Podcasts about Leiden

Hittegolven, nauwelijks regen en bosbranden die zijn weerga niet kenden. Klimaatverandering is nu echt zichtbaar en voelbaar voor iedereen. Hoe uitzonderlijk was deze zomer nou echt?Deze aflevering in het kort:☑️ Klimaatdeskundige Bart van den Hurk over de zomer van 2026☑️ Frankrijk zag dit jaar al meer dan honderdduizend hectare bos in vlammen opgaan☑️ Warmtenetwerk bij Rotterdam krijgt steeds meer vormUitzonderlijk als je naar het verleden kijkt. Het nieuwe (ab)normaal als je de blik op de toekomst richt. Nederland zit dit jaar in de droogste 5 procent sinds het begin van de metingen, met hittegolf na hittegolf sinds mei. De Rijn bij Lobith zakte eind juli naar het laagste punt ooit gemeten, met alle gevolgen van dien: schepen die maar half beladen kunnen varen, sluizen die minder vaak opengaan en fabrieken die hun koelwater niet meer kwijt kunnen. Tegelijkertijd stond Frankrijk in brand: meer dan 100.000 hectare bos ging er dit seizoen al in vlammen op. Klimaatdeskundige Bart van den Hurk van Deltares legt uit hoe dat allemaal met elkaar samenhangt.

Jede zweite Person erfährt in ihrem Leben eine psychische Erkrankung. Doch was heisst überhaupt krank? Und warum verstehen wir noch heute nicht richtig, woher psychische Leiden kommen? Ein Gespräch über Diagnosen, Vererbung und soziale Umstände – und über die heilende Kraft von Geschichten. Angststörungen, Depressionen, Sucht: Jede zweite Person erkrankt in ihrem Leben psychisch. Eine erschreckend hohe Zahl, welche die Frage aufwirft, ob wir als Gesellschaft immer kränker werden. Oder wird eher das Raster, was als normal gilt, immer enger? Welche Ursachen liegen den Krankheiten zugrunde, sind es die Gene oder macht doch das gesellschaftliche Umfeld krank? Und welche Rolle spielt die Psychiatrie, um seelischen Leiden zu begegnen oder sie sogar zu heilen? Darüber spricht Olivia Röllin mit Leon Engler, Autor des Buchs «Botanik des Wahnsinns» und angehender Psychotherapeut, sowie dem Mediziner und Wissenschaftshistoriker Michael Hagner. Wiederholung vom 22. Februar 2026

Jede zweite Person erfährt in ihrem Leben eine psychische Erkrankung. Doch was heisst überhaupt krank? Und warum verstehen wir noch heute nicht richtig, woher psychische Leiden kommen? Ein Gespräch über Diagnosen, Vererbung und soziale Umstände – und über die heilende Kraft von Geschichten. Angststörungen, Depressionen, Sucht: Jede zweite Person erkrankt in ihrem Leben psychisch. Eine erschreckend hohe Zahl, welche die Frage aufwirft, ob wir als Gesellschaft immer kränker werden. Oder wird eher das Raster, was als normal gilt, immer enger? Welche Ursachen liegen den Krankheiten zugrunde, sind es die Gene oder macht doch das gesellschaftliche Umfeld krank? Und welche Rolle spielt die Psychiatrie, um seelischen Leiden zu begegnen oder sie sogar zu heilen? Darüber spricht Olivia Röllin mit Leon Engler, Autor des Buchs «Botanik des Wahnsinns» und angehender Psychotherapeut, sowie dem Mediziner und Wissenschaftshistoriker Michael Hagner. Wiederholung vom 22. Februar 2026

Schrijver Christiaan Weijts vergelijkt het in zijn nieuwe essaybundel met flaneren: essayeren is als dralen, als slenteren, als drentelen. Onderzoekend, onzeker, onvast, in een tijdperk dat barst van stelligheden en vraagt om productiviteit. Deze avond duiken we in het essaygenre en flaneren we ons een aarzelende weg naar voorzichtige antwoorden over de staat en de toekomst van het essay.Het genre lijkt aan populariteit te winnen. Is het de aandachtsspanne van de lezer – die iets langers wil dan een column, maar iets korters dan een boek? Is het het onderzoekende karakter? Is het de aanbidding van de schrijver, van de intellectueel – lezen we graag over diens leven en denkwijzen? Of imiteren we vooral gretig de Amerikaanse voorhoede? Wat zegt het essay over onze behoeften, onze verlangens?En wat maakt het essay eigenlijk een essay? Waarin verschilt het van, bijvoorbeeld, een pamflet, of memoires, of andere non-fictie? Is het essay elitair? Noemen we een essay dat niet door een veronderstelde intellectueel geschreven is ook een essay, of heet het dan een reportage, een longread, een verhaal?Deze avond duiken we in het essaygenre van Montaigne tot The New Yorker en flaneren we ons een aarzelende weg naar voorzichtige antwoorden over de staat en de toekomst van het essay.Over de sprekersChristiaan Weijts is naast schrijver ook essayist, columnist en criticus. Hij publiceert op regelmatige basis in NRC en De Groene Amsterdammer. In 2006 verscheen zijn veelgeprezen debuut Art. 285b., waarmee hij in 2006 de Anton Wachterprijs en in 2008 het Gouden Ezelsoor won. Daarna schreef hij succesvolle en meervoudig bekroonde romans als Via Cappello 23, Euforie en Het valse seizoen. Deze maand verschijnt de essaybundel Flaneren kun je leren.Joost de Vries is de chef van het katern Zondag van de Volkskrant. De Vries schreef onder andere de romans Clausewitz en De republiek (bekroond met de Gouden Boekenuil). Ook maakt hij de literatuurpodcast Boeken FM. Voor zijn gehele oeuvre ontving hij in 2023 de Frans Kellendonkprijs. In 2024 kwam zijn meeste recente boek Hogere Machten uit.Marian Donner is filosoof en schrijver. In 2019 publiceerde ze het Zelfverwoestingsboek: een oproep om de teugels te laten vieren. Het pamflet werd lovend ontvangen en is inmiddels in verschillende talen uitgebracht. In 2024 verscheen haar non-fictieboek Rooksignalen, een hoofdkussenboek dat genomineerd werd voor de Jan Hanlo Essayprijs. Ze heeft een column over media in de Groene en schrijft essays voor De Volkskrant en het NRC.Arjen van Veelen is schrijver van onder meer de bekroonde roman Aantekeningen over het verplaatsen van obelisken en van de non-fictiebestsellers Amerikanen lopen niet en Rotterdam. Hij publiceert regelmatig essays in o.a. NRC. Arjen studeerde klassieke talen en journalistiek in Leiden. Hij werkte als docent Grieks en Latijn in Rotterdam en als Amerika-correspondent.Programmamaker: Anne Grietje FranssenIn samenwerking met: De ArbeiderspersZie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Der Abschluss unseres Tour de France Twitter-Tagebuchs als Podcast-Folge. John Degenkolb über schwere Momente, tolle Erinnerungen, ein absurdes Grundtempo, großartige Fans, Emotionen & Leiden. +++++++++ Der odcast wird präsentiert von Tubolito – Pionier & Spezialist für TPU-Fahrradschläuche. Mit "SYNCD" hat Tubolito einen Fahrradschlauch mit integriertem Sensor entwickelt, der den Reifendruck in Echtzeit misst und direkt an dein Smartphone oder Garmin-Geräte überträgt.

Fluent Fiction - Dutch: Finding Balance: A Heartfelt Journey Amid Tulip Fields Find the full episode transcript, vocabulary words, and more:fluentfiction.com/nl/episode/2026-08-10-22-34-02-nl Story Transcript:Nl: De zon scheen helder boven de tulpenvelden buiten Leiden.En: The sun shone brightly over the tulip fields outside Leiden.Nl: Rijen vol rode, gele en roze bloemen wiegden zachtjes in de zomerbries.En: Rows of red, yellow, and pink flowers swayed gently in the summer breeze.Nl: De lucht was blauw en leeg, op een enkele witte wolk na.En: The sky was blue and empty, except for a single white cloud.Nl: Fenna liep hand in hand met haar zoon, Bas, terwijl Joris wat langzaam achter hen liep.En: Fenna walked hand in hand with her son, Bas, while Joris walked a bit slowly behind them.Nl: Joris probeerde te glimlachen.En: Joris tried to smile.Nl: Het was een prachtige dag en hij wilde ervan genieten.En: It was a beautiful day and he wanted to enjoy it.Nl: Hij had veel te hard gewerkt de afgelopen maanden.En: He had worked too hard in recent months.Nl: Nu was hij hier, om samen met zijn gezin te ontspannen.En: Now he was here, to relax with his family.Nl: Maar de lichte pijn in zijn borst weigerde te verdwijnen.En: But the light pain in his chest refused to disappear.Nl: Het was al begonnen toen ze uitstapten uit de tram.En: It had already started when they got off the tram.Nl: Toch hield hij het voor zichzelf.En: Yet he kept it to himself.Nl: "Papa, kijk eens!"En: "Dad, look!"Nl: riep Bas vrolijk, wijzend naar een bijzonder mooie tulp met oranje bloemblaadjes.En: Bas called out happily, pointing to a particularly beautiful tulip with orange petals.Nl: Joris knikte, forceerde een glimlach en stapte dichterbij.En: Joris nodded, forced a smile, and stepped closer.Nl: Fenna keek hem kort aan, een vleugje bezorgdheid op haar gezicht.En: Fenna glanced at him briefly, a hint of concern on her face.Nl: "Gaat het, Joris?"En: "Are you okay, Joris?"Nl: vroeg ze zachtjes.En: she asked softly.Nl: "Prima," antwoordde Joris snel.En: "Fine," Joris replied quickly.Nl: Hij wilde niet dat Fenna zich zorgen maakte.En: He didn't want Fenna to worry.Nl: Maar diep vanbinnen voelde hij de knagende angst.En: But deep down, he felt the nagging fear.Nl: Wat als deze pijn iets ernstigs was?En: What if this pain was something serious?Nl: Joris besloot sterk te blijven, voor zijn familie.En: Joris decided to stay strong, for his family.Nl: Ze bezochten ieder hoekje van het veld tot Bas een idee kreeg.En: They visited every corner of the field until Bas had an idea.Nl: "Laten we een foto maken!"En: "Let's take a picture!"Nl: stelde hij voor.En: he suggested.Nl: Joris, Fenna en Bas poseerden tussen de tulpen.En: Joris, Fenna, and Bas posed among the tulips.Nl: Terwijl de camera klikte, voelde Joris de pijn scherp terugkeren.En: As the camera clicked, Joris felt the pain sharply return.Nl: Alsof zijn borst werd samengeknepen.En: As if his chest was being squeezed.Nl: In het midden van Fenna's lach viel Joris plotseling op zijn knieën, zijn handen beschermend op zijn borst.En: In the middle of Fenna's laugh, Joris suddenly fell to his knees, his hands protectively on his chest.Nl: Fenna schreeuwde en Bas verstijfde van schrik.En: Fenna screamed and Bas froze in shock.Nl: Omstanders snelden toe terwijl Fenna haar telefoon pakte en om hulp riep.En: Bystanders rushed over as Fenna grabbed her phone and called for help.Nl: Joris werd wakker in een bed, het geluid van piepende machines om hem heen.En: Joris woke up in a bed, the sound of beeping machines around him.Nl: Fenna zat naast hem en streelde zijn hand.En: Fenna sat next to him, stroking his hand.Nl: Haar ogen waren rood van tranen, maar ze glimlachte opgelucht.En: Her eyes were red from tears, but she smiled with relief.Nl: "Je bent veilig," fluisterde ze.En: "You're safe," she whispered.Nl: De dokter legde uit dat Joris een waarschuwing had gekregen.En: The doctor explained that Joris had received a warning.Nl: "Je moet beter voor jezelf zorgen," zei de dokter vriendelijk maar duidelijk.En: "You need to take better care of yourself," the doctor said kindly but clearly.Nl: Joris knikte traag, de ernst van de situatie drong eindelijk tot hem door.En: Joris nodded slowly, the seriousness of the situation finally sinking in.Nl: Die zomer veranderde alles voor Joris.En: That summer changed everything for Joris.Nl: Hij leerde zijn werk te delen, minder uren te maken en meer tijd met zijn gezin door te brengen.En: He learned to share his work, put in fewer hours, and spend more time with his family.Nl: Hij begreep dat gezondheid en familie voor alles kwamen.En: He understood that health and family came before anything else.Nl: En dat het oké was om om hulp te vragen.En: And that it was okay to ask for help.Nl: Met Fenna en Bas aan zijn zijde stapte Joris de toekomst in, vastberaden om een betere balans te vinden.En: With Fenna and Bas by his side, Joris stepped into the future, determined to find a better balance.Nl: Het leven was te kostbaar om alleen te besteden aan werk.En: Life was too precious to spend only on work.Nl: Hij glimlachte zachtjes naar Fenna en Bas, dankbaar dat hij hen nog steeds had.En: He smiled softly at Fenna and Bas, grateful that he still had them.Nl: Hun liefde gaf hem de kracht om zijn leven te veranderen.En: Their love gave him the strength to change his life.Nl: En dat maakte alle verschil.En: And that made all the difference. Vocabulary Words:shone: scheenswayed: wiegdenbreeze: briesglanced: keekconcern: bezorgdheidrefused: weigerdehint: vleugjenagging: knagendeposed: poseerdensharply: scherpsqueezed: samengeknepenbystanders: omstandersbed: bedbeeping: piependerelief: opgeluchtwarning: waarschuwingkindly: vriendelijkclearly: duidelijksinking: drongbalance: balansprecious: kostbaarstrength: krachtlight: lichthint: vleugjedecided: beslootprotectively: beschermendknelt: knieënstroked: streeldefrozen: verstijfdesmiling: glimlachte

Zu kurze Schnauze, zu kleiner Schädel, zu langes oder gar kein Fell: Millionen Haustiere leiden darunter, dass sie im Sinne vermeintlicher Schönheitsmerkmale gezüchtet werden – nicht im Sinne der Gesundheit. Rund jeder zehnte Hund hat von Geburt an zum Beispiel Atemnot, stechende Kopfschmerzen oder einen Knorpeldefekt. SWR-Journalistin Annette Fuhrmann hat recherchiert, warum Qualzucht in Deutschland so verbreitet ist. Sie erzählt in dieser 11KM-Folge von Züchtern, die viel Geld verdienen, einem Verband, der keine kritischen Fragen beantworten möchte und einer Hundebesitzerin, die den Kauf ihrer Hunde mittlerweile bereut. Hinweis: Ab Minute 16 spricht unser Gast von sechs Wochen alten Hundewelpen mit geschlossenen Augen. Richtig ist, dass Welpen in den ersten zwei bis drei Lebenswochen ihre Augen öffnen. Diese Folge ist ein 11KM Classic und lief zum ersten Mal am 23.03.2026. Hier geht's zum Film “Leiden auf vier Pfoten. Züchten wir unsere Haustiere kaputt?” von Annette Fuhrmann: https://www.ardmediathek.de/video/story/leiden-auf-vier-pfoten-zuechten-wir-unsere-haustiere-kaputt/swr/Y3JpZDovL3N3ci5kZS9hZXgvbzIyNjQ4MTg Hier kommt ihr zu unserer 11KM-Folge „Endstation Labor: Geht es ohne Tierversuche?“: https://1.ard.de/11KM_Tierversuche Diese und viele weitere Folgen von 11KM findet ihr überall da, wo es Podcasts gibt, auch hier in ARD Sounds: https://www.ardsounds.de/sendung/11km-der-tagesschau-podcast/urn:ard:show:4549910994dc2464/ An dieser Folge waren beteiligt: Folgenautor: Jakob Müller Mitarbeit: Lukas Waschbüsch, Marc Hoffmann Host: David Krause Produktion: Jonas Teichmann, Konrad Winkler, Hanna Brünjes / Christine Dreyer / Lisa Krumme / Jürgen Kopp Planung: Caspar von Au und Hardy Funk Distribution: Kerstin Ammermann Redaktionsleitung: Yasemin Yüksel und Fumiko Lipp 11KM: der tagesschau-Podcast wird produziert von BR24 und NDR Info. Die redaktionelle Verantwortung für diese Episode liegt beim BR / NDR.

Der Rekordsommer hat Folgen für die Tierwelt. Paula Goebel war in Münster, wo Fische mit Sauerstoff versorgt werden. Sarah Lopez hat eine Fisch-Ambulanz in den Niederlanden begleitet. Birgit Königs vom NABU erklärt, wie Vögel unter der Dürre leiden. Von WDR 5.

Infrastructural Urbanism in Contemporary China: Volunteering, Infrastructures and Civic Imaginations (Leiden University Press, 2026) examines how Chinese citizens negotiate their everyday experiences with urban spaces, improved city infrastructure, and an increasingly tight surveillance regime through volunteering. This book asks how citizens connect to city spaces where facilities for transit, culture, and leisure have been substantially upgraded. Drawing on extensive research, Ka-ming Wu investigates how citizens conduct volunteer activities that not only promote party-state campaigns and engage with new urban spaces and services, but also experiment with political, social, and cultural rights, including advocating for the rights of people with disabilities and promoting unofficial interpretations of national history. The book argues that volunteering has become an urban practice through which citizens navigate existing hierarchies of urban and rural status, gender, age, and ability, while contesting top-down, mega-event-driven urbanization. It situates Chinese everyday urbanism within the context of China's hosting of multiple international events, its expanding public and digital infrastructures, heightened party-state control, and burgeoning digital activism. The book contributes to the infrastructural turn in urban anthropology and the field of China studies, offering a new understanding of urban rights and public access in contemporary China. NOTE: The book Ka-ming Wu mentioned in the interview is Stephen Graham's Cities under Siege: The New Military Urbanism (Verso, 2010). Wu Ka-ming is Associate Professor in the Department of Cultural and Religious Studies at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, with courtesy appointments in the Department of Anthropology and the Centre for China Studies. Trained as a cultural anthropologist, her work is interdisciplinary, situated at the intersection of cultural studies, anthropology, China studies, and environmental humanities. She is the author of Reinventing Chinese Tradition: The Cultural Politics of Late Socialism (UIP 2015) and the co-author of Living with Waste (CUP 2017). Yadong Li is an anthropologist-in-training. He is a PhD candidate of Socio-cultural Anthropology at Tulane University. More details about his scholarship and research interests can be found here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Infrastructural Urbanism in Contemporary China: Volunteering, Infrastructures and Civic Imaginations (Leiden University Press, 2026) examines how Chinese citizens negotiate their everyday experiences with urban spaces, improved city infrastructure, and an increasingly tight surveillance regime through volunteering. This book asks how citizens connect to city spaces where facilities for transit, culture, and leisure have been substantially upgraded. Drawing on extensive research, Ka-ming Wu investigates how citizens conduct volunteer activities that not only promote party-state campaigns and engage with new urban spaces and services, but also experiment with political, social, and cultural rights, including advocating for the rights of people with disabilities and promoting unofficial interpretations of national history. The book argues that volunteering has become an urban practice through which citizens navigate existing hierarchies of urban and rural status, gender, age, and ability, while contesting top-down, mega-event-driven urbanization. It situates Chinese everyday urbanism within the context of China's hosting of multiple international events, its expanding public and digital infrastructures, heightened party-state control, and burgeoning digital activism. The book contributes to the infrastructural turn in urban anthropology and the field of China studies, offering a new understanding of urban rights and public access in contemporary China. NOTE: The book Ka-ming Wu mentioned in the interview is Stephen Graham's Cities under Siege: The New Military Urbanism (Verso, 2010). Wu Ka-ming is Associate Professor in the Department of Cultural and Religious Studies at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, with courtesy appointments in the Department of Anthropology and the Centre for China Studies. Trained as a cultural anthropologist, her work is interdisciplinary, situated at the intersection of cultural studies, anthropology, China studies, and environmental humanities. She is the author of Reinventing Chinese Tradition: The Cultural Politics of Late Socialism (UIP 2015) and the co-author of Living with Waste (CUP 2017). Yadong Li is an anthropologist-in-training. He is a PhD candidate of Socio-cultural Anthropology at Tulane University. More details about his scholarship and research interests can be found here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

Infrastructural Urbanism in Contemporary China: Volunteering, Infrastructures and Civic Imaginations (Leiden University Press, 2026) examines how Chinese citizens negotiate their everyday experiences with urban spaces, improved city infrastructure, and an increasingly tight surveillance regime through volunteering. This book asks how citizens connect to city spaces where facilities for transit, culture, and leisure have been substantially upgraded. Drawing on extensive research, Ka-ming Wu investigates how citizens conduct volunteer activities that not only promote party-state campaigns and engage with new urban spaces and services, but also experiment with political, social, and cultural rights, including advocating for the rights of people with disabilities and promoting unofficial interpretations of national history. The book argues that volunteering has become an urban practice through which citizens navigate existing hierarchies of urban and rural status, gender, age, and ability, while contesting top-down, mega-event-driven urbanization. It situates Chinese everyday urbanism within the context of China's hosting of multiple international events, its expanding public and digital infrastructures, heightened party-state control, and burgeoning digital activism. The book contributes to the infrastructural turn in urban anthropology and the field of China studies, offering a new understanding of urban rights and public access in contemporary China. NOTE: The book Ka-ming Wu mentioned in the interview is Stephen Graham's Cities under Siege: The New Military Urbanism (Verso, 2010). Wu Ka-ming is Associate Professor in the Department of Cultural and Religious Studies at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, with courtesy appointments in the Department of Anthropology and the Centre for China Studies. Trained as a cultural anthropologist, her work is interdisciplinary, situated at the intersection of cultural studies, anthropology, China studies, and environmental humanities. She is the author of Reinventing Chinese Tradition: The Cultural Politics of Late Socialism (UIP 2015) and the co-author of Living with Waste (CUP 2017). Yadong Li is an anthropologist-in-training. He is a PhD candidate of Socio-cultural Anthropology at Tulane University. More details about his scholarship and research interests can be found here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/anthropology

Infrastructural Urbanism in Contemporary China: Volunteering, Infrastructures and Civic Imaginations (Leiden University Press, 2026) examines how Chinese citizens negotiate their everyday experiences with urban spaces, improved city infrastructure, and an increasingly tight surveillance regime through volunteering. This book asks how citizens connect to city spaces where facilities for transit, culture, and leisure have been substantially upgraded. Drawing on extensive research, Ka-ming Wu investigates how citizens conduct volunteer activities that not only promote party-state campaigns and engage with new urban spaces and services, but also experiment with political, social, and cultural rights, including advocating for the rights of people with disabilities and promoting unofficial interpretations of national history. The book argues that volunteering has become an urban practice through which citizens navigate existing hierarchies of urban and rural status, gender, age, and ability, while contesting top-down, mega-event-driven urbanization. It situates Chinese everyday urbanism within the context of China's hosting of multiple international events, its expanding public and digital infrastructures, heightened party-state control, and burgeoning digital activism. The book contributes to the infrastructural turn in urban anthropology and the field of China studies, offering a new understanding of urban rights and public access in contemporary China. NOTE: The book Ka-ming Wu mentioned in the interview is Stephen Graham's Cities under Siege: The New Military Urbanism (Verso, 2010). Wu Ka-ming is Associate Professor in the Department of Cultural and Religious Studies at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, with courtesy appointments in the Department of Anthropology and the Centre for China Studies. Trained as a cultural anthropologist, her work is interdisciplinary, situated at the intersection of cultural studies, anthropology, China studies, and environmental humanities. She is the author of Reinventing Chinese Tradition: The Cultural Politics of Late Socialism (UIP 2015) and the co-author of Living with Waste (CUP 2017). Yadong Li is an anthropologist-in-training. He is a PhD candidate of Socio-cultural Anthropology at Tulane University. More details about his scholarship and research interests can be found here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/chinese-studies

Infrastructural Urbanism in Contemporary China: Volunteering, Infrastructures and Civic Imaginations (Leiden University Press, 2026) examines how Chinese citizens negotiate their everyday experiences with urban spaces, improved city infrastructure, and an increasingly tight surveillance regime through volunteering. This book asks how citizens connect to city spaces where facilities for transit, culture, and leisure have been substantially upgraded. Drawing on extensive research, Ka-ming Wu investigates how citizens conduct volunteer activities that not only promote party-state campaigns and engage with new urban spaces and services, but also experiment with political, social, and cultural rights, including advocating for the rights of people with disabilities and promoting unofficial interpretations of national history. The book argues that volunteering has become an urban practice through which citizens navigate existing hierarchies of urban and rural status, gender, age, and ability, while contesting top-down, mega-event-driven urbanization. It situates Chinese everyday urbanism within the context of China's hosting of multiple international events, its expanding public and digital infrastructures, heightened party-state control, and burgeoning digital activism. The book contributes to the infrastructural turn in urban anthropology and the field of China studies, offering a new understanding of urban rights and public access in contemporary China. NOTE: The book Ka-ming Wu mentioned in the interview is Stephen Graham's Cities under Siege: The New Military Urbanism (Verso, 2010). Wu Ka-ming is Associate Professor in the Department of Cultural and Religious Studies at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, with courtesy appointments in the Department of Anthropology and the Centre for China Studies. Trained as a cultural anthropologist, her work is interdisciplinary, situated at the intersection of cultural studies, anthropology, China studies, and environmental humanities. She is the author of Reinventing Chinese Tradition: The Cultural Politics of Late Socialism (UIP 2015) and the co-author of Living with Waste (CUP 2017). Yadong Li is an anthropologist-in-training. He is a PhD candidate of Socio-cultural Anthropology at Tulane University. More details about his scholarship and research interests can be found here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dieser unvergessliche Blick aus meinem Zimmer bleibt in Fotos, Podcasts und Reels für immer erhalten. Für mich sind solche Aufnahmen mehr als nur Erinnerungen. Sie sollen inspirieren und zeigen, welche Möglichkeiten das Leben bietet. Inspiration, das eigene Leben bewusst zu gestalten. Inspiration, Entscheidungen selbst zu treffen. Inspiration, viel öfter Nein zu sagen. Nein zu Dingen, die dir nicht mehr guttun. Nein zu Situationen, in denen du nur noch funktionierst. Nein zu einem Leben, das dich unglücklich macht. Viele Menschen bleiben jahrelang in Beziehungen, in denen kaum noch Liebe, Nähe oder Wertschätzung vorhanden sind. Sie sagen: „Es ist eben so." Oder: „Jetzt weiß ich wenigstens, was ich habe." Doch gehört es wirklich dazu, in einer Partnerschaft zu bleiben, die nur noch aus Streit, Distanz und Gewohnheit besteht? Nur weil zwei Menschen schon viele Jahre zusammen sind, müssen sie nicht weitere Jahrzehnte unglücklich leben. Manche Menschen leiden laut. Andere leiden still. Gerade dieses stille Leiden kann dich innerlich auffressen. Du spürst jeden Tag, dass etwas nicht stimmt. Du merkst, dass du unglücklich bist und fragst dich: Soll das wirklich alles gewesen sein? Dann suchst du Rat bei anderen und hörst vielleicht: „So schlimm ist es doch nicht." Aber niemand anderes steckt in deiner Haut. Niemand kann fühlen, wie es dir wirklich geht. Wenn du leidest, dann ist es schlimm genug, um genau hinzuschauen. Frag dich deshalb ehrlich: Wie lange willst du noch leiden? Wie lange willst du dich schlecht behandeln lassen? Wie lange willst du in einer kalten Partnerschaft bleiben? Wie lange willst du nur noch funktionieren? Es geht nicht darum, vorschnell alles hinzuwerfen. Es geht darum, ehrlich Bilanz zu ziehen und deine eigenen Bedürfnisse ernst zu nehmen. Wenn etwas endgültig vorbei ist, musst du es nicht künstlich am Leben halten. Du darfst loslassen. Du darfst eine neue Entscheidung treffen. Und du darfst wieder Ja zu dir selbst sagen. Ich wünsche dir den Mut und die Kraft, dein Leben bewusst zu gestalten und für dich einzustehen. Tschüss, bye-bye, dein Ernst. #Partnerschaft #NeinSagen #Selbstachtung #Wertschätzung #Entscheidungen #Veränderung #Lebensfreude #podcast #ergebnisorientiert #ernstcrameri Wenn du Ernst Crameri im Video sehen willst, in unterschiedlichen Umgebungen, schaue es dir jetzt hier an https://www.youtube.com/user/ErnstCrameri   Hier findest du das aktuelle Seminar: https://bit.ly/NEIN-Seminar-Podcast   Kontaktdaten von Ernst Crameri: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ErnstCrameri Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/crameriernst/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@ernst_crameri LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ernstcrameri/ X: https://x.com/Ernst_Crameri    

Es war die Medienstory des Frühjahrs 2026: ein Buckelwal wird in der Ostsee zunächst vor Wismar gesichtet und strandet schließlich vor Timmendorfer Strand. Seine weitere Odyssee wird nicht nur medial begleitet, sondern auch von vielen Menschen vor Ort direkt verfolgt. Eine sogenannte Rettungsaktion bringt den Wal in die Nordsee. Wenige Wochen später stirbt das Tier im Kattegat vor der dänischen Insel Anholt. Längst hatte sich eine heftige Debatte entwickelt, darüber, wie und ob man überhaupt dem Tier helfen soll und kann - ein Streit, der streckenweise den Pfad der Wissenschaft längst verlassen hat. Wir erzählen die Geschichte dieser drei Monate, fragen nach bei Wissenschaftlern und wollen vor allem wissen, ob sich so etwas wiederholen kann oder ob und was man aus dieser Geschichte um den Buckelwal gelernt hat. Burkhard Baschek: der Direktor des Deutschen Meeresmuseums in Stralsund berichtet über die ersten Rettungsversuche in der Ostsee, über Verschwörungstheorien und Drohungen gegen Wissenschaftler. Joe Groebel: der Hamburger Medienpsychologe erklärt, wie dieser Hype um den Buckelwal zu erklären ist und welche Rolle die Politik im Drama um Timmy spielt. Fabian Ritter: der Meeresbiologe und Walforscher erklärt die Routen der Buckelwale und die Risiken für die Tiere. Er sagt, der umstrittene Rettungsversuch, der den Wal in die Nordsee gebracht hat, habe das Leiden des Tieres unnötig verlängert. Timmy im Theater: im Ernst-Deutsch-Theater in Hamburg ist der Buckelwal der Star einer einmaligen Aufführung.

Predigt vom 09.08.2026 Pastor Johannes Demandt Bibeltext: 1. Petrus 1, 5-7 Link zur Predigt: https://1aj5r4k.podcaster.de/predigt/media/20260809.mp3

Prediger: Rüdiger Sumann

Coming-of-age in Harare: Jedza zieht in die Stadt und sucht dort seine verschwundene Schwester. Ein von viel Musik inspirierter Debütroman.

Heat waves don’t get as much attention as blizzards, floods, and hurricanes, but extreme heat is one of the deadliest weather events on average. Research: National Weather Service. “Weather Related Fatality and Injury Statistics.” https://www.weather.gov/hazstat Last, John. “This Summer’s Drought Is Europe’s Worst in 500 Years. What Happened Last Time?” Smithsonian Magazine. 9/8/2022. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/this-summers-drought-is-europes-worst-in-500-years-what-happened-last-time-180980711/ Wetter, Oliver; Seneviratne, Sonia I. et al. “The year-long unprecedented European heat and drought of 1540 - a worst case.” Climatic Change 125(3-4), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1184-2 Orth, Rene et al. “Did European temperatures in 1540 exceed present-day records?” Environmental Research Letters. 11 (2016) 114021 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114021. United Nations Environment Programme. “Impacts of summer 2003 heat wave in Europe.” Environmental Alert Bulletin. https://www.unisdr.org/files/1145_ewheatwave.en.pdf Pfister, Christian. “The ‘Black Swan’ of 1540: Aspects of a European Megadrought.” From Climate Change and Cultural Transition in Europe. Brill. 1/1/2018. doi:10.1163/9789004356825_007 Grodzinsky, Ewa, and Märta Sund Levander. “History of the Thermometer.” Understanding Fever and Body Temperature: A Cross-disciplinary Approach to Clinical Practice 23–35. 23 Aug. 2019, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21886-7_3 John Huxham, Dr. Watson. “Remarks upon the Heat of the Air in July 1757. in an Extract of a Letter from John Huxham, M. D. F. R. S. to William Watson, M. D. F. R S. Dated at Plymouth 19th of That Month. With Additional Remarks by Dr. Watson.” Philosophical Transactions (1683-1775), Vol. 50 (1757 - 1758), pp. 428-430 (3 pages). Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/105279. Huxham, John. “An Account of the Extraordinary Heat of the Weather in July 1757, and of the Effects of It. In a Letter from John Huxham, M. D. F. R. S. to Wm. Watson, M. D. F. R. S..” Philosophical Transactions (1683-1775), Vol. 50 (1757 - 1758). Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/105292 Smeaton, John. “Remarks on the Different Temperature of the Air at Edystone, from That Observed at Plymouth, between the 7th and 14th of July 1757. By Mr. John Smeaton, F. R. S.” Philosophical Transactions (1683-1775), Vol. 50 (1757 - 1758). https://www.jstor.org/stable/105286 Sunderland, Helen. “The Great British Summer? A Historical Heatwave.” Doing History In Public. 8/12/2025. https://doinghistoryinpublic.org/2025/08/12/the-great-british-summer-a-historical-heatwave/ Scott, John. “Four elegies, descriptive and moral.” London J. Buckland. 1760. The Western Flying Post; or, Sherborne and Yeovil Mercury. Page 3. 8/15/1757. Lind, James. “An essay on the most effectual means of preserving the health of seamen in the Royal Navy.” 1774. Walpole, Horace. “The letters of Horace Walpole, fourth earl of Orford.” Vol. 3: 1750-1756. Oxford. 1903. Zwierlein, Cornel. "Chapter 3 The Danger between Nature and Culture: The Quotidian Threat of Urban Fires in the Premodern Era". Prometheus Tamed. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004431225_004 Web. Luterbacher, Jürg et al. “European Seasonal and Annual Temperature Variability, Trends and Extremes since 1500.” Science 303, 1499 (2004). DOI: 10.1126/science.1093877 Beniston, Martin. “The 2003 heat wave as an example of summers in a greenhouse climate? Observations and climate model simulations for Basel, Switzerland.” Global and Planetary Change. Volume 44, Issues 1–4, December 2004. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921818104000980 Franck, Marcy. “Heat waves and annual death rates in older adults in the United States.” Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 3/16/2026. https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/heat-waves-and-annual-death-rates-in-older-adults-in-the-united-states/ Poitras, Colin. “Warming U.S. climate linked to rising deaths from heat.” Yale School of Public Health. 11/7/2025. https://ysph.yale.edu/news-article/warming-us-climate-linked-to-rising-deaths-from-heat/ World Meteorological Association. “Western Europe has hottest June on record.” 7/9/2026. https://wmo.int/media/news/western-europe-has-hottest-june-record Cole, Deborah. “Germany records nearly 100 drowning deaths, many of them young men, in June heatwave.” The Guardian. 6/12/2026. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/12/germany-drowning-deaths-heatwave-paris-france-spain PBS News. “Europe swelters under an early heat wave as France records 40 drowning deaths.” 6/23/2026. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/europe-swelters-under-an-early-heat-wave-as-france-records-40-drowning-deaths See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amy Weitzman interviews Emily Sneff on her new book When the Declaration of Independence Was News and the graduate school experience. In 1776 people could hear the Declaration of Independence proclaimed in public squares and could read it in the pages of their local newspapers. Stories of the Declaration typically recount the work that took place inside the Continental Congress, focusing on the men tasked with drafting the text. Although Congress declared independence, the work of spreading the news involved printers, post riders, ship captains, civic leaders, soldiers, clerks, orators, preachers, diplomats, and translators. When the Declaration of Independence Was News reveals the stories behind how the Declaration was communicated in the United States and around the Atlantic. Tracing the travels of the founding document of the United States from Philadelphia to New York, Boston, Charleston, London, Leiden, Paris, and beyond, Emily Sneff shows how people both celebrated the Declaration and critiqued it. In the weeks after the document was penned, it was printed in the columns of newspapers, translated into German and French, and shared with Native American allies. The document induced some people to make public their privately held beliefs about whether they wanted the United States to be independent or to reconcile with King George III. The Declaration was met with unique circumstances everywhere it went, and people modified the text along the way. The questions of who experienced the news of independence, when, and how reveal an expansive and complex history of a critical moment in the American Revolution. Published for the 250th anniversary of American independence, When the Declaration of Independence Was News returns to a time before the legacy of these words and the outcome of the war against Great Britain were known to reconsider what the founding of the United States meant to the people who were living through it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Amy Weitzman interviews Emily Sneff on her new book When the Declaration of Independence Was News and the graduate school experience. In 1776 people could hear the Declaration of Independence proclaimed in public squares and could read it in the pages of their local newspapers. Stories of the Declaration typically recount the work that took place inside the Continental Congress, focusing on the men tasked with drafting the text. Although Congress declared independence, the work of spreading the news involved printers, post riders, ship captains, civic leaders, soldiers, clerks, orators, preachers, diplomats, and translators. When the Declaration of Independence Was News reveals the stories behind how the Declaration was communicated in the United States and around the Atlantic. Tracing the travels of the founding document of the United States from Philadelphia to New York, Boston, Charleston, London, Leiden, Paris, and beyond, Emily Sneff shows how people both celebrated the Declaration and critiqued it. In the weeks after the document was penned, it was printed in the columns of newspapers, translated into German and French, and shared with Native American allies. The document induced some people to make public their privately held beliefs about whether they wanted the United States to be independent or to reconcile with King George III. The Declaration was met with unique circumstances everywhere it went, and people modified the text along the way. The questions of who experienced the news of independence, when, and how reveal an expansive and complex history of a critical moment in the American Revolution. Published for the 250th anniversary of American independence, When the Declaration of Independence Was News returns to a time before the legacy of these words and the outcome of the war against Great Britain were known to reconsider what the founding of the United States meant to the people who were living through it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

Amy Weitzman interviews Emily Sneff on her new book When the Declaration of Independence Was News and the graduate school experience. In 1776 people could hear the Declaration of Independence proclaimed in public squares and could read it in the pages of their local newspapers. Stories of the Declaration typically recount the work that took place inside the Continental Congress, focusing on the men tasked with drafting the text. Although Congress declared independence, the work of spreading the news involved printers, post riders, ship captains, civic leaders, soldiers, clerks, orators, preachers, diplomats, and translators. When the Declaration of Independence Was News reveals the stories behind how the Declaration was communicated in the United States and around the Atlantic. Tracing the travels of the founding document of the United States from Philadelphia to New York, Boston, Charleston, London, Leiden, Paris, and beyond, Emily Sneff shows how people both celebrated the Declaration and critiqued it. In the weeks after the document was penned, it was printed in the columns of newspapers, translated into German and French, and shared with Native American allies. The document induced some people to make public their privately held beliefs about whether they wanted the United States to be independent or to reconcile with King George III. The Declaration was met with unique circumstances everywhere it went, and people modified the text along the way. The questions of who experienced the news of independence, when, and how reveal an expansive and complex history of a critical moment in the American Revolution. Published for the 250th anniversary of American independence, When the Declaration of Independence Was News returns to a time before the legacy of these words and the outcome of the war against Great Britain were known to reconsider what the founding of the United States meant to the people who were living through it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

Amy Weitzman interviews Emily Sneff on her new book When the Declaration of Independence Was News and the graduate school experience. In 1776 people could hear the Declaration of Independence proclaimed in public squares and could read it in the pages of their local newspapers. Stories of the Declaration typically recount the work that took place inside the Continental Congress, focusing on the men tasked with drafting the text. Although Congress declared independence, the work of spreading the news involved printers, post riders, ship captains, civic leaders, soldiers, clerks, orators, preachers, diplomats, and translators. When the Declaration of Independence Was News reveals the stories behind how the Declaration was communicated in the United States and around the Atlantic. Tracing the travels of the founding document of the United States from Philadelphia to New York, Boston, Charleston, London, Leiden, Paris, and beyond, Emily Sneff shows how people both celebrated the Declaration and critiqued it. In the weeks after the document was penned, it was printed in the columns of newspapers, translated into German and French, and shared with Native American allies. The document induced some people to make public their privately held beliefs about whether they wanted the United States to be independent or to reconcile with King George III. The Declaration was met with unique circumstances everywhere it went, and people modified the text along the way. The questions of who experienced the news of independence, when, and how reveal an expansive and complex history of a critical moment in the American Revolution. Published for the 250th anniversary of American independence, When the Declaration of Independence Was News returns to a time before the legacy of these words and the outcome of the war against Great Britain were known to reconsider what the founding of the United States meant to the people who were living through it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/communications

Amy Weitzman interviews Emily Sneff on her new book When the Declaration of Independence Was News and the graduate school experience. In 1776 people could hear the Declaration of Independence proclaimed in public squares and could read it in the pages of their local newspapers. Stories of the Declaration typically recount the work that took place inside the Continental Congress, focusing on the men tasked with drafting the text. Although Congress declared independence, the work of spreading the news involved printers, post riders, ship captains, civic leaders, soldiers, clerks, orators, preachers, diplomats, and translators. When the Declaration of Independence Was News reveals the stories behind how the Declaration was communicated in the United States and around the Atlantic. Tracing the travels of the founding document of the United States from Philadelphia to New York, Boston, Charleston, London, Leiden, Paris, and beyond, Emily Sneff shows how people both celebrated the Declaration and critiqued it. In the weeks after the document was penned, it was printed in the columns of newspapers, translated into German and French, and shared with Native American allies. The document induced some people to make public their privately held beliefs about whether they wanted the United States to be independent or to reconcile with King George III. The Declaration was met with unique circumstances everywhere it went, and people modified the text along the way. The questions of who experienced the news of independence, when, and how reveal an expansive and complex history of a critical moment in the American Revolution. Published for the 250th anniversary of American independence, When the Declaration of Independence Was News returns to a time before the legacy of these words and the outcome of the war against Great Britain were known to reconsider what the founding of the United States meant to the people who were living through it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/journalism

Amy Weitzman interviews Emily Sneff on her new book When the Declaration of Independence Was News and the graduate school experience. In 1776 people could hear the Declaration of Independence proclaimed in public squares and could read it in the pages of their local newspapers. Stories of the Declaration typically recount the work that took place inside the Continental Congress, focusing on the men tasked with drafting the text. Although Congress declared independence, the work of spreading the news involved printers, post riders, ship captains, civic leaders, soldiers, clerks, orators, preachers, diplomats, and translators. When the Declaration of Independence Was News reveals the stories behind how the Declaration was communicated in the United States and around the Atlantic. Tracing the travels of the founding document of the United States from Philadelphia to New York, Boston, Charleston, London, Leiden, Paris, and beyond, Emily Sneff shows how people both celebrated the Declaration and critiqued it. In the weeks after the document was penned, it was printed in the columns of newspapers, translated into German and French, and shared with Native American allies. The document induced some people to make public their privately held beliefs about whether they wanted the United States to be independent or to reconcile with King George III. The Declaration was met with unique circumstances everywhere it went, and people modified the text along the way. The questions of who experienced the news of independence, when, and how reveal an expansive and complex history of a critical moment in the American Revolution. Published for the 250th anniversary of American independence, When the Declaration of Independence Was News returns to a time before the legacy of these words and the outcome of the war against Great Britain were known to reconsider what the founding of the United States meant to the people who were living through it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Het is zomer... en in de vijfde en laatste aflevering van de Summerschool vertelt dr. Bert van den Berg van de Universiteit Leiden het verhaal van wat wel het oudste boek van Europa genoemd wordt: de Derveni-papyrus. Een fascinerend verhaal over de vondst van deze papyrus, over de publicatie van een 'pirateneditie' en een uitgebreide blik op de inhoud. Wat leren deze teksten ons over antieke filosofie? Waarom plaatst de tekst Plato in perspectief? Dat en meer bespreken we in de Summerschool!Zomer en seizoen 4Vanaf woensdag 1 juli luister je de hele maand juli naar de 'Summerschool' van Oudheid! De maand augustus staat in het teken van de jaarlijkse 'Zomerspecials' van Oudheid. Op woensdag 2 september start alweer het vierde seizoen van Oudheid... kortom: maak je klaar voor een zomer vol Oudheid!Shownotes

Vinije Haabo groeide op in Pikin Slee, diep in het Surinaamse binnenland. Hij groeide op met de de natuur als leermeester. Later bracht zijn zoektocht naar kennis hem naar Paramaribo en uiteindelijk naar Nederland, waar hij ging studeren in Leiden. Maar die reis betekende ook een confrontatie tussen verschillende werelden: tussen het leven in het bos en de stad, tussen de Saramakaanse cultuur en de Nederlandse samenleving.

Bevor ich für eine Weile weg bin, gibt's noch eine kleine Sonderfolge für euch – mit ein paar Worten zum Abschluss und Neuigkeiten, die ich euch nicht vorenthalten möchte. ☀️ Was sich bei "Bleib entspannt!" gerade tut, warum diese Folge ein bisschen anders ist als sonst, und was euch erwartet, wenn's weitergeht – das erfahrt ihr in dieser Episode. Wie immer gilt: Kuschelt euch ein, macht's euch gemütlich, und lasst euch mitnehmen. ✨ Aktuelle Infos und Updates gibt's auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bleib_entspannt/ ------------------------------------------------- Werbeinformationen: ✨

In many ways this episode is one I really loved because it was like a homecoming of sorts as she had a journey into Boston as did I many decades earlier. Here was a woman who really knows jazz and how to sing it and has the deepest connections with some of the greats in the music. Hearing her stories about her many accomplishments (did I say she is also a therapist and psychologist?) and, above all, seeing and hearing the great achievement of her album, a simply beautiful work of art that literally appears to singlehandedly bring back the record album era made for an episode that was joyous.  This episode is what our podcast is all about.More about the magnificent Vivienne Aerts:Dutch New York-based vocalist, conductor, and composer with a focus on electronics, chocolate, and multi-sensory experience design, as well as a clinical psychologist and faculty at Berklee College of Music in Boston. ( Extended bio available on her beautiful website -www.vivienneaerts.com )Social Links to Ms. Aerts and her new album: www.vivienneaerts.nl/links The story of her new album Current The journey of this album started a couple of years ago. When the world ground to a halt in 2020, I bought a small 1951 mahogany sailboat to disappear into for a while. I renamed it 'De Vouw' which is Dutch for 'The Fold'; a nod to origami, but also to folding the water when it moves. During our early outings, I quickly found out that there is a stillness on the water that could be used as a living studio. There is a natural reverb that I found appealing - it gave a very vivid signature to a recording.In the summer of 2025, we set out to record this album on that same little sailboat. I grew up in this region of the Netherlands, and water has always been around us. My husband grew up on these waters and is an avid sailor, so he knows them like the back of his hand. During this two-week process, I got to use that natural reverb that started it all, but I also learned about the wind, the sun, reeds and all the different birds around me. I learned about my own country by returning to its root: the water. And, I got to know myself a little bit better in the process; who I am, what I need, how my creativity flows, and how much of it I can actually control. Just the two of us on a tiny boat in the middle of the lake, surrounded by nature, feeling both free and strangely stuck at the same time.We traveled from our hometown Leiden, to Lake Braassem, all the way up to Amsterdam and back. Along the way, we met up with saxophonist Susanne Alt on the side of Beatrix Park, and we recorded harmonica player Hermine Deurloo in a secret spot on the canals in the oldest part of Amsterdam. We carried Adinda Meertins' double bass onto De Vouw and drifted into the middle of the lake, where it also ended up serving as a wind blocker. We met friends and family at the small water lock in Roelofarendsveen, the mysterious photographer John Brussel, who lives hidden away in a little cabin on the shores of De Kaag, and we even found a few original Amsterdammers as well.I set out to make an album on the water, but in the end, I made an album with the water, guided by the current. Because when life becomes difficult, sometimes the only thing you can do is move with it. This album is a journey through where my music is right now, a love letter to Dutch waters, and the beginning of a new chapter in my artistry. This is me. This is Current.#jazz #vocalist #singing #kennywerner #piano #effortlessmastery #berkleecollegeofmusic #meditation #selfcompassion #selfesteem #selfcare #selfhelp #lifelonglearning #psychology #improvisation #sound #engineering #choir #chorus #women #feminism #music #alcohn #zootsims #joecohn #billieholiday #boston #nyc #digital #analog #album #shirleyhorne #dominiqueeade #ocean #sea #water #experiemental #belgium #netherlands #chocolate #bakery #baking #food #cuisine

Hannah und ihr Ehemann Brian stecken mitten in einer erbitterten Scheidung. Genau in dieser Phase beginnt Hannah, sich krank zu fühlen – Übelkeit, Krämpfe, eine Erschöpfung, die einfach nicht verschwindet. Und Ausgerechnet jetzt zeigt sich Brian von einer völlig neuen, fürsorglichen Seite: Er kümmert sich um sie, begleitet Hannah zu jedem Arzttermin – und stellt ihr sogar spezielle Vitamine zusammen.Doch Hannahs Zustand verschlechtert sich dramatisch, bis sie im Januar 2022 zusammenbricht.Diese Folge enthält Schilderungen von schwerer Vergiftung, medizinischem Leiden, psychischer Gewalt in einer Ehe sowie das Thema Unfruchtbarkeit.++++Unser Buch: DIE ZEUGEN - Fiktive Ich-Erzähler berichten über ihre Begegnungen mit der dunklen Seite der Täter.

Het is zomer... en in de vierde aflevering van de Summerschool neemt dr. Willemijn Waal van de Universiteit Leiden ons mee naar de wereld van de sprookjes... of beter: een Hettitische sprookje uit de 17de eeuw v. Chr.! Welke bekende en wellicht minder bekende verhaalmotieven komen we tegen in dat sprookje? Wat toont ons dit over de verspreiding van verhalen, door tijd en ruimte? Dat en meer bespreken we in de Summerschool!Zomer en seizoen 4Vanaf woensdag 1 juli luister je de hele maand juli naar de 'Summerschool' van Oudheid! De maand augustus staat in het teken van de jaarlijkse 'Zomerspecials' van Oudheid. Op woensdag 2 september start alweer het vierde seizoen van Oudheid... kortom: maak je klaar voor een zomer vol Oudheid!Shownotes

Het is de dag van de WK-finale. Vanavond strijden Spanje en Argentinië om de wereldtitel. Thierry Boon blikt vooruit met Arno Vermeulen, Arman Avsaroglu en Jeroen Grueter. 

Arend Jan, Rob en Hugo houden een zomerbreak. Maar speciaal voor de leden van Boekestijn & De Wijk PLUS hebben we elke zaterdag iets bijzonders: 'B&W off the record'. Nog geen lid? Ga dan naar www.boekestijnendewijk.nl. Vanaf maandag 17 augustus is Boekestijn en De Wijk weer dagelijks te beluisteren. Over de Podcast Arend Jan Boekestijn en Rob de Wijk gaan onder leiding van Hugo Reitsma op zoek naar de nieuwe wereldorde. Wat betekenen oorlog, machtspolitiek en economische verschuivingen voor Europa en Nederland? In elke aflevering duiken zij in de geopolitieke actualiteit. Genomineerd voor de Zilveren Reissmicrofoon 2026, winnaar van de Dutch Podcast Awards 2022 in de categorie Nieuws & Politiek. Word lid van B&W Plus op boekestijnendewijk.nl voor de zaterdag-podcast, reclamevrij luisteren, en vele extra's! Reageren? Op X: @ajboekestijn en @robdewijk Bluesky: @hugoreitsma.bsky.social Mail: boekestijnendewijk@bnr.nl Over de makers: Arend Jan Boekestijn is een Nederlands historicus en voormalig politicus. Hij studeerde geschiedenis en politieke wetenschappen aan de Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam. Boekestijn is voormalig Tweede Kamerlid (tot 2009). Sinds 1989 is hij verbonden aan de vakgroep geschiedenis van de Universiteit Utrecht en sinds 2016 lid van commissie Vrede en Veiligheid van AIV. Rob de Wijk studeerde eigentijdse geschiedenis en internationale betrekkingen, promoveerde op kernwapenstrategieën, werd hoogleraar in Leiden en richtte in 2007 het Den Haag Centrum voor Strategische Studies op. Hugo Reitsma studeerde rechten en politicologie. Hij werkte eerder als politiek verslaggever en vanuit verschillende conflictgebieden. Hij is auteur van het boek ‘Boekestijn en De Wijk voorspellen de toekomst’ (november 2023).See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Eigentlich war bei Nina und ihrer Ex-Person alles gut – bis die Stimmung plötzlich gekippt ist und dysfunktional wurde. Bei toxischen Beziehungen wird Anziehung oft für Liebe gehalten. Es gibt Warnzeichen, die ungesunde Muster erkennbar machen.**********Ihr hört: Gesprächspartnerin: Nina, hatte bisher keine gesunde Beziehung Gesprächspartnerin: Daniela Holsboer, Literaturwissenschaftlerin und Autorin Gesprächspartner: Christian Hemschemeier, Psychologe, Paartherapeut und Autor Autor und Host: Przemek Żuk Redaktion: Lena Mempel, Jana Niehof, Anton Stanislawski, Friederike Seeger Produktion: Philipp Adelmann**********Quellen:Cavalli, R. G., Feeney, J., Rogier, G., & Velotti, P. (2025). Conceptualizing love addiction within the attachment perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 14(2), 611-629.Sanches, M., John, V.P. (2019). Treatment of love addiction: Current status and perspectives. The European Journal of Psychiatry, 33(1), 38-44.Bradbury, P., Short, E. & Bleakley, P. (2025). Limerence, Hidden Obsession, Fixation, and Rumination: A Scoping Review of Human Behaviour. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 40, 417–426.Willmott, L., & Bentley, E. (2015). Exploring the Lived-Experience of Limerence: A Journey toward Authenticity. The Qualitative Report, 20(1), 20-38.**********Empfehlungen aus dieser Folge:Otto, D. (2018). Lieben, Leiden und Begehren: Wie Filme unsere Beziehungen beeinflussen. Hollywoods geheime Liebesbotschaften entschlüsselt. Springer.Tennov, D. (1979). Love and Limerence: The Experience Of Being In Love. Scarborough House.Bellamy, T. (2025). Smitten: Romantic obsession, the neuroscience of limerence, and how to make love last. Watkins Media Limited. **********Mehr zum Thema bei Deutschlandfunk Nova:High auf Liebe: Wie kommen wir klar, wenn wir einen Crush haben?Delusionship: Wenn wir uns in eine Fantasie verliebenBeziehungen: Warum wir uns nicht auf romantische Liebe fokussieren sollten**********Den Artikel zum Stück findet ihr hier.**********Ihr könnt uns auch auf diesen Kanälen folgen: TikTok und Instagram .**********Meldet euch!Ihr könnt das Team von Facts & Feelings über Whatsapp erreichen.Uns interessiert: Was beschäftigt euch? Habt ihr ein Thema, über das wir unbedingt in der Sendung und im Podcast sprechen sollen?Schickt uns eine Sprachnachricht oder schreibt uns per 0160-91360852 oder an factsundfeelings@deutschlandradio.de.Wichtig: Wenn ihr diese Nummer speichert und uns eine Nachricht schickt, akzeptiert ihr unsere Regeln zum Datenschutz und bei Whatsapp die Datenschutzrichtlinien von Whatsapp.

Het is zomer... en in de derde aflevering van de Summerschool maken we dankzij prof. dr. Alwin Kloekhorst van de Universiteit Leiden kennis met het fascinerende vakgebied van de Taalwetenschap, meer specifiek met het onderzoek naar de Indo-Europese talen! Alwin heeft in deze aflevering van de Summerschool het verhaal meegenomen van de laryngaaltheorie: het verhaal over een doorbraak binnen zijn vakgebied. Dat en meer bespreken we in de Summerschool!Zomer en seizoen 4Vanaf woensdag 1 juli luister je de hele maand juli naar de 'Summerschool' van Oudheid! De maand augustus staat in het teken van de jaarlijkse 'Zomerspecials' van Oudheid. Op woensdag 2 september start alweer het vierde seizoen van Oudheid... kortom: maak je klaar voor een zomer vol Oudheid!Shownotes

Poetin wil doorvechten | Europese luchtverdediging | Trumps triomfboog Oekraïne beschadigt in een gecoördineerde campagne Russische raffinaderijen, havens en wapenfabrieken en zet zo de logistiek rond de Krim en de binnenlandse brandstofvoorziening onder druk. Arend Jan Boekestijn en Rob de Wijk duiden hoe deze droneoorlog de Russische economie raakt en tegelijk de burgerdoden in Oekraïne blijven oplopen. De Europese reactie loopt via extra luchtverdediging, van de Amerikanen of van Oekraïne. Moskou verklaart de ‘speciale operatie’ tot oorlog, fixeert op volledige controle over Donbass en zet de deur juridisch open voor inzet van reservisten en dienstplichtigen. Een anonieme Russische generaal schetst de onrealistische rekruteringscijfers en de bewuste propagandastrategie om het Westen te overtuigen dat Rusland wint. Deze combinatie van interne druk, mobilisatie en retoriek voedt expliciete dreigementen richting een NAVO-land en scherpt de Europese veiligheidscrisis aan. Iran intensiveert ondertussen de confrontatie in de Golf en kan met minimale middelen de Straat van Hormuz vrijwel stilleggen. Amerikaanse bombardementen op raket- en dronecapaciteit verminderen die dreiging nauwelijks, terwijl haviken in Teheran de toon bepalen en onderhandelingen blokkeren. Trump balanceert tussen NAVO-top, Iran-aanvallen en binnenlandse machtspolitiek, en de vraag wordt hoe lang Europa eigen raketschilden en wapenproductie kan opbouwen voordat een nieuwe grote escalatie iedereen raakt. [Samenvatting geschreven door AI en gecontroleerd door mens] Over de Podcast Arend Jan Boekestijn en Rob de Wijk gaan onder leiding van Hugo Reitsma op zoek naar de nieuwe wereldorde. Wat betekenen oorlog, machtspolitiek en economische verschuivingen voor Europa en Nederland? In elke aflevering duiken zij in de geopolitieke actualiteit. Genomineerd voor de Zilveren Reissmicrofoon 2026, winnaar van de Dutch Podcast Awards 2022 in de categorie Nieuws & Politiek. Word lid van B&W Plus op boekestijnendewijk.nl voor de zaterdag-podcast, reclamevrij luisteren, en vele extra's! Reageren? Op X: @ajboekestijn en @robdewijk Bluesky: @hugoreitsma.bsky.social Mail: boekestijnendewijk@bnr.nl Over de makers: Arend Jan Boekestijn is een Nederlands historicus en voormalig politicus. Hij studeerde geschiedenis en politieke wetenschappen aan de Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam. Boekestijn is voormalig Tweede Kamerlid (tot 2009). Sinds 1989 is hij verbonden aan de vakgroep geschiedenis van de Universiteit Utrecht en sinds 2016 lid van commissie Vrede en Veiligheid van AIV. Rob de Wijk studeerde eigentijdse geschiedenis en internationale betrekkingen, promoveerde op kernwapenstrategieën, werd hoogleraar in Leiden en richtte in 2007 het Den Haag Centrum voor Strategische Studies op. Hugo Reitsma studeerde rechten en politicologie. Hij werkte eerder als politiek verslaggever en vanuit verschillende conflictgebieden. Hij is auteur van het boek ‘Boekestijn en De Wijk voorspellen de toekomst’ (november 2023).See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Was de NAVO-top geslaagd? | Kan Poetin het Westen wel verrassen? | Oekraïens NAVO-lidmaatschap Arend Jan Boekestijn en Rob de Wijk fileren Trumps optreden op de NAVO-top in Ankara, waar holle taal en Groenland-provocaties de geloofwaardigheid van de Amerikaanse veiligheidsgarantie aantasten. Ze schetsen hoe Europa en Oekraïne tegelijk sterker uit de top komen, maar ook hoe ver de trans-Atlantische relatie inmiddels is uitgehold. Rob de Wijk plaatst de Russische dreiging in de context van ‘fase nul’: militaire opbouw langs NAVO-grenzen, grootschalige sabotage en hybride operaties richting Europese infrastructuur. De analyse benadrukt dat de inlichtingenpositie van het Westen redelijk is, maar geen reden tot geruststelling biedt, omdat Poetin juist profiteert van Europese escalatie-angst en politieke zwakte. Boekestijn en De Wijk verkennen scenario’s rond NAVO-lidmaatschap van Oekraïne, vetorechten voor Poetin en een mogelijk rompstaatscenario met bevroren conflict. Ze bespreken hoe de NAVO en EU omgaan met een toekomstige, assertieve Oekraïense staat, de rol van nucleaire garanties en de spanning tussen rechtvaardigheid, machtspolitiek en het zoeken naar een uitweg uit de oorlog. [Samenvatting geschreven door AI en gecontroleerd door mens] Over de Podcast Arend Jan Boekestijn en Rob de Wijk gaan onder leiding van Hugo Reitsma op zoek naar de nieuwe wereldorde. Wat betekenen oorlog, machtspolitiek en economische verschuivingen voor Europa en Nederland? In elke aflevering duiken zij in de geopolitieke actualiteit. Genomineerd voor de Zilveren Reissmicrofoon 2026, winnaar van de Dutch Podcast Awards 2022 in de categorie Nieuws & Politiek. Word lid van B&W Plus op boekestijnendewijk.nl Voor de zaterdag-podcast, reclamevrij luisteren, en vele extra's! Reageren? Op X: @ajboekestijn en @robdewijk Bluesky: @hugoreitsma.bsky.social Mail: boekestijnendewijk@bnr.nl Over de makers: Arend Jan Boekestijn is een Nederlands historicus en voormalig politicus. Hij studeerde geschiedenis en politieke wetenschappen aan de Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam. Boekestijn is voormalig Tweede Kamerlid (tot 2009). Sinds 1989 is hij verbonden aan de vakgroep geschiedenis van de Universiteit Utrecht en sinds 2016 lid van commissie Vrede en Veiligheid van AIV. Rob de Wijk studeerde eigentijdse geschiedenis en internationale betrekkingen, promoveerde op kernwapenstrategieën, werd hoogleraar in Leiden en richtte in 2007 het Den Haag Centrum voor Strategische Studies op. Hugo Reitsma studeerde rechten en politicologie. Hij werkte eerder als politiek verslaggever en vanuit verschillende conflictgebieden. Hij is auteur van het boek ‘Boekestijn en De Wijk voorspellen de toekomst’ (november 2023).See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Stroke in children and younger adults differs significantly from adult stroke, with varied presentations and a broader range of underlying causes such as congenital heart disease and arteriopathies. This episode highlights key diagnostic considerations and evolving approaches to treatment in these younger populations. In this episode, Aaron L. Berkowitz, MD, PhD, FAAN, speaks with Thalia S. Field, MD, FRCPC, MHSc, coauthor of the article "Stroke in Children and Younger Adults" in the Continuum® June 2026 Cerebrovascular Disease issue. Dr. Berkowitz is a Continuum® Audio interviewer and a professor of neurology in the Department of Neurology at the University of California, San Francisco, in San Francisco, California. Dr. Field is a professor at the University of British Columbia and the Sauder Family Heart and Stroke Professor of Stroke Research, and a stroke neurologist at the Vancouver Stroke Program, Vancouver Coastal Health in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Additional Resources Read the article: Stroke in Children and Younger Adults Subscribe to Continuum®: shop.lww.com/Continuum Earn CME (available only to AAN members): continpub.com/AudioCME Continuum® Aloud (verbatim audio-book style recordings of articles available only to Continuum® subscribers): continpub.com/Aloud More about the American Academy of Neurology: aan.com Social Media facebook.com/continuumcme @ContinuumAAN Host: @AaronLBerkowitz Full episode transcript available here Dr Berkowitz: Most neurologists are used to evaluating and treating adults with stroke since it's one of the most common neurologic conditions. But stroke can also occur in children, in infants, and even in utero. Today, I have the privilege of interviewing Dr. Thalia Field to talk about pediatric stroke.  Dr Jones: This is Dr. Lyell Jones, Editor-in-Chief of Continuum. Thank you for listening to Continuum Audio. Be sure to visit the links in the episode notes for information about earning CME, subscribing to the journal, and exclusive access to interviews not featured on the podcast.  Dr Berkowitz: This is Dr. Aaron Berkowitz, and today I'm interviewing Dr. Thalia Field about her article on stroke in children and younger adults. This article appears in the June 2026 Continuum issue on cerebrovascular disease. Welcome to the podcast, Dr. Field, and could you please introduce yourself to our audience?  Dr Field: Well, thanks so much. It's a pleasure to, uh, be speaking to you. I'm a stroke neurologist, and I treat adults generally. My wonderful colleague, Thivya Selvanathan, who's a neonatal neurologist, co-wrote the chapter with me. We do, unfortunately, have to treat some children with stroke collaboratively and I do advise on those cases. My practice is about one-quarter clinical, so I treat patients with acute stroke, look after them on the wards, see patients in stroke prevention clinic, and the rest of my time is mainly research and some administrative work and teaching. I run the clinical trials program for the Vancouver Stroke Program, and I do research of my own, mainly focused on stroke in younger adults. We previously did a trial and registry on cerebral venous thrombosis, and more recently, I've been running a national study looking at brain health in adults and children with congenital heart disease.  Dr Berkowitz: Fantastic. Wow, that is a lot that you do, and we'll look forward to the results of some of those studies. So, when adults suffer a stroke, they typically present with sudden onset focal neurologic deficits, very common scenario we're consulted on.  And one thing you and your colleague talk about in the article is that strokes can present differently in infants and in young children. Can you talk a little bit about the differing clinical presentations of stroke in the youngest young as compared to our usual experience treating the older adults?  Dr Field: Sure. So, you know, speaking about this as someone who doesn't see the children directly but has had the opportunity to discuss these patients with my colleagues and, like we all do, learn about it during our training, I think one of the distinctions, especially with neonates, is that it's generally not a presentation with focal neurologic deficits. Often these babies will have seizures or encephalopathy as their main presentation, and sometimes we're only finding out after the fact if they're presenting with developmental delay or early preference for handedness and hypotonia, things like that. So, in very young children, that's a distinction. And in older children, there can be sudden onset deficits and, and unfortunately, sometimes these are mistaken for other conditions that are more common in children, like seizures. But sometimes you can have a more indolent course, say, with something like a focal cerebral arteriopathy or something like that. So, it depends on the scenario, but the big difference primarily is in neonates, as far as I understand.  Dr Berkowitz: Perfect. That's very helpful. So as an adult neurologist, when I think about causes of stroke or teach sort of the categories of causes of stroke to our residents and students, when we think about the evaluation of stroke, I divide them broadly into causes related to the heart, causes related to the blood vessels, and causes related to the blood with, in the adult world, the most common things, of course, being atrial fibrillation for the heart, atherosclerosis for the blood vessels, and then risk factors for atherosclerosis in the blood, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, very rarely picking up a hypercoagulable disorder in the blood column. And reading your article, it seems that, correct me if I'm wrong, stroke in young adults, stroke in the pediatric population can basically be organized into those same broad categories, heart, blood vessels, and blood, just that there's many more conditions on the differential diagnosis that you would consider in young adults to begin with and then children and then neonates as we get into the younger and younger population. So, I'd like to talk about each of these sort of buckets of etiology in turn and ask you about some of the causes we would consider in young adults and children in each of these, and then as they come up, probably ask you more questions about how frequently we find these sorts of things, how frequently they're the cause of stroke treatment, et cetera. So, let's start with the heart. As I said, in adults, we're mostly looking for rhythm disorders, right, atrial fibrillation. Sometimes we'll pick up a patent foramen ovale or PFO or other structural abnormalities, but mostly we're thinking about atrial fibrillation. But reading your paper, I was struck by the huge variety of conditions that you might be looking for in the heart in children or infants with stroke. So, can you tell us a little more about cardiac etiologies of stroke in the young?  Dr Field: Yeah. So, I'd say unlike in older adults, where it tends more often to be a rhythm disorder, in children and adults who are younger, it's primarily a structural cause, and congenital heart disease being the most common. And it changes a little bit from younger adults shifting downwards in age to younger children in terms of the fact that often if we're seeing an adult with stroke related to congenital heart disease, it can be a paradoxical embolism from a previously undiagnosed PFO. Not in all cases, but fortunately this is improving over time. You know, generally people with diagnoses of more severe congenital heart disease are followed up from childhood and people are aware of the diagnosis, and hopefully they're being managed and watched for things like premature arrhythmias or depressed heart function or other things that can develop and require their own distinct antithrombotic management, for example. In young children, however, more severe causes of congenital heart disease tend to more frequently be associated with stroke. And in many cases, those strokes can be early on in life or associated, say, with perioperative complications or other iatrogenic-related causes in, in that way. Again, congenital heart disease can be associated with stroke at, at any point in the life course. But as adult neurologists, most frequently we're seeing very simple lesions like PFO with large shunts, and in children, it tends to be the more complex causes of congenital heart disease.  Dr Berkowitz: Got it. So, let's move on to the blood vessels. Again, in adults, we're usually thinking about atherosclerotic disease, be that of the cervical arteries or of the intracranial arteries. But in your paper, a lot of discussion about the various vasculopathies, arteriopathies that can be cause of stroke in younger adults and in children. Could you talk a little bit more about some of the vasculopathies and vascular conditions that are causes of stroke in the younger population?  Dr Field: Sure. Before I do that, I will say that especially in older younger adults, particularly over the age of thirty-five, and you know, kind of makes me shudder that that's an older younger adult. But, um, in, in any case, certainly conventional vascular risk factors are more common in this population with stroke, especially in those who don't have PFO-associated stroke. Like conventional atherosclerosis, you know, certainly is a cause of stroke in younger adults. But that being said, certainly other vascular causes and vasculopathy in particular is a much more common cause of stroke in younger adults and, and children than it is in older adults. In particular, dissection is an extremely common cause of stroke in younger adults. Generally cervical artery dissection from non-inflammatory vasculopathy, usually on, sometimes on the FMD fibromuscular dysplasia spectrum and, and sometimes, you know, provoked by minor trauma or something post-infectious that may make the vessels a little bit more susceptible. And in younger children, this inflammatory focal cerebral arteriopathy is a distinct cause that is a common cause of stroke in, in young children. There are other causes that can affect the blood vessels, you know, rarer things like vasculitis and vasculopathies that can develop in the context, say, of sickle cell anemia. But in general, as a bucket, vessels are still very important, but the pathology tends to shift.  Dr Berkowitz: Got it. And you, um, alluded to a point that I wanted to ask you about. You mentioned the sort of, there's stroke in the young, and then where do you draw the line at young? Less than sixty, less than thirty-five, and then we've also talked about strokes as young as before the age of birth. Yeah, I'm remembering, is it the Helsinki study, one of the early large series of stroke in younger individuals? I think that, was it eighteen to forty-nine in that or fifty-nine? I don't remember the exact age, but being struck reading that paper as a resident and thinking about the workup for exotic causes we do, right, and when a young patient has a stroke. And correct me if I'm wrong, the most common etiologies of stroke in that series, and I'm curious the other large series yourself have been involved with, have still been vascular risk factors and arrhythmias and things that we, even common, quote unquote, common things in the young, such as dissection or hypercoagulable states. Uh, the things that we sort of tend to think about first are actually less common. But acknowledging that that paper has folks up to the late forties when the vascular risk factors may be, um, unfortunately kicking in earlier, uh, and earlier due to dietary and lifestyle factors. So is that true, or do you have sort of an age cutoff when it's, we say stroke in the young, people sort of think, "Oh, they'd work someone up differently if they're less than sixty, and they have no vascular risk factors or few vascular risk factors." When do we start getting into the kind of younger population where atherosclerosis and cardiac arrhythmias are not number one and two?  Dr Field: I'd say first of all, you and I must have trained around the same time because I was also in my training, really struck by the results of the Helsinki study going, "Wow, I, I really didn't know how much of a role these conventional vascular risk factors still play." And I think we're seeing that information reiterated, unfortunately, like even with higher prevalences and more attributable risk in some of the newer series. There are newer European series looking at stroke in younger adults, and more recently, there's been one that we mentioned in the article from the Florida Stroke Registry. And it's true that generally the burden is in the older younger adults. But what I would say overall in terms of kind of how things guide the workup, you need to look at the patient and consider things. I mean, obviously you don't want to miss things that can be treated differently and identified by tests easily. You know, things like ruling out syphilis or antiphospholipid antibody disease in, in younger patients. You really want to make sure that that's not something that, that you'd miss because, you know, obviously your treatment is going to change. However, certainly we start with the basics for stroke workup in any patient that's coming in. At my center, CT angiography. Some centers it may be MR angiography and echocardiography. We take a careful history. We look at the blood work. We look at the vascular risk factor burden. We find out if there's kind of any worrisome personal history, family history, look at their general health context. I think that really helps to guide how far we go in a particular workup, and it also helps to direct the other investigations and types of follow-up we need to do. For example, if a patient has a fairly suspicious story for dissection, let's say they're getting over a cold, and they went to the gym, and, you know, there was a sudden movement that they did that really produced headache and neck pain, and there's an obvious cervical artery dissection. I'm not going to go too far down testing them for rare infections and doing advanced cardiac imaging unless something shows up on their initial echo, for example. But I will make an effort to do more detailed vascular imaging of the rest of their body, find out careful family history. If there's additional manifestations of a non-inflammatory vasculopathy elsewhere, say consider sending them to medical genetics, or obviously, if this is, you know, a second event, your flags raise even more. So, it really depends on the patient. If I find out that there's, you know, a family history of premature cardiac disease and things like that, you know, obviously we're gonna be keeping a close eye on their cholesterol, making sure that we're not identifying, for example, familial hypercholesterolemia, which is, you know, something that comes up not infrequently where we'll see an LDL in an untreated patient of more than five. I apologize, you're gonna have to do the conversion to American units on that. But there are things we identify and, you know, again, you don't want to fall solely on heuristics and your preconceived notion of, of the patient. You do have to consider the results of the investigations that you do order. But I think you can certainly be mindful in terms of how you direct your workup and in turn, how you direct your follow-up.  Dr Berkowitz: That's great to hear your approach. Yeah, as you said, our approach always begins with the same, coming back to these three categories, right? Doing some type of structural imaging of the heart, rhythm monitoring for the heart, and then vascular imaging of the head and neck. And then I was going to ask you, and you sort of began to answer this question. Yeah. What's next and how far do you go? I think most people think the expanded stroke workup in the young is at a minimum, a TEE if there's been no signal thus far on the original workup. I just mentioned and you spoke about, and then probably hypercoagulable testing and only sending arterial side if there's no shunt and venous and arterial side if there's a shunt. Is that your second pass approach or did I miss anything, or are there other nuances there that are helpful to discuss?  Dr Field: No, I think that's generally in keeping with what I do. I think with TEE being very important. I mean, the first pass are arterial stuff. Really, it's antiphospholipid antibodies and, and making sure there's no cancer. Like you said, only if there's a shunt do I pursue other venous hypercoagulability testing. Again, you [chuckles] kind of reiterate, go through with the history, make sure there's kind of no red flags. And sometimes, obviously, you do your best reasonable job with the first pass workup, and you will find out when someone presents with a second event that it's something very unexpected. Maybe first manifestation, someone with no obvious history and very initially normal-looking imaging, say with, with CATASL or something like Fabry's disease or something where you would consider it if there was kind of a more classical picture. But it wouldn't be something you would do kind of on your first or even second pass workup in the absence of any sort of clinical suspicion, family history, or something along those lines.  Dr Berkowitz: I'm curious just as far as rough percentage. I feel like many of these patients we see it's a patient who's young and who's had a stroke, and the initial first pass has been unremarkable, and we do our TEE, and we do our hypercoagulable workup. Again, antiphospholipid antibodies only if it's-- there's no shunt. And if there's a shunt, adding on some of the venous hypercoagulability protein C, protein S, factor five, Leiden, et cetera. A lot of the times I feel like we don't find anything. What's your sort of general gestalt? Again, as a general neurologist who does a lot of inpatient neurology, I feel like when these cases come up, it's not that common that you say, "Oh, I actually diagnosed protein S deficiency." Or every once in a while, diagnose an antiphospholipid antibody, or you'll find a PFO on TEE. You didn't find on TT. I've maybe found one fibroelastoma in many years. How often do you find something? How often is it just as an adult a cryptogenic stroke in a young adult or child?  Dr Field: So much of what we see is PFO-related, dissection-related, conventional vascular risk factor-related. We do send referrals to medical genetics. Sometimes we'll do testing for rare things like Fabry's or consider other diagnoses. But I mean, those tend to be the exceptions. About one in four to one in five young adults with stroke end up with this cryptogenic label. I like to keep them on my radar for a few reasons. I think, one, it produces tremendous anxiety for them to not have a cause of stroke identified and just to kind of have a generic approach to secondary prevention. So, I think just to kind of keep an eye on them, manage their anxieties each year, make sure there's kind of no updates in, in terms of general secondary preventionAnd sometimes just things dawn on you later or there are new conditions, say things like, you know, DADA2, this, you know, adenosine deaminase deficiency. You know, there are new diagnoses that, that come on the radar. And sometimes treatments change. You know, for example, when I was starting my early career, the evidence hadn't yet been in place for PFO closure, and then all of a sudden, the paradigm completely changed. And you want to make sure that you can get in touch with those patients to reconsider your approach at the time. So I realize that not everybody has the luxury of extended follow-up with their patients, but I think often you can kind of encourage them or their healthcare team or just, you know, patient themselves to keep in touch periodically just to make sure that there haven't been any changes in treatment paradigms or just with your own awareness of particular, you know, diagnoses or, or just kind of readdressing the situation, uh, a year after and seeing if there's anything that may have occurred to you in the interim.  Dr Berkowitz: Perfect. Really illuminating to hear your approach to these challenging cases. And as you said here and then a couple of times, I think, in this interview is in many of these cases it's your first pass, maybe even your second pass, you haven't found anything. And the key is, unfortunately, as distressing as it may be for the patient as well as for us to not have an answer, to just keep following these patients. And sometimes you really can't sort it out until something else happens, either neurologically or systemically, where you say, "Oh, that's what this was." But there would've been no way to know it from the first presentation. So, we've talked a lot about the diagnosis of causes of stroke in younger adults and children. And in the last minute or two here, I just wanted to talk a little bit about treatment. You mentioned early on that you're involved in thrombectomy cases in children. What's the state of evidence or at least state of practice in terms of offering therapies like thrombolysis and thrombectomy in our patient population? I guess it would be under 18, right, who is not studied in the major trials. Do we have evidence and, or in the absence of evidence, what's sort of the, the expert guidance on treating young adults under 18 and children with some of these acute therapies?  Dr Field: So, trying to keep up with the literature on this. You know, certainly the evidence has been more established in a small trial and pediatric registries for use of tPA, tissue plasminogen activator, in children just because, you know, it's been around much longer. In terms of tenecteplase, which I, I really think signifies a, a practice shift in adult stroke because of its, you know, non-inferior efficacy and ease of use and potentially better rates of recanalization over time. In children, to my knowledge, that evidence base is, is limited to case series and anecdotal shifts in availability of drug and, and different practices. So, the evidence base is not particularly strong for tenecteplase in children who are identified within a reasonable amount of time who are still otherwise candidates for thrombolysis, you know, thrombolysis in children. Children who are a little bit older, I think, can't remember the exact age, but generally very young, like neonates, children who are under the age of two, I believe. I would want to double-check that thrombolysis is less commonly used and just because the safety has not really been that well-established. And for thrombectomy, it's now recommended to use thrombectomy in otherwise eligible children in the newest AHA guidelines. It gets a little bit more controversial in very young children. Under the age of six, there's less of an evidence base and, and often it will depend on people's level of comfort in terms of the size of the arteries. It's my understanding that once you get to about age six, the artery diameter is similar to that in fully grown people. But in younger children, I think just because of the catheters, there can be risk of, of injury. So, it's more of a case-by-case conversation with your interventionalist for younger children. And again, the evidence to intervene is not there for very, very young babies, for example.  Dr Berkowitz: That's very helpful to hear the current state of the evidence and the current state of practice, acknowledging, of course, there's not that much evidence, and these are relatively uncommon occurrences, fortunately, for children, but making it challenging for practitioners and practices may, um, vary based on different institutional protocols. So again, today I've been interviewing Dr. Thalia Field about her article on stroke in children and younger adults. This article appears in the June 2026 Continuum issue on cerebrovascular disease. Be sure to check out Continuum Audio episodes from this and other issues. And thank you to our listeners for joining us today.  Dr Monteith: This is Dr. Teshamae Monteith, Associate Editor of Continuum Audio. If you've enjoyed this episode, you'll love the journal, which is full of in-depth and clinically relevant information important for neurology practitioners. Use the link in the episode notes to learn more and subscribe. AAN members, you can get CME for listening to this interview by completing the evaluation at continpub.com/audioCME. Thank you for listening to Continuum Audio.

Trump ontspoort opnieuw bij de NAVO | Oekraïne mag Patriot-raketten produceren | Akkoord met Iran “voorbij” Trump zet tijdens de NAVO-top in Ankara de alliantie onder druk met aanvallen op Europese bondgenoten, twijfels over artikel vijf en een tirade over Iran. Arend Jan Boekestijn en Rob de Wijk fileren hoe Mark Rutte hem intussen blijft vleien met cijfers over Europese defensie-uitgaven, terwijl Groenland en Spanje publiekelijk worden afgebrand. De NAVO presenteert zich nog als waardegemeenschap, maar een top in Erdogan’s Ankara met Trump aan tafel maakt dat verhaal steeds holler. Europa versterkt tegelijk zijn eigen defensiepositie met miljarden aan nieuwe contracten en een duidelijke verschuiving richting Europese en Oekraïense wapensystemen. Saab verdringt Boeing bij radarvliegtuigen, Airbus levert zware transporters en twaalf Europese landen pompen 44 miljard euro in raketproductie. Zelensky sluit dronedeals en krijgt een Patriot-licentie, waardoor Oekraïne uitgroeit tot wapenleverancier in plaats van alleen ontvanger. Oekraïense drones raken ondertussen massaal Russische olietankers, raffinaderijen en energie-infrastructuur op de Krim en diep in Rusland. De enorme omvang van Rusland verandert van strategisch voordeel in kwetsbaarheid, terwijl de Zwarte Zeevloot zich terugtrekt en de logistiek naar Kherson piept en kraakt. Tegelijk escaleert de schaduwoorlog tussen de VS en Iran rond de Straat van Hormuz, met raketten, olieprijsstijgingen en oplopende rentes als signaal dat de geopolitieke rekening nog lang niet is voldaan. [Samenvatting geschreven door AI en gecontroleerd door mens] Over de Podcast Arend Jan Boekestijn en Rob de Wijk gaan onder leiding van Hugo Reitsma op zoek naar de nieuwe wereldorde. Wat betekenen oorlog, machtspolitiek en economische verschuivingen voor Europa en Nederland? In elke aflevering duiken zij in de geopolitieke actualiteit. Genomineerd voor de Zilveren Reissmicrofoon 2026, winnaar van de Dutch Podcast Awards 2022 in de categorie Nieuws & Politiek. Word lid van B&W Plus op boekestijnendewijk.nl voor de zaterdag-podcast, reclamevrij luisteren, en vele extra's! Reageren? Op X: @ajboekestijn en @robdewijk Bluesky: @hugoreitsma.bsky.social Mail: boekestijnendewijk@bnr.nl Over de makers: Arend Jan Boekestijn is een Nederlands historicus en voormalig politicus. Hij studeerde geschiedenis en politieke wetenschappen aan de Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam. Boekestijn is voormalig Tweede Kamerlid (tot 2009). Sinds 1989 is hij verbonden aan de vakgroep geschiedenis van de Universiteit Utrecht en sinds 2016 lid van commissie Vrede en Veiligheid van AIV. Rob de Wijk studeerde eigentijdse geschiedenis en internationale betrekkingen, promoveerde op kernwapenstrategieën, werd hoogleraar in Leiden en richtte in 2007 het Den Haag Centrum voor Strategische Studies op. Hugo Reitsma studeerde rechten en politicologie. Hij werkte eerder als politiek verslaggever en vanuit verschillende conflictgebieden. Hij is auteur van het boek ‘Boekestijn en De Wijk voorspellen de toekomst’ (november 2023).See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Normalisering van Russische aanvallen | Hoe de NAVO en de EU moeten reageren op Russische prikacties | De escalatieladder Boekestijn en De Wijk duiden hoe Rusland met zware raketaanvallen op Kiev en andere steden de Oekraïense bevolking probeert te breken, terwijl het Westen militair en politiek beperkt kan reageren. Arend Jan Boekestijn en Rob de Wijk schetsen hoe uitgeputte voorraden, schaarse Patriot-raketten en vermenging van burger- en militaire doelen de westerse handelingsruimte verder inperken, met groeiende spanningen in Europese publieke opinies als gevolg. De NAVO discussieert ondertussen over mogelijke Russische prikacties tegen bondgenoten, van sabotage tot beperkte grensschendingen in het Hoge Noorden. Rob de Wijk legt uit hoe artikel 4 en artikel 5, de escalatieladder en opties als cyberaanvallen elkaar raken, zeker als de Verenigde Staten aarzelen en Europese landen hun eigen coalities moeten smeden. De kernwapendrempel komt ook nadrukkelijk in beeld nu Rusland vaker nucleair dreigt en de klassieke taboes uit de Koude Oorlog vervagen. De Wijk bespreekt hoe afschrikking alleen werkt als inzet van kernwapens geloofwaardig blijft, terwijl politieke druk, interne verdeeldheid en Poetin’s calculaties het risico op misrekening vergroten, wat deze aflevering ongemakkelijk actueel maakt. [Samenvatting geschreven door AI en gecontroleerd door mens] Over de Podcast Arend Jan Boekestijn en Rob de Wijk gaan onder leiding van Hugo Reitsma op zoek naar de nieuwe wereldorde. Wat betekenen oorlog, machtspolitiek en economische verschuivingen voor Europa en Nederland? In elke aflevering duiken zij in de geopolitieke actualiteit. Genomineerd voor de Zilveren Reissmicrofoon 2026, winnaar van de Dutch Podcast Awards 2022 in de categorie Nieuws & Politiek. Word lid van B&W Plus op boekestijnendewijk.nl Voor de zaterdag-podcast, reclamevrij luisteren, en vele extra's! Reageren? Op X: @ajboekestijn en @robdewijk Bluesky: @hugoreitsma.bsky.social Mail: boekestijnendewijk@bnr.nl Over de makers: Arend Jan Boekestijn is een Nederlands historicus en voormalig politicus. Hij studeerde geschiedenis en politieke wetenschappen aan de Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam. Boekestijn is voormalig Tweede Kamerlid (tot 2009). Sinds 1989 is hij verbonden aan de vakgroep geschiedenis van de Universiteit Utrecht en sinds 2016 lid van commissie Vrede en Veiligheid van AIV. Rob de Wijk studeerde eigentijdse geschiedenis en internationale betrekkingen, promoveerde op kernwapenstrategieën, werd hoogleraar in Leiden en richtte in 2007 het Den Haag Centrum voor Strategische Studies op. Hugo Reitsma studeerde rechten en politicologie. Hij werkte eerder als politiek verslaggever en vanuit verschillende conflictgebieden. Hij is auteur van het boek ‘Boekestijn en De Wijk voorspellen de toekomst’ (november 2023).See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Een kat in het nauw… | NAVO bijeen in Ankara | China’s nucleaire arsenaal Rusland voert zware raket- en droneaanvallen uit op Kyiv, terwijl Oekraïne diep in Rusland olieraffinaderijen en schaduwvloot-schepen bestookt, wat de oorlog verder escaleert. Arend Jan Boekestijn en Rob de Wijk duiden Poetins opschepperij over terreinwinst rond Kostjantynivka als desinformatie die de Russische wanhoop maskeert en wijzen op het risico van horizontale escalatie richting NAVO-grondgebied. De openlijke oorlogsretoriek van Dmitri Peskov maakt mobilisatie juridisch makkelijker en vergroot de druk in een samenleving die al worstelt met benzinetekorten. De NAVO-top in Ankara draait om geld, luchtverdediging en het managen van Donald Trump als nieuwe Amerikaanse president. Zelensky vraagt Patriot-systemen en langdurige financiële steun, terwijl Europese landen nieuwe drone-samenwerkingen met Oekraïne sluiten en Ursula von der Leyen miljarden voor luchtverdediging bepleit. Rob de Wijk schetst hoe Trump onvrede over NAVO-bestedingen en Iran-beleid kan gebruiken om bondgenoten als Italië en Spanje onder druk te zetten, terwijl Mark Rutte balanceert tussen paaien en tegenwicht bieden. In het Midden-Oosten verzwakt Iran de Oman-route en vergroot de greep op de Straat van Hormuz, zonder dat de olieprijs direct reageert. De interne machtsstrijd tussen ultrahaviken, pragmatische haviken en Khameneis kamp vertraagt nucleaire onderhandelingen met de VS, terwijl de begrafenisretoriek richting Saoedi-Arabië, Qatar en Turkije de regionale spanningen voedt. Tegelijkertijd demonstreert China met een raket-lancering vanuit een kernonderzeeër in de Pacific zijn versnelde nucleaire modernisering, wat de wapenwedloop met de VS en de druk op Australië, Japan en Nieuw-Zeeland verder opvoert en de luisteraar met nieuwe zorgen achterlaat. [Samenvatting geschreven door AI en gecontroleerd door mens] Over de Podcast Arend Jan Boekestijn en Rob de Wijk gaan onder leiding van Hugo Reitsma op zoek naar de nieuwe wereldorde. Wat betekenen oorlog, machtspolitiek en economische verschuivingen voor Europa en Nederland? In elke aflevering duiken zij in de geopolitieke actualiteit. Genomineerd voor de Zilveren Reissmicrofoon 2026, winnaar van de Dutch Podcast Awards 2022 in de categorie Nieuws & Politiek. Word lid van B&W Plus op boekestijnendewijk.nl voor de zaterdag-podcast, reclamevrij luisteren en vele extra's! Reageren? Op X: @ajboekestijn en @robdewijk Bluesky: @hugoreitsma.bsky.social Mail: boekestijnendewijk@bnr.nl Over de makers: Arend Jan Boekestijn is een Nederlands historicus en voormalig politicus. Hij studeerde geschiedenis en politieke wetenschappen aan de Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam. Boekestijn is voormalig Tweede Kamerlid (tot 2009). Sinds 1989 is hij verbonden aan de vakgroep geschiedenis van de Universiteit Utrecht en sinds 2016 lid van commissie Vrede en Veiligheid van AIV. Rob de Wijk studeerde eigentijdse geschiedenis en internationale betrekkingen, promoveerde op kernwapenstrategieën, werd hoogleraar in Leiden en richtte in 2007 het Den Haag Centrum voor Strategische Studies op. Hugo Reitsma studeerde rechten en politicologie. Hij werkte eerder als politiek verslaggever en vanuit verschillende conflictgebieden. Hij is auteur van het boek ‘Boekestijn en De Wijk voorspellen de toekomst’ (november 2023).See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Aujourd'hui heureusement ça va mieux, mais pendant longtemps, les gauchers étaient dénigrés et réprimés. On faisait quelques exceptions, par exemple pour des Léonard de Vinci, Michel-Ange et autres Beethoven, mais pour tous les autres la vie n'était pas facile ! Croyances, préjugés, persécutions…d'où ça vient ?Bonne écoute !

Vergelding over en weer tussen Moskou en Kyiv | Russische activiteit aan de Baltische grens | Trump zet de NAVO-top op scherp Russische raket- en droneaanvallen op Kyiv en andere Oekraïense steden escaleren met nieuwe Geran-3 drones en meer ballistische wapens, terwijl beide partijen in een vergeldingslogica terechtkomen. Arend Jan Boekestijn en Rob de Wijk duiden hoe de Oekraïense luchtverdediging onder druk komt, de verliezen aan Russische zijde exploderen en de strijd verschuift naar strategische aanvallen en vestingsteden in Donetsk. Oekraïne intensiveert tegelijk de druk op de Krim door energie- en brandstofinfrastructuur aan te vallen, wat de positie van Vladimir Poetin en zijn ‘heldendaad’ uit 2014 direct raakt. Rob de Wijk schetst hoe nieuwe nucleaire wetgeving in Litouwen en Finland de spanning langs de NAVO-Russische grens opvoeren. De Russische blokkade van spoorovergangen naar Letland, Estland en Finland en troepenopbouw aan de grens voeden zorgen over verdere destabilisering in het Baltische gebied. Deze reeks schijnbaar kleine stappen vormt volgens Boekestijn en De Wijk een patroon van geleidelijke escalatie dat Europese veiligheid direct raakt. In het NAVO-dossier plaatsen zij Trumps aanval op het bondgenootschap, zijn dreigende taal over Iran en zijn eisen rond 3,5% defensie-uitgaven in de aanloop naar de top in Ankara. Arend Jan Boekestijn, Rob de Wijk en Hugo Reitsma bespreken hoe Nederland en Europa reageren, welke rol Mark Rutte en Turkije spelen en wat er gebeurt als Amerika zich verder naar de uitgang van de NAVO manoeuvreert. Het beeld van een steeds onbetrouwbaarder Amerikaanse veiligheidsgarantie maakt de discussie over Europese defensie urgent en prikkelt de verbeelding over hoe Ankara kan aflopen. [Samenvatting geschreven door AI en gecontroleerd door mens] Over de Podcast Arend Jan Boekestijn en Rob de Wijk gaan onder leiding van Hugo Reitsma op zoek naar de nieuwe wereldorde. Wat betekenen oorlog, machtspolitiek en economische verschuivingen voor Europa en Nederland? In elke aflevering duiken zij in de geopolitieke actualiteit. Genomineerd voor de Zilveren Reissmicrofoon 2026, winnaar van de Dutch Podcast Awards 2022 in de categorie Nieuws & Politiek. Word lid van B&W Plus op boekestijnendewijk.nl voor de zaterdag-podcast, reclamevrij luisteren, en vele extra's! Reageren? Op X: @ajboekestijn en @robdewijk Bluesky: @hugoreitsma.bsky.social Mail: boekestijnendewijk@bnr.nl Over de makers: Arend Jan Boekestijn is een Nederlands historicus en voormalig politicus. Hij studeerde geschiedenis en politieke wetenschappen aan de Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam. Boekestijn is voormalig Tweede Kamerlid (tot 2009). Sinds 1989 is hij verbonden aan de vakgroep geschiedenis van de Universiteit Utrecht en sinds 2016 lid van commissie Vrede en Veiligheid van AIV. Rob de Wijk studeerde eigentijdse geschiedenis en internationale betrekkingen, promoveerde op kernwapenstrategieën, werd hoogleraar in Leiden en richtte in 2007 het Den Haag Centrum voor Strategische Studies op. Hugo Reitsma studeerde rechten en politicologie. Hij werkte eerder als politiek verslaggever en vanuit verschillende conflictgebieden. Hij is auteur van het boek ‘Boekestijn en De Wijk voorspellen de toekomst’ (november 2023).See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Shifting the Focus Sobald dein Nervensystem darauf konditioniert ist, das Leiden anderer nicht nur wahrzunehmen, sondern es stellvertretend mitzutragen, trittst du jeder Begegnung aus der alten Märtyrer-Frequenz entgegen. Verbindung wird dann unbewusst an die Bedingung geknüpft, dass etwas von dir geopfert werden muss. In dieser transformierenden Frequenzheilungs-Session lösen wir diese tief verwurzelten co-abhängigen Strukturen im Nervensystem im Bereich 1D-3D unseres multidimensionalen Lichtkörpers. Wir expandieren uns dann bewusst über den Herzraum in höhere verkörperte Realitäten, in denen wahre Heilung geschehen kann. Dein Nervensystem lernt ab 5D automatisch, Lasten natürlich zurückzugeben, Co-Abhängigkeit sanft loszulassen und sich neu auf Erfüllung in Beziehungen auszurichten. Sehr kraftvoll. Happy Self-Healing! Ludwig Worte der Achtsamkeit: Ich bin kein Arzt, Therapeut oder Heilpraktiker , stelle keine Diagnosen und gebe keine Heilversprechen. Die Informationen in dieser Session werden nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen weitergegeben. Sie sind ausschließlich für Interessierte und zur Fortbildung gedacht und keinesfalls als Diagnose- oder Therapieanweisungen zu verstehen. Bei Verdacht auf Erkrankungen konsultiere bitte deinen Arzt oder Heilpraktiker. Meine Arbeit hat das Ziel, spirituelle Transformation & energetisches Wohlbefinden durch körperzentrierte Frequenzveränderung zu initiieren und kann keine konventionellen Therapiemethoden ersetzen. Sie richtet sich an spirituell Interessierte und “energiefühlige” Menschen

The sisters are elated to dialogue with two revolutionary artists, Charlotte Brathwaite and Malick Welli. They share their love for art and one another and how their practices intersect with community, history, and transformation.Charlotte is an award-winning artist, creative director, and theater director whose work moves across performance, spectacle, and immersive experience. Working across theater, opera, film, dance, installation, and site-specific performance, Brathwaite creates cross-disciplinary projects that bring narrative, sound, movement, and space into close relationship. Her genre-defying practice centers the histories, realities, and imagined futures of communities that have been historically excluded, engaging questions of power, race, social justice, and collective memory.Malick is a Senegalese visual artist who lives and works in Dakar. His work lies at the intersection of fine art, photography and installation. His work has recently been shown at the National Museum of World Cultures in Leiden, Netherlands, and at the Chanel Fashion house's 19M gallery. Welli is interested in religion, spirituality, power dynamics and how they shape visual culture. His work has been exhibited at 1-54 Contemporary African Art Fair (USA); Art X Lagos ( Nigeria) EXPO CHGO (USA); Cairo Biennial (Egypt); AKAA (Also Known As Africa, France), among others. His work is included in the permanent collection of the Chazen Museum of Art (USA). ---⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TRANSCRIPT⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠---⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SUPPORT OUR SHOW⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/Endoftheworldshow---HTS ESSENTIALS⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SUPPORT Our Show on Patreon⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/Endoftheworldshow⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠PEEP us on IG⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/endoftheworldpc/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠