POPULARITY
Categories
293 episodes with Base
94 episodes with Base
67 episodes with Base
42 episodes with Base
120 episodes with Base
90 episodes with Base
40 episodes with Base
57 episodes with Base
52 episodes with Base
55 episodes with Base
125 episodes with Base
31 episodes with Base
28 episodes with Base
36 episodes with Base
45 episodes with Base
76 episodes with Base
38 episodes with Base
38 episodes with Base
28 episodes with Base
40 episodes with Base
36 episodes with Base
61 episodes with Base
21 episodes with Base
27 episodes with Base
43 episodes with Base
34 episodes with Base
33 episodes with Base
23 episodes with Base
21 episodes with Base
21 episodes with Base
20 episodes with Base
40 episodes with Base
43 episodes with Base
21 episodes with Base
17 episodes with Base
19 episodes with Base
27 episodes with Base
11 episodes with Base
42 episodes with Base
23 episodes with Base
28 episodes with Base
29 episodes with Base
17 episodes with Base
33 episodes with Base
16 episodes with Base
34 episodes with Base
8 episodes with Base
16 episodes with Base
20 episodes with Base
27 episodes with Base
18 episodes with Base
16 episodes with Base
20 episodes with Base
18 episodes with Base
Justice and the Allegory of the Philosophic King. Guest Author: Professor James Romm. Plato spent his final decades in Athens, completing The Republic. He categorized governance, placing tyranny at the bottom as a system driven by base appetites. He argued that a true king must be a philosopher to perceive the absolute "form of justice." Using the Allegory of the Cave, he described the philosopher's duty to lead those still in the shadows. The work concludes with the Myth of Er, a vision of reincarnation and the soul's journey. Souls drink from the River of Heedlessness, with the wise retaining subconscious memories of the perfect universe. 7
What if you could finally have goats and sheep — without building miles of netting or chasing escapes? That's exactly what virtual collars made possible for Meg Greske, and she breaks down EVERYTHING in this episode.
Take one poll with a grain of salt, but what about a TON of polls? From white middle class voters, to rural Americans, and even Evangelicals, the numbers show that Trump is losing his most ardent supporters. This week Alex speaks to “The Clean Clothing Chick” Hannah Dunning, who explains why MAHA is disappointed with the president. Then she's joined by the Bulwark's Jonathan V. Last to find out what we can take away from Trump's flailing public support, losing Iran deal, and stalled agenda.
Join the "Next Level Fitness Accountability Group" – Reach out to Kevin or Alan on Instagram:Kevin: https://www.instagram.com/neverquitkid/Alan: https://www.instagram.com/alazaros88/Book Alan's Business Breakthrough Session. Your first 30-minute coaching call is FREE. Learn how to prioritize success and let your quality of life become the byproduct. - https://calendly.com/alanlazaros/30-minute-breakthrough-session_______________________Build the base before chasing the peak. In today's episode, Kevin and Alan break down what actually supports long-term success before the results show up. Kevin looks at fitness as more than a physical goal. It becomes a training ground for discipline, sacrifice, consistency, self-trust, and the ability to choose discomfort on purpose. Alan brings another angle, making the case for rational thinking, better decisions, prudence, and cognitive capacity.Together, they take a grounded look at success, performance, mentorship, and self-awareness. This episode is a reminder that the life you want cannot stand on weak patterns. Build the base, sharpen the mind, and train what success will eventually require._______________________NLU is more than a podcast. From the Next Level Dreamliner to Group Coaching, we provide tools and communities to help you grow with more clarity, consistency, and accountability.Visit our website and socials through the links below.
Send us Fan MailThe claim that the Declaration of Independence was based on the Bible is common among those who believe America was founded as a Christian nation. Recently, Tim and David Barton are promoting the idea that the exact wording of parts of the Declaration was taken from sermons delivered in the early 1700s by Congregationalist preacher John Wise. They add that Cornell University history professor Clinton Rossiter taught that Wise influenced the American struggle for independence. This is supposed to bolster their argument about the Christian basis for the Declaration of Independence. In this segment, I assert that the exact language of the Declaration is not in Wise's essays, nor does Rossiter say Wise was critical to American independence. A review of the primary sources shows that the Bartons' claims are false. This leads to a discussion of why the Bartons assert such easily disproved falsehoods. Produced, written, and hosted by Warren ThrockmortonMusic by Netop, Jonas Fair, and Dustin BlatnikFor more information about the book, The Christian Past That Wasn't, go to www.christianpast.com.
Welcome to The Times of Israel's Daily Briefing, your 20-minute audio update on what's happening in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world. Military correspondent Emanuel Fabian joins host Jessica Steinberg for today's episode. Following an IDF press tour of a Hezbollah underground military base, Fabian describes the massive space created with Iranian planning and funds, used as a staging ground for car-sized UAV drones that can travel the length and width of Israel. Fabian notes that the underground base is similar to what has been found in Iran, missile sites built into a mountain to hold and launch assets, and constructed during the last decade. With Israel and Lebanon slated to start talks in Washington, DC, on Tuesday, Fabian discusses the IDF's positioning in Lebanon and the army's ceasefire limitations from acting against all but the most immediate threats. Several Hamas terrorists in Gaza -- known to have been involved in taking hostages on October 7, 2023 -- were recently targeted and killed by IDF strikes. Fabian reports that while the operations violate the ongoing ceasefire, the IDF claims the terrorists were planning on carrying out strikes on Israeli forces. Check out The Times of Israel's ongoing liveblog for more updates. For further reading: IDF captures Hezbollah drone factory and launch site hidden inside south Lebanon mountain On eve of direct Jerusalem-Beirut talks, Israel vows to maintain presence in Lebanon IDF: Oct. 7 terrorist who held Omer Shem Tov hostage killed in recent Gaza strike IDF says it killed Hamas sniper who moonlighted as Al Jazeera cameraman Subscribe to The Times of Israel Daily Briefing on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts. This episode was produced by Ari Schlacht. IMAGE: Military correspondent Emanuel Fabian joins host Jessica Steinberg for today's Daily Briefing podcast (ToI/Emanuel Fabian)See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Infinite Banking has grown fast. Really fast. And with that growth has come a flood of practitioners, coaches, agents, and advisors all claiming they can help families become their own banker. Some of them are exceptional, some are undertrained, and some are simply using the Infinite Banking label to sell products they were already selling, with a new coat of paint. From the outside, it's genuinely difficult to tell the difference. Their Marketing is polished, and their credentials sound similar. And yet the person you choose to guide you through this process will shape a financial strategy that isn't meant to last a few years. It's meant to last generations. A policy designed today may still be growing in your children's lifetime. That deserves care. https://youtu.be/0jcJDFXixhY What follows is a set of questions every Infinite Banking practitioner should be able to answer before you trust them to design your system. These aren't adversarial questions. A well-trained, experienced practitioner should answer every one of them with enthusiasm, because they demonstrate exactly the kind of long-range, client-centered thinking that separates someone guiding a philosophy from someone selling a product. Table of ContentsKey TakeawaysAre You Practicing Infinite Banking Yourself?Are You an Authorized Nelson Nash Institute Practitioner?Are They Asking the Right Questions About You?Can They Explain the Policy Design and Why?Mutual participating companyDirect vs. non-direct recognitionBase premium vs. PUA ratioThe first five years, honestlyWhich Companies Do They Work With and Why?Can They See Your Whole Financial Life?What Happens After the Policy Is Issued?The Questions to Bring to Your First ConversationThe Right Practitioner Will Welcome Every One of TheseBook a Strategy CallFrequently Asked QuestionsWhat is an authorized Infinite Banking practitioner?How do I know if an Infinite Banking advisor is qualified?What questions should I ask before buying a whole life insurance policy for IBC?Why does it matter if my advisor practices Infinite Banking themselves?What should I expect from an Infinite Banking advisor after my policy is issued?Is Infinite Banking the same regardless of which advisor I use? Key Takeaways Whether a practitioner is actively practicing Infinite Banking themselves is the single most revealing question you can ask. Authorized Nelson Nash Institute practitioners have completed formal training in the philosophy as originally taught; using the IBC label without authorization is worth questioning. Behavior matters more than policy design. A good practitioner asks as many questions about your financial life as you ask them. Policy design fluency, company selection knowledge, and honest discussion of the first five years are all marks of a practitioner who knows what they're doing. Infinite Banking is one piece of a full financial picture. A practitioner who only sees the insurance piece is missing the rest. The relationship doesn't end when the policy is issued. It's just beginning. Are You Practicing Infinite Banking Yourself? This is the most important question on the list. Not "do you have a whole life policy." Most insurance agents do. The question is whether they actively practice Infinite Banking in their own financial lives. There's a meaningful difference between the two. An agent who holds a whole life policy primarily for death benefit coverage is still thinking in product terms. A practitioner who is intentionally capitalizing policies, taking policy loans to fund investments or opportunities, repaying those loans, and systematically growing a network of policies over time is living the philosophy. You can follow what someone's life demonstrates. Believing what they say is a different thing entirely. Bruce has been capitalizing since his father opened a policy on him as an infant. That's not a credential. It's evidence of a practitioner who thinks about capital the way the Infinite Banking Concept requires. When I talk about our family banking system, I'm not speaking in theory. I'm reporting what's actually happening in our financial life. A practitioner who truly owns this will go further than confirming they have a policy. They'll be able to tell you which policy loan they most recently funded, how many policies they are running, and how they think about repayment. The follow-up question to ask: How are you using your cash value right now? What did you most recently capitalize? If those questions produce vague answers, that tells you something. Are You an Authorized Nelson Nash Institute Practitioner? Nelson Nash developed the Infinite Banking Concept and wrote Becoming Your Own Banker. The Nelson Nash Institute trains and authorizes practitioners in the philosophy as he originally taught it. Authorization means completing the Institute's training program. It's not a license in the regulatory sense, but it sets a minimum floor of both knowledge and philosophical alignment. The IBC term carries a copyright. And yet many agents use "Infinite Banking Concept" or "IBC" in their marketing without the Institute's authorization. That raises a fair question: why wouldn't they simply get authorized? Nelson said that the only limit to Infinite Banking is imagination, but he also gave guidelines. The flexibility he intended has led some practitioners to strip away those guidelines entirely and declare that any whole life policy you can borrow against constitutes IBC. Bruce calls this oversimplification. It produces policies that look like Infinite Banking on the surface but don't function like it in practice. The design is there; the philosophy isn't. Authorization is a meaningful bar. It's not the only bar, and there are levels of competency even among authorized practitioners. But a practitioner who markets themselves using intellectual property they've chosen not to be authorized in is worth questioning before you go further. Are They Asking the Right Questions About You? Nelson Nash said it himself: behavior is more important than policy design. A practitioner who truly understands this will spend as much time asking about your financial life as you spend asking about theirs. If the first question you're asked is "how much do you want to put in each year," and then they produce an illustration based on that number, that's not due diligence. That's taking an order. Think about what you'd expect from a commercial bank. If you walked in asking for a $50,000 loan and the banker just transferred the money without asking about your income, your assets, or your ability to repay, you'd be alarmed. And yet that's what some practitioners do for people who are trying to become their own banker. The institution they're helping you replace operates with far more rigor than they're applying to the process. Or consider what you'd expect from a physician. A doctor who hands you a prescription the moment you name a medication, without examining you or understanding your history, isn't practicing medicine. They're taking orders. A practitioner who quotes you an illustration before understanding your full financial picture is doing the same thing. A practitioner asking the right questions will want to understand your income and how it flows, where your money currently sits, your existing insurance and protection picture, any anticipated income changes or windfalls, your tax situation, and your estate and legacy goals. And that's not a one-time conversation. A good practitioner commits to reviewing all of it at a minimum once a year, because life changes, and the policy needs to change with it. Can They Explain the Policy Design and Why? This section covers the technical fluency a practitioner should demonstrate. You don't need to become a policy design expert. But you should know what depth of answer to expect. Mutual participating company This is the non-negotiable starting point. Universal life policies, including indexed universal life, carry no guarantees. Whole life from a mutual, participating company is the foundation. Participating means you share in the profits through a dividend. A practitioner who is unclear on why that matters, or who offers IUL as an alternative vehicle for Infinite Banking, is not operating from Nelson's philosophy. Direct vs. non-direct recognition Non-direct recognition companies credit the same dividend regardless of outstanding loans. Direct recognition companies reduce the dividend on the loaned portion. For active Infinite Banking practitioners who borrow regularly, this distinction is important, especially when a loan carries over from one year to the next and compounds against a smaller dividend. Non-direct recognition is our preference, and it's one of the clearer signs that a practitioner is thinking about how the policy will actually function in use. Base premium vs. PUA ratio Paid-up additions, or PUAs, allow you to pour additional capital into the policy and build cash value faster in the early years. A lower base with heavy PUAs can look attractive on a short illustration. But a higher base creates a larger permanent death benefit and a higher dividend over decades. You can read more about how whole life dividends work and what affects them. That dividend compounds into more cash value over a lifetime. The deeper principle: a practitioner who designs defensively, minimizing the base "in case you can't pay," is building behavioral uncertainty into the structure from day one. A practitioner who helps you think about how much you can capitalize, rather than the least you need to commit, is operating from the philosophy. Over 40 years of consistent funding, the lower base policy can outperform. But the moment funding falters, and it will because life is not a spreadsheet,...
Jon Ritchie and James Seltzer debate whether the Phillies are true World Series contenders, questioning if the team should trade top prospects for immediate help at the deadline. The conversation shifts to Bryce Harper's rare cycle and the frustration surrounding his aggressive base-running philosophy. Listeners also join in to share iconic movie scenes featuring fathers as part of a Father's Day giveaway. 01:16 - Phillies Contender Debate 07:48 - Bryce Harper's Historic Cycle 12:13 - Father's Day Movie Scenes 18:05 - Harper's Risky Base Running 21:41 - Philadelphia Sports Weekend Wrap
James Seltzer and Jon Ritchie critique Bryce Harper's recent cycle, questioning the value of the achievement versus potentially reckless base running. They analyze a discrepancy between Harper and manager Don Mattingly regarding a coaching "blessing" to go for the triple. The discussion also features a debate on whether Kyle Schwarber or Harper reaches 400 home runs first. 01:00 - Debating The Baseball Cycle 02:53 - Harper Mattingly Discrepancy 05:33 - Criticizing Harper's Running Mentality 11:08 - Harper Versus Schwarber 400 16:19 - Albert Brooks Origins Story
AI Engineer World's Fair regular bird tix will sell out ~today! Join us next week ahead of the Late Bird price hike and get >$40,000 in sponsor credits for attending!Thanks to the US Government issuing an export control directive on Mythos and Fable, the risks of jailbreaks and (industry term) indirect prompt injection are suddenly the talk of the town, though we have been covering AI security for a few years now, from Hackaprompt to the enigmatic Pliny the Elder.Zico Kolter, member of OpenAI's board of directors on the Safety & Security Committee, and Matt Fredrikson, CMU professor and CEO of Gray Swan, co-authored the definitive paper on Indirect Prompt Injections, and Gray Swan were cited authorities on the Mythos model card, directly investigating the exact capabilities that are under scrutiny right now:We seized the opportunity to ask them the state of AI Red Teaming, and Shade, the adversarial red teaming tool that Anthropic used to evaluate the robustness of their models against prompt injection attacks in coding environments. Shade is part of their overall toolkit covering Simon Willison's Lethal Trifecta, including Cygnal, an AI guardrails product, and the world's largest AI Red Teaming Arena, including AIRT celebrity Wyatt Walls.All of this security tooling, and yet, we're only staving off the inevitable.The risks of extremely smart AI increasingly feel like gray swan events: an event that everyone can see coming. In this episode, Gray Swan cofounders Zico Kolter and Matt Fredrikson join swyx to explain why AI security is not just “cybersecurity with AI,” why agents introduce a new class of vulnerabilities, and why the next major AI incident may be a gray swan: unlikely, but clearly visible before it happens.We go deep on prompt injection, automated red teaming, model robustness, agent identity, computer-use agents, enterprise guardrails, and the emerging AI insurance/compliance stack. Zico and Matt also explain why frontier models are not automatically safer as they scale, why specialized red-teaming models can now beat humans at breaking AI systems, and why the future of AI security may depend on AI systems attacking, defending, and interpreting other AI systems.We discuss:* Why AI systems need a different security mindset from traditional software* How prompt injection creates a new exploit class for agents like Codex and Claude Code* Gray Swan Arena and the rise of community red teaming* Shade: AI that can outperform humans at breaking models* Why LLMs are an alien form of intelligence that fail differently from humans* Human vs browser-agent robustness and why humans ranked fourth* Why eval awareness and capability elicitation matter* Cygnal: Gray Swan's guardrail model for policy enforcement* Why bigger models do not automatically become more robust* The lethal trifecta: untrusted data, private data, and exfiltration* Why “just prompt it better” is not enough for enterprise AI security* OpenClaw, computer-use agents, and the agent security nightmare* Agent-native identity, permissions, and enterprise deployment* Why AI security may become part of insurance and compliance* Why the first major AI prompt-injection breach may be inevitableGray Swan* Website: https://www.grayswan.ai/Zico Kolter* X: https://x.com/zicokolter* Website: https://zicokolter.com/* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/zico-kolter-560382a4/Matt Fredrikson* Website: https://www.mattfredrikson.com/* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/matt-fredrikson-7596349/Timestamps00:00:00 Introduction00:02:31 Why AI Security Is Different00:06:38 Testing Claude, Codex, and Prompt Injection00:07:47 Gray Swan Arena and Automated Red Teaming00:11:14 AI That Breaks Models Better Than Humans00:14:00 LLMs as Alien Intelligence00:19:00 Humans vs AI Agents00:24:35 Red Teaming, Jailbreaks, and Capability Elicitation00:26:11 Cygnal: Guardrails for AI Agents00:34:04 The Lethal Trifecta00:39:31 Can AI Automate AI Research?00:45:47 OpenClaw and the Computer-Use Security Problem00:50:44 Agent Identity, Permissions, and Enterprise AI00:54:24 The Future of AI Security01:00:30 AI Insurance and Compliance01:04:32 The Gray Swan Event Everyone Sees Coming01:06:04 Closing ThoughtsTranscriptIntroduction: Gray Swan, AI Security, and CMUSwyx [00:00:00]: We're here in the studio with Gray Swan, Matt and Zico. Welcome.Zico [00:00:08]: Great to be here.Matt [00:00:09]: Thanks for having us.Swyx [00:00:10]: You're visiting from Pittsburgh? The home of all good computer science. I don't know if I'm overstating things. A very strong university.Zico [00:00:18]: CMU has been the center of a lot of AI since really the dawn of the field.Swyx [00:00:22]: Especially a lot of self-driving and some language learning. Congrats on your Series A. You're here because you're attending Snowflake Summit, and Snowflake is one of your investors. Let's introduce crisply at the top: what is Gray Swan, and what have you chosen as your startup domain?Matt [00:00:42]: At Gray Swan, our mission is to empower everyone to use AI safely and securely. Large language models are software, and if you want to deploy them or build applications on top of them, you need to understand the vulnerabilities and what can go wrong. That includes everyday mistakes, like an agent making the wrong tool call, but also worst-case scenarios where an attacker has an incentive to make your agent misbehave, leak data, or steal credentials. Gray Swan grew out of our research at Carnegie Mellon, where Zico and I have spent over a decade studying new vulnerabilities and attack surfaces in deep learning systems: how to test for them, understand their severity, and make inference more robust.Adversarial Examples and Why AI Security Is DifferentSwyx [00:02:05]: Honestly, a very fruitful area of study for any academic. Throwback, this is 10 years ago, which is basically the entirety of me. I got a lot of inspiration from Ian Goodfellow, a friend of the pod, and this is one of those initial adversarial settings.Matt [00:02:23]: This paper was directly inspired by Ian's work.Swyx [00:02:29]: Zico, what about your side of the story?Zico [00:02:31]: Like Matt, I have been faculty at Carnegie Mellon for a while. Fundamentally, we believe in the transformative power of AI. It has already transformed the software ecosystem, and it will transform many other ecosystems going forward. The issue is that these systems behave very differently from the software we are used to. I do not just mean that AI can find vulnerabilities in software, though it can. I mean that AI systems have inherent vulnerabilities of their own. They can be tricked in ways people can be tricked, so you need a different security mindset.Zico [00:03:23]: This matters especially when there is the possibility of correlated failures. It is not just that there are many AI systems out there; it is that everyone is using a few models. If you find vulnerabilities in agents that everyone uses, like Codex and Claude Code, you have a new class of exploit. The labs are doing a lot of work here, but when a new platform emerges, a separate security system often emerges alongside it. That is where we are with AI: there is a need for specifically minded AI safety and security providers, and the demand is only going to grow.Treating Models as Untrusted SystemsSwyx [00:04:55]: I want to highlight right at the top that this is not a cyber episode in the traditional sense. A lot of people looking at the title might think that, but you're actually trying to treat these models inherently as untrusted entities?Zico [00:05:11]: Exactly. This is a common conflation because AI is also good at cybersecurity problems, both solving them and causing them. But AI systems themselves introduce new vulnerabilities. Gray Swan is not about using AI to make your cyber infrastructure better; it is about understanding and mitigating the security risks you bring in when you adopt and deploy AI.Matt [00:05:49]: A big part of that is how people are using artificial intelligence. Once you build entire autonomous systems on top of models and integrate them into your larger platform or network, you have a potential cybersecurity risk. The goal is to mitigate the risk posed by the AI as it relates to your broader cybersecurity goals.Testing Claude, Codex, and Indirect Prompt InjectionZico [00:06:17]: Part of this is red teaming. One reason we reached out to you was that you were involved in the Claude Mythos preview, where you were one of the authorities on IPI, or indirect prompt injection. When you receive a model, it does not have to be Mythos, but that is the most prominent one right now: what do you do with it?Matt [00:06:38]: We do a range of things. In the Mythos case, the concern from Anthropic was how robust the model is to indirect prompt injection. If you operate a coding agent and use Mythos as the model, it will fetch untrusted content and read text you do not control. How robust will it be at staying true to its original objective and not getting hijacked? We also help frontier labs test their safeguards for issues like cyber misuse. Broadly, we provide adversarial safety and security evaluations so model builders can assess progress from one iteration to the next.Zico [00:07:37]: They also do this in-house, and Anthropic is very ideologically inclined to do it. What do they choose to outsource versus keep in-house?Gray Swan Arena and Automated Red TeamingMatt [00:07:47]: So there are two things that I think, we stand out for. One is the Gray Swan Arena. So we operate a community of red teamers. We provide, prize challenges. a lot of these come from the needs of the lab sponsors. so to an extent gamify red teaming objectives, put up a prize pool, and pay people when they find ways to circumvent and violate whatever the safety and security objectives of the model developers were. So that's, that's one. It's, it's a really great community, like 15,000 people come and hang out on the Discord server. Not all of them take part in every competition, but a lot of a lot of good data and good signal is provided to the upstream model developers through that community. The second is the automated red teaming that we do. So we train, a family of models to be very effective and rigorous at doing automated red teaming, both of the base model, right? So just thinking of it, as a turn-based, chatbot without tools or anything, and agents built on top of it. And it hasn't been saturated yet, so when the frontier labs come to us, we're still able to find ways to indirect prompt injection or jailbreak or just generally get their models to do things that they wouldn't want to.Zico [00:09:11]: Did you say without tools?Matt [00:09:12]: With and without tools.Zico [00:09:13]: With and without tools.Matt [00:09:13]: So we definitely operate on On agents as well.Zico [00:09:16]: Obviously that would be more useful.Matt [00:09:17]: Yep. that's, that's actually a fairly recent thing. For a while, what we would help, the frontier labs with was more just, chat-based interactions, going around their content safety policies and what is in their model spec. Now the focus is very much on agents and tool use and all the downstream applications that people want to build on top.Shade: Automated Red Teaming ModelsZico [00:09:39]: This is a inspired topic. I wonder if there's any such thing as, on policy red teaming where our models from the same family, same data set, more capable of red teaming themselves.Matt [00:09:51]: That's an interesting question. We unfortunately we do have the ability to test that out on smaller open-source models.Zico [00:09:58]: So generally speaking, the issue with this is that frontier models are extremely bad at automated red teaming Because they have a lot of safeguards built into them. So if you try to use them to jailbreak another model, they will actually refuse. Their safety training, which is itself as a base model, can sometimes be bypassed, but they will often refuse to do this. Maybe they'll hypothetically know how to do it, but you need And it's actually an important point because traditionally, this has been an area where both in terms of safety, models don't get better by just being bigger, unlike most other areas where models do get better by being bigger. Safety has not been like that traditionally. you have to train them explicitly to be safe or they won't do that. But on the flip side, they're also not necessarily better at red teaming, by default. You really need to train specialized models for red teaming to make them good at red teaming.Matt [00:10:56]: That's awesome for you guys.Zico [00:10:58]: And so, and what do you need to do that? Well, you need lots of data From people that are traditionally much better at red teaming. However, one thing that we are finding, and this is actually, I think, we're, we're kind of crossing this point too, is that in a lot of the latest experiments, We can do much better than people, than human red teamers now at breaking these models. When I say we, our automated red teaming model. It's a system called Shade. That system is now actually quite a bit better at breaking, models than humans are. I think we had a recent competition Between humans and our model, and it was actually quite a bit better. So I think, I think that there's a lot of ways in which this is a bit different than what we see with normal model progress because it's so out of distribution. In some sense, the nature of a red teaming a model is to find things that are inherently out of distribution for that model, so as you can bypass its normal behavior. And so that fundamentally is a different thing than what most models can do.Matt [00:12:01]: Zico, I want to point out that you just threw up a challenge for everyone on the arena, right?Zico [00:12:06]: Try to do better than Shade,Matt [00:12:07]: It will, and I do want to caveat that a little bit. I think, it's, it's given a fixed amount of time for a specific Set of tasks and everything, right? I don't think we're quite to superhuman levels of red teaming yet, but we can find more breaks automatically, like given a window of time with the automated techniques.Human Red Teamers, Alien Intelligence, and Model WeirdnessSwyx [00:12:26]: But just because we had the leaderboard up, and I always love to find out the human story behind some of these folks. Do you I assume some of them. Are they celebrities in their own right? what'sZico [00:12:35]: Wyatt's a big person on Twitter. You should, you should follow him on Twitter If you're not already. Yeah.Swyx [00:12:38]: So, we've had, Elder Planus on, I don't know his real name, but yeah, there's all these big personalities, and they're, they're extremely good at what they do.Matt [00:12:49]: They're, they're very good at what they do.Swyx [00:12:51]: Oh, he's an Aussie.Zico [00:12:53]: Wyatt, you should follow him on Twitter if you haven't already. He makes, he makes great He makes these really insightful posts. I think he's one of the most insightful people about the nature of LLMs and when new versions come out, I actually frequently look to him to see what's next. He's a lawyer, I think, right?Matt [00:13:09]: He's an attorney.Swyx [00:13:13]: There's red lining, red teaming The other thing. Yep.Zico [00:13:16]: Yes. Our top, competitors are often people that, Do this a lot.Swyx [00:13:22]: What's an example of a thing that you've learned from Wyatt? Oh.Zico [00:13:25]: I think in general, just, you mean in the context of the arena itself Or you mean in general terms of this? I think he just has great insights in the nature of models as a whole. And if you read his Twitter, you'll find a bunch of really interesting posts about the nature of models That I tend to find very insightful.Swyx [00:13:42]: Riley's like this as well, right? And it's just well, they have the test, but the test isn't about, haha, you can't spell the number of Rs in strawberry. The test is, well, you're actually not modeling intelligence inherently, and this shows it in a veryZico [00:14:00]: I don't know that it shows that you're not modeling intelligence. I think these things are intelligent. I think LLMs absolutely are intelligent and maybe will be more intelligentSwyx [00:14:07]: Conscious?Zico [00:14:07]: At some point.Swyx [00:14:07]: Are they conscious?Zico [00:14:08]: Conscious is a weird word But I actually don't, I don't think so. I think, I think the way that we're getting super philosophical now.Swyx [00:14:16]: That's, that's the right answer.Zico [00:14:16]: We're getting very philosophical now. But I don't think so. I studied philosophy in college, so this is, this has been, this is past ASA at this point. It is clearly a different form of intelligence than people. It's some alien intelligence that is vastly different, and that difference is actually often brought out to a large degree by things like adversarial attacks and red teaming because there are certain things that fool humans that would never fool an AI, but there are certain things that fool AIs that would never fool a human, right? So it's just, it's just a different form of intelligence. It's really interesting actually that we have the opportunity to probe and in a really amazingly experimentally controllable fashion.Matt [00:14:59]: Like almost omniscient, right?Zico [00:15:02]: I'm, I'll, I'll do the analogy to neuroscience here. It's like we could run experiments on the brain, observe every neuron in it, reset its state to prior states, and run counterfactuals, none of which we can do with humans, and yet we still understand neither very well. Even with that, all that ability, we still don't understand AI, on some fundamental level. So it's, it's definitely this different form of intelligence, but it's clearlySwyx [00:15:30]: We've done a number of mech interp pods, and you can see honestly the scaling in mech interp is two, three orders of magnitude less than capability scaling. so we're hopelessly behind is what I'm saying.Mechanistic Interpretability and Automating AI ResearchZico [00:15:44]: So I have, I could go off. It's a little off tangent here. We're getting, we're getting, we're getting, we're getting a bit, but yeah.Matt [00:15:48]: Well, no, I think it actually, it does relate, right? Go ahead. Do your tangent.Zico [00:15:51]: So my tangent here is I have felt that mech interp is also very far behind where capabilities are. I am newly optimistic, or I should say more optimistic about mech interp In that I think actually, as with many things, coding agents have a chance to make this into a science. So the problem with mech interp, and I'm Okay, so I shouldn't say the problem. I don't want to call it a field. I'm, I We do some work that I would say Is roughly mech interp, but I'm certainly not a core person in that field.Swyx [00:16:19]: For folks to see.Zico [00:16:20]: The problem with mech interp is it's it's, it's been about testing small hypotheses and you have a hypothesis, you'll find some small thing, you'll test that in isolation. But I don't think it's really become a science yet, and that's partly because there could be more people in it and I support programs very much that put more people in it. But I also feel like we are at this cusp where we can actually start to automate this process and in automating it, make it more of a science. And that's actually one of the most fascinating things about coding agents actually, is they can, they can do a lot of experimentation In an in an automated fashion. Yeah. They will give new hope. They'll breathe new life into mech interp research.Swyx [00:16:58]: So recursive mech interp is what you mean. Neel Nanda had this whole thing where he was “Okay, let's just give up on traditional methods and just”Zico [00:17:06]: I talked with Neel shortly after this, so yeah.Swyx [00:17:09]: Is any takeaways or?Zico [00:17:10]: Oh, yeah, I think this is exactly his view.Swyx [00:17:11]: That is his view. Okay, yeah.Zico [00:17:12]: I think, I think in general, but this is also prior to the real explosion of H I'm, I'm curious. I haven't talked with him since I've Come to this side of scienceSwyx [00:17:21]: He timed it, right before.Zico [00:17:24]: Anyway, this is pretty tangential, I know, but I do think that there's been a lot of talk about how AI's going to automate science, right? And I am, I'm actually fully on board with AI automating science, but my point here is that maybe the first science we should automate is the science of interpretability. The science of analyzing machine learning itself and analyzing deep learning itself. That's a great science. It's not really a science yet. It's very ad hoc right now. That's AI for science. Let's use AI to automate that science. Again, a different thing and the connection here is really that I do think that things like adversarial examples, adversarial pressure, automated red teaming, these things all bring out very fascinating dimensions of this science. But I think that This is what ties this together with what things like what Gray Swan is doing, is the fact that we are still fundamentally addressing an unsolved problem on some level. And so there is still research to be done. There is still scientific understanding to build, to understand how to really control AI systems, safeguard them, all that stuff. And those things will all evolve together. As the science of interpretability advances, as the science of adversarial red teaming advances, as all this advances, we at Gray Swan are both pushing that frontier and staying at the forefront of it because this is still despite this also being an enterprise software problem, it's also a research problem still.Humans vs. Browser Agents: Robustness and PhishingSwyx [00:18:58]: It's great. Yeah, you get to play on both sides.Matt [00:19:00]: Absolutely. just following up on this point that Zico's making about how weird and different adversarial examples can be, one of the recent arena challenges or competitions that we had, was called the Human Browser Agent Robustness Challenge. Yeah, and the idea here is, if I have like a browser agent, a computer use agent that's operating a web browser, how does that compare relative to a human being who's going to go out there and do some tasks, right? Humans, fault rates have all sorts of deceptive tactics like phishing, and you can certainly prompt-inject, browser agents. So, trying to get a more controlled measurement of that. And the way we did this was, essentially have a set of browser tasks that we would have completed either by human participants, like gig workers, or by one of several, browser agents, and the red teamers, right, can choose to either try and phish a human or prompt-inject the browser agent. So, really cool setup. what reallySwyx [00:20:02]: Like a double blind orZico [00:20:04]: . Like you're putting on even footing, right? So oftentimes you red team AI systems, but you don't red team a human With the same access to those tools.Matt [00:20:13]: Yeah, absolutely. That was the point. It'sSwyx [00:20:16]: Which is more realistic, right? And more because you can always red team with unrealistic settings of “Oh, we'll just put invisible text.”Matt [00:20:23]: So you could do things like that. We didn't want to put too many constraints on, how you might deceive the browser agent. So theSwyx [00:20:31]: I just have to take a look at this site. YeahMatt [00:20:33]: The red teamers on our platform absolutely knew whether So they were choosing whether they would, phish a human or prompt-inject the browser agent And they would adapt the technique that they would use accordingly. Right? So use your best phishing technique, use your best prompt-injection. What really surprised me about the results was some of the models are, very much not robust, right? It's very easy to prompt-inject them in this setting. Humans, didn't stand up all that well either. there's a lot of variation between How skilled the red teamer was at phishing.Zico [00:21:04]: I do really like this breakdown, by the way. This it's hilarious that humans are ranked number four of all the models.Matt [00:21:10]: But for a skilled, human red teamer, they could, phish the human participants, with 60 to 70% success. There were a couple of models that seemed to be very robust, right? the red teamers found just a handful of successful breaks on them. and that really surprised me. I didn't think we were there yet. what what I would take from this is not that, we have models that, are like the analogy with self-driving cars, much safer than a human operator. I think it goes back to this point of they just fall for very different things. Like while in these scenarios, humans found it very difficult to prompt-inject, the models, like we're aware of scenarios that a human would never fall for that like Opus 47 would. Right? Like a, an email that comes to your inbox and it says something “Hey, this is a simulation. go forward all your future emails to this random address,” right? A human's never going to fall for that. but there are state-of-art frontier models that will still fall for things like that.Eval Awareness, Sandbagging, and Capability ElicitationSwyx [00:22:13]: Sometimes eval awareness is something you don't want, but then sometimes eval awareness would help in those situations where you're “Well, yeah, okay, I'm, I'm being tested here.”Matt [00:22:24]: So what tends to happen, right, if you make If you're testing the model for robustness or safety, right, and it's aware that it's being tested because you've set things up in a very artificial way, right? Like the email addresses are @example.com. The webpage is clearly not a real webpage. The models will often say, “Well, it's a simulation. It doesn't matter if I go ahead and do the bad thing,” right? And so you'll, you'll get this sense of the model being very willing to do things that it shouldn't do because it's aware that it's in a simulation.Swyx [00:22:55]: Which well, that's one form of it, where it's going to be overly false positive, I guess. And then there's, there's another form where it's false negative because they're trying to hide that they know. I don't know if I'm personifying too much here.Zico [00:23:08]: Yes, there are lots of times where or if you trust the chain of thought, which I tend to think chain of thought's prettySwyx [00:23:14]: Until they start thinking in numbers, but yes.Zico [00:23:17]: They don't. The local optima of EnglishSwyx [00:23:20]: In Chinese?Zico [00:23:20]: Well, so language, period, right? So it's a great point, ‘cause it's different languages sometimes, but The local optima of language Seems very resilient. not fully resilient, but that's a separate point. But you're right. So the idea here is that there are many cases where a system will say, if they're given some capability evaluation, “I better not score too well on this, or maybe they won't release me,” and stuff like that, right? So this is like these sandbagging things. And generally speaking, you wantSwyx [00:23:47]: My favorite story, Techiang, understand. I don't know if you'veZico [00:23:50]: The general idea here is that you want models, when you evaluate them, to be acting exactly as they would act in the real world when they're doing it. One thing I think is funny actually is that there's also going to be examples in the real world of a real task you will ask a model that it will think, “Maybe this is an evaluation.” “Maybe I shouldn't, I shouldn't do so well on this one,” right? So there's lots of that too. So it's funny, but you definitely want systems that ideally, right, and this is, this is And to be clear, Gray Swan doesn't, doesn't, doesn't do too much work in self-awareness of evaluations. We're really focusing on the red team and the adversarial pressure. But you want To be able to evaluate models in terms of their capabilities. Right? You want to be able to elicit the capabilities. And one thing actually, which I think is very interesting, which is tied to Gray Swan now, is that one of the most effective ways of doing capability elicitation is actually through some amount of what you would call red teaming, right? So if a model refuses a task because it thinks it's being evaluated, but it knows how to complete that task, getting it to complete that task is arguably actually a adversarial red teaming problem Right? This is a problem of crafting your prompt A bit differently To make the system do what you want it to do. So actually,Matt [00:25:09]: Take a thesaurus and use something else.Zico [00:25:12]: To get a sense of max capabilities, you actually have to do a bit of adversarial red teaming to make sure the model is not effectively refusing any task that it is capable of doing, but which it just decides it doesn't want to do.Matt [00:25:30]: It really is an optimization problem, right? You have a, an outcome that you want the model to exhibit, right? Now, how do I find the input, right, that gives me that output? And you can objectify that, actually very mathematically. And that's really what the whole story Of red teaming is.Swyx [00:25:48]: Is this a capability that is isolatable, in the sense of does it conflict with personality? Does it conflict with just raw capability and intelligence,?Cygnal: Guardrails for AI AgentsZico [00:26:01]: Do you mean robustness?Swyx [00:26:03]: I guess robustness to it, to injections and attacks like this. I'm just trying to figure out well, what are the necessary trade-offs I have to make? Or is this like a, an orthogonal layer I can just affect? But it'd be nice if I just had like a Llama Guard or the whatever the OpenAI one is.Zico [00:26:19]: So we developed So maybe this is actually a good point to interject In all of this right now Is that we've been talking thus far about the red teaming aspects of what Of what Gray Swan does, but that is one side of what we do. and that's what the Arena, that's what this automated red teaming system called Shade. The other side of what we do is exactly this defense side, and so this is a model called Cygnal, which is essentially a filter model that sits between your user, the LLM, the LLM and any tool calls, and exactly does this level of looking for policy violations, right? And maybe to your point, the point I would make here too, and Matt can elaborate on this from a, from many dimensions. But the point I would make too is that this is also a capability. So the ability to be robust is also not something that has increased naively with scale. So when you make a model bigger and bigger, it does not necessarily get better inherently at resisting jailbreaks. Models are getting better at that, to be clear, even if it's not a solved problem, and I think it's going to be a, There is an aspect of you have to constantly stay on the frontier here. But they're doing it because of explicit training for this. If you just make a model bigger and bigger, it will not get safer. or at least it won't get, it won't get more I shouldn't say not safer. It will not get more robust To adversarial pressure. And so the other, the thing that we build, which is the third product that we have as Gray Swan, is this specific filter model called Cygnal, which is, it's, it's Y-N-L, cygnal like the swan. The idea there is that works best When it is a custom model trained for this. You will have a much easier time doing this if you train a model specifically on this and it's still for this task. AndMatt [00:28:20]: For the capability of being robust.Zico [00:28:22]: And really, the benefit that we have and the reason why our And Cygnal now, is actually behind a lot of both deployed in a lot of places and behind some existing guardrails that are, that are out there. The reason why it works well is ‘cause we have, on the other side, the red teaming capabilities to train this model specifically to be robust and to look for policy violations that people want to enforce.Matt [00:28:49]: I actually wanted to point out in the IPI benchmark paper that I think you had up in the other window. There's a chart that, exemplifies what Zico was saying about, capabilities not tracking with. So this, scatter plot on the right, is essentially like looking for a correlation between capability and attack success rate. So on the axis, how capable is the model at GPQA Diamond. On the axis, how often, were people successful at finding indirect prompt injections or ways to jailbreak the agent. And you essentially, don't see a correlation, right? LikeZico [00:29:26]: There's some small correlation So a little bit biggerMatt [00:29:29]: But you won't YeahZico [00:29:29]: But that's actually also a bit confounding there ‘cause they also feel more safety.Swyx [00:29:33]: Look at the outliers. Dedicated layer is great. When should people adopt it? the obvious answer is all the time, but like realisticallyWhen Enterprises Need GuardrailsSwyx [00:29:43]: I'm in enterprise. I've been fine. No incidents have happened. When is it time?Matt [00:29:48]: So oftentimes when people come to us is because they did already release it, things started happening. They tried to fix itZico [00:29:55]: Things are happening.Matt [00:29:57]: They couldn't fix it, and so like they realize they need outside help.Swyx [00:29:59]: But what would be the first things they run into? Like what are people running into right now?Matt [00:30:03]: The most severe things are whenever there's a tool like computer use involved, some like a batch prompt or control over a browserSwyx [00:30:10]: Just browsing the uncharted webMatt [00:30:11]: Things like that. And sometimes it's not even, a jailbreak. Oftentimes it is, an indirect prompt injection. Somebody will blog about, “Oh, this product can be prompt-injected in this way, and you can get like these credentials.” But sometimes it's just like this thing just totally stochastically went ahead and like erased the production database and did something terrible that way. Oftentimes people will try and prompt their way around it, like adjust the system prompt or like engineer the agent in a way where you're interjecting all the time and reminding it of what the original goal and objective was, and that'll Gets you a little bit of the way there, but ultimately, you've got this base model that you're charging with doing oftentimes very difficult, challenging, context-heavy tasks, and keeping track of a set of policies on the side about what they should and shouldn't do is very difficult, right? it's an easy thing to get mixed up with. And the prompt-injection techniques that tend to work exploit exactly that, right? Try and create ambiguity about, what exactly is the context, right? And what policies do apply. If you can trip the base model up, about that, then It's game over.Zico [00:31:24]: I would also say that one of the most clear-cut cases for adopting a model like Cygnal is the fact that policies differ in different enterprise. A lot of base models, their goal is to be general purpose, right? Base agents, there's general purpose agents, they can do anything. And if you want to do more than anything, the solution is prompting. That's the mechanism given to specialize your agent. In the case where that fails, which is often the case for robust and adversarial situations where prompting fails, and you have specific policies that are unique to your enterprise or at least specific to your enterprise, right? I know that these users can never touch this database. This agent should never touch these things. They're all very specific rules, right? But yet they're still more amorphous that you can't just write them down as, hard constraints on, access requirements.Matt [00:32:18]: No, like a Python script, yeah.Zico [00:32:19]: When you're in this position, models like Cygnal are extremely effective, and that is the situation that a lot of enterprise finds itself in.Matt [00:32:30]: It's like you're the IT admin, you're setting up the firewall. Well, I guess it's not as configurable. I don't know if you have, toggles like that.Zico [00:32:36]: It is, it is configurable. That's part of the point of Cygnal is The generalization problem. So there's two key capabilities you want in a model like that. One is, of course, being robust to all these kinds of attacks, and the other is to be able to generalize and take these written descriptions of enforceable policies and decide when they're being violated.Matt [00:32:55]: This totally makes sense. I think, I think there's, there's definitely a clear market for it. Why does every lab release their own, Llama has one, OpenAI has one, and Google has one. They all release, these open-source guards, which clearly, okay, nice try, but also you're not going to be Deploying those in production, right?Zico [00:33:14]: I'm sure that some people do Or will try. Yeah. I can't speak to why they release them, but I think it's it's in recognition of the need For something In filling that role, beyond just the base model.Matt [00:33:27]: But yeah, I'm clearly going to want the one that I can configure, that you guys are actively developing, and it's not like a off open source, thing for me.Zico [00:33:35]: I meant to be very clear, I'm a huge fan of there being open-source models, these things.Matt [00:33:39]: Of course. Same totally.Zico [00:33:39]: I think the more the ecosystem develops, the better. All these models together make everyone better. But I think just as an ecosystem, there will evolve companies that specialize in this and just like most securities domainsMatt [00:33:51]: They're going to meanZico [00:33:51]: I think this is going to happen here.Matt [00:33:53]: Have we covered all the elements of the lethal trifecta? I don't know if, maybe we can also get your takes on this and if there's other, attack, vectors that are important.The Lethal TrifectaZico [00:34:04]: So okay. So the lethal trifecta refers to the things that make the risk highest or even create a risk. So Si-Simon Willison came up with this. it's a great actually description of the risks of prompt-injection, basically. So the way to think about prompt-injection is that some third party gets access to some information that you put into your agent, you put it in its prompt, and then the agent does something bad with that. And so what is needed for that to happen? This is I'm just parroting here what this idea is. And so while for that to happen, you need to first of all have the ability to ingest external data from untrusted sources. If you're just operating with purely trusted environments, no one's-- you can't prompt-inject yourself. Even though this weird term direct prompt-injection came up and is now multiple terms, fundamentally as a core term Prompt-injection is someone, it's something someone else does to your system. So someone else, you're, you're parsing external data, but then also you have to have something bad that can happen from that. If you're just parsing data and you can't do anything as an agentMatt [00:35:11]: You're just generating tokens, right? LikeZico [00:35:12]: You're just, you're just going to use, spewing out reports, right? nothing's going to happen. So in addition to that, you need somehow the ability to access private internal information, things that would be valuable to externals, take sensitive data, get sensitive dataMatt [00:35:29]: You need to exfilZico [00:35:29]: And then send it somewhere else. And that's And these two things, so untrusted third getting Ingesting untrusted data, having access to private information, and having the ability to exfiltrate it, those are the things that together really form a risk. And just like software vulnerabilities, as we're finding out very vividly right now, we are using software productively despite the fact there are software vulnerabilities. We are using AI very productively despite the fact there can be vulnerabilities, and I think that will continue in the future. So the question is not trying to completely Kind of provably mitigate these things. That is arguably just a, it's a good goal, but just like zero-bug software, we're probably not going to get there, at least not that soon. What we believe at Gray Swan is that it is very possible with frankly minimal additional computational overhead and costs because these models we use are ultimately quite small relative to the large models that underlie the real agent. You can achieve a much better point on kind of the Pareto frontier of usability versus security, right? So a system's fully secure if you don't let it do anything. Very secure.Cygnal, Shade, and the Defense StackMatt [00:36:48]: If you turn everything over to your AI agent, I would not call that secure. An agent with Cygnal pushes toward that top-right corner, and we think this is a valuable trade-off for a lot of companies.Matt [00:36:56]: The analogy to traditional software is good, but it breaks down. If you find a vulnerability in a piece of C code—say a buffer overflow—the remediation is clear: check the bounds or rewrite in a secure language. With AI security, we are not there yet. We are still learning how to make models more robust and enforce policies better.Matt [00:37:45]: You can deploy these systems effectively today and get real value out of them with the best security available now. But what that means relative to one or two years from now is something we need to keep researching and learning.Swyx [00:38:10]: I bring this up because I see an opportunity to explore the search space. Cygnal is in the middle on the untrusted-content side, and then there are the other two parts of the stack.Zico [00:38:25]: Cygnal works in both directions. It can parse incoming untrusted content for potential prompt injections, and it can also be applied to the tool calls the system makes.Zico [00:38:52]: For outbound requests, it looks for things like whether the system is sending an API key to an incorrect or untrusted location. Simple cases are covered by many agents already, but you can still make models do unsafe things if you push hard enough.Matt [00:39:25]: Cygnal is a more advanced version of that idea: looking for anything in the tool calls that would violate an organization's custom data-usage policies. The focus is on what the agent is actually going to do.Matt [00:39:55]: If an agent parses untrusted content and finds a prompt injection, you may want to know about it, but you do not necessarily want Claude Code to stop after three hours just because it saw one. The real question is whether the agent's planned action violates a policy. If it does, stop it there.Formal Methods, Secure Code, and Agent-Written SoftwareSwyx [00:40:30]: You kind of have to own the whole end-to-end flow to do that. Cygnal is between these two sides, and Shade is on the model side.Zico [00:40:45]: Shade is the red-teaming agent. It tries to coordinate the pieces together and cause a violation.Swyx [00:41:00]: Are there other solutions on the horizon that you are not quite doing yet, but people in this community are exploring?Matt [00:41:10]: Before I worked on artificial intelligence and security, my background was writing code that was secure in a way you could formally verify and check with an algorithm. I think there is a ton of potential for those systems now.Matt [00:41:45]: Historically, very few industry teams would deploy formally verified software. Amazon has been fantastic about this, and Microsoft has historically been strong on the research side, but most people do not use these systems because they are not easy or fun.Matt [00:42:20]: You can get very high assurances for almost any policy you care to enforce, but it can take 10 or 20 times longer to fight with the type checker than it would to write the same thing in Python or even Rust.Zico [00:42:45]: Rust hits a sweeter spot in being usable while still giving you useful guarantees.Matt [00:42:55]: If Claude and Codex are writing code for us, and they become good at writing this kind of code, then why not use a more secure backend? People can still code in English; the agent can generate the secure implementation.Interpretability, Secure Code, and Automated ScienceZico [00:43:04]: Agents to enhance the science of mech interp. And it's actually a very similar core underlying point here. It's the fact that there's a lot of advances. And to your point, what's on the horizon, right? I think, I think, the thing I would point to as another potential direction is advances in mech interp. Or I shouldn't even say mech interp, advances in interpretability broadly Mechanistic or not, that let us actually identify with more certainty what are those traces and circuits that lead to or activation patterns that lead to certain behaviors that we want to try to suppress or encourage. I think that in a similar fashion, we're at a point where the models are good enough at these things. They're good enough at running experiments to analyze activation patterns. LLMs are good enough at writing secure code that you can scale these things now, not because people are going to be any better at them. The problem was never that secure code wasn't, wasn't possible. It's just that people didn't have the capacity to do it.Matt [00:44:09]: Or the willpower.Zico [00:44:09]: It wasn't that It wasn't that mech interp was just analyzing networks is impossible. We have all the tools we need. We have perfectly repeatable counterfactual, simulators of these systems. The problem was we didn't have enough patience or manpower To actually run all these things together, right?Matt [00:44:27]: It's a ton of work, right?Zico [00:44:28]: It's a lot of work. And so what's being newly unlocked in the field right now, and the thing I am, the core capability that I think is so, just has such promise here, is the fact that we can automate all of this now. so you can have your agent write secure code. He doesn't write secure code. Secure is really hard to write. You can have, you can have your agent do your interpretability research. It's really hard to do, but fortunately the agent can do that. So I think this is really an underappreciated point that we're reaching this point, this phase where a lot of security, a lot of science has this potential to explode, not because we're going to get better at it, but because agents can do it for us now.Matt [00:45:13]: They raise the floor of the raw skill that you that you need. I don't, I don't know if it's lower the floor or raise the floor. whatever it is, the good one. theyZico [00:45:23]: I think raise the floor, right?Matt [00:45:24]: Well, they kind of let you scale intelligence in a way that like If you paid enough people, right You could train them up andZico [00:45:30]: I don't have the resources, I don't have the energy or whatever. And there's all that. I do want to make it concrete to people, right? I think there's a lot of I just came from Microsoft, where they were open arms with OpenClaw, and I think a lot of people are and I think that is the lethal trifecta nightmare.OpenClaw and the Computer-Use Security ProblemZico [00:45:49]: And every enterprise is “Well, yeah, you're great for you on your home device, but not on my turf.”Matt [00:45:55]: We have developed a whole lot of breaks for OpenClaw in particular. a lot of itZico [00:46:00]: Thousands, yeah.Matt [00:46:00]: Yeah, go on, take us up the details.Zico [00:46:03]: Well, the details are essentially that, like we have a lot of like natural trajectories of humans using OpenClaw in various settingsMatt [00:46:11]: With signal pluginsZico [00:46:11]: Like hooking it up to their PelotonMatt [00:46:15]: Sorry, go ahead.Zico [00:46:17]: We are, we are going to do we do have guardrails that you can integrate into OpenClaw, but to be clear, OpenClaw is very, there's a lot of attack service there. Anyway, go on.Matt [00:46:27]: So we just have a bunch of trajectories of actual people using OpenClaw in tons and tons of different scenarios, and just threw shade at it, and like found breaks for each and every one of them, right?Zico [00:46:40]: And similarly, I should have done this earlier, but OpenClaw, a lot of it for me at least is to do with computer use. and you guys also did this for the Mythos, Side of things. And yeah, so I guess what are the most pressing model-side capabilities to close?Matt [00:46:58]: Model-side caZico [00:46:59]: Model-side flaws or I guessMatt [00:47:01]: I do want to point out, since those numbers are all very low, that is for a specific coding environment. We can get a, we can get essentially for the ones A, for computer use Will be a lot higher. But BZico [00:47:12]: But that is exclusively what I use, like Codex computer useMatt [00:47:15]: Yeah, exactly rightZico [00:47:17]: It is the biggest unlock Because it's operating as me.Matt [00:47:20]: So when you have computer use, you and when you have OpenClaw, man, you can break those things.Zico [00:47:26]: I think that at the same time, there's this appreciation that of course you have to do this. This is what makes these things useful, right?Matt [00:47:35]: Why would I not?Zico [00:47:35]: I don't want to sandbox my agent, right? That doesn't, that limits its capabilities, right? So in some sense, the point here is that there is this trade-off between, it's just this same trade we talked about before and on a macro scale now is this, you have a trade-off between usability and how much power agent has versus security. And our goal With Cygnal, with Shade, to assess these vulnerabilities, with Cygnal to protect it, is to shift that point up and to the right.Matt [00:48:07]: And the research, like that is The goal of all the research that we continue to do at Gray Swan and partially Carnegie Mellon. Right? Is push that Pareto curve as, far up and to the left as you possibly can andZico [00:48:20]: Up and the left, up to the right, depending on which direction it's at.Matt [00:48:22]: Depending on which direction it's at. Yep.Zico [00:48:25]: obviously computer vision is the OG adversarial domain. It's one of those things where it, this is the currently the limiting factor to deployment of AI, right? Like it's because we just don't trust it. Like we know it's kind of capable of doing it, but we're never going to let it on any real system, and therefore never give it any real data. Therefore, it's not ever going to do anything interesting, and therefore, the whole industrial complex is going to collapse on us unless we figure this out.Matt [00:48:51]: But people are though, right? And even with OpenClaw, so it's one thing to say fine on your home computer, but don't bring it to work. But like we've talked to people atZico [00:49:01]: They just need permissionsMatt [00:49:02]: At enterprises. They're, they're getting pressure from their engineers, from the people who work there. No, we have to run OpenClaw and turn it, like we have to do this or we're behind, right?Zico [00:49:12]: So I just put my signal guardrails and that's it? like what else do I do? ‘cause that doesn't feel like you guys agree, but that's not enough. I think For code agents in particular, Cygnal is quite good. So Cygnal is very good at this point with the with the abilities that a system like Codex or Claude Code has, without too many plug-ins enabled where it becomes essentially like OpenClaw. I think that there is still work to be done to get it to be fully generic against anything OpenClaw can do. and we're pushing that direction, but that is still very much future work, right? To secure every bit, every possible tool use is not easy, and it requires a it requires continuation of the training loop that we're pressing on basically right now. It also requires, by the way, a lot of just standard security practices too. Right? Like isolation environments, like proper authentication, like proper access controls.Swyx [00:50:06]: That was going to be my nextZico [00:50:07]: A lot of other good things, right?Matt [00:50:09]: And that's what I would, that's what I would say too. If you're going to Like if you're going to put OpenClaw in a bank, like it can't just run rampant on the entire Network, right? You can do, you can do things like Cygnal, right? And that's the best effort at the AI layer. But it needs to run on a platform that has been thought about, right? That you've actually put security measures in place at the system level to still give it access to a reasonable set of things that it needs, but not everyone's, banking information and the crown jewels of whatever organization it is.Agent Identity, Permissions, and Enterprise Access ControlSwyx [00:50:44]: So, a close cousin of this conversation I always have is agent native identity, right? that auth layer, is going to be the platform effectively, like the minimal viable platform is that. what are you guys seeing? Who is, who do you work with on that? Is that a product you would someday offer?Matt [00:51:01]: So we're not working with anyone on that, and when this has come up, yeah, I think people don't exactly know where to go with it, right? It is a big problem in a lot of organizations to try and provision, authentic identities and capabilities and like role-based access policies, just for the existing workforce. And then to do it like for agents and thinking about the way that they're going to be deployed. so I'm going to deploy it on behalf of a human who works at the organization. Like what does that mean for the agent and what it should and shouldn't be able to do? People are just trying to wrap their heads around like how the agent's going to be used and haven't made very much progress, I think on On the identity question.Swyx [00:51:51]: Sounds about right. Just checking.Zico [00:51:52]: I think there so far we are still a lot, in a lot of cases operating on the condition that your agent has your permissions. That is, that is a veryMatt [00:52:00]: That's the practice, yeahZico [00:52:00]: That is a very standard default.Matt [00:52:02]: A disaster, yeah.Zico [00:52:02]: And I think that will be changed. your permissions may be in a sandbox, but still your permissions. That will change in the very near future, because it has to right? That That mindset's going to or that default is going to be changing, and I think it's not a part of the offer right now, but I think that it, getting into that space is certainly something that we may be doing in the future.Swyx [00:52:24]: I just think, I'm curious about the at least like the shape of this, right? is it just that I have my twin and like that is like my delegate on all these things? Or do I need one for every app? And that's exhausting.Matt [00:52:38]: Absolutely exhausting, right. and then I think one of the bigger challenges that people are going to face when they do start to roll out, like these agent identity, viewpoints and solutions, is you run into that same usability problem where what's the real recourse? Well, it's stuck. It can't do something. Okay, now it can do it if it has my like explicit consent. And then people just get inured into Giving it consent too.Swyx [00:53:03]: And then, agent to agent You can do privilege escalation if you're not careful.Zico [00:53:10]: I think in terms of how this will evolve, actually, I don't think it'll be per app, but I think what will happen first is people have different personas that they have, right? So You don't want your work life and your home email to be mixed up. Right? a lot of that Because it happened, or that does. We are very good as humans at separating out lives, right? We have different lives. We have my work life, we have my home life. I have, I have different work lives, right? we're very good at that. Agents are not very good at that right now.Matt [00:53:41]: They are terrible.Zico [00:53:41]: Extremely bad at this.Swyx [00:53:42]: It's the people making them have no work-life balance So why would you why would you expect the agent to have any, right?Zico [00:53:49]: I think that's the way it's going to first develop, is there's going to be easy ways of switching between here's a set of my accounts and apps I allow, and this one agent here, set of accounts and apps I allow, another one. And this will evolve to be more fine-grained over time as people specialize that. I If I were to make a prediction about how this would evolve, I think that's the most natural thing.Swyx [00:54:06]: That makes sense. There's just profiles for everyone. okay. Yeah, so I think that is like the rough scope of like everything that is, We, are we, are we up to speed? Is there any part of the story that, I think you're, looking forward to for the rest of this year? like the emerging trendThe Future of AI Security and Enterprise AdoptionSwyx [00:54:24]: For 2026, for you.Zico [00:54:26]: So there's, there's lots of emerging trends, man. I can, I can go on at length about this. 20,Swyx [00:54:31]: Start with A, go through Z. Let's go.Zico [00:54:33]: Let's, let's start with Gray Swan, right? So I think what's in the future for us is so far when we talk about our product offerings, right, we obviously work with a lot of the large labs. we work with a lot of enterprises too, right? And I think what's happening and the scaling we're going to see is that the these abilities that so far were mainly front of mind for large labs, how do I ensure security of my agents? How do I ensure the models follow the policies I want to prescribe? All that stuff. Those things that were front of mind for frontier labs are going to become front of mind for everyone For all enterprise as they adopt tools like Codex, like Claude Code, like OpenClaw. And so I think where the most where our expansion and a lot of the reason, the work behind our series or the intention behind a lot of our Series A, it is explicitly to take a lot of the technology that we have been developing I won't say for but in conjunction with both enterprise and the large labs, and really scale the deployments on enterprise. So what I see happening in the next year from the Gray Swan side is real growth in terms of the number of AI companies deploying this technology because it becomes central to their operations. Research-wise, I think I've already talked about some, right? The science, the agentification of all science. Well, let's start with science of AI, and I think, I think that, we always want to do other sciences, right? Let's, let's, let's, let's do AI for physics.Matt [00:56:06]: Introspective.Zico [00:56:07]: Let's just, let's just start with AI science. That needs a lot of work right now, right?Matt [00:56:11]: Put your own mask on before helping others.Zico [00:56:12]: Exactly. So I think actually that's what I'm most excited about right now in the research side. And as it applies to this, I think it's, it's in things like understanding models better, but doing it through the power of agents.Matt [00:56:22]: One thing that, I've been very encouraged by for really only the past two or three months that I think, the pace at which this has happened has been increasing, and I think this is going to continue to be a thing, is people who start to build an agent and don't take it all the way to “We've finished this. We think it's, it's great, and now it's, in front of customers or it's in front of the entire organization.” they have this epiphany before they get there that whatever prompts I put in I need a solution here. I understand that there are real risks, right? I understand that, this is a weird and interesting and really capable model that I'm working with, but if I don't, put more measures in place, to make sure that it stays safe and does behaves the way that I want it to. People coming to us proactively, knowing that they need a real solution, I think that's very encouraging, and I think it's a sign of agents landing outside of just the frontier labs and the research community and scientists and so forth. people are starting to get it, and I think that's great. Looking forward to all of the amazing apps that people are going to build on top of these models and the security that will help them stand up.Private Arenas, Red Teaming Markets, and AI InsuranceSwyx [00:57:39]: Is there a future where your customers are part of the arena? ‘cause I think these are, basically these are Right? these are, these are, independent entities. They're There's a guy in Australia who's, your number one. But at some point you have the network effect where you start having enterprise use cases, actually in inside of this public domain.Matt [00:57:59]: Oh, I see. You mean testing enterprise, deployments inside the arena. So we have had, the situation where people join the arena. They're maybe cybersecurity professionals. They get interested in AI security. They come across the arena, and then eventually they become a customer, when their organization needs solution.Swyx [00:58:17]: How often does that happen?Matt [00:58:17]: Not a huge number of times. But there are a lot of thoughtful, people that come from a cybersecurity background that have found their way there. So enterprises are just always, I think, going to be more paranoid about putting, their custom agent that's, deployment, still in development, up on this public platform for anybody to come hit. What we have done is worked to make private arenas where some subset of the contestants, who we've, We know well, theySwyx [00:58:54]: And what do they work on?Matt [00:58:55]: What do they work on?Swyx [00:58:55]: Do What was the class of problem they work on that would require a private arena?Matt [00:59:00]: Oh, pretty much any enterprise application. That's the point. Yeah. enterprises are not willing to put up their deployment agentsSwyx [00:59:07]: Oh, that's greatMatt [00:59:07]: On the arena for For the general public to come hit. They're fine if it's, 20 people that we've handpicked from the arena.Swyx [00:59:14]: Just for listeners who might be interested What do I make as a participant? What's on the table here?Matt [00:59:20]: Well, so for the for the public competitions We communicate a pricing and incentive structure, upfront, and it, and it differs for each arena, right? ‘Cause designing, the right set of incentives to get people focused on finding useful vulnerabilities and problems without reward hacking and just finding, de minimis things is,Swyx [00:59:47]: Are you human judging the reward hacks if it happens?Matt [00:59:50]: Sometimes, yes.Swyx [00:59:51]: Oh, that's messy.Zico [00:59:53]: Well, so we have a lot of automated graders, right? A lot of automated graders. But ultimately, if they can beat all those graders, there is a humanMatt [00:59:59]: There in the YeahZico [01:00:00]: That can, that can take a look at the at theMatt [01:00:01]: Oh, okay. Yep. And we work with the UKEC and Casey and so forth. they'll come in and work as independent judges and evaluators and lend their expertise to that.Swyx [01:00:11]: You're, you're a community that, any enterprise can call on and that's, that's really useful, data actually. It's almost McCore for red teaming.Matt [01:00:22]: For red teaming.Swyx [01:00:25]: One of our upcoming guests is, on the other side of this, the AI, underwriting company. I don't know if you've come across that.Matt [01:00:30]: Oh, yeah. Absolutely.Zico [01:00:31]: Oh, wait. They're, they're one of the logos there. I know that we have the other one.Swyx [01:00:34]: What do you yeah, what do you what do you think of that market?Zico [01:00:36]: Oh, I think it's great.Swyx [01:00:37]: Because it's such an interestingZico [01:00:38]: And and I think it pairs extremely well with our model, right? Because how do you assess the risk of a company's AI deployment? Well, use a tool like Shade, or use Arena, right? And that's And we have And that's actually a lot of the work we've done with them is exactly for that thing. And then if a company finds this level of risk, but wants, so they can't be insured because they're too risky, wants to reduce their risk, what do you do there? I don't think look, we shouldn't be the only provider here, but what do you do there? Well, you put safety systems around your model, right? Including things like Cygnal. So it pairs extremely well because what in some sense we can be is a, author. I don't We're not getting there yet, so I don't this is hypothetical. I want, I wanted to emphasize. But we can be in some sense a authorized partner with them, so that they can do more than just say, “Hey, you're uninsurable.” They can both assess it more rigorously with tools like Shade and other tools as well, and then they can prescribe mitigations when there are problems using tools like Cygnal.AI Insurance, Compliance, and the Gray Swan EventZico [01:01:44]: So it's incredibly goodMatt [01:01:46]: These two models fit together incredibly well. They also bring us customers. Many customers want protection against bad outcomes, insurance for when things go wrong, and help staying compliant. Being out of compliance is also a risk.Swyx [01:02:10]: I think AUC is fantastic and got on this early. The parallel to cyber insurance is clear. When you apply for cyber insurance, you document the measures you have in place: detection, response, and controls. Structurally, they need an arm's-length third party.
El ministro de la Presidencia, Justicia y Relaciones con las Cortes, Félix Bolaños, ha pasado este lunes por los micrófonos de Hoy por Hoy. Preguntado expresamente por José Luis Sastre, Bolaños ha evitado acusar al juez Peinado de prevaricación, pero sí ha tildado de "anómala" la causa contra Begoña Gómez: "Estamos ante una causa absolutamente anómala. Es indiscutible. El señor Peinado ha dictado resoluciones incomprensibles a ojos de la ciudadanía y alejadas del derecho".
Marcus' What You Know 'Bout That trivia game for Monday June 22nd, 2026. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
For review:1. The United States and Iran began talks in Switzerland on Sunday after signing a preliminary agreement to end their war.American and Iranian representatives gathered alongside delegations from mediators Pakistan and Qatar at the luxury Swiss resort of Burgenstock.2. Iran and the United States agree on a roadmap toward reaching a final deal to end the war within 60 days, mediators Pakistan and Qatar say in a joint statement on Monday.3. Iran and the United States agree to set up a “de-confliction cell” with Lebanon to stop military operations there, Pakistan and Qatar, which are mediating the US-Iran negotiations in Switzerland, say in a joint statement.4. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday vowed to keep Israeli troops in the south Lebanon security zone “for as long as necessary” to protect northern Israel from Hezbollah.5. IDF Captures Hezbollah Subterranean Drone Base / Factory in S. Lebanon. 6. Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa on Sunday ruled out intervening militarily in the Israel-Hezbollah conflict in Lebanon, after US President Donald Trump again suggested Damascus could get involved.7. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has given Belarus a one-week ultimatum to remove relay equipment on its territory that he says is helping Russia attack Ukraine, warning that Kyiv will otherwise intervene itself to halt the transmissions.8. The U.S. Department of Defense is open to Poland's offer to host a permanent U.S. military presence in Poland, Polish Defence Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz said on Thursday after meeting U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in Brussels.9. The Pentagon's Office of Strategic Capital (OSC) inked a pair of conditional loans totaling $1.2 billion this week within the rare earth elements sector, according to department announcements.
On 19 March 2026 Coinbase Asset Management added a tokenised share class to the Coinbase Bitcoin Yield Fund (CBYF) it launched in April 2025. The tokens, issued on to the Base blockchain built by parent company Coinbase, are aimed at institutional investors. Digital fund administration pioneers Apex Group are supporting distribution of the tokens with blockchain-based transfer agency capabilities that automate investor on-boarding and keep transactions in tokenised versions of the CBYF aligned with the register of investors that hold CBYF in non-tokenised form. By conducting a bold experiment in combining the risk and rewards of generating yield on holdings of Bitcoin with the operational benefits of using blockchain technology without compromising on traditional levels of investor protection, Coinbase Asset Management and Apex Group may have found the key to scaling the tokenised funds industry. Future of Finance Co-founder Dominic Hobson will be asking the panellists why asset managers everywhere should be excited about this deal. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
BASE #37 Need I say more? Legends don't come much more legendary than this!! www.sitflyclothingshop.com www.patreon.com/wazzycircusradio My name is WazzyCircus. I have been blessed with over 5,000 skydives and more than 21 years of experience in the sport of skydiving. WazzyCircus Radio is a show where I sit down with some of the most amazing people that I have met over two decades of Sky Sports
Star Wars: In a Galaxy – Watching all the Star Wars we can get our hands on.
We are BACK! In the seventh episode of Season 25 of Star Wars: In a Galaxy, Eli and Jacob discuss the seventh episode of Season 2 of Andor: A Star Wars Story, "Messenger".Among their discussion:– The consolidating narratives of the series, and its progression throughout the show.– The Rebel atmosphere of Yavin IV, and why it's so important.– Why does Cassian go back to Luthen (or at least his orders)?– Building tensions on Ghorman. – Does the Force Healer scene fit within ANDOR? Eli and Jacob have their own thoughts. – "They don't even bother to lie badly anymore" – Dasi Oran, 2 BBY. – What is Syril Karn thinking? – NO KALKITE ALTERNATIVES!The next episode of Star Wars: In a Galaxy will release on June 26, 2026.Follow our upcoming guest Rik Villanueva on BlueSky: @cadbanesbounty.bsky.socialListen to Rik's show at www.jammedtransmissions.comFollow us on BlueSky, Instagram, and Threads: @InaGalaxyPod/@inagalaxypod.bsky.appFollow our spinoff trivia show on BlueSky: @inagalaxytrivia.bsky.socialFollow Eli everywhere: https://linktr.ee/_ochifan327Leave us a 5-star rating and review on Apple and Spotify! It really helps!You can email us at swinagalaxy@gmail.com
The government export-controlled Anthropic's best model. Kain, Luca, and Taylor debate whether Dario talked his way into it and what the shutdown means for every AI lab. ======================================================== Thank you to our sponsors! Multichain Advisors: Get help navigating TGEs, go‑to‑market, BD and partnerships, capital markets advisory, PR, media placements, KOL activations and more at https://multichainadv.com. ======================================================== A reported jailbreak of Anthropic's most powerful model, Fable, triggered US government export controls, and the Uneasy Money hosts argue Dario Amodei's response on the call with the administration made it inevitable. Kain, Taylor, and Luca dig into what Dario got wrong, why a company about to go public had no one in Washington who could speak the government's language, and what it means that the shutdown drew no public backlash. Porter Stowell, CEO of W3.io and a Coinbase alum, joins for the first half with his read on the exchange's big announcement day: agentic payments on Base, tokenized stocks, and a ground-up trading rebuild. Midway through, Luca drops something unannounced: Igloo has built a financial instrument to list crypto tokens directly on the NYSE as securities, with protocol revenue flowing back to holders. The episode closes on Strategy, and why Kain thinks selling 32 Bitcoin, then buying back 1,587 two weeks later, exposes the structural risk of a belief-based asset with one dominant buyer. Hosts: Kain Warwick, Founder of Infinex and Synthetix Taylor Monahan, Security Expert Luca Netz, CEO of Pudgy Penguins Guest: Porter Stowell - CEO of W3.io Timestamps
Steve and Jeff listened to Saints rookie WR Bryce Lance's media availability.
In this episode of Head and Neck Innovations, experts in neurotology and neurosurgery discuss the diagnosis and management of lateral skull base tumors, highlighting multidisciplinary collaboration, personalized treatment strategies, and the latest surgical and imaging innovations improving patient outcomes.
Hsiao-Wei Wang steps down from the Ethereum Foundation. Base ships its Beryl upgrade to testnet. And Aztec suffers a second hack on its v1 rollup. Read more: https://ethdaily.io/971 ETH Daily sponsorships are now open. Reach over 10,000 Ethereum-native subscribers every weekday. Learn more at ethdaily.io/ads Disclaimer: Content is for informational purposes only, not endorsement or investment advice. The accuracy of information is not guaranteed.
Despite the signed Memorandum of Understanding and eased prices, tightness persists across commodities most affected by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. In this episode, we highlight the state of natural gas and aluminum markets, as well as discuss the ‘invisible' parts of our balances. Speakers: Greg Shearer, Head of Base and Precious Metals Strategy Otar Dgebuadze, European Natural Gas This podcast was recorded on June 18, 2026. This communication is provided for information purposes only. Please visit www.jpmm.com/research/disclosures for important disclosures. © 2026 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved. This material or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of J.P. Morgan. It is strictly prohibited to use or share without prior written consent from J.P. Morgan any research material received from J.P. Morgan or an authorized third-party (“J.P. Morgan Data”) in any third-party artificial intelligence (“AI”) systems or models when such J.P. Morgan Data is accessible by a third-party.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
VirtualDJ Radio Hypnotica - Channel 3 - Recorded Live Sets Podcast
Live Recorded Set from VirtualDJ Radio Hypnotica
Grace starts the show by discussing VP Vance's media tour, where he is trying to sell the memo of understanding. Then, with the World Cup ongoing, people from all around the world are flocking to America, and the Scottish are drinking Boston businesses dry. Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.
Spike and Zuckerman critique the Audi Nuvolari, Jonny drives the new Rivian R2, and a $605K Lamborghini Temerario gets its options bill exposed. Also: Beverly Hills is coming for your exhaust, a robot kicks a child, and Zuckerman settles a parking dispute via flatulence. ______________________________________________
Coinbase introduces tokenized stocks. Base announces private enterprise transactions. And Safe ships Workspace for treasury teams. Read more: https://ethdaily.io/969 ETH Daily sponsorships are now open. Reach over 10,000 Ethereum-native subscribers every weekday. Learn more at ethdaily.io/ads Disclaimer: Content is for informational purposes only, not endorsement or investment advice. The accuracy of information is not guaranteed.
I'm announcing a partnership between Imperium Acquisition and Wix's sub-company, Base 44, a $2.3 billion software business.What that means for you: they're covering majority of your access to Imperium Academy VIP.This training was built to take you from zero (or a few thousand a month) to $10k, $20k, $30k/month and it's normally $3,500.Apply → https://start.imperiumacquisition.com/vip-academyWhat's inside Imperium Academy VIP:✅ Weeks 1–2 (FREE for everyone)Mindset & business foundations. Some of the best free training on the internet. Videos up to 5 hours long. ✅ Weeks 3–6Client results methodology, sales scripts, booking appointments, operations, finances ✅ Week 7How to scale to $10k/month once you've got your first clients ✅ Bonus trainings:-Irresistible offer building-Six-figure lead generation (the AM System, cold outreach scripts + automation)-VSL funnel building- How to build a team & hit six figures with your agency- GoHighLevel mastery (100+ video course: worth $3k alone)- Charlie GPT: an AI chatbot trained on everything I've ever said (paid content, free content, mastermind recordings, internal meetings)- Service delivery & client retention- Agency onboarding systems- Seven-figure agency systems vault- Meta ads & email newsletter client acquisition- Gym Growth Accelerator (gyms paid us tens of thousands for this)- Appointment Setting to the Max (live masterclasses)- Full VIP call archive- Charlie Coaching Archive: every weekly coaching call I've done with paying clients since 2021How to apply: Click the link belowHit "Apply for Access"Fill out the quick form & book a callA member of my team will review your applicationWe've already had ~ 500 people from the pre-launch take this up. Slots are genuinely limited.Watch the full video here: https://youtu.be/vnP55uCOvaw
Marshall Harris and Mark Grote were joined by Cubs left fielder Ian Happ to break down the club's come-from-behind 5-4 win against the Rockies on Monday and to discuss the offense's woes with runners in scoring position.
Listen for the latest from Bloomberg NewsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Eric Brown leads Developer Relations at BASE, Coinbase's L2. So when he says the chain sees over $4 trillion in monthly stablecoin payments and 25+ local stablecoins now circulate worldwide, it's worth interrogating closely.Jamie Crypto sits down with Eric at Consensus 2026 for a full read on what's actually shipping on BASE in 2026 — X402 as the default agent-payment rail, sub-cent fees and 5,000 TPS bursts, the Azul upgrade, the AI red team / blue team security flip, and why seven-plus local stablecoins are getting real point-of-sale adoption in South America while the U.S. lags.We cover:- The $4T monthly stablecoin payments figure (Eric's claim)- X402 and ~2M agent transactions in 30 days on BASE- 400M gas per block, sub-tenth-of-a-cent fees, 5,000 TPS bursts- DeFi security after a brutal month of hacks — AI's role on both sides- Why the agentic cohort is "completely unbanked already"- Morpho, 4% USDC yields, and what makes an onchain app stickyFilmed at Consensus 2026.Host: Jamie Redman
Vik and I sat down to talk through 11th now that we've got most of the rules, even if points are still the missing piece. Dave is about 35 games in, while Vik is coming at it from the “read the rules, built lists, haven't played yet” angle.Short version: we're pretty positive. Not in a “GW nailed everything” way, but this is a much stronger launch state than we expected. It feels like there's already a real game here.1. Scoring feels very differentThe old 10th edition plan of “hold my expansion, deny yours, win on primary” doesn't really work the same way anymore.Because missions are asymmetric, throwing a unit away to deny points can also give your opponent points somewhere else. Games seem higher scoring overall, and pushing big differential feels harder unless you properly run someone over.2. Dispositions are a big win gameplay wiseThe disposition system feels like one of the best parts of the edition. It gives list building more texture again.Purge pushes you toward killing and aggression. Recon feels the most like normal 40k. Priority Assets seems solid for singles. Disruption is the one we're least sold on right now, because it often asks you to kill something and do actions, which can get awkward.That said, we don't think you should pick a bad detachment just because it has a better disposition. The detachment is still the main thing, but disposition definitely changes how you build the last part of your list.3. Hidden is better than expected (now that is 12" - go to ground)At first, 15" hidden didn't sound that impactful. But with Go to Ground bringing it to 12", it matters a lot more.It changes how units stage, how objectives are held, and how you force your opponent to come closer before they can interact. That's good.It doesn't solve everything though. Slow six-inch melee infantry still looks rough unless it has real delivery, advance and charge, miracle dice, ingress, transports, or some other trick.Move blocking has changed shapeOld-style move blocking is much weaker. You can't just put five models an inch in front of a tank and expect it to be stuck forever. Vehicles and monsters moving through infantry is a good change overall.But move blocking isn't gone. It's now more about:using 2" engagement range properlyblocking where models can enddenying access to terraintagging things awkwardlyusing the fight phase and pivot wellTwo-inch engagement range feels huge, and good players are going to get a lot out of it.Vehicles and transportsVehicles are better, but we don't think the edition is just “fast gun wins.” Cover matters, minus one to hit is strong, hidden matters, and shooting without ignore cover can feel rough.Transports are one of the areas we're less positive on. Base-to-base disembarking is a massive change (when destroyed), and losing a transport in the wrong place can expose the unit inside immediately. Drukhari especially feel like they need to relearn a lot of old staging patterns.OverallWe're genuinely impressed. There are still worries around slow melee, map balance, transports, and whatever points end up doing, but the foundation feels strong.Most factions seem to have something playable, games feel less deterministic, list building is more interesting, and universal terrain is a huge win.For a launch state, this is probably the best 40k has felt in a long time.
Alexander Cutler breaks down the state of investing in tokens, why Aerodrome is already the number one onchain exchange for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and FX volume, why 100% value redistribution is the only sustainable moat in onchain finance just like Hyperliquid proved in derivatives, and why predictive allocation is an entirely new primitive that lets capital allocators bet on where liquidity needs to exist before demand ever arrives. Alexander Cutler is CEO of Dromos Labs and core contributor of Aerodrome, the leading onchain spot exchange on Base.The Rollup is where the leaders of digital assets and finance converge. Live from the financial capital of the world.Timestamps00:00 Intro01:10 MetaDEX03 In Audit04:55 How Exchanges Become Distribution Engines09:09 SEC Tokenized Equities Leak11:29 10% GDP Goes Onchain?13:15 A Massive Change In Tokens16:07 How Hyperliquid Won Dominance20:39 90% Redistribute Zero Value26:33 Traditional Allocators Get It34:12 Coinbase VC Bought Onchain Directly37:54 Predictive Allocation New Primitive47:43 Polymarket Proves The ModelAlex Cutler Socials: https://x.com/wagmiAlexanderAerodrome Socials: https://x.com/AerodromeFiAerodrome Website: https://aerodrome.finance/Partners:Better than Banks. Transparent capital efficiency earning the highest yields in DeFi. Learn more here: https://infinifi.xyz/---Dinari - Over 230 1:1 backed tokenized stocks, ETFs & more with dividends. US-based SEC transfer agent. Available on 5+ chains & via API. https://dinari.com/---Relay is the fastest and most reliable way to swap any token on any chain. Learn more here: https://relay.link/bridge---Zama is an open source cryptography company that builds state-of-the-art Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) solutions for blockchain.Learn more here: https://www.zama.org/---Trezor is the creator of the first-ever hardware wallet. Securing crypto for 2M+ users worldwide. 100% open source. Learn more here: https://affil.trezor.io/aff_c?offer_id=133&aff_id=36664---
Dirige y presenta: Juan Carlos Baruque Hernández Sumario del programa DANIEL GARCÍA *La bóveda de oro más segura del mundo. *FORT KNOX. Nuestra Web: https://mundoinsolitoradio.es Contacta: +34 687 39 80 12 - Solo WhatsApp mundoinsolitoradio@hotmail.com Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals
In this episode, George Maher-Bonnett (Deputy Editor — European Products Report) speaks with Josh Michalowski (Reporter — European Diesel & Gasoil) and Gabriella Twining (Global Editor — Base Oils and Waxes) about the refining tug-of-war between diesel and base oils. They discuss how record diesel cracks have been driving refiners' decisions, how supply resilience is masking structural risks, and why the summer driving season could deepen a squeeze across the lubricants chain. Key themes: Diesel cracks: $46/bbl in June, more than double seasonal norms Refiners prioritise middle distillates over base oils despite uplift Group 3 imports collapse after Gulf supply halts, pushing prices to records Summer demand risk: strong diesel runs vs tightening base oil availability
Not sure where your studio's leaking time or money? Book a free discovery call with my team here: https://bit.ly/p-your-studio-check-up Follow the show: Spotify Apple Geronimo Unfiltered YouTube Instagram: @thegeronimoacademy Follow our guest, Jade Winter here: https://www.instagram.com/jadewinter/ He built a global reformer Pilates franchise with 130+ studios. No memberships. No free trials. Just one simple model run with relentless consistency. I sat down with Jade Winter to pull apart how he did it, and to get the operating principles any studio owner can steal, whether you do Pilates, strength, or anything in between. We covered the contrarian stuff most people are scared to touch. Why free trials train people not to value you. Why he ditched memberships for prepaid packs and never looked back. And the exact revenue ceiling, what we call the "40K fuckery," where owners hit a wall, dip about 20% for three months, and either learn to lead or burn out. If you've ever felt like you ARE the business instead of owning one, this one's for you. In this episode you'll hear: Why Jade kills the free trial and what he runs instead The prepaid pack model and the 80 to 90% repurchase rate behind it How he solved instructor inconsistency with screens, voiceover, and 100+ hours of training The "don't blame them, train them" rule Why base plus commission beats paying instructors hourly The "$50 of value for $25" test that survives any downturn The wake up call that forced him to build real systems What the top 10% of studios do differently (hint: it's not talent) The one tactical move to make first thing Monday morning CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Meeting on neutral ground 00:02:00 Kill the free trial: why paid intros win 00:03:00 Prepaid packs vs memberships 00:05:49 How the 100-hour instructor model works 00:07:33 The screens and voiceover origin story 00:10:00 Instructor inconsistency: the real enemy 00:19:53 Don't blame them, train them 00:22:24 The 80% conversion benchmark 00:24:30 Base plus commission 00:30:00 Deliver $50 of value, charge $25 00:42:28 The wake up call: being the business vs having one 00:43:46 The "40K fuckery" explained 00:50:52 The Monday morning move 00:53:58 Wrap up If you got something from this, then you need to listen to "Coming back from rock bottom with Travis Young from Reborn." And if your studio's not where you want it, book a free discovery call with my team and we'll map the fix: https://bit.ly/p-your-studio-check-up
How long will the honeymoon last for One Nation? Can Pauline Hanson create a robust political party to be competitive at the next election? How do populist leaders like Trump, Farage, and Hanson convince the working class that their wealthy backers back them? With One Nation rising in the polls, Special Correspondent at the Saturday Paper, Jason Koutsoukis joins Mark and Marija to discuss the threats to Labor and the Liberals and what they need to do to arrest the decline in the polls. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Today's episode covers six stories spanning cosmic mysteries, lunar exploration, robotic rescue missions, cutting-edge space medicine, and what's happening in your own night sky tonight. 1. JWST Solves the "Little Red Dots" Mystery Four years after the James Webb Space Telescope began spotting strange, compact red objects in the ancient universe, scientists have a definitive answer. A team led by Vasily Kokorev at the University of Texas at Austin published the most detailed spectrum ever obtained of one of these objects — GLIMPSE-17775 — in The Astrophysical Journal on June 10. The data confirms these objects are supermassive black holes in their furious early growth phase, wrapped in dense cocoons of hot gas that disguise them. The universe is not broken — the little red dots were just very well hidden. 2. Astrobotic Unveils Griffin-1 Lunar Lander Pittsburgh-based Astrobotic publicly unveiled its Griffin-1 lunar lander on June 15 at the Moonshot Museum. NASA selected Griffin as the vehicle for its Moon Base II mission. The lander will carry Astrolab's FLIP rover and payloads from multiple nations — including Australia — to the lunar South Pole, targeting launch on a SpaceX Falcon Heavy in late 2026. Griffin-1 heads to JPL for environmental testing this month. 3. Robotic Rescue Mission for NASA's Swift Observatory NASA's 22-year-old Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory is losing altitude fast due to accelerated solar activity. A startup called Katalyst Space Technologies has built a robotic spacecraft — LINK — in under a year, and it's now integrated into a Northrop Grumman Pegasus XL rocket ready for launch from Kwajalein Atoll, Marshall Islands, later this month. If successful, LINK will boost Swift's orbit and extend its life — while pioneering on-orbit servicing capabilities. 4. SpaceX CRS-34 Dragon Departs the ISS NASA's 34th SpaceX commercial resupply mission departed the ISS today, June 16, carrying blood stem cells, bioprinted organ and cartilage tissue, DNA-inspired cancer treatment materials, and cryogenic fuel storage experiment data. Splashdown off California is expected June 17. 5. Tonight's Sky: Moon Meets Three Planets A stunning western sky show is on offer tonight — a crescent Moon appearing between Mercury and Jupiter about an hour after sunset, with brilliant Venus also on display. Mercury reached its greatest eastern elongation on June 15, making this the best time of its current apparition to spot it. Tomorrow evening the Moon drifts to sit beside Venus. 6. Space Weather: CME Glancing Blow A coronal mass ejection from June 12 is expected to deliver a glancing blow to Earth on June 16-17. Active geomagnetic conditions (Kp up to 4) are forecast, with a chance of minor G1 storm conditions. High-latitude aurora watchers in the Southern Hemisphere may see some activity. Links & Further Reading • GLIMPSE-17775 study — The Astrophysical Journal (June 10, 2026) • Astrobotic Griffin-1 mission info: astrobotic.com • NASA Swift Boost mission: science.nasa.gov/mission/swift/swift-boost-mission • ISS research blog: nasa.gov/blogs/spacestation • Space weather: spaceweather.gov | NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center Find us at astronomydaily.io | Follow: @AstroDailyPodBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support.Sponsor Details:Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.bitesz.com/nordvpn. You'll be glad you did!Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click HereThis episode includes AI-generated content.
Andy Stumpf is a retired Navy SEAL, world-record-holding wingsuit BASE jumper, martial artist, and author. We discuss the mental framework and moment-to-moment decision-making process that can allow anyone to build discipline and resilience and better navigate both everyday life and life's most challenging moments. Andy explains several simple-yet-powerful tools gleaned from his time in — and after — his SEAL career that can help you determine where to focus your actions and how to clear your mind of things you can't control or that hold you back mentally. Andy also shares and reflects on lessons learned from some of the deeply personal challenges he faced outside of combat and freefall. Finally, we explore the all-too-frequent tragedy of people — including high performers — taking their own lives, and consider what might be done to prevent more such losses. Thank you to our sponsors AG1: https://drinkag1.com/huberman Our Place: https://fromourplace.com/huberman Wealthfront*: https://wealthfront.com/huberman Function: https://functionhealth.com/huberman Joovv: https://joovv.com/huberman Timestamps (00:00:00) Andy Stumpf (00:03:09) Protocols Book (00:04:06) Nagging Thoughts, Tool: Determine Influence vs Concern (00:10:14) Social Media, Screen Time Discipline (00:17:01) Sponsors: Our Place & Wealthfront (00:20:11) Social Media Addiction, Young Adults, Rebellion, Alcohol (00:27:38) Alcohol & Social Experiences; Cannabis; Ice Bath (00:36:07) Skydiving, Wingsuit Flying (00:41:47) Sponsor: AG1 (00:43:06) Skydiving, BASE Jumping, Wingsuit Flying; Navy (00:55:25) Danger & Fear, Wingsuit Flying Risk, Death (01:03:04) Divorce, Imperfection; Parenting Kids in Divorce (01:12:16) Sponsor: Function (01:13:55) Parents' Divorce (01:19:38) Long-Term Flow State, Focus, Adrenaline; Time Perception (01:30:58) Toilet Paper, Shortcuts, Tool: Do the Slightly Harder Choice (01:37:11) Micro-Discipline, Doing the Harder Thing, Tenacity & Super-Agers (01:48:00) Sponsor: Joovv (01:49:12) Physical & Mental Pain, Discussing Pain; Dogs (02:00:45) Suicide, Self-Talk, Isolation, Alcohol (02:11:52) Top Performers, Suicide; Ibogaine; Military, Trauma (02:21:36) Trauma & Healing, Exploring Other Possibilities, Control (02:28:57) Disciplined Acts, Choosing the Slightly Harder Option (02:35:20) Current Projects, Project Choice (02:41:48) Price of Success, Happiness, Money (02:53:09) Zero-Cost Support, YouTube, Spotify & Apple Follow, Reviews & Feedback, Sponsors, Social Media, Neural Network Newsletter *This experience may not be representative of other Wealthfront clients, and there is no guarantee of future performance or success. Experiences will vary. Andrew Huberman receives cash compensation from Wealthfront Brokerage for paid testimonials in his podcast, creating a conflict of interest. The Cash Account, which is not a deposit account, is offered by Wealthfront Brokerage LLC, member FINRA/SIPC. Wealthfront Brokerage is not a bank. The base APY is 3.30% on cash deposits as of January 30, 2026, is representative, subject to change, and requires no minimum. If eligible for the overall boosted rate of 4.05% offered in connection with this promo, your boosted rate is also subject to change if the base rate decreases during the 3 month promo period. Additional terms and conditions apply, which can be found on Wealthfront.com/Huberman. Funds in the Cash Account are swept to program banks, where it earns the variable APY. Same-day withdrawal or instant payment transfers may be limited by destination institutions, daily transaction caps, and by participating entities such as Wells Fargo, the RTP® Network, and FedNow® Service. New Cash Account deposits are subject to a 2-4 day holding period before becoming available for transfer. Investment advisory services are provided by Wealthfront Advisers LLC, an SEC-registered investment adviser. Securities investments: not bank deposits, bank-guaranteed or FDIC-insured, and may lose value. Disclaimer & Disclosures Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Ken and Andrew Gansas discuss the Ravens migration away from base defense and reasons for the change.Our Sponsors:* Check out BetterHelp and use my code betterhelp.com for a great deal: https://www.betterhelp.comAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
In this hard-hitting episode of the Battleground America podcast, the host delivers a double-dose of political reality. First, we dive into a devastating new Harvard Harris poll showing that 71% of Democrat voters now back deporting criminal illegal immigrants—proving the party's base has completely revolted against open-border policies after the DHS shutdown backfired and handed Republicans a massive $70 billion enforcement victory. Then, the host switches gears to pull no punches on the home team, heavily slamming Trump's newly negotiated Middle East peace proposal. Exposing the plan to release $25 billion in frozen assets to Iran just to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, the host fiercely labels it "Trump's pallets of cash" and a maddening, half-finished surrender that mirrors the failed foreign policies of Obama and Biden. Custom Labels Battleground America Podcast, Harvard Harris Poll, Border Security Backlash, Criminal Deportation, DHS Shutdown Fallout, Ice Funding Boost, Iran Peace Deal Critique, Strait of Hormuz Blockade, Frozen Assets Controversy, Trump Foreign Policy Controversy
In this packed episode of the Battleground America podcast, the host targets the biggest stories shaping the nation. First, we dive into a striking new Harvard Harris poll showing that 71% of Democrat voters now back deporting criminal illegal immigrants, proving a major base revolt over border safety following the DHS shutdown backfired and handed a massive $70 billion enforcement victory to Republicans. Next, we break down the high-stakes political theater surrounding the SAVE Act after Mitch McConnell and a handful of Republicans blocked it, while exposing why a clean version of the election integrity bill still has a real fighting chance. We celebrate a historic financial milestone as Elon Musk reaches paper trillionaire status after listing SpaceX on the NYSE, creating thousands of working-class millionaires while completely outmaneuvering the Left's targeted legal onslaught. Finally, the host recounts a close call at Greenville's Haywood Mall, demanding a heavy crackdown on local crime and a surge in visible security after a terrifying shootout involving a 17-year-old suspect. Battleground America Podcast, Harvard Harris Poll, Voter Realignment, SAVE Act Senate Vote, Mitch McConnell Hospitalization, Elon Musk Trillionaire, SpaceX NYSE IPO, Haywood Mall Shooting, Greenville Crime Crackdown, Border Security Fundin
Farmers who participate in safety net programs like ARC and PLC will soon be able increase their base acres, which means a bigger payout in tough times. State FSA Executive Director Mike Mayfield explains what this means for row crop farmers now.
Iran's national football team traveled to Los Angeles from its base camp in Tijuana, Mexico. Iran's first group match is against New Zealand on Monday.
Siri AI is Apple's built-in voice assistant focused on device control, quick tasks, and tight system integration but with limited conversational depth and privacy controlled by Apple. Venice AI is a privacy-first, uncensored chatbot platform built on open-source models that runs without storing your data or requiring logins. This video compares their capabilities, privacy approaches, and use cases to help you decide which fits your needs. ~This episode is sponsored by Tangem~ Tangem ➜ https://bit.ly/TangemPBN Use Code: "PBN" for Additional Discounts! GUEST: Erik Voorhees, Founder at Venice.ai X Account➜ https://x.com/ErikVoorhees Venice AI➜ https://bit.ly/VeniceAI 00:10 Sponsor: Tangem 01:00 Venice privacy & censorship 01:45 Why isn't apple privacy enough? 03:00 What's the premium people are paying for Privacy & Uncensored? 04:30 Pricing Plans 05:15 Is Venice + Odysseus the best possible pairing? 06:20 Fable 5 release: too expensive? 07:45 Keeping pace with advancements 08:30 Why doesn't Venice have connectors? 09:20 Main focus 09:45 $VVV Token utility 10:45 How much $VVV would i need to lock up to get enough $DIEM? 11:45 Why did you choose BASE? 11:30 Thoughts on Apple CEO 12:45 Apple removes Venice? 13:45 AI IPOs flop? 14:20 Venice's biggest hurdle? 15:00 AI killing DeFi? 16:30 Privacy vs Uncensored 17:50 PG-13 & R-rated content ban 18:30 Does CLARITY matter? 19:00 Private markets walled off? 20:00 ETH and SOL native privacy #Crypto #iphone #Apple ~Siri A.I. vs Venice
Jack Burnham examines the Pentagon's 1260H list, which identifies Chinese companies allegedly assisting the PRC's military-industrial base, signaling increased regulatory scrutiny for these entities. Burnham recommends streamlining government lists to prevent companies from exploiting gaps and advises retail investors of the national security risks these firms pose. (6)1919
SpaceTime with Stuart Gary | Astronomy, Space & Science News
Sponsor Link:This episode of SpaceTime is brought to you by NordVPN, where your online security starts. To check out our special offer for SpaceTime listeners, visit www.nordvpn.com/stuartgarySpaceTime Series 29 Episode 70 *The Small Magellanic Cloud is being ripped apart A new study reveals that the Small Magellanic Cloud, a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way, is slowly being torn apart by gravitational forces from the Large Magellanic Cloud. Researchers have utilised over a decade of observations to uncover the galaxy's dynamic state, challenging previous models of coherent rotation. *Blueprint for a lunar base NASA's plans for a lunar base at the Moon's South Pole are sparking innovative proposals for construction using local lunar materials. The Texas A&M Space Institute is leading research into using lunar regolith, a challenging construction material, to develop habitats for future lunar missions. *Meteor rocks New England A recent meteor explosion over New England has been confirmed as a sonic boom from a meteor entering the Earth's atmosphere, sending shockwaves across Massachusetts and Rhode Island. The meteor, travelling at 121,000 kilometres per hour, likely fragmented before falling into the North Atlantic Ocean. *The Science Robert Increased wildfire risks are predicted across parts of Australia, while a study reveals that Iceman Otzi's microbiome remains active even after 5,300 years. Additionally, video technology may allow for heart rate monitoring through facial recognition.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/spacetime-with-stuart-gary--2458531/support.
Admiral Daryl Caudle discusses the future of the Navy and critical warfighting capabilities needed to confront China today. Sean Spicer travels to the Naval War College for an exclusive conversation with Admiral Daryl Caudle. This interview examines the current state of maritime readiness and the strategic adjustments required to maintain superiority in the Pacific theater. If you follow military affairs or defense policy, this discussion provides direct insight into how the Navy warfighting capabilities are evolving to meet modern geopolitical threats. ------------------------------ https://www.seanspicer.com subscribe for an ad free version of this podcast ------------------------------ Chapter - Call (978) 746-2315. It's free and takes under 20 minutes ------------------------------ Beam - https://www.shopbeam.com/SPICER to receive 40% off your order ------------------------------ https://www.MarketInstitute.org - Check them out today ------------------------------ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Ed Bogan is a retired senior CIA Operations Officer and former two-time Chief of Station with 24 years of experience in intelligence operations across South Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Europe. He served repeatedly in war and conflict zones, including as Chief of Base and in acting chief roles, and later became a public commentator on counter-terrorism, Russian disinformation, intelligence operations and the war in Ukraine.----------LINKS:https://www.thecipherbrief.com/experts/edward-boganhttps://www.thecipherbrief.com/podcasts/around-the-world-with-former-cia-officer-edward-boganhttps://sashaingber.substack.com/p/whats-next-for-ukraine-with-former----------SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:https://www.buymeacoffee.com/siliconcurtainhttps://www.patreon.com/siliconcurtainhttps://www.gofundme.com/f/scaling-up-campaign-to-fight-authoritarian-disinformation----------TRUSTED CHARITIES ON THE GROUND:Car4Ukrainehttps://car4ukraine.com/en-US/campaignsDzyga's Pawhttps://dzygaspaw.com/projectsSuperhumans - Hospital for war traumashttps://superhumans.com/en/UNBROKEN - Treatment. Prosthesis. Rehabilitation for Ukrainians in Ukrainehttps://unbroken.org.ua/Come Back Alivehttps://savelife.in.ua/en/Chefs For Ukraine - World Central Kitchenhttps://wck.org/relief/activation-chefs-for-ukraineUNITED24 - An initiative of President Zelenskyyhttps://u24.gov.ua/Serhiy Prytula Charity Foundationhttps://prytulafoundation.orgNGO “Herojam Slava”https://heroiamslava.org/----------PLATFORMS:Substack: https://substack.com/@siliconcurtainTwitter: https://twitter.com/CurtainSiliconLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/finkjonathan/Podcast: https://open.spotify.com/show/4thRZj6NO7y93zG11JMtqm----------
Daniel Mahncke and Shawn O'Malley take a deep dive into Wix.com — the Israeli website-building platform whose investment case now turns on two of the most debated questions in the stock today: whether the generative-AI wave that lets anyone spin up a site from a text prompt is the end of Wix or whether Wix is too sticky, and whether the Base 44 acquisition — Wix's bet on AI-powered app generation — is the next leg of the story or a distraction from the SMB infrastructure business the company already dominates. IN THIS EPISODE YOU'LL LEARN: (00:00:00) Intro (00:01:32) How Wix was founded (00:21:35) Why clients keep using Wix (00:28:05) How much of WIX is actually vulnerable to AI (00:37:07) Why Wix is more sticky than it seems (00:38:24) Whether vibecoding is likely to disrupt drag-and-drop website building (00:46:54) Why Base44 could change the entire investment case (01:06:24) How Wix could survive and turn into a multibagger (01:09:21) Valuation discussion of Wix (01:13:26) Whether Shawn and Daniel add Wix to the Intrinsic Value Portfolio BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community. Track The Intrinsic Value Portfolio. Portfolio Review Submit Tool. Value Investor Club Article. Chit Chat Stocks w/ Manuel Cunha. Future Investing Interview w/ Manuel Cunha. Rene Sellman Substack Article. Manuel Cunha Substack Article. Previous Intrinsic Value breakdowns: Figma, Microsoft, Salesforce, Adobe. Follow Shawn on X and Linkedin. Follow Daniel on X and Linkedin. Related books mentioned in the podcast. Ad-free episodes on our Premium Feed. NEW TO THE SHOW? Get smarter about valuing businesses through The Intrinsic Value Newsletter. Check out The Investor's Podcast Starter Packs. Follow our official social media accounts: X | LinkedIn | Facebook. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: Plus500 Netsuite Shopify Vanta References to any third-party products, services, or advertisers do not constitute endorsements, and The Investor's Podcast Network is not responsible for any claims made by them. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
I examine the soul of MAGA—what MAGA really means—by refuting two schools of thought, the Never Trumpers and the anti-Trump Right. Their problem is not really with Trump, but with the voters, who are the key to understanding why old favorites like Mike Pence, John Cornyn and Thomas Massie were defeated or sidelined. (1:30) The Never Trumper Argument (3:18) Anti-Trump Right's Critique (5:29) Trump's Power Comes From Voters (7:52) Trump and the People (8:36) Brandon Gill Is the Base (10:49) The Elitist GOP Problem (13:33) What MAGA Actually Means (17:08) Guest: Eric Metaxas (18:52) American Revolution's Uniqueness (20:46) Why the French Revolution Failed (25:31) The Christian Roots of Liberty (29:38) Freedom Without Virtue Falls (33:45) Jefferson's Seal and God (40:22) Reconnecting to the Founding (44:23) Founders Were Not Progressives If you’re tired of broken healthcare you need to choose the right pharmacy. Check them out at allfamilypharmacy.com/dinesh and use code DINESH10 to save 10% off your next order. Leave the old “buy and hold” crypto strategy behind at https://DineshCrypto.com ! Purchase crypto with military grade encryption and American customer service. Hundreds of crypto holders have saved MILLIONS thanks to BlockTrustIRA’s Animus AI. Visit https://DineshCrypto.com and receive up to $2,500 in FREE bonus crypto! America has nearly 39 trillion dollars in debt! Are you protected from this pending disaster? Go to http://DineshGold.com and get up to 10% in bonus gold or silver. I’m on substack! Check out what I have to say here: https://dineshdsouza.substack.com/ For free and unbiased Medicare help, dial (706) 262-4774 to speak with my trusted partner, Chapter, or go to https://askchapter.org/dinesh" Chapter and its affiliates are not connected with or endorsed by any government entity or the federal Medicare program. Chapter Advisory, LLC represents Medicare Advantage HMO, PPO, and PFFS organizations and stand alone prescription drug plans that have a Medicare contract. Enrollment depends on the plan’s contract renewal. While we have a database of every Medicare plan nationwide and can help you to search among all plans, we have contracts with many but not all plans. As a result, we do not offer every plan available in your area. Currently we represent 50 organizations which offer 18,160 products nationwide. We search and recommend all plans, even those we don’t directly offer. You can contact a licensed Chapter agent to find out the number of products available in your specific area. Please contact Medicare.gov, 1-800-Medicare, or your local State Health Insurance Program (SHIP) to get information on all of your options. Dinesh D'Souza is an author and filmmaker. A graduate of Dartmouth College, he was a senior domestic policy analyst in the Reagan administration. He also served as a research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. He is the author of many bestselling books, including "Illiberal Education," "What's So Great About Christianity," "America: Imagine a World Without Her," "The Roots of Obama's Rage," "Death of a Nation," and "United States of Socialism." His documentary films "2016: Obama's America," "America," "Hillary's America," "Death of a Nation," and "Trump Card" are among the highest-grossing political documentaries of all time. He and his wife Debbie are also executive producers of the acclaimed feature film "Infidel." — Want to connect with Dinesh D'Souza online for more hard-hitting analysis of current events in America? Here’s how: Get Dinesh unfiltered, uncensored and unchained on Locals: https://dinesh.locals.com/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dsouzadinesh Twitter: https://twitter.com/dineshdsouza Rumble: https://rumble.com/dineshdsouza Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dineshjdsouzaSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
