Podcast appearances and mentions of Gianni Vattimo

Protagonista románu Lidská skvrna od Philipa Rotha poznamenává, že západní písemnictví vzniká ze sporu – ze sporu nad krásnou Helenou, který nakonec přerostl ve válku. V nadsázce lze totéž říct i o filozofii. Pro mnohé myslitele napříč staletími je stěžení Hérakleitův výrok, dle kterého je válka otcem všech věcí. Znamená to, že sklon k agresivitě je vlastní i filozofii a že se snad tato agresivita může přelévat do skutečných válek?Tuto tezi formuluje v knize Totalita a nekonečno filozof Emmanuel Lévinas. Má za to, že princip identity vládnoucí filozofii, tedy snaha převést stejnost na různost, se skutečně ozývá i ve válce. Válka je v tom případě bytostně spjatá s naším myšlením. Jsme bojové plemeno, protože jsme se naučili myslet skrze kategorie my a oni. Lze se to odnaučit? Lévinas říká, že nám nic jiného nezbývá, ne po druhé světové válce.A možná jsme se i ledacos odnaučovali, třeba i tím, že jsme si poslední roky říkali, že pravou sílou je slabost. I to má své kulturní dějiny. Ježíš učil, že skutečnou mocí je služba. Tato myšlenka – či spíše Ježíšova existence – se podle italského filozofa Giovanni Vattima vtělila do dějin západu. Navzdory tomu, že i křesťanství má svou agresivní stránku, obecně kulturu zjemňuje. A přestože byl Ježíš vše jiné jen ne slabý, formuloval Vattimo právě na pozadí křesťanství tzv. pensiore debole, slabé myšlení, které je prý pravou silou západní společnosti.V čem tkví tato „slabost“? Třeba v tomto: Postupně přestáváme fyzicky trestat; neupalujeme, ale diskutujeme; odbouráváme hierarchie; společnost stavíme na konsensu, ne na moci. Ale není to nakonec jen část pravdy? Nemá v sobě každé myšlení kus agrese, bez níž by nebylo ani nic dobrého? A jak rozumět tomu, že se nám na veřejnosti náhle mísí dva imperativy? Ještě si opakujeme „slabost je síla“, ale také už slýcháme, že je třeba dát „zbraně na stůl“. Znamená to, že se chceme částečně rozejít s principem „slabého myšlení“? Nebo nechceme, ale musíme?KapitolyI. Hádka, z níž vyrůstá západní písemnictví [začátek až 16:20]II. Pryč od totality! [16:20 až 42:00]III. Richard Overy: Války jsou dobré „k myšlení“. [42:00 až 57:30]IV. Fašistický princip uprostřed současnosti [57:30 až konec]BibliografieEmmanuel Levinas, Totalita a nekonečno, přel. Miroslav Petříček – Jan Sokol, Praha: OIKOYMENH, Tamtéž, str. 10.Tereza Matějčková, „Jsem na Tebe alergická. Hegel a Lévinas o vztahu k druhému“, in: Jakub Sirovátka – Ondřej Sikora, Lévinas v konfrontaci, Praha: OIKOYMENH, 2020, str. 36–53.Richard Overy, Why Wars? New York: Norton Company, 2024.Philip Roth, The Human Stain, London: Vintage, 2000.Peter Trawny ve skvělé knize Hitler, die Philosophie und der Hass (Berlin: Matthes & Seitz, 2022).Gianni Vattimo, Transparentní společnosti, přel. Antonín Kosík, Praha: Rubato, 2013.Zlomky předsokratovských myslitelů, přel. Karel Svoboda, Praha: Československý akademie věd, 1962.

In this season of Interactions, Whitney Barth and John Bernau engage with contemporary voices in the field to discuss recent works in law and religion. Today's guest is Dr. Thomas Jared Farmer, the McDonald Scholar in residence at the Center for the Study of Law and Religion at Emory University. In this episode, Dr. Farmer talks about his motivation to write a biography about Gianni Vattimo, and the importance of Vattimo's contributions to modern western philosophical thought. This podcast is produced by the Center for the Study of Law and Religion at Emory University in collaboration with Canopy Forum.Thomas Jared Farmer Faculty PageCenter for the Study of Law and Religion | Emory University School of Law | Atlanta, GACanopy Forum

Stefano Pivato"Contro lo sport"Utet Libriwww.utetlibri.itFin dal suo apparire, verso la fine dell'Ottocento, lo sport è stato il catalizzatore di un dibattito fra modernità e passatismo, tradizione e innovazione, novità e misoneismo. Oggi che lo sport è un fenomeno di massa, una passione largamente condivisa, è difficile ricordarlo, ma erano molte le ragioni per cui, al suo apparire in Italia, fu osteggiato attivamente: dalla difficile accettazione della cultura del corpo da parte di varie ideologie (a cominciare da quella cattolica) al rifiuto da parte del pensiero risorgimentale, che considera lo sport come un elemento disgregatore dell'amor di patria. Fino alla contrarietà di gran parte del socialismo, che lo ritiene un prodotto del «capitalismo borghese». Insomma una sorta di oppio dei popoli. Queste riserve durano a lungo nella società italiana e riaffiorano di tanto in tanto, come in occasione della stagione del Sessantotto. Tuttavia, dagli anni ottanta del Novecento, quella che un filosofo come Gianni Vattimo definisce la stagione dell'«edonismo reaganiano» mette al centro della propria visione quel consumismo che, un tempo contestato anche nelle sue espressioni sportive, ormai si impone come nuovo modello di comportamento – fino a portare l'Italia dove è oggi, fra le massime potenze sportive mondiali.Stefano Pivato ha insegnato Storia contemporanea nelle Università di Trieste e Urbino. Studioso dei comportamenti collettivi, è stato fra i primi a introdurre in Italia la storia dello sport. Fra i suoi titoli sul tema: L'era dello sport (Giunti, 1994), Storia sociale della bicicletta (Il Mulino, 2019), Storia dello sport in Italia (con Paul Dietschy, Il Mulino, 2019) e Tifo. La passione sportiva in Italia (con Daniele Marchesini, Il Mulino, 2022).IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

Para que mais uma introdução ao Espiritismo? Com essa pergunta em mente, entrevistamos o nosso velho conhecido, o cientista social e escritor Márcio Sales Saraiva, que está lançando "Espiritismo hoje: breve introdução", pela Ed. Comenius. Na obra, Márcio inova ao apresentar as ligações do Espiritismo não apenas com os saberes do seu tempo, mas com uma série de doutrinas e ideias que vão dos estoicos e neoplatônicos da Antiguidade até as noções mais recentes da psicanálise e o "pensamento fraco" de Gianni Vattimo. Em nossa conversa, falamos de ciência, história, filosofia, religião, eroticidade, pluralismo, o possível impacto das mudanças culturais do Brasil sobre o movimento espírito e vários outros tópicos.  O livro será lançado no dia 18/5/2024, na Livraria Leonardo Da Vinci, no Rio de Janeiro, mas já foi disponibilizado no Clube do Livro da Ed. Comenius. Maiores informações em: https://editoracomenius.com.br. 

Katarzyna Kasia opowiada o najważniejszych książkach w swoim życiu. Nagranie jest zapisem cyklu KSIĄŻKI MOJEGO ŻYCIA, który w Big Book cafe realizujemy od 2019 r. Gośćmi spotkań są ważne i cenione postaci polskiego życia publicznego. Opowiadając o swoich ukochanych książkach zachęcają do czytania. Co czytać, żeby zostać filozofką? A kiedy się nią już jest, co czytać dla czystej przyjemności? O lekturach, które pomagają przeniknąć naturę rzeczywistości i o tych, które pozwalają odetchnąć. O czytaniu, które prowadzi do odkryć i o książkach, z którymi warto iść przez życie mówi doktorka filozofii, naukowczyni i dziennikarka. Rozmawia Paulina Wilk. Oto lista najważniejszych lektur, wybranych przez Katarzynę Kasię. "Jednorożec" Irmelin Sandman Lilius "Mary Poppins otwiera drzwi" P.L. Travers "Trzeba umieć sobie radzić. Elementarz zajęć domowych dla dzieci" Anne Braun i Edith Nell "Maria i Magdalena" Magdalena Samozwaniec "Narodziny tragedji" Fryderyk Nietzsche "Nie być Bogiem" Gianni Vattimo "Genialne przyjaciółka" Elena Ferrante "Umberto Eco "Wahadło Foucaulta" "Rozmyślania (do siebie samego)" Marek Aureliusz "Alfabet wspomnień" Antoni Słonimski "Notatki z Podziemia. Gracz" Fiodor Dostojewski "Słowo i ciało" Julian Tuwim "Sto lat samotności" G. G. Marquez "Czarownica" Jules Michelet "Estetyka. Teoria formatywności" Luigi Pareyson "Krytyka władzy sądzenia" Immanuel Kant Dziękujemy Miastu Stołecznemu Warszawa za wsparcie naszych działań w Stałym Programie Kulturalnym.

Gianni Vattimo: entrevista a un filósofo postmoderno.

22-IX-2023. IN AMERICA SEPTENTRIONALI. IN CANADA. TRANSLATIONES de Canada ex Casandra Freire SUNT: Trudeau Indiam accusat Sikh magistrem ad mortem dantis in Canada. Minister primarius offensionem popularem habet, sociis negantibus condemnare Indiam ad mortem magistri Sikh. India canadienses a visis removet, major perturbatio Sikh caedis. IN CIVITATIBUS FOEDERATAE AMERICAE. Duae priores TRANSLATIONES de Ce-eF-A (anglice U-eS-A) ex Israéle García Avilés SUNT. Respublica Islamica Iraniae quinque captivos americanos commutat. Negotium a Bideno tractatur, praeterea, reffert pecunias quas reddit ex oleo no gelato. Biden Unitatem Universalem urget ut favet Ucrainae in Nationis Coniunctis. Praesidens lassitudinem belli ostendat, dum Zelensky Russiam tamquam minatio omnibus contemplat. ‘ZELENSKY’, quod Congressus ad Ucrainam magis adiuvet, EXPERITUR. ‘Rupertus MURDOCH’ ‘pro primogenito’ ‘DIMITTIT’. ‘MIGRANTES’ ‘Aquila oppido in Texia’ ‘ATTONANT’. IN MEXICO: ‘QUI PECUNIAM COLLOCANT’ ‘Mexici regiminis charta nummaria’ ‘in hebdomada una’ ‘DISSOLVERUNT’. ‘Consociatio ad Cooperationem et Progressionem Oeconomicas (abbreviatione hispanica O-Ce-De-E)’ DECLARAVIT Mexici oeconomiam ad tres punctum tres centesimas CRETURUM ESSE. Migrantium AESTUS in Mexici limitibus crescit. IN CONTINENTE TERRA EUROPAE. IN EUROPA: ‘Urgentium rerum CONSILIUM’ ‘de migrantibus’ ‘pro Lampedusa’ ‘NECESSE EST’. IN BRITANNIÁRUM REGNUM: ‘Britanniarium Regnum Primus minister SUNAK’ ‘ex promisionibus contra calefactionem globalem’ ‘RECEDIT’. Postea, ‘FACTIO laboris’ ‘suffragium’ contra FERUNT’. ‘BRITANNIARUM REGNUM’ ‘sociari’ ‘ad Unionem Europaeam’ ‘sicut sodalis consociatorum’ ‘POSSET’. IN GALIA: De coronae viro. ‘EXPEDITIO ad vaccinum inserendum’ ‘provectus’ ‘EST’. De molestia. ‘IMPETUS’ ‘contra media socialia’ ‘EST’. ‘CAROLUS Tertius’ ‘Macron’ ‘in Lutetia’ ‘VISITAT’. Papa FRANCISCUS ad Massilliam VADET et de migrantibus CURABIT. Etiam cum Macron CONVENIET. IN HISPANIA: ‘Hispaniae OECONOMIA’ ‘extra unum punctum centesimas’ ‘post coronae virus’ ‘CRESCIT’. ‘LINGUA hispanica ‘castellano’ vocata’ ‘Congressus lingua’ ‘iam non EST’. ‘Hispaniae primus minister SÁNCHEZ’ ‘pro Puigdemont amnestia’ ‘EST’. IN ITALIA: ‘Gianni VATTIMO’ ‘mortuus EST’. Migrantium DISCRIMEN in Italia CRESCIT. ‘ITALIA’ ‘circa migrantes’ ‘in Europa’ et ‘in ipsa Italia’ ‘sola’ ‘EST’. IN AMERICA MERIDIONALI. IN VENETIOLA: ‘MADURO’ ‘infrastructuram pro systema electrica’ ‘ad Sinas’ ‘DABIT’. ‘Undecim milia MILITES’ ‘Tocorón carcerem’ ‘pro Venetiola’ ‘RECUPERANT’. IN AEQUATORIA: ‘Quadraginta milia PUERI’ ‘ad scholam’ ‘non REDEUNT’. IN PERUVIA: ‘MILITES’ ‘ad vias’ ‘EGREDIUNTUR’. IN CILIA: ‘Vitae ius’ ‘pro nascituris’ ‘APPROBANT’. IN CONTINENTE TERRAE AFRICAE. IN LIBYA: ‘In Derna in Libia’, ‘superstites’ ‘cum mortui suos’ ‘SUNT’. IN ORBE TERRARUM: ‘Nationum Unitae Secretarius generalis GUTERRES’ ‘reformationes’ ‘pro Nationibus Unitis’ ‘EXPOSCIT’. IN EUROPA. IN GERMANIA: ‘FOEDUS semaphorum vocatus’ ‘limes migrantium’ ‘RECUSAT’. ‘Germaniae ARGENTARIA Centralis (germanico ‘Bundesbank’)’ ‘quod ‘Germaniae oeconomia’ ‘Sinarum nimis pendet’ ‘ADMONET’. ‘Migrantium MERCATORES’ ‘milia et milia milium’ ‘LUCRANTUR’ et magis magisque violenti ‘SUNT’. ‘STEINMER’ ‘CONSIDERAT’ ‘quod GERMANIA ad migrantium cifram maximam receptionem’ ‘ADVENIT’. IN POLONIA: ‘POLONIA’ ‘armas sufficere’ ‘ad Ucráinam’ ‘iam non VULT’. IN UCRAINA: ‘ZELENSKY’ ‘Putin’ ‘genocidium’ ‘prae Nationibus Unitis’ ‘ACCUSAT’. ‘Russiae MISSILE’ ‘Ucráinae infrastructuram electricam’ ‘BATTUIT’. Autem, ‘UCRAINA’ ‘etiam cum missilibus’ ‘Russiae classis praetorium’ ‘in Sebastopolis’ ‘OPPUGNAT’. IN ADRABIGANIA: ‘ADRABIGANIA’ ‘Armeniae Nagorno-Karabaj’ ‘ASSULTAT’. ‘Adrabiganiae MINISTERIUM Defensionis’ ‘NUNTIAT’ ‘contra facinorosos quod cum terrore aggrediuntur’ ‘OPERARI’. ‘MORTUI ET VULNERATI’ ‘in Adrabigania’ ‘SUNT’. ‘ARMISTITIUM’ ‘inter Adrabiganiam et Armeniam’ SUBSIGNATUR. CIRCUM MARE MEDITERRANEUM: Erdogan, de proximo synodo dicit difficultates in Aeageo delere velle. ‘NIKOS PAPPAS’ ‘DICIT’ ‘Alexis Tsipras decisionem ad abdicandum’ ‘aliquid’ ‘intervenire’. IN CONTINENTE TERRAE AFRICAE. IN ANGOLIA: ‘Minister Angoliae ad negotia progressionem ADALGIZA VAZ’ ‘diversis Nationibus’ ‘ad delicta nummaria pugnanum’ ‘ADHORTATUR’. IN MOZAMBICO: ‘MOZAMBICUM’ ‘importare triticum’ ‘a Zimbabua’ ‘VULT’. IN CONTINENTE TERRAE AMERICA. IN BRASILIA: ‘Bolsonaro Assessor anterior MAURO CID’ ‘DECLARAVIT’ ‘Bolsonaro’ ‘coniuratio adversus reipublicae’ ‘in animo’ ‘HABUISSE’. IN CONTINENTE ASIATICA. IN INIDIA: ‘Canádae primus minister TRUDEAU’ ‘Khalistanis’ ‘in India’ ‘PERTURBAT’. ‘Indiae MULIERES’ ‘chartam pro partibus in parlamento habemdum’ ‘ASSEQUITUR’. ‘TERTIA PARS’ ‘Indiae Parlamenti’ ‘pro mulieribus’ ‘ERIT’. ‘INDIA’ ‘Visas’ ‘pro canadensibus’ ‘SUSPENDIT’. IN IAPONIA: ‘INDICIUM próximum’ ‘in linguis latina, ánglica et iapónica’ ‘RECITÁBIMUS’. ‘Primus minister KISHIDA’ ‘Tria milia miliardum Iaponicorum nummorum’ ‘contra arma nuclearia’ ‘SUPERIMPENDET’. ‘FORMULA UNA (abbreviatione eF-una)’ ‘in Suzuka circuitus’ ‘in exeunte hebdomada’ ‘FIT’. ‘In apertura’ ‘multi eF-Una amatores’ ‘iam ASTITERUNT’. Translationes ex Luis Pesquera Olalde.

Gianni Vattimo (1936 – 2023), filosofo, scrittore ed esponente politico. LASER lo ricorda con questo estratto di una lunga intervista – disponibile in modo integrale sulla nostra pagina web – in cui Vattimo affronta le basi della sua filosofia, le ragioni che l'hanno portato ad essere considerato il massimo esponente del “pensiero debole”, il richiamo ai suoi maestri Karl Löwith e Georg Gadamer. Il filosofo spiega con chiarezza anche la sua militanza comunista e il suo fermo credo cristiano. Posizioni che sono illustrate nell'autobiografia “Non essere Dio”, pubblicata da Ponte alle Grazie nel 2015 e che dà spunto a questa intervista.

Oggi a Cult: il filosofo Stefano Moriggi ricorda Gianni Vattimo; a Palazzo Reale di Milano la mostra "Jimmy Nelson, Humanity"; la scrittrice vietnamita Nguyen Pahn Que Mai sul suo ultimo libro "Dove vola la polvere" (ed. Nord); Le Vie del Cinema 2023 nelle sale di Milano; la rassegna Esplorazioni (danza e musica live) a cura di Triennale Teatro al Volvo Studio di Milano...

Metahumanist philosopher Stefan Lorenz Sorgner shares his thoughts on the debates surrounding contemporary transhumanism, the possibility of immortality achieved through mind-uploading, and the ethical issues associated with gene editing, digital data collection, and life extension. Prof. Stefan Lorenz Sorgner teaches philosophy at John Cabot University in Rome, whereby he particularly promotes the emerging field of posthuman studies. He is also Director and Co-founder of the Beyond Humanism Network, Fellow at the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies (IEET), Research Fellow at the Ewha Institute for the Humanities at Ewha Womans University in Seoul, and Visting Fellow at the Ethics Centre of the Friedrich-Schiller-University in Jena, where he was also Visiting Prof. during the summer of 2016. He studied philosophy at King's College/University of London (BA), the University of Durham (MA by thesis; examiners: David E. Cooper, Durham ; David Owen, Southampton), the University of Giessen and the University of Jena (Dr. phil.; examiners: Wolfgang Welsch, Jena; Gianni Vattimo, Turin). In recent years, he taught at the Universities of Jena (Germany), Erfurt (Germany), Klagenfurt (Austria) Ewha Womans University in Seoul (South Korea) and Erlangen-Nürnberg (Germany). His main fields of research are Nietzsche, the philosophy of music, bioethics and meta-, post- and transhumanism. Find out more: futurespodcast.net CREDITS Produced by FUTURES Podcast Recorded, Mixed & Edited by Luke Robert Mason FOLLOW Twitter: twitter.com/futurespodcast Facebook: facebook.com/futurespodcast Instagram: instagram.com/futurespodcast

Nelle sue opere si è occupato dell'ontologia ermeneutica contemporanea, proponendone una propria interpretazione, che ha chiamato pensiero debole, in contrapposizione con le diverse forme di pensiero forte dell'Otto-Novecento: l'hegelismo con la sua dialettica, il marxismo, la fenomenologia, la psicanalisi, lo strutturalismo. Sembra ieri quando le studentesse accorrevano a Palazzo Nuovo, la sede delle facoltà umanistiche a Torino, per vedere il bel filosofo biondo che parlava di Nietzsche e Heidegger, per di più fresco di coming out, che in quegli Anni 70 non era ancora una moda ma un'uscita coraggiosa, e per tutta una fetta di mondo engagé un'ulteriore aura di fascinazione. Oggi Gianni abita in un grande appartamento di via Po affacciato sul Rettorato dell'Università dove ha insegnato fino al 2008, e dove ora è professore emerito. Ammette che ci ha provato gusto in certi casi a provocare e spiega: «Ma perché non dovrei divertirmi? Una volta un gruppo di madame torinesi mi aveva invitato a una conferenza sui giardini, e io ho concluso il mio intervento - dove si parlava di un giardino dei sentieri che si biforcano, una cosa un po' borgesiana - cantando quella canzone di Brassens, “Je suis la mauvaise herbe, braves gens, braves gens…”. Sì, l'unica figura che mi piace oggi è la figura di uno che rompe le palle». E di Torino dice: «È una bellissima città, come diceva Nietzsche quando era già pazzo. Ma forse quando lo diceva non era poi così pazzo».

Today I speak to Stephen Batchelor, figurehead for Secular Buddhism, well known author, and Scot. I present the lovely man some of the critique aimed at his work in the book Secularizing Buddhism, and from my previous interview with Richard K. Payne. We also discuss some of his intellectual influences, touch on phenomenology, Gianni Vattimo, and whether Stephen is fixated on the past in his relationship with early Buddhism. Stephen was game throughout for what turned out to be a constructive and illuminating conversation. Next up will be one of Stephen's collaborators and philosophically informed secular Buddhist teachers, Winton Higgins, all the way from Australia. Matthew O'Connell is a life coach and the host of the The Imperfect Buddha podcast. You can find The Imperfect Buddha on Facebook and Twitter (@imperfectbuddha). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/buddhist-studies

Today I speak to Stephen Batchelor, figurehead for Secular Buddhism, well known author, and Scot. I present the lovely man some of the critique aimed at his work in the book Secularizing Buddhism, and from my previous interview with Richard K. Payne. We also discuss some of his intellectual influences, touch on phenomenology, Gianni Vattimo, and whether Stephen is fixated on the past in his relationship with early Buddhism. Stephen was game throughout for what turned out to be a constructive and illuminating conversation. Next up will be one of Stephen's collaborators and philosophically informed secular Buddhist teachers, Winton Higgins, all the way from Australia. Matthew O'Connell is a life coach and the host of the The Imperfect Buddha podcast. You can find The Imperfect Buddha on Facebook and Twitter (@imperfectbuddha). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today I speak to Stephen Batchelor, figurehead for Secular Buddhism, well known author, and Scot. I present the lovely man some of the critique aimed at his work in the book Secularizing Buddhism, and from my previous interview with Richard K. Payne. We also discuss some of his intellectual influences, touch on phenomenology, Gianni Vattimo, and whether Stephen is fixated on the past in his relationship with early Buddhism. Stephen was game throughout for what turned out to be a constructive and illuminating conversation. Next up will be one of Stephen's collaborators and philosophically informed secular Buddhist teachers, Winton Higgins, all the way from Australia. Matthew O'Connell is a life coach and the host of the The Imperfect Buddha podcast. You can find The Imperfect Buddha on Facebook and Twitter (@imperfectbuddha). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/spiritual-practice-and-mindfulness

Today I speak to Stephen Batchelor, figurehead for Secular Buddhism, well known author, and Scot. I present the lovely man some of the critique aimed at his work in the book Secularizing Buddhism, and from my previous interview with Richard K. Payne. We also discuss some of his intellectual influences, touch on phenomenology, Gianni Vattimo, and whether Stephen is fixated on the past in his relationship with early Buddhism. Stephen was game throughout for what turned out to be a constructive and illuminating conversation. Next up will be one of Stephen's collaborators and philosophically informed secular Buddhist teachers, Winton Higgins, all the way from Australia. Matthew O'Connell is a life coach and the host of the The Imperfect Buddha podcast. You can find The Imperfect Buddha on Facebook and Twitter (@imperfectbuddha). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/secularism

Today I speak to Stephen Batchelor, figurehead for Secular Buddhism, well known author, and Scot. I present the lovely man some of the critique aimed at his work in the book Secularizing Buddhism, and from my previous interview with Richard K. Payne. We also discuss some of his intellectual influences, touch on phenomenology, Gianni Vattimo, and whether Stephen is fixated on the past in his relationship with early Buddhism. Stephen was game throughout for what turned out to be a constructive and illuminating conversation. Next up will be one of Stephen's collaborators and philosophically informed secular Buddhist teachers, Winton Higgins, all the way from Australia. Matthew O'Connell is a life coach and the host of the The Imperfect Buddha podcast. You can find The Imperfect Buddha on Facebook and Twitter (@imperfectbuddha). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/religion

Today I speak to Stephen Batchelor, figurehead for Secular Buddhism, well known author, and Scot. I present the lovely man some of the critique aimed at his work in the book Secularizing Buddhism, and from my previous interview with Richard K. Payne. We also discuss some of his intellectual influences, touch on phenomenology, Gianni Vattimo, and whether Stephen is fixated on the past in his relationship with early Buddhism. Stephen was game throughout for what turned out to be a constructive and illuminating conversation. Next up will be one of Stephen's collaborators and philosophically informed secular Buddhist teachers, Winton Higgins, all the way from Australia. Matthew O'Connell is a life coach and the host of the The Imperfect Buddha podcast. You can find The Imperfect Buddha on Facebook and Twitter (@imperfectbuddha). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Gianluca De Candia"Il forse bifronte"L'emergenza della libertà nel pensiero di Dioprefazione di Thomas LeinkaufMimesis Edizionihttp://mimesisedizioni.it/«Il forse è la parola più bella del vocabolario italiano. Perché apre delle possibilità, non certezze. Perché non cerca la fine, ma va verso l'infinito» scrive Leopardi. Il termine tuttavia non rientra fra quelli maggiormente frequentati dai filosofi, i quali prediligono piuttosto avverbi pacifici e rassicuranti, come quelli che rimarcano o confutano la certezza. Attraverso un ripensamento inedito e coinvolgente del pensiero di Dio da Cartesio a Cacciari, il saggio verifica invece la presenza di un “forse” (ermeneutico, anfibologico e congetturale) al di sotto di ogni costruzione razionalistica e porta allo scoperto il momento di libertà latente in ogni atto metafisico. «Il Forse è un'erma bifronte, dalla quale è impossibile estirpare una delle due facce. Il Forse nel modo maggiore è ottimista. Il Forse nel modo minore tende a negare questa potenzialità, eppure non può vietare che essa sussista, che permanga sullo sfondo come opzione di secondo ordine. In entrambi i casi, una porta si schiude: una sulla luce, l'altra sull'oscurità, ma la soglia rimane la stessa. E l'uscere qui e una ragione libera, la sola a cui spetta l'interpretazione.» Gianluca De Candia ha studiato filosofia e teologia presso la Facoltà Teologica Pugliese, l'Università “Aldo Moro” di Bari e la Gregoriana di Roma. Borsista della Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, ha conseguito l'abilitazione in “Questioni filosofiche della teologia” presso l'Università di Münster. Già Professore a contratto di Filosofia presso la Facoltà Teologica Pugliese e di Teologia Sistematica presso l'Università di Siegen, è ora Privatdozent presso l'Università di Münster e responsabile di un progetto (DFG) sulla ricezione del pensiero di Luigi Pareyson. Hanno detto di lui: «leggendo De Candia mi riconosco perfettamente nel "Weg" che descrive, come dovessi iniziare di nuovo» (Massimo Cacciari); «un importante mediatore fra filosofia italiana e tedesca» (Gianni Vattimo); «un uomo prezioso, mi ha proprio stregato» (Giliano Ferrara); «Gianluca De Candia ha il dono della trasfigurazione. Senza trasfigurazione non c'è comprensione.» (Barbara Alberti); «Nei saggi di De Candia si colgono le forme della concretezza incarnata e raggiante della fede cristiana, spesso trascurate dalla teologia di scuola. Egli riesce a rintracciare le orme di un altro Dio e un altro uomo, ambedue umili e forti, vulnerabili e fieri nella loro amabilità» (Elmar Salmann).IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

00:00 Covid, per il Corsera aumentano i contagi e i ricoveri, per il Qn solo i contagi. 01:40 Green pass, un incomprensibile Gianni Vattimo, sulla Stampa, dà ragione a Cacciari. […]

Un incontro assolutamente inedito tra due originali pensatori contemporanei sul tema di una nuova visione, anche europea, della politica. Krippendorff, politologo insoddisfatto sia della sua disciplina sia di una politica sterile e piena di stereotipi, sostiene la necessità di riprendere a parlare di filosofia, arte, letteratura nel discorso politico. Vattimo è conosciuto in Italia e all'estero per la definizione di “pensiero debole”, una filosofia che pensa la storia dell'emancipazione umana come una progressiva riduzione della violenza e dei dogmatismi.

While some philosophers view their primary task as one of discovering the nature of reality and then describing it accurately for the rest of us, others have practiced philosophy as an edifying enterprise, asserting that it should be employed to help us better resolve social and political problems—to change the world. Although both of these approaches have been utilized throughout history, the philosopher John McCumber argues that this later movement in philosophy was mostly purged from academia in the United States starting during the Cold War. 1950s McCarthyism and the “Red Scare” made many American politicians and professors wary of becoming blacklisted or punished for expressing viewpoints associated with communism. These views included concerns for the poor and economically-disadvantaged, support for labor unions, and outcries regarding exploitative economic practices. In turn, this meant that many academics were pushed out of their positions at colleges and universities if they engaged in rhetoric or activities that were perceived as being too “red.”  This academic McCarthyism, according to McCumber, further enabled the ascent of analytic philosophy, a method that attempts to describe the world in the most linguistically precise way possible, leaning heavily toward a mathematical-like language to capture an accurate picture of reality. As a result, philosophy departments throughout the United States became less interested in engaging in edifying philosophy. Consequently, academic McCarthyism helped elevate subjects like mathematics, philosophy of science, and logic at the expense of political and social philosophy. In the later part of the twentieth century, Richard Rorty ushered in a new era of philosophy. Turning their own methods against them, Rorty argued that we ought to jettison analytic philosophy, instead focusing on the practical consequences of our ideas as they manifest in politics and society. Rejecting a representationalist approach, Rorty spent much of his career rallying philosophers around a more edifying position, suggesting that we’re better served by focusing on how ideas can advance society and improve social conditions for people—especially the poor and marginalized. In fact, Rorty went so far as to make several political predictions regarding the practical uses of philosophy and literature in the twenty-first century. On numerous occasions, he outlined how they would be applied throughout society to transform politics following what he imagines will be the darkest years in American history—from 2014 to 2044. Jeffrey Howard speaks with Jacob Goodson, Associate Professor of Philosophy at Southwestern College in Winfield, Kansas. Goodson believes that, despite some of Rorty’s philosophical shortcomings, we ought to embrace a more edifying orientation toward ideas. In his recent book, The Dark Years?: Philosophy, Politics, and the Problem of Predictions (2020), he considers Rorty’s political predictions and how they might help guide us toward a better future. Goodson examines which predictions have already been realized—including the election of a “strongman” in 2016—which ones might be coming to fruition now, and whether Rorty’s conception of an idealized future will unfold in the way the neopragmatist philosopher hopes it will.  A few questions to ponder. In what ways might analytic philosophy be inadequate for addressing social and political problems? Should philosophers focus on changing society or is their primary role to help us better understand the nature of reality? What does philosophy stand to lose by following Richard Rorty into his neopragmatist vision for the discipline? And where should we place our hope for the future? Show Notes The Dark Years?: Philosophy, Politics, and The Problem of Predictions by Jacob Goodson (2020) Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America by Richard Rorty (1997) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity by Richard Rorty (1989) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature by Richard Rorty (1979) Overdoing Democracy: Why We Must Put Politics in Its Place by Robert Talisse (2019) “Suspending Politics to Save Democracy” by Lawrence Torcello (2020) “We’re Overdoing Democracy. But Why?” by Kevin Vallier (2019) The Philosophy Scare: The Politics of Reason in the Early Cold War by John McCumber (2016) Time in a Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era by John McCumber (2001) Philosophy and Social Hope by Richard Rorty (2000) Richard Rorty: The Making of an American Philosopher by Neil Gross (2008) Analytic Philosophy “Self-Reliance” by Ralph Waldo Emerson (1841) Ep. 1 Richard Rorty and Achieving Our Country with Adrian Rutt (2020) The Future of Religion by Richard Rorty and Gianni Vattimo (2007) Walter Rauschenbusch Jeffrey Stout

Many Western philosophers have approached questions of knowledge conceiving of truth as something that is “out there,” unchangeable, abstract, and universal. There is an inherent structure in the universe and we must discover what exactly it is. One merely needs to uncover a segment of the structure of the universe and the rest of truth will reveal itself. In this tradition, truth is viewed as foundational and essential. Truth can be reasoned to from the solitude of one’s desk. Experience doesn’t change truth, doesn’t touch it. Truths just need to be gathered in. In other words, obtaining truth means getting the concepts in our minds to mirror or correspond to that which exists “out there” in reality. According to this view, an individual’s reason can carry them to the whole of noble, perfect truth.  By contrast, pragmatist philosophers like Charles Sanders Peirce argue that the pursuit of truth is a collective endeavor manifesting in what he calls “the community of inquirers.” No single individual has a totalized view of reality. In a world that is constantly changing and malleable, we must turn toward experience, pushing against the ease of abstractions moving into the messy realities of existence. Inquiry is not just experiential but experimental. We test out the truth qualities and meaning of our ideas according to their practical consequences, and not what is supposed a priori. By expanding our community of fellow inquirers, we expose ourselves to a wider range of experiences that can tell us a bit more about the practical consequences of ideas in the lives of many people, across many times, and within particular places. Lived experiences matter. Jeffrey Howard speaks with David O'Hara, Professor of Philosophy, Classics, and Environmental Studies at Augustana University in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. He is also Chair of the Department of Religion, Philosophy, and Classics, and directs programs in Environmental Studies and Sustainability. A scholar of Charles Sanders Peirce, Plato, and C.S. Lewis, his current research focuses on the relationships between fish and forests.  He introduces us to pragmatism, or pragmaticism, as Peirce eventually came to call his philosophy in an effort to differentiate his views from those of fellow pragmatist William James. In addition to elaborating on what the pragmatic maxim offers us, O’Hara emphasizes the communitarian ethos necessary for satisfactory inquiry. Central to Peirce’s notion of inquiry are the values of inclusion, humility, and love, which are for both Peirce and O’Hara informed by their pragmatist views on scripture.  Complete truth is an infinite horizon we’ll encounter at “the end of inquiry,” to borrow Peirce’s term, a future that we’ll likely never arrive at. But who is included in the community of inquirers? How are we to make sense of a plurality of communities? How do we preserve the integrity of the community without becoming exclusionary of other much-needed perspectives? What does it mean to be an expert in a community of divergent viewpoints? And do experts’ views receive greater weight within the community of inquirers?    Show Notes American Philosophers Read Scripture edited by Jacob L. Goodson (2020)  "How to Make Our Ideas Clear" by Charles Sanders Peirce (1878) The Future of Religion by Richard Rorty and Gianni Vattimo (2007) “The Will to Believe” by William James (1896) The Varieties of Religious Experience by William James (1902) “A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God” by Charles Sanders Peirce (1908) “Dmesis” by Charles Sanders Pierce (1892)

En este podcast encontrarás información sobre el impacto de la globalización en la comercialización y producción de contenido cultural, así como en la homogeneización de un solo sujeto social. Se referencian teóricos como Guy Debord, Herbert Marcuse, Heidegger, Gianni Vattimo, Habermas; que hablan del fenómeno social y cultural, la identidad y la industria del espectáculo.

Die Beiträge von Zygmunt Bauman (1925 – 2017 zum Verständnis des Zeitalters der Postmoderne fanden und finden weithin große Beachtung. Der polnische Soziologe und Philosoph hielt den hier dokumentierten Eröffnungsvortrag zum großen und von intensiven Konflikten um den australischen Philosophen Peter Singer begleiteten Heidelberger Kongress „Science/Fiction – Über Fundamentalismus und Beliebigkeit in Wissenschaft und Therapie“ im Jahr 1996. Das Heidelberger Institut für systemische Forschung zeichnete verantwortlich für diesen sog. „Science/Fiction-Kongress“. Hans Rudi Fischer, Arnold Retzer, Fritz B. Simon und Gunthard Weber bildeten die Programm-Gruppe. Weitere prominente Referierende trugen zum Kongress bei, insbesondere aus dem Feld des Diskurses zur Postmoderne, wie Gianni Vattimo und Wolfgang Welsch. Folgen Sie der autobahnuniversität auch auf: Apple Podcasts podcasts.apple.com/de/podcast/carl…4t/id1479529658 Spotify open.spotify.com/show/0HVLyjAHZkFMVr9XDATMGz Stitcher www.stitcher.com/podcast/carlauer…bahnuniversitat/ Facebook www.facebook.com/carlauerautobahnuniversitaet/ Folgen Sie auch unserem anderen Podcast "Carl-Auer Sounds of Science" auf: Apple Podcasts podcasts.apple.com/de/podcast/carl…ce/id1487473408 Spotify open.spotify.com/show/6wX82k2waqcU8IDUK9Vn7o Stitcher www.stitcher.com/podcast/carlauer…ounds-of-science Soundcloud @carlauersoundsofscience Facebook www.facebook.com/carlauersoundsofscience/ Folgen Sie dem Carl-Auer Verlag auf: Facebook facebook.com/carlauerverlag/ Twitter twitter.com/carlauerverlag Instagram www.instagram.com/carlauerverlag/ YouTube www.youtube.com/carlauerverlag Oder schauen Sie hier vorbei www.carl-auer.de

Giovanna Di Lello"Dalla parte di John Fante"Scritti e testimonianzeGiovanna Di Lello e Toni RicciardiCarocci Editorehttp://www.carocci.it/Questa storia ebbe inizio più di due secoli fa a Torricella Peligna, il piccolo borgo abruzzese da dove partì il nonno di John Fante, uno degli scrittori americani più amati, controversi e originali del Novecento. Il John Fante Festival “Il dio di mio padre”, a lui dedicato e che da 15 anni si tiene nel paese dei suoi avi, trova in questo volume le voci di chi vi ha partecipato per almeno un'edizione. Allo sguardo appassionato dei figli Victoria, Jim e Dan, ma anche di chi ha conosciuto da vicino la sua famiglia, come lo sceneggiatore Frank Spotnitz e la direttrice del festival Giovanna Di Lello, si unisce l'omaggio di scrittori come Sandro Veronesi, Marco Vichi, Giancarlo De Cataldo, Simona Baldelli, Gaetano Cappelli, Alessio Romano, fino al filosofo Gianni Vattimo e al cantautore Vinicio Capossela, tutti suoi grandi estimatori e divulgatori. La raccolta è arricchita, inoltre, da un contributo postumo di Francesco Durante, uno dei massimi esperti di John Fante in Italia, cui si affiancano saggi sulla sua opera narrativa e cinematografica firmati dagli studiosi Antonio Buonanno, Fred Gardaphé, Lia Giancristofaro e Giuliana Muscio.Giovanna Di LelloDirettrice del John Fante Festival “Il dio di mio padre”, giornalista, documentarista e organizzatrice di eventi, ha realizzato tra l'altro i documentari John Fante. Profilo di scrittore (Fazi Editore, 2003) e Il razzismo indiscreto degli americani. Incontro con Noam Chomsky sull'immigrazione negli Stati Uniti (left, 2007).Toni RicciardiStorico delle migrazioni all'Università di Ginevra, condirettore della collana “Présent et Histoire”, è tra i coautori del Rapporto italiani nel mondo (Fondazione Migrantes), del primo Dizionario enciclopedico delle migrazioni italiane nel mondo (ser, 2014), membro del comitato editoriale di “Studi Emigrazione” e autore di monografie e saggi sulla storia delle migrazioni.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

Bienvenidos a entre marketing, libros y música; Un podcast para los amantes del marketing digital. Aquí encontrarás noticias, metodologías y herramientas para tu estrategia digital, además vamos analizar los mejores libros que te van ayudar a ser un mejor profesional, todo esto acompañado de recomendaciones musicales.. Así que acompáñame todos los martes y jueves en un nuevo episodio!….

Italian philosopher and politician Gianni Vattimo thinks history is over with. Moreover, he thinks modernity is going out the window with it. This week, Connor and Dan contend with this idea and find themselves strangely comfortable with the uncomfortable nature of postmodernism.

On this edition of Parallax Views, Synthetic Zero's Michael James joins the show to discuss speculative realism, post-nihilism, the problems of accelerationism, and catastrophic climate change. If you enjoy this conversation there will be a Patreon-exclusive Part II this weekend in which Michael discusses Synthetic Zero's interest in the theory of patchworks, which they are attempting to bring into real-world practice via an experiment akin to the 60s counterculture's communes and shared-living spaces. Synthetic Zero is a "multimedia research and design collective seeking adaptive responses to the various crises and unequally distributed realities of contemporary life." Michael and I begin by discussing the origins of Synthetic Zero and how it was envisioned by Michael, alongside Aaron Crawford, as a para-academic unit born out of philosophical explorations that arose from the speculative realist movement spearheaded by figures like Graham Harman, Timothy Morton, Quentin Meillassoux, and others. We discuss what speculative realism and object-oriented ontology are and their relation to Meillassoux's ideas about finitude. Michael outlines how speculative realism attempted to deal with philosophical conundrums around our perception of reality and reality itself. From there we delve into the topic of nihilism. We give particular mention to the works of philosopher Ray Brassier during this portion of the discussion and Michael goes over some of the basic ideas found in Brassier's Nihil Unbound. From there we delve into Michael's essay "From the Ruins" which deals with Synthetic Zero's interest in the concept of "Post-Nihilism". Michael argues vis-à-vis the philosopher Gianni Vattimo that an emancipatory potential exists within nihilism. Is it possible to find meaning in simply being human rather than searching for meaning in a transcendental narrative like those provided by religion? Is it possible to reach beyond the language games of philosophy and the grips of ideology? Are there new ways of thinking beyond the registers of postmodernism? Can we bridge the gap between theory and praxis? These are just some of the issues we cover during this portion of the conversation. Nick Land From there we delve into Michael's interest in, and harsh critiques of accelerationism. Accelerationism has been a topic we've covered in previous episodes, and has proven a popular topic. Michael has had many interactions with accelerationist thinkers and has become highly critical of them, including the infamous "Shanghai Sith" Nick Land and the meme-loving denizens of U/Acc "Cave Twitter" who advocate for accelerating capitalism to it's endpoint regardless of it's outcome. Michael takes strong issue with these views especially in light of collapse scenarios like climate catastrophe looming in the horizon. We begin wrapping up Part I of the conversation with Michael by delving into the topic of climate catastrophe in light of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report on the topic. Additionally, Michael discusses his background in anthropology, including his research into the Tahltan Nation, and how it relates to his work. We discuss what connects these matters and what the 12 year period the IPPC report gives for dealing with climate change means for the future of humanity.

Dove si parla con ANTONIO MONACO, editore, della nuova rivista Kaizen, rivista trimestrale di natura e cultura, Sonda edizioni, di zero dolore, di canapa, di zucchero, di Neal D. Barnard, di Gianni Vattimo, di Primo Levi, di Quanto tempo ci vuole per morire, di Chiara Caprio, di Animal Equality, di cucina, di bellezza, di Walden Cafè, ma anche di Cena con Relatore al Ristorante Radicetonda con Enrico Ruggeri, medico nutrizionista di Fondazione ANT onlus di assistenza domiciliare oncologica e scopriamo che Antonio avrebbe voluto essere uno Scoiattolo

Dove si parla con ANTONIO MONACO, editore, della nuova rivista Kaizen, rivista trimestrale di natura e cultura, Sonda edizioni, di zero dolore, di canapa, di zucchero, di Neal D. Barnard, di Gianni Vattimo, di Primo Levi, di Quanto tempo ci vuole per morire, di Chiara Caprio, di Animal Equality, di cucina, di bellezza, di Walden Cafè, ma anche di Cena con Relatore al Ristorante Radicetonda con Enrico Ruggeri, medico nutrizionista di Fondazione ANT onlus di assistenza domiciliare oncologica e scopriamo che Antonio avrebbe voluto essere uno Scoiattolo (seconda parte)

Dove si parla con ANTONIO MONACO, editore, della nuova rivista Kaizen, rivista trimestrale di natura e cultura, Sonda edizioni, di zero dolore, di canapa, di zucchero, di Neal D. Barnard, di Gianni Vattimo, di Primo Levi, di Quanto tempo ci vuole per morire, di Chiara Caprio, di Animal Equality, di cucina, di bellezza, di Walden Cafè, ma anche di Cena con Relatore al Ristorante Radicetonda con Enrico Ruggeri, medico nutrizionista di Fondazione ANT onlus di assistenza domiciliare oncologica e scopriamo che Antonio avrebbe voluto essere uno Scoiattolo (seconda parte)

Italien afholder parlamentsvalg d. 4. marts, og kampen står mellem Centrumhøjre og Centrumvenstre med indblanding fra Femstjernebevægelsen, stiftet af komikeren Beppe Grillo. Italien er et land, hvor de personlige særinteresser står højere end det politiske ideal, og det påvirker den måde, der bliver ført politik og tænkt. Italien er et land, hvor familien, mafiaen og den katolske kirke spiller meget store roller og ofte tilsidesætter retsstaten. Og så er det landet, som fostrede Machiavelli, Mussolini og Berlusconi, samt filosoffer som Umberto Eco, Antonio Gramsci, Gianni Vattimo og Giorgio Agamben. Medvirkende: Bernhard Hagen, foredragsholder, lektor emeritus i Historie, Italiensk og Samfundsfag. Gert Sørensen, Seniorforsker på Institut for Engelsk, Germansk og Romansk, Københavns Universitet. Tilrettelægger og vært: Carsten Ortmann.

The present volume is an aftermath of an international convention of philosophers and specialists in social theory, who sought answers to the question of how the idea of solidarity, as it is explored today, might point towards new hopes. Authors of the essays are Shlomo Avineri, John Gray, Ivan Krastev, Scott Lash, Pierre Manent, Peter Sloterdijk, Jadwiga Staniszkis, Gianni Vattimo, Marcin Krol and Jacek Koltan. By organising the meeting and by publishing this collection of essays we want to support the claim that without a broad discussion about the future there is no understanding of the present crisis of culture. To gain a profound insight into new forms of solidarity and trust, we would like to confront the current situation with a variety of historical and global contexts. The conference, organized in 2010 by the European Solidarity Centre and the Erasmus of Rotterdam Department of the University of Warsaw, followed the 30th anniversary of Solidarity trade union movement.

The present volume is an aftermath of an international convention of philosophers and specialists in social theory, who sought answers to the question of how the idea of solidarity, as it is explored today, might point towards new hopes. Authors of the essays are Shlomo Avineri, John Gray, Ivan Krastev, Scott Lash, Pierre Manent, Peter Sloterdijk, Jadwiga Staniszkis, Gianni Vattimo, Marcin Krol and Jacek Koltan. By organising the meeting and by publishing this collection of essays we want to support the claim that without a broad discussion about the future there is no understanding of the present crisis of culture. To gain a profound insight into new forms of solidarity and trust, we would like to confront the current situation with a variety of historical and global contexts. The conference, organized in 2010 by the European Solidarity Centre and the Erasmus of Rotterdam Department of the University of Warsaw, followed the 30th anniversary of Solidarity trade union movement.

con: Gianni Vattimo ordinario di filosofia Università Torino, Luigi Guiso economista Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance, Mario Del Pero docente storia internazionale SciencesPo Paris

Apie Nidoje prasidedantį Tomo Mano festivalį. Vilniaus dailės akademijos absolventų kūryba. Apie scenos meno ir fotografijos įtaigumą. Pokalbis su prancūzų filosofu Bernardu Stiegleriu. Italų filosofas Gianni Vattimo.

Apie Nidoje prasidedantį Tomo Mano festivalį. Vilniaus dailės akademijos absolventų kūryba. Apie scenos meno ir fotografijos įtaigumą. Pokalbis su prancūzų filosofu Bernardu Stiegleriu. Italų filosofas Gianni Vattimo.

Father Frizzell interviews Father Thomas G. Guarino, Professor of Systematic Theology in the Immaculate Conception Seminary at Seton Hall University, about his book, Vattimo & Theology, which is about the Post-Modern Italian Philosopher, Gianni Vattimo.

Weiter geht es mit den Impulsen vom EmergingCamp der Initiative Nord in Bremen: “Tobias Künkler beschrieb dann im Anschluss an Gianni Vattimo unsere Zeit als ‘Zeitalter der Interpretation’, wobei die Interpretation wie ein Virus alles infiziere, womit es in Berührung komme. Eindrücklich sein Bericht über ein … Weiterlesen