosophical concepts to them or to diss your enemies and rivals or to write a kind of Duncia explaining why everyone you know is a moron. That's just really, I guess Byron is the last major, is the only of figure who is in that tradition who would be a popular figure nowadays with things like English bards and scotch reviewers. But that whole idea of poetry I think was really alien to us. And I mean I'm probably formed by that prejudice because I really do love Pope, but I don't love him as much as the other people we've discussed.Henry: I think part of his problem is that he's clever and rational and we want our poems always to be about moods, which may be, I think why George Herbert, who we've both got reasonably high is also quite underrated. He's very clever. He's always think George Herbert's always thinking, and when someone like Shakespeare or Milton is thinking, they do it in such a way that you might not notice and that you might just carry on with the story. And if you do see that they're thinking you can enjoy that as well. Whereas Pope is just explicitly always thinking and maybe lecturing, hectoring, being very grand with you and as you say, calling you an idiot. But there are so many excellent bits of Pope and I just think technically he can sustain a thought or an argument over half a dozen or a dozen lines and keep the rhyme scheme moving and it's never forced, and he never has to do that thing where he puts the words in a stupid order just to make the rhyme work. He's got such an elegance and a balance of composition, which again, as you say, we live under romantic ideals, not classical ones. But that doesn't mean we should be blind to the level of his accomplishment, which is really, really very high. I mean, Samuel Johnson basically thought that Alexander Pope had finished English poetry. We have the end of history. He had the end of English poetry. Pope, he's brought us to the mightiest of the heroic couplers and he's done it. It's all over.James: The other thing about Pope that I think makes us underrate him is that he's very charming. And I think charm is a quality we're not big on is that sort of, but I think some of Pope's charm is so moving. One of my favourite poems of his is, do you know the Epistle to Miss Blount on going into the country? The poem to the young girl who's been having a fashionable season in London then is sent to the boring countryside to stay with an aunt. And it's this, it's not like a romantic love poem, it's not distraught or hectic. It's just a sort of wonderful act of sympathy with this potentially slightly airheaded young girl who's been sent to the countryside, which you'd rather go to operas and plays and flirt with people. And there's a real sort of delicate in it that isn't overblown and isn't dramatic, but is extremely charming. And I think that's again, another quality that perhaps we're prone not to totally appreciate in the 21st century. It's almost the kind of highest form of politeness and sympathyHenry: And the prevailing quality in Pope is wit: “True wit is nature to advantage dressed/ What often was thought, but ne'er so well expressed”. And I think wit can be quite alienating for an audience because it is a kind of superior form of literary art. This is why people don't read as much Swift as he deserves because he's so witty and so scornful that a lot of people will read him and think, well, I don't like you.James: And that point about what oft was thought and ne'er so well expressed again, is a very classical idea. The poet who puts not quite conventional wisdom, but something that's been thought before in the best possible words, really suffers with the romantic idea of originality. The poet has to say something utterly new. Whereas for Pope, the sort of ideas that he express, some of the philosophical ideas are not as profound in original perhaps as words with, but he's very elegant proponent of them.Henry: And we love b******g people in our culture, and I feel like the Dunciad should be more popular because it is just, I can't remember who said this, but someone said it's probably the most under appreciated great poem in English, and that's got to be true. It's full of absolute zingers. There's one moment where he's described the whole crowd of them or all these poets who he considers to be deeply inferior, and it turns out he was right because no one reads them anymore. And you need footnotes to know who they are. I mean, no one cares. And he says, “equal your merits, equal is your din”. This kind of abuse is a really high art, and we ought to love that. We love that on Twitter. And I think things like the Rape of the Lock also could be more popular.James: I love the Rape of the Lock . I mean, I think anybody is not reading Pope and is looking for a way in, I think the Rape of the Lock is the way in, isn't it? Because it's just such a charming, lovely, funny poem.Henry: It is. And probably it suffers because the whole idea of mock heroic now is lost to us. But it's a bit like it's the literary equivalent of people writing a sort of mini epic about someone like Elon Musk or some other very prominent figure in the culture and using lots of heroic imagery from the great epics of Homer and Virgil and from the Bible and all these things, but putting them into a very diminished state. So instead of being grand, it becomes comic. It's like turning a God into a cartoon. And Pope is easily the best writer that we have for that kind of thing. Dryden, but he's the genius on it.James: Yeah, no, he totally is. I guess it's another reason he's under appreciated is that our culture is just much less worshipful of epic than the 18th century culture was. The 18th century was obsessed with trying to write epics and trying to imitate epics. I mean, I think to a lot of Pope's contemporaries, the achievement they might've been expecting people to talk about in 300 years time would be his translations of the Iliad and the Odyssey and the other stuff might've seen more minor in comparison, whereas it's the mock epic that we're remembering him for, which again is perhaps another symptom of our sort of post romantic perspective.Henry: I think this is why Spenser suffers as well, because everything in Spenser is magical. The knights are fairies, not the little fairies that live in buttercups, but big human sized fairies or even bigger than that. And there are magical women and saucers and the whole thing is a sort of hodgepodge of romance and fairy tale and legend and all this stuff. And it's often said, oh, he was old fashioned in his own time. But those things still had a lot of currency in the 16th century. And a lot of those things are in Shakespeare, for example.But to us, that's like a fantasy novel. Now, I love fantasy and I read fantasy, and I think some of it's a very high accomplishment, but to a lot of people, fantasy just means kind of trash. Why am I going to read something with fairies and a wizard? And I think a lot of people just see Spenser and they're like, what is this? This is so weird. They don't realise how Protestant they're being, but they're like, this is so weird.James: And Pope has a little, I mean, the Rape of the Lock even has a little of the same because the rape of the lock has this attendant army of good spirits called selfs and evil spirits called gnomes. I mean, I find that just totally funny and charming. I really love it.Henry: I'm going to read, there's an extract from the Rape of the Lock in the Oxford Book, and I'm going to read a few lines to give people an idea of how he can be at once mocking something but also quite charming about it. It's quite a difficult line to draw. The Rape of the Lock is all about a scandalous incident where a young man took a lock of a lady's hair. Rape doesn't mean what we think it means. It means an offence. And so because he stole a lock of her hair, it'd become obviously this huge problem and everyone's in a flurry. And to sort of calm everyone down, Pope took it so seriously that he made it into a tremendous joke. So here he is describing the sort of dressing table if you like.And now, unveil'd, the Toilet stands display'd,Each silver Vase in mystic order laid.First, rob'd in white, the Nymph intent adores,With head uncover'd, the Cosmetic pow'rs.A heav'nly image in the glass appears,To that she bends, to that her eyes she rears;Th' inferior Priestess, at her altar's side,Trembling begins the sacred rites of Pride.What a way to describe someone putting on their makeup. It's fantastic.James: It's funny. I can continue that because the little passage of Pope I picked to read begins exactly where yours ended. It only gets better as it goes on, I think. So after trembling begins the sacred rites of pride, Unnumber'd treasures ope at once, and hereThe various off'rings of the world appear;From each she nicely culls with curious toil,And decks the Goddess with the glitt'ring spoil.This casket India's glowing gems unlocks,And all Arabia breathes from yonder box.The Tortoise here and Elephant unite,Transformed to combs, the speckled, and the white.Here files of pins extend their shining rows,Puffs, Powders, Patches, Bibles, Billet-doux.It's just so lovely. I love a thing about the tortoise and the elephant unite because you've got a tortoise shell and an ivory comb. And the stuff about India's glowing gems and Arabia breathing from yonder box, I mean that's a, realistic is not quite the word, but that's a reference to Milton because Milton is continually having all the stones of Arabia and India's pearls and things all screwed through paradise lost. Yeah, it's just so lovely, isn't it?Henry: And for someone who's so classical and composed and elegant, there's something very Dickensian about things like the toilet, the tortoise and the elephant here unite, transform to combs. There's something a little bit surreal and the puffs, powders, patches, bibles, it has that sort of slightly hectic, frantic,James: That's sort of Victorian materialism, wealth of material objects,Henry: But also that famous thing that was said of Dickens, that the people are furniture and the furniture's like people. He can bring to life all the little bits and bobs of the ordinary day and turn it into something not quite ridiculous, not quite charming.James: And there is a kind of charm in the fact that it wasn't the sort of thing that poets would necessarily expect to pay attention to the 18th century. I don't think the sort of powders and ointments on a woman's dressing table. And there's something very sort of charming in his condescension to notice or what might've once seemed his condescension to notice those things, to find a new thing to take seriously, which is what poetry or not quite to take seriously, but to pay attention to, which I guess is one of the things that great perch should always be doing.Henry: When Swift, who was Pope's great friend, wrote about this, he wrote a poem called A Beautiful Young Lady Going to Bed, which is not as good, and I would love to claim Swift on our list, but I really can't.James: It's quite a horrible perm as well, that one, isn't it?Henry: It is. But it shows you how other people would treat the idea of the woman in front of her toilet, her mirror. And Swift uses an opportunity, as he said, to “lash the vice” because he hated all this adornment and what he would think of as the fakery of a woman painting herself. And so he talks about Corina pride of Drury Lane, which is obviously an ironic reference to her being a Lady of the Night, coming back and there's no drunken rake with her. Returning at the midnight hour;Four stories climbing to her bow'r;Then, seated on a three-legged chair,Takes off her artificial hair:Now, picking out a crystal eye,She wipes it clean, and lays it by.Her eye-brows from a mouse's hide,Stuck on with art on either side,Pulls off with care, and first displays 'em,Then in a play-book smoothly lays 'em.Now dexterously her plumpers draws,That serve to fill her hollow jaws.And it goes on like this. I mean, line after this is sort of raw doll quality to it, Pope, I think in contrast, it only illuminates him more to see where others are taking this kind of crude, very, very funny and witty, but very crude approach. He's able to really have the classical art of balance.James: Yes. And it's precisely his charm that he can mock it and sympathise and love it at the same time, which I think is just a more sort of complex suite of poetic emotions to have about that thing.Henry: So we want more people to read Pope and to love Pope.James: Yes. Even if I'm not letting him into my top.Henry: You are locking him out of the garden. Now, for the second tier, I want to argue for two anonymous poets. One of the things we did when we were talking about this was we asked chatGPT to see if it could give us a good answer. And if you use o1 or o1 Pro, it gives you a pretty good answer as to who the best poets in English are. But it has to be told that it's forgotten about the anonymous poets. And then it says, oh, that was stupid. There are quite a lot of good anonymous poets in English, but I suspect a lot of us, a lot of non artificial intelligence when thinking about this question overlook the anonymous poets. But I would think the Gawain poet and the Tom O' Bedlam poet deserve to be in here. I don't know what you think about that.James: I'm not competent to provide an opinion. I'm purely here to be educated on the subject of these anonymous poets. Henry: The Gawain poet, he's a mediaeval, assume it's a he, a mediaeval writer, obviously may well not be a man, a mediaeval writer. And he wrote Sir Gawain and The Green Knight, which is, if you haven't read it, you should really read it in translation first, I think because it's written at the same time as Chaucer. But Chaucer was written in a kind of London dialect, which is what became the English we speak. And so you can read quite a lot of Chaucer and the words look pretty similar and sometimes you need the footnotes, but when you read Gawain and The Green Knight, it's in a Northwestern dialect, which very much did not become modern day English. And so it's a bit more baffling, but it is a poem of tremendous imaginative power and weirdness. It's a very compelling story. We have a children's version here written by Selena Hastings who's a very accomplished biographer. And every now and then my son remembers it and he just reads it again and again and again. It's one of the best tales of King Arthur in his knights. And there's a wonderful book by John Burrow. It's a very short book, but that is such a loving piece of criticism that explicates the way in which that poem promotes virtue and all the nightly goodness that you would expect, but also is a very strange and unreal piece of work. And I think it has all the qualities of great poetry, but because it's written in this weird dialect, I remember as an undergraduate thinking, why is this so bloody difficult to read? But it is just marvellous. And I see people on Twitter, the few people who've read it, they read it again and they just say, God, it's so good. And I think there was a film of it a couple of years ago, but we will gloss lightly over that and not encourage you to do the film instead of the book.James: Yeah, you're now triggering a memory that I was at least set to read and perhaps did at least read part of Gawain and the Green Knight at University, but has not stuck to any brain cells at all.Henry: Well, you must try it again and tell me what you think. I mean, I find it easily to be one of the best poems in English.James: Yeah, no, I should. I had a little Chaucer kick recently actually, so maybe I'm prepared to rediscover mediaeval per after years of neglect since my degree,Henry: And it's quite short, which I always think is worth knowing. And then the Tom Bedlam is an anonymous poem from I think the 17th century, and it's one of the mad songs, so it's a bit like the Fool from King Lear. And again, it is a very mysterious, very strange and weird piece of work. Try and find it in and read the first few lines. And I think because it's anonymous, it's got slightly less of a reputation because it can't get picked up with some big name, but it is full of tremendous power. And again, I think it would be sad if it wasn't more well known.From the hag and hungry goblinThat into rags would rend ye,The spirit that stands by the naked manIn the Book of Moons defend ye,That of your five sound sensesYou never be forsaken,Nor wander from your selves with TomAbroad to beg your bacon,While I do sing, Any food, any feeding,Feeding, drink, or clothing;Come dame or maid, be not afraid,Poor Tom will injure nothing.Anyway, so you get the sense of it and it's got many stanzas and it's full of this kind of energy and it's again, very accomplished. It can carry the thought across these long lines and these long stanzas.James: When was it written? I'm aware of only if there's a name in the back of my mind.Henry: Oh, it's from the 17th century. So it's not from such a different time as King Lear, but it's written in the voice of a madman. And again, you think of that as the sort of thing a romantic poet would do. And it's strange to find it almost strange to find it displaced. There were these other mad songs. But I think because it's anonymous, it gets less well known, it gets less attention. It's not part of a bigger body of work, but it's absolutely, I think it's wonderful.James: I shall read it.Henry: So who have you got? Who else? Who are you putting in instead of these two?James: Hang on. So we're down to tier two now.Henry: Tier two.James: Yeah. So my tier two is: Donne, Elliot, Keats, Tennyson. I've put Spenser in tier two, Marvell and Pope, who we've already discussed. I mean, I think Eliot, we've talked about, I mean Donne just speaks for himself and there's probably a case that some people would make to bump him up a tier. Henry: Anybody can read that case in Katherine Rudell's book. We don't need to…James: Yes, exactly. If anybody's punching perhaps in tier two, it's Tennyson who I wasn't totally sure belonged there. Putting Tenon in the same tier as Donne and Spenser and Keets. I wonder if that's a little ambitious. I think that might raise eyebrows because there is a school of thought, which I'm not totally unsympathetic to this. What's the Auden quote about Tennyson? I really like it. I expressed very harshly, but I sort of get what he means. Auden said that Tennyson “had the finest ear perhaps of any English poet who was also undoubtedly the stupidest. There was little that he didn't know. There was little else that he did.” Which is far too harsh. But I mentioned to you earlier that I think was earlier this year, a friend and I had a project where we were going to memorise a perva week was a plan. We ended up basically getting, I think three quarters of the way through.And if there's a criticism of Tennyson that you could make, it's that the word music and the sheer lushness of phrases sometimes becomes its own momentum. And you can end up with these extremely lovely but sometimes slightly empty beautiful phrases, which is what I ended up feeling about Tithonus. And I sort of slightly felt I was memorising this unbelievably beautiful but ever so slightly hollow thing. And that was slightly why the project fell apart, I should say. Of course, they absolutely love Tennyson. He's one of my all time favourite poets, which is why my personal favouritism has bumped him up into that category. But I can see there's a case, and I think to a lot of people, he's just the kind of Victorian establishment gloom man, which is totally unfair, but there's not no case against Tennyson.Henry: Yeah, the common thing is that he has no ideas. I don't know if that's true or not. I'm also, I'm not sure how desperately important it is. It should be possible to be a great poet without ideas being at the centre of your work. If you accept the idea that the essence of poetry is invention, i.e. to say old things in a fantastically new way, then I think he qualifies very well as a great poet.James: Yes..Henry: Well, very well. I think Auden said what he said because he was anxious that it was true of himself.James: Yeah, I mean there's a strong argument that Auden had far too many ideas and the sorts of mad schemes and fantastical theories about history that Auden spent his spare time chasing after is certainly a kind of argument that poets maybe shouldn't have as many ideas, although it's just reading. Seamus Perry's got a very good little book on Tennyson, and the opening chapter is all about arguments about people who have tended to dislike Tennyson. And there are all kinds of embarrassing anecdotes about the elderly Tennyson trying to sort of go around dinner parties saying profound and sage-like things and totally putting his foot in it and saying things are completely banal. I should have made a note that this was sort of slightly, again, intensifying my alarm about is there occasionally a tinsely hollowness about Tennyson. I'm now being way too harsh about one of my favourite poets—Henry: I think it depends what you mean by ideas. He is more than just a poet of moods. He gives great expression, deep and strongly felt expression to a whole way of being and a whole way of conceiving of things. And it really was a huge part of why people became interested in the middle ages in the 19th century. I think there's Walter Scott and there's Tennyson who are really leading that work, and that became a dominant cultural force and it became something that meant a lot to people. And whether or not, I don't know whether it's the sort of idea that we're talking about, but I think that sort of thing, I think that qualifies as having ideas and think again, I think he's one of the best writers about the Arthurian legend. Now that work doesn't get into the Oxford Book of English Verse, maybe that's fair. But I think it was very important and I love it. I love it. And I find Tennyson easy to memorise, which is another point in his favour.James: Yeah.Henry: I'm going to read a little bit of Ulysses, which everyone knows the last five or six lines of that poem because it gets put into James Bond films and other such things. I'm going to read it from a little bit from earlier on. I am become a name;For always roaming with a hungry heartMuch have I seen and known; cities of menAnd manners, climates, councils, governments,Myself not least, but honour'd of them all;And drunk delight of battle with my peers,Far on the ringing plains of windy Troy.I am a part of all that I have met;Yet all experience is an arch wherethro'Gleams that untravell'd world, whose margin fadesFor ever and for ever when I move.I think that's amazing. And he can do that. He can do lots and lots and lots of that.James: Yeah, he really can. It's stunning. “Far on the ringing planes of windy Troy” is such an unbelievably evocative phrase.Henry: And that's what I mean. He's got this ability to bring back a sort of a whole mood of history. It's not just personal mood poetry. He can take you into these places and that is in the space of a line. In the space of a line. I think Matthew Arnold said of the last bit of what I just read is that he had this ability in Ulysses to make the lines seem very long and slow and to give them this kind of epic quality that far goes far beyond the actual length of that poem. Ulysses feels like this huge poem that's capturing so much of Homer and it's a few dozen lines.James: Yeah, no, I completely agree. Can I read a little bit of slightly more domestic Tennyson, from In Memoriam, I think his best poem and one of my all time favourite poems and it's got, there are many sort of famous lines on grief and things, but there's little sort of passage of natural description I think quite near the beginning that I've always really loved and I've always just thought was a stunning piece of poetry in terms of its sound and the way that the sound has patented and an unbelievably attentive description natural world, which is kind of the reason that even though I think Keats is a better poet, I do prefer reading Tennyson to Keats, so this is from the beginning of In Memoriam. Calm is the morn without a sound,Calm as to suit a calmer grief,And only thro' the faded leafThe chesnut pattering to the ground:Calm and deep peace on this high wold,And on these dews that drench the furze,And all the silvery gossamersThat twinkle into green and gold:Calm and still light on yon great plainThat sweeps with all its autumn bowers,And crowded farms and lessening towers,To mingle with the bounding main:And I just think that's an amazing piece of writing that takes you from that very close up image that it begins with of the “chestnut patterning to the ground” through the faded leaves of the tree, which is again, a really attentive little bit of natural description. I think anyone can picture the way that a chestnut might fall through the leaves of a chestnut tree, and it's just an amazing thing to notice. And I think the chestnut pattern to the ground does all the kind of wonderful, slightly onomatopoeic, Tennyson stuff so well, but by the end, you're kind of looking out over the English countryside, you've seen dew on the firs, and then you're just looking out across the plane to the sea, and it's this sort of, I just think it's one of those bits of poetry that anybody who stood in a slightly wet and romantic day in the English countryside knows exactly the feeling that he's evoking. And I mean there's no bit of—all of In Memoriam is pretty much that good. That's not a particularly celebrated passage I don't think. It's just wonderful everywhere.Henry: Yes. In Memoriam a bit like the Dunciad—under appreciated relative to its huge merits.James: Yeah, I think it sounds, I mean guess by the end of his life, Tennyson had that reputation as the establishment sage of Victorian England, queen of Victoria's favourite poet, which is a pretty off-putting reputation for to have. And I think In Memoriam is supposed to be this slightly cobwebby, musty masterpiece of Victorian grief. But there was just so much, I mean, gorgeous, beautiful sensuous poetry in it.Henry: Yeah, lots of very intense feelings. No, I agree. I have Tennyson my third tier because I had to have the Gawain poet, but I agree that he's very, very great.James: Yeah, I think the case for third tier is I'm very open to that case for the reasons that I said.Henry: Keats, we both have Keats much higher than Shelly. I think Byron's not on anyone's list because who cares about Byron. Overrated, badly behaved. Terrible jokes. Terrible jokes.James: I think people often think Byron's a better pert without having read an awful lot of the poetry of Byron. But I think anybody who's tried to wade through long swathes of Don Juan or—Henry: My God,James: Childe Harold, has amazing, amazing, beautiful moments. But yeah, there's an awful lot of stuff that you don't enjoy. I think.Henry: So to make the case for Keats, I want to talk about The Eve of St. Agnes, which I don't know about you, but I love The Eve of St. Agnes. I go back to it all the time. I find it absolutely electric.James: I'm going to say that Keats is a poet, which is kind of weird for somebody is sent to us and obviously beautiful as Keats. I sort of feel like I admire more than I love. I get why he's brilliant. It's very hard not to see why he's brilliant, but he's someone I would very rarely sit down and read for fun and somebody got an awful lot of feeling or excitement out of, but that's clearly a me problem, not a Keats problem.Henry: When I was a teenager, I knew so much Keats by heart. I knew the whole of the Ode to a Nightingale. I mean, I was absolutely steeped in it morning, noon and night. I couldn't get over it. And now I don't know if I could get back to that point. He was a very young poet and he writes in a very young way. But I'm going to read—The Eve of St. Agnes is great. It's a narrative poem, which I think is a good way to get into this stuff because the story is fantastic. And he had read Spenser, he was part of this kind of the beginning of this mediaeval revival. And he's very interested in going back to those old images, those old stories. And this is the bit, I think everything we're reading is from the Oxford Book of English Verse, so that if people at home want to read along they can.This is when the heroine of the poem is Madeline is making her escape basically. And I think this is very, very exciting. Her falt'ring hand upon the balustrade,Old Angela was feeling for the stair,When Madeline, St. Agnes' charmed maid,Rose, like a mission'd spirit, unaware:With silver taper's light, and pious care,She turn'd, and down the aged gossip ledTo a safe level matting. Now prepare,Young Porphyro, for gazing on that bed;She comes, she comes again, like ring-dove fray'd and fled.Out went the taper as she hurried in;Its little smoke, in pallid moonshine, died:She clos'd the door, she panted, all akinTo spirits of the air, and visions wide:No uttered syllable, or, woe betide!But to her heart, her heart was voluble,Paining with eloquence her balmy side;As though a tongueless nightingale should swellHer throat in vain, and die, heart-stifled, in her dell.A casement high and triple-arch'd there was,All garlanded with carven imag'riesOf fruits, and flowers, and bunches of knot-grass,And diamonded with panes of quaint device,Innumerable of stains and splendid dyes,As are the tiger-moth's deep-damask'd wings;And in the midst, 'mong thousand heraldries,And twilight saints, and dim emblazonings,A shielded scutcheon blush'd with blood of queens and kings.I mean, so much atmosphere, so much tension, so many wonderful images just coming one after the other. The rapidity of it, the tumbling nature of it. And people often quote the Ode to autumn, which has a lot of that.James: I have to say, I found that totally enchanting. And perhaps my problem is that I need you to read it all to me. You can make an audio book that I can listen to.Henry: I honestly, I actually might read the whole of the E and put it out as audio on Substack becauseJames: I would actually listen to that.Henry: I love it so much. And I feel like it gets, when we talk about Keats, we talk about, On First Looking into Chapman's Homer and Bright Star and La Belle Dame Sans Merci, and these are great, great poems and they're poems that we do at school Ode to a Nightingale because I think The Great Gatsby has a big debt to Ode to a Nightingale, doesn't it? And obviously everyone quotes the Ode to Autumn. I mean, as far as I can tell, the 1st of October every year is the whole world sharing the first stands of the Ode to Autumn.James: Yeah. He may be one of the people who suffers from over familiarity perhaps. And I think also because it sounds so much what poetry is supposed to sound like, because so much of our idea of poetry derives from Keats. Maybe that's something I've slightly need to get past a little bit.Henry: But if you can get into the complete works, there are many, the bit I just read is I think quite representative.James: I loved it. I thought it was completely beautiful and I would never have thought to ever, I probably can't have read that poem for years. I wouldn't have thought to read it. Since university, I don't thinkHenry: He's one of those people. All of my copies of him are sort of frayed and the spines are breaking, but the book is wearing out. I should just commit it to memory and be done. But somehow I love going back to it. So Keats is very high in my estimation, and we've both put him higher than Shelly and Coleridge.James: Yeah.Henry: Tell me why. Because those would typically, I think, be considered the superior poets.James: Do you think Shelly? I think Keats would be considered the superior poetHenry: To Shelly?James: Certainly, yes. I think to Shelly and Coleridge, that's where current fashion would place them. I mean, I have to say Coleridge is one of my all time favourite poets. In terms of people who had just every so often think, I'd love to read a poem, I'd love to read Frost at Midnight. I'd love to read the Aeolian Harp. I'd love to read This Lime Tree Bower, My Prison. I'd love to read Kubla Khan. Outside Milton, Coleridge is probably the person that I read most, but I think, I guess there's a case that Coleridge's output is pretty slight. What his reputation rest on is The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, Kubla Khan, the conversation poems, which a lot of people think are kind of plagiarised Wordsworth, at least in their style and tone, and then maybe not much else. Does anybody particularly read Cristabel and get much out of it nowadays? Dejection an Ode people like: it's never done an awful lot for me, so I sort of, in my personal Pantheon Coleridge is at the top and he's such an immensely sympathetic personality as well and such a curious person. But I think he's a little slight, and there's probably nothing in Coleridge that can match that gorgeous passage of Keats that you read. I think.Henry: Yeah, that's probably true. He's got more ideas, I guess. I don't think it matters that he's slight. Robert Frost said something about his ambition had been to lodge five or six poems in the English language, and if he'd done that, he would've achieved greatness. And obviously Frost very much did do that and is probably the most quotable and well-known poet. But I think Coleridge easily meets those criteria with the poems you described. And if all we had was the Rime of the Ancient Mariner, I would think it to be like Tom O' Bedlam, like the Elegy in a Country Churchyard, one of those great, great, great poems that on its own terms, deserves to be on this list.James: Yeah, and I guess another point in his favour is a great poet is they're all pretty unalike. I think if given Rime of the Ancient Mariner, a conversation poem and Kubla Khan and said, guess whether these are three separate poets or the same guy, you would say, oh, there's a totally different poems. They're three different people. One's a kind of creepy gothic horror ballad. Another one is a philosophical reflection. Another is the sort of Mad Opium dream. I mean, Kubla Khan is just without a doubt, one of the top handful of purposes in English language, I think.Henry: Oh yeah, yeah. And it has that quality of the Elegy in a Country Churchyard that so many of the lines are so quotable in the sense that they could be, in the case of the Elegy in a Country Churchyard, a lot of novels did get their titles from it. I think it was James Lees Milne. Every volume of his diaries, which there are obviously quite a few, had its title from Kubla Khan. Ancient as the Hills and so on. It's one of those poems. It just provides us with so much wonderful language in the space of what a page.James: Sort of goes all over the place. Romantic chasms, Abyssinian made with dulcimer, icy pleasure dome with caves of ice. It just such a—it's so mysterious. I mean, there's nothing else remotely like it at all in English literature that I can think of, and its kind strangeness and virtuosity. I really love that poem.Henry: Now, should we say a word for Shelly? Because everyone knows Ozymandias, which is one of those internet poems that goes around a lot, but I don't know how well known the rest of his body of work is beyond that. I fell in love with him when I read a very short lyric called “To—” Music, when soft voices die,Vibrates in the memory—Odours, when sweet violets sicken,Live within the sense they quicken.Rose leaves, when the rose is dead,Are heaped for the belovèd's bed;And so thy thoughts, when thou art gone,Love itself shall slumber on.I found that to be one of those poems that was once read and immediately memorised. But he has this very, again, broad body of work. He can write about philosophical ideas, he can write about moods, he can write narrative. He wrote Julian and Maddalo, which is a dialogue poem about visiting a madman and taking sympathy with him and asking the question, who's really mad here? Very Swiftian question. He can write about the sublime in Mont Blanc. I mean, he has got huge intellectual power along with the beauty. He's what people want Tennyson to be, I guess.James: Yeah. Or what people think Byron might be. I think Shelly is great. I don't quite get that Byron is so much more famous. Shelly has just a dramatic and, well, maybe not quite just as, but an incredibly dramatic and exciting life to go along with it,Henry: I think some of the short lyrics from Byron have got much more purchase in day-to-day life, like She Walks in Beauty.James: Yeah. I think you have to maybe get Shelly a little more length, don't you? I mean, even there's something like Ode to the West Wind is you have to take the whole thing to love it, perhaps.Henry: Yes. And again, I think he's a bit like George Herbert. He's always thinking you really have to pay attention and think with him. Whereas Byron has got lots of lines you can copy out and give to a girl that you like on the bus or something.James: Yes. No, that's true.Henry: I don't mean that in quite as rude a way as it sounds. I do think that's a good thing. But Shelly's, I think, much more of a thinker, and I agree with you Childe Harold and so forth. It's all crashing bore. I might to try it again, but awful.James: I don't want move past Coledridge without inflicting little Coledridge on you. Can I?Henry: Oh, yes. No, sorry. We didn't read Coledridge, right?James: Are just, I mean, what to read from Coledridge? I mean, I could read the whole of Kubla Khan, but that would be maybe a bit boring. I mean, again, these are pretty famous and obvious lines from Frost at Midnight, which is Coledridge sitting up late at night in his cottage with his baby in its cradle, and he sort of addressing it and thinking about it. And I just think these lines are so, well, everything we've said about Coledridge, philosophical, thoughtful, beautiful, in a sort of totally knockout, undeniable way. So it goes, he's talking to his young son, I think. My babe so beautiful! it thrills my heartWith tender gladness, thus to look at thee,And think that thou shalt learn far other lore,And in far other scenes! For I was rearedIn the great city, pent 'mid cloisters dim,And saw nought lovely but the sky and stars.But thou, my babe! shalt wander like a breezeBy lakes and sandy shores, beneath the cragsOf ancient mountain, and beneath the clouds,Which image in their bulk both lakes and shoresAnd mountain crags: so shalt thou see and hearThe lovely shapes and sounds intelligibleOf that eternal language, which thy GodUtters, who from eternity doth teachHimself in all, and all things in himself.Which is just—what aren't those lines of poetry doing? And with such kind of confidence, the way you get from talking to your baby and its cradle about what kind of upbringing you hope it will have to those flashes of, I mean quite Wordsworthian beauty, and then the sort of philosophical tone at the end. It's just such a stunning, lovely poem. Yeah, I love it.Henry: Now we both got Yeats and Hopkins. And Hopkins I think is really, really a tremendous poet, but neither of us has put Browning, which a lot of other people maybe would. Can we have a go at Browning for a minute? Can we leave him in shreds? James: Oh God. I mean, you're going to be a better advocate of Browning than I am. I've never—Henry: Don't advocate for him. No, no, no.James: We we're sticking him out.Henry: We're sticking him.James: I wonder if I even feel qualified to do that. I mean, I read quite a bit of Browning at university, found it hard to get on with sometimes. I think I found a little affected and pretentious about him and a little kind of needlessly difficult in a sort of off-puttingly Victorian way. But then I was reading, I reviewed a couple of years ago, John Carey has an excellent introduction to English poetry. I think it's called A Little History of Poetry in which he described Browning's incredibly long poem, The Ring in the Book as one of the all time wonders of verbal art. This thing is, I think it's like 700 or 800 pages long poem in the Penguin edition, which has always given me pause for thought and made me think that I've dismissed Browning out of hand because if John Carey's telling me that, then I must be wrong.But I think I have had very little pleasure out of Browning, and I mean by the end of the 19th century, there was a bit of a sort of Victorian cult of Browning, which I think was influential. And people liked him because he was a living celebrity who'd been anointed as a great poet, and people liked to go and worship at his feet and stuff. I do kind of wonder whether he's lasted, I don't think many people read him for pleasure, and I wonder if that maybe tells its own story. What's your case against Browning?Henry: No, much the same. I think he's very accomplished and very, he probably, he deserves a place on the list, but I can't enjoy him and I don't really know why. But to me, he's very clever and very good, but as you say, a bit dull.James: Yeah, I totally agree. I'm willing. It must be our failing, I'm sure. Yeah, no, I'm sure. I'm willing to believe they're all, if this podcast is listened to by scholars of Victorian poetry, they're cringing and holding their head in their hands at this—Henry: They've turned off already. Well, if you read The Ring and the Book, you can come back on and tell us about it.James: Oh God, yeah. I mean, in about 20 years time.Henry: I think we both have Auden, but you said something you said, “does Auden have an edge of fraudulence?”James: Yeah, I mean, again, I feel like I'm being really rude about a lot of poets that I really love. I don't really know why doesn't think, realising that people consider to be a little bit weak makes you appreciate their best stuff even more I guess. I mean, it's hard to make that argument without reading a bit of Auden. I wonder what bit gets it across. I haven't gotten any ready. What would you say about Auden?Henry: I love Auden. I think he was the best poet of the 20th century maybe. I mean, I have to sort of begrudgingly accept T.S. Eliot beside, I think he can do everything from, he can do songs, light lyrics, comic verse, he can do occasional poetry, obituaries. He was a political poet. He wrote in every form, I think almost literally that might be true. Every type of stanza, different lines. He was just structurally remarkable. I suspect he'll end up a bit like Pope once the culture has tur

Talking points: masculinity, culture, gratitude, anger, poetryI don't typically get starstruck or awed in interviews, even though I've talked to many incredible people. But David? Well, he's had an immense impact on my life, and so much of my work and way of thinking lives inspired by him. He joined me in Seattle and shared so much wisdom, beauty, and of course, poetry. Dig into this one.(00:00:00) - What is the “conversational nature of reality”, why the unknown is so uncomfortable, and the fear of “descent”(00:18:44) - How the need for control kills off meaning and purpose, and how real poetry and philosophy come from NOT knowing what to say(00:25:53) - David reads “Blessing of the Morning Light”(00:32:42) - How does a man start building a relationship to the unknown parts of himself, and David's relationship with his father(00:44:24) - The role of anger and the power of poetry(00:56:16) - On forgiveness and male friendship(01:31:57) - How do you properly thank someone who's had a profound impact on you?David Whyte is an internationally renowned poet and author, and a scintillating and moving speaker. Behind these talents lies a very physical attempt to give voice to the wellsprings of human identity, human striving and, most difficult of all, the possibilities for human happiness. He draws from hundreds of memorized poems, his own and those of other beloved poets such as Wordsworth, Emily Dickinson, Keats, Pablo Neruda, Fleur Adcock and the sonnets of Shakespeare. He is the author of ten books of poetry, three books of prose on the transformative nature of work; a widely-acclaimed, best-selling book of essays, and an extensive audio collection.Connect with David-Website: https://davidwhyte.com/-Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/davidjwhyte/-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PoetDavidWhyte/-YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@poetdavidwhyte-SubStack: https://davidwhyte.substack.com/***Pick up my book, Men's Work: A Practical Guide To Face Your Darkness, End Self-Sabotage, And Find Freedom: https://mantalks.com/mens-work-book/Heard about attachment but don't know where to start? Try the FREE Ultimate Guide To AttachmentCheck out some other free resources: How To Quit Porn | Anger Meditation | How To Lead In Your RelationshipBuild brotherhood with a powerful group of like-minded men from around the world. Check out The Alliance. Enjoy the podcast? If so, please leave a review on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, or

durée : 00:55:18 - Very Good Trip - par : Michka Assayas - Au menu de ce Very Good Trip, la voix d'une femme qui ne ressemblait à aucune autre. Michka Assayas consacrait cette émission à Marianne Faithfull à l'occasion de la sortie d'un album ou elle ne chantait pas mais récitait ses poèmes anglais préférés, Tennyson, Wordsworth, Keats et Byron.

"Paws of War: Heroes in the Wake of LA's Wildfires" When disaster strikes, it doesn't just affect people—it impacts our beloved pets and the wildlife around us. The devastating LA fires left a trail of destruction, displacing families, destroying habitats, and endangering countless animals. But amidst the chaos, incredible organizations like Paws of War step in to bring hope and healing. In this episode, Robin Keats shares the inspiring work of Paws of War, an organization making a real difference for animals affected by these wildfires. Imagine this: your home is in the fire's path, and you have only moments to escape. In the rush to save your family, you realize your pet is missing, and you're forced to leave them behind. Heartbreaking, right? Or consider the wildlife in LA's hills—habitats destroyed, food and water scarce. Enter Paws of War, which has installed over 50 temporary food and water stations for displaced wildlife in the affected areas. But they didn't stop there. Recognizing the devastating effects of smoke inhalation, they've also equipped first responders with animal-specific oxygen masks to save pets and wildlife in critical condition. This is a story of compassion, resilience, and the extraordinary lengths people will go to in order to save lives—both human and animal. Don't miss this heartwarming episode about how Paws of War is making a profound impact in the face of tragedy. www.furrealpodcast.com             www.pawsofwar.org fb The Fur Real Podcast             fb Paws of War ig @thefurrealpodcast               ig @pawsofwar tik tok @thefurrealpodcast        tik tok @pawsofwar Speical thanks to J Jig Cicero @jjigcicero for our music intro and outro..you rock!!! Special thanks to Jake Olson  jfolson.music@gmail.com for awesome sound editing  and to our supporters: www.prepvet.com  Stem cells for pets

In his final Sophia Lecture, “Finitude and the Infinite,” Dr Iain McGilchrist grapples with the vital role that the imagination plays in the perception of reality, and what this power can disclose about reality itself. He shows that imagination has the capacity to make contact with an illimitable, irreducible, and inexhaustible world, one that presents itself to us under the aspects of finitude and infinitude. Beginning with the English Romantic poets, McGilchrist shows how these artists resisted the habits of perception that can be associated with the brain's left hemisphere. This part of the brain is adept at rendering, representing, and modeling, but it does so at the cost of simplifying whatever it constructs. Poets like Wordsworth, Keats, Shelley, and Blake strove to remove the film of familiarity from their vision. For them, imagination was the power that made intuitive connections and integrative “leaps,” giving access to a richer, unbounded reality not subject to the strictures of reductive categories. In dialogue with physicists, philosophers, and mathematicians, McGilchrist ultimately shows how the vision of the world offered by the Romantic poets lays claim to the infinite and the eternal. For these artists, eternity is “adverbial”: it is a way of being, a manner, and a modality. McGilchrist convincingly shows us that we, too, can decline to see the world through categories that are measurable, predictable, and countable—but finally lifeless; like the poets whom he takes as his main interlocutors in this lecture, we can, instead, open ourselves to reality's boundless, vital, and infinite character. Authors and Works Mentioned in this Episode: William Wordsworth - Preface to the Lyrical Ballads Samuel Taylor Coleridge - Biographia Literaria Percy Bysshe Shelley - A Defence of Poetry Max Scheler William Blake Richard Feynman James A. Shapiro Denis Diderot Barbara McClintock William James Albert Einstein Leonhard Euler William Wilson Morgan Richard Feynman The Ancient of Days (William Blake, 1794, watercolor etching) Nicholas of Cusa - De Docta Ignorantia Jason Padgett Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Galileo Galilei David Hilbert Henri Bergson Richard Wagner Isaac Luria - Lurianic Kabbalah Edward Nelson Alfred North Whitehead Eugène Minkowski Heraclitus Jordan Peterson Zeno of Elea John Milton John Keats Jorge Luis Borges Martin Heidegger Tao-te Ching William Blake - “The Tyger” Emily Dickinson Marianne Moore Robert Browning - “Two in the Campagna” Bhagavad Gita Peter Cook John Polkinghorne Mary Midgley René Descartes Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling J. B. S. Haldane Lee Smolin Eugene Koonin Hildegard of Bingen - The Choirs of Angels Christ Pantocrator and Signs of the Zodiac C. S. Lewis Johannes Kepler Jesus

rWotD Episode 2807: Fanny Brawne Welcome to Random Wiki of the Day, your journey through Wikipedia’s vast and varied content, one random article at a time.The random article for Thursday, 9 January 2025 is Fanny Brawne.Frances "Fanny" Brawne Lindon (9 August 1800 – 4 December 1865) is best known as the fiancée and muse to English Romantic poet John Keats. As Fanny Brawne, she met Keats, who was her neighbour in Hampstead, at the beginning of his brief period of intense creative activity in 1818. Although his first written impressions of Brawne were quite critical, his imagination seems to have turned her into the goddess-figure he needed to worship, as expressed in Endymion, and scholars have acknowledged her as his muse.They became secretly engaged in October 1819, but Keats soon discovered that he was suffering from tuberculosis. His condition limited their opportunities to meet, but their correspondence revealed passionate devotion. In September 1820, he left for the warmer climate of Rome, and her mother agreed to their marrying on his projected return, but he died there in February 1821, aged twenty-five.Brawne drew consolation from her continuing friendship with Keats' younger sister, who was also called Fanny. Brawne later married and bore three children, whom she entrusted with the intimate letters Keats had written to her. When these were published in 1878, it was the first time the public had heard of Brawne, and they aroused interest among literary scholars. But they attracted much venom from the press, which declared her to have been unworthy of such a distinguished figure. This may have been exacerbated by the fact that none of Brawne's letters to Keats have survived, also giving rise to her reputation as a cold and unfeeling personage among earlier Keats scholars. By contrast, the later publication of Brawne's letters to Fanny Keats showed her in a more favourable light, greatly improving her reputation.This recording reflects the Wikipedia text as of 00:35 UTC on Thursday, 9 January 2025.For the full current version of the article, see Fanny Brawne on Wikipedia.This podcast uses content from Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.Visit our archives at wikioftheday.com and subscribe to stay updated on new episodes.Follow us on Mastodon at @wikioftheday@masto.ai.Also check out Curmudgeon's Corner, a current events podcast.Until next time, I'm standard Brian.

In 1819, John Keats quit his job as an assistant surgeon, abandoned an epic poem he was writing, and focused his poetic energies on shorter works. What followed was one of the most fertile periods in the history of poetry, as in a few months' time Keats completed six masterpieces, including such celebrated classics as "To Autumn," "Ode to a Nightingale," and "Ode on a Grecian Urn." Now, two hundred years later, an American scholar has written an exciting new book called Keats's Odes: A Lover's Discourse, in which she gathers and revisits the Great Odes, viewing them through a personal prism. Anahid Nersessian was born and grew up in New York City. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Chicago, and has taught at Columbia University and UCLA. Her first book, Utopia, Limited: Romanticism and Adjustment was published by Harvard University Press in 2015, and her second book, The Calamity Form: On Poetry and Social Life, by the University of Chicago in 2020. She lives in Los Angeles, CA. [This episode, presented without commercial interruption, was originally released on February 8, 2021.] Help support the show at patreon.com/literature or historyofliterature.com/donate. The History of Literature Podcast is a member of Lit Hub Radio and the Podglomerate Network. Learn more at thepodglomerate.com/historyofliterature. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hi, so we're Mary E. Pearson fangirls. We have been for such a longgggg time. This is Mary's THIRD time on our podcast because we are, respectfully, in love with her and her personality. Oh... and her writing. We loved the imagery, the faerie lore, the tension and the prose of The Courting of Bristol Keats, and we did everything in our power to get Mary to spill all of her secrets. We love her! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/novelboundpodcast/support

It's time for another episode of What's Your Forte! In this captivating episode, Tamara speaks with percussionist Madison Keats about what it means to really lean into your craft. Madison also delves into the heart of percussion ensembles, sharing her profound insights on the value of teamwork and trusting your fellow percussionists. Madison Keats (she/her) describes her interest in music beginning with a feeling of finally fitting in and strives to ensure she conveys that feeling to everyone she meets. As a female percussionist she hopes to inspire girls to take a chance on percussion and aspires to make music more accessible to larger audiences. Madison holds a Bachelor of Music in Performance with a minor in Psychology from Wilfrid Laurier University. Madison has participated in many clinics, seminars, and ensembles such as WASBE (World Association for Symphonic Bands and Ensembles) Youth Wind Orchestra, Stratford Symphony, and Torq Percussion Seminar, among others. Using her various experiences, Madison hopes to inspire the next generation of musicians. Follow Bandology on all social media! Facebook: facebook.com/BandologyCA Instagram: @BandologyCA TikTok: @BandologyCA

Welcome to Episode 212 of The Thinklings Podcast! In this episode, we have our Books & Business, Thinkling Little discusses “one flesh” throughout Scripture, and Thinkling Carter ends the podcast with a final meditation in John 15. Books & Business: New Testament Nuptial Imagery - Richard Baty - Thinkling Little Selected Poems of Byron, Keats, Shelley - Byron, Keats, Shelley - Thinkling Stearns Hillbilly Elegy - J.D. Vance - Thinkling Carter Main Content: Thinkling Little leads a discussion on the “One Flesh” phrase in Scripture. Final Meditation: Thinkling Carter shares a final meditation from John 15.

Today's poem is a particularly novel example of an ancient writerly tradition: writing about how hard it is to write. Happy reading.On February 9, 1874, Amy Lowell was born at Sevenels, a ten-acre family estate in Brookline, Massachusetts. Her family was Episcopalian, of old New England stock, and at the top of Boston society. Lowell was the youngest of five children. Her elder brother Abbott Lawrence, a freshman at Harvard at the time of her birth, went on to become president of Harvard College. As a young girl she was first tutored at home, then attended private schools in Boston, during which time she made several trips to Europe with her family. At seventeen, she secluded herself in the 7,000-book library at Sevenels to study literature. Lowell was encouraged to write from an early age.In 1887 Lowell, with her mother and sister, wrote Dream Drops or Stories From Fairy Land by a Dreamer, printed privately by the Boston firm Cupples and Hurd. Her poem “Fixed Idea” was published in 1910 by the Atlantic Monthly, after which Lowell published individual poems in various journals. In October of 1912, Houghton Mifflin published her first collection, A Dome of Many-Coloured Glass.Lowell, a vivacious and outspoken businesswoman, tended to excite controversy. She was deeply interested in and influenced by the Imagist movement, led by Ezra Pound. The primary Imagists were Pound, Richard Aldington, H.D. (Hilda Doolittle), and Ford Madox Ford. This Anglo-American movement believed, in Lowell's words, that “concentration is of the very essence of poetry” and strove to “produce poetry that is hard and clear, never blurred nor indefinite.” Lowell campaigned for the success of Imagist poetry in America and embraced its principles in her own work. She acted as a publicity agent for the movement, editing and contributing to an anthology of Imagist poets in 1915.Lowell's enthusiastic involvement and influence contributed to Pound's separation from the movement. As Lowell continued to explore the Imagist style she pioneered the use of “polyphonic prose” in English, mixing formal verse and free forms. Later she was drawn to and influenced by Chinese and Japanese poetry. This interest led her to collaborate with translator Florence Ayscough on Fir-Flower Tablets in 1921. Lowell had a lifelong love for the poet John Keats, whose letters she collected and whose influence can be seen in her poems. She believed him to be the forbearer of Imagism. Her biography of Keats was published in 1925, the same year she won the Pulitzer Prize for her collection What's O'Clock (Houghton Mifflin Company, 1925).A dedicated poet, publicity agent, collector, critic, and lecturer, Amy Lowell died on May 12, 1925, at Sevenels.-bio via Academy of American Poets Get full access to The Daily Poem Podcast at dailypoempod.substack.com/subscribe

Inspired by a conversation with my son, today we explore John Keats' idea of “Negative Capability” and how it relates to flow psychology and peak performance. Keats' insight into embracing uncertainty without needing immediate answers can help us find peace and unlock deeper levels of creativity and focus. Key Takeaways: • ✔️ “Negative Capability” teaches us to embrace uncertainty.• ✔️ Letting go of control helps unlock creativity and flow.• ✔️ Sometimes, peace comes from being okay with not knowing.• ✔️ Mastery and the pursuit of beauty drive transcendence.• ✔️ Sensory immersion enhances flow. Make sure to subscribe and follow me for updates, tips, and more ways to stay in the flow! You can connect with me on:• Instagram: @flow_network__• YouTube: @flow_network__• TikTok: @theflownetwork• LinkedIn Newsletter: Daily Flow Stay tuned for more great content, and as always, stay in the flow!

Duke Keats was a man with an angry streak who wasn't afraid to charge into the stands to fight a fan. He was also one of the greatest playmaking centres of his era. Support: patreon.com/canadaehx Merch: https://www.ohcanadashop.com/collections/canadian-history-ehx Donate: buymeacoffee.com/craigu Donate: canadaehx.com (Click Donate) E-mail: craig@canadaehx.com Twitter: twitter.com/craigbaird Threads: https://www.threads.net/@cdnhistoryehx Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@cdnhistoryehx YouTube: youtube.com/c/canadianhistoryehx Want to send me something? Craig Baird PO Box 2384 Stony Plain PO Main, Alberta T7Z1X8 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Cullen's exact birthplace is unknown, but in 1918, at the age of 15, Countee LeRoy was adopted by Reverend Frederick A. Cullen, the minster to the largest church congregation in Harlem.Cullen kept his finger on the pulse of Harlem during the 1920s while he attended New York University and then a graduate program at Harvard. His poetry became popular during his student years, especially his prize-winning poem “The Ballad of a Brown Girl.” In 1925, he published his first volume of poetry entitled Color. Within the next few years, Cullen became well-known, publishing several books and winning a Guggenheim Fellowship in 1928 (to write poetry in France).At first, Cullen was critical of Langston Hughes' poetry, writing that, in using jazz rhythms in his poetry, Hughes was erecting barriers between race instead of removing them. In his own poetry, Cullen sought to erase these boundaries and took traditionalist poets, such as Keats and A.E. Housman, as models for his own poetry. However, despite his criticisms of other black poets, the majority of Cullen's own verses confront racial issues.By the 1930s, Cullen's influence had waned, though he continued to publish prolifically, including novels, a collection of poems for children, the autobiography of his cat, and an adaption of his novel God Sends Sunday into a Broadway musical.-bio via Song of America Get full access to The Daily Poem Podcast at dailypoempod.substack.com/subscribe

INTERVIEW BEGINS AT : 29:45 Shelley, Keats, Byron and Beatriz? Beatriz, Who's Beatriz? Well the answer to that questions is the main character of the new time travel novel by the great Chuck Rosenthal Awake For Ever in a Sweet Unrest. But the real question is, who were Shelley, Byron and Keats, at least that's the question new students were asking (so sadly asking) at Loyola Marymount University, where Professor Rosenthal taught about the great romantics. So a fresh idea was born, a time travel novel that could introduce a new generations of young readers to these legendary masters, and Chuck Rosenthal was just the man to do it!! Professor Rosenthal is not only a great educator, but author of 14 novels, an ex cowboy, horse trainer, surfer and cross country motor cyclist (and that's just scratching the surface of his fascinating life), this will be a fun one folks!! So kick back, enjoy, and please subscribe, rate and share the show, Let's keep the audience growing and feel free to reach out to us at Trans.History.Rambling@gmail.com And hey, why not check out our merch store for t-shirts, baseball hats, hoodies, coffee mugs, stickers, magnets and a whole host of other items. https://www.teepublic.com/user/tahistory All of our episodes are listed as explicit due to language and some topics that may not be suitable for all listeners. Opening and closing theme is Random Sanity by British composer DeeZee

Rexford is president of Keats Group LLC, a comprehensive financial advisory firm. He works with successful families and family businesses to implement effective income planning, tax planning, and asset protection solutions that are administratively practical. He manages our service relationships with specialists for complex tax and estate planning, business transitions, and company retirement benefit planning.He writes and speaks on various succession and compensation planning topics for professionals and business owners. He is the lead author of InBusiness™, which features topics of planning interest to Private Clients.Mr. Cattanach has served on community boards and other leadership roles in the Twin Cities, including the Board of Directors of Lakeview Health, a sole corporate member of HealthPartners health system, where he was chair of the physician and executive compensation committee, a member of the finance committee and the ad hoc committee overseeing the Lakeview Health integration with HealthPartners.Rexford is a fiduciary, independent financial advisor who has completed over one hundred business valuations and transitions. He has volunteered as an academic tutor and mentor to at-risk K-12 children at Good Neighbor Center in Saint Paul, Minnesota for 19 years. To recharge, he enjoys the quiet scenery of trail hiking, road biking, and Nordic skiing.Learn More: https://www.keatsgroup.com/Keats Group LLC is a comprehensive financial services company that provides investment, tax and estate planning, asset protection, and pre- and post-sale guidance to private clients and business families. Keats Group and its agents and employees do not provide legal or tax advice. Investment services are offered as a fiduciary Independent Advisor Representative of Advisor Share Wealth Management, a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA), upon completing a signed Service Agreement.Influential Entrepreneurs with Mike Saundershttps://businessinnovatorsradio.com/influential-entrepreneurs-with-mike-saunders/Source: https://businessinnovatorsradio.com/interview-with-rexford-cattanach-president-of-keats-group-discussing-working-with-cpas-on-business-succession

Rexford is president of Keats Group LLC, a comprehensive financial advisory firm. He works with successful families and family businesses to implement effective income planning, tax planning, and asset protection solutions that are administratively practical. He manages our service relationships with specialists for complex tax and estate planning, business transitions, and company retirement benefit planning.He writes and speaks on various succession and compensation planning topics for professionals and business owners. He is the lead author of InBusiness™, which features topics of planning interest to Private Clients.Mr. Cattanach has served on community boards and other leadership roles in the Twin Cities, including the Board of Directors of Lakeview Health, a sole corporate member of HealthPartners health system, where he was chair of the physician and executive compensation committee, a member of the finance committee and the ad hoc committee overseeing the Lakeview Health integration with HealthPartners.Rexford is a fiduciary, independent financial advisor who has completed over one hundred business valuations and transitions. He has volunteered as an academic tutor and mentor to at-risk K-12 children at Good Neighbor Center in Saint Paul, Minnesota for 19 years. To recharge, he enjoys the quiet scenery of trail hiking, road biking, and Nordic skiing.Learn More: https://www.keatsgroup.com/Keats Group LLC is a comprehensive financial services company that provides investment, tax and estate planning, asset protection, and pre- and post-sale guidance to private clients and business families. Keats Group and its agents and employees do not provide legal or tax advice. Investment services are offered as a fiduciary Independent Advisor Representative of Advisor Share Wealth Management, a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA), upon completing a signed Service Agreement.Influential Entrepreneurs with Mike Saundershttps://businessinnovatorsradio.com/influential-entrepreneurs-with-mike-saunders/Source: https://businessinnovatorsradio.com/interview-with-rexford-cattanach-president-of-keats-group-discussing-working-with-cpas-on-business-succession

Rexford is president of Keats Group LLC, a comprehensive financial advisory firm. He works with successful families and family businesses to implement effective income planning, tax planning, and asset protection solutions that are administratively practical. He manages our service relationships with specialists for complex tax and estate planning, business transitions, and company retirement benefit planning.He writes and speaks on various succession and compensation planning topics for professionals and business owners. He is the lead author of InBusiness™, which features topics of planning interest to Private Clients.Mr. Cattanach has served on community boards and other leadership roles in the Twin Cities, including the Board of Directors of Lakeview Health, a sole corporate member of HealthPartners health system, where he was chair of the physician and executive compensation committee, a member of the finance committee and the ad hoc committee overseeing the Lakeview Health integration with HealthPartners.Rexford is a fiduciary, independent financial advisor who has completed over one hundred business valuations and transitions. He has volunteered as an academic tutor and mentor to at-risk K-12 children at Good Neighbor Center in Saint Paul, Minnesota for 19 years. To recharge, he enjoys the quiet scenery of trail hiking, road biking, and Nordic skiing.Learn More: https://www.keatsgroup.com/Keats Group LLC is a comprehensive financial services company that provides investment, tax and estate planning, asset protection, and pre- and post-sale guidance to private clients and business families. Keats Group and its agents and employees do not provide legal or tax advice. Investment services are offered as a fiduciary Independent Advisor Representative of Advisor Share Wealth Management, a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA), upon completing a signed Service Agreement.Influential Entrepreneurs with Mike Saundershttps://businessinnovatorsradio.com/influential-entrepreneurs-with-mike-saunders/Source: https://businessinnovatorsradio.com/interview-with-rexford-cattanach-president-of-keats-group-discussing-tax-planning-for-high-net-worth-clients

Rexford is president of Keats Group LLC, a comprehensive financial advisory firm. He works with successful families and family businesses to implement effective income planning, tax planning, and asset protection solutions that are administratively practical. He manages our service relationships with specialists for complex tax and estate planning, business transitions, and company retirement benefit planning.He writes and speaks on various succession and compensation planning topics for professionals and business owners. He is the lead author of InBusiness™, which features topics of planning interest to Private Clients.Mr. Cattanach has served on community boards and other leadership roles in the Twin Cities, including the Board of Directors of Lakeview Health, a sole corporate member of HealthPartners health system, where he was chair of the physician and executive compensation committee, a member of the finance committee and the ad hoc committee overseeing the Lakeview Health integration with HealthPartners.Rexford is a fiduciary, independent financial advisor who has completed over one hundred business valuations and transitions. He has volunteered as an academic tutor and mentor to at-risk K-12 children at Good Neighbor Center in Saint Paul, Minnesota for 19 years. To recharge, he enjoys the quiet scenery of trail hiking, road biking, and Nordic skiing.Learn More: https://www.keatsgroup.com/Keats Group LLC is a comprehensive financial services company that provides investment, tax and estate planning, asset protection, and pre- and post-sale guidance to private clients and business families. Keats Group and its agents and employees do not provide legal or tax advice. Investment services are offered as a fiduciary Independent Advisor Representative of Advisor Share Wealth Management, a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA), upon completing a signed Service Agreement.Influential Entrepreneurs with Mike Saundershttps://businessinnovatorsradio.com/influential-entrepreneurs-with-mike-saunders/Source: https://businessinnovatorsradio.com/interview-with-rexford-cattanach-president-of-keats-group-discussing-tax-planning-for-high-net-worth-clients

Rexford is president of Keats Group LLC, a comprehensive financial advisory firm. He works with successful families and family businesses to implement effective income planning, tax planning, and asset protection solutions that are administratively practical. He manages our service relationships with specialists for complex tax and estate planning, business transitions, and company retirement benefit planning.He writes and speaks on various succession and compensation planning topics for professionals and business owners. He is the lead author of InBusiness™, which features topics of planning interest to Private Clients.Mr. Cattanach has served on community boards and other leadership roles in the Twin Cities, including the Board of Directors of Lakeview Health, a sole corporate member of HealthPartners health system, where he was chair of the physician and executive compensation committee, a member of the finance committee and the ad hoc committee overseeing the Lakeview Health integration with HealthPartners.Rexford is a fiduciary, independent financial advisor who has completed over one hundred business valuations and transitions. He has volunteered as an academic tutor and mentor to at-risk K-12 children at Good Neighbor Center in Saint Paul, Minnesota for 19 years. To recharge, he enjoys the quiet scenery of trail hiking, road biking, and Nordic skiing.Learn More: https://www.keatsgroup.com/Keats Group LLC is a comprehensive financial services company that provides investment, tax and estate planning, asset protection, and pre- and post-sale guidance to private clients and business families. Keats Group and its agents and employees do not provide legal or tax advice. Investment services are offered as a fiduciary Independent Advisor Representative of Advisor Share Wealth Management, a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA), upon completing a signed Service Agreement.Influential Entrepreneurs with Mike Saundershttps://businessinnovatorsradio.com/influential-entrepreneurs-with-mike-saunders/Source: https://businessinnovatorsradio.com/interview-with-rexford-cattanach-president-of-keats-group-discussing-business-succession-planning

Rexford is president of Keats Group LLC, a comprehensive financial advisory firm. He works with successful families and family businesses to implement effective income planning, tax planning, and asset protection solutions that are administratively practical. He manages our service relationships with specialists for complex tax and estate planning, business transitions, and company retirement benefit planning.He writes and speaks on various succession and compensation planning topics for professionals and business owners. He is the lead author of InBusiness™, which features topics of planning interest to Private Clients.Mr. Cattanach has served on community boards and other leadership roles in the Twin Cities, including the Board of Directors of Lakeview Health, a sole corporate member of HealthPartners health system, where he was chair of the physician and executive compensation committee, a member of the finance committee and the ad hoc committee overseeing the Lakeview Health integration with HealthPartners.Rexford is a fiduciary, independent financial advisor who has completed over one hundred business valuations and transitions. He has volunteered as an academic tutor and mentor to at-risk K-12 children at Good Neighbor Center in Saint Paul, Minnesota for 19 years. To recharge, he enjoys the quiet scenery of trail hiking, road biking, and Nordic skiing.Learn More: https://www.keatsgroup.com/Keats Group LLC is a comprehensive financial services company that provides investment, tax and estate planning, asset protection, and pre- and post-sale guidance to private clients and business families. Keats Group and its agents and employees do not provide legal or tax advice. Investment services are offered as a fiduciary Independent Advisor Representative of Advisor Share Wealth Management, a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA), upon completing a signed Service Agreement.Influential Entrepreneurs with Mike Saundershttps://businessinnovatorsradio.com/influential-entrepreneurs-with-mike-saunders/Source: https://businessinnovatorsradio.com/interview-with-rexford-cattanach-president-of-keats-group-discussing-business-succession-planning

Send us a textDescription: An immersive reading of On Being Ill by Virginia Woolf with reflection on language, health humanities and bipolar disorder.Website:https://anauscultation.wordpress.comWork:Excerpts from On Being Ill by Virginia WoolfFinally, to hinder the description of illness in literature, there is the poverty of the language. English, which can express the thoughts of Hamlet and the tragedy of Lear, has no words for the shiver and the headache. It has all grown one way. The merest schoolgirl, when she falls in love, has Shakespeare or Keats to speak her mind for her; but let a sufferer try to describe a pain in his head to a doctor and language at once runs dry. There is nothing ready made for him. He is forced to coin words himself, and, taking his pain in one hand, and a lump of pure sound in the other (as perhaps the people of Babel did in the beginning), so to crush them together that a brand-new word in the end drops out. Probably it will be something laughable. […] Yet it is not only a new language that we need, more primitive, more sensual, more obscene, but a new hierarchy of the passions; love must be deposed in favour of a temperature of 104; jealousy give place to the pangs of sciatica; sleeplessness play the part of villain, and the hero become a white liquid with a sweet taste—that mighty Prince with the moths' eyes and the feathered feet, one of whose names is Chloral.References:On Being Ill: https://www.gutenberg.net.au/ebooks15/1500221h.html#ch3 Bantel C, Sörös P. On pain - Virginia Woolf and the language of poets and patients. Br J Pain. 2021 Nov;15(4):497-500.Munday I, Kneebone I, Newton-John T. The language of chronic pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Feb;43(3):354-361. Pett S. Rash Reading: Rethinking Virginia Woolf's On Being Ill. Lit Med. 2019;37(1):26-66. Dalsimer K. Virginia Woolf (1882-1941). Am J Psychiatry. 2004 May;161(5):809. Koutsantoni K. Manic depression in literature: the case of Virginia Woolf. Med Humanit. 2012 Jun;38(1):7-14.Bazin, N. T. (1994). Postmortem diagnoses of Virginia Woolf's 'madness': The precarious quest for truth. In B. M. Rieger (Ed.), Dionysus in literature: Essays on literary madness (pp. 133-147). Bowling Green State University Popular Press. 

Renowned “Dark Artist” Chet Zar chats with Keats of PRAGMAGICK about his brilliant artworks and their methods, the confluence of art & magick, conversations with the muse & the serpent, his creature FX work and the whims & blunders of the artist archetype in this modern digital age. A two part liminalstream, now combined as a mondo-sode with brilliant arts and DARK ART MAGE, Chet Zar! We definitely made up for the MARS/ALGO/URANUS techno goofjuice that ended our first liminalstream. This has to be one of my favorite discussions that truly exemplify that ‘third mind’ communion of pragmatism and magick as we saunter through the inner/outer/supra realities that conduct a modern artist’s paradigm. WATCH THE 2 PART LIMINALSTREAM:  PART 1: https://youtube.com/live/M3D1Z_MElkI PART 2: https://youtu.be/4ZQicEQvdIs CHET ZAR: https://chetzar.com CHET’S OCTOBER SANTA MONICA SHOW: https://www.copronason.com/oct21_pr.html The Dark Art Society Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/@darkartsocietypodcast Musick this episode courtesy of DIM ∴ TZUM: The Mauve Sessions by DIM∴TZUM WATCH THE NEW VIDEOMANCY CONJURED FOR THE FULL DIM ∴ TZUM ALBUM: https://youtu.be/6lTWVLiCVcc DOWNLOAD DIM ∴ TZUM “The Mauve Sessions”: BANDCAMP: https://dimtzum.bandcamp.com/ WATCH THE NEW VIDEOMANCY CONJURED FOR THE FIRST REVEL ROSZ SONGSIGIL, ‘MANY NAMED' (The Second Body): https://youtu.be/Y0PJ4cnBu5w?si=hpGCnYJoKGanTGwi Follow REVEL ROSZ for updates on forthcoming songsigils and live dates: BANDCAMP: https://revelrosz.bandcamp.com/ INSTAGRAM: https://instagram.com/revelrosz To support a new era of WE THE HALLOWED and the many media magicks we've conjured, we launched http://HALLOWEDPRESS.ART as a means to collect our many completed projects from Published Literature, Illustration, Albums, Audio Sigils and now, custom apparel and wares designed by WtH Seer Eric J. Millar and Revel∴ Keats Rosz! FIND EVERYTHING PRAG∴MAGICK: http://pragmagick.com SUPPORT VIA PATREON: https://patreon.com/pragmagick PAYPAL: http://www.paypal.me/keatsross WE THE HALLOWED: https://wethehallowed.org I want to give a big thanks to Eric J. Millar for his invaluable partnership in weathering the proud tides of human error. And of course, all the amazing patrons that have stayed with me as I swayed these past couple of months. Thank you Temple of Babalon Choronzon (Bobby, Leah, Stashia & Groucho), Frater Perseus, MetemPsychotic, Saroth The Mage, Sam Shadow, Lya & Azure Edwards, Kendall Esse, JJ Reine De Blanc, Jenny Rocky, SorcerersHomie, Cal Desmond Pearson, Alex Leadbetter, Bibi, CW Chanter, Jonicide, Jilly Beans, Corrie Anne, Spooky, Derek Hunter Vanessa Sinclair, Carl Abrahamsson, Tony Davis, Arnemancy and you, dear ghost, for your ongoing support! You, too, can pledge your support to PRAGMAGICK & WE THE HALLOWED for as little as 1 dollar to help finance all the many artistick mediums we release our works through! http://patreon.com/pragmagick GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DID NOT CREATE, AUGMENT or INSPIRE ANY ARTISTIC MEDIUM EXPRESSED WITHIN THIS PODCAST or WE THE HALLOWED ARTWORKS WRIT LARGE. CELEBRATE HUMAN ERROR.

With the hype of MCU being fully back after the success of Deadpool and Wolverine, Offended brings you the Marvel Draft! Tricky, Keaton (Tricky's brother and first time on the show) aka the Batman, GRG and KT KT Naked Ladyy take turns selecting Marvel movies and shows. 

Just when you thought you were out, The Daily Poem pulls you back in–to poems about movies. Today's charming and earnest poem imitates the medium it describes (film) by swapping memorable images and sensations for linear propositions. Happy reading.Amy Clampitt was born and raised in New Providence, Iowa. She studied first at Grinnell College in Grinnell, Iowa, and later at Columbia University and the New School for Social Research in New York City. Throughout the 1940s and 1950s, Clampitt held various jobs at publishers and organizations such as Oxford University Press and the Audubon Society. In the 1960s, she turned her attention to poetry. In 1974 she published a small volume of poetry titled Multitudes, Multitudes; thereafter her work appeared frequently in the New Yorker. Upon the publication of her book of poems The Kingfisher in 1983, she became one of the most highly regarded poets in America. Her other collections include A Silence Opens (1994), Westward (1990), What the Light Was Like (1985), and Archaic Figure (1987). Clampitt received fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation, the MacArthur Foundation, and the Academy of American Poets. A member of the American Academy of Arts and Letters, Clampitt taught at the College of William and Mary, Amherst College, and Smith College.Joseph Parisi, a Chicago Tribune Book World reviewer, called the poet's sudden success after the publication of The Kingfisher “one of the most stunning debuts in recent memory.” Parisi continued, “throughout this bountiful book, her wit, sensibility and stylish wordplay seldom disappoint.” In one of the first articles to appear after The Kingfisher's debut, New York Review of Books critic Helen Vendler wrote that “Amy Clampitt writes a beautiful, taxing poetry. In it, thinking uncoils and coils again, embodying its perpetua argument with itself.” Georgia Review contributor Peter Stitt also felt that “The Kingfisher is … in many ways an almost dazzling performance.” In the Observer, Peter Porter described Clampitt as “a virtuoso of the here and the palpable.” Porter ranked her with the likes of Emily Dickinson and Elizabeth Bishop.Critics praised the allusive richness and syntactical sophistication of Clampitt's verse. Her poetry is characterized by a “baroque profusion, the romance of the adjective, labyrinthine syntax, a festival lexicon,” said New York Times Book Review contributor Alfred Corn in an article about Clampitt's second important collection, What the Light Was Like (1985). Indeed, the poet's use of vocabulary and syntax is elaborate. “When you read Amy Clampitt,” suggests Richard Tillinghast in the New York Times Book Review, “have a dictionary or two at your elbow.” The poet has, Tillinghast continues, a “virtuoso command of vocabulary, [a] gift for playing the English language like a musical instrument and [a] startling and delightful ability to create metaphor.” Her ability as a poet quickly gained Clampitt recognition as “the most refreshing new American poet to appear in many years,” according to one Times Literary Supplement reviewer.Clampitt's work is also characterized by erudite allusions, for which she provides detailed footnotes. Times Literary Supplement critic Lachlan Mackinnon compared her “finical accuracy of description and the provision of copious notes at the end of a volume,” to a similar tendency in the work of Marianne Moore. “She is as ‘literary' and allusive as Eliot and Pound, as filled with grubby realia as William Carlos Williams, as ornamented as Wallace Stevens and as descriptive as Marianne Moore,” observed Corn. Washington Post reviewer Joel Conarroe added Walt Whitman and Hart Crane to this list of comparable poets: “Like Whitman, she is attracted to proliferating lists as well as to ‘the old thought of likenesses,'” wrote Conarroe. “And as in Crane her compressed images create multiple resonances of sound and sense.”What the Light Was Like centers around images of light and darkness. This book is “more chastely restrained than The Kingfisher,” according to Times Literary Supplement contributor Neil Corcoran. Conarroe believed that the poet's “own imagery throughout [the book] is sensuous (even lush) and specific—in short, Keatsian.” Corn similarly commented that “there are stirring moments in each poem, and an authentic sense of Keats' psychology.” He opined, however, that “her sequence [‘Voyages: A Homage to John Keats‘] isn't effective throughout, the reason no doubt being that her high-lyric mode” does not suit narrative as well as a plainer style would.Clampitt's Archaic Figure (1987) maintains her “idiosyncratic style,” as William Logan called it in the Chicago Tribune. New York Times Book Review contributor Mark Rudman noted the poet's “spontaneity and humor; she is quick to react, hasty, impulsive, responsive to place—and to space.” In the London Sunday Times, David Profumo further praised Archaic Figure. Taking the example of the poem “Hippocrene,” the critic asserted that this work “demonstrates her new powers of economy, the sureness of her rhythmic touch and the sheer readability of her magnificent narrative skills.” “Amy Clampitt,” concluded Logan, “has become one of our poetry's necessary imaginations.”Clampitt died in Lenox, Massachusetts in 1994. Get full access to The Daily Poem Podcast at dailypoempod.substack.com/subscribe

Wilfred Owen wrote ‘Strange Meeting' in the early months of 1918, shortly after being treated for shell shock at Craiglockhart hospital in Edinburgh, where he had met the stridently anti-war Siegfried Sassoon. Sassoon's poetry of caustic realism quickly found its way into Owen's work, where it merged with the high romantic sublime of his other great influences, Keats and Shelley. Mark and Seamus discuss the unstable mixture of these forces and the innovative use of rhyme in a poem where the politics is less about ideology or argument than an intuitive response to the horror of war.Mark Ford is Professor of English at University College, London, and Seamus Perry is Professor of English Literature at Balliol College, Oxford.Sign up to the Close Readings subscription to listen ad free and to all our series in full:Directly in Apple Podcasts: https://lrb.me/ppapplesignupIn other podcast apps: https://lrb.me/ppsignupFurther reading in the LRB:Seamus Heaney on Auden (and Wilfred Owen): https://lrb.me/pp6heaney Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

WATCH THE LIMINALSTREAM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQ6YXUAowuw&t=285s Mage Erik Arneson of Arnemancy chats with Keats about newfangled applications of archaic grimoires such as the Arbatel, Agrippa's 3 Books Of Occult Philosophy, the Greek Magical Papyri and more! Also, they discuss the effervescent confluence of musick and magick, and the contemporary current of esoteric broadcasting. ERIK ARNESON: http://arnemancy.com ERIK'S ARBATEL CLASS : https://darkstarmagick.com/events-main/class-unraveling-the-arbatel/ MUSICK in this episode is from a forthcoming Audio Sigil by REVEL ROSZ The Divergent Magick Grimoire: https://a.co/d/0xdSVBO To support a new era of WE THE HALLOWED and the many media magicks we've conjured, we launched http://HALLOWEDPRESS.ART as a means to collect our many completed projects from Published Literature, Illustration, Albums, Audio Sigils and now, custom apparel and wares designed by WtH Seer Eric J. Millar and Revel∴ Keats Rosz! FIND EVERYTHING PRAG∴MAGICK: http://pragmagick.com SUPPORT VIA PATREON: / pragmagick PAYPAL: http://www.paypal.me/keatsross WE THE HALLOWED: https://wethehallowed.org I want to give a big thanks to Eric J. Millar for his invaluable partnership in weathering the proud tides of human error. And of course, all the amazing patrons that have stayed with me as I swayed these past couple of months. Thank you Temple of Babalon Choronzon (Bobby, Leah, Stashia & Groucho), Frater Perseus, MetemPsychotic, Saroth The Mage, Sam Shadow, Lya & Azure Edwards, JJ Reine De Blanc, Jenny Rocky, SorcerersHomie, Cal Desmond Pearson, Alex Leadbetter, Bibi, CW Chanter, Jonicide, Jilly Beans, Corrie Anne, Spooky, Derek Hunter Vanessa Sinclair, Carl Abrahamsson, Tony Davis, Arnemancy and you, dear ghost, for your ongoing support! You, too, can pledge your support to PRAGMAGICK & WE THE HALLOWED for as little as 1 dollar to help finance all the many artistick mediums we release our works through! http://patreon.com/pragmagick GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DID NOT CREATE, AUGMENT or INSPIRE ANY ARTISTIC MEDIUM EXPRESSED WITHIN THIS PODCAST or WE THE HALLOWED ARTWORKS WRIT LARGE. CELEBRATE HUMAN ERROR.

As part of the [Hire Well] series, I talk with Kristen Keats, founder of founder of Breakaway Bookkeeping & Advising, owner of Sherwood Tax & Accounting, founder and client of Cadencia, about how to use near-shore talent in Guadalajara, Mexico, to build a team that works smoothly together.…Hey CPA firm owner, glad you found the podcast. If you feel like you've become trapped by your own accounting firm, you're fed up PiTB clients who get you their stuff late, don't appreciate the value you provide, and complain to you when you don't turn it around on a dime, I can help you stop the chaos and end the long hours, without losing revenue. If you like the podcast, join 4200+ other CPAs who get Vitamin G, my daily dose of single-tip business strategy delivered straight to their inbox: Subscribe here: geraldinecarter.com/subscribeReaders say they love it because they're short and on point.Want to get your life back while protecting your revenue?Here are a few ways I help overworked CPAs:GO DOWN TO 40 HOURS THE EMAIL COURSEStop Working Weekends will teach you how to get your hours down without giving up revenue. geraldinecarter.com/stop-working-weekendsFreeTHE BOOKA Roadmap for CPAs to End Overworking Without Losing Revenuegeraldinecarter.com/book$9.99THE VIDEO COURSEGet access to 16 video lessons, bonus training, template letters, website teardowns, and more. Plus, a $1000 credit toward my DT40H Mastermind and a money-back guarantee.geraldinecarter.com/down-to-40-hours-video-course$997A 1:1 CONSULTATIONDo you have a burning question about the material in Down to 40 Hours? Book a one-on-one call with me to get guidance on implementing the material in your specific situation.geraldinecarter.com/coaching-options/$1295CPA MASTERMINDFor the overworked CPA at six figures of revenue who is ready to stop working weekends and wants to implement overdue changes but has trouble doing it alone:Get guidance on increasing prices without overdoing it or underdoing itDisengage problem clients at a pace you're comfortable withCreate packages while knowing how to navigate scope creepFocus on your client niche without feeling like you're jumping off a ledgeBe in a community of like-minded CPAs on a similar journey to share best practices, have a sounding board, and get accountabilityMake more progress faster and with greater confidence and ease. Guaranteed to get you down to 40 hours. geraldinecarter.com/$9500

   If Rashee Rice was driving the car registered to him in that crash in Dallas Saturday evening, he's in big trouble.  But this is what the Chiefs are really good at.  Long before these Super Bowls, the Chiefs were better at keeping players out of jail and on the field than they were scoring touchdowns.  And this happened in the city the Hunt Family has been in power for generations.  Lucky kid.     Bobby Witt Jr is on fire but if you want to get excited about the Royals, look at their starting pitching.  Brady Singer dealt a show stopper on Sunday and this is the best thing possible for season long success in KC.     NC State is the cinderella of college basketball this year as coach Kevin Keats has gone from likely getting fired to getting a contract extension in the past three weeks.  We set the table for the Final Four.    Denver has had enough of being a sanctuary city, Mizzou's Journalism School gives out a disgusting award and liberals and conservatives alike now agree the leftist Covid "experts" got it wrong and owe us an apology.