Podcasts about santa clara university school

Are Product Counsels in the best position to anticipate and solve privacy and AI compliance problems before we release new products to the public at large - all of it while avoiding costly delays in fast-moving projects? Linsey Krolik is Assistant Clinical Professor at Santa Clara University School of Law, where she runs the Privacy Law Certificate and teaches Privacy Law. She is Director of the Entrepreneurs' Law Clinic, where students work with real startups on transactional law projects, and Director of the TechEdge JD, a skills based certificate program for students interested in working in technology law. She also teaches a class called Law and Technology of Silicon Valley, with students playing the role of product or privacy counsel for a day.  Prior to joining academia, Linsey held senior in-house roles as a product, privacy, and commercial lawyer at global companies including PayPal, ARM, and Palm. Also, she continues to consult on privacy and AI governance in her solo law practice. References: Linsey Krolik on LinkedIn Santa Clara University School of Law TechEdge JD Entrepreneurs' Law Clinic Privacy Law Certificate Navigating AI and Data Ethics: The Essential Role of Product Lawyers and the Product Counsel Framework (Linsey Krolik, Adrienne Go, Olga Mack) Gam Dias: Agents Unleashed, understanding the Agentic AI stack (Masters of Privacy)

Tijana Brien, a partner at the elite law firm Cooley, specializes in high-stakes securities litigation. In this episode, she unpacks the complexities of defending major corporations, discussing the importance of motions to dismiss, investigation, and focusing on the elements of a case. She shares how she navigates the challenge of translating complex technological concepts—like encryption—into accessible arguments that judges can readily comprehend, drawing from her experience representing companies such as Zoom. TIjana also reflects on how her role has evolved from detailed casework as an associate to more big-picture strategy as a partner, although she still spends more time in the weeds than more senior partners. She talks about managing the pressures of biglaw and the importance of teamwork in a high-stakes environment. Tijana is a graduate of Santa Clara University School of Law.This episode is hosted by Kyle McEntee.Mentioned in this episode:Access LawHub today!Learn more about Vermont LawLearn more about Rutgers LawLearn more about Rutgers Law

In this episode, we dive into the systems, structures, and practices that are working against us. Because my goal isn't just that women (and I do mean all women) get a fair shake, but that we expect it. That we require it. Our guest is June Carbone, the Robina chair of law, science, and technology at the University of Minnesota Law School. Previously she served as the Edward A. Smith/Missouri chair of law, the constitution, and society at the University of Missouri at Kansas City; and as the associate dean for professional development and presidential professor of ethics and the common good at Santa Clara University School of Law. Basically, she's wicked smart and very well-researched. She has just released her new book Fair Shake: Women and the Fight to Build a Just Economy which she co-authored with two other incredible women. My call to action: consider, in addition to what you care most about and what you believe is best, what will move policy and opportunity forward for all women. It's time for us to think beyond just our own best interests. Buy June's Book: Fair Shake  https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Fair-Shake/Naomi-Cahn/9781982115128  Like what you heard? Please rate and review

Meet Hussein Kudrati,  Hussein is a lawyer licensed in both Ontario and California, with degrees from Queen's University, SOAS University of London, and Santa Clara University, and he specializes in business incorporation, tax-efficient structuring, and custom estate planning through his firm, HSK Law. In this episode, Hussein discusses about:Building strong relationships through transparent communication and educating partners about key points in agreements can prevent deals from falling apart due to misunderstandings or legal scrutiny.Lawyers can sometimes present their opinions as facts, which may scare clients off from deals, so it's important to challenge them and request factual support.Risk-averse professionals may impose their fears onto clients, but successful investors should focus on facts and trends to make informed decisions.Thorough due diligence is critical in real estate to ensure the soundness of a deal, but it's equally important to explore the gray areas that might offer creative solutions.Successful real estate investors must navigate difficult circumstances by staying creative, especially when dealing with less-than-ideal professionals or unexpected challenges.Traveling can be an educational opportunity for investors, helping them understand different markets and global economic trends, which informs their investment strategies.Real estate investing can be fun and rewarding, but it requires careful planning, due diligence, and the ability to collaborate effectively with experienced professionalsAbout HusseinHussein completed his undergraduate degree at Queen's University, his Masters degree at SOAS University of London, and his law degree at Santa Clara University School of Law. He is a lawyer in good standing with the Law Society of Ontario and the State Bar of California. He completed his articles at a Bay Street law firm and practiced at a boutique law firm in Burlington before launching HSK Law Firm.Hussein is passionate about helping clients craft sensible solutions for their legal matters. He has helped numerous businesses incorporate and structure themselves in a tax-efficient manner and enjoys the challenge of drafting custom estate plans. He looks forward to continuing to provide his clients with reliable and personalized service.Connect with HusseinInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/hsklawfirmConnect with Danielle ChiassonWebsite: https://strategicsuccessconsulting.comLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/daniellechiasson/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DaniChiassonInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/letsgetrealTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@danichiassonBook in a call: https://calendly.com/strategicsuccess/lets-get-real-estate-20-min-chat Listen in and subscribe for more.You can also leave us a review and of course, don't forget to share. I'm sure there are real people in your network who can take advantage of what they're going to learn from the show.Interested in becoming a guest on the show? Email admin@letsgetrealpodcast.com with the Subject: I want to be a guest! OR simply fill out: https://letsgetrealestatepodcast.com/be-a-guest/.

Welcome to an interview with the authors of Fair Shake: Women and the Fight to Build a Just Economy, Naomi Cahn, June Carbone, and Nancy Levit. This book explains that the system that governs our economy—a winner-take-all economy—is the root cause of these myriad problems. The WTA economy self-selects for aggressive, cutthroat business tactics, which creates a feedback loop that sidelines women. The authors, three legal scholars, call this feedback loop “the triple bind”: if women don't compete on the same terms as men, they lose; if women do compete on the same terms as men, they're punished more harshly for their sharp elbows or actual misdeeds; and when women see that they can't win on the same terms as men, they take themselves out of the game (if they haven't been pushed out already). With odds like these stacked against them, it's no wonder women feel like, no matter how hard they work, they can't get ahead.   Naomi Cahn is the Justice Anthony M. Kennedy Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, as well as the Co-Director of the Family Law Center. Cahn is the author or editor of numerous books written for both academic and trade publishers, including Red Families v. Blue Families and Homeward Bound. In 2017, Cahn received the Harry Krause Lifetime Achievement in Family Law Award from the University of Illinois College of Law and in 2024 she was inducted into the Clayton Alumni Hall of Fame.    June Carbone is the Robina Chair of Law, Science and Technology at the University of Minnesota Law School. Previously she has served as the Edward A. Smith/Missouri Chair of Law, the Constitution and Society at the University of Missouri at Kansas City; and as the Associate Dean for Professional Development and Presidential Professor of Ethics and the Common Good at Santa Clara University School of Law. She has written From Partners to Parents and co-written Red Families v. Blue Families; Marriage Markets; and Family Law. She is a co-editor of the International Survey of Family Law.   Nancy Levit is the Associate Dean for Faculty and holds a Curator's Professorship at the University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Law. Professor Levit has been voted Outstanding Professor of the Year five times by students and was profiled in Dean Michael Hunter Schwartz's book, What the Best Law Teachers Do. She has received the N.T. Veatch Award for Distinguished Research and Creative Activity and the Missouri Governor's Award for Teaching Excellence. She is the author of The Gender Line and co-author of Feminist Legal Theory; The Happy Lawyer; The Good Lawyer; and Jurisprudence—Classical and Contemporary.   Get Fair Shake here: https://rb.gy/r2q7rw   Here are some free gifts for you: Overall Approach Used in Well-Managed Strategy Studies free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/OverallApproach   McKinsey & BCG winning resume free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/resumepdf   Enjoying this episode? Get access to sample advanced training episodes here: www.firmsconsulting.com/promo

Welcome to Strategy Skills episode 453, featuring an interview with the authors of Fair Shake: Women and the Fight to Build a Just Economy, Naomi Cahn, June Carbone, and Nancy Levit. This book explains that the system that governs our economy—a winner-take-all economy—is the root cause of these myriad problems. The WTA economy self-selects for aggressive, cutthroat business tactics, which creates a feedback loop that sidelines women. The authors, three legal scholars, call this feedback loop “the triple bind”: if women don't compete on the same terms as men, they lose; if women do compete on the same terms as men, they're punished more harshly for their sharp elbows or actual misdeeds; and when women see that they can't win on the same terms as men, they take themselves out of the game (if they haven't been pushed out already). With odds like these stacked against them, it's no wonder women feel like, no matter how hard they work, they can't get ahead.   Naomi Cahn is the Justice Anthony M. Kennedy Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, as well as the Co-Director of the Family Law Center. Cahn is the author or editor of numerous books written for both academic and trade publishers, including Red Families v. Blue Families and Homeward Bound. In 2017, Cahn received the Harry Krause Lifetime Achievement in Family Law Award from the University of Illinois College of Law and in 2024 she was inducted into the Clayton Alumni Hall of Fame.    June Carbone is the Robina Chair of Law, Science and Technology at the University of Minnesota Law School. Previously she has served as the Edward A. Smith/Missouri Chair of Law, the Constitution and Society at the University of Missouri at Kansas City; and as the Associate Dean for Professional Development and Presidential Professor of Ethics and the Common Good at Santa Clara University School of Law. She has written From Partners to Parents and co-written Red Families v. Blue Families; Marriage Markets; and Family Law. She is a co-editor of the International Survey of Family Law.   Nancy Levit is the Associate Dean for Faculty and holds a Curator's Professorship at the University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Law. Professor Levit has been voted Outstanding Professor of the Year five times by students and was profiled in Dean Michael Hunter Schwartz's book, What the Best Law Teachers Do. She has received the N.T. Veatch Award for Distinguished Research and Creative Activity and the Missouri Governor's Award for Teaching Excellence. She is the author of The Gender Line and co-author of Feminist Legal Theory; The Happy Lawyer; The Good Lawyer; and Jurisprudence—Classical and Contemporary.   Get Fair Shake here: https://rb.gy/r2q7rw   Here are some free gifts for you: Overall Approach Used in Well-Managed Strategy Studies free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/OverallApproach   McKinsey & BCG winning resume free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/resumepdf   Enjoying this episode? Get access to sample advanced training episodes here: www.firmsconsulting.com/promo

Eric Goldman, associate dean of research at Santa Clara University School of Law, assesses concerns around the impending TikTok ban or buyout. It faces significant First Amendment challenges, he said. The debate over the potential TikTok ban, or forced sale under recent federal legislation, hinges on significant legal and constitutional challenges. Eight TikTok influencers have already filed a lawsuit, arguing the ban infringes on their First Amendment rights. Santa Clara University School of Law Associate Dean of Research Eric Goldman joins our Government A to Z, panel, drawing attention to the difficulties the government faces in justifying the ban, noting the lack of publicly available evidence on national security risks and the broader implications for free speech. Goldman suggests that the ban could set a precedent for digital trade barriers, leading to potential international retaliation and exacerbating political distrust among younger Americans. The conversation underscores the complex intersection of technology, law and public policy.TFIC co-host and Government Technology Staff Writer Ashley Silver along with two colleagues from Governing* — Staff Writer Zina Hutton and Digital Editor Zoe Manzanetti, react to Goldman's analysis in thinking about the future of TikTok in the lives of American users. They discuss the app's unique appeal, question whether its algorithm fosters deeper connections and consider the impact of a ban on users and the political landscape. SHOW NOTES Here are the top five takeaways from this episode:1. Legislative Actions: President Joe Biden signed a bill to ban TikTok if ByteDance, its Chinese owner, doesn't divest within a year. ByteDance has nine months to sell, with a potential three-month extension if it can demonstrate progress. 2. Legal Challenges: Eight TikTok influencers are suing the U.S. government, claiming the ban violates their First Amendment rights. Prior bans by the federal government, states and universities have already restricted TikTok usage on government devices. 3. Constitutional Concerns: Goldman argues the ban faces significant First Amendment challenges, as it affects users' and the platform's rights. The lack of public evidence on national security risks weakens the government's case. 4. Economic and Social Impact: TikTok is a major platform for income and social interaction for millions, raising questions about the fairness of the ban. The ban could set a precedent for future digital trade barriers, affecting international relations. 5. Public Opinion and Political Pressure: Younger generations view the ban as a diversion from more pressing issues like housing and climate change. There's a concern that a ban could increase distrust in the government, particularly among Gen Z and Alpha. Related Links to items referenced in the episode: Questions Swirl Over Future of TikTok Ownership What Would a TikTok Ban Mean? Our editors used ChatGPT 4.0 to summarize the episode in bullet form to help create the show notes. The main image for this story was created using DALL-E 3. *Governing and Government Technology are both part of e.Republic. Subscribe to The Futre In Context for free on YouTube or the podcast app of your choice — Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Audacy and Audible.

Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School and host of the “Passing Judgment” podcast, discusses Stormy Daniels' testimony at the Trump hush money trial. Eric Goldman, Co-Director of the High Tech Institute at Santa Clara University School of Law, discusses TikTok suing over the US ban. John Elwood, head of the Appellate and Supreme Court practice at Arnold & Porter, discusses the Supreme Court's unanimous decisions of late. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Eric Goldman, Co-Director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University School of Law, discusses TikTok challenging the US ban. Patricia Hurtado, Bloomberg legal reporter, discusses Stormy Daniels' testimony against Donald Trump. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

With more than 15 years of litigation experience, Robyn is a savvy and successful trial attorney specializing in the types of complex, high-conflict divorces where it can appear that progress and resolution are impossible. Robyn's prior experience as a crisis counselor gives her an extra edge in these types of cases: she has a background in psychology, crisis counseling, and special education that gives her a unique perspective and insight into her client's fears and the games that others play to prolong or complicate a divorce. Robyn's experience allows her to offer a blend of legal and psychological expertise to successfully resolve the toughest cases. She has built a trusted network of financial advisors, realtors, and therapists to further help our clients navigate the complex challenges that can arise when dealing with difficult ex-spouses. No one should have to go through this process alone – Robyn helps you build a team to support you during and after the divorce. Her education includes Santa Clara University School of Law, J.D. 2003. In the rare times when she is not advocating on behalf of our clients, Robyn loves good books, travel, and teaching. She has taught in the Stanford Law School Trial Advocacy Workshop since 2015 and regularly judges high school mock trial tournaments in Northern California. Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/robyn-ginney-76b1277/ Hart Ginney: https://hartginney.com/ Learn more about EmotionTrac and our AI-driven Emotional Intelligence Platform: https://legal.emotiontrac.com/

lovethylawyer.comA transcript of this podcast is available at lovethylawyer.com.Go to https://www.lovethylawyer.com/blog for transcripts.In collaboration with the Alameda County Bar Association, Love Thy Lawyer presents an interview with: Amir Adibihttps://adibiip.com/amir-adibi/Amir V. Adibi graduated from Harvey Mudd College with a B.S. in General Engineering and holds a J.D. from Santa Clara University School of Law. Amir's practice focuses on all aspects of patent and trademark prosecution and counseling. Amir has particular expertise in drafting and prosecuting patent applications in the areas of semiconductors, power electronics, electric vehicles, computer hardware, software, Internet, and telecommunications. Prior to his career as a lawyer, Amir held technical positions on engineering projects for Boeing, General Dynamics, Cisco Systems, and Sun Microsystems. Amir is fluent in Spanish.  Alameda County Bar AssociationThe Alameda County Bar Association (ACBA) is a professional membership association for lawyers and other members of the legal profession. The ACBA provides access to ongoing legal education; and promotes diversity and civil rights in the Alameda County legal community. Our mission is to promote excellence in the legal profession and to facilitate equal access to justice. Louis Goodman www.louisgoodman.com louis@lovethylawyer.com 510.582.9090  Special thanks to ACBA staff and members: (https://www.acbanet.org/) Musical theme by Joel Katz, Seaside Recording, Maui Technical support: Bryan Matheson, Skyline Studios, OaklandAudiograms & Transcripts: Paul Roberts    We'd love to hear from you.  Send us an email at louisgoodman2010@gmail.com. Please subscribe and listen. Then tell us who you want to hear and what areas of interest you'd like us to cover.  Please rate us and review us on Apple Podcasts.    Louis Goodman www.louisgoodman.comhttps://www.lovethylawyer.com/510.582.9090Music: Joel Katz, Seaside Recording, MauiTech: Bryan Matheson, Skyline Studios, OaklandAudiograms: Paul Roberts louis@lovethylawyer.com

Eric Goldman, a professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law and co-director of the High Tech Law Institute discusses the House bill that could ban TikTok. Alan Levin, Bloomberg aviation safety reporter, discusses the problems with the accident investigation into Alaska Airlines midair emergency in January. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law, discusses a possible TikTok ban. Alan Levin, Bloomberg aviation safety reporter, discusses Boeing's problems. Ryan Rowberry, a professor at the Georgia State University College of Law, discusses an unprecedented federal water rights claim to protect the Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Eric Goldman, a professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law and co-director of the High Tech Law Institute discusses the House bill that could ban TikTok. Alan Levin, Bloomberg aviation safety reporter, discusses the problems with the accident investigation into Alaska Airlines midair emergency in January. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law, discusses a possible TikTok ban. Alan Levin, Bloomberg aviation safety reporter, discusses Boeing's problems. Ryan Rowberry, a professor at the Georgia State University College of Law, discusses an unprecedented federal water rights claim to protect the Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Santa Clara University School of Law Professor David Sloss provides insight into the groundbreaking Colorado ballot decision. William Swor & Associates Founder Bill Swor joins Rich and Tina to discuss the James Crumbley trial. The Daily Beacon Sports Editor Caleb Jarreau breaks down Tennessee's NIL suit against the NCAA. In the Legal Grab Bag, Tina […]

This week on the Tech Policy Grind, an expert panel unpacked the  two First Amendment cases heard by the Supreme Court last week. In 2021, Florida and Texas introduced laws to prevent social media companies from banning political candidates or censoring content based on viewpoints, sparking a debate about the balance between free speech and platform regulation.  The Supreme Court hearing on February 26, 2024 on the Florida and Texas laws set the stage for a broader conversation on the First Amendment rights of social media companies.  To comment on the recent hearings, we brought in Internet Law and Policy Foundry alumna Jess Miers, Senior Counsel at Chamber of Progress to moderate a conversation with two other experts: Vidushi Dyall, Director Legal Analysis at Chamber of Progress who was reporting from the courtroom last week and Eric Goldman, the Associate Dean for Research, Professor of Law, Co-Director of the High Tech Law Institute, and Co-Supervisor of the Privacy Law Certificate, at Santa Clara University School of Law.  DISCLAIMER: Daniela, Evan, Jess, Vidushi, and Eric engaged with this episode by the Internet Law & Policy Foundry voluntarily and in their personal capacity. The views and opinions expressed on this show do not reflect the organizations and institutions they are affiliated with. Bios:  Jess Miers is Senior Counsel at Chamber of Progress. As a lawyer and technologist, Jess primarily focuses on the intersection of law and the Internet. She is widely considered an expert on U.S. intermediary liability law and has written, spoken, and taught extensively about topics such as speech and Section 230, content moderation, intellectual property, and cyber crime. Jess is also currently an advisor to the Trust & Safety Professional Association, and an industry mentor for Santa Clara Law's Tech Edge J.D. certificate program. Vidushi Dyall is the Director of Legal Analysis at the Chamber of Progress. She is a Fordham Law graduate and has gained meaningful professional experience across tech policy, privacy, and cybersecurity. In her current role she provides rapid analysis and response to breaking developments in cases that involve critical tech policy issues. Eric Goldman is Associate Dean for Research, Professor of Law, Co-Director of the High Tech Law Institute, and Co-Supervisor of the Privacy Law Certificate, at Santa Clara University School of Law. His research and teaching focuses on Internet law, and he blogs on that topic at the Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Resources: Moody v. NetChoice, LLC NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton Communications Decency Act Reno v. ACLU Section 230

Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law and co-director of the High Tech Law Institute, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments over Florida and Texas laws regulating how social media companies police content on the internet. Jennifer Rie, Bloomberg Intelligence senior litigation analyst, discusses the FTC suing to block Kroger's acquisition of Albertsons. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law and co-director of the High Tech Law Institute, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments over Florida and Texas laws regulating how social media companies police content on the internet. Jennifer Rie, Bloomberg Intelligence senior litigation analyst, discusses the FTC suing to block Kroger's acquisition of Albertsons. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Julia Wobbe is a Senior Associate Attorney at Tobener Ravenscroft. In 2009, she earned her undergraduate degree in Criminal Justice from California State University of Sacramento. Immediately after earning her Bachelor of Science degree, Ms. Wobbe earned her Juris Doctor degree from Santa Clara University School of Law where she was on the Dean's List. During law school, Ms. Wobbe earned a certificate in Public Interest and Social Justice Law, received a Pro Bono award, and was an editor for a journal. As an attorney, Ms. Wobbe has tried more than twenty trials before judges and juries. Ms. Wobbe has represented hundreds of tenants in wrongful eviction, habitability, sexual harassment, and personal injury cases. She is experienced in litigating cases against landlords, negotiating buyouts, and handling a wide range of tenant rights issues. In addition to litigating on behalf of her clients, Ms. Wobbe volunteers weekly at the San Francisco Housing Rights Committee. Julia is passionate about social justice and is dedicated to fighting for her clients. Julia Wobbe was selected to the 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022 Northern California Rising Star list by Super Lawyers, an honor reserved for lawyers who exhibit excellence in practice. Only 2.5% of attorneys in Northern California receive this distinction. Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jwobbe/ Tobener Ravenscroft LLP: https://www.tobenerlaw.com/

lovethylawyer.comA transcript of this podcast is available at lovethylawyer.com.Go to https://www.lovethylawyer.com/blog for transcripts. In collaboration with the Alameda County Bar Association, Love Thy Lawyer presents an interview with: BART Attorney Byron TomaSan Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District – Office of the General Counsel (Department Head: Matthew Burrows) Staff Attorney, January 2008 to present Advising various government clients, including Media Affairs, Marketing, Expressive Activities Permitting, Planning, Engineering and Operations, Office of Civil Rights, Real Estate, “Art at BART,” Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority, the Office of the Independent Police Auditor, Police Department, Public Works Construction and Procurement Contracting. Appearing, as needed, on Pitchess Motions and Workplace Violence Restraining Orders. Working on issues related to CEQA/NEPA, the Political Reform Act, Govt. Code Section 1090, conflicts of interest, incompatible offices/activities, Public Records Act, Records Retention, Privacy Rights and the Brown Act. Supervision of law clerks and post-graduate volunteers. Santa Clara University School of Law Adjunct Lecturer, Externship Program, May of 2016 to May 2019 Serving within the Legal Externship Program to review student externship placement summaries, student diaries, assignments, and other administrative duties as required by the position. Alameda City Attorney's Office (Department Head: Teresa L. Highsmith) Assistant City Attorney II, July 2006 to November 2007 Advising various government clients, including the Chuck Corica Golf Course, Recreation and Parks Department, Information Services Department, Alameda Free Libraries, Finance Department, Housing Authority, Development Services Department, Community Improvement Commission (Redevelopment Commission), Alameda Reuse & Redevelopment Authority, 5150 Gun Retention cases. Supervision of law clerks and volunteers. Marin County Counsel's Office (Department Head: Patrick K. Faulkner) Deputy County Counsel III, December 2000 to July 4, 2006 Sonoma County Counsel's Office (Department Head: Steven M. Woodside) Deputy County Counsel IV, April 1987 to December 2000  Alameda County Bar AssociationThe Alameda County Bar Association (ACBA) is a professional membership association for lawyers and other me Louis Goodman www.louisgoodman.comhttps://www.lovethylawyer.com/510.582.9090Music: Joel Katz, Seaside Recording, MauiTech: Bryan Matheson, Skyline Studios, OaklandAudiograms: Paul Roberts louis@lovethylawyer.com

In a brief order this week, the US Supreme Court restored federal government access to and control of the border. In response to the Supreme Court's order, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said this: “I will continue to defend Texas' constitutional authority to secure the border”. So here is my question: does the Constitution give Governor Abbot, or any state governor for that matter, the authority to control our country's international borders? To better understand the history of the tension between US states and our federal government when it comes to immigration, which is a highly polarizing issue now, I spoke with Mr. Gulasekaram, who at the time of this recording, was a Professor of Law at the Santa Clara University School of Law, where he taught Constitutional Law and Immigration Law. He now teaches at the University of Colorado, Boulder law school: https://lawweb.colorado.edu/profiles/profile.jsp?id=1126 Prof. Gulasekaram is co-author of the leading immigration law casebook used in law schools, Immigration & Citizenship: Process and Policy. And he is also co-author of The New Immigration Federalism - a book that provides an in-depth empirical and theoretical analysis of the resurgence of state and local immigration lawmaking, which is the subject of our conversation in this episode. Prof. Gulasekaram is also the co-founder of the ⁠World Children's Initiative⁠, a non-profit organization dedicated to improving health and educational infrastructure for children in developing areas around the world. You may also be interested in an earlier episode, in which, my guest, Prof. Jennifer Chacon, answers this question: do immigrants commit more crime than native-born Americans? Listen here: ⁠https://bit.ly/HbN-S3E18⁠ I hope you enjoy these episodes. Adel, host & producer ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠History Behind News⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ podcast & ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠on YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠https://historybehindnews.com/ ⁠Unravelling the Middle East: This new special series - an in-depth history and analysis of the Middle East - will launch in late January. Get Unravelling the Middle East ⁠⁠⁠⁠on Spotify⁠⁠⁠⁠: ⁠https://bit.ly/UME-Spotify⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠Apple⁠⁠⁠⁠: ⁠https://bit.ly/UME-Apple⁠ Google: ⁠https://bit.ly/UME-Google⁠ Image: Construction of a floating barrier in the Rio Grande near Eagle Pass as part of Texas's Operation Lone Star. The image was taken by a USBP drone. Public Domain.

On this special best-of-edition of Bloomberg Law we recap some of the big legal stories of the year. Eric Goldman, a professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law and co-director of the High Tech Law Institute, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments on whether public officials can block citizens on social media. Former federal prosecutor Jessica Roth, a professor at Cardozo Law School, discusses Donald Trump's claim that he is entitled to presidential immunity in the case charging him with trying to overturn the 2020 election. Bloomberg law reporter Dan Papscun discusses the legal “hot tub.”  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this special best-of-edition of Bloomberg Law we recap some of the big legal stories of the year. Eric Goldman, a professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law and co-director of the High Tech Law Institute, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments on whether public officials can block citizens on social media. Former federal prosecutor Jessica Roth, a professor at Cardozo Law School, discusses Donald Trump's claim that he is entitled to presidential immunity in the case charging him with trying to overturn the 2020 election. Bloomberg law reporter Dan Papscun discusses the legal “hot tub.”  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Former federal prosecutor Michael Weinstein of Cole Schotz, discusses the conviction of Sam Bankman-Fried. Professor Eric Goldman of the Santa Clara University School of Law, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments over whether public officials can block citizens from their social media. Intellectual property litigator Terence Ross, a partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman, discusses the Supreme Court considering the trademark “Trump Too Small.” Bloomberg Intelligence senior litigation analyst Jennifer Rie, discusses the government's trial to block the merger of Jet Blue and Spirit Airlines. June Grasso hosts.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Former federal prosecutor Michael Weinstein of Cole Schotz, discusses the conviction of Sam Bankman-Fried. Professor Eric Goldman of the Santa Clara University School of Law, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments over whether public officials can block citizens from their social media. Intellectual property litigator Terence Ross, a partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman, discusses the Supreme Court considering the trademark “Trump Too Small.” Bloomberg Intelligence senior litigation analyst Jennifer Rie, discusses the government's trial to block the merger of Jet Blue and Spirit Airlines. June Grasso hosts.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Eric Goldman, a professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law and co-director of the High Tech Law Institute, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments on whether public officials can block citizens on social media. Elections law expert Rick Hasen, a professor at UCLA Law School, discusses a lawsuit in Colorado to get Donald Trump off the ballot in 2024. June Grasso hosts.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Eric Goldman, a professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law and co-director of the High Tech Law Institute, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments on whether public officials can block citizens on social media. Elections law expert Rick Hasen, a professor at UCLA Law School, discusses a lawsuit in Colorado to get Donald Trump off the ballot in 2024. June Grasso hosts.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

David Friedman is Professor Emeritus at the Santa Clara University School of Law. While he was trained as a physicist, David is best known for his work in economics, and particularly his defense of anarcho-capitalism, a political philosophy that advocates for a free-market system unhampered by government. In this episode, Robinson and David discuss some criticisms of current economic systems, the varieties of anarchism, David's arguments for anarcho-capitalism, and one of his fascinating hobbies, anachronism. David's Website: http://www.daviddfriedman.com David's Substack: https://daviddfriedman.substack.com The Machinery of Freedom: https://a.co/d/iKpTQYK OUTLINE 00:00 In This Episode… 00:17 Introduction 02:55 Physics to Economics 09:35 What is Anarchism? 16:09 Is Government an Agency of Legitimized Coercion? 27:41 Could Anarchy Be More Efficient than Government? 37:52 What Are Moral Facts? 44:46 Was John Rawls a Quack? 48:44 What Are Moral Facts? 56:07 How Much Should We Trust the Government? 01:02:05 Can Governments Prevent Climate Change? 01:13:18 Could We Privatize Police? 01:30:11 Would Anarchy Lead to Wealth Inequality? 01:40:08 Will the United States Ever Become Anarchic? 01:46:26 Anachronism Robinson's Website: http://robinsonerhardt.com Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, weightlifters, artists, and everyone in-between.  --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/robinson-erhardt/support

In this episode, David G. Yosifon, Peter Canisius, S.J. Professor of Law at Santa Clara University School of Law, discusses his article "Agent Correction: Chastisement, Wellness, and Personal Ethics," which is published in the Florida State University Law Review. Yosifon begins by describing the broader scholarly project of which this article is a part, investigating how concepts derived from corporate governance can inform and promote human well-being. He describes the early modern concept of "agent correction," which authorized the principal to enforce the agency relationship by "chastizing" or hitting the agent. He explains that the law has long-since rejected agent correction, but observes that the concept of "wellness" may have replaced it as a humane and agent-centered way of encouraging observance of fiduciary obligations and personal ethics. Yosifon is on Twitter at @DavidYosifon.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Leadership is a key component of other professional schools, particularly business and policy programs. But it's less emphasized in law schools. Should it be taught in law schools, and what are the most important elements for them to learn? Another critical question is whether leadership training will make a real difference for lawyers as they move into the profession.In this episode, Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky is joined by three expert leaders to talk about what's happening and what law schools can do to make an impact in this area: Christopher Edley, who spent 23 years at Harvard Law School before leading Berkeley Law as dean from 2004 to 2013. He recently finished a term as interim dean of the UC Berkeley School of Education and has a public policy portfolio, including government service, stretching over four decades. Janet Napolitano, who served as president of the University of California from 2013 to 2020, as the U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security under President Barack Obama, and as governor and attorney general of Arizona. She's now a professor of public policy at Berkeley and director of the new Center for Security in Politics.Donald Polden, dean emeritus and a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law, where he was dean from 2003 to 2013 and helped develop its curriculum for leadership education.Want to know more about the leadership courses offered by Berkeley Law's Executive Education Program, including Leadership in the Legal Profession, a groundbreaking 10-week leadership course? Click here to see a course description and find out when applications for the spring 2024 cohort will be accepted. Have a question about the law, or a topic you'd like us to cover? Send an email to morejust@berkeley.edu to tell us your thoughts. For a transcript, please visit the episode page on the Berkeley Law podcast hub. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Professor and Dean Emerita Lisa Kloppenberg, author of The Best Beloved Thing is Justice: The Life of Dorothy Wright Nelson, discusses her mentor, colleague, and friend. Judge Nelson was a true trailblazer for women in the legal profession. She was one of only two women in her class at the UCLA School of Law and one of the first 14 female tenure-track law professors in the United States. She became one of the first women to lead an American law school as Dean of USC Gould School of Law and later became a distinguished jurist on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. An inspiring story shared by a nationally renowned scholar in her own right, Santa Clara University School of Law Professor and Dean Emerita Lisa Kloppenberg.

David Super, a professor at Georgetown Law School, discusses Justice Samuel Alito refusing to recuse himself in a major tax case despite sitting down for two interviews with an attorney involved in that case. Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law and co-director of the High Tech Law Institute, discusses the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision concluding that the Biden White House, the Surgeon General, the CDC and the FBI likely violated the First Amendment by coercing social media platforms to take down posts on their sites. June Grasso hostsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What does Meta's Threads product mean for the future of social media? Reema dives into this and the current state of social media with Professor Eric Goldman, one of the world's leading experts on social media and the law. They discuss how the fediverse works and the pros and cons of decentralizing social media. Professor Goldman explores how content moderation impacts the potential proliferation of decentralizing social media platforms, and vice versa. They also cover how interoperability online interacts with competition concerns, and what this means for social media users' experience. Plus, stay tuned for Professor Goldman's favorite piece of advice to his students at SCU law. Eric Goldman is a Professor of Law and Co-Director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University School of Law. Follow him on LinkedIn or his many other social media platforms (@ericgoldman). Check out the Foundry on Instagram, Twitter, or LinkedIn and subscribe to our newsletter! If you'd like to support the show, donate to the Foundry here or reach out to us at foundrypodcasts@ilpfoundry.us. Thanks for listening, and stay tuned for our next episode! DISCLAIMER: Reema engages with the Foundry voluntarily and in her personal capacity. The views and opinions expressed on air do not reflect on the organizations Reema works for or is affiliated with.

Listen to this Podcast as Rachel Nicholas, a partner in the Phoenix office of Lewis Roca  discusses a recent blog post, "NCAA First Ever NIL Era Sanction" authored by SLA's NextGen Committee Member, Maria Aiello, a recent graduate of Santa Clara University School of Law. Hosted by NextGen Committee Member Landis Barber, Associate Attorney at the Safran Law Offices, as they delve into the NCAA's first ever issuance of NIL penalties for recruiting violations.   

Immigration Federalism! VA, WV, SC, MS, IA, TN, NE & FL... these GOP-led states have or are planning to send troops to the Texas border with Mexico. Why, because Texas Governor Abbot has asked for their help. To learn about Governor Abbot's Operation Lone Star program, visit the Texas Indigent Defense Commission site. But can they don't that? Isn't regulating immigration the role and responsibility of the federal government? A recent New York Times article included the following admonition: "But states cannot enforce federal immigration law — that is up to the federal government". But what if our federal government abdicates its responsibility in enforcing immigration laws, in protecting our borders?  This is not a crazy question. As my guest, Prof. Deep Gulasekaram, explains, this is, in fact, is the very claim that Republican governors of AZ and TX have made - that our federal government has abdicated its responsibility in matters of immigration. Strangely, for an issue that is and has been so important to our nation's history - hint: we a nation of immigrants, immigration is not even mentioned in the Constitution. And my guest, Dr. Deep Gulasekaaram, tells it, for the initial 100 years of our history, immigration was pretty much run and regulated by our states. It wasn't until after the Civil War that the federal government its involvement in immigration matters the way we think of it today. From the 1870s to mid-20th Century, immigration was a race-based regulated system. For example, for the longest time, only white people could become US citizens. There were also quotas that favored Northern and Western Europeans. All of this changed in the 1960s, from which time to 2001, immigration became a bipartisan matter. But after 9/11, immigration became a hot button political and polarizing issue. As a result, our Congress hasn't really passed a robust immigration law for a long time. To better understand the history of the tension between US states and our federal government when it comes to immigration, which is a highly polarizing issue now, I spoke with Mr. Gulasekaram, a Professor of Law at the Santa Clara University School of Law... Where he teaches Constitutional Law and Immigration Law. Prof. Gulasekaram is co-author of the leading immigration law casebook used in law schools, Immigration & Citizenship: Process and Policy. And he is also co-author of  The New Immigration Federalism - a book that  provides an in-depth empirical and theoretical analysis of the resurgence of state and local immigration lawmaking, which is the subject of our conversation in this episode...  Prof. Gulasekaram is also the co-founder of the World Children's Initiative, a non-profit organization dedicated to improving health and educational infrastructure for children in developing areas around the world. You may also be interested in an earlier episode, in which, my guest, Prof. Jennifer Chacon, answers this question: do immigrants commit more crime than native-born Americans? Listen here: https://bit.ly/HbN-S3E18 I hope you enjoy these episodes. Adel Host of the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠History Behind News⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ podcast ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SUPPORT⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Click here⁠ and join⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ our other supporters in the news peeler community. Thank you.

In 2011, United States business entities incurred $29 billion in direct costs because of patent trolls. Lawsuits brought by "patent assertion companies" made up 61% of all patent cases in 2012, according to the Santa Clara University School of Law. From 2009 through mid-2013, Apple Inc. was the defendant in 171 lawsuits brought by non-practicing entities (NPEs), followed by Hewlett-Packard (137), Samsung (133), AT&T (127), and Dell (122). Patent troll-instigated litigation, once mostly confined to large companies in patent-dependent industries such as pharmaceuticals, came to involve companies of all sizes in a wide variety of industries. In 2005, patent trolls sued 800 small firms (those with less than $100 million annual revenue), the number growing to nearly 2,900 such firms in 2011; the median defendant's annual revenue was $10.3 million. A July 2014 PricewaterhouseCoopers study concluded that non-practicing entities (NPEs) accounted for 67 percent of all patent lawsuits filed—up from 28 percent five years earlier—and though the median monetary award size has shrunk over time, the median number of awards to NPEs was three times higher than those of practicing companies. A 2014 study from Harvard University, Harvard Business School and the University of Texas concluded that firms forced to pay patent trolls reduce R&D spending, averaging $211 million less than firms having won a lawsuit against a troll. That 2014 study also found that trolls tend to sue firms with fewer attorneys on staff, in effect encouraging firms to invest in legal representation at the expense of technology development. The 2014 study reported that trolls tend to opportunistically sue firms with more available cash, even if the firm's available cash was not earned in the technology that is the subject of the patent lawsuit, and targeting the firms long before a product begins turning a profit, thus disincentivizing investment in new technologies. Emphasis became progressively focused on patents covering software rather than chemical or mechanical inventions, given the difficulty in defining the scope of software patent claims in comparison to the more easily defined specific compounds in chemical patents. A GAO study concluded that the proportion of patent lawsuits initiated by trolls hadn't changed significantly from 2007 through 2011, the GAO speculating that the raw numerical increase in both troll and non-troll instituted lawsuits may be due to the "inherently imprecise" language and a lack of common, standardized, scientific vocabulary in constantly evolving emerging technologies such as software. Software patents were described as "particularly prone" to abuse because software is "inherently conceptual", with research indicating that a software patent is four times as likely as a chemical patent to be involved in litigation, and a software "business method patent" is thirteen times more likely to be litigated. On June 4, 2013, the National Economic Council and Council of Economic Advisers released a report entitled Patent Assertion and U.S. Innovation that found significant harm to the economy from such entities and made recommendations to address them. The report further stated: "Specific policies should focus on fostering clearer patents with a high standard of novelty and non-obviousness, reducing disparity in the costs of litigation for patent owners and technology users, and increasing the adaptability of the innovation system to challenges posed by new technologies and new business models, would likely have a similar effect today." --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Should the police be privatised? Should we have open borders? In this recording, IEA Communications Officer Harrison Griffiths interviews Dr David D. Friedman to discuss the anarcho-capitalist perspective on these questions and many more. Dr Friedman is is an American economist, physicist, legal scholar, author, and anarcho-capitalist theorist. He currently serves as a Professor Emeritus at the Santa Clara University School of Law. His book, 'The Machinery of Freedom: A Guide to Radical Capitalism', can be read online here: http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Machinery%203rd%20Edn.pdf

For 26 years, the Open Library of the San Francisco-based Internet Archive has been preserving millions of books and lending them out freely online. Last month, a federal judge sided with a group of book publishing giants – Hachette, HarperCollins, Penguin Random House, and Wiley – that sued the nonprofit archive for “mass copyright infringement.” Publishers argued, and the court agreed, that the Open Library provided a way for libraries to avoid paying ebook licensing fees that generate substantial revenue for publishers. Internet Archive, whose mission is to provide “universal access to all knowledge,” said it will appeal the ruling. We'll talk about the dispute and explore how the lawsuit could set the stage for what book lending looks like in an increasingly digital era. Guests: Brewster Kahle, digital librarian; founder, Internet Archive Sydney Johnson, reporter, KQED News Tyler Ochoa, professor, Santa Clara University School of Law

#STSNation,Welcome to another episode of Surviving The Survivor, the podcast that brings you the #BestGuests in all of True Crime…Alex Murdaugh is now a convicted killer, shooting his Wife Maggie and Son Paulat the family's Colleton County property in June of 2021.A jury of his peers took less than 3 hours to come back with the guilty verdict. And that's just a fraction of the story. #BestGuests:Lori Murray has an office in Columbia, South Carolina that bears her name. She is an aggressive litigator and negotiator whose focus is on criminal defense and personal injury matters. Lori's a former law clerk and also a former prosecutor. The National Trial Lawyer's Top 100 Trial Lawyers + Voted Eilte Attorney 2020 by her peers in both Personal Injury and Criminal LawBrian Shealy worked for 5 years at the Richland County, South Carolina Public Defender's Office before establishing the Shealey Law Firm, LLC.Brian has spent the majority of his legal career defending the most violent charges, including clients charged with murder, armed robbery, rape and burglary.Luke Shealy, a native of South Carolina, began his career as a public defender before switching to criminal defense. Luke has trained in the Colorado Method of Capital Voir Dire at the Colorado School of Law and also in death penalty defense at the Santa Clara University School of Law. In 2013, Luke was appointed to his first death penalty case. He and the other team members were tasked with literally trying to save this man from execution by the State of South Carolina. Dr. Christina Marinakis has over 20 years of jury research, study, and applied practice in law and psychology.  Although her primary home is in Los Angeles, she is in the courtroom nearly every week assisting with jury selections and trial strategy in cases throughout the country.  Though most of her experience is in civil litigation for defendants, Christina is also known for her pro bono work in selecting the jury and assisting with theme development for the prosecution in Minnesota v. Derek Chauvin, and more recently assisting the plaintiffs in Vanessa Bryant v. County of Los Angeles.  Support STS by joining our channel membership or become a patron:Patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor#truecrime #alexmurdaugh #murdaugh #truestory #truecrimecommunity #news #podcast #murdermystery #trial #crime_news #jury #southcarolina #AlexMurdaughTrial

#STSNation,Welcome to another episode of Surviving The Survivor, the podcast that brings you the #BestGuests in all of True Crime…It's Week Five of the double murder trial of embattled former attorney Alex Murdaugh …Murdaugh is accused of killing his wife and youngest son, Maggie and Paul, at the family's Colleton County property in June of 2021.And that's just a fraction of the story. #BestGuests:Dr. Laura Pettler is one of the most accomplished forensic scientists in America. She has invented ground-breaking technology and methods based on her published research in staging behavior in homicide cases, death investigation methodology, and crime scene reconstruction ...which led to recognition as the most influential women in forensics in the world today in 2019 and is a world-renowned expert in staged murder. Dr. Pettler was the OzTeam Forensic Criminologist for the Emmy-Winning Dr. Oz Brian Shealey worked for 5 years at the Richland County, South Carolina Public Defender's Office before establishing the Shealey Law Firm, LLC.Brian has spent the majority of his legal career defending the most violent charges, including clients charged with murder, armed robbery, rape and burglary.Luke Shealey, a native of South Carolina, began his career as a public defender before switching to criminal defense. Luke has trained in the Colorado Method of Capital Voir Dire at the Colorado School of Law and also in death penalty defense at the Santa Clara University School of Law. In 2013, Luke was appointed to his first death penalty case. He and the other team members were tasked with literally trying to save this man from execution by the State of South Carolina. Support STS by joining our channel membership or become a patron:Patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor#truecrime #alexmurdaugh #murdaugh #truestory #truecrimecommunity #news #podcast #murdermystery #trial #crime_news #jury #southcarolinaShow less

Jess Miers, Legal Advocacy Counsel at Chamber of Progress, joins Gus to discuss trust and safety on the internet. Together they examine content moderation policies, business and technical decisions made by online platforms, and Section 230. Prior to joining the team at Chamber of Progress, Miers worked as a Policy Analyst at Google. She discusses her experiences working with Google's engineering teams on policy issues, and how she shaped her own career path starting at Santa Clara University School of Law.Follow Jess Miers on TwitterFollow Gus Hurwitz on TwitterFollow Chamber of Progress on TwitterFollow NGTC on TwitterLinksChamber of ProgressNebraska Governance and Technology Center

Probate matters and general civil matters can sometimes be seen as operating in two separate worlds.  However, in practice, these worlds often interact with one another.  In this episode, we are covering probate and civil crossover issues.  We discuss a lot of the basic concepts and considerations given when choosing to file either a probate or civil case and dealing with concurrent litigation.  We also briefly address some new legislation as well as other practice tips that may prove helpful in tackling these issues.About Our GuestsBen Futernick is a research attorney in the Civil Division of the Los Angeles Superior Court.  Ben has experience working on both the civil side and probate side, including the assignment of relating cases to one another.  He recently coauthored two MCLE articles for the Daily Journal entitled “Introduction to Powers and Duties of Guardians Ad Litem” and “Minor's Compromises and Possible Changes to Guardian Ad Litem Statutes.”David Gibson is a probate attorney for the Los Angeles Superior Court.  David previously worked as a research attorney in the probate department handling law and motion matters and, in private practice, advised and represented clients in family law proceedings.Erin Norcia is a partner at Temmerman, Cilley & Kohlmann, LLP.  Erin's practice focuses on trust, probate, and conservatorship litigation.  She is a member of the California Lawyer Association Trusts and Estates Section's Executive Committee.  Erin is also a fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC) and is an Adjunct Professor of the Wills & Trusts Course at Santa Clara University School of Law.About Our HostRyka Farotte is a research attorney at the Los Angeles County Superior Court.  He is currently a member of the Executive Committee of the California Lawyer Association's Trusts and Estates Section.Produced byFoley Marra Studios (thefoleymarrastudios.com)Thank you for listening to Trust Me!

Much of the social media ecosystem — love it or hate it — has been made possible by a federal law from 1996 called the Communications Decency Act. Section 230 of that law shields online publishers like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from liability for much of the content posted on their platforms. This week, the Supreme Court announced it will hear challenges to that law. One of the cases, Reynaldo Gonzalez v. Google LLC, questions whether Section 230 protects platforms that use algorithms to recommended content to users. Marketplace’s Meghan McCarty Carino spoke with Eric Goldman, a law professor at Santa Clara University School of Law. He said there are a few ways the decision could go.

Much of the social media ecosystem — love it or hate it — has been made possible by a federal law from 1996 called the Communications Decency Act. Section 230 of that law shields online publishers like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from liability for much of the content posted on their platforms. This week, the Supreme Court announced it will hear challenges to that law. One of the cases, Reynaldo Gonzalez v. Google LLC, questions whether Section 230 protects platforms that use algorithms to recommended content to users. Marketplace’s Meghan McCarty Carino spoke with Eric Goldman, a law professor at Santa Clara University School of Law. He said there are a few ways the decision could go.

Will the gas from this fiber feud pass? In this special episode, Brooke Siffrin and Aricia Skidmore-Williams of Even The Rich, and Hannah Seligson, a reporter for The Daily Beast, sink their teeth into all the juicy fiber issues from the series. Plus additional perspectives from Christy Harrison, a registered dietitian and host of the podcast Food Psych, and Eric Goldman, a Professor at Santa Clara University School of Law and legal scholar whose focus is Internet Law.If you, or someone you know, is struggling with your relationship with food, please know you are not alone. There are free confidential helplines with people waiting to help. In the US you can call or text the National Eating Disorder Association at 1-800 -931-2237.Listen to new episodes 1 week early and to all episodes ad free with Wondery+. Join Wondery+ for exclusives, binges, early access, and ad free listening.Please support us by supporting our sponsors!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This year's ground shifting Supreme Court term comes to a close on Thursday. This term, the Court has overturned Roe v. Wade, expanded religious rights and struck down gun regulation. In the process, it has positioned its jurisprudence to rely heavily on historical precedents from colonial times to guide its decisions. With confidence in the Supreme Court at an all-time low, many Americans believe that the justices are out of step with the majority of the country. What will that mean for the Court's future? We'll talk to a panel of experts about the term's most significant rulings and look at what might be on the docket for next year's term when Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson joins the Court. Guests: Rory Little, professor; UC-Hastings College of the Law; former attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice Margaret Russell, professor of Constitutional Law; Santa Clara University School of Law

lovethylawyer.comA transcript of this podcast is available at lovethylawyer.com.Go to https://www.lovethylawyer.com/blog for transcripts. In collaboration with the Alameda County Bar Association, Love Thy Lawyer presents an interview with: Hon. Pelayo LlamasPelayo Llamas comes from a historic Filipino family with a long line of public servants from Spanish colonial time to the US Commonwealth and post-World War II.In our time, Pelayo A. Llamas is an Alameda County Superior Court commissioner. He was appointed on March 4, 2019.Previously he was with the Oakland City Attorney's office from 1999 to 2010. He tried solo practice for a while but went back to the City Attorney's office in 2012 as a Senior Deputy City Attorney.Before that, he was an associate at Larson & Burnham from 1992 to 1998, then at Berding & Weil from 1998 to 1999. He earned a BA in History in 1986 from UC Berkeley and got his JD from the Santa Clara University School of Law in 1992.He is a member of the Alameda County Bar Association, the Advisory Board of the Filipino Bar Association of Northern California and the Earl Warren American Inn of Court. Alameda County Bar AssociationThe Alameda County Bar Association (ACBA) is a professional membership association for lawyers and other members of the legal profession. The ACBA provides access to ongoing legal education; and promotes diversity and civil rights in the Alameda County legal community. Our mission is to promote excellence in the legal profession and to facilitate equal access to justice. Louis Goodman www.louisgoodman.com louisgoodman2010@gmail.com 510.582.9090  Special thanks to ACBA staff and members: Cailin Dahlin, Saeed Randle, Hadassah Hayashi, Vincent Tong and Anne Beles. (https://www.acbanet.org/) Musical theme by Joel Katz, Seaside Recording, Maui Technical support: Bryan Matheson, Skyline Studios, OaklandAudiograms & Transcripts: Paul Roberts    We'd love to hear from you.  Send us an email at louisgoodman2010@gmail.com. Please subscribe and listen. Then tell us who you want to hear and what areas of interest you'd like us to cover.  Please rate us and review us on Apple Podcasts.   

Sam and Emma host Khiara M. Bridges, professor at Berkeley Law School, and Michelle Oberman, professor at Santa Clara University School of Law, to discuss the bombshell leaked SCOTUS brief that would overturn Roe V. Wade. Prof. Bridges first joins to clarify what it actually was that was leaked, looking at Justice Alito's first draft of, what he hopes to be, the majority opinion, whether that means the overturn is likely (it is very likely) and whether that can change (possibly), before they get into discussing the role of the leak as a tactic to ward off any defectors and soften the blowback against the right when it comes to the midterms. They then look to the institution itself, diving into the corroding trust that resulted in this leak, and Professor Bridges' take on the “originalist exercise” and the absurdity of lending extra credence to beliefs that were birthed from an incredibly exclusive population. Next, Khiara, Sam, and Emma look at Alito's take on of substantive due process and other 14th Amendment guarantees, particularly as bat signals for the right to go after Obergefell (same-sex marriage) and Lawrence (TX sodomy laws). Professor Oberman then joins to look to the future, as they dive into what repercussions we could see from a full federal ban on abortion, particularly when it comes to the iron law of prohibition, and what Black market abortions entail, before looking at the overwhelming child poverty that would further be inspired by these policies. They wrap up their discussion by noting the importance of centering the needs of the most marginalized and vulnerable when attempting to build a response, looking at HOW they'll be affected, and then building infrastructure from there. Sam and Emma also talk the Ohio and Indiana primaries, and watch Mitch McConnell's immediate pivot to blaming the left for the leak. And in the Fun Half: Sam and Emma are joined by Nomiki Konst as they cover Susan Collins' absolute SHOCK over yesterday's SCOTUS decision after years of her telling us that Justice Kavanaugh would NEVER vote this way, diving into the disastrous desire of centrists and Democrats to meet conservatives half-way on abortion, and touching on Ari Fleischer's appearance on Fox to rally against the misguided zealot that leaked this. This brings them to a conversation on the Right's obsession with the leak, and where the leak might've come from, before they touch on Tucker Carlson's fun redefinition of neoliberalism (hint: it's a smokescreen for race and gender politics), Josh Mandel capitalizes on Trump's idiocy to claim his endorsement of JD Vance as his own, and the crew dives into the New York State gerrymandering ruling. They wrap up with one more conversation on the politics of the leak, plus, your IMs!   Purchase tickets for the live show in Boston on May 15th HERE:   https://majorityreportradio.com/live-show-schedule Become a member at JoinTheMajorityReport.com: https://fans.fm/majority/join Subscribe to the AMQuickie newsletter here:  https://madmimi.com/signups/170390/join Join the Majority Report Discord! http://majoritydiscord.com/ Get all your MR merch at our store: https://shop.majorityreportradio.com/ Check out today's sponsors: Tushy: Hello Tushy cleans your butt with a precise stream of fresh water for just $79. It attaches to your existing toilet – requires NO electricity or additional plumbing – and cuts toilet paper use by 80% – so the Hello Tushy bidet pays for itself in a few months. Go to https://hellotushy.com/?utm_source=Majority+Report&utm_medium=Podcast&utm_campaign=Oxford to get 10% off today! Cozy Earth: One out of three Americans report being sleep deprived, and their sheets could be the problem. Luckily Cozy Earth provides the SOFTEST, MOST LUXURIOUS and BEST-TEMPERATURE REGULATING sheets. Cozy Earth has been featured on Oprah's Most Favorite Things List Four Years in a Row! Made from super soft viscose from bamboo, Cozy Earth Sheets breathe so you sleep at the perfect temperature all year round.  And for a limited time, SAVE 35% on Cozy Earth Bedding. Go to https://cozyearth.com/and enter my special promo code MAJORITY at checkout to SAVE 35% now. Support the St. Vincent Nurses today! https://action.massnurses.org/we-stand-with-st-vincents-nurses/ Check out Matt's show, Left Reckoning, on Youtube, and subscribe on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/leftreckoning Subscribe to Matt's other show Literary Hangover on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/literaryhangover Check out The Nomiki Show on YouTube. https://www.patreon.com/thenomikishow Check out Matt Binder's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/mattbinder Subscribe to Brandon's show The Discourse on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/ExpandTheDiscourse Check out The Letterhack's upcoming Kickstarter project for his new graphic novel! https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/milagrocomic/milagro-heroe-de-las-calles Check out Jamie's podcast, The Antifada. https://www.patreon.com/theantifada, on iTunes, or at https://www.twitch.tv/theantifada (streaming every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday at 7pm ET!) Subscribe to Discourse Blog, a newsletter and website for progressive essays and related fun partly run by AM Quickie writer Jack Crosbie. https://discourseblog.com/ Subscribe to AM Quickie writer Corey Pein's podcast News from Nowhere. https://www.patreon.com/newsfromnowhere  Follow the Majority Report crew on Twitter: @SamSeder @EmmaVigeland @MattBinder @MattLech @BF1nn @BradKAlsop Check out where to donate to abortion funds nationwide and promote abortion access here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-aDTsZXnKhMcrDmtcD35aWs00gw5piocDhaFy5LKDY/preview?pru=AAABgK5HcZ8*ZyfWlj-cCxs8bF1lLtL4dg The Majority Report with Sam Seder - https://majorityreportradio.com/

The Jan. 6 committee's probe into the Capitol attack is turning up new findings about the involvement of former President Trump's allies, as Senate Democrats prepare to advance the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. Margaret Russell of Santa Clara University School of Law, Kyle Cheney of POLITICO, and Chuck Rosenberg, a former U.S. attorney, join Geoff Bennett to discuss. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders