Podcasts about Leeuwen

In de allereerste aflevering van Wereldzaken duiken we in de schimmige wereld van conservatieve denktanks in Brussel. EU-correspondent Rik Rutten en geopolitiek redacteur Michel Kerres nemen ons mee naar een wereld van slappe croissantjes en radicaal rechtse ideeën. Hoeveel invloed hebben deze clubs? Zijn zij de verborgen architecten van de Europese koers?Wil je meer weten over dit onderwerp of ben je benieuwd wat de aflevering niet heeft gehaald? Meld je dan aan voor onze nieuwsbrief via: www.nrc.nl/wereldzakenGast: Rik RuttenCo-host: Michel KerresPresentatie: Mandula van den BergProductie: Lotteke BoogertMontage: Lars van Leeuwen & Ruben PestVideo: Cato Visser, Rosa Juffer en Arno VanhollebekeHeb je vragen, suggesties of ideeën over onze journalistiek? Laat het de redactie weten via wereldzaken@nrc.nl.Zie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In 1992 worden in verschillende Amsterdamse grachten lichaamsdelen van een jonge vrouw gevonden. Ze is op gruwelijke wijze vermoord en haar lichaam is verminkt. Zo zijn haar vingertoppen en tenen afgesneden en is haar hart uitgesneden. Wie is deze vrouw, wat is er met haar gebeurd en wie heeft dit gedaan? De politie doet met man en macht onderzoek naar de gruwelijke moord, maar tot op de dag van vandaag is de zaak nooit opgelost. Oud-forensisch rechercheur en voormalig boegbeeld van het Cold Case Team van Amsterdam Carina van Leeuwen vertelt over het cold case onderzoek.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This latest episode of the Seatrade Maritime Podcast is the final part in a series of three focusing on major international companies with a strong footprint in the Chinese market.In this episode we will take a dive into the world of offshore vessel design with Edwin van Leeuwen, Managing Director at Ulstein Designs and Solutions. In a conversation with Seatrade Maritime News Editor Marcus Hand we explore the complexities of creating specialised vessels for marine operations, the significance of the Chinese shipbuilding market, and the innovative technologies that shape the future of maritime engineering. Edwin shares insights on current projects, the shift towards sustainable practices in vessel design, and the importance of collaboration between designers, shipyards, and clients. The conversation includes:Meet Edwin Van LeeuwenDiscussion of unique vessel designsThe importance of the Chinese MarketAn overview of current projects The shift to sustainabilityExpectations for Marintec China 2025Listen to the full episode now

Wethouder Bas van Leeuwen over plannen Amsterdam over fatbike-verbod by Haarlem105

In deze dubbele aflevering van De Boekenpraktijk spreken we met twee auteurs die ieder vanuit een totaal ander perspectief naar het brein kijken.AI-onderzoeker Thomas Moerland, auteur van Van IQ naar AI, onderzoekt hoe intelligentie werkt en in hoeverre we die kunnen nabouwen in computers.Leiderschapsdocent en spreker Ronald van der Molen, auteur van Het bevlogen brein, laat zien hoe ons oerbrein ons vaak gijzelt – en hoe je juist meer bevlogenheid, geluk en focus kunt ontwikkelen.Wat gebeurt er wanneer deze twee werelden botsen én elkaar aanvullen?We praten over de kracht van sprankelmomentjes, waarom ons brein geprogrammeerd is voor gevaar, hoe AI door straffen en belonen leert, en waarom we als mens soms meer op robots gaan lijken dan andersom.Ook onderzoeken we hoe leiders in organisaties de voordelen van technologie kunnen benutten zonder dat medewerkers vervolgens uitgeblust raken - én waarom flow misschien wel makkelijker bereikbaar wordt als AI routinetaken overneemt.Luister deze aflevering wanneer je wilt begrijpen hoe AI en ons eigen brein elkaar beïnvloeden - en hoe jij als professional daar bewust en bevlogen je voordeel mee kunt doen.StellingenZoals altijd legt Willem van Leeuwen onze gasten een aantal stellingen voor. In deze aflevering zijn dat:1. Hoe slimmer de technologie wordt, hoe dommer wij ons brein gebruiken.2. De toekomst van intelligentie is niet kunstmatig óf menselijk, maar relationeel.LinksAlle boeken van Ronald van der Molen bestel je hier: https://www.managementboek.nl/auteur/19159/ronald-van-der-molenEn het boek van Thomas Moerland, Van IQ naar AI, vind je hier:  https://www.managementboek.nl/boek/9789045051963/van-iq-naar-ai-thomas-moerland OverIn de Boekenpraktijk, de podcast van Managementboek, praat Willem van Leeuwen met auteurs van nieuw verschenen boeken over de brede thema's ontwikkeling en verandering: van persoonlijke ontwikkeling en verandering tot op het niveau van een gehele organisatie. Altijd met een koppeling naar de dagelijkse praktijk.

Kirk & Lacy on shifting research funding away from federal grants: what happens to community partnerships when the money—and the rules—change? Summary Three Audiences, One Report Lacy Fabian and Kirk Knestis untangle a fundamental confusion in community health research: there are three distinct audiences with competing needs—funders want accountability, researchers want generalizable knowledge, and communities want immediate benefit. Current practice optimizes for the funder, producing deliverables that don’t help the people being served. The alternative isn’t “no strings attached” anarchy but rather honest negotiation about who benefits and who bears the burden of proof. Kirk’s revelation about resource allocation is stark: if one-third of evaluation budgets goes to Click here to view the printable newsletter with images. More readable than a transcript. Contents Table of Contents Toggle EpisodeProem1. Introductions & Career Transitions2. The Catalyst: Why This Conversation Matters3. The Ideal State: Restoring Human Connection4. The Localization Opportunity5. Evidence + Story = Impact6. The Funder Issue: Who Is This Truly Benefiting?7. Dissemination, Implementation & Vested Interest8. Data Parties – The Concrete Solution9. No Strings Attached: Reimagining Funder Relationships10. Balancing Accountability and Flexibility11. Where the Money Actually Goes12. The Pendulum Swings13. The Three Relationships: Funder, Researcher, Community14. Maintaining Agency15. Listen and LearnReflectionRelated episodes from Health Hats Please comment and ask questions: at the comment section at the bottom of the show notes on LinkedIn  via email YouTube channel  DM on Instagram, TikTok to @healthhats Substack Patreon Production Team Kayla Nelson: Web and Social Media Coach, Dissemination, Help Desk  Leon van Leeuwen: editing and site management Oscar van Leeuwen: video editing Julia Higgins: Digit marketing therapy Steve Heatherington: Help Desk and podcast production counseling Joey van Leeuwen, Drummer, Composer, and Arranger, provided the music for the intro, outro, proem, and reflection Claude, Perplexity, Auphonic, Descript, Grammarly, DaVinci Podcast episode on YouTube Inspired by and Grateful to: Ronda Alexander, Eric Kettering, Robert Motley, Liz Salmi, Russell Bennett Photo Credits for Videos Data Party image by Erik Mclean on Unsplash Pendulum image by Frames For Your Heart on Unsplash Links and references Lacy Fabian, PhD, is the founder of Make It Matter Program Consulting and Resources (makeitmatterprograms.com). She is a research psychologist with 20+ years of experience in the non-profit and local, state, and federal sectors who uses evidence and story to demonstrate impact that matters. She focuses on helping non-profits thrive by supporting them when they need it—whether through a strategy or funding pivot, streamlining processes, etc. She also works with foundations and donors to ensure their giving matters, while still allowing the recipient non-profits to maintain focus on their mission. When she isn't making programs matter, she enjoys all things nature —from birdwatching to running —and is an avid reader. Lacy Fabian’s Newsletter: Musings That Matter: Expansive Thinking About Humanity’s Problems Kirk Knestis is an expert in data use planning, design, and capacity building, with experience helping industry, government, and education partners leverage data to solve difficult questions. Kirk is the Executive Director of a startup community nonprofit that offers affordable, responsive maintenance and repairs for wheelchairs and other personal mobility devices to northern Virginia residents. He was the founding principal of Evaluand LLC, a research and evaluation consulting firm providing customized data collection, analysis, and reporting solutions, primarily serving clients in industry, government, and education. The company specializes in external evaluation of grant-funded projects, study design reviews, advisory services, and capacity-building support to assist organizations in using data to answer complex questions.  Referenced in episode Zanakis, S.H., Mandakovic, T., Gupta, S.K., Sahay, S., & Hong, S. (1995). “A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 1, March 1995, pp. 59-79. This paywalled article presents a detailed analysis of 306 articles from 93 journals that review project/program evaluation, selection, and funding allocation methods in the service and government sectors. Episode Proem When I examine the relationships between health communities and researchers, I become curious about the power dynamics involved. Strong, equitable relationships depend on a balance of power. But what exactly are communities, and what does a power balance look like? The communities I picture are intentional, voluntary groups of people working together to achieve common goals—such as seeking, fixing, networking, championing, lobbying, or communicating for best health for each other. These groups can meet in person or virtually, and can be local or dispersed. A healthy power balance involves mutual respect, participatory decision-making, active listening, and a willingness to adapt and grow. I always listen closely for connections between communities and health researchers. Connections that foster a learning culture, regardless of their perceived success. Please meet Lacy Fabian and Kirk Knestis, who have firsthand experience in building and maintaining equitable relationships, with whom I spoke in mid-September. This transcript has been edited for clarity with help from Grammarly. Lacy Fabian, PhD, is the founder of Make It Matter Program Consulting and Resources. She partners with non-profit, government, and federal organizations using evidence and storytelling to demonstrate impact and improve program results. Kirk Knestis is an expert in data use planning, design, and capacity building. As Executive Director of a startup community nonprofit and founding principal of Evaluand LLC. He specializes in research, evaluation, and organizational data analysis for complex questions. 1. Introductions & Career Transitions Kirk Knestis: My name’s Kirk Knestis. Until just a few weeks ago, I ran a research and evaluation consulting firm, Evaluand LLC, outside Washington, DC. I’m in the process of transitioning to a new gig. I’ve started a non-profit here in Northern Virginia to provide mobile wheelchair and scooter service. Probably my last project, I suspect. Health Hats: Your last thing, meaning you’re retiring. Kirk Knestis: Yeah, it’s most of my work in the consulting gig was funded by federal programs, the National Science Foundation, the Department of Ed, the National Institutes of Health, and funding for most of the programs that I was working on through grantees has been pretty substantially curtailed in the last few months. Rather than looking for a new research and evaluation gig, we’ve decided this is going to be something I can taper off and give back to the community a bit. Try something new and different, and keep me out of trouble. Health Hats: Yeah, good luck with the latter. Lacy, introduce yourself, please. Lacy Fabian: Hi, Lacy Fabian. Not very dissimilar from Kirk, I’ve made a change in the last few months. I worked at a large nonprofit for nearly 11 years, serving the Department of Health and Human Services. But now I am solo, working to consult with nonprofits and donors. The idea is that I would be their extra brain power when they need it. It’s hard to find funding, grow, and do all the things nonprofits do without a bit of help now and then. I’m looking to provide that in a new chapter, a new career focus. Health Hats: Why is this conversation happening now? Both Kirk and Lacy are going through significant changes as they move away from traditional grant-funded research and nonprofit hierarchies. They’re learning firsthand what doesn’t work and considering what might work instead—this isn't just theory—it’s lived experience. 2. The Catalyst: Why This Conversation Matters Health Hats: Lacy, we caught up after several years of working together on several projects. I’m really interested in community research partnerships. I’m interested in it because I think the research questions come from the communities rather than the researchers. It’s a fraught relationship between communities and researchers, often driven by power dynamics. I’m very interested in how to balance those dynamics. And I see some of this: a time of changing priorities and people looking at their gigs differently —what are the opportunities in this time of kind of chaos, and what are the significant social changes that often happen in times like this? 3. The Ideal State: Restoring Human Connection Health Hats: In your experience, especially given all the recent transitions, what do you see as the ideal relationship between communities and researchers? What would an ideal state look like? Lacy Fabian: One thing I was thinking about during my walk or run today, as I prepared for this conversation about equitable relationships and the power dynamics in this unique situation we’re in, is that I feel like we often romanticize the past instead of learning from it. I believe learning from the past is very important. When I think about an ideal scenario, I feel like we’re moving further away from human solidarity and genuine connection. So, when considering those equitable relationships, it seems to me that it’s become harder to build genuine connections and stay true to our humanness. From a learning perspective, without romanticizing the past, one example I thought of is that, at least in the last 50 years, we’ve seen exponential growth in the amount of information available. That's a concrete example we can point to. And I think that we, as a society, have many points where we could potentially connect. But recent research shows that’s not actually the case. Instead, we’re becoming more disconnected and finding it harder to connect. I believe that for our communities, even knowing how to engage with programs like what Kirk is working on is difficult. Or even in my position, trying to identify programs that truly want to do right, take that pause, and make sure they aim to be equitable—particularly on the funder side—and not just engage in transactions or give less generously than they intend if they’re supporting programs. But there are strings attached. I think all of this happens because we stop seeing each other as human beings; we lose those touchpoints. So, when I think about an ideal situation, I believe it involves restoring those connections, while more clearly and openly acknowledging the power dynamics we introduce and the different roles we assume in the ecosystem. We can’t expect those dynamics to be the same, or to neutralize their impact. However, we can discuss these issues more openly and consistently and acknowledge that they might influence outcomes. So, in an ideal scenario, these are the kinds of things we should be working toward. 4. The Localization Opportunity Health Hats: So Kirk, it strikes me listening to Lacy talk that there’s, in a way, the increased localization of this kind of work could lead to more relationships in the dynamic, whereas before, maybe it was. Things were too global. It was at an academic medical center and of national rather than local interest. What are your thoughts about any of that? Kirk Knestis: Yeah, that’s an excellent question. First, I want to make sure I acknowledge Lacy’s description philosophically, from a value standpoint. I couldn’t put it any better myself. Certainly, that’s got to be at the core of this. Lacy and I know each other because we both served on the board of the Professional Evaluation Society on the East Coast of the United States, and practice of evaluation, evaluating policies and programs, and use of resources, and all the other things that we can look at with evidence, the root of that word is value, right? And by making the values that drive whatever we’re doing explicit, we’re much more likely to connect. At levels in, way, in ways that are actually valuable, a human being level, not a technician level. But to your question, Danny, a couple of things immediately leap out at me. One is that there was always. I was primarily federally funded, indirectly; there’s always been a real drive for highly rigorous, high-quality evaluation. And what that oftentimes gets interpreted to mean is generalizable evaluation research. And so that tends to drive us toward quasi-experimental kinds of studies that require lots and lots of participants, validated instrumentation, and quantitative data. All of those things compromise our ability to really understand what’s going on for the people, right? For the real-life human stakeholders. One thing that strikes me is that we could be as funding gets picked up. I’m being optimistic here that funding will be picked up by other sources, but let’s say the nonprofits get more involved programs that in the past and in the purview of the feds, we’re going to be freed of some of that, I hope, and be able to be more subjective, more mixed methods, more on the ground and kind of maturein the, dirt down and dirty out on the streets, learning what’s going on for real humans. As opposed to saying, “Nope, sorry, we can’t even ask whether this program works or how it works until we’ve got thousands and thousands of participants and we can do math about the outcomes.” So that’s one way I think that things might be changing. 5. Evidence + Story = Impact One of the big elements I like to focus on is the evidence—the kind of, so what the program is doing—but also the story. Making sure both of those things are combined to share the impact. And one of the things that I think we aren’t great about, which kind of circles back to the whole topic about equitable relationships. I don’t often think we’re really great at acknowledging. Who our report outs are for 6. The Funder Issue: Who Is This Truly Benefiting? Health Hats: Yes, who’s the audience? Lacy Fabian: Describing the kind of traditional format, I’m going to have thousands of participants, and then I’m going to be able to start to do really fancy math. That audience is a particular player who’s our funder. And they have different needs and different goals. So so many times, but that’s not the same as the people we’re actually trying to help. I think part of actually having equity in practice is pushing our funders to acknowledge that those reports are really just for them. And what else are we doing for our other audiences, and how can we better uphold that with our limited resources? Do we really need that super fancy report that’s going to go on a shelf? And we talk about it a lot, but I think that’s the point. We’re still talking about it. And maybe now that our funding is shifting, it’s an excellent catalyst to start being smarter about who our audience is, what they need, and what’s best to share with them. 7. Dissemination, Implementation & Vested Interest Health Hats: So, in a way, that’s not only do we need to think about who the work is for. How do we get it to those people? So how do we disseminate to those people? And then, what are the motivations for implementation? And it seems to me that if I have a vested interest in the answer to the question, I am more likely to share it and to try to figure out what the habits are—the changing habits that the research guides. What are some examples of this that you’ve, in your experience, that either you feel like you hit it like this, worked, or where you felt like we didn’t quite get there? So, what are your thoughts about some practical examples of that? Kirk Knestis: I was laughing because I don’t have so many examples of the former. I’ve got lots of examples of the latter. Health Hats: So start there. 8. Data Parties – The Concrete Solution Kirk Knestis: A good example of how I’ve done that in the past is when clients are willing to tolerate it. We call them different things over the years, like a data party. What we do is convene folks. We used to do it in person, face-to-face, but now that we’re dealing with people spread out across the country and connected virtually, these meetings can be done online. Instead of creating a report that just sits on a shelf or a thumb drive, I prefer to spend that time gathering and organizing the information we collect into a usable form for our audiences. This acts as a formative feedback process rather than just a summative benchmark. Here’s what we’ve learned. You share the information with those who contributed to it and benefit from it, and you ask for their thoughts. We’re observing that this line follows a certain path. Let’s discuss what that means or review all the feedback we received from this stakeholder group. It’s quite different from what we’ve heard from other stakeholders. What do you think is happening there? And let them help add value to the information as it moves from evidence to results. Health Hats: This is the solution to the funder problem. Instead of writing reports for funders, Kirk brings together the actual stakeholders—the people who provided data and benefit from the program. They assist in interpreting the findings in real-time. It’s formative, not summative. It’s immediate, not shelved. 9. No Strings Attached: Reimagining Funder Relationships Health Hats: I think it’s interesting that a thread through this is the role of the funder and the initiative’s governance. I remember that we worked on a couple of projects. I felt like the funder’s expectations were paramount, and the lessons we learned in the process were less important, which aligns with what we didn’t show. Publication bias or something. Sometimes in these initiatives, what’s most interesting is what didn’t work —and that’s not so, anyway. So how? So now that you’re looking forward to working with organizations that are trying to have questions answered, how is that shaping how you’re coaching about governance of these initiatives? Like, where does that come in? Lacy Fabian: Yeah. I think, if we’re talking about an ideal state, there are models, and it will be interesting to see how many organizations really want to consider it, but the idea of no-strings-attached funding. Doesn’t that sound nice, Kirk? The idea being that if you are the funding organization and you have the money, you have the power, you’re going to call the shots. In that way, is it really fair for you to come into an organization like something that Kirk has and start dictating the terms of that money? So, Kirk has to start jumping through the hoops of the final report and put together specific monthly send-ins for that funder. And he has to start doing these things well for that funder. What if we considered a situation where the funder even paid for support to do that for themselves? Maybe they have somebody who comes in, meets with Kirk, or just follows around, shadows the organization for a day or so, collects some information, and then reports it back. But the idea is that the burden and the onus aren’t on Kirk and his staff. Because they’re trying to repair wheelchairs and imagining the types of models we’ve shifted. We’ve also left the power with Kirk and his organization, so they know how to serve their community best. Again, we’ve put the onus back on the funder to answer their own questions that are their needs. I think that’s the part that we’re trying to tease out in the equity: who is this really serving? And if I’m giving to you, but I’m saying you have to provide me with this in return. Again, who’s that for, and is that really helping? Who needs their wheelchair service? And I think that’s the part we need to work harder at unpacking and asking ourselves. When we have these meetings, put out these funding notices, or consider donating to programs, those are the things we have to ask ourselves about and feel are part of our expectations. 10. Balancing Accountability and Flexibility Health Hats: Wow. What’s going through my mind is, I’m thinking, okay, I’m with PCORI. What do we do? We want valuable results. We do have expectations and parameters. Is there an ideal state? Those tensions are real and not going away. But there’s the question of how to structure it to maximize the value of the tension. Oh, man, I’m talking abstractly. I need help thinking about the people who are listening to this. How does somebody use this? So let’s start with: for the researcher? What’s the mindset that’s a change for the researcher? What’s the mindset shift for the people, and for the funder? Let’s start with the researcher. Either of you pick that up. What do you think a researcher needs to do differently? Kirk Knestis: I don’t mind having opinions about this. That’s a fascinating question, and I want to sort of preface what I’m getting ready to say. With this, I don’t think it’s necessary to assume that, to achieve the valuable things Lacy just described, we must completely abrogate all responsibility. I think it would be possible for someone to say, money, no strings attached. We’re never going to get the board/taxpayer/or whoever, for that. Importantly, too, is to clarify a couple of functions. I found that there are a couple of primary roles that are served by the evaluation or research of social services or health programs, for example. The first and simplest is the accountability layer. Did you do what you said you were going to do? That’s operational. That doesn’t take much time or energy, and it doesn’t place a heavy burden on program stakeholders. Put the burden on the program’s managers to track what’s happening and be accountable for what got done. Health Hats: So like milestones along the way? Kirk Knestis: Yes. But there are other ways, other dimensions to consider when we think about implementation. It’s not just the number of deliveries but also getting qualitative feedback from the folks receiving the services. So, you can say, yeah, we were on time, we had well-staffed facilities, and we provided the resources they needed. So that’s the second tier. The set of questions we have a lot more flexibility with at the next level. The so-what kind of questions, in turn, where we go from looking at this term bugs me, but I’ll use it anyway. We’re looking at outputs—delivery measures of quantities and qualities—and we start talking about outcomes: persistent changes for the stakeholders of whatever is being delivered. Attitudes, understandings. Now, for health outcomes—whatever the measures are—we have much more latitude. Focus on answering questions about how we can improve delivery quality and quantity so that folks get the most immediate and largest benefit from it. And the only way we can really do that is with a short cycle. So do it, test it, measure it, improve it. Try it again, repeat, right? So that formative feedback, developmental kind of loop, we can spend a lot of time operating there, where we generally don’t, because we get distracted by the funder who says, “I need this level of evidence that the thing works, that it scales.” Or that it demonstrates efficacy or effectiveness on a larger scale to prove it. I keep wanting to make quotas, right, to prove that it works well. How about focusing on helping it work for the people who are using it right now as a primary goal? And that can be done with no strings attached because it doesn’t require anything to be returned to the funder. It doesn’t require that deliverable. My last thought, and I’ll shut up. 11. Where the Money Actually Goes Kirk Knestis: A study ages ago, and I wish I could find it again, Lacy. It was in one of the national publications, probably 30 years ago. Health Hats: I am sure Lacy’s going to remember that. Kirk Knestis: A pie chart illustrated how funds are allocated in a typical program evaluation, with about a third going to data collection and analysis, which adds value. Another third covers indirect costs, such as keeping the organization running, computers, and related expenses. The remaining third is used to generate reports, transforming the initial data into a tangible deliverable. If you take that third use much more wisely, I think you can accomplish the kind of things Lacy’s describing without, with, and still maintain accountability. Health Hats: This is GOLD. The 1/3: 1/3: 1/3 breakdown is memorable, concrete, and makes the problem quantifiable. Once again, 1/3 each for data collection and analysis, keeping the organization alive, and writing reports. 12. The Pendulum Swings Lacy Fabian: And if I could add on to what Kirk had said, I think one of the things that comes up a lot in the human services research space where I am is this idea of the pendulum swing. It’s not as though we want to go from a space where there are a lot of expectations for the dollars, then swing over to one where there are none. That’s not the idea. Can we make sure we’re thinking about it intentionally and still providing the accountability? So, like Kirk said, it’s that pause: do we really need the reports, and do we really need the requirements that the funder has dictated that aren’t contributing to the organization’s mission? In fact, we could argue that in many cases, they’re detracting from it. Do we really need that? Or could we change those expectations, or even talk to our funder, as per the Fundee, to see how they might better use this money if they were given more freedom, not to have to submit these reports or jump through these hoops? And I believe that’s the part that restores that equity, too, because it’s not the funder coming in and dictating how things will go or how the money will be used. It’s about having a relational conversation, being intentional about what we’re asking for and how we’re using the resources and then being open to making adjustments. And sometimes it’s just that experimentation: I think of it as, we’re going to try something different this time, we’re going to see if it works. If it doesn’t work, it probably won’t be the end of the world. If it does, we’ll probably learn something that will be helpful for next time. And I think there’s a lot of value in that as well. Health Hats: Lacy’s ‘pendulum swing’ wisdom: not anarchy, but intentional. Not ‘no accountability’ but ‘accountability without burden-shifting.’ The move is from the funder dictating requirements to relational conversation. And crucially: willingness to experiment. 13. The Three Relationships: Funder, Researcher, Community Health Hats: Back to the beginning—relationships. So, in a way, we haven’t really —what we’ve talked about is the relationship with funders. Lacy Fabian: True. Health Hats: What is the relationship between researchers and the community seeking answers? We’re considering three different types of relationships. I find it interesting that people call me about their frustrations with the process, and I ask, “Have you spoken with the program officer?” Have you discussed the struggles you’re facing? Often, they haven’t or simply don’t think to. What do you think they’re paid for? They’re there to collaborate with you. What about the relationships between those seeking answers and those studying them—the communities and the researchers? How does that fit into this? Kirk Knestis: I’d like to hear from Lacy first on this one, because she’s much more tied into the community than the communities I have been in my recent practices. 14. Maintaining Agency Health Hats: I want to wrap up, and so if. Thinking about people listening to this conversation, what do you think is key that people should take away from this that’ll, in, in either of the three groups we’ve been talking about, what is a lesson that would be helpful for them to take away from this conversation? Lacy Fabian: I think that it’s important for the individual always to remember their agency. In their engagements. And so I know when I’m a person in the audience, listening to these types of things, it can feel very overwhelming again to figure out what’s enough, where to start, and how to do it without making a big mistake. I think that all of those things are valid. Most of us in our professional lives who are likely listening to this, we show up at meetings, we take notes. We’re chatting with people, engaging with professional colleagues, or connecting with the community. And I think that we can continue to be intentional with those engagements and take that reflective pause before them to think about what we’re bringing. So if we’re coming into that program with our research hat on, or with our funder hat on, what are we bringing to the table that might make it hard for the person on the other side to have an equitable conversation with us? If you’re worried about whether you’ll be able to keep your program alive and get that check, that’s not a balanced conversation. And so if you are the funder coming in, what can you do to put that at ease or acknowledge it? Suppose you are the person in the community who goes into someone’s home and sees them in a really vulnerable position, with limited access to healthcare services or the things they need. What can you do to center that person, still like in their humanity, and not just this one problem space? And that they’re just this problem because that’s, I think, where we go astray and we lose ourselves and lose our solidarity and connection. So I would just ask that people think about those moments as much as they can. Obviously, things are busy and we get caught up, but finding those moments to pause, and I think it can have that snowball effect in a good way, where it builds and we see those opportunities, and other people see it and they go, Huh, that was a neat way to do it. Maybe I’ll try that too. 15. Listen and Learn Health Hats: Thank you. Kirk. Kirk Knestis: Yeah. A hundred percent. I’m having a tough time finding anything to disagree with what Lacy is sharing. And so I’m tempted just to say, “Yeah, what Lacy said.” But I think it’s important that, in addition to owning one’s agency and taking responsibility for one’s own self, one stands up for one’s own interests. At the same time, that person has to acknowledge that everybody else knows that the three legs of that stool I described earlier have to do the same thing, right? Yeah. So, it’s about a complicated social contract among all those different groups. When the researchers talk to the program participant, they must acknowledge the value of each person’s role in the conversation. And when I, as the new nonprofit manager, am talking to funders, I’ve got to make sure I understand that I’ve got an equal obligation to stand up for my program, my stakeholders, and the ideals that are driving what I’m doing. But at the same time, similarly, respecting the commitment obligation that the funder has made. Because it never stops. The web gets bigger and bigger, right? I had a lovely conversation with a development professional at a community foundation today. And they helped me remember that they are reflecting the interests and wishes of different donor groups or individuals, and there’s got to be a lot of back-and-forth at the end of the day. I keep coming back to communication and just the importance of being able to say, okay, we’re talking about, in our case, mobility. That means this. Are we clear? Everybody’s on the same page. Okay, good. Why is that important? We think that if that gets better, these things will, too. Oh, have you thought about this thing over here? Yeah, but that’s not really our deal, right? So having those conversations so that everybody is using the same lingo and pulling in the same direction, I think, could have a significant effect on all of those relationships. Health Hats: Here’s my list from the listening agency, fear, mistake, tolerance, grace, continual Learning, communication, transparency. Kirk Knestis: and equal dollops of tolerance for ambiguity and distrust of ambiguity. Yes, there you go. I think that’s a pretty good list, Danny. Lacy Fabian: It’s a good list to live by. Health Hats: Thank you. I appreciate this. Reflection Everyone in a relationship faces power dynamics – who's in control and who's not? These dynamics affect trust and the relationship’s overall value, and they can shift from moment to moment. Changing dynamics takes mindfulness and intention. The community wanting answers, the researcher seeking evidence-based answers, and those funding the studies, have a complex relationship. Before this conversation, I focused on the community-research partnership, forgetting it was a triad, not a dyad. The Central Paradox: We have exponentially more information at our disposal for research, yet we’re becoming more disconnected. Lacy identifies this as the core problem: we’ve stopped seeing each other as human beings and lost the touchpoints that enable genuine collaboration—when connection matters most. This is true for any relationship. The Hidden Cost Structure Kirk’s 1/3:1/3:1/3 breakdown is golden—one-third for data collection and analysis (adds value), one-third for organizational operations, and one-third for reports (mostly shelf-ware). The key takeaway: we’re allocating one-third of resources to deliverables that don’t directly benefit the people we’re trying to help. Perhaps more of the pie could be spent on sharing and using results. Three Different “Utilities” Are Competing Kirk explains what most evaluation frameworks hide: funder utility (accountability), research utility (understanding models), and community utility (immediate benefit) are fundamentally different. Until you specify which one you’re serving, you’re likely to disappoint two of the three audiences. Data Parties Solve the Funder Problem Pragmatically. Rather than choosing between accountability and flexibility, data parties and face-to-face analysis let stakeholders interpret findings in real time – the data party. I love that visual. It’s formative, not summative. It’s relational, not transactional. The Funding Question Reverses the Power Dynamic. Currently, funders place the burden of proving impact on programs through monthly reports and compliance documentation. Lacy’s alternative is simpler: what if the funder hired someone to observe the program, gather the information, and report back? This allows the program to stay focused on its mission while the funder gains the accountability they need. But the structure shifts—the program no longer reports to the funder; instead, the funder learns from the program. That’s the difference between equity as a theory and equity as built-in. Related episodes from Health Hats Artificial Intelligence in Podcast Production Health Hats, the Podcast, utilizes AI tools for production tasks such as editing, transcription, and content suggestions. While AI assists with various aspects, including image creation, most AI suggestions are modified. All creative decisions remain my own, with AI sources referenced as usual. Questions are welcome. Creative Commons Licensing CC BY-NC-SA This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:    BY: credit must be given to the creator.   NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.    SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms. Please let me know. danny@health-hats.com. Material on this site created by others is theirs, and use follows their guidelines. Disclaimer The views and opinions presented in this podcast and publication are solely my responsibility and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute®  (PCORI®), its Board of Governors, or Methodology Committee. Danny van Leeuwen (Health Hats)

Met: Michael van Praag, Guus Hiddink, Gerard van der Lem, Arno van Leeuwen, Bart Vlietstra, Vincent Schildkamp en Bert Dijkstra. Presentatie: Leo Driessen.

Wat is de slappe lach eigenlijk? En wat gebeurt er dan allemaal in je brein? Dat hoor je van lachpsycholoog Alida van Leeuwen en humoronderzoeker Madelijn Strick

In Den Haag zitten D66 en het CDA vandaag opnieuw bij informateur Buma. Op de agenda: defensie & veiligheid. En weer een rits aan gasten. Aan tafel schoven vandaag onder anderen commandant der strijdkrachten Onno Eichelsheim aan, en NAVO-gezant Geoffrey van Leeuwen. En terwijl Jetten en Bontenbal binnen over Europese veiligheidslijnen praten, kreeg de Tweede Kamer een nieuwe ondervoorzitter: Geert Wilders. We praten erover met Floor Doppen, politiek verslaggever. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In 'Goeiegast*' tekent journalist Eddy Buiting de ideeën en verhalen op van Martijn Verspeek, ondernemer en eigenaar van installatiebedrijf Verspeek. Een boek waarin gezond boerenverstand, psychologie en ondernemerschap samenkomen. In deze aflevering gaat Willem van Leeuwen met Martijn in gesprek over wat hem een lichtend én verrassend nuchtere ondernemer maakt.Waarom wil Martijn helemaal niet 'anders' zijn - en creëert hij toch een bedrijf dat radicaal afwijkt van de norm? Wat betekent het om vanuit vertrouwen te ondernemen, geen handtekeningen te vragen en medewerkers te zien als goeiegasten en goeievrouwkes? En hoe bouw je aan superfans, zelfs als mensen nog nooit iets bij je hebben gekocht?Met verhalen over stagiaires die een onvergetelijke stage krijgen, een 85-jarige superfan die nooit klant werd, én waarom hij bewust 1-ster-reviews verzamelt om niet door Google geregeerd te worden. Een gesprek over eigenwaarde, normaal doen en ondernemen vanuit liefde in plaats van angst.StellingenElke aflevering van de podcast legt host Willem van Leeuwen de gasten een aantal stellingen voor. De stellingen bij deze aflevering zijn:1. We moeten af van alle regels en vinkjes, want ze drijven de gepassioneerde vakmensen uit het werk.2. Ondernemen vanuit vertrouwen levert uiteindelijk betere resultaten op dan sturen op controle. LinksHet, inmiddels nummer 1, boek 'Goeiegast*' van Martijn Verspeek bestel je hier: https://www.managementboek.nl/boek/9789083359168/goeiegast-martijn-verspeekEn zijn boekentip - 'Verslaafd aan Liefde' van Jan Geurtz - vind je hier: https://www.managementboek.nl/boek/9789026322297/verslaafd-aan-liefde-jan-geurtz OverIn de Boekenpraktijk, de podcast van Managementboek, praat Willem van Leeuwen met auteurs van nieuw verschenen boeken over de brede thema's ontwikkeling en verandering: van persoonlijke ontwikkeling en verandering tot op het niveau van een gehele organisatie. Altijd met een koppeling naar de dagelijkse praktijk.

Ineens had ze niets meer. Geen bedrijf. Geen inkomen. Geen baan. Geen pensioen. Geen trots. Manon van Leeuwen's leven stortte in na het faillissement van haar onderneming Zustaina. Maar bij de pakken neerzitten deed ze niet: letterlijk niet want ze voltooide de Camino de Santiago. En vond en passant zichzelf weer terug. Marloes en Aldert spreken met Manon over de ups-and-downs van duurzaam ondernemen.Shownotes - LinkedIn-profiel Manon van Leeuwen- Website Manon van LeeuwenDisclaimerDe standpunten, gedachten en meningen in deze podcast zijn die van de spreker en vertegenwoordigen niet de standpunten, gedachten en meningen van BNP Paribas. BNP Paribas heeft geen controle over en/of is niet verantwoordelijk voor de kwaliteit, volledigheid en nauwkeurigheid van de informatie die door sprekers wordt verstrekt. De informatie die hier wordt gepresenteerd is enkel voor algemene informatiedoeleinden en mag niet worden beschouwd als professioneel advies. BNP Paribas onderschrijft, beveelt of keurt geen specifieke mening, organisatie, product of dienst goed waarnaar in deze podcast wordt verwezen.

De humanitaire ramp in Soedan wordt groter en groter. De burgeroorlog tussen het Soedanese leger en de Rapid Support Forces (RSF) kost aan steeds meer mensen het leven. De herinneringen gaan terug naar de genocide in de westelijke regio Darfur van 2003. De inzet zijn dit keer grondstoffen zoals goud. Te gast is Sophie van Leeuwen, Afrika-correspondent voor RTL Nieuws. Luister ook | Oekraïne gaat wapens exporteren: 'Het slagveld is hun testveld' Dat de RSF zo succesvol is heeft vooral te maken met de steun die de rebellengroep krijgt van de Verenigde Arabische Emiraten. Tegelijkertijd hebben ook Rusland en China er grote belangen en wordt de druk op Amerika opgevoerd om eventueel in te grijpen. Lees ook | Oekraïne wil op informele EU-top huiswerk laten zien, onder andere op corruptiedossier Europa zit in zijn maag met corruptieschandaal in Oekraïne De Europese Commissie noemt het corruptieschandaal in Oekraïne zeer ongelukkig. Naar verluidt zou er met zo'n 100 miljoen dollar zijn gefraudeerd in de energiesector. Europa-verslaggever Geert Jan Hahn legt uit wat dit schandaal betekent, maar dat het ook goed is dat zoiets naar buitenkomt, op weg naar het Oekraïense EU-lidmaatschap. Luister ook | De toekomst van Europese spionage is nu - 11 november 2025 Von der Leyen wil machtspositie verstevigen met eigen inlichtingendienst Ursula von der Leyen denkt eraan om een eigen inlichtingendienst op te tuigen om de geopolitieke uitdagingen het hoofd te kunnen bieden. Dat heeft haar woordvoerder bevestigd na berichtgeving van de Financial Times. Volgens VVD-Europarlementariër is dit een slecht idee. Volgens hem dubbelt het te veel met wat er al is qua Europese inlichtingen en verstevigt het enkel de machtspositie van Von der Leyen. Lees ook | Langste shutdown VS ooit officieel ten einde De shutdown is voorbij (voor nu) | Postma in Amerika Na 43 dagen is de shutdown voorbij, maar een nieuwe deadline doemt alweer op. Hoe deze deal er is gekomen legt Amerika-correspondent Jan Postma uit, die ook zag dat Trump geen enkele vraag wilde beantwoorden over de beëindiging van die shutdown, want het ging maar over één man: Jeffrey Epstein.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

De humanitaire ramp in Soedan wordt groter en groter. De burgeroorlog tussen het Soedanese leger en de Rapid Support Forces (RSF) kost aan steeds meer mensen het leven. De herinneringen gaan terug naar de genocide in de westelijke regio Darfur van 2003. De inzet zijn dit keer grondstoffen zoals goud. Te gast is Sophie van Leeuwen, Afrika-correspondent voor RTL Nieuws.

Met de winter voor de deur komt netbeheerder Enexis met een opvallende en vervelende waarschuwing: de kans dat de stroom uitvalt is in grote delen van het land veel groter dan eerder gedacht. Dit heeft allerlei gevolgen voor huishoudens, bedrijven en publieke voorzieningen in de regio. En dus is het volgens de opperbaas verstandig om je voor te bereiden op stroomuitval, bijvoorbeeld door een zaklamp in huis te hebben. Presentator Jan Willem Wesselink gaat hierover in gesprek met: Rutger van der Leeuwen, CEO van Enexis

Met: Alex Pastoor, Guus Hiddink, Valentijn Driessen, Michael van Praag, Gerard van der Lem, Arno van Leeuwen, Harry van Vliet en Bert Dijkstra. Presentatie: Leo Driessen.

Ons brein houdt niet van verandering. In zijn boek Denk niet aan een krokodil legt auteur en organisatieadviseur Mike Hoogveld uit waarom dat zo is — en wat je kunt doen om het te doorbreken. Hij laat zien hoe onze denkfouten, ofwel biases, diep verankerd zitten in ons oerbrein: we nemen beslissingen die ooit hielpen om te overleven, maar die ons nu vaak in de weg zitten.In deze aflevering van De Boekenpraktijk spreekt host Willem van Leeuwen met Hoogveld over de evolutionaire kant van verandering, de rol van angst en zekerheid, en wat leiders kunnen leren van de metafoor van de krokodil: die vertrekt pas van zijn veilige plek als hij weet dat de andere plek ook veilig is.Een gesprek over ons aanpassingsvermogen, over waarom we liever vasthouden aan wat we kennen, en over hoe organisaties psychologische veiligheid en kleine stapjes kunnen inzetten om echte verandering mogelijk te maken.StellingenElke aflevering van de podcast legt host Willem van Leeuwen de gasten een aantal stellingen voor. De stellingen bij deze aflevering zijn:1. Bij organisatieverandering wordt de kennis van het brein onvoldoende meegenomen, waardoor we steeds opnieuw dezelfde fouten maken.2. De toegenomen polarisatie in onze maatschappij wordt aangewakkerd door de versimpeling die de media ons presenteert, in relatie tot de attributie-bias. LinksAlle boeken van Mike Hoogveld bestel je hier: https://www.managementboek.nl/auteur/23765/mike-hoogveldEn zijn boekentip - 'Even tussen mij en mij' van Elke Wiss - vind je hier: https://www.managementboek.nl/boek/9789026355127/even-tussen-mij-en-mij-elke-wiss OverIn de Boekenpraktijk, de podcast van Managementboek, praat Willem van Leeuwen met auteurs van nieuw verschenen boeken over de brede thema's ontwikkeling en verandering: van persoonlijke ontwikkeling en verandering tot op het niveau van een gehele organisatie. Altijd met een koppeling naar de dagelijkse praktijk.

Your health data belongs to you—but how can you share it safely? Fabienne Bourgeois, MD, exposes the complex truth about privacy, permissions, and data control. Summary According to Fabienne Bourgeois, MD, patients want control over their health data, but privacy preferences and constant changes complicate this. The discussion is relevant to people with disabilities, caregivers, and others navigating complex health information. About 80% of people share common privacy concerns that current systems can't address. The remaining 20% need more detailed controls and customization, though balancing autonomy with privacy remains challenging. Ownership means individuals have the right to participate in research and make informed choices. They need "digital intermediaries"— professionals who assist with data sharing—and genuinely intuitive interfaces. Privacy protections must remain a top priority as health and AI tools continue to develop. Click here to view the printable newsletter with images. More readable than a transcript, which can also be found below. Contents Table of Contents Toggle EpisodeProemWhen Life Throws Your Kid a CurveballEmerging Adults MatterYour Medical Records Called—They're Lost and SeparatedOne Size Fits All? Please!Spoiler: This Affects Way More People Than You'd ThinkCan We Teach Tech to Understand ‘It's Complicated'?All-or-Nothing Privacy: The Sledgehammer ApproachMacGyver Solutions: When Your Software Says ‘No'The Secret Society of People Who Actually CareJuggling Your Mom's Meds and Your Kids' Forms: A Sandwich Generative NightmarePlaying Gatekeeper (Because We're Scared You'll Overshare)80% We Can Solve + 20% That's a NightmareInformed Consent: What If People Actually Understood?Needles in a Haystack: Finding Your 100 People WorldwidePlot Twist: When It's Your Data, Everything ChangesTraining Wheels for Privacy: Teaching People to ChooseThe New Job Nobody's Hired Yet: Your Privacy ConciergeCan We Build This So My Oma Can Use It?Tech's Outrunning Privacy (And We're All Just Watching)ReflectionRelated episodes from Health Hats Please comment and ask questions: at the comment section at the bottom of the show notes on LinkedIn  via email YouTube channel  DM on Instagram, TikTok to @healthhats Substack Patreon Production Team Kayla Nelson: Web and Social Media Coach, Dissemination, Help Desk  Leon van Leeuwen: editing and site management Oscar van Leeuwen: video editing Julia Higgins: Digit marketing therapy Steve Heatherington: Help Desk and podcast production counseling Joey van Leeuwen, Drummer, Composer, and Arranger, provided the music for the intro, outro, proem, and reflection Claude, Perplexity, Auphonic, Descript, Grammarly, DaVinci Podcast episode on YouTube Inspired by and Grateful to:  Alexis and Sara Snyder, Amy and Morgan Gleeson, Fatima Mohammed Ighile, Esosa Ighile, Jill Woodworth, Tomas Moran, Marianne Hudgins Photo Credits for Videos 80/20 by Austin Distel on Unsplash Design flaws by Getty Images on Unsplash Privacy by Hector Reyes on Unsplash Links and references Fabienne Bourgeois, MD LinkedIn and Publications National Center for Medical Legal Partnerships Episode Proem The slogan, “Give Me My Damn Data,” began in 2009 with E-Patient Dave DeBronkart as a call for transparency and control: patients arguing that real involvement in their healthcare needs open access to their personal health information. But once we have our data, what will we do with it? Who will we share it with, and in what situations? What are the personal and technical challenges of managing that sharing? I know enough to be dangerous about data-sharing technology. I do understand the personal and relationship sides of data sharing, though. To learn more, I reached out to my former colleague, Fabienne Bourgeois, an Adolescent Medicine doctor and Associate Chief Medical Information ...

Wat gebeurt er als je leiderschap niet langer ziet als iets wat in jou zit, maar als iets wat tussen mensen gebeurt?Organisatiesocioloog Aty Boers, directeur van Coach Boulevard en auteur van Systeemgericht leiderschap, breekt met het idee dat ‘je als leider belangrijk bent om wie je bent'. Volgens haar gaat leiderschap niet om zelfreflectie als doel op zich, maar om de acties die het systeem verder helpen.In deze aflevering vertelt Aty waarom aansturen op resultaat geen tegenstelling is met aandacht voor de mens. Haar boek biedt, zoals ze zelf zegt, ‘een handelingsperspectief – iets waar je morgen mee aan de slag kunt'. Ze spreekt over systeemdynamiek, over het nut van antipathie als signaal in plaats van oordeel, en over hoe je het gesprek voert over de goede dingen doen in plaats van of je een goede leider bent.Verder legt ze uit hoe leiders steeds schakelen tussen vier perspectieven – visie, ordening, ontwikkeling en norm – en waarom het helpt om steeds de eerstvolgende betekenisvolle stap te formuleren.Een nuchter, praktisch gesprek voor iedereen die leidinggeeft aan verandering, zonder te verzanden in zelfanalyse.StellingenElke aflevering van de podcast legt host Willem van Leeuwen de gasten een aantal stellingen voor. De stellingen bij deze aflevering zijn:1. Veel leiders verwarren persoonlijke ontwikkeling met leiderschap; het gaat niet om wie je bént, maar om wat je dóét in het systeem.2. Eigenaarschap groeit niet van zelforganisatie alléén; zonder een helder norm- en visieperspectief zakt elk team weg. LinksAlle boeken van Aty Boers bestel je hier: https://www.managementboek.nl/boek/9789024468058/systeemgericht-leiderschap-aty-boers En haar boekentip - 'Tussentaal' van Marijke Spanjersberg - vind je hier: https://www.managementboek.nl/boek/9789086842681/tussentaal-marijke-spanjersberg OverIn de Boekenpraktijk, de podcast van Managementboek, praat Willem van Leeuwen met auteurs van nieuw verschenen boeken over de brede thema's ontwikkeling en verandering: van persoonlijke ontwikkeling en verandering tot op het niveau van een gehele organisatie. Altijd met een koppeling naar de dagelijkse praktijk.

Hélène Hendriks, Jack van Gelder, Merel Ek en Frank van Leeuwen bespreken de actualiteit: de Televizier-Ringwinst van Vandaag Inside, Ajax dieper in de problemen en de laatste politieke peilingen.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Spinnen, spoken, dystopieën en tegenwoordig ook hypotheken - wat ons de stuipen op het lijf jaagt in horrorverhalen is nogal verandert in de afgelopen eeuwen. Maar waarom veranderen de thema's van horrorverhalen eigenlijk door de jaren heen? En wat zegt dat over de ontwikkeling van onze samenleving? "Eerst gingen horrorverhalen over spoken, nu gaan ze vaak over hypotheken" - Evert Jan van Leeuwen. Terwijl de vleermuizen 's nachts om het verlaten radiohuis fladderen ontrafelt literatuurhistoricus Evert Jan van Leeuwen de trends in het horrorgenre. Hij zoekt samen met presentator Syb Faes de betekenis achter Frankenstein, haunted houses, en dystopieën. En hij analyseerde ook Syb's eigen monstertekening - wat zegt die over hem?

Congo is een land vol goud, kobalt en diamanten — maar arm aan stabiliteit. President Félix Tshisekedi, zoon van de legendarische oppositieleider Étienne Tshisekedi, kwam aan de macht met grote beloftes: vrede, hervormingen en een einde aan corruptie.Zes jaar later is de realiteit weerbarstig. In het oosten laait de oorlog op, politieke allianties verschuiven, en de vraag blijft: wie heeft écht de macht in Kinshasa?Samen met correspondent Sophie van Leeuwen onderzoeken we wie Tshisekedi werkelijk is — hervormer, overlever, of gewoon een nieuwe versie van het oude systeem.Volg onze LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/africastpodcast?originalSubdomain=nlVoor mooie beelden, quizjes en 'behind the scenes', volg onze Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/africast_podcast/Link met Jos of Joeri via LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jos-hummelen/ & https://www.linkedin.com/in/joerinortier/

Atoms are the building blocks of our world. Many have been around since right after the Big Bang created the universe nearly 14 billion years ago. And if life on Earth is made of atoms that are from all the way back then... will those atoms keep existing forever? That's what CrowdScience Listener Rob in Australia would like to know. Caroline Steel investigates the immortality of atoms by travelling to CERN, the world's largest particle physics laboratory located along the border of France and Switzerland. There, theoretical physicist Matthew McCullough explains whether the smallest atoms can decay or survive the test of time. Physicist Marco van Leeuwen from Nikhef, the National Particle Physics Laboratory in the Netherlands, gives Caroline a behind-the-scenes tour of the ALICE experiment and the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. She learns how atoms are smashed at incredibly high speeds, and whether that might spell the end of an atom. And all life on earth is made up of atoms, but how does a collection of tiny particles become a living being? Astrobiologist Betül Kaçar from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, breaks down how life works from an atomic point of view. Presenter: Caroline Steel Producer: Imaan Moin Editor: Ben Motley (Photo: Hands cupping a glowing atom in the studio - stock photo. Credit: Paper Boat Creative via Getty Images)

Hoe creëer je als leidinggevende een organisatie waar mensen echt tot bloei komen? In hun nieuwe boek 'The Smell of the Place - Bouwen aan een gezonde organisatiecultuur' laten Merlijn Ballieux en Guido van de Wiel zien dat niet gedrag, maar de omgeving de grootste invloed heeft op hoe mensen werken en zich gedragen.In deze aflevering van De Boekenpraktijk spreekt host Willem van Leeuwen met Merlijn Ballieux over het belang van gezonde sturing, context en congruentie. Wat maakt dat medewerkers in de ene organisatie floreren, en in de andere juist afhaken? Hoe ruikt de cultuur van jouw organisatie – naar frisse lucht of naar muffe regels?Een gesprek over de rol van leidinggevenden, overzien en bewogen worden, over vertrouwen en mentale ruimte. En over waarom kleine, oprechte interventies vaak meer effect hebben dan grote reorganisaties.StellingenElke aflevering van de podcast legt host Willem van Leeuwen de gasten een aantal stellingen voor. De stellingen bij deze aflevering zijn:1.  Veel organisaties zijn te veel gericht op persoonlijke ontwikkeling zonder dat effectief te verbinden aan organisatieontwikkeling. 2. Aandacht scoort bij mensen, maar het systeem is zo leidend geworden dat die aandacht het al bij voorbaat verliest. LinksAlle boeken van Merlijn Ballieux bestel je hier: https://www.managementboek.nl/auteur/83637/merlijn-ballieux En zijn boekentip - 'Verdraaide organisaties' van Wouter Hart - vind je hier: https://www.managementboek.nl/boek/9789013105735/verdraaide-organisaties-wouter-hart OverIn de Boekenpraktijk, de podcast van Managementboek, praat Willem van Leeuwen met auteurs van nieuw verschenen boeken over de brede thema's ontwikkeling en verandering: van persoonlijke ontwikkeling en verandering tot op het niveau van een gehele organisatie. Altijd met een koppeling naar de dagelijkse praktijk.

Good Spirits een cosy small town romance van bestsellerauteur B.K. Borison. De aftrap van de nieuwe, betoverende serie Ghosted belooft alle populaire tropes met een geestige twist. Uitgegeven door HarperCollins Sprekers: Kiki van Leeuwen, Raymond Boterbloem

Aflevering 6/6 Als je kinderen hebt, ben je na een scheiding niet van je ex af. Je blijft levenslang ouders samen. Hoe zorg je ervoor dat jullie relatie zo is dat jullie samen goed voor de kinderen zorgen?  Te gast zijn Judith van Leeuwen, ze heeft vier kinderen en is na achttien jaar huwelijk gescheiden, en Jolanda Vogelzang, ze heeft ook vier kinderen en is na 27 jaar huwelijk gescheiden. Een goede relatie onderhouden met je ex is een grote opgave, ervaarden beiden. Hoe hebben ze dat aangepakt?  Duidelijke afspraken zijn volgens hen erg belangrijk bij de opvoeding van jullie kinderen. ‘Maak heel praktische en concrete afspraken zodat de kinderen weten waar ze aan toe zijn.' Ook eerlijke communicatie speelt daarbij een belangrijke rol. Jolanda: ‘Mijn ex zei op een gegeven moment tegen de kinderen: vraag maar aan je moeder. Dat vond ik te afstandelijk en toen heb ik gelijk gevraagd of hij papa en mama wilde blijven zeggen.' De komst van nieuwe partners kan voor nieuwe hobbels op de weg zorgen in de relatie met je ex en kinderen. Zo wachtte Judith lang voordat ze ging samenwonen met haar nieuwe partner. ‘Dat zou ik iedereen aanbevelen. De kinderen rust geven om te wennen aan een nieuwe situatie.' Judith en Jolanda vertellen in deze aflevering hoe zij de relatie met hun ex hebben opgepakt na de scheiding. Van samen feestdagen blijven vieren tot respectvol over je ex-partner blijven praten tegen je kinderen. Scheidingsexpert Anje Slootweg geeft tips over hoe je goed samen je kinderen blijft opvoeden, ondanks dat je uit elkaar bent.  Dit was de laatste aflevering van seizoen 2. Reageren op deze aflevering? Mail dan naar gebrokengelofte@nd.nl. Meer informatie: nd.nl/gebrokengelofte Gebroken Gelofte is een podcast van het Nederlands Dagblad over scheiden in christelijk Nederland. Een serie voor iedereen die wil begrijpen wat scheiden betekent en om het onderwerp onder christenen beter bespreekbaar te maken.  

Healthcare AI isn't a tech problem—it's a mirror reflecting how our health system already fails. Uncomfortable truths from Datapalooza 2025. Summary We're asking the wrong questions about AI in healthcare. Instead of debating whether it's good or bad, we need to examine the system-eating-its-tail contradictions we've created: locking away vital data so AI learns from everything except what matters most, demanding transparency from inherently secretive companies, and fearing tools could make us lazy instead of more capable. Privacy teams protect data, tech companies build tools, regulators write rules—everyone's doing their part, but no one steps back to see the whole dysfunctional picture. AI in healthcare isn't a technology problem; it's a mirror reflecting how our health system already falls short with privacy rules that hinder progress, design processes that exclude patients, and institutions that fear transparency more than mediocrity. The real question is whether we're brave enough to fix these underlying problems that AI makes impossible to ignore. Click here to view the printable newsletter with images. More readable than a transcript, which can also be found below. Contents Table of Contents Toggle EpisodeProemParadox, Irony, Catch 22Burying the Treasure to Keep It SafeBias, Treating the Chart, Not the PatientCircular Dependence, Chasing Your TailIt Doesn't Have to Make Sense.Throwing Out the Baby with the BathwaterClear as MudRedistricting to DemocratizeHumanize Through the Looking GlassDriving while looking into the Rearview MirrorA Million Interns Working for YouWhat Keeps Me Up at Night About AI?ReflectionRelated episodes from Health Hats Please comment and ask questions: at the comment section at the bottom of the show notes on LinkedIn  via email YouTube channel  DM on Instagram, TikTok to @healthhats Production Team Kayla Nelson: Web and Social Media Coach, Dissemination, Help Desk  Leon van Leeuwen: editing and site management Oscar van Leeuwen: video editing Julia Higgins: Digit marketing therapy Steve Heatherington: Help Desk and podcast production counseling Joey van Leeuwen, Drummer, Composer, and Arranger, provided the music for the intro, outro, proem, and reflection Claude, Perplexity, Auphonic, Descript, Grammarly, DaVinci Podcast episode on YouTube Inspired by and Grateful to:  Christine Von Raesfeld, Mike Mittleman, Ame Sanders, Mark Hochgesang, Kathy Cocks, Eric Kettering, Steve Labkoff, Laura Marcial, Amy Price, Eric Pinaud, Emily Hadley. Links and references Academy Health's Datapalooza 2025  Innovation Unfiltered: Evidence, Value, and the Real-World Journey of Transforming Health Care Tableau  a visual analytics platform Practical AI in Healthcare podcast hosted by Steven Labkoff, MD Episode Proem Here's the thing about AI in healthcare—it's like that friend who offers to help you move, then shows up with a sports car. The Iron Woman meant well, but it doesn't quite meet your actual needs. I spent September 5th at Academy Health's 2025 Datapalooza conference about AI in healthcare, 'Innovation Unfiltered: Evidence, Value, and the Real-World Journey of Transforming Health Care. a is Academy Health's strongest conference for people with lived experience. I'm grateful to Academy Health for providing me with a press pass, which enabled me to attend the conference. I talked to attendees about how they use AI in their work and what keeps them up at night about AI. I recorded some of those conversations and the panels I attended. When I listened to the raw footage, I heard terrible recordings filled with crowd noise and loud table chatter, like dirty water spraying out of a firehose. Aghast, I thought, what is the story here? I was stumped. How can I make sense of this? I had to deliver something. So, here's how I use AI in my work as a podcaster/vlogger.

Wederom uit het hoge noorden – Groningen! (Vorige week nog Walg, nu Death Doom formatie Sad Whisperings). Alexander van Leeuwen (gitaar & vocals) en Aad van Straalen (bas) trotseerden de reis en brachten verhalen mee over het verleden, het heden en de toekomst van de band. Verhalen van Argentienie tot Groningen.Kort over Sad Whisperings history: Opgericht begin jaren '90, groeide de band uit tot een vaste naam in de Nederlandse doom/death underground. Met de release Sensitive to Autumn drukten ze met name hun stempel op de scene. En nu zijn ze terug met nieuw materiaal – zaterdag verschijnt de nieuwe EP "Strategy of tension" en in januari volgt de LP. Veel nieuwe muziek dus, met wortels diep in de NL metalgeschiedenis!

Hoe werd Rwanda, een land verscheurd door genocide, het internationale voorbeeld van orde en vooruitgang? In deze aflevering duiken we in het leiderschap van Paul Kagame, de president die zijn land wist te transformeren, maar dat deed met een ijzeren hand.Kagame wordt geprezen om digitalisering, economische groei en stabiliteit, maar ook bekritiseerd vanwege repressie, het monddood maken van oppositie en zijn rol in de bloedige conflicten in buurland Congo. Een man die geen tegenspraak duldt, maar wiens invloed verder reikt dan de grenzen van Rwanda.Samen met correspondent Sophie van Leeuwen onderzoeken we de successen én de hoge prijs van Kagame's leiderschap.Volg onze LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/africastpodcast?originalSubdomain=nlVoor mooie beelden, quizjes en 'behind the scenes', volg onze Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/africast_podcast/Link met Jos of Joeri via LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jos-hummelen/ & https://www.linkedin.com/in/joerinortier/

Tijdens De Nacht van Ontdekkingen in Leiden onderzoekt presentator Sander Nieuwenhuijsen met stresswetenschapper Laura Nawijn (https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/staffmembers/laura-nawijn#tab-1) en literatuurhistoricus Evert van Leeuwen (https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/staffmembers/evert-jan-van-leeuwen#tab-1) en het publiek de fascinerende horrorparadox: waarom zoeken we angst op, terwijl we het tegelijkertijd willen vermijden? In een speciaal gebouwd spookhuis werden bezoekers blootgesteld aan klassieke angstmomenten – van duistere geluiden tot onverwachte luchtstoten – en werden hun reacties gemeten.  “Je lichaam reageert op horror zoals op verliefdheid of bungeejumpen.” Van Leeuwen reflecteert daarbij op horror in fictie en literatuur. “Jonge lezers zoeken in dystopische horror niet alleen gruwel, maar ook schoonheid en zingeving.” Samen onderzoeken ze hoe angst werkt – fysiek, emotioneel en cultureel – en wat we kunnen leren van hoe mensen reageren op gecontroleerde spanning.

“Wenn jeder für sich selbst schaut, ist für alle geschaut.” - Stine vraagt schoolvriendin Alexandra van Leeuwen om een Zwitserse levenswijsheid. 

NAVO-kabinetschef Geoffrey van Leeuwen is sceptisch over het inrichten van een no-flyzone boven Oekraïne, om ervoor te zorgen dat Russische drones niet opnieuw NAVO-grondgebied binnenvliegen. Waarom? Dat legt hij uit in Café Kockelmann. Café Kockelmann is een programma van Omroep WNL. Meer van WNL vind je op onze website en sociale media: ► Website: https://www.wnl.tv  ► Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/omroepwnl  ► Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/omroepwnl ► Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/wnlvandaag ► Steun WNL, word lid: https://www.steunwnl.tv ► Gratis Nieuwsbrief: https://www.wnl.tv/nieuwsbrief 

Texas Nights is een mooie en meeslepende cowboyserie, van de auteur van Gek van Clementine. Perfect voor lezers van Elsie Silver en Lauren Asher Uitgegeven door Love Books Sprekers: Kiki van Leeuwen, Jasper den Hartogh

Ophitsing en beeldvorming domineren het maatschappelijk debat en verhullen de echte problemen. In zijn nieuwe boek 'De prijs van ophef' laat bestuurskundige en FNV-onderzoeker Hendrik Noten zien hoe verdeeldheid ons minder welvarend maakt en wie er baat hebben bij het vasthouden van die dynamiek.Noten werd in 2021 samen met Sander Heijne bekroond met het Managementboek van het Jaar voor 'Fantoomgroei'. Vier jaar later is hij terug in De Boekenpraktijk om te laten zien hoe ophef ons collectief verlamt – en wat er nodig is om de blik weer te richten op oplossingen en rechtvaardiger verdeling.In dit gesprek met host Willem van Leeuwen gaat het over de rol van media en politiek, over economische en culturele conflicten, en over hoe we met nuance en ontmoeting de polarisatie kunnen doorbreken.StellingenElke aflevering van de podcast legt host Willem van Leeuwen de gasten een aantal stellingen voor. De stellingen bij deze aflevering zijn:1.  Ongelijkheid is wel een motor van ambitie, het prikkelt namelijk mensen om harder te werken en risico's te nemen. 2. Nederland heeft arbeidsmigranten nodig voor zijn economische welvaart. LinksAlle boeken van Hendrik Noten bestel je hier: https://www.managementboek.nl/auteur/96763/hendrik-noten  De boekentips zijn:Why We're Polarized - Ezra Klein > https://www.managementboek.nl/zoeken?q=Ezra+Klein Le Courage de la Nuance - Jean Birnbaum OverIn de Boekenpraktijk, de podcast van Managementboek, praat Willem van Leeuwen met auteurs van nieuw verschenen boeken over de brede thema's ontwikkeling en verandering: van persoonlijke ontwikkeling en verandering tot op het niveau van een gehele organisatie. Altijd met een koppeling naar de dagelijkse praktijk.

Na lang getouwtrek is China het zat. De toezichthouder daar vertrouwt de Amerikaanse technologie van Nvidia echt niet meer, dus geeft alle Chinese bedrijven nu de opdracht om te stoppen met het kopen van hun AI-chips. Alle geplande bestellingen worden geschrapt, en alles dat nog niet geleverd is wordt geannuleerd. Is China dan echt ver genoeg om zonder Amerikaanse chips verder te durven? Of is het gewoon spierballenvertoon? Dat zoeken we deze aflevering uit. Dan hebben we het ook over een ander breekijzer tussen China en de VS. Stukje bij beetje komen we meer te weten over de aanstaande deal rond TikTok. Moederbedrijf ByteDance moet de Amerikaanse activiteiten gaan afstaan, anders gaat de app in de VS op zwart. En er staat een verzameling aan bedrijven klaar om die tak over te nemen. Verder hoor je over ExxonMobil. Dat ziet met een soepeler wordende beurswaakhond z'n kans schoon om activistische aandeelhouders buiten spel te zetten. Je komt ook te weten welk bedrijf eigenlijk eraan dacht om in Amsterdam naar de beurs te komen, maar dat nu opeens een andere bestemming heeft gevonden. En we vertellen je over de nieuwste markt die Uber aanboort. Na taxi's en maaltijdbezorging, zoeken ze het nu in exotischere oorden.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Letters beat emails for trustworthiness. A gullible skeptic reflects on navigating trust in a 50-year marriage, and the energy cost of distrust. Click here to view the printable newsletter with images. More readable than a transcript, which can also be found below. Please comment and ask questions: at the comment section at the bottom of the show notes on LinkedIn  via email YouTube channel  DM on Instagram, TikTok to @healthhats Production Team Kayla Nelson: Web and Social Media Coach, Dissemination, Help Desk  Leon van Leeuwen: editing and site management Oscar van Leeuwen: video editing Julia Higgins: Digital marketing therapy Steve Heatherington: Help Desk and podcast production counseling Joey van Leeuwen, Drummer, Composer, and Arranger, provided the music for the intro, outro, proem, and reflection Podcast episode on YouTube Episode Dear Listener and Reader, I thought I'd start writing you letters. I miss letters. I send cards thanking my guests for their participation. People universally appreciate getting something via snail mail. But cards aren't letters. They're preformatted notes, where I just change the image and the name. For giggles, I looked back at my very first blog post, July 31, 2012. It was a paragraph, a letter of sorts, short and simple, Improv and Best Health. It's taking me longer to produce each episode. So, no more frequently than once a month. So, why not a letter, short and sweet, from time to time? Let's start with trust. A letter feels more trustworthy than an email or a tweet. It's signed; a person who writes a letter really wants to communicate and thinks about what they're saying. So, perhaps, not a troll, more trustworthy. I always open letters. My immediate, momentary, default reaction to almost anything is trust. My kids say I'm gullible. My next instant reaction is skepticism. I think about what's not true about whatever. ‘AI is the solution to everything.' What do you mean, everything? What is AI anyway? Like that. I've been married for 50 years because at our core, my wife and I trust each other. We disagree, we misunderstand, we anger, I sulk. Yet we trust. On the other hand, I make stuff up. I misremember, create a story, and if it serves my purposes, stick with it or modify it as needed. My wife and grandkids are my fact-checkers. Still, we trust each other. In my personal life, trust isn't an on-or-off switch, all or nothing. Well, not usually. It's a matter of degree; it's about something. I trust that I can count on you to be there for me, unless you can't. I trust that you'll return my call, unless you're hurt, don't feel like it, or missed it. Distrust sucks energy; be more careful with my words, self-censor, close my heart and mind. I don't expect to trust everybody or everything. When I do trust, it's priceless. Thanks for listening, I'll be back. Related episodes from Health Hats https://health-hats.com/improv-and-health/ https://health-hats.com/pod113/ https://health-hats.com/trust-willing-to-be-vulnerable-worth-the-investment/ Artificial Intelligence in Podcast Production Health Hats, the Podcast, utilizes AI tools for production tasks such as editing, transcription, and content suggestions. While AI assists with various aspects, including image creation, most AI suggestions are modified. All creative decisions remain my own, with AI sources referenced as usual. Questions are welcome. Creative Commons Licensing CC BY-NC-SA This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:    BY: credit must be given to the creator.

Eén van de allergrootste defensiebedrijven van Europa is het Duitse Rheinmetall. In 2017 was de Nederlandse vestiging in Ede op sterven na dood. Maar sinds de oorlog in Oekraïne stromen de orders binnen. Het maakt tot nu toe voornamelijk oorlogsvoertuigen, maar wil ook luchtafweer gaan produceren. Presentator Joram Kaat gaat hierover in gesprek met: Coen van Leeuwen, CEO van Rheinmetall Nederland

Intelligent Waveforms 102 - 2025 August 16 Tracklist: 1. 00:00:00 - Intelligent Waveforms Intro (Meza) 2. 00:01:02 - Wonderful (Extended Mix) (Alex M.O.R.P.H., Aimoon, Northern Storm) 3. 00:05:59 - Euphoria (Extended Mix) (ReOrder, Lyd14) 4. 00:09:44 - Digital Breeze (Extended Mix) (ELV) 5. 00:14:46 - Reminiscence (Extended Mix) (N-sKing, ShoMa (JP)) 6. 00:19:48 - Where Did You Go (Extended Mix) (NG Rezonance, David Morrish) 7. 00:24:36 - Echoes of Eternity (Extended Mix) (Alex van Leeuwen) 8. 00:30:19 - Kimochi (Simon O_Shine Extended Remix) (Mana, Simon O_Shine, Christish) 9. 00:36:34 - Marcel (Extended Mix) (Ruslan Khatmullin) 10. 00:40:41 - Till The Sunrise (Extended Mix) (Giuseppe Ottaviani) 11. 00:46:10 - Icarus (Extended Mix) (Bekim Izairi) 12. 00:49:22 - Obsessed (Extended Mix) (Microm) 13. 00:54:51 - Lost Paradise (Extended Mix) (Rene Ablaze) 14. 00:59:53 - Immortal (Extended Mix) (Allan Berndtz) 15. 01:04:14 - Levitation (Extended Mix) (Guava Project) 16. 01:10:03 - The Force (Extended Mix) (DJ Eternity) 17. 01:16:00 - Ephemeral Love (Iberian Remix) (SounEmot, Grande Piano) 18. 01:22:22 - Submarine (Extended Mix) (Diago, Daniel Cesana) 19. 01:26:47 - Reflections (James Dymond 2025 Remix) (Matt Bukovski, Aku, Ghazaly) 20. 01:30:43 - Stalemate (Extended Mix) (Alexander de Roy) 21. 01:35:49 - Voyage (Rene Ablaze Extended Remix) (Mind-X) 22. 01:41:09 - Gänsehaut (Extended Mix) (Scott Ramsay) 23. 01:46:11 - Carte Blanche (Original Mix) (Sasha Vatoff) 24. 01:51:16 - Metanoia (Original Mix) (Ed Sánchez) 25. 01:55:21 - I Want (Extended mix) (Kanallia, Casepeat)

Ronda Alexander on strategies to build inclusive health coalitions, manage power dynamics, center marginalized voices, & design sustainable governance. Summary In this episode of Health Hats, host Danny van Leeuwen talks with Ronda Alexander, a community health advocate and skilled facilitator, about the challenges of building and maintaining effective health coalitions. Alexander shares her journey from attending Detroit's innovative Henry Ford Academy to working with Ford Partnership for Advanced Studies on workforce development, ultimately finding her calling at Vital Village Networks in Boston, where she spent seven years supporting national coalitions focused on health equity and early childhood wellbeing. The conversation explores practical ways to manage power dynamics in cross-sector collaborations, from setting group norms that encourage real participation to designing decision-making processes that balance speed and sustainability. Alexander stresses the critical importance of listening to marginalized communities—those "furthest from opportunity"—and making sure they have real seats at decision-making tables, not just token representation. Key insights include strategies for inclusive facilitation, such as incorporating quiet reflection time, small group discussions, and developing shared talking points that coalition members can take back to their organizations. Alexander advocates for proactive governance planning, comparing effective coalition building to chess strategy, where groups think "seven to eight moves down the board" to prepare for inevitable challenges. The episode wraps up with Alexander's call to action for health advocates: start by listening to the communities you want to serve, trust what people tell you about their needs, and design systems that place those most affected by health inequities in leadership and decision-making roles. Click here to view the printable newsletter with images. More readable than a transcript, which can also be found below. Contents Table of Contents Toggle EpisodeProemWhen did you first realize health was fragile?Vital Village NetworkLeadership, Impact, and MeasurementData StorytellingCommunity Research CollaborationFundingConvening, FacilitatingGetting Started at Henry Ford AcademyFord Partnership for Advanced StudiesTeaching Takes a VillageBack to DetroitPower DynamicsNorms: Don't Be a JerkFirst, Take a Few SecondsGovernanceFast or Sustainable DecisionsWho are the Decision-makers?Coalition BuildingTalking PointsFirst, We ListenReflectionRelated episodes from Health Hats Please comment and ask questions: at the comment section at the bottom of the show notes on LinkedIn  via email YouTube channel  DM on Instagram, TikTok to @healthhats Production Team Kayla Nelson: Web and Social Media Coach, Dissemination, Help Desk  Leon van Leeuwen: editing and site managementresil Oscar van Leeuwen: video editing Julia Higgins: Digit marketing therapy Steve Heatherington: Help Desk and podcast production counseling Joey van Leeuwen, Drummer, Composer, and Arranger, provided the music for the intro, outro, proem, and reflection, including Moe's Blues for Proem and Reflection and Bill Evan's Time Remembered for on-mic clips. Podcast episode on YouTube Inspired by and Grateful to:  Jan Oldenburg, Ellen Schultz, Tomas Moran, Susannah Fox, Betsy Neptune, Tania Marien Links and references Ronda Alexander Henry Ford Academy Henry Ford Museum and Greenfield Village Ford Partnership for Advanced Studies Vital Village Network The Networks of Opportunity for Child Wellbeing Dr. Renee Boynton-Jarrett B'More for Healthy Babies Marginalization refers to the inequality certain individuals face in society due to power imbalances built into our systems. Episode Proem Learn with People on the Journey toward Best Health. That's my tagline. Let's break it down.

Begin jaren ‘90 lijkt een seriemoordenaar actief te zijn in Rotterdam. De levenloze lichamen van de 45-jarige Berendina Stijger en de 22-jarige Francis Hofland worden op dezelfde manier aangetroffen: met messteken en een doorgesneden onderbroek, terwijl de bovenkant van hun lichamen is bedekt met theedoeken en kranten. Beide vrouwen waren dakloos, drugsverslaafd en werkten als prostituee op de tippelzone bij de G.J. de Jonghweg. En zij zijn niet de enige vermoorde sekswerkers. Nog drie andere vrouwen worden op vergelijkbare wijze dood aangetroffen. Toch krijgen de moorden op de sekswerkers weinig aandacht en wordt er geen dader opgepakt. Tot een coldcaseteam jaren later een nieuw onderzoek start. Een achtergelaten sigarettenpeuk en een slimme DNA-match leidde naar een verdachte: een verwarde man met een teruggetrokken bestaan. In het Oude Luxor Theater in Rotterdam vertelt rechter Jacco Janssen over de zaak waarin hij het oordeel velde. Ook aanwezig is Carina van Leeuwen, dé coldcase-expert van Nederland. Het vonnis: https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBROT:2018:8603See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Exploring bird flu prevention with farm owner Shannon Hayes. Discover boot washing, flock protection with coyotes, and best practices in biosecurity. Summary

PJ talks to Art van Leeuwen about his beautiful art, his Tour de Munster and helping Down Syndrome because of his coffee pal Abagail See also here Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Long live die Queens of the Stone Age! Die US Rock Band rund um Josh Homme hat im letzten Jahr ihre Tour wegen Krankheit überraschend absagen müssen. „We're here to make up for last time! We never cancel like that. It was a very strange and serious situation but everything's good now!” sagt der Queens Of The Stone Age Gitarrist Troy van Leeuwen im FM4 Interview. Bevor sich der Bandleader Josh Homme letztes Jahr auf seine Genesung konzentrieren konnte, hat die Band ein langgeplantes Wunsch-Konzert gespielt das auch als ein besonderes Live-Album nun released wurde: „Alive in the Catacombs“ Aufgenommen 20 Meter unter der Erde in den Pariser Katakomben. Im Gespräch mit Susi Ondrusova erzählt Troy über diese einzigartige Erfahrung, er spricht über seine Liebe zu Iggy Pop und stellt sich vor wie es wäre heute 16 zu sein und eine Band starten zu wollen.Sendunshinweis: FM4, Morning Show, 14.07.2025, 6 Uhr

Welcome to Football Architects - a summer series for The Athletic FC Tactics Podcast. Over the next five weeks, we'll tell the stories of esteemed footballing nations and clubs, speaking to the unsung heroes who changed history.Today's episode is focused on Ajax's rebirth and how the club was rebuilt in the image of legendary figure Johan Cruyff.Host Michael Bailey will be joined by The Athletic's Jacob Whitehead and a number of our tactics writers. We'll also be hearing excerpts of Jacob's interviews with key figures who were at the forefront of these projects.On this episode, we hear from Ruben Jongkind, former head of talent development at Ajax, and the club's former head talent recruitment, Jasper van Leeuwen.Every episode will also have a written piece on the website, which we will link below.Host: Michael BaileyWith: Jacob Whitehead and Liam TharmeProducer: Mike Stavrou Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

MS patient turned healthcare disruptor shares why your biggest "problem users" are actually your most valuable system improvers. Summary

These families created a pandemic pod with clear rules & shared childcare. While adults navigated anxiety, their kids called it "the best time of their lives." Summary Bevin Croft and David Weintraub talk about their experience forming a "pod" during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Hats introduces participatory governance - a concept I've studied throughout my life in various contexts, including families, communities, organizations, and healthcare. My history with governance spans from 1968, through college activism, homeschooling my children, living in an intentional community, and working in corporate settings. The main segment features a conversation with Bevin and David, who formed a COVID-19 support group, or pod, with other families to help one another during the pandemic. They discuss: They spontaneously decided to form the pod in May 2020 Creating formal rules and a written agreement to manage risks and expectations The challenges of prioritizing the pod over extended family relationships The practical arrangements include shared meals, childcare, and rotating responsibilities Their collective approach to virtual schooling for their children The difficulties David experienced as a teacher during hybrid learning How their children viewed the pod experience as "the best time of their lives" despite adults' pandemic anxiety The lasting bonds their "family of friends" developed and maintained The pod used tools from Bevin's work in person-centered practices to create its governance structure. They made decisions based on consensus, with particular attention to accommodate the most cautious member's concerns. Their experience strengthened existing friendships and created lasting bonds between the families. Click here to view the printable newsletter with images. More readable than a transcript, which can also be found below. Contents Table of Contents Toggle EpisodeProemPodcast introMy Life with Participatory GovernanceForming a PodRulesNot easyPrioritiesRules, Contract, RisksTools for AgreementAccountabilityHow are You Different?MealsChildcareTraveling TogetherSchool and WorkingTough Times as a TeacherKids Loved ItBelated Introductions Call to actionReflectionPodcast OutroRelated episodes from Health Hats Please comment and ask questions: at the comment section at the bottom of the show notes on LinkedIn  via email YouTube channel  DM on Instagram, TikTok to @healthhats Production Team You know who you are. I'm grateful. Podcast episode on YouTube Inspired by and Grateful to Jan Oldenburg, Nakela Cook, Russ Howerton Links and references World Health Network National Center on Advancing Person-Centered Practices and Systems Episode Proem My advocacy revolves around participatory governance in everything that contributes to a decent quality of life. Participatory governance entails broad involvement, accessible information, transparency, and accountability, leading to trust in decision-making. I'm a lifelong student of governance, having studied it in families, communities, teams, organizations, healthcare, research, and various other settings. Podcast intro Welcome to Health Hats, the Podcast. I'm Danny van Leeuwen, a two-legged cisgender old white man of privilege who knows a little bit about a lot of healthcare and a lot about very little. We will listen and learn about what it takes to adjust to life's realities in the awesome circus of healthcare. Let's make some sense of all of this. My Life with Participatory Governance I've watched and participated in governance since 1968, when I was 16, dealing with the Vietnam War draft. I learned that the plumbing of the draft contained laws, written regulations, and unwritten rules, with people making decisions, people moving paper, and massive numbers of kids like me processing through. I wanted to prepare myself,

Who needs Spanish when you've got a saxophone? A music-lover proves that disability access is just another improvisation in Havana's jazz scene. Best viewed as a video https://youtu.be/Qz9Rm89LHD0 Summary Danny, Health Hats, chronicles his week-long trip to Cuba in January for a music-cultural exchange. Using a wheelchair and playing baritone saxophone, he traveled with a group of 11 from the States, organized by Dan Fox and Arlington MA's Morningside Studios. The group participated in a "Band Camp" hosted by the Havana Music School, receiving daily individual lessons, rehearsing in ensembles, and performing Cuban music at a restaurant. Despite Danny's initial anxieties about traveling with his disability and instrument, he found Cubans accommodating and helpful. The podcast features an interview with Claudia Fumero, manager of the Havana Music School, who discusses: The school's focus on teaching Cuban music to foreign visitors How the business began and evolved from connecting students with teachers in their homes to having a dedicated facility Her dream of expanding with more instruments and creating a small café where people can play music The episode is interspersed with musical performances by the ensembles, including renditions of "Sofrito" and "Afro Blue" by Mongo Santamaria. The group also attended the Havana Jazz Festival each night during their stay. Click here to view the printable newsletter with images. More readable than a transcript, which can also be found below. Contents Table of Contents Toggle ProemPodcast introBlending Language and CultureHavana Music SchoolHavana Music School – Morningside Studios ConnectionManaging the BusinessManaging the StayEmployer of Musicians Call to actionDreamsTraveling with DisabilitiesWhy Cuba?More MusicReflectionPodcast OutroRelated episodes from Health Hats Please comment and ask questions: at the comment section at the bottom of the show notes on LinkedIn  via email YouTube channel  DM on Instagram, TikTok to @healthhats Production Team You know who you are. I'm thankful. Inspired by and Grateful to Dan, Peter, Ann, Sonja, Jeff, Deb, Bob, Richard, Pachy, Claudia, Gisselle, Miguel, Alejandro, Mauri, Leo, Adrian, Angelito, Lazaro Links and references Morningside Studios Morningside Studio Tours Havana Music School on Instagram The Second Ensemble performance featuring Jeff Stout, Deb Larkin, Bob Salitsky, and Dan Fox Havana Jazz Festival 2025 Sofrito by Mongo Santamaria Mambo Inn by Mario Bauza Afro Blue by Mongo Santamaria Lagrimas Negras by Miguel Matamoros Guantanamera by Jose Marti/JoesitoFernandez Proem Music is a world within itself, with a language we all understand. — Stevie Wonder. My nighttime voices bombarded me. How can you go to Cuba as a musician? You're not good enough. Your wheelchair won't make it over their crumbling roads and sidewalks.  Your horn is too big and heavy with everything else. You can't do too many stairs. You don't speak Spanish. You won't be safe. I hate those deflating voices. I should be excited about this chance of a lifetime. I completely trust Dan Fox, our guide and arranger. My disabilities do not define me. Helpful people are everywhere. I'm going with my partner of fifty years. We love music and culture. Who cares about politics? What the heck? We went. Welcome to the story of our adventures. Podcast intro Welcome to Health Hats, the Podcast. I'm Danny van Leeuwen, a two-legged cisgender old white man of privilege who knows a little bit about a lot of healthcare and a lot about very little. We will listen and learn about what it takes to adjust to life's realities in the awesome circus of healthcare. Let's make some sense of all of this. Blending Language and Culture Music alone can abolish differences of language or culture between two people and invoke something indestructible within t...

Paul en Wouter spraken met Carina van Leeuwen, de drijvende kracht achter het Amsterdamse coldcaseteam. Welke memorabele zaken zijn haar bijgebleven? Hoe gaat dit team te werk? En wie is toch die deels in cement gegoten dode vrouw die in de rivier de Gaasp werd gevonden? Verder zit 'Sontje' B. van Zone 6 opnieuw vast voor marteling, nu in de 'Keulse drugsoorlog' En alleen al in Nederland zijn 30 verdachten gearresteerd voor geweldsgolf na rip 1400 kilo cocaïne. Presentatie: Corrie GerritsmaJournalisten: Paul Vugts en Hanneloes PenProductie en montage: Verena VerhoevenEindredactie: Josien WolthuizenMuziek: Kloaq Audio Design Schrijf je hier in voor de wekelijkse Misdaadnieuwsbrief. Reageren of vragen?Mail: misdaad@parool.nlWhatsapp en Signal: 06 27 19 33 64 Meer lezen? Zij leidt het coldcaseteam van de Amsterdamse politie: ‘Wij zitten te rommelen in een verleden waar soms al lang een deken overheen is gegooid’ ‘Sontje’ B. van rapformatie Zone 6 opnieuw vast, nu voor marteling in ‘Keulse drugsoorlog’ Alleen in Nederland al 30 verdachten gearresteerd voor geweldsgolf na rip 1400 kilo cocaïne Dankzij deze forensisch onderzoeker hebben drie onbekende doden nu een naam Support the show: https://www.kiosk.nl/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In Gaza werden lichamen van 15 hulpverleners van de Palestijnse Rode Halve Maan teruggevonden in een massagraf. Hoogleraar Thea Hilhorst kan zich niet voorstellen dat ze niet herkenbaar waren als hulpverleners.  De film 'Een Kano naar Zee' ging de afgelopen week in première en gaat over de opkomst en de toekomst van de Rotterdamse haven. De maker, André van Hout,was als klein jongetje al gefascineerd door de haven. En de Haagse band Kane gaat opnieuw uit elkaar. In het najaar nemen ze afscheid met een concert in Ahoy Rotterdam. De band hield er in 2014 ook al een keer mee op, maar maakte vorig jaar een succesvolle comeback. Een gesprek met gitarist Dennis van Leeuwen.

Met vandaag: Impact aardbeving op rebellen en junta in Myanmar | Premier Schoof over signalgate | Gitarist Dennis van Leeuwen van Kane over waarom de band stopt | Herdenking landing Amerikaanse militairen op Japanse eiland Iwo Jima | 5voor12: Bingo mag weer met borrel | Presentatie: Sheila Sitalsing  

Send us a textLouisette Blikkenhorst is the founder of the Ketogeen Instituut Nederland, otherwise known as the Ketogenic Institute of the Netherlands! Louisette is the first trainer to offer Dutch-language educational programs on Ketogenic Metabolic Therapy."Lifestyle diseases" are a term we hear more and more, and Louisette is trying to eliminate this term from the world with an effective ketogenic diet. On her website, people can find several resources and guides to following a ketogenic diet!After years of experience as an orthomolecular and ketogenic therapist, she transitioned to imparting knowledge and skills to other health professionals. This allows even more people to be supported in taking control of their health. Under Ketogenic Institute of the Netherlands several initiatives are offered, including training in Ketogenic Metabolic Therapy, education on Metabolic & Mental Health, a Ketogenic Lifestyle Program, and the Keto Switch Challenge. Their offerings also include a consultation with Floor van Leeuwen and Elske Hammer, and a platform for other ketogenic professionals.Louisette is also the host of the De Keto Podcast, which has over 300,000 downloads!Find Louisette at-https://ketogeeninstituut.nl/Podcast- De Keto PodcastIG- @ketogeeninstituutnlFind Boundless Body at- myboundlessbody.com Book a session with us here!