Podcast appearances and mentions of John Coffee

In this episode, CII General Counsel Jeff Mahoney interviews James D. Cox, the Brainerd Currie Distinguished Professor of Law at Duke University. Cox is a member of The Shadow SEC, a recently formed independent organization of six current academics that, like the earlier established Federal Reserve Shadow Open Market Committee, is intended to provide, encourage, facilitate and distribute policy discussions and debates relating to the federal securities laws and the SEC. 

Executive Producer Sam Dolan and I discuss INSP's Into The Wild Frontier and the episode, John Coffee Hays: A Texas Legend.

This Day in Legal History: Unsinkable SinksOn this day in legal history, April 15 marks the sinking of the RMS Titanic in 1912, a maritime disaster that led to significant legal repercussions. After striking an iceberg in the North Atlantic, the Titanic sank, resulting in the loss of over 1,500 lives out of the 2,228 passengers and crew aboard. This tragedy not only devastated families but also precipitated a flurry of lawsuits against the White Star Line, the ship's owners. The legal battles focused on issues of negligence and inadequate safety measures, such as the insufficient number of lifeboats on board. These lawsuits were filed in multiple jurisdictions, including the United States and Britain, challenging the existing maritime laws and pushing for reforms. The aftermath of the Titanic disaster significantly influenced maritime safety regulations, leading to the establishment of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) in 1914. This pivotal moment in legal history underscored the necessity for stringent safety standards and legal accountability in maritime operations.A recent court decision in New York has raised concerns among Wall Street's major players, suggesting that this ruling could dramatically alter the process of underwriting stock offerings. The appeals court has permitted ViacomCBS Inc. investors to proceed with their lawsuit against prominent banks like Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group Inc., and Wells Fargo & Co. This legal action challenges the banks on the grounds of alleged undisclosed conflicts of interest during the media company's stock offerings, specifically scrutinizing the internal firewalls that should prevent the exchange of sensitive information between different divisions within the banks.Legal experts, including Andrew Vollmer of the Mercatus Center, argue that this case may blur the banks' obligations to disclose potential conflicts, particularly their own trading activities during such offerings. The traditional focus of offering documents might shift, increasing the burden on banks to disclose more about their activities rather than just the issuer's details. The litigation stems from the banks' actions surrounding the Archegos Capital Management collapse, where they allegedly sold off Viacom stock to mitigate losses, directly impacting the stock's value and causing significant investor losses.The banks are now positioned to further appeal the decision, which upheld the initial ruling allowing the case to proceed. The lawsuit claims that the banks failed to disclose that their investment bankers were preparing to sell off Viacom stock even as they helped launch the stock on the market. The court's recent acknowledgment doesn't dismiss the possibility of existing ethical barriers, suggesting that the banks might have a defense if they can demonstrate that these firewalls were effective.Legal scholars and industry groups, including the American Bankers Association, express concern that the ruling imposes new disclosure obligations that exceed current SEC requirements, potentially disrupting established legal and regulatory frameworks. They fear that this could lead to a significant shift in how underwriters manage and disclose potential conflicts of interest. However, others, like Columbia Law School professor John Coffee, believe the ruling aligns with the essence of underwriters' responsibilities and does not foresee the drastic changes that some predict.Overall, the unfolding legal battle could redefine the transparency required in stock offerings and test the robustness of internal controls within banks, with far-reaching implications for the financial industry's operation and regulatory landscape.Big Banks' Underwriting Firewalls at Risk in Archegos-Tied SuitThe Supreme Court is set to deliberate on the implications of using a post-Enron statute, originally intended to curb evidence destruction, against defendants from the January 6th Capitol riot. This legal examination stems from concerns that the Justice Department may have stretched the statute's application, applying it to actions such as the Capitol breach, which resulted in a potential 20-year sentence for some. Critics, including those defending the accused, argue that this statute is being misapplied, citing past cases where the Supreme Court has sided against overextended prosecutorial interpretations, notably in cases unrelated to financial crimes.The law under scrutiny was designed to prevent obstruction of "official proceedings" and was enacted following financial scandals to discourage the destruction of corporate evidence. However, approximately one-quarter of the January 6 defendants were charged under this provision, sparking debate over its relevance to the riot's context. Proponents of the defendants argue that the law's origins tied to financial misconduct make its application to the Capitol riot inappropriate and overly punitive.On the other hand, supporters of the prosecution contend that the statute's broad wording intentionally encompasses a wide range of obstructive actions, including those committed during the Capitol riot. They emphasize that the statute's language about corruptly obstructing or impeding any official proceeding should be taken at face value, aligning with textualist judicial philosophy, which prioritizes the statute's text over the legislative history or intent.The case, which involves former Boston police officer Joseph Fischer among others, has attracted considerable attention, with various legal scholars and groups submitting amicus briefs. These briefs reflect the deep divide over the interpretation of federal laws and the scope of prosecutorial discretion. The upcoming arguments in the Supreme Court will likely focus on whether the actions of January 6 defendants fall within the intended scope of the law and the broader implications of this interpretation on legal standards for obstructing official proceedings.The decision could have significant implications for how broadly laws are interpreted and applied, especially in cases of national significance involving public and political actions. The Supreme Court's ruling will also test the balance between preventing prosecutorial overreach and ensuring accountability for acts that threaten governmental processes.Jan. 6 Case Pulls Conservative Supreme Court in Two DirectionsAt a rally in Schnecksville, Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump criticized the judge presiding over his upcoming criminal trial, which is set to begin in Manhattan. This trial involves allegations related to hush money payments to Stormy Daniels. Trump accused Justice Juan Merchan and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg of political bias, a sentiment he has expressed previously. He referred to Judge Merchan as "crooked" and complained about a gag order that restricts his public statements about the case, extending even to comments about Merchan's family.Trump's remarks came during a campaign stop in Pennsylvania, a crucial battleground state in the upcoming presidential election. He also briefly mentioned international issues, claiming that the recent Iranian drone and missile attacks on Israel would not have occurred under his presidency. The timing of his Pennsylvania rally aligns with President Joe Biden's planned visits to the state, highlighting its significance in the 2024 election. Biden, who narrowly won Pennsylvania in 2020, will be speaking about tax reform in his hometown of Scranton and other locations.The former president's visit targeted key areas in Pennsylvania, including Northampton County, a critical bellwether that Biden flipped in the previous election. Trump also attended a fundraiser in Bucks County, another pivotal region, before his rally. During his speech, he endorsed Republican Dave McCormick for the U.S. Senate, despite their occasionally complex relationship. The state's changing demographics and voter registration trends, particularly among rural and blue-collar voters, may influence upcoming electoral outcomes.Trump, in Pennsylvania, attacks judge as first criminal trial looms | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School and an expert in business law, discusses the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, approving Purdue Pharma's $6 billion opioid settlement proposal, and protecting the company's billionaire owners from future lawsuits. Madlin Mekelburg, Bloomberg News Texas legal reporter, discusses the impeachment of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School and an expert in business law, discusses the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, approving Purdue Pharma's $6 billion opioid settlement proposal, and protecting the company's billionaire owners from future lawsuits. Madlin Mekelburg, Bloomberg News Texas legal reporter, discusses the impeachment of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today we are joined by Edward Baker of Voodoo Weightlifting to talk about the life and passing of Coach John Coffee.A pioneer in the sport of weightlifting, John Coffee died on Jan. 22, 2023, at the age of 76. Coffee dedicated more than a half-century to advancing Olympic-style lifting, running the storied Coffee's Gym from 1980 to 2017 out of Marietta, Georgia. The USA Weightlifting Hall of Fame member is credited with helping develop competitive weightlifting for women in the United States, with his efforts being noticed and admired around the globe as well. The 19-time women's team champion at the USA Weightlifting National Championships, Coffee's Gym trained the athletes responsible for 36 of the first 65 medals won by U.S. women at the IWF World Championships. Coffee's pupils included Olympian Robin Byrd Goad, the most decorated U.S. weightlifter in history with 20 world medals to her name, and fellow world medalists Colleene Colley, Sibby Flowers, and Carla Garrett.Tune in to hear more about this true legend of our sport. Enjoy the show!

Let God be the healing factor in a person's life. If you love a person, or even when it comes to yourself allow space for healing to take place. No external means can heal internal and emotional trauma, especially if it's connected to a problematic past. Only the eternal God can heal the internal issues of a person's life. You are not the healer. If you could, would you want that responsibility to maintain it? If you are looking for a person to do it for you, do you want them having that type of power and responsibility over you? Let's love one another and allow folks to unpack baggage alone and as a team, but know this God is the healer from within and without. In the words of John Coffee, I can help it Boss. Some things gotta go to God in this case. Help them by giving them space to heal.

On today's episode we speak with Brock Neeley & John Coffee. They talk about what Veterans Park & what it all mean to them, as well as the rest of the community.

This Tuesday, Twitter's sued Elon Musk to force him to honor his legally binding agreement to buy the company. Twitter asked the Delaware Court of Chancery to fast-track a trial for September. According to the complaint “Musk apparently believes that he — unlike every other party subject to Delaware contract law — is free to change his mind, trash the company, disrupt its operations, destroy stockholder value, and walk away.”The Delaware court will examine the case on its merits and lawyers are suggesting that Musk's defense is weak, if not laughable. “We will finally see if Elon Musk is ‘above the law,” according to John Coffee of Columbia Law School. “I am confident that in the Delaware courts the answer is no.” he told the FT.Gods at War by Steven Davidoff Solomon: https://amzn.to/3uNpPJ1Twitter Merger Agreement: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418091/000119312522176753/d283119dprer14a.htm#toc283119_94Elon Musk Cancellation Letter: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418091/000110465922078413/tm2220599d1_ex99-p.htmThe Twitter Lawsuit: https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/rvMR5WrmwCGQ/v0Patrick's Books:Statistics For The Trading Floor:  https://amzn.to/3eerLA0Derivatives For The Trading Floor:  https://amzn.to/3cjsyPFCorporate Finance:  https://amzn.to/3fn3rvC Patreon Page: https://www.patreon.com/PatrickBoyleOnFinanceVisit our website: www.onfinance.orgFollow Patrick on Twitter Here: https://twitter.com/PatrickEBoylePatrick Boyle On Finance YouTube Channel Support the show

Russia has halted its gas supply to Germany through the Nord Stream 1 pipeline for ten days to do annual maintenance works. But the German government fears the flow of natural gas might not be resumed after repairs are completed. We talk about the potential consequences with Paula Rodriguez-Masiu, Head of Market Intelligence at Spanish oil and gas company CEPSA. Elon Musk has pulled out of his US$44 bn deal to buy Twitter but the platform won't let him go so easily. The firm could now file a lawsuit to force the acquisition to go ahead as the failed takeover causes shares to plummet. We hear more from John Coffee, professor of law at Columbia Law School in New York and former advisor to the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq. Images by the James Webb telescope, the largest and most powerful ever launched into space, have been shown to the public for the first time. We talk about their relevance with Greg Redfern from Nasa's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Petrol and gas supplies have begun to trickle to Sri Lanka's population after days of political turmoil that have ended with the President and the Prime Minister fleeing the country and announcing their disposition to resign. We hear from University of St Andrews' Anthropologist Vindhya Buthpitiya. Sam Fenwick discusses these and other big business news throughout the programme with Forbes' assistant managing editor Diane Brady, in New York, and The Smart Investor's co-founder David Kuo, in Singapore. (Picture: Gas compressor station in Mallnow. Picture credit: EPA)

Fuel supplies begin to trickle to Sri Lanka's population after days of political turmoil that ended with the residences of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa being stormed by protesters, and the house of his Prime Minister burnt. As the country's main opposition parties scramble to form a new government, we hear from University of St Andrews' Anthropologist Vindhya Buthpitiya. Nord Stream 1, Russia's main gas pipeline to Germany, went offline for scheduled maintenance but there are fears supplies might not resume after the repairs are completed. We talk to Paula Rodriguez-Masiu, Head of Market Intelligence at Spanish oil and gas company CEPSA. Shares in Twitter fell after the news that Elon Musk has pulled out of his US$44 bn deal to buy the platform. Twitter could now file a lawsuit to force the acquisition to go ahead. We ask John Coffee, professor of law at Columbia Law School in New York and former advisor to the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq, about the legal intricacies. We also discuss the stock markets with Peter Jankovskis, Vice President of Research and Analytics at Arbor Financial Services in Illinois.

Sri Lanka's president Gotabaya Rajapaksa is to stand down on Wednesday. Thousands of protesters stormed both his and prime minister Ranil Wickremesinghe's official residences over the weekend. The president has been blamed for the country's economic mismanagement, which has caused dire shortages of food, fuel and medicine for months. The prime minister has also announced that he is standing down, but where does this leave the crisis-hit country? Independent policy analyst Amita Arudpragasm speaks to us from Colombo. Elsewhere, the fallout from the collapse of Elon Musk's plan to buy Twitter continues. The Tesla boss has mocked the social media giant for threatening to sue him for cancelling the proposed $44bn buyout. Professor of Law at Columbia University in New York, John Coffee, talks us through all the ramifications. Tensions grow in South Africa over continuing rolling power blackouts.

Taylor Swift Can't 'Shake Off' Lawsuit (Podcast) Source: Bloomberg, 34:52 Intellectual property litigator Terence Ross, a partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman, discusses the case against pop star Taylor Swift where two songwriters claim that she ripped off some of the phrases in her hit song, "Shake It Off," Securities law expert John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discusses the Justice Department's investigation into short selling by hedge funds and research firms. Former public defender Christa Groshek, managing attorney of Groshek Law, discusses the prosecution's case against Kim Potter, the Minnesota police officer who shot and killed Daunte Wright in a traffic stop. June Grasso hosts. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Taylor Swift Can't 'Shake Off' Lawsuit (Podcast) Source: Bloomberg, 34:52 Intellectual property litigator Terence Ross, a partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman, discusses the case against pop star Taylor Swift where two songwriters claim that she ripped off some of the phrases in her hit song, "Shake It Off," Securities law expert John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discusses the Justice Department's investigation into short selling by hedge funds and research firms. Former public defender Christa Groshek, managing attorney of Groshek Law, discusses the prosecution's case against Kim Potter, the Minnesota police officer who shot and killed Daunte Wright in a traffic stop. June Grasso hosts. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

In Q&A 4, I tackle patron questions about Hueco round 2 and other goals for 2022, my plans for V12 and 5.14, how my trip to Leavenworth went and plans to return, my favorite features in the van, dating on the road, my remote working setup, what I've learned from nearly 100 episodes of the podcast, and making sense of conflicting advice. *Treat this episode like a buffet! Listen straight through or jump around as you like. I organized these questions into categories and added timestamps below.Support the Podcast:thenuggetclimbing.com/supportWe are supported by these amazing BIG GIVERS:Bryan Fast, Leo Franchi, Michael Roy, and David LahaieBecome a Patron:patreon.com/thenuggetclimbingWebsite Links:Top ListsSteven's FavoritesShow Notes:  thenuggetclimbing.com/episodes/qa-4Nuggets:0:00 – Intro and updates7:04 – My Climbing / Training / Goals: 7:14 – Oskar: Tips for night climbing?14:07 – Taylor: Plans for Hueco round 2?16:53 – Casey: Hueco tick list? And what about Rifle?17:57 – Casey: Do you prefer to write your own training programs or to have a coach?18:46 – Casey: Outdoor vs. indoor bouldering performance? Does it matter?21:27 – Casey: Do you like night sessions? Is it hard to fall asleep after?22:52 – Jimmy: Favorite endurance workout on a home wall? 25:43 – Karl: Do you think kneepads change grades?33:12 – Tim: Do you ever climb easy stuff for fun?35:44 – Tyler: Party tricks vs. helpful training?38:14 – Tyler: Dream areas or routes in Canada?38:55 – Andrew: What makes a limit boulder problem “limit”? What makes a perfect repeat “perfect”?42:32 – Shanna: What will you implement from the PCC?46:24 – Jordan: Have you dabbled in trad or multi-pitch climbing?49:44 – Eric: What is the softest 5.14 in the US? Why aren't you trying it now?51:09 – Nolan: How have you moved past plateaus?53:08 – Nolan: Have you been on JDI yet?54:35 – Conor: Can you tell us about your early climbing and training? What would you change?58:20 – RJB: Where are you on your climbing journey?1:00:57 – Luke: Goals for 2022? How do you go about goalsetting?1:09:06 – Drew: Did you come back to try The Practitioner? And how did it go?1:12:55 – David: Goals in Leavenworth?1:14:37 – Nutrition / Weight Gain:1:14:45 – Karl: Does starch count as sugar?1:17:33 – Angelo: I'm embracing my body type and getting stronger, but when will I stop gaining weight?1:23:15 – Vanlife / Current Lifestyle / Personal Life:1:23:24 – Tyler/Ethan/Luke: Favorite van features? What did you bring but haven't used? 1:28:03 – Tyler: Can you describe work station in your van? What is your internet setup?1:31:50 – Matt: Any mice in the van?1:32:54 – Jordan: How long have you had your van? Thoughts on dirtbagging now vs. pre-van?1:34:47 – Michael: Pee bottle tips?1:36:54 – Logan: Why did you choose your van?1:39:27 – Howard: Health insurance as a vanlifer?1:41:53 – Nolan: Have you settled into the lifestyle as a full-time vanlifer podcast superstar yet?1:43:59 – Desiree: What are some favorite experiences you get to have living on the road? Pitfalls? Tips?1:49:29 – John: How do you handle long winter nights in the van?1:50:42 – Alexandra: How is a dating life when living in a van?1:53:56 – Shanna: Are you living in the van nonstop? Do you think you can do it indefinitely?1:56:49 – John: Coffee or tea? Method of brewing? Any tats?1:57:45 – Brian: Vanlife product you just can't get behind?1:58:42 – Brian: What have you given up for vanlife that you miss?1:59:35 – Brian: What alternate life would you be content with?2:00:41 – Daniel: Do you still play video games?2:03:26 – Liam: Did you save up money before quitting your job, or say fuck it? Also, what is your climbing story?2:06:30 – Jonathan: What is your relationship to mindfulness or meditation? How do they affect your life and climbing?2:10:52 – Fun / Funny / Other:2:11:00 – Tyler S: Weirdest smell you've had in the van?2:12:03 – Tyler S: Most ridiculous outfit you've climbed in? 2:13:27 – Tyler B: Any plans to head out east to climb on southern sandstone? Dream climbing trip?2:14:49 – Tyler B: Who would you like to spend a climbing with?2:15:42 – Brian: Other hobbies?2:17:21 – Brian: Who would you take on a multi-pitch climb?2:18:18 – Podcasting / What I've Learned From Episodes:2:18:30 – Ryan: You've put out nearly 100 episodes—How do you deal with conflicting advice from all of these badass climbers? 2:24:22 – Tyler: If you could collaborate with any podcast, what would it be?2:25:30 – Tyler: Top 3 podcast guests?2:26:36 – Finn: What interview do you find yourself organically thinking back to the most?  2:28:23 – Garrett: Has the podcast made you a better communicator? Has it made you more confident when meeting people?2:31:30 – Wrapup

McNew kills off a Larceny pick from The Rural Inn and tells us about her visit to the Rotary Jail and Crawfordsville Indiana's first execution. 

This week is the 20th anniversary of 9/11. On Saturday Tom and Jay ask that you take a moment of silence to remember all those who lost their lives on that day, their loved ones and those who were impacted by those events over the past 20 years.  Stories 1.     Elizabeth Holmes finally goes to trial. Aly McDevitt in Compliance Week (sub req'd) Opening statements review in the WSJ. 2.     The role of compliance in an ESG effort. David Povey in Compliance Week. (sub req'd) Matt Kelly weighs in on diversity as well in Navex Global's Risk and Compliance Matters. 3.     Raytheon under FCPA scrutiny. Dylan Tokar in WSJ Risk and Compliance Journal.  4.     CCI surveying stress in compliance. Henry Kronk in CCI. Take the survey here. 5.     From Wells Fargo to Kraft Foods. Matt Kelly in Radical Compliance. Tom and Matt in Compliance into the Weeds.  6.     Has the SFO turned the corner? Martin Kenney in the FCPA Blog. 7.     Measuring compliance measurement. Jeff Kaplan in COI Blog.  8.     From firm specific risk to systemic risk. John Coffee in Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance 9.     Do you need a BOD Code of Conduct? Kristy Grant-Hart in Compliance Kristy. 10.  Joe Biden-the anti-corruption President?  Joe Acotoia in Corruption Crime and Compliance.  Podcasts and Events 11.  On Everything Compliance, the full gang discuss where they were on 9/11 and its impact on their profession. Lisa Fine looks back on 9/11 in  Great Women in Compliance.  12.  On Innovation in Compliance, Tom has run a 6-part special podcast series on Looking Back on 9/11, sponsored by Affiliated Monitors. In this series he will visit with professionals from a variety of compliance perspectives who will discuss how 9/11 changed our profession, including three who were in NYC during the attacks. Hear thoughts and reflections from Gabe Hidalgo, Juan Zarate, Alex Dill, Eric Feldman, Scott Moritz and John Lee Dumas. 13.  Join K2 Integrity September 15 for a round-table on the 20th Anniversary of September 11 and consider its impact on countering terrorist financing and illicit financing, and the continuing risks to national security. The roundtable will include members of the team that spearheaded the post-9/11 counter illicit finance regime: Juan Zarate, Chip Poncy, Danny McGlynn, moderated by Dr. Michele L. Malvesti. Information and Registration here.    14.  Ethisphere's World Most Ethical Company awards for 2022 are open for submission. For more information on the Application Process, click here.  15.  Breaking News features The Compliance Handbook, 2nd edition. Check out the Breaking News feature here. Purchase The Compliance Handbook, 2nd edition here.  Tom Fox is the Voice of Compliance and can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com. Co-host Jay Rosen (AKA ‘Mr. Monitor') can be reached at jrosen@affiliatedmonitors.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

"Today we are leaving Alabama and going into the state of Tennessee. In 1663 King Charles II granted the Carolina Colony all the land starting at the Atlantic Ocean and running west between the 31st and 36th parallel. The 31st parallel is the bottom border of Mississippi below Natchez. The 36th parallel is now the northern boundary of North Carolina and Tennessee. When North and South Carolina separated they established the border between them as the 35th parallel. North Carolina released it's claim on lands west of the Appalachian Mountains, and this became the state of Tennessee the 16th state, entering the Union in 1796. So, the 35th parallel became what is now the southern border of Tennessee. "John Coffee, supervised the survey of this line between 1817 and 1822, some 10 years later John Coffee negotiated for the United States in the Treaties of Dancing Rabbit Creek and Pontotoc Creek. "Just for the record, I checked the almanac under Tennessee... the state flower is the iris, Motto: AGRICULTURE AND COMMERCE, state bird: the same as Mississippi, the mockingbird, tree: tulip poplar and the state song: THE TENNESSEE WALTZ. "Join us next time when we will visit SUNKEN TRACE. For Natchez Trace a road through the wilderness, I'm Frank Thomas."

"Today on our journey up the Natchez Trace Parkway from Natchez, Mississippi to Nashville, Tennessee we are crossing the Tennessee River at the JOHN COFFEE MEMORIAL BRIDGE. "John Coffee was an old Indian fighting buddy of Andrew Jackson and one of Jackson's Generals who fought with him against the British at the Battle of New Orleans in 1815.  Coffee was chosen by Jackson to negotiate for the United States with the Choctaw at Dancing Rabbit Creek in 1830 and with the Chickasaw at Pontotoc Creek in 1832. In both cases Coffee was successful in getting the Indians to give up all their tribal lands to the United States. These negotiations resulted in later banishment of the Indians from their ancestral home to lands West of the Mississippi during the painful Indian Removal that has come to be known as the Trail of Tears. In 1839, along this infamous trail to exile the Chickasaw Indian Chief, Tishomingo, died of smallpox before reaching the new lands in Oklahoma. This old respected leader of the Chickasaw Indians was buried west of Little Rock, Arkansas near Fort Coffee. "Join us next time when we will visit ROCK SPRING. For Natchez Trace a road through the wilderness, I'm Frank Thomas." For more about Natchez Trace: A Road Through the Wilderness, visit eddieandfrank.com

Jules ligner på John Coffee? Abu hører på Britney på trening, og Jae blir roasta på clubhouse. Vi snakker med Abu om opp- og nedturer, psykisk helse, underholdningsbransjen, og viktigheten av genuine relasjoner.

"Today on our journey up the Natchez Trace Parkway from Natchez to Nashville we visit an exhibit known as the Chickasaw Council House. It is 11 or 12 miles south of Tupelo and due east of the town of Pontotoc. Along the original Old Natchez Trace was an Indian Village "PONTATOCK." The village had a council house, which became the capitol of the entire Chickasaw Indian Nation in the 1820s. "In the fall of 1832, President Andrew Jackson had John Coffee to negotiate with the Chickasaw, for their land, as Coffee had done with the Choctaw two years earlier at Dancing Rabbit Creek. Negotiations took place at The CHICKASAW COUNCIL HOUSE in Pontotoc and on October 20th 1832 the Chickasaw and the United States Government signed the Treaty of Pontatock Creek, where the Chickasaw relinquished all their lands. "When the Chickasaw went west, they carried the name of Pontotoc with them -- there's also a county and village of Pontotoc in Oklahoma. By the way, Pontotoc, known as the land of the hanging grapes, is the Chickasaw name meaning "Cattail Prairies". "Join us next time when we will visit Black Belt Overlook. For Natchez Trace a road through the wilderness, I'm Frank Thomas." For more about Natchez Trace: A Road Through the Wilderness, visit eddieandfrank.com

March 3, 2021--On this edition of Forthright Radio host Joy LaClaire speaks with Columbia University Law Professor, John Coffee about his book, CORPORATE CRIME AND PUNISHMENT: THE CRISIS OF UNDERENFORCEMENT. Why have corporate executives at major companies such as Boeing, Pacific Gas and Electric, Purdue and Goldman Sachs escaped prosecution, despite the severe injuries their firms have inflicted on many? That’s on Forthright Radio, from KZYX and Z.

Thanks for listening share with someone who wont be super cranky hearing our voices. In this episode we talk about the what ifs of dropping something in a parking lot. You end up in prison getting your kidney stones sucked out John Coffee style.

Friday February 19, 2021 John Coffee Calls Boeing Criminal Settlement One of the Worst

When Paul meets John Coffee his life changes when John has the ability to heal others but only tragedy happens at the end --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

Harold Krent, a professor at the Chicago-Kent College of Law, discusses why pop star Taylor Swift was featured prominently during Supreme Court arguments in a case about when government officials can shake off past constitutional violations. John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discusses the Supreme Court ordering a new look at the convictions of four men in an insider-trading case involving a scheme to profit from government secrets. June Grasso hosts.

Harold Krent, a professor at the Chicago-Kent College of Law, discusses why pop star Taylor Swift was featured prominently during Supreme Court arguments in a case about when government officials can shake off past constitutional violations. John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discusses the Supreme Court ordering a new look at the convictions of four men in an insider-trading case involving a scheme to profit from government secrets. June Grasso hosts. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

We come to this episode as somber as we have ever been. President Trump incited insurrection against America, the American people and America’s Democracy on Wednesday. Tom and Jay join the call of Senators and Representative of both political parties to remove President Trump via the 25th Amendment or impeachment. We also have our first look in 2021 at some of the top compliance articles and stories which caught their eye this week.  A game-changer in compliance-the AMLA Law of 2020. Tom takes a deep dive in a 5-part blog post series and podcast series on the FCPA Compliance Report. Why you need a compliance ‘Victory Plan’ for 2021. Dick Cassin explains in the FCPA Blog. CFTC’s foray into FCPA enforcement creates new risk factors. Aaron Nicodemus in Compliance Week (sub req’d) Was the Goldman Sachs FCPA resolution ‘just and appropriate’? Jenny Kline in GAB. Is your digital culture mature? Jim DeLoach in CCI. What are your compliance resolutions for 2021? Andrew Burt in Navex Global’s Risk & Compliance Matters First SolarWinds shareholder action filed. Kevin LaCroix in the D&O Diary. Rethinking corporate enforcement. John Coffee in Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Goverance. A new month is here and a new guest on The Compliance Life. Gwen Hassan- Director of Compliance at CNH Industrial. In this month’s first episode, Gwen talks about the twisting road which introduced her to compliance. Check out the episode here. This month, on 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program, I look back over 2020 and set out some of the key enhancements you need to do for your compliance program in 2021. Day 1 | What 2020 Brought To Compliance Programs; Day 2 | Continuous Monitoring and Continuous Improvement; Day 3 | Leadership’s Conduct At The Top; Day 4 | Moving Compliance Tone Down Through An Organization; Day 5 | The Board and Operationalizing Compliance; Day 6 | The Code of Conduct; Day 7 | Policies and Procedures; and Day 8 | Internal Controls and Compliance. Note 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program now has its own iTunes channel. Join Tom on the Convercent event, “Future-proof your compliance program for 2021”, on Wednesday, January 20th | 11:00 am -:00 pm ET. For details and registration, click here. Join K2 Integrity on Thursday, January 14, 2021 at 10 AM ET, when financial crimes compliance experts respond to your AML/CFT, sanctions, and other financial integrity-related questions. Submit your questions and register here. Tom Fox is the Compliance Evangelist and can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com. Jay Rosen is Mr. Monitor and can be reached at jrosen@affiliatedmonitors.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

message by Jeff James

Columbia Law School professor John Coffee talks about why he thinks a new Labor Department proposal represents a shot against ESG investing, new SEC rules for shareholder proposals, and more, on the latest episode of the Activist Investing Today podcast.

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School and author of the new book, “Corporate Crime and Punishment: The Crisis of Underenforcement,” discusses how the prosecution of white collar crime has dropped 30% under President Trump, as well as a drop in fines on corporations. Matt Dallek, a professor at Washington University’s Graduate School of Political Management, discusses whether Trump’s pandemic relief orders are likely to face legal challenges. June Grasso hosts. 

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School and author of the new book, “Corporate Crime and Punishment: The Crisis of Underenforcement,” discusses how the prosecution of white collar crime has dropped 30% under President Trump, as well as a drop in fines on corporations. Matt Dallek, a professor at Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management, discusses whether Trump's pandemic relief orders are likely to face legal challenges. June Grasso hosts.  Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Gary talks with Mr. John Coffee, an elementary school Music Teacher. John shares memories of his early interest in music, his time at Berklee College of Music and the several school districts he has taught in. He offers a full description of the role and responsibilities of a public-school Music Teacher, the rewards and challenges; the strategy of bringing kids along, musically, from a young age through the high school level. Finally, he comments on the characteristics that make for success in his line of work, and not surprisingly they are the same fundamentals that apply to most any career, including this one of fostering creative potential in kids.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the US President's taxes cannot be withheld from a grand jury investigation - but what does it mean for his bid to keep his finances private and to get himself re-elected in November? Ed Butler asks John Coffee, professor of law at New York's Columbia Law school, which legal team and which political party should be celebrating more over this complicated ruling. Plus, New York Times investigative journalist Susanne Craig tells us what is already known about Mr Trump's tax affairs and the source of his wealth. And tax journalist David Cay Johnston explains why Mr Trump's finances were so little investigated before he became president. (Picture: US President Donald Trump in the cabinet room of the White House; Credit: EPA/Samuel Corum)

This story was co-published with ProPublica. Our reporting on President Trump's relationship with Deutsche Bank was originally published in May 2019. A decade ago, loan filings showed Trump Tower in New York City had a reported profit of about $13.3 million. But when the tower refinanced its debt soon after, the profits for the same year — 2010 — somehow appeared higher. A new lender listed the profits as $16.1 million, or 21% more than they had been recorded previously.   The next year’s earnings for the building also “improved” between the two filings. Profits for 2011 were listed as 12% higher under the new loan than the old, according to reports by loan servicers and data provider Trepp.  ProPublica uncovered the Trump Tower discrepancies by examining publicly available data for mortgages that are packaged into securities known as commercial mortgage-backed securities, comparing the same years in reports for different CMBS. If a bank had held onto the loan, instead of selling it to investors, such information would have been kept private. No evidence has emerged that the Trump Organization was involved in changing the profit figures. Alan Garten, the Trump Organization’s chief legal officer, said: “Not only were the numbers provided to the servicer accurate, but Trump Tower is considered one of the most underleveraged commercial buildings around.”  The discrepancies in the tower profits match a pattern described in a whistleblower complaint filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which ProPublica revealed this month. The complaint accuses commercial lenders of fraudulently inflating the income numbers underlying loans in many CMBS.  The complaint named seven servicers and 14 lenders, including two of the country’s biggest issuers of CMBS — Ladder Capital and Wells Fargo. Both were involved in the more recent Trump Tower loan, one as the lender, the second as the financial institution that packaged the loan into a CMBS. The complaint does not say which entities altered specific numbers and does not address whether borrowers were involved in, or knew about, the alleged fraud. Wells Fargo declined to comment. Ladder Capital did not respond to questions about Trump’s signature Fifth Avenue tower. Ladder did respond to questions for ProPublica’s earlier article; it acknowledged it had altered historical numbers for two other loans ProPublica asked about, to remove expenses that were not recurring in the future. The lender said its actions were appropriate. (Ladder is a publicly traded commercial real estate investment trust with more than $6 billion in assets. It employs Jack Weisselberg, the son of the Trump Organization’s longtime CFO, Allen Weisselberg, as an executive director whose job is to make loans. Jack Weisselberg declined to comment.) When the Trump Organization refinanced its loan for Trump Tower in 2012, it increased the size of its loan from $27.5 million to $100 million, extracting $67.9 million in cash. The interest-only loan originally represented about 8% of the more than $1 billion in mortgages assembled into the CMBS. (Only the commercial part of the tower — with retail tenants such as Gucci and offices, including for the Trump Organization — served as collateral for the loan.) For both 2010 and 2011, data shows the discrepancies in net operating income between the old and new loans for Trump Tower were largely due to the new loan reporting lower expenses. The prospectus for the more recent loan stated that “the historical expenses exclude security associated with Donald J. Trump’s personal services” — though it did not specify dollar amounts for the change. Greater revenues were cited for both years under the new loan, too, but the prospectus did not explain why. The whistleblower complaint, filed by a CMBS-industry insider named John Flynn, concerns the nearly $600  billion CMBS market. It accuses lenders and servicers of manipulating historical cash flows, failing to report misrepresentations, changing names and addresses of properties, and “deceptively and inaccurately” describing loan representations. The complaint asserts that Flynn has found overstatements in $150 billion worth of CMBS since 2013. The misrepresentations allowed properties to qualify for loans they wouldn’t have otherwise, Flynn asserts, while leaving investors in the dark. The SEC has not taken any public action in response to Flynn’s complaint; the agency declined to comment.  Altering past profits without providing an explanation is “highly questionable,” John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School and an expert in securities regulation, told ProPublica for its earlier article on CMBS. As hotels, retail and office properties face unprecedented difficulties due to the virus that has shuttered much of the country, Flynn says the manipulations have increased the likelihood and potential severity of a crash.  Last year, ProPublica revealed another set of income discrepancies at Trump Tower and other company-owned buildings, ones that seemed to hark to the testimony of former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, who testified that Trump would inflate income figures when seeking a loan and deflate the figures when filing taxes. Other Trump Organization properties investigated by ProPublica reported higher profits in the CMBS filings than they did in tax filings. A Trump Organization spokesperson said at the time that “comparing the various reports is comparing apples to oranges” because reporting requirements differ. Sign up for email updates from Trump, Inc. to get the latest on our investigations.

Time to explore a good old fashioned Texas badass. Listen to the story of one man who just racked up IRL achievements. 

Don't have time for the full episode? Not sure if Film Feud is the podcast for you? Or maybe you're just a little commitment phobic? No worries, we've got you covered. Check out the episode highlights! On this week's feud, Vikram and Vidur debate The Green Mile. They begin by finding common ground and agreeing that Mr Jingles the mouse gave the best performance. Vidur cannot stop bringing up the director Frank Darabont’s previous prison-based classic - The Shawshank Redemption while Vikram deep dives in to reddit threads on how many units of magic John Coffee transferred. Vidur takes the feuding to the next level by reciting a poem he wrote on the movie. They even attempt winging a discussion on the death penalty which fades very quickly. Let us know who you think won the feud by reaching out on  facebook (https://www.facebook.com/munchermovies/) , instagram (https://www.instagram.com/munchermovies/) or twitter (https://twitter.com/munchermovies) . You can also find more episodes on our website (https://www.munchermedia.com/video) . 

A moving masterpiece with powerful emotional journey or an overstuffed story that feels like a life sentence? They feud, you decide!  On this week's feud, Vikram and Vidur debate The Green Mile. They begin by finding common ground and agreeing that Mr Jingles the mouse gave the best performance. Vidur cannot stop bringing up the director Frank Darabont’s previous prison-based classic - The Shawshank Redemption while Vikram deep dives in to reddit threads on how many units of magic John Coffee transferred. Vidur takes the feuding to the next level by reciting a poem he wrote on the movie. They even attempt winging a discussion on the death penalty which fades very quickly. Let us know who you think won the feud by reaching out on  facebook (https://www.facebook.com/munchermovies/) , instagram (https://www.instagram.com/munchermovies/) or twitter (https://twitter.com/munchermovies) . You can also find more episodes on our website (https://www.munchermedia.com/video) . 

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discuses two cases the Supreme Court heard this week on whether to limit the powers of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. He speaks to host June Grasso. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discuses two cases the Supreme Court heard this week on whether to limit the powers of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. He speaks to host June Grasso.

We recap the best shoes from All Star weekend, who shined and MJ has feelings. We still sad about Kobe so no disrespect the great. Like comment subscribe and share!

Retail investors are being harmed by essentially secret IPO protection deals still-private companies are reaching with mutual funds. At least that's the view of Columbia Law School professor John Coffee, who spoke with The Deal for its Activist Investing Today podcast about so-called IPO ratchets — contracts some mutual funds are receiving entitling them to additional shares in the event an initial public offering falls below the valuation reflected in the final private equity round. In a wide-ranging conversation, Coffee explained that public investors can suffer dilution while the IPO itself is at risk of becoming overpriced. He argued adequate disclosure of the details of these ratchets could discourage their use. On the podcast, Coffee offered shocking details of what a particular ratchet would have given Softbank Group Corp. had WeWork Cos. debuted earlier this year. He also argued WeWork share ownership and voting structure produced a particularly egregious example of why it is dangerous to give a founder, in this case ex-CEO Adam Neumann, too much power.“ This is the most extreme illustration of what can happen when you lock up control in this fashion,” Coffee said. Congress or the Securities and Exchange Commission, however, won't ban these kinds of dual-class share structures giving founders control anytime soon, Coffee said.

November 15, 2019: Columbia Law Prof. John Coffee interviews SEC Commissioner Robert Jackson about the latest issues of corporate law that the Commission is considering. Commissioner Jackson recently dissented in a partisan 3-2 vote regarding proposed proxy solicitation rules that he says will make it easier for CEOs to spend shareholder money. The Commissioner makes a compelling case for the SEC's role in protecting investors. Among the other topics Professor Coffee brings up are new practices in short selling, the failure of the WeWork IPO, and whether the Commission has the right to seek disgorgement for violations of SEC regulations. This interview was conducted at Columbia Law School for the podcast of the Blue Sky Blog, http://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu, an offering of the law school's Center on Corporate Governance, which Professor Coffee leads. Ren Holding, the Blog's editor, introduces the podcast. The podcast was produced by John Metaxas of WallStreetNorth Communications, Inc., https://wallstreetnorth.com. John is an alumnus of Columbia Law.

A look at what's happening in the south valley, agriculture with California Ag Today, and a chat with John Coffee, a Porterville resident who served his country. He talks about post-traumatic stress disorder or PTSD, what triggers it, fireworks and much more.

Ed Baker, student of John Coffee and head coach of Voodoo Weightlifting, joined us on the podcast this week. Ed was one of the few voices in my ear in my early weightlifting days as I listened to him on his podcast Commissioners of Power. Talking to him about stories from Coffee and other weightlifting legends was a treat. Enjoy!https://www.instagram.com/voodooweightlifting/?hl=enhttps://www.facebook.com/voodooweightlifting/https://www.voodooweightlifting.com/https://www.instagram.com/bakernator105/?hl=en

Ed Baker, student of John Coffee and head coach of Voodoo Weightlifting, joined us on the podcast this week. Ed was one of the few voices in my ear in my early weightlifting days as I listened to him on his podcast Commissioners of Power. Talking to him about stories from Coffee and other weightlifting legends was a treat. Enjoy!https://www.instagram.com/voodooweightlifting/?hl=enhttps://www.facebook.com/voodooweightlifting/https://www.voodooweightlifting.com/https://www.instagram.com/bakernator105/?hl=en

Professor John Coffee of Columbia Law School speaks with WallStreetNorth's John Metaxas (Columbia Law '84)about the state of insider trading law. Professor Coffee has been asked to join a task force to develop proposals to update this area of the law. The task force is to be chaired by former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara (Columbia Law '93). Professor Coffee explains that insider trading law is largely judicially created and has not been addressed by Congress. Recent Circuit Court decisions have created divergences among the Circuits that have not yet been addressed by the Supreme Court. Furthermore, new issues surrounding hacking and cybersecurity have emerged. The professor says the time is ripe for this blue-ribbon panel to create some standards that can be presented to Congress and/or the SEC for future adoption. Bharara has tapped former regulators, prosecutors, judges, academics and defense lawyers to serve on the panel, including The Hon. Jed S. Rakoff, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, and adjunct professor at Columbia Law School. Coffee and Rakoff co-teach a popular class, Black Letter Law/White Collar Crime. John Metaxas is an award winning broadcast journalist with three decades of experience at CBS, CNN, Bloomberg and other networks. His podcasts on the law can be listened to at WallStreetNorth.com.

Barry Eichengreen, University of California Professor Berkeley, analyzes the IMF's future. Alberto Gallo, Algebris Macro Strategies Head, sees little contagion in Europe after the approval of the Italian budget. John Coffee, Columbia Law Professor, says the Tesla board is not strong. Elaine Kamarck, Brookings Institution Senior Fellow, notes the Republicans have no women on the Senate Judiciary Committee. And Shannon Pettypiece, Bloomberg News White House Reporter, updates us on Sen. Flake's decision to confirm Judge Kavanaugh.  Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Barry Eichengreen, University of California Professor Berkeley, analyzes the IMF's future. Alberto Gallo, Algebris Macro Strategies Head, sees little contagion in Europe after the approval of the Italian budget. John Coffee, Columbia Law Professor, says the Tesla board is not strong. Elaine Kamarck, Brookings Institution Senior Fellow, notes the Republicans have no women on the Senate Judiciary Committee. And Shannon Pettypiece, Bloomberg News White House Reporter, updates us on Sen. Flake's decision to confirm Judge Kavanaugh. 

Earlier this week, Elon Musk’s biggest fan in the investment world urged Tesla’s founder to stop his ideas of taking the company private. Catherine Wood of ARK Invest re-iterated her bullish earlier projections in an open letter on the money manager’s website where she reckons the company’s shares will be worth anything from $700 to $4,000 in five years. Musk, you may recall, threw any number of cats among Wall Street’s pigeons at the beginning of the month tweeting that he intended taking the company private at a price of $420 a share. After peaking fractionally below $380, the price has since fallen back to its current $320. Below the pre-tweet level and a long way from the “funding secured” price. So far, those who bet against Musk have been the big winners, with disclosed short sellers of Tesla stock making over $1bn in profit since his bombshell tweet. These cynics think Ms Wood’s valuations are a figment of an alternative reality. But where they do agree, although for different reasons, is that it’s very unlikely that Tesla will be going private. The main reason is that Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, on which Musk is pinning his buyout hopes, doesn’t actually have the money to help him out - even if it wanted to pay $100 a share more than the current market price. The London Financial Times reported this morning that the Saudi Public Investment Fund has lined up a consortium of global banks to lend it $11bn simply to meet existing obligations. The PIF is quite clearly no white desert charger riding to Elon’s rescue… That’s the last bit of news Musk needs right now. Because a buyout by the Saudis was the only elegant way out of some very serious legal consequences of his ill advised tweet.

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discusses the regulatory scrutiny that could meet Tesla CEO Elon Musk as he explores taking Tesla private. Plus, Jimmy Gurule, a professor at Notre Dame Law School, discusses the trial of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, where a jury is currently deliberating on eighteen charges of bank and tax fraud against Manafort. They speak with Bloomberg's June Grasso.  Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discusses the regulatory scrutiny that could meet Tesla CEO Elon Musk as he explores taking Tesla private. Plus, Jimmy Gurule, a professor at Notre Dame Law School, discusses the trial of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, where a jury is currently deliberating on eighteen charges of bank and tax fraud against Manafort. They speak with Bloomberg's June Grasso. 

A moving masterpiece with powerful emotional journey or a long overstuffed story that feels like a life sentence? They feud, you decide!  On this week's feud, Vikram and Vidur debate The Green Mile. They begin by finding common ground and agreeing that Mr Jingles the mouse gave the best performance. Vidur cannot stop bringing up the director Frank Darabont’s previous prison-based classic - The Shawshank Redemption while Vikram deep dives in to reddit threads on how many units of magic John Coffee transferred. Vidur takes the feuding to the next level by reciting a poem he wrote on the movie. They even attempt winging a discussion on the death penalty which fades very quickly. A moving masterpiece with powerful emotional journey or a long overstuffed story that feels like a life sentence? They feud, you decide! Tweet to Film Feud [@filmfeudpod](https://twitter.com/filmfeudpod) and let them know who you think won and what points you would have raised during the feud.

Stephen Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law, discusses bipartisan support in the Senate Judiciary Committee for a bill that would protect special counsel Robert Mueller. Majority leader Mitch McConnell has already said that he would not allow a full senate vote on the bill, which committee chairman Chuck Grassley has said is intended to protect the constitution. Plus, John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discusses the acquittal of Andre Flotron, a former UBS precious metals trader who was found not guilty of a market manipulation process known as “spoofing.” They speak with Bloomberg's June Grasso.  Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Stephen Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law, discusses bipartisan support in the Senate Judiciary Committee for a bill that would protect special counsel Robert Mueller. Majority leader Mitch McConnell has already said that he would not allow a full senate vote on the bill, which committee chairman Chuck Grassley has said is intended to protect the constitution. Plus, John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discusses the acquittal of Andre Flotron, a former UBS precious metals trader who was found not guilty of a market manipulation process known as “spoofing.” They speak with Bloomberg’s June Grasso. 

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, and Robert Hockett, a professor at Cornell University Law School, discuss former S.A.C. Capital Advisors portfolio manager Mathew Martoma's lost bid to overturn his insider-trading conviction and the boost it has given to federal prosecutors seeking to clean up illegal behavior on Wall Street. They speak with June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law." Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, and Robert Hockett, a professor at Cornell University Law School, discuss former S.A.C. Capital Advisors portfolio manager Mathew Martoma's lost bid to overturn his insider-trading conviction and the boost it has given to federal prosecutors seeking to clean up illegal behavior on Wall Street. They speak with June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law."

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discusses a split verdict in the trial of three former Nomura Holdings traders, who are accused of conspiring to lie to clients about mortgage-bond prices. He speaks with June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law."

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discusses a split verdict in the trial of three former Nomura Holdings traders, who are accused of conspiring to lie to clients about mortgage-bond prices. He speaks with June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law." Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

(Bloomberg) -- Corrects headlineu0010u0010Peter Henning, a professor at Wayne State University, and John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discuss a Supreme Court decision to limit the SEC in its use of disgorgement as a way to recoup money from people who have violated federal laws. They speak with June Grasso and Greg Stohr on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

(Bloomberg) -- Corrects headlineu0010u0010Peter Henning, a professor at Wayne State University, and John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, discuss a Supreme Court decision to limit the SEC in its use of disgorgement as a way to recoup money from people who have violated federal laws. They speak with June Grasso and Greg Stohr on Bloomberg Radio’s "Bloomberg Law.

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia University Law School, and Adam Pritchard, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School, discuss the insider trading trial of professional gambler Billy Walters. They speak with June Grasso and Greg Stohr Best on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law." Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia University Law School, and Adam Pritchard, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School, discuss the insider trading trial of professional gambler Billy Walters. They speak with June Grasso and Greg Stohr Best on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law."

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia University Law School, and Peter Henning, a professor at Wayne State University, discuss charges against currency traders at major international banks, who are accused of market-rigging. They speak with June Grasso and Michael Best on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law." Karen Moscow and John Tucker discuss the day's top legal stories. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia University Law School, and Peter Henning, a professor at Wayne State University, discuss charges against currency traders at major international banks, who are accused of market-rigging. They speak with June Grasso and Michael Best on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law." Karen Moscow and John Tucker discuss the day's top legal stories.

John Coffee, a securities law professor at Columbia University, and Peter Henning, a professor at Wayne State University Law School, discuss why Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse settled Justice Department suits, and Barclays decided to fight the suit in court. They speak with June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law." Karen Moscow and Bob Moon discuss the days top legal stories. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

John Coffee, a securities law professor at Columbia University, and Peter Henning, a professor at Wayne State University Law School, discuss why Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse settled Justice Department suits, and Barclays decided to fight the suit in court. They speak with June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law." Karen Moscow and Bob Moon discuss the days top legal stories.

(Bloomberg) -- James Cox, a Professor of Law at Duke University, and John Coffee, a Law Professor at Columbia University will discuss SEC Chair Mary Jo White leaving at the end of the Obama Administration. They speak on "Bloomberg Law" with host June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio.

(Bloomberg) -- James Cox, a Professor of Law at Duke University, and John Coffee, a Law Professor at Columbia University will discuss SEC Chair Mary Jo White leaving at the end of the Obama Administration. They speak on "Bloomberg Law" with host June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

This is a special lost podcast we did over a year ago with the legendary John Coffee and Edward Baker at Coffees gym. Check it out for great knowledge and insight from one of the best weightlifting coach in america ever.

Travis Cooper, John Coffee, Juan Supelveda, and Edward Baker give you the scoop on different training philosophies and motivation. I have to get stronger, I cannot take it any longer.

John Coffee, Securities Law Professor at Columbia University-Will a new stock market policy prevent the market from another fallout?