Podcasts about musculoskeletal disorders

In this episode of Workplace Matters we talk about Musculoskeletal Disorders or MSDs. Musculoskeletal disorders are common, chronic health conditions which impact workers. Ann Marie Dale, a retired professor of medicine and occupational therapy at Washington University in St. Louis Missouri, spent years treating workers with Musculoskeletal disorders and researched how the workplace can play a role in prevention and slowing progression of these conditions. Guest: Ann Marie Dale Host: Michael Guhin

Listen to episode 129 of the ACA Podcast: The Impacts of Environmental Exposures on Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) with Dr Nicole Bijlsma.

Send us a textIn this episode we discuss: History of corticosteroid injectionsEvidence base behind corticosteroid injectionsEffectiveness of injection therapyInjection therapy for specific conditions e.g. Frozen shoulder, RC related disorders, carpal tunnel syndrome, tennis elbowRisks and benefits of corticosteroid injectionsWant to learn more about Injection Therapy? Nick recently did a brilliant Masterclass with us, called “Injection therapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders” where he goes into further depth on everything you need to know about injection therapy. 

Dr. Dmitriy Sheyn is an Associate Professor in the Department of Orthopedics and Regenerative Medicine Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. His lab focuses on the development of stem cell therapies for multiple musculoskeletal disorders caused by acute injuries and aging. He talks about ways to model disc degeneration and tendon injuries. He also discuses his lab's work on tendon differentiation and the mechanisms of low back pain.

Send me a messageIn this episode of the Sustainable Supply Chain Podcast, I sit down with Nick Brown, Senior Director at Ansell. With over 20 years of experience across various industries and continents, Nick brings a unique perspective to our discussion on workplace safety and sustainability.We dive into the profound impact COVID-19 had on the PPE industry, highlighting the dramatic surge in demand and subsequent supply chain challenges. Nick explains how Ansell adapted, addressing both the immediate needs during the pandemic and the long-term implications for the industry.Nick also sheds light on Ansell's innovative connected workplace solutions under the Intelliforce brand. These IoT devices not only enhance safety by providing real-time data and analytics but also contribute to overall workplace efficiency and sustainability.A significant portion of our conversation focuses on Ansell's commitment to sustainability. Nick outlines the company's ambitious targets, including achieving net-zero emissions by 2040, reducing water usage, and implementing comprehensive recycling programmes.Tune in to learn how Ansell is leading the way in integrating safety and sustainability, ensuring a safer future for all.Elevate your brand with the ‘Sustainable Supply Chain' podcast, the voice of supply chain sustainability.Last year, this podcast's episodes were downloaded over 113,000 times by senior supply chain executives around the world.Become a sponsor. Lead the conversation.Contact me for sponsorship opportunities and turn downloads into dialogues.Act today. Influence the future.Podcasting For Brands // bring your guest we do the restVideo episodes. Social clips. Live producer. Virtual studio. Coaching.Support the Show.Podcast supportersI'd like to sincerely thank this podcast's generous supporters: Lorcan Sheehan Olivier Brusle Alicia Farag And remember you too can Support the Podcast - it is really easy and hugely important as it will enable me to continue to create more excellent episodes like this one.Podcast Sponsorship Opportunities:If you/your organisation is interested in sponsoring this podcast - I have several options available. Let's talk!FinallyIf you have any comments/suggestions or questions for the podcast - feel free to just send me a direct message on LinkedIn, or send me a text message using this link.If you liked this show, please don't forget to rate and/or review it. It makes a big difference to help new people discover it. Thanks for listening.

Dr. Heather O'Reilly (nee Johnston) from McMaster University discusses the connection between musculoskeletal disorders and psychological factors, and what workplaces and workers can do to limit risks for injuries.  Released: February 1, 2024 File Size:  10 MB Length:  17:40 minutes ------------------------- « Musculoskeletal Disorders and Mental Health » Heather O'Reilly (née Johnston), Ph. D., de l'Université McMaster explique le lien entre les troubles musculosquelettiques et les facteurs psychosociaux, et ce que les milieux de travail peuvent faire pour limiter les risques de blessures.  Date de diffusion : 1 fevrier 2024 Taille du fichier : 10 MB Durée : 17 : 46 minutes

Our podcast focuses primarily on preventing musculoskeletal disorders in the United States meatpacking industry. Due to the high meat consumption in America, meatpacking workers are subject to highly intensive labor for long hours and low wages. All of these factors lead to a high prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders or MSDs among meatpacking workers, especially in the wrists and hands. Sources https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqwnZ4KbiQM

Alan Fredendall // #LeadershipThursday // www.ptonice.com  In today's episode of the PT on ICE Daily Show, ICE COO Alan Fredendall discusses the three pillars of evidence-based medicine: clinical expertise, current best peer-reviewed evidence, and patient input. He gives suggestions on how clinicians can better incorporate all 3 pillars to improve practice. Take a listen to the podcast episode or read the full transcription below. If you're looking to learn more about courses designed to start your own practice, check out our Brick by Brick practice management course or our online physical therapy courses, check out our entire list of continuing education courses for physical therapy including our physical therapy certifications by checking out our website. Don't forget about all of our FREE eBooks, prebuilt workshops, free CEUs, and other physical therapy continuing education on our Resources tab. EPISODE TRANSCRIPTION 00:00 – ALAN FREDENDALL Team, good morning. Welcome to the PT  on ICE Daily Show. Happy Thursday morning. I hope your morning is off to a great start. My name is Alan, happy to be your host today. Currently have the pleasure of serving as the Chief Operating Officer here at ICE and a faculty member in our Fitness Athlete Division. We're here on YouTube, Instagram, the podcast on Thursday. It's Leadership Thursday, that also means it is Gut Check Thursday. Gut Check Thursday this week, four rounds for time, some interval work. Four rounds, 10 handstand pushups. Those can be strict or kipping. Read the caption on Instagram for some help with modifications if you're still working on those. 10 handstand pushups right into a 50 foot double kettlebell front rack walking lunge. Kettlebells in front of the body, working the thoracic spine, working the legs, 50 feet of a front rack lunge, and then out the door for a 200 meter run on the treadmill, whatever. The goal there is one to one work to rest. That means we're looking to finish that round in about two minutes. Work two minutes, rest two minutes, complete for four rounds. you'll be done in ideally about 16 minutes. So read the caption, check for modifications, scaling is needed to try to get your round time as close to two minutes as possible, modify the handstand pushups as needed, reduce the load on the lunge as needed, and then sub out the run for a row or bike as needed. So hope you have fun with that one. That's a great one that really facilitates intensity. You've got some upper body with the handstand pushups, some lower body with the running and some monostructural, with the lunging, sorry, and then some monostructural with the running. So a great workout to really drop the hammer, rest, repeat a couple times, really working on that anaerobic glycolysis system. Before we get started, just some quick courses coming your way. Today I want to highlight our cervical and lumbar spine courses. A couple chances left towards the end of the year as we get near the holidays to catch cervical spine management. This weekend you can join Zach Morgan up in Waterford, Connecticut. The weekend of November 11th and 12th, you can join Jordan Berry up in Bridgewater, Massachusetts. That's kind of the greater Boston area. And then December 2nd and 3rd, you can join Zach Morgan at his home base at Onward Tennessee in Hendersonville, Tennessee. Lumbar management, also a couple chances left before the end of the year. Next weekend, October 21st and 22nd, Jordan will be in Frederick, Maryland. That's kind of west of the Baltimore area. He will also be in Fort Worth, Texas the weekend of November 4th and 5th. And then you have two chances the weekend of December 2nd and 3rd. You can catch our newest spine faculty member, Brian Melrose. He'll be up in Helena, Montana. And then you can catch Jordan Berry at his home base in Onward, Charlotte, also the weekend of December 2nd and 3rd. 02:55 – EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE Today's topic, evidence-based medicine. A couple different ways to frame this. Are you doing it right? Are you doing it wrong? Or it takes a village of really drilling down and better understanding what comprises evidence-based practice. For many folks, they think it's the research. For others, they think it's many, many, many years of clinical expertise, pattern recognition, and others believe none of that matters. What matters the most is actually what the patient believes is happening, what they believe will help them, and matching our treatments, our interventions, our education as best as possible to essentially the patient input side of the equation. And if you're on the podcast, I'm gonna show a Venn diagram. You're not missing much, if I'm being honest. I've got it right here on the whiteboard. What we know with evidence-based medicine is that it's actually all of that stuff, right? It is three different spheres, three stools, whatever analogy or metaphor you've heard to refer to these before is correct. When we look at evidence-based medicine, is it an overlapping of, yes, scholarly evidence, peer-reviewed research, Yes, clinician experience, practice and pattern recognition. And yes, also patient expectations and beliefs, and that the point at which these three areas overlap is the middle where we have evidence-based medicine, evidence-based practice. But what you'll find is because of this overlap, none of these areas can be evidence-based on their own. So our goal today is not to show you this Venn diagram, but to show you when evidence-based medicine goes wrong, how it goes wrong, and how we can all get a little bit sharper at evidence-based practice in our clinic with our patients. So, let's tackle these points one by one. The first, the one we're all most comfortable with as clinicians is our own clinical expertise. Probably more important than anything else with expertise and experience is the pattern recognition, the dose response relationship that begins to form in our brain The more patience we see, the longer we've been seeing patience. This is, you could call this the 10,000 hour rule, whatever you want to call it, but the belief that the more work, the more time you put in, the more you will maybe, theoretically, begin to master your craft. And there's some truth to that and there's some non-truth to that as well. 05:06 – AVOIDING DOGMA IN PRACTICE The biggest issue, as I have it written out here on the whiteboard, is that just focusing on this area in your practice, the bias here is that you become really prone to dogmas, becoming a dogmatic person, becoming almost a guru. We see this, of course, and we're going to mention it a lot on social media, of the approach on one side of the continuum or other. It doesn't really matter if manual therapy sucks. physical therapy doesn't do anything to the far end of that same continuum of, I believe that I'm putting people's bones back into place with things like spinal mobilization manipulation. So it doesn't really matter where people fall in the continuum, they fall somewhere on some sort of dogmatic continuum line, which is not great because it tends to the further they get into their own dogma and guru like behavior, the less they tend to incorporate research evidence from peer-reviewed sources and also the patient input. These people over time you may have heard phrases of I use what works with most people and the key there is that it works with most people not all people of the true person practicing evidence-based medicine the true clinical expert is the person that gets all almost every single person better. It's not enough to get 50% of your patients better, or 60, or 70. You should, or we hope you would be pursuing excellence in such a manner that you're thinking, how can I help 99.99% of people? And again, just focusing so much on one of the three aspects of evidence-based medicine with your clinical expertise is not gonna cut it. I often think of how much pattern recognition informs practice, but that doesn't mean that that's what we do with every person. I often think of when people come into the clinic, they present with anterior shoulder pain, what we might call instability, the feeling of looseness in the joint or otherwise just pain or maybe even stiffness on the front of the shoulder. I look at it as something wrong with the relationship between the deltoid and the lat. I understand the need to treat the rotator cuff, load the rotator cuff, but I also understand that the rotator cuff is ultimately paying the price for what the deltoid and the lat are not doing for the shoulder complex itself. That when these folks present with limited range of motion overhead, that getting in and treating, particularly the internal rotators, subscapularis can have a lot of value in restoring that range of motion and increasing tolerance to load long-term. However, that pattern recognition in my head is yes, where I'm going to go to first, but again, I can't get caught up too much in thinking this is what works with most people, this is what I'm gonna do no matter what. I have to be aware, I have to be humble that if it's not working for that patient in front of me, I need to go back and say what does the evidence say, what other treatments could I pursue, and also what input does the patient have into the equation of Are we maybe, yes, identifying the right cause, using the right treatment, but the patient expectation is that they can continue to do three to five hours a day of elite level CrossFit training on top of trying to move through the rehab of their shoulder. Those two things are always going to be at odds, and until I can start to incorporate more of the other arms of evidence-based medicine, I'm going to have a limited effect of how many people I can potentially help rather than most, I'm thinking again, how can I help that 99% of people? 10:40 – CURRENT BEST EVIDENCE That moves really nice into making sure that we understand that yes, evidence-based medicine does include evidence. It includes what we would call and what's labeled as current best evidence. That's the second aspect of evidence-based medicine. I think we can be really hard on ourselves and social media here can make you feel like you're not doing a good job at keeping up with the research. Because the truth here, if we're being really intellectually honest, is no one can keep up with the research. There are 1.8 million scientific journal articles published every year. There are 35,000 articles being published every single week. It is impossible for any individual practitioner to read all of those. Ever. It doesn't matter if that was your full-time job. You would not be able to keep up with it. So what we tend to see is that we tend to focus on specialty areas in practice. And I think that's okay. I think that helps narrow our lens. And as long as we are finding a source bias here is I think we do a good job with hump day hustling. There are other great sources as well that do a good job of taking a bunch of research and condensing it in a way that can be absorbed, especially that is then kind of classified by specialty area. But understanding, it's really impossible here to always be up to date on the current best evidence. And just being up to date and reading new articles doesn't mean that that evidence necessarily has any value. We need to be mindful of that fact as well, that just because something new has been published doesn't mean it has value. This is a great example. This is an article. You may have seen this make the rounds on social media. The title is, One and Done, The Effectiveness of a Single Session of Physiotherapy Compared to Multiple Sessions to Reduce Pain and Improve Function in Patients with Musculoskeletal Disorders, a Systematic Review and Med Analysis. This paper was published just a couple days ago, so brand new off the press, right? We tend to associate newer with better in research, which is not always the case. And we tend to try to immediately incorporate articles like this into practice and make giant conclusions that often the paper does not support. Already there are people on social media posting this article and saying, look, physical therapy doesn't work. You should not go to physical therapy. There are folks posting this and saying, see, I told you manual therapy does suck. In some of these studies, in a systematic review, they did manual therapy. I told you it was worthless. Dry dealing does nothing. Spinal manipulation does nothing. Cupping does nothing. People who practice that are committing malpractice. They should be fined or lose their license or be in prison for doing dry needling. And all of those giant conclusions are being made from just this one article. They're being made in such a manner too that tells a lot of us who read a lot of research that they probably haven't actually read the full paper, right? They probably have just read the abstract. Because if we read the full paper, what this paper is really saying is that more physical therapy doesn't seem to help as long as all we care about measuring is pain. No information was given about any other outcome measure, strength, changes in vital signs, did people's blood pressure get better, did stuff like depression, anxiety get better, kinesiophobia, all these other different things that we can measure about a patient that we would expect to change with physical therapy intervention were not measured in any of these studies. And probably the most important thing that's missing from this study all the studies that it analyzes and pretty much every piece of physical therapy research is there's absolutely no information on what was actually done to these people in a way not only that the study could be replicated in the future and possibly validated, or that we have any idea of what was done. It's entirely possible that folks in some of these studies only got manual therapy, that some folks maybe, yes, got exercise, but how was it dosed? Did they test the sub-max lift? Did they train at or above 60% of that sub-max number to ensure that strength was actually happening? And the answer to all those questions usually is no. So it's really important we don't get deep down the evidence-based hole, knowing that for the most part, a lot of the research that comes out, even though there's a high volume of it, it's all quite weak and doesn't necessarily get incorporated into practice because it doesn't really help change and inform practice pretty significantly. Also from this study, Most of these patients had a spinal fracture, they had diagnosed osteoarthritis of the knee, or they had some sort of whiplash disorder of the neck. So kind of specialty populations that can't just really be extrapolated to the general population to say that physical therapy doesn't work. Nonetheless, people grab this article and they cite it. That kind of shows us an overlap between the sphere of clinical expertise and pattern recognition and evidence. I've written it right here on the whiteboard. That person, we would call that person a cherry picker. That person has a very shallow knowledge of the research and they're basically using the research to better inform their own dogma, right? That is not evidence-based medicine. That is just cherry picking research that supports your bias and ignoring the rest and not really taking a deep dive in the research. We have to remember as well that it is evidence based not evidence only that we have to act in the absence of evidence we actually have to do something with people and that we don't always have the best research to inform what we're currently doing in the practice that if we are treating a patient we're doing certain interventions they are making progress both according to their own input, their own goals, their subjective input, and also what we're measuring objectively, then by every way we can measure it to both us and to the patient, the patient is making satisfactory progress. And sometimes we don't always have research to support that. And that's okay. We need to also be intellectually honest, that some of the research we would like to see happen can't happen. A lot of research is either done on folks who are already healthy or it's done in a manner that whatever intervention is given can't potentially make that person either less healthy or more injured. We often see people in low back pain get some sort of treatment and then another group gets some sort of what we call usual care. Either way, somebody is getting some sort of intervention that is designed to improve their symptoms, not maybe theoretically worsen their symptoms. I would love to see research of folks lifting near or at their maximal one rep max potential with a deadlift, and I would love to see the outcomes of what happens with a group of people who lift with a focus on a brace neutral spine, what happens to people who intentionally flex their spine throughout the deadlift, what happens to people who intentionally extend their spine without a deadlift. Is that research ever likely to happen? No. Why? Because it would be really unethical to take a group of people who have nothing wrong with them and potentially cause them maybe a lifetime of debilitating injury just to try to prove a point from the research, and that is not the point of research. We have to be mindful that we're conducting research on human beings who have lives, who have families, who have jobs, and as much as we would like to see some specific lines of research come to fruition, we'll probably never see some of that because of the interventions the risk is simply too high, it probably won't pass review from something like an institutional review board at a university. So we need to be mindful as well of, yes, we're always trying to keep up with the current best evidence, but that doesn't mean it's actually the best, even if it is current, and it doesn't actually mean that it's research we would actually like to see happen, because it can be limited, again, by the ethical nature of actually conducting that research on living human beings. The bias here is being prone to being so far in this camp, and I've written here on the Venn diagram of being up in the ivory tower, of only doing things that has a lot of evidence to support it. Again, in the absence of evidence, we still need to do something with that patient. We still need to understand their condition. We still need to at least try some other evidence-based interventions to help that patient out. What many of you can't do is have a patient come in for evaluation and say, I don't have the current best evidence way to treat you, you'll need to leave now. That usually doesn't go very well. And we need to recognize as well, that patient is probably just gonna go see another provider anyways. Even if you were being very, very intellectually honest with them, that there was no evidence on treatment for their current condition, they're probably just gonna go somewhere else and get less evidence informed care there anyways. So for the best, it's probably that they stick with you for the long term. 19:14 – MATCHING PATIENT EXPECTATIONS & BELIEFS Our final aspect is including patient expectations, values, input. I think this is the weakest area for all of us, of the thing we probably consider last, when maybe it should be what we consider first. This is forgotten far too often that the patient, again, is a living human being with thoughts, feelings, beliefs in front of us, and doing our best to match our interventions to their expectations, beliefs, values, is really, really important, and kind of tying in to the current best evidence, we have really good evidence to show that as well. If that patient comes in and says, hey, you know what, you may not remember, but you saw my husband about six months ago for some really bad low back pain. he was in so much pain, he was off work, and you did something with some needles and electricity or something, and anyways, he felt so much better, he was able to go back to work, he's back, he has no issues anymore, that's fantastic, and I was hoping, with my back pain, that we could try something like that. Now, of course, what that patient did not get from their husband is all the other stuff you probably, hopefully, did with that patient. But what they took away from it was that dry needling appeared to cure that person. And so, it's really helpful, I think, if you can match that expectation as much as possible. Yes, you could give that patient a 45 minute lecture on how dry needling for low back pain doesn't have as much evidence to support it as strengthening the spine and increasing cardiorespiratory fitness and reducing inflammatory diet and getting more sleep and managing your stress and you can go all the way down that pain neuroscience rabbit hole to the point at which maybe that patient doesn't come back to see you anymore Or if your long-term goal is to help that person and you know what is the most evidence-based way to help that person is to have their back get stronger, to help them with their current lifestyle habits, then probably the shortest point there, the shortest line between two points is a straight line between points A and B. It means that if you can just offer the dry needling, that's probably going to be the most beneficial thing, right? You're matching that patient expectation, belief, and value. Does it take time? Yes. It doesn't take a lot of time. Does it take a lot of resources? No, it doesn't. It costs a couple cents for the needles, right? And it lets us get to what we ultimately want to get to that person which is addressing their lifestyle, getting them loading, getting them moving if they're not currently moving, and overall changing their life for the better from both a physical fitness but also overall health and lifestyle perspective. And I think far too often We have an agenda, we have a bias with certain treatments where it doesn't matter who comes in the door. We can be on either side of the dogmatic perspective of everybody gets spinal manipulation, everybody gets dry needling without actually consulting the patient, do they want this or not? Are they open to another treatment? And what will ultimately get us to what we know works the best for most people, which is to get them moving more, get them stronger, get their heart rate up, address their lifestyle. So you can have many sessions of education only. You would think you're practicing in the most current evidence-based way, but we know we can't talk patients better. We actually need to do some stuff. And at the end of the day, I would challenge you that it's probably better if they do that stuff with you versus leaving your care and going to see another healthcare provider. That's another thing that articles like this do not address, of how much follow-up care did patients receive after they leave the study. Overwhelmingly, that is something that is not addressed. of if you do not provide the treatments that the patient wants, whether they want manual therapy, whether they want strengthening and you don't have the time or equipment to provide that, whatever they want, if you do not match those expectations and values, they're probably gonna go somewhere else. They're gonna spend healthcare dollars somewhere else. And that might be with a healthcare provider that's not as evidence-based as you are. So challenge yourself. Are you actually practicing within all of these three different spheres? Are you trying your best to keep up on the scholarly research, at least as it relates to the areas of practice that you're passionate about? Are you honest with yourself that you do have clinical pattern recognition that has value, but knowing that it does have its limitations and you're willing to adjust your treatment when things don't work? And are you combining your practice expertise and the current best evidence with patient expectations and values to ensure that the treatment you're offering is actually the treatment that the patient wants. So check yourself. Evidence-based medicine, are you actually doing it? I hope this was helpful. I hope you all have a fantastic weekend. Have fun with Gut Check Thursday. If you're gonna be at a live course, I hope you have a fantastic time. We'll see you next week. Bye, everybody. OUTRO Hey, thanks for tuning in to the PT on Ice daily show. If you enjoyed this content, head on over to iTunes and leave us a review and be sure to check us out on Facebook and Instagram at the Institute of Clinical Excellence. If you're interested in getting plugged into more ice content on a weekly basis while earning CEUs from home, check out our virtual ice online mentorship program at ptonice.com. While you're there, sign up for our Hump Day Hustling newsletter for a free email every Wednesday morning with our top five research articles and social media posts that we think are worth reading. Head over to ptonice.com and scroll to the bottom of the page to sign up.

Ergonomics is the scientific discipline of fitting the job or task to the physical dimensions, physical abilities, and mental capabilities of the worker – matching the job to the person. The goal of Ergonomic intervention is to identify, minimize, and eliminate hazards (or risk factors) that may contribute to the onset of musculoskeletal injuries.  In this podcast we discuss Ergonomics, Ergonomic risk factors, and Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs), as well as how identifying, assessing, and implementing ergonomic controls can help with injury prevention.

A big part of learning about pediatrics is understanding different musculoskeletal disorders in children. Rather than going through each of these using the full Straight A Nursing LATTE method, I've provided a concise summary of a wide range of conditions: * Soft tissue injuries and fractures * Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) * Skeletal limb deficiencies * Osteogenesis imperfecta * Legg-Calve-Perthes * Slipped capital femoral epiphysis * Spinal curvature disorders * Juvenile idiopathic arthritis * Achondroplasia * Osteochondroma and osteosarcoma * And more! You can read this information and view references in the articles "Pediatric Soft Tissue Injuries and Fractures" and "Musculoskeletal Disorders in Children". Review pediatric topics on the go with Study Sesh! Study for your nursing school exams and NCLEX on the go with over 90 PodQuiz episodes covering a wide range of topics. Sign up for Study Sesh here! __________  The information, including but not limited to, audio, video, text, and graphics contained on this podcast are for educational purposes only. No content on this podcast is intended to guide nursing practice and does not supersede any individual healthcare provider's scope of practice or any nursing school curriculum. Additionally, no content on this podcast is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Straight a Nursing is a proud member of the Airwave Media Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A discussion with Andrew Flanagan, ergonomist for the Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers (OHCOW) and Amir Estulin, who is the Western Region MLITSD Ergonomist to understand the role of a MLITSD Ergonomist in reducing the risk of musculoskeletal disorders in Ontario.In the podcast we reference some links that I say we will include in the description. They are:  https://www.ontario.ca/page/filing-workplace-health-and-safety-complaint (11m30s) Home Centre of Research Expertise for the Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders (msdprevention.com) (16:20) Ergonomics in the workplace | ontario.ca (17m10s)

Listen in as Nationwide Long Term Disability ERISA Attorney Nancy L. Cavey talks about the many disabling conditions that disability insurance carriers broadly classify as Shoulder Problems, how the carrier will classify your injuries or conditions in a way that benefits them the most, and other issues you may have regarding your Long Term Disability policy coverage. Nancy is known for helping those with specific conditions fight the disability insurance company for the rights of her clients. Resources Mentioned In This Episode:LINK TO ROBBED: https://caveylaw.com/get-free-reports/get-disability-book/LINK TO PROFESSIONAL BOOK: https://caveylaw.com/get-free-reports/disability-insurance-claim-survival-guide-professionals/FREE CONSULT LINK: https://caveylaw.com/contact-us/Need Help Today?Need help with your Long Term Disability or ERISA claim? Have questions? Please feel free to reach out to use for a FREE consultation. Just mention you listened to our Podcast!Review like and give us a thumbs up! We love to see your feedback about our Podcast!

In this Talking Health, Rory speaks to Matt Harrison, a First Contact Physiotherapist and Guillermo Moreno-Sanz from Zerenia Clinics, to get insight on how we can protect our bodies from back pain and other Musculoskeletal Disorders. 

Dr. Emily Savage of Revive Upper Cervical Talks About Scoliosis. Scoliosis is an abnormal lateral curvature of the spine. You can also notice this when there is an unequal level of the shoulders and the pelvis, which then translates down to the legs and feet. Several factors can cause Scoliosis: Congenital, Structural, Neurological According to a 2021 study published by the Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Treatments, a subtle neurological imbalance of the bilateral peripheral muscle tone could be a plausible causative factor for scoliotic deformation initiation. Spinal growth and imbalance of the paraspinal muscles both result in biomechanical instability, leading to the progression of the scoliotic curve. The craniocervical junction misalignment may induce a neuromuscular imbalance leading to functional leg length discrepancy and is associated with Scoliosis. As always Stay Connected w/ @DrIanBulow on all the socials and with the clinic @ReviveUCC - Youtube, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are one of the most common conditions affecting the working population. They are also a major cause of lost time on the job. Discover how these painful injuries don't just affect physical health, but mental health, with Paul Krewson, founder and CEO of Peak Ergonomics. 

In this episode host Rick Richey deep dives into a musculoskeletal disorder research study which has been implemented by the National Academy of the Sports Medicine. The NASM Master Instructor will focus on several different key findings in the study, including the levels of musculoskeletal disorder, strength, flexibility, and other factors which led to these statistical outcomes. Expand your fitness knowledge with a little help from the “NASM-CPT Podcast!” The most trusted name in fitness is now expanding into the wellness world. Become an NASM Certified Wellness Coach and you'll be able to guide and motivate clients to make lasting changes through mental and emotional well-being, recovery, and more. https://bit.ly/3zi7Z3R

Recognition and prevention of MSDs in the workplace is critical to employee safety and health.  A special thank you to Big Ass Fans For more than 20 years, Big Ass Fans has been the industry leader in comfort. Its state-of-the-art fans, evaporative coolers, and heaters have transformed the most inhospitable of spaces into the most inviting of environments. Serving industrial, commercial, and residential sectors, every Big Ass Fans product is engineered for unequaled performance. Learn more at BigAssFans.com.

The Importance of Ergonomic Education in Preventing Perioperative Musculoskeletal Disorders by AORNJournal

Trevor Charles, a professor in the Department of Biology and an entrepreneur, discusses the LiftOff program for Black entrepreneurs. The University has announced changes to public health restrictions on our campuses for the Spring term and beyond. Employees are invited to take a survey capturing worker and workplace experiences with remote work during the pandemic. And the Sustainability Office launches the Waste Sorting Game to better manage waste on the campus and further the University's Shift:Zero Campaign. Links and resources in this episode: VP Finance and Administration questionnaire: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/WaterlooVPFA Waste Sorting Challenge: https://api.recollect.net/r/area/UnivofWaterloo https://uwaterloo.ca/plant-operations/services/environmental-services/shift-zero-waste-management Centre of Research Expertise for the Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders : https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-of-research-expertise-for-the-prevention-of-musculoskeletal-disorders/about Work from Home study: https://uwaterloo.ca1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_0kqODJ16L7PnzWS Podcast Listener Survey: https://uwaterloo.ca/daily-bulletin/podcast-listener-survey

The Importance of Ergonomic Education in Preventing Perioperative Musculoskeletal Disorders by AORNJournal

Host: John J. Russell, MD Guest: Joseph E. Bavaria, MD Featuring a wide range of disciplines and a new approach to comprehensive care, what do we need to know about the Aorta Center at Penn Medicine? Dr. John Russell is joined by Dr. Joseph E. Bavaria to dive into this aortic program and discuss a new approach to comprehensive care.

In this episode, we hear from Matt Birtles, Principal Ergonomics Consultant at HSE's Science and Research Centre about the different approaches to managing the risks associated with Musculoskeletal disorders. Matt, an ergonomics and human factors expert, shares his thoughts on look at why MSDs are important, the various prevalent rates across the UK, what you can do within your own organisation and the Risk Management process surrounding MSD's. The audio extract was taken from a recent HSE webinar, in association with HSE and TSO, which also featured Hollie Stocks, Sales Manager at HSE, and Carl Whitman, Marketing Manager at TSO. In the webinar, which is available on-demand, you can hear a full demonstration of how to use HSE's MAC digital tool to log assessments and receive access to various publications on specific guidance, as well as hear the panel answering audience questions. https://www.shponline.co.uk/resources/musculoskeletal-disorders-managing-risk-and-the-hse-assessment-tools/ (Listen back, on-demand, to the full webinar this audio was taken from: Musculoskeletal disorders (managing risk and the HSE assessment tools)) https://www.shponline.co.uk/ergonomics/what-are-musculoskeletal-conditions/ (What are Musculoskeletal Conditions?) https://www.hse.gov.uk/msd/msds.htm (Musculoskeletal disorders at work (HSE)) https://www.hse.gov.uk/msd/mac/ (Manual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)) https://www.shponline.co.uk/legislation-and-guidance/health-safety-executive-hse/ (Click here for SHP's HSE hub page) https://www.shponline.co.uk/shp-webinars/?cid=nav (Click her for more on-demand SHP webinars) If you've not already subscribed, please do so, to get the latest episodes as soon as they are released. And, if you like what you hear, we'd be grateful if you could rate us, as that will help us get the shows out to a wider audience. Check out the previous eleven episodes on the https://www.shponline.co.uk/the-safety-and-health-podcast/ (Safety & Health Podcast hub). Please be sure to stay tuned in to https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/CyFQC73nA5ImGBn68F2zbPX?domain=shponline.co.uk/ (SHPonline.co.uk) for the very latest health and safety news. https://www.shponline.co.uk/get-the-shp-newsletter/ (Sign up to the SHP Daily Newsletter, here.)

Host: Charles Turck, PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP Guest: Kathryn Gallagher, MS, RN, BSN Guest: Kate Newcomb-DeSanto, MSN, RN, MSW What does Penn Medicine's newly-opened patient room facility have to offer? Dr. Charles Turck is joined by Penn Medicine Clinical Advisors Kathy Gallagher and Kate Newcomb-DeSanto to discuss the new pavilion and how it's revolutionizing patient care.

Host: Charles Turck, PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP Guest: Sandy Marks Guest: Kim Horvath, JD Guest: Kyle Thomson, JD With telehealth services expanding during the COVID-19 pandemic, has our access to them changed? To better understand this, Dr. Charles Turck meets with Sandy Marks, Kim Horvath, and Kyle Thomson from the AMA to explore what's been done to provide Medicare coverage during a public health emergency and what's on the horizon for telehealth access.

Clubfoot & Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)

Host: Charles Turck, PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP Guest: Emily Carroll, JD, MSW The No Surprises Act aims to protect consumers from surprise medical bills. But how exactly does it go about doing that, and what's the current status of its implementation? Joining Dr. Charles Turck to share progress and challenges associated with the No Surprises Act is Ms. Emily Carroll, a senior legislative attorney for the American Medical Association's Advocacy Resource Center.

This podcast is an excerpt from the "Musculoskeletal Disorders" lecture by Dr. Robin Murphy, NDMusculoskeletal Disorders (formerly Musculoskeletal Problems and Health Philosophy, (A & B)) include the five principles of health and health philosophy from a vitality perspective, carpal tunnel syndrome, frozen shoulder, back injuries, bone remedies, sacroiliac problems, slipped disks, TMJ, whiplash, sciatica, bursitis, ankylosing spondylitis, and tendonitis.The full lecture is available on:CD: https://lotushealthinstitute.com/store/musculoskeletal-problems-and-health-philosophy-a-b.htmlStreaming access: https://mysoundwise.com/soundcasts/1600867285999s

Get CE off your to-do list! Start earning your CE credits today at https://rdh.tv/ce Musculoskeletal Disorders: Lateral (Tennis Elbow) versus Medial (Golfer's Elbow) Epicondylitis By Meghan Greening, RDH, BSDH, EFDA Original article published on Today's RDH: https://www.todaysrdh.com/musculoskeletal-disorders-lateral-tennis-elbow-versus-medial-golfers-elbow-epicondylitis/ Get daily dental hygiene articles at https://www.todaysrdh.com Follow Today's RDH on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TodaysRDH/ Follow Kara RDH on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DentalHygieneKaraRDH/ Follow Kara RDH on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kara_rdh/

Date: August 27th, 2021 Reference: Gagnon et al. Direct-access physiotherapy to help manage patients with musculoskeletal disorders in an emergency department: Results of a randomized controlled trial. AEM 2021 Guest Skeptic: Dagny Kane-Haas is a physiotherapist who also has a master's degree in Clinical Science in Manipulative Therapy. Case: A forty-year-old woman presents to the emergency department […]

Traction's and casts

Fractures, Clubfoot, Traction, Casts and others

The Top 5 Takeaways from the SafetyCast - Musculoskeletal Disorders in Construction

Ryan Tinker is joined by Alice Cheng to discuss managing the likelihood and risk of Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Construction Sector

We take a look at various musculoskeletal problems and solutions

We take a look at Neural tube defects, the manifestations and management.

We take a look at the various musculoskeletal procedures and Amputation in the part one of the system.

Welcome to another episode of The Words Matter Podcast.On this episode I speak with Dr Giacomo Rossettini. Giacomo is an MSK physiotherapist and researcher from Italy. He competed his PhD' degree in Neuroscience in 2018 and has been working as a physiotherapist since 2009 specializing in Rehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Disorders.He is a lecturer of Methodology and Clinical Practice of the Cervical Spine in the Master's program of Rehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Disorders at Genova University and, he also lectures at Verona University: Bachelor's program of Manual Therapy in Physiotherapy.In the last 2 years he has promoted in Italy his course on "placebo, nocebo effects and contextual factors in physiotherapy and musculoskeletal pain”.Giacomo has a growing track record of research into placebo, nocebo and contextual effects in relation to MSK healthcare practice (see here). Some of his excellent papers on these topics can be found here, here and here and have contributed to the Words Matter online course (see here).In this episode we talk about: the nature and definitions of placebo, nocebo and contextual effects. how enriching our clinical rituals can constitute a contextual effect and boost placebo. avoiding nocebo through unhelpful clinical practice, communication and interaction. touch on the ethics of utilising contextual factors to enhance the placebo effect. we discuss the challenge of the lack of contextual factors and the ability to control such factors which has been placed on clinicians through face masks and conducting appointments via telehealth during the pandemic. Huge thanks and applause to Giacomo for stepping up to the challenge and chatting in English- if we were relying on my Italian the podcast would never have happened and we'd all miss out on his incredibly informant information and experience.I bring you Dr Giacomo RossettiniFind Giacomo on Twitter @GiacomoRoss86If you liked the podcast, you'll love the Words Matter online course on effective language and communication when managing back pain - ideal for all MSK therapists and students.Help the podcast grow and don't miss an episode- Subscribe, Rate and Share. Instagram @Wordsmatter_educationTwitter @WordsClinicalFacebook Words Matter - Improving Clinical Communication ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Mike Clayman, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder, Flexion Therapeutics brings us up to speed on the work at Flexion developing and commercializing new treatments for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) including osteoarthritis (OA) knee pain. Mike also talks about how the company has been adapting to the COVID-19 pandemic to get their drug Zilretta out to patients in need. @FlexionInc #musculoskeletaldisorder #OAK #kneepain #osteoarthritisofknee #MSD #COVID19 FlexionTherapeutics.com Download the transcript here

Mike Clayman, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder, Flexion Therapeutics brings us up to speed on the work at Flexion developing and commercializing new treatments for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) including osteoarthritis (OA) knee pain. Mike also talks about how the company has been adapting to the COVID-19 pandemic to get their drug Zilretta out to patients in need. @FlexionInc #musculoskeletaldisorder #OAK #kneepain #osteoarthritisofknee #MSD #COVID19 FlexionTherapeutics.com Listen to the podcast here

Ortho

Join us for part 2 of this exciting Pathology Review as we discuss Nervous System Pathology and Musculoskeletal Disorders. Topics to be discussed are as follows: Nervous System Pathology- Neural Tube Defects- Dandy-Walker Syndrome- Arnold-Chiari- Subdural vs. Epidural Hematoma - Huntington's Chorea vs. Alzheimer's- Parkinson's Disease- Neurofibromatosis- Tay-Sachs- Retinoblastoma- Glioblastoma Multiforme Musculoskeletal Pathology- Osteomalacia- Giant Cell Tumor- Seronegative Arthropathy (PEAR)- Lyme Disease- Osteosarcoma vs. Osteomyelitis - Gout- Dermatomyositis- Osteochondroma - DISH- Avascular Necrosis- Bell's PalsyREFERENCE: Pathology Review (3rd Edition) JR LaRose

In this episode we talk to Professor Simon French about his paper on undertanding chiropractic practice. Simon is a Professor of Musculoskeletal Disorders at the Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University. Simon completed his PhD at the Australasian Cochrane Centre, Monash University, and undertook his post-doctoral position at the School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, where he was supported by a Primary Care Research Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council. From 2013 to 2018 he was based at Queen’s University in Ontario, Canada, and held the Canadian Chiropractic Research Foundation Professorship in the School of Rehabilitation Therapy. Simon conducts research in the area of knowledge translation in primary healthcare settings with a focus on the management of low back pain and osteoarthritis. His research aims to improve the quality of healthcare by understanding, informing and improving health practices, including care provided by chiropractors. He also undertakes randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews of interventions relevant to primary care settings. Paper details: French SD, Charity M, Forsdike K, Gunn J, Polus B, Walker B, Chondros P, Britt H. Chiropractic Observation and Analysis STudy (COAST): providing an understanding of current chiropractic practice. Medical Journal of Australia 2013;199(10):687-91 Link: https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2013/199/10/chiropractic-observation-and-analysis-study-coast-providing-understanding

CME credits: 0.25 Valid until: 14-10-2020 Claim your CME credit at https://reachmd.com/programs/cme/increasing-awareness-and-access-spinal-muscular-atrophy-therapy/10992/ Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic disorder characterized by weakness in muscles and is caused by a loss of specialized nerve cells, called motor neurons, that control muscle movement. Since SMA significantly impacts both the quality of life and lifespan of those affected, this activity will describe the genetic basis for SMA and the various phenotypic expressions as well as improvements in accessing pharmacologic treatments for SMA.

Host: Jennifer Caudle, DO Guest: Catherine Apicella, MPT, PYT-C, PRPC With less and less primary care physicians partnering with physical therapists, it’s time we ask: are we doing ourselves—and our patients—a disservice by not taking advantage of this option? To find out, Dr. Jennifer Caudle sits down with physical therapist Catherine Apicella to discuss the often-overlooked benefits of physical therapy and how primary care physicians and physical therapists can work together to benefit their patients.

Host: Jennifer Caudle, DO Guest: Catherine Apicella, MPT, PYT-C, PRPC With less and less primary care physicians partnering with physical therapists, it’s time we ask: are we doing ourselves—and our patients—a disservice by not taking advantage of this option? To find out, Dr. Jennifer Caudle sits down with physical therapist Catherine Apicella to discuss the often-overlooked benefits of physical therapy and how primary care physicians and physical therapists can work together to benefit their patients.

Host: Jennifer Caudle, DO Guest: Catherine Apicella, MPT, PYT-C, PRPC With less and less primary care physicians partnering with physical therapists, it’s time we ask: are we doing ourselves—and our patients—a disservice by not taking advantage of this option? To find out, Dr. Jennifer Caudle sits down with physical therapist Catherine Apicella to discuss the often-overlooked benefits of physical therapy and how primary care physicians and physical therapists can work together to benefit their patients.

Host: Matt Birnholz, MD Guest: Patrick J. Connolly, MD Back and neck pain is extremely common, with 80-90% of people experiencing some pain within their lifetime. About 90% of cases resolve within six weeks, but for those patients whose pain persists, questions arise as to who should be referred next for further consultation. While patients often see a spine specialist at first, the care journey sometimes leads to a neurosurgeon or orthopaedic spine surgeon. Can this pathway from primary care to neurosurgery or orthopaedic surgery ever be expedited? Dr. Patrick Connolly, neurosurgeon at Penn Medicine joins host Dr. Matt Birnholz to discuss when primary care physicians should consider referring patients to neurosurgeons for neck and back pain. Dr. Connolly will also discuss the different types of surgical options for patients seeking prolonged back and neck pain relief.