Podcasts about supreme court trump

I never thought I'd be glued to my screen watching the Supreme Court like it's the Super Bowl, but here we are in late January 2026, and President Donald Trump's legal battles are heating up faster than a Florida summer. Just this week, on January 21, the justices heard arguments in Trump, President of the United States v. Cook, a case straight out of the Oval Office power playbook. According to the Supreme Court's own monthly argument calendar, it was one of the key sessions testing how far Trump can push executive authority. Picture this: Trump's team arguing he can fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook over allegations of mortgage fraud, no full hearing required. News4JAX reports the Court seemed skeptical during those arguments, with justices across the spectrum questioning whether the president can boot independent agency leaders on a whim like that.Rewind a bit to the shadow docket frenzy of 2025—that's the Supreme Court's fast-track emergency rulings without full debates or explanations. Scotusblog details how Trump's administration leaned on it heavily, winning over 80% of the time from the conservative majority. They greenlit canceling foreign aid and health funding, firing independent agency heads, even immigration questioning based on appearance or language, and requiring passports to match biological sex. But the Court drew a line at Trump's plan to deploy the National Guard to Chicago, blocking it in a December 23 decision, and handled Trump v. Illinois on September 8 over immigration detentions in Los Angeles. These shadow moves shaped policy quietly, but now, with Trump's approval dipping to 42% by late 2025 per News4JAX polls, the big full hearings are here.Coming down the pike: birthright citizenship challenges under the 14th Amendment—can Trump end automatic U.S. citizenship for anyone born here? Sweeping global tariffs without Congress's okay, testing presidential trade power. And that Fed firing case, potentially gutting the Federal Reserve's independence. Chief Justice John Roberts wrapped 2025 with a year-end report hammering home judicial independence, calling courts a counter-majoritarian check against popular whims. He sidestepped politics, focusing on history, but experts like Constitutional Law Professor Rod Sullivan on News4JAX's Politics & Power say the Court's timing is no accident—Trump's weaker politically, so justices might finally clip his wings.Meanwhile, down in Congress, the House Judiciary Committee grilled former Special Counsel Jack Smith on January 23 about Trump's alleged criminal actions, from conspiring to overturn the 2020 election to mishandling classified documents. Representative Steve Cohen's newsletter recounts Smith facing questions on Trump's witness intimidation tactics, with Cohen praising him as a great American standing firm. Lawfare's Trump Administration Litigation Tracker notes a dismissal on January 14 of a case over dismantling the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, mooted out. And don't sleep on criminal law sidelines: Scotusblog's mid-term update flags nine new cases, like Wolford v. Lopez argued January 20 on Second Amendment rights, or geofence warrants in United States v. Chatrie testing Fourth Amendment limits.As California's Republicans begged the Court on January 22 to block a new 2026 midterm election map, per Scotusblog, it feels like every corner of the judiciary is tangled in Trump's orbit. These rulings could redefine presidential power, from citizenship in cities like New York to trade hitting ports in Miami. Chief Justice Roberts' quiet defense of court independence is about to face its ultimate stress test—will the justices stand firm, or bend to the political gale?Thanks for tuning in, listeners. Come back next week for more, and this has been a Quiet Please production. For more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

Hey listeners, picture this: it's been a whirlwind few days in the courts, with President Donald Trump's legal battles dominating headlines from the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., all the way to Capitol Hill. Just two days ago, on Wednesday, January 21, I was glued to the live updates from SCOTUSblog as the nation's highest court dove into Trump v. Cook, a blockbuster case over Trump's bold move to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook from the Board of Governors. The arguments kicked off at 10 a.m. sharp in the majestic Supreme Court chamber, with Trump administration lawyers defending the president's authority to remove her, claiming it's essential for executive control over the independent Fed. On the other side, Lisa Cook's powerhouse attorney, Paul Clement—the guy often called the LeBron James of the Supreme Court for his wins under President George W. Bush—argued fiercely that Fed governors serve 14-year terms protected by statute, shielding them from political whims.Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell showed up in person, drawing fire from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who blasted it on CNBC as a mistake that politicizes the Fed. Bessent said, and I quote from the report, "If you're trying not to politicize the Fed, for the Fed chair to be sitting there trying to put his thumb on the scale, that's a mistake." Bloomberg Law highlighted Clement's role, noting his recent clashes with the Trump team on everything from Big Law firm executive orders to Harvard's foreign student visa fights. The justices grilled both sides intensely—Justice Amy Coney Barrett even pressed a lawyer on disagreements with the government's brief—leaving everyone buzzing about a potential ruling that could reshape presidential power over economic watchdogs.But that's not all. Shifting to Congress, yesterday, Thursday, January 22, the House Judiciary Committee in the 2141 Rayburn House Office Building held a tense 10 a.m. hearing titled "Oversight of the Office of Special Counsel Jack Smith." Lawmakers zeroed in on Smith's office, scrutinizing his past investigations and prosecutions of President Trump and his co-defendants in cases tied to the 2020 election and classified documents. Tension was thick as Republicans pushed for accountability, while Democrats defended the probes' integrity—echoes of Smith's indictments that rocked the nation before Trump's return to the White House.Meanwhile, other Trump-related fights simmer. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco scheduled a June hearing on Trump's appeal of an Oregon federal judge's injunction blocking National Guard deployment to Portland, after the Supreme Court sided against a similar Illinois push last month, per The Oregonian. Lawfare's Trump Administration Litigation Tracker noted a dismissal as moot on January 14 in a case over dismantling the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, one of dozens tracking the administration's court clashes. And don't forget the Supreme Court's recent denials of gun rights petitions, though they punted on one involving a woman's old check-forgery conviction—Trump's influence looms large even there.As these battles unfold, from Fed independence to prosecutorial oversight, the stakes feel sky-high for our democracy and economy. Will the justices side with Trump's firing power? What's next for Jack Smith's legacy? Listeners, thanks for tuning in—come back next week for more updates. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

Administrative Law: When may the President fire members of the Federal Reserve Board? - Argued: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 14:57:36 EDT

# Trump v. Cook: A Quiet Please Deep DiveWelcome back to Quiet Please. I'm your host, and today we're diving into one of the most consequential Supreme Court cases unfolding right now. Just hours ago, the justices began hearing oral arguments in Trump v. Cook, a case that will fundamentally reshape how much power any sitting president can wield over independent agencies.Let me set the scene. It's Wednesday morning at the Supreme Court building in Washington. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell walked through those marble halls to witness history. The case at hand involves President Donald Trump's attempt to remove Lisa Cook from her position as a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Now, this might sound like an arcane administrative matter, but it cuts to the heart of American democracy. The question before the nine justices is brutally simple: Can a president fire the heads of independent agencies without cause, or does Congress have the authority to limit that power?This isn't Trump's first rodeo at the Supreme Court this term. Just days earlier, on Monday, January 20th, the Court was also set to hear arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, a case examining a Hawaii law that prevents gun owners from bringing firearms onto private property open to the public without explicit permission from the property owner. That same day, justices heard arguments in M&K Employee Solutions versus Trustees of the IAM Pension Fund, a technical but financially massive dispute over how much money a business owes when withdrawing from a multi-employer pension plan.But Trump v. Cook demands our attention in a different way. The stakes couldn't be higher. If the Supreme Court rules that Trump can unilaterally fire Lisa Cook, it strips away decades of congressional protections designed to insulate the Federal Reserve from political pressure. The Federal Reserve controls interest rates and monetary policy affecting every American's wallet. If a president can simply remove a dissenting board member with a phone call, the independence that economists credit with keeping inflation under control could evaporate.The case arrives amid a broader power struggle between Trump and the courts over executive authority. According to documents from the Supreme Court's January 2026 calendar, this oral argument session represents just one piece of a constellation of cases that will define Trump's second term. The Court is simultaneously grappling with his executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship, his use of emergency powers to impose tariffs without congressional approval, and his efforts to deploy the National Guard to cities like Chicago.What makes Trump v. Cook particularly significant is that it operates under the shadow of Justice Brett Kavanaugh's recent concurrence in Trump v. Illinois. That December ruling blocked Trump from deploying the National Guard to Chicago without meeting strict statutory requirements. In a footnote that legal scholars are still parsing, Kavanaugh suggested that his opinion doesn't address presidential authority under the Insurrection Act itself, potentially leaving the door open for more expansive executive power.The Federal Reserve case will be decided within months. If the justices side with Trump, they hand him a powerful tool to reshape executive agencies across government. If they side with Cook and the congressional framework protecting her office, they reaffirm that some checks on presidential power remain intact.The oral arguments concluded this morning at the Supreme Court. Now the waiting begins as the justices deliberate what American presidential power should look like in the twenty-first century.Thanks so much for tuning in to Quiet Please. Come back next week for more on how this case unfolds and what it means for your rights and freedoms. This has been a Quiet Please production. For more, check out quietplease.ai.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

# Trump's Legal Battles Heat Up at the Supreme CourtWelcome back to Quiet Please. We're diving straight into what's shaping up to be a pivotal moment for Donald Trump's presidency, as the Supreme Court prepares to rule on cases that could define his entire second term.Let's start with the centerpiece of Trump's economic agenda. The Supreme Court is preparing to decide the legality of Trump's sweeping tariffs on foreign products, a case Trump himself has called the most important case ever. According to reporting from SCOTUSblog and Yahoo Finance, Trump warned the court in a recent social media post that if they rule against his tariffs, "we're screwed." The court heard arguments back in November, and a ruling could come as soon as this week. What makes this case critical is the stakes involved. If the justices side with Trump's challengers, the government could be forced to refund over 100 billion dollars in tariffs already collected from American businesses and consumers. That's real money that could reshape the economy depending on which way the court goes.But the tariff case is just one piece of a much larger legal puzzle Trump is navigating. According to SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court is also preparing to hear arguments on January 21st regarding Trump's push to remove Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors. This ties into a broader constitutional question about whether Trump has the power to unilaterally fire the heads of independent agencies, which would overturn 90 years of legal precedent if the court rules in his favor. Cook is just one person Trump wants removed. He's also targeted Federal Trade Commission officials, making this a test of executive power that could reshape how the president interacts with the federal bureaucracy.There's another major case looming as well. The Supreme Court will decide the legality of a Hawaii law that prohibits people from carrying firearms onto private property without explicit consent from the owner. This case, Wolford versus Lopez, will test the limits of Second Amendment rights against property rights in a way the court hasn't fully addressed before.Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is also set to address a case challenging prohibitions on conversion therapy for minors, the discredited practice aimed at changing sexual orientation or gender identity. According to Axios, Republicans argue these restrictions violate the First Amendment, framing this as a free speech issue rather than a health and safety matter.Throughout all of this legal maneuvering, Trump has repeatedly used the Supreme Court's emergency procedures known as the shadow docket to suspend lower court decisions while cases are ongoing. According to USA Today, this gave Trump victories on everything from keeping tariffs in place to withholding foreign aid and conducting immigration raids. Now those emergency wins face scrutiny in the full court proceedings.These Supreme Court cases will ripple across Trump's entire presidency, affecting economic policy, executive power, and civil rights all at once.Thanks for tuning in. Come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production. For more, check out Quiet Please dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

I never thought I'd be glued to my screen, watching the Supreme Court become the hottest ticket in town, but here we are on this crisp January morning in 2026, with President Donald Trump's legal battles dominating the headlines. Just days ago, on December 23, 2025, the justices handed down a key ruling in Trump v. Illinois, partially siding with the administration in a tense showdown over federalizing the National Guard in Illinois. The majority allowed the move, with Justice Kavanaugh writing a concurrence, while Justices Alito and Thomas dissented, arguing it overstepped state authority. According to the Brennan Center's Supreme Court Shadow Docket Tracker, this decision came after a First Circuit ruling let it stand, underscoring Trump's push to assert federal control amid rising urban unrest in Chicago.But that's just the appetizer. The real drama kicks off next week. On January 13, the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., will hear oral arguments in two massive challenges to state bans on transgender students—like those in West Virginia and Idaho—playing on sports teams matching their gender identity. KVUE News reports these cases hinge on the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause and Title IX, which prohibits sex-based discrimination in schools. Challengers say the bans unfairly sideline kids like Becky Pepper-Jackson in West Virginia, who's been fighting since 2021 to compete in girls' track.Then, on January 21, all eyes turn to Trump v. Cook, a blockbuster testing presidential firing powers. President Trump tried to oust Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook in August 2025, citing alleged mortgage fraud from before her 2023 appointment to the Fed's Board in Washington. A D.C. district judge blocked it, and now the Supreme Court has deferred any stay until arguments, per the official docket for case 25A312. The Constitution Center notes this stems from the Federal Reserve Act, which only allows removal "for cause," not at-will. If Trump wins, it could reshape independent agencies like the Fed, which steers the U.S. economy with trillions in influence—think interest rates affecting your mortgage or job market.These aren't isolated fights. The Court's fall term already tackled Trump v. Slaughter on firing a Federal Trade Commissioner and Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump over tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Lawfare's Trump Administration Litigation Tracker logs dozens more, from immigration deportations under the Alien Enemies Act in Trump v. J.G.G. to earlier agency head removals. With decisions due by June, the stakes couldn't be higher—executive power, civil rights, economic stability all colliding.As I sip my coffee, scrolling updates from the National Constitution Center, I can't help but wonder: will this term redefine Trump's second presidency? The justices, from Chief Justice John Roberts to the newest voices, hold the gavel.Thanks for tuning in, listeners. Come back next week for more, and this has been a Quiet Please production. For more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

Administrative Law: Must the president be able to terminate all officers of the United States at will? - Argued: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 16:40:50 EDT

Join the conversation with C4 & Bryan Nehman..C4 & Bryan started the show this morning discussing the latest on the tariffs & the supreme court.  A recap of the interview President Trump had on 60 Minutes last night.  A weekend of violence in the city including a shooting.  C4 & Bryan dive into a new poll related to the economy & capitalism.  President of The Baltimore City Downtown Partnership Shelonda Stokes joined the show to discuss the annual meeting & new report.  C4 & Bryan also recap Bill Fergusons TV interview as well.  Listen to C4 & Bryan Nehman live weekdays from 5:30 to 10am on WBAL News Radio 1090, FM 101.5 & the WBAL Radio App!

Dan Rayfield, Oregon Attorney General; Jason Jacques, Interim Parliamentary Budget Officer; The Front Bench with: Christy Clark, Marco Mendicino, James Moore & Tony Clement.

Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist and Fox News Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court Trump vs. the Media Mollie Hemingway's Federalist Articles The post A New Survey of Likely Voters on the Regulation of Abortion Drugs – Mollie Hemingway, 10/28/25 (3012) first appeared on Issues, Etc..

Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist and Fox News Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court Trump vs. the Media Mollie Hemingway's Federalist Articles The post The Life and Legacy of Charlie Kirk – Mollie Hemingway, 9/12/25 (2554) first appeared on Issues, Etc..

When it comes to foreign workers inside the United States today, the world of immigration law has seemingly been upended. It can be hard to keep up with rapidly evolving events and rulings, but with clients and employers at risk, professionals who represent them can't afford to fall behind. When do employers check work authorization, and how often can they? What do employers need to be looking for? And what industries are most affected?  While the Trump v. Casa case may not have brought the clarity many in labor and employment law sought, it was simply a procedural move that limits jurisdiction, it's not the final word. This gets confusing in a hurry as the labor and employment professionals grapple with protective status, refugees, temporary status, and workforce eligibility issues. Hear insights from accomplished guests Jonathan Grode and Ingrid Nava into where shifting immigration policies may affect labor and employment law and what some of these decisions mean across the country and across labor sectors. In today's uncertain times, it's important to understand the limits of what employers can do, even when they are trying to do the right thing, as well as the rights of employees. Confused? You're not alone. Mentioned in This Episode: Trump v. Casa, U.S. Supreme Court “Trump v. CASA and the future of the universal injunction,” SCOTUSblog explainer ABA Labor and Employment Law Section ABA Labor and Employment Law events Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We break down the shocking courtroom twist as Sean “Diddy” Combs walks free on all but one charge, sparking outrage. On Capitol Hill, Hakeem Jeffries delays critical votes while House Republicans clash over the latest budget bill. We spotlight Thomas Massie's questionable voting history, what's new with the ICE tracker app,  and how Democrats are scrambling to respond.Also in this episode:*The radical judge undermining the Supreme Court*Trump's promise to save NYC from a socialist threat*The Left's bizarre theories about Gaza aidPLUS: Woke meltdowns galore!SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS TO SUPPORT OUR SHOW!Stay hydrated and energized all summer long with Native Path Hydrate. Get an exclusive 44% off, plus free shipping and a free gift with your order!  Visit https://NativeHydrate.com/ChicksBe ready for any emergency with ReadyWise. Visit https://ReadyWise.com and use promo code CHICKS10 for 10% off your entire purchase.Take control of your medical freedom with All Family Pharmacy. Get what you need when you need it. Visit https://AllFamilyPharmacy.com/Chicks and use code CHICKS20 for 20% off your entire order.Make your bed feel brand new with a MyMattress Topper from My Pillow.  Visit https://MyPillow.com/Chicks and use promo code CHICKS to get the MyMattress Topper for as low as $99.99.

The Supreme Court ruled that President Trump has the right to deport 500,000 migrants brought to America by ex-President Biden.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Immigration: May the president deny birthright citizenship to the children of immigrants? - Argued: Thu, 15 May 2025 18:35:27 EDT

Breaking news tonight: The Supreme Court orders the Trump administration to help get back the man they deported to a notorious El Salvador prison, by mistake. Plus, all we're learning about the helicopter sightseeing trip that ended in New York's Hudson River with six lives lost, including the pilot and a family of five. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Dive into a candid Trump as he tears into reporters with his signature no-holds-barred style. Then, get ready for laughs as Rep. Burchett hilariously roasts a nosy reporter and shares some rugged tales from his ranch! Witness Megyn Kelly bravely discussing her support for Trump and stay on the edge of your seat for the latest drama in Signalgate. Discover the Democrats' surprising new strategy—yes, it involves cussing! Is this their bold move in political discourse? Plus, Elon Musk is stirring the pot in big ways, from industry shake-ups to unexpected protests. And don't miss the shocking revelations from a DOGE protester that everyone's talking about!00:00Good Morning plus topics3:42Scott Jennings recap!4:49Trump goes crazy on the tweets9:05Readywise11:03Trump takes more questions12:55Knoxville Congressman is funny17:58Megyn Kelly talks with NYT reporter20:40First reserve21:59RFK blackmail story?26:05Signalgate latest35:58More clips of dems swearing39:05ad39:06Tesla violence and interview52:34ad52:35X business news53:19Elon on Wisconsin Supreme Court56:54Bill Maher latest71:16ad71:17Crockett attacks Donalds 74:25Elon's kid drama76:35Walz kids at grad school78:08White men should get scaredShop the first-ever MEGA SALE going on now with My Pillow. Use code CHICKS to save at https://MyPillow.com/Chicks, plus get FREE shipping on every order!Visit https://Readywise.com/ code CHICKS10 for 10% off your entire purchase. Prepare when times are good, before things turn bad. Ready Wise Emergency FoodSecure your silver today with First Fidelity Reserve. Get your one-ounce .999 fine American Silver Eagle for only $35 + free shipping. Call 800-336-1630 and visit https://www.FirstFidelityReserve.com

Dive into a candid Trump as he tears into reporters with his signature no-holds-barred style. Then, get ready for laughs as Rep. Burchett hilariously roasts a nosy reporter and shares some rugged tales from his ranch! Witness Megyn Kelly bravely discussing her support for Trump and stay on the edge of your seat for the […]

In this December 26, 2024 episode, Hawk analyzes a recent court decision regarding Donald Trump's claims of presidential immunity in his Manhattan criminal case, where he was convicted on 34 felony counts for falsifying business records. The decision, written by Judge Juan Merchan on December 16, 2024, came in response to Trump's motion to dismiss the indictment and vacate the jury's verdict based on a Supreme Court immunity decision from July 1, 2024.Hawk details how Judge Merchan systematically dismantled Trump's immunity claims, explaining that the evidence in question related to unofficial rather than official acts, and therefore wasn't protected by presidential immunity. The judge also concluded that even if some evidence was improperly admitted, it would constitute harmless error given the overwhelming evidence of guilt from other sources, including documentary evidence and testimony from multiple witnesses.Throughout the episode, Hawk praises the thoroughness and readability of Judge Merchan's decision while noting how the judge subtly criticizes the Supreme Court's immunity doctrine. He emphasizes that despite Trump's claims, the judge clearly states in the decision that Trump "stands convicted" of the 34 felony counts, and ultimately denied Trump's motion to dismiss the case.REFERENCE LINKS:12/16/24 Judge Merchan Decision and Order, the subject of the podcast:https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFs/press/PDFs/CPL330.30Dec.pdf7/1/24 Supreme Court Trump immunity decision:https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdfJudge Tanya Chutkan immunity ruling, Jack Smith SC case:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24180338-12_1-chutkan-rejects-mtd/Judge Engeron final decision in NY AG civil case against Trump:https://www.scribd.com/document/706231478/452564-2022-People-of-the-State-of-v-People-of-the-State-of-Decision-After-Trial-1688#1fullscreen=1 SUPPORT & CONNECT WITH HAWK- Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mdg650hawk- Support Hawk's Merch Store: https://hawkmerchstore.com- Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mdg650hawk7thacct- Connect on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts ALL HAWK PODCASTS INFO- Additional Podcasts Available Here: https://www.hawkpodcasts.com- Listen to Hawk Droppings On Your Favorite Platform:Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3RWeJfyApple Podcasts: https://apple.co/422GDuLYouTube: https://youtube.com/@hawkpodcastsiHeartRadio: https://ihr.fm/47vVBdPPandora: https://bit.ly/48COaTBSimplecast: https://hawk-droppings.simplecast.com- Hawk Droppings RSS Feed: https://feeds.simplecast.com/pPVtxSNJ

Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist and Fox News Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court Trump vs. the Media Mollie Hemingway's Federalist Articles The post Post-Election Analysis – Mollie Hemingway, 11/6/24 (3114) first appeared on Issues, Etc..

Let's talk about Michigan's Supreme Court, Trump, and 2024.... --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/beau-of-the-fifth-column/support

President Joe Biden on Monday unveiled a long-awaited proposal for reforms at the U.S. Supreme Court, calling on Congress to establish term limits and an enforceable ethics code for the court's nine justices. He's also pressing lawmakers to ratify a constitutional amendment limiting presidential immunity.The FBI says former President Donald Trump has agreed to be interviewed as part of the investigation into the assassination attempt earlier this month. The agency says investigators want to get Trump's perspective on what happened.Venezuela's president Nicolás Maduro was declared the winner in the presidential election on Sunday, as his opposition rival also claimed victory. Several nations—including the United States—have expressed doubts about the legitimacy of the election results.

SERIES 2 EPISODE 204: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:44) SPECIAL COMMENT: If Joe Biden had been pulling his punches in fighting back against the Trump/Supreme Court conspiracy to subvert democracy, he stopped doing so last night. To my mind he should take the Court's unprecedented decision to transform our form of government into a monarchy by the fabrication of something called 'presidential immunity' by showing how it works, announcing he was adding six seats to the Court by Executive Order, and daring SCOTUS to stop him. But as a start, Biden took off the gloves, insisting the American people should join him and Justice Sotomayor in dissenting from the Court immunity decision. Biden attacked Trump by name, said that because the Supreme Court had done “a terrible disservice to this nation” by preventing a Trump trial on January 6th before the election, that therefore the people “must decide” on Trump, and acknowledged “there are virtually no limits to what a president can do." It was a clear declaration of war on the Supreme Court; it was a clear re-positioning of Trump from an unprincipled political opponent to a menace to our form of government. “Any president will be free to ignore the law.”He closed with “may god help preserve our democracy.” The Supreme Court has thrown out 248 years of American history – more really – at the start of the week in which we CELEBRATE that 248thbirthday. As Sotomayor also noted, Alexander Hamilton was specific about the necessity to have a FORMER president be subject to possible prosecution for any crimes he committed, IN OFFICE, because THAT would be one of the key differences between the new United States and the Kingdom of Great Britain, from which we had to stage a revolution to free ourselves. THEIR king was “sacred and inviolable.” OUR president would be subject to “personal punishment and disgrace.” As to the nomination uncertainty: the polls continue to be inconclusive and the tightrope just gets longer. I remain agnostic on the outcome (I want whatever wins). But I want to suggest that the logical extension of calling for Biden to drop off the ticket because you don't think he's sharp enough to win re-election and/or serve another term, is to say he's not sharp enough to be president NOW - and should resign. If you're going to be cynical enough to force him out of office later, why not now, when you could still offer new president Kamala Harris as the incumbent on Election Day? B-Block (31:40) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: Ken Dilanian of NBC, Matthew Belloni of Puck, and Ben Smith of Semafor all miss the point of the Biden candidacy story. Ralph Nader blames Hillary for the Chief Justice appointed the president who is Nader's fault. Worst Persons Hall of Famer Bill O'Reilly makes up a story about Biden quitting (but it must be true! It's from the Bill-O'Reilly-Dot-Com-News-Headquarters!) C-Block (42:10) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL: Another 4th of July falling in the middle of another week, just like it did the year I started my professional career in network radio simply because... the 4th of July was falling in the middle of another week and they needed somebody unemployed, cheap, and immediately.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Following the Supreme Court's ruling on former President Trump's presidential immunity claim, Chris Hayes and team break down the impact on his legal battles and the 2024 election. Want more of Chris? Download and subscribe to his podcast, “Why Is This Happening? The Chris Hayes podcast” wherever you get your podcasts.

In a huge decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that former President Donald Trump has limited immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts he took as president including possibly some efforts he took to overturn the election. We break down what this means for pending cases against the former president. Plus, Democrats in Washington D.C. and across the country are panicking over whether they can continue with Biden as the nominee.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Alan Dershowitz joins Sid to discuss the ongoing crisis in Israel, plus the Supreme Court Trump immunity case decision Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Western banks have cut their workforces in China, the US Supreme Court ruled that former president Donald Trump cannot be prosecuted for his ‘official' actions, and Amazon has turned its first international profit in four years. Plus, the FT's Leo Lewis explains how online competitors are affecting Japan's regional banks.Mentioned in this podcast:Global investment banks' China expansion goes into retreat US Supreme Court says Donald Trump immune for ‘official acts' as presidentAmazon's international unit on track to swing into annual profit Threat of deposit exodus haunts Japan's regional banksThe FT News Briefing is produced by Fiona Symon, Sonja Hutson, Kasia Broussalian and Marc Filippino. Additional help from Breen Turner, Sam Giovinco, Peter Barber, Michael Lello, David da Silva and Gavin Kallmann. Our engineer is Monica Lopez. Our intern is Prakriti Panwar. Topher Forhecz is the FT's executive producer. The FT's global head of audio is Cheryl Brumley. The show's theme song is by Metaphor Music. Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

It's Tuesday, July 2nd, A.D. 2024. This is The Worldview in 5 Minutes and heard at www.TheWorldview.com.  I'm Adam McManus. (Adam@TheWorldview.com) By Kevin Swanson and Adam McManus Namibia, Africa decriminalizes homosexual behavior Last week, the high court of the Southern African nation of Namibia struck down a colonial law banning homosexual behavior in the country.   Last year, the same court legitimized homosexual faux marriage for a bi-national couple.   Homosexual behavior is criminalized in 30 African countries, and allowed in 24 countries now. Supreme Court: Trump has limited immunity from prosecution The U.S. Supreme Court ruled yesterday in favor of the former President, in relation to his post-election activities on January 6th, 2021, reports LifeSiteNews.com. By a vote of 6 to 3, the high court granted Donald Trump immunity for official acts taken in his role as president of the United States. The majority on the court agreed with Trump's appeal. The decision, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, concluded that: “The President is not above the law. But under our system of separated powers, the President may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for his official acts.” What remains to be answered is which actions taken after the 2020 election by the president were official and which were unofficial. This question is remanded to the lower courts. House Speaker Mike Johnson called the decision “a victory for former President Trump.” And the Biden campaign said the decision has handed Trump "the keys to a dictatorship," reports the New York Post. Supreme Court deals blow to regulation stranglehold   In other Supreme Court news, the high court has rendered the regulatory bureaucracy a serious setback in the United States.   Friday's decision overturned the 1984 decision Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc., — which to this point had allowed federal bureaucracies extensive latitude for interpreting law and implementing regulations. Poll: Donald – 44%, Biden – 41% The latest Non-Partisan Patriot Polling puts Donald Trump ahead of Joe Biden in the presidential race,  44% to 41%. The current president's rating has also dropped off from 33% to 29%. And 76% of prospective voters polled say Donald Trump won last Thursday's debate. Colonel Macgregor: Biden's cognitive decline means US gov't is in "unelected hands" Speaking of that debate, Retired U.S. Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor has said that “the governing power” of the U.S. lies “in unelected hands” after the first presidential debate highlighting President Joe Biden's cognitive decline to the whole world, reports LifeSiteNews.com. In a 5-minute video message published on the YouTube channel Our Country Our Choice, Col. MacGregor expressed his profound concern for the United States after Biden's catastrophic performance. Listen. MacGREGOR: “President Biden is not fit to discharge the immense duties of the presidency. The alarming evidence of his cognitive decline was on display for all to witness. Yet his enablers and political allies continue to exploit the president to substitute their destructive agenda for the interests of the American people. “The unconscionable betrayal of the sacred trust that must exist between the federal government and American citizens is all around us. Destructive executive orders and policy directives, many of which were likely signed when President Biden was in a rapidly diminished state of mind, inflicting tremendous damage on our nation. “Sadly, President Biden's fragile mental state was laid bare for all to see in last night's debate. His responses were frequently incoherent, he appeared lost even confused, struggling to complete basic thoughts. It was heartbreaking, a spectacle that confirmed our worst fears about his deteriorating capacity.” Col. MacGregor questioned the legitimacy of Biden's executive orders in light of his demonstrable mental incapacity. MacGREGOR: “No individual whose mental health is compromised, should be allowed to continue in the most demanding job on Earth. Americans, we find ourselves at a critical juncture in our nation's journey. In the private sector or in matters of estate planning, the validity of signatures made under such circumstances would be challenged and invalidated in a court of law. “How can we accept crucial national decisions being made under these conditions? The American people deserve better. It is time to ask, ‘Who truly governs this country?' Is it ‘we the people,' as our Founders intended, or have we surrendered control to unelected bureaucrats?” Trump ally Steve Bannon went to jail yesterday Longtime Trump ally Steve Bannon was taken into custody yesterday after surrendering at a federal prison in Danbury, Connecticut. He began his four-month prison sentence on contempt charges for defying a subpoena in the congressional investigation into the events on January 6, 2021 at the U.S. Capitol, reports the Associated Press. Speaking to reporters, Bannon called himself a “political prisoner.” BANNON: “I'm a political prisoner of Nancy Pelosi. I'm a political prisoner of Merrick Garland. I'm a political prisoner of Joe Biden, the corrupt Biden establishment. “You saw on Thursday, all the lies that they told any group that would sit there and lie to you about the shape of the President of the United States, with the national security element of that, lied about the 2020 election. They've lied about COVID. They've lied about everything that they've done to the American people and they're not going to stop. Until we stop them, they're not going to stop.”  Court injunction allows Good News Clubs into Hawaiian schools Here's some good news for the Good News Clubs sponsored by Child Evangelism Fellowship! Since 2022, Hawaii's Department of Education had denied every single request for access Hawaii's primary schools by the Christian Good News Clubs. Liberty Counsel has obtained a court injunction to open access to the Good News clubs in Hawaii, and provide “timely responses to future applications.” In Mark 16:15, Jesus said, “Go ye into all the world, and preach the Good News to every creature.” Criminal illegal immigrants entry to America has quadrupled Criminals entering the borders of the United States have quadrupled since 2019 — in just five years. These are people that had already been convicted of one or more crimes prior to entering America. The official Customs and Border Protection numbers clocked 4,300 arrests in 2019. By contrast, this year that number is approaching 17,000 or an average of 1,459 per month. Banks welcome gold back as a hedge in an uncertain economy Interest in gold as a safe hedge is back, at least for the world banks. For fifty years, between 1960 and 2010, the world banks shed their gold reserves, dropping from 1.23 billion ounces to 960 million ounces. Now, for the last 14 years, the banks have been buying back gold.  There is now 1.15 billion ounces of gold representing about 2.7% of the Gross World Product, reports WolfStreet.com. New Mexico's surgical abortions have tripled Since 2020, the number of abortions performed in New Mexico has tripled.   Most of that is due to women from Texas seeking abortions across the border.  Now, 71% of New Mexican abortions are out-of-state abortions, reports Abortion Free New Mexico. The Word of God is firm on this: “You shall not murder.” (Exodus 20:13) 14 Worldview listeners gave a final $9,600 And finally, between some checks that just arrived in the mail at our P.O. Box and some last minute donations online on Sunday and yesterday, 14 Worldview listeners stepped up to the plate to fund our 6-member team for another fiscal year. Our thanks to Jon in Dewitt, Michigan who gave $50, Johannah in Sedalia, Kentucky who gave $100, as well as Stacy in Metuchen, New Jersey, Michael in Estancia, New Mexico, Moriah, a 16-year-old, in Register, Georgia, and Jonathan in Atascadero, California – each of whom gave $200. We're grateful to LeShun in Newport News, Virgina who gave $250, Charles and Susan in Stroughton, Wisconsin $300, as well as Griffin in Kila, Montana and Shawn in Newaygo, Michigan – both of whom pledged $25/month for 12 months for a gift of $300 each. And we appreciate the sacrifice of Max in Macon Georgia who gave $500, Mary in Wake Forest, North Carolina who pledged $50/month for 12 months for a gift of $600, an anonymous donor in Greenwood, Missouri who gave $2,400, and Jeanne in Columbia, South Carolina who gave $4,000. Those 14 donors gave $9,600.  Ready for our new grand and final total? Drum roll please. (sound effect of drum roll) $96,575! (audience cheering) Absolutely incredible!  We are blown away by your generosity.  To each and every one of you who made a donation, whatever the size, we have a simple message.  Thank you for believing in our unchanging mission: to report on world news from an unapologetically Biblical perspective.  To God be the glory! Close And that's The Worldview on this Tuesday, July 2nd, in the year of our Lord 2024. Subscribe by iTunes or email to our unique Christian newscast at www.TheWorldview.com. Or get the Generations app through Google Play or The App Store. I'm Adam McManus (Adam@TheWorldview.com). Seize the day for Jesus Christ.

For this episode of Trump's Trials, All Things Considered host Ailsa Chang speaks with University of Baltimore law professor Kim Wahle and later, NPR senior editor and political correspondent Domenico Montanaro.In a 6-to-3 decision, along ideological lines, the Court ruled that presidents have absolute immunity for their core constitutional powers, and are entitled to a presumption of immunity for other official acts. But they also ruled that presidents do not have immunity for unofficial acts. The decision will affect the federal election interference case and the Georgia election interference case. Topics include:- Supreme Court immunity decision- Federal election interference case- Georgia election interference case Follow the show on Apple Podcasts or Spotify for new episodes each Saturday.Sign up for sponsor-free episodes and support NPR's political journalism at plus.npr.org/trumpstrials.Email the show at trumpstrials@npr.org.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Kevin Miller and Lars Larson react to the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in favor of President Trump.

David returns after a brief food poisoning hiatus to discuss two oral arguments heard before the Supreme Court: Trump's immunity case and Idaho's case on abortion bans. But first, a request from The Dispatch's resident Wilson-hater. The Agenda: —Are solo podcasters sociopaths? —Proposals for changes on the Israeli Supreme Court —Absolute immunity for presidents —The role of the executive vesting clause —Reviewing Idaho's abortion ban —Time, place, and manner restrictions on college campuses —Answering questions and issuing corrections Show Notes: —Previous AO episode —South Dakota v. Dole —NFIB v. Sebelius —Dr. Martin Luther King on “civil disobedience” —Columbia University banned student protester over saying “Zionists don't deserve to live” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Friday briefing: Supreme Court Trump case; USC and Columbia student protests; Harvey Weinstein; NFL draft first round; and moreRead today's briefing.

Separation of Powers: Is a former president absolutely immune from federal prosecution for acts done while in office? - Argued: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:49:48 EDT

Today on Truth in Politics and Culture, the House and Senate pass a massive spending bill, Mifepristone lands at the Supreme Court, the Biden Administration launches a new agency to fund ways to thwart the Second Amendment, and ISIS-K attacks Russia.

This week on CounterSpin: Donald Trump, if he should become president again, could order the Department of Justice to drop any charges against him stemming from his fomenting of an insurrection aimed at overturning the results of the 2020 election. That's just been enabled by the Supreme Court, which put off until April the legal case wherein Trump declares himself immune to criminal prosecution. We speak with Vox Court-watcher Ian Millhiser, who says he tries to reserve his “this is an exceptionally alarming decision” voice, but this occasion calls for it. Then, we look at the anti-elder narrative promulgated by corporate news which says, “Keep up or you're in the way,” and, “if you aren't working 40 to 60 hours a week, you're a societal drain.” Alfredo Lopez is a longtime organizer and activist, and a founder of the new group Radical Elders. We talk with him about the space the group seeks to fill.   The post Ian Millhiser on Supreme Court Trump Protection / Alfredo Lopez on Radical Elders appeared first on KPFA.

Donald Trump could declare himself above the law—and that's just been enabled by a recent Supreme Court ruling. The post Ian Millhiser on Supreme Court Trump Protection, Alfredo Lopez on Radical Elders appeared first on FAIR.

The Tom Renz Show – The Colorado Supreme Court just got roundly trounced by the SCOTUS. Trump will, much to the chagrin of the left, be on the ballots in all of these dem states. That does not mean that 2024 is safe. To the contrary, the people that stole 2020 will be taking steps to do the same in 2024 and we will be discussing some of the strategy that will be used today...

The Tom Renz Show – The Colorado Supreme Court just got roundly trounced by the SCOTUS. Trump will, much to the chagrin of the left, be on the ballots in all of these dem states. That does not mean that 2024 is safe. To the contrary, the people that stole 2020 will be taking steps to do the same in 2024 and we will be discussing some of the strategy that will be used today...

Van Lathan and Rachel Lindsay give their opinions on the latest Supreme Court ruling (27:37) and reparation comments from the lieutenant governor of North Carolina, Mark Robinson (45:52), before rating the apology from Charlamagne tha God to viral TikTok creator Ressa Tessa (1:07:53). Hosts: Van Lathan and Rachel Lindsay Producers: Ashleigh Smith Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

We look at the aftermath of the Supreme Court's unanimous decision that former President Donald J. Trump should remain on Colorado's primary ballot. What does it mean for other state ballots, and what will Nikki Haley do next? Facebook, Instagram, and possibly other Big Tech platforms suffer a major outage while we are live on the air. Sinbad has an encouraging message for his fans after suffering a stroke. Jason Kelce's retirement speech is filled with tears and memories. Rick contemplates trying to learn to golf, and we try to talk him out of it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We look at the aftermath of the Supreme Court's unanimous decision that former President Donald J. Trump should remain on Colorado's primary ballot. What does it mean for other state ballots, and what will Nikki Haley do next? Facebook, Instagram, and possibly other Big Tech platforms suffer a major outage while we are live on the air. Sinbad has an encouraging message for his fans after suffering a stroke. Jason Kelce's retirement speech is filled with tears and memories. Rick contemplates trying to learn to golf, and we try to talk him out of it.SPONSOR: COOKING WITH THE ROBERTSON'S - YOU'VE BEEN ASKING TO SEE MORE FROM PHIL ROBERTSON AND HIS FAMILY – AND WE LISTENED. COOKING WITH PHIL, MISS KAY, AND THE FAMILY HAS ALWAYS BEEN ONE OF YOUR FAVORITE PARTS OF THE SHOWS, AND THAT'S WHY WE BROUGHT YOU MORE OF IT. IT'S TIME TO GO FROM “DYNASTY” TO “DINING”, WITH THE NEW HIT SHOW “COOKING WITH THE ROBERTSONS.” AVAILABLE EXCLUSIVELY TO BLAZETV SUBSCRIBERS, THIS SHOW FEATURES PHIL, JASE, AL, AND OTHERS SHOWING OFF THEIR FAVORITE RECIPES, COOKING UP A MESS OF DELICIOUS FOOD, AND DIPPING INTO GODLY WISDOM IN THE WAY ONLY THE ROBERTSONS CAN. THIS SHOW IS ONLY AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE A SUBSCRIPTION TO BLAZETV. SO IF YOU DON'T HAVE ONE YET, HEAD OVER TO HTTPS://BLAZETV.COM AND USE CODE “ROBERTSON30” TO GET $30 OFF YOUR FIRST YEAR!  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoicesSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jordan Sekulow - The Supreme Court rules that Donald Trump will stay on the Colorado primary ballot. stating that “the Constitution makes Congress rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3” Ryan Fournier - Tomorrow is Super Tuesday, what is the political fallout following the Supreme Court decision? Some say it gives Trump a major boost. Auron MacIntyre - Journalist Steve Baker was forced to turn himself in to face capitol riot charges after simply reporting and documenting the event. Abby Johnson - The Left is trying to promote abortion access as “health care”. CVS and Walgreens will be selling abortion pills in the next few weeks. James Lindsey - Logan Lancing and co-author James Lindsay wrote an important book regarding America's youth “The Queering Of The American Child”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Supreme Court Rules 9-0 in favor of Trump remaining on the ballot in Colorado.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In episode 1634, Jack and Miles are joined by hosts of On Theme, Yves Jeffcoat and Katie Mitchell, to discuss… The Supreme Court Will Rule On Trump's Immunity… Very, Very Slowly, More Shitty Wonka Updates, VR Is Improving The Lives Of Senior Citizens and more! Trump immunity claim: Top US court agrees to hear case in April The Supreme Court just made Jack Smith's job that much harder US supreme court urged to make ‘immediate, definitive decision' on Trump's immunity "The Unknown" AKA The Willy's Chocolate Experience Villain (Clip) Furious Harry Potter fans demand refunds after 'world of magical wonder' turns out to be room with finger buffet and wands made out of chopsticks 'Much like Snape, people have looked at me like a villain!' Man behind failed Harry Potter event in Canada shares plans to donate $2,000 to J.K. Rowling's charity - but Potterheads won't get a refund VR Is Improving The Lives Of Senior Citizens V.R. ‘Reminiscence Therapy' Lets Seniors Relive the Past In nursing homes, VR is a hit. Is that a good thing? Nursing Home Staff Shortage Among Reasons for Nationwide Closings US will regulate nursing home staffing for first time, but proposal lower than many advocates hoped US nursing home workers face ‘catastrophic crisis' of understaffing WATCH: Richard Lewis on Candid Camera LISTEN: Untitled by Kate BollingerSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

After reacting to an impromptu press conference by President Joe Biden, Rachel Maddow and a prime time panel discuss the arguments made before the Supreme Court about whether Donald Trump's role in the January 6 insurrection should disqualify him from holding office.

SERIES 2 EPISODE 119: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:44) SPECIAL COMMENT: Today we begin to find out if we still have a Constitution. Because the Constitution, in the third clause of the fourteenth amendment, says no person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector, or hold any office, civil or military… who having previously taken an oath as a member of Congress or as an officer of the United States to support the Constitution shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. It does NOT say that that person has to be CONVICTED of insurrection or rebellion. It does NOT say that that person has to be disqualified from the ballot by a judge or a legislature or a plebiscite. It does NOT say that the president is NOT an officer of the United States or that a President is exempt. It does NOT say that the disqualification of an insurrectionist from being president is any different than is the disqualification of a foreign citizen, nor any different than is the disqualification of a 14-year old, that all of them are self-executing. It does NOT say that this clause of the constitution can only be enforced if all the voters agree. It does NOT say that this clause of the constitution can only be enforced AFTER somebody ineligible is elected. It does NOT say that this clause of the constitution can only be enforced if the insurrectionist's cult and gangs and militias and stochastic terrorists promise not to threaten civil war.  It does NOT say that this clause of the constitution can only be enforced if a majority of justices of the Supreme Court can't make up a bullshit excuse for NOT enforcing it. It DOES say that this clause of the constitution CAN be overridden if Congress removes the disqualification of an individual by a vote of two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate. PERIOD. I will quote extensively from the two Federalist Society constitutional scholars whose extraordinary research into the 14th Amendment really mainstreamed it: Professors William Baude and Michael Pearson. And I'll quote a third Professor they quote, at the crux of the real argument here: if the Justices should find an excuse to make up some rule to NOT enforce our Constitution out of fear of Trump and violence. From Daniel Epps of Washington University: "The Supreme Court shouldn't rule that Trump is ineligible for the presidency for engaging in insurrection, because if they do Trump will definitely stage an insurrection." B-BLOCK (20:18) POSTSCRIPTS TO THE NEWS: If at first you don't impeach, try try again. Next Tuesday, in fact. And meet Valentina Gomez, trying to win the GOP nomination for Secretary of State of Missouri. She too is fed up with book banning. Her platform moves directly to book BURNING. (25:41) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: Trump calls Grammy ratings "anemic" even though they exceed his last four hour-long network specials COMBINED. UK's Prime Minister shames himself. As do Tucker Carlson and the very gullible rightwing nut job Juanita Broadddrick. C-BLOCK (33:30) EVERY DOG HAS ITS DAY: Can you help out Guidry's Guardian Foundation? (34:45) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL: Somebody mentioned he went to a baseball event and got applause and support. So let me tell you about the baseball event at which I found out Rudy Giuliani was nuts. We are approaching its 30th anniversary!    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Election Law: Was Donald Trump properly disqualified from the Colorado presidential ballot under the Fourteenth Amendment? - Argued: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 13:54:38 EDT

Hawk discusses the trial court decision out of Colorado that determined Trump committed insurrection against the United States and the Colorado Supreme Court's decision that Trump is not eligibility to be on the ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution   SUPPORT & CONNECT WITH HAWK - Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mdg650hawk - Support Hawk's Merch Store: https://hawkmerchstore.com - Connect on TikTok:  https://www.tiktok.com/@mdg650hawk7thacct - Connect on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts   ALL HAWK PODCASTS INFO - Additional Podcasts Available Here: https://www.hawkpodcasts.com - Listen to Hawk Droppings On Your Favorite Platform: - Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3RWeJfy - Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/422GDuL - YouTube: https://youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts - iHeartRadio: https://ihr.fm/47vVBdP - Pandora: https://bit.ly/48COaTB - Simplecast: https://hawk-droppings.simplecast.com - Hawk Droppings RSS Feed: https://feeds.simplecast.com/pPVtxSNJ

Guest: John Nichols is the national affairs correspondent for The Nation Magazine. He is the author of several books including his latest co-written with Senator Bernie Sanders, “It's OK to Be Angry About Capitalism.”  His Latest piece in the Nation is: Kevin McCarthy's Final Act of Retribution Totally Screws Over the House GOP.  With his exit from the House, the embittered former speaker leaves his caucus with a collapsed majority that may not be able to govern.   Photo (c): Wikimedia commons. The post The Supreme Court & Trump's Eligibility for Colorado Primary Ballot appeared first on KPFA.

Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist and Fox News Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court Trump vs. the Media Mollie Hemingway's Federalist Articles The post 2613. President Trump's Abortion Comments on “Meet the Press” – Mollie Hemingway, 9/18/23 first appeared on Issues, Etc..