Podcasts about disproving

Kelly goes behind the scenes of Alzheimer’s research with science writer Charles Piller whose new book is called “Doctored: Fraud, Arrogance, and Tragedy in the Quest to Cure Alzheimer's.”  “Disproving someone else's experiment can be a death wish in science.”  “Most academic bio-scientists depend on the National Institute of Health to keep the lights on.”  “Eleven […]

GPT-o1 demonstrates the Blindsight thesis is likely wrong. Peter Watts on Blindsight Andrew Cutler on origins of consciousness part 1 and part 2 Thou Art Godshatter

Donald Trump is already claiming the upcoming presidential election will be rigged if he loses. There is no evidence for the claim— just like there was zero evidence behind his claim that his loss in 2020 was stolen. The man Trump hired to find that evidence says the election was clean. His new book is Disproven: My Unbiased Search for Voter Fraud for the Trump Campaign.

Disproving the author's claim that technology has left Generation Z behind. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/suzies411/message

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: The Dunning-Kruger of disproving Dunning-Kruger, published by kromem on May 18, 2024 on LessWrong. In an online discussion elsewhere today someone linked this article which in turn linked the paper Gignac & Zajenkowski, The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data (PDF) (ironically hosted on @gwern's site). And I just don't understand what they were thinking. Let's look at their methodology real quick in section 2.2 (emphasis added): 2.2.1. Subjectively assessed intelligence Participants assessed their own intelligence on a scale ranging from 1 to 25 (see Zajenkowski, Stolarski, Maciantowicz, Malesza, & Witowska, 2016). Five groups of five columns were labelled as very low, low, average, high or very high, respectively (see Fig. S1). Participants' SAIQ was indexed with the marked column counting from the first to the left; thus, the scores ranged from 1 to 25. Prior to providing a response to the scale, the following instruction was presented: "People differ with respect to their intelligence and can have a low, average or high level. Using the following scale, please indicate where you can be placed compared to other people. Please mark an X in the appropriate box corresponding to your level of intelligence." In order to place the 25-point scale SAIQ scores onto a scale more comparable to a conventional IQ score (i.e., M = 100; SD = 15), we transformed the scores such that values of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5… 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 were recoded to 40, 45, 50, 55, 60… 140, 145, 150, 155, 160. As the transformation was entirely linear, the results derived from the raw scale SAI scores and the recoded scale SAI scores were the same. Any alarm bells yet? Let's look at how they measured actual results: 2.2.2. Objectively assessed intelligence Participants completed the Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM; Raven, Court, & Raven, 1994). The APM is a non-verbal intelligence test which consists of items that include a matrix of figural patterns with a missing piece. The goal is to discover the rules that govern the matrix and to apply them to the response options. The APM is considered to be less affected by culture and/or education (Raven et al., 1994). It is known as good, but not perfect, indicator of general intellectual functioning (Carroll, 1993; Gignac, 2015). We used the age-based norms published in Raven et al. (1994, p. 55) to convert the raw APM scores into percentile scores. We then converted the percentile scores into z-scores with the IDF.NORMAL function in SPSS. Then, we converted the z-scores into IQ scores by multiplying them by 15 and adding 100. Although the norms were relatively old, we considered them essentially valid, given evidence that the Flynn effect had slowed down considerably by 1980 to 1990 and may have even reversed to a small degree since the early 1990s (Woodley of Menie et al., 2018). An example of the self-assessment scoring question was in the supplemental materials of the paper. I couldn't access it behind a paywall, but the paper they reference does include a great example of the scoring sheet in its appendix which I'm including here: So we have what appears to be a linear self-assessment scale broken into 25 segments. If I were a participant filling this out, knowing how I've consistently performed on standardized tests around the 96-98th percentile, I'd have personally selected the top segment, which looks like it corresponds to the self-assessment of being in the top 4% of test takers. Behind the scenes they would then have proceeded to take that assessment and scale it to an IQ score of 160, at the 99.99th percentile (no, I don't think that highly of myself). Even if I had been conservative with my self assessment and gone with what looks like the 92-96th pe...

Link to original articleWelcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: The Dunning-Kruger of disproving Dunning-Kruger, published by kromem on May 18, 2024 on LessWrong. In an online discussion elsewhere today someone linked this article which in turn linked the paper Gignac & Zajenkowski, The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data (PDF) (ironically hosted on @gwern's site). And I just don't understand what they were thinking. Let's look at their methodology real quick in section 2.2 (emphasis added): 2.2.1. Subjectively assessed intelligence Participants assessed their own intelligence on a scale ranging from 1 to 25 (see Zajenkowski, Stolarski, Maciantowicz, Malesza, & Witowska, 2016). Five groups of five columns were labelled as very low, low, average, high or very high, respectively (see Fig. S1). Participants' SAIQ was indexed with the marked column counting from the first to the left; thus, the scores ranged from 1 to 25. Prior to providing a response to the scale, the following instruction was presented: "People differ with respect to their intelligence and can have a low, average or high level. Using the following scale, please indicate where you can be placed compared to other people. Please mark an X in the appropriate box corresponding to your level of intelligence." In order to place the 25-point scale SAIQ scores onto a scale more comparable to a conventional IQ score (i.e., M = 100; SD = 15), we transformed the scores such that values of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5… 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 were recoded to 40, 45, 50, 55, 60… 140, 145, 150, 155, 160. As the transformation was entirely linear, the results derived from the raw scale SAI scores and the recoded scale SAI scores were the same. Any alarm bells yet? Let's look at how they measured actual results: 2.2.2. Objectively assessed intelligence Participants completed the Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM; Raven, Court, & Raven, 1994). The APM is a non-verbal intelligence test which consists of items that include a matrix of figural patterns with a missing piece. The goal is to discover the rules that govern the matrix and to apply them to the response options. The APM is considered to be less affected by culture and/or education (Raven et al., 1994). It is known as good, but not perfect, indicator of general intellectual functioning (Carroll, 1993; Gignac, 2015). We used the age-based norms published in Raven et al. (1994, p. 55) to convert the raw APM scores into percentile scores. We then converted the percentile scores into z-scores with the IDF.NORMAL function in SPSS. Then, we converted the z-scores into IQ scores by multiplying them by 15 and adding 100. Although the norms were relatively old, we considered them essentially valid, given evidence that the Flynn effect had slowed down considerably by 1980 to 1990 and may have even reversed to a small degree since the early 1990s (Woodley of Menie et al., 2018). An example of the self-assessment scoring question was in the supplemental materials of the paper. I couldn't access it behind a paywall, but the paper they reference does include a great example of the scoring sheet in its appendix which I'm including here: So we have what appears to be a linear self-assessment scale broken into 25 segments. If I were a participant filling this out, knowing how I've consistently performed on standardized tests around the 96-98th percentile, I'd have personally selected the top segment, which looks like it corresponds to the self-assessment of being in the top 4% of test takers. Behind the scenes they would then have proceeded to take that assessment and scale it to an IQ score of 160, at the 99.99th percentile (no, I don't think that highly of myself). Even if I had been conservative with my self assessment and gone with what looks like the 92-96th pe...

You can take a customer from Facebook, Instagram and your website and track their spending in the restaurant. ..FYI you wouldn't mind drop a review on the podcast where you're listening to it at, or below. https://americasbestrestaurants.live/reviewus And don't forget to check out mattplapp.live/2024 to find out how you could get massive help marketing your restaurant and building a brand that lasts. If you're ever in the Cincinnati area or Vegas, let me know.  This is my cell and I always love to meet and chat with restaurant owners, 859-743-2408

This podcast will show that if the doctrine of preservation is unfounded and based on presumption and utilizes scriptures that are being mishandled then there's no biblical reason why the Bible couldn't be changing. It turns out that's exactly what's happening.Jump InDonatewww.wakeuporelse.com/donateSupplements - Merch - & morehttps://www.bargintopia.com/Get the book - The Conspiracy Theorist Survival GuideAvailable on Amazon and most retailershttps://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C91X6K55Learn more about the bookhttps://www.wakeuporelse.com/landingContact John for interviews, live events etcjohn@wakeuporelse.comSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/the-conspiracy-theorist-survival-guide-podcast/donations

Ken Block was surprised to get a phone call from an unfamiliar number one day after the 2020 election. It was a lawyer for Donald Trump's campaign, and he wanted to know if Block would search for evidence of fraud in the election. Block ran as a third party candidate for governor in 2010 and as a Republican in 2014. But he's also an expert in database technologies and data analytics -- and that's why the Trump campaign reached out to him. Block details his findings in a new book. So why has Trump not backed away from his lie about a stolen election? How can Americans move ahead when so many people disregard facts? And what needs to be done to strengthen the election process? I'm Ian Donnis and this week I'm going in-depth with Ken Block, author of “Disproven: My Unbiased Search For Voter Fraud For The Trump Campaign, The Data That Shows Why He Lost, And How We Can Improve Our Elections.”

This week's guest wears several hats: he's an author, a data analyst, a tech businessman and a former gubernatorial candidate in his home state of Rhode Island. Ken Block, who joined Major for breakfast at Any Day Now in D.C.'s Navy Yard neighborhood, was also briefly employed by the Trump campaign to hunt for voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Block's new book, Disproven, details his unbiased search for evidence of fraud that ultimately, "wasn't there." He tells Major that he's worried about the election fraud narratives bubbling up ahead of the 2024 presidential election and warns that former President Trump, "has to be mindful that the election denialism is not a winning message."See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Welcome to an engaging episode of 'Toplines and Tails' featuring Sally Crowe, a renowned and inspiring crofter from Caithness renowned for her efforts in wool wrapping and diversification in agriculture. Sally, a single mother inheriting a 25-acre croft, is a shining example of women empowerment in the field of agriculture. Follow along with her intriguing journey which spans from her cattle and sheep rearing, to remote working, global travels, wool handling show participation, and striving in the face of debilitating illness. With resilience unmatched, Sally, even after falling victim to Q fever, continued with the extensive farming tasks, working uphill towards recovery. In this episode, you learn how adversity fostered creativity and brought about sustainable farming practices. Delve into the insights of an energetic, single parent balancing work and family while also care-taking elderly parents. Gain a unique perspective on managing responsibilities while maintaining optimism. Learn about the intriguing parts of farm life, including rotational grazing, legislating regenerative agriculture, and being part of a fascinating Irish cow breed society. Based far north of Inverness, Sally successfully navigates these daily chores with a sense of humour and determination. Turn up the volume as we explore Sally's progressive journey, who emerged successful despite odds. Starting from a humble, small-scale farmer, she is now leveraging social media to broaden her farming business while establishing direct consumer connections. This episode also delves into the intricate relationship between environment-friendly farming practices, carbon audits, and sustainability. Dive into discussions as Sally discusses her success using social platforms extending from Facebook to TikTok. Disproving misconceptions about digital technology among farming communities, Sally's use of social platforms is indeed a journey not to be missed. In the last part of the episode, Sally shares her insights on the quintessence of farming, discussing financial aspects, environmental issues, crucial farm data and emergency planning from her wealth of experience. Revealing how emergency planners strengthen families and the farming community, she also touches upon challenges and learnings from her journey. Tune into this riveting dialogue to get an exceptional perspective into farming and the potential for innovative and worthwhile business opportunities within the industry, offered by the inspiring Sally Crowe. BTW, an AI machine wrote this text! Pretty good eh?

Disproving the old adage that the best things in life are worth waiting for, the 100th episode of the Madaxeman Podcast thunders onto the airwaves with an epic, 6-handed special all the way from Spain, as myself, Dave From The Podcast & Aussie Simon are joined by Gordon, Revolutionary Dave and Mark to discuss and digest the lists we all used at the recent Alicante competition.   That means there is some sort of analysis of the Ancient Britons, Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Mithradatics, Warring States Chinese and the countless  hordes of Aztecs shoehorned in among some tourism discussions, culinary observations, and insightful exposition about the contents of Spanish motorway service station vending machines - plus the first ever advert break to ever feature on a Madaxeman Podcast! This whole podcast is also available on the Madaxman YouTube channel where you can see pictures of the lists, some of the games and troops, as well as our tourism and eating exploits too. The army lists can all be found in the ADLG Wiki on the Madaxeman Website 

Canon Benjamin Norman, ICKSP currently serves as Representative of the Institute of Christ the King at St. Margaret Mary Catholic Church in Oakland, California. He was ordained in 2018.     In Today's Show: When your congregation is speaking with you or in reference to you, is it improper to call you "father" in lieu of canon? Would it be permissible to Baptize a new grandchild whose parents have walked away from the faith and have no intention of doing this? What can a man do to prepare for his first child? How should we respond to extreme criticisms of the Pope, even from our fellow Catholics? If I find any lost Rosaries, either ones I have lost track of in the past or ones accidentally abandoned, should I have them blessed? My understanding is that all ICKSP Canons have to learn French, which unites the ICKSP under a common language. That makes sense, but why isn't that language Latin? Are we falling into sin when we acknowledge someone's gender that is not a gender they were given by God? I cannot eat the standard foods most others eat on Fridays in order to abstain from meat. What are some other things we can do in order to observe the rule to abstain from meat on Fridays? My girlfriend is Roman Catholic and she wants to get married in a church. I'm a non-believer. Can we get married, and is that marriage sacramental? Disproving false claims about Mary   Visit the show page at thestationofthecross.com/askapriest to listen live, check out the weekly lineup, listen to podcasts of past episodes, watch live video, find show resources, sign up for our mailing list of upcoming shows, and submit your question for Father!

In the 12 p.m. half hour of the K&C Masterpiece, the guys lay out how the Cowboys are disproving a 50 year trend, then preview Rangers-Red Sox with Jared Sandler

From 'Reception Perception' (subscribe here): On this episode of Reception Perception, Matt and James discuss two receivers that have a widely inaccurate public perception of their abilities. First, they discuss Las Vegas Raiders receiver Davante Adams and his uncanny consistency. They finish the episode by discussing Cleveland Browns receiver Amari Cooper and explain why he is NOT an elite route runner. Tune in!Matt Harmon and James Koh whip around the NFL and cover the position they know best: Wide receivers. Using the data from Harmon's exclusive Reception Perception charting methodology, the guys give their takes on receivers at every level of the game.Whether it's the biggest stars in the league or new rookies bursting on the scene, you won't get better wideout information anywhere else. Along the way, they'll break down the biggest stories in the NFL and offer up a few big-picture fantasy football thoughts, as well.Follow the guys on Twitter @JamesDKoh and @MattHarmon_BYB. Follow Reception Perception @RecepPerception. Download and Subscribe to the Reception Perception Show anywhere you get your podcasts.Watch segments of the show on YouTube at Matt Harmon!! To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

On this episode of Reception Perception, Matt and James discuss two receivers that have a widely inaccurate public perception of their abilities. First, they discuss Las Vegas Raiders receiver Davante Adams and his uncanny consistency. They finish the episode by discussing Cleveland Browns receiver Amari Cooper and explain why he is NOT an elite route runner. Tune in! Matt Harmon and James Koh whip around the NFL and cover the position they know best: Wide receivers. Using the data from Harmon's exclusive Reception Perception charting methodology, the guys give their takes on receivers at every level of the game. Whether it's the biggest stars in the league or new rookies bursting on the scene, you won't get better wideout information anywhere else. Along the way, they'll break down the biggest stories in the NFL and offer up a few big-picture fantasy football thoughts, as well. Follow the guys on Twitter @JamesDKoh and @MattHarmon_BYB. Follow Reception Perception @RecepPerception. Download and Subscribe to the Reception Perception Show anywhere you get your podcasts. Watch segments of the show on YouTube at Matt Harmon!! To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Disproving the assumption that spaceflight is only for the wealthy, this episode of CES Tech Talk tells the story of spaceflight experiences for the general public. Imagine seeing the world from the heavens, free of borders and boundaries, then returning to Earth with a renewed appreciation for our shared global ecosystem. Watch to learn how two companies, Space Perspectives and Base Ventures, are making this a more accessible reality. In this episode, you'll:  Discover new heights in the travel experience with Space Perspective's unique approach to space tourism   Learn how space travel has the potential to alter quality of life through new adventures   Better appreciate the vital role diverse voices play in sparking innovation, underscored by the Base Ventures dedication to empowering underrepresented communities to become tomorrow's leaders   

Episode recorded: 07/07/23In this episode of Living Proof, Dan Aspel and Marianne Freiberger are joined by Tomer Schlank (Hebrew University of Jerusalem) and Jeremy Hahn (MIT). Working alongside Robert Burklund and Ishan Levy, Tomer and Jeremy's recently announced a disproof of Ravenel's telescope conjecture at the June 2023 INI workshop "A panorama of homotopy theory".  Here, they explain why this was such a significant announcement, and what effect it has had on the field of homotopy theory.2018 INI programme: https://www.newton.ac.uk/event/hhh/2023 follow-on workshop: https://www.newton.ac.uk/event/hhhw05/

Welcome to another episode of the Digible Dudes podcast! Join hosts David Staley and Reid Wicoff as they engage in weekly interviews with the most influential minds in the apartment marketing world. In this episode, David and Reid explore the delicate balance between embracing life's unpredictability and making strategic, essentialist decisions. Join us as we dive deep into the philosophies of Andrew Huberman and Greg McEwen, discovering how to navigate the complexities of exploration, experimentation, and making meaningful contributions to the world. David and Reid share their insights on how to innovate and grow while adhering to essentialist principles. Learn how to achieve a well-rounded, fulfilling existence by applying these valuable lessons to your own business and personal life. Time management and finding your flow play a crucial role in striking this delicate balance. Discover the benefits of taking time to think through decisions, the power of journaling, and the art of distinguishing between companies and features. If you find this episode helpful, please leave a 5-star rating on Spotify and a review on Apple Podcasts. Digible: https://digible.com/ Fiona: https://www.myfiona.com// Leave a Spotify Review: https://spoti.fi/3LfoEdU Leave an Apple Review: https://apple.co/3AA2zRj (00:00) Preview (01:26) Andrew Huberman and Greg McEwan: Essentialism  (06:42) Over planning vs. following your interests & curiosity  (10:32) Jim Collins on the importance of focus  (12:17) Experimenting vs. direct focus in a niche   (14:25) Microsoft, Google's dilemma in product development  (22:15) Peter Thiel: features versus a product  (24:42) Disproving the rule and creating sticky products (28:27) Essentialism versus a random walk strategy (31:55) Journaling your time on creativity & important tasks (35:25) Daniel Pink: perform audits of your work

Why do I feel phantom pain? What is the sleep in my eyes constituted of? Why are things we drop into our eyes poisonous to ingest? What is fibromyalgia? What is aquamation? Like this podcast? Please help us by supporting the Naked Scientists

Why do I feel phantom pain? What is the sleep in my eyes constituted of? Why are things we drop into our eyes poisonous to ingest? What is fibromyalgia? What is aquamation? Like this podcast? Please help us by supporting the Naked Scientists

Go to https://babbel.com/WAN for 55% off your subscription Find the right cup of coffee just for you at https://drinktrade.com/wan Enable your creative side! Check out Moment at https://lmg.gg/ShopMoment Timestamps - Note timing may be off due to sponsor change: 0:01 Topics 1:00 Intro 1:25 Topic 1: Realistic Gameplay Footage 2:30 People don't believe its fake 3:52 Luke plays devil's advocate 6:02 Disproving the footage 12:02 Area scans are the future of gaming 17:42 The dangers of hyper-realism 21:03 LTT Wag Hoodie Launch 24:44 New LTT store items 26:54 Topic 2: Nintendo Modder Lawsuit 28:59 This is cruel and unusual punishment 32:04 Possible solutions 34:46 Does this reduce piracy? 39:51 This out of line with other White Collar Crimes 43:39 Merch Message 1 45:36 Advice for an Embedded C Programmer 48:07 Is AI depriving today's youth? 48:58 Post pupper pics on the Forum 50:09 Youtube/Twitch response to Merch Messages 51:01 What Kitchen tech do you recommend? 51:31 What's the most frustrating bud Luke has dealt with? 52:34 Topic 3: Game Devs Crack Down On Hardware Cheating 53:15 Cheating using Mouse and Keyboard (MnK) on Controller 55:25 Why this is hard to stop 58:12 How should we define cheating? 1:01:12 Topic 4: Seagate Fine 1:03:05 The double standard of fines 1:06:58 Topic 5: UrAvgConsumer LTT Backpack Review 1:10:58 Did we send him a backpack? 1:13:37 Topic 6: SpaceX Starship Successfully Explodes 1:16:13 This is what tests are for 1:17:22 Armchair scientists 1:19:29 Parked van was hit 1:20:27 THE GREAT LTT CONSPIRACY 1:22:45 Topic 7: Twitter Checkmarks 1:25:06 Free speech vs free reach 1:25:56 LTT's plan 1:26:50 Floatplane Update 1:33:14 MM: Should you disclose AI tools? 1:34:40 Sponsors 1:37:57 Merch Messages 2 1:38:15 How to handle your boss as your landlord 1:40:49 How to change topics respectfully 1:47:37 What are the largest costs for network streaming? 1:51:12 What cheap games are fun? (MageQuit) 1:54:34 Will we test water cooling loops? 1:57:38 Best techdad joke 1:57:54 Will you make a slim backpack? 1:59:33 What games would you remaster? 2:01:33 What creative things do you like to do? 2:03:40 Luke's handyman story 2:05:00 Linus' handyman experience 2:07:09 Linus' childhood home 2:09:34 Topic 8:(censored) charging for API 2:13:07 Topic 9: Amazon increasing Dialogue and Samsung might switch to Bing 2:17:06 Topic 10: Netflix ends DVD mail service 2:18:33 Parroting ;) (Word censored by Youtube) 2:22:38 Resurrecting old shows 2:24:09 Topic 11: Red Cross (this part was censored by youtube) 2:27:07 WAN Show: After Dark 2:29:11 Would you sponsor Athletes? 2:32:34 Would PrimoCache interview Direct Storage? 2:34:11 How does Floatplane handle technical debt? 2:35:53 Should you approach LTT employees? 2:39:11 Is there tech that surprises you? 2:41:39 How does WIFI motion sensing work? 2:42:38 Rocket launch van update 2:43:58 What are tips for making a product? 2:47:11 Self driving semi trucks 2:49:50 USB devices 2:51:10 Tech tip told to everyone 2:51:37 What cars might Luke drive in the future? 2:54:27 Top tech product/games 2:55:40 AMD challenge update 2:56:44 Balancing remote work 2:58:54 Linus' "I'M LINUS AND THIS IS MY COMPANY" moments 3:01:01 Linus Calls His Wife 3:03:00 Other Examples 3:07:21 Rapid Fire Merch Messages 3:07:22 AI taking care of children/elderly 3:08:26 Ludwig Bidet update 3:09:12 Tech TV 3:09:48 Computer Fittings 3:12:49 Plex Media server 3:13:14 Media Literacy 3:14:02 Surprising Tech 3:15:14 Pixel Fold 3:15:40 Luke's take on Amazon 3:16:36 Smart home update 3:17:37 LLT en Español 3:18:10 Tech that you are impressed with 3:18:50 Bird Stickers when? 3:19:47 How to make personable YouTube videos? 3:20:00 Magnets in garments 3:21:58 Brian the Electrician 3:22:20 Feedback for Working for LTT 3:23:25 LTT adult videos? 3:23:56 Life lessons from old tech 3:26:05 Why don't you talk about margins? 3:28:08 Linus overcoming ADHD 3:40:43 Rapid Rapid fire 3:34:38 Outro

While many people look for evidence to doubt the resurrection, they also deny the facts that are there. He is risen. Today, we tackle the reality of the resurrection and what the gospel means to us.

This week, Lauren interviews a local man who is trying to change the town name, and a bartender. Interview Hour is a completely improvised podcast, created and preformed by Lauren Morrell and Peter Narby. Follow us: Instagram Reach out to us: deadwithbenefitspod@gmail.com  

Our limiting beliefs can keep us from achieving our goals, manifesting our desires, having successful partnerships, making money....they can literally control every aspect of our life if we allow them to! But the amazing news is, you have the power to rewrite these beliefs and choose a new way of seeing yourself and seeing the world. The choice is in your hands bb!  TOPICS INCLUDE:1. Acknowledging the Beliefs & Where They Come From 2. Disproving our Fears & Negative Thoughts3. Reprogramming our Subconscious 4.  The Magic of Mirror Work    confiDANCE Enrollment is now OPEN!https://calendly.com/highvibeheels/free-discovery-call-for-chm-with-ashlyn  confiDANCE info page: https://highvibeheels.mykajabi.com/confiDANCE-info-page  Shop our High Vibe Courses, 1:1 Offerings, & More!https://highvibeheels.mykajabi.com/store  Connect With Ashlyn on Social Media:https://www.instagram.com/high.vibe.heels/https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-Xn1jeHIIyWBVXOkgdtjpQ

In this episode my friend X breaks down a recent problematic article published in the UK from the perspective of an ADHD journalist with a masters in digital culture and society at Kings College London. We also discuss possible new names for ADHD, using the term "attention regulation" rather than disorder. Our cats make brief appearances as well.

Former atheist Ben Clifton thought religious belief was for the weak-minded, for those who didn’t believe in science.  His caricatures of Christianity began to break down as he encountered authentic, intelligent Christians who challenged him to consider the reality of God. Ben’s Resources: www.apologeticsonmission.org Resources recommended by Roger: Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis Fingerprints of God, […]

Dr. Wilfred Reilly—Professor of Political Science at Kentucky State University & Author of “Taboo: 10 Facts You Can't Talk About”—joins The Rich Zeoli Show to discuss Disney's cartoon series, “The Proud Family”, explaining to children that America was built on slavery and that the country was founded on white supremacy. Citing economic date, Dr. Reilly refutes the narrative that the south "built" America and explains that the false narrative mirrors theories espoused by southern confederates prior to the Civil War. So, why is Disney embracing this historically inaccurate theory in 2023—and pushing it on children?

We're continuing our in-depth video study series on Basic Christian Doctrine: The Nature Of God + The Gospel Plan Of Salvation. This series will explore some of the most overlooked essentials and basics of Biblical Christian doctrine.  Doctrine is simply a teaching. It is the basis or foundation for how one lives and conducts his life. As the Chief Cornerstone, Jesus, working through the apostles and prophets, laid the foundation of the doctrine of the church. The early church held to their doctrine so closely that they were willing to give up their lives for it. But as the centuries passed, more and more false doctrines crept into the church, corrupting it from within. What began as a powerful inferno became nothing more than a glowing ember by the Middle Ages. Then came the Reformation, as men began an effort to restore the church back to the doctrinal truths of the original apostolic church. However, although some progress was made, many false doctrines were retained.    Today, the Spirit of God is breathing afresh across the world and igniting the revelation of the doctrine of the original church described in the historical record of the Book of Acts. As we undertake a study of the foundational principles of true Christian doctrine, we will uncover just how far mainstream Christianity has strayed from the sound teachings of the Scriptures! In this 27th episode, we will cover: The Gospel Plan Of Salvation -Historical Evidence Disproving The Trinitarian Baptismal Formula (Section 57) Visit https://www.LetUsReason.com to download the full study notes, complete with references, charts, and quotes. https://www.letusreason.com/christian-doctrine

Today on the Richard Syrett Show: Richard starts taking calls from listeners! Leader of the New Blue Party of Ontario, Jim Karahalios on Premier Ford trying to avoid the inquiry. Ruth Gaskovski, The Home School Advisor brings up a study showing homeschoolers have better social skills. Tom Korski, managing editor at Blacklocks talks about evidence disproving the ‘lawless streets' at the Freedom Convoy.

From 2020: Bob Enyart continues to air audio from last week from Greg Koulk, apologist president of Stand to Reason, who tragically denies, and thus defends, his moral relativism. Back in 2007 (see kgov.com/koukl) Greg encouraged Christians to support Republican candidates who are mass-murderers (by their open support for abortion). And still in 2020, he openly exhibits his own moral relativism as in his claim, though with clarification, that "some same sex couples are fabulous." And by that, he means, fabulous parents who we can support even in adopting children. Bob let Greg know that we planned to air and discuss his audio and Koukl did reply, but with the same defense he made years ago. "We report. You decide?" No. Actually, God decides. * BEL Resources on Moral Relativism: - 2020 Apologist Koukl Still Tragically Denies His Moral Relativism - 2020 Koukl BELs 7/21 (today's program) 7/29 8/3  - 2010 Personhood, Creation, the Law, and Moral Relativism - Suggest other BEL resources to us at Bob@kgov.com. Thanks! - 2007 Bob Debates Moral Relativist Greg Koukl - 2007 Focus on the Strategy 2 video... Today's Resource: Nicer Than God Enjoy this fast-paced critique of religion where Bob Enyart presents questions such as: When should a Christian lie? Should he ever mock? How about name-calling? Does sarcasm belong in the Christian's repertoire? How about ridicule? Learn why nice is not in the Bible and how to identify a Nicer-Than-God Christian. If Christians are not supposed to judge, then why does Jesus command us to judge rightly? And if only God will judge, then why does Paul say that we believers will judge the angels, and judge the world? If Jesus logged onto a website forum under a pseudonym, would we recognize Him, or condemn Him? This album communicates well Bob Enyart's unique style. But, warning, warning, warning, Will Robertson, it is not for the faint of heart.   * Separately, Koukl says Science Cannot be Certain of Anything: As a preview to our 2015 rsr.org/forensics program on historical science, in 2013 we published a brief KGOV article, Can Science Prove Anything Absolutely? As quoted there, Greg Koukl had written that science "cannot be certain about anything in an absolute sense. ...its method never allows certainty" and then apparently contradictorily, Greg stated, "science is not the only means of giving us true information..." Consider this excerpt: ...it is said that science cannot “prove” anything. We allege that in this vein, creationists have surrendered far too much to atheistic relativists. As a corollary, to this, we hear that science cannot prove anything but it can only disprove things. Sources: 1. A theory can "never [be] proven correct" on PBS.org; "can never be shown to be correct" at gsu.edu; 2. UCMP at the Berkeley department of paleontology. 3. A popular creationist homeschool textbook says, "Science cannot prove anything. The best science can say is that all known data support a given statement. …there is no way that science can prove anything." Wile & Durnell, Exploring Creation with Biology, 2nd Edition, 2005, p. 33; Science, "cannot be certain about anything in an absolute sense. ...its method never allows certainty" and then perhaps contradictorily, "science is not the only means of giving us true information..." Greg Koukl, Stand to Reason, 2013; "all scientific knowledge is tentative… nothing is final. There is no such thing as final proven knowledge in science" at psychologytoday.com. Scientific Absolutes: The claim that science cannot absolutely prove anything is related to the more extreme and easily falsified atheist claim that there is no truth. Yes, we Christians take the Scriptures as our highest authority. But millions of people lived prior to Moses and Job, and it is not as though they had no ability to know truth. (They could even know God, as a number of them did, and God is truth.) There are various ways of obtaining or possessing apodictic, or absolute, knowledge. Consider the common claim, as in this quote from Berkeley, that "a hypothesis cannot ever be proven, only disproven." Has that been proven? To disprove a hypothesis is to prove its negation. (A hypothesis: The reason that even very large array telescopes will never find the center of the universe is because the universe has no center. Falsification: A theoretical falsification is the growing redshift data that increasingly indicates that the universe does have a center. Disproving that hypothesis proves another: The universe has a center.)Absolutes vs. Omniscience: Knowing some things absolutely does not equate to knowing everything. Could it be that the especially extreme claim that science "cannot prove anything" is really just unintentional hyperbole? Those making such claims seem to confuse something with everything, and therefore confuse our ability to know some things absolutely with our inability to know everything. Some claim that the best that scientific investigation can do is to bring you closer to the truth (i.e., closer to understanding reality). However, if science doesn't know absolutely that: - light travels faster than sound, nor that - the solar surface is hotter than the lunar, nor that - electromagnetic opposites attract, if it were that much in the dark, then science could not bring anyone "closer" to anything. However, science does know these things absolutely. When some argue that science cannot tell us anything, it seems that what they really mean is that science cannot make us omniscient. If that's what they mean, though, then that is what they should say; for the overstatement we hear only serves to promote the relativism of materialism. Lacking omniscience does not prove the lack of all knowledge. RSR hopes that creationists will realize that they have been unnecessarily agreeing with atheists by making such an extreme claim. Real Science Radio has other disagreements with creationists on such assumptions, but for now we'll add one last observation, and then let these suffice as our first shot across the bow. :) We see the matter of historical vs. observational science as mostly a manufactured issue. We do not only make careful observations and do repeated experiments in the laboratory. Human beings live that same way. We cook, work, and read while making careful observations and performing inherent repeated experiments. In a dream, every time we read a book the words can change; in the waking world, we know that the words on our printed pages do not rearrange themselves into varying messages. That alone is a form of absolute scientific knowledge. If we didn't know that, we couldn't trust the words we read in a book, whether a dictionary or the Bible. Claiming that science can tell us nothing absolute is tantamount to saying that we can have no trust in our minds, nor our senses, and if this were true, of course we would have no ability to trust any input, whether from the Bible, or, like ourselves and the millions who lived prior to the Scriptures, from any source whatsoever. We assert that the claims of the impossibility of certain scientific knowledge are concessions to the relativism of the materialist.

I watched NOPE tonight and it was amazing I did see spoilers before and watched the YouTube videos explaining the ending prior because I get scared easily and I wanted to be prepared for stuff and it helped a lot tbh but still the day prior to seeing it I saw Logan Pauls twitter thread and looking at it after seeing it all of his takes made zero sense and he had no depth of making and conclusions like everything was so surface level so im going through why I disagree and I dont dislike Logan Paul I watch impulsive ive mentioned it on here before but after hearing Jordan peele talk about it and listening to interviews of the actors and using critical thinking Logans takes suck and kind of prove the fact that people who exploit others and animals dont think its wrong another thing I have talked about a lot on this podcast. He talks about Daniel kaluuya and barbie Ferreira I think barbie Ferreira's role was perfect and didn't need to be emphasized honestly i liked that there weren't many characters that we needed to know and really learn because it made the story have more depth and detail instead I think every character was present for a reason and barbies character was realistic to angels story if he never interacted with a coworker it wouldn't be realistic I think the actor was amazing my favorite character for sure and I think hearing Jordan peele talk about how he wanted to depict black joy as well as it being a scary movie describes Daniel kaluuyas character as a black women who listens to black people talk about what they want to see in the entertainment field often we do want to see black people just doing shit and not experiencing trauma constantly and I think oj's character is just a normal dude and I think its important like what the fuck do you want him to do tap dance for you that was kinda giving microagression in a weird way He thinks that its weird that the saucer thing couldn't tell a blimp from a human I think it was going after anything that moved it was a predator and it was looking for any signs of life in its way I dont think that the intelligence is linked to its actions if that makes sense like just because the power went down when it went by doesn't mean its a mastermind you know? Kind of like people who harm things without even realizing it and animals that often cant tell the difference between things that are alive and aren't Anyways everyone go see nope all the actors and actresses were amazing and I think it was great movie and really important for people to see I think of black fish and all of the time recently I have spent watching videos of animals in captivity versus in the wild and its so sick what we do to animals I think of polar bears being held in hotter climates and want to cry we are creating so much pain and torture for those animals and they deserve their peace The idea of an animal getting upset with being controlled in their territory is not absurd look at the elephant in India that killed a woman after she tried to tell poachers where he was makes sense doesn't it? Go see nope! Thanks for listening. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/al4s/message

On today's edition of the Allez Les Rouges Podcast we have a star-studded line-up! Host Peter Hooton is joined by Journalist Brian Reade, MP Ian Byrne, Spirit of Shankly Chair Joe Blott & LFC Superfan Ste Mono. The lads give their recollections of their trips to Paris for the European Cup final as well as what they experienced outside of the stadium.Since the match, all of the panel have taken different actions to right the authorities wrongs at the Stade de France whether it be in parliament, journalistically or involvement with fan groups, they give their own perspectives and give an idea of the necessary steps to take next. Enjoy.

In one hand, we value-own ourselves on the river by not considering better bet sizing. In the other, we disprove Zeebo's Theorem by folding a full house in a very specific configuration. Hand 1: http://mysmp.me/h_qYRHand 2: http://mysmp.me/h_qYQSammy on Twitter - @sammyreidfi

Welcome to episode 33 of The Great Deception Podcast. On this episode we are unraveling the great deception story by the inheritors. As we know much of what we have been taught is his-story, not our-story. So we take a look at 3 articles that show the narrative has many holes in it. Specifically in America, as this land has a history far older than we have been told. First I look at Antiquities in America from 1858 where it compares America of old to being as beautiful and majestic as Thebes or Nineveh, with ruins of ancient cities and beyond. Then I look at a 1987 article from the Chicago Tribune on the long lost city of Chilaga, modern day Chicago possibly. After looking at Chilaga (even autocorrect wants to change Chilaga to Chicago) I take a look at an article by Frederick Dodson, a legend, The Fake History of Chicago, a great article exposing the deception and lies in the history of Chicago in the 1800's. Articles from the show: https://theunexpectedcosmology.com/raftsmans-journal-antiquities-in-america-january-61858/ https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1987-03-04-8701170765-story.html https://www.realitycreation.org/the-fake-history-of-chicago/ If you like the show, please share it, review it, and check out my other work! Mat from The Great Deception Podcast https://altmediaunited.com/the-great-deception-podcast/ IG: @thegreatdeceptionpodcast YouTube: https://youtube.com/user/Barons44 Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/hPdLAyfQQ2DP/ Odysee: https://odysee.com/@TheGreatDeceptionPodcast:6 Email: thegreatdeceptionpodcast@gmail.com

Isaiah Saldivar, Alexander Pagani, Vlad Savchuk, and Mike Signorelli will discuss why they believe Cessationism is a false doctrine. Cessationism is a doctrine that spiritual gifts such as speaking in tongues, prophecy, and healing ceased with the Apostolic Age. Join us in this broadcast as we discuss this!  www.Isaiahsaldivar.com  "I don't think cessationism is a salvation issue but I do think it's important to talk about & also bring some clarity." - Isaiah Saldivar Alexander Pagani   Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/alexanderpaganiministries  Youtube https://www.youtube.com/c/AlexanderPaganiMinistries/featured    Vlad Savchuk  Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/vladhungrygen  Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/vladimirsavchuk1    Mike Signorelli  Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/PsMikeSignorelli  Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/c/MikeSignorellinyc/featured   Guests on podcast: Alexander Pagani, Vlad Savchuk & Mike Signorelli Connect With Isaiah Saldivar, the Host of Revival Lifestyle Podcast   www.Isaiahsaldivar.com www.Instagram.com/Isaiahsaldivar www.Facebook.com/Isaiahsaldivar www.youtube.com/Isaiahsaldivar   To sow  www.Isaiahsaldivar.com/partner 

It's Tuesday and you know what that means! On todays show, I welcome back to the program Mr. Todd Neiss as he shares with us his plans for giving scientific evidence for the supernatural abilities of the Sasquatch. Why can't a clear photo be taken? Why do they seem to vanish or cloak? Is there a scientific reason for it?  We talk about the possibilities and then he shares some humourous stories while out in the field in his 28 years of research. We quickly talk about Beachfoot 2022 Conference and what to expect. I have included a link to the 10 year anniversary documentary down below if you would like to know more about this very cool conference.  #ToddNeiss If you have had an encounter and want to be on the show, email me at nicolavalleybigfoot@gmail.com and happy 2/22/22! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWyA9-4eI9Q

How can I describe Matt Vincent? While he's crazy strong and built his reputation on being a Highland Games World Champion, he's evolved. This is what we love so much about Matt. He's an adventurer, a philosopher, and ever curious. Disproving the moniker of “meathead”, Matt's always looking for ways to expand his mind and body in the most accessible ways. Get to know him in this week's chat. A conversation between John Welbourn and Matt Vincent is like a confusing, yet entertaining, web of deep thoughts, conspiracy theories, some legitimate strength and conditioning advice, and personal confessions. When you get two people like them, who are as curious about this rapidly changing world as they are, the discussion never disappoints. Shownotes: https://pahq.co/Ep586 7 Day Risk Free Power Athlete Training Trial: https://pahq.co/Train Check out what we do: Website - https://powerathletehq.com/ Podcast - http://pahq.co/PARadioSpotify Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/powerathletehq

QUOTE of the Day: We're always both "disproving the untruth" & "proving what is more real." Our energy is always at work despite what we are thinking of. – Tatyana Sussex -- In this episode of “My Love of Life Energy,” I am speaking with Tatyana Sussex. She is a writer, editor, and coach. She speaks about the beauty of seeing the creative energy inside every human.  Tatyana says we are always creating in one way or another as we go about our day-to-day life. Tatyana Sussex is a coach, writer, beauty hunter, everyday athlete and a late bloomer. She specializes in working with creative professionals who are itching to bring their ideas, projects, and offerings into the world—but don't know where or how to begin. Tatyana loves to move people off the starting line and into action, debunk scary old myths around the creative process and ground people in their innate creative nature. The best part is watching people surprise themselves with what they're capable of making. More recently she's started a series of virtual salons—conversations that explore the meaning of beauty in daily life and at work. She writes about it on Substack as Beauty Hunter. In March, Tatyana will launch a Creators' Salon for a motivated group who are ready to lift their ideas off the ground and do it in a challenging and fun environment. A late-marrier, Tatyana recently completed a memoir about marrying at 49 and publishes personal essays at various online publications including her own Medium page, @tatyanasussex. You can visit her at Everyday Creative Coaching and check out more offerings at everydaycreative.net. For more information on Tatyana Sussex please visit:  www.EverydayCreative.net -- I am Wisdom Business Coach for entrepreneurial spirited people who want to make their dreams become a reality. If you are looking to access your innate wisdom and apply it to all aspects of your business and life and create rich results with ease, reach out to me and let's see what we can do together.  https://calendly.com/annalscott --- #MyLofeOfLifeEnergy #LoveLife #Relief #EpisodeDropped #AnnaScott #Freedom #Ease #YourGenius #Genius #Inspiration #Happiness #Wisdom #SeeWhoYouAre #Understanding #Happiness #Wisdom  #TheThreePrinciples #Mind #Thought #Consciousness #MentalHealth #PodCreator #PodHelp #PodernFamily

Let's face it, if you're a tall woman reading this, you know the struggle. It's difficult to find clothes that can fit your length, let alone clothes that make you feel confident! I even used to wear pants that were too short on me to school everyday. EVERYDAY! The embarrassment I felt. But if I can prevent another tall girl from going through what I went through, I'll do it in a split second! Tune in for some tips on how to find confidence through fashion as a tall girl!Let's stay connected: https://linktr.ee/atallgirlspodcastLeave a review: atallgirlspodcast.com/reviews

Psychics and psychic abilities have been around since the beginning of time. But do they even really exist? There have been some legitimate scientific studies giving credence to paranormal abilities. There have also been plenty more studies and tests DISPROVING psychics. The truth? You'd have to be psychic to know for sure... --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/wewerehad/support

Tim, Ian, Luke, and Lydia join friend and fellow podcaster Jack Posobiec to discuss emerging evidence that there were 'shoot-to-kill' orders on January 6th at the Capitol, Biden's abysmal ratings that are lower than Trump's, the half a million people who flooded alternative social media platform Gettr after Joe Rogan joined it, Ethan Klein's ridiculous anti-scientific criticism of the eminently physically healthy Joe Rogan's approach to Covid, the third Chinese spy who pled guilty to stealing American biomedical secrets to funnel to China, and the 'plague ship of wokeness' known as Glee. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

How are legends made? A common belief is that people are born with talent, or get hit with a lightning bolt of ability that rockets them to greatness. But as we discover in this episode, there is no such thing as innate talent. Masters are not born, they are made. How you choose to act and communicate to yourself is the map you are drawing for your achievements. Talk is cheap; consistent, dedicated, hard work, and hours of putting in the time is how you will achieve greatness. In this episode, we discuss a professor who puts this concept to the test with, get this, his own children! The results that came from his family are truly astonishing. The key lesson to come away with is, what you immerse yourself in will dramatically increase your ability. Whatever habits are normal in your culture will be among the most attractive behaviors you'll find. As we go through life what are the most important things to you? What direction are you going in? What are you becoming through your actions each and every day? You are going somewhere, so make sure it's the place you want to be going. If you want to change the state of mind you are in, remember the three things needed. 1. Change your physiology 2. Change your language (verbal and nonverbal) 3. Change your focus/belief. Remember, whether you say you can or cannot do something, you are right. What you focus on, you feel. Scribd (one month free) Reagan's Goodreads Reagan's Youtube Reagan's Website Austin's Goodreads Austin Website Austin's Youtube Mind Castle is where Reagan and I (Austin) discuss how to develop our optimal selves, be productive, and the lessons we're learning from what we're reading. Plus, the occasional story from our many travels. New episodes as we have time to make them. :)

How are legends made? A common belief is that people are born with talent, or get hit with a lightning bolt of ability that rockets them to greatness. But as we discover in this episode, there is no such thing as innate talent. Masters are not born, they are made. How you choose to act and communicate to yourself is the map you are drawing for your achievements. Talk is cheap; consistent, dedicated, hard work, and hours of putting in the time is how you will achieve greatness. In this episode, we discuss a professor who puts this concept to the test with, get this, his own children! The results that came from his family are truly astonishing. The key lesson to come away with is, what you immerse yourself in will dramatically increase your ability. Whatever habits are normal in your culture will be among the most attractive behaviors you'll find. As we go through life what are the most important things to you? What direction are you going in? What are you becoming through your actions each and every day? You are going somewhere, so make sure it's the place you want to be going. If you want to change the state of mind you are in, remember the three things needed. 1. Change your physiology 2. Change your language (verbal and nonverbal) 3. Change your focus/belief. Remember, whether you say you can or cannot do something, you are right. What you focus on, you feel. Scribd (one month free) Reagan's Goodreads Reagan's Youtube Reagan's Website Austin's Goodreads Austin Website Austin's Youtube Mind Castle is where Reagan and I (Austin) discuss how to develop our optimal selves, be productive, and the lessons we're learning from what we're reading. Plus, the occasional story from our many travels. New episodes as we have time to make them. :)

In this episode, Jess and Phil get a little heated as they respond to an article in Inc Magazine entitled T_here Are No Such Things as Introversion or Extroversion_. They have a lot of thoughts. Links in this episode: https://www.inc.com/joshua-spodek/there-are-no-such-things-as-introversion-or-extroversion.html

In this episode, I discuss how the best way to prove that the resurrection happened is by trying to prove that it didn't happen.

If you've ever struggled with anxiety on any level, this is a chance to sit down for a free counseling session with one of the leading anxiety experts and find out what to start doing about it. Dr. David Russ and I talk about how to overcome your anxiety, social anxiety, how to explain your anxiety to people who don't understand it, and answer some of the most important questions about it at this live event we recorded in Charlotte, NC. If you know anyone that needs this, we decided to make this an open resource to help as many people as people. Love you guys, Garrett Transcript: 00:56 - Intro (At Event) 05:08 - Disclaimers about triggers 06:46 - What is anxiety? (Good vs bad, and distractions) 14:56 - Anxiety, technology, and distraction 18:09 - How do we handle anxiety? [18:33 - The body's response to anxiety] [22:49 - Disproving the threat] [24:18 - Exposure and response prevention] [28:54 - How anxiety hijacks your brain] [32:40 - Why it's worth it to battle your anxiety] [38:01 - A word of caution about anxiety pushing back] 38:44 - Why exposure therapy works (allergic reaction analogy) 40:13 - Four different options for exposure therapy [40:25 - The first option: Imaginal] [44:20 - The second option: virtual] [45:29 - The third option: Situational] [48:48 - The fourth option: Interoceptive (Creating a sensation)] [51:50 - Dropping safety behaviors (Response prevention)] 53:49 - Practical application: social anxiety example 1:04:46 - Social media and anxiety 1:07:53 - ***What to show the people in your life who don't understand your anxiety*** 1:13:28 - What to do for someone experiencing anxiety during a peak 1:15:57 - When do we need to get therapy? 1:22:33 - Closing statements

In this week's episode I disprove the idea of being "self-made" in a literal sense. This term gets thrown around a lot when talking about success and I wanted to give my humble opinion of why I believe that it is literally impossible to be self-made.  Not for the faint of heart in this episode as I really get into this topic and do not hold back lol don't say I didn't warn you. Sign up for 1on1 Coaching: https://www.thesophisticatedman.net/request Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/t_rig15/ Subscribe to my YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCx1azPlDVv4mdrrZoc9lWTg?view_as=subscriber

Disproving the myth that not everyone can be an entrepreneur because otherwise there would be no jobs left.

Sage Turk returns to Infants on Thrones with his Listener Essay “Disproving Santa Claus.” Jake and Tom join in the conversation as “apologetics” turn towards the satirically ridiculous and the absurd – for once. No, that was not a chiasmus.