Podcasts about Pro bono

This week, we have an update in the case of Milwaukee judge Hannah Dugan.Texas Governor Abbott is threatening to fine, arrest, and remove house Democrats who have fled the state to protest the new maps Republicans are trying to draw.Jeffrey Clark has been recommended for disbarment. An old law suit brought by Devin Nunes has been thrown out.And we are joined by the founder of Lawyers for Good Government to talk about their latest initiative.Pro Bono Litigation Corps — Lawyers for Good Governmenthttp://whistlebloweraid.org/beansThank you, Mint Mobile.Get this new customer offer and your 3-month Unlimited wireless plan for just $15 a month at  MINTMOBILE.com/CLEANUP  Allison Gillhttps://muellershewrote.substack.com/https://bsky.app/profile/muellershewrote.comHarry DunnHarry Dunn | Substack@libradunn1.bsky.social on BlueskyWant to support this podcast and get it ad-free and early?Go to: https://www.patreon.com/aisle45podTell us about yourself and what you like about the show - http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=short

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on ‪@TheEmilyDBaker‬ YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/live/fjBRC1EgNL8?si=FHARvyhjby51vnFM We sat down with the incredible Robert Alessi, a DLA Piper partner known for his linguistic prowess and legal expertise. While typically practicing environmental and finance law, Robert became a key figure in the high-profile Karen Read case, offering his extensive experience with experts.In this interview, Alessi shares his fascinating journey, from his unexpected path into pharmacy (and how that background still serves him in complex cases) to his insights on the evolving landscape of high-profile cases influenced by social media. Discover how his love for learning and unique scientific background have shaped his legal career, especially when working with diverse expert witnesses. RESOURCES: LIVE TRIALS with EMILY D BAKER: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo&si=QztCkFnpM90uJnG6 DOCKET: 0:00 - Intro: Robert Alessi & The Karen Read Case 1:02 - Robert's General Legal Practice & Working with Experts 3:33 - From Pharmacist to Attorney: A Unique Career Path 6:00 - The Love of Learning in Law & Language in the Courtroom 9:59 - Word Games & Vocabulary in Legal Practice 11:59 - The Impact of Pro Bono Work on High-Profile Cases (Karen Read) 16:00 - Teamwork on the Karen Read Defense & Meeting David Jannetty 18:54 - Robert & David Jannetty's Upcoming Podcast 20:38 - Advice for Attorneys in High-Profile & Online Cases 22:40 - The Importance of Public Engagement with the Judicial Process 23:52 - Where to Find Robert Alessi & Podcast Updates STAY IN THE LOOP WITH EMILY D. BAKER Download Our FREE App: https://lawnerdapp.com Get the Free Email Alert: https://www.LawNerdAlert.com Case Requests & Business Inquiries: TeamEmilyDBaker@wmeagency.com Help with the shop: https://www.lawnerdshop.com/pages/contact Mailing Address: Emily D. Baker 2000 Mallory Ln. St. 130-185, Franklin TN 37067 LAW NERD MERCH! https://www.LawNerdShop.com LONG FORM CONTENT https://www.youtube.com/@TheEmilyDBaker The Emily Show Podcast on YouTube: https://emilydbaker.com/TheEmilyShowPlaylist Apple Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/AppleTheEmilyShow Spotify Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/SpofityTheEmilyShow On your favorite podcast player Mondays EMILY ON SOCIAL @TheEmilyDBaker Instagram: https://www.Instagram.com/TheEmilyDBaker Twitter: https://www.Twitter.com/TheEmilyDBaker Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheEmilyDBaker MY YOUTUBE TOOLS **My Favorite YOUTUBE TOOL VidIQ https://vidiq.com/LawNerd Follow My Cats on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fredandgeorge_cat Emily's glasses lenses are Irlen tint https://www.irlen.com *This video is not legal advice; it is commentary for educational and entertainment purposes. Some links shared are affiliate links, all sponsorships are stated in video. Videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise stated. Sharing a resource is not an endorsement; it is a resource. Copyright 2020-2025 Baker Media, LLC* Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In Legal Terms, the show about you and your rights hosted by attorney Adam Kilgore. legalterms@mbponline.orgIf you enjoyed listening to this podcast, please consider contributing to MPB: https://donate.mpbfoundation.org/mspb/podcastToday's Legal Terms on In Legal Terms is / are: Pro Bono, Pro Se, and IndigentWe're talking with guests Sam H. Buchanan, Jr., Executive Director MS Center for Legal Services and Ben Thomas Cole II, Executive Director North MS Rural Legal Service about options for legal services for low-income Mississippians.It's election day! for some. Is it for you? Special Primary Elections are taking place in specific counties on Tuesday, August 5. Ok – think about the name of your county. Got it in your mind? The special election is for folks in Chickasaw, Coahoma, DeSoto, Forrest, Greene, Jones, Lamar, Lee, Lowndes, Monroe, Perry, Pontotoc, Quitman, Tate, Tunica, and Wayne. Learn what elections are occurring, where your polling location is, and find election results at MPBOnline.org/election or YallVote.MSHow can you contact our guests? The website and phone number for our guest Sam H. Buchanan, Jr. is MS Center For Legal Services.org and that phone number is (800) 773-1737If you'd like to find more information about Ben Thomas Cole II,'s organization North MS Rural Legal Service the website and phone number are https://nmrls.com/ and the NMRLS Intake Call Center is 1-800-498-1804 Upcoming: August 26th, 2025 Special Education Clinic with Southern Poverty Law Center concerning Special Education - Hattiesburg. Registration begins at 4pm2026 the 60th anniversary of NMRLS Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng has pleaded guilty on Monday (Aug 4) to abetting the obstruction of justice in a case linked to former transport minister S. Iswaran. A second charge for instigating Mr Iswaran to obtain flights and a hotel stay from Ong will be taken into consideration during sentencing, which has been adjourned to Aug 15. Both the prosecution and defence called for the court to exercise judicial mercy and impose only a fine, as Ong has advanced multiple myeloma, which is an incurable cancer. So what exactly did Ong admit to? What sentence awaits him on Aug 15?And more importantly, what does this case say about accountability, discretion, and Singapore’s zero-tolerance stance on corruption? On The Big Story, Hongbin Jeong speaks with Associate Professor Mervyn Cheong, Deputy Director, Centre for Pro Bono and Clinical Legal Education, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore, to find out more. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Pro bono ist der lateinische Ausdruck für das Leisten von Arbeit ohne Bezahlung oder gegen geringe Bezahlung. Der Begriff "pro bono" bedeutet "zum Wohle des Guten" bzw. "für das öffentliche Wohl". In der Praxis bezieht sich der Ausdruck darauf, dass professionelle Dienstleistungen kostenlos oder zu vergünstigten Konditionen erbracht werden, um der Allgemeinheit oder bedürftigen Personen zu helfen. Hier sind einige typische Anwendungsbereiche des Begriffs "pro bono": 1. Juristische Dienstleistungen: Anwälte und Kanzleien bieten häufig pro bono Rechtsberatung und Rechtsvertretung an, um Menschen zu helfen, die sich keine rechtliche Unterstützung leisten können. Dies kann besonders wichtig sein in Fällen, die grundlegende Rechte oder soziale Gerechtigkeit betreffen. 2. Medizinische Dienstleistungen: Ärzte und andere Gesundheitsfachkräfte können pro bono Gesundheitsdienste anbieten, insbesondere in Bereichen oder für Personen, die keinen Zugang zu medizinischer Versorgung haben. 3. Beratungsdienstleistungen: Fachleute aus verschiedenen Branchen können ihre Beratungs- oder Coaching-Dienste pro bono zur Verfügung stellen, um gemeinnützige Organisationen, Start-ups oder Einzelpersonen zu unterstützen. 4. Kreativdienstleistungen: Designer, Werbeexperten oder Marketingberater können pro bono Dienstleistungen anbieten, um gemeinnützige Projekte oder Organisationen zu unterstützen, die sich keine professionelle Unterstützung leisten können. 5. Bildungsdienstleistungen: Fachleute aus der Bildungsbranche bieten pro bono Workshops oder Schulungen an, um benachteiligte Gemeinschaften zu unterstützen und Wissen weiterzugeben. Pro bono Arbeit ist ein wichtiger Bestandteil des sozialen Engagements und der Unternehmensverantwortung. Sie ermöglicht Fachleuten, ihre Fähigkeiten und Ressourcen zum Wohl der Gesellschaft einzusetzen und Menschen zu unterstützen, die andernfalls keinen Zugang zu professionellen Dienstleistungen hätten. Hast du schon einmal von pro bono profitiert oder wärst du bereit, pro bono zu arbeiten? Schreibe mir gerne eine Nachricht über mein Kontaktformular.

As passionate advocates for pro bono work, Bob Allen (Allen Law Group) and Sandy Wunderlich (Tucker Ellis LLP) are truly lawyers who lead.  In this episode, IADC Speaks Host Rebecca Weinstein Bacon (Bartlit Beck LLP) speaks with Bob and Sandy. Bob and Sandy share their personal experiences helping children in need. Bob reflects on a multi-issue insurance case that presented itself involving a family friend, and Sandy describes how she got involved with CASA – Court Appointed Special Advocates. Together they discuss the impact of their work and share stories that illustrate the power of giving back.

(Originally published 4/28/23): Many lawyers take on pro bono cases unaware of the vicarious trauma they can experience when helping clients in extreme situations. Hear Akin Pro Bono partner Lauren Connell and interactive learning expert Ken Rosenblad discuss the types of training that can help lawyers manage their mental health — and become more effective advocates.  Want to hear about new Pursuing Justice releases? Subscribe to our monthly pro bono emails Explore our Pro Bono programs and resources Learn about our Pro Bono Memberships and Scholarships for qualified organizations and individuals Please note: CLE is not offered for listening to this podcast, and the views and opinions expressed within represent those of the speakers and not necessarily those of PLI.

 In episode 3 of KWM's Responsible Business podcast NEXT, hosts Clem Johnson and Dan Creasey dive deep into the world of pro bono legal services with guests Christina Carney from NAB and Elise Perry from KWM. The conversation explores the critical role of pro bono work in helping to bridge access to justice, highlighting how lawyers can create meaningful social impact by providing pro bono to individuals and organisations. Through personal stories and professional insights, the episode reveals the transformative potential of pro bono work, demonstrating how lawyers can be powerful allies in addressing systemic social challenges. Key Topics:Pro bono legal work is fundamentally about providing free legal assistance for the public good, extending beyond individual cases to create systemic change.Corporate leadership plays a crucial role in establishing and sustaining pro bono programs, with senior executives like NAB's Sharon Cook driving cultural transformation.The future of pro bono work is increasingly focused on long-term, strategic interventions in addition to addressing immediate legal needs.Technology, including AI, presents emerging opportunities to expand the reach and efficiency of pro bono legal services.Successful pro bono programs require dedicated teams, leadership support, and integration into core professional responsibilities.Evaluation and impact measurement are becoming more sophisticated, moving beyond hours worked to understanding actual client outcomes.A new generation of purpose-driven lawyers is emerging, seeking meaningful opportunities to contribute to social justice through their legal careers.Effective pro bono work depends on genuine partnerships with community organisations, ensuring interventions are community-led and responsive to real needs. 

Welcome to 'AI Lawyer Talking Tech', the podcast that explores the transformative power of artificial intelligence in the legal sector. Today, we delve into how AI is rapidly reshaping legal services, moving beyond a mere buzzword to become an essential tool for law firms and corporate legal departments alike. From automating routine tasks and significantly boosting efficiency in areas like legal research, document review, and contract management, to enabling legal professionals to focus on high-value, strategic work, AI is fundamentally changing how legal work gets done. Examining the Law Commission's consultation on reforming private international law for the digital age (England and Wales)29 Jun 2025Addleshaw GoddardWhy Are Los Angeles Law Firms Reimagining Outsourcing? The Smarter, Leaner Model Explained28 Jun 2025Programming InsiderWhy Choose Ace4 AI?28 Jun 2025Legaltech on MediumWhy Explainability is Essential for AI Adoption in Legal Work28 Jun 2025Legaltech on MediumMary Meeker's Trends In AI Report: A Must Read For Lawyers And Legal Professionals27 Jun 2025Above The LawNorth Carolina Newspapers, Teaching K-12 Health Education, TikTok Creator Fest, More: Friday Afternoon ResearchBuzz, June 27, 202527 Jun 2025ResearchBuzzHow Legal Practice Management Systems Solve Your Firm's Chaos27 Jun 2025TechBullionVault Ranks Lowenstein in Multiple Categories, Including Best Law Firms for Pro Bono, Technology & Innovation, Inclusion, and Summer Associate Program27 Jun 2025Lowenstein Sandler PCCleared for Takeoff? Copilot Legal and Technical Preflight Checklist27 Jun 2025JD SupraFinTech Revolution in Legal Services: How Digital Innovation is Transforming Personal Injury Law27 Jun 2025TechBullionThe Legal-FinTech Ecosystem: How Personal Injury Practices Are Pioneering Digital Finance Innovation27 Jun 2025TechBullionBringing a Human Connection to Law and Ministry27 Jun 2025AxiomLaw.comReconciliation Bill Would Nullify State Laws Protecting Students from the Risks of AI27 Jun 2025Century FoundationSales team and the legal department: A playbook for in-house counsel27 Jun 2025Thomson ReutersContractPodAi Wins Two Golden Globee® Awards for Technology27 Jun 2025ContractPodAiHarvey and Ethics and Research and More! Tons to Talk About on Legaltech Week Today at 3 p.m. ET. Join us!27 Jun 2025LawSitesLawDroid Launches CiteCheck AI, A Fail-Safe Against AI Citation Hallucinations27 Jun 2025LawSitesHow to Keep Client Data Safe in a World Full of Online Threats27 Jun 2025Security BoulevardMeta, Anthropic win legal battles over AI 'training.' The copyright war is far from over.27 Jun 2025AOL.comGetty drops primary claims against Stable Diffusion in AI lawsuit after 'failing to establish a sufficient connection between the infringing acts and the UK jurisdiction for copyright law to bite'27 Jun 2025PC Gamer MagazineMultilingual AI Agents for Global Legal Teams27 Jun 2025Legaltech on MediumWhat Makes our Legal AI Framework Stand out?27 Jun 2025Legaltech on MediumWhy Legal AI Agents?27 Jun 2025Legaltech on MediumWhy Law Firms are Adopting AI for Document Management27 Jun 2025Legaltech on MediumTransform Your Legal Document Workflows27 Jun 2025Legaltech on MediumAce4 AI Supercharges Legal Document Workflows27 Jun 2025Legaltech on MediumMultilingual document intelligence made simple27 Jun 2025Legaltech on MediumRevolutionize your legal workflow with the power of AI!27 Jun 2025Legaltech on MediumThe #1 Time Killer for Legal Teams?27 Jun 2025Legaltech on MediumFrom Quiet Expert to Recognized Leader: Become a Legal Webinar Speaker27 Jun 2025Legal Marketing & Technology BlogAI in court translation: Navigating opportunities, risks & the human factor27 Jun 2025Thomson Reuters InstituteLitigators of the Week: Winner27 Jun 2025Cooley

26 06 2025 03 Momento Justo Mónica Cáceres, coordinadora del Programa Abogacía Probono del Cidsep de la Universidad Católica by ABC Color

When Bob Chappell vanished from his yacht in Hobart, suspicion quickly turned on his partner, Sue Neill-Fraser, an unassuming woman who soon found herself at the centre of one of Australia’s most controversial murder cases. But behind the headlines lies a deeper story - one of forensic failure, investigative tunnel vision, and a conviction that may never have happened if all the available avenues had been investigated. In this episode, former detective Colin McLaren unpacks the crucial DNA evidence, the overlooked clues on the yacht, and the questions raised by a mysterious yellow Ford. This is a story about how forensics should work, and what happens when it doesn’t. Note: Sue Neill-Fraser was found guilty by a Supreme Court jury; her appeal was dismissed, and a Coroner’s investigation, which reviewed all the available evidence, supported the findings of the criminal proceedings. Tasmania Police stand by the integrity and thoroughness of the investigation, and the efforts of the investigation team, including the forensic experts, and the prosecution of the case by the office of the DPP.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hear from attorneys Keith Y. Cohan and Ryan M. Goldstein of Reid Collins, and Nora Ahmed of the ACLU of Louisiana, about the Justice Lab's longstanding advocacy for individuals impacted by discriminatory policing — and how the pursuit of justice in dozens of these cases can lead to systemic reforms. Want to hear about new Pursuing Justice releases? Subscribe to our monthly pro bono emails Explore our Pro Bono programs and resources Learn about our Pro Bono Memberships and Scholarships for qualified organizations and individuals Please note: CLE is not offered for listening to this podcast, and the views and opinions expressed within represent those of the speakers and not necessarily those of PLI.

The third instalment of the VAS series looks at the pro bono work required to assist the victims of historic injustice. Diarmuid Brecknell from Phoenix Law Solicitors and Andrew McKeown BL talk to us about Inquests, Inquiries and Campaigns and the intense yet rewarding work required to assist victims. For more on the Voluntary Assistance Scheme, visit lawlibrary.ie/vas

The Cambridge Pro Bono Project (CPP) hosted the annual lecture featuring Professor Judge Leonardo Brant (International Court of Justice; Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil) on Thursday 16th May 2025.The Cambridge Pro Bono Project is a research centre that draws on the subject-matter expertise of graduate researchers and Faculty experts to produce reports on a wide range of public interest matters. Every year, we invite distinguished speakers to address our researchers, staff, and students at the University of Cambridge. For more information about the Cambridge Pro Bono Project, see https://www.cpp.law.cam.ac.uk/ Twitter (https://twitter.com/Cam_ProBono) or Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/CamProBono).

The Cambridge Pro Bono Project (CPP) hosted the annual lecture featuring Professor Judge Leonardo Brant (International Court of Justice; Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil) on Thursday 16th May 2025.The Cambridge Pro Bono Project is a research centre that draws on the subject-matter expertise of graduate researchers and Faculty experts to produce reports on a wide range of public interest matters. Every year, we invite distinguished speakers to address our researchers, staff, and students at the University of Cambridge. For more information about the Cambridge Pro Bono Project, see https://www.cpp.law.cam.ac.uk/ Twitter (https://twitter.com/Cam_ProBono) or Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/CamProBono).

Episode 101: Pro Bono This month on Calendar Call, Matt Berardino talks Pro Bono with Attorney Jenn Shukla, Director of Access to Justice Initiatives and Interim Director of DEI at the Connecticut Bar Association and Attorney Dan Brody, Co-Chair of the CBA's Pro Bono Committee. Matt, Attorney Shukla, and Attorney Brody discuss a number of topics including why do pro bono, pro bono obligations, potential MCLE credits for pro bono, and critical areas of need for pro bono. Other topics include opportunities available through the CBA, training for practitioners, concerns and issues, as well as many resources available. Rule 6.1 of Professional Conduct CTbar.org/volunteer

Guests from a Kansas pro bono partnership discuss how private businesses and in-house attorneys can support legal aid initiatives in their communities on Talk Justice. In 2017, Koch was interested in making pro bono work an official part of the company, but learned that Kansas rules did not allow in-house attorneys who are licensed by outside states to provide local pro bono services. Koch worked with KLS to get the rule changed, demonstrating that the demand for free legal help greatly exceeded the supply of legal aid lawyers. Ever since, Koch attorneys have engaged in an ongoing partnership with KLS to provide pro bono expungement and driver's license restoration clinics. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Guests from a Kansas pro bono partnership discuss how private businesses and in-house attorneys can support legal aid initiatives in their communities on Talk Justice. In 2017, Koch was interested in making pro bono work an official part of the company, but learned that Kansas rules did not allow in-house attorneys who are licensed by outside states to provide local pro bono services. Koch worked with KLS to get the rule changed, demonstrating that the demand for free legal help greatly exceeded the supply of legal aid lawyers. Ever since, Koch attorneys have engaged in an ongoing partnership with KLS to provide pro bono expungement and driver's license restoration clinics.

Anna Chu, Executive Director of We the Action, joins Deepak Puri, CEO of The Democracy Labs, to discuss the critical role lawyers play in defending the rule of law and supporting nonprofits during these challenging times.  The We the Action platform connects lawyers with organizations addressing the challenges both sides face in finding specific expertise and meaningful opportunities.  Deepak and Anna talk about Making it easier for lawyers to find nonprofits they can help Increasing need for legal support for nonprofits Working with unions to set up free legal counsel for Federal workers who have been laid off or fired   The responsibility of lawyers to serve the public good #WetheAction #TheDemLabs #Lawyers #Nonprofits #ProBonoLegalServices WeTheAction.org TheDemLabs.org    

Send us a textIf you've ever wondered how to offer sliding scale services or pro bono work without devaluing your business, you're not alone— and that's exactly what I'm diving into in this episode. I see so many purpose-driven entrepreneurs struggling to make their services accessible without draining their energy or undermining their value. In this conversation, I unpack the five biggest mistakes people make when offering reduced-rate work and show you how to avoid them with clarity and confidence. You'll walk away with practical tips on setting healthy boundaries, communicating the true value of your services, and ensuring you're serving from a place of strength—not scarcity. Whether you're offering coaching, consulting, or wellness services, this episode will help you do good without compromising your business goals. Take a listen now—you'll thank yourself later.What to listen out for:00:43 Episode Focus: Sliding Scale and Pro Bono Services02:37 Challenges of Offering Sliding Scale and Pro Bono Work08:02 Tips for Sustainable Sliding Scale and Pro Bono Work13:03 Reflecting on Your Business Practices14:21 ConclusionDon't go yet. If you're enjoying the show please rate and review. It helps us spread the word to more people and ultimately get more small businesses on the path to sustainable profitability and business success. Thanks for Listening.*********Reach Out, Connect, or Book a Call with JaneneGet started improving your business. Sometimes it's difficult to know where to begin. I suggest you Download the self-assessment Pricing Scorecard (https://thepricinglady.com/pricing-self-assessment-scorecard/). Get a view of what's working and what's not working when it comes to pricing in your business. Figure out where to start making improvements.Get in touch with Janene. If you've got a question that needs answering, a challenge you're facing or you have suggestions for future topics or guests, let me know. Contact Janene (https://thepricinglady.com/book-a-call/)

Join host Alicia Aiken and fellow movie buff and attorney John Whitcomb for another lively discussion of how pro bono has been depicted in past Oscar-nominated films, exploring how these stories reflect the popular understanding of access to justice. Want to hear about new Pursuing Justice releases? Subscribe to our monthly pro bono emails Explore our Pro Bono programs and resources Learn about our Pro Bono Memberships and Scholarships for qualified organizations and individuals Please note: CLE is not offered for listening to this podcast, and the views and opinions expressed within represent those of the speakers and not necessarily those of PLI.

This Day in Legal History: Louisiana PurchaseOn this day in legal history, April 30, 1803, the United States signed the Louisiana Purchase Treaty with France, dramatically altering the legal and territorial landscape of the country. The treaty, signed in Paris by American envoys Robert Livingston and James Monroe, officially transferred approximately 828,000 square miles of land west of the Mississippi River from French to American control. President Thomas Jefferson, though uncertain whether the U.S. Constitution explicitly authorized such a land acquisition, ultimately supported the deal, citing the necessity of expanding the republic and securing trade access to the port of New Orleans.The purchase, which cost $15 million (roughly four cents an acre), effectively doubled the size of the United States and set a precedent for executive power in foreign affairs. It raised important legal questions regarding the role of the executive branch, the powers of Congress, and the interpretation of constitutional authority in territorial expansion. The acquisition also intensified debates over the expansion of slavery and the treatment of Indigenous peoples, both of which would become central legal and political issues throughout the 19th century.In addition to expanding national territory, the Louisiana Purchase laid the groundwork for the exploration and legal organization of new states. Soon after, Congress passed legislation governing how the territory would be divided and admitted into the Union. This required new legal frameworks for property rights, governance, and federal versus state authority in previously foreign lands.The U.S. Supreme Court is preparing to hear arguments on whether Oklahoma can fund a religious charter school—the first case of its kind. At issue is the state's attempt to establish St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, a K-12 online institution run by two Catholic dioceses, using public funds. A state court previously blocked the school, ruling it would act as a “governmental entity” and violate the First Amendment's Establishment Clause, which bars government endorsement of religion.The school's supporters, including Oklahoma's governor and President Trump, argue that denying the school solely because it is religious constitutes a violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. Meanwhile, opponents, including the state's attorney general, warn that the move would amount to taxpayer-funded religious indoctrination and could erode public education standards, particularly around non-discrimination.Charter schools in Oklahoma are considered public entities, which complicates claims that St. Isidore would operate as a private, independent institution. Organizers maintain that contracting with the state doesn't make the school an arm of the government. The Supreme Court's decision, expected by June, could redefine the boundaries between church and state in education.The legal element worth highlighting here is the Establishment Clause vs. Free Exercise Clause tension—the case tests how far states can go in accommodating religious institutions without endorsing them. This clash sits at the core of modern debates about public funding and religious liberty. Under the current Supreme Court composition, it is likely we will see an expansion of the former at the cost of the limits in the latter. US Supreme Court mulls legality of milestone religious charter school | ReutersGoogle CEO Sundar Pichai is set to testify in a high-stakes antitrust trial where the U.S. Department of Justice is pushing to break up parts of Google's business to restore competition in online search. The DOJ is urging the court to force Google to divest its Chrome browser and stop paying major tech partners like Apple and Samsung to be the default search engine on their devices. Prosecutors argue these deals entrench Google's monopoly and hinder innovation, especially as search overlaps more with emerging generative AI tools like ChatGPT.U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta has already found that Google maintains a dominant position in the search market with no real rivals. The government is also asking the court to make Google share search data with competitors to level the playing field. Google, in response, claims that such measures would harm user privacy and undercut smaller partners like Mozilla that depend on Google funding.Pichai is expected to argue that the proposed remedies would have unintended consequences across the tech ecosystem. Google has already made some adjustments, allowing phone makers to pre-install alternative search and AI apps, but it still plans to appeal any adverse ruling. The case could have sweeping implications for the future of search, digital competition, and AI integration online.Google CEO Sundar Pichai to take the stand at search antitrust trial | ReutersPresident Trump issued an executive order directing the Justice Department to coordinate free legal defense for police officers accused of misconduct. The order calls on Attorney General Pam Bondi to organize pro bono support from private law firms, aiming to protect officers who, in the administration's view, face "unjust liability" for actions taken in the line of duty. Though the order doesn't name specific firms, it expands Trump's broader effort to harness the legal industry to support his administration's priorities.This follows recent agreements between the Trump administration and nine major law firms—including Paul Weiss, Skadden, and Kirkland & Ellis—to commit $940 million worth of pro bono work to causes the administration endorses, such as veterans' services and combating antisemitism. Critics, including the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and 20 Democratic state attorneys general, have raised concerns about political pressure and lack of transparency in how these firms were selected and what they've agreed to.The order also calls for improved pay and training for police while denouncing efforts to “demonize law enforcement.” Critics warn this could undermine accountability and place pressure on firms to align their legal services with political goals. Meanwhile, some firms have publicly stated they will maintain control over their pro bono work, even as Trump claims the right to “use” them for administration-selected causes.Trump executive order seeks law firms to defend police officers for free | ReutersIn a piece I wrote for Forbes this week, I examined President Trump's renewed push to replace income taxes with tariffs, particularly targeting relief for Americans making under $200,000. The idea sounds populist, but it's economically misleading. Tariffs, after all, are simply hidden taxes that show up in the form of higher prices on imported goods. For lower- and middle-income Americans—those Trump claims to want to help—this shift would likely increase, not reduce, their financial burden.The proposal doesn't change the amount of money the government needs—just where it's extracted. Instead of the IRS, the “bill collector” becomes stores, suppliers, and foreign producers, with consumers footing the bill at checkout. Trump's approach, I argue, banks on the psychological difference between writing a tax check and absorbing incremental price hikes, though the economic effect is the same.Historically, tariff-based revenue systems led to inequality and volatility—conditions that helped inspire the adoption of the income tax through the Sixteenth Amendment. And practically speaking, tariffs simply cannot generate the hundreds of billions needed to sustain modern federal programs. Relying on them also cedes revenue control to foreign exporters, which undermines national fiscal stability.Ultimately, this policy doesn't tackle the real issue—Americans' frustration with a high cost of living. Instead, it disguises taxation while dodging the deeper structural question of who should be paying more. I emphasized that real reform must address not just how taxes are collected, but also the fairness of who bears the burden.Trump Continues To Push Idea Of Replacing Income Tax With TariffsSpecial ThanksStephanie Himel-Nelson, Jennifer Porter Law, PLLC This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Episode 29: Institute for Free Speech v. J.R. Johnson, et al. Institute for Free Speech v. J.R. Johnson, et al. argued before Chief Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod and Judges Kurt D. Engelhardt and Greg Gerard Guidry in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on April 28, 2025. Argued by Del Kolde (on behalf of the Institute for Free Speech) and Cory R. Liu (on behalf of J.R. Johnson, et al.). Case Background, from the Institute for Free Speech website: Texas law prohibits corporations—including nonprofits—from making “in-kind contributions” to candidates and political committees. The Texas Ethics Commission (TEC) recently interpreted this ban to extend to pro bono litigation services, even when such services aim to challenge the constitutionality of state laws. The Institute for Free Speech (IFS) filed a federal lawsuit against the TEC commissioners and executive director over this ban on pro bono legal services. This law stops organizations like IFS from advocating for the civil rights of Texas candidates and political committees in court. It imposes stiff civil and criminal penalties for violations. The lawsuit argues that the TEC's interpretation of the Texas Elections Code violates IFS' First Amendment rights to free speech and association. The TEC's reading of the law prevents IFS from representing potential clients like Chris Woolsey, a city councilmember in Corsicana, and the Texas Anti-Communist League PAC, headed by Cary Cheshire, both of whom want to contest a state law that compels speech on political signs. Resources: Institute for Free Speech case page Institute for Free Speech press release Plaintiff-Appellant's Opening Brief  Complaint  The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the political speech rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government guaranteed by the First Amendment. If you're enjoying the Free Speech Arguments podcast, please subscribe and leave a review on your preferred podcast platform. To support the Institute's mission or inquire about legal assistance, please visit our website: www.ifs.org

"That was the moment where I almost quit. That was my pivotal moment. We saw so many people die as a level 1 trauma center so there was so much emotional baggage that we carry as doctors through that, but I never faltered. It was always 'this is what I want to do, this is what I was born to do,' and that moment when I was verbally attacked at this grand rounds, that questioned everything to me about my choices in neurosurgery."This episode is with Dr. Sheri Dewan, a board certified neurosurgeon practicing in Chicago. In this episode we talk about:- Sheri's inspiration behind becoming a neurosurgeon- Talking with her husband while they were dating about what it would look like for the two of them to get married and her have a career in neurosurgery- How she dealt with the numerous people who told her she couldn't be a neurosurgeon- Having her children in residency training- The pivotal moment in which an attending clearly didn't want her in the residency program, publicly humiliated her and how that was the first time she thought about quitting- The support of her parents, husband and mentors that carried her through- The times in training when she might go several days where she only saw her children while they were asleep- Writing her memoir, Cutting A Path- Doing pro-bono surgeries in India, another thing people told her she couldn't do or would no longer have the desire to do after finishing her training- And so much more! Connect with Moms of Medicine:- Instagram @moms_of_medicine- Momsofmedicine@gmail.comConnect with Dr. Dewan:- Instagram  @drsheridewan- drsheridewan.com- Grab a copy of her book, Cutting A Path

In the sixth episode of Season 6 of Emphasis Added, we have an impactful conversation with Professor Alissa Gomez to explore the intersection of legal education, access to justice, and the impact of pro bono work.Professor Gomez shares her path from commercial litigation at King & Spalding to leading Houston Volunteer Lawyers and eventually joining the University of Houston Law Center. We dive into the civil justice gap and how pro bono efforts can help close it. Professor Gomez explains the concept of legal literacy, highlights effective community outreach strategies, and shares insights from her research. The conversation also covers practical ways young attorneys and law students can get involved in pro bono work and her efforts as UHLC Pro Bono Facilitator to connect students with real-world opportunities.To get a mailing or electronic subscription to the Houston Law Review click here. For more Emphasis Added content, follow us on Instagram and check out our video content on YouTube!

This Day in Legal History: Senate Approves Alaska PurchaseOn April 9, 1867, the United States Senate voted to ratify the Treaty with Russia for the Purchase of Alaska, approving the acquisition of the territory for $7.2 million. The deal, championed by Secretary of State William H. Seward, added over 586,000 square miles to U.S. territory. At the time, many Americans viewed the icy, remote land as a barren wasteland, mocking the transaction as “Seward's Folly” or “Seward's Icebox.” Despite public ridicule, Seward pursued the deal partly to prevent British expansion from neighboring Canada and to extend American commercial interests into the Pacific. Russia, for its part, saw little strategic or economic value in Alaska and feared it might lose the territory without compensation in a future conflict.The treaty passed in the Senate by a vote of 37 to 2, reflecting support among lawmakers despite popular skepticism. Legal authority for the purchase came through the treaty-making power of the executive branch, with Senate ratification required under Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution. Once finalized, the transfer of sovereignty occurred in October 1867 in Sitka, with a formal ceremony marking Russia's departure.Criticism of the purchase subsided decades later following the Klondike Gold Rush and, eventually, the discovery of significant oil reserves. These developments drastically changed the public's perception of Alaska from frozen liability to strategic asset. The purchase also helped lay the groundwork for America's growing influence in the Pacific and Arctic regions.President Donald Trump announced that major law firms pledging $340 million in pro bono work would assist his administration with coal industry initiatives and international tariff negotiations. Speaking at a White House event, Trump said these firms—such as Paul Weiss, Skadden, Milbank, and Willkie—would provide legal support for leasing and regulatory issues in coal mining, as well as in talks with foreign countries on trade. While he didn't specify which firms would take on specific tasks, Trump emphasized their legal talent and claimed they were offering services “for the right price.”The announcement coincided with Trump signing executive orders invoking the Defense Production Act to increase coal mining and directing investments into advanced coal technology. He also said the Department of Justice would be tasked with challenging state and local regulations he views as harmful to miners. The law firm agreements came after Trump targeted several legal firms with directives that threaten their business, prompting lawsuits from Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, and Jenner & Block. Trump posted the agreements on Truth Social, stating the firms would work on causes like veterans' rights and combating antisemitism, although details on how their roles will be determined remain unclear.Trump Says He'll Enlist Big Law Dealmakers for Coal, TariffsA group of 67 former top legal executives from companies like Microsoft, Intel, and Eli Lilly filed a legal brief condemning President Trump's executive orders targeting several major law firms. They argue that the orders violate the Constitution and threaten the independence of corporate legal counsel by coercing political loyalty through federal contract threats. The brief supports a lawsuit by Perkins Coie, one of the firms impacted by the orders, which claims the directives bar its attorneys from government buildings and jeopardize its clients' federal contracts.The former general counsels contend that Trump's actions don't just punish individual firms, but undermine the principle that companies should be free to choose their legal representation without fear of political retaliation. The brief highlights how the orders signal to businesses that hiring lawyers linked to Trump's critics could lead to government sanctions. Trump issued similar orders against WilmerHale and Jenner & Block, and all three firms have secured temporary legal blocks against the measures.While some firms like Paul Weiss struck deals with Trump to avoid penalties—agreeing to provide pro bono work for causes aligned with his administration—others have pushed back. Four days prior, hundreds of law firms submitted their own brief supporting Perkins Coie. Trump's administration defends the orders as efforts to stop perceived political bias in Big Law.Former top lawyers at major companies decry Trump orders against law firms | ReutersAn immigration judge has given the U.S. government through today to present evidence justifying the deportation of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University student and lawful permanent resident. Khalil was arrested in New York and transferred to a detention facility in rural Louisiana, sparking concern over due process and free speech rights. At Tuesday's hearing, Judge Jamee Comans made it clear that if the government cannot prove Khalil is deportable, she will dismiss the case by Friday. She also criticized delays in sharing evidence and emphasized the importance of Khalil's due process rights.Khalil's lawyer, Marc Van Der Hout, claims the deportation effort is politically motivated and violates the First Amendment, suggesting that Khalil is being targeted for speaking out in support of Palestinians. The government argues Khalil should be deported under a Cold War-era law that allows removal if an immigrant is deemed a threat to U.S. foreign policy, and also accuses him of omissions on his green card application—charges he denies.The case has drawn national attention, including a crowded virtual courtroom. A separate habeas petition is also under consideration in federal court, and Khalil cannot be deported while that process plays out. His wife, a U.S. citizen who is expecting their child this month, has been unable to visit him due to her pregnancy.US given one day to show evidence for deporting Columbia University protester Khalil | ReutersA federal judge has ordered President Trump's White House to temporarily lift access restrictions on the Associated Press (AP) while a lawsuit challenging the ban moves forward. The Trump administration had barred AP journalists from events like Oval Office briefings and Air Force One trips after the agency refused to adopt Trump's preferred term, "Gulf of America," instead continuing to refer to the "Gulf of Mexico." U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump appointee, ruled that the First Amendment prohibits the government from excluding journalists based on viewpoint.The ruling, which takes effect Sunday to allow time for appeal, restores the AP's access to White House press events. McFadden emphasized that if some journalists are granted access, others cannot be denied for their editorial stance. The AP sued three senior Trump aides in February, claiming the restrictions were unconstitutional retaliation against protected speech and lacked due process.AP reporters testified that the ban hindered their ability to cover the president, while Justice Department lawyers argued that access to presidential spaces is a privilege, not a right. Press freedom groups and the White House Correspondents' Association welcomed the decision, calling it a win for independent journalism. The case remains ongoing, with a final ruling expected in the coming months.Judge lifts Trump White House restrictions on AP while lawsuit proceeds | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Law firms are striking deals with President Trump to avoid getting hit with a punitive executive order, and all of these deals include pledges of tens of millions of dollars in pro bono legal work. In this quickly changing landscape, it appears that the biggest law firm in the country, Kirkland & Ellis, is considering one of these commitments to the White House. However, the details of how these deals will work in practice are scant to nonexistent. How will the legal work be tracked? What qualifies as a conservative client? Can the White House reject certain clients as not conservative enough? And does this mean these firms will now turn away liberal-leaning pro bono clients? On today's episode of our podcast, On The Merits, Bloomberg Law reporters Justin Henry and Meghan Tribe dig into the questions surrounding these law firm deals and ask whether this ambiguity is by design. They also talk about what it means that a firm as big as Kirkland is now choosing to negotiate with the White House rather than fight it in court. Do you have feedback on this episode of On The Merits? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

In dieser spannenden Folge begrüßt Marc Ramona Leutschaft, die als Syndikusanwältin beim Arbeitgeberverband in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern tätig und im Nebenjob pro bono als niedergelassene Rechtsanwältin im Sozialrecht arbeitet. Die Episode gibt Einblicke in Ramonas außergewöhnlichen Werdegang: Geprägt durch familiäre Vorbehalte und anfängliche Zweifel, über herausfordernde Momente wie einen Fahrradunfall, der sie zwang, sowohl ihre körperliche als auch ihre juristische Belastbarkeit zu testen, bis hin zu ihrem mutigen Schritt, sich selbst in einem sozialgerichtlichen Verfahren zu vertreten. Ramona berichtet, wie sie trotz Rückschlägen und anfänglich chaotischer Studienerfahrungen Unterstützung von engagierten Mentorinnen erhielt und wie sie ihren eigenen Lernstil entdeckte, um sich persönlich und fachlich weiterzuentwickeln. Dabei beleuchtet sie auch ihre Doppelrolle als Syndikusanwältin und niedergelassene Rechtsanwältin, die es ihr ermöglicht, Menschen in schwierigen Situationen zu unterstützen – ein ambitionierter Balanceakt neben einem Vollzeitjob. Welche persönlichen und beruflichen Herausforderungen prägen den Weg junger Juristinnen und Juristen? Wie kann man Rückschläge im Studium und im Referendariat als Chance begreifen? Und welche Bedeutung hat das Engagement im Sozialrecht für die Gemeinschaft? Antworten auf diese und viele weitere Fragen sowie ein tolles Vorbild für Eure Karriere erhaltet ihr in dieser Folge von IMR. Viel Spaß!

A major Premier League club vs agent dispute has been redirected to football arbitration by the High Court - what's this mean for agents, and why does choosing the right dispute forum matter? We explore the options available for agents, including FIFA's Pro-Bono and Legal Aid Fund (FLAF), and discuss how legal safeguards can impact costs and case outcomes.Then, football agent and sports lawyer Erkut Sogut joins the show to discuss IFFA (International Federation of Football Agents)—why now, what sets it apart from existing associations, and how it plans to tackle agent misrepresentation and FIFA's regulatory approach.We also dive into the growing issue of unpaid transfer fees, a problem that directly affects agents and players alike. Plus, with football agent associations failing to unite the industry, is there finally a vacuum for a new, influential agent body?An episode packed with expert insights into the latest industry shifts—don't miss it!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠EMAIL : ⁠⁠questions@theagentsangle.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SUPPORT THE SHOW via KoFi⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠======SHOW RUNNING ORDER :(01:08) - Downtime Period For Football Agents ... Really ??? >(02:44) - High Court Instructs Premier League Agent Dispute to Go to Football Arbitration > (04:54) - Importance of Choosing the Right Forum for an Agent Dispute to be Heard > (13:06) - Helps With Costs of Disputes Through FIFA Pro-Bono and FLAF (FIFA Legal Aid Fund) >(16:33) - Do Football Agent Associations Shortcomings Create a Vacuum for a 'New Kid On The Block'? >(17:54) - Guest Interview - Erkut Sogut (pt1/1) - 'IFFA' (International Federation of Football Agents') > (18:52) - Why Now for a New Football Agents Association? > (23:23) - The 'Tipping Points' In The Misrepresentation of Football Agents and 'Consultation' With FIFA > (26:39) - Response to IFFA, and the Position on the FIFA Agent Working Group ((F)AWG) > (33:08) - How Should the Football Agent Regulations (and FFAR) Evolve? > (36:21) - Is There a 'Template' for Becoming a Successful Football Agent? > (39:59) - What are the Biggest Challenges for Newer Football Agents Today? >(48:16) - Which Agent Association(s) Should Football Agents Join? > (51:35) - Does Size Matter? > (52:44) - Equality, Quality, Representation and Association 'Leadership' >(57:51) - Who Should (Has Failed to) Address the Problem of Football Agent Association Legitimacy? > (61:59) - Problems & Opportunities for Football Agent Association >(64:11) - Unpaid Transfer Fees Have Broader Implications for Agents and Client-Players > (68:03) - Announcements & Notices - Internal Agency Conferences & New Oceania League > (71:23) - Disclaimer======RELATED LINKS :Dr Erkut Sogut >--IFFA - International Federation of Football Agents >--Should FIFPRO & 'Ultimately'​ the Players License ‘Player Agents' in Football? (2022) >======FEATURED ARTICLES & POSTS :⁠Agent dispute with ex-Chelsea director referred to FA >--CAS Ruling Highlights Strict Compliance in Football Transfer Agreements >----Strong interest as 24 clubs eye historic spot in OFC Professional League >======EVENTS & ANNOUNCEMENTSLevelling Up: ROOF International Agents Meeting in Mallorca! >=====SHOW LINKS:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠WEBSITE : ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.theagentsangle.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Bluesky⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter (X)⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ======CREDITS :Theme Music : Agent Red by AbbynoiseMusic from #Uppbeat : https://uppbeat.io/t/abbynoise/agent-red

Kramer Levin's commitment to justice is powerfully exemplified in its pro bono work to overturn the wrongful conviction of Anthony Hall, who spent 26 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. Through relentless legal advocacy, strategic litigation, and an impactful partnership with Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project, the firm fought to expose critical flaws in the case – from unreliable eyewitness testimony to systemic issues within the criminal justice system. Their unwavering dedication not only helped secure Hall's freedom but also underscored the transformative power of pro bono work in changing lives and addressing injustice. In this Challenge Signatory Showcase episode of the Pro Bono Happy Hour podcast, Nihad Mansour, Assistant Director, Law Firm Pro Bono Project, is joined by David Alexander, Litigation Associate at Kramer Levin. Listen to hear more about this inspiring work!

A pro-Israel student is suing Toronto Metropolitan University for $1.3 million, arguing the school allowed violations of campus policies that created a toxic atmosphere for Jews—and even cost her a job. Eslewhere, Jewish members of the Public Service Alliance of Canada—whose dues get donated to Palestinian causes like the United Nations Relief & Works Agency—are outraged that a senior official in the union has been posting pro-Hamas slogans to social media. What connects these stories, and more than 500 others? These Canadians sought help from the new CIJA Legal Task Force, a free initiative created by the lobbyist organization the Centre for Israel Jewish Affairs. Created years ago as a professional development group, the task force has, since Oct. 7, evolved into a “rapid response” pro bono legal team that combats antisemitism directly—by taking the issues to court. Officials behind the group say that politicians, police officers, school boards, unions and hospitals have failed to take the problem seriously, prompting them to take matters into their own hands. On today's episode of The CJN Daily, we're joined by former federal crown prosecutor Nanette Rosen, who co-chairs the legal task force, and Richard Marceau, a lawyer and CIJA's general counsel. Related links Learn more about the CIJA Legal Task Force and how to apply for help. Why CIJA is helping some families of the Canadians murdered on Oct. 7 to sue Ottawa for resuming funding to UNRWA, in The CJN. Read the legal brief filed at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice last April by a Toronto Metropolitan University student against her school, alleging toxic antisemitic conditions. Credits Host and writer: Ellin Bessner (@ebessner) Production team: Zachary Kauffman (producer), Michael Fraiman (executive producer) Music: Dov Beck-Levine Support our show Subscribe to The CJN newsletter Donate to The CJN (+ get a charitable tax receipt) Subscribe to The CJN Daily (Not sure how? Click here) Read transcript

We are delighted to welcome Marianne Staniunas, who is the Pro Bono Immigration Counsel at Ropes & Gray LLP. Marianne talks about the complexities of U.S. immigration law and how migrants have a right to legal representation, but not a right to free counsel. Given the shortage of immigration lawyers in the country, many asylum seekers face a complex system without representation. Marianne shares her fears at the start of a new administration with the criminalization of migrants and the ways their rights are being arbitrarily stripped from them. In spite of this, she continues to find hope in her clients, who offer inspiring examples of resilience. Brian and Joe share stories that highlight the need for legal representation to navigate the immigration system. Brian tells the story of Felipe and Rebeka, who were recently deported to Mexico after getting stopped at a checkpoint on the way to Houston to get medical care for their 10-year-old daughter who had a brain tumor. Brian started sending texts to Marianne (today's guest) to try to understand the situation and provide some orientation to the family. Joe weighs in on the complexities of U.S. asylum law through two examples. Alejandro was a soldier in Venezuela and a member of the ruling party who refused an order to fire upon fellow countrymen, which brought threats to him and his family. Dolores witnessed the murder of her sister by the cartel and feared for her life, especially after she reported the case to the local police and did not receive any protection. These two cases might sound like obvious asylum claims, but Joe reflects on how narrow interpretations of asylum can lead to denials in cases like Alejandro and Dolores, especially if they do not have legal representation to help argue their cases.

Alicia Aiken speaks with Toby Rothschild, Of Counsel, OneJustice, about his career spanning more than 50 years in legal services, how he motivates others to do pro bono work, and why he's still dedicated to teaching and giving back in spite of being “retired.” Toby is the winner of PLI's inaugural Victor J. Rubino Award for Excellence in Pro Bono Training, recognizing his extraordinary contributions as a speaker and program chair for pro bono ethics and related programs. Want to hear about new Pursuing Justice releases? Subscribe to our monthly pro bono emails Explore our Pro Bono programs and resources Learn about our Pro Bono Memberships and Scholarships for qualified organizations and individuals Please note: CLE is not offered for listening to this podcast, and the views and opinions expressed within represent those of the speakers and not necessarily those of PLI.  

Ped, Burk and Tommy open this episode discussing the advantages of being tall. Then Adam gives the boys his takes on Killers Of The Flowermoon and the new OJ Simpson docuseries on Netflix. Both have Adam very riled up and lead to the boys laying down the law, literally. The fellas then discuss reality tv and social media etiquette, yet again, and also navigating school for teachers and students and letting go of the immature people we used to be. Adam wants to the boys to get a pedicure together. Ped & Burk then draft their all-time movie stars list before closing the show discussing myths we were told in the 90s. Love y'all!

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this podcast are solely those of Luke Liss and the host, and do not represent the views of any referenced organizations.   Join us for a powerful conversation with Luke Liss, Pro Bono Partner at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, as he shares his inspiring journey from adversity to advocacy.  Episode 170 delves into Luke's personal experiences as a biracial (Black and White) adoptee, his path to becoming a social justice leader, and his vision for pro bono work.   Luke opens up about the impact of his unique background on his sense of belonging and purpose. He recounts his challenges, including almost dropping out of high school, and how he overcame them to graduate from Stanford Law School.  He emphasizes the crucial role of mentorship in his success and shares insights on fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the workplace that goes beyond mere compliance.   This episode explores:   Overcoming adversity: Luke's story of resilience and how he transformed challenges into motivation. The impact of adoption and racial identity: Luke's reflections on his personal journey as a biracial adoptee and its influence on his advocacy work. The power of mentorship: How early mentorship shaped his path to success and the importance of finding mentors. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in action: Practical strategies for creating inclusive environments that uplift everyone. Advocating for marginalized communities: Insights into supporting asylum seekers and immigrants, and how to advocate for change. Pro bono and social justice leadership: Luke's journey to becoming Pro Bono Partner at a top Am Law 50 law firm and his passion for social justice. Career development and leadership: Tips for positioning yourself for leadership roles and confidently asking for what you deserve. Immigration law and advocacy: The challenges and rewards of working in immigration law, especially in the face of political uncertainty. Finding hope and joy in challenging times: Strategies for maintaining resilience and finding purpose amidst uncertainty.   Tune in to hear Luke's remarkable story of resilience, leadership, and advocacy, and gain valuable insights on making a difference in the world.   Connect with us: Connect with Luke at https://www.linkedin.com/in/luke-liss-a461907/ and https://www.wsgr.com/en/people/luke-a-liss.html.  Follow Luke's work on Instagram at @wsgives or https://www.instagram.com/wsgives/ and on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/wsgives/posts/?feedView=all.   Follow Samorn on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/samornselim/. Get a copy of Samorn's book, “Belonging: Self Love Lessons From A Workaholic Depressed Insomniac Lawyer” at https://tinyurl.com/2dk5hr2f.  Get weekly career tips by signing up for our advice column at www.careerunicorns.com.  Schedule a free 30-minute build your dream career consult by sending a message at www.careerunicorns.com.   

Providing pro bono service to small businesses in Dallas, Texas not only persevered through the pandemic - it expanded. The innovative program developed by attorney Fawaz Bham coordinated more than 40 law firms and community organizations through a transition from in-person to remote clinics to sustain a program that has served over 25,000 clients. Bham's efforts were recognized by the 2024 American Bar Association's Pro Bono Publico Award for exceptional volunteer public service. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A devilishly clever legal thriller.

Barbara Peters in conversation with Thomas Perry

Have you ever wondered how a chance encounter at a Christmas party could change the course of your career? Or how a former dressmaker from New York found his calling in financial advising amidst a market crash? In this episode of Carlsbad: People, Purpose, and Impact, I had the pleasure of chatting with Andrew Lippman, who shares his fascinating journey from the bustling streets of New York to the welcoming embrace of Carlsbad.Andrew's story is one of remarkable adaptability and resilience. He talks about transitioning from the declining garment industry to finance, all while highlighting the importance of building long-term relationships with clients. His commitment to community extends beyond his professional life; you'll hear about his involvement with Kids For Peace and his passion for competitive pickleball, which he uses as a platform for charity.Join us as Andrew opens up about his love for the performing arts, his culinary talents, and how he continues to nurture connections across state lines. Whether you're interested in finance, community engagement, or simply love a good story of personal growth, this episode is for you! Connect with Andrew through his website and LinkedIn for more insights and stories.Andrew Lippman's Bio:I am very happy and proud to say I am now a Carlsbad resident for almost 14 months. I grew up in Queens, NYC and lived most of my prior adult life on Long Island. After graduating college I worked in NY's Garment Center. Where I bought dresses for a Midwest Department store chain before becoming a Dress Manufacturer. In 1986 I went back to school at night to take finance courses at NYU. I passed my Series 7 Brokers license exam in August 1987. In October of 1987 the Stock Market crashed. Suddenly I realized I needed to pivot to a more Holistic approach for Financial Advice. I got my Life Insurance License and embarked on a 37 year journey of Financial Education which has helped me deliver quality cutting edge advice to my clients as an independent highly credentialed financial adviser.Andrew Lippman, CFP®, AIF®, ChFC®, CLTC®, CFS®, CSSCSCertified Financial Planner® Chartered Financial Consultant® Accredited Investment Fiduciary® Certified in Long Term Care® Certified Fund Specialist®Certified in Social Security Claiming StrategiesAs an Accredited Fiduciary with 37 years of experience, I specialize in using advanced award-winning Financial Software to assist in designing a truly personalized financial plan. I enjoy helping people and my work gives me much satisfaction. I do Pro Bono work often and offer advice when and where it can be of benefit. I am single with no children of my own and I'm an avid tournament tough pickle-ball player. I am also a Serious Foodie and love and support live theater.Connect with Andrew:Complimentary Cutting Edge Financial Planning Discovery Surveys:-HALO - Health Analysis Longevity Optimizerhttps://halo.lumiant.io/advisor/inwealth-RISA - Retirement Income Style Awarenesshttps://account.myrisaprofile.com/invitation-link/9LC2FD8C9M-Riskalyze - Award Winning Risk Profile Analysishttps://pro.riskalyze.com/embed/da0478849b912f7b75c3-Atlas Point - Financial Virtueshttps://atlaspoint.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_1MOUlguEn4AIWq2?uid=61TVHIY86-Website: InWealth.com-Email: Andrew@InWealth.com-LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/andrew-lippman-cfp®-aif®-3aa91417b-Phone: 442-244-0563 Did this episode have a special impact on you? Share how it impacted youCarlsbad Podcast Social Links:LinkedInInstagramFacebookXYouTubeSponsor: This show is sponsored and produced by DifMix Productions. To learn more about starting your own podcast, visit www.DifMix.com/podcasting

Legal experts share the impactful tech projects they have contributed to, and the struggles and successes of getting volunteer lawyers to engage with tech tools on Talk Justice. Oswald's project at Legal Aid Society uses automation and AI to handle record expungements more efficiently. Seely has seen great success from a project that allows people with medical debt from Chattanooga's Erlanger Hospital to engage in alternative dispute resolution fully online. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Legal experts share the impactful tech projects they have contributed to, and the struggles and successes of getting volunteer lawyers to engage with tech tools on Talk Justice. Oswald's project at Legal Aid Society uses automation and AI to handle record expungements more efficiently. Seely has seen great success from a project that allows people with medical debt from Chattanooga's Erlanger Hospital to engage in alternative dispute resolution fully online.

Local journalism is in crisis — and among its challenges is the urgent need for lawyers to enforce open records laws and assess stories for legal vulnerabilities. In Part One, hear how lawyers from Microsoft and Davis Wright Tremaine joined forces with the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and the Knight Foundation to build ProJourn, an initiative to protect journalists by equipping them with the pro bono legal support they need to tell impactful, truthful stories. Want to hear about new Pursuing Justice releases? Subscribe to our monthly pro bono emails Explore our Pro Bono programs and resources Learn about our Pro Bono Memberships and Scholarships for qualified organizations and individual Please note: CLE is not offered for listening to this podcast, and the views and opinions expressed within represent those of the speakers and not necessarily those of PLI.

In Part Two of our episode on pro bono legal assistance for journalists, hear how ProJourn lawyers are fighting to ensure that Open Vallejo — a local independent newsroom in California — can shine a light on serious police misconduct and local government. Want to hear about new Pursuing Justice releases? Subscribe to our monthly pro bono emails Explore our Pro Bono programs and resources Learn about our Pro Bono Memberships and Scholarships for qualified organizations and individuals Please note: CLE is not offered for listening to this podcast, and the views and opinions expressed within represent those of the speakers and not necessarily those of PLI.

Accenture has been a leader in expanding legal access, with impactful projects like Disability:In and a name change pro bono initiative in Brazil with NGO Casa Florescer. These efforts highlight how in-house legal teams can structure and deliver different pro bono legal services, even within the same corporation. In this Challenge Signatory Showcase episode of the Pro Bono Happy Hour podcast, Nihad Mansour, Assistant Director, Law Firm Pro Bono Project, interviewed Derek Bolka, Contract Specialist and Project Lead for Disability:In at Accenture, and Luciana Arana, Senior Contracting Counsel at Accenture Brazil. Listen to hear more about their respective pro bono efforts.

Brutal slang words like Bye Felicia, Someone's Yuck is Someone Else's Yum, Bloomies, Trunk Or Treat, Easy Peasy Chicken Squeezy, Freshwomen, Pro Bono and the worst one ever I Didn't Have That On My Bingo Card.  Sign up for patreon for an extra episode every week at Patreon.com/jimflorentine.  Tour dates and Everybody Is Awful T Shirts at jimflorentine.com.

Matching willing lawyers with appropriate pro bono projects can be a challenge. What are the factors that contribute to their decisions to work on one project or another — or to even get involved at all? Two experts on managing and advising pro bono teams, Julia Wilson and Kelly Tautges, share how in-depth discussions and focus groups have helped them identify the key drivers of pro bono involvement. Related CLE Content: How you write the recruitment email has a big impact on whether folks say yes to pro bono. You can learn how to make all of your emails more impactful in PLI's Informal Legal Writing program – co-created & taught by our host, Alicia Aiken. Want to hear about new Pursuing Justice releases? Subscribe to our monthly pro bono emails Explore our Pro Bono programs and resources Learn about our Pro Bono Memberships and Scholarships for qualified organizations and individuals Please note: CLE is not offered for listening to this podcast, and the views and opinions expressed within represent those of the speakers and not necessarily those of PLI.  

Check out Pro Bono recourses and opportunities here.  Email us with your ideas or messages - Azya Thornton Thanks for supporting the Tennessee Bar Association!

In this special live episode from NYIT's DPT program, we sit down with Lori Hochman, Assistant Professor and Director of Clinical Education at NYIT. Lori shares her journey of building a fulfilling physical therapy career rooted in volunteerism, mentorship, and specialized care for individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) and Parkinson's disease. Lori also discusses her roles with Empower SCI, APTA NY, and Rock Steady Boxing, emphasizing the power of giving back through pro-bono work and how it can elevate your career in ways you might not expect.Key Takeaways:How pro-bono work at Empower SCI has shaped Lori's career and personal growth.The importance of mentorship in the physical therapy profession and tips for becoming a great mentor.Insights into treating individuals with spinal cord injuries and Parkinson's disease, and the role of Rock Steady Boxing.Balancing a successful career in academia, clinical practice, and volunteerism.Guest Information: Lori Hochman, PT, Ph.D.Director of Clinical Education, Assistant Professor at NYITRock Steady Boxing Coach | Clinical Specialist at Empower SCI

Is it ever a good idea to work for free? Many entrepreneurs wouldn't consider it, especially after being in business for years, but this CEO makes a solid case for why selective pro bono work pays off - sometimes more than you would have even netted from charging for the original service. Tracy Marlowe, founder of marketing agency Creative Noggin, has consistently taken on 1-2 pro bono projects a year. In today's case study, Tracy details how she's made MILLIONS of dollars in ROI over the years with this unconventional marketing strategy, either landing paid contracts with satisfied pro bono clients, or referrals from other businesses who were impressed with her work. View the transcript for this episode at: https://otter.ai/u/BziZqzdteytTGuT3X37PW8nCgeo?utm_source=copy_url Thank you to our sponsor! FOR A LIMITED TIME: Get 60% off your Babbel subscription at https://babbel.com/ellen Connect with Tracy: Email her