Podcasts about Easley

Q:I watched your YT session on "If Christians should use AI".   I have a dilemma currently with music. I only listen to Faith/Christian music and recently have found some new music that I am very much enjoying.  I always do research on the band/music/song to ensure it is morally within the context of Scripture and the message is directed about Jesus. However, I found out that this new Christian/Faith music that I was listening to was AI created.  The publisher of the music on social media has openly admitted that the songs are AI created.  The messages in the songs are (in my belief) to be strong Christian messages.  I do have some reservations with AI creating songs like this.  I am not sure if I am over-reacting to this, but it scares me somewhat. One day we may not know what AI created and passed as someone's work.  Would it be wrong to let AI help us create something that we feel are unable to express?  It seems that we are cheating in some way by using AI. Summary: In this episode, Dr. E tackles a question about whether or not it's wrong to let AI help us creatively. AI isn't inherently evil. It's a tool—like electricity or a microwave. It can help us find information, speed up tasks, and even assist in medicine. But when it starts replacing our thinking, our creativity, or our worship, we need to pause. MIT research shows that relying on AI can actually reduce how our brains function. That's not just a tech issue. That's a spiritual issue. We're image-bearers of a creative God. We're meant to struggle, to think, to wrestle with truth and beauty. Taking shortcuts with something as sacred as worship or prayer robs us of the growth God intended. AI might be efficient, but it's not inspired.  Takeaways: AI is a tool, not a substitute for the God-given work of creativity and discipleship. Outsourcing creative labor to AI can undermine spiritual formation. AI-generated messages, even with good theology, lack the soul of human wrestling. MIT studies show AI use diminishes brain activity and engagement over time. Christians should be cautious about “cheating” their way through expressions of faith. We are image-bearers of a Creator—designed to think, feel, and create, not copy. Links Mentioned: Should Christians Use AI?  The Kerby Anderson interview Michael mentions will come out on 8/5. We'll update this with the link once it's live but you can subscribe here to keep an eye out.  Kerby Anderson on AI use John Piper ChatGPT Prayer  Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Summary In this sermon, Dr. Michael Easley explores Romans 3:21–31. Through Paul's words, we're confronted with the sobering reality that all people are equally sinful and fall short of God's glory. The good news is that God makes sinners righteous, not through human effort, but through His grace, accomplished by the redemptive work of Jesus Christ. Dr. Easley walks through Paul's logic, showing how God's righteousness is revealed apart from the Law, through faith in Christ alone. He explains that justification is a gift—completely unearned and undeserved. It was made possible because Jesus bore the wrath we deserved. The cross is not just a moment of forgiveness, but the very place where God's justice and mercy meet. As Dr. Easley explains, this truth dismantles religious pride. There's no room to boast. All have sinned. All need grace. And anyone—Jew or Gentile—can be justified by faith. In a culture that minimizes sin and elevates self, this sermon re-centers believers on God's incredible mercy and the unmatched significance of Christ's finished work. Takeaways Jesus redefined the Law by exposing sin not just in actions, but in the heart. All people, regardless of status or background, are equally sinful before God. God's righteousness is revealed apart from the Law and is accessed by faith alone. Justification is a free gift given through grace, not earned by works. Jesus' sacrifice satisfies God's justice and redeems us from sin's penalty. Because salvation is entirely God's work, there is no room for boasting. To read the book of Romans, click here. Click here for other Michael Easley Sermons.

Q: Hi Dr. E, Based on Revelation 12:9, when was Satan cast out of heaven? Could you give me Scriptures for your reasoning? Thanks so much! Summary In this episode, Dr. E unpacks Revelation 12:9 and explores what Scripture reveals about Satan's fall, his defeat, and final judgment. From his rebellion and role in Eden to his defeat at the cross and expulsion during the tribulation, Dr. E outlines the key stages of Satan's downfall. He addresses the complex theological implications of evil still being active even as believers are with God in heaven. Dr. E also explains the shifting scholarly interpretations of Isaiah and Ezekiel, passages long associated with Satan but increasingly seen as addressing earthly kings. He affirms that while some details remain mysterious, the overarching truth is clear: Satan is a defeated enemy, and God is sovereign over all. The question of whether there is mourning in heaven today is ultimately tied to the hope of final restoration. While sorrow may exist in a limited or temporary sense, heaven is defined by God's presence—and His plan leads to a future where mourning is forever removed. Takeaways Satan's defeat was pronounced in Eden and finalized at the cross. Revelation 12 places Satan's final expulsion during the tribulation. Solid theological resources help us navigate complex doctrines. God's sovereignty and ultimate victory are never in doubt. Theology should lead to faithful living, not just curiosity. Links Mentioned: The Moody Handbook of Theology by Paul Enns Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Pantheon Resources has officially spudded the Dubhe-1 appraisal well, marking a major turning point as the company transitions from exploration to development and production. CEO Max Easley and Chief Development Officer Erich Krumanocker joined Steve Darling from Proactive to provide insight into this strategic milestone and what it means for the company's future in Alaska's energy landscape. Easley explained that the Dubhe-1 well is designed to validate reservoir deliverability by using a modern horizontal well and completion system. “The objective here is to demonstrate what the reservoir can deliver,” he said. “It also supports our gas sales agreement with the State of Alaska tied to the Alaska gas line project.” Krumanocker added that while Dubhe-1 is targeting a known resource, the well has been engineered to penetrate three additional zones—Upper Prince Creek, Shelf Margin Deltaic C, and a slope fan system. These formations have no currently booked resources, but may offer significant upside if hydrocarbons are encountered. “This is not like Megrez-1,” Krumanocker clarified, referencing a previous well that produced mostly water. “Dubhe-1 is located in a well-characterized zone that has already flow-tested oil and could actually become our first production well.” Easley emphasized that the coming months will bring a steady stream of updates as drilling progresses. He plans to personally visit the drill site next week to oversee operations and share more insight as results begin to emerge. With Dubhe-1, Pantheon Resources is aiming to unlock meaningful near-term production potential and de-risk broader development efforts across its Alaskan portfolio. #proactiveinvestors #pantheonresourcesplc #mining #lse #panr #pthrf #Dubhe1 #AlaskaOil #OilAndGasDevelopment #EnergyStocks #NaturalGas #AlaskaEnergy #OilExploration #OilProduction #PantheonDrilling #InvestingInOil

In this episode of the HUNTR Podcast, we're joined by Ty Easley—a seasoned killer from the Heartland Bowhunter crew who's built his entire approach around one thing: hunting mature bucks. Not just big racks—old deer. Ty walks us through his mindset, how he prepares all year long, and what it really takes to consistently target 5½- and 6½-year-old whitetails. We talk access, pressure, wind, timing, and how experience and discipline make the difference. No gimmicks. No shortcuts. There's nothing better than having conversations with like-minded hunters who are just as passionate about deer as we are. We appreciate Ty for jumping on the show and talking deer with us. Hope you enjoy this episode. Sit back, relax, and enjoy the show.Follow Ty's whitetail journey:https://www.instagram.com/tseasley/https://www.youtube.com/channel/@UCfv4iVCP-yW8KBxThqDPqsQ SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL HERE:https://www.youtube.com/c/HUNTRTUBEBuy some merch on our website:https://wearehuntr.com/HUNTR Podcast is presented by:Hoyt Archery: https://hoyt.com (USE CODE HUNTR FOR 20% OFF APPAREL)DeerGro: https://www.deergro.com (USE CODE HUNTR FOR 15% OFF)Beast Broadheads: https://beastbroadheads.com/(USE CODE HUNTR FOR 10% OFF)MTN Tough: http://lab.mtntough.com/checkout/subscribe/purchase?code=huntr&plan=monthly(USE CODE HUNTR FOR 1 FREE MONTH)RackHub: https://www.rack-hub.com/huntr (USE CODE HUNTR FOR 10% OFF)Pure Wildlife Blends: https://www.purewildlifeblends.com (USE CODE HUNTR FOR 10% OFF)Lone Wolf Custom Gear: https://www.lonewolfcustomgear.com/(USE CODE HUNTR FOR 7% OFF)

Summary In this sermon, Dr. Michael Easley unpacks the biblical doctrine of sin and humanity's universal need for salvation. He begins by addressing how both the church and culture define “sin,” exposing the world's denial of sin and the believer's need to own it personally: “My sin is the problem.” Drawing on Paul's sweeping argument, Dr. Easley shows that all people—Jew and Gentile alike—are under the power of sin. No one seeks God. No one does good. We are condemned not just by our actions but by our very nature. Dr. Easley walks through Paul's Old Testament citations to demonstrate sin's pervasive reach: we sin against God, with our speech, and through our actions. Even religious privilege, like being entrusted with God's Word, doesn't give immunity from sin's reign. Ultimately, he reminds us that the law exposes our sin but cannot justify us. Only a perfect Savior—Jesus Christ—can rescue us. Takeaways Everyone is a sinner—no one is righteous. Sin isn't just what we do; it's our nature. The law reveals sin but cannot save. We can't stand before God on our own merit. Christ alone makes us righteous by His work. Believing culture's view of sin leads to deception. To read the book of Romans, click here. Click here for other Michael Easley Sermons.

H1 - Segment 3 Mon July 21 2025 - Caller Jeff in Easley talked about Zohran Mamdani and MN Rep Omar Fatteh

Q: Over the past few episodes or so, I believe I heard that “the Trinity” is not found in the Bible.  This inspired some study, and now I'm wondering why we call God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit the Trinity at all?  It seems that, before the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, early Christians had differing ways of describing them, usually referring to them as separate, but not necessarily as a 3-in-1.  As a child, I tried to think of the Trinity like an apple with the outer part, inner part, and the seeds being separate but one, and that being like God.  But that was still incredibly confusing.  Is that confusion necessary, if it's not actually described that way in the Bible?  What if we went back to the early Christian way of understanding, that the relationship between them is not fully defined?  More mysterious, but maybe more precise that way?  Thanks for your thoughts! Summary: Dr. E addresses a listener's question regarding the Trinity. Dr. E affirms that while the term “Trinity” doesn't appear in Scripture, the truth of the Trinity is clearly taught throughout. He explains that God exists as three united persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—without separate existence, forming one divine essence. Using passages like Matthew 3:16–17, 1 Corinthians 12:4–7, and others, Dr. Easley shows how Scripture reveals each person of the Godhead functioning distinctly yet in perfect unity. He cautions against modalism and stresses the importance of clarity over mystery. The early church wrestled with how to define the Trinity, but Scripture drives us toward this essential doctrine for understanding salvation: the Father sends the Son, the Son accomplishes redemption, and the Spirit indwells believers. While mysterious, the Trinity is vital—foundational to Christianity and unmistakably present in the biblical narrative. In short, we don't believe in three gods—we believe in one God, three persons, co-equal and co-eternal. Takeaways: The word “Trinity” isn't in Scripture, but the doctrine is clearly taught. God exists as three distinct persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—in one divine essence. Analogies like water or apples oversimplify and often misrepresent the Trinity. Scripture presents the Father sending the Son, the Son sending the Spirit, and the Spirit indwelling believers. The Trinity is essential for understanding salvation and God's relational nature. We worship one God in three persons—not three gods, and not one God acting in different modes. Links Mentioned: The Moody Handbook of Theology by Paul Enns Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Summary In this sermon, Dr. Michael Easley unpacks the challenging theological argument Paul makes in Romans 3:1-8. He begins by exploring the question, “What advantage is there to being a Jew?” Paul acknowledges the Jews' privileged status as recipients of God's oracles, the trustworthy Scriptures, and the covenant people through whom Christ would come. However, Paul also confronts objections regarding human unfaithfulness and God's righteousness. If many Jews are unfaithful, does that mean God is unfaithful? Paul emphatically denies this, asserting that God's faithfulness stands firm even when humans fail. Dr. Easley outlines four key objections Paul addresses: the significance of religion, faithfulness, righteousness, and truth. Some argue that human unrighteousness somehow glorifies God's righteousness, or that sinning more might enhance God's glory. Paul condemns such thinking as blasphemous and dangerous. The heart of the message is that God's righteousness and faithfulness are unchanging, regardless of human failure. Believers today hold the same “oracles of God” in Scripture and in Christ, entrusted with a living Word that calls for faithful response. Dr. Easley challenges listeners to cherish and live out this divine trust faithfully. Takeaways: God entrusted the Jews with His oracles, giving them great religious advantage. Human unfaithfulness never negates God's perfect faithfulness. God's righteousness remains true even when humans are unrighteous. Sinning cannot be justified as a means to glorify God—it is condemned. The gospel reveals the mystery of how God declares sinners righteous in Christ. Believers today are entrusted with the living Word of God, calling for faithful stewardship. To read the book of Romans, click here. Click here for other Michael Easley Sermons.

Q: I go to a Christian college and many students, including some of my friends, are converting to Catholicism. Here are my questions: What are your insights on how to engage with them when they are talking about it? I am concerned they are leaning more towards works rather than trusting in the finished work of Jesus. What are things that I can do as a friend veer towards judgement? I am trying to show love to them but also pointing out their bad theology. They are also very focused on Mary being the Saint. How would you respond to that? Are there books you recommend to help me understand the differences between Catholics and Evangelicals? Summary: In this episode, Dr. E and Hanna explore how to engage Catholics with grace by discussing the theological differences between Catholicism and Evangelicalism, especially regarding faith, works, and the role of tradition. They stress the importance of understanding both faiths' core beliefs and encourage believers to approach conversations with kindness and patience. The conversation also underscores the significance of prayer and the desire for greater depth in spiritual practices. Takeaways: Salvation by grace alone, through faith, is non-negotiable in evangelical theology. Catholicism often elevates tradition and ritual above Scripture. Worship of Mary and the saints lacks biblical support. Protestantism emphasizes the sufficiency of Christ's finished work on the cross. Many Catholics don't fully understand their own church's doctrine. Engage friends with love, prayer, and Scripture—not argument. Links Mentioned: Chris Castaldo on inContext Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Summary In this sermon, Dr. Michael Easley unpacks Romans 2:17–29, where Paul confronts religious hypocrisy among the Jews in Rome. Though they boast in the law, claim to know God's will, and present themselves as moral guides, Paul warns that their actions betray their claims. When believers condemn sin while committing the same, they dishonor God and cause His name to be blasphemed. Dr. Easley highlights how spiritual privilege—like bearing the name "Jew," possessing the law, or having the sign of circumcision—does not excuse hypocrisy. Instead, it demands authentic obedience. Paul insists that true identity before God is not about outward signs, but about inward transformation—a heart changed by the Spirit, not the letter of the law. The same is true for Christians today. It's not enough to appear religious; God desires inward change. Dr. Easley reminds us that we are all "consistently inconsistent" in our walks with Christ, and when we fail, we must acknowledge it, confess it, and seek forgiveness. That kind of humility has a profound impact, even on those far from faith. The goal isn't religious performance—it's genuine heart change through Christ. Takeaways: Spiritual status means nothing without obedience to God's Word. Religious hypocrisy causes God's name to be blasphemed. Outward signs like circumcision are meaningless without inward change. God desires heart-level transformation, not surface-level religion. When Christians live inconsistently, humility and confession build credibility. True obedience is rooted in salvation, not spiritual pride. To read the book of Romans, click here. Click here for other Michael Easley Sermons.

Q: I'm studying Revelation chapter 20 with BSF right now. I've never understood something about the final judgement. How do we reconcile verses such as Matthew 16:27 referencing the rewards individual believers will receive during the final judgment with teachings found in Galatians about freedom from the law (behavior and sins condemnation) and concepts such as every good and perfect gift comes from the father of lights. I think I've heard in church, about rewards and extra jewels in your crown, but I'm not certain where that is in the Bible. It is a little confusing to consider freedom through Christ and also a reward system that doesn't equally reward if we can't add or take away anything from the work of Christ on the cross. Summary In this episode , Dr. E and Hanna tackle a nuanced question about Revelation 20 and the concept of eternal rewards. Drawing from multiple New Testament passages, Dr. E outlines seven distinct judgments found in Scripture, explaining the Judgment Seat of Christ as a moment for believers' works—not their salvation—to be evaluated. He unpacks how rewards in heaven are not based on merit, but are gracious gifts from God, rooted in faithfulness and obedience. The conversation explores the meaning of crowns, such as the crown of righteousness and the unfading crown of glory, and how believers will ultimately cast these rewards before Christ's throne. They also reflect on the earthly mindset that struggles with the idea of disparity in heaven and offer reassurance that envy and pride will be absent in eternity. This episode encourages believers to live faithfully now, knowing that our lives carry eternal significance beyond what we can see. Takeaways Eternal rewards are not about merit but about faithfulness and obedience to God. Scripture describes multiple types of judgment, including the judgment seat for believers. Crowns of righteousness and glory are symbols of God's gracious recognition. Rewards will be cast at Christ's feet—there's no room for pride or envy in eternity. Modern culture often downplays eternal life, but Jesus emphasized it repeatedly. Living with an eternal perspective reshapes how we view our work, suffering, and purpose. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

What if hitting rock bottom was the start of something amazing?  In this episode, I'm joined by Heidi Easley - artist, author and founder of Paint Party Headquarters - who shares her incredible journey from bankruptcy to building a 7-figure business through art and creativity. If you've ever felt stuck or unsure if your creative path could actually support you, Heidi's story will open your eyes to what's possible. She's also one of our featured speakers at the Teach Your Art Summit, and you can sign up now using the link below. Don't miss it - it's free and packed with ways you can make impact and income through teaching your art. https://teachyourart.org

Summary In this sermon, Dr. Michael Easley unpacks Romans 2 and explores the inescapable and impartial judgment of God. Beginning with Paul's transition from addressing the sins of the Gentiles in Romans 1 to confronting the Jews in chapter 2, Easley explains how no one is exempt from God's righteous judgment—neither those with the Law nor those without it. All people appeal to some moral standard, which points to a moral Lawgiver. God judges according to truth, and His judgment is always just, never biased. Dr. Easley highlights that self-righteous judgment is condemned—not judgment itself. Paul uses a diatribe to anticipate and respond to objections, showing that both Jews and Gentiles are guilty before God. God's patience and kindness should lead to repentance, not complacency. Ultimately, everyone will stand before the impartial Judge—Jesus Christ—who knows every secret. For believers, Christ becomes both their advocate and substitute, having absorbed God's wrath on the cross. For unbelievers, judgment remains a fearful certainty. Takeaways: God's judgment is inescapable because it is based on absolute truth, not personal or cultural standards. Both Jews and Gentiles are guilty before God—possessing the Law or conscience does not exempt anyone from judgment. Self-righteousness is condemned; judging others while committing the same sins reveals a hardened, unrepentant heart. God's kindness and patience are meant to lead us to repentance, not justify continued rebellion. Every person will be judged impartially by Christ according to their works and the motives behind them. The only true hope in judgment is the advocacy of Jesus Christ, who bore God's wrath so we could receive eternal life. To read the book of Romans, click here. Click here for other Michael Easley Sermons.

Q: Knowing division in the church displeases the Lord, what are your thoughts about the “sharp disagreement” between Paul and Barnabas. How should it have been handled? Summary: In this episode Dr. E and Hanna address a question about the sharp disagreement between Paul and Barnabas recorded in Acts 15. They discuss how they should have handled their conflict, assuming that division in the church displeases the Lord. Dr. Easley begins by reminding believers that the Bible is not always prescriptive; sometimes it simply describes what happened. The disagreement centered on John Mark, who had deserted their mission earlier, causing tension. Paul was firm and cautious, while Barnabas, the “son of encouragement,” took a more compassionate approach. This resulted in them parting ways, but God used that division for good, expanding the missionary work as they went different directions. Dr. E emphasizes that believers are sinful, prone to conflict, and that sometimes peace isn't fully possible. He encourages humility and prayer, trusting God to work through even broken situations. Finally, he urges believers to keep the church's mission—evangelism and discipleship—at the forefront, rather than getting caught up in internal disputes. Ultimately, God can bring good even from sharp disagreements. Takeaways: The Bible sometimes describes conflicts without giving a “how-to” fix. Paul and Barnabas parted ways over John Mark's earlier desertion. Barnabas showed compassion; Paul took a firmer stance. God used their disagreement to expand the missionary effort. Peace isn't always possible, but believers should pursue it so far as it depends on you. The church's mission of evangelism and discipleship should always be the priority over internal disputes. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Summary: In this conversation, Dr. Michael Easley and Natasha Crain address the increasing hostility Christians face in today's culture—not simply for what they believe, but that they believe. They examine the biblical call to suffer for righteousness, the roots of cultural rebellion, and why defining the “common good” must begin with God's standards, not shifting societal norms. Together, they unpack how social media fuels tribalism and outrage, and they offer practical encouragement for Christians to stay rooted in truth while engaging the world around them. Crain and Easley also confront misconceptions about pro-life advocacy, especially accusations of misogyny, and equip believers to respond with clarity and conviction. The conversation draws a sharp contrast between fleeting cultural happiness and enduring biblical joy, reminding us that true good is defined by God—not by personal preference or public opinion. With wisdom and urgency, they challenge listeners to engage cultural issues thoughtfully, biblically, and with bold grace in every sphere of influence. Takeaways: Suffering for righteousness is a biblical reality—not an exception. The common good must be defined by God's standards, not cultural sentiment. Cultural anger often stems from rebellion against God, not just disagreement. Christians are called to be salt and light—engaging, not retreating. Joy rooted in faith is far greater than the fleeting pursuit of happiness. Everyone has a sphere of influence—faithful presence starts where you are. Links Mentioned: When Culture Hates You by Natasha Crain  Natasha's Website Watch the highlights and full version of this interview on our Youtube channel. For more inContext interviews, click here.

Summary In this sermon, Dr. Michael Easley carefully examines Romans 1:24–32, focusing on the seriousness of rejecting God's truth and the resulting consequences that flow from such rebellion. He emphasizes the authority of Scripture as the unchanging, divine Word that reveals not only God's character but also humanity's sinful condition. Dr. Easley explains the phrase “God gave them over” as a judicial act of God—He actively allows those who reject Him to be controlled by their sinful desires, particularly emphasizing the distortion of God's design for sexuality. He walks believers through the passage's description of lust, impurity, and degrading passions, showing how these are not just isolated sins but part of a deeper turning away from God that leads to a depraved mind and further unrighteous behavior. Dr. Easley carefully balances truth with compassion, reminding believers to approach those struggling with sin with both conviction and grace. Finally, he points to the hope found in Christ, the One who redeems sinners and restores God's design. He urges the church to stand firm in biblical truth while loving those caught in cultural pressures that deny God's order. This sermon calls for faithfulness, compassion, and a renewed commitment to God's gospel in a world that often rejects it. Takeaways: “God gave them over” is a judicial act of God's judgment, not passive neglect. Rejecting God leads to an insatiable craving for moral impurity. Degrading passions twist and defile God's design for human sexuality. A depraved mind results from suppressing the knowledge of God. Sin escalates from private rebellion to public approval of evil. The list of sins in Romans 1 reflects a mind and society void of God. To read the book of Romans, click here. Click here for other Michael Easley Sermons.

Q: My question is from Romans 4:10-12. If Abraham's righteousness was based on faith and not circumcision, how might women in Abraham's time have expressed their covenant relationship with God, given they did not receive circumcision? Summary: In this episode Dr. E and Hanna respond to a listener's insightful question from Romans 4:10–12: If Abraham was credited as righteous by faith before he was circumcised, how did women—who were never circumcised—participate in the Abrahamic covenant? Dr. E explains that Abraham's righteousness came through faith in Genesis 15:6, and circumcision came later as a sign and seal of that faith. Though only males received the physical mark of circumcision, Dr. E emphasizes that women absolutely participated in the covenant. Like uncircumcised Gentiles who believed, women were counted righteous by faith in Yahweh. The sign of circumcision was given to men as a symbol of being set apart and because the covenant seed passed through the male line. But the covenant itself—and its blessings—extended to all who believed, regardless of gender. Women participated fully in the Abrahamic covenant by their belief in the promises of God. Their faith, not ritual, was what God honored. This reinforces a key biblical truth: righteousness and covenant inclusion have always been by faith. Abraham's story serves as a timeless reminder that it is belief in God—not outward signs—that defines belonging in His family. Takeaways: Abraham was declared righteous by faith before he was ever circumcised. Circumcision was a sign of the covenant, not the source of righteousness. Women participated in the covenant by faith, just like uncircumcised Gentiles. The physical sign was given to men because the seed of the covenant passed through them. Inclusion in God's promises has always been by belief, not by physical rituals. Romans 4 affirms that faith is the defining mark of God's people—then and now. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Journey to a Million Miles: Driver Services Revealed: Your Ultimate Support Network Join Tim Cicciarelli as he explores Stevens Transport's resources for driver success, focusing on the journey to a million miles. Special guest Rachel Easley, Director of Driver Services, delves into crucial support systems like payroll assistance, CDL management, and DOT physical coordination. Highlighting the vital role her experienced team plays, Easley assures drivers receive timely help, enhancing focus on safety and efficiency. Discover how Stevens Transport's robust network empowers drivers to excel in their careers with ease and support, turning logistical challenges into seamless operations. Stevens Transport is proud to welcome Shane Weeks as our new Vice President of Operations. Shane Weeks brings more than 20 years of proven leadership in the transportation industry. Please join us in warmly welcoming Shane Weeks to the Stevens Transport leadership team.  We're excited about the future and what we'll achieve together. Become a Team Driver for Stevens Transport Discover the transformative world of team driving with Stevens Transport in this insightful discussion. Learn how driving with a partner boosts efficiency, earning potential, and safety, while allowing for nearly constant travel and the enjoyment of America's stunning landscapes. Understand how federal regulations intersect with teamwork logistics, enabling over 5,500 miles a week. Insights on rest strategies, like bunk bed sleeping arrangements, are shared. Stevens Transport explains the advantages of choosing your driving partner and how this approach can elevate your trucking career. Explore team driving's benefits and start your journey to success now. Earn More/Team Up - https://vimeo.com/1020240977 Behind the Wheel: How Stevens Transport Transforms Lives Tim Cicciarelli chats with Chansten Bowman about completing his lease with Stevens Transport, highlighting the journey of dedication and the support from mentors like Ryan Turner and Johnny Cox. Chansten reflects on the freedom of being an independent contractor, the guidance available through Stevens Transport, and the importance of resilience and a second chance. He shares experiences that underscore the value of a family-operated business, emphasizing Stevens Transport's commitment to supporting drivers in building successful independent careers. Navigating New Beginnings: Lessons Learned From Starting Over in Trucking Tim Cicciarelli sits down with new Stevens Transport driver, Anthony Jewett, to discuss his journey into trucking. Motivated by his late uncle's advice and the desire to provide for his three sons, Anthony shares insights from his background as a corrections officer and semi-pro football player. Despite a challenging start, including a sidelining accident, Anthony's tenacity leads him back to Stevens Transport for a fresh start. Hear about his training experiences and determination to succeed, reflecting the company's strong focus on safety and excellence in driver training. Pilot/Flying J Rewards App: https://pilotflyingj.com/rewards Become a Driver for Stevens Transport For questions on whether you meet our driver qualifications, please call our Recruiting Department at 1-800-333-8595 or visit: www.stevenstransport.com/drivers/ Stevens Transport 9757 Military Parkway, Dallas, TX 75227 http://www.stevenstransport.com/ http://www.becomeadriver.com/ Driver Recruiting: 1-800-333-8595.  Apply Here: https://intelliapp2.driverapponline.com Paragon Leasing Technician Careers: https://www.stevenstransport.com/careers/fleet-maintenance-jobs/ Stevens Transport on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/StevensTransport

Q: I was reading Daniel 10 recently, and there's some wild stuff in there I'd love to get your thoughts on. Daniel's fasting and mourning for three weeks, and then he's finally met by an angel. The angel says he was sent in response to Daniel's prayer but was delayed for 21 days by the 'spirit prince of Persia.' He goes on to say he left Michael the archangel there to continue fighting the prince of Persia while he came to deliver the message. Then he also mentions needing to go back to fight the 'prince of Greece.' So, I'm just really curious—what does this say about spiritual warfare? More specifically, what do we make of the fact that God sent an angel, but the answer to prayer was apparently delayed by a demonic power? What can we take away from this? How can we apply it to our lives today? Summary In this conversation, Dr. E and Hanna discuss Daniel 10 and what it reveals about spiritual warfare. Prompted by a listener's question about the delayed response to Daniel's prayer, they unpack the unseen realities at play when Daniel is told that his answer was hindered by the “prince of Persia” and aided by the archangel Michael. Dr. E emphasizes that while the Bible gives us glimpses into spiritual battles, it does not provide exhaustive detail. What we do know, from passages like Ephesians 6, is that spiritual warfare is real, it's unseen, and it involves powers beyond human comprehension. Rather than focusing on deliverance language or engaging demons directly, Dr. E stresses the biblical instruction to stand firm, remain alert, and stay rooted in Christ and His Word. The passage reminds us that God's answers to prayer may be delayed—not because He is absent—but because of realities we cannot see. While the idea of angels battling behind the scenes may be mysterious or unsettling, it ultimately points us back to trusting in God's sovereign control. The call for believers is not to fight these battles ourselves but to remain faithful, prayerful, and grounded in biblical truth. Takeaways: Daniel 10 offers a rare glimpse into spiritual warfare, showing unseen conflict among angelic beings. The delay in Daniel's answered prayer reflects a spiritual battle, not God's negligence. Believers should not attempt to “pray out” demons, but instead stand firm in Christ. Scripture teaches us to be alert, resist, and lean on God's word—not to engage directly in cosmic battles. Evil and spiritual principalities often explain what human reasoning cannot, especially societal violence. We trust in God's sovereignty even when we don't fully understand how or why delays occur in the spiritual realm. Links Mentioned: Constable's Notes Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Note: In this episode, Jami talks about her pregnancy—but don't worry, you didn't miss another baby announcement! If you're part of our TFI family, you know her sweet little one has already arrived. This episode was recorded back in January! Sometimes, it can feel like the conversation within the foster care community is predominantly shaped by female voices. While it's wonderful to have such a strong female perspective in this space, it can be a challenge for men to find resources that speak to their unique experiences.  This is the heartbeat behind the Foster Fathers podcast. Hosts Chris Easley and Kyle Seick are striving to create a community where men can learn and grow from one another within the context of foster care.  Chris and Kyle met during virtual foster care training classes in Boise, Idaho. They quickly bonded over shared humor and mutual support as they embarked on their foster care journeys. Together they offer valuable advice, encouragement, and connection to other foster and adoptive fathers who are navigating the joys and struggles that come with this calling. In this episode, you'll hear what inspired Chris and Kyle to become foster fathers, an honest take on some of the challenges of foster care and adoption, common misconceptions about the men and women who become foster parents, and much more. Find resources mentioned and more in the show notes for this episode: https://theforgotteninitiative.org/foster-fathers-271/

Summary In this sermon, Dr. Michael Easley discusses the concept of shame and its implications in the context of faith and the gospel. He emphasizes that while society has moved away from shame, it is important to recognize the power of the gospel, which is the means of salvation for all who believe. Dr. Easley explores the nature of salvation, the righteousness of God revealed through the gospel, and the centrality of faith in receiving this righteousness. He concludes with an invitation to embrace the gift of salvation and the transformative power of faith in Christ. Takeaways There is no shame in the gospel because it is the power of God to save anyone who puts their trust in Christ. Paul emphasizes that salvation through the gospel is not earned by works but given freely by faith, making all people equal before God. Shame surrounding the gospel often stems from pride, fear of misunderstanding, or the perception that the message is foolish. Faith in Christ means trusting in a person—not in one's own effort, religion, or moral standing—to do what we cannot do for ourselves. The gospel reveals the righteousness of God, which is both a divine attribute and a status that God gives to believers. Righteousness before God is not something we achieve, but something God declares over us through Christ, like a judge declaring the guilty not guilty. To read the book of Romans, click here. Click here for other Michael Easley Sermons.

Q: A few years ago, a dear friend and his wife (mid 70's), lost an adult son to a drug overdose. Upon that death, another son (early 50's) confessed to his parents that he, too, was an addict. Since then, the older son has been in and out of drug rehab and has also been incarcerated several times for drug offenses. At the end of their rope, both financially and emotionally, they have given the older son a deadline to be out of the house. While in agreement and at peace (somewhat) with this decision, he and his wife are struggling with the “what if's”. Any wisdom and/or resources that you can share on how these parents can navigate this journey would be greatly appreciated. They are believers. Summary In this conversation, Dr. E reflects on the painful tension between loving and enabling, offering hard-earned wisdom. Addiction wreaks havoc on families. The deception, manipulation, and endless cycle of rehab and relapse can leave even the most committed parents worn thin. The key question becomes: are we actually helping this child take responsibility, or are we preventing that growth by cushioning the consequences? Dr. E urges parents to lock arms in unity, prepare for difficult emotions, and remember that unconditional love doesn't mean underwriting sin. Sometimes love means saying, “I'll help you when you're ready—but I will no longer enable you.” While there may not be easy answers, there is a path to navigating addiction with Biblical wisdom—even when it looks like letting go. Takeaways: Addiction affects not just the individual but the entire family. It's crucial to differentiate between helping and enabling an addict. Setting boundaries is essential for the well-being of the family. Tough love may be necessary to encourage recovery. Support from others who understand the situation is invaluable. Parents should prepare for emotional fallout when making tough decisions. Resources for addiction recovery are available and should be utilized. Recovery often involves multiple attempts and setbacks. Unconditional love does not mean supporting destructive behaviors. Links Mentioned: Focus on the Family's Drug & Addiction Resources Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Summary In this sermon, Dr. Michael Easley emphasizes the importance of prayer, the rapid spread of the gospel, and the personal relationship believers can have with God. He reflects on Paul's gratitude for the faith of the Roman believers and the significance of their reputation in the Christian community. Dr. Easley encourages listeners to pray unceasingly and to be eager in sharing the gospel, drawing parallels between Paul's mission and the modern-day call to action for believers. Takeaways: True worship begins when we set aside distractions and let God's Word transform us, not just inform us. The gospel is not slow or bound by time—it spreads faster than news and changes hearts more deeply than headlines. Paul's thanksgiving through Jesus Christ reminds us that gratitude and access to God always come through our one Mediator. You can't manufacture a faithful reputation—when Christ takes root, the world of believers takes notice. Prayer is not optional for the believer; it is the ongoing work of worship and the evidence of a heart aligned with God's. Encouragement in the body of Christ is mutual—we are built up when we give and receive spiritual gifts in fellowship. To read the book of Romans, click here. Click here for other Michael Easley Sermons.

Q: Not sure if this is the right place to ask this question, but I'm curious what your take is on spiritual attacks in dreams? Do you think it's possible that one growing in their faith could be being attacked by the other realm during sleep or is just simply bad dreams? Summary In this conversation, Dr. E and Hanna discuss the complexities of dreams, particularly in relation to spiritual attacks and the influence of faith. They emphasize the reality of spiritual warfare, the importance of prayer, and how a strong foundation in Christ can mitigate fears associated with nightmares. The discussion also touches on parenting, encouraging children to focus on positive thoughts and dreams, and the significance of being aware of the content they consume. Bottom line? Dreams aren't where the real battle lies. It's about who and what you trust. Stand firm in your identity in Christ, resist the devil, and let God's Word shape your peace. The believer's strength is not in dream interpretation—but in the indwelling power of the Spirit. Takeaways: -Demons are real, but the Holy Spirit who indwells believers is far more powerful. -Satan can tempt but cannot control a Christian's dreams or thoughts. -Obsessing over dreams or mysticism can lead to spiritual vulnerability. -Scripture and prayer are the best defenses against spiritual anxiety—even during sleep. -Teach children to end their day focused on God to guard their imagination and rest. -Stand firm in faith, not fear—Christ has already won the battle. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

The Fruit of the Spirit - Chris Easley by

Q: My husband and I are looking at the option of IVF in our fertility journey. Do you think that there is a biblical way to go about this process?  Summary In this conversation, Dr. E and Hanna discuss the emotional and ethical complexities of infertility, focusing on whether there is a biblical way to go about IVF. They explore key questions couples must ask—most importantly, why they want to have children—and emphasize the need for unity between spouses before pursuing any path. Drawing from personal experience and trusted Christian ethics resources, Dr. E highlights issues surrounding embryo creation, selection, and storage, as well as the emotional weight of long-term outcomes. They stress that neither IVF nor adoption is for everyone and that wisdom, prayer, and sound counsel are essential. Takeaways Adoption and IVF are not for everyone. Understanding the 'why' behind wanting a child is crucial. The ethical implications of embryo handling are significant. Couples should set a time frame for IVF procedures. Seek good counsel from trusted sources. Be cautious of advice from those with different experiences. God may provide children in unexpected ways. Links Mentioned Dr. Joy Riley interview Outside The Womb by Dr. Joy Riley and Scott Rae Focus on the family IVF article Wayne Grudem IVF article Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

As this episode hits, it is the final Monday of the school year.  And, well, I guess folks around the International Podcasting Headquarters of Kingdom Culture Conversations are feeling a bit reflective.  So, G and Geoff invited in Beth Easley, as fine an alumni of Northwest Christian as one will find, to reflect on her experiences within the school.  Foundational to it all is Beth's commitment to ministry within the local church as well as her countless experiences on the mission field."Kingdom Culture Conversations" is a podcast created through Frameworks, a Biblical worldview initiative of Northwest Christian School.For more information on Frameworks, please visit: https://frameworks.ncsaz.org/For more information on Northwest Christian School, visit: https://www.ncsaz.org/To reach out to Geoff Brown, please email gbrown@ncsaz.org or you can reach him by cell phone: (623)225-5573.

Summary In this sermon, Dr. Michael Easley shares profound insights on living a Christ-centered life, emphasizing the importance of selflessness, purpose, and the impact of sin. He discusses the necessity of seeking godly counsel, the journey of personal growth, and the dangers of comparison. Dr. Easley encourages listeners to own their present circumstances while planning for the future, and to cultivate an immovable faith amidst life's challenges. He concludes with a call to integrity and courage in living out one's faith. Takeaways Live for Christ, not for self. Live with purpose. Seek good and godly counsel. Our Sins Have a Greater Impact Than We Want to Acknowledge, But Christ's Forgiveness Has Greater Effect Than We Understand. Maturity is When You Stop Blaming Your Past, Own Your Present, and Plan Your Future. Be a Lifelong Student of God's Word. Comparison is The Kiss of Death to Contentment. Ask God Not Merely For a Miracle, But For An Immovable Faith. This Life, at Best, is a Clean Bus Station. Be The Person Christ Wants You to be No Matter What. To read the gospel of John, click here. Click here for other Michael Easley Sermons.

Q: In regards to the Lord's Supper, can you explain 1 Corinthians 10:14-17? That text has always been a conundrum for me. Summary In this conversation, Dr. E and Hanna address a question regarding the Lord's Supper, specifically focusing on 1 Corinthians 10:14-17. They explore the complexities of the passage, emphasizing the importance of understanding the elements of communion and their significance in Christian fellowship. The discussion also touches on various theological perspectives, including the concept of transubstantiation and the implications of idolatry in relation to the Lord's Supper. Takeaways The Lord's Supper is a significant aspect of Christian worship. Idolatry is a key theme in understanding the Lord's Supper. The elements of communion symbolize unity in the body of Christ. Proclaiming the Lord's death is central to the practice of communion. The act of communion should be both a moment of reflection and celebration. Understanding the context of the Lord's Supper can enhance its meaning. The Lord's Supper anticipates Christ's return and the hope of renewal. Links Mentioned ADE 228: During Communion, Does The Bread and Wine Change Into Christ's Body and Blood? Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Summary In this sermon, Dr. Michael Easley reflects on a powerful moment of restoration for Peter in the Gospel of John. After denying Jesus three times, Peter is confronted by the Savior at a charcoal fire—the same place of his denial. Jesus asks him three times, “Do you love me?” This isn't just a question of affection but a call to action: "Feed my lambs. Shepherd my sheep." Dr. Easley reminds us that love for God isn't only about words but is demonstrated through our actions. For Peter, it meant caring for God's people. For us, it's about investing in what God loves—His church and His mission. Jesus reaffirms Peter's calling, and in doing so, calls us all to serve, guide, and nurture those entrusted to us. Takeaways Peter's restoration exemplifies the depth of God's grace and forgiveness. Jesus' questions to Peter reveal the profound love He desires. Following Christ requires sacrifice and a life of obedience. God's grace overflows for those who turn back to Him in repentance. Our love for God should be evident in every part of our lives. Obedience to God reflects the sincerity of our love for Him. Life's challenges reveal the true strength of our commitment to Christ. The call to follow Jesus is personal, clear, and unshakable. To read the gospel of John, click here. Click here for other Michael Easley Sermons.

Q: How did Pharaoh know to use his magicians and dark arts when Moses was coming to meet with him? Moses was basically dealing with “hostage“ negotiations to let the Israelites go free— seems like it would be a matter of negotiating terms rather than conjuring up the dark arts? Since the Old Testament is a foreshadow of things now, do you think that wicked power in high places is being used today? In a massive, behind the scenes way?  Summary In this conversation, Dr. E and Hanna address questions about the use of dark arts in biblical times, particularly in relation to Pharaoh and Moses. They explore the nature of evil in today's world, emphasizing the importance of standing firm in faith and focusing on the personal work of Christ rather than being distracted by demonic influences. The discussion also highlights the role of prayer in spiritual warfare and critiques literary works that delve into the nature of evil, advocating for a focus on biblical truths instead. Takeaways Pharaoh's magicians show that spiritual deception has always been a tool of the enemy. The true battle was about who is God, not about political negotiations. Evil influence still exists behind power structures today. Christians are called to stand firm, not obsess over spiritual warfare. Scripture gives us enough — we don't need to over-study the demonic realm. Prayer is our main response to unseen battles, not fascination or fear. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Summary In this sermon, Dr. Michael Easley explores the extremes of Christian spiritual life: striving through discipline versus letting go entirely, often falling into functional deism or mystical experiences. He reflects on how people swing between controlling every aspect of their faith to completely giving up, and challenges whether the spiritual life is really about finding balance between these extremes. The sermon culminates in Jesus' invitation: “Come have breakfast.” He emphasizes the warmth and humanity of this moment—Jesus, resurrected and divine, shares a simple meal with his friends. It's a poignant reminder that amidst confusion or failure, Christ meets us where we are—with grace, restoration, and fellowship. Dr. Easley ultimately encourages believers to return to Scripture and relationship with Jesus, rather than chasing control or mystical experiences. Takeaways Avoid the Extremes of the Christian life. Jesus shows up in our daily routines, not just the dramatic moments. Obedience Often Comes Before we fully recognize God's hand. Jesus restores us gently, meeting failure with forgiveness and grace. Jesus calls us “children” to affirm our beloved identity in Him. What Jesus desires most is connection with us, not our perfect performance. To read the gospel of John, click here. Click here for other Michael Easley Sermons.

What if you wanted to make up your own rules for grieving and do what feels right for you? That's EXACTLY what Diane Easley decided to do. This is an incredibly honest and inspiring conversation with Diane Easley, who graciously shared her journey through widowhood after suddenly losing her husband, Walter, in 2017.  I know you will enjoy it and all of the wisdom she shares!What “Doing Grief Your Own Way” Really Looks LikeDiane's story starts with the unexpected loss of her husband while he was away on a work trip in Florida—a devastating call that changed everything in an instant. What followed wasn't a prescribed script of grief, but a deeply mindful, authentic approach rooted in self-awareness and honoring what she needed, not what tradition or others expected.Diane's Approach to Grieving:Intentionality Over Expectations: Diane realized early on that there isn't a “right way” to mourn. Wearing black, lighting a candle at the one-year mark, and “moving on” wasn't the real answer! Documenting the Realness: She began sharing daily reflections on Instagram—sometimes about a broken watering can that brought her to her knees in grief, other days about the surprising moments of joy she allowed herself to feel.Setting Boundaries: Diane put a sign on her front door, politely asking visitors not to knock or ring the doorbell, but to quietly come in if the door was open. “It makes people be thoughtful when they show up,” she added—it was what she needed to feel safe and respected during her most vulnerable days.Be sure to check out the latest workbook in the Widow 180 Workbook series, The Boost Your Confidence Level After Loss Workbook available for immediate download now!If you are tired of feeling scared and letting fear run your life, this workbook is for you!Get it at https://widow180.kit.com/products/confidence Be sure to join our Facebook group, Widow 180 The Community: https://www.facebook.com/groups/312036956454927Also follow us on Insta: https://www.instagram.com/widow_180/Check us out on YouTube at Widow 180: The Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-DK_dl31qMilJ5cE6t9MVQFor more blog posts and resources go to www.widow180.comQuestions? Email me at jen@widow180.com

Q: Growing up in the 80s and 90s, having Christian ideals was about as common as speaking English.  Sunday lessons were “winsome”, and friends I invited usually came back. I never felt at odds with society, ever.  It was much easier to be a Christian, even when a few disagreed.  Those Sundays, Wednesday night bible studies, and church camps had a lasting positive effect on me. Fast forward 30- 40 years, and it seems much more difficult to speak openly about what we believe.  Our values are openly being targeted, and a Christian is wondering if the 90s playbook still works?  Should we respond to these attacks “winsomely”, with grace/peace?  Or should Christians go on the attack to get our values back?  How best to do this in 2024?  Appreciate your thoughts! P.s. We've been to several local churches over the last ten years.  In our experience, about 80% still use the winsome technique, while about 15-20% seem to be taking the Don't Tread On Me approach.  What is “The Way”? Summary In this conversation, Dr. E and Hanna discuss the evolving nature of Christianity, the importance of effective communication within the church, and the resilience of the church despite cultural challenges. Dr. E emphasizes the need for clarity in messaging and the significance of being involved in the church community. Takeaways: Churches change, but Christ's mission doesn't. Biblical truth should be taught plainly, not watered down. The Church has always been messy, but God calls us to love. Less theological depth = weaker pulpits. Show up. Serve. Be part of the Church you want to see. God preserves His Church, no matter the attacks. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Summary In this sermon, Dr. Michael Easley addresses the reality of doubt in the Christian life, using the story of “Doubting Thomas” to encourage believers. He begins by acknowledging the many doubts people wrestle with—about the Bible's truth, salvation, God's justice, and the concept of hell—and candidly admits that he, too, has doubted. Dr. Easley walks through the resurrection appearances of Jesus, starting with Mary Magdalene at the empty tomb. Mary initially looks for a dead body, not a risen Savior, illustrating how grief can cloud recognition of God's work. When Jesus calls her by name, she finally recognizes Him—reminding us of His personal relationship with His followers. Takeaways Doubts are a common part of the faith journey. Mary Magdalene's grief turns to joy upon encountering Jesus. The physical resurrection of Jesus is significant for believers. The Holy Spirit empowers the disciples for their mission. Believing without seeing is a blessed state. Grief can be transformed by faith in Christ. Faith in Christ leads to joy and salvation.  To read the gospel of John, click here. Click here for other Michael Easley Sermons.

Q: Dear Dr. E, I have often wondered about the meaning of Jesus' parable in Luke 16:1-8, the shrewd manager. Can you explain? Summary In this conversation, Dr. E and Hanna discuss the parable of the shrewd manager from Luke 16, exploring its context, the actions of the characters, and the lessons it imparts about shrewdness and stewardship. Dr. E emphasizes the importance of understanding the cultural background of the parable and how it relates to other biblical stories, particularly in the context of Jesus' teachings on wealth and morality. Takeaways: Context is crucial for understanding biblical parables. Jesus used parables to challenge societal norms and expectations. The master in the parable represents a figure of mercy and generosity. The parable encourages believers to leverage worldly resources for good. Understanding the cultural context enhances interpretation of scripture. Jesus' teachings often subvert traditional views of righteousness. The parable of the shrewd manager ties into broader themes of grace and redemption. Links Mentioned: Kenneth Bailey on parables Poet & Peasant and Through Peasant Eyes by Kenneth Bailey Jacob and the Prodigal by Kenneth Bailey The Good Shepherd by Kenneth Bailey "Reading Luke," Charles Talbert Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Pantheon Resources was listed in 2006 as an independent UK based oil and gas exploration company focused on hydrocarbon producing basins located onshore USA – a region of low sovereign risk, abundant infrastructure and established oil and gas markets. Pantheon now has a host of discovered resources that it has continued to mature as the Company has transitioned from what was an early-stage speculative exploration company, into an appraisal company with an intention of becoming a development and production company after FID is reached on its Ahpun project which is targeted for late 2025. Over the years, Pantheon has used its proprietary data set to carefully and strategically build and optimize its acreage position across the ANS where it now owns 100% working interest across c.258,000 contiguous acres covering the Kodiak and Ahpun projects and is the Operator.

Q: Are gifts of the Spirit as detailed in 1st Corinthians, chapters 11-13 still applicable or are they no longer relevant/needed in this day and age?  Summary In this conversation, Dr. Michael Easley and Hanna Seymour discuss the relevance of spiritual gifts as outlined in 1 Corinthians, emphasizing their purpose and application in today's church. He explores the distinction between miraculous gifts and the innate abilities individuals possess. He encourages listeners to understand and utilize their unique gifts in service to others. The discussion also touches on the importance of love as the foundation for all spiritual gifts. Takeaways: Spiritual gifts are grace gifts given for the common good. The purpose of sign gifts was authentication of the apostles. Miracles are different from the gifts of the Spirit. Spiritual gifts can align with one's natural abilities. Love is the greatest of all gifts and should underpin all actions. The lists of spiritual gifts in the Bible are not exhaustive. Each person is uniquely created and gifted by God. Understanding your gifts can enhance your service in the church. Gifts may evolve as a person grows in faith. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

From bankruptcy to Buffalo Wild Wings to building a multi-million dollar paint party business—Heidi Easley's story is one for the books.

Summary: In this conversation, Michael Easley and Dr. Calvin Beisner discuss the intersection of faith, environmental stewardship, and poverty. They explore Beisner's journey into stewardship, the founding of the Cornwall Alliance, and the importance of prioritizing human needs in environmental discussions. They also touch on the recent publication of Megan Basham's book, 'Shepherds for Sale,' which critiques the evangelical environmental movement and the influence of money in faith-based organizations. The dialogue emphasizes the need for accountability and critical engagement within the Christian community.  Dr. Beisner and Dr. Easley discuss the importance of critical thinking and reading in developing a Christian worldview. They emphasize the need for Christians to engage deeply with scripture and literature to sharpen their minds. The discussion also delves into the green agenda, exploring the implications of environmentalism from a biblical perspective, including the trade-offs involved in energy production and the impact on the poor. Takeaways: Human beings should be the top priority of all life. Poverty is a tragic reality that many have never seen. The principles of the Cornwall Declaration remain applicable today. Public figures should be held accountable for their statements. Critique should be expected in public discourse. Discipline in thought is essential for Christians. Logic is a vital tool in understanding faith. We need to pay attention to sharpening our thinking. Critical thinking skills are lost in most education. Social media contributes to a decline in reading. Reading a real Bible is essential for understanding scripture. Engaging with literature enhances critical thinking. The green agenda often overlooks human welfare. Trade-offs exist in environmental policies. Fossil fuels are crucial for modern life. Rising energy costs disproportionately affect the poor. LINKS MENTIONED: Shepherd's For Sale by Megan Basham  Climate and Energy: The Case For Realism by Cal Beisner and David Legates The Cornwall Alliance  Watch the highlights and full version of this interview on our Youtube channel. For more inContext interviews, click here.

Q: I am a minister of music, and I've been reading through the Pentateuch to study the foundations of the Israelites' worship... and I've hit a theme I'm curious about, application-wise, for the church today. In Deut. 7:25–26, God orders the pre-conquest Israelites to completely destroy the idols of the pagans when they overtake their cities, saying, "Don't covet the silver or gold on the images and take it for yourself, or else it will ensnare you." I grew up during the "height" of the traditional/contemporary "worship wars" controversy, and while I never really took a side, I find church members on both sides can idolize styles of music (or even music itself). However, I found that those against contemporary styles usually went the farthest in their rejection, saying it's "too worldly." My question: is there anything Scripture has to say as a litmus between "redeeming" secular (or maybe even godless) things for Christ's Church, and being "ensnared by the gold and silver" of worldly standards, trends, and styles? Summary In this conversation, Dr. Michael Easley and Hanna Seymour explores the complexities of worship music, particularly the divide between contemporary and traditional styles. He highlights the importance of education in helping congregations understand and appreciate diverse musical expressions. The discussion also covers the role of songwriters, the distinction between secular and sacred music, and the impact of personal preferences on worship experiences. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com. Takeaways: You cannot please everybody in worship. Education is essential for understanding worship music. All truth is God's truth, regardless of the source. Music is a creation of God, meant for His glory. Every songwriter has flaws, but their work can still be valuable. Congregations can sing secular songs with a different perspective. Understanding your congregation's preferences is crucial for worship leaders. Education can enhance appreciation for diverse music styles. Worship leaders have the power to shape congregational experiences. Personal preferences should not hinder worship. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Last time we spoke about the invasion of Iwo Jima. In March 1945, as the Pacific War raged, the US Marines began and invasion of Iwo Jima while Allied forces advanced across the Philippines. The Japanese formed the 32nd Army to defend the island, but faced shortages of supplies and equipment. They mobilized Okinawan civilians for support and constructed extensive fortifications. The Americans launched Operation Iceberg, neutralizing enemy air facilities in the Ryukyus, Kyushu, and Formosa. Task Force 58 and other air forces struck Japanese targets, while Spruance's 5th Fleet prepared to land Buckner's 10th Army. Initial landings occurred in the Kerama Islands, followed by the main assault on April 1 on Okinawa's Hagushi beaches. Despite heavy bombardment, Japanese defenses remained concealed. The Americans encountered minimal resistance initially, but the stage was set for a bloody and brutal battle. This episode is Yamato's Last Stand Welcome to the Pacific War Podcast Week by Week, I am your dutiful host Craig Watson. But, before we start I want to also remind you this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Perhaps you want to learn more about world war two? Kings and Generals have an assortment of episodes on world war two and much more  so go give them a look over on Youtube. So please subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry for some more history related content, over on my channel, the Pacific War Channel you can find a few videos all the way from the Opium Wars of the 1800's until the end of the Pacific War in 1945.  As we last left off, Admirals Turner and Spruance successfully landed over 60,000 troops from General Buckner's 10th Army on the Hagushi beaches of Okinawa with minimal resistance. In response, General Ushijima's main forces remained inactive in their underground positions in the south, having effectively endured the continuous naval and air assaults from the enemy. However, under pressure from higher authorities in Tokyo and Formosa, the 32nd Army began to develop plans for a general counteroffensive aimed at the Yontan and Kadena airfields, utilizing nighttime infiltration and close combat tactics. The primary response, however, was expected to come from the air. As part of Operation Ten-Go, all Army and Navy air forces stationed in the Home Islands were to focus their efforts in the East China Sea to execute a series of coordinated mass air strikes against enemy transport and carrier task forces, collectively referred to as the Kikisui attacks. Japan's wartime terminology exploited the distinctively poetic and euphemistic nature of the Japanese language. The informal term kamikaze actually means “divine wind.” Specifically, kamikaze refers to the typhoons that miraculously wrecked Kublai Khan's Mongol–Koryo invasion fleets in 1274. Like “blitzkrieg”, the unofficial term “kamikaze” was mostly used by Allied journalists. The IJN and IJA officially called suicide attack units tokubetsu kogekitai, meaning “special attack unit.” This was usually shortened to tokkutai, with tokko both noun and adjective meaning “special” i.e. suicide. Kikisui was the codename for the ten mass kamikaze attacks off Okinawa against the Allied fleet. Kikisui means “floating chrysanthemum,” which was the war emblem of legendary 14th-century samurai Masashige Kusinoke, a national exemplar of sacrificial devotion to the Emperor. Ten-Go had been initiated on March 26, following the initial landings on the Kerama Islands; however, by the time of the invasion, Admiral Toyoda's disorganized Combined Fleet was unable to carry out any large-scale kamikaze attacks, as it was still consolidating approximately 3,000 aircraft in Kyushu. Additionally, encouraged by Emperor Hirohito, Toyoda momentarily sanctioned a dramatic, one-way suicide mission involving the superbattleship Yamato and Rear-Admiral Komura Keizo's 2nd Destroyer Squadron, aimed at destroying Spruance's invasion fleet. This surface attack mission, codenamed Ten-Ichi-Go and led by Vice-Admiral Ito Seiichi of the 2nd Fleet, vaguely suggested that if Yamato reached Okinawa, she would ground herself as an artillery platform while her crew disembarked as naval infantry. Nonetheless, the chances of success for this mission were slim; it was primarily intended for the Imperial Japanese Navy to maintain its honor. On April 2, while General Watson's 2nd Marine Division conducted another demonstration off the southeast beaches, American forces prepared to advance eastward. In the south, benefiting from ideal weather and minimal resistance, the 17th Regiment secured the highlands overlooking Nakagusuku Bay and extended its patrols to the bay's shoreline. The 32nd Regiment eliminated a strongpoint south of Koza using tanks and then aligned with the 17th. The 381st Regiment advanced through Shimabuku but faced enemy resistance in and around Momobaru. Meanwhile, the 383rd Regiment captured a hill just south of Momobaru after a fierce battle and also took a ridge northeast of Futema with support from airstrikes, artillery, and tanks. In the north, however, General Geiger's Marines faced challenging terrain and supply issues. The 1st Battalion, 29th Marines moved north to secure the unoccupied Zampa Misaki area, where Turner later established a radar station. The 22nd Marines advanced quickly eastward throughout the day against light opposition, successfully securing the Nagahama beaches alongside the 6th Reconnaissance Company. On the other hand, the 4th Marines met with steadily mounting resistance. At 1100 a platoon of 3/4, entering the mouth of a steep ravine was met by a sharp fusillade of small-arms fire, which revealed a series of mutually supporting caves on both sides of the draw. In the fire fight that ensued, 12 wounded men were isolated and not recovered for four hours. "Every means of painlessly destroying the strongpoint was unsuccessfully tried and it was finally taken by a typical 'Banzai' charge, with one platoon entering the mouth of the draw and one platoon coming down one side of the two noses that formed the pocket."  The 1st Marine Division continued its advance with little resistance to the Ishimmi-Kutoku line, also extending southward to Chatan, while the 1st Marines moved past the 5th Marines toward Chibana. With approximately 6,000 yards separating General Del Valle's main frontline units from the 7th Division, General Arnold decided to send Colonel Roy Greene's 184th Regiment to fill this significant gap. At sea, Admiral Mitscher's Task Force 58 launched a strike against Amami Oshima, sinking three vessels and damaging two others, while also witnessing four warships collide and sustain damage. In retaliation, Admiral Ugaki's Kyushu aircraft force conducted sporadic kamikaze attacks, resulting in damage to five transports. The next day, General Hodge's 24th Corps shifted its focus southward. The 17th Regiment secured the rear areas and captured Awase, while the 32nd Regiment advanced approximately 5,000 yards along Nakagusuku Bay to occupy Kuba and establish its lines in front of Hill 165. The 381st Regiment took control of Kishaba and Atanniya but failed in its assaults on Hill 165 and Unjo. Meanwhile, the 383rd Regiment swiftly occupied Isa, Chiyunna, and the Futema high ground. Looking north, Del Valle dispatched the 1st Reconnaissance Company to scout the area along the corps boundary, sweep the Katchin Peninsula, and patrol back up the east coast to the village of Hizaonna. This maneuver enabled the 1st Marines to advance quickly in formation and reach the sea wall overlooking the northern end of Nakagusuku Bay by nightfall. Concurrently, the 5th Marines moved forward and successfully occupied Agina and Tengan; the 7th Marines gained around 2,700 yards of enemy territory and ultimately reached Hizaonna, although Company K became lost and was ambushed. The 4th Marines navigated the challenging terrain and light enemy resistance to secure the significant hill mass behind Yontan airfield, located 3,000 yards short of the east coast. The 22nd Marines advanced and successfully captured Nakadomari, along with a position 400 yards south of that line. Meanwhile, the 6th Reconnaissance Company, supported by armored units, crossed the Ishikawa Isthmus to the village of Ishikawa, where they faced mortar fire. At sea, Mitscher's aircraft carriers targeted Okinawa, sinking two vessels and damaging two others. In response, Ugaki was finally able to launch a preliminary mass Ten-Go air attack, with 119 aircraft causing damage to the escort carrier Wake Island, the destroyers Bennett, Prichett, and Foreman, the minesweeper Hambelton, and two landing craft. Due to significant advancements, Geiger successfully deployed Colonel Victor Bleasdale's 29th Marines to take control of the Yontan airfield and other rear areas. To the south, Del Valle's units moved toward the eastern shore of Okinawa, with the 1st Marines occupying the Katchin Peninsula without facing any resistance, while the 5th and 7th Marine Regiments secured the coastline in their designated zones. Further south, after splitting the island in two, Hodge began advancing toward Naha, targeting the hill mass stretching from Urasoe-Mura to Hill 178 and Ouki. In response, General Bradley positioned Colonel Macey Dill's 382nd Regiment in front of Nodake, while the 184th Regiment moved through the 381st in the Attaniya-Unjo area. For the initial push toward the Uchitomari-Tsuwa line, the 383rd Regiment advanced quickly from Isa to Mashiki, where they were ultimately halted by heavy fire from the south. The 382nd advanced over two miles south from Nodake along the eastern boundary of the division, while Arnold's forward units lagged about two miles behind due to moderate resistance at a high, wooded ridge parallel to the coastline just west of Kuba. Meanwhile, at sea, Ugaki launched only sporadic kamikaze attacks, which resulted in damage to the destroyer Wilson near the Kerama Islands. Additionally, two American vessels collided while Task Force 58 targeted Okinawa, and later that night, a suicide boat attacked and sank an LCI gunboat. In the Attaniya-Unjo area, the 383rd Regiment made a swift advance from Isa to Mashiki as part of the initial push towards the Uchitomari-Tsuwa line. However, the following day marked the onset of fierce resistance on Okinawa, with the 383rd Regiment struggling to make headway against the formidable Japanese defenses on Cactus Ridge. Meanwhile, the 382nd Regiment continued its advance southward against a series of fortified positions, achieving gains of approximately 400 yards to the east and 900 yards to the west. The 184th Regiment moved through Arakachi but was halted by intense and precise fire from a rocky outcrop located about 1,000 yards southwest. The 32nd Regiment finally managed to capture Castle Hill before pushing more than two miles along the coast to a point east of Ukuma. To the north, while the 1st Marine Division shifted to a primarily defensive posture, the 6th Marine Division conducted active reconnaissance toward the Motobu Peninsula, advancing the front to the Atsutabaru-Chima line. Additionally, a patrol from the 1st Marines on the Katchin Peninsula crossed the reef to seize Yabuchi Island swiftly. At sea, there were no kamikaze attacks that day as Ugaki and Toyoda prepared to launch the main phase of Operation Ten-Go, although an Okinawa shore battery managed to hit the battleship Nevada. Unbeknownst to the Japanese, American intelligence had successfully intercepted Combined Fleet codes, allowing them to anticipate the details of the surface Ten-Ichi-Go attack. Consequently, Spruance's warships were prepared for the imminent departure of Ito's “Surface Special Attack Force,” which was executed a few hours later. Additionally, Ushijima was instructed to initiate a strong counterattack the following day to coincide with Ten-Ichi-Go and the first Kikisui attack, but he firmly rejected this order and called for the cancellation of the unnecessarily suicidal surface attack. During the night, as Admiral Blandy's minesweepers completed the perilous task of clearing the vast areas of Chimu and Nakagusuku Bays, the Fleet Marine Force Amphibious Reconnaissance Battalion landed on the northern coast of Tsugen Island to gather intelligence on enemy positions. Upon their arrival in the early hours of April 6, they encountered machine-gun and mortar fire, which ultimately compelled the battalion to retreat to the beach and reembark. Simultaneously, the 4th and 29th Marine Regiments advanced through the 22nd Marine Regiment, with the 29th Marines moving up the west coast in formation and reaching Chuda by noon, while the 4th Marines progressed along the eastern coastal road, successfully advancing seven miles toward Madaira. Further south, the 383rd Regiment continued its assault on the fortified enemy positions at Cactus Ridge, pushing forward relentlessly until they secured the western half by nightfall. The 2d Battalion, 383d Infantry, made frontal assaults through intense mortar fire to gain the ridge. "We figured," S/Sgt. Francis M. Rall later wrote, "that the way to get out of that knee mortar fire was to get to where it was coming from. So we stood up in waves, firing everything we had and throwing hand grenades by the dozen, and charged the Jap position." By such tactics the 2d Battalion gained the western half of Cactus.  Over the next two days, the 382nd Regiment advanced slowly east of the Ginowan road, facing fierce resistance from the Tombstone and Nishibaru Ridges. After a 10-minute artillery bombardment, two companies of the 1st Battalion, 184th Regiment climbed nearly to the summit of the Pinnacle but were ultimately pushed back by strong resistance from caves and underground strongholds. Undeterred, Company B continued frontal assaults while Company C maneuvered up the western approaches to surprise the determined defenders. This strategy proved effective, with Company C reaching the top without sustaining any casualties and then methodically eliminating the remaining Japanese troops using white phosphorus grenades and flamethrowers. As the Pinnacle was being captured, the 32nd Regiment advanced across the coastal flatlands with minimal resistance to maintain contact with the 184th Regiment. On this day, Task Force 58 returned to sea, launching strikes on Okinawa and the Daito Islands, while Admiral Rawlings' Task Force 57 targeted the Ishigaki and Miyako Islands. Meanwhile, Japanese aerial reconnaissance identified two American carrier groups near Okinawa, prompting Ugaki to initiate his first mass Kikisui attack, sending hundreds of Japanese aircraft to assault Mitscher's carriers. US carriers unleashed a combined 19 USN and four USMC squadrons to blunt the onslaught. Swirling, running dogfights developed around noon and lasted through sunset. April 6 may have started slow, but by evening it had developed into one of the greatest aerial confrontations of all time. American CAPs overwhelmingly massacred the poorly trained Japanese attackers; Mitscher's Task Force 58 fighters claimed 249 Japanese planes for just two lost—a staggering 125-to-1 kill ratio. Yet the kamikaze pilots' grim determination was chillingly apparent. According to VF-82's action report: “Of all the enemy planes encountered, not one returned fire, all remained on course, boring in toward the surface vessels. The only evasive action offered was jinking, and the majority of the aircraft were obsolete models as can be seen by the list [of] destroyed. Primary danger to our pilots was collision or getting in the path of a friendly plane's fire.” Essex's VF-83 (36 Hellcats) and VBF-83 (36 Corsairs) combined for 69 kills, while Belleau Wood's 24 VF-30 Hellcats shot down 47. Belleau Wood's skipper, Captain Red Tomlinson, duly signaled Task Group 58.1's Rear Admiral Joseph J. Jocko Clark: “Does this exceed the bag limit?” Clark responded, “Negative. There is no limit. This is open season. Well done.” The US carrier fighters' 275 kills was thus the war's 4th-highest 1-day total. 13 US pilots achieved ace status (scored their 5th kill) on April 6, with 4 becoming “ace-in-a-day.” 10 pilots claimed 4 kills, while another 17 shot down 3 each. Combined with anti-aircraft fire, the Americans destroyed 355 Japanese planes. However, even significant aerial victories could not prevent the devastating kamikaze assaults, with approximately 182 Japanese aircraft in 22 groups attacking Spruance's 5th Fleet that afternoon. This led to 24 kamikaze planes sinking the destroyers Bush and Colhoun, as well as three transport ships, and inflicting further damage on the light carrier San Jacinto, 12 destroyers, three destroyer minesweepers, and one minesweeper. Friendly anti-aircraft fire also caused damage to battleship North Carolina, light cruiser Pasadena, and destroyer Hutchins. Despite the extensive damage, four new escort carriers arrived off Okinawa that day, bringing the first 222 fighters of Major-General Francis Mulcahy's Tactical Air Force, stationed at Yontan airfield. Meanwhile, the Yamato force set sail at 15:24 towards Okinawa, but within 45 minutes, a B-29 spotted them in transit. Submarine Threadfin then detected Ito's strike force moving through the Bungo Strait at 17:45. As Ito's force rounded Kyushu to the southwest, it was monitored overnight by submarine Hackleback, which sent four additional contact reports and was pursued three times briefly by one of Yamato's escorting destroyers. Concerned about a potential mass Kikisui attack on April 7, Spruance ordered Mitscher's carriers to concentrate on thwarting Japanese air assaults while tasking Admiral Deyo's Task Force 54 with intercepting Ito's strike force. At 06:20, April 7, six Zeros of the 203rd Kokutai arrived over Yamato as CAP. 14 total Zeros would relay in small groups over the Yamato task force, but all would depart as scheduled by 10:00. The Americans already knew the exact CAP schedule of Yamato's fighters, a later US intelligence memo dryly observing, “They left too soon.” At 08:32, an Essex Hellcat reported the Yamato task force southwest of Koshiki Retto at a heading of 300 degrees. The Yamato group was doing 22kts and deployed in a diamond formation, with Yamato in the center and Yahagi astern. Yamato simultaneously reported that she had been sighted. Visibility was highly variable, with patchy overcast. Within minutes, two VPB-21 PBM-3 Mariner flying boats (based at Kerama Retto with seaplane tender Chandeleur) arrived and began shadowing Yamato and radioing situation reports. Meanwhile, Mitscher duly reported the Yamato sighting to Spruance, before dispatching 16 additional fighters at 09:15 to track Yamato. Shortly after Yamato's CAP had departed, at 10:14, the Japanese discovered the two shadowing PBM-3 Mariners, and simultaneously reported a US submarine stalking the task force—this was Hackleback, which had managed to catch back up with the zig-zagging Japanese. Three minutes later, at 10:17, Yamato turned towards the Mariners and opened fire with her awesome 18.1in. Sanshikidan anti-aircraft shells. Yahagi also opened fire, and additionally began jamming the Mariners' transmissions. The Mariners retreated into the clouds unharmed at 10:18, and Yamato and Yahagi ceased fire. To his chief-of-staff, Commodore Arleigh Burke, Mitscher announced: “Inform Admiral Spruance that I propose to strike the Yamato sortie group at 1200hrs unless otherwise directed.” The grizzled aviator desperately wished to sink Yamato, but he likely suspected that Spruance, riding New Mexico, intended his beloved dreadnoughts claim one last moment of glory. “Will you take them or shall I?” Mitscher pressed. Spruance's response: “You take them.” At 10:00, the carriers of Task Groups 58.1 and 58.3 launched the first wave of 282 aircraft, although only 227 managed to locate Ito's strike force as they navigated through challenging, overcast weather. At 11:07, Yamato's radars detected the large formation approaching from 63 nautical miles away, prompting Ito to increase speed to 25 knots. Within eight minutes, the formation closed to 44 nautical miles, leading the Japanese to initiate sharp evasive maneuvers. Bennington's Lieutenant-Commander Hugh Woods' airborne radar detected the Yamato task force some 25nm away from its predicted location, and the US strike altered course. Five minutes later, the Americans made visual contact through a hole in the patchy 3,000ft overcast, a Hornet pilot recalling, “Yamato looked like the Empire State Building plowing through the water.” Yamato cruised in the center, flanked by destroyers Kasumi, Suzutsuki, Hamakaze, and Yukikaze. Light cruiser Yahagi was in the van, followed by destroyers Hatsushimo, Isokaze, and Fuyutsuki. The first American aviators encountered the destroyer Asashimo, which had been experiencing machinery issues for five hours and had fallen 12 nautical miles behind the main task force to the north. San Jacinto's seven Hellcats dove against Asashimo, but the crippled destroyer threw up notably heavy flak. The Hellcats' 1,000lb bombs closely straddled Asashimo, buckling the destroyer's hull plating. The Hellcats then repeatedly strafed the destroyer, causing large fires that quickly silenced Asashimo's guns. San Jacinto's eight Avengers then made a textbook attack run at 300ft, dropping torpedoes from 1,200 to 1,600yds range. Trailing a wide oil slick, the crippled Asashimo attempted to comb the torpedoes, but one struck beneath her bridge and a second hit near her engine room. Successive explosions blew Asashimo partly out of the water and broke her in half. Asashimo sank at 1213hrs, going down with all 330 men. She had lasted three minutes against San Jacinto's attack. Twelve miles ahead, Yamato lookouts spotted the incoming aircraft at 12:32, which then spent the next five minutes circling just outside the range of Japanese anti-aircraft fire to coordinate their strike plan. Around this time, Yamato also raised Togo's iconic Tsushima flag signal: “On this one battle rests the fate of our nation. Let every man do his utmost.”At 12:37, the circling planes launched their coordinated assault on Yamato and her escorts, focusing on the superbattleship's port side in an attempt to capsize her. US fighters repeatedly strafed Yamato with their 5in. rockets and 0.50cal. machine guns, decimating Japanese antiaircraft batteries and slaughtering exposed antiaircraft crews. The intense carnage and chaos that followed suppressed careful targeting and further ravaged Japanese gunners' morale. Yamato was maneuvering hard at her flank speed of 27kts, when at 1240hrs four Bennington Helldivers from VB-82 delivered two 1,000lb bombs near Yamato's mainmast. The first bomb exploded in Yamato's crew quarters. The second detonated near Yamato's aft command station and caused serious damage, destroying one of Yamato's two air search radars, her after secondary gun director, and several 25mm antiaircraft guns. The subsequent fires shortly reached the powder handling area beneath Yamato's after 6.1in. turret and detonated the readyuse propellant. The resulting conflagration virtually exterminated the 6.1in. turret crew, but flash doors prevented the explosion from reaching the rest of the magazine. Nevertheless, the explosion killed the area's entire damage control party, meaning the resulting fire would rage uncontrolled for the rest of the battle. The Americans lost one Helldiver. At 1243hrs, eight Hornet Avengers launched torpedo attacks against Yamato's port side, covered by 14 Bunker Hill Corsairs strafing Yamato with rockets. Antiaircraft fire hit six Avengers, destroying one, but at least three torpedoes hit the water. The first two torpedoes missed, but at 1245hrs the third torpedo slammed into Yamato's port side, opening her hull to 2,235 tons of seawater. Japanese damage control counterflooded with 604 tons of water to correct the list. Attempting to draw US attackers from Yamato, Hara's light cruiser Yahagi had maneuvered away from the Japanese battleship, steaming hard at 35kts. US strafing had already ricocheted machine gun bullets around Yahagi's bridge, killing a lookout. Watching the attack unfold, Hara admitted, “The spectacle was at once thrilling and terrifying.” Meanwhile, Bennington's Lieutenant-Commander Ed De Garmo led three Avengers against Yahagi. At 1246hrs, De Garmo's Avengers delivered Yahagi her first hit and it was a devastating one. A single torpedo struck Yahagi in the engine room, killing the entire engineering crew. Yahagi was left dead in the water nine minutes into the battle. Destroyer Isokaze subsequently sped towards Yahagi to take off Rear Admiral Komura. Meanwhile, around 56 aircraft targeted Yamato's escorting destroyers, leading to multiple torpedo hits that split Hamakaze in two; Isokaze was bombarded with bombs; Fuyutsuki suffered minor damage from two dud rockets; and Suzutsuki was struck by a bomb that severed her bow. The first wave of attacks concluded at 12:50, as Ito sought to reorganize his forces and evaluate Yahagi's status. Shortly after 13:00, a second wave of 50 aircraft appeared, managing to hit Yamato's port bow with a bomb at 13:23 and inflicting several bomb hits near the battleship's bridge. Additionally, two bomb hits and several near misses critically damaged the destroyer Kasumi, leaving her dead in the water and ablaze. At 1333 the third wave of US attackers arrived, comprising 110 new Yorktown, Intrepid, and Langley aircraft from the delayed TG-58.4 strike. The Americans now overwhelmingly focused on the reeling Yamato. Twenty Avengers attacked Yamato's portside. Around 1337, the third wave saw three confirmed torpedo hits on Yamato's portside, plus a fourth probable hit, increasing her portside list to 15–16 degrees. Stationed on Yamato's bridge, Ensign Mitsuru Yoshida recalled, “I could hear the Captain vainly shouting, ‘Hold on men! Hold on men!'”. Aruga had no option but to flood Yamato's starboard machinery spaces, where hundreds of engineers toiled to keep Yamato underway. Water, both from torpedo hits and the flood valves rushed into these compartments and snuffed out the lives of the men at their posts, several hundred in all. Caught between cold sea water and steam and boiling water from the damaged boilers, they simply melted away.” Aruga's drastic measure reduced Yamato's portside list back to five degrees, but exhausted her last starboard counterflooding capacity. Having lost one shaft and gained 3,000 tons more water, Yamato's speed fell to 12kts. At 1342hrs, TG-58.4 Avengers dropped another four torpedoes. Yoshida marveled, “That these pilots repeated their attacks with such accuracy and coolness, was a sheer display of the unfathomable, undreamed-of strength of our foes!” Yamato shot down one Avenger, but two torpedoes plowed into Yamato's portside, making five torpedo hits in five minutes. The Americans had intentionally targeted Yamato's stern to wreck her steering, and the gamble paid off. Yamato's rudders were now disabled, jamming her in a permanent starboard turn. Any chance of reaching Okinawa was gone. Reduced to a speed of 8 knots and unable to maneuver, the stricken Yamato became an easy target. Around 14:02, Mitscher's relentless carrier planes inflicted at least four more bomb hits, disabling most of Yamato's remaining operational anti-aircraft guns as the battleship helplessly circled. As a result, Ito canceled the Ten-Ichi-Go attack and promptly ordered all his warships to rescue survivors and attempt to retreat to Japan. The sinking battleship was then deserted, except for Ito and Captain Aruga Kosaku, who chose to go down with their ship.  Throughout the battle, a stoic Ito had sat silently with arms crossed on Yamato's bridge, unflinching as bullets ricocheted around him, slaughtering his staff. Ensing Yoshida Mitsuru now observed that Ito “struggled to his feet. His chief of staff then arose and saluted. A prolonged silence followed during which they regarded each other solemnly.” Ito then told his staff, “Save yourselves. I shall stay with the ship.” Ito then shook hands deliberately with his officers, retired to his sea cabin one deck below, and locked it behind him. Meanwhile, with Yamato's pumps no longer functioning, alarms began to blare: temperatures in the 18.1-inch magazines were approaching dangerous levels. By 14:20, the capsizing Yamato's main deck was vertical to the ocean. Captain Aruga, eating a biscuit given to him by a rating, tied himself to a binnacle on Yamato's bridge. As Yamato capsized, surviving men clambered across her keel, a crazed, half-naked officer screaming and brandishing his samurai sword at the Americans.  Meanwhile, the Americans continued pummeling the helpless Yahagi, which “quivered and rocked as if made of paper,” recalled Captain Hara. The stricken Yahagi suffered repeated hits. “My proud cruiser,” Hara brooded, “was but a mass of junk, barely afloat.” Around 1400hrs Yahagi took the decisive torpedo hit, triggering a clearly fatal starboard roll. Hara finally ordered, “Abandon ship.” At 1405hrs, one minute after receiving her last bomb, Yahagi capsized and sank, having somehow absorbed at least 12 bombs and seven torpedoes. Captain Hara and Rear Admiral Komura calmly stepped into the water as Yahagi sank from beneath them, only barely surviving the sinking Yahagi's undertow. Now clinging to floating wreckage, the exhausted Hara observed “scores of planes swarming about [Yamato] like gnats.” By 14:20, the capsizing Yamato's main deck was vertical to the ocean, and three minutes later, the sinking dreadnought exploded catastrophically before finally disappearing beneath the East China Sea. Yamato's capsizing motion had likely forced open her 18.1in. powder room doors, allowing fires into the battleship's magazines. An American gunner described the explosion as “the prettiest sight I've ever seen … A red column of fire shot up through the clouds and when it faded Yamato was gone.” The detonation killed most Yamato survivors still struggling in the water and may have destroyed several US aircraft. The Americans' exact score will never be known, but Yamato had certainly absorbed seven bombs and nine to twelve torpedoes out of 150 torpedoes dropped. The US planes departed at 1443, but not before issuing “a few farewell strafing runs across the Yamato survivors.” Destroyers Suzutsuki, Fuyuzuki, Yukikaze, and Hatsushimo rescued 1,620 men, including Hara and Komura, before successfully returning to Japan. Additionally, the disabled destroyers Isokaze and Kasumi were scuttled by Yukikaze and Fuyuzuki, respectively. By the end of the action, the combined losses for Ten-Ichi-Go totaled 4,242 Japanese lives. Meanwhile, Ugaki had launched a second mass kamikaze attack around noon, sending 132 aircraft towards Task Force 58. Although Mitscher's fighters shot down 54 attackers, the kamikazes managed to damage the fast carrier Hancock, the battleship Maryland, the destroyers Bennett and Wesson, and a motor minesweeper. The initial Kikisui operation resulted in the deaths of 485 Americans and left 582 wounded. The significant losses over the two days hindered Ugaki from launching another large-scale Kikisui attack for five days. Meanwhile, back in Okinawa on April 7 and 8, Hodge continued his offensive in the south. In Bradley's sector, the 383rd Regiment persistently executed banzai charges against the remaining enemy strongholds on Cactus Ridge until the entire area was secured by American forces. They then advanced toward Kakazu Ridge, where they faced even stronger resistance. The 382nd Regiment made a slow but steady push forward, ultimately being halted by intense fire across a broad front just north of Kaniku and Tombstone Ridge.  The fighting in the 7th Division's sector on April 7 centered on a low, bare hill 1000 yards west of the town of Minami-Uebaru, called Red Hill because of its color. The enemy had made a fortress of the hill by constructing his usual system of caves and connecting trenches. A frontal assault on Red Hill by troops of the 3rd Battalion failed in the face of machine-gun and mortar fire. In a 2nd attempt, 3 platoons of tanks supported the attack. 10 medium and 5 light tanks advanced through a cut toward Red Hill; 2 tanks were blown up by mines and 1 was satchel-charged as the column moved toward the hill and up the sides. Intense enemy artillery and machine-gun fire drove the infantry back and disabled more tanks. Japanese swarmed in among the armor and tried to destroy the tanks with satchel charges and flaming rags. 2 medium tanks held off the attackers, the defending crews resorting to hand grenades, while the rest of the operative tanks withdrew. The 14th Independent Battalion headquarters proudly described this action as a perfect example of how to separate troops from tanks and thus break up the American infantry-tank team. The enemy dispatch stated: "The above method of isolating the troops from the tanks with surprise fire followed by close combat tactics is an example in the complete destruction of enemy tanks and will be a great factor in deciding the victories of tank warfare." After these 2 reversals the 3rd Battalion made a wide enveloping maneuver to the right. Behind fire from artillery and supporting weapons, the troops drove toward Red Hill from the west and occupied it, suffering only 2 casualties in the move. Once more a Japanese outpost had shown its strength against a frontal attack and its vulnerability to a flanking maneuver. The capture of Red Hill left another sector of enemy territory open for the taking. The troops advanced 100 yards south before digging in. A platoon of tanks conducted a remarkable 4000-yard foray almost to Hill 178 and withdrew safely, despite a bombing attack by two single-engined Japanese planes. The following day, the 184th continued its advance southward under heavy fire, managing to take Triangulation Hill after two fierce assaults. Simultaneously, the 32nd Regiment captured Tsuwa as it extended the front along the coastline. By the night of April 8, the 24th Corps had sustained 1,510 battle casualties while inflicting 4,489 Japanese fatalities and capturing 13; they had finally reached the formidable perimeter of the Shuri fortified zone. Looking north, on April 7, the Fleet Marine Force Amphibious Reconnaissance Battalion landed on Ike Island, encountering no opposition. Subsequently, Company B was dispatched to secure Takabanare Island, while Company A took control of Heanza and Hamahika Islands. During the night, Company B reembarked, maneuvered around Tsugen Island, and landed on Kutaka Island, where they also found no enemy presence. Simultaneously, the 32nd Regiment captured Tsuwa as it expanded the front along the coastline. By the evening of April 8, the 24th Corps had incurred 1,510 battle casualties. On the same day, Shepherd advanced north with minimal resistance, as the 29th Marines successfully reached Nago while the 4th Marines moved through Henoko. Ahead of the division, the 6th Reconnaissance Company traveled up the west coast road to the village of Awa and then crossed the base of the Motobu Peninsula to Nakaoshi, encountering and either destroying or scattering several enemy groups along the way. As the reconnaissance zone was extended westward on April 8, clear signs, confirmed by aerial observations and photographs, indicated that the enemy had chosen the rugged mountains of Motobu as their defensive position. As a result, the 22nd Marines were deployed across the island from Nakaoshi to Ora to protect the right flank and rear of the 29th Marines attacking westward, while the 4th Marines assembled near Ora to support either the 29th on Motobu or the 22nd in the north. The 2nd Battalion, 29th Marines probed westward, moving across the base of Motobu and occupying the village of Gagusuku. Additionally, the reserve 1st Battalion at Yofuke successfully secured Yamadadobaru and Narashido, facing heavy enemy machine-gun and rifle fire at the latter location. The following day, the 29th Marines advanced in three columns to locate the enemy's main force at Motobu; all columns encountered resistance, revealing that a significant enemy force confronted the division in the area stretching from Itomi to Toguchi. On April 10, the 2nd Battalion, 29th Marines captured Unten Ko, where the Japanese had established a submarine and torpedo boat base; the 3rd Battalion took Toguchi and sent patrols into the interior, while the 1st Battalion advanced through Itomi and uncovered well-fortified positions on the high ground north of the village. On April 9, the 184th Regiment successfully captured Tomb Hill in the south following an artillery and air bombardment, while the 32nd Regiment took control of several finger ridges to the east that oversaw the approaches to Ouki. The Japanese-held area in front of the 383rd Regiment offered the enemy an ideal combination of defensive features. A deep moat, a hill studded with natural and man-made positions, a cluster of thick-walled buildings behind the hill; these were the basic elements of Kakazu stronghold. The enemy had exploited each one of them. Moreover, Kakazu, unlike such outposts as the Pinnacle, was an integral element of the Shuri fortified zone and a vital rampart that could expect reinforcements and heavy fire support from within the ring of positions that surrounded the 32nd Army headquarters, only 4000 yards to the south. Between the Americans and Kakazu lay a deep gorge, half hidden by trees and brush, which could be crossed only with difficulty. The Kakazu hill mass itself, which was made up of two hills connected by a saddle, stretched northwest-southeast for 2000 yards, sloping on the west toward the coastal flat and ending on the east at Highway 5. Just below Kakazu Ridge on the southeast was the town of Kakazu, a compact group of tile-roofed structures, each surrounded by hedges and stone walls and somewhat in defilade to the adjoining open fields. In and around the Kakazu hills the Japanese had created one of their strongest positions on Okinawa. Mortars dug in on the reverse slope were zeroed-in on the gorge and on vulnerable areas between the gorge and the crest of Kakazu. Several spigot mortars also protected the hill. In an intricate system of coordinated pillboxes, tunnels, and caves Japanese machine-guns were sited to cover all avenues of approach. The enemy was also supported by many artillery pieces within the Shuri fortified zone. The heavy walls and the hedges of the town of Kakazu-and eventually its rubble-afforded the Japanese countless defensive positions. Concurrently, the 383rd Regiment initiated its first coordinated assault on Kakazu Ridge, with Companies A, C, and L swiftly reaching the summit by dawn without detection. However, the surprised defenders quickly launched a fierce counterattack, ultimately forcing Companies A and C to withdraw. Company L, positioned on Kakazu West, continued to fend off enemy counterattacks alone until late afternoon when the exhausted unit had no choice but to retreat. The next day, Brigadier-General Claudius Easley proposed a "powerhouse attack," where the 381st Regiment would assault Kakazu West from positions south of Uchitomari while the 383rd would press on Kakazu Ridge from positions north of the gorge. Following a heavy artillery bombardment, the assault commenced, with the 2nd Battalion of the 381st Regiment rapidly fighting through strong enemy defenses to secure the crest of Kakazu West. However, the 383rd was struggling to make headway, prompting Colonel May to direct his two battalions to execute flanking maneuvers. Although the eastern encirclement was unsuccessful, May's 3rd Battalion managed to cross the gorge at the northern base of Kakazu West to join Colonel Halloran's 2nd Battalion on the crest. Both units then attempted to advance eastward in heavy rain, but relentless Japanese counterattacks forced them back to Kakazu West. Stalemated, Easley eventually ordered Halloran's 1st Battalion to move through May's 3rd Battalion to attack southeast along Kakazu Ridge, but this assault was also repelled by the determined defenders. At the same time, the 382nd Regiment launched its primary assault on Tombstone Ridge, advancing southwest with three battalions in formation but managing to gain only a few hundred yards to the west as fierce defenders thwarted their main offensives against the hills held by the Japanese. Meanwhile, to the east, the 32nd Regiment attempted to advance into the town of Ouki without success, while the 184th Regiment on the heights defended against minor counterattacks, sealed off caves, and solidified their positions. I would like to take this time to remind you all that this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Please go subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry after that, give my personal channel a look over at The Pacific War Channel at Youtube, it would mean a lot to me. The battle for Okinawa is really heating up, showcasing to the Americans they would be paying dearly for every foot they took off the island. Meanwhile the last stand of the super battleship Yamato would form a legend encompassing the defiant spirit of Japan as well as producing one of the most bizarre science fiction animes of all time.

Q: Hello Dr. E. I've always been taught that if you have professed your faith in Christ you could participate in the communion. But recently our pastor is preaching that we have to be baptized in order to participate in the communion! Summary In this episode, Dr. Michael explores the significance of understanding the gospel, the implications of age restrictions on baptism and communion, and the nature of faith and discipleship. The conversation highlights the importance of childlike faith while cautioning against the dangers of legalism in church practices. Michael and Hanna challenge the idea of arbitrary age limits for baptism and communion, advocating instead for a grace-filled approach to faith and spiritual growth. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: Hello Dr. E. I've always been taught that if you have professed your faith in Christ you could participate in the communion. But recently our pastor is preaching that we have to be baptized in order to participate in the communion! Summary Dr. Michael Easley explores the complexities of baptism and communion in the church, focusing on the debate between believers' baptism and infant baptism. He examines historical perspectives, theological implications, and the emerging trend of requiring individuals to be 18 before baptism. The discussion underscores the importance of understanding the gospel and recognizing baptism as a public declaration of faith in Christ. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com. Takeaways: Baptism is a debated topic within the church. Communion participation is often tied to baptism. Historical tensions exist over baptism practices. The age requirement for baptism is a recent trend. Baptism serves as a public identification with Christ. The concept of sacrament versus ordinance is significant. Church history shows the dangers of legalism in baptism. Articulating faith is crucial for baptism eligibility. The New Testament does not specify an age for baptism. Discipleship and grounding in faith are essential for youth. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

This sermon explores the significance of a fair trial in the context of Jesus' trial before Pilate. It delves into the allegations made against Jesus, the irony of the situation, and the historical context of Pilate's role. Dr. Easley highlights the nature of Jesus' kingdom and the responses of individuals towards Him, ultimately emphasizing the importance of truth and authority in the life of a believer. Takeaways The concept of a fair trial is a cornerstone of the American legal system. Jesus faced multiple trials that lacked fairness and justice. Pilate's historical existence was confirmed through archaeological evidence. The Jews sought to manipulate Pilate into executing Jesus without a fair trial. Jesus' kingdom is not of this world, indicating a different kind of authority. Pilate's question, 'What is truth?' reflects a common human dilemma. Many people today deny, destroy, or dismiss the truth of Christ. Believers are called to submit to the authority of Christ and His teachings. The world is not meant to be a paradise for believers; it is a place of duty. Understanding the nature of Jesus' kingship is crucial for living a faithful Christian life. This audio is originally from Michael's sermon of ‘Man's Court, God's Kingdom, Pt. 1 (John 18:28-38)' at Immanuel Bible Church.

Q: I am studying to teach Matthew 14 and wanted to see if you could help me with this question: Was Herod Antipas (who had John the Baptist beheaded) Jewish? One of my commentaries said he was, but I'm not convinced. Please help! Summary Dr. Michael Easley delves into the complex legacy of Herod the Great and his son, Herod Antipas, particularly in relation to their actions and identities within the context of Jewish history. The discussion explores the nuances of their Jewish heritage, the political dynamics of their reign, and the implications of their actions, such as the beheading of John the Baptist. The conversation highlights the intricate relationship between personal identity, political power, and religious affiliation in the historical narrative of the Herods. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.   Takeaways: Herod the Great was a paranoid murderer. Herod Antipas is considered half Jewish. The actions of Herod Antipas raise questions about Jewish identity. Herod's legacy is marked by political manipulation and violence. The historical context of the Herods is complex and multifaceted. Herod the Great's building projects included synagogues and mikvahs. The relationship between Herod and Judaism is complicated. Herod Antipas's actions were influenced by his family legacy. The Herods can be compared to modern political dynasties. Understanding the Herods requires a nuanced approach to history. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.