Podcasts about adverse possession

We welcomed back Laura Montgomery, atty for an action packed discussion on her policy and law wish list for space this year and for the new administration. We talked about two key items on her wish list. The first was for her to see an Executive Order issuing clarification for Article 6 of the OST. She explained the matter at hand and its an important and necessary event needing to happen on her wish list. In addition, we talked about space property rights. Here, Laura suggested we see if we can apply our terrestrial Adverse Possession laws to the Moon/space. For sure you don't want to miss this discussion which took place near the end of our program. We had two callers and several email listener questions. Please read the full summary of this program when available at www.thespaceshow.com for this date, Friday, March 14, 2025.

Should you start a Guild?In this episode, Squirrel and Jeffrey discuss examples of adverse possession, including listener Marcel-Jan's experience of starting a Python guild within his team, and how you can take similar proactive steps to help build a more engaging and dynamic community of practice. Links: Co-conspirators episode: https://soundcloud.com/troubleshootingagile/co-conspirators-and-citcon Adverse possession: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dsquirrel_squirrel-squadron-events-activity-7015965093418934272-1qZf/ -------------------------------------------------- You'll find free videos and practice material, plus our book Agile Conversations, at agileconversations.com And we'd love to hear any thoughts, ideas, or feedback you have about the show: email us at info@agileconversations.com -------------------------------------------------- About Your Hosts Douglas Squirrel and Jeffrey Fredrick joined forces at TIM Group in 2013, where they studied and practised the art of management through difficult conversations. Over a decade later, they remain united in their passion for growing profitable organisations through better communication. Squirrel is an advisor, author, keynote speaker, coach, and consultant, and he's helped over 300 companies of all sizes make huge, profitable improvements in their culture, skills, and processes. You can find out more about his work here: douglassquirrel.com/index.html Jeffrey is Vice President of Engineering at ION Analytics, Organiser at CITCON, the Continuous Integration and Testing Conference, and is an accomplished author and speaker. You can connect with him here: www.linkedin.com/in/jfredrick/

Allen Clark

Property Law What is Property? Property is a legally protected interest in something tangible or intangible. It can be classified into real property (land and attachments) and personal property (movable items and intangible rights). The Bundle of Rights Theory views property rights as a collection of individual rights, including possessing, using, excluding others from, and transferring ownership. History of Property Law Property law originated from English common law and developed through feudalism, market economies, and American colonial history. The feudal system transitioned into a system of private ownership. In American history, property law played a role in nation-building (Homestead Act of 1862) but was also used to dispossess Native Americans and justify slavery. Ways to Acquire Property First Possession, Adverse Possession, Discovery, Capture, Creation, Gift Key Doctrines and Concepts Estates and Future Interests, Rule Against Perpetuities, Co-Ownership Key Concepts in Property Ownership and Possession, Legal and Equitable Ownership Land Use and Zoning Regulations and Laws, Zoning Controversies Government's Power Over Property Eminent Domain, Kelo v. City of New London (2005) Private Land Use Controls Easements, Covenants, Equitable Servitudes, Nuisance Law Transfer of Property Voluntary Transfers, Involuntary Transfers, Contracts for Sale and Escrow, Title Searches and Insurance Mortgages and Financing Mortgage, Types, Foreclosure, Key Considerations Landlord-Tenant Law Types of Tenancies, Landlord Obligations, Tenant Obligations, Disputes and Protections Intellectual Property as Property Intellectual Property (IP), Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, Trade Secrets, Ownership and Licensing, Emerging Issues Environmental and Natural Resource Law Regulatory Frameworks, Natural Resource Management, Policy Debates Policy Considerations and Reforms Access to Affordable Housing, Equity in Property Ownership, Technological Innovations, Proposed Reforms

Hon. Gordon H. Piper of the Massachusetts Land Court explains the land court's history and jurisdiction in the state, excerpted from MCLE's 4/10/2024 live webcast: Lawyer's Roadmap to the Land Court. The full program is available as an on-demand webcast or an MP3 here.  Get 24/7 instant access to hundreds of related eLectures like this one—and more—with a subscription to the MCLE OnlinePass. Learn more at www.mcle.org/onlinepass and start your free trial today! Connect with us on socials!Instagram: mcle.newenglandBluesky: mclenewengland.bsky.socialLinkedIn: Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. (MCLE│New England)Facebook: MCLE New EnglandX (Formerly Twitter): MCLENewEngland

En P360 Radio, la Cónsul General de México en San Francisco, California, Ana Luisa Vallejo Barba invitó a la comunidad a participar en las actividades que se llevan acabo en el consulado, como el mes de la salud, el Mercadito Virtual y visitar la exposición “Treasures of Adverse Possession”. Este programa corresponde al 24 de septiembre de 2024, sintonízanos en vivo en la 1010 AM en San Francisco y 990AM para Sacramento.

“AdVerse Possession” by Karl Lykken Manawaker’s Patreon: https://patreon.com/manawaker/ Manawaker books: https://payhip.com/Manawaker More info / Contact CB Droege: https://cbdroege.taplink.ws Author Bio: Karl Lykken writes stories and software in Texas. His work has appeared in Overtime (a chapbook series by Blue Cubicle Press), Love Letters to Poe, and Daily Science Fiction.

Send us a Text Message.We've all seen the videos on social media.  A landlord or developer shows up to their vacant investment property to find someone has moved in and is claiming they have the right to be there.Last week we discussed what squatting and adverse possession are and how it can affect your rental property.This week we are talking about what to do if a squatter moves into your rental and how to protect yourself from it even happening in the first place.Worried this might happen to you?  Give this episode a listen to see how you can reduce that risk!LINKS

Send us a Text Message.This is a hot topic in many areas right now!From property lot lines to someone actually gaining entry to your property and living there, many real estate investors have to be very careful about what you buy, how you manage the land and the structure, and protecting your vacant property.In this episode we are talking about the law behind squatting, also known as adverse possession.  We will discuss the history behind it, where it has gone wrong, and what some states are now rushing to do and correct the problem.This is a two-part podcast episode.  This week is all about what it is and how it can affect your rental property.  Next week we will discuss what to do if a squatter moves into your rental and how to protect yourself from it even happening in the first place. LINKS

Crogga Gas Field latest, Bishop's vote could go, Registrar General on Adverse Possession, Assisted Dying legislation & farming struggles continue. It's Update with Andy Wint #iom #news #manxradio

“Trespassing plus time equals adverse possession,” Paul Golden writes in his new book, Litigating Adverse Possession Cases: Pirates v. Zombies. When someone has occupied or used a piece of property as though they own it for long enough, a court could determine that they are the rightful owner—regardless of what the paperwork says. It's a concept more popularly discussed as squatter's rights. In this episode of The Modern Law Library, Golden speaks with the ABA Journal's Lee Rawles about the ancient concepts underlying modern adverse possession law; some quirky state laws; and why societies would allow land to be transferred in this way. They also discuss how the plain meaning of terms like “hostile” are changed when used in adverse possession cases, and Rawles raises a hypothetical—taken from real life—of a neighbor's crooked fence. During Golden's first appearance on The Modern Law Library, he explained how the lack of a written contract could be navigated by a savvy lawyer. In his new book, Golden guides attorneys and their clients through the finer points of arguing for and against adverse possession claims. He shares some of the errors he's seen pop up in adverse possession cases, and offers advice for how to avoid common pitfalls. Modern Law Library listeners have been given a promotional discount code for Litigating Adverse Possession Cases: Pirates v. Zombies through May 10, 2024. For 20% off, go to the ABA's online shop and enter LAPC2024 at checkout.

“Trespassing plus time equals adverse possession,” Paul Golden writes in his new book, Litigating Adverse Possession Cases: Pirates v. Zombies. When someone has occupied or used a piece of property as though they own it for long enough, a court could determine that they are the rightful owner—regardless of what the paperwork says. It's a concept more popularly discussed as squatter's rights. In this episode of The Modern Law Library, Golden speaks with the ABA Journal's Lee Rawles about the ancient concepts underlying modern adverse possession law; some quirky state laws; and why societies would allow land to be transferred in this way. They also discuss how the plain meaning of terms like “hostile” are changed when used in adverse possession cases, and Rawles raises a hypothetical—taken from real life—of a neighbor's crooked fence. During Golden's first appearance on The Modern Law Library, he explained how the lack of a written contract could be navigated by a savvy lawyer. In his new book, Golden guides attorneys and their clients through the finer points of arguing for and against adverse possession claims. He shares some of the errors he's seen pop up in adverse possession cases, and offers advice for how to avoid common pitfalls. Modern Law Library listeners have been given a promotional discount code for Litigating Adverse Possession Cases: Pirates v. Zombies through May 10, 2024. For 20% off, go to the ABA's online shop and enter LAPC2024 at checkout.

“Trespassing plus time equals adverse possession,” Paul Golden writes in his new book, Litigating Adverse Possession Cases: Pirates v. Zombies. When someone has occupied or used a piece of property as though they own it for long enough, a court could determine that they are the rightful owner—regardless of what the paperwork says. It's a concept more popularly discussed as squatter's rights. In this episode of The Modern Law Library, Golden speaks with the ABA Journal's Lee Rawles about the ancient concepts underlying modern adverse possession law; some quirky state laws; and why societies would allow land to be transferred in this way. They also discuss how the plain meaning of terms like “hostile” are changed when used in adverse possession cases, and Rawles raises a hypothetical—taken from real life—of a neighbor's crooked fence. During Golden's first appearance on The Modern Law Library, he explained how the lack of a written contract could be navigated by a savvy lawyer. In his new book, Golden guides attorneys and their clients through the finer points of arguing for and against adverse possession claims. He shares some of the errors he's seen pop up in adverse possession cases, and offers advice for how to avoid common pitfalls. Modern Law Library listeners have been given a promotional discount code for Litigating Adverse Possession Cases: Pirates v. Zombies through May 10, 2024. For 20% off, go to the ABA's online shop and enter LAPC2024 at checkout.

Owning a property doesn't mean you automatically have rights to it. If someone can claim they've squatted on the property for many years and you did nothing about it, they may take possession of it with adverse possession laws. So what is adverse possession, and how do you avoid it?  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn about the challenges and progress in fostering neurodiversity inclusion within the legal industry.This week we're super excited to be chatting with Martin Whitehorn, a distinguished property solicitor at Julie West Solicitors. Martin shares his unique journey into law and his subsequent achievements that have positioned him as a trailblazer in the legal community.Martin's impressive legal career has not gone unnoticed. Featured in the Financial Times and named a legal hero by the Law Society in 2023, Martin has garnered attention for his outstanding contributions.He was recognized for his pivotal role in improving neurodiversity inclusion within the legal profession, showcasing his commitment to diversity and equal opportunities.

Distinguished Attorney, Bill Conklin joins Todd & Craig in the Mother-Ship for a discussion on a number of topics including Land Use Rights, Easements, Adverse Possesison, and much more.  Attorney Bill Conklin is a well known Michigan Attorney who has experience in a number of areas of law.  This episosde is informative, fun, high energy, and will not disappoint the listener. Please share, post and listen. ENJOY!!!!!      

We've been receiving a lot of questions about Antonio's story, specifically asking how in the world the adverse possession case was botched.So, for all you legal lovers out there, here is how the simple adverse possession case was botched by Antonio's attorney.  For more details, go to the previous episode to learn how this botched case against the Remax listing agent has led to seven years of harassment, abuse of police and judicial services, racism, and much more!State laws and regulations may vary.Have a story you would like to share with other sellers or buyers?Hit us up here.

This homebuyer story is quite possibly the worst story we have heard when it comes to accountability (or lack of) in the real estate industry.As a kid, Antonio's family would drive through the wealthier part of Kansas City, MO and dream of one day owning a home there.   Some 40  years later, Antonio finally had that chance to buy a home for his parents in that neighborhood.     But what was supposed a dream retirement for his parents, turned into a nightmare when the Remax listing agent of the home he bought (who is also the neighbor) claimed adverse possession on the property she sold them.  Thanks to an incompetent lawyer, what should have been an open and shut case has now stretched out over seven years.   Over those years, Antonio's family encountered a botched contracting job, harassment, racism, alleged blackmail and more!   Yet through all of this, the agent, her broker, and Remax have never been held accountable.  The worst part of this story is that Antonio's father is now ill.   So, what should have been a luxurious, relaxing, happy seven years for his parents in that home, was ruined by the listing agent.  State laws and regulations may vary.Have a story you would like to share with other sellers or buyers?Hit us up here.

5th Romanian beggar gaoled, large vehicle parking petition, adverse possession definition, LoveIOM cards scrapped, Womens T20 goes international & our wonderful Manx rivers. Update with Andy Wint #iom #news #manxradio

“Audrey Hale Male or Female” “Adverse Possession” "Woke Artistic Expression Part 1" "Woke Artistic Expression Part 2"

EP23-048 - Squatter wins Adverse Possession case in court Twitter: @VoicesHead100 Youtube: @VoicesHead100

In this episode of Deserts to Mountaintops, Jessica interviews Olivia Ash, author of the anthology chapter titled "Adverse Possession," where she details her desert to mountaintop experience with her chronic illness. Deserts to Mountaintops is a limited series podcast created by Top 1% ranking podcast host, Jessica Kidwell, she lifts the author off the page as she holds conversations with co-authors of this inaugural anthology released in January 2023 by Soul Speak Press.This series is meant to give readers of DTM a deeper insight into the authors that brought their experiences to the page and hopes to inspire it's audience to a place of transformational healing.Deserts to Mountaintops: Our Collective Journey to (re)Claiming Our Voice is available now on Amazon.For more information on Deserts to Mountaintops, Soul Speak Press and upcoming anthologies, please visit www.desertstomountaintops.com.  For more information Jessica Buchanan, please visit www.jessbuchanan.com or follow her on instagram at @jessicacbuchananMeet Olivia:Olivia “Liv” AshAn artist at heart, teacher by nature, and attorney by profession, Liv believes one of life's greatest gifts is the ability to learn—to grow from within while contributingto life's symphony. Ever learning, Liv holds degrees in Law, Education, and Exercise Science. She's an award-winning published author for her original research in the field of loneliness and law students, seeking to understand why law and other professions struggle with emotional health. Liv holds Indiana licenses in the fields of Law andEducation. She serves as Benefits Compliance Counsel for a national insurance services company where she creates ERISA education content. Liv continues teaching courses in lifestyle wellbeing and curriculum development as Adjunct Faculty in the School of Health and Human Sciences at Indiana University—Indianapolis.Liv's personal journey in managing chronic pain has brought both humility and an appreciation for life's nuances. She believes wisdom resides within struggles, yet so does learning. Liv seeks her own balance and the beauty within each day by spending time in nature while also celebrating the color and style within the arts. Liv cycles for fitness; paints for balance; and writes both poetry and prose. To express, encourage,and enlighten, Liv founded Liv Balanced, LLC, an evolving creative space where visitors may access wellbeing content, purchase prints of Liv's abstract art, or listen to podcast interviews about managing loneliness.Learn more about Liv and her creative projects, including the progress of her memoir, at https://www.livbalanced.net. Contact Liv via Facebook at Liv Balanced, LLC; Instagram@liv_balanced_llc; or email at liv@livbalanced.net.

Support the showIf you would like to discuss legal topics in person, join Law Schoolers Pro at https://lawschoolers.com/law-schoolers-pro/Disclaimers:1. Nearly all of our episodes are unedited. We want to give you raw footage which means that there will be bumps, dings, and some pops.2. The information contained in these episodes are for educational purposes only, not to be used as legal advice.3. If the information is used as legal advice, Law Schoolers is not liable for any legal outcomes.

Support the showIf you would like to discuss legal topics in person, join Law Schoolers Pro at https://lawschoolers.com/law-schoolers-pro/Disclaimers:1. Nearly all of our episodes are unedited. We want to give you raw footage which means that there will be bumps, dings, and some pops.2. The information contained in these episodes are for educational purposes only, not to be used as legal advice.3. If the information is used as legal advice, Law Schoolers is not liable for any legal outcomes.

Segment 1 – What Happens When a House Sits EmptyWe air the Real Estate Voice show every Saturday, if you cannot listen to the whole show, it is available on Barbs' site: BarbHasTheBuyers.com, OR search Barb & most podcasts like IHeart Radio.Every week the Real Estate Voice covers great information about people's primary assets – their home. What will we be covering today?• What Happens When a House Sits Empty• Should I Sell or Rent Out My Home in 2022• Top Questions to Ask Agents When Selling Your Home• Home Selling Checklist - How to Sell Up to 11% More EVEN in a Shifting Market & Hot New ListingsBarb, indications are the housing market is cooling off quickly, some people decide to move out of their homes first, then sell them. What are some issues with doing that?Why Vacate?• Moving• Empty for Estate Sale• Too Hard to Show with Family in Kids and Dogs, etcWhat Could Go Wrong?Adverse Possession. Happened several times to me:• Rave Parties• Squatters Move In• Agents Let Buyers Move in Without permissionWhat Could Go Wrong?Property Gets Damaged:• Weather• Toilets Used• Carpet Pulled Back• Lawn Gets Over Grown – City Fines• Worst of All – Plumbing IssuesWhat We Do:• Visit at Least Weekly• Let the Neighbors Know to Call Us• Put Prominent Signs Up where anyone can reach usCurrent Market Conditions1. Rise in Current Available Inventory of Homes a. Bidding wars are FAR less frequent b. Inventory typically looks like a Bell Curve Jan – Dec2. Real Estate is Very Local!3. Speed of Sale is slowing substantially4. The Days are Gone of SOLD IN A FEW HOURS!CURRENT INVENTORY IS RISING!• Inventory of Available Homes at STILL LOW!• Supply and Demand:All Types of Properties (SFA, TH, Condo, Patio) (up 24% IN 1 MONTH!)• 2398 SF HomesLOW SUPPLY - WEAKENING DEMAND! WHY?Rising Interest RatesConsumer UncertaintyTwo Years of LOW SUPPLY/HIGH DEMAND - Market Swinging to a more even market due to rising interest rates not supply issues!“Mortgage rates near 6% have put a big chill on demand for homes,” said Redfin chief economist Daryl Fairweather. “With home prices still at record highs, the affordability crisis has been dialed up to an 11 out of 10."What's Happening Now!Fewer Buyers Facing CompetitionTo Give Predications we Need to Look at the Leading Indicators and Especially the Local Market:I Think Some Sellers are Looking Backwards at Similar Sales and Expecting More Than They Can Get NowWhat Does This Mean for Sellers?1. Price REALISTICALLY not OPTIMISTICALLY2. You cannot fully rely on Historic Sales to Substantiate what it will sell for NOW.3. Why? Interest Rates! More Competition!The Good News Prices will Still Rise Expectation of Home ValuesYou are listening to the Real Estate Voice with Barb Schlinker of Your Home Sold Guaranteed Realty, if you are thinking of making a move Barb at 719-301-3900 or visit BarbHasTheBuyers.com When we come back we will be discussing: Should I Sell or Rent Out My Home in 2022?#realestatevoice #barbschlinker #coloradosprings #yourhomesoldguaranteedrealtycolorado #barbhasthebuyers

We have my girl, Maria Acosta in the house!   This episode is LOADED with some major nuggets including how to raise money, subject to deals, incorporating social media, and even some adverse possession!  Maria is fearless when it comes to telling everyone what she does for a living, including a pair of police officers that pulled her over!  They both left with her card, by the way. If you are just starting out or have been investing for years, this is a great episode you do NOT want to miss!   Maria Acosta is a full-time Real Estate Investor and Entrepreneur in North Texas. Over the course of the last 5 years, she has managed to fix and flip nearly 30 homes, build a portfolio of 12 rental units, and raise over $1 million dollars in private funding for real estate transactions completed by her company. Not only does Maria invest in TX, but she also invests in states such as MI, OH, and others. Currently, her company has 3 projects scheduled to close that will net $100k as well as 3 more being renovated that will yield similar profits. What's amazing about this is, that Maria just left her corporate job, transitioning full time into real estate last November, and in the first quarter of this year, her business will profit over $100K.  FB - https://www.facebook.com/maria.acosta.355/ IG - https://www.instagram.com/lady_hustle23/   To learn more about Jen Josey, visit www.TheRealJenJosey.com To join REIGN, visit www.REIGNmastermind.com To learn how to flip houses, check out our Free Crash Course: www.tarekscrashcourse.com/jj Join Jen and Maria in Jamaica for The Absolute Best Retreat for real estate investors: https://attend.tabretreat.com/tab-retreat-cancun-5-partner?affiliate_id=3233088

On Episode 79 of Business Law 101, one way to get title to property is through adverse possession – more commonly known as squatting. I am an attorney and speaker as well as the founder and CEO of Claremont Management Group, a consulting firm in Houston, Texas. I'm also a tenured professor, the Cameron Endowed Chair of Management and Marketing, and the Director of Graduate Programs at the University of St. Thomas. Connect with me on LinkedIn [@DavidSchein], Twitter [@DSchein1], Facebook [@AuthorDavidSchein], and YouTube [user/ClaremontManagement]! My latest book, Bad Deal for America, explores the high-stakes game U.S. politicians are playing with the taxpayers' money. The major players, themselves like a deck of cards, have shown us in their own words that the political system is broken. Readers can follow the money to see how some have lived high on the hog while masquerading as public servants. Told in an entertaining and unique way, this book is a call to arms to fulfill the ideals of the founding fathers by holding the political class responsible. My 2018 book, The Decline of America: 100 Years of Leadership Failures, is a thought-provoking, non-partisan book that reviews the last100 years of American Presidents (from Wilson through Obama), offering not just criticism, but common-sense solutions to help fix America before it's too late. I also host the podcast Saving America, where I explore the intersection between business and politics. Remember to subscribe to and rate Saving America and Business Law 101 in your favorite podcast app!

Welcome to Property on Fire, Episode 24. On this show, you'll hear about the collapse of JVIP, and the effect the £17million deficit will likely have on investors. Prompted by this news, and the insightful chat with Neil Briggs on the last episode, Ian reminds us of the importance of due diligence... Whether you're researching a potential JV partner, a mentor, or at the start of any other kind of business arrangement, please do your DUE DILIGENCE! You'll hear more from the drama that's getting Ian stopped in public (and almost gripping the nation)... British Gasgate! Ian's A-Z of Property is BACK, and we're still on A. Today it's "Adverse Possession" you'll find out about. As always, Ian's had many questions land on his desk. This week on Property on Fire, he answers one for Connor about Article 4 blocking S.A's, and one for Max about direct to vendor letters/marketing. ________ A regular podcast from your host Ian Walmsley. Join him every week for a dynamic podcast with Ian and his guests on how to seize the opportunities out there before others do!  You will learn about planning from a developer's eye, you will benefit and learn together from the mistakes that Ian makes. He is very grateful for the opportunities that he has had and would love to share these with you. ________ ABOUT THE HOST Ian Walmsley  is a third-generation experienced developer who loves Planning. Referred to as a ‘Walking Encyclopaedia' by a mentor he developed a passion for planning in 2015 having got fed up with inaccurate information on some websites as to what was possible with property or land that he was looking to develop. In 2017 he set up the site ‘Planning Geek‘ as a way to inform others as to the possibilities of using permitted development rights on both domestic and commercial property. This has now grown to cover many other aspects of planning, giving plenty of ‘wow' moments. To the best of our knowledge, It is now the largest planning website in the UK, apart from the national planning portal. He now speaks around the UK at both property meets and with mentorship groups as a developer/planning geek. As a developer with his company, Leading Homes, he has 40 dwellings under construction with a further 50 plus in legals or pre-construction. The one thing he is not is a Planning Consultant – he is a Planning Geek – although a chartered town planner said ‘Ian knows more about planning than most planners!'. He is simply ‘A developer who loves planning'. As a result he has nothing to sell from his talks, which is always a refreshing change!   CONTACT METHOD Podcast website: https://propertyonfire.co.uk/ (https://PropertyonFire.co.uk) Podcast email: ian@propertyonfire.co.uk Ian's official website: https://ianwalmsley.com/ (https://IanWalmsley.com/) Facebook: https://facebook.com/Ian.C.Walmsley (https://facebook.com/Ian.C.Walmsley) LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/iancwalmsley/ (https://linkedin.com/in/iancwalmsley/) Leading Homes: https://lleadinghomes.co.uk/ (https://LeadingHomes.co.uk) Planning Geek: https://planninggeek.co.uk/ (https://PlanningGeek.co.uk) Planning Geek Facebook Community: https://facebook.com/groups/planninggeek (https://facebook.com/groups/planninggeek) DISCLAIMER The views, thoughts and opinions expressed in this podcast belong solely to the hosts and guest speakers. Please conduct your own due diligence before investing in property, undertaking a new business venture or Joint ventures with new partners.

The process of adverse possession would require a thorough analysis if private property is taken by eminent domain, after which control is given to a private corporation (such as a railroad), and then abandoned. Where land is registered under a Torrens title registration system or similar, special rules apply. It may be that the land cannot be affected by adverse possession (as was the case in England and Wales from 1875 to 1926, and as is still the case in the state of Minnesota) or that special rules apply. Adverse possession may also apply to territorial rights. In the United States, Georgia lost an island in the Savannah River to South Carolina in 1990, when South Carolina had used fill from dredging to attach the island to its own shore. Since Georgia knew of this yet did nothing about it, the U.S. Supreme Court (which has original jurisdiction in such matters) granted this land to South Carolina, although the Treaty of Beaufort (1787) explicitly specified that the river's islands belonged to Georgia. Squatter's rights. Most cases of adverse possession deal with boundary line disputes between two parties who hold clear title to their property. The term "squatter's rights" has no precise and fixed legal meaning. In some jurisdictions the term refers to temporary rights available to squatters that prevent them, in some circumstances, from being removed from property without due process. For example, in England and Wales reference is usually to section 6 of the Criminal Law Act 1977. In the United States, no ownership rights are created by mere possession, and a squatter may only take possession through adverse possession if the squatter can prove all elements of an adverse possession claim for the jurisdiction in which the property is located. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

Most property rights are acquired as part of a transaction as part of a buyer and a seller, with a clear, written description of that property interest. However, there are times when someone may acquire a property interest in land when there has been no formal transaction. If someone follows the following procedures, they may acquire a property through adverse possession. the full article here: https://www.oflaherty-law.com/learn-about-law/adverse-possession-in-iowa O'Flaherty Law now serves over 105 counties across Illinois, Iowa, and Indiana. If you have any questions regarding a case or would like to speak to one of our attorneys after watching a #LearnAboutLaw video, give us a call at (630) 324-6666 or send us an email at info@oflaherty-law.com to get in contact with someone from our team. Subscribe to our channel for daily videos dedicated to all things law and leave a comment with any questions about this topic. Find us online for more legal content and to stay connected with our team - Website: https://www.oflaherty-law.com/ - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/oflahertylaw - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oflahertylaw - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/oflahertylawGroup/ **None of the content in this series is intended as paid legal advice. If someone follows the following procedures, they may acquire a property through adverse possession. This article will discuss: What is #adversepossession? What is the hostile requirement in adverse possession? What is the actual requirement in adverse possession? What is the open requirement in adverse possession? What is the exclusive requirement in adverse possession? What is the continuous possession requirement in adverse possession? What is the claim of right requirement? What is color of title?

Hostile possession. The disseisor must have entered or used the land without permission from the true owner. The disseisor's motivations may be interpreted by the court in several ways, depending upon state law and precedent: Objective view – the land was used without the true owner's permission and in a manner inconsistent with the true owner's rights. Bad faith or intentional trespass view – the land was used with the adverse possessor's subjective intent to disregard or violate the actual property owner's rights. Good faith view – a few states require that the party claiming adverse possession must have mistakenly believed that it is their land. Some jurisdictions permit accidental adverse possession, as might occur as the result of a surveying error that places the boundary line between properties in the wrong location. Renters, hunters or others who enter the land with permission are not taking possession that is hostile to the title owner's rights. (mistaken possession in some jurisdictions does not constitute hostility) Open and notorious use. The disseisor must possess the property in a manner that is capable of being seen. That is, the disseisor's use of the property must be sufficiently visible and apparent that it gives notice to the legal owner that someone may assert claim, and must be of such character that would give notice to a reasonable person. If the legal owner has actual knowledge of the use, this element is met; it can be also met by fencing, opening or closing gates or an entry to the property, posted signs, crops, buildings, or animals that a diligent owner could be expected to know about. Continuous. The disseisor claiming adverse possession must hold that property continuously for the entire statute of limitations period, and use it as a true owner would for that time. Generally, the disseisor's openly hostile possession must be continual (although not necessarily constant) without challenge or permission from the lawful owner, but breaks in use that are consistent with how an owner would use the property will not prevent an adverse possession claim. Occasional activity on the land with long gaps in activity fails the test of continuous possession; courts have ruled that merely cutting timber at intervals, when not accompanied by other actions that demonstrate actual and continuous possession, fails to demonstrate continuous possession. If at any time during the statute of limitations period, the true owner ejects the disseisor from the land either verbally or through legal action, and the disseisor then returns and dispossesses him again, then the statute of limitations period begins anew. The statute of limitations applies only to the disseisor's time on the property, not how long the true owner may have been dispossessed of it (by, say, another disseisor who then left the property). However, if adverse possession is continuous between two or more successive disseisors without interruption, it may be possible for the second disseisor to claim adverse possession for the entire period based upon a legal doctrine known as tacking. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

Adverse possession, sometimes colloquially described as "squatter's rights", is a legal principle under which a person who does not have legal title to a piece of property — usually land (real property) — acquires legal ownership based on continuous possession or occupation of the property without the permission of its legal owner. In general, a property owner has the right to recover possession of their property from unauthorized possessors through legal action such as ejectment. However, in the English common law tradition, courts have long ruled that when someone occupies a piece of property without permission and the property's owner does not exercise their right to recover their property for a significant period of time, not only is the original owner prevented from exercising their right to exclude, but an entirely new title to the property "springs up" in the adverse possessor. In effect, the adverse possessor becomes the property's new owner. Over time, legislatures have created statutes of limitations that specify the length of time that owners have to recover possession of their property from adverse possessors. In the United States, for example, these time limits vary widely between individual states, ranging from as low as three years to as long as 40 years. Although the elements of an adverse possession action are different in every jurisdiction, a person claiming adverse possession is usually required to prove non-permissive use of the property that is actual, open and notorious, exclusive, adverse and continuous for the statutory period. Personal property, traditionally known as 'chattel', may also be adversely possessed, but owing to the differences in the nature of real and chattel property, the rules governing such claims are rather more stringent, and favor the legal owner rather than the adverse possessor. Claims for adverse possession of chattel often involve works of art. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

This episode is also available as a blog post: https://sivaprasadbose.wordpress.com/2021/10/18/what-is-adverse-possession/ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/sivaprasadbose/message

Welcome back to the Law School Toolbox podcast! Today we're talking about adverse possession, which is a commonly-tested issue in Real Property questions on law school exams.  In this episode we discuss: The elements of adverse possession Issues affecting the statutory period analysis The case of Howard v. Kunto Analyzing two hypos involving adverse possession Resources: “Listen and Learn” series (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/law-school-toolbox-podcast-substantive-law-topics/#listen-learn) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, July 2011 (https://nwculaw.edu/pdf/bar/July%202011%20Essays%20and%20Sample%20Answers.pdf) Howard v. Kunto (https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/casebrief/p/casebrief-howard-v-kunto) Podcast Episode 265: Listen and Learn – Constructive Eviction (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/podcast-episode-265-listen-and-learn-constructive-eviction/) Download the Transcript  (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/episode-310-listen-and-learn-adverse-possession/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/law-school-toolbox-podcast/id1027603976) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Law School Toolbox website (http://lawschooltoolbox.com/contact). If you're concerned about the bar exam, check out our sister site, the Bar Exam Toolbox (http://barexamtoolbox.com/). You can also sign up for our weekly podcast newsletter (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/get-law-school-podcast-updates/) to make sure you never miss an episode! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! Today we're talking about adverse possession, which is a commonly-tested issue in Real Property questions on the bar exam.  In this episode, we discuss: The elements of adverse possession Issues affecting the statutory period analysis The case of Howard v. Kunto  Analyzing two hypos involving adverse possession Resources: “Listen and Learn” series (https://barexamtoolbox.com/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-archive-by-topic/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-explaining-individual-mee-and-california-bar-essay-questions/#listen-learn) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, July 2011 (https://nwculaw.edu/pdf/bar/July%202011%20Essays%20and%20Sample%20Answers.pdf) Howard v. Kunto (https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/casebrief/p/casebrief-howard-v-kunto) Podcast Episode 39: Tackling a California Bar Exam Essay: Real Property (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-39-tackling-a-california-bar-exam-essay-real-property/) Podcast Episode 65: Tackling an MEE Real Property Essay Question (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-65-tackling-an-mee-real-property-essay-question/) Podcast Episode 93: Listen and Learn – Constructive Eviction (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-93-listen-and-learn-constructive-eviction/) Podcast Episode 122: Listen and Learn – Easements (Real Property) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-epiusode-122-listen-and-learn-easements-real-property/) Podcast Episode 133: Listen and Learn – Covenants (Real Property) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-133-listen-and-learn-covenants-real-property/) Download the Transcript (https://barexamtoolbox.com/episode-144-listen-and-learn-adverse-possession/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-pass-bar-exam-less-stress/id1370651486) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Bar Exam Toolbox website (https://barexamtoolbox.com/contact-us/). Finally, if you don't want to miss anything, you can sign up for podcast updates (https://barexamtoolbox.com/get-bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-updates/)! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

Subscribe to my Rokfin, Adverse Possession, The Eviction Moratorium, BlackRock, Cuomo's Troubles, Simone Biles vs Charlie Kirk, The Fauci Files & A Neighborhood Feel

In this episode Bob plays guest on his own show as the amazing Sarah Clifford, Esq., interviews him about adverse possession.Adverse possession, basically, is the legal process by which you could lose your land without permission or payment to another party. A squatter! Bob sees this process in action ALL THE TIME, as does Sarah, although when they heard about it back in law school they thought it was old school fiction (think of the adult child that does not inherit the house, but stays in it after the parents pass on, for example and eventually claims it his). Sarah has decided to camp out on Bob's front lawn, cook up some bratwurst, and eventually own his yard. Is That Even Legal?Key Show Notes:Know what you own!What is "adverse possession" and its elements(actual possession; exclusive possession; open and notorious possession; adverse and hostile possession; continuous possession; plus the statutory period)What is Quiet Title?What is Tacking?In Arizona alone, a single adverse possession claim can be asserted for up to 160 acres. Don't be adversely impacted by adverse possession. Listen to Bob.

The Boozy Barrister/Boozy Badger talks about the most basic part of real property law: Deeds.  And in doing so explains why the plot of "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?" is absolute bullshit and Toontown would have, in reality, would have ended up razed to the ground, talks about why Bob is a bastard, discusses the differences in property ownership, reveals lawyers will never avoid an Adverse Possession joke, and curses a LOT.Also discussed is Lin Wood doxxing the bar, the tragedy of people being forced to sell their homes, lawyers punching each other, and a drunken legal opinion.Recorded 2/22/2021If you like the Legal Funhouse, you can support it at Patreon.com/lawyersandliquor, go check out Lawyersandliquor.com, or just rate the sucker fairly (i.e. lie like a dog) on whatever podcast service you use.Support the show (http://www.patreon.com/lawyersandliquor)

For six years, Lisa Even has worked specifically with distressed properties in the Phoenix market. Weird clouds on the title or city violations don’t scare her because those usually mean that the seller is having a harder time getting rid of the property.This particular property was vacant and had a number of city violations, which made it a hot lead because it meant that it wasn’t being taken care of at all. At the time, Lisa went and physically knocked on the door of the woman who filed for probate because that’s how she operated at the time. Up until this time, she’d always operated under the assumption that someone who filed probate was an heir to the estate.Except for this property. The long-time tenant had attempted to quit claim a deed from herself to herself, and you cannot actually do that. Well, you can go buy a form from Office Depot and pretend, but the title company isn’t going to go along with your plan.And yet, even though the quit claim deed wasn’t valid, the long-time tenant did have a verbal agreement and one other very important ace in her sleeve: she’d paid the property taxes for years.Finding the real heir to the property and dealing with another heir that had dollar signs in her eyes was a challenge. And even though the roof was caved in on the property and the house would have to be bulldozed, there was enough potential money in the deal that Lisa kept at it until she had it under contract.What's Inside:—Don’t be scared of visibly distressed properties, or properties with tricky legalities, as long as the spread is big enough.—Why more than one violation makes a property a hotter lead.—How a long-time tenant can gain a claim on a rental property, even if they have no legal contract.

On today's show, we have a very special guest, and that guest to some and maybe a surprise to others that may not be a surprise. She is a new real estate investor, new to the game. She's new to wholesaling and I want to welcome my wife, Stephanie Maloney. Stephanie will provide us a little bit of inspiration and spark to those who are trying to close that first deal that is trying to do things. So let's get some insight on some of the struggles, snd successes on closing this first deal, so don't miss it! Join us. Things You'll Learn from this episode: 6:05 Working with your spouse 7:30 Marketing for that 1st deal what you need to know 9:58 The emotions of not closing a deal for months 11:45 Dealing with deals falling through 14:50 False motivation from sellers 17:02 1st deal phone conversation 21:10 How to verify homeownership 26:00 Adverse Possession what is it? 30:45 Let’s check the numbers on the deal 33:15 Importance of working with a quality team 36:18 Excitement of closing 40:50 Communication and reassuring your seller 42:30 Words of Encouragement (persistence and confidence) Connect with Stephanie Maloney: Facebook   ---------------------------------------------------- Thanks for Listening! And, if you enjoyed this episode, please share it on social media using the social share buttons below, and don't forget to leave a short review on iTunes.  This means a lot to us!  Also, if you want to learn more about real estate wholesaling, feel free to visit my website and youtube channel.  If you get value from the videos and content we’re putting out, please subscribe. GET YOUR FREEBIES: 15Minutes Free Consultation: Purchase Contract:  Assignment Agreement Link:  15 Questions to validate your seller:  JOIN OUR CONVERSATIONS: Facebook:  Facebook group:  Twitter:  Instagram:  Linkedin:  -- GET YOUR TICKETS NOW! Flip Hacking Live:  Also, find the show on Feedspot:  Enjoy the Real Estate Journey!

Hostile possession. The disseisor must have entered or used the land without permission from the true owner. The disseisor's motivations may be interpreted by the court in several ways, depending upon state law and precedent: Objective view – the land was used without true owner's permission and in a manner inconsistent with true owner's rights. Bad faith or intentional trespass view – the land was used with the adverse possessor's subjective intent to disregard or violate the actual property owner's rights. Good faith view – a few states require that the party claiming adverse possession must have mistakenly believed that it is their land. Some jurisdictions permit accidental adverse possession, as might occur as the result of a surveying error that places the boundary line between properties in the wrong location. Renters, hunters or others who enter the land with permission are not taking possession that is hostile to the title owner's rights. (mistaken possession in some jurisdictions does not constitute hostility) Open and notorious use. The disseisor must possess the property in a manner that is capable of being seen. That is, the disseisor's use of the property must be sufficiently visible and apparent that it gives notice to the legal owner that someone may assert claim, and must be of such character that would give notice to a reasonable person. If the legal owner has actual knowledge of the use, this element is met; it can be also met by fencing, opening or closing gates or an entry to the property, posted signs, crops, buildings, or animals that a diligent owner could be expected to know about. Continuous . The disseisor claiming adverse possession must hold that property continuously for the entire statute of limitations period, and use it as a true owner would for that time. Generally, the disseisor's openly hostile possession must be continual (although not necessarily constant) without challenge or permission from the lawful owner, but breaks in use that are consistent with how an owner would use the property will not prevent an adverse possession claim. Occasional activity on the land with long gaps in activity fails the test of continuous possession; courts have ruled that merely cutting timber at intervals, when not accompanied by other actions that demonstrate actual and continuous possession, fails to demonstrate continuous possession. If at any time during the statute of limitations period, the true owner ejects the disseisor from the land either verbally or through legal action, and the disseisor then returns and dispossesses him again, then the statute of limitations period begins anew. The statute of limitations applies only to the disseisor's time on the property, not how long the true owner may have been dispossessed of it (by, say, another disseisor who then left the property). However, if adverse possession is continuous between two or more successive disseisors without interruption, it may be possible for the second disseisor to claim adverse possession for the entire period based upon a legal doctrine known as tacking. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

Adverse possession, sometimes colloquially described as "squatter's rights", is a legal principle under which a person who does not have legal title to a piece of property — usually land (real property) — acquires legal ownership based on continuous possession or occupation of the property without the permission of its legal owner. In general, a property owner has the right to recover possession of their property from unauthorized possessors through legal action such as ejectment. However, in the English common law tradition, courts have long ruled that when someone occupies a piece of property without permission and the property's owner does not exercise their right to recover their property for a significant period of time, not only is the original owner prevented from exercising their right to exclude, but an entirely new title to the property "springs up" in the adverse possessor. In effect, the adverse possessor becomes the property's new owner. Over time, legislatures have created statutes of limitations that specify the length of time that owners have to recover possession of their property from adverse possessors. In the United States, for example, these time limits vary widely between individual states, ranging from as low as three years to as long as 40 years. Although the elements of an adverse possession action are different in every jurisdiction, a person claiming adverse possession is usually required to prove non-permissive use of the property that is actual, open and notorious, exclusive, adverse and continuous for the statutory period. Personal property, traditionally known as 'chattel', may also be adversely possessed, but owing to the differences in the nature of real and chattel property, the rules governing such claims are rather more stringent, and favor the legal owner rather than the adverse possessor. Claims for adverse possession of chattel often involve works of art. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

Did you know you can claim ownership of someone else's land without paying a cent for it? It's called adverse possession and it's a property law principle under Section 60 of the Transfer of Land Act. Paul Cott, Principal at Law on Lydiard, warns that your own land could be claimed through adverse possession. He explains why that's possible and outlines your options if that were to occur. lawonlydiard.com.au See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Join us as Rob Walton delves into some quirky parts of Florida law (Adverse Possession and Unlawful Detainer) that could really have an adverse impact on your real estate ownership and real estate investing. Eric shares his own personal story of how he learned about unlawful detainer when he found somebody squatting in his house. In this case, Eric worked with Rob Walton who worked to quickly get the squatter out.   Others are not so lucky. And still others find themselves in an adverse possession situation in which another person who has trespassed on their property ends up occupying it and gaining legal ownership of the property (also known as legally stealing the property).   Rob Walton can help with these types of cases as well as with Florida land trust planning, landlord/tenet eviction type cases, and he can help with litigation if needed. 

Politics & Philosophy

Learn about stealing shit the legal way!

Politics & Philosophy

Politics & Philosophy

Adverse possession, otherwise known as "squatter's rights" is a topic that is controversial and often misunderstood.  When can a person claim ownership of another's real property based upon open, notorious use over a certain period of time?  That's the topic that Amber Miller is here to discuss today. Claiming title to land owned by another is not easy, and adverse possession is disfavored by courts.  Thus, a person seeking ownership of property based upon a claim of adverse possession must be able to prove a number of required elements.  For persons seeking to claim adverse possession based upon agricultural uses such as grazing or farming, these requirements are extremely specific and exacting.  We walk through the different types of adverse possession in Texas, the elements that much be proven for each, and give some examples from case law on how this works in the real world.   Contact Info for Amber Miller (Website) https://www.cdmlaw.com/attorneys/amber-s-miller/  (Email) amiller@cdmlaw.com  (Twitter) https://twitter.com/BradyAmber    Links to Topics Mentioned on the Show - Ag Law in the Field Episode #5 - Amber Miller (Business Entity Considerations for Farms and Ranches) - Blog Post:  Does Grazing Cattle for Years Allow Claim of Adverse Possession? - Blog Post:  Opinion Outlines Adverse Possession Law - Parker v. Weber - Parker v. McGinnes  

Imagine a complete stranger suddenly owning title to your property—while you’re still living on it! It’s known as Adverse Possession. And it can happen. In certain circumstances a trespasser can enter your property, occupy it, and then gain legal claim to it. So what exactly is Adverse Possession? How does it end up in court? And what is the test for a trespasser to qualify for ownership? Before you start building walls around your home, JDSA Attorney Matthew Hitchcock informs us about something most of us didn’t know was a thing, in this podcast titled Adverse Possession – When Trespassers Become Property Owners.

Today we take a Deeper Dive into the Un-Sexy, yet Extremely Important, details that can make or break your rental property investments: - why you should always have an Attorney review your Contracts - the importance of Title Companies when you buy a Property - how to avoid Adverse Possession - the Hostile Takeover of your Property - How you can Profit from having a Cell Tower on your Property - How to avoid Land Contract Disasters Brian Durham is a Real Estate Agent and Office Manager for Precision Real Estate. He's also finished law school and is in the process of taking the bar exam. Brian has a background in Telecommunications, business management, and tenant law. In this episode, Brian shares how his first home presented a unique and lucrative profit potential when a large grocery store chain made him an offer he couldn't refuse, what happened when a house he sold on land contract burned down, and why he sees the strong housing market continuing for another two to three years. I know you'll gain a lot of in-depth real estate knowledge from today's conversation. Please take a moment to go to itunes to give us a review & rating. To contact Brian: facebook: Precision Real Estate llc 616-299-5777 bdurham5@gmail.com And share your Real Life Ghost Story by emailing Brian Hamrick @ brian@higinvestor.com

On this episode of Court Appointed, Mike and Tommy cover the inside and outside of Adverse Possession. Who does this and why? Also, what's everyone so adverse to? Sometimes all you can say is "U-sucka-pea-o" ........ Say What??? The Court is now in Session with music, "Doctor, Lawyer, Indian Chief" by MCRB.

Changes in motorcycle journalism, AGV's new top of the line helmets, Quentin's new job at Alta Motors, and the Russians investing in MV Agusta...all things you'll learn about in this episode of the Two Enthusiasts Podcast.

How We Started Buying Land 90s Jack Butala: How We Started Buying Land 90s. Leave us your feedback for this podcast on iTunes and get the free ebook at landacademy.com, you don't even have to read it. Thanks for listening. Jack Butala: Jack Butala with Jill DeWit. Jill DeWit: Hello. Jack Butala: Welcome to our show today. In this episode Jill and I talk about how we started buying land in the 90s. I was forced to tell my own story a couple of days ago and Jill liked it so much she's going to make me do it on the air again. Jill DeWit: Love it. Jack Butala: Before we get into it, first lets take a question posted by one of our members on LandAcademy.com, the online community there. It's free. Jill DeWit: Cool. Ted asked, "I have a parcel in New Mexico ... Excuse me, Minnesota, that I've currently got sold on a contract for deed. The buyer has been looking to getting some permits and the county has alerted him that there's a fee owner on the title from way back in 1972. Apparently, when they parceled out a larger piece of property it wasn't done correctly so this guy is on the titles of this parcel and all the neighboring parcels and he passed away in 1995. It wasn't an issue 3 owners before me until now. Is this something that probate would clear up or a quick title action? What should I do?" Jack Butala: Excellent, Ted. This is a great question. It's probably even a PhD level question, at least master's degree for sure. I think that you and I ... I'm really glad we're doing this on the air. We alluded to answering this question on our weekly call on Thursday for our members, but the thick of it is this: It sounds to me like you need to do a Quiet Title action. I know in Minnesota, I did a bunch of research for you, and I found out that it's called Adverse Possession. In Minnesota they don't actually call it Quiet Title. The first thing I would do is, like I suggested to you pretty much in private, I would contact an attorney and just have a consultation. There's several law firms that pop right up in Google that rectify situations like this. On the thick of it or on the front end of this it sounds really scary, like, oh my gosh, I'm going to lose all this money, I sold the property, I did something wrong. I really don't think it's really that complicated. I really would just consult with an attorney and if you do end up having to do what's in effect a Quite Title action or Adverse Possession action, all it really is is just following the statutes. You have to literally put notice in the newspapers for a certain amount of time and then file a bunch of court documents. The whole thing probably takes 3 to 6 months. If nobody responds to the posting in the newspaper, because I'm not sure people read newspapers anymore. Jill DeWit: Isn't that funny. It's funny that it's still a formality, but you still have to do it. Okay. Jack Butala: In the end, you're done. At that point, by the way, you have what I think, this is my opinion, now you have an insurable piece of property, what some people call Marketable Title. Is is a little bit of a wrench? Yeah, but you know what's going to end up happening too is you're going to find out how easy this is and now you're going to seek property out, because there's a ton of property that's just sitting around because this makes everybody really afraid. This will open up Minnesota acquisitions for you too. Jill DeWit: That's very true, once you figure these things out. I agree. It's funny, some of these terms, it's easy to go, oh no, it sounds so big and scary. No it's not. There's ways around it. Is anybody trying to pull a fast one or do anything? No. The guy's not here anymore, it's just a formality. Jack Butala: It's a formality, Jill. Jill DeWit: It is. Jack Butala: Exactly. Well said. Jill DeWit: We get hung up on these sometimes. You can work through it. You know what? You just have to call sometimes,

How We Started Buying Land 90s Jack Butala: How We Started Buying Land 90s. Leave us your feedback for this podcast on iTunes and get the free ebook at landacademy.com, you don't even have to read it. Thanks for listening. Jack Butala: Jack Butala with Jill DeWit. Jill DeWit: Hello. Jack Butala: Welcome to our show today. In this episode Jill and I talk about how we started buying land in the 90s. I was forced to tell my own story a couple of days ago and Jill liked it so much she's going to make me do it on the air again. Jill DeWit: Love it. Jack Butala: Before we get into it, first lets take a question posted by one of our members on LandAcademy.com, the online community there. It's free. Jill DeWit: Cool. Ted asked, "I have a parcel in New Mexico ... Excuse me, Minnesota, that I've currently got sold on a contract for deed. The buyer has been looking to getting some permits and the county has alerted him that there's a fee owner on the title from way back in 1972. Apparently, when they parceled out a larger piece of property it wasn't done correctly so this guy is on the titles of this parcel and all the neighboring parcels and he passed away in 1995. It wasn't an issue 3 owners before me until now. Is this something that probate would clear up or a quick title action? What should I do?" Jack Butala: Excellent, Ted. This is a great question. It's probably even a PhD level question, at least master's degree for sure. I think that you and I ... I'm really glad we're doing this on the air. We alluded to answering this question on our weekly call on Thursday for our members, but the thick of it is this: It sounds to me like you need to do a Quiet Title action. I know in Minnesota, I did a bunch of research for you, and I found out that it's called Adverse Possession. In Minnesota they don't actually call it Quiet Title. The first thing I would do is, like I suggested to you pretty much in private, I would contact an attorney and just have a consultation. There's several law firms that pop right up in Google that rectify situations like this. On the thick of it or on the front end of this it sounds really scary, like, oh my gosh, I'm going to lose all this money, I sold the property, I did something wrong. I really don't think it's really that complicated. I really would just consult with an attorney and if you do end up having to do what's in effect a Quite Title action or Adverse Possession action, all it really is is just following the statutes. You have to literally put notice in the newspapers for a certain amount of time and then file a bunch of court documents. The whole thing probably takes 3 to 6 months. If nobody responds to the posting in the newspaper, because I'm not sure people read newspapers anymore. Jill DeWit: Isn't that funny. It's funny that it's still a formality, but you still have to do it. Okay. Jack Butala: In the end, you're done. At that point, by the way, you have what I think, this is my opinion, now you have an insurable piece of property, what some people call Marketable Title. Is is a little bit of a wrench? Yeah, but you know what's going to end up happening too is you're going to find out how easy this is and now you're going to seek property out, because there's a ton of property that's just sitting around because this makes everybody really afraid. This will open up Minnesota acquisitions for you too. Jill DeWit: That's very true, once you figure these things out. I agree. It's funny, some of these terms, it's easy to go, oh no, it sounds so big and scary. No it's not. There's ways around it. Is anybody trying to pull a fast one or do anything? No. The guy's not here anymore, it's just a formality. Jack Butala: It's a formality, Jill. Jill DeWit: It is. Jack Butala: Exactly. Well said. Jill DeWit: We get hung up on these sometimes. You can work through it. You know what? You just have to call sometimes,

Whenever you go looking for a home, you try to find the perfect one. Does it have enough room, what style is it, can you see this place as a home? What about the neighborhood? Is it kid-friendly or do college student light it up at night? But when you find that perfect dream home, you see you and your family as part of it and it's a part of you. Or is it? Join me and Jess Hanna as we discuss his book Adverse Possession and talk about the growing area of Christian spec fiction. Join me by calling in at 646-668-8485, press 1 to be live on air. Or you can click on the link here: http://tobtr.com/8229551. Tune In!

Story: "Adverse Possession (Excerpt)" by Jess HannaGenre: Horror, SupernaturalRating: PG-13 The Forresters have found their dream home… So has something else. ----more---- Credits: "Adverse Possession (Excerpt)" by Jess Hanna JessHanna.comFacebookTwitter Purchase Adverse Possession Works by Jess Hanna:"If It Causes You To Sin" (Free eBook)Adverse PossessionThe Road to Hell Support us on Patreon

From far northern climes, we are joined by Sarah Schindler, land use and property expert, hipster scholar, and lawn destroyer. In this episode we discuss Maine, backyard chicken raising, zoning, Brasília, the virtues and pleasures of law-breaking, and banning lawns. Sponsored this week by the Monsanto Corporation. Not really. This show’s links: Sarah Schindler’s faculty profile (http://mainelaw.maine.edu/faculty/profiles/schindler.html) and writing (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1099143) Errata! Jukkasjärvi and its ice hotel (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jukkasjärvi) are in Sweden, not Finland. Apologies to our Swedish listeners. Aaron Perzanowski, Tattoos and IP Norms (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2145048) David Fagundes, Talk Derby to Me: Intellectual Property Norms Governing Roller Derby Pseudonyms (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1755305) Hella Blitzgerald (http://classiccityrollergirls.com/about/skaters/hella-blitzgerald) Sarah Schindler, Of Backyard Chickens and Front Yard Gardens: The Conflict Between Local Governments and Locavores (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2030526) backyardchickens.com (http://www.backyardchickens.com); City of Longmont Backyward Chicken Hen Permit (http://www.ci.longmont.co.us/planning/permits/documents/henpermit.pdf) Some articles on local food and energy: USDA Economic Research Service, Energy Use in the U.S. Food System (http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err94.aspx#.UtnMXHn0C2w); Stephen Budiansky, Math Lessons for Locavores (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/20/opinion/20budiansky.html); Wikipedia on Local Food (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_food) Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8376015914752485063) Brasília (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brasilia) US PIRG, Transportation and the New Generation (http://www.uspirg.org/sites/pirg/files/reports/Transportation%20%26%20the%20New%20Generation%20vUS_0.pdf) Nicole Stelle Garnett, Redeeming Transect Zoning? (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2188084) Tiebout Model (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiebout_model) Paula Franzese, Privatization and its Discontents: Common Interest Communities and the Rise of Government for the Nice (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=871289) St. Augustine Confessions, Book 2, Chapter 6 (http://www.ourladyswarriors.org/saints/augcon2.htm#chap6) (“I stole those simply that I might steal, for, having stolen them, I threw them away. My sole gratification in them was my own sin, which I was pleased to enjoy; for, if any one of these pears entered my mouth, the only good flavor it had was my sin in eating it.”) Scott James on illegal pop-Up restaurants (https://www.baycitizen.org/columns/scott-james/underground-dining-illegal-tasty/) Eduardo M. Peñalver and Sonia Katyal, Property Outlaws (http://www.amazon.com/Property-Outlaws-Squatters-Protesters-Ownership/dp/0300122950) Adverse Possession (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverse_possession): trespassing until it’s yours Guerrilla bike lanes in Cleveland (http://www.cleveland.com/architecture/index.ssf/2013/08/guerrilla_stripers_add_bike_la.html), New York (http://untappedcities.com/2013/09/25/guerrilla-bike-lanes-appear-nyc-cycling-advocacy-group-right-of-way-6th-avenue/), New York again (http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/22/unauthorized-bike-lanes-created-in-midtown/), and Seattle (http://www.seattlebikeblog.com/2013/04/04/guerrilla-road-safety-group-politely-installs-illegal-bike-lane-protectors-on-cherry-street/), and everywhere (http://www.bicycling.com/news/advocacy/paint-your-lane) Sarah Schindler, Banning Lawns (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2279544) Special Guest: Sarah Schindler.

This podcast looks at the law on adverse possession. A squatter who takes possession of someone else's land acquires some kind of ownership interest in it. If the squatter stays in possession for long enough then he can defeat a claim for possession by the formal owner of the land. This podcast outlines the law in this area. It explains what is needed for an adverse possession claim to succeed. It considers the idea of possession.