Podcasts about Boris

Domingo é a vez do eleitor / Justiça comparece e mela debate da Globo / Lula e Flávio seguem empatados / Esses são assuntos em destaque na edição de hoje do Jornal do Boris

The right oil temp, inop and new equipment, and oily turbos are on tap for this episode. Email podcasts@aopa.org for a chance to be on the show. Join the world's largest aviation community at aopa.org/join Full episode notes below: Grace's engine runs rough above about 2,000 rpm. She currently has a single probe monitor, and is waiting to install a more comprehensive engine monitor. She's worried about running too cold, given that her oil temp is relatively low, even in the Pennsylvania summer. It's not too low in her 180-horsepower Sundowner, Paul said. She's unsure what's too cool and how to check to see if there's too much moisture in the oil, which would indicate it's not running hot enough to burn off the moisture. Mike said that an oil analysis is the best way to tell, and so far hers have been consistently good.   Boris is looking deep into the regs and is wondering about equipment failures. He has a friend with a Piper Seminole and the manifold pressure gauge was inop. The gauge isn't listed in the type certificate, minimum equipment list, etc. The current Part 23 doesn't specifically require a manifold pressure gauge with a controllable pitch propeller. However, 91.113(d) says that the equipment must be operational as originally certified, and Part 23 at the time required a manifold pressure gauge for an engine with a controllable pitch propeller.   Mark is wondering how turbos impact oil. Mike had written that the ratio of displacement to oil capacity is an indicator of how long you can go between changes. An IO-550 with a small sump calls for more frequent oil changes, for example. The other thing Mark has heard is that an airplane with a turbo should have more frequent oil changes, and he's wondering if that's true. The turbocharger doesn't make the oil dirty, Mike says. If the oil cooler is working properly it also shouldn't make the oil run hotter. Paul also said not to worry because it doesn't seem to make a difference. Mike said he's seen really poor oil analysis reports with Cirrus that run to around 75 hours.   Jacob is a new A&P and he's trying to figure out some of the ELT installation regulations. He's unsure whether the remote audio and controller is a different installation for the purpose of the STC, regs, logbook, etc. The hosts agree that the TSO that form the basis of the ELT certification requires the remote switch.

Lula ou Flávio? Domingo, a pesquisa final / Mais da metade dos eleitores ainda não definiram voto para senadores / Rebu no avião: copiloto esfaqueia piloto / Esses são assuntos em destaque na edição de hoje do Jornal do Boris

Send us Fan MailEP #78 - Angels, Demons & Therapy - Boris WalterWhat happens when a psychotherapist encounters something that challenges everything he thought he knew about the mind?Today we're joined by Boris Walter, an ex-FIFO boilermaker turned psychotherapist and hypnotherapist, to explore what happens when psychology collides with spirituality. We talk angels, demons, therapy, hypnosis and past lives, and the extraordinary experiences that have challenged Boris's understanding of consciousness, healing and the nature of reality.In this episode we explore:From offshore oil rigs to psychotherapyThe hypnosis session that changed everythingPast lives, death and continuity of consciousnessArchangel Ezekiel and the message Boris says he receivedAngels, demons and the danger of labelsWhen clients report psychic experiencesWhat happens when belief systems start to crackWhy more knowledge may not be the answerCourage, faith and the power of stillnessTurning spiritual insight into real-world action#BorisWalter #AngelsAndDemons #PastLifeRegression #Hypnotherapy #Psychotherapy #Consciousness #SpiritualAwakening #AlteredStates #Spirituality #SpiritualPodcast  CONNECT WITH BORIS:Website https://www.boriswalter.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/boriswalterofficial/ Support the show

Click to Subscribe: https://bit.ly/Youtube-Subscribe-SoapDirt Young and the Restless spoilers for Oct 5-9, 2026 reveal that Nick Newman (Joshua Morrow) is seen in a fierce confrontation, while Victoria Newman (Amelia Heinle) writhes in discomfort in interactions with her daughter, Claire Newman (Hayley Erin). Additional spoilers reveal that Logan Kirkland (Tommy Walker) lands in the hospital in a critical state following another overdose. Meanwhile, Nikki Newman (Melody Thomas Scott) staunchly defends a crucial matter. Y&R spoilers deliver a tense turn of events as Adam Newman (Mark Grossman) informs the family that Marie has overdosed yet again and is hospitalized, unconscious. This news triggers Nick to confront drug dealer Joe, escalating into a worrisome situation for Sharon and Esther. Meanwhile, Victoria and Kyle Abbott (Michael Mealor) continue their flirtatious escapades under the aliases Natasha and Boris, further complicating their relationships. Spoilers for Young and Restless suggest the plot thickens as Nick becomes more determined to help Marie, even covering all her medical expenses and considering bringing her family to her side. However, Adam reveals that Marie's reported family is non-existent, leaving Nick devastated. This revelation triggers a darker side of Nick, who is seen muttering threats against Joe. More Y&R spoilers indicate that Victoria's sudden family meeting leaves Kyle disappointed at their cancelled rendezvous. As the week progresses, Nick takes matters into his own hands, possibly leading to a violent altercation with the drug dealer. Simultaneously, Victor Newman (Eric Braeden) rallies the family to form a plan in support of Nick, anticipating potential legal issues that might require the expertise of Michael Baldwin (Christian Jules Leblanc). Spoilers for Young and Restless indicate that Adam and Sally Spectra (Courtney Hope) reaching an understanding, possibly linked to their wedding or a pact to keep Marie's overdose off the media radar. Additionally, Audra and Chelsea conclude their feud, while Victoria shows Kyle a new side of herself. A possible reunion between Tessa Porter (Cait Fairbanks) and Daniel Romalotti (Michael Graziadei), deepening feelings between Victoria and Kyle, and the return of Jill Abbott (Jess Walton). You are listening to Belynda from Soap Dirt. The most listened to soap opera podcaster. Visit our Young and the Restless section of Soap Dirt: https://soapdirt.com/category/young-and-the-restless/ Listen to our Podcasts: https://soapdirt.podbean.com/ And Check out our always up-to-date Young and the Restless Spoilers page at: https://soapdirt.com/young-and-the-restless-spoilers/ Check Out our Social Media... Twitter: https://twitter.com/SoapDirtTV Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SoapDirt Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/soapdirt/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@soapdirt Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/soapdirt/

Lula e Flávio seguem empatados nas pesquisas do segundo turno / Sem grandes ideias candidatos a governador debatem na Globo / Trump entrega a empresários o comando da IA / Esses são assuntos em destaque na edição de hoje do Jornal do Boris

We are excited to have Anthropic share their latest AI x Finance work at AI Engineer New York, coming up in 2 weeks!In case you've been under a rock, here's a non-exhaustive list of what Anthropic has been shipping since closing the largest fundraise of all time in May at $47B ARR:* June: Launched Claude Tag and Sonnet 5 and Fable 5* July: Opus 5, /checkup. crossed $65B ARR* Last month: Fable/Mythos 5.1, and EFS (upcoming pod)* IPO target $2T, end 2026 ARR estimated $100B* Cowork/chat merged before did* Claude Mods* Dario endorses the same Pacing the Frontier message cosigned by all labs* Last week: Opus 5.5, Plugins portal, Cloud Sessions/Claude Projects* Today: Sonnet 5.5!Today's episode should catch you up, with Thariq Shihipar, the explainer-king of Anthropic, who we last caught up on Fable launch day with The Field Guide to Fable:The Future of Mutable SoftwarePay special attention to Claude Mods (especially the cheatsheet):In general this is also the inverse of the other viral tweet from Thariq:Cloud Brain, Local HandsAnd give a try to Claude Projects:The “hands” terminology is not just an analogy for the local/cloud paradigm that is being built up at frontier coding agent companies like Cognition, but is ALSO particularly relevant to the safety systems discussions that we'll be discussing with Anthropic in an upcoming episode as they prepare to pace to frontier with responsible AI deployment.For those who want Thariq's writing tips we teased at the start of the pod, watch the full video here:From the rapid rise of Claude Code to a future where agents can rewrite their own harnesses, collaborate across teams, and operate across cloud and local environments, the way we build software is changing extraordinarily fast. In this episode, Anthropic's Thariq Shihipar joins swyx and Vibhu to unpack how power users are actually working with Claude Code today, why prompting remains a high-skill discipline, and where Anthropic thinks the agent harness is headed next.We go deep on Claude Code's evolving interface: Ask User Question and elicitation, artifacts as persistent generative interfaces, Claude Tag for multiplayer agent workflows, Projects, model effort, implementation notes, and the new Claude Mods system for customizing the harness itself. Thariq explains why Claude.md may eventually disappear, why the smartest model could also become the cheapest model for many tasks, and why mutable software could become a new paradigm for how applications are built and customized.The conversation then turns to agent security and Anthropic's “Pacing the Frontier” argument. Thariq walks through recent incidents where agents discovered unexpected ways to communicate, exploit infrastructure, reverse-engineer benchmark scorers, and chain vulnerabilities together. We discuss sandboxing, prompt injection, autonomous agents, interpretability, constitutional classifiers, probes, fallbacks, Auto Mode, and why securing increasingly capable agents may become one of the defining engineering problems of the next few years.We discuss:* Why agentic coding went from controversial to the default in less than a year* Why prompting is still one of the highest-leverage skills for working with Claude Code* How expert users build a mental model of Claude and what it can reliably one-shot* Why discovering your “unknown unknowns” matters more as agents become more capable* Artifacts as persistent, generative interfaces between humans and agents* How Claude could split into a cloud-based “brain,” local or remote “hands,” and dynamic interfaces* Claude Tag, Projects, and multiplayer agents and how collaborative agent workflows could evolve* Why spending more time on the initial prompt can dramatically reduce wasted agent work* When to use low, medium, high, or max effort for different engineering tasks* Why frontier models may eventually outperform smaller models on both intelligence and token efficiency* Why implementation notes can expose decisions the model considered but chose not to make* Why Claude.md may eventually disappear — and why starting without one can sometimes be better* Claude Mods: customizing the execution loop, UI, subagents, routing, and behavior of Claude Code* Model routers, forked agents, and supervisor agents that automatically improve agent workflows* Why Claude Mods may be an early preview of “mutable software”* The bitter lesson of harness engineering and why agent architectures go out of date so quickly* How Claude Tag is becoming an organizational harness for multiplayer work* Why giving agents access to company data creates an enormous new security surface* The Exploit-Bench incident where agents discovered ways to communicate and collaborate* Why agents hacked Hugging Face for scorer code rather than benchmark answers* How agents chained sandbox and infrastructure vulnerabilities in unexpected ways* Why increasingly capable agents make traditional security assumptions harder to maintain* The argument behind Anthropic's “Pacing the Frontier” proposal* Why software engineers are increasingly doing two jobs: engineering and keeping up with AI* Constitutional classifiers, probes, and fallbacks and what interpretability looks like in production* How Auto Mode checks whether an agent's actions actually match the user's permissions* Why Thariq can see serious AI risks while still having a relatively low p(doom)Thariq Shihipar* X: https://x.com/trq212* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/thariqshihiparTimestamps00:00:00 Introduction00:04:12 Ask User Question and the Future of Agent Interfaces00:08:29 Artifacts, Projects, and Multiplayer Agents00:15:37 Prompting as the Core Claude Code Skill00:21:52 Context, Effort, and Smarter Model Usage00:28:10 Is Claude.md Going Away?00:32:49 Claude Mods: Customizing the Claude Code Harness00:36:35 Model Routing and the Rise of Mutable Software00:44:40 The Bitter Lesson of Harness Engineering00:50:49 Claude Tag as an Organizational Harness00:55:59 Pacing the Frontier and Autonomous Agent Security00:58:22 Agents Hack Hugging Face for the Scorer01:05:34 What Happens When Agents Need More Compute?01:10:32 AI Coding Is Changing Faster Than Engineers Can Keep Up01:17:17 Probes, Fallbacks, Interpretability, and Auto Mode01:28:32 AI Risk, p(doom), and Closing ThoughtsTranscriptIntroduction: Life at Anthropic and the Pace of ChangeSwyx [00:00:00]: We're here in the studio with our friend Thariq from Anthropic, and I guess generally the Claude Code, I-- there's, there's so much, merging of boundaries and you've been so on top of everything since you joined Anthropic. You have been early to Claude Code itself, but then also, and you've told that story in other podcasts, and you've also been talking about seeing like an agent. Most recently you did the top AIE World Tour talk, Field Guide to Fable, which obviously you guys launched Fable, so that was-- that's cheating. And mostly you most recently also launching Claude Tag, and we're also gonna be talking about Pacing the Frontier. There's a lot going on in Anthropic. I guess top of the question is, what's it like being at Anthropic when there's so much going on?Thariq Shihipar [00:00:48]: I think that It is, like. I think you can get whiplash sometimes. I think, like, going. When I joined Anthropic, I joined because of Claude Code. Like Claude Code had just come out and I was like, “This is so good.” And Opus 4 to me was like just, I could not imagine, like, how good it was? And that was, like, a real moment for me. But I was, like, trying to convince, like, my startup friends to use agentic coding, and they're like, “Oh, no, like, our engineers don't think it's good enough,” or something. And I was like, “That's insane.” and now you, like, fast-forward, 12 months, less, and, like, it's just like, yeah, the default way that everyone codes, right? And I think that, like, just having to go from, like, selling it to, like, now, teaching people how to be. make the most use of it and be more efficient and things like that is just like a big, like big change. And, yeah, I think, like, it's just hard to stay on top of everything as a human? Like, I think things happen so fast and likeSwyx [00:01:51]: You just throw more agents at it.Thariq Shihipar [00:01:52]: Yeah, like that's like the agentic stuff scales much better than the, like, human stuff where it's like, oh, like, there are three things happening right now and, like, they're all emergencies and, like, how do you, like, respond to it? Yeah.Teaching People to Use Claude CodeVibhu [00:02:05]: What do you split your time on? You do a lot of technical writing, engineering work.Thariq Shihipar [00:02:10]: Yeah, so I think that, like, when I joined the Claude Code team, I wanted to teach people how to use Claude Code and I think that, like, that has been something that, like, I thought, like, maybe I would spend a little bit of time on it or, like, I'd, like, do. I was spending some time on the agent SDK first, and I wasn't exactly sure, like, how the bitter lesson would go, when it comes to, like, harnesses, right? Like, I think sometimes we were like, “Oh, like, what's after Claude Code?”? And so initially I was like, I just wanna teach people how to use Claude Code and make it easier to use Claude Code. And I think that has just, like, as the harnesses have gotten better and better, that's like the dominant problem now is, like, how do you use the agents, right? Like, it's like such a high skill expression thing. So I do that and then I do engineering work. I give talks, but I think, like, when I'm doing engineering work, my goal is to take that feedback that we get from users and also, like, then be able to talk about, like, hey, how to use Claude Code to do engineering. So there's like a good loop there. Yeah.Swyx [00:03:07]: Yeah. I'll-- For listeners, we'll attach, the talk that you did with Sarah for the Dev Writers, meetupThariq Shihipar [00:03:13]: Oh, yeahSwyx [00:03:13]: Which we talked a little bit about, well, first you do the work and then you talk about the work.Thariq Shihipar [00:03:16]: Right.Swyx [00:03:16]: Something like that.Thariq Shihipar [00:03:17]: Yeah.Swyx [00:03:17]: It's sow and reap orThariq Shihipar [00:03:19]: Yeah, reap and. Sow and reap.Swyx [00:03:21]: Something like that. Something like that. Yeah, so, and then just to preview a little bit, we are gonna talk about the evolution of the harness. It has come a long way from just being a CLI. We're gonna talk about, Claude Mods, which is starting to leak today, because you couldn't keep it secret.Thariq Shihipar [00:03:36]: Yeah. yeah.Swyx [00:03:39]: Yeah, there's, there's a lot, there. I think you started off with, like, adding ask user question tool, which people love and hate.Thariq Shihipar [00:03:48]: Yeah.Swyx [00:03:48]: Like, I thought it was, like, very innovative, and then now I have, like, my own version. You have your Interview Me version.Thariq Shihipar [00:03:55]: Yeah.Swyx [00:03:56]: And, yeah, everyone just has, like, their own stuff. And, like, it no longer matters ‘cause now you're supposed to, write prompts that create other prompts and loops and all these things.Ask User Question and Human-Agent InteractionThariq Shihipar [00:04:05]: Sure, yeah.Swyx [00:04:06]: So what's the state of the art, today? Like, what are people. what are you, like, telling people to do today?Thariq Shihipar [00:04:12]: Yeah, ask user question was the first time that the model was good at elicitation. I think this was, like, an emergent behavior that I, like, wanted to see if the models could do. I have, like a human-computer interaction background, so I, like, did that in undergrad and grad school. And so this was like. I think it's like human-agent interaction to me, like, trying to figure out, like, how can the agent communicate with you and extract, the requirements, right? I think that, like, one of the things about, like, that's difficult as Claude Code has gone broader and broader is that everyone has, like, their own way of using it, and it's very hard to, like, change the default behavior. So for example, like, if someone asks Claude Code to do something,Thariq Shihipar [00:04:59]: Sometimes they just want them to do the work, ‘cause they're, like, maybe a very good prompter, and sometimes they want. like, are not good at prompting? And you need. like, the agent needs to, like, clarify? And so that's, like, a good split. Like, and the ask you the question tool like, splits along that side where, like, are-- do you feel like you're good enough to instruct the agent as it is, or is the agent able to, like. does the agent need to, like, pull out more requirements and, like, collaborate with you more and really understand your preferences?Thariq Shihipar [00:05:27]: I, on the whole, believe that pretty much everyone is more on the latter than the former, that they, like, have more ambiguity and they know less than they want, than they, like, think they know about the problem. but, like, it's like a interface design problem to make that easy? And so, like, if you're designing a problem, like, or if you're going through a problem, like, things like what's the schema or, like, what's the call stack and things like that are really important. like, the details in the design are important. Ideally, you want to figure out some of these, like, hard problems ahead of time before starting implementation. And yeah, that's why they call, like, unknowns, right? And so I think that this will forever be, like, a skill in agentic coding is, like, figuring out your unknowns. So, like, because even if the model is, like, super intelligent- It, like, needs to know what you want? And, like, you have preferences. like, you need to like, pull the, pull that out. and so that's, like, I think how I'm, what I'm pushing. the question then is, like, how does the agent interact with you? And I think that has been HTML, has been, like, the big way of doing that. And we've recently added artifacts, right? And artifacts, I think we've done a bad job of, like, or, like, I've done a bad job of, like, explaining how to use them fully. We have a lot of property capabilities. They have a database associated with them? And so every artifact can store and write persistent data. They can, like, feed back into Claude? And so, like, one thing that, like, people are not doing yet that I'm trying to, like, encourage is, like, this idea of a dashboard artifact. So you have, like, Claude working on a project long-term. Maybe it's like a kanban or something. it can store that kanban data in its database. Multiple Claudes can access that data via, like, the artifact MCP, and, like, that artifact can, like, talk to those Claudes as well. And so, like, the. We're building the primitives for you to be able to have this, like, generative interface via artifacts that will, like, let you surface more of that rich detail from the agents. And I think that, like, almost everything with agents right now is, like, this problem of, like, you think what you want, but you don't really know what you want, and, like, the agents need a lot of detail, and collaborating with them in the loop is really important. And so artifacts are, like, the, like, way that we're trying to evolve there. But there's a lot of work to do because it's so much more complicated than, like, a multiple-choice question? there's a lot more, like, detail in terms of, like, diagrams and code snippets and schemas or, like, whatever it is for that problem. But, like, artifacts is, like, the mo-more AGI-pilled way of, like, doing ask user question. So yeah.Artifacts as the Interface to the HarnessSwyx [00:08:15]: I think one thing that's unclear to me about these, the artifact stuff is, like, what feedback should go in through the artifact and what feedback should go through a Claude, a chat? Because the more AGI-pilled one is to just feed everything to the Claude.Thariq Shihipar [00:08:29]: I think the more AGI-pilled one is to go through the artifact. Like, and I think that, like, we imagine in the limit, I think that artifacts will be your interface into the harness? You can, like, comment on this, like, live, like, document of your plan, of the work. you can see maybe, like, multiple agents and different agents are doing this, and that artifact is built for the current work that you're doing, right? And so, like, each one has, like, slightly different. I think we're still, like, getting there from, like, an infrastructure perspective. But yeah, I think, like, on-the-fly interface for your harness is probably where things are headed.Vibhu [00:09:03]: Is there a version of it that's an abstraction from CLI or chat and you. Because right now, a lot of it is, okay, you're interfacing with Claude Code, you're having HTML given back for a mockup. It's pretty rich. There's diagrams. Artifacts are ways to connect these together. Why not just do everything that way?Separating Brain, Hands, and Surface UIThariq Shihipar [00:09:22]: Then it becomes, like, separating out, like, where is the inference happening? Where is the intelligence happening? Where is the work happening? like, I think this is like, difference between, like, or, like, some of the distinction between local and cloud, right? And so, I think right now, if you use Claude Code, it's, like, local and, like, you can spin off remote control, for example, to get some cloud behavior, or you can spin off Claude Code in the cloud, right? We're moving towards a place where instead of Claudes, like, you message a local Claude, it starts a session locally and it executes, to more like you have a Claude that you message that's in the cloud that's running. it can run, like, local, or, like, cloud sessions. This is how Claude Tag works. But, like, over time, we'll add, like, local hands as well. And so, like, local hands will be the ability for that agent to access your computer if it's online, and be able to, like, work there. And so it can spin off many different subagents. It can, like, commu- those subagents can communicate with each other, and that's where the artifact comes in to display all of that work. So you can imagine, like, the. You're separating out these things. So there's, like, the surface UI display that's an artifact and hosted somewhere and has a database and everything. There is the inference intelligence, right, that's happening on the cloud, and you don't have to worry about shutting off your computer or whatever, right? and then there's the, like, hands. Like, and it can be local, it can be in, like, a remote sandbox or wherever you need your work to be done. That's like unpackaging, like, the Claude Code experience right now where, like, right now it all happens in one place, right? So.Multiplayer Agents, Claude Tag, and ProjectsVibhu [00:11:00]: How do you see, like, the multiplayer side of that? So say teams want to work in this way. Right now it's very individual, but how do you see the future of multiplayer? Like, right now, I guess there's Claude Tag, which is a version, but.Thariq Shihipar [00:11:12]: We're launching projects. And so projects is the, like, this abstraction that's like Claude Tag, but on our Claude products, right? So you can message it and, like, it will do the Claude Tag-like stuff, like spinning off subagents. So We think with multiplayer. Like, Claude Tag is, like, a little bit more native multiplayer because it's just, like, in your Slack and the permissions are all figured out and stuff like that. But I do think multiplayer is, like, an important part of the story and, like, that will need to get tied together more. Like, you can imagine how complicated it gets when you're like, oh, you have hands, but now you have other hands in other people's computers too, and, like, you need to, like, permission them or, like, you have, like, your MCP and someone else's MCP, and how do you figure out how to use them, right? It gets, like, quite complicated. And Claude Tag does a good job of, like, sanding down all of these issues, right? So that, like, when you have, yeah, Google Docs, how does it access Google Docs, right? Like, it accesses through the shared Claude MCP, or it can access through your local credentials as well if it doesn't have access. But yeah, I think Claude Tag is our multiplayer, product, and it's really useful for these, like, things that are inherently multiplayer. Like, okay, like on-call, for example, incidents are inherently multiplayer. You want to tag Claude, you want multiple people to log in, you want it to be able to find context. I think whenever I'm, like, working on something and I want, like, privacy or security or, like, I want other people to review it's really nice to, like. I'll have a channel per project and I'll, like, at legal, for example, be like, “Hey, like, I want to ship this. Can you, like.” Like, here's. Like Claude knows everything, just chat with it. And that way legal gets precise answers, on like what exactly is shipping into the code, and I don't need to be in the loop, right? So I think like multiplayer is getting like more and more like, yeah, everyone can participate with Claude. I think Claude Tag is like that product and like projects will start off single player and will like, expand.Swyx [00:13:14]: I think there's a question about like maybe dual questions about identity and the unit of isolation.Identity, Permissions, and IsolationThariq Shihipar [00:13:20]: Yeah.Swyx [00:13:20]: Claude Tag, you specifically chose to make it its own identityThariq Shihipar [00:13:26]: Yes.Swyx [00:13:26]: Which is like, a controversial choice. There's, there's other ways to do it.Thariq Shihipar [00:13:30]: Yeah.Swyx [00:13:30]: Claude Projects probably it sounds like, if it's anything like ChatGPT Projects, it is, the isolation is that artifacts, that cloud instance, everyone's collaborating on this. It'll. It sounds like, it should be like if you're, if you're collaborating with legal on a thing, like that channel should be a project, right? Like it's not yetThariq Shihipar [00:13:50]: Yes.Swyx [00:13:50]: But it. that's the natural next step.Thariq Shihipar [00:13:53]: Yeah, like I think in Claude Tag, it's effectively. Like Claude Tag, you have to do your own arrangement. And so Claude Tag, yeah, each channel is like you can name it as you want, and I nameSwyx [00:14:04]: Yeah.Thariq Shihipar [00:14:04]: Like each featureSwyx [00:14:06]: Yeah.Thariq Shihipar [00:14:07]: As a channel.Swyx [00:14:07]: And, but I think like there is some trans- like it's unclear when there is transference, because let's say it is. if you have a coworkerThariq Shihipar [00:14:14]: Yeah.Swyx [00:14:14]: Who is tagging on all these things, yes, there is transferThariq Shihipar [00:14:16]: Yeah.Swyx [00:14:16]: Because it's the same person. but with Claude, it's unclear if it's like necessarily like, well, no, you don't know any of. you don't know about the other stuff. You should only use this stuff.Thariq Shihipar [00:14:25]: It's like the tip of the iceberg meme, right, where you can like. This is what we spend so much time onSwyx [00:14:31]: Yeah.Thariq Shihipar [00:14:31]: Is like there is like infinite surface area of like, okay, you want Claudes to. Not infinite, but like there's like surface area, a lot of like, surface area to figure out of like permissions and visibility and like how can you let Claude operate as well as you can, as safely as you can? And obviously, this is very important to us because like security for our code base is very important. And so we've put a lot of time into this. Yeah, there's so many like edge cases you can figure out where it's like, oh, like, yeah, this Claude in this channel has different permissions, but it can message another channel, and can't it exfiltrate data that way? Or like can you like. What if it uses your MCP and then messages someone else? Like there's like so much, and we've like really put a lot of work into sanding it down.Swyx [00:15:14]: Yeah. Lots of work. okay. Fable?Fable and the Meta-Skill of PromptingVibhu [00:15:18]: Fable, you wrote two good articles. you've written many good articlesThariq Shihipar [00:15:22]: Yeah.Vibhu [00:15:22]: But on, Field Guide to Fable, Building Claude Code. I'm curious from what you've seen, is there any common patterns that you see in like top users at Anthropic externally? Like what are best practices for getting the most out of Claude Code?Thariq Shihipar [00:15:37]: The like meta skill I say is like prompting is like very important? And like that. Like I think this is like not trivial to say because I think a lot of people are like, “Oh, prompting doesn't matter. It's just like I can just say a sentence and Claude will do it.” And I think prompting is really this like, this. It's like public speaking, like, or writing or something, and for a specific audience, and that audience is Claude. And you need to like build a mental model of Claude and how it thinks and how it works, right? And so that's like the most important skill in working with Claude Code is like having this mental model, right, of Claude and like what it can do well, what it can one-shot, what it can't. And so many people when you see prompting, they're just like, they're short prompts, but they have such a good mental model of Claude and of like the code base and things like that like it's effortless? But it's like high skill ceiling. So like that work of like, spending a lot of time prompting and building mental models of how, and intuition for how the agents work is really important. And then I think like the next thing is like the unknown stuff we talked about earlier, where it's like being able to find out like your, what you don't know or what you haven't written down, learning about like different things. I think as Claude can do more and more things, the likelihood of you doing something out of distribution for you and like you have low domain knowledge on is very high? And the more you can like learn the vocabulary to be able to prompt Claude, it becomes really important. And so like I think the most important unknowns are the unknown unknowns, where you're like, I just like don't even know that this exists, right? Yeah, exactly. I think that's like a illustration of like the map and the territory, right, where you're like, “Okay, this is my prompt,” and the territory is like the actual like work that the agent needs to do, right? And if you are like very precise, you can give more precise things, right? So like for example, in design, I'm not very precise. I'm not a designer, so I say like, “Give me like eight different mock-ups.” But if I was a designer, maybe I'd be like, “Oh, hey, here are some reference sites.” Like, “I want this type of font and this type of like look to it, and here's like a few different components to like visualize. Here's a Figma MC board to bring in,” like. And so you can just be so much more precise with that language. And if you're not a designer, you just need to like try and learn the language or learn the unknown unknowns. And this is true of like everything, I think. Like the more, like you can work with Claude to learn like how things work, the better your prompting will be. I think another good example of this is like game design, like where a lot of people are like, “Oh, like I can vibe code a game now.” And they're like, “It's not fun.” And like it's just like the thing about game design is like every one of these choices has like a lot ofTaste, Domain Knowledge, and Learning the VocabularySwyx [00:18:25]: Variations.Thariq Shihipar [00:18:25]: A lot of like craft to them. So it's like, oh, okay, like when you're making a flying game, the feel of the plane and the like, way it responds to your controls has a lot of like. Like, a game designer would spend like days on that. Do? and likeSwyx [00:18:44]: To me, that's what taste is, right?Swyx [00:18:45]: Like it is like from the possible space of one thousand mathematically valid answersThariq Shihipar [00:18:49]: Yeah.Swyx [00:18:49]: Here's the one that is the humans will like.Thariq Shihipar [00:18:51]: Yes. Yeah.Thariq Shihipar [00:18:52]: I think with taste, I'm like torn on this word ‘cause I think you're right, but everyone has different definitions, and it sounds kind, sounds like low skill or like elitist almost, where you're like, oh, like there are certain people with taste?Swyx [00:19:06]: It's like taste is what I call taste.Thariq Shihipar [00:19:07]: Yeah, exactly.Swyx [00:19:08]: And it's like these guys don't have taste.Thariq Shihipar [00:19:09]: Yeah, exactly. Oh, like an engineer doesn't have taste. Like I, the like founder, have taste.Thariq Shihipar [00:19:14]: ? And I think that's not true. Like I think like the engineers have a lot of taste for these particular like problems? And I think everyone has taste for particular problems. I think like Jason Liu, like say like in order to, yeah, have taste, you have to eat?Thariq Shihipar [00:19:32]: And I really like that, where it's like, okay, you have to like do a lot of things. You have to like iterate and figure out what you want, what you like, and, like build that like domainSwyx [00:19:41]: YesThariq Shihipar [00:19:41]: Domain vocabulary. And then when you're prompting, you're like synthesizing all of that for a product.Swyx [00:19:46]: Isn't it annoying when someone else says it better than you?Swyx [00:19:48]: It's just like, f**k, I have to quote this guy forever.Vibhu [00:19:51]: Having to quote Jason Liu forever.Vibhu [00:19:53]: He's gonna love this.Thariq Shihipar [00:19:55]: So I get prompts, more than that.Vibhu [00:19:57]: And sometimes it's not even that. Sometimes it's just intuitive, right? Like you don't realize you even want something till a model puts it out, and you're like, “Oh, this just feels immediately better,” right?Voice Prompting and Information DensityThariq Shihipar [00:20:07]: Yeah, exactly.Swyx [00:20:09]: One thing I go back and forth on is I feel like the way I prompt half the time, let's say I use voice.Swyx [00:20:16]: Did I say voice? Other people have voice. that is the opposite. That is just like me rambling for like two minutes Pressing down the function key and then let go, and then like hopefully it figures it out. And oftentimes it does.Thariq Shihipar [00:20:26]: Yeah.Swyx [00:20:26]: But it's not as thoughtful as like a structured prompt with like Well-run communication as though it's a PRD or a memo. Is that in line with how people do this? There's like bimodal prompting where there's some prompts where you spend a lot of time upfront and other prompts you just dash it off?Thariq Shihipar [00:20:43]: I don't think the voice is necessarily low. Like I think it's like more like how much information is in the prompt. like the model can. Like you can and like add some sentencesSwyx [00:20:53]: RightThariq Shihipar [00:20:53]: And be like, “Oh, like I changed my mind,” like in the middle of the prompt, and it will be able to follow that perfectly? So I think the like actual format of the text is less important, but then like the ability to. Like how much information is in it, right? And I think for voice, a lot of times, going back to like human-agent interaction and like for a lot of people, it's just way easier to talk than to like type? and I. If that gets more information out of you, like that's better.Vibhu [00:21:21]: At some level, it feels like just giving the model as much contextThariq Shihipar [00:21:24]: YesVibhu [00:21:24]: Over prompting before you kick off is a best practice. I don't know. A lot of the times, like when I was first trying out Fable, I spend a solid 30 minutes like really crafting a long prompt. This, I think, is a response of models running for longer and longer, right? It's still a little difficult to nudge them as they're in like, in the loop, but I just like intuitively spend more time kicking off that first prompt and working with it a lot.Spend More Upfront, Iterate LessThariq Shihipar [00:21:52]: My personal opinion is that if I was a software engineer, if I was like, just running my own startup, for example, I think I would mostly fit, stick to a max 20x? like maybe verification and so code review are like separate things. But I think like what I see a lot of times is people hit rate limits when they're doing this like, oh, like it did a lot of work and you're like, “Oh, I don't like this.” Like, “Can you like undo this and redo it?” And then you're like iterating on this like thing that the model could have done if you had like spent more upfront time or given it better context? And instead it's like you're like, “Nope, don't like that design. Try this.” Or like, “You messed this up,” or something like that. And then that just eats up so much more of like, your usage. And so that's like, I think maybe like a key like tip both for like efficiency as well, right? And yeah, I think like context, and not just like context on like what the goal is good, right? Like are you building a prototype or is it like a production thing? Like where can you spend compute or when, where can you not spend compute? Like I think you have to give the model permission or like not permission to do things sometimes where, like it doesn't know intuitively how much you want to spend on this task, right? And you can use effort for this. So I did-- I'm working on a blog post about that where it's like, if you want. For like we see that effort scales with the complexity of the task. So for security, effort gets like way more results. Like high effort versus like low effort gets, like changes the evals a lot. But for software engineering, it doesn't change it a huge amount because effort is mostly spent on the verification and the like edge case testing and things like that. And so like being able to like give the model that guidance of like, “Hey, this problem is something that I think I want you to spend a lot of time verifying and edge case testing,”?Effort, Model Choice, and VerificationVibhu [00:23:43]: How about model in the mix? So, there's Opus and Fable with effort.Thariq Shihipar [00:23:47]: Yeah.Vibhu [00:23:48]: There's also Haiku in there.Thariq Shihipar [00:23:49]: Yeah. It's not quite true yet, but it's very close where I think the frontier models will be Pareto dominant over like almost everything. like maybe. And sometimes I think Opus might be Pareto dominant. Do? Like I think depending on like how things, like shake out if it's like a newer version of Opus. But I think that like increasingly it's just going to be like the smart model is going to be able to like do the simple task for less tokens than the like the other models because of verification. With verification, in the limit, your model doesn't need to verify, right? If it's a perfect model, it just does the work once and it's like, okay, like you, I did it? And increasingly with Fable, I'm like, I'm like, “Dude, you don't need to spin up Chromium and screenshot all of these things.” Like I see it. Like you did it, right? And so a lot of the. At higher effort, you spend more of those tokens verifying. But if you're working on simpler problems, and a lot of software engineering is like well, like in Fable, like low and medium stability, it can spend less tokens verifying. And as the models get smarter and smarter, they will just be able to like, “All right, done.”? Like, I can run the lint for sanity's sake, but, like, I, like, know it lints? Like, you don't even need to do that. And that will be so much more token efficient than, like, the smaller models. Yeah.Swyx [00:25:15]: Is there a good, practice on our side that we can use to see if we're using too much effort? Like, I freakingThariq Shihipar [00:25:23]: YeahSwyx [00:25:23]: Hate wasting time on that stuff.Thariq Shihipar [00:25:24]: Yeah. I know what you mean. I think, like, so in this blog post, my rough distribution is, like, code review and security should be, like, high or max and, like, software engineeringSwyx [00:25:37]: You said recommend mix settings per domain.Thariq Shihipar [00:25:37]: Yeah. I think, like, if you're doing, like, UI or something like that, like low and medium, I think is you're building, like, an API and you want to make sure, like, you cover enough edge cases? And so I think building, like I said, that mental model of, like, how things work across these distributions is, like, yeah, part of the job.Implementation Notes and Decision LogsVibhu [00:25:56]: This is more intuition-driven or eval? Because I'm guessing this would change as you go.Swyx [00:26:00]: He has evals.Thariq Shihipar [00:26:01]: Yeah. So what I did in the blog post is I go over all of the terminal bench evals. So there are, like, 70 problems and I'm show that, like, okay, like, in the security problems it does more. and then I also, like, look at some of the transcripts just in terms of, like, how-- what does it answer, what does it forget or something. And a lot of times, this is another prompting tip I have, is, like, asking it to make decision notes or implementation notes because, in every eval problem that it faces, it thinks about the correct solution, and decides not to do it. it's like, oh, like, here is the answer. What if I did this? And then it's like, oh, probably not? and then keeps going. And this is, like, the majority of the failures, at, like, a higher max level. It's very rare that the model just doesn't know how to do something. If you just have these implementation notes, then you can review and you can be like, “Oh, I want you to do this thing that you didn't do.” The models are getting better at surfacing that overall. Like, I see in the transcripts of Fable 5.1, like, when it does this output, it will call out its decision-making as well. but making this more explicit in the harness is better. And now we're, allowing ways of you modifying the harness so you can, like, add someVibhu [00:27:23]: Ooh.Thariq Shihipar [00:27:24]: Calculate with there. Yeah.Swyx [00:27:25]: Yeah. So I do wanna call out two things that you mentioned that I think exist outside of prompting. One is like, let's, let's call it the prompt that is so important that it shouldn't be in a prompt. It is in Claude.md or Agents.mdThariq Shihipar [00:27:38]: YeahSwyx [00:27:38]: Which is like goals, right? Like your situation, your goals, the things that you want, the thing. and then second of all is the decision log or the experiment log or whatever log of traces that you might want to survive the current session to do those things. Those are, like, externalities that there's no standard. There's no-- It's not like skills. It's not like MCP. There's no standard. It's, it's just like it's a markdown file. first of all, is that right? Is Claude.md going away? You have a documented dislike of, Agents.md, but you're gonna do it?Claude.md, Agents.md, and Model-Specific InstructionsThariq Shihipar [00:28:10]: Yeah. Okay. So Agents.md, yeah, like, we're, we're gonna do it. I think it's just, like, different models are very different from each other? But I realize that it's, like, such a pain to, like, maintain different ones? And yeah, like, as the models get better and better, the floor of how they accomplish the simpler task is better. And so I do think in the limit, Claude.md goes away, and maybe not even, like, that far. Like, I think, like, I think that right now it might be better to start a new project without a Claude.md.Swyx [00:28:44]: Yes.Thariq Shihipar [00:28:44]: I think that, like, maybe if you see very repeated failure modes, you add them to your Claude.md. The really tough thing is that this changes per model. And so, like, if you've added a bunch of failure modes or, like evenSwyx [00:28:57]: So you need Fable MD, you need Opus MD.Thariq Shihipar [00:28:59]: Or well, even Fable 5.1 versus Fable 5.Swyx [00:29:03]: Yeah.Thariq Shihipar [00:29:03]: Like, it is annoying. Like, I'm not like,Swyx [00:29:05]: YeahThariq Shihipar [00:29:05]: Like, we don't, like, do this on purpose? It's just, like, how the models work, right? And so, like, maybe, like, Fable 5 had this, like, failure mode that Fable 5.1 doesn't. And if you keep this context, this running log of a bunch of different failure modes, they will probably over constrain Claude? And so this is like. we just added evals plugins for skills.Swyx [00:29:28]: Yeah.Thariq Shihipar [00:29:29]: And so now you can eval if a skill is better. I think Daisy on our team did this. And so, yeah, this is like we're trying to work on this. We know it's, like, you still have to spend tokens on it and, like, it's not, it's not perfect, but it's, like, we're trying to help out with this problem.Swyx [00:29:44]: And so, and as far as prompting goes, the one tip I wanna offer is, something I have told people a lot is sufficiently advanced prompting is indistinguishable from sufficiently advanced executive communication. So I've referred to-- This is an executive comms workshop from Heavybit that is the best I've ever seen in my career. And they teach this thing called the SCQA model. Just Google it. It's a, it's a thing. Like, people have done prompting for decades. It's just called executive communication. It's like when one person has to communicate to thousands of people down the org chart, this is what you do. so situation, complication, question and answer, is how you write the memo. but obviously sometimes you don't have the answer, but you can at least list out the SC and Q, and then they have some examples in there. So just leaving breadcrumbs for people if they want to explore.Underrated Prompting Patterns and ELI5Vibhu [00:30:31]: Before we move on, I wanna ask you, any other underrated tips, ways people could get a lot of value from Claude Code that they're not using?Thariq Shihipar [00:30:41]: Yeah, I think a lot of them are in the, this unknowns, like, doc. Like, I give a bunch of example prompts, like, using it for brainstorming, using it to quiz you after. we added this, like, explain it like I'm five skill which is a very short prompt. And it doesn't even say explain it like I'm five. It's like the key word of this prompt is big pictures, few words. like, that's like the main thing. And it is shockingly good? Like, you, like, I think I tweeted about this and it's like /eli5, and, like, you can install it as a plug-in. But yeah, it's, like, way better at just cutting through the BS and being like, yeah, exactly right here. So the diagrams are, like, quite clear. I think one of the things that is true with artifacts is, like, they put too much text in and people are not reading the artifacts? And so, like, this simplifies it a lot more. And, yeah, this came out of, like, just people at Anthropic, like, going through very complicated incidents and being like, “What is happening?”? So, this one I think is great, yeah.Swyx [00:31:47]: My version of this is the, it's like test your understanding. Give you a few choices and then, like, if you get it wrong, you have a mismatch between what you think is happening versus what's happening.Thariq Shihipar [00:31:58]: Yeah. I think this is one of those things that everyone loves talking about, and then very few people really do. Like, I thinkSwyx [00:32:05]: Really helpful.Thariq Shihipar [00:32:07]: Yeah. But most people just don't want to get quizzed about something? Unfortunately, I think this is one of the, like, things that we need to, like.Swyx [00:32:16]: What's the opposite of ask you the question or ask you the question before the thing?Thariq Shihipar [00:32:19]: Yeah.Swyx [00:32:19]: This is after the thing.Thariq Shihipar [00:32:20]: Exactly. Yeah.Vibhu [00:32:21]: It's a good way to stay grounded of, like, do you even know what you're doing, right? The worst case is when people send you slop and they haven't understood what they're asking for or what the output is, and it's like, “Dude, I don't wanna read this. Do you even know what it is?” So, you make it a rule for yourself that before you send stuff, you should at least know what's implemented.Claude Mods: Customizing the HarnessThariq Shihipar [00:32:41]: Yes, but so you could make this a mod and you could build your own mod to, like, make sure you test it. So yeah, you can do that.Swyx [00:32:49]: All right. Let's get right into it. What is Claude Mod, and what is this diagram showing?Thariq Shihipar [00:32:54]: Yeah. Okay, so Claude Mods is you can customize the entire Claude Code harness, and we're going to. If you have requests, we will, like, let you, like, please let us know. We'll add more and more. This works for CLI, it works for desktop. maybe it will work for Claude Tag in the future. I don't know. Like, we're trying to make this very extensible. You can see this reference sheet. I don't want people to get overwhelmed by it? At a high level, you can customize both the execution of the harness, and the UI of the harness. And so, like, you say on that Tetris example from Boris, that's like customizing the UI, right? Like showing, like, Tetris in the game.Thariq Shihipar [00:33:35]: But, like, let's say that you wanted to do this thing where you had. you tested your assumptions or, like, tested your understanding after every project, right? What you would do is you would ask Claude to make this plug-in. It would spin a classifier after every prompt. And so, like, at the end of each turn, you would spin off a sub-agent or, like, a forked agent. A forked agent is, like, maintains the prompt cache, right? So it's like a, like one of those unintuitive things where you can fork and do, like, a little request, and it'll be very cheap because the entire prompt cache is, like, done. And so you can be like, “Has this task been completed?” likeSwyx [00:34:18]: This is how you do BTW and all those.Thariq Shihipar [00:34:20]: Yeah. The underlying forked agent, yes. But so you can, in the f-fork sub-agent, you can say, like, “Has this task been completed? If so, return true.” And then in your hook, or in your, like, plug-in mod, or sorry, like, in the sub-agent probably, you would say, like, “If true, give me a quiz.” give me questions and answers, and then, like, in a JSON format, and then you'd parse it, and then you display above the prompt input, this list of questions, right? And so this is something that's, like, slightly token-intensive because, like, you have to do it after every end of the assistant turn. But it's, like, a lightweight classification, and then you can, like, get this quiz, and then you'll see, like, Claude will always do it for you. You don't need to remember to do it. There are lots of these, like, tips that we've talked about, right, where it's like, oh, implementation notes. You can also add a tool for implementation notes now. And so, like, this tool that I'm adding is, like, register, like, I think assumption is what I'm calling it, but, like, maybe I'll change it around. And this is a mod. And so, like, you give it a register assumption tool, and then it will keep a list. It'll. Every time it does it'll keep a, like, add to the list, and then at the end it will display those assumptions? Another mod I'm working on is a model router. And so, like, internal, like, Claude model routing, right? So it's. This is, I want to say the reason we don't do model routing by default is, like, it's a hard problem? And likeForked Agents, Assumption Tracking, and Model RoutingSwyx [00:35:51]: You will get it wrong.Thariq Shihipar [00:35:52]: Yeah, you, like, yeah, you will, like, accidentally use, like, Fable for a hard problem or Sonnet forSwyx [00:35:57]: Yeah, if you have auto approve, but you don't have auto mode.Thariq Shihipar [00:36:01]: Well, you will have auto. Like, you don't have, like, auto routing or something.Vibhu [00:36:04]: You don't have auto mode for model picker.Thariq Shihipar [00:36:06]: Yeah, exactly. SoVibhu [00:36:07]: I'm getting the rough question of, like, how much do you open this up and how much do people have to think about this? Like, when you talk about prompt caching and building a router, it seems like you could easily build a mod that routes per query, and I'm just killing my plan very fast, right? I guess my question is more so, like, what is, like, a product talk like this look like, right? Who is it for? Is it for power users? Is it everyone should be able to go throughSwyx [00:36:33]: Oh, definitely power users, right?Thariq Shihipar [00:36:35]: Yeah, I think it is power users, but, like, the nature of Claude Code is that so many people are power users? Because it's easy to share things, like you can. Like, one person can make a good model router thing that doesn't break prompt cache all the time, and then you can, like, compose them. Another cool thing about the plug-ins is that they can hook into and compose with each other. And so I have, like, a mod that will, like, create a mode selector at the top, and any plug-ins can register to be a mode. And so, like, the auto router can be a mode, right? Or, like, you can have a mode that's, like, artifact mode, where it's like it primarily talks to you in artifacts. like, you can toggle between plan mode? And so, like, you can create more and more of these modes. But the ability to create modes is in it itself a mod? And so there's a lot of richness here, but we do want to make it fairly easy. We want to be-- make it so that you can just, like, install someone else's. You can ta-- you can chat with Claude and, we'll, like, make sure that it understands the nuances of things like prompt caching and stuff, so it can, like, warn you. This is, like, not extremely complicated behavior for Claude, I think, but we should have just a good skill on how to make mods. and yeah, we'll see how we go. But I do think that this is, like, a preview of, like, mutable software, and, like, how, like, generative software, just like you can customize safely. If enabled, you could customize any piece of software. And I think that more and more apps ideally do something like this?Power Users, Modes, and Mutable SoftwareSwyx [00:38:13]: And by the way, you, we have, you have another cool tweet about how, there's the infinite money button, which is like make your SaaS, consumable by agents. I think mutable software is interesting and, other people have also tried to do it. I think the hurdle comes when you can do everything, then people, users get, tend to get confused. So usually the stuff that works is just like one opinionated flow. This is in the side of less opinionation. It's just like, well, more power to power users. And I think probably unlocked by AI, where, like, you can just prompt for whatever the thing is.Thariq Shihipar [00:38:47]: Yeah, or there can be a skill that gives the opinions?Mods vs. Hooks vs. ArtifactsSwyx [00:38:50]: Yeah.Thariq Shihipar [00:38:50]: And then, yeah.Swyx [00:38:51]: So knowing a little bit about, like, TypeScript and build systems and all these things, the closest-- I'm very curious that the team who worked on this, if, I don't know how close you were to them, if they drew any inspiration from build systems like Babel, Webpack, all these, like, old school things. Because it sounds very similar, like the plug-in ecosystem of those things where they can compose with each other.Thariq Shihipar [00:39:11]: Yeah, I'm not deep in the technical details, but I do know it was a collaboration with someone on the Bun team and someone on the Claude Code team.Swyx [00:39:17]: Yeah, it's a build system mecca.Thariq Shihipar [00:39:19]: Yeah. Exactly. It's, it's very exciting. But yeah, like, agents can just do this very complicated like, extensibility into your software now. And so, yeah, like, another reason to, like. If you run a startup, like, you can just prompt Claude and be like, “Hey, like, could we make an extension system? Like, what would that look like?”?Swyx [00:39:37]: Yeah.Swyx [00:39:38]: And I just really wonder, like, you had hooks in the past and plug-ins, all these things. So what specifically will mods be able to do that those things could not do?Thariq Shihipar [00:39:47]: Internally, we were originally calling this function hooks. And so, like, that's, like, gives you a little bit of an idea where, like, hooks register a, like an event to happen and then, like, a script to call. And this inside of the, like, TypeScript runtime is running things. And so, like, you get some benefits of just, like, it has a bunch of things in the Scope with, like, for example, like how many turns is in this conversation, right? Like, how many tokens have been used? Like, et cetera. Like, what are the messages? Things like that. So it has a bunch of messages that can be used. And then it's just, like, a lot more hooks. So we have, like, or a lot of, lot more, like, things you can register on. And then you can do because of the. because it's all happening in process, you can, spawn sub-agents, with four contests and contexts and stuff. And, like, that will return. You can parse the results of those. You can use structured output to like, return them. and then you can modify the UI, which you can never do in hooks. So, yeah.Swyx [00:40:50]: Yeah. Yeah. So modify UI, this is why you showed the Tetris example. Does it also ex-extend to artifacts? I assume it does.Thariq Shihipar [00:40:57]: You-- Like, artifacts are like a different way of customizing it. like, you can definitely. One of the mods I'm working on is, like, this dashboard mod, which will, like, prompt Claude to maintain a dashboard, that's an artifact. But they're like, slightly orthogonal, or not orthogonal. They compose with each other in different ways. Like, mods are, like, a little bit more, like, in your Claude Code harness, changing the agent loop? And, like, the UI is, like, an added benefit. and then artifacts are just like you want to, see things at a high level, very inter- highly interactive. like, the affordances can be a lot bigger than, like a TUI or even in our desktop.Next Steps, Supervisors, and Persistent GuidanceVibhu [00:41:40]: I'm guessing you'll have a good blog post on the differences, because right now you can also, make a loop that outputs to an artifact that's an interactive dashboard, but you can also do it with a mod. There's just some thinking about making a hacking on a harness when we don't know much about the harness, right?Thariq Shihipar [00:42:00]: Well, something I'm excited about with mods is, like, there's so much things with Claude Code that you just have to remember? You're like, “Oh, like, let me do this, and then let me call the dashboard skill that does the loop,” and things like that. And, or like, “Let me test my assumptions afterwards.” And I think, like, if you do all of these things using these little classifiers and stuff, and you're like, “These are the things I care about. This is what I want to do,” you can, like. You don't have to remember as much. One more, like, mod I'm working on is a next steps mod thatSwyx [00:42:28]: I have-- I was gonna say, I have a next step skill. I always run next steps.Thariq Shihipar [00:42:32]: And does it have access to your skills? Like, this is one of those things where I'm like.Swyx [00:42:37]: I think so.Thariq Shihipar [00:42:38]: Okay. Yeah, probablyVibhu [00:42:39]: Do skills need specific access toThariq Shihipar [00:42:41]: Well, I think there'sSwyx [00:42:41]: Don't they always haveThariq Shihipar [00:42:42]: I think there's, like, specific prompting, I guess, to, like, know your skills. Like I think Claude forgets them sometimes throughout, like, the thing. But anyways, the idea of, like, yeah, next steps that also are like, “Oh, hey, this has happened. Use the explain skill to explain to you what happened because this seems, like, quite complex,”? Or, like, yeah, “Use your unknown skill. It looks like you are, like, asking the model to, like, iterate on these small changes. It seems like you could prompt better.” like, “What if you did this?” Right? So, I think, yeah, like spending more compute there. Yeah.Swyx [00:43:20]: And it should always come out as multiple choice. we have, I haveVibhu [00:43:23]: We have his skill.Swyx [00:43:24]: My next step skill is like this.Thariq Shihipar [00:43:26]: Okay, perfect. Yeah.Swyx [00:43:27]: You can steal it.Thariq Shihipar [00:43:28]: Yeah.Swyx [00:43:29]: Like, but like, for me, it's all-- I think models really always need to be reminded, what are you trying to do here?Thariq Shihipar [00:43:35]: Yeah.Swyx [00:43:35]: Look at the whole transcript and go like, oh, was this original goal? Did your solution solve it? Were you lazy? If you're lazy, maybe there's a reason. Maybe you needed approval from me. Maybe you needed, there's two things you wanna suggest. So it's, it's a little bit like the modification of the ask user question or interview me skill. so it's next steps.Thariq Shihipar [00:43:55]: Yeah, exactly. And again, the benefit of doing it with mods is you can do it as a fork sub-agent, and so it doesn't remain in the context afterwards. So you have this, like, idea of like, okay, the model is doing its execution and you have this almost like supervisor, like, that is like making sure that you can do like the next steps well. So yeah.Swyx [00:44:15]: Yes. I do have two panels and like I often try to have a supervisor thing, keep the high-level context and then the implementationThariq Shihipar [00:44:21]: YeahSwyx [00:44:22]: Detail in another agent.Vibhu [00:44:23]: I feel like a lot of this abstracts away as models change? The, like, half an hour ago you said bitter lesson of harness engineeringThe Bitter Lesson of Harness EngineeringThariq Shihipar [00:44:31]: YeahVibhu [00:44:31]: And we're on the other extreme right now, I feel.Swyx [00:44:33]: Well, so yeah, exactly. If everything's customizable, what is Claude Code, right?Thariq Shihipar [00:44:37]: Yeah.Swyx [00:44:37]: And which I talked to you about last night.Thariq Shihipar [00:44:40]: Yeah, I think that this is. I think the bitter lesson is unintuitive? In terms of like. Also, like we're misusing a little bit of the bitter lesson here where it's like, it's more about like scaling and compute and stuff. But like, I think there is something where it's just like. I think I use it as an approximation here to say that harnesses go out of date very quickly? And like how, but how they change is unintuitive? And so like the big obvious example is like from chat to like agents where you had to give them entirely new tools, right? But like, I think this new version of like, oh, it can modify its own harness, right? This is like, an own harness loop is like a way of using its capabilities, right? Or like it can build an artifact. And like, I think the way I think about it is like the models have more and more intelligence, and they're like so much more intelligent now than like the average software engineering task. Like, you look at the like terminal bench ones and they're like solve like the Jacobian conjecture. Not really, but like, it's like they're, they're quite complex. Like, I would not have been able to do this really as a software engineer.Swyx [00:45:42]: And you said TB4 or TB2?Thariq Shihipar [00:45:43]: TB3. TB3.Swyx [00:45:44]: TB3.Thariq Shihipar [00:45:44]: Yeah. They're quite complex, but the goal is still to deliver user value, right? And like you said, there's like this infinite space of things to do. And so the ways like you spend compute are to keep the user in the loop and make sure that like you're getting to the right decision in the end of the day and like the right output. And artifacts and mods are this way of like spending that intelligence. and I think that's like, yeah, the next step. And so, yeah, I think Claude Code is like, has the core things of agent loop which are, have gotten more complicated. It's like, it needs a sandbox to operate safely. It needs auto mode to like make sure like the permissionsVibhu [00:46:21]: Approvals.Thariq Shihipar [00:46:21]: Yeah, approvals. it needs computer use and MCPs and like all of these like ways of accessing your data, and it needs web search and web fetch. And like, so the-- as the models can do more and more, the core harness has to be like quite complex and very secure. But then like how you interact with it can change quite a lot.Vibhu [00:46:42]: What other harness engineering best practices have you, from the Claude Code team itself? I feel like, there was a phase of plan mode, which is not as used. We now have auto mode. at a point you cut the majority of the system prompt, you got rid of examples. What other best practices are there for harness engineering?Core Harness Primitives and Managed AgentsThariq Shihipar [00:47:02]: I think there is like a forking path where at some point, eventually, yes, the model will just be able to like vibe code the exact version of Claude Code, even describing all this complexity that I've talked about, right? Like auto mode and computer use and stuff. Eventually, the models will just be able to do that in one shot. But I think they can one shot simpler harnesses? And so like, I think some people. Sometimes you don't need this full, like if you don't need computer use or like all this like more complicated stuff. I think before we, you had to use things like the agent SDK, which was like Claude Code wrapped, in order to like. And I would, like suggest people do that because there was so much complexity into building a harness. And now as that's got more abstracted, we have like, Claude managed agents, which lets you have that complexity, but still like, right, like a very bare bones like harness that's scoped to your task. Yeah, I think there's like this barbell effect where like for like very complex, for like coding task and like these like complex things, you should use our harness. And then for like a lot of like simpler or like, more domain-specific things, you can build your own harness because Claude has gotten better at building harnesses, and we have these harness primitives like managed agents. So yeah.Swyx [00:48:18]: Yeah. Is there a general progression? Let's say chapter one was ultra code dynamic workflows, then chapter two was cloud mods. Where is this going?Swyx [00:48:29]: Where you're, you're, you can customize the thing on demand.Thariq Shihipar [00:48:36]: Yeah. I do think that like this evolution of projects and like artifacts and splitting out like brain and hands and, surfaces is like where things are going more. And like, I think it's like not all quite there. partially it's like a, it's just like more token expensive? And like, I think likeProjects, Local Hands, and Cloud-to-Local HandoffsSwyx [00:48:59]: Why would projects be more token expensive? I understand mods would be slightly more token expensive. No, not something I'm worried about.Thariq Shihipar [00:49:06]: Yeah.Swyx [00:49:06]: But whatThariq Shihipar [00:49:07]: You're asking Claude to do. It's like creating loops. Like you're asking Claude to do more work for you. And so like it's managing the sub-agents and reviewing it, versus where you would be doing that work normally. And so that's like gonna be a little bit more intensive, like. Outputting to an artifact is gonna be a little bit more token-intensive than, like, outputting normally. I don't think it's too much more, but like, it's like combining all of these together well, like I think we're, we're still working on like local hands and things like that, I think is like, yeah, where things are headed, yeah.Swyx [00:49:37]: Yeah. Claude and local is, handoff is very interesting. I was thinking about this as reverse cloud remote.Thariq Shihipar [00:49:44]: Yeah.Swyx [00:49:45]: Because it's like remote, it's you're handing off to cloud, but here the cloud is handing off to local, right?Thariq Shihipar [00:49:49]: Yeah, exactly. Yeah, remote control is also another way of doing it. And I do want to say this is like how I think about it and like what the things that I'm most excited about this, but like there are, just like lots of different ways to work with Claude. Like some people use remote control a lot, some people use Claude Code on the web a lot. Obviously, like at Anthropic, we use Claude Tag a lot, and like what's great about Claude Tag is we set up all this stuff for our own execution. And I do think if you're an enterprise, that's still the best way to go. but if you're like an individual, Projects is this way of like, getting some of that like niceness of Tag, which has like that like supervising agent and yeah, adding artifacts and stuff, but like without having that whole like admin setup. And so there will be many ways to use Claude, I think. I think it's probably not just one like single.Claude Tag as an Organizational HarnessSwyx [00:50:36]: You had the multiplayer thing here. Let's, let's just check in on Claude Tag. it's been about two-plus months. Lots of, public, adoption and trying it out.Thariq Shihipar [00:50:45]: Yeah.Swyx [00:50:45]: What's new? What's, what have you found since the launch?Thariq Shihipar [00:50:49]: Like, Claude Tag is how we useSwyx [00:50:51]: It's like 80% of your

Eleição se aproxima e tensão política aumenta / Pesquisas continuam apontando para empate no segundo turno / Desistência de Salles reforça candidaturas de direita / Esses são assuntos em destaque na edição de hoje do Jornal do Boris

El viernes cerramos este Reporte pidiendo una cosa muy concreta: la invitación al encuentro de la discordia. Bueno... tres Doritos después un periódico panameño dice que tuvo acceso a la convocatoria original de la dichosa reunión del Escudo de las Américas y resulta que Donald Trump no aparecía en ella.

Boris presents his weekly Transmissions Radio show featuring new and already established names in the music world. Check out the latest episodes on your favorite streaming platform: https://ssyncc.com/transmissions-podcast/ ELIAS R - ELIAS R - TAKE ME HIGHER (EDIT) Taranco - Baby (Extended Mix) And Dance Calussa - Tocame (Original Mix) NUSONIDO Blaqq & Why'd - In The Mood (Original Mix) Ibiza Talents Records ELIAS R - ELIAS R - HIDE U (EDIT) Khenya - Jarana (The Deepshakerz Remix) Ulu Records Blaqq & Why'd, M.O.E - Damn (Original Mix) Regroove Records Tommy Vee, Keller - Do What You Like (Extended Mix) Lapsus Music Daniel Steinberg - No Good (Original Mix) Arms & Legs Paul C, Paolo Martini - Warpath (Original Mix) Paul's Boutique Tony Romera, Jamie Coins - Check It (Extended Mix) Edible Chico Rose (NL) - Chompa (Original Mix) MOXY MUZIK Piem - Higher (Original Mix) Blink Franky Rizardo - Feel (Extended Mix) LTF Records This show is syndicated & distributed exclusively by Syndicast. If you are a radio station interested in airing the show or would like to distribute your podcast / radio show please register here: https://syndicast.co.uk/distribution/registration

Deze Brievenmaandag is ook te bekijken via https://youtu.be/5tEulwYZ_2c Na een relaxed weekend is het tijd voor de nieuwe werkweek. Of we het nu willen of niet. Die werkweek luiden we zoals altijd in met een nieuwe livestream van Brievenmaandag. Met dit keer achter de desk Boris, JJ en Koos. Een trio dat altijd wel garant staat voor wat verbaal spektakel. Vragen kwamen ook deze week uit allerhande richtingen binnen. Zo wil iemand weten welke koers PlayStation nu voert, omdat er na The Last of Us 2 geen enkele game meer is uitgekomen die hij tof vindt. Willen ze hem niet meer als klant? En door welke film of serie kregen we direct zin om een bepaalde game te gaan spelen? Of hebben we altijd trek in een nieuw spel, no matter what? En leeft de game Beyond Good and Evil 2 nog? Antwoorden op al deze vragen krijg je te zien en te horen in de Brievenmaandag van maandag 28 september 2026. ‘Na The Last of Us 2 is er geen goede PlayStation exclusive meer uitgekomen’ Vragen zijn er elke week. In alle vormen en maten. Wat te denken van de vraag of zelfs ROMs maken van 3DS nog wel illegaal is, omdat Nintendo niks meer voor deze handheld maakt? Plus, hij heeft nog een zeer intrigerende conspiracy theory voor Boris. Eentje die ook nog uit ons eigen land komt. Dus wat wil je nog meer? Behalve dan een antwoord van Boris natuurlijk. Gaat het nog een keer gebeuren met Beyond Good & Evil 2? Een andere intrigerende vraag is of er zich situaties of gebeurtenissen hebben voorgedaan waardoor we geen zin meer hadden om (bepaalde) games te gaan spelen. Denk aan heftige periodes in het leven, zoals geboortes, huwelijken of sterfgevallen. Een zeer persoonlijke vraag waar we echter bij Gamekings niet voor weglopen. Die gaat dus gewoon door de heren beantwoord worden.Wil je adverteren bij de podcast Gamekings óf misschien bij een andere podcast van ILVY Network? Mail dan naar management@ilvy.com en/of kijk even op de website : https://ilvy.com/podcastSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Trump with Xi, Trump signs Gaza peace deal,They're trying to censor the internet (again), people are already being arrested for hate speech online,Migrants get private rooms in Ontario hospitals while Canadians are given hallways and closets?Moosehead is struggling to maintain it's business, US alcohol ban starts tomorrow,Boris wants peaceful ground forces in ukraine,Did you see the poilievre rap video? The funniest part about it is the paid influencers who are defending it. Sign Up for the Full ShowLocals (daily video)Sample Showshttps://canadapoli2.locals.com/ Spotify https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/canadapoli/subscribePrivate Full podcast audio https://canadapoli.com/feed/canadapoliblue/Buy subscriptions here (daily video and audio podcast):https://canadapoli.cm/canadapoli-subscriptions/Youtubehttps://www.youtube.com/c/CanadaPoli/videosMe on Telegramhttps://t.me/realCanadaPoliMe on Rumblehttps://rumble.com/user/CanadaPoli Me on Odysseyhttps://odysee.com/@CanadaPoli:f Me on Bitchutehttps://www.bitchute.com/channel/l55JBxrgT3Hf/ Podcast RSShttps://anchor.fm/s/e57706d8/podcast/rsshttps://LinkRoll.co Go here to discuss the show without algorithmic censorship. See you there! ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Music: If I Had a Chicken - Kevin MacLeod • If I Had a Chicken – Kevin MacLeod https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fewLXi6GATM - Royalty Free Music––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Sem ideias, eleição entra na reta final / Pesquisas continuam apontando empate / Nossa Senhora é arma de campanha / Esses são assuntos em destaque na edição de hoje do Jornal do Boris

Už před více než sto lety hlubinní psychologové Freud a Jung upozorňovali na procesy uvnitř člověka, kterých si lidé nejsou vědomi. I současná věda ví, že náš náš mozek zpracovává obrovské množství informací, aniž bychom si jich všimli. Jak v současnosti chápeme vědomí a nevědomí? Jakou roli hrají v našich životech? A má sebepoznávání limity? V debatě Vertikály se setkávají s psychoterapeut Boris Rafailov a neurolog a neurovědec Rastislav Šumec. Moderuje Karolina Antlová.Všechny díly podcastu Vertikála můžete pohodlně poslouchat v mobilní aplikaci mujRozhlas pro Android a iOS nebo na webu mujRozhlas.cz.

Piet Oud was de brug tussen de politiek van de late 19e eeuw en het liberalisme van de VVD in de 21e eeuw. Oud was tijdgenoot, partner en opponent van grote namen als Troelstra, Wilhelmina, Kuyper, Ruys de Beerenbrouck, Colijn, Seyss Inquart, Drees, Stikker, Burger, Romme. De jonge Hans Wiegel zag hem als voorbeeld. Jaap Jansen en PG Kroeger duiken in dat rijke politieke leven met dr. Boris van Haastrecht, die promoveerde op een indrukwekkende biografie: Strijdbaar democraat, P.J. Oud 1886-1968. Want een vechtersbaas was hij, al op zijn 21ste een fameus, door heel het land trekkende propagandist, gevreesd debater en vanaf zijn 30ste Tweede-Kamerlid voor die Vrijzinnig Democratische Bond. In 1917 gekozen in het oude districtenstelsel, in 1918 in het nieuwe kiesstelsel van evenredigheid. Zijn ideaal was een 'doorbraakcoalitie' met VDB, sociaaldemocraten en progressieve katholieken. *** Deze aflevering is mede mogelijk gemaakt met donaties van luisteraars die we hiervoor hartelijk danken. Word ook vriend van de show! Als vriend maak je kans op een exemplaar van het boek over Oud. Deze aflevering bevat een advertentie van Bestuursfilosoof. Ga naar bestuursfilosoof.nl en ontdek wat een bestuursfilosoof voor jouw organisatie kan betekenen. Daar vind je verhalen, beloften en aanbod en vraag je in één klik een kennismaking aan. Deze aflevering heeft ook een advertentie van NordVPN. Profiteer nu van de exclusieve NordVPN-deal. Probeer NordVPN zonder risico met de 30 dagen geld-terug-garantie! Heb je belangstelling om in onze podcast te adverteren of ons te sponsoren? Zend ons een mailtje en wij zoeken contact. *** Hij maakte snel carrière door binnen de VDB alle grijpbare functies te verenigen, loyaal aan en onmisbaar voor zijn partijleider en 'generaal' Henri Marchant. Oud is zo een eerste markant voorbeeld van de beroepspoliticus, zoals Max Weber die schetste. Hij was links, sociaal-cultureel als voorvechter van vrouwenkiesrecht en openbaar onderwijs, en sociaaleconomisch als bepleiter van een sterk progressief belastingstelsel met lage loonbelasting en hoge vermogensbelasting. Tegelijkertijd was de Oud afkerig van het dogmatisme van Marx, klassenstrijd en socialistische revolutiedromen. Troelstra's poging tot een rode machtsgreep in 1918 maakte dat zijn ideale coalitie er nimmer kwam. En na bezetting en de Tweede Wereldoorlog was Oud en zijn VDB als brug tussen 'Rooms' en 'Rood' overbodig geworden. De strijdbare kant van de politicus werd opvallend zichtbaar in de lange reeks van conflicten en heibel binnen de VDB en ook later in zijn VVD. Tragisch was de scheuring met Marchant. Niet minder die met mede VVD-oprichter Dirk Stikker. Oud kon daarentegen goed opschieten met 'self made men' en sociale klimmers, ongeacht hun ideologie. Zo bewonderde hij Hendrik Colijn, wiens minister van Financiën hij werd in diepe crisistijd. Van Haastrecht toont een boeiend, nogal ander beeld van het beleid dat hij toen voerde. En onthult een vuige politieke intrige in 1939, die Oud bijna premier had gemaakt. Tragiek kende Ouds leven beslist. Zijn zeer dominante vader en psychisch aangeslagen, jong gestorven moeder zijn deel van dit levensverhaal. Dat hij net burgemeester was toen Rotterdam door het Nazi-bombardement verwoest werd niet minder. Na de bevrijding was zijn greep op de Haagse politiek sterk verminderd. En daar hield hij niet van. Hij klampte zich vast aan de nieuwe PvdA, maar Oud vond daarin geen prominente rol meer. Uitkomst bood oprichting van een nieuwe partij: de VVD. Hij regeerde deze partij als een kleine dictator, alom bewonderd in de politiek en de media als kenner van staatsrecht en politieke geschiedenis. En nog steeds als gevreesd kundig en fel debater. Cruciaal werd zijn koerswending na 1956. De VVD zag hij ook nu als linkse partij, tegen het confessionele blok, maar hij keerde zich vooral tegen de PvdA zodra Drees die niet meer domineerde. Het leverde zetelwinst op, maar juist nu de VVD politieke macht kon veroveren, vonden velen daarbinnen dat Ouds tijd voorbij was. Een jonge generatie liberalen zag nieuwe stijl, ideeën en sociale verhoudingen opkomen. "Hoe haal je het in je hoofd?" brieste Oud toen zijn vicevoorzitter een vertrek suggereerde. Die weigering de tijd te herkennen werd een wezenlijke impuls voor het ontstaan van D66. In zekere zin heeft Oud - zijn hele leven een fel anti-confessioneel - aan de wieg gestaan van elk van de drie paarse partijen. Zo werd hij de brug tussen de links-liberale jaren na Thorbecke, de 20e eeuw van verzuiling en modernisering en nadat 'Paars' de confessionelen buiten spel zette de 21ste eeuw waarin Mark Rutte de eerste VVD minister-president werd. *** Verder luisteren Ouds wortels en zijn vroege jaren 520 - De radicaaldemocratische erfenis van Pieter Vreede 339 - De negentiende eeuw van Bismarck 274 - Thorbecke, denker en doener 149 - De zeven levens van Abraham Kuyper, een ongrijpbaar staatsman 403 - Sam van Houten, een eeuw lang verrassend dwars Ouds politieke wording 208 - Max Weber: politiek als beroep 60 - Coen Brummer & Daniël Boomsma: De canon van het sociaal-liberalisme Oud en zijn tijd 502 – Schipperen, laveren, boot afhouden en bakzeil halen. De Haagse ambtelijke top tijdens de Nazi-overheersing 55 - De geboorte van het poldermodel 43 - Liberaal denker Witteveen *** Tijdlijn 00:00:00 – Deel 1 00:43:40 – Deel 2 01:34:05 – Deel 3 02:15:30 – Einde See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Por eleição, Lula decide acabar com as bets que ele mesmo implantou / Flávio também viajou em avião de Vorcaro / EUA e China classificam como positiva reunião de presidentes / Esses são assuntos em destaque na edição de hoje do Jornal do Boris

Un livre, Un lecteur, émission présentée par Florence Berthout. Elle reçoit Boris Grebille pour parler du livre « La petite fille au ruban bleu » de Nathalie David-Weill À propos du livre : « La Petite Fille au ruban bleu: Le monde disparu d'Irène Cahen d'Anvers » paru aux éditions Flammarion "La Petite Fille au ruban bleu est l'un des tableaux les plus connus de Renoir. Son modèle, Irène Cahen d'Anvers, faisait partie de la grande bourgeoisie juive de la fin du XIXᵉ siècle, très influente dans le monde de l'art. La destinée du tableau révèle les tumultes de l'époque. Commandé à Renoir en 1880 par les parents d'Irène, mécènes brillants, sa spoliation par les nazis, plus de cinquante ans plus tard, marque l'effondrement d'une élite qui finira en majorité déportée. Après la guerre, Irène Cahen d'Anvers récupère son tableau et le vend à un marchand d'armes proche des Allemands. Paradoxalement, plus La Petite Fille au ruban bleu gagne en célébrité, plus son modèle s'efface des mémoires. En réalité, on ne sait à peu près rien d'Irène Cahen d'Anvers. Elle est perçue comme l'épouse indigne de Moïse de Camondo, qui a, lui, laissé l'image d'un homme généreux, cultivé et respecté. À la lumière d'archives inédites et de rencontres, j'ai découvert tout un monde, celui de Parisiennes élégantes dont la vie a basculé dans la tragédie. Parmi elles, se dégage une Irène féministe avant l'heure, idéaliste et déterminée. Faire revivre la femme cachée derrière le portrait, tel a été mon objectif."

Love the show? Subscribe, rate, review, and share!Here's How »Join the Capital Gains Tax Solutions Community today:capitalgainstaxsolutions.comCapital Gains Tax Solutions FacebookCapital Gains Tax Solutions TwitterCapital Gains Tax Solutions Linked In

Det her var en god episode med min kæreste Boris. God lytning. Hej. Få et godt tilbud og lyt til de nyeste episoder af Akavet, Emma lige her: https://podimo.dk/akavet-rss Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

durée : 00:13:45 - par : Emilie Munera, Rodolphe Bruneau-Boulmier - Le jeune violoniste canadien Jacques Forestier fait ses débuts discographiques aux côtés du pianiste Boris Kusnezow avec Song & Dance, un recueil d'œuvres pour violon inspirées par la voix et le mouvement. - équipe : Pauline Boisaubert Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

durée : 00:13:45 - par : Emilie Munera, Rodolphe Bruneau-Boulmier - Le jeune violoniste canadien Jacques Forestier fait ses débuts discographiques aux côtés du pianiste Boris Kusnezow avec Song & Dance, un recueil d'œuvres pour violon inspirées par la voix et le mouvement. - équipe : Pauline Boisaubert Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

ODS kritizuje návrh státního rozpočtu na příští rok a schválené navýšení důchodů. Udělala vláda vše pro snížení plánovaného deficitu rozpočtu na příští rok? S jakým pozměňovacím návrhem přišel Boris Šťastný (Motoristé sobě)? A dává smysl kromě pravidelné valorizace důchodů přidávat seniorům ještě příspěvek ve výši dvou tisíc korun? Na otázky Tomáše Pancíře odpovídá místopředseda poslaneckého klubu ODS a stínový ministr práce a sociálních věcí Jiří Havránek.

ODS kritizuje návrh státního rozpočtu na příští rok a schválené navýšení důchodů. Udělala vláda vše pro snížení plánovaného deficitu rozpočtu na příští rok? S jakým pozměňovacím návrhem přišel Boris Šťastný (Motoristé sobě)? A dává smysl kromě pravidelné valorizace důchodů přidávat seniorům ještě příspěvek ve výši dvou tisíc korun? Na otázky Tomáše Pancíře odpovídá místopředseda poslaneckého klubu ODS a stínový ministr práce a sociálních věcí Jiří Havránek.Všechny díly podcastu Dvacet minut Radiožurnálu můžete pohodlně poslouchat v mobilní aplikaci mujRozhlas pro Android a iOS nebo na webu mujRozhlas.cz.

„Stávající rozpočet Aleny Schillerové je sestaven zodpovědně. Je potřeba vědět, že tzv. mandatorní nebo kvazimandatorní výdaje jsou 97 procent celého rozpočtu,“ zdůrazňuje předseda poslaneckého klubu Motoristů sobě a ministr pro sport, prevenci a zdraví Boris Šťastný. S jakými pocity zvedal ruku pro návrh rozpočtu na příští rok? A proč by se měly rozšiřovat kompetence českého Antidopingového výboru? Poslechněte si rozhovor.Všechny díly podcastu Dvacet minut Radiožurnálu můžete pohodlně poslouchat v mobilní aplikaci mujRozhlas pro Android a iOS nebo na webu mujRozhlas.cz.

Boris presents his weekly Transmissions Radio show featuring new and already established names in the music world. Check out the latest episodes on your favorite streaming platform: https://ssyncc.com/transmissions-podcast/ Dario Nunez Cesar Sanchez “Bottom Up Boris & Gruuvelents Unreleased track Hector Cute Andrew Azara “ Keep On Gruuvelements “ Vacation” David Herrero “Big Lier” Seige, Thomas Newson, I Jah, “Pitcha Boris & Gruuvelements Unreleased track Gama, Bautista, Mops “Money talks” James Wyler “Groovy” George Privatti, Tony Romera “ For The Nation” Question Harris featuring Margaret Grace” My Joy “ (Nicole Fiallo remix) Jewel Kid “Scream n Shout” Angelo Raguso “ Don't Stop The Vibe” Detlaf “swagger” Tony Romera remix This show is syndicated & distributed exclusively by Syndicast. If you are a radio station interested in airing the show or would like to distribute your podcast / radio show please register here: https://syndicast.co.uk/distribution/registration

Deze Brievenmaandag is ook te bekijken via https://youtu.be/n1D2HACGPA0 Na een lekker weekend is het, zoals dat het hele jaar door gaat, tijd voor een nieuwe werkweek. Het is aan het driemanschap Boris, Daan & Shelly om de nieuwe werkdagen in te luiden. Een dame en twee heren die allen goed van de tongriem gesneden zijn en niet bang zijn elkaar de maat te nemen. Wat vaak tot leuke en spannende afleveringen leidt. Het vocaal inwijden van de komende week gebeurt via een nieuwe aflevering van Brievenmaandag. Dit keer hebben we om korte vragen gevraagd zodat we niet te veel hoeven voor te lezen en vooral veel vragen kunnen beantwoorden. Vragen over bijvoorbeeld het niet langer funden van de game van Kojima, de speciale Zelda themed Switch 2 en een open wereld Max Payne game. En zijn de middelmatige reviews van Wolverine een voorbode voor de reviews van GTA 6? Je krijgt de antwoorden op al deze vragen in de Brievenmaandag van maandag 21 september 2026. Zijn de middelmatige reviews van Wolverine een voorbode voor de reviews van GTA 6? De vragen komen vandaag in een razend tempo naar je toe. Wat zouden we veranderen als we nu één ding mochten veranderen aan de videogamesindustrie? En welke drie games beschouwen we als de beste ooit gemaakt? Zo, spontaan uit het hoofd. Wat vinden we van de open wereld games aanpak die Nintendo opeens op veel van zijn games los laat. Denk aan Kirby The World Beyond. En denken wij dat we nog een nieuwe Star Fox game zien als de verkoopcijfers van de recente remake niet echt denderend zijn? Onze grootste fan uit Japan bezocht de Tokyo Game Show We kregen ook een leuke mail van onze grootste fan in Japan, Kengo. Hij is als grote videogames-fan vanzelfsprekend naar de Tokyo Game Show geweest, typhoon of geen typhoon. En hij heeft ons wat beelden gestuurd. Hoeveel balen we nu als we dit zien? Je hoort het in deze video.Wil je adverteren bij de podcast Gamekings óf misschien bij een andere podcast van ILVY Network? Mail dan naar management@ilvy.com en/of kijk even op de website : https://ilvy.com/podcastSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the Wealth and Law Podcast, Brent Nelson is joined by Boris Musheyev for a conversation on Proactive Tax Planning. They discuss how business owners can reduce unnecessary tax burdens through year-round planning and explore how tax strategy can impact profitability and long-term financial goals. Boris Musheyev is a CPA, Certified Tax Strategist, and founder of BORISMTAX, a tax planning and advisory firm serving business owners across 40+ states. Since founding the firm in 2017, Boris has focused on helping entrepreneurs and high-income professionals reduce unnecessary tax burdens through proactive, year-round planning. He is also the host of the Tax Reduction Podcast, and BORISMTAX has been recognized on the Inc. 5000 list for two consecutive years. He can be found at: BORISMTAX | Tax Strategy & Advisory This material is for informational purposes only. The views expressed are those of the speaker as of the date noted and not necessarily of the speaker's firm or its affiliates. This podcast may be considered attorney advertising. This podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship and is not a legal opinion or legal advice. If you are enjoying the podcast please SUBSCRIBE and leave a REVIEW, and if you want to learn more about Brent go to Team – Wealth and Law. Legal Disclaimer: Legal Disclaimer – Wealth and Law

In dieser Folge geht es um Fotografie unter schwierigen Bedingungen: Boris fotografiert in der Reithalle, während der Titel bereits verrät, dass Licht und Lichtqualität dabei keine idealen Partner sind. Außerdem werfen Chris und Boris einen Blick auf die „Satzfahne 1“ von Chris Marquardts „Abenteuer Fotografie“ und sprechen über das neue iPhone 18, dessen variable Blende neue Möglichkeiten für die Smartphone-Fotografie verspricht. Die Slomo Guys liefern dazu Kameras im Detail und zeigen, wie viel Technik in modernen Aufnahmesystemen steckt. Bei den Neuigkeiten reicht das Spektrum vom Saugroboter zur 8K-Actioncam bis zum Firmware-Update 1.3.2 für Canon EOS R1 und EOS R5 Mark II. Don Pettits Aufnahmen aus dem All dokumentieren das Ende des orangefarbenen Natriumlichts in Städten. Außerdem geht es um fotografische Experimente mit Film, Push und Pull sowie um Workshops, die ganz ohne klassische Technik auskommen. Das Very Large Telescope soll 1000 kleine Roboterarme bekommen, und eine NASA-Fotobearbeitungstechnik, ursprünglich für den Mars entwickelt, macht auf der Erde alte Höhlenkunst sichtbar. Zum Schluss führt der Blick noch tiefer ins All: Das 3200-Megapixel-Auge des Rubin-Observatoriums nimmt den COSMOS-Bereich ins Visier. Und als besonders kurioses „One More Thing“ sorgt eine Zahnbürste mit Kamera für Street Photography – ein ungewöhnliches Beispiel dafür, wie weit sich fotografische Geräte inzwischen von der klassischen Kamera entfernen.

Говорят, если стартуешь бизнес в 2026 и ты не AI-native, можно не стартовать. Позвали Андрея Девяткина, со-основателя FivexL: он строит AI-продукт BORIS и уже несколько раз его переупаковал. Разбираем контекстный layer, MCP, Bedrock, экономику токенов и почему AI SRE выглядит мертворождённой категорией. О ЧЁМ ВЫПУСК • Как всё началось: на митапе Amazon Q CLI не смог понять, почему упал Vote App на ECS. • Harness как упряжка: LLM даёт лошадиную силу, а Claude Code, Codex и Kiro CLI решают, куда её направить. • Архитектура под паранойю: данные в аккаунте заказчика, Bedrock в zero retention, отдельный аккаунт на клиента. • Живое демо: чистая сессия Claude без памяти, ответ про сервис за минуту и 38 центов. • Пивоты: «context engineering platform» никто не понял, DevOps-агент не дал traction. • Почему AI SRE выглядит мертворождённой категорией и чем от неё отличается AWS DevOps Agent. • Граф и temporal: троублшутинг serverless, RAG без понятия о времени, корпоративная амнезия. • Стек честно: Bedrock Knowledge Base, S3 Vectors, лимиты Titan, сломанный Kimi. • Нужны ли DevOps дальше: три разные позиции и спор про то, умирает ли навык чтения. • Стоит ли стартовать AI-продукт в 2026 и кто платит за токены. ГОСТЬ Андрей Девяткин, со-основатель FivexL (AWS Advanced Tier), AWS Community Builder, лидер AWS User Group в Лас-Пальмасе. У нас во второй раз, первый был в DKT65 про ECS и EKS.

In part two, Boris explores the odd biography of the mosque's co-founder; respected nuclear scientist, US Army colonel, and Sufi Sheikh Asaf Duraković who had dark connections to Ustaša war criminals and right-wing extremists. They follow the progression of the mosque from the Cold War to the 90s, when its designation changed from Croation to Bosnian. --- Subscribe to https://patreon.org/tenepod https://bsky.app/profile/tenepod.bsky.social https://x.com/tenepod

Ministr pro sport Boris Šťastný (Motoristé) chce v rámci úspor ve státním rozpočtu omezit výdaje na školní inkluzi. Zpochybňuje mimo jiné počet asistentů pedagoga. „Pokud budeme šetřit na inkluzi nebo na pomoci dětem se specifickými potřebami, tak na to jako společnost doplatíme daleko více,“ říká poslankyně Andrea Hoffmannová (Piráti). „Náš návrh není o tom, že mají být sníženy služby nebo kvalita toho, co je těm dětem poskytováno,“ oponuje Miroslav Krejčí (za Motoristy). Všechny díly podcastu Pro a proti můžete pohodlně poslouchat v mobilní aplikaci mujRozhlas pro Android a iOS nebo na webu mujRozhlas.cz.

Death, taxes and Marc Marquez winning. These are the things one can rely on in life and the universe was in balance in Italy at the weekend. Of course, that is bad news for Boris but the big man has plenty of opportunity to express his displeasure in episode 213. And he does. But he also has a brilliant poem, Massive checks in and there's even a live cross to a special guest chatting with Freido. It's madness, it's impossible to explain but it's a lot of fun. Press play to be part of it and while youre listening loosen the purse strings and head over to Patreon to join the Pit Crew. It's guaranteed to get you laid.TRIUMPH AUSTRALIAhttps://www.triumphmotorcycles.com.au/APRILIA MOTORCYCLEShttps://www.aprilia.com/au_EN/MOTO GUZZIhttps://www.motoguzzi.com/au_EN/SAVIC MOTORCYCLEShttps://www.savicmotorcycles.com/PRESTIGE MOTORBIKE TRANSPORThttps://prestigemotorbiketransport.com.au/TROOPER LUhttps://trooperlu.com.au/ONTRACK EXPERIENCEShttps://ontrackexperiences.com/SC-PROJECT OCEANIAhttps://sc-project.com.au/HARLEY-DAVIDSONhttps://www.harley-davidson.com/au/en/index.htmlAMX SUPERSTOREShttps://www.amxsuperstores.com.au/CF-MOTOhttps://www.cfmoto.com.au/COMPASS EXPEDITIONShttps://compassexpeditions.com/BMW MOTORRADhttps://www.bmw-motorrad.com.au/en/home.html#/filter-allMADE IN GERMANYhttps://www.migmotorrad.com.au/GREY GUMS INTERNATIONAL CAFÉhttps://greyguminternationalcafe.com.au

Are you using continuous glucose monitors to their full potential? In this episode of IRH Clinician's Corner, Margaret Floyd Barry talks with Boris Berjan, founder of Theia Health and a two-time chronic illness conqueror who turned his personal health challenges into a mission to solve metabolic health globally through innovative technology. Together, they dive into the practical and business applications of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs), revealing how these cutting-edge biosensors can revolutionize clinical practice, provide real-time data for tailored interventions, and open up powerful new revenue streams for practitioners. In this episode: Why CGMs offer a unique window into physiology How CGM data can improve client buy-in and behavior change Three ways practitioners can incorporate CGMs into their business How CGMs can help troubleshoot stubborn clinical cases How a 30-day group CGM challenge can serve as a powerful entry-point offer Why technology and AI should support—not replace—the practitioner Check out our Clinician's Corner interview with Boris from 2023 to learn more about CGMs and Theia Health: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZMzxouSeqs The Clinician's Corner is brought to you by the Institute of Restorative Health: https://instituteofrestorativehealth.com/ Follow us on IG: https://www.instagram.com/instituteofrestorativehealth/ Join our email list here: https://instituteofrestorativehealth.com/join-our-email-list/ Book a call with the admissions team to continue your training: https://instituteofrestorativehealth.com/study-with-us/?utm_source=email  The CGM Challenge Toolkit is live! Want to run a challenge inside of your own practice and have a way to get clients in the door at a lower ticket level? Grab your toolkit here.  Connect with Boris Berjan: Website: https://theiahealth.ai/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/borisberjan/ Timestamps:  00:00 Continuous glucose monitoring explained 04:31 Using objective data in health 07:45 Discussing CGM business strategies 10:25 Challenges with app-based nutrition advice 14:41 Integrating technology in healthcare 19:23 Challenges with tracking health data 20:38 Selling data solutions packages 24:03 Real-time health monitoring tech 28:54 Creating a 30-day CGM challenge 32:40 Group program and clinical work integration 34:54 Using CGMs in client packages 37:52 Starting with a single sensor 42:45 Addressing Sales and Integration Concerns 46:03 Importance of Clinician Commitment 50:13 Comparing app features and benefits 51:03 Customizing scoring for different clients 55:09 Building the CGM challenge program 57:57 Thanking production team and listeners Guest bio:  Boris Berjan has battled and beat not one, but two chronic illnesses, scaled multiple companies past 7 & 8 figures (1 exit) and has ads that have reached over 1 billion people. He now runs Theia Health - a technology company helping to end metabolic health globally. Theia makes biology actionable in real-time for the first time ever.  Boris feels the biggest tragedy in the history of the human species is not collectively working on body deterioration, while we gain momentum in wisdom, intellect and experience. Keywords: functional health, clinical skills, CGM, continuous glucose monitor, blood sugar monitoring, metabolic health, Theia Health, practitioner tools, glucose data, group challenge, client accountability, pricing strategy, clinical packages, group coaching, business strategies, tech integration, HIPAA compliance, lab data, client retention, marketing health services, real-time feedback, corporate health, patient-provider relationship, wearable integrations, AI nutrition, glucose trends, chronic illness, mold testing, insurance premiums, health tech Disclaimer: The views expressed in the IRH Clinician's Corner series are those of the individual speakers and interviewees, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute of Restorative Health, LLC. The Institute of Restorative Health, LLC does not specifically endorse or approve of any of the information or opinions expressed in the IRH Clinician's Corner series. The information and opinions expressed in the IRH Clinician's Corner series are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice. If you have any medical concerns, please consult with a qualified healthcare professional. The Institute of Restorative Health, LLC is not liable for any damages or injuries that may result from the use of the information or opinions expressed in the IRH Clinician's Corner series. By viewing or listening to this information, you agree to hold the Institute of Restorative Health, LLC harmless from any and all claims, demands, and causes of action arising out of or in connection with your participation. Thank you for your understanding.  

He's spent over two decades in central banking, helped lead Croatia into the euro area and is now the ECB's Vice-President. In this episode of In Conversation, Boris Vujčić joins our host Stefania Secola to reflect on the experiences that shaped him, discuss European financial stability and share his top priorities for his new role. The views expressed are those of the speakers and not necessarily those of the European Central Bank. Boris Vujčić https://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb/decisions/html/cvvujcic.en.html Speech by Boris Vujčić: Listening to households: expectations, behaviour and monetary policy https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2026/html/ecb.sp260901~bb28f33f54.en.html ECB Instagram https://www.instagram.com/europeancentralbank/ Euro Matters on Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/1E7EirKc3SF0dji6ZdwlVF?si=5a33d7abb83a427e Euro Matters on Apple Podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/de/podcast/euro-matters-the-european-central-bank-podcast/id1481819425

Shadow permet aujourd'hui d'utiliser un PC puissant à distance depuis presque n'importe quel appareil, du vieux laptop au smartphone. L'entreprise veut aussi valoriser son infrastructure GPU pour l'inférence IA lorsque les joueurs ne l'utilisent pas.

back in the podcast studio/ Daniel's computer room and he is ready for us to be done, so he can play some more Minecraft. Thanks for being awesome.  We love you. Email: basementbuddiespod@gmail.com 

Priya Blunts and Boris Khaykin join Zac Amico and discuss an update on the Wheel of Fortune announcer allegations, the waiter who saved a woman from her ex-husband trying to shoot her at a restaurant, Zac's Super Bowl halftime prediction, the missing porn star, the woman suffering from a disorder that cause her boobs to never stop growing, the girl beating her own fastest time for eating a burrito, the cops who clipped a woman with their police car, the baby rat found in food and so much more! Air Date: 09/08/26Support our sponsors!⁠BodyBrainCoffee.com⁠ - Use promo code: ZOO15 to get 15% off!Zac Amico's Morning Zoo plug music can be found here: ⁠https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMgQJEcVToY&list=PLzjkiYUjXuevVG0fTOX4GCTzbU0ooHQ-O&ab_channel=Bulby⁠To advertise your product or service on GaS Digital podcasts please go to ⁠TheADSide.com⁠ and click on "Advertisers" for more information!Submit your artwork via postal mail to:GaS Digital Networkc/o Zac's Morning Zoo151 1st Ave, #311New York, NY 10003You can sign up at ⁠GaSDigital.com⁠ with promo code: ZOO for a discount of $1.50 on your subscription and access to every Zac Amico's Morning Zoo show ever recorded! On top of that you'll also have the same access to ALL the shows that GaS Digital Network has to offer!Follow the whole show on social media!Priya BluntsInstagram: https://instagram.com/priyabluntsBoris KhaykinTwitter: https://twitter.com/TheBorisKInstagram: https://instagram.com/TheBorisKZac AmicoTwitter: ⁠https://twitter.com/ZASpookShow⁠Instagram: ⁠https://instagram.com/zacisnotfunny⁠Dates: ⁠https://punchup.live/ZacAmicoSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Historias de seres peludos, huellas imposibles y una expedición financiada por el Estado soviético que ha permanecido oculta durante más de medio siglo. Tras la aparición de unos documentos largamente olvidados, hoy reconstruimos la búsqueda del hombre salvaje en las antiguas repúblicas de Asia Central. Hablamos de la figura de Boris Porsnev, de cómo el periódico Pravda se inundó de testimonios y de la fascinante uniformidad de los relatos que, desde Kirguistán hasta Uzbekistán, describen a un habitante esquivo de las montañas. Un episodio sobre la frontera entre la leyenda y la antropología, y sobre la incesante búsqueda de lo que se resiste a ser encontrado. Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

El periodista Boris Muñoz aseguró en Dos Puntos que los atentados del 11 de septiembre de 2001 le hicieron ver “cerrarse el mundo” de cara al siglo XXI.

Le PNCAST reprend pour une nouvelle saison : Boris est accompagné de Shishi, Xavier et Axfili à la réalisation. Au programme : nos tests d'Onimusha: Way of the Sword et d'Orbitals sur Switch 2, puis le tour complet des deux Nintendo Direct de la semaine. Shishi défend son 17/20 pour Onimusha malgré des QTE envahissants et des boss qui deviennent un mur, et son 19/20 pour Orbitals, un jeu qui se pratique uniquement à deux et assume sa nostalgie manga. Nous revenons ensuite sur le Zelda Direct des 40 ans : le film The Legend of Zelda attendu le 30 avril, le remake d'Ocarina of Time pour le 5 novembre, la console collector et sa manette au tarif qui fait parler, l'exposition du Nintendo Museum et la tournée de concerts de Koji Kondo qui oublie la France. Nous terminons sur le Nintendo Direct du 9 septembre : Metroid Ravenous pour le 28 janvier 2027, Kirby and the World Beyond en 3D, les Switch 2 Edition de Xenoblade Chronicles 3 et Pikmin 4, les circuits rétro de Mario Kart World, Capcom avec Monster Hunter Wilds et les remakes Resident Evil, Final Fantasy VII Revelation, Persona 4 Revival et Persona 6, The Witcher 3, le retour de LEVEL-5, et les grands absents.

In this two part news update, Boris and Rey discuss the recent state funeral for Bosnian Serb war criminal Ratko Mladić. In part two, we are joined by returning guest Peter Korotaev of the Events in Ukraine substack to discuss the shootout in Kyiv between two factions of the Ukrainian intelligence services over a member of Neo-Nazi paramilitary Russian Volunteer Corps. Check out Peter's substack here: https://eventsinukraine.substack.com/ --- Subscribe to https://patreon.org/tenepod https://bsky.app/profile/tenepod.bsky.social https://x.com/tenepod  

Presenting... The Steam Rollers Adventure Podcast,     Season 4: "The Curse of the Glass Witch"   Episode 325, Chapter 44 "Doesn't Everybody Like The Plabe?" EARLY RELEASE (BRONZE+): 3+ weeks early! COMMERCIAL FREE! PUBLIC RELEASE: Thursday, September 10, 2026 Show Notes for the Episode... Matisse draws the wrong kind of attention when she's tasked with starting the show. Percy comes face to face with his zombie self! Holly the Faerie Witch finds herself trapped inside the White Temple. Fortunately, the Keepers gave her a map! Production... Executive Producer:            George Pecenica Producer:            Sholom West Patreon Sponsor:             Michael Cast...Storycrafter - Mike Rigg           Robbie, Boris, Margie, and Ben - Themselves     George Pecenica as Percy Alexander     Ray Volk as Martin Barnett     Jenn Avril as Connie Ross     Rupert Faullhurst as Nigel Osbert Wintermann     Dave Murtagh as Oliver Glass     and introducing Robin as Holly the Faerie Witch and Blake Azur as Jasper Remington Music Credits...          "Almost New, "Dark Times," "Hitman, "The Parting" by Kevin MacLeod (Incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . Additional music: "The Steam Rollers Adventure Podcast Theme" performed by Floof* , "A Jaunty Day," "Robut Reviews," "A Jaunty Day in SRAPLand," "The Halo Temple," "The Halo Temple (Darker)," "The Saddest Music Ever," "The Temple" by RST Musek (* Floof is a fictional band. Find out more by following Whiskey Tango Furball on YouTube @WTFurball. RST Musek lyrics written by Michael J Rigg, music generated using SUNO.)

In dieser Folge geht es um fotografische Entscheidungen, neue Technik und die Frage, wie man sich beim Bildermachen und -auswählen nicht selbst ausbremst. Chris stellt die deutsche Version von „1 Hour 1000 Pics“ vor: Eine Stunde lang tausend Bilder zu sichten, soll gegen Entscheidungsmüdigkeit helfen und den Blick für die wirklich starken Aufnahmen schärfen. Außerdem berichtet Boris von seinem eigenen Fototrip. Bei den Neuigkeiten reicht die Spannweite von der eingestellten Pentax K-1 Mark II über geleakte Bilder einer OM System PEN bis zu Gerüchten über die Canon EOS R8 Mark II. Besprochen werden außerdem ein Leica-Summicron-Objektiv als Hommage an ein militärisches Spionageobjektiv, das Sigma 85 mm f/1,2 DG DN für E- und L-Mount sowie Fujifilms leichtes 400 mm f/4,5 für die X-Serie. Auch die ungewöhnliche Dyson CameraJet und ein Blick auf Adobes Photoshop-Debüt in der Today Show sorgen für Gesprächsstoff. Im Feedback geht es unter anderem um fünf Millionen Sekunden Happy Shooting, Ferrumpics, ein Tool zur Flickr-Auswahl und einen neuen Entwicklungs- und Scan-Service für Filme. Dazu kommen technische und kreative Abzweigungen, die zeigen, wie unterschiedlich fotografische Workflows aussehen können – von der Auswahl digitaler Bilder bis zur analogen Verarbeitung.

Check out the latest advanced manufacturing technologies at the Smart Manufacturing Experience Showcase at IMTS in Chicago.

Boris presents his weekly Transmissions Radio show featuring new and already established names in the music world. Check out the latest episodes on your favorite streaming platform: https://ssyncc.com/transmissions-podcast/ No Tracklist This show is syndicated & distributed exclusively by Syndicast. If you are a radio station interested in airing the show or would like to distribute your podcast / radio show please register here: https://syndicast.co.uk/distribution/registration

Boris Lecoeur, PDG de Qwant, Lilo & Shadow, était l'invité de Frédéric Simottel dans Tech & Co, la quotidienne, ce lundi 7 septembre. Il s'est penché sur ses motivations d'aller vers les marques Qwant, Lilo et Shadow, ainsi que sur la souveraineté numérique, sur BFM Business. Retrouvez l'émission du lundi au jeudi et réécoutez la en podcast.

Boris examines the strange backstory behind a Toronto area mosque founded by a former member of the Waffen SS and a Sufi Sheikh nuclear scientist as a bridge between the Islamic world and Croatian emigre extremists. --- Subscribe to https://patreon.org/tenepod https://bsky.app/profile/tenepod.bsky.social https://x.com/tenepod