Podcasts about Habermas

Der Klügere gibt nach? - von Udo Hahn

Almanya'da Hıristiyan Demokrat Birliği'nin lideri Friedrich Merz'in, seçimleri önde tamamladıktan sonra yaptığı ilk açıklamalardan biri İsrail'le ilişkiler hakkındaydı. Merz, bu açıklamayla savaş suçlusu Netanyahu hakkında Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi (UCM) tarafından çıkarılan tutuklama emrini tanımayacağını bütün dünyaya bildirmiş oldu. Merz'in sözü şu şekilde: “Bir İsrail başbakanının Almanya'yı ziyaret edemeyeceği fikrinin tamamen saçma olduğunu düşünüyorum.” Almanya özellikle 7 Ekim 2023'ten sonra soykırım suçlamalarına rağmen bütün dünyaya meydan okurcasına İsrail'e destek vermişti. Ne yazık ki bu tutum İsrail'in ve elbette ABD-İngiltere'nin kolonyal yayılmacılık faaliyetlerine fiilen katılmak anlamına geliyordu. Almanya, İsrail'i birçok yönden desteklemişti. Hatta savaş teknolojisinin geliştirilmesi amacıyla Filistin'i bir laboratuvar olarak gördüklerini de beyan etmişlerdi. Almanya'nın bu açık tutumu özellikle Jürgen Habermas gibi dünyaca meşhur entelektüeller tarafından da desteklenmişti. Bu sebeple Merz'in uluslararası hukuku çiğneyeceği anlamına gelen sözleri şaşkınlığa meydan vermedi.

Jürgen Habermas - deliberativ demokrati, Den moraliska synpunkten, Moral consciousness and communicative actionImmanuel Kant - Kategoriska imperativetJonathan Haidt - moraliska intuitionerMercier and Sperberhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/abs/why-do-humans-reason-arguments-for-an-argumentative-theory/53E3F3180014E80E8BE9FB7A2DD44049Frederic Laloux - Reinventing organizationsRobert Kegan - Deliberately Developmental OrganizationsBrené Brown - Power of vulnerabilityElon MuskAndlighet på olika plattformarEngelska kanalen: https://www.youtube.com/@EverythingisSpiritualityYoutube: https://www.youtube.com/@andlighetApple podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/se/podcast/andlighet/id1603002647?l=enSpotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5CIB4x6sOyceoxShQvnKpZ?si=Hyo1wvOqTqCIKj5-BIXowQAndlighet, spiritualitet, sanning, ärlighet, kärlek, zen, advaita vedanta, ickedualitet, nonduality, enhet, Ramana Maharshi, Nisargadatta Maharaj, Eckart Tolle, Rumi, psykologi, Ken Wilber, flow, flöde, varande, sådanhet, upplysning, uppvaknande, moksha, teosis, nirvana, fanaa, kensho, satori, kristen mystik, Jesus, sufism, kabbalah, daoism, vetenskap, medvetandet

Piše Marija Švajncer, bereta Sanja Rejc in Renato Horvat. Joseph Heath je, kot je navedeno na zadnji platnici, kanadski filozof in predavatelj na Univerzi v Torontu. V času študija sta bila njegova mentorja znana filozofa Charles Taylor in Jürgen Habermas. Raziskovalno se ukvarja s politično in moralno filozofijo, kritično družbeno teorijo in ekonomskimi vedami. Objavil je vrsto odmevnih knjig, za delo Razsvetljenstvo 2.0 je leta 2014 prejel kanadsko nagrado za politično pisanje Shaughnessy Cohen. Elizabeth Shaughnessy Cohen, po kateri se nagrada imenuje, je bila kanadska liberalna političarka. Joseph Heath je knjigo posvetil filozofu Andrewu Potterju. Pisanja sta se namreč lotila skupaj, kaj kmalu pa je sodelavec dobil drugo nalogo in postal odgovorni urednik časnika Ottawa Citizen. Heathu torej ni preostalo nič drugega, kot da je načrt uresničil sam. V knjigi predstavlja program za drugo razsvetljenstvo ali razsvetljenstvo 2.0. Oznaka 2.0 se nanaša na splet. Uvedli so jo leta 2003, opisuje pa številne pomembne spremembe v razvoju medmrežja. Heath jo v naslovu navaja zato, ker pomeni premik, ki bi ga rad priporočil pri razmišljanju o racionalnosti. Pri tem pojasnjuje, zakaj je razum nepogrešljiv, kako se je izoblikovalo okolje iracionalizma in kaj bi bilo treba še storiti. Vse skupaj se začne s kritiko ameriške politike, sčasoma pa pisec namenja čedalje več pozornosti delovanju, učinku in zmožnostim tako razuma kot tudi intuicije, se pravi racionalnim in iracionalnim postopkom. Že res, da je razsvetljenstvo zanj prizadevanje, ki pomeni velik izziv, toda dvomi tako o razumu kot tudi o intuitivnih in čustvenih vidikih. Naslanja se na spoznanja psihologije in v nasprotju s kakim Kantom enači izraza razum in um. Pojem razuma se, kot pravi, tradicionalno nanaša na posebno duševno sposobnost, ki je povezana s prepoznavnim načinom razmišljanja. Posebna lastnost razumskega mišljenja je, da ga je mogoče skoraj v celoti izraziti ter navajati argumentacijo in utemeljevanje. Intuitivne presoje pa povedo tisto, kar bi bilo mogoče imeti za rezultate kognitivnih procesov. Intuicija je koristna pri razmišljanju o resničnem svetu in odzivanju nanj, medtem ko razmišljanje o možnem svetu in tudi negaciji resničnega sveta zahteva uporabo racionalnega dela možganov. Razum sklepa tudi hipotetično. Morda bi si celo zastavili vprašanje, ali je Razsvetljenstvo 2.0 sploh knjiga s filozofsko vsebino. Pisec namenja veliko besed človekovemu ravnanju, njegovim zmotam, sprenevedanju in odzivanju na delovanje v skupini. Heath je sicer velik poznavalec filozofije, omenja kar nekaj filozofov, med njimi Aristotela, Nietzscheja, Heideggerja in Marxa ter tudi utemeljitelja psihoanalize Freuda, toda svoja poglavitna spoznanja podkrepi s številnimi slikovitimi primeri iz javnega življenja, politike, medijev in gospodarstva. Naslanja se na sodobno psihologijo in navaja njeno novejšo terminologijo, saj je prav psihologija pokazala, da je nekatere probleme mogoče rešiti samo z razumom. Čeprav razum ni popoln, nam ne preostane drugega, kot da delamo s tem, kar imamo. Od njega je odvisna civilizacija. Najbolj očitne slabosti razuma naj bi bile v tem, da je počasen in zato zahteva veliko napora, trpi pa tudi zaradi omejene pozornosti, ozkega delovnega spomina in nezanesljivega dolgoročnega spomina. Vse skupaj dobi tudi politične razsežnosti. Težava ni v tem, da je levica zamudila svojo priložnost in bila neartikulirana ali da so bili njeni voditelji strahopetni, temveč je razlog pravzaprav temeljna asimetrija med desnico in levico, torej nesomernost, ki se v takšnih časih izrazi. Heath poudarja, da je prav to osrednja trditev njegove knjige. Progresivne družbene spremembe so že po naravi zapletene, težko dosegljive in zahtevajo kompromis, zaupanje in kolektivno delovanje. Zato jih ni mogoče doseči samo s »srcem« – zanje potrebujemo tudi veliko »glave«. Avtor je ironičen in tudi duhovit. Priznava, da je racionalno razmišljanje težavno in se mu ljudje radi izognejo. Razum ni naraven, temveč je, prav nasprotno, globoko nenaraven. Hkrati je edina stvar, ki nam omogoča, da se izvijemo iz prisilnega jopiča animalističnih umov. Joseph Heath je kdaj pa kdaj tudi oseben. Predstavi se kot univerzitetni profesor na oddelku za filozofijo, pred tem je študiral in poučeval logiko, analizo argumentacije in teorijo verjetnosti. Po značaju je nekoliko racionalističen. Otroci so ga v tretjem razredu začeli klicati »gospod Spock«. Benjamin Spock je bil pediater, ki je spodbujal bolj strpno vzgojo otrok. Knjiga Razsvetljenstvo 2.0 je zakladnica idej in kopičenje domiselno izbranih primerov. Avtor sega na različna področja in je izvedenec v kognitivni znanosti. S številnimi opombami, v katerih navaja različne vire, od knjižnih do spletnih, širi vednost o predmetu svoje knjige. Pomembno je zavedanje, predlaga, da racionalnost ni niz pravil, ki bi bila vsiljena od zgoraj, temveč je temelj človekove svobode in avtonomije. Prav dobro ve, kako je »iracionalna desnica« doživela velik volilni uspeh, toda prijatelji in zavezniki razsvetljenstva, med katere se uvršča tudi sam, morajo spremeniti svojo taktiko in poskusiti znova. Racionalno politiko bo omogočilo kolektivno delovanje. Ideal je svet, v katerem si skupaj prizadevamo ustvariti okolja, ki nas delajo pametnejše, namesto okolij, ki nas delajo neumnejše, ne le s predmeti, ki jih upravljamo, temveč tudi z institucijami, s katerimi sodelujemo. Heath verjame, da se je k zdravemu svetu mogoče pomikati z majhnimi koraki, zato na koncu ponudi tako imenovani manifest počasne politike. Avtorica poglobljene spremne besede slovenska sociologinja Ksenija Vidmar Horvat Josepha Heatha uvršča na seznam avtorjev, ki obujajo idejo razsvetljenstva in pozivajo k razumu. Pogosto so na nasprotnih bregovih, za razum in proti njemu, Heath pa je tisti, je prepričana, ki o razsvetljenstvu nima vselej najboljšega mnenja in razsvetljenstvu očita predvsem njegovo individualističnost in ošaben odnos do tradicije. Ksenija Vidmar Horvat meni, da Heathovo delo kljub temu prinaša pomembno razsvetljenje glede razsvetljenstva samega. Poudarja, da je treba v načrt obnove razuma vključiti tudi politiko čustev, in med drugim zapiše: »Vsesplošna krepitev kulture zasmehovanja na eni strani in vzpon brezsramne politične kulture na drugi strani sta resno opozorilo o omejitvah, ki jih ima na razum oprt razsvetljenski projekt v našem stoletju.«

Nancy Fraser discusses her understanding of capitalism as an integrated social order and explores its implications for envisioning a desirable postcapitalism.   --- If you are interested in democratic economic planning, these resources might be of help: Democratic planning – an information website https://www.democratic-planning.com/ Sorg, C. & Groos, J. (eds.)(2025). Rethinking Economic Planning. Competition & Change Special Issue Volume 29 Issue 1. https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/ccha/29/1   Groos, J. & Sorg, C. (2025). Creative Construction - Democratic Planning in the 21st Century and Beyond. Bristol University Press. https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/creative-construction International Network for Democratic Economic Planning https://www.indep.network/ Democratic Planning Research Platform: https://www.planningresearch.net/ Democratic Planning Forum: https://forum.democratic-planning.com/ --- Shownotes Remarque Institute https://as.nyu.edu/research-centers/remarque.html Nancy Fraser at The New School for Social Research: https://www.newschool.edu/nssr/faculty/nancy-fraser/ Fraser, N. (2023). Cannibal Capitalism: How our System is Devouring Democracy, Care, and the Planet and What We Can Do About It. Verso Books. https://www.versobooks.com/products/2685-cannibal-capitalism?srsltid=AfmBOopHZ8reXaCDUToeZsbdoTqnXb-wbejQdYin2J_bsa9tAu36oQCQ Ivkovic, M., & Zaric, Z. (2024). Nancy Fraser and Politics. Edinburgh University Press. https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-nancy-fraser-and-politics.html Fraser, N., & Jaeggi, R. (2023). Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory. Verso Books. https://www.versobooks.com/products/2867-capitalism Fraser, N. (2022) Benjamin Lecture 3 – Class beyond Class (Video) https://youtu.be/jf6laSf6Eko?si=iWL-Za4pPPwF0xvb on social differentiation as discussed in sociology: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differentiation_(sociology) Rodney, W. (2018). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Verso Books. https://www.versobooks.com/products/788-how-europe-underdeveloped-africa?srsltid=AfmBOoqKZ6g4j8UpPJD6qC5yEmKuP0h6sFTvcEX5qjBF7CtPSzedUtcP on Marx's account of surplus value: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surplus_value Robaszkiewicz, M. & Weinman, M. (2023) Hannah Arendt and Politics. Edinburgh University Press. https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-hannah-arendt-and-politics.html Vančura, M. (2011) Polanyi's Great Transformation and the concept of the embedded economoy. IES Occasional Paper No. 2/2011 https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/83289/1/668400315.pdf Elson, D. (2015). Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism. Verso Books. https://www.versobooks.com/products/159-value?srsltid=AfmBOooSko5DiXwMNN2NjSay4BP4n9cM-4y53r7G90VPbvE6itl5rxKT Robertson, J. (2017) The Life and Death of Yugoslav Socialism. Jacobin. https://jacobin.com/2017/07/yugoslav-socialism-tito-self-management-serbia-balkans Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital. Verso Books. https://www.versobooks.com/products/74-capitalism-in-the-web-of-life Patel, R., & Moore, J. W. (2018). A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things: A Guide to Capitalism, Nature, and the Future of the Planet. Verso Books. https://www.versobooks.com/products/817-a-history-of-the-world-in-seven-cheap-things?srsltid=AfmBOoqMnr0nAUfdHOxlQPTXsnGfQtMkDKgFtJsMQ3mtk7Jcyd3Wjqko Brand, U., & Wissen, M. (2021). The Imperial Mode of Living: Everyday Life and the Ecological Crisis of Capitalism. Verso Books. https://www.versobooks.com/products/916-the-imperial-mode-of-living?srsltid=AfmBOopUs15MsSgvJ7TRVfwmo330sHvjQIAST_UymD-90i3VIfCw6vg8 Bates, T. R. (1975) Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony. Journal of the History of Ideas Vol. 36 No. 2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2708933 Bois, W. E. B. Du. (1935). Black Reconstruction. An Essay toward a History of the Part which Black Folk played in the Attempt to Reconstruct Democracy in America, 1860-1880. Harcourt, Brace and Company. https://cominsitu.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/w-e-b-du-bois-black-reconstruction-an-essay-toward-a-history-of-the-part-which-black-folk-played-in-the-attempt-to-reconstruct-democracy-2.pdf Trotsky, L. (1938) The Transitional Program. Bulletin of the Opposition. https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1938/tp/ Morris, W. (1890) News from Nowhere. Commonweal. https://www.marxists.org/archive/morris/works/1890/nowhere/nowhere.htm Hayek, F. A. von. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review, 35(4). https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/articles/hayek-use-knowledge-society.pdf Schliesser, E. (2020) On Foucault on 17 January 1979 On the Market's Role (as site) of Veridiction (III) Digressions & Impressions Blog. https://digressionsnimpressions.typepad.com/digressionsimpressions/2020/06/on-foucault-on-17-january-1979-on-the-markets-role-as-site-of-veridiction-iii.html Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1978-1979. Palgrave Macmillan. https://1000littlehammers.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/birth_of_biopolitics.pdf Marx, K. (1973) Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Penguin. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/grundrisse.pdf on Bernard Mandeville and “Private Vice, Public Virtue”: https://iep.utm.edu/mandevil/ Kaufmann, F. (1959) John Dewey's Theory of Inquiry. The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 56, No. 21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2022592 on Habermas: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/habermas/ on “Neurath's boat”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurath%27s_boat   Future Histories Episodes on Related Topics S03E24 | Grace Blakeley on Capitalist Planning and its Alternatives https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e24-grace-blakeley-on-capitalist-planning-and-its-alternatives/ S03E19 | Wendy Brown on Socialist Governmentality https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e19-wendy-brown-on-socialist-governmentality/ S03E04 | Tim Platenkamp on Republican Socialism, General Planning and Parametric Control https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e04-tim-platenkamp-on-republican-socialism-general-planning-and-parametric-control/ S03E03 | Planning for Entropy on Sociometabolic Planning https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e03-planning-for-entropy-on-sociometabolic-planning/ S03E02 | George Monbiot on Public Luxury https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e02-george-monbiot-on-public-luxury/ S02E51 | Silvia Federici on Progress, Reproduction and Commoning https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e51-silvia-federici-on-progress-reproduction-and-commoning/ S02E33 | Pat Devine on Negotiated Coordination https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e33-pat-devine-on-negotiated-coordination/ S03E23 | Andreas Malm on Overshooting into Climate Breakdown https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e23-andreas-malm-on-overshooting-into-climate-breakdown/   Future Histories Contact & Support If you like Future Histories, please consider supporting us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/join/FutureHistories Contact: office@futurehistories.today Twitter: https://twitter.com/FutureHpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/futurehpodcast/ Mastodon: https://mstdn.social/@FutureHistories English webpage: https://futurehistories-international.com Episode Keywords #NancyFraser, #JanGroos, #Podcast, #Socialism, #PostCapitalism, #Capitalism, #MarketPower, #Markets, #EconomicDemocracy, #PatDevine, #WorkingClass, #WelfareState, #CriticalTheory, #Markets, #Veridiction, #Foucault, #Governmentality, #Care, #CareWork, #Labour, #Labor, #Race, #Imperialism, #DemocraticPlanning, #EconomicPlanning, #SocialReproduction, #PostcapitalistReproduction, #Ecology, #FutureHistoriesInternational, #Boundaries, #CannibalCapitalism, #Socialism  

Nesse último Filosorreia de 2024 falaremos sobre Habermas, pensador que nos ensina como valorizar a razão.

Look at what Santa dropped when he came down the chimney last night. A bunch of valuable ThisISResearch Best paper Awards! As we do at the end of every year, we look back at the finest information systems scholarship our field has produced this year, and we pick some of our favorite papers that we want to give an award too. Like in previous years, we recognize three different kinds of best papers – a paper that is innovative in its use of research methods, a paper that is a fine example of elegant scholarship, and a paper that is trailblazing in the sense that it starts new conversations in our field. References Pujol Priego, L., & Wareham, J. (2023). From Bits to Atoms: White Rabbit at CERN. MIS Quarterly, 47(2), 639-668. Recker, J., Zeiss, R., & Mueller, M. (2024). iRepair or I Repair? A Dialectical Process Analysis of Control Enactment on the iPhone Repair Aftermarket. MIS Quarterly, 48(1), 321-346. Seidel, S., Frick, C. J., & vom Brocke, J. (2025). Regulating Emerging Technologies: Prospective Sensemaking through Abstraction and Elaboration. MIS Quarterly, 49, . Abbasi, A., Somanchi, S., & Kelley, K. (2025). The Critical Challenge of using Large-scale Digital Experiment Platforms for Scientific Discovery. MIS Quarterly, 49, . Lindberg, A., Schecter, A., Berente, N., Hennel, P., & Lyytinen, K. (2024). The Entrainment of Task Allocation and Release Cycles in Open Source Software Development. MIS Quarterly, 48(1), 67-94. Kitchens, B., Claggett, J. L., & Abbasi, A. (2024). Timely, Granular, and Actionable: Designing a Social Listening Platform for Public Health 3.0. MIS Quarterly, 48(3), 899-930. Chen, Z., & Chan, J. (2024). Large Language Model in Creative Work: The Role of Collaboration Modality and User Expertise. Management Science, 70(12), 9101-9117. Matherly, T., & Greenwood, B. N. (2024). No News is Bad News: The Internet, Corruption, and the Decline of the Fourth Estate. MIS Quarterly, 48(2), 699-714. Morse, L., Teodorescu, M., Awwad, Y., & Kane, G. C. (2022). Do the Ends Justify the Means? Variation in the Distributive and Procedural Fairness of Machine Learning Algorithms. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(4), 1083-1095. Hansen, S., Berente, N., & Lyytinen, K. (2009). Wikipedia, Critical Social Theory, and the Possibility of Rational Discourse. The Information Society, 25(1), 38-59. Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Heinemann.   

Piše Majda Travnik Vode, bere Igor Velše. Milan Knep, trenutno tajnik Škofijskega katehetskega urada pri ljubljanski nadškofiji, je leta 2020 po več kot štiridesetih letih raznovrstnega duhovniškega delovanja in potem ko je svoja razmišljanja objavljal v različnih medijih – tudi v oddaji Duhovna misel na Prvem programu Radia Slovenija – izdal knjižni prvenec Eseji o križu letos pa so jim sledili še Eseji o vstajenju. Kot v spremni besedi piše Tadej Rifel, sta po avtorjevih besedah kljub nekajletnemu časovnemu razmiku »zbirki dopolnjujoči, kajti krščansko oznanilo je celota le, če se križ nadaljuje z vstajenjem.« Poleg vsebine, ki jo avtor umešča nekoliko stran od prevladujočega družbenega in kulturnega diskurza, ki ga po njegovem mnenju zaznamujeta odsotnost metafizičnega in tragični svetovni nazor, je zanimivo tudi formalno ozadje dvainpetdesetih esejev v zbirki, ki jih je avtor večinoma izpeljal iz specifične žanrske oblike – katoliške pridige ali homilije. Za prvo in hkrati najznamenitejšo pridigo v zgodovini velja Jezusov govor na gori blizu Galilejskega jezera, vendar gre tudi sicer za zelo staro polliterarno obliko, v katero je pravzaprav že od začetka vtisnjen esejistični format – kljub temu, da je pridiga namenjena širšemu občinstvu, esej pa velja za poudarjeno intimno oziroma zasebno zvrst. Pridiga je tudi drugi, najbolj znani brižinski spomenik (z znamenitim začetkom: Če bi naš ded ne grešil…), ki velja za izvrsten primer srednjeveške retorike. V Evropi pa so najbrž najbolj prepoznavne in še danes pomembne pridige Mojstra Eckharta s konca 13. in začetka 14. stoletja, ki se prav tako zlahka berejo kot vrhunski eseji. Knepovi Eseji o vstajenju vznikajo iz volje po preseganju običajnega tragičnega obzorja pričakovanja, kamor se po avtorjevih besedah vpisuje velika večina novoveške in sodobne umetnosti, filozofije in kulture – in sicer z obratom v krščansko oziroma biblično izročilo. Kot lahko opazujemo, je krščanstvo tako v Evropi kot pri nas že dolgo v zatonu, pri čemer ne gre samo za afere, ki usodno pretresajo cerkvene strukture, ampak – kot lahko na primer beremo v pred kratkim izdanem brezkompromisnem, razgaljajočem eseju Chantal Delsol –, za konec krščanske civilizacije kot take. Kljub vtisu skorajšnjega pogorišča pa lahko vidimo tudi, da v krščanstvu še vedno vztraja veliko vernikov in duhovnikov ¬– morda tudi zaradi Jezusove obljube, da bo s svojo Cerkvijo ostal do konca sveta. Tako tudi Knep, čeprav si ne zatiska oči pred stvarnostjo, v svoja nazorsko, duhovno, psihološko in filozofsko izjemno široko zarisana besedila ne pripušča malodušja. Njegovi eseji – kratki, a od začetka do konca izpeljani v žlahtni filozofski maniri in retorično brezhibni – odpirajo probleme in jih s pomočjo Svetega pisma dialektično razrešujejo in zapirajo, pri čemer ima vselej zadnjo besedo nekaj, kar je že zdavnaj izginilo iz moderne filozofije – duh oziroma presežno. Čeprav je bila, kot v enem svojih zadnjih intervjujev skorajda presenečeno ugotavlja Jürgen Habermas, filozofija dolgo skoraj istovetna s teologijo, se je ta povezava že davno izgubila – morda je bila ravno ta metamorfoza eden od zgodnjih znanilcev zatona krščanske civilizacije. In na čem sloni sodobna filozofija, če se ne sprašuje več o absolutni resnici, biti, poslednjih rečeh, telosu? Alain Badiou v spisu Manifest za filozofijo iz leta 1989, razbere in nato brez sence dvoma – kot rečeno, gre za manifest –, ugotovi, da je sodobna filozofija pogojena s štirimi »generičnimi postopki resnice«: politiko, znanostjo, umetnostjo in ljubeznijo. Čeprav zadnji pojem, ljubezen, na videz dopušča večsmerne interpretacije, med njimi na nobeni instanci ni predvidena konkretna transcendenca, kakršno je nekdaj predstavljal krščanski Bog. Zaradi tega in neštevilnih drugih podobnih dogodkov se zdi krščanska filozofija stvar preteklosti. Vendar nas ravno besedila, kakršna so Knepovi eseji, drobna, a prepričana, argumentirana in nagovarjajoča, prisilijo, da se vprašamo, ali je res tako? Knep, ki se je v duhovniški karieri največ ukvarjal z mladinsko in zakonsko pastoralo, namreč s pomočjo svojih svetopisemskih navdihovalcev, prerokov Izaija, Jeremija, Siraha in apostolov Pavla, Janeza in Jezusa, vsakič znova ubesedi katerega od ključnih problemov zdajšnjosti; bodisi smrt in naš odnos do nje, odmiranje življenjskega smisla, vzgojo otrok in medgeneracijske odnose bodisi družbeno stvarnost. Osvetljuje jih iz perspektive slehernika, v katerega se vsakič znova postavi, nato pa tematiko sistematično razčleni in obdela iz vseh običajnih zornih kotov – le da na koncu iz široko razgrnjenih aporij ne izide kot tragični poraženec, ampak kot zmagovalec. Njegova besedila tako res postanejo eseji o vstajenju – seveda le, če sprejmemo njihovo krščansko logiko. To, kar Knepu daje odločilno prednost, je namreč za marsikoga nezamisljivo, saj avtor svoje razpravljanje vsakič znova subtilno privede do točke nič oziroma do točke, kjer je potrebna totalna odpoved razumu in predaja štafete duhu. Ravno tu je kleč: potem ko je ob nekem problemu v razpravo kompetentno pritegnil in obdelal na primer Hegla, Spinozo, Fichteja, Platona ali katerega od principov sodobne psihologije ali psihoterapije, na koncu vso skrbno predstavljeno argumentacijo izpusti in se vrže v prazno, saj iskreno verjame, da bo tako storil največ in najhitreje. Da je predaja duhu kraljevska pot do rešitve. Čeprav je zbirka Eseji o vstajenju kristocentrična in je njeno gravitacijsko jedro Kristusovo odrešenjsko poslanstvo, se poleg Kristusa avtorjev največji zgled zdi apostol Pavel s svojim neutrudnim evangelizatorskim žarom. Pravzaprav so katoliški duhovniki danes v podobnem položaju, kot je bil nekoč Pavel: Kristusa oznanjajo v skorajda povsem poganskem svetu. S svojimi esejističnimi razmišljanji Milan Knep to počne samozavestno in zavezujoče.

Another week, another German philosopher. This time, Steven Klein joins us to discuss the ideas and legacy of one Jürgen Habermas. We talk about his evolution alongside and away from the Frankfurt School, the enlightenment project at the core of his work, and why a critical theory born in crisis is a different animal than a critical theory born under conditions of relative capitalist stability. Love him or not, we can't deny that Habermas is a giant of modern European philosophy. Shout out to the Habermaniacs. leftofphilosophy.com | stevenmklein.comReferences:Jürgen Habermas, “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article,” trans. Sara Lennox and Frank Lennox, New German Critique  (3)(1974): 49-55. Original published in 1964.Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests, trans. Jeremy J. Shapiro (Beacon Press, 1971). Original German published in 1968. Jürgen Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, trans. Thomas McCarthy (Beacon Press, 1987).Steven Klein, The Work of Politics: Making a Democratic Welfare State (Cambridge University Press, 2020). Music:“Vintage Memories” by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com“My Space” by Overu | https://get.slip.stream/KqmvAN

Wenn Menschen „Eigentum“ haben, dann dürfen sie darüber bestimmen, was mit diesem Eigentum passiert (siehe letzte Episode). Aber warum darf überhaupt irgend jemand Eigentum haben? Angenommen, wir stranden auf einer unberührten Insel – wem gehört dann alles das, was auf dieser Insel ist? Wer darf darüber bestimmen? Alle gleichzeitig? Oder niemand? Mit dieser Frage hat sich John Locke ausführlich beschäftigt. In der heutigen Episode stelle ich seine Konzeption der ursprünglichen Aneignung vor. Wir betrachten die einzelnen Schritte von Lockes Argumentation und ordnen dieses Konzept nachher kritisch ein. Außerdem geht es um Tomatensaft. Literatur: John Locke, Zwei Abhandlungen über die Regierung, Frankfurt/M. 1977 Walter Euchner: John Locke zur Einführung, Hamburg 2011 Andreas Eckl und Bernd Ludwig (Hrsg.), Was ist Eigentum? Philosophische Positionen von Platon bis Habermas, München 2005 Robert Nozick, Anarchie, Staat, Utopia, München 2011

This week on the podcast, CrossExamined board member Dan Hodges sits down with New Testament scholar and resurrection expert, Dr. Gary Habermas, for an in-depth exploration of the Shroud of Turin. In their discussion, Dan and Dr. Habermas examine the complex history and preservation of the Shroud, digging into why it has captivated both scholars and skeptics for decades. Together, they'll tackle questions such as:What are the most crucial questions for assessing the Shroud's authenticity?Could the burial cloth of Jesus truly have survived for nearly 2,000 years?What evidence supports or refutes the theory that the Shroud was created in the Middle Ages? Could it depict someone other than Jesus?How do non-biblical sources, archaeology, and medical research contribute to our understanding of crucifixion practices?What kind of event could have imprinted the image of a 6 ft., 180 lb. man on this ancient cloth? As Dr. Habermas unpacks over 40 years of Shroud research, discover why this remarkable artifact continues to be a point of discussion in Christian apologetics and Church history.Resources mentioned during the episode:Gary's website: https://garyhabermas.com/On the Resurrection, Volume 1 (Evidences) : https://a.co/d/1iufB8jOn the Resurrection, Volume 2 (Refutations): https://a.co/d/8O4Yc78

Do you prefer multistory episodes, single story episodes, or a mix? Let us know! In this episode of Discover Daily, we begin with Google DeepMind's Habermas Machine, an AI-driven mediation tool designed to help groups find consensus on divisive topics. By analyzing individual opinions and generating balanced group statements, the Habermas Machine has shown promising results in increasing agreement and facilitating more productive discussions.Next, we delve into the exciting revival of Scout Motors, a Volkswagen spinoff that has unveiled its first electric vehicles in over four decades. The Terra pickup truck and Traveler SUV blend iconic American design with cutting-edge electric technology, featuring impressive off-road capabilities, high-performance specs, and innovative features like the optional "Harvester" range-extender system.Finally, Alex and Sienna explore a groundbreaking discovery in neuroscience - the confirmation of a waste-clearance system in living human brains. Researchers at Oregon Health & Science University have visualized the glymphatic system, which uses cerebrospinal fluid to flush out toxic proteins associated with neurodegenerative diseases. This discovery opens up new possibilities for understanding and potentially treating conditions like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, emphasizing the crucial role of sleep in maintaining brain health.From Perplexity's Discover Feed:https://www.perplexity.ai/page/deepminds-habermas-machine-B2rpSbXeTTmofdFV1qglsAhttps://www.perplexity.ai/page/scout-motors-ev-revival-.rLLLgAiQSaAc1jcsv_.WAhttps://www.perplexity.ai/page/brain-s-waste-clearance-system-5c5Tl5l0RLqAtaWdtP3SCAPerplexity is the fastest and most powerful way to search the web. Perplexity crawls the web and curates the most relevant and up-to-date sources (from academic papers to Reddit threads) to create the perfect response to any question or topic you're interested in. Take the world's knowledge with you anywhere. Available on iOS and Android Join our growing Discord community for the latest updates and exclusive content. Follow us on: Instagram Threads X (Twitter) YouTube Linkedin

En el episodio de hoy de "10 Minutos con Sami", exploramos tres desarrollos cruciales en el mundo de la Inteligencia Artificial. Comenzamos analizando el nuevo memorando de seguridad nacional de Biden sobre IA, que establece directrices fundamentales para las agencias de seguridad estadounidenses. Continuamos con la ambiciosa iniciativa "Oxygen" de Andreessen Horowitz, que planea reunir más de 20.000 GPUs para impulsar startups de IA, y finalizamos con la fascinante "Máquina Habermas" de Google DeepMind, una herramienta de mediación que promete revolucionar el diálogo y el consenso grupal. Estas tres noticias reflejan la creciente importancia de la IA en diferentes aspectos de nuestra sociedad: desde la seguridad nacional hasta el emprendimiento tecnológico y la resolución de conflictos. El episodio destaca cómo la tecnología está transformando nuestra manera de abordar desafíos complejos, mientras plantea importantes consideraciones sobre seguridad, acceso a recursos y mediación digital. Fuentes: https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2024/10/white-house-signs-national-security-memo-ai/400512/, https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/white-house-ai-national-security/, https://news.futunn.com/en/post/44797902/providing-oxygen-to-start-ups-celebrity-venture-capitalists-stock-up, https://www.therundown.ai/p/a16z-ai-chip-power-play, https://euroweeklynews.com/2024/10/18/ai-mediation-tool-could-it-bridge-gaps-in-conflicting-europe/

What if trustworthiness was the key to unlocking a deeper understanding of faith? Join us as we engage with Dr. Ben Shaw, the author of "Trustworthy: 13 Arguments for the Reliability of the New Testament," who shares his fascinating journey from a curious child passionate about ice hockey to a devoted follower of Christ. Through Ben's unique path, we uncover the profound connection between faith and scholarship, and his insights will inspire patience and hope for those navigating their spiritual journeys. This episode highlights Ben's dedication to making complex theological ideas accessible and relevant to everyone, emphasizing the cultivation of an informed spirituality.Our conversation traverses the landscape of faith, curiosity, and understanding life's bigger questions. We discuss the challenges and reflections that come with aging, the role of curiosity in personal growth, and the significance of questioning in the pursuit of truth. Ben shares his academic journey, including his work with Dr. Habermas, shedding light on how to balance a career in business and teaching while effectively communicating religious beliefs. We also delve into the historical and cultural significance of ancient creeds, emphasizing their importance in preserving early Christian traditions.Everyday believers play a crucial role in this narrative. We explore the importance of apologetics and discipleship in providing a strong foundation for faith, addressing the gap in spiritual education within some churches. Through compelling stories and practical advice, we discuss the necessity of engaging deeply with scripture and fostering environments where believers can grow in understanding and confidently articulate their faith. Whether you're rekindling your passion for daily Bible study or seeking meaningful, thought-provoking content, this episode provides the tools and inspiration for a vibrant spiritual journey.Support the showBegin Your Heartlifter's Journey: Visit and subscribe to Heartlift Central on Substack. This is our new online coaching center and meeting place for Heartlifters worldwide. Meet me on Instagram: @janellrardon Leave a review and rate the podcast: WRITE A REVIEW Learn more about my books and work: Janell Rardon Make a tax-deductible donation through Heartlift International Learn more about Young Living Therapeutic-Grade Essential Oils and the Aroma Freedom Technique: HEALINGFROMTRAUMA

¡Vótame en los Premios iVoox 2024! En la filosofía del Siglo XXI existen temas candentes que se abordan a muy diferentes niveles y que alcanzan sin duda también a la calle y a los medios. Hoy en nuestra serie sobre la historia de la filosofía nos detenemos en dos de ellos y a los autores que nos arrojan luz para ayudarnos en la reflexión sobre ellos. Junto a Francisco J. García analizamos, dentro de la filosofía política, el estado de la cuestión sobre cómo nos planteamos la democracia y nuestra relación con ella, quizá en plena crisis en especial en Occidente, para lo que tocaremos autores como Habermas o Richard Rorty. Y también el feminismo, una corriente de reflexión que nos hace replantearnos muchas cosas determinantes en nuestra sociedad, un asunto para el que nos apoyaremos en la importante filósofa feminista Judith Butler y en la teoría queer. Enlace a la serie completa sobre filosofía: https://go.ivoox.com/bk/10369731 El Abrazo del Oso 29x06 Guion: Francisco J. García Dirección y producción: Eduardo Moreno Navarro Accede a más contenidos extra y haz posible la producción de El Abrazo del Oso pinchando en el botón 'apoyar' aquí en iVoox. O pásate por www.patreon.com/elabrazodeloso ¡GRACIAS! www.eabrazodeloso.es Sintonía de inicio y cierre: Navegantes del tiempo de José Apolo iVoox: https://go.ivoox.com/sq/3737 Programa publicado originalmente el 20 de octubre de 2024. Camisetas, bolsas, tazas: www.latostadora.com/elabrazodeloso Canal de Telegram para estar informado: https://t.me/+T6RxUKg_xhk0NzE0 Grupo abierto de Telegram para conversar con el equipo y la audiencia: https://t.me/+tBHrUSWNbZswNThk Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/elabrazodeloso ¿Quieres patrocinar este podcast?: https://advoices.com/el-abrazo-del-oso-podcast Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

Köhler, Michael www.deutschlandfunk.de, Büchermarkt

Karches, Nora www.deutschlandfunk.de, Büchermarkt

Gary Habermas has spent a lifetime studying the resurrection of Jesus and asking: did Jesus truly rise from the dead? He just published volume two in a four-volume series on the resurrection published by Broadman & Holman. Dr. Habermas will deliver the fourth annual John Warwick Montgomery lecture in Evidential and Legal Apologetics at the Lanier Theological Library on Saturday, November 9, 2024. In this podcast, he joins David Capes to preview the lecture on the iconic campus. Join us for the lecture, either in person or online. The Stone Chapel Podcast is part of the ChurchLeaders Podcast Network. For a transcript of this episode click here:  To listen to previous episodes of “The Stone Chapel Podcast” click here. This podcast is about 20 minutes in length.

Ausnahmsweise mal ein Wutmachpodcast. Immer lauter, gemeiner, unversöhnlicher - unsere Debatten sind kaputt. Im Deeptalk der Familienpackung erklärt Journalist Korbinian Frenzel, wie wir unsere privaten und gesellschaftlichen Gespräche rekultivieren. Unsere Themen im Schöneberger Hinterhofstudio: Corona-Zäune und Söder-Debatten. Die Kunst, das Andersartige zuzulassen. War bei Strauß und Wehner wirklich alles besser? Das Gift des böswilligen Missverstehens und die Verantwortung der Medien. Ambivalenz und Ambiguität. Warum Krawall belohnt wird. Pausentaste für Postings. Scheindebatten, Dauerdebatten und folgenloses Geschwätz. Und am Ende doch wieder Habermas. Plus: Ein Exemplar des fangfrischen Buches „Defekte Debatten“ zu gewinnen, das Frenzel mit der Politikwissenschaftlerin Julia Reuschenbach geschrieben hat. Folge 823.

Imágenes, historias, instantáneas que nos regala el capitalismo tardío que no se podrían dar en otras etapas históricas Si en el centro de la escena colocamos un oso, ocurrirán algunas cosas. Si en el centro de la escena colocamos un payaso, ocurrirán otras. Si en medio del escenario colocamos una manzana o un coco, ocurrirán determinado tipo de cosas. Y si en el centro de todo colocamos al dinero, ocurrirán otras. Aguas, que esto no pretende ser un análisis académico de las nociones de Mandel o Habermas ni explicar la expansión del proceso de acumulación de capital ECDQEMSD podcast El Cyber Talk Show - episodio 5866 Imágenes del Capitalismo Tardío Conducen: El Pirata y El Sr. Lagartija https://canaltrans.com Noticias Del Mundo:  Edmundo González se fue de Venezuela - Cuernavaca prohíbe los elotes - Boeing trae de regreso la Starliner - Un Italiano ganó el US Open - Maniobras de Aterrizaje Colombia 2024 Historias Desintegradas:  Vamos de compras - Todos están grandes - Promoción caduca - Pareja enojada - Pescado para todos - Ansiedad anual - Ya casi fin de año - Ocho años eternos - El niño lleno de rencor - Televisión estatal - Estudiantes chiapanecos - Analizando todo los resultados - Aventuras canadienses - La familia en el bosque - Sigan al perro - Faso zurdo - Día mundial de la agricultura - Coman frutas y verduras - Vehículos eléctricos  y más... En Caso De Que El Mundo Se Desintegre - Podcast no tiene publicidad, sponsors ni organizaciones que aporten para mantenerlo al aire. Solo el sistema cooperativo de los que aportan a través de las suscripciones hacen posible que todo esto siga siendo una realidad. Gracias Dragones Dorados!! NO AI: ECDQEMSD Podcast no utiliza ninguna inteligencia artificial de manera directa para su realización. Diseño, guionado, música, edición y voces son de  nuestra completa intervención humana.

Im neuen Gesprächsband von Jürgen Habermas „Es musste etwas besser werden…“ blickt der bedeutendste deutsche Philosoph auf sein Leben und Werk zurück. Eine überraschend offene und ehrliche Bilanz. Am Ende bleibt die pessimistisch getrübte Einsicht, dass auch der Veränderer Jürgen Habermas am Ende so viel nicht verändert hat.

Mehr als 70 Jahre Theorie und politisches Engagement: Jürgen Habermas ist 95 Jahre alt geworden. Er war ein Schüler Adornos, hat seit den fünfziger Jahren die Debatten in der Republik mitgeprägt und ist weltweit einer der führenden Philosophen. (Wdh. vom 18.06.2024)

Die parlamentarische (indirekte) Demokratie ist in vielen Ländern gefährdet. Wir haben längst „postdemokratische Zustände“, so der britische Politikwissenschaftler Colin Crouch, und der deutsche Philosoph Jürgen Habermas spricht von einer „Fassadendemokratie“. Die Menschen wenden sich ab. Es entsteht Politikverdrossenheit. Das Vertrauen in die Demokratie schwindet seit der letzten Bundestagswahl 2021 besonders rapide, stellt in einer jüngstenWeiterlesen

Will Stovall (Ph.D. Yale University, 2018; M.F.A. Bard College, 2025) is an artist based in Washington, DC. He completed a dissertation on the institutional imagination of German philosopher Jürgen Habermas. His paintings were the subject of a solo exhibition at Ulrik and have been featured as cover illustrations for Oxford German Studies and Seminar: A Journal of Germanic Studies. In addition to his interest in visuality in the German philosophical tradition, he has presented research and organized exhibitions on the art history of Washington, DC, and is the editor of Of the Land: The Art and Poetry of Lou Stovall (Georgetown University Press, 2022). Eden and Inferno, 2020, oil on canvas, walnut frame, 15 x 10 in. (38.1 x 25.4 cm.). Courtesy of Ulrik, New York; Photo: Stephen Faught Faces and Goalie, 2021, oil on paper pinned on linen, 6 3/4 x 5 1/2 in. (17.1 x 14 cm.) Courtesy of Ulrik, New York; Photo: Stephen Faught Watchers, 2021, oil on linen, 4 1/2 x 5 1/4 in. (11.4 x 13.3 cm.) Courtesy of Ulrik, New York; Photo: Stephen Faught Watchers [verso], 2021, oil on linen, 4 1/2 x 5 1/4 in. (11.4 x 13.3 cm.) Courtesy of Ulrik, New York; Photo: Stephen Faught

Er gilt als "einflussreichster Philosoph", wurde als "Hegel der Bundesrepublik" bezeichnet, die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung machte ihn zum "Popstar", und überhaupt wird Jürgen Habermas mit Superlativen überschüttet. Scharfsinnig beobachtet er, entrüstet sich, mischt sich ein in die politische Debattenlage. Das macht der heute 95-jährige schon seit vielen Jahrzehnten. Solange er zurückdenken kann, war Jürgen Habermas "around" mit Texten, Büchern, Zeitungsartikeln, Statements. Das sagt der Kulturhistoriker Philipp Felsch. Er ist Jahrgang 1972, hat Philosophie studiert, lehrt heute an der Berliner Humboldt-Universität und hat sich mit philosophischen und soziologischen Werken, Systemen, Biografien beschäftigt. Mit dem Buch "Der lange Sommer der Theorie. Geschichte einer Revolte 1960-1990" wurde Felsch 2015 einem breiteren Publikum bekannt. Jetzt hat er in seinem jüngsten Buch, "Der Philosoph. Habermas und wir" die Geschichte der alten Bundesrepublik durchleuchtet, sucht mit dem Zeitdiagnostiker nach Deutungen und Analysen in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart.

Foundations of Hermeneutics:1.1 Definition and origins of hermeneutics1.2 Historical development: from biblical exegesis to general theory of interpretation1.3 Key figures in early hermeneutics (Schleiermacher, Dilthey)1.4 The hermeneutic circle: understanding parts and wholes Contemporary Hermeneutic Theories:2.1 Heidegger's ontological turn in hermeneutics 2.2 Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics 2.3 Ricoeur's critical hermeneutics2.4 Habermas and the hermeneutics of suspicion 2.5 Feminist and postcolonial approaches to hermeneuticsApplications and Implications of Hermeneutics:3.1 Hermeneutics in literary theory and criticism3.2 Legal hermeneutics and constitutional interpretation3.3 Hermeneutics in social sciences and cultural studies3.4 The role of hermeneutics in intercultural communication3.5 Challenges and critiques of hermeneutic approaches3.6 Future directions: digital hermeneutics and AI interpretationBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/philosophy-acquired--5939304/support.

Kaum ein deutscher Philosoph hat so intensiv erforscht, wie öffentlicher Streit und Diskurse in der Bundesrepublik funktionieren. Auch mit 95 Jahren analysiert Jürgen Habermas messerscharf das aktuelle Geschehen.

Diaz, Pablo www.deutschlandfunk.de, Kultur heute

(00:00:50) Das Zürcher Theater Neumarkt stellt diese Frage im Senioren-Lab.  (00:05:27) Der Philosoph Jürgen Habermas wird 95. Was hat es mit seiner «Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns» auf sich? (00:09:40) Im Buch «Malnata» von Beatrice Salvioni lehnen sich zwei ungleiche Freundinnen gegen die Gesellschaft auf.  (00:14:24) Alle reden über Milo Rau: Der neue Schweizer Intendant zieht eine positive Bilanz zu seinen ersten Wiener Festwochen.

heute u.a. Neues Buch über die Lebenswelten von Musiker*innen: "Kommst Du mit in den Alltag?"; Philosoph und Soziologe Jürgen Habermas zum 95. Geburtstag; Deutschlands bester Club: Bootshaus Köln; Gedicht: "Inkognito" von Safiye Can; Jugendbuchempfehlung: "Beat vor der Eins" von Alexandra Helmig. Moderation: Claudia Dichter. Von Claudia Dichter.

Der Biograf Philipp Felsch würdigt die Rolle des Philosophen Jürgen Habermas als Intellektueller. Es sei dessen Verdienst, die Bedeutung der Öffentlichkeit für die Demokratie entdeckt zu haben. Habermas wird 95 Jahre alt. Felsch, Philipp www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Interview

Kaum ein deutscher Philosoph hat so intensiv erforscht, wie öffentlicher Streit und Diskurse in der Bundesrepublik funktionieren. Auch mit 95 Jahren analysiert Jürgen Habermas messerscharf aktuelle Geschehnisse. Von Christoph Vormweg.

Europa hat gewählt und Rechtspopulisten haben mit großem Stimmenzuwachs abgeschnitten. Hat Europa noch eine Zukunft? Jemand, der sich mit dieser Frage über Jahrzehnte beschäftigt hat, ist Jürgen Habermas. Der deutsche Starphilosoph wird in diesen Tagen, am 18. Juni, 95 Jahre alt. Er wird von den Ergebnissen alles andere als begeistert sein,

Wie steht es um unsere Demokratie, was macht ihre Qualitäten aus? Zu seinem 95. Geburtstag ein Blick auf die demokratie-theoretischen Thesen von Jürgen Habermas, der die Geschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland als Philosoph und öffentlicher Intellektueller hinterfragt und begleitet hat. Studiogast: Philipp Felsch, Kulturwissenschaftler, Moderation: Jürgen Wiebicke Von WDR 5.

Anlässlich des 95. Geburtstags von Jürgen Habermas diskutiert Jürgen Wiebicke mit Kulturwissenschaftler Philipp Felsch über die demokratie-theoretischen Thesen Habermas', der die Geschichte Deutschlands als Philosoph und Intellektueller oft hinterfragt hat. Von WDR 5.

durée : 00:58:51 - Avec philosophie - par : Géraldine Muhlmann - En 1935, lors d'une conférence, le philosophe Husserl évoque la crise que traverse l'Europe. Presque cinquante ans plus tard, Habermas propose de dépasser le modèle de l'Etat-nation en crise au profit d'une "constellation postnationale". L'Europe ne se pense-t-elle pas toujours sur fond de crise ? - invités : Natalie Depraz Professeure de philosophie à l'Université Paris-Nanterre, membre universitaire des Archives Husserl; Justine Lacroix Professeur de science politique à l'université libre de Bruxelles

I denne episoden snakker vi om en retning innenfor pedagogikken kalt kritisk pedagogikk, med kjente navn som Paolo Freire og Henri Girioux som noen av de viktigste teoretikerne. Vi er mildt sagt kritiske, for denne teoritradisjonen, som påstår å være kritisk til det etablerte, er så belemret med en språklig vaghet at den tilsynelatende ofte ikke klarer å forholde seg kritisk til egne teorier.  Så hvorfor er det slik, hvorfor har vi denne tendensen til slik tungrodd og uklart språk innenfor et fagområde som pedagogikken, som kaller seg frigjørende og kritisk men som sjelden lever opp til slike ambisjoner? Vår målsetning med denne diskusjon er ikke å være en introduksjon til denne teoriretningen eller en detaljert gjennomgang, men snarere en kommentar, rettet mot andre folk innen skolen og pedagogikk som har stiftet kjennskap med slike teoritradisjoner.  Fortell oss gjerne om vi lykkes, om dette leder til noen gode samtaler eller kritiske bemerkninger som dere klør etter å sende oss. Vi tar som alltid gjerne imot innspill og kommentarer, og tar en ny runde med tema om det skulle vise seg å være nyttig eller nødvendig.  Bøker og artikler: François Dosse, Histoire du structuralisme. I. Le champ du signe, 1945-1966, La Découverte Rita Felski, The Limits of Critique, 2015, University of Chicago Press Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed (først utgitt i 1970) Henri Giroux, Critical Pedagogy, 2021, i Bauer et al (red), Handbuch Bilduns- und Erziehungssoziologie, Springer Nature Karl Popper, Reason or revolution, i The Myth of the Framework, 1994, http://www.the-rathouse.com/shortreviews/Reason_or_Revolution._Habermas_et_al.pdf Espen Schaanning, Foucault og det akademiske jåleriet, 2013, https://arrvev.no/artikler/foucault-og-det-akademiske-jaleriet   ---------------------------- Logoen vår er laget av Sveinung Sudbø, se hans arbeider på originalkopi.com Musikken er av Arne Kjelsrud Mathisen, se facebooksiden Nygrenda Vev og Dur for mer info. ----------------------------  Takk for at du hører på. Ta kontakt med oss på larsogpaal@gmail.com Det finnes ingen bedre måte å få spredt podkasten vår til flere enn via dere lyttere, så takk om du deler eller forteller andre om oss.  Både Lars og Pål skriver nå på hver sin blogg, med litt varierende regelmessighet. Du finner dem på disse nettsidene: https://paljabekk.com/ https://larssandaker.blogspot.com/ Alt godt, hilsen Lars og Pål

THIS ONE IS AN AMAZING VIDEO SO PLEASE WATCH ON YT: https://youtu.be/d-FhCfjTPDk Ivan Illich is the most important thinker of institutions, technology, tools, and the human condition who got overhyped while simultaneously misunderstood and then eclipsed by Foucault and Habermas on the one side, and Freire, hooks, and Giroux on the other. We're calling for a critical, sincere, and earnest return to Ivan Illich. Bryan Weeks, one of the core TU instructors (who co-taught The Idea of the University course) has put this together and will be leading lectures and discussions around the texts he considers to be most essential to understanding Illich on his own terms but for our times. LIMITED TIME COUPON DEAL: for 20% off all tiers us ILLICH4PD (expires at the end of April) Sign up here: https://theoryunderground.com/product/illich-1/           ABOUT / CREDITS / LINKS Become a monthly TU Tier Subscriber to access to the TU HUB, which includes past, ongoing, and upcoming courses, special events, office hours, clubs, and critical feedback that will help you evolve your comprehension capacities and critical faculties, via the website here: https://theoryunderground.com/product/tu-subscription-tiers/ (Whatever tier you subscribe to in the month of March 2024 will be promoted to the privileges of the next one up (e.g. Tier 1 will have Tier 2 privileges, etc.!).)   Don't have time for that but want to help anyway? Consider supporting the patreon here: Welcome to Theory Underground. https://www.patreon.com/TheoryUnderground   Get TU books at a discount: https://theoryunderground.com/publications   Theory Underground is a lecture, research, and publishing platform by and for working class intellectuals, autodidacts, and academics who want to do more than they are able to within the confines of academia.   Think of Theory Underground like a Jiu Jitsu gym for your brain. Or like a post-political theory church. It doesn't matter. None of the analogies will do it justice. We're post-identity anyway. Just see if the vibe is right for you. We hope you get something out of it!   If you want to help me get setup sooner/faster in a totally gratuitous way, or support me but you don't care about the subscription or want to bother with the monthly stuff, here is a way to buy me something concrete and immediately useful, then you can buy me important equipment for my office on this list (these items will be automatically shipped to my address if you use the list here) https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/2MAWFYUJQIM58?   Buy me some coffee: https://www.venmo.com/u/Theorypleeb https://paypal.me/theorypleeb   If Theory Underground has helped you see that text-to-speech technologies are a useful way of supplementing one's reading while living a busy life, if you want to be able to listen to PDFs for yourself, then Speechify is recommended. Use the link below and Theory Underground gets credit! https://share.speechify.com/mzwBHEB Follow Theory Underground on Duolingo: https://invite.duolingo.com/BDHTZTB5CWWKTP747NSNMAOYEI See Theory Underground memes here: https://www.instagram.com/theory_underground/ https://tiktok.com/@theory_underground   Missed a course at Theory Underground? Wrong! Courses at Theory Underground are available after the fact on demand. https://theoryunderground.com/courses   MUSIC CREDITS Logo sequence music by https://olliebeanz.com/music https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode Mike Chino, Demigods https://youtu.be/M6wruxDngOk            

On A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere and Deliberative Politics   [Patreon Tier III & IV Exclusive]   Continuing our theme of "the intelligentsia & the public," we discuss German critical theorist Jürgen Habermas's 2023 book, asking what sort of political culture is required for democracy. What role do the institutions of the public sphere and the media have in producing, sustaining or undermining this culture? How does Habermas' account contrast with B. Anderson on print capitalism? Is 'deliberative' democracy a trap? Who sets the rules of deliberation? Is a good media structure a 'constitutional imperative'? How do interests fit into Habermas' model? Do we need to leave our interests at the door?   Links: A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere and Deliberative Politics, Jurgen Habermas Jürgen Habermas is a major public intellectual. What are his key ideas?, Duncan Ivison, The Conversation /362/ Life Doesn't Have to Zuck ft. Cory Doctorow - on social media

Er ist der derzeit wohl einflussreichste deutsche Politologe, war Berater von mehreren Bundeskanzlern und ist Autor zahlreicher Bestseller. DIE ZEIT nannte ihn einen "Ein-Mann-Thinktank", Kritiker nennen ihn einen "Extremisten der Mitte": Jetzt ist Herfried Münkler zu Gast bei "Alles gesagt?", dem unendlichen Podcast. Im Gespräch mit den Gastgebern Christoph Amend und Jochen Wegner spricht Herfried Münkler über Macht und Naivität, über Freiheit und Wohlstand, über Demokratie und Sicherheit. Er erklärt, warum die USA ihre Rolle als Welthüter aufgegeben hat – und warum der Rückzug des Westens aus Afghanistan die wahre Zeitenwende war. Er erzählt von seinen Begegnungen mit Angela Merkel und Helmut Schmidt, von einer Frage, die ihm einmal von Jürgen Habermas gestellt wurde – und was er dem Westen im Umgang mit Wladimir Putin rät. Und er erklärt, was ihn so früh am Philosophen Niccolò Machiavelli fasziniert hat, dass er ein Buch über ihn geschrieben hat, das heute als Standardwerk gilt: "Ich habe Machiavelli gegen den Strich gebürstet." Herfried Münkler wurde 1951 im hessischen Friedberg geboren, hat in Frankfurt studiert und von 1992 bis 2008 an der Berliner Humboldt-Universität gelehrt. Er ist Autor und Herausgeber von über 30 Büchern, darunter "Die neuen Kriege" und "Imperien". Im Podcast erklärt Herfried Münkler, warum er sich bis heute für einen EU-Beitritt der Türkei ausspricht, wieso er in seiner Freizeit am liebsten in seinem Garten "in der Erde wühlt" – und warum Machiavelli kein Machiavellist war. Nach 4 Stunden und 40 Minuten beendet Herfried Münkler das Gespräch, denn das kann bei "Alles gesagt?" nur der Gast. [ANZEIGE] Mehr über die Angebote unserer Werbepartnerinnen und -partner finden Sie HIER [ANZEIGE] Falls Sie uns nicht nur hören, sondern auch lesen möchten, testen Sie jetzt 4 Wochen kostenlos Die ZEIT. Hier geht's zum Angebot.

What is the latest case for the resurrection? After 32,000+ hours studying the resurrection of Jesus, what does Habermas consider the strongest evidence? What is the backstory to his latest 1,100-page volume? And how has Resurrection scholarship shifted in the past 50 years? READ: On the Resurrection: Evidences, by Gary Habermas (https://amzn.to/4aVn1gd) WATCH: The State of Resurrection Research with Mike Licona and Gary Habermas (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OImf99ta89M&t=2s) Make sure to subscribe and check out some of my other videos for more on Christianity, Theology and other aspects of culture! *Get a MASTERS IN APOLOGETICS or SCIENCE AND RELIGION at BIOLA (https://bit.ly/3LdNqKf) *USE Discount Code [SMDCERTDISC] for $100 off the BIOLA APOLOGETICS CERTIFICATE program (https://bit.ly/3AzfPFM) *See our fully online UNDERGRAD DEGREE in Bible, Theology, and Apologetics: (https://bit.ly/448STKK) FOLLOW ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA: Twitter: https://twitter.com/Sean_McDowell TikTok: @sean_mcdowell Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/seanmcdowell/ Website: https://seanmcdowell.org

Alex and Benjamin delve into Habermas' notions of the public sphere, legitimacy, and communication. They also discuss postmetaphysical thinking.

Scriptures Referenced:1 Corinthians 15:1-3, 17Mark 15, 16; Luke 24; Matthew 28; John 20-21; Acts 1Works ReferencedWilliam Lane Craig in Copan and Tacelli, Jesus' Resurrection , Fact or Figment—A Debate Between William Lane Craig and Gerd Lüdemann (Downers Grover, Intervarsity Press, 2000) 31.Gary Habermas and Mike Licona, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2004) 49, 50. Habermas and Licona, 68, 69. NT Wright, The Resurrection of the Son of God, (Minneapolis, Fortress Press, 2003) 686.

Is there strong scientific evidence for near-death experiences? On this episode of Mind Matters, we’re happy to share host Andrew McDiarmid’s recent ID The Future conversation with Dr. Gary Habermas about his chapter evaluating the evidence for near-death experiences in the recent book Minding the Brain. As Dr. Habermas explains, most near-death accounts contain both objective and subjective elements. While personal testimony about other Read More › Source

On this episode, Frank and Megan discuss near death experiences (NDEs). Are NDEs evidence that the mind is separate from the body? Are there any plausible skeptical explanations that explain the data? What might NDEs tell us about particular spiritual and religious worldviews? And could NDEs have something to teach us about humanity's deepest hopes and fears?-----------------------Hosts' Websites:Megan J Fritts (google.com)Frank J. Cabrera (google.com)Email: philosophyonthefringes@gmail.com-----------------------Bibliography:Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest: a prospective study in the Netherlands - The LancetNear-Death Experiences Evidence for Their Reality - PMC (nih.gov)Dell'Olio, Do near-death experiences provide a rational basis for belief in life after death? B. Mitchell-Yellin & J. M. Fischer, The Near-Death Experience Argument Against Physicalism: A Critique R. G. Mays & S. B. Mays, Near-Death Experiences: Extended Naturalism or Promissory Physicalism? A Response to Fischer's ArticleJ.M. Fischer, University Professor Lecture: Near-Death Experiences: The Stories They TellG.R. Habermas, Evidential Near‐Death ExperiencesA. J. Ayer – ‘What I Saw When I Was Dead' Afterlife (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)K. Augustine - Hallucinatory Near-Death Experiences » Internet InfidelsSusan Blackmore Near-Death Experiences: In or out of the body? (discussion of Sagan's explanation)Lehoux - The Trouble with Taxa | What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking (discussion of garlic and magnets)-----------------------Cover Artwork by Logan Fritts-------------------------Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!):https://uppbeat.io/t/simon-folwar/neon-signsLicense code: I0NNKBBUOCKXBD02

Is there strong scientific evidence for near-death experiences? On this ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid speaks with Dr. Gary Habermas about his chapter evaluating the evidence for near-death cases in the new book Minding the Brain: Models of the Mind, Information, and Empirical Science. As Dr. Habermas explains, most near-death accounts contain both objective and subjective elements. Personal testimony about other realms can't be independently corroborated, but objective evidence rooted in this world can be confirmed and evaluated. "I can't verify heavenly discussions or heavenly sites," says Habermas, "so the kind of NDE data I'm talking about virtually always occur on this earth in normal kinds of situations, like parking lots or in your home two miles away. That's where the evidence comes from." Dr. Habermas relays several examples of near-death cases with strong evidential support. He also lays out five different lines of verifiable phenomena. Tune in to learn more about the scientific case for this intriguing phenomenon. Source

Do we have good enough reasons to believe that the New Testament documents are really telling the truth? One of the most effective ways to establish that Christianity is actually true is to demonstrate that Jesus rose from the dead. But do the Gospel accounts contain enough evidence to support a literal, historical, and miraculous first century resurrection? During the recent Steadfast apologetics conference hosted by SES, Frank sat down with Dr. Ben Shaw of Liberty University, who is working alongside the great New Testament scholar, Dr. Gary Habermas, on four volumes of Gary's magnum opus. Ben holds a PhD in Theology and Apologetics, serves as the president of the brand-new ministry Core Apologetics, and is also the author of the upcoming book entitled 'Trustworthy: 13 Arguments for the Reliability of the New Testament', which will be released in 2024. In this week's podcast episode, Ben and Frank tackle questions like: How do scholars determine the dating of the Gospels? Is there better historical evidence for Jesus than for Alexander the Great? What has it been like working with Dr. Habermas on his magnum opus? What are some of the most embarrassing details recorded in the New Testament and how do they support its reliability? Should the Gospels be categorized as historical fiction? What are the minimal facts that even skeptics like Bart Ehrman accept about the New Testament?   Early documents, eyewitnesses, and embarrassing testimonies are just a few pieces of evidence that show that the New Testament is a credible source for the historical Jesus. As you'll hear in the show, mounting evidence for the resurrection continues to strengthen the claims of the risen Jesus, even causing non-Christians to acknowledge the evidence as valid. There's no doubt you'll be encouraged by what you learn in this discussion! To view the entire VIDEO PODCAST be sure to join our CrossExamined private community. It's the perfect place to jump into some great discussions with like-minded Christians while simultaneously providing financial support for our ministry. You can also SUPPORT THE PODCAST HERE. Pre-Order Volume 1 of Gary Habermas' magnum opus: https://a.co/d/0sl9qhu Core Apologetics: https://www.coreapologetics.com/

On polycrisis.   [Patreon Tier II and III Exclusive -  subscribe at patreon.com/bungacast]   We reflect back on Jurgen Habermas' Legitimation Crisis as a whole, having gone through it section by section in previous episodes, before exploring what the idea of 'polycrisis' is about. Everyone from Adam Tooze to the FT to the World Economic Forum think we're in a polycrisis. How does this notion compare to Habermas' understanding of crisis?    We also explore some related themes: cynical ideology and how it deflects criticism; whether we are more or less individualised today, and how you can have less collectivism and less individualism at the same time; and the difference between crisis and emergency.   Links: Why the West's elites invented a permacrisis, Thomas Fazi, Unherd Welcome to the world of the polycrisis, Adam Tooze, FT  Year in a word: Polycrisis, Jonathan Derbyshire, FT  On the crisis of crisis: /327/ Capitalism on Edge ft. Albena Azmanova  On the structural reasons why the regime survives: /246/ Why Isn't There Revolution? ft. Vivek Chibber   

Hal Foster is one of the most well-known thinkers about art today. In a career that spans several decades, he is known for important much-cited books including The Return of the Real from 1996, Design and Crime from 2002 and most recently, Brutal Aesthetics from 2020. He teaches at Princeton and writes for a broader audience at Artforum and the London Review of Books, among many other places.  And anyone who has studied art theory or contemporary art is probably familiar with a masterful book he edited called The Anti Aesthetic. Put out by the Bay Press in 1983, the slim, purple, 150 page collection brought together nine essays by figures including Jürgen Habermas, Rosalind Krauss, Frederic Jameson, and Edward Said, plus an introduction by Foster himself, theorizing in exciting, contradictory, and new ways what it meant to write about, make, and see art. It set the tone for a lot of the criticism and reception of art theory in the 1980s and beyond, and helped make theory cool in art. Indeed, this small book has cast such a long shadow that Foster has just published a text for Artforum called The Anti Aesthetic at 40, where he assesses its legacy four decades on from its publication. The work reminds one of the sense of intellectual excitement and seriousness of purpose that drew many into writing about art in the first place. A sense that feels very embattled now. This week on the podcast, Hal Foster joins Artnet's chief art critic Ben Davis to discuss the recent past and present of art criticism. 

On the 3rd and final part of Jurgen Habermas' Legitimation Crisis.   [Patreon Tier II & III Exclusive]   We wrap up this challenging book by debating some key points. Habermas already felt we lived in a post-truth society. How does his notion differ from the contemporary one concerned with misinformation? And is it possible to get beyond the notion of political authority grounded in (arbitrary) rules and laws – to an order rooted in truth and meaning?   Habermas also discusses his Frankfurt School colleagues and 'the end of the individual'. What does this mean? Is there any hope for free, rational, democratic politics?   Reading: Legitimation Crisis, Jurgen Habermas The Return of the Repressed, Wolfgang Streeck, NLR 104, March–April 2017