Podcasts about reclaim party

Laurence Fox discusses his recent trip to the United States, emphasizing the political and cultural climate differences between the US and the UK. He shares his experience at a Trump rally, expressing admiration for the energy and commitment to freedom he observed, contrasting it with the political landscape in the UK. Fox critiques British political figures, particularly Nigel Farage, for their reluctance to confront contentious issues directly. He raises concerns about rising crime and immigration in the UK, arguing that current cultural practices threaten national identity. Fox criticizes the judicial system's handling of violent crime and calls out media double standards. He advocates for a rethinking of governance in the UK, suggesting a bold campaign that prioritizes citizens' rights and national pride. His reflections highlight the need for a strong defense of freedoms and cultural identity amidst prevailing political correctness.   Connect with Hearts of Oak...

We are delighted to have on Laurence Fox this week where we discuss critical challenges of our time, from the disconcerting lack of clarity in our political leadership to the encroaching threats on free speech, the evolving cultural fabric of our society, and the controversial aspects of immigration and mental health policies. Expect an unflinching dialogue that seeks not only to address these issues but to galvanize a movement towards preserving our democratic essence and cultural heritage. Laurence Fox is an English actor, musician, broadcaster, and leader of The Reclaim Party. Laurence graduated from the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art in 2001. He debuted as a screen actor in 2001's The Hole, directed by Nick Hamm. He is likely best known in the entertainment world for his 10 year stint as James Hathaway in the TV show Lewis. In 2020, Fox criticized both the George Floyd riots, and the COVID vaccine mandates, coming from the Conservative point of view. He then founded the Reclaim Party, from which he unsuccessfully ran for mayor. Since this, he has been ever-present in the media, denouncing political correctness.  Connect with Laurence and Reclaim Party...

Support our work here - https://urbanscoop.news/support-us/In this episode of SILENCED Tommy speaks to English actor, broadcaster, musician, political activist and leader of the Reclaim Party.Laurence used to work for GB News but was sacked for his satirical live takedown of a rabid man hating feminist. Laurence came to prominence as an 'anti woke' activist after an appearance on BBC when he pushed back on 'progressive' racial grievance culture in the aftermath of criticisms of Megan Markle.Laurence has had a fair few ups and downs during his political awakening and subsequent activism which has led him to be targeted by the Met Police for being suspected of conspiring to commit criminal damage to Ulez cameras in London, one of Sadiq Khans money generating 'green' laws.Laurence gives an open, honest and candid account of his personal and professional life as well as his political activism.

On today's #NCFWhittle we are joined once again by Laurence Fox, Leader of the Reclaim Party for a wide-ranging discussion covering his recent defamation court case, the state of the nation, the realities of a Labour government, reform of the education system, acting and the arts, and the upcoming election and the role Reclaim might play. --------------- SUBSCRIBE: If you are enjoying the show, please subscribe to our channel on YouTube (click the Subscribe Button underneath the video and then Click on the Bell icon next to it to make sure you Receive All Notifications) AUDIO: If you prefer Audio you can subscribe on iTunes or Soundcloud. Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-923838732 itunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/s... SUPPORT/DONATE: PAYPAL/ CARD PAYMENTS - ONE TIME & MONTHLY: You can donate in a variety of ways via our website: http://www.newcultureforum.org.uk/#do... It is set up to accept one time and monthly donations. JOIN US ON SOCIAL MEDIA: Web: http://www.newcultureforum.org.uk F: https://www.facebook.com/NCultureForum/ Y: http://www.youtube.com/c/NewCultureForum T: http://www.twitter.com/NewCultureForum (@NewCultureForum)

Let's discuss free speech in the age of censorship. We are having another live event with Reclaim Party leader Laurence Fox and Father Calvin Robinson on Friday 1st March in Central London.   Laurence and Calvin were both cancelled in 2023 yet they command substantial social media presence and are very important voices in the public square.  Revd. Fr Calvin Robinson is a political adviser, TV/radio presenter, and conservative commentator. His fearless common sense earned him a slot on GB News and before long he had his own weekly show “Calvin's Common Sense Crusade”. When GB News bosses suspended Laurence Fox (and the host for that slot Dan Wootton) for his views on a female journalist, Calvin showed his loyalty to his fellow journalists and was promptly sacked. Calvin was ordained at the end of 2023 and splits his time between preaching Good News from his pulpit on Sunday and on social media during the week. Laurence Fox was known to many of us for his role in the ITV drama Lewis which ran for 9 seasons from 2006 to 2015. He has also appeared in many films and stage productions. In January 2020 Laurence appeared on the BBC's political debate programme Question Time challenging the woke narrative and his forthright common sense views have now become a mainstay in the British psyche. Later that year he set up the Reclaim Party to challenge the uni-party system in the UK. His forthright views gained him a slot on GB News only to be sacked for those very same forthright views that got him hired in the first place. TICKETS  https://www.tickettailor.com/events/davidpeterevents/1115546 Interview recorded 31.1.24 Connect with David Vance... X                         https://x.com/DVATW?s=20 WEBSITE            https://davidvance.net/ Connect with Hearts of Oak... WEBSITE            https://heartsofoak.org/ PODCASTS        https://heartsofoak.podbean.com/ SOCIAL MEDIA  https://heartsofoak.org/connect/ Support Hearts of Oak by purchasing one of our fancy T-Shirts....  SHOP                  https://heartsofoak.org/shop/ *Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast. Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on X https://twitter.com/TheBoschFawstin?s=20 

Peter engages actor Laurence Fox and TRIGGERnometry host Francis Foster in a game of Spectrum Street Epistemology. The conversation begins with a claim about hiring airline pilots based on race, a topic that has been widely discussed in recent weeks after a door blew off in-flight on an Alaska Airlines plane. Other claims include dating someone who's transgender, immigration issues in the UK, and more!Peter asks Laurence and Francis to argue in favor of an opinion they do not hold. The pair leaned into the character of someone who holds beliefs opposite to their own, resulting in a more dynamic (and often funnier) conversation. Laurence Fox is a renowned actor, the leader of Britain's Reclaim Party, and host of the Laurence Fox Show. Francis Foster is a cultural commentator, well-known comedian, and former teacher of English and drama.Watch this episode on YouTube.

Dr. Jordan B. Peterson speaks with English actor, musician, broadcaster, and party leader Laurence Fox. They discuss his current canceling, arrest, and litigation, the globalist scheming of London's current mayor, Sadiq Khan, the ironic expansion of surveillance cameras across England, and the state of Western Democracy when removed from humor, art, and nuance. Laurence Fox graduated from the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art in 2001. He debuted as a screen actor in 2001's The Hole, directed by Nick Hamm. He is likely best known in the entertainment world for his 10 year stint as James Hathaway in the TV show Lewis. In 2020, Fox criticized both the George Floyd riots, and the COVID vaccine mandates, coming from the Conservative point of view. He then founded the Reclaim Party, from which he unsuccessfully ran for mayor. Since this, he has been ever-present in the media, denouncing political correctness. This episode was recorded on December 11th, 2023 Dr. Jordan B. Peterson speaks with English actor, musician, broadcaster, and party leader Laurence Fox. They discuss his current canceling, arrest, and litigation, the globalist scheming of London's current mayor, Sadiq Khan, the ironic expansion of surveillance cameras across England, and the state of Western Democracy when removed from humor, art, and nuance. Laurence Fox graduated from the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art in 2001. He debuted as a screen actor in 2001's The Hole, directed by Nick Hamm. He is likely best known in the entertainment world for his 10 year stint as James Hathaway in the TV show Lewis. In 2020, Fox criticized both the George Floyd riots, and the COVID vaccine mandates, coming from the Conservative point of view. He then founded the Reclaim Party, from which he unsuccessfully ran for mayor. Since this, he has been ever-present in the media, denouncing political correctness. This episode was recorded on December 11th, 2023  - Links - For Laurence Fox: Reclaim Media https://www.youtube.com/c/ReclaimTheMedia_ On X https://twitter.com/LozzaFox?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor On Instagram https://www.instagram.com/lozzafox1/?hl=en 

On today's show, Sonia Poulton discusses Andrew Bridgen MP leaving the Reclaim Party and what it means for Bridgen and the future of Reclaim. Later, Christine Hart discusses Tony Blair meeting Netanyahu to discuss a cease-fire in the Gaza conflict. GUEST 1 OVERVIEW: Sonia Poulton is a journalist, broadcaster, commentator, and filmmaker who has an attitude about injustice and she doesn't care who knows it. GUEST 2 OVERVIEW: Christine Hart is a journalist, private investigator, and Sunday Times bestselling author. She was trained by an ex-MI6 officer and ex-CID officers, and she has worked as a private detective for over 35 years.

On today's show, Anne Gwinnett & Anne Stares discuss 15 minute cities and other globalist plans for Oxford that the New Party hopes to disrupt. GUEST 1 OVERVIEW: Andrew Bridgen is a Member of Parliament for North West Leicestershire UK since 2010 and is very active in standing up against the COVID narrative. Initially elected in 2010 as a member of the Conservative Party. Andrew Bridgen is a member of the Reclaim Party. http://www.andrewbridgen.com/ GUEST 2 & 3 OVERVIEW: Anne Gwinnett is the chair of a new Oxford based political party aiming to disrupt globalist council plans in the city, and Anne Stares is one of its candidates.  

James Fox is a true British icon of Hollywood and an incredible man. Now, at 85 years old, James carries the legacy of an illustrious career starring in films such as The Loneliness of a Long-Distance Runner, The Servant, Performance, A Passage to India, Charlie & The Chocolate Factory, and many more. I wanted to speak to James about when, at the very heights of his stardom, he decided to give it all up to become an evangelical Christian - and how he sees God as he looks back at his career. I hope you find James as charming and wise as I did. Some highlights include his insights into choosing roles, how he avoided compromising standards as a mainstream actor, his advice to young Christians, and more.Follow For All The Saints on social media and sign up to the newsletter for updates and inspiring weekly messages:For All The Saints episodes are released every Monday on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more. If you have any suggestions for topics or guests, connect with Ben & Sean via hello@forallthesaints.org

On today's show, Andrew Bridgen will discuss with Lembit BBC's biased coverage of the parliamentary debate. Later, Jay will tell us his thoughts on the statement by the former leader of the UFO project at the UK's Ministry of Defence that it is 'outrageous' that ministers are not taking 'meaningful action' on UFOs. Are UFOs a real threat? GUEST 1 OVERVIEW: Andrew Bridgen is a Member of Parliament for North West Leicestershire UK since 2010 and is very active in standing up against the COVID narrative. Initially elected in 2010 as a member of the Conservative Party. Andrew Bridgen is a member of the Reclaim Party. His website is www.andrewbridgen.com GUEST 2 OVERVIEW: Jay Tate is Director of the Spaceguard Centre. The Spaceguard Centre is the National Near Earth Objects Information Centre (NNEOIC). It is the only organisation in the UK dedicated to addressing the hazard of Near Earth Objects.

Show notes and Transcript At long last it has happened. Andrew Bridgen MP (Reclaim Party) secured a debate on excess deaths in the UK Parliament.  Nearly twenty requests were turned down but Andrew simply would not give up.  His courage and determination to find out the truth won in the end.  Andrew gave a 25 minute presentation of all the data and facts which show a shocking rise in excess deaths since the covid jab rollout.  The fact that many people have died after receiving an injection appears to be the very reason every government wants total silence on this issue.  As you watch Andrew speak, be inspired to speak truth in the circles you find yourself in.  Use the information in the speech to arm yourself with the facts.  We now await a much longer 3 hour debate on excess deaths which Andrew is requesting. *This episode contains a background of the debate, the full speech by Andrew Bridgen MP, his message afterwards to the supporters gathered outside in Parliament Square and Peter catches a few words with the man himself. Andrew Bridgen  Member of Parliament for North West Leicestershire since 2010https://www.reclaimparty.co.uk/andrew-bridgen  Some Key Points Made During the Speech... - Ambulance calls for life-threatening emergencies ranged from a steady 2,000 calls per day until the vaccine rollout, from then it rose to 2,500 daily and calls have stayed at this level since.   - The surveillance systems designed to spot a safety problem have all flashed red, but no one's looking. - Payments for Personal Independent Payments (PIP) for people who have developed a disability and cannot work, have rocketed with the vaccine rollout and have continued to rise ever since. - The trial data showed that one in eight hundred injected people had a serious adverse event, meaning the risk of this was twice as high than the chance of preventing a Covid hospitalisation. - There were just over 14,000 excess deaths in the under 65-year-olds, before vaccination, from April 2020 to the end of March 2021. However, since that time there have been over 21,000 excess deaths in this age group alone. - There were nearly two extra deaths a day in the second half of 2021 among 15 – 19-year-old males,  but potentially even more if those referred to the coroner were fully included. Recorded 20.10.23 *Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast. Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on GETTR https://gettr.com/user/BoschFawstin and Twitter https://twitter.com/TheBoschFawstin?s=20  To sign up for our weekly email, find our social media, podcasts, video, livestreaming platforms and more... https://heartsofoak.org/connect/ Support Hearts of Oak by purchasing one of our fancy T-Shirts.... https://heartsofoak.org/shop/ Please subscribe, like and share!   Subscribe now Transcript (Hearts of Oak) Hello, Hearts of Oak. Today we are here with Andrew Bridgen at a debate in Parliament, the first debate in this Parliament, on excess deaths. There's been very little debates, very little discussions on vaccine harms here. Of course, this is the issue that Andrew Bridgen MP was thrown out of the Conservative Party, the Tories, for beginning to raise the issue of vaccine harms and now raising the issue of excess deaths was simply is not discussed in this place. I've seen discussion in other parts of the world, especially Germany, with the AFD. But Andrew Bridgen has made this the hill that he will fight and die on. And he has been thrown out of the Conservative Party. He's lost that position he had for many years. Andrew Bridgen, of course, is one of the original Brexiteers, well known to any of us involved in the Brexit movement, in the UKIP movement. And Andrew has been fearless. He's one of those strange beasts in Westminster. He is led by conviction. He is led by courage and led by a desire to do what is right. And he had no desire to climb up the greasy pole. He's traditionally been a backbencher. So has stood his ground, kept his position as a lowly MP and not wanted to rise to the ministerial level, because that gives him the freedom to discuss what he wants. He's not held, he's not restricted by government restrictions, but he can say what he thinks and do what is right for his constituents, for those who vote for him, and realise that he is the servant of the people and he is not the servant of the government. So today there will be a debate led by Andrew Bridgen, I assume he will be one of maybe very few, one of one, who will actually speak on this. I'm really curious to see. I've seen a couple of Conservative, MPs who have touched on this, who have spoken a little bit about this, sometimes on GB News, but they have not gone as far as Andrew Bridgen. And Andrew Bridgen has gone this far. He has lost his job over it, and he doesn't care, because this is the right thing to do when a jab when an experimental vaccine, so-called vaccine, was rolled out and everyone was coerced and more or less forced to take it. Andrew was in that, he also took it, now regrets that and wants to keep raising the alarm on the ongoing effects of this and of course to challenge this government overreach that wants to force this upon everyone. This of course is a conservative government supposedly that stands up for freedom of speech, personal responsibility, rights, and yet all those traditional understandings of a conservative party have been completely upended and is no longer a party of freedom and liberty but is now a party of coercion and control. A number of MPs I assume will come in and speak after Andrew will present his position on excess deaths and ask the question, why is this? It seems to correlate to the rollout of the jab. You and I know that. We've seen the data. Andrew will be careful in how he puts it forward. He will use parliamentary language. He's skilled enough in this chamber to know what to say, what not to say, what connects with those in the chamber, and to win them over. Because ultimately, politics is about the art of persuasion. It is about winning the public over. And today, it is not necessarily the public is winning over, although you will watch the debate in a few moments, but actually is winning over MPs. And that also is crucial. Whatever you think, we still have 650 individuals and many of us mistrust absolutely, many of us detest. Many of us have had a traditional understanding of politics where there was a level of trust with our institutions and that included those in the building behind me. That is gone. I think for all of us, that is completely gone. And to have an individual who is a champion on the issue of curtailing that government overreach, asking questions, following the money, saying, was this just a push by big pharma for profits? Was this something darker? There are a whole load of areas we can go into, but Andrew has, wisely stayed within the areas he can understand. He has read papers, he has, understood them and he has presented those and I think he has been extremely wise on how far he has gone on this because it is a case of winning people over. That's what we have faced, all of us, over the last three years of winning friends, family, colleagues, connections over to persuade them that this is a dangerous experiment on not only the UK population but on the world population. We have a police car. I hope they don't want to arrest Andrew before his debate. I don't think even our government would do that, would they? Anyway, I will let you watch the debate, watch Andrew speaking, and then after I will try and catch up with a number of the people who have been here to support Andrew. I saw, Mike Yeadon earlier heading into the debate and I saw Matt Le Tissier earlier, I saw Fiona Hines earlier, I saw a big group of people who are here to support Andrew as he speaks truth and to let him know that he is not alone because it must feel very alone in that chamber. No one to back you, no one to support you and you feel as though you are a lonely voice crying out in the wilderness and yet. Many people have come to show Andrew that there are many people behind him who are indebted to him for actually speaking truth in this place and are standing with him shoulder-to-shoulder. So we'll hopefully talk to a few of those people after the debate. (Andrew Bridgen MP) Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. We've experienced more excess deaths since July 2021, than the whole of 2020. Unlike the pandemic, however, these deaths are not disproportionately of the old. In other words, the excessive deaths are striking down people in the prime of life. But no one seems to care. I fear history will not judge this House kindly. Worse still, in a country supposedly committed to free and frank exchange of views, it appears that no one cares that no one cares. Well, I care, Mr Deputy Speaker, and I credit those members here in attendance today who also care. And I'd also like to thank the Honourable Member for Lincoln for his support, and I'm, sorry that he couldn't attend today's debate. It's taken a lot of effort and more than 20 rejections to be allowed to raise this topic, But at last we're here to discuss the number of people dying. Nothing could be more serious. Numerous countries are currently gripped in a period of unexpected mortality, and no one wants to talk about it. It's quite normal for death numbers to fluctuate up and down by chance alone, but what we're seeing here is a pattern, repeated across countries, and the rise has not let up. I'll give way to my Honourable Gentleman.  (Phillip Davies MP) I'm very grateful and can I commend him for the tenacious way he's battled on this particular, issue. I certainly admire him for that. I just wonder where he found the media was in all of this, because of course during the Covid pandemic, every day, the media, particularly the BBC, couldn't wait to tell us how many people had died in that particular day without any context of those figures whatsoever. But they seem to have gone strangely quiet over these excess deaths now. (Andrew Bridgen MP) I thank the gentleman for his intervention. He's absolutely right. The media have let the British public down badly. There will be a full press pack going out to all media outlets following my speech with all the evidence to back up all the claims I'll make in that speech. But I don't doubt there'll be no mention of it in the mainstream media. You might think that a debate about excess deaths is going to be full of numbers. This speech does not have that many numbers because most of the important numbers have been kept hidden. Other data has been oddly presented in a distorted way, and concerned people seeking to highlight important findings and ask questions have found themselves inexplicably under attack. Before debating excess deaths, it's important to understand how excess death is determined. To understand if there is an excess, by definition you need to estimate how many deaths it would have been expected. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development used 2015-2019 as a baseline, and the Government's Office of Health Disparities and Improvement used its 2015-2019 baseline modelled to allow for ageing, and I've used that data here. Unforgivably, the Office of National Statistics have included deaths in 2021 as part of their baseline calculation for expected deaths, as if there was anything normal about the deaths in 2021. Exaggerating the number of deaths expected, the number of excess can be minimized. Why would the ONS want to do that? There's just too much that we don't know and it's not good enough Mr. Deputy Speaker. The ONS published promptly each week the number of deaths that were registered and while this is commendable it's not the data point that really matters. There's a total failure to collect, never mind publish, data on deaths that are referred for investigation to the coroner. Why does this matter? A referral means that it can be many months and, given the backlog, many years before a death is formally registered. Needing to investigate the cause of a death is fair enough. Failing to record when the death happened is not. Because of this problem, we actually have no idea how many people actually died in 2021. Even now, the problem is greatest for the younger age groups, where there's, a higher proportion of deaths are investigated. This date of failure is unacceptable. It must change. There's nothing in a coroner's report that can bring anyone back from the dead and those deaths should be reported. The youngest age groups are important not only because they should have their whole lives ahead of them. If there is a new cause of excess mortality across the board, it would not be noticed so much in the older cohorts because the extra deaths would be drowned out amongst the expected deaths. However, in the youngest cohorts, that is not the case. There were nearly two extra deaths a day in the second half of 2021 among 15 to 19 year old males, but potentially even more if those referred to the coroner were fully included. In a judicial review of the decision to vaccinate yet younger children, the ONS refused in court to give anonymised details about these deaths. They, admitted that the data they were withholding was statistically significant and I quote they said, the ONS recognises that more work could be undertaken to examine the mortality rates of young people in 2021 and intends to do so once more reliable data are available. How many more extra deaths in 15 to 19 year olds would it take to trigger such work? Surely the ONS should be desperately keen to investigate deaths in young men. Why else have an independent body charged with examining mortality data? Surely the ONS has a responsibility to collect data from the coroners to produce timely information? Let's move on to old people, because most deaths in the old are registered promptly and we do have a better feel for how many older people are dying. Deaths from dementia and Alzheimer's show what we ought to expect. There was a period of high mortality coinciding with COVID and lockdowns, but ever since there have been fewer deaths than expected. After a period of high mortality, we expect, and historically have seen, a period of low mortality because those who have sadly died cannot die again. Those whose deaths were slightly premature because of COVID and lockdowns, died earlier than they otherwise would have. This principle should hold true for every cause of death and every age group, but that's not what we're seeing. Even for the over 85-year-olds, according to the Office of Health Improvement and Disparities, there were 8,000 excess deaths, 4% above the expected levels, for the 12 months starting in July 2020. That includes all of the autumn 2020 wave of COVID, when we had tiering, the second lockdown, and it includes all of the first COVID winter. However, for the year starting July 2022, there have been over 18,000 excess deaths in this age group, 9% above expected levels, more than twice as many in a period when there should have been a deficit. And when deaths from diseases previously associated with old age were actually fewer than expected. Mr Deputy Speaker, I have raised my concerns around NG163 and the use of midazolam and morphine, which may have caused and may still be causing premature deaths in the vulnerable, but that is sadly a debate for another day. There were just over 14,000 excess deaths in the under 65-year-olds before vaccination from April 2020 to the end of March 2021. However, since that time there have been over 21,000 excess deaths, ignoring the registration delay problem, the majority, 58% of these deaths, were not attributed to Covid. We turned society upside down before vaccination for fear of excess deaths from Covid. Today we have substantially more excess deaths, and in younger people, and there's complete and eerie silence, Mr Deputy, Speaker. The evidence is unequivocal. There was a clear stepwise increase in mortality following the vaccine rollout. There was a reprieve in the winter of 2021-22 because there were fewer than expected respiratory deaths, but otherwise the excess has been incessantly at this high level. Ambulance data for England provides another clue. Ambulance calls for life-threatening emergencies were running at a steady 2,000 calls per day until the vaccine rollout. From then it rose to 2,500 daily and calls have stayed at this level since. The surveillance systems designed to spot a safety problem have all flashed red but no one's looking. Claims for personal independence payments for people who've developed a disability and cannot work rocketed with the vaccine rollout and it's, continued to rise ever since. The same was seen in the USA, also started with the vaccine rollout, not with Covid. A study to determine the vaccination status of a sample of such claimants, would be relatively quick and inexpensive to perform, yet nobody seems interested in ascertaining this vital information. Officials have chosen to turn a blind eye to this disturbing, irrefutable and frightening data, much like Nelson did, but for far less honourable reasons. He would be ashamed of us, Mr Deputy Speaker. Furthermore, data that has been used to sing the praises of the vaccines is deeply flawed. Only one COVID-related death was prevented in each of the initial major trials that led to authorisation of the vaccines and that is taking their data entirely at face value, whereas a growing number of inconsistencies and anomalies suggest we ought not to do this. Extrapolating from that means that between 15,000 and 20,000 people had to be injected to prevent a single death from COVID. To prevent a single COVID hospitalisation, over 1,500 people needed to be injected. The trial data showed that 1 in 800 injected people had a serious adverse event, meaning they were hospitalised or had a life-changing or life-threatening condition. The risk of this was twice as high as the chance of preventing a COVID hospitalisation. We're harming 1 in 800 people to supposedly save 1 in 20,000. This is madness. The strongest claims have too often been based on modelling carried out on the basis of flawed assumptions. Where observational studies have been carried out, researchers will correct, for age and comorbidities to make the vaccines look better. However, they never correct for socio-economic or ethnic differences that would make the vaccines look worse. This matters. For example, claims of high mortality in less vaccinated regions in the United States, took no account of the fact that this was the case before the vaccines were rolled out. That is why studies that claim to show the vaccines prevented Covid deaths also showed a marked effect of them preventing non-Covid deaths. The prevention of non-Covid deaths is always a statistical illusion and claims of preventing Covid deaths should not be assumed when that illusion has not been corrected for. And when it is corrected for, the claims of efficacy for the vaccines vanish with it. COVID disproportionately killed people from ethnic minorities and lower socioeconomic groups. During the 2020, during the pandemic, the deaths among the most deprived were up by 23%, compared to 17% for the least deprived. However, since 2022, the pattern has reversed, with 5% excess mortality amongst the most deprived, compared to 7% among the least deprived. These deaths are being caused by something different. In 2020, the excess was highest in the oldest cohorts and there were fewer than expected deaths amongst the younger age groups. But since 2022, the 50 to 64 year old cohort has had the highest excess mortality. Even the youngest age groups are now seeing substantial excess, with a 9% excess in the under 50s since 2022 compared to 5% now in the over 75 group. Despite London being a younger region, the excess in London is only 3%, whereas it is higher in every more heavily vaccinated region of the UK. It should be noted that London is famously the least vaccinated region in the UK by some margin. Studies comparing regions on a larger scale show the same thing. There are studies from the Netherlands, Germany and the whole world each showing that the highest mortality after vaccination was seen in the most heavily vaccinated regions. So we need to ask, what are people dying of? Since 2022, there has been 11% excess in ischemic heart disease deaths and a 16% excess in heart failure deaths. In meantime, cancer deaths, only 1% above expected levels, which is further evidence that it is not simply, some other factor that affects deaths across the board, such as a failing to account for an aging population or a failing NHS. In fact, the excess itself has a seasonality with a peak in the winter months. The fact it returns to baseline levels in summer is a further indication that this is not due to some statistical error or an ageing population alone. Dr Clare Craig from the Heart Group first highlighted a stepwise increase in cardiac arrest calls after the vaccine rollout in May 2021 and Heart have repeatedly raised concerns about the increase in cardiac deaths and they have every reason to be concerned. Four participants in the vaccine group of the Pfizer trial died from cardiac arrest compared to only one in the placebo group. Overall there were 21 deaths in the vaccine group up to March 2021 compared to 17 in the placebo group. And there are serious anomalies about the reporting of the deaths within this trial, with the deaths in the vaccine group taking much longer to report than those in the placebo group. And that's highly suggestive, Mr Deputy Speaker, of a significant bias in what was supposed to be a blinded trial. An Israeli study clearly showed an increase in cardiac hospital attendances, among 18 to 39 year olds that correlated with vaccination, not with COVID. There have now been several postmortem studies demonstrating a causal link between vaccination and coronary artery disease leading to death up to four months after the last dose. And we need to remember that the safety trial was cut short to only two months. So there's no evidence of any vaccine safety beyond that point. The decision to unblind the trials after two months and vaccinate the placebo group is nothing less than a public health scandal. Everyone involved failed in their duty to the truth. But no one cares, Mr Deputy Speaker. The one place that can help us understand exactly what caused this is Australia. Australia had almost no Covid when vaccines were first introduced, making them the perfect control group. The state of South Australia had only a thousand cases of Covid across its whole population by December 2021, before Omicron arrived. What was the impact of vaccination there? For 15 to 44 year olds there was historically 1,300 emergency cardiac presentations a month. With vaccine rollout in the under 50s this rocketed to 2,172 cases in November 2021 in this age group alone, a 67% more than usual. Overall there were 17,900 South Australians who had a cardiac emergency in 2021, compared to only 13,250 in 2018, a 35% increase. It is clearly the vaccine that must be the number one suspect in this and it cannot be dismissed as just a coincidence. Australian mortality overall has increased from early 2021 and the increase is due to cardiac deaths. These excess deaths are not due to an ageing population because there are fewer deaths in the diseases of old age. These deaths are not an effect of COVID because they've happened in places where COVID have not reached and they're not due to low statin prescriptions or under-treated hypertension, as Chris Whitty would suggest, because prescriptions did not change and in any effect would have taken many years and been very small. The prime suspect must be something that was introduced to the population as a whole, something novel. The prime hypothesis must be the experimental COVID-19 vaccines. The ONS published a data set of deaths by vaccinated and unvaccinated. At first glance, it appears to show that the vaccines are safe and effective. However, there were several huge problems with how they presented that data. One was that for the first three-week period after injection, the ONS claimed, there were only a tiny number of deaths. The number the ONS would normally predict to occur in a single week. Where were the deaths from the usual causes? When this was raised, the ONS claimed that the sickest people did not get vaccinated, and therefore people who were taking the vaccination were self-selecting for those least likely to die. Not only is this not the case in the real world, with even hospices heavily vaccinating their residents, but the ONS's own data showed that the proportion of sickest people was equal in the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. This inevitably raises serious questions about the ONS's data presentation. There were so many problems with the methodology used by the ONS that the Statistics Regulator agreed that the ONS data could not be used to assess vaccine efficacy or safety. That tells you something about the ONS. Consequently, Hart asked the UK Health Security Agency to provide the data they had on people who had died and therefore needed to be removed from their vaccination dataset. This request has been repeatedly refused, with excuses given, including the false claim that anonymising this data will be equivalent to creating it even though there is case law that, anonymization is not considered creation of new data. Mr Deputy Speaker I believe if this data was released it would be damning. That so many lives have been saved by mass vaccination that any amount of harm, suffering and death caused by the vaccines is a price worth paying. They're delusional, Mr Deputy Speaker. The claim of 20 million lives saved is based on now discredited models which assume that Covid waves do not peak without intervention. There have been numerous waves globally that now demonstrate that is not the case, and it was also based on there having been more than half a million lives saved in the UK. That's more than the worst-case scenario predicted at the beginning of the pandemic. For the claim to have been true, the rate at which Covid killed people would have to have taken off dramatically at the beginning of 2021 in the absence of vaccination. This is ludicrous and it bears no relationship to the truth. In the real world, Australia, New Zealand and South Korea had a mortality rate of 400 deaths per million up to the summer of 2022, after they were first hit with Omicron. So how does that compare with the Wuhan strain? France and Europe as a whole had a mortality rate of under 400 deaths per million up to the summer of 2020. Australia, New Zealand and South Korea were all heavily vaccinated before infection. So tell me, where was the benefit? The UK had just over 800 deaths per million up to the summer of 2020. So twice as much. But we know that Omicron is half as deadly as the Wuhan variant. The death rates per million are the same before and after vaccination. So where was the benefits of vaccination? The regulators have failed in their duty to protect the public. They've allowed these novel products to skip crucial safety testing by letting them be described as vaccines. They've failed to insist on safety testing being done in the years since the first temporary emergency authorisation. Even now, no one can tell you how much spike protein is produced on vaccination and for how long. Yet another example of where there is no data for me to share with the House. And when it comes to properly recording deaths due to vaccination, the system's broken. Not a single doctor registered a death from a rare brain clot before doctors in Scandinavia forced the issue and the MHRA acknowledged the problem. Only then did these deaths start to be certified by doctors in the UK. It turns out that doctors were waiting for permission from the regulator and the regulators were waiting to be alerted by the doctors. This is a lethal circularity. Furthermore, coroners have written Regulation 28 reports highlighting deaths from vaccination to prevent further deaths, yet the MHRA said in a response to an FOI that they had not received any of them. The system we have in place is clearly not functioning to protect the public. The regulators also missed the fact that the Pfizer trial, in the Pfizer trial, the vaccine was made for the trial participants in a highly controlled environment, in stark contrast to the manufacturing process used for the public rollout, which was based on a completely different technology. And just over 200 participants were given the same product that was given to the public. But not only was the data from these people never compared to those in the trial for efficacy and safety, But the MHRA have admitted that they dropped the requirement to provide the data. That means there was never a trial on the Pfizer product that was actually rolled out to the public. And that product has never been compared to the product that was actually trialled. The vaccine mass production processes use vats of Escherichia coli and present a risk of contamination with DNA from the bacteria as well as bacterial cell walls which can, cause dangerous reactions. This is not theoretical, Mr Deputy Speaker, this is now sound evidence that has been replicated by several labs across the world, and the mRNA vaccines were contaminated by DNA which far exceeded the usual permissible levels. Given that this DNA is enclosed in the lipid nanoparticle delivery system, it is arguable that even the permissible levels have been far too high. These lipid nanoparticles are known to enter every organ of the body, as well as this potentially causing some of the acute adverse reactions seen, there is a serious risk that this foreign bacterial DNA is inserting itself into human DNA. Will anybody investigate? No, they won't. I'll give way on that point.  (Danny Kruger MP) I am conscious that time is tight. I recognise that the hon. Gentleman is making a very powerful case. Does he agree that the Government should be looking at this properly and should commission of review into the excess deaths, partly so that we can reassure our constituents that the case he's making is not in fact valid and that the vaccines have no cause behind these excess deaths. (Andrew Bridgen MP) I thank the Honourable Gentleman for his support on this topic and of course that is what exactly any responsible government should do. I wrote to the Prime Minister on the 7th August 2023 with all the evidence of this but sadly Mr Deputy Speaker I still await a response. What will it take to stop these products? Their complete failure to stop infection was not enough and we all know plenty of vaccinated people who have caught and spread Covid. The, mutation of the virus to a weaker variant, Omicron, that wasn't enough. The increasing evidence of the serious harms to those of us that were vaccinated. That's not enough. And now the cardiac deaths and the deaths of young people is apparently not enough either. It's high time these experimental vaccines were suspended and a full investigation into the harms they've caused initiated. History will be a harsh judge if we don't start using evidence-based medicine. We need to return to basic science, basic ethics immediately, which means listening to all voices and investigating all concerns. In conclusion, Mr Deputy Speaker, the experimental Covid-19 vaccines are not safe and they're not effective. Despite there only being limited interest in the chamber from colleagues, and I'm very grateful for those who have attended, we can see from the public gallery there is considerable public interest. I would implore all members of the House, present and those not. Support calls for a three-hour debate on this important issue. And Mr Deputy Speaker, this might be the first debate on excess deaths in our Parliament. Indeed, it might be the first debate on excess deaths in the world, but very sadly I promise you won't be the last. (Parliament Square Speech Andrew Bridgen MP) But without further ado let's welcome to the stage Mr Andrew Bridgen. Thank you ladies and gentlemen, thank you for coming down here to support the debate today, and thank you for supporting me and the cause. More? I just spoke for 25 minutes. Blood. It's been quite a week. Start of the week, get attacked from behind by a blunt instrument. But what an ending to this week. We have made history today. Nine months, more than 20 refused attempts to get a debate on excess deaths, the first debate on excess deaths in the UK, Parliament, the first proper debate on excess deaths in the world and I promise you, I absolutely promise you, it won't be the last. We will get a three hour debate in the next few weeks now on excess deaths. We've got two democracies under challenge all over the world. We're hanging over and using what we've got to make sure we get our message out there. On Tuesday next week I'm, I'm bringing in a bill, a ten minute rule motion, a bill called the Sovereignty and Referendums Bill. I'm going to put it to the House. That would stop, if we could bring that in, that would stop the WHO power grab of the people of the UK. I've been invited to speak as well next week on Zoom to some African political leaders, to try and persuade them to resist the WHO power grab, because it doesn't matter where we break this, we can break it in the UK, we can break it anywhere else in the world. This is a worldwide problem, an absolute assault on humanity, and we've all got to stick together. I've been an MP for nearly 14 years. I've given a lot of speeches in that chamber. That I was a bit nervous today because I knew there was never going to be a more important, speech I've ever given. I've never been in a more important speech than the one I was giving today. Can't you hear at the back? Turn up the PA. So, here we go. There was never going to be a more important speech than the one I was giving today, and, even after 14 years as an MP I was a little bit nervous standing up. But what really got me was, OK, there wasn't as many MPs in the chamber as I'd liked, but, the public gallery was full and the support from there was absolutely incredible. And they always say the politicians, that place over there, is in the Westminster bubble. We are going to burst the bubble in Westminster. Absolutely. Ultimately, my message to send you away with is that your determination, your cheerfulness, your resilience will deliver us victory. Thank you very much for coming today. (Hearts of Oak) Andrew, we've just been in on the debate on vaccine harms. Tell us about the process, because it's been a long, hard battle, which you talk about in the chamber. (Andrew Bridgen MP) Yeah, I've been putting in since January every week for a backbench business debate. That was refused. I've put in for a Westminster Hall debate on a weekly basis and I've put in for an adjournment debate. Eventually, after nine months and more than 20 rejections, we had the first debate on excess deaths in the UK Parliament. I think it's the first one in the world, but I promise you it won't be the last. I think the dozen or so MPs who attended today's debate, I'm hoping I'll be able to get a get them to sign up that we can have a three-hour debate well before Christmas and then it's going to grow from there because ultimately the data that I imparted in the chamber today, it's all backed up with the science. Every MP is going to be getting a copy of my Hansard speech and the full data pack of all the evidence that backs up everything I've said. There's no excuses now. So this goes to law because it's a no-brainer really to have these conversations because we've all seen excess deaths across Europe. Ask yourself in a democracy why don't they want to have a conversation about anything? I mean, I'm aware that in the Australian Senate four or five senators asked for a debate on excess deaths they ended up having a debate on whether you should have a debate on excess deaths and the consensus of the Australian Senate was they didn't want to have a debate on excess deaths. Well, I mean that's a red flag straight away, isn't it? (Hearts of Oak) Last question, I assume you believe that there are some MPs that can be won over, that public figures have kept quiet a further reputation, which you don't care about and you've walked away from the party. Tell us about those who you think you can possibly win over and then support you publicly on this. (Andrew Bridgen MP) Well certainly some of the ones that were there today, I know of some who weren't there today who will support calling for a much bigger debate on excess deaths. And ultimately it's the pressure of the electorate, the people, and you could see that although the House wasn't very full of members, the public gallery was full and that shows you that public opinion is they want this issue debated, they want to know what's gone on, and it's their right to have it happen. And that will become an irresistible force for politicians. That's how democracy works. (Hearts of Oak) Well, we've just had the debate in Parliament, a debate that I actually, to be honest, didn't think would happen. I thought that it would be stopped and held off. Only one member of 650 MPs in that place was willing to stand up and have this conversation, on vaccine arms as on excess deaths. He spoke for 24 minutes, presented everything in a measured calm manner, no emotion. One of the many things Andrew is great at, that he just lays it out gently, softly, step by step, that he doesn't raise the hyperball that maybe some others will rise to. And he laid it out in 24 minutes. And of course, the government's response is, Well, excess deaths are other factors, lifestyle factors, like smoking, like cholesterol, even fatty foods. So the government are blaming all the excess deaths over a period of a sudden spike in, smoking and a spike in eating fish and chips. That's what the government. Wow. Like ostriches with their heads in the sand. So Andrew presented his figures. The great thing is that we expect now there to be a much longer debate in Parliament. That was a short motion, a short debate, a 30 minute session. Andrew is hopeful that this can now go to a three hour fuller debate and that will be really interesting to see whether that gets tabled and whether it actually does go ahead and I would like to see other MPs backing Andrew and I think the more he speaks the more courage they will get. Andrew is someone with courage, with conviction, with a backbone, with a determination to speak truth and often, that is a rarity across there, it really is, really people want to, keep their heads down, they want to climb up the greasy pole and attain those higher levels of political achievement. So we obviously will watch this, follow Andrew. He is a hero. There's no one else in that Parliament across the way that's a hero like Andrew. And what else? I mean, it's the hill that he's chosen to die on. It's the hill that he has chosen to fight on. It's the hill that he has lost his career in the Conservative Party. And why? Because people are dying and no one is talking about it. What more important issue is there apart from life and death? And if something has been introduced and it's killing people, you need to look at it, you need to address, you need to understand it, to analyse it and then see what you do with that. So we have won here amongst 650. We will follow this and watch this closely as we see this move towards a fuller debate in Parliament and certainly my hope and prayer is that many other MPs stand up and speak, and that this happens across the world. We've seen a debate happening, I know, in the German Parliament with the AfD. I know we've seen debates happening in the Australian Parliament and the One Nation Party with Pauline and Malcolm are doing a fantastic job there. And here is one individual. Obviously, the Reclaim Party is behind Andrew Bridgen. He's a member of that of Lawrence Fox's party. And Andrew will continue to speak. And as he speaks, I believe that we will see ripple effects across the world because the world watches what happens here. This is called the mother of parliament and I believe that as Andrew continues to speak and continues to speak within this chamber that we will see other parliaments around the world address this issue. But this doesn't affect future debt, I mean, the damage is done, the deaths are happening. But at least you have to hold people to account. And for me, this is about justice. It's about honesty. It's about clarity. It is about truth, which is something that's been in short supply over the last couple of years during the COVID tyranny. So keep an eye on this space for Andrew to continue to push this. And when that longer three hour debate does happen, we will be here reporting on us and reporting on those who have come out to support Andrew today. Matt Le Tissier was here, Le God was in the chamber watching Andrew, Mike Yeadon was here speaking, Fiona Hine has done a great job in pulling people together. There is massive support and I think the parliamentarians in the government want individuals like Andrew Bridgton to feel they are alone, but they are not alone. They are backed by masses of the population and today was a small subset, of that, but Andrew knows he is not alone. Make sure and post this video, let others see what has happened here in the UK Parliament and have hope, because I think often that's also in short supply and I think what has happened today is a day of hope, is a day of reckoning and is a day of moving forward to actually presenting the truth and holding people to account.

GUEST OVERVIEW: Andrew Bridgen is a Member of Parliament for North West Leicestershire UK since 2010 and is very active in standing up against the COVID narrative. Initially elected in 2010 as a member of the Conservative Party. Andrew Bridgen is a member of the Reclaim Party. His website is www.andrewbridgen.com

As the Final Countdown to the Aboriginal Voice Referendum Day approaches Lidia Thorpe has a meltdown over an Aboriginal flag-burning video. Plus Hamas launches a bloody land assault on Israel from Gaza. It's the final countdown to the Aboriginal Voice Referendum Day on October 14. Former A Current Affair Host Ray Martin said at an official Yes event attended by Anthony Albanese that if you vote no because you don't know you're a dinosaur or a dickhead. More polls show that the No vote is in a commanding lead. The Warriors of Convict Resistance released another video where a member mentioned Lidia Thrope by name, burnt the Aboriginal flag, and gave a Nazi salute. The Australian Federal Police are investigating, they recently charged Australian Meditations with using a carriage service to offend over a previous Warriors of Convict Resistance video released in January 2022. Lidia Thorpe accused the Prime Minister of wanting fascists to come get her. Lidia is part of the progressive no campaign wanting a treaty first. Hamas has launched a bloody operation into Southern Israel with over 700 Israelis confirmed murdered so far including 260 at the Re'im Music Festival with others kidnapped. Muslim Arabs were celebrating in the streets of Western Sydney last night with a pro-voice Imam Ibrahim Dadou telling Muslims in Lekemba how elated he was about the Hamas assault. Government buildings across Australia including Parliament House and the Sydney Opera House are being lit up in the Israel flag colours. Hamas is a listed terrorist organisation in Australia. A pro-Palestine rally is taking place at Sydney Town Hall tonight with a man carrying the Israeli flag removed by NSW Police. Two thousand Victorians attended the annual March for the Babies in Melbourne on Saturday. The official pro-abortion counter-protest was cancelled by organizer Christopher Johnson whom Avi Yemini recently confronted about his unhinged triggered behaviour. All the pro-abortionists could muster was two feminists interrupting March President Bernie Finn during an address outside Premier Jacinta Allan's office. Ashley Paul Griffith who's been named as the childcare worker charged with 1600 child sex offences against 91 girls at childcare centres in Brisbane, Sydney and abroad over a 15-year period was allegedly attacked in a Queensland prison along with Brett Peter Cowen the man convicted of murdering 13-year-old Daniel Morcombe in 2003. Back in August West Australian MP James Hayward was found guilty of an incident dealing with an 8-year-old girl. The Met Police arrested Reclaim Party leader and recently sacked GB News host Laurence Fox on suspicion of ‘conspiring to damage ULEZ cameras. Yet journalist Chris Packham can produce a documentary advocating climate activists break the law and not be arrested. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's signature policy announcement at the Conservative Party Conference was to ban cigarette smoking for the next generation copying New Zealand's Jacinda Ardern's prohibition lead. Nigel Farage attended the Conservative Party conference in his capacity as a GB News reporter but announced he would stay with the Reform Party the successor party to his Brexit Party. A severely obese man who can't fit out his front door Gavin Plumb has been charged with attempting to hire a hitman to kidnap and murder ITV Host Holly Willoughby. MAGA Republicans as well as Donald Trump have endorsed Rep Jim Jordan to become the House Speaker after Kevin McCarthy was ousted last week over hiding foreign aid to Ukraine in the Continuos Spending Resolution. The Biden Administration has waived 26 federal laws to build a border wall in the Rio Grande Valley, though Joe Biden told reporters he doesn't believe border walls work. 31-year-old Antifa activist Ryan Carson was stabbed to death in New York City by 18-year-old BLM activist Brian Dowling. Dowling's lawyer described him as a great kid. Carlson's girlfriend Claudia Morales refused to give a description of his attacker because he was black. Carlson's friends set up a GoFundMe so they could take time off work to properly grieve. NZ Police have concluded a trespasser at the home Te Pāti Māori candidate Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke was not racially motivated. The trespasser was a National Party member who claimed he wanted to congratulate her for recent high polling. Email: me@timwilms.comMessage: https://t.me/timwilmsWebsite: http://timwilms.com/Twitter: https://twitter.com/wilmsfrontGab: https://gab.com/timwilmsTelegram: https://t.me/wilmsfront Support the Show:Membership: http://www.theunshackled.net/membershipDonate: https://www.theunshackled.net/donate/ Other Unshackled Links:Website: https://www.theunshackled.netFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/TUnshackledTwitter: https://twitter.com/Un_shackledGab: https://gab.ai/theunshackledTelegram: https://t.me/theunshackledMinds: https://www.minds.com/The_Unshackled Music and Graphics by James Fox HigginsVoice Over by Morgan MunroSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Megyn Kelly is joined by Laurence Fox, leader of The Reclaim Party in the UK, for his first interview since his release from jail and exit from GB News to talk about his firing, arrest, cancel culture, the difference between free speech in the UK and the US, his relationship now with Dan Wootton, why he's "scared” of staying in Great Britain, and more. Plus, Dr. Miriam Grossman, author of the new book “Lost in Trans Nation,” joins to discuss the trauma parents endure when their child wants to transition, Los Angeles elementary schools celebrating “National Coming Out Day”, why parents need to stay on top of what their children are being taught in schools, and more.Fox: https://www.youtube.com/c/ReclaimTheMedia_Grossman: https://www.miriamgrossmanmd.com Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at: https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow

Show notes and Transcript Andrew Bridgen MP is one of those rare individuals in UK politics.  He is driven by convictions and critical thinking as opposed to fame and power which is the norm in Westminster (or on Capital Hill I assume).  He was an absolute Brexiteer and led part of that campaign for The UK to have freedom from the EU.  He joins Hearts of Oak to discuss how he fought for Brexit all through his political life, but his biggest battle has been against the Covid Tyranny imposed on us by the UK government.  Andrew spoke up for all who have been vaccine injured and for that he was thrown out of the Conservative party and vilified in the media.  But the Conservatives loss was the gain of The Reclaim Party as he now represents them as the MP for North West Leicestershire. His bravery and boldness is plain for all to see and as long as we have people like Andrew Bridgen in Parliament, we have a glimmer of hope in the UK. Andrew Bridgen was elected in 2010 after spending 25 years running his successful family business, AB Produce, based in the constituency at Measham. Prior to this Andrew attended local state schools and Nottingham University. He has also trained as an officer in the Royal Marines. During his time in Parliament, Andrew has been a prolific speaker and has campaigned on a variety of local and national issues in Parliament. Locally Andrew campaigned for grant funding to bring all of NW Leics District Council housing up to the Decent Homes Standards. Andrew has also campaigned for better transport infrastructure which led to the duelling of the A453 and the planned electrification of the midland mainline. He has also worked with business and community groups to bring down the rate of unemployment in the District, as well as holding a jobs fair. On a national level, Andrew led the successful campaigns to decriminalise non-payment of the TV Licence and to scrap Air Passenger Duty for Children. He has also used his business experience to serve on the Regulatory Reform Committee as well as the Deregulation and the Enterprise Bill committee. Connect with Andrew... X: https://x.com/ABridgen?s=20 The Reclaim Party: https://www.reclaimparty.co.uk/andrew-bridgen Interview recorded 22.9.23 *Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast. Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on GETTR https://gettr.com/user/BoschFawstin and Twitter https://twitter.com/TheBoschFawstin?s=20  To sign up for our weekly email, find our social media, podcasts, video, livestreaming platforms and more... https://heartsofoak.org/connect/ Support Hearts of Oak by purchasing one of our fancy T-Shirts.... https://heartsofoak.org/shop/ Please subscribe, like and share! Transcript (Hearts of Oak) Andrew Bridgen, it is wonderful to speak to you today. Thank you so much for your time. (Andrew Bridgen MP) Yeah, you're welcome.  Andrew Bridgen, of course you can find him @ABridgen on Twitter and he has served as Member of Parliament for North West Leicestershire since 2010, re-elected 2015, 2017 and 2019 with a whopping 62% off the vote, one of the few MPs with anywhere near that. Obviously, thrown out of the Conservative Party, the whip removed, and then that was in April 2023 for raising concerns on the Covid jab, and Andrew now represents the Reclaim Party in Parliament as an MP. Andrew, may I ask you first, what got you into politics? You entered Parliament in 2010. What made you think it would be a good idea to get into politics? Frustration, Peter, and I've been running a business for 22 years, which would start it up the thousand pounds. So I've been I've been MD and chairman of the company and we built it up to 25 million turnover company employing 300 people by 2006. And I'd give, I'd been interested in politics. I joined the Conservatives in 1983 at Nottingham University. And I'd been chairman of the Institute of Directors and on the council of the IOD in Pall Mall, and through working during the Blair years with the East Midlands Regional Assembly as a business member. Obviously I'd met a lot of ministers and I can't say that I was impressed. Well, it was pretty clear they were going to bankrupt us. So a group of friends, most, they were all really sort of small and medium-sized business people and their wives, we used to meet in a pub locally and every Friday night it was sort of a groundhog day, so they always moaned about the state of the country. I'd given a reasonable donation to the Conservative Party in 2005 and I think we had a half a percent swing to the Conservatives so worked out at that rate we're never going to get rid of Tony Blair. And so they moaned every Friday night and it eventually it got to me but I mean by that time I was running a business that was making about three million pounds a year across the group. I've got a good management team and no debt whatsoever and one pint of Marston's Pedigree on a Friday night too many and I said to this group of collected individuals, that's it then. It's no good relying on anybody else. There's only us. So in North West Leicestershire was supposed to be a rock solid Labour seat. The council I don't think had ever been conservative controlled properly. I think they may have had control for about three months once out of 40 years after a by-election. So I said well you all stand for the council, the district council, I'll stand for MP, we'll take over and we'll get it sorted and to a man and a woman every single one of them agreed. And so I put most of the money up for the, I put the money up for the campaign and I got the nomination. Nobody really wanted to be the MP for North West Leicestershire, well the candidate for North West Leicestershire because no one, the Conservatives told me we can't win North West Leicestershire, 83rd target seat. They also said they weren't giving me any money but I said that's fine, I've got my own money and my factory was in the, in the, so I actually did have a payroll vote. So 300 people plus their families in the constituency and the District Council elections came round first in 2007 and I was already selected as the parliamentary candidate. I ran those elections and put the money up and it was the first time the Conservatives had put a full slate up in the seat and they said I was running them too thin but I always thought basically if you didn't put a candidate up at an election it's very difficult to see how how they're going to vote for somebody aren't they? So we put a full slate of candidates up and took Labour down to five councils out of 38 in one night, the biggest swing in the country in the District Council elections in 2007. We took control of the council obviously, and I had the second biggest swing in against Labour in 2010, so I turned a rock-solid four and a half thousand Labour majority with a much loved Labour MP, who sadly died, into seven and a half thousand Conservatives at one, so that's like a 12.5% swing. The seat's my home and, you know, I'm very comfortable in North West Leicestershire. And we moved it to, in 2015, it went up to 11,200 majority. And despite Theresa May's best efforts in 17 with her manifesto, which was appalling, I moved it up to 13,300 majority. Then in 19, I led the leave campaign in the referendum for the East Midlands. I told my seat that if they didn't back me I would have to resign as their MP because we didn't agree on the big issues but to be honest Peter I was fairly sure they would. So the East Midlands voted 59-41 to leave and my own seat voted 61 39 and I'm actually the MP who persuaded Boris Johnson to back leave. He was no way that he was a natural Brexiteer and also if you look back on YouTube you'll find that on the eve of the referendum Boris Johnson came to my seat and we went round Ashby de la Zouch. That's when I told him we were going to win and you should have seen his face when I told him we were going to win. I don't think that that wasn't actually part of the plan Peter and in fact he tried to talk me out of it he said no no it's going to be close but we're not going to win. I said no no we're going to win tomorrow. No, it's going to be close. I said, well, maybe I said, but certainly not around here, not around here. It's not going to be close. You know, the bit we're running. So, and then in 19, on the get Brexit done election, which now seems so much happened since 19. It feels like a very long time ago, more than four years away. And I got a 20,400 majority, it was 62.8% of the vote. And the BBC, I had no sleep that night, the next morning the BBC interviewed me and they said, Mr Bridgen, you must be delighted, this is your fourth election victory, each time you've increased your vote, you've increased your majority, your percentage of the vote, you must be delighted. I said, no, it's terrible actually. They said, why is it terrible? I said, well, I've, you know, it's nine years since I was first elected as the MP, I've delivered the highest economic growth in the country. We've taken the poorest constituency in Leicestershire and made it the richest, the only part of Leicestershire with above-average UK salaries and wages. We've got the happiest place to live in the Midlands now, Colville, which was the most deprived town in Leicestershire. I said one in three of the electorate are still not voting for me. I'm gonna have to work much much harder.  Tell me about that whole Brexit battle. I mean my time was UKIP and UKIP was easy because 100% of Kippers were on board. The Conservative Party have always had that tension and division over Europe. What was that like actually in the Conservative Party pushing something that wasn't necessarily what the Conservatives wanted?  Well it wasn't what the establishment wanted, all the established parties were backing Remain. I think it was interesting that the Conservative Party was like, a very civilized internal war, and there were probably only a quarter to 30 percent of conservative MPs who were for leave, so still the majority were, remain, or indifferent, and some of them maintaining indifference, which I mean, I don't know what you're into politics for. If a big question like whether we should remain or leave the European Union, they say, I don't want to get involved in this. I'll just sit down and see what my people say. I mean, that's not exactly leadership, is it? I mean, I think that should be pretty much automatic deselection, if you can't make your mind up on that sort of issue. And what comes back to mind is that the Conservative Party, we used to, when I was in the Conservative Party, before they threw me out, well, first I'll tell you this, Conservatives have never been encouraged in the Conservative Party, they're only ever tolerated. And the Conservative Party, Parliamentary Party, had something called an away day every two years, and they pay for them in advance to get a good deal. So despite the fact that there was this internal schism over the referendum that was coming, the party had paid for an away weekend in Oxfordshire at this basically hotel that's like a Bond villain's hideout, with an underground lecture theatre, which is a very weird place, and because we paid for it, we were told we'd all got to go there, and this is only sort of three months before the referendum, and we had a very civilised weekend of talking about policy, but no one mentioned the EU and no one mentioned the referendum over the whole two and a half days and the dinner, but I do remember that Craig Oliver sat with me at the final dinner he sat next to me on my table at the final dinner and I told him, I said have you got yourself another job lined up for when you lose, and he said to me he said that's fine he said if we win by one vote that's it settled and that's that's it done. I said well I'll be honest I'll take though I'll take that on as as it cuts both ways, you know, if we win by one. And I knew we were going to win, Peter, because, I'd been around the East Midlands and I could tell we were definitely going to win. But it's about driving the vote up because it wasn't just winning by a seat, all the votes were cumulative, so every vote counted. And what I'd sussed out is in my seat and in the East Midlands is that people who didn't normally vote were going to come out and vote. They weren't, those people who didn't normally engage with politics, they weren't coming out to, they weren't coming out to vote for the status quo, they were voting for change. So I concentrated my campaigning efforts the last six weeks. And did a lot of campaigning and also I was running a load of field operatives who were, 90% of it, they were UKIP. The Remain campaign had nobody on the ground willing to deliver leaflets, hardly at all, for them. We were destroying them on the ground battle. Obviously, in the air campaign we could only be responsive because they got all the media, they got all the established parties, and we were the insurgents. So that was more of a struggle, but on the ground we were doing very, very well. And what I'd sussed out was that people were going to come out and vote who didn't normally vote and every time I saw the polls I was not disappointed because I knew that we were probably, we probably got five or six percent better than the polls were saying because these people who were going to come out and vote and they told me they were and I believe they were, They're not engaged in politics, they're not on YouGov's polling panel, and when Com Res or somebody else rang them up and they said, oh, I'm going to vote to leave the European Union, they'd say, well, did you vote in the last general election? No. Did you vote in the local? No. Did you vote in the one before? No. Have you ever voted? No. And they'd put them down as zero chance of voting. Well, I knew as long as we got those people out, it was all going to come as a bit of a surprise to the Remain campaign. In North West Leicestershire, and we counted our votes, so I know it's fine, I know exactly what the vote was in North West Leicestershire, but you could terminate my seat of North West Leicestershire until the next boundary changes. I think it was a sort of 70-75% turnout to get me in in 2010, important election. And then ever since then, as my majority had gone up, the turnout had gone down and it dropped to sort of 68.5% or something in 19. But I mean, it was a stonking massive majority. And obviously the referendum, I was very encouraged when it was nearly 80%. And I'd spent all my time in Northwest Leicestershire and across the East Midlands. In my villages, I mean, it's a general election, they turn out 85 percent anyway. I'm not going to squeeze much more out of those people. You know, it's very hard to squeeze that they're on the second, third pressings of the pips. So I went to all the areas that normally turn out 50, 55, 60 percent because there was plenty of low-hanging fruit and you know it was that turnout in North West Leicestershire and across the East Midlands some people who didn't normally vote and that's why we won and that's why the polling was so wrong and that's what people like David Cameron who'd come to my seat in 2008 when he was leader of the opposition and he really upset me Peter so I'm a a candidate. We've just taken the council with the biggest swing in the country for the first time in living memory and Cameron told me in front of constituents that my seat was a dump and it should never be conservative. And they weren't giving me any money and I said I don't need your money and to be honest David if that's your view, never ever come to my constituency again and I will with it. And to be honest, David Cameron is a man of his word, he never came, he never came again. So that's fine. And I think now my majority is bigger than Whitney, so I mean what a dump the Cotswolds must be. North West Leicestershire. And we've gentrified. So people used to say Coalville was a very poor place and it didn't have a chance and now it's Coalville and proud. In fact I'm speaking to you from Coalville today.  I want to get on to the COVID discussion situation, but just you, you talked at the beginning about having a business and I guess part of your reason for getting into politics was you wanted the government to butt out, you want local businesses to be able to get on, to have, not to have restrictions on them actually doing well, making money, employing people. What kind of other kind of interests or passions? Well, I've actually cut my teeth in politics when I was chair of the Institute of Directors, which they didn't like particularly because they were fairly pro-EU, is that I got involved as a businessman in the,business for sterling in the no campaign to keep the pound so 25 years ago and thank goodness we didn't join the euro otherwise I mean it'd be much much more difficult to extract ourselves. Yes and Simon Wolfson the chairman of Next we used to meet at Enderby in his boardroom and plot business for Sterling in the No campaign. So I suppose that's where I got involved. And a chap called Chris Eaton Harris, who's gone on to great things, apparently, he was an MEP. And his father had a fruit and vegetable wholesale pitch in Covent Garden Market. And since I was into washing, packing, and distributing vegetables, mostly potatoes, nothing sexy. Chris was one of my customers. I used to buy from Mark Potatoes from Mark Spencer. And Philip Dunn as well. They're farmers. So we had the whole supply chain between us, do you know what I mean? But I made most of the money.  Which is just as well because they're not in parliament. Just as well. So yeah, I wanted to put something back and yeah, that's where we ended up. Obviously being a Brexiteer, there was backlash in the media, there was probably some pushback within the party itself. But I guess none of that even prepared you for the backlash whenever you addressed COVID tyranny. Is that a fair assessment?  Well I know that the two years under Theresa May were purgatory quite honestly. I mean I was a Spartan so I voted three times against Theresa May's deal which you know it wasn't, you know, some colleagues were conflicted and there was Steve Baker crying his eyes out. Well I mean there's nothing to cry about because I've already voted against it twice, it hasn't got any better and once you've come to the conclusion, which was the correct conclusion, that Theresa May's deal was constitutionally and democratically worse than being in the European Union. I mean at least if you're in the European Union you have a chance of leaving whereas Theresa May's deal we would be in vassalage forever and there's no way of leaving. Well I mean that's not a deal, not in my name and that vote on the third time Theresa May's deal came up before the Commons I was pretty convinced that there were probably going to be 28 Conservatives in the no lobby. The rest of Parliament would vote yes and that we would have been slung out of the Conservative Party within a few days. That was where I thought we were. Thank goodness. I mean we always criticise Jeremy Corbyn but he is a man of principle and he is secretly a Brexiteer really I think and he marched the Labour Party in behind us and the rest, as they say, is history. But I mean, a politically savvy Keir Starmer would never, would have taken Theresa May's deal and consigned us to EU vassalage. So thank goodness it was Jeremy Corbyn. But he did win the Conservatives the 19th election. That wasn't, down to Boris, it was pure fear of Jeremy Corbyn.  Yeah, no, it was, you don't want Corbyn, 100% I remember that well.  Well, I actually had two, during that 19 election, I can remember when I was going around the doorsteps, two members, two paid-up locally members of the Labour Party came to me and said I'll be voting Conservative, I can't vote for Jeremy Corbyn.  And they actually told me they were paid up members of the Labour Party locally. Well I mean if you, I mean that is your core, ultra core vote. They weren't even voting for him. Wow. On to the COVID. I've never seen anything and I mean I've loved politics, forever with Northern Ireland parties, the DUP and we've had Ian Paisley and Sammy Wilson on before and then conservatives then over to UKIP, but nothing has divided people like what we've had in the last three years with the COVID tyranny. But you spoke a step, it wasn't just on the restrictions that we had, that civil liberty, but you also saw what was happening with harms and went on that. Tell us about that, how you worked that out, because that was a big step and that was an unacceptable step.  I think there's an element of destiny about all of this Peter. When I was 18 and I'm the only member of my family that's been to university, I had a foreground because my parents weren't very wealthy, they were poor. So about two and a half percent of people went to University when I went in the 80s and I went to Nottingham locally but I studied biological sciences with biochemistry specializing in genetics, virology and behaviour. Oh dear! And I don't know why, just they were things I found quite fascinating so I've tried to keep my knowledge up so I mean in February when we'd had the 19 election and then we had a sort of six weeks period and then we had then we had COVID and everything changed. Well in the February I was sent and I looked through the scientific papers for the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine, its effectiveness against coronaviruses and it was compelling. They were scientific papers and because I've got, my degree a very long time ago in those subjects I mean I can read them and I can understand the papers and I sent the papers to Mark Spencer, Chief Whip, and said the government need to look at this urgently, this could be could be very useful and also sent them to Jeremy Hunt who was at the time, Chair of the Health Select Committee, and I didn't get anything back from Spencer. And I also told Spencer, I said, you realise that I've got qualifications in all the areas that'll be useful, if you want some help in the number 10, with someone who can actually read the papers and understand it and put it across politically, I'll be quite happy to help. They never, Mr Stewart never asked me to help, and I rang up Jeremy Hunt a week later, and this shocked me, Peter and it will shock your listeners. So I rang him Hunt up and said Jeremy I sent you these papers, have you have you looked at them? And he said Andrew he said don't send me scientific papers he said I don't understand them and I said but Jeremy you're chairman of the health select committee and you were health secretary for seven years. I said what? You don't understand scientific papers, and what you have no access to anyone who does understand them he could actually explain them to you and he put the phone down and that was it and so my suspicion, so I hadn't got a great deal of confidence I did support the first lockdown because I don't think anybody knew, well somebody knew what was going on it certainly wasn't me, you know was it three weeks to flatten the curve. Anyway, so, and I was, from then on, things just didn't seem to stack up. The masks, I couldn't see the sense behind the masks. I mean, those paper masks, they are to stop saliva from the doctors and nurses going on to the patient's wounds and to stop blood and other bodily fluids squirting into the medic's mouths, which they don't really like, they don't like that. That's what they're there for. So not to stop viruses and the gaps around the edges And I was briefly in the military. And if you had a full nuclear biological chemical suit, you've only got an 80% chance of keeping a virus out. Well, I mean, that's not what these paper masks are. And I guess, I hated putting them on anyway. They're horrible. So I was on that. And then the continuous lockdowns, and Northwest Leicestershire was chucked in with Leicester. And so we were locked down as much as anywhere in the country. It was completely unprecedented and unwarranted. I also really objected to the schools being closed. And I objected. I mean, they were making the children wear masks. And even some schools were making the children wear masks when it wasn't mandated. And none of this seemed right. And there are some, speaking to some scientists who were speaking out about their concerns, And the fact that they were silenced, and they said all the science is all settled, I mean we've heard that one before several times, I'm sure we'll hear it again, but I mean science is never settled. It's a bit like politics, there's always another view, and if you can't defend your position, then there's something wrong. You know, every scientific thesis is open to challenge, or should be able to challenge, and most of them, I mean half of everything that doctors are taught in medical school within 10 years will be proved to be completely wrong. That's a fact, I mean that's just a fact. So, you know, the only constant is the evolution of science and new theories to supersede old ones and saying that, you know, we're not having any debate about this and cancelling eminent scientists. Then my concerns grew and grew and grew but I didn't want to believe the worst of the government. I actually am double vaccinated. They will call me an anti-vaxxer so which is difficult when I'm vaxxed. I'm more the sort of concerned vaxxed and I had two shots of AstraZeneca, I wish I had none, and I had a bad reaction after the second jab, which really, really hurt me. So I'd bitten my tongue, that also uncovered a lot of corruption around PPE. My whistle-blower was sacked. We uncovered £860 million worth of PCR tests that had disappeared from stock at Kuehne & Nagel were the distributor. We traced some of the unique barcodes and they turned up in Berlin. They'd been resold. So nearly a billion pounds. And my whistle-blower could only go back 12 months on his computer. And he was only in one of the three channels. He was in the channel to do with bulk. So it was only sort of prisons, schools, hospitals, things like that. But 860 million pounds worth of PCR tests had gone missing the taxpayer paid for. We took it to the government and the civil service. My whistle-blowers computer was switched off on the day and he was sacked within seven days, no investigation. I was pretty annoyed. And I mean, the corruption of the Boris Johnson regime was the first one I'd, and he was the he'd been the first Prime Minister I'd actually voted for and I was feeling very betrayed. So I hadn't voted for David Cameron, obviously, I voted for David Davies, and Cameron got in and I didn't vote for Theresa May. She got in. And so then Boris turned out to be as crooked as all the rest of them. So that wasn't good. And then my pretty view on the vaccines and the mRNA technology, the messenger ribonucleic acid technology. I was working behind the scenes and obviously Matt Hancock had to go and we had, Sajid Javid became health secretary. But there are about five Conservative MPs who are qualified doctors. Well Matt Hancock, not a good man, but he had said in the House of Commons that these vaccines were for adults, they weren't for children, so no one under 18 was going to have them. I know that every one of the doctors, qualified doctors, went to see Sajid Javid and told him not to use the experimental vaccines on under-18s and he listened to all of them and then approved it. It's interesting that these two health secretaries are both leaving the Commons at the next election, isn't it? I wonder where they'll land, you know what I mean? I suspect Peter, there'll be earning a lot more money than MPs get paid, let's just put it that way.  And then when the MHRA came out in November last year and wanted to extend the experimental vaccines to babies, down to six months of age, and I'll declare an interest, I've got a five-year-old and I thought now, I've got to speak out and I knew there'd be a huge backlash from the party, politically and I knew the vested interests that were involved in it but I also knew that it was probably going to cost me my position in the Conservative Party because they were so committed, but that I could win, that I'm pretty sure I thought, well there's no point doing it for nothing, you've got to win and I was pretty sure that I could put the science over that there were no healthy child of that age had died anywhere in the world of COVID-19 so there was minimal, minuscule risk from the virus but there was a risk from the vaccine. I thought even the most pro-vaccine person I could persuade that since the manufacturers still had immunity from prosecution that there had to be a risk. But there was no risk for those children. I thought I could get that message across and we could actually do some good and so I'd spoken out in a Westminster Hall debate, in I think it was October and then on November 13th I secured an adjournment debate and and blew the lid off the childhood vaccines, vaccination with the experimental mRNA. And that night, my life changed. I was basically immediately cancelled by the mainstream media. And from that moment onwards, I had hundreds of thousands of emails from around the world from people who were telling me about the vaccine harms and the vaccine deaths that they were seeing and that was it really. So after that, although the government will say that I'm a conspiracy theorist and anti-science, anti-vax, and all the people who call me anti-science and everything, I mean they haven't got any science degrees between them and the fact is that the government, our government was never able to approve those vaccines for healthy under fives, whereas all the other countries around the world did. So despite the fact that they said that I was talking absolute rubbish, they never bought the policy and every other country did. And then we got round to sort of January and the infamous tweet, which was actually, I mean, yes, so I retweeted, I actually didn't do it, but it was retweeted on my Twitter, a tweet from Dr. Josh Guetzkow of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and it's fair to say that Mr. Guetzkow is a Jewish gentleman, that he'd been told by a top cardiologist that the rollout of the vaccine was the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust, and the party seized on that, the Conservative Party seized on that, to say I was an anti-Semite, and suspended me immediately from the party. I had a meeting at that time with a Conservative Party grandee who'd clearly been briefed by the party. We had an hour together in his office and I told him all of my concerns around the vaccine harms, the midazolam and morphine, the creation of the first wave of deaths by moving people out of care homes and then putting them onto the death pathway, putting them down, treating them with respiratory suppressants to give them the symptoms of COVID-19 which will appear on their on their death certificate and they were pretty much all cremated very shortly afterwards so there was no autopsies and we had an hour of that. I also knew that the person I was meeting with, because I'd done my research and I've got plenty of informers, he knew full well all of my concerns because he'd been told them. I also know that his sister had had to go into hospital after the second Pfizer jab with chest pains, but I didn't tell him any of this. And at the end of the meeting this grandee turned around to me, obviously with the party line, I've been suspended and said that there is currently no political appetite for your views on the vaccine, Andrew. They may well be in 20 years time and you're probably going to be proved right but in the meantime you need to bear in mind you're taking on the most powerful vested interest in the world with all the personal risk for you which that will entail, and at that point I said well the meeting's over then isn't it? I'm not, don't ever threaten me and I don't like being threatened by public school boys. You know, as a comprehensive school boy, if they had been at my school, they'd have spent most of their time with their head down the toilet. It was a very comprehensive education.  So we basically called it a day at that and then they just fast-tracked the investigation and found me guilty and permanently expelled me from the Conservative Party, which is interesting because in their investigation what they didn't discover is I never put the tweet out myself anyway. I've never ever had the codes to my own Twitter. It was actually posted by my association chairman who remains in the Conservative Party.  Can I ask you about... I need to ask you about the conversations with colleagues and obviously not breaking confidentiality of that, but working with Lord Pearson I'm always amazed people come to him after a debate and says well done. I could never say that but well done you said that. Did you have any kind of similar?  Yes, it's coming up to a year since I first spoke out so yeah I've probably had 20, I probably had 30 backbenchers have come up to me and said you're definitely onto something with these vaccine harms, keep going but that's a million miles from standing in the chamber and saying anything. I've had senior members of the Conservative Party have come to me and said that they're going to speak out. I've had a very senior MP came to me before summer recess and said he'd been approached by a constituent representing 1,100 vaccine-harmed people and he'd have to speak out, but he hasn't, and I had a very senior minister who came to me and said that they're, I mean this is all in private in parliament, no witnesses, so I mean they can deny it if they want to, but you have my word it's the truth, and come to me and said you do realize that my sister's just taken the Moderna booster and now she's paralyzed from the neck down. And I said well that's that's that's terrible news but clearly you're going to have to speak out now aren't you? and they said no, well she doesn't want any publicity and they think they're going to get her to walk again. I said well you don't have to name names I mean you know, you've got to speak out you know and the minister said I'm not speaking out and walked off. And I don't know what to go, I mean, we're supposed to speak without fear or favour, you know, I think the job of an MP is to, certainly I see the job as being to represent, the people, start with my people in North West Leicestershire, against the government and the establishment. And now what we seem to have is a lot of MPs who represent the government and the establishment against the people. That's an inversion of the job of a Member of Parliament. They said to me, you know, why are you willing to die on the hill of vaccine harms, you know, of an issue? And I said, well, because that's the hill you're killing my people on. No completely. I want to add two things to finish. One, you're in the Reclaim Party because that seemed to be the only option. Course you could do as an independent, that doesn't really happen in the UK, but also you're continually asking the government questions. One of the latest questions is did the MHRA inform the Minister of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine had been switched? Tell us about Reclaim and I'm assuming you're yet to receive an answer to that government question.  Well Reclaim are a political party, they didn't have any MPs but they're well funded and they've got some lovely premises and they've got great people and they're also aligned with something called the Bad Law Project, so I have access to lawyers and solicitors and so I'm taking Matt Hancock to court for defamation and we have a very strong case. I'm probably going to take the Conservative Party to court for the way they handled my dismissal from the party, which is unbelievable. I'm on my fifth subject access request to the Cabinet Office. I mean, Peter, I've put in for all the information they're holding on me, and even when I'm over four, this is the fifth one going in now, I keep cutting down the number of keywords and compressing the time, and every time they come back and say, I mean, they must have a library on me. They haven't got a black book, they've got a whole library on me. And every time they come back and say, it's too much work. I mean, the last one was about 10 key words. And I said, it's only from 1st of January, 2017. I'll publish all the papers one day and it'll be fascinating, but goodness knows what they're hiding. They're certainly not willing to release any documentation. So I think we're going to have a massive, massive, massive bust up with the government over that. And if they're doing it to me, it won't be just me, will it? There'll be. Yeah, I mean, if there is any mitigation of my colleagues, and I'm not thinking of any any mitigation at all for their inactivity when so many of them, I mean, what you've got to understand, Peter, is people say to me, So there was a lovely female Conservative MP who will remain nameless, but she was elected in 19. And she came up to me a few months ago and said, Andrew, I'm really worried about you. You speak in the chamber on your own. You have all your meals on your own. You sit on your own table in the tea room and the dining room. No one talks to you. You seem really isolated. I'm really worried about you. I said, well, that's very touching. I said, but you've got to remember, 4,000 real people work in Parliament. The cooks, the cleaners, the waiters, the security guards, the police, I said, and they all come to me and 80% of those agree with me. So I'm not really isolated at all, am I? I said, actually, you're isolated, you just don't realise it. So it's not been that bad in Parliament. As far as the Pfizer data, it was again Dr. Josh Guetzkow sent me some from the Hebrew University, sent me some evidence and he's not a scientist, he's a criminologist but he's a specialist in fraud and he went through the Pfizer papers and discovered how they'd switched the vaccines. There were two batches in the initial batch, one that they basically made a Rolls-Royce vaccine up which they gave to 22,000 individuals and they had 22,000 in the placebo group who got a saline shot and that's what they got approval for with the MHRA and every other regulator around the world. But that wasn't the vaccine, that wasn't the Pfizer vaccine that was rolled out. And the smoking gun for the switch of the vaccines is the fact that the MHRA changed the protocols on day two of the mass rollout of the vaccination in the UK, and said that everyone got to stay at the vaccine centre for 15 minutes after day two because of the risk of anaphylactic shock and you only get anaphylaxis if there's endotoxins in the vaccines and you only get endotoxins in the vaccines if they're cultured up in bacteria such as Escherichia coli and the MHRA hadn't expected anaphylaxis because that is not how the vaccine that was given approval for was manufactured, it wasn't manufactured in bacteria with all the contaminants that would go with it. Now, you can't, to get approval for a drug, you have to use the same mechanism of production. You can't change anything because then you've got a different drug with different side effects. So basically, what my allegation is, supported by 44 pages of evidence supplied to me by a doctor of criminology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the government will not answer or even acknowledge, is that the vaccine that was rolled out in the UK and around the world was effectively completely untested and it also explains why the, I mean that the harms from the Pfizer trials of the very best vaccine they could make in in a very small, basically a bespoke vaccine that they made for 22,000 doses, I mean that was horrific enough and that should never have had approval but it was nothing like the harm profile we've seen in actuality through the VAERS system and the yellow card system and the fact that the vaccine is a different vaccine basically explains that as well. If they were doing that with Pfizer, I mean I have no doubt that Moderna and the same and of course I had the AstraZeneca vaccine which which was actually that bad. It was just quietly withdrawn, wasn't it? And it's interesting that the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, which is the AstraZeneca vaccine is not a messenger RNA. It's a DNA strand in an adenovirus vector. So it's different technology to the Pfizer and the Moderna. It's because obviously the DNA then will code for the messenger RNA. And so it's one step further back. It's interesting also that the, I asked for an urgent question in Parliament a few months ago because the Johnson & Johnson vaccine was withdrawn in America and I saw the FDA, the Federal Drugs Agency guidelines and it said stop basically, stop injecting the Johnson and Johnson and all stocks are to be destroyed. And the Johnson and Johnson that was also, a DNA strand not a messenger RNA strand and also in an adenovirus vector to get it into the into the cell. So it's interesting that basically both the vaccines, experimental vaccines were using the DNA adenovirus vector method, they were, both withdrawn and destroyed. But it is interesting that India are still producing effectively AstraZeneca under license. They call it Covishield in India. And of course they didn't stop the Australian version of the AstraZeneca vaccine until only a couple of months ago, so there's going to be a big kickoff there as well. So that's it. I sent it to the Attorney General because one of the questions I did ask was did the MHRA tell the Minister that they'd switched the vaccines, in which case if they didn't then the MHRA are guilty of potentially a crime which is I think it's a two-year prison sent us an unlimited fine, but if they did tell the minister, then how could the minister go out and say they're safe, effective, and tested when they knew that they weren't? I don't understand why the prime minister doesn't want to come back to me. I'm afraid the letter I sent him was a bit of a, do you still beat your wife question. There isn't a good answer, because either I'm going to nail the MHRA, or I'm going to nail the ministers. And it's also interesting, I think, you know, so many health ministers are deciding to not stand at the next general election. No, 100%. Andrew, I've watched your many speeches in the Commons and followed those written questions and I think for our UK viewers and listeners who are very frustrated at UK politics, I think as long as there remains someone like you speaking this truth, then there is hope. So thank you for what you do and thank you for your time today. Thank you very much for having me on. I'm sure we'll speak again in the future.

Richie is joined by Tony Gosling and also by Dr. Anna Loutfi and Sally Beck.Broadcast journalist Tony Gosling came on to discuss news that a tech billionaire has donated over $80 million to The Tony Blair Foundation to be used to build a vaccination database in Africa. Also, Tony recently spoke at a No To NATO meeting near Downing Street and tells Richie why he believes that NATO is nothing more than a protection racket run by gangsters.www.thisweek.org.ukSally Beck is a freelance journalist. Sally has written an important article for The Conservative Woman, detailing how The Bad Law Project and The Reclaim Party have combined to challenge the legality of Relationship and Sex Education (RSE) lessons in which children as young as five are exposed to graphic descriptions and depictions of sex. To discuss this, Sally was joined by Dr. Anna Loutfi. Anna is a human rights lawyer and head of legal at The Bad Law Project. She has described the curriculum as child abuse, ‘mental, physical, and sexual, child exploitation and child indoctrination', and is preparing the legal case to expose it.www.badlawproject.comhttps://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/backlash-grows-against-school-transgender-agenda/

On today's show, Andrew Bridgen discusses, despite emailing all the MSM the research evidence from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and MIT, that the Pfizer BioNTech Covid 19 vaccine rolled out in the UK and the World was not the same vaccine trialled on 44k individuals and all this means regarding informed consent and misleading the public. Later, Charlie Downes discusses Ted Kacynski the UNABOMBER, Where Technology is Taking Us and The Surveillance State. GUEST OVERVIEW: Andrew Bridgen is a Member of Parliament for North West Leicestershire UK since 2010 and is very active in standing up against the COVID narrative. Initially elected in 2010 as a member of the Conservative Party. Andrew Bridgen is currently a member of the Reclaim Party. His website is http://www.andrewbridgen.com/ GUEST OVERVIEW: Charlie Downes is a ​political commentator and regular contributor to TalkTV, lotuseaters.com, and Wolves of Westminster.He's also an energetic proponent in the UK's traditionalist movement defining Traditionalism ​as a way of life and not merely a political worldview​ but a ​belief that duty, propriety, and standards are what make a man who he is. Charlie Downes is a ghost-writer, public speaker and a social media site manager. ​​When not in the political arena, he participates in Brazilian jiu-jitsu. Find Charlie Downes under the handle @cfdownes_ on GETTR, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. His website is http://www.cfdownes.uk/      

James catches up with his old mate, actor turned political campaigner and Reclaim Party leader Laurence ‘Lozza’ Fox, and gives him a grilling: why on earth is he standing in the Uxbridge by-election? And why does he want people to like him? They also broach the contentious topic of Controlled Opposition: who is, who isn’t, […]

James catches up with his old mate, actor turned political campaigner and Reclaim Party leader Laurence 'Lozza' Fox, and gives him a grilling: why on earth is he standing in the Uxbridge by-election? And why does he want people to like him? They also broach the contentious topic of Controlled Opposition: who is, who isn't, and can't we just all get along? ↓ ↓ ↓ LOCH NESS STAY https://lochnessstay.smoobu.net/en/ 10 per cent discount if you mention the Delingpod and book through this site. ↓ ↓ ↓ Earn interest on Gold: https://monetary-metals.com/delingpole/ / / / / / / The Delingpod LIVE IN DORSET | James Delingpole x Clive de Carle For the first time in Delingpod history, James will be bringing his podcast live to Dorset to chat with Clive de Carle. Purchase tickets here: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/the-delingpod-live-in-dorset-james-delingpole-x-clive-de-carle-tickets-670815646657?aff=ebdshpsearchautocomplete / / / / / / Buy James a Coffee at: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jamesdelingpole Support James' Writing at: https://delingpole.substack.com Support James monthly at: https://locals.com/member/JamesDelingpole?community_id=7720

GUEST OVERVIEW: Laurence Fox is a broadcaster, actor and head of Reclaim Party standing in Uxbridge election. https://www.reclaimparty.co.uk/

On this week's episode of #NFWhittle, Peter is joined by the Laurence Fox, Leader of the Reclaim Party. Laurence discusses a range of subjects, from trans ideology to free speech and the environment, and he explains why he is standing for the Reclaim Party in next month's by-election for Uxbridge & Ruislip, the London constituency previously represented by Boris Johnson. Laurence tells us what the Reclaim Party believes in and outlines its key areas of concern and focus: * Free Speech * Immigration * Education * Climate Change * Trans ideology etc * Sovereignty * ULEZ --------------- SUBSCRIBE: If you are enjoying the show, please subscribe to our channel on YouTube (click the Subscribe Button underneath the video and then Click on the Bell icon next to it to make sure you Receive All Notifications) AUDIO: If you prefer Audio you can subscribe on itunes or Soundcloud. Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-923838732 itunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/s... SUPPORT/DONATE: Your donations will help ensure the show not only continues but can grow into a major online platform challenging the cultural orthodoxies dominant in our institutions, public life and media. PAYPAL/ CARD PAYMENTS - ONE TIME & MONTHLY: You can donate in a variety of ways via our website: http://www.newcultureforum.org.uk/#do... It is set up to accept one time and monthly donations. JOIN US ON SOCIAL MEDIA: Web: http://www.newcultureforum.org.uk F: https://www.facebook.com/NCultureForum/ Y: https://www.youtube.com/@NewCultureForum T: http://www.twitter.com/NewCultureForum (@NewCultureForum)

EXPOSING the Banality of ESG and the Woke Movement with James LindsayWelcome to #TheLaurenceFoxShow, where provocative conversations uncover the hidden truths behind societal movements. In this gripping episode, Laurence Fox invites renowned author and cultural critic James Lindsay to expose the banality of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) and the woke movement. Brace yourself for a thought-provoking exploration that challenges prevailing narratives and sheds light on the complexities of these contemporary phenomena.Join Laurence Fox and James Lindsay as they dive deep into the depths of ESG and the woke movement. Prepare for a riveting analysis that explores the origins, impact, and underlying motivations of these societal trends. Gain a comprehensive understanding of the banality that lurks beneath the surface and the implications they hold for our future.In this episode of #TheLaurenceFoxShow, Fox and Lindsay dissect the complexities surrounding ESG and the woke movement. Here are the key points covered in this gripping conversation:Origins of ESG: Uncover the origins and evolution of the ESG framework, examining its impact on business practices, investment strategies, and the broader social landscape.The Woke Movement Unveiled: Delve into the woke movement, exploring its ideological foundations, cultural influence, and the implications it has on free speech, critical thinking, and societal cohesion.The Banality of ESG: Expose the inherent banality that underpins the ESG movement, highlighting the potential dangers of reducing complex issues to simplistic metrics and virtue signalling.Ideological Challenges: Investigate the ideological underpinnings of both ESG and the woke movement, uncovering the potential pitfalls of dogmatic adherence to particular narratives and the suppression of dissenting voices.Critical Analysis and Solutions: Engage in a critical analysis of the ESG and woke phenomena, while exploring alternative approaches that emphasise nuance, individual autonomy, and genuine progress.Continue the conversation beyond this video by following ReclaimTheMedia, Laurence Fox, The Reclaim Party and James Lindsay on other platforms to stay updated on future episodes, exclusive content, and engaging discussions that challenge the status quo.https://www.reclaimthemedia.co/https://www.reclaimparty.co.uk/https://twitter.com/thereclaimpartyhttps://www.facebook.com/thereclaimpartyofficialhttps://www.instagram.com/the_reclaim_partyhttps://twitter.com/LozzaFox https://twitter.com/ConceptualJameshttps://newdiscourses.com/Follow James' youtube channel  @newdiscourses If you found this enlightening conversation compelling, show your support by liking this video and subscribing to our channel. Don't forget to enable notifications, so you never miss another episode of The Laurence Fox Show or any other content from  @ReclaimTheMedia_    Share this video with others who crave insightful discussions and encourage them to be part of the conversation.#LaurenceFox #ESG #JamesLindsay

Step into the intellectual arena of #TheLaurenceFoxShow where provocative discussions take center stage. In this gripping episode, Laurence Fox invites the brilliant academic and author, Peter Boghossian, to shed light on pressing societal issues. Brace yourself for an enlightening conversation that dissects the complex topics of wokeness, far-left ideologies, free speech, and the trans debate.Prepare to have your perspectives challenged as Laurence Fox engages in a thought-provoking dialogue with Peter Boghossian. Together, they delve into the depths of wokeness, far-left ideologies, free speech, and the intricacies surrounding the trans debate. Brace yourself for a gripping exploration of these significant topics that have captivated public discourse.Wokeness Unveiled: Gain a comprehensive understanding of the origins, implications, and controversies surrounding the concept of wokeness. Explore its influence on various aspects of society and engage in a critical analysis of its impact.Far-Left Ideologies Exposed: Delve into the realm of far-left ideologies and their influence on contemporary political and social landscapes. Examine the underlying principles, potential pitfalls, and challenges posed by these ideologies in the pursuit of social justice.The Vitality of Free Speech: Uncover the importance of free speech as a cornerstone of a democratic society. Navigate through the complexities of balancing free expression with the need for inclusivity and understanding, fostering an environment conducive to open dialogue.The Trans Debate Explored: Engage in a respectful exploration of the trans debate, examining the multifaceted perspectives surrounding gender identity, personal autonomy, and societal norms. Gain insights into the challenges faced by both trans individuals and those questioning prevailing narratives.Continue the conversation beyond this video by following ReclaimTheMedia, Laurence Fox, The Reclaim Party and Peter Boghossian on other platforms to stay updated on future episodes, exclusive content, and engaging discussions that challenge the status quo.https://www.reclaimthemedia.co/https://www.reclaimparty.co.uk/https://twitter.com/thereclaimpartyhttps://www.facebook.com/thereclaimpartyofficialhttps://www.instagram.com/the_reclaim_partyhttps://twitter.com/LozzaFox https://twitter.com/peterboghossianIf you found this enlightening conversation compelling, show your support by liking this video and subscribing to our channel. Don't forget to enable notifications, so you never miss another episode of The Laurence Fox Show or any other content from ReclaimTheMedia. Share this video with others who crave insightful discussions and encourage them to be part of the conversation.#TheLaurenceFoxShow #PeterBoghossian #WokenessUnveiled

EXPOSED: The New Elite | The Laurence Fox Show with Matt GoodwinIn this episode of The Laurence Fox Show, host Laurence Fox and guest Matt Goodwin delve into the controversial topic of the new elite class. As society becomes more divided, there are concerns that a select few are gaining increasing power and influence over the rest of us. From the worlds of politics, media and business, this new elite has been accused of promoting political correctness, cancel culture and stifling free speech.Laurence and Matt explore the origins of this group and the ways in which they have come to dominate public discourse. They discuss how the new elite's values and beliefs are shaping society, and the impact this is having on democracy, equality, and social issues.By the end of the show, you'll have a better understanding of the forces shaping our world and how we can navigate the challenges they present. Join the conversation and gain valuable insights into the new elite, political correctness, cancel culture, and the broader cultural shifts taking place in our society.You can follow Matt on twitter here: https://twitter.com/GoodwinMJ You can follow Laurence on twitter here: https://twitter.com/LozzaFoxYou can follow The Reclaim Party on twitter here: https://twitter.com/thereclaimpartyYou can follow  @ReclaimTheMedia_   on twitter here: https://twitter.com/media_reclaim#TheLaurenceFoxShow #MattGoodwin #TheNewElite 

Very interesting chat with Alex McCarron of the Reclaim Party. Alex is a filmmaker and former journalist with great insights into the state of politics and the culture war. He talks to Nick about: -How to change politics -What 'woke' really means -Working with Laurence Fox -Where he stands on conspiracy theories  -The real reason for climate alarmism  -His theory of the 'inverse gammon' And lots more! Alex's Twitter: https://twitter.com/alexmaccaroon Reclaim The Media YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReclaimTheMedia_ This episode is sponsored by: Harry Willis: https://www.instagram.com/harry_willis/ https://willis-coaching.addpotion.com Get tickets for Weekly Sceptic Live: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-weekly-sceptic-live-tickets-600595195397 Nick's Twitter: @nickdixoncomic Nick's Substack: nickdixon.substack.com Nick's YouTube (with all Current Thing episodes): https://www.youtube.com/@nickdixoncomedy Produced by the legendary Jason Clift.

Part 1 of the interview by Laurence Fox of The Reclaim Party in which Calvin Robinson reveals his treatment by The Church of England and #BishopSarahM#Excommunication #ChurchForAll #BishopofFulhamhttps://www.reclaimparty.co.uk/https://twitter.com/thereclaimpartyhttps://www.instagram.com/the_reclaim_party/https://www.facebook.com/thereclaimpartyofficialhttps://rumble.com/user/ReclaimTheMediahttps://www.gettr.com/user/thereclaimparty

The Laurence Fox Show: Unfiltered Freedom, OFCOM, Free Speech & The Media with  @nickdixoncomedy . In this episode of The Laurence Fox Show, join Laurence as he sits down with comedian Nick Dixon to discuss unfettered freedom, Ofcom, freedom of speech and the media. This is a show you won't want to miss!Nick Dixon, host of GBNEWS show Headliners, is known for his thought-provoking comedy, and in this episode, he shares his views on the state of freedom in our society and the impact that organisations like Ofcom and the media are having on free speech.Laurence Fox is a well-known British actor, singer, and political activist who is no stranger to controversial discussions. He brings his unique perspective to the table and sparks an animated debate with Nick Dixon on these important topics.#NickDixon #LaurenceFox #Ofcom To sign up to The Reclaim Party click here: https://www.reclaimparty.co.uk/To support The Reclaim Party click here: https://www.facebook.com/becomesupporter/thereclaimpartyofficial/To follow The Reclaim Party on twitter click here: https://twitter.com/thereclaimpartyTo follow Laurence Fox on twitter click here: https://twitter.com/LozzaFoxTo follow Nick Dixon on twitter click here: https://twitter.com/nickdixoncomicTo read Nick's latest Substack article click here: https://nickdixon.substack.com/To subscribe to Nick's podcast click here: https://currentthingpod.podbean.com/Subscribe to Nick's youtube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/@nickdixoncomedy

Hey, y'all! This week we have another installment of Gadfly Movie Night. Political nerd Gabby Vice and screenwriter Jake Disch join us to talk about a movie that never figures out what it is and how much Laurence Fox & Hunter Biden really have in common.

Support the Delingpod's existence by joining James' Locals: https://jamesdelingpole.locals.com/ Hunter and Gather are a real food and supplements brand, simplifying optimal healthy living for all through a great tasting, award-winning range of products all free from gluten, refined sugar, and inflammatory seed oils. Head to hunterandgatherfoods.com and use code TDP10 for a 10% discount off your order. James is spontaneously joined by Yorkshireman Laurence (or ‘Lozza') Fox, leader of the Reclaim Party. You can follow Laurence on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LozzaFox and find more info about the Reclaim Party at: https://www.reclaimparty.co.uk/ Freedom isn't free - James needs your support to continue creating The Delingpod. There are many ways you can show your support to James: Join the James Delingpole Community as a paid supporter at: jamesdelingpole.locals.com Support James monthly at: subscribestar.com/jamesdelingpole Support James' Writing at: substack.com/jamesdelingpole www.delingpoleworld.com Buy James a Coffee at: buymeacoffee.com/jamesdelingpole   Find full episodes of The Delingpod for free (and leave a 5-star rating) on: Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-delingpod-the-james-delingpole-podcast/id1449753062 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7bdfnyRzzeQsAZQ6OT9e7G?si=a21dc71c7a144f48 Podbean: delingpole.podbean.com Odysee: https://odysee.com/@JamesDelingpoleChannel:0 Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/JamesDelingpole BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/Zxu5yMwNWTbs/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheJamesDelingpoleChannel   Follow James on Social Media: Twitter: twitter.com/jamesdelingpole Instagram: instagram.com/delingpodclips GETTR: gettr.com/jamesdelingpole Telegram: https://t.me/+dAx_7JX7WQlwYzVk

To watch this episode and other past episodes, please visit Greg Ellis' YouTube channel.Join our Community: https://community.therespondent.com/ Listeners can find Laurence Fox on Twitter: https://twitter.com/LozzaFox and his website: https://www.laurencefox.co.uk/. Laurence Fox is an actor, musician, and political commentator. He co-founded and is the leader of The Reclaim Party and The Bad Law Project.In this episode, we chat about Laurence's experience with the family court system, the current battle he is in for custody of his sons, being guilty until proven more guilty, the devaluation of fatherhood in our current culture, and much more.“Tomorrow we have to just pray that the judge returns the kids to the situation they've lived in for six and a half years, and I need to get their mom and me, so I'm not saying that I'm better and she's worse. I'm just saying you need to get me, her, and our kids around a table so that we can talk about each other's problems and we can find a way through, in a way which is not impeccably hostile.” - Laurence Fox Show Notes: [0:00] Intro[1:30] Greg welcomes Laurence back to the show[2:10] Laurence talks about family law situation[5:45] Potential medical intervention with child[7:10] Laurence's cell phone incident with his son[10:10] Laurence's ex-wife files a complaint with social services[12:05] Laurence has not seen his kids in weeks and has tried to contact his ex-wife with no response[14:10] Feeling like he has no options [16:25] Greg talks about his own experiences with being separated from his children[20:10] Parents must be able to discipline their children + children needing their fathers[22:30] Being guilty until proven more guilty + doing what's best for the children[29:30] Laurence tells story about his oldest son[30:40] Not being allowed to discuss these issues publicly [32:45] Walking away and trying to make peace [39:40] Laurence asks Greg: “What do you wish you'd done when you were in my place?”[41:30] Telling the truth and being afraid of offending people[43:10] Parental alienation [46:30] How victimhood culture is connected with this[48:40] How do you re-establish your relationship with your child once it's undermined by a court?[52:20] Family court system incentives and devaluation of fatherhood [57:00] Domestic violence being charged in a criminal court[58:40] Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard[59:05] “Believe all women”[1:01:30] Laurence talks about his upcoming court hearings and the importance of mediation [1:04:10] Greg wraps up the showThanks for listening to another episode! If you're loving the show and want to help grow the show, please head over to Itunes and leave a rating and review! How to Leave an Apple Podcast Review: First, Open the podcast app on your iPhone, Mac, or iPad. Then, hit the “Search” tab at the bottom right-hand corner of the page and search for The Respondent. Select the podcast, scroll down to find the subheading “Ratings & Reviews”. and select “Write a Review.” Next, select the number of stars you'd like to leave. Please choose 5 stars! Using the text box which says “Title,” write a title for your review. Then in the text box, write the review itself. The review can be up to 300 words long, but doesn't need to be much more than: “Love the show! Thanks!” or Once you're done select “Send” in the upper right-hand corner.

Support the Delingpod by joining James' Locals: https://jamesdelingpole.locals.com/ James Fox is an English actor. He appeared in several notable films of the 1960s and early 1970s, including King Rat, The Servant, Thoroughly Modern Millie and Performance, before quitting the screen for several years to be an evangelical Christian. James's son, Laurence Fox, is the leader of the Reclaim Party.  Freedom isn't free - James needs your support to continue creating The Delingpod. There are many ways you can show your support to James: Join the James Delingpole Community as a paid supporter at: jamesdelingpole.locals.com Support James monthly at: subscribestar.com/jamesdelingpole Support James' Writing at: substack.com/jamesdelingpole www.delingpoleworld.com Buy James a Coffee at: buymeacoffee.com/jamesdelingpole   Find full episodes of The Delingpod for free (and leave a 5-star rating) on: Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-delingpod-the-james-delingpole-podcast/id1449753062 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7bdfnyRzzeQsAZQ6OT9e7G?si=a21dc71c7a144f48 Podbean: delingpole.podbean.com Odysee: https://odysee.com/@JamesDelingpoleChannel:0 Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/JamesDelingpole BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/Zxu5yMwNWTbs/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheJamesDelingpoleChannel   Follow James on Social Media: Twitter: twitter.com/jamesdelingpole Instagram: instagram.com/delingpodclips GETTR: gettr.com/jamesdelingpole Telegram: https://t.me/+dAx_7JX7WQlwYzVk  

On this episode of Dewbs & Co. Laurence Fox - Leader of the Reclaim Party & Kevin Craig - Founder of PLMR join Michelle to look at all the today's big stories.Conservative leadership hopefuls whittled down to just eight candidates - who's the favourite now? Police apologising ‘wholeheartedly' to Telford child sex abuse victims & could Covid masks be making a comeback, as hospitals reintroduce mandatory face masks?All that on today's episode of Dewbs & Co. Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

On this episode of Dewbs & Co. Marton Daubney - Deputy Leader of the Reclaim Party, James Woudhuysen - Visiting Professor at London Southbank Univeristy, and Rabina Khan - Former Liberal Democrat Advisor. In the UK, we are pretty self sufficient in growing the food that we eat, however when it comes to the picking of it, there is a problem. Tons of food is getting wasted, so the government is looking at creating 10,000 new work visas for people to come into the country and do the work. But does that defeat one of the objectives of Brexit?Today has seen the launch of a fresh campaign for Scottish independence. Michelle asks, should Scotland be independent?And, second homes - should people be allowed to buy one, or not?All that on today's episode of Dewbs & Co. Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

It's been a while since Harry Miller was with us and since then he has taken on a whole new role as Chairman of the Reclaim Party, which is led by Laurence Fox. There are so many areas and issues which need addressing in the UK and this latest crusade looks directly at legislation. Bad Law Project seeks to highlight laws that are not beneficial to society. Legislations that actually harm our freedoms and effect the way we live our lives. And there is no shortage of bad laws on the statute books in the UK and no shortage of bad interpretations by our police, judiciary and authorities. Join us to hear what it's all about and how you can be a part of this new initiative. Harry Miller is a former police officer and businessman from Lincolnshire. He hit the headlines in 2020 when Humberside Police visited Harry to ‘check his thinking' after a complaint over alleged transphobic tweets he had made. It was recorded on a national database as a non-crime hate incident. Subsequently Harry won a legal challenge against a national policy for forces to record gender-critical views as non-crime “hate incidents”. The Court of Appeal ruled the guidance was wrongly used and it had a “chilling effect” on his freedom of speech. This all led to Harry founding the pressure group ‘We Are Fair Cop' and is he is now one of the leading free speech campaigners in the UK. And now as chairman of The Reclaim Party, he brings the hard-nosed pragmatism that is required to establish Reclaim as a vibrant and sustainable political movement. Follow and support Harry and The Reclaim Party at the links below. https://gettr.com/user/thereclaimparty https://twitter.com/HarryTheOwl101 https://twitter.com/WeAreFairCop https://twitter.com/BadLawTeam https://www.thereclaimparty/co.uk https://www.faircop.org.uk/ Interview recorded 1.6.22 *Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast. Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on GETTR https://gettr.com/user/BoschFawstin To sign up for our weekly email, find our social media, podcasts, video, livestream platforms and more go to https://heartsofoak.org/find-us/ Please like, subscribe and share!

Liz Phillips is back with us as we take a look at stories and articles that have got our attention in this weeks news and media. She has been sharpening her teeth, ready to let rip on the woke world as we look at the revelation that more than half of police forces in England and Wales have received more corruption and sexual misconduct complaints relative to their size. The government's flagship counter-extremism Prevent strategy is failing to engage with Muslim communities with a "vacuum" of information about its purpose being left out which was then being filled by Islamists, and fear of racism accusations made some local authorities uncomfortable with tackling extremism. With the Platinum Jubilee in the UK this weekend we hear Her Majesty will miss her second event of felicitations, the Epsom Derby horse race while the Archbishop of Canterbury fails to attend a thanksgiving service for The Queen due to Covid. Lolz. We in the UK have been responsible for many musical icons and legends. The Beatles, Oasis, The Rolling Stones and Elton John to name but a few, but today we present The Kunts (not a typo) who are storming the pop charts with the very catchy tune 'Prince Andrew is a Sweaty Nonce', just in time for the Jubilee celebrations! Monkeypox mystery continues as it is revealed the outbreak is being linked to gay haunts with over 80% of the cases in London and only 2 women being reported as having the virus. The constant stream of small vessels filled with illegal migrants continues its assault on our south coast with the numbers that have crossed this year approaching 10,000, almost 3x the rate of 2021. A sad prediction by experts as they warn that almost 500,000 small businesses are at risk of going under within weeks as rising costs have created a 'ticking timebomb' with profits being wiped out by soaring energy bills. The Reclaim Party led by Laurence Fox has a new campaign called The Bad Law project, so we take a quick look at that before being joined next Monday by Harry Miller, Chairman of Reclaim, who will tell us about it in more detail. Liz Phillips was brought up as a farmer's daughter in rural Kent in South East England. She has led a varied life, working in many industries including animal feed manufacturing, fencing, paper making and security. Liz was on the management team that opened the first ever Argos store, she owned and leased three restaurants in Mid Wales and has even managed a 5000 acre estate in France!! A member of both the Referendum Party and UKIP working latterly for Nigel Farage and Gerard Batten as PA, to help achieve the referendum and Brexit vote. Liz also has fond memories of working with the late Stuart Wheeler to reach the same goal. Married to an ex serviceman for the last 34 years, Liz and her husband started their own TV company (Freedom Digital Media Ltd.) in 2020 to rebut the propaganda and fake news from the MSM!! This covers Freedom Digital Broadcasting for TV available on ROKU, Amazon Fire and on their website, Free Tube – with similar properties to YouTube, and Free Voice on Mastodon. Liz and her husband have also used their extensive knowledge of the security industry to re-train and help with the tutoring of Peace Constables and Common Law. https://freedomdigitalbroadcasting.tv/ Recorded as a live news discussion 4.6.22 *Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast. Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on GETTR https://gettr.com/user/BoschFawstin To sign up for our weekly email, find our social media, podcasts, video, livestreaming platforms and more go to https://heartsofoak.org/connect/ Please like, subscribe & share! Links to this weeks stories Fears about police misconduct swamp forces across Britain https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10882617/Nearly-HALF-police-forces-received-misconduct-claims-1-000-employees-Met.html Anti-extremism Prevent strategy 'failing to engage Muslim communities' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-61679347 Platinum Jubilee: Queen to miss Derby but celebrations continue https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61626176 Platinum Jubilee: Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby to miss service due to Covid https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61635972.amp The Kunts single slamming ‘sweaty' Prince Andrew https://metro.co.uk/2022/06/02/kunts-song-slamming-sweaty-prince-andrew-climbs-charts-over-jubilee-16760282/ Britain's monkeypox outbreak is linked https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10875645/Britains-monkeypox-outbreak-linked-gay-bars-saunas-Grindr.html?ito=native_share_article-masthead Migrant numbers crossing Channel nearly at 10,000 this year https://www.gbnews.uk/news/migrant-numbers-crossing-channel-nearly-at-10000-this-year-after-eight-small-boats-arrive-in-dover-today/307094 Almost 500,000 UK small businesses ‘at risk of going bust within weeks' https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/may/30/almost-500000-uk-small-businesses-at-risk-of-going-bust-within-weeks?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=news_tab&fs=e&s=cl Rape of Britain Ep 3 trailer https://gettr.com/post/p1cjl0w4e10 The Reclaim Party New Campaign https://gettr.com/post/p1c9m5ma527 Liz Phillips is back with us as we take a look at stories and articles that have got our attention in this weeks news and media. She has been sharpening her teeth, ready to let rip on the woke world as we look at the revelation that more than half of police forces in England and Wales have received more corruption and sexual misconduct complaints relative to their size. The government's flagship counter-extremism Prevent strategy is failing to engage with Muslim communities with a "vacuum" of information about its purpose being left out which was then being filled by Islamists, and fear of racism accusations made some local authorities uncomfortable with tackling extremism. With the Platinum Jubilee in the UK this weekend we hear Her Majesty will miss her second event of felicitations, the Epsom Derby horse race while the Archbishop of Canterbury fails to attend a thanksgiving service for The Queen due to Covid. Lolz. We in the UK have been responsible for many musical icons and legends. The Beatles, Oasis, The Rolling Stones and Elton John to name but a few, but today we present The Kunts (not a typo) who are storming the pop charts with the very catchy tune 'Prince Andrew is a Sweaty Nonce', just in time for the Jubilee celebrations! Monkeypox mystery continues as it is revealed the outbreak is being linked to gay haunts with over 80% of the cases in London and only 2 women being reported as having the virus. The constant stream of small vessels filled with illegal migrants continues its assault on our south coast with the numbers that have crossed this year approaching 10,000, almost 3x the rate of 2021. A sad prediction by experts as they warn that almost 500,000 small businesses are at risk of going under within weeks as rising costs have created a 'ticking timebomb' with profits being wiped out by soaring energy bills. The Reclaim Party led by Laurence Fox has a new campaign called The Bad Law project, so we take a quick look at that before being joined next Monday by Harry Miller, Chairman of Reclaim, who will tell us about it in more detail. Liz Phillips was brought up as a farmer's daughter in rural Kent in South East England. She has led a varied life, working in many industries including animal feed manufacturing, fencing, paper making and security. Liz was on the management team that opened the first ever Argos store, she owned and leased three restaurants in Mid Wales and has even managed a 5000 acre estate in France!! A member of both the Referendum Party and UKIP working latterly for Nigel Farage and Gerard Batten as PA, to help achieve the referendum and Brexit vote. Liz also has fond memories of working with the late Stuart Wheeler to reach the same goal. Married to an ex serviceman for the last 34 years, Liz and her husband started their own TV company (Freedom Digital Media Ltd.) in 2020 to rebut the propaganda and fake news from the MSM!! This covers Freedom Digital Broadcasting for TV available on ROKU, Amazon Fire and on their website, Free Tube – with similar properties to YouTube, and Free Voice on Mastodon. Liz and her husband have also used their extensive knowledge of the security industry to re-train and help with the tutoring of Peace Constables and Common Law. https://freedomdigitalbroadcasting.tv/ Recorded as a live news discussion 4.6.22 Audio Podcast version available at ⁣https://heartsofoak.podbean.com/ and all major podcast directories. To sign up for our weekly email, find our social media, podcasts, video, livestreaming platforms and more go to https://heartsofoak.org/connect/ Please like, subscribe & share! Links to this weeks stories Fears about police misconduct swamp forces across Britain https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10882617/Nearly-HALF-police-forces-received-misconduct-claims-1-000-employees-Met.html Anti-extremism Prevent strategy 'failing to engage Muslim communities' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-61679347 Platinum Jubilee: Queen to miss Derby but celebrations continue https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61626176 Platinum Jubilee: Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby to miss service due to Covid https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61635972.amp The Kunts single slamming ‘sweaty' Prince Andrew https://metro.co.uk/2022/06/02/kunts-song-slamming-sweaty-prince-andrew-climbs-charts-over-jubilee-16760282/ Britain's monkeypox outbreak is linked https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10875645/Britains-monkeypox-outbreak-linked-gay-bars-saunas-Grindr.html?ito=native_share_article-masthead Migrant numbers crossing Channel nearly at 10,000 this year https://www.gbnews.uk/news/migrant-numbers-crossing-channel-nearly-at-10000-this-year-after-eight-small-boats-arrive-in-dover-today/307094 Almost 500,000 UK small businesses ‘at risk of going bust within weeks' https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/may/30/almost-500000-uk-small-businesses-at-risk-of-going-bust-within-weeks?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=news_tab&fs=e&s=cl Rape of Britain Ep 3 trailer https://gettr.com/post/p1cjl0w4e10 The Reclaim Party New Campaign https://gettr.com/post/p1c9m5ma527

Laurence Paul Fox is an English actor and political activist, who's been an outspoken critic of political correctness and ‘cancel culture', both on national TV and social media.Born in 1978 in Leeds, the third of five children, he enrolled at Harrow School at the age of 13 before moving onto the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art. Laurence graduated in 2001.He is best known for playing DS James Hathaway in the British TV drama series Lewis from 2006 to 2015.He first appeared in The Hole (2001), and has since appeared in numerous films, national television features, and theatre productions. Fox is also a singer-songwriter and guitarist with his debut album, “Holding Patterns”, released in February 2016, followed up with “A Grief Observed” in 2020.He is the founder and Leader of the UK's Reclaim Party, and in March 2021, he announced he would stand against Sadiq Khan in the forthcoming London mayoral election to fight against extreme political correctness.If you enjoyed this content, you can show your $upport by tipping Clifton on Twitter:https://www.twitter.com/cliftonaduncanSubscribe to my Substack, "Musings from the Apocalypse":https://cliftonduncan.substack.comTIMESTAMPS:0:00:00 -- Being Hunter Biden0:10:45 -- Social Justice and "The End of Art"0:31:00 -- Anti-Humanism and Racism in the "Equity" Movement1:06:35 -- The Reclaim Party, and Going Forward

Nick, Roxy and Joe, come together to assess the most recent goings on in the sad social lives of the far right. Britain First have lots of possibly made-up signatures on their anti RNLI, pro-drowning,  campaign, Ben Raymond is doing bird (8 years of a custodial that even an abolitionist might like to celebrate), the Reclaim Party has got into bed with a real crank, and 'Fenek Solere' of PA seems to have stopped publishing entirely- off the back of our Patriotic Alternative report.Unfortunately, despite the pratfalls of the idiotic far right, and major wins by antifascists, the new migration bill has, at the flick of a pen, thrown the legal status of 6 million British citizens into question. It is another deeply worrying act emanating not from the fringe far right, but instead from the mainstream of politics- in this case the ruling Conservative party.

This time on #SWYSI we are joined by barrister & legal commentator Francis Hoar, author of "In Protection of Freedom of Speech", a report commissioned by Laurence Fox's "Reclaim Party" and which includes a foreword by former Supreme Court Justice Lord Sumption. According to Mr. Hoar, a right to freedom of expression should be enshrined in UK law to counter the rising tide of “cancel culture” and other forms of woke-inspired censorship and discrimination. His report comes as the government propose an ‘Online Safety Bill' which would require social media companies to censor ‘harmful' speech that might offend adults, even if no criminal offence was committed. In his report Mr. Hoar proposes three key reforms designed to give UK citizens the same protection as the First Amendment to the US Constitution: 1. The police should lose the power to investigate so-called “non-crime hate incidents” and the Scottish Hate Crime Bill should be scrapped 2. Websites should be prevented from censoring content posted by users unless a criminal offence or civil wrong is committed 3. Employers should no longer be able to sack people for their speech The report may be downloaded here: https://reclaimparty.co.uk/wp-content... --------------- SUBSCRIBE: If you are enjoying the show, please subscribe to our channel on YouTube (click the Subscribe Button underneath the video and then Click on the Bell icon next to it to make sure you Receive All Notifications) AUDIO: If you prefer Audio you can subscribe on itunes or Soundcloud. Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-923838732 itunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/s... SUPPORT/DONATE: "So What You're Saying Is.." is still very new and to continue to produce quality programming we need your support. Your donations will help ensure the show not only continues but can grow into a major online platform challenging the cultural orthodoxies dominant in our institutions, public life and media. PAYPAL/ CARD PAYMENTS - ONE TIME & MONTHLY: You can donate in a variety of ways via our website: http://www.newcultureforum.org.uk/#do... It is set up to accept one time and monthly donations. ABOUT THE SHOW: So What You're Saying Is... (SWYSI) is a weekly discussion show with experts and significant figures from the political, cultural and academic worlds. The host is Peter Whittle (@PRWhittle), Founder & Director of The New Culture Forum, a Westminster-based think tank that seeks to challenge the cultural orthodoxies dominant in the media, academia, and British culture / society at large. JOIN US ON SOCIAL MEDIA: Web: http://www.newcultureforum.org.uk F: https://www.facebook.com/NCultureForum/ Y: http://www.youtube.com/c/NewCultureForum T: http://www.twitter.com/NewCultureForum (@NewCultureForum)

Leo Kearse is a multi-award-winning Scottish comedian who is known for his controversial material taking on ‘wokeness'. Kearse has previously been crowned UK Pun Champion and Scottish Comedian of the Year, and most recently he ran in Scotland for the Reclaim Party against the Scottish Hate Crime Bill. Support the Delingpod!!! https://www.subscribestar.com/jamesdelingpole

Support the Delingpod!!! https://www.subscribestar.com/jamesdelingpole Leo Kearse is a multi-award-winning Scottish comedian who is known for his controversial material taking on ‘wokeness'. Kearse has previously been crowned UK Pun Champion and Scottish Comedian of the Year, and most recently he ran in Scotland for the Reclaim Party against the Scottish Hate Crime Bill.

On this episode, guest hosts Prismatic and Pablo chat with Gord from the Little Red School House about the Party for Reclamation and Survival's Party School.We discuss topics surrounding how our classes are set up and how they are facilitated, along with the topics we cover, comparing them to more conventional classroom structures and learning methods.We go on to discuss methods that radical educators within the system might engage their students in a dialectic learning experience through engaging in questions and context-building stories to help better understand concepts and ideas.You can find the Little Red School House @LRedSchoolHouse on Twitter and you can support them via Patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/LittleRedSchoolHouseSupport the show (https://www.patreon.com/ploughandstars)

On this episode, Gord gets to chat with members and facilitators of The Party For Reclamation and Survival Party School. We discuss topics surrounding how their classes are set up and how they are facilitated, along with the topics they covered, comparing them to more conventional classroom structures and learning methods. We go onto discuss methods that radical educators within the system might engage their students in a dialectic learning experience through engaging in questions and context-building stories to help better understand concepts and ideas. You can find the Party for Reclamation and Survival at on Twitter at @Reclaim_Survive and contact their party school at ras (dot) school (at) protonmail (dot) com.

The BBC is facing a potentially existential crisis. Libertarian Tory backbenchers who don’t believe in it in the first place see, as Harold MacMillan put it, 'one damn thing after another' - Rolf Harris, Stuart Hall, Jimmy Savile and now their former religious affairs editor Martin Bashir. Of course, champions of the free market probably wouldn’t like the BBC’s socialised business model even if it was run by Franciscan Friars, but is this the moment when a critical mass of enemies of the BBC can finally strike? Laurence Fox sees this story from one side. He is of course an actor of note and has performed on the Corporation; however, in what now seems to be his day job, as the leader of the Reclaim Party, he clearly cannot be counted as one of Auntie’s friends – he came aboard Sputnik to tell us why. Of course the proximate cause of the BBC crisis is the forgeries which may have tricked the late Princess Diana into speaking as she did in her now infamous Panorama interview with Martin Bashir. The cover-up which followed prompted the man who would one day be King, Prince William, to make a heartfelt attribution of BBC culpability in his mother’s death and a plea that the BBC interview with his mother should never be aired again. Brian Basham is a supporter of the BBC but has a rather jaundiced view of the royal institution. He co-produced a film on the death of Princess Diana which, to say the least, was extremely critical of the Royal family. So we invited him onto Sputnik to give us a rather different view of the BBC.

Reclaim Party leader Laurence Fox tells Brendan O’Neill about his campaign to liberate London from lockdown and cancel culture.Support the show: https://www.spiked-online.com/donate-to-spiked/ Sign up to Today on spiked: https://www.spiked-online.com/newsletters/ Sponsored by: The Great Courses Plus: https://www.thegreatcoursesplus.com/brendan ExpressVPN: http://expressvpn.com/brendan 

Dr. Debra Soh talks to London mayoral candidate and leader of the Reclaim Party, Laurence Fox, about relationship dealbreakers, divorce, what he looks for in a romantic partner, and co-parenting successfully. Get "The End of Gender" at DrDebraSoh.com. The audiobook is FREE on Audible and read by Dr. Soh (link available on her website). Follow Dr. Soh on Instagram & Twitter: @DrDebraSoh © 2021 Dr. Debra Soh

In our first episode of A Pint Of Interest, we sit down with Calvin Robinson. Calvin is a political commentator and activist and has been involved with campaigns from Defund the BBC to the Reclaim Party. We ask him whether wokeism has gone too far? Are puzzles racist and have a spicy debate about the BBC over a pint. You won't want to miss it! Subscribe to our social medias @apintofinterest to stay up to date with our latest episodes, to find out more about our hosts and to pose questions for future guests we'll have on the show!