Podcasts about bef

Die neue SRG-Chefin Susanne Wille steht unter Druck: Anfang Jahr hat die SRG mit dem UKW-Ausstieg hunderttausende Radiohörerinnen und -hörer verloren. Der Spardruck wirkt sich aufs Angebot aus. Und die Abstimmung über die 200-Franken-Initiative steht vor der Tür. Der Einbruch bei den Radios der SRG sind markant: Hundertausende Menschen haben nach dem Ende der UKW-Übertragung zu privaten oder ausländische Radiostationen gewechselt. War der vorzeitige Ausstieg ein Fehler? Und wie reagiert die SRG, wenn das Parlament UKW noch einmal verlängert? Kritische Fragen an Susanne Wille. Ohnehin hatte die neue Generaldirektorin kein geruhsames erstes Amtsjahr. Gleich am ersten Tag als oberste SRG-Chefin stimmte sie Personal und Öffentlichkeit auf ein umfangreiches Sparprogramm ein. Hintergrund sind sinkende Werbeeinnahmen aber vor allem die bevorstehende Senkung der Radio- und Fernseh-Abgabe von 335 auf 300 Franken pro Haushalt und Jahr. Kritiker allerdings nehmen der SRG den Sparwillen immer noch nicht ab – was ist da dran? Und: Wie einschneidend wird der kommende Abbau beim Angebot? Die für die SRG wohl grösste Bedrohung ist die SRG-Initiative «200 Franken sind genug», auch Halbierungsinitiative genannt. In wenigen Monaten stimmen wir ab. Wie kontert Susanne Wille die Argumente der Befürworterinnen und Befürworter? Vor wenigen Monaten hat die SRG – auch im Hinblick auf die Abstimmung – mit den Verlegern eine Vereinbarung getroffen: Sie sieht zahlreiche Zugeständnisse an die privaten Verlage vor. Hat sich die SRG erpressen lassen, wie Kritiker sagen? SRG-Generaldirektorin Susanne Wille ist Gast bei Dominik Meier. Ergänzend zum Tagesgespräch finden Sie jeden Samstag in unserem Kanal die aktuelle Samstagsrundschau.

Seit Jahren will die EU die Verfolgung sexueller Gewalt gegen Kinder erleichtern. Nun wurde erneut ein Kompromiss verworfen. Befürworter wollten Messengerdienste zu Kontrollen verpflichten. Kritiker sprechen von „anlassloser Chatkontrolle“. Loll, Anna www.deutschlandfunk.de, Hintergrund

In Johannes 17 bittet ein Mitarbeiter (Jesus) den Chef (Vater) ganz nonchalant darum, ihn zu verherrlichen. Ist das nicht verwegen, so freimütig um eine Beförderung zu bitten? Nun, Jesus hat alle seine Prüfungen bestanden. Da darf man schon mal kühn sein. Wer seine Arbeit gut macht, wird belohnt. Jesus hat Gott verherrlicht. Wie? Indem er das Werk vollbrachte, das ihm aufgetragen war. Man verherrlicht Gott einzig und allein dadurch, daß man ihm gehorcht. Tun wir das, belohnt Gott uns, indem er auch uns "verherrlicht." Wie sieht das aus? Pastor Gert schaut sich das längste Gebet Jesu hier mal genauer an.Wichtige Bibelstellen:Johannes 17Unser Spendenkonto, falls Sie uns unterstützen möchten:Delta Christl. Dienste e.V. (Vorstandsvorsitzender: Gert Hoinle)DE13 7935 0101 0000 8235 91BYLADEM1KSWPaypal? Klicken Sie hier zwecks QR-Code: https://www.delta-edition.de/WPVersio...Oder an: Spende@OnlineKirche.orgSpendenquittung? Bitte Namen und Adresse angeben.

gefallenDas Bedürfnis, zu gefallen und es anderen immer recht zu machen, kennen viele Frauen. Auch Katrin. Es könnte einfach nur eine nette Eigenschaft netter Menschen sein, wenn es nicht regelmäßig zu Selbstverleugnung und Selbstverlust führen würde. In der Psychologie gibt es dafür sogar einen Begriff: fawning. Statt zu kämpfen, Reißaus zu nehmen oder zu erstarren (fight, flight, freeze), versuchen wir, durch rehäugige Freundlichkeiten die Situation zu entschärfen. Kurzfristig mag das wirksam sein, doch es lohnt sich, einen genauen Blick auf die Ursachen und langfristigen Konsequenzen dieses Verhaltens zu werfen.FaschismusFaschismus ist ein starkes Wort und wird bisweilen als „Nazi-Keule“ benutzt. Doch mit Blick auf die USA sollten wir die Fraglichkeit des Begriffs nochmal überdenken, findet Alexandra. Denn die offene Befürwortung von Gewalt, der Versuch, Demokratie und Rechtsstaatlichkeit auszuhöhlen und eine fast religiöse Verehrung von Technologie waren seit jeher Merkmale faschistischer Systeme. Gerade KI-Ideologien in Verbindung mit dem Wirken rechter politischer Kräfte könnten uns in Schwierigkeiten bringen, wenn wir nicht aktiv ein Mitspracherecht fordern. Bitte und DankeNoch immer kostet die Produktion von anekdotisch evident mehr, als wir derzeit einnehmen. Wenn ihr könnt, werft doch gern ein paar Euro in einen unserer Hüte. DANKE an alle, die schon dabei sind

Der Eigenmietwert wird abgeschafft und alle Schweizerinnen und Schweizer können in Zukunft eine digitale ID beziehen und diese über eine App auf ihrem Handy hinterlegen. So hat die Bevölkerung am Sonntag abgestimmt. Ein doppeltes Ja.Dabei war das Ja zur Abschaffung des Eigenmietwerts erstaunlich deutlich. Umfragen hatten ein viel knapperes Resultat vorausgesagt. Das Ja zur E-ID hingegen war hauchdünn. Es kam zu einem Krimi - mit einem knapp besserem Ausgang für die Befürworterinnen und Befürworter.Wie kam es zu diesen Resultaten? Und was bedeuten diese Entscheide nun konkret?In einer neuen Folge des täglichen Podcasts «Apropos» ordnet Larissa Rhyn, Bundeshauschefin von Tamedia, die Resultate des Abstimmungssonntags ein.Host: Philipp LoserProduktion: Sara SpreiterDiverse Artikel zum Abstimmungssonntag: Politgeograf über das Aus des Eigenmietwerts: «Die Jungen sind selbst schuld, wenn sie finanzielle Zusammenhänge zu wenig verstehen»Trotz Ja zur Abschaffung: Der Eigenmietwert wird nicht so schnell fallenInterview zur Eigenmietwert-Abschaffung: Steigen nach dem Ja des Volks die Hauspreise? «Sie sind schon an der oberen Grenze»Kommentar: Knappes Ja zur E-ID: Beat Jans und das Parlament sind mit einem blauen Auge davongekommenWas kann die E-ID überhaupt? Das müssen Sie jetzt wissenTicker zur E-ID-Abstimmung  Unser Tagi-Spezialangebot für Podcast-Hörer:innen: tagiabo.chHabt ihr Feedback, Ideen oder Kritik zu «Apropos»? Schreibt uns an podcasts@tamedia.ch Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Diversity ist in vielen Unternehmen ein Buzzword – doch was bedeutet es wirklich, Vielfalt zu leben statt nur zu posten?Michaela Jaap beschäftigt sich seit Jahren genau mit dieser Frage. Als Head of Corporate Culture & Responsibility bei HAYS und Vorstandsmitglied der Charta der Vielfalt weiß sie, was es braucht, damit Diversität in Organisationen nicht symbolisch bleibt, sondern Wirkung entfaltet – strukturell, menschlich, kulturell.In dieser Folge sprechen wir über echte Veränderung – und darüber, wie HR, Führung und Organisation gemeinsam Verantwortung übernehmen können.Was du in dieser Folge lernst:Vielfalt ist oft schon da – nur nicht sichtbar: Warum der erste Schritt nicht Kampagne, sondern Bestandsaufnahme ist – und wie Unternehmen erkennen, wo bereits Vielfalt gelebt wird.Prozesse statt Plakate: Wie man diskriminierende Muster in Strukturen erkennt – z. B. in Gremienarbeit, Beförderungsprozessen oder Recruitingkriterien – und warum soziale Herkunft oft unbewusst ausgeschlossen wird.Führung braucht Haltung: Welche Verantwortung Führungskräfte tragen – und warum Sensibilisierung, Ansprechbarkeit und klare Konsequenzen der Schlüssel sind.Konsequenzen statt Schweigen: Warum Organisationen klare Grenzen setzen müssen – und wie das Vertrauen und Sicherheit im Team stärkt.Diversity trifft Nachhaltigkeit: Wie sich soziale Verantwortung mit ökologischen Zielen verbinden lässt – z. B. durch inklusive Praktika, gezielte Kooperationen und Sichtbarkeit für neue Perspektiven.Diese Folge zeigt: Wer Vielfalt wirklich will, muss dorthin schauen, wo es unbequem wird – und dann bereit sein, Strukturen zu verändern.Jetzt reinhören – und lernen, wie Diversity mehr wird als ein Versprechen.Und hier ist der Kontakt zu Michaela: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/michaela-jaap/ Website: https://www.charta-der-vielfalt.de/

Das St. Galler Stadtparlament hat eine Initiative für ein Rauchverbot auf öffentlichen Spielplätzen deutlich abgelehnt. Befürworter wollen damit Kinder schützen. Gegner appellieren an die Eigenverantwortung. Jetzt kommts zu einer Volksabstimmung. Weitere Themen: · Gemeinde Glarus und Verein wollen Freibad Ygruben gemeinsam betreiben · Bürgerversammlung von Lichtensteig hat entschieden: Kita zieht in alte Turnhalle

Neue Gaskraftwerke, verändertes Heizungsgesetz, CO2-Preis-Kritik: Die Entscheidungen der neuen Bundesregierung geben Klimaschützern Anlass, um Deutschlands Ausstieg aus fossiler Energie zu bangen. Was ist an den Befürchtungen dran?

Ab Montag ist die Zugstrecke im Laufental wieder befahrbar, sie war für fünf Monate gesperrt. Im Vorfeld waren die Befürchtungen gross, dass es mehr Stau geben könnte, falls die Pendlerinnen und Pendler aufs Auto umsteigen. Die Bilanz zeigt nun: die Befürchtungen sind nur beschränkt eingetreten. Ausserdem: - Basler Pharmakonzerne an rundem Tisch mit Bundesrat.

Das Kantonsreferendum zur Individualbesteuerung ist zustande gekommen: Mit dem Entscheid des Aargauer Grossen Rats als achter Kanton wird das Volk über das Bundesgesetz abstimmen. Befürchtet werden Mehraufwand und Steuerausfälle – Befürworter sehen einen Schritt zur Gleichstellung. Weitere Themen: · In Hägglingen wird der dritte kantonale Bike-Trail eingeweiht. Der Kanton Aargau möchte damit erreichen, dass die Mountainbikerinnen und - Biker nur noch auf diesen Trails fahren. · Die Stadt Olten steht finanziell schlechter da als erwartet. Sie budgetiert für das kommende Jahr ein Minus von 8,2 Millionen Franken. Im vergangenen Jahr betrug das Minus noch 1,6 Millionen Franken. · In Solothurn sorgt die Restessbar dafür, dass überschüssige Lebensmittel nicht in der Mülltonne landen. Der Verein hinter dem Projekt ist nun mit dem Solothurner Sozialpreis ausgezeichnet worden.

⭐️ ⁠⁠https://vianu.shop/ (Werbung)⭐️ Artikel auf buddhaweisheit.de mit allen Infos zur Folge!In einem aufschlussreichen Gespräch mit Prof. ⁠Dr. Porst⁠, einem Experten auf dem Gebiet der Testosteron-Replacement-Therapy (TRT), wurden die vielfältigen Aspekte und Auswirkungen dieser Behandlung beleuchtet. Von den Gründen, warum Menschen TRT in Betracht ziehen, bis hin zu den potenziellen Risiken und Vorteilen, bietet das Gespräch wertvolle Einblicke in ein oft missverstandenes Thema. Dies ist übrigens nicht nur ein Gespräch für Männer, sondern für alle die Männer in ihrem Leben, für die sie Zuneigung empfinden. #buddhaweisheitpodcast #trt ⭐️ Links zum Gast: https://www.porst-hamburg.deVideo: Inhalte von buddhaweisheit Copyright, Videos Audio: Inhalte von buddahweisheit Copyright Angaben zur Verwendung von Bildern und Videos: Microsoft designer (AI Genrierte Bilder und Infografiken) Pexels.com / canva.com (Premium) / pixapay.com Haftungsausschluss / DisclaimerDie in diesem Podcast geäußerten Meinungen, Erfahrungen und Aussagen stammen ausschließlich von den jeweiligen Gästen und spiegeln nicht notwendigerweise die Haltung oder Meinung des Moderators bzw. des Podcast-Teams wider.Dieser Podcast dient ausschließlich zu Informations- und Diskussionszwecken und ersetzt in keiner Weise eine medizinische, rechtliche oder anderweitige fachliche Beratung. Insbesondere bei gesundheitlichen Fragen wird ausdrücklich empfohlen, sich an qualifiziertes medizinisches Fachpersonal zu wenden.Wir übernehmen keine Verantwortung für mögliche Konsequenzen, die sich aus der Anwendung der im Podcast besprochenen Inhalte ergeben könnten. Jede:r Hörer:in ist selbst dafür verantwortlich, kritisch mit den Informationen umzugehen und gegebenenfalls weitere Quellen zu konsultieren.Die Erwähnung oder Darstellung bestimmter Behandlungen, Therapien oder Heilmethoden bedeutet keine Empfehlung oder Befürwortung durch die Podcast-Redaktion.

Diesen Sonntag entscheiden die Schweizer an der Urne über das E-ID-Gesetz. Was die Vorlage bedeutet – und warum sie gefährlich istEin Standpunkt von Michael Straumann.Weltweit gewinnt die digitale Identität an Boden. Die EU arbeitet an einer Altersverifikations-App, die die E-ID direkt mit den Online-Aktivitäten der Bürger verknüpfen soll. Der Prototyp läuft bereits in Italien, Dänemark, Spanien und Griechenland. Parallel dazu wird eine digitale Brieftasche entwickelt, in der künftig Führerschein, Gesundheitsdaten und Bankkarten Platz finden.Auch Deutschland treibt die elektronische Identität voran: Der Koalitionsvertrag der schwarz-roten Regierung sieht ein verpflichtendes Bürgerkonto und eine E-ID vor, die mit der EU-Brieftasche gekoppelt wird. Im Vereinigten Königreich ist die elektronische Identität schon heute Voraussetzung für Arbeitsplatz, Wohnung und Gesundheitsversorgung. Australien geht noch weiter: Dort soll der Zugriff auf Internetsuchmaschinen wie Google oder Bing künftig nur noch mit E-ID möglich sein. In Schweden gilt sie zwar offiziell als freiwillig, ist aber im Alltag faktisch unverzichtbar – sei es bei Bankgeschäften, Steuererklärungen oder Arztbesuchen. Österreich wiederum setzt auf Druck: Wer die staatliche ID Austria verweigert, kann sanktioniert werden. So verlor kürzlich eine Lehrerin ihre Stelle, weil sie sich weigerte, die digitale Identität zu nutzen.Auch in der Schweiz drängt die Politik auf eine E-ID – gebremst einzig durch die direkte Demokratie. 2021 lehnte das Stimmvolk die damalige Vorlage mit deutlichen 64,4 Prozent ab. Statt diesen Entscheid zu akzeptieren, legte der Bundesrat rasch nach: In der neuen Gesetzesvorlage soll der digitale Identitätsnachweis nicht mehr von privaten Firmen, sondern angeblich vom Staat herausgegeben werden. Doch auch dieses Gesetz kommt glücklicherweise vors Volk. Am 28. September entscheidet sich, ob die Bürger die E-ID erneut ablehnen – oder ob sie sich diesmal von den Versprechen des Bundesrats und seiner Befürworter überzeugen lassen.Alles andere als staatlich...https://apolut.net/der-digitale-fichenstaat-von-michael-straumann/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Der bundesnahe Betrieb Swisscom hat mit einem namhaften Betrag ein Abstimmungskomitee unterstützt, das sich für ein Ja zur elektronischen Identität einsetzt. Das sorgt für Stirnrunzeln – sogar bei einigen Befürwortern der E-ID. Weitere Themen: Derzeit debattiert das Parlament über das Zivildienstgesetz. Mit der Reform soll der Wechsel von der Armee zum Zivildienst erschwert werden. Damit will der Bundesrat der Armee zu mehr Personal verhelfen. Doch braucht es das überhaupt? Schweizer Behörden wie auch viele Firmen sind von US-Techfirmen abhängig und etwa angewiesen auf Microsoft. Deshalb hat das neu gegründete Netzwerk für eine "Souveräne Digitale Schweiz" konkrete Ideen, wie unsere Verwaltung digital unabhängig werden kann.

Es gibt dieses Gefühl… man weiß es nicht, aber man ahnt es. Irgendwas stimmt hier nicht. Da schleicht sich Misstrauen ein, Eifersucht und die Befürchtung, dass der andere oder die andere fremdgeht. Man spricht nicht gerne darüber, weil es verletzend ist und einen Riss in die Beziehungen reißt. Deswegen entscheiden sich manche, das alles mit sich selber auszumachen und womöglich nicht mal innerhalb der Beziehung offen darüber zu reden. Und andere sprechen es an, platzen vor Wut. Paula Lambert erzählt, wie sie selbst zur Furie wurde und vor allem zur Detektivin. Paula ist Beziehungs-Expertin und hat die Gabe, selbst Abgründe des menschlichen Zusammenlebens mit Humor und Leichtigkeit zu besprechen. Wir kennen uns seit wir sehr jung waren und auch deswegen ist sie genau die Richtige, um sich mal sehr ehrlich dieses schmerzhafte Thema vorzunehmen. Und zu ergründen, wie man bestmöglich damit umgeht. Übrigens, wir beide kennen auch die andere Seite und sind nicht stolz drauf. Aber auch das will besprochen werden. Manchmal hat die Beziehung danach noch eine Chance und manchmal sollte man gehen. Wenn Ihr diese Gefühle kennt, wird Euch die Folge sicher sehr guttun.

Der Mindestlohn wird erhöht, das gilt auch für ausländische Wanderarbeiter, die auf deutschen Feldern Erdbeeren, Spargel oder Äpfel ernten. Das macht vielen Landwirten Angst. Sie befürchten, dass der Mindestlohn die Preise für Obst und Gemüse aus Deutschland so sehr nach oben treibt, dass die Käufer lieber zu günstigen Erzeugnissen aus dem Ausland greifen. Zumal deren Qualität nicht schlechter ist als die heimischer Produkte. Wie berechtigt sind diese Befürchtungen? Sorgt der Mindestlohn tatsächlich dafür, dass sich der Anbau bestimmter Kulturen in Deutschland bald nicht mehr lohnt? Dominik Bartoschek diskutiert mit Dr. Hildegard Garming – Agrarökonomin, Thünen-Institut für Betriebswirtschaft, Braunschweig; Benjamin Luig – Fachreferent für Agrarwirtschaft bei der Industriegewerkschaft Bauen-Agrar-Umwelt, Berlin; Simon Schumacher – Vorstandssprecher und Geschäftsführer des Verbands Süddeutscher Spargel- und Erdbeeranbauer e.V.

Vor ein paar Wochen haben die Kolleg*innen beim Dönerspießhersteller Birtat in Murr den ersten Tarifvertrag in ihrer Branche und damit bessere Einkommen für sich erkämpft. Einige hundert Male begegnete uns unter unseren Beiträgen und Videos dazu die Befürchtung, dass das den Döner im Laden (noch) teurer machen würde. Ob da was dran ist, hat Peter mal ordentlich durchgerechnet. Was alles zum Preis eines Döners beiträgt, wie das im Vergleich mit anderen Branchen aussieht und was das alles mit Arbeit zu tun hat, erfahrt ihr in dieser Folge. 0:00 Intro und Trivia 2:33 Warum diese Folge? 8:34 Was ist politische Ökonomie? 15:32 Die politische Ökonomie des Döners 56:26 Schlusswort und Abspann ---------------------------------------- Den Arbeitswelt Podcast findet ihr überall, wo es Podcasts gibt, und immer unter https://arbeitsweltradio.podigee.io/. Weitere Informationen, aktuelle Termine und Kontaktdaten der DGB-Region Stuttgart findet ihr unter https://stuttgart.dgb.de. ---------------------------------------- Der Arbeitswelt Podcast ist ein Angebot der DGB-Region Stuttgart. Radaktion: Peter Schadt und Andre Fricke. V.i.S.d.P.: Julia Friedrich, DGB-Region Stuttgart, Willi-Bleicher-Straße 20, 70174 Stuttgart

Die Schweiz stimmt über die Abschaffung des Eigenmietwerts ab. Eigentümer:innen müssten den fiktiven Mietwert nicht mehr versteuern, gleichzeitig würden Abzüge – etwa für Hypothekarzinsen – eingeschränkt. Befürworter:innen sehen ein einfacheres Steuersystem, Gegner:innen kritisieren ein Privileg für Eigentümer:innen. Umstritten ist auch, ob eine Steuer auf Zweitwohnungen Einnahmeausfälle decken kann.

Olympische Spiele in München. Das könnte wieder Wirklichkeit werden. Am 26. Oktober findet dazu ein Bürgerentscheid statt, jetzt hat das Wahlamt damit begonnen, die Unterlagen dazu zu versenden. Rund 1,1 Millionen Menschen in München sollen darüber abstimmen, ob sich die Stadt um Olympische und Paralympische Spiele in den Jahren 2036, 2040 oder 2044 bewerben soll. Irene Esmann erklärt, wie die Abstimmung erfolgt. Befürworter und Gegner kommen zu Wort und Martin Raspe aus der BR24 Sportredaktion erklärt, was nach einem positiven Bürgerentscheid die nächsten Schritte sind und wie wahrscheinlich es überhaupt ist, dass München wieder Olympia-Stadt wird. Moderation : Theresia Graw

Die europäischen Unterstützer der Ukraine versuchen mit Begriffen wie „Friedensordnung“, „Friedenssicherung“ und „Friedenstruppen“, ihren eigenen Bevölkerungen einzureden, es ginge ihnen um eine baldige friedliche Lösung des Konflikts mit Russland. Das tatsächliche Frontgeschehen der letzten zweieinhalb Jahre offenbart jedoch die offensichtlich wahren Absichten hinter den „Friedensbemühungen“. Die Formulierungen der Befürworter einer Eskalation des Krieges in derWeiterlesen

Das Thema Schule stand heute gleich mehrfach auf der Tagesordnung des St. Galler Kantonsparlaments. Die Regierung hat unter anderem darüber berichtet, wie gut die Schülerinnen und Schüler sind & was gegen den Lehrpersonenmangel helfen könnte. Wir waren bei der Debatte dabei und fassen sie zusammen. Weitere Themen: · Windkraftstandorte im Richtplan? In Appenzell Ausserrhoden rufen Gegner und Befürworter schon vor der Debatte zum Demonstrieren auf - und zwar vor dem Kantonsparlament. Das ist aussergewöhnlich. · Nach fast 30 Jahren. Das Trainerteam der OLMA-Rennsäuli übergibt das Amt in neue Hände. Ein Abschiedsgespräch.

⭐️ Live: https://zeroemissions.eu/live⭐️ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/zeroemissions.eu/⭐️ ⁠⁠vianu.shop⁠⁠ (Werbung)In diesem Podcast spricht Michael Walther über seine bevorstehende Herausforderung, 6.000 km alleine über den Atlantik zu paddeln. Er verbindet dieses Abenteuer mit seinem Zero Emissions Projekt, das sich für Klima- und Meeresschutz einsetzt. Michael teilt seine Erfahrungen aus früheren Projekten, die Ausstattung seines Bootes, die Vorbereitung und das Training, sowie die Risiken und Ängste, die mit dieser Reise verbunden sind. In diesem Gespräch erzählt Michael von seinen Vorbereitungen und den Herausforderungen, die er während seiner Atlantiküberquerung mit dem Stand-Up-Paddle Board erwartet. Er spricht über die Risiken, die er eingeht, wie die Gefahr von Stürmen, Blitzen und der Einsamkeit auf dem Wasser. Zudem gibt er Einblicke in seinen Alltag, seine Ernährung und die mentale Vorbereitung auf die Reise. Michael teilt auch seine Erwartungen an Naturerlebnisse und die Veränderungen, die er durch das Abenteuer erwartet. Abschließend reflektiert er über den Sinn des Lebens und die Bedeutung von Erlebnissen und Inspiration.#klimawandel #klimaschutz #buddhaweisheitpodcast Video: Inhalte von buddhaweisheit Copyright, Videos und Ausschnitte von Michael Walthers Instagram KanalAudio: Inhalte von buddahweisheit Copyright Angaben zur Verwendung von Bildern und Videos: Microsoft designer (AI Genrierte Bilder und Infografiken) Pexels.com / canva.com (Premium) / pixapay.com Haftungsausschluss / DisclaimerDie in diesem Podcast geäußerten Meinungen, Erfahrungen und Aussagen stammen ausschließlich von den jeweiligen Gästen und spiegeln nicht notwendigerweise die Haltung oder Meinung des Moderators bzw. des Podcast-Teams wider.Dieser Podcast dient ausschließlich zu Informations- und Diskussionszwecken und ersetzt in keiner Weise eine medizinische, rechtliche oder anderweitige fachliche Beratung. Insbesondere bei gesundheitlichen Fragen wird ausdrücklich empfohlen, sich an qualifiziertes medizinisches Fachpersonal zu wenden.Wir übernehmen keine Verantwortung für mögliche Konsequenzen, die sich aus der Anwendung der im Podcast besprochenen Inhalte ergeben könnten. Jede:r Hörer:in ist selbst dafür verantwortlich, kritisch mit den Informationen umzugehen und gegebenenfalls weitere Quellen zu konsultieren.Die Erwähnung oder Darstellung bestimmter Behandlungen, Therapien oder Heilmethoden bedeutet keine Empfehlung oder Befürwortung durch die Podcast-Redaktion.

Nick Lloyd's "The Western Front: The History of the Great War, Volume 1" provides a comprehensive narrative of the Great War in Belgium and France from 1914 to 1918. As the first volume of a planned trilogy, this work aims to offer a nuanced understanding of this pivotal theater, moving beyond common myths and focusing on the operational perspective of senior commanders across all involved powers. 1919 LONDON CHURCHILL Z PERSHING Here's a summary of the key aspects, figures, and events covered: Lloyd's Ambition and Approach Comprehensive Narrative: Lloyd, a reader in military and imperial history at King's College London, undertook this "big project" to create a grand narrative of the entire Western Front, encompassing the French sector, American sector, and the German story, alongside the often-emphasized British perspective. Focus on Senior Commanders: A primary goal was to view the war from the lens of senior commanders, challenging the traditional portrayal of them as "donkeys or butchers and bunglers." Lloyd aims to help readers appreciate the immense pressures and difficulties these individuals faced, offering a "cooler perspective" on their successes and errors. Trilogy: This book is the first of three volumes; future volumes will cover the Eastern Front and global warfare in the Middle East and Africa. Lloyd emphasizes that while other fronts are mentioned, the Western Front remained the decisive theater where Germany, France, Britain, and America determined the war's outcome. British Involvement and Leadership Initial Reluctance: Britain initially entered the conflict with a limited commitment, deploying only four infantry divisions and one cavalry division as the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), a "small army" compared to the French (80 divisions) and Germans (over 100 divisions). This reflected a desire for "limited liability" to the Western Front, contrasting sharply with French demands for more manpower. Early Leaders: H.H. Asquith (Prime Minister) was reportedly distracted by personal affairs at the war's outset. Lord Kitchener (Minister of War) was a professional soldier and hero of the empire, wary of deep British involvement but committed to supporting the French. Field Marshal Sir John French (Commander-in-Chief, BEF) was a Boer War hero who found himself "out of his depth" by 1914, struggling with the war's scale and intensity. During the August 1914 retreat, French considered pulling the BEF out of the line due to immense losses and pressure, a move Kitchener personally intervened to prevent, ordering French to stay and fight. Frencheventually "breaks down" due to losses and pressure and is sent home at the end of 1915. Later Leadership and Strategy: David Lloyd George (Prime Minister from late 1916) is credited as "the prime minister that wins the war" in Britain. He showed great energy in revitalizing British industry and re-equipping the army, despite having poor relations with his top generals. Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig replaced French as Commander-in-Chief of the BEF. Haig and Lloyd George had fundamentally different strategic outlooks, leading to "constant arguments and backstabbing". At the Battle of the Somme (1916), Haig favored a breakthrough strategy, aiming for maneuver and cavalry deployment to defeat the German army. However, his army commander, Rawlinson, advocated a "bite and hold" strategy, focusing on concentrated artillery to smash enemy lines, take ground, then consolidate before repeating, acknowledging that a grand breakthrough was not yet feasible for the largely "green" British army. German Strategy and Commanders Initial Invasion: The German invasion of France and Belgium in 1914 was based on the ambitious Schlieffen Plan, which aimed for a massive attack through Belgium to outflank French defenses and destroy their army in a grand battle of envelopment. Helmuth von Moltke the Younger (Chief of the General Staff) was under immense pressure and altered the Schlieffen Plan, weakening its critical right wing, and ultimately suffered a nervous breakdown by mid-September 1914. Moltke's controversial decision to order General Kluck's First Army to turn southeast instead of enveloping Paris contributed to the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, despite Kluck initially ignoring the order. Kaiser Wilhelm: His character was inconsistent, often described as a "weather vane," and he gradually became a less central figure as Hindenburg and Ludendorff gained influence from 1916. Erich von Falkenhayn (replaces Moltke in 1914) was the architect of the Verdun Offensive (1916). His vision was unique, aiming not for territorial gains but for attrition: to "kill Frenchmen" and exhaust them. Political Interference: Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg often opposed Falkenhayn's desire for unrestricted submarine warfare due to diplomatic concerns (e.g., fear of American entry), illustrating the German military's tendency to prioritize tactical effectiveness over political and strategic issues, which was ultimately "fatal". French Efforts and Leadership Joseph Joffre (Commander of French Forces): Described as a "great hero" of the French army, Joffrepossessed remarkable calmness and an ability to absorb punishment and react quickly. His leadership was crucial in defeating the Schlieffen Plan and counterattacking at the Battle of the Marne in September 1914, preventing a German victory. Raymond Poincaré (President of the French Republic): A nationalist deeply involved in military analysis, Poincaré was central to the political efforts to reassert civilian primacy over the army and secure British manpower commitments. General Castelnau (Joffre's chief of staff): A deeply religious man who personally lost three sons in the war, Castelnau exemplifies the human cost and personal horror experienced by some senior commanders, helping to humanize these figures in Lloyd's narrative. Robert Nivelle: An artillery officer who rose rapidly due to his successes at Verdun, Nivelle replaced Joffrein December 1916. He attempted a decisive breakthrough in his Nivelle Offensive in April 1917 with a "formula" for success, but it failed catastrophically due to his being "out of his depth" at the command-in-chief level, leading to French army issues including mutiny. Philippe Pétain: Replaced Nivelle, Pétain became a "savior of France." He was renowned for his deep understanding of battlefield realities and a strong connection with his troops. At Verdun, he innovated by rotating divisions out of the line for rest and recuperation, contrasting with the German practice of fighting units "until basically there's not a lot left". Ferdinand Foch (Supreme Allied Commander from April 1918): Foch is widely regarded as one of the most important generals of the war. He was an energetic and charismatic leader who successfully coordinated the American, British, and French forces in 1918, leading them to victory in the multinational war. His reputation continues to strengthen over time. American Involvement Entry into War: The United States declared war on Germany and Austria in April 1917. General John J. Pershing arrived in Paris in June 1917 to lead the American Expeditionary Force (AEF), despite having only 113,000 men in the army at the time. Rejection of Amalgamation: Pershing steadfastly resisted French and British desires to "amalgamate" American manpower into their existing divisions, insisting that American soldiers fight as an independent army. He argued that the Allies had a poor record of "not killing your own troops". German Miscalculation: Germany severely underestimated how quickly the United States could build and deploy an army, believing it would take years. This misjudgment ultimately contributed to their defeat once the Americans demonstrated their seriousness in 1918. American involvement became "crucial" by 1917, changing the atmosphere. Evolution of Warfare on the Western Front From Movement to Stalemate: The initial German invasion failed to achieve a decisive victory, leading to the establishment of trench warfare after the Battle of the Marne. Realization of No Breakthrough: After the Second Battle of Champagne (1915), Allied and Germancommanders like Joffre and Falkenhayn began to recognize that a "grand shattering breakthrough" was not achievable in the foreseeable future. Constant Adaptation: This realization led to a continuous arms race. As Allied artillery and tactics improved, German defenses evolved from single lines to complex "zones of pill boxes," making progress difficult and bloody. The war became an intense exercise in violence where commanders constantly adapted to a "cauldron of war". Key Battles and Their Significance Battle of the Marne (September 1914): Joffre's successful counterattack forced the Germans to retreat, effectively ending the Schlieffen Plan and leading to the beginning of trench warfare. Second Battle of Champagne (September-October 1915): A major French offensive that, despite immense effort and casualties, failed to achieve a decisive breakthrough, solidifying the understanding that trench deadlock could not be easily broken. Verdun (1916): Falkenhayn's attrition battle, designed to "kill Frenchmen," concentrated immense firepower in a small area, creating a "moonscape effect." While not decisive in destroying the French, it was a moment where "things start to go wrong for Germany," from which she never truly recovers. Somme (1916): A British and French offensive intended to relieve pressure on Verdun, but also driven by Haig's ambition for a breakthrough. The debate between breakthrough and Rawlinson's "bite and hold" strategy highlighted the dilemmas of Western Front warfare. Nivelle Offensive (April 1917): A disastrous French attempt at a breakthrough, which highlighted Nivelle'soverreach and led to significant disillusionment and mutiny within the French army. End of the War and its Legacy German Defeat: Lloyd's book argues that the German army was "falling apart" and "defeated rapidly in 1918" despite the persistent "stab in the back" myth that claimed they were betrayed at home. Armistice Decision: The decision by the Allies not to invade Germany was primarily political, as the British and French were "totally exhausted," while the Americans were "much fresher" and more keen to continue. Lloyd considers the armistice "fair on all sides". Lloyd's work underscores that the Western Front was a complex, multinational struggle marked by evolving strategies, immense pressures on commanders, and profound human costs, which ultimately determined the course of the Great War and cast a long shadow over the 20th century.

Nick Lloyd's "The Western Front: The History of the Great War, Volume 1" provides a comprehensive narrative of the Great War in Belgium and France from 1914 to 1918. As the first volume of a planned trilogy, this work aims to offer a nuanced understanding of this pivotal theater, moving beyond common myths and focusing on the operational perspective of senior commanders across all involved powers. 1914 ROYAL FLYING CORPS Here's a summary of the key aspects, figures, and events covered: Lloyd's Ambition and Approach Comprehensive Narrative: Lloyd, a reader in military and imperial history at King's College London, undertook this "big project" to create a grand narrative of the entire Western Front, encompassing the French sector, American sector, and the German story, alongside the often-emphasized British perspective. Focus on Senior Commanders: A primary goal was to view the war from the lens of senior commanders, challenging the traditional portrayal of them as "donkeys or butchers and bunglers." Lloyd aims to help readers appreciate the immense pressures and difficulties these individuals faced, offering a "cooler perspective" on their successes and errors. Trilogy: This book is the first of three volumes; future volumes will cover the Eastern Front and global warfare in the Middle East and Africa. Lloyd emphasizes that while other fronts are mentioned, the Western Front remained the decisive theater where Germany, France, Britain, and America determined the war's outcome. British Involvement and Leadership Initial Reluctance: Britain initially entered the conflict with a limited commitment, deploying only four infantry divisions and one cavalry division as the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), a "small army" compared to the French (80 divisions) and Germans (over 100 divisions). This reflected a desire for "limited liability" to the Western Front, contrasting sharply with French demands for more manpower. Early Leaders: H.H. Asquith (Prime Minister) was reportedly distracted by personal affairs at the war's outset. Lord Kitchener (Minister of War) was a professional soldier and hero of the empire, wary of deep British involvement but committed to supporting the French. Field Marshal Sir John French (Commander-in-Chief, BEF) was a Boer War hero who found himself "out of his depth" by 1914, struggling with the war's scale and intensity. During the August 1914 retreat, French considered pulling the BEF out of the line due to immense losses and pressure, a move Kitchener personally intervened to prevent, ordering French to stay and fight. Frencheventually "breaks down" due to losses and pressure and is sent home at the end of 1915. Later Leadership and Strategy: David Lloyd George (Prime Minister from late 1916) is credited as "the prime minister that wins the war" in Britain. He showed great energy in revitalizing British industry and re-equipping the army, despite having poor relations with his top generals. Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig replaced French as Commander-in-Chief of the BEF. Haig and Lloyd George had fundamentally different strategic outlooks, leading to "constant arguments and backstabbing". At the Battle of the Somme (1916), Haig favored a breakthrough strategy, aiming for maneuver and cavalry deployment to defeat the German army. However, his army commander, Rawlinson, advocated a "bite and hold" strategy, focusing on concentrated artillery to smash enemy lines, take ground, then consolidate before repeating, acknowledging that a grand breakthrough was not yet feasible for the largely "green" British army. German Strategy and Commanders Initial Invasion: The German invasion of France and Belgium in 1914 was based on the ambitious Schlieffen Plan, which aimed for a massive attack through Belgium to outflank French defenses and destroy their army in a grand battle of envelopment. Helmuth von Moltke the Younger (Chief of the General Staff) was under immense pressure and altered the Schlieffen Plan, weakening its critical right wing, and ultimately suffered a nervous breakdown by mid-September 1914. Moltke's controversial decision to order General Kluck's First Army to turn southeast instead of enveloping Paris contributed to the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, despite Kluck initially ignoring the order. Kaiser Wilhelm: His character was inconsistent, often described as a "weather vane," and he gradually became a less central figure as Hindenburg and Ludendorff gained influence from 1916. Erich von Falkenhayn (replaces Moltke in 1914) was the architect of the Verdun Offensive (1916). His vision was unique, aiming not for territorial gains but for attrition: to "kill Frenchmen" and exhaust them. Political Interference: Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg often opposed Falkenhayn's desire for unrestricted submarine warfare due to diplomatic concerns (e.g., fear of American entry), illustrating the German military's tendency to prioritize tactical effectiveness over political and strategic issues, which was ultimately "fatal". French Efforts and Leadership Joseph Joffre (Commander of French Forces): Described as a "great hero" of the French army, Joffrepossessed remarkable calmness and an ability to absorb punishment and react quickly. His leadership was crucial in defeating the Schlieffen Plan and counterattacking at the Battle of the Marne in September 1914, preventing a German victory. Raymond Poincaré (President of the French Republic): A nationalist deeply involved in military analysis, Poincaré was central to the political efforts to reassert civilian primacy over the army and secure British manpower commitments. General Castelnau (Joffre's chief of staff): A deeply religious man who personally lost three sons in the war, Castelnau exemplifies the human cost and personal horror experienced by some senior commanders, helping to humanize these figures in Lloyd's narrative. Robert Nivelle: An artillery officer who rose rapidly due to his successes at Verdun, Nivelle replaced Joffrein December 1916. He attempted a decisive breakthrough in his Nivelle Offensive in April 1917 with a "formula" for success, but it failed catastrophically due to his being "out of his depth" at the command-in-chief level, leading to French army issues including mutiny. Philippe Pétain: Replaced Nivelle, Pétain became a "savior of France." He was renowned for his deep understanding of battlefield realities and a strong connection with his troops. At Verdun, he innovated by rotating divisions out of the line for rest and recuperation, contrasting with the German practice of fighting units "until basically there's not a lot left". Ferdinand Foch (Supreme Allied Commander from April 1918): Foch is widely regarded as one of the most important generals of the war. He was an energetic and charismatic leader who successfully coordinated the American, British, and French forces in 1918, leading them to victory in the multinational war. His reputation continues to strengthen over time. American Involvement Entry into War: The United States declared war on Germany and Austria in April 1917. General John J. Pershing arrived in Paris in June 1917 to lead the American Expeditionary Force (AEF), despite having only 113,000 men in the army at the time. Rejection of Amalgamation: Pershing steadfastly resisted French and British desires to "amalgamate" American manpower into their existing divisions, insisting that American soldiers fight as an independent army. He argued that the Allies had a poor record of "not killing your own troops". German Miscalculation: Germany severely underestimated how quickly the United States could build and deploy an army, believing it would take years. This misjudgment ultimately contributed to their defeat once the Americans demonstrated their seriousness in 1918. American involvement became "crucial" by 1917, changing the atmosphere. Evolution of Warfare on the Western Front From Movement to Stalemate: The initial German invasion failed to achieve a decisive victory, leading to the establishment of trench warfare after the Battle of the Marne. Realization of No Breakthrough: After the Second Battle of Champagne (1915), Allied and Germancommanders like Joffre and Falkenhayn began to recognize that a "grand shattering breakthrough" was not achievable in the foreseeable future. Constant Adaptation: This realization led to a continuous arms race. As Allied artillery and tactics improved, German defenses evolved from single lines to complex "zones of pill boxes," making progress difficult and bloody. The war became an intense exercise in violence where commanders constantly adapted to a "cauldron of war". Key Battles and Their Significance Battle of the Marne (September 1914): Joffre's successful counterattack forced the Germans to retreat, effectively ending the Schlieffen Plan and leading to the beginning of trench warfare. Second Battle of Champagne (September-October 1915): A major French offensive that, despite immense effort and casualties, failed to achieve a decisive breakthrough, solidifying the understanding that trench deadlock could not be easily broken. Verdun (1916): Falkenhayn's attrition battle, designed to "kill Frenchmen," concentrated immense firepower in a small area, creating a "moonscape effect." While not decisive in destroying the French, it was a moment where "things start to go wrong for Germany," from which she never truly recovers. Somme (1916): A British and French offensive intended to relieve pressure on Verdun, but also driven by Haig's ambition for a breakthrough. The debate between breakthrough and Rawlinson's "bite and hold" strategy highlighted the dilemmas of Western Front warfare. Nivelle Offensive (April 1917): A disastrous French attempt at a breakthrough, which highlighted Nivelle'soverreach and led to significant disillusionment and mutiny within the French army. End of the War and its Legacy German Defeat: Lloyd's book argues that the German army was "falling apart" and "defeated rapidly in 1918" despite the persistent "stab in the back" myth that claimed they were betrayed at home. Armistice Decision: The decision by the Allies not to invade Germany was primarily political, as the British and French were "totally exhausted," while the Americans were "much fresher" and more keen to continue. Lloyd considers the armistice "fair on all sides". Lloyd's work underscores that the Western Front was a complex, multinational struggle marked by evolving strategies, immense pressures on commanders, and profound human costs, which ultimately determined the course of the Great War and cast a long shadow over the 20th century.

Nick Lloyd's "The Western Front: The History of the Great War, Volume 1" provides a comprehensive narrative of the Great War in Belgium and France from 1914 to 1918. As the first volume of a planned trilogy, this work aims to offer a nuanced understanding of this pivotal theater, moving beyond common myths and focusing on the operational perspective of senior commanders across all involved powers. 1914 BELGIUM Here's a summary of the key aspects, figures, and events covered: Lloyd's Ambition and Approach Comprehensive Narrative: Lloyd, a reader in military and imperial history at King's College London, undertook this "big project" to create a grand narrative of the entire Western Front, encompassing the French sector, American sector, and the German story, alongside the often-emphasized British perspective. Focus on Senior Commanders: A primary goal was to view the war from the lens of senior commanders, challenging the traditional portrayal of them as "donkeys or butchers and bunglers." Lloyd aims to help readers appreciate the immense pressures and difficulties these individuals faced, offering a "cooler perspective" on their successes and errors. Trilogy: This book is the first of three volumes; future volumes will cover the Eastern Front and global warfare in the Middle East and Africa. Lloyd emphasizes that while other fronts are mentioned, the Western Front remained the decisive theater where Germany, France, Britain, and America determined the war's outcome. British Involvement and Leadership Initial Reluctance: Britain initially entered the conflict with a limited commitment, deploying only four infantry divisions and one cavalry division as the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), a "small army" compared to the French (80 divisions) and Germans (over 100 divisions). This reflected a desire for "limited liability" to the Western Front, contrasting sharply with French demands for more manpower. Early Leaders: H.H. Asquith (Prime Minister) was reportedly distracted by personal affairs at the war's outset. Lord Kitchener (Minister of War) was a professional soldier and hero of the empire, wary of deep British involvement but committed to supporting the French. Field Marshal Sir John French (Commander-in-Chief, BEF) was a Boer War hero who found himself "out of his depth" by 1914, struggling with the war's scale and intensity. During the August 1914 retreat, French considered pulling the BEF out of the line due to immense losses and pressure, a move Kitchener personally intervened to prevent, ordering French to stay and fight. Frencheventually "breaks down" due to losses and pressure and is sent home at the end of 1915. Later Leadership and Strategy: David Lloyd George (Prime Minister from late 1916) is credited as "the prime minister that wins the war" in Britain. He showed great energy in revitalizing British industry and re-equipping the army, despite having poor relations with his top generals. Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig replaced French as Commander-in-Chief of the BEF. Haig and Lloyd George had fundamentally different strategic outlooks, leading to "constant arguments and backstabbing". At the Battle of the Somme (1916), Haig favored a breakthrough strategy, aiming for maneuver and cavalry deployment to defeat the German army. However, his army commander, Rawlinson, advocated a "bite and hold" strategy, focusing on concentrated artillery to smash enemy lines, take ground, then consolidate before repeating, acknowledging that a grand breakthrough was not yet feasible for the largely "green" British army. German Strategy and Commanders Initial Invasion: The German invasion of France and Belgium in 1914 was based on the ambitious Schlieffen Plan, which aimed for a massive attack through Belgium to outflank French defenses and destroy their army in a grand battle of envelopment. Helmuth von Moltke the Younger (Chief of the General Staff) was under immense pressure and altered the Schlieffen Plan, weakening its critical right wing, and ultimately suffered a nervous breakdown by mid-September 1914. Moltke's controversial decision to order General Kluck's First Army to turn southeast instead of enveloping Paris contributed to the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, despite Kluck initially ignoring the order. Kaiser Wilhelm: His character was inconsistent, often described as a "weather vane," and he gradually became a less central figure as Hindenburg and Ludendorff gained influence from 1916. Erich von Falkenhayn (replaces Moltke in 1914) was the architect of the Verdun Offensive (1916). His vision was unique, aiming not for territorial gains but for attrition: to "kill Frenchmen" and exhaust them. Political Interference: Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg often opposed Falkenhayn's desire for unrestricted submarine warfare due to diplomatic concerns (e.g., fear of American entry), illustrating the German military's tendency to prioritize tactical effectiveness over political and strategic issues, which was ultimately "fatal". French Efforts and Leadership Joseph Joffre (Commander of French Forces): Described as a "great hero" of the French army, Joffrepossessed remarkable calmness and an ability to absorb punishment and react quickly. His leadership was crucial in defeating the Schlieffen Plan and counterattacking at the Battle of the Marne in September 1914, preventing a German victory. Raymond Poincaré (President of the French Republic): A nationalist deeply involved in military analysis, Poincaré was central to the political efforts to reassert civilian primacy over the army and secure British manpower commitments. General Castelnau (Joffre's chief of staff): A deeply religious man who personally lost three sons in the war, Castelnau exemplifies the human cost and personal horror experienced by some senior commanders, helping to humanize these figures in Lloyd's narrative. Robert Nivelle: An artillery officer who rose rapidly due to his successes at Verdun, Nivelle replaced Joffrein December 1916. He attempted a decisive breakthrough in his Nivelle Offensive in April 1917 with a "formula" for success, but it failed catastrophically due to his being "out of his depth" at the command-in-chief level, leading to French army issues including mutiny. Philippe Pétain: Replaced Nivelle, Pétain became a "savior of France." He was renowned for his deep understanding of battlefield realities and a strong connection with his troops. At Verdun, he innovated by rotating divisions out of the line for rest and recuperation, contrasting with the German practice of fighting units "until basically there's not a lot left". Ferdinand Foch (Supreme Allied Commander from April 1918): Foch is widely regarded as one of the most important generals of the war. He was an energetic and charismatic leader who successfully coordinated the American, British, and French forces in 1918, leading them to victory in the multinational war. His reputation continues to strengthen over time. American Involvement Entry into War: The United States declared war on Germany and Austria in April 1917. General John J. Pershing arrived in Paris in June 1917 to lead the American Expeditionary Force (AEF), despite having only 113,000 men in the army at the time. Rejection of Amalgamation: Pershing steadfastly resisted French and British desires to "amalgamate" American manpower into their existing divisions, insisting that American soldiers fight as an independent army. He argued that the Allies had a poor record of "not killing your own troops". German Miscalculation: Germany severely underestimated how quickly the United States could build and deploy an army, believing it would take years. This misjudgment ultimately contributed to their defeat once the Americans demonstrated their seriousness in 1918. American involvement became "crucial" by 1917, changing the atmosphere. Evolution of Warfare on the Western Front From Movement to Stalemate: The initial German invasion failed to achieve a decisive victory, leading to the establishment of trench warfare after the Battle of the Marne. Realization of No Breakthrough: After the Second Battle of Champagne (1915), Allied and Germancommanders like Joffre and Falkenhayn began to recognize that a "grand shattering breakthrough" was not achievable in the foreseeable future. Constant Adaptation: This realization led to a continuous arms race. As Allied artillery and tactics improved, German defenses evolved from single lines to complex "zones of pill boxes," making progress difficult and bloody. The war became an intense exercise in violence where commanders constantly adapted to a "cauldron of war". Key Battles and Their Significance Battle of the Marne (September 1914): Joffre's successful counterattack forced the Germans to retreat, effectively ending the Schlieffen Plan and leading to the beginning of trench warfare. Second Battle of Champagne (September-October 1915): A major French offensive that, despite immense effort and casualties, failed to achieve a decisive breakthrough, solidifying the understanding that trench deadlock could not be easily broken. Verdun (1916): Falkenhayn's attrition battle, designed to "kill Frenchmen," concentrated immense firepower in a small area, creating a "moonscape effect." While not decisive in destroying the French, it was a moment where "things start to go wrong for Germany," from which she never truly recovers. Somme (1916): A British and French offensive intended to relieve pressure on Verdun, but also driven by Haig's ambition for a breakthrough. The debate between breakthrough and Rawlinson's "bite and hold" strategy highlighted the dilemmas of Western Front warfare. Nivelle Offensive (April 1917): A disastrous French attempt at a breakthrough, which highlighted Nivelle'soverreach and led to significant disillusionment and mutiny within the French army. End of the War and its Legacy German Defeat: Lloyd's book argues that the German army was "falling apart" and "defeated rapidly in 1918" despite the persistent "stab in the back" myth that claimed they were betrayed at home. Armistice Decision: The decision by the Allies not to invade Germany was primarily political, as the British and French were "totally exhausted," while the Americans were "much fresher" and more keen to continue. Lloyd considers the armistice "fair on all sides". Lloyd's work underscores that the Western Front was a complex, multinational struggle marked by evolving strategies, immense pressures on commanders, and profound human costs, which ultimately determined the course of the Great War and cast a long shadow over the 20th century.

Nick Lloyd's "The Western Front: The History of the Great War, Volume 1" provides a comprehensive narrative of the Great War in Belgium and France from 1914 to 1918. As the first volume of a planned trilogy, this work aims to offer a nuanced understanding of this pivotal theater, moving beyond common myths and focusing on the operational perspective of senior commanders across all involved powers. 1914 HINDENBERG Here's a summary of the key aspects, figures, and events covered: Lloyd's Ambition and Approach Comprehensive Narrative: Lloyd, a reader in military and imperial history at King's College London, undertook this "big project" to create a grand narrative of the entire Western Front, encompassing the French sector, American sector, and the German story, alongside the often-emphasized British perspective. Focus on Senior Commanders: A primary goal was to view the war from the lens of senior commanders, challenging the traditional portrayal of them as "donkeys or butchers and bunglers." Lloyd aims to help readers appreciate the immense pressures and difficulties these individuals faced, offering a "cooler perspective" on their successes and errors. Trilogy: This book is the first of three volumes; future volumes will cover the Eastern Front and global warfare in the Middle East and Africa. Lloyd emphasizes that while other fronts are mentioned, the Western Front remained the decisive theater where Germany, France, Britain, and America determined the war's outcome. British Involvement and Leadership Initial Reluctance: Britain initially entered the conflict with a limited commitment, deploying only four infantry divisions and one cavalry division as the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), a "small army" compared to the French (80 divisions) and Germans (over 100 divisions). This reflected a desire for "limited liability" to the Western Front, contrasting sharply with French demands for more manpower. Early Leaders: H.H. Asquith (Prime Minister) was reportedly distracted by personal affairs at the war's outset. Lord Kitchener (Minister of War) was a professional soldier and hero of the empire, wary of deep British involvement but committed to supporting the French. Field Marshal Sir John French (Commander-in-Chief, BEF) was a Boer War hero who found himself "out of his depth" by 1914, struggling with the war's scale and intensity. During the August 1914 retreat, French considered pulling the BEF out of the line due to immense losses and pressure, a move Kitchener personally intervened to prevent, ordering French to stay and fight. Frencheventually "breaks down" due to losses and pressure and is sent home at the end of 1915. Later Leadership and Strategy: David Lloyd George (Prime Minister from late 1916) is credited as "the prime minister that wins the war" in Britain. He showed great energy in revitalizing British industry and re-equipping the army, despite having poor relations with his top generals. Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig replaced French as Commander-in-Chief of the BEF. Haig and Lloyd George had fundamentally different strategic outlooks, leading to "constant arguments and backstabbing". At the Battle of the Somme (1916), Haig favored a breakthrough strategy, aiming for maneuver and cavalry deployment to defeat the German army. However, his army commander, Rawlinson, advocated a "bite and hold" strategy, focusing on concentrated artillery to smash enemy lines, take ground, then consolidate before repeating, acknowledging that a grand breakthrough was not yet feasible for the largely "green" British army. German Strategy and Commanders Initial Invasion: The German invasion of France and Belgium in 1914 was based on the ambitious Schlieffen Plan, which aimed for a massive attack through Belgium to outflank French defenses and destroy their army in a grand battle of envelopment. Helmuth von Moltke the Younger (Chief of the General Staff) was under immense pressure and altered the Schlieffen Plan, weakening its critical right wing, and ultimately suffered a nervous breakdown by mid-September 1914. Moltke's controversial decision to order General Kluck's First Army to turn southeast instead of enveloping Paris contributed to the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, despite Kluck initially ignoring the order. Kaiser Wilhelm: His character was inconsistent, often described as a "weather vane," and he gradually became a less central figure as Hindenburg and Ludendorff gained influence from 1916. Erich von Falkenhayn (replaces Moltke in 1914) was the architect of the Verdun Offensive (1916). His vision was unique, aiming not for territorial gains but for attrition: to "kill Frenchmen" and exhaust them. Political Interference: Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg often opposed Falkenhayn's desire for unrestricted submarine warfare due to diplomatic concerns (e.g., fear of American entry), illustrating the German military's tendency to prioritize tactical effectiveness over political and strategic issues, which was ultimately "fatal". French Efforts and Leadership Joseph Joffre (Commander of French Forces): Described as a "great hero" of the French army, Joffrepossessed remarkable calmness and an ability to absorb punishment and react quickly. His leadership was crucial in defeating the Schlieffen Plan and counterattacking at the Battle of the Marne in September 1914, preventing a German victory. Raymond Poincaré (President of the French Republic): A nationalist deeply involved in military analysis, Poincaré was central to the political efforts to reassert civilian primacy over the army and secure British manpower commitments. General Castelnau (Joffre's chief of staff): A deeply religious man who personally lost three sons in the war, Castelnau exemplifies the human cost and personal horror experienced by some senior commanders, helping to humanize these figures in Lloyd's narrative. Robert Nivelle: An artillery officer who rose rapidly due to his successes at Verdun, Nivelle replaced Joffrein December 1916. He attempted a decisive breakthrough in his Nivelle Offensive in April 1917 with a "formula" for success, but it failed catastrophically due to his being "out of his depth" at the command-in-chief level, leading to French army issues including mutiny. Philippe Pétain: Replaced Nivelle, Pétain became a "savior of France." He was renowned for his deep understanding of battlefield realities and a strong connection with his troops. At Verdun, he innovated by rotating divisions out of the line for rest and recuperation, contrasting with the German practice of fighting units "until basically there's not a lot left". Ferdinand Foch (Supreme Allied Commander from April 1918): Foch is widely regarded as one of the most important generals of the war. He was an energetic and charismatic leader who successfully coordinated the American, British, and French forces in 1918, leading them to victory in the multinational war. His reputation continues to strengthen over time. American Involvement Entry into War: The United States declared war on Germany and Austria in April 1917. General John J. Pershing arrived in Paris in June 1917 to lead the American Expeditionary Force (AEF), despite having only 113,000 men in the army at the time. Rejection of Amalgamation: Pershing steadfastly resisted French and British desires to "amalgamate" American manpower into their existing divisions, insisting that American soldiers fight as an independent army. He argued that the Allies had a poor record of "not killing your own troops". German Miscalculation: Germany severely underestimated how quickly the United States could build and deploy an army, believing it would take years. This misjudgment ultimately contributed to their defeat once the Americans demonstrated their seriousness in 1918. American involvement became "crucial" by 1917, changing the atmosphere. Evolution of Warfare on the Western Front From Movement to Stalemate: The initial German invasion failed to achieve a decisive victory, leading to the establishment of trench warfare after the Battle of the Marne. Realization of No Breakthrough: After the Second Battle of Champagne (1915), Allied and Germancommanders like Joffre and Falkenhayn began to recognize that a "grand shattering breakthrough" was not achievable in the foreseeable future. Constant Adaptation: This realization led to a continuous arms race. As Allied artillery and tactics improved, German defenses evolved from single lines to complex "zones of pill boxes," making progress difficult and bloody. The war became an intense exercise in violence where commanders constantly adapted to a "cauldron of war". Key Battles and Their Significance Battle of the Marne (September 1914): Joffre's successful counterattack forced the Germans to retreat, effectively ending the Schlieffen Plan and leading to the beginning of trench warfare. Second Battle of Champagne (September-October 1915): A major French offensive that, despite immense effort and casualties, failed to achieve a decisive breakthrough, solidifying the understanding that trench deadlock could not be easily broken. Verdun (1916): Falkenhayn's attrition battle, designed to "kill Frenchmen," concentrated immense firepower in a small area, creating a "moonscape effect." While not decisive in destroying the French, it was a moment where "things start to go wrong for Germany," from which she never truly recovers. Somme (1916): A British and French offensive intended to relieve pressure on Verdun, but also driven by Haig's ambition for a breakthrough. The debate between breakthrough and Rawlinson's "bite and hold" strategy highlighted the dilemmas of Western Front warfare. Nivelle Offensive (April 1917): A disastrous French attempt at a breakthrough, which highlighted Nivelle'soverreach and led to significant disillusionment and mutiny within the French army. End of the War and its Legacy German Defeat: Lloyd's book argues that the German army was "falling apart" and "defeated rapidly in 1918" despite the persistent "stab in the back" myth that claimed they were betrayed at home. Armistice Decision: The decision by the Allies not to invade Germany was primarily political, as the British and French were "totally exhausted," while the Americans were "much fresher" and more keen to continue. Lloyd considers the armistice "fair on all sides". Lloyd's work underscores that the Western Front was a complex, multinational struggle marked by evolving strategies, immense pressures on commanders, and profound human costs, which ultimately determined the course of the Great War and cast a long shadow over the 20th century.

Nick Lloyd's "The Western Front: The History of the Great War, Volume 1" provides a comprehensive narrative of the Great War in Belgium and France from 1914 to 1918. As the first volume of a planned trilogy, this work aims to offer a nuanced understanding of this pivotal theater, moving beyond common myths and focusing on the operational perspective of senior commanders across all involved powers. 1918 JOHN MONASH Here's a summary of the key aspects, figures, and events covered: Lloyd's Ambition and Approach Comprehensive Narrative: Lloyd, a reader in military and imperial history at King's College London, undertook this "big project" to create a grand narrative of the entire Western Front, encompassing the French sector, American sector, and the German story, alongside the often-emphasized British perspective. Focus on Senior Commanders: A primary goal was to view the war from the lens of senior commanders, challenging the traditional portrayal of them as "donkeys or butchers and bunglers." Lloyd aims to help readers appreciate the immense pressures and difficulties these individuals faced, offering a "cooler perspective" on their successes and errors. Trilogy: This book is the first of three volumes; future volumes will cover the Eastern Front and global warfare in the Middle East and Africa. Lloyd emphasizes that while other fronts are mentioned, the Western Front remained the decisive theater where Germany, France, Britain, and America determined the war's outcome. British Involvement and Leadership Initial Reluctance: Britain initially entered the conflict with a limited commitment, deploying only four infantry divisions and one cavalry division as the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), a "small army" compared to the French (80 divisions) and Germans (over 100 divisions). This reflected a desire for "limited liability" to the Western Front, contrasting sharply with French demands for more manpower. Early Leaders: H.H. Asquith (Prime Minister) was reportedly distracted by personal affairs at the war's outset. Lord Kitchener (Minister of War) was a professional soldier and hero of the empire, wary of deep British involvement but committed to supporting the French. Field Marshal Sir John French (Commander-in-Chief, BEF) was a Boer War hero who found himself "out of his depth" by 1914, struggling with the war's scale and intensity. During the August 1914 retreat, French considered pulling the BEF out of the line due to immense losses and pressure, a move Kitchener personally intervened to prevent, ordering French to stay and fight. Frencheventually "breaks down" due to losses and pressure and is sent home at the end of 1915. Later Leadership and Strategy: David Lloyd George (Prime Minister from late 1916) is credited as "the prime minister that wins the war" in Britain. He showed great energy in revitalizing British industry and re-equipping the army, despite having poor relations with his top generals. Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig replaced French as Commander-in-Chief of the BEF. Haig and Lloyd George had fundamentally different strategic outlooks, leading to "constant arguments and backstabbing". At the Battle of the Somme (1916), Haig favored a breakthrough strategy, aiming for maneuver and cavalry deployment to defeat the German army. However, his army commander, Rawlinson, advocated a "bite and hold" strategy, focusing on concentrated artillery to smash enemy lines, take ground, then consolidate before repeating, acknowledging that a grand breakthrough was not yet feasible for the largely "green" British army. German Strategy and Commanders Initial Invasion: The German invasion of France and Belgium in 1914 was based on the ambitious Schlieffen Plan, which aimed for a massive attack through Belgium to outflank French defenses and destroy their army in a grand battle of envelopment. Helmuth von Moltke the Younger (Chief of the General Staff) was under immense pressure and altered the Schlieffen Plan, weakening its critical right wing, and ultimately suffered a nervous breakdown by mid-September 1914. Moltke's controversial decision to order General Kluck's First Army to turn southeast instead of enveloping Paris contributed to the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, despite Kluck initially ignoring the order. Kaiser Wilhelm: His character was inconsistent, often described as a "weather vane," and he gradually became a less central figure as Hindenburg and Ludendorff gained influence from 1916. Erich von Falkenhayn (replaces Moltke in 1914) was the architect of the Verdun Offensive (1916). His vision was unique, aiming not for territorial gains but for attrition: to "kill Frenchmen" and exhaust them. Political Interference: Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg often opposed Falkenhayn's desire for unrestricted submarine warfare due to diplomatic concerns (e.g., fear of American entry), illustrating the German military's tendency to prioritize tactical effectiveness over political and strategic issues, which was ultimately "fatal". French Efforts and Leadership Joseph Joffre (Commander of French Forces): Described as a "great hero" of the French army, Joffrepossessed remarkable calmness and an ability to absorb punishment and react quickly. His leadership was crucial in defeating the Schlieffen Plan and counterattacking at the Battle of the Marne in September 1914, preventing a German victory. Raymond Poincaré (President of the French Republic): A nationalist deeply involved in military analysis, Poincaré was central to the political efforts to reassert civilian primacy over the army and secure British manpower commitments. General Castelnau (Joffre's chief of staff): A deeply religious man who personally lost three sons in the war, Castelnau exemplifies the human cost and personal horror experienced by some senior commanders, helping to humanize these figures in Lloyd's narrative. Robert Nivelle: An artillery officer who rose rapidly due to his successes at Verdun, Nivelle replaced Joffrein December 1916. He attempted a decisive breakthrough in his Nivelle Offensive in April 1917 with a "formula" for success, but it failed catastrophically due to his being "out of his depth" at the command-in-chief level, leading to French army issues including mutiny. Philippe Pétain: Replaced Nivelle, Pétain became a "savior of France." He was renowned for his deep understanding of battlefield realities and a strong connection with his troops. At Verdun, he innovated by rotating divisions out of the line for rest and recuperation, contrasting with the German practice of fighting units "until basically there's not a lot left". Ferdinand Foch (Supreme Allied Commander from April 1918): Foch is widely regarded as one of the most important generals of the war. He was an energetic and charismatic leader who successfully coordinated the American, British, and French forces in 1918, leading them to victory in the multinational war. His reputation continues to strengthen over time. American Involvement Entry into War: The United States declared war on Germany and Austria in April 1917. General John J. Pershing arrived in Paris in June 1917 to lead the American Expeditionary Force (AEF), despite having only 113,000 men in the army at the time. Rejection of Amalgamation: Pershing steadfastly resisted French and British desires to "amalgamate" American manpower into their existing divisions, insisting that American soldiers fight as an independent army. He argued that the Allies had a poor record of "not killing your own troops". German Miscalculation: Germany severely underestimated how quickly the United States could build and deploy an army, believing it would take years. This misjudgment ultimately contributed to their defeat once the Americans demonstrated their seriousness in 1918. American involvement became "crucial" by 1917, changing the atmosphere. Evolution of Warfare on the Western Front From Movement to Stalemate: The initial German invasion failed to achieve a decisive victory, leading to the establishment of trench warfare after the Battle of the Marne. Realization of No Breakthrough: After the Second Battle of Champagne (1915), Allied and Germancommanders like Joffre and Falkenhayn began to recognize that a "grand shattering breakthrough" was not achievable in the foreseeable future. Constant Adaptation: This realization led to a continuous arms race. As Allied artillery and tactics improved, German defenses evolved from single lines to complex "zones of pill boxes," making progress difficult and bloody. The war became an intense exercise in violence where commanders constantly adapted to a "cauldron of war". Key Battles and Their Significance Battle of the Marne (September 1914): Joffre's successful counterattack forced the Germans to retreat, effectively ending the Schlieffen Plan and leading to the beginning of trench warfare. Second Battle of Champagne (September-October 1915): A major French offensive that, despite immense effort and casualties, failed to achieve a decisive breakthrough, solidifying the understanding that trench deadlock could not be easily broken. Verdun (1916): Falkenhayn's attrition battle, designed to "kill Frenchmen," concentrated immense firepower in a small area, creating a "moonscape effect." While not decisive in destroying the French, it was a moment where "things start to go wrong for Germany," from which she never truly recovers. Somme (1916): A British and French offensive intended to relieve pressure on Verdun, but also driven by Haig's ambition for a breakthrough. The debate between breakthrough and Rawlinson's "bite and hold" strategy highlighted the dilemmas of Western Front warfare. Nivelle Offensive (April 1917): A disastrous French attempt at a breakthrough, which highlighted Nivelle'soverreach and led to significant disillusionment and mutiny within the French army. End of the War and its Legacy German Defeat: Lloyd's book argues that the German army was "falling apart" and "defeated rapidly in 1918" despite the persistent "stab in the back" myth that claimed they were betrayed at home. Armistice Decision: The decision by the Allies not to invade Germany was primarily political, as the British and French were "totally exhausted," while the Americans were "much fresher" and more keen to continue. Lloyd considers the armistice "fair on all sides". Lloyd's work underscores that the Western Front was a complex, multinational struggle marked by evolving strategies, immense pressures on commanders, and profound human costs, which ultimately determined the course of the Great War and cast a long shadow over the 20th century.

Nick Lloyd's "The Western Front: The History of the Great War, Volume 1" provides a comprehensive narrative of the Great War in Belgium and France from 1914 to 1918. As the first volume of a planned trilogy, this work aims to offer a nuanced understanding of this pivotal theater, moving beyond common myths and focusing on the operational perspective of senior commanders across all involved powers. 1914-1918 US MERCHANT NAVY Here's a summary of the key aspects, figures, and events covered: Lloyd's Ambition and Approach Comprehensive Narrative: Lloyd, a reader in military and imperial history at King's College London, undertook this "big project" to create a grand narrative of the entire Western Front, encompassing the French sector, American sector, and the German story, alongside the often-emphasized British perspective. Focus on Senior Commanders: A primary goal was to view the war from the lens of senior commanders, challenging the traditional portrayal of them as "donkeys or butchers and bunglers." Lloyd aims to help readers appreciate the immense pressures and difficulties these individuals faced, offering a "cooler perspective" on their successes and errors. Trilogy: This book is the first of three volumes; future volumes will cover the Eastern Front and global warfare in the Middle East and Africa. Lloyd emphasizes that while other fronts are mentioned, the Western Front remained the decisive theater where Germany, France, Britain, and America determined the war's outcome. British Involvement and Leadership Initial Reluctance: Britain initially entered the conflict with a limited commitment, deploying only four infantry divisions and one cavalry division as the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), a "small army" compared to the French (80 divisions) and Germans (over 100 divisions). This reflected a desire for "limited liability" to the Western Front, contrasting sharply with French demands for more manpower. Early Leaders: H.H. Asquith (Prime Minister) was reportedly distracted by personal affairs at the war's outset. Lord Kitchener (Minister of War) was a professional soldier and hero of the empire, wary of deep British involvement but committed to supporting the French. Field Marshal Sir John French (Commander-in-Chief, BEF) was a Boer War hero who found himself "out of his depth" by 1914, struggling with the war's scale and intensity. During the August 1914 retreat, French considered pulling the BEF out of the line due to immense losses and pressure, a move Kitchener personally intervened to prevent, ordering French to stay and fight. Frencheventually "breaks down" due to losses and pressure and is sent home at the end of 1915. Later Leadership and Strategy: David Lloyd George (Prime Minister from late 1916) is credited as "the prime minister that wins the war" in Britain. He showed great energy in revitalizing British industry and re-equipping the army, despite having poor relations with his top generals. Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig replaced French as Commander-in-Chief of the BEF. Haig and Lloyd George had fundamentally different strategic outlooks, leading to "constant arguments and backstabbing". At the Battle of the Somme (1916), Haig favored a breakthrough strategy, aiming for maneuver and cavalry deployment to defeat the German army. However, his army commander, Rawlinson, advocated a "bite and hold" strategy, focusing on concentrated artillery to smash enemy lines, take ground, then consolidate before repeating, acknowledging that a grand breakthrough was not yet feasible for the largely "green" British army. German Strategy and Commanders Initial Invasion: The German invasion of France and Belgium in 1914 was based on the ambitious Schlieffen Plan, which aimed for a massive attack through Belgium to outflank French defenses and destroy their army in a grand battle of envelopment. Helmuth von Moltke the Younger (Chief of the General Staff) was under immense pressure and altered the Schlieffen Plan, weakening its critical right wing, and ultimately suffered a nervous breakdown by mid-September 1914. Moltke's controversial decision to order General Kluck's First Army to turn southeast instead of enveloping Paris contributed to the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, despite Kluck initially ignoring the order. Kaiser Wilhelm: His character was inconsistent, often described as a "weather vane," and he gradually became a less central figure as Hindenburg and Ludendorff gained influence from 1916. Erich von Falkenhayn (replaces Moltke in 1914) was the architect of the Verdun Offensive (1916). His vision was unique, aiming not for territorial gains but for attrition: to "kill Frenchmen" and exhaust them. Political Interference: Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg often opposed Falkenhayn's desire for unrestricted submarine warfare due to diplomatic concerns (e.g., fear of American entry), illustrating the German military's tendency to prioritize tactical effectiveness over political and strategic issues, which was ultimately "fatal". French Efforts and Leadership Joseph Joffre (Commander of French Forces): Described as a "great hero" of the French army, Joffrepossessed remarkable calmness and an ability to absorb punishment and react quickly. His leadership was crucial in defeating the Schlieffen Plan and counterattacking at the Battle of the Marne in September 1914, preventing a German victory. Raymond Poincaré (President of the French Republic): A nationalist deeply involved in military analysis, Poincaré was central to the political efforts to reassert civilian primacy over the army and secure British manpower commitments. General Castelnau (Joffre's chief of staff): A deeply religious man who personally lost three sons in the war, Castelnau exemplifies the human cost and personal horror experienced by some senior commanders, helping to humanize these figures in Lloyd's narrative. Robert Nivelle: An artillery officer who rose rapidly due to his successes at Verdun, Nivelle replaced Joffrein December 1916. He attempted a decisive breakthrough in his Nivelle Offensive in April 1917 with a "formula" for success, but it failed catastrophically due to his being "out of his depth" at the command-in-chief level, leading to French army issues including mutiny. Philippe Pétain: Replaced Nivelle, Pétain became a "savior of France." He was renowned for his deep understanding of battlefield realities and a strong connection with his troops. At Verdun, he innovated by rotating divisions out of the line for rest and recuperation, contrasting with the German practice of fighting units "until basically there's not a lot left". Ferdinand Foch (Supreme Allied Commander from April 1918): Foch is widely regarded as one of the most important generals of the war. He was an energetic and charismatic leader who successfully coordinated the American, British, and French forces in 1918, leading them to victory in the multinational war. His reputation continues to strengthen over time. American Involvement Entry into War: The United States declared war on Germany and Austria in April 1917. General John J. Pershing arrived in Paris in June 1917 to lead the American Expeditionary Force (AEF), despite having only 113,000 men in the army at the time. Rejection of Amalgamation: Pershing steadfastly resisted French and British desires to "amalgamate" American manpower into their existing divisions, insisting that American soldiers fight as an independent army. He argued that the Allies had a poor record of "not killing your own troops". German Miscalculation: Germany severely underestimated how quickly the United States could build and deploy an army, believing it would take years. This misjudgment ultimately contributed to their defeat once the Americans demonstrated their seriousness in 1918. American involvement became "crucial" by 1917, changing the atmosphere. Evolution of Warfare on the Western Front From Movement to Stalemate: The initial German invasion failed to achieve a decisive victory, leading to the establishment of trench warfare after the Battle of the Marne. Realization of No Breakthrough: After the Second Battle of Champagne (1915), Allied and Germancommanders like Joffre and Falkenhayn began to recognize that a "grand shattering breakthrough" was not achievable in the foreseeable future. Constant Adaptation: This realization led to a continuous arms race. As Allied artillery and tactics improved, German defenses evolved from single lines to complex "zones of pill boxes," making progress difficult and bloody. The war became an intense exercise in violence where commanders constantly adapted to a "cauldron of war". Key Battles and Their Significance Battle of the Marne (September 1914): Joffre's successful counterattack forced the Germans to retreat, effectively ending the Schlieffen Plan and leading to the beginning of trench warfare. Second Battle of Champagne (September-October 1915): A major French offensive that, despite immense effort and casualties, failed to achieve a decisive breakthrough, solidifying the understanding that trench deadlock could not be easily broken. Verdun (1916): Falkenhayn's attrition battle, designed to "kill Frenchmen," concentrated immense firepower in a small area, creating a "moonscape effect." While not decisive in destroying the French, it was a moment where "things start to go wrong for Germany," from which she never truly recovers. Somme (1916): A British and French offensive intended to relieve pressure on Verdun, but also driven by Haig's ambition for a breakthrough. The debate between breakthrough and Rawlinson's "bite and hold" strategy highlighted the dilemmas of Western Front warfare. Nivelle Offensive (April 1917): A disastrous French attempt at a breakthrough, which highlighted Nivelle'soverreach and led to significant disillusionment and mutiny within the French army. End of the War and its Legacy German Defeat: Lloyd's book argues that the German army was "falling apart" and "defeated rapidly in 1918" despite the persistent "stab in the back" myth that claimed they were betrayed at home. Armistice Decision: The decision by the Allies not to invade Germany was primarily political, as the British and French were "totally exhausted," while the Americans were "much fresher" and more keen to continue. Lloyd considers the armistice "fair on all sides". Lloyd's work underscores that the Western Front was a complex, multinational struggle marked by evolving strategies, immense pressures on commanders, and profound human costs, which ultimately determined the course of the Great War and cast a long shadow over the 20th century.

Nick Lloyd's "The Western Front: The History of the Great War, Volume 1" provides a comprehensive narrative of the Great War in Belgium and France from 1914 to 1918. As the first volume of a planned trilogy, this work aims to offer a nuanced understanding of this pivotal theater, moving beyond common myths and focusing on the operational perspective of senior commanders across all involved powers. 1916 VERDUN Here's a summary of the key aspects, figures, and events covered: Lloyd's Ambition and Approach Comprehensive Narrative: Lloyd, a reader in military and imperial history at King's College London, undertook this "big project" to create a grand narrative of the entire Western Front, encompassing the French sector, American sector, and the German story, alongside the often-emphasized British perspective. Focus on Senior Commanders: A primary goal was to view the war from the lens of senior commanders, challenging the traditional portrayal of them as "donkeys or butchers and bunglers." Lloyd aims to help readers appreciate the immense pressures and difficulties these individuals faced, offering a "cooler perspective" on their successes and errors. Trilogy: This book is the first of three volumes; future volumes will cover the Eastern Front and global warfare in the Middle East and Africa. Lloyd emphasizes that while other fronts are mentioned, the Western Front remained the decisive theater where Germany, France, Britain, and America determined the war's outcome. British Involvement and Leadership Initial Reluctance: Britain initially entered the conflict with a limited commitment, deploying only four infantry divisions and one cavalry division as the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), a "small army" compared to the French (80 divisions) and Germans (over 100 divisions). This reflected a desire for "limited liability" to the Western Front, contrasting sharply with French demands for more manpower. Early Leaders: H.H. Asquith (Prime Minister) was reportedly distracted by personal affairs at the war's outset. Lord Kitchener (Minister of War) was a professional soldier and hero of the empire, wary of deep British involvement but committed to supporting the French. Field Marshal Sir John French (Commander-in-Chief, BEF) was a Boer War hero who found himself "out of his depth" by 1914, struggling with the war's scale and intensity. During the August 1914 retreat, French considered pulling the BEF out of the line due to immense losses and pressure, a move Kitchener personally intervened to prevent, ordering French to stay and fight. Frencheventually "breaks down" due to losses and pressure and is sent home at the end of 1915. Later Leadership and Strategy: David Lloyd George (Prime Minister from late 1916) is credited as "the prime minister that wins the war" in Britain. He showed great energy in revitalizing British industry and re-equipping the army, despite having poor relations with his top generals. Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig replaced French as Commander-in-Chief of the BEF. Haig and Lloyd George had fundamentally different strategic outlooks, leading to "constant arguments and backstabbing". At the Battle of the Somme (1916), Haig favored a breakthrough strategy, aiming for maneuver and cavalry deployment to defeat the German army. However, his army commander, Rawlinson, advocated a "bite and hold" strategy, focusing on concentrated artillery to smash enemy lines, take ground, then consolidate before repeating, acknowledging that a grand breakthrough was not yet feasible for the largely "green" British army. German Strategy and Commanders Initial Invasion: The German invasion of France and Belgium in 1914 was based on the ambitious Schlieffen Plan, which aimed for a massive attack through Belgium to outflank French defenses and destroy their army in a grand battle of envelopment. Helmuth von Moltke the Younger (Chief of the General Staff) was under immense pressure and altered the Schlieffen Plan, weakening its critical right wing, and ultimately suffered a nervous breakdown by mid-September 1914. Moltke's controversial decision to order General Kluck's First Army to turn southeast instead of enveloping Paris contributed to the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, despite Kluck initially ignoring the order. Kaiser Wilhelm: His character was inconsistent, often described as a "weather vane," and he gradually became a less central figure as Hindenburg and Ludendorff gained influence from 1916. Erich von Falkenhayn (replaces Moltke in 1914) was the architect of the Verdun Offensive (1916). His vision was unique, aiming not for territorial gains but for attrition: to "kill Frenchmen" and exhaust them. Political Interference: Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg often opposed Falkenhayn's desire for unrestricted submarine warfare due to diplomatic concerns (e.g., fear of American entry), illustrating the German military's tendency to prioritize tactical effectiveness over political and strategic issues, which was ultimately "fatal". French Efforts and Leadership Joseph Joffre (Commander of French Forces): Described as a "great hero" of the French army, Joffrepossessed remarkable calmness and an ability to absorb punishment and react quickly. His leadership was crucial in defeating the Schlieffen Plan and counterattacking at the Battle of the Marne in September 1914, preventing a German victory. Raymond Poincaré (President of the French Republic): A nationalist deeply involved in military analysis, Poincaré was central to the political efforts to reassert civilian primacy over the army and secure British manpower commitments. General Castelnau (Joffre's chief of staff): A deeply religious man who personally lost three sons in the war, Castelnau exemplifies the human cost and personal horror experienced by some senior commanders, helping to humanize these figures in Lloyd's narrative. Robert Nivelle: An artillery officer who rose rapidly due to his successes at Verdun, Nivelle replaced Joffrein December 1916. He attempted a decisive breakthrough in his Nivelle Offensive in April 1917 with a "formula" for success, but it failed catastrophically due to his being "out of his depth" at the command-in-chief level, leading to French army issues including mutiny. Philippe Pétain: Replaced Nivelle, Pétain became a "savior of France." He was renowned for his deep understanding of battlefield realities and a strong connection with his troops. At Verdun, he innovated by rotating divisions out of the line for rest and recuperation, contrasting with the German practice of fighting units "until basically there's not a lot left". Ferdinand Foch (Supreme Allied Commander from April 1918): Foch is widely regarded as one of the most important generals of the war. He was an energetic and charismatic leader who successfully coordinated the American, British, and French forces in 1918, leading them to victory in the multinational war. His reputation continues to strengthen over time. American Involvement Entry into War: The United States declared war on Germany and Austria in April 1917. General John J. Pershing arrived in Paris in June 1917 to lead the American Expeditionary Force (AEF), despite having only 113,000 men in the army at the time. Rejection of Amalgamation: Pershing steadfastly resisted French and British desires to "amalgamate" American manpower into their existing divisions, insisting that American soldiers fight as an independent army. He argued that the Allies had a poor record of "not killing your own troops". German Miscalculation: Germany severely underestimated how quickly the United States could build and deploy an army, believing it would take years. This misjudgment ultimately contributed to their defeat once the Americans demonstrated their seriousness in 1918. American involvement became "crucial" by 1917, changing the atmosphere. Evolution of Warfare on the Western Front From Movement to Stalemate: The initial German invasion failed to achieve a decisive victory, leading to the establishment of trench warfare after the Battle of the Marne. Realization of No Breakthrough: After the Second Battle of Champagne (1915), Allied and Germancommanders like Joffre and Falkenhayn began to recognize that a "grand shattering breakthrough" was not achievable in the foreseeable future. Constant Adaptation: This realization led to a continuous arms race. As Allied artillery and tactics improved, German defenses evolved from single lines to complex "zones of pill boxes," making progress difficult and bloody. The war became an intense exercise in violence where commanders constantly adapted to a "cauldron of war". Key Battles and Their Significance Battle of the Marne (September 1914): Joffre's successful counterattack forced the Germans to retreat, effectively ending the Schlieffen Plan and leading to the beginning of trench warfare. Second Battle of Champagne (September-October 1915): A major French offensive that, despite immense effort and casualties, failed to achieve a decisive breakthrough, solidifying the understanding that trench deadlock could not be easily broken. Verdun (1916): Falkenhayn's attrition battle, designed to "kill Frenchmen," concentrated immense firepower in a small area, creating a "moonscape effect." While not decisive in destroying the French, it was a moment where "things start to go wrong for Germany," from which she never truly recovers. Somme (1916): A British and French offensive intended to relieve pressure on Verdun, but also driven by Haig's ambition for a breakthrough. The debate between breakthrough and Rawlinson's "bite and hold" strategy highlighted the dilemmas of Western Front warfare. Nivelle Offensive (April 1917): A disastrous French attempt at a breakthrough, which highlighted Nivelle'soverreach and led to significant disillusionment and mutiny within the French army. End of the War and its Legacy German Defeat: Lloyd's book argues that the German army was "falling apart" and "defeated rapidly in 1918" despite the persistent "stab in the back" myth that claimed they were betrayed at home. Armistice Decision: The decision by the Allies not to invade Germany was primarily political, as the British and French were "totally exhausted," while the Americans were "much fresher" and more keen to continue. Lloyd considers the armistice "fair on all sides". Lloyd's work underscores that the Western Front was a complex, multinational struggle marked by evolving strategies, immense pressures on commanders, and profound human costs, which ultimately determined the course of the Great War and cast a long shadow over the 20th century.

Nick Lloyd's "The Western Front: The History of the Great War, Volume 1" provides a comprehensive narrative of the Great War in Belgium and France from 1914 to 1918. As the first volume of a planned trilogy, this work aims to offer a nuanced understanding of this pivotal theater, moving beyond common myths and focusing on the operational perspective of senior commanders across all involved powers. Here's a summary of the key aspects, figures, and events covered: Lloyd's Ambition and Approach Comprehensive Narrative: Lloyd, a reader in military and imperial history at King's College London, undertook this "big project" to create a grand narrative of the entire Western Front, encompassing the French sector, American sector, and the German story, alongside the often-emphasized British perspective. Focus on Senior Commanders: A primary goal was to view the war from the lens of senior commanders, challenging the traditional portrayal of them as "donkeys or butchers and bunglers." Lloyd aims to help readers appreciate the immense pressures and difficulties these individuals faced, offering a "cooler perspective" on their successes and errors. Trilogy: This book is the first of three volumes; future volumes will cover the Eastern Front and global warfare in the Middle East and Africa. Lloyd emphasizes that while other fronts are mentioned, the Western Front remained the decisive theater where Germany, France, Britain, and America determined the war's outcome. British Involvement and Leadership Initial Reluctance: Britain initially entered the conflict with a limited commitment, deploying only four infantry divisions and one cavalry division as the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), a "small army" compared to the French (80 divisions) and Germans (over 100 divisions). This reflected a desire for "limited liability" to the Western Front, contrasting sharply with French demands for more manpower. Early Leaders: H.H. Asquith (Prime Minister) was reportedly distracted by personal affairs at the war's outset. Lord Kitchener (Minister of War) was a professional soldier and hero of the empire, wary of deep British involvement but committed to supporting the French. Field Marshal Sir John French (Commander-in-Chief, BEF) was a Boer War hero who found himself "out of his depth" by 1914, struggling with the war's scale and intensity. During the August 1914 retreat, French considered pulling the BEF out of the line due to immense losses and pressure, a move Kitchener personally intervened to prevent, ordering French to stay and fight. Frencheventually "breaks down" due to losses and pressure and is sent home at the end of 1915. Later Leadership and Strategy: David Lloyd George (Prime Minister from late 1916) is credited as "the prime minister that wins the war" in Britain. He showed great energy in revitalizing British industry and re-equipping the army, despite having poor relations with his top generals. Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig replaced French as Commander-in-Chief of the BEF. Haig and Lloyd George had fundamentally different strategic outlooks, leading to "constant arguments and backstabbing". At the Battle of the Somme (1916), Haig favored a breakthrough strategy, aiming for maneuver and cavalry deployment to defeat the German army. However, his army commander, Rawlinson, advocated a "bite and hold" strategy, focusing on concentrated artillery to smash enemy lines, take ground, then consolidate before repeating, acknowledging that a grand breakthrough was not yet feasible for the largely "green" British army. German Strategy and Commanders Initial Invasion: The German invasion of France and Belgium in 1914 was based on the ambitious Schlieffen Plan, which aimed for a massive attack through Belgium to outflank French defenses and destroy their army in a grand battle of envelopment. Helmuth von Moltke the Younger (Chief of the General Staff) was under immense pressure and altered the Schlieffen Plan, weakening its critical right wing, and ultimately suffered a nervous breakdown by mid-September 1914. Moltke's controversial decision to order General Kluck's First Army to turn southeast instead of enveloping Paris contributed to the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, despite Kluck initially ignoring the order. Kaiser Wilhelm: His character was inconsistent, often described as a "weather vane," and he gradually became a less central figure as Hindenburg and Ludendorff gained influence from 1916. Erich von Falkenhayn (replaces Moltke in 1914) was the architect of the Verdun Offensive (1916). His vision was unique, aiming not for territorial gains but for attrition: to "kill Frenchmen" and exhaust them. Political Interference: Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg often opposed Falkenhayn's desire for unrestricted submarine warfare due to diplomatic concerns (e.g., fear of American entry), illustrating the German military's tendency to prioritize tactical effectiveness over political and strategic issues, which was ultimately "fatal". French Efforts and Leadership Joseph Joffre (Commander of French Forces): Described as a "great hero" of the French army, Joffrepossessed remarkable calmness and an ability to absorb punishment and react quickly. His leadership was crucial in defeating the Schlieffen Plan and counterattacking at the Battle of the Marne in September 1914, preventing a German victory. Raymond Poincaré (President of the French Republic): A nationalist deeply involved in military analysis, Poincaré was central to the political efforts to reassert civilian primacy over the army and secure British manpower commitments. General Castelnau (Joffre's chief of staff): A deeply religious man who personally lost three sons in the war, Castelnau exemplifies the human cost and personal horror experienced by some senior commanders, helping to humanize these figures in Lloyd's narrative. Robert Nivelle: An artillery officer who rose rapidly due to his successes at Verdun, Nivelle replaced Joffrein December 1916. He attempted a decisive breakthrough in his Nivelle Offensive in April 1917 with a "formula" for success, but it failed catastrophically due to his being "out of his depth" at the command-in-chief level, leading to French army issues including mutiny. Philippe Pétain: Replaced Nivelle, Pétain became a "savior of France." He was renowned for his deep understanding of battlefield realities and a strong connection with his troops. At Verdun, he innovated by rotating divisions out of the line for rest and recuperation, contrasting with the German practice of fighting units "until basically there's not a lot left". Ferdinand Foch (Supreme Allied Commander from April 1918): Foch is widely regarded as one of the most important generals of the war. He was an energetic and charismatic leader who successfully coordinated the American, British, and French forces in 1918, leading them to victory in the multinational war. His reputation continues to strengthen over time. American Involvement Entry into War: The United States declared war on Germany and Austria in April 1917. General John J. Pershing arrived in Paris in June 1917 to lead the American Expeditionary Force (AEF), despite having only 113,000 men in the army at the time. Rejection of Amalgamation: Pershing steadfastly resisted French and British desires to "amalgamate" American manpower into their existing divisions, insisting that American soldiers fight as an independent army. He argued that the Allies had a poor record of "not killing your own troops". German Miscalculation: Germany severely underestimated how quickly the United States could build and deploy an army, believing it would take years. This misjudgment ultimately contributed to their defeat once the Americans demonstrated their seriousness in 1918. American involvement became "crucial" by 1917, changing the atmosphere. Evolution of Warfare on the Western Front From Movement to Stalemate: The initial German invasion failed to achieve a decisive victory, leading to the establishment of trench warfare after the Battle of the Marne. Realization of No Breakthrough: After the Second Battle of Champagne (1915), Allied and Germancommanders like Joffre and Falkenhayn began to recognize that a "grand shattering breakthrough" was not achievable in the foreseeable future. Constant Adaptation: This realization led to a continuous arms race. As Allied artillery and tactics improved, German defenses evolved from single lines to complex "zones of pill boxes," making progress difficult and bloody. The war became an intense exercise in violence where commanders constantly adapted to a "cauldron of war". Key Battles and Their Significance Battle of the Marne (September 1914): Joffre's successful counterattack forced the Germans to retreat, effectively ending the Schlieffen Plan and leading to the beginning of trench warfare. Second Battle of Champagne (September-October 1915): A major French offensive that, despite immense effort and casualties, failed to achieve a decisive breakthrough, solidifying the understanding that trench deadlock could not be easily broken. Verdun (1916): Falkenhayn's attrition battle, designed to "kill Frenchmen," concentrated immense firepower in a small area, creating a "moonscape effect." While not decisive in destroying the French, it was a moment where "things start to go wrong for Germany," from which she never truly recovers. Somme (1916): A British and French offensive intended to relieve pressure on Verdun, but also driven by Haig's ambition for a breakthrough. The debate between breakthrough and Rawlinson's "bite and hold" strategy highlighted the dilemmas of Western Front warfare. Nivelle Offensive (April 1917): A disastrous French attempt at a breakthrough, which highlighted Nivelle'soverreach and led to significant disillusionment and mutiny within the French army. End of the War and its Legacy German Defeat: Lloyd's book argues that the German army was "falling apart" and "defeated rapidly in 1918" despite the persistent "stab in the back" myth that claimed they were betrayed at home. Armistice Decision: The decision by the Allies not to invade Germany was primarily political, as the British and French were "totally exhausted," while the Americans were "much fresher" and more keen to continue. Lloyd considers the armistice "fair on all sides". Lloyd's work underscores that the Western Front was a complex, multinational struggle marked by evolving strategies, immense pressures on commanders, and profound human costs, which ultimately determined the course of the Great War and cast a long shadow over the 20th century.

Mitte Juni hat Aussenminister Ignazio Cassis die neuen Verträge zwischen der Schweiz und der Europäischen Union in die Vernehmlassung geschickt. Ob das neue Vertragspaket dann auch tatsächlich angenommen wird, ist noch völlig offen. Klar ist aber, dass eine Partei dabei eine besonders wichtige Rolle spielen wird – auch aus historischen Gründen: die FDP.Innerhalb des Freisinns ist man sich uneinig. In der Romandie ist die Zustimmung zum Paket gross, in der Innerschweiz überwiegt die Skepsis. Cassis, selbst FDP-Bundesrat, wirbt öffentlich dafür, doch längst nicht alle in seiner Partei folgen ihm.Auf welche Seite kippt der Freisinn schlussendlich? Warum ist die Position der FDP historisch gesehen überhaupt so wichtig? Und wie ist die Stimmung in der Basis, wenn es um Europa geht?Diese Fragen beantwortet Larissa Rhyn, Bundeshauschefin von Tamedia, in einer neuen Folge des täglichen Podcasts «Apropos».Host: Philipp LoserProduzentin: Jacqueline WechslerMehr zum Thema:Bundesrat und Befürworter planen Turbo­behandlung der EU-Verträge – SVP will das verhindernCassis: «Die Unabhängigkeit der Schweiz wird gestärkt» Unser Tagi-Spezialangebot für Podcast-Hörer:innen: tagiabo.chHabt ihr Feedback, Ideen oder Kritik zu «Apropos»? Schreibt uns an podcasts@tamedia.ch Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Herzlich Willkommen zum pflegenetz Podcast. Heute sprechen wir über ein Thema, das uns alle betrifft, aber oft tabuisiert wird: den kompetenten Umgang mit Sterben, Tod und Trauer. Im Mittelpunkt steht das Konzept der Death Literacy, das – ähnlich wie Health Literacy – seinen Ursprung im englischsprachigen Raum hat. Entwickelt wurde es im Rahmen einer sechsjährigen Forschungsarbeit von Debbie Noonan und ihrem Team in Australien. Dabei wurden 308 Angehörige zu ihren Erfahrungen in der Begleitung Sterbender befragt. Das Ergebnis: Death Literacy beschreibt ein Zusammenspiel aus Wissen, Fähigkeiten, Erfahrungen und sozialem Handeln, das Menschen und Gemeinschaften befähigt, gut informierte Entscheidungen am Lebensende zu treffen. Dazu gehören Kenntnisse über Palliative Care, rechtliche Fragen wie „Wie lange darf ein:e Verstorbene:r zu Hause bleiben?“ und die Fähigkeit, Erfahrungen aus der Begleitung als Lernprozesse zu nutzen. Das Konzept findet mittlerweile Anwendung in Letzte Hilfe Kursen, Compassionate Communities und mit dem Death Literacy Index, der international genutzt wird, um Death Literacy in Gesellschaften zu messen. Eines ist klar: Death Literacy ist ein gesamtgesellschaftliches Thema – von Schulen bis zur Ausbildung im Gesundheitswesen. Besonders Community Nurses spielen dabei eine Schlüsselrolle in der Begleitung und Befähigung von Menschen am Lebensende. Im heutigen pflegenetz podcast sprechen Nadine Hirche, Anja Herzog und Marlene Kraske über Ihre Erfahrungen zur Death Literacy. Wir wünschen Ihnen viel Spaß und gute Unterhaltung.

In dieser Folge erkläre ich die geplante Abschaffung des Eigenmietwerts in der Schweiz und die gleichzeitige Einschränkung der Steuerabzüge. Ich gehe darauf ein, wie sich die Reform auf Erst- und Zweitliegenschaften auswirkt und warum Kantone künftig eine Sondersteuer auf Ferienwohnungen erheben könnten. Dabei beleuchte ich die Argumente von Befürwortern und Gegnern und vergleiche die finanziellen Auswirkungen auf Staat und Eigenheimbesitzer. Am Ende teile ich meine persönliche Meinung und sage klar, dass ich für die Abschaffung stimmen werde.

Kopftuch-Streit im Klassenzimmer: Schutz oder Bevormundung? Verhüllen verboten: Die Regierung will das Tragen von Kopftüchern an Schulen für Unter-14-Jährige verbieten. Befürworter sehen darin einen Schutz der Kinderrechte: Mädchen sollen frei aufwachsen, ohne religiösen oder familiären Zwang. Das Kopftuch hingegen sei ein Symbol der Unterdrückung. Gegner aber warnen vor Bevormundung und Diskriminierung: Ein Verbot greife in die Religionsfreiheit und das Elternrecht ein, stigmatisiere muslimische Familien und erschwere Integration, statt sie zu fördern. Und schon einmal hat der Verfassungsgerichtshof ein Verbot an Volksschulen gekippt. Darf der Staat bestimmen, was Kinder tragen dürfen? Ist das Kopftuch ein Zeichen der Unterdrückung oder Ausdruck der Freiheit? Und welche Rolle spielt der Islam im Leben unserer Kinder? Mord an Andersdenkenden: Woher kommt die Gewalt? Die ganze Welt ist erschüttert vom Mord an Trump-Aktivist Charlie Kirk, der auf offener Bühne erschossen wurde. Der Täter befindet sich noch auf der Flucht, das Motiv ist weiter unklar. US-Präsident Donald Trump geißelt aber schon die “radikale Linke” dafür. Nicht nur in den USA befürchtet man seither weitere Polarisierung, Verrohung des öffentlichen Diskurses und Gewalttaten. Schwappt diese Welle politischer Gewalt auch zu uns über? Und wird die Gefahr durch die Gewalt der politischen Linken unterschätzt? Drohnen über Polen: Stürzt Europa in den Krieg? Der Krieg in der Ukraine droht sich auszuweiten: Russische Drohnen sind in polnischen Luftraum eingedrungen. Namhafte Experten werten das als bewusstes Austesten der militärischen Fähigkeiten, manche sprechen sogar von einem Angriff auf ein Nato-Land. Auch Polen selbst sieht sich so nah am Krieg wie seit 1945 nicht mehr. Russland freilich kann kein eigenes Fehlverhalten erkennen - und hält prompt eine große Militärübung an der polnischen Grenze ab. Braucht es jetzt eine entschiedene Antwort von Nato und EU, um den russischen Provokationen zu begegnen? Oder führt die Konfrontationslinie gegen Moskau in die Katastrophe? Darüber diskutiert Michael Fleischhacker mit diesen Gästen: Gerald Markel, Polit-Blogger Martina Salomon, Herausgeberin des "Kurier" Robert Misik, Journalist und Autor Lena Schilling, EU-Parlamentarierin der Grünen Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Susanne Vincenz-Stauffacher und Benjamin Mühlemann wollen die FDP im Co-Präsidium führen – doch ausgerechnet in der Europafrage sind sie sich uneins. Kann das gut gehen? Halten sie die FDP auf Rechtskurs? Und: Wie sichern sie die zwei Bundesratssitze? Sie kennen sich erst seit anderthalb Jahren und werden im Oktober aller Voraussicht nach gemeinsam eines der schwierigsten politischen Ämter der Schweiz übernehmen. In der «Samstagsrundschau» antworten FDP-Nationalrätin Susanne Vincenz-Stauffacher und Ständerat Benjamin Mühlemann auf kritische Fragen: Wie verhindern sie, dass sie sich auseinanderdividieren lassen? Wie gehen sie mit Differenzen um – schliesslich gilt Mühlemann gerade in der Gesellschaftspolitik als konservativer als Vincenz-Stauffacher. Eine der grössten Herausforderungen wartet bereits am Tag ihrer Wahl durch die FDP-Delegierten auf das Duo: Am selben Tag nämlich legt die FDP ihre Haltung zum Vertragspaket mit der EU fest. Vincenz-Stauffacher ist eine Befürworterin, Mühlemann hat Bedenken wegen der Souveränität – eine oder einer der beiden also wird als «Verlierer» ins Co-Präsidium starten. Kommt das gut? Die FDP steht zurzeit mit dem Rücken zur Wand. Bei den letzten nationalen Wahlen lag sie nur noch 0,2 Prozentpunkte vor der Mitte-Partei, der Trend bei den kantonalen Wahlen seither war mehrheitlich negativ – kurz: Die Wahlen in zwei Jahren werden entscheidend sein, auch für den zweiten Bundesratssitz der FDP. Wie will das künftige Führungsduo die Partei wieder auf die Siegerstrasse führen? Hat sich der pointierte Rechtskurs des bisherigen Präsidenten Thierry Burkart tatsächlich bewährt? Susanne Vincenz-Stauffacher und Benjamin Mühlemann sind zu Gast bei Dominik Meier. Ergänzend zum «Tagesgespräch» finden Sie jeden Samstag in unserem Kanal die aktuelle «Samstagsrundschau».

Am 28. September 2025 entscheidet die Stimmbevölkerung über einen Systemwechsel bei der Besteuerung von Wohneigentum. Wird die kantonale Liegenschaftssteuer auf Zweitliegenschaften eingeführt, fällt der Eigenmietwert. Was bedeutet das für Eigentümerinnen und Mieter? Wer in seinem eigenen Haus oder in seiner eigenen Wohnung lebt, muss den Eigenmietwert versteuern. Dieser Wert orientiert sich am Betrag, der bei einer Vermietung der Liegenschaft eingenommen werden könnte. Diese Besteuerung soll nun abgeschafft werden. Im gleichen Schritt sollen die geltenden Abzugsmöglichkeiten – etwa bei Schuldzinsen oder beim Unterhalt – stark eingeschränkt werden. Im Gegenzug sollen die Kantone die Möglichkeit erhalten, eine Liegenschaftssteuer auf Zweitliegenschaften einzuführen. Dafür ist eine Verfassungsänderung nötig. Über diese stimmt die Bevölkerung am 28. September 2025 ab. Bei einem Ja tritt auch die damit verknüpfte Gesetzesvorlage zur Abschaffung der Besteuerung des Eigenmietwerts in Kraft. Wer profitiert, wer verliert? Die vom Parlament beschlossene Reform sorgt bereits im Vorfeld der Abstimmung für hitzige Diskussionen. Für die Befürworterinnen und Befürworter ist klar, dass mit dem Eigenmietwert die Eigentümer gegenüber den Mietenden benachteiligt werden. Die Abschaffung der Eigenmietwertbesteuerung vereinfache das Steuersystem und reduziere die Anreize zur privaten Verschuldung. Die Reform sei ausgewogen und fair. Die Gegnerinnen und Gegner der Vorlage warnen hingegen vor massiv weniger Steuereinnahmen für den Staat. Ausserdem komme die Abschaffung des Eigenmietwerts primär Eigenheimbesitzern zugute. Weil Hausbesitzerinnen ihre Unterhaltskosten und Energiesparmassnahmen kaum mehr von den Steuern abziehen könnten, sei zudem die Energiewende gefährdet. Welche Auswirkungen hätte die Abschaffung des Eigenmietwerts? Droht tatsächlich ein massiver Steuerausfall oder tritt genau das Gegenteil ein? Und was bedeutet die Vorlage für die Energiewende? Zu diesen Fragen begrüsst Mario Grossniklaus am 12. September 2025 in der «Abstimmungs-Arena» als Befürworterinnen und Befürworter der Vorlage: – Gregor Rutz, Nationalrat SVP/ZH und Präsident HEV Schweiz; – Brigitte Häberli-Koller, Ständerätin Die Mitte/TG und Vizepräsidentin HEV Schweiz; – Markus Ritter, Nationalrat Die Mitte/SG und Präsident Schweizer Bauernverband; und – Peter Schilliger, Nationalrat FDP/LU. Gegen die Vorlage treten an: – Eva Herzog, Ständerätin SP/BS; – Mathias Zopfi, Ständerat Grüne/GL und Präsident Schweizerischer Gemeindeverband; – Martin Bühler, Leitender Ausschuss Konferenz der Kantonsregierungen, Regierungsrat GR/FDP; und – Martin Wyss, Vorstand Schweizerischer Maler- und Gipserunternehmer-Verband.

Moderation Martin Gross/Gesendet in Ö1 am 10.9.2025++Nach langen Verhandlungen hat sich die Bundesregierung auf ein Kopftuchverbot an öffentlichen Schulen und Privatschulen für alle Mädchen bis 14 Jahre. Von der IGGÖ, der Islamischen Glaubensgemeinschaft in Österreich, kam umgehend Kritik. Dass muslimische Frauen ein Kopftuch tragen sollen, wird von Seiten der Befürworter mit religiösen Vorschriften, die man zu befolgen habe, argumentiert. (Maria Harmer)++Die Caritas fordert von der Politik einmal mehr bessere Rahmenbedingungen für Beschäftige in der Pflege. Hintergrund ist eine heute von der Caritas präsentierte Studie, wonach rund ein Drittel der in der Pflege Teilzeitbeschäftigten mehr arbeiten würden, wenn es bessere Rahmenbedingungen gäbe. Das wäre laut Caritas ein wesentlicher Schritt, um der Pflegekrise beizukommen. (Andreas Mittendorfer)

Die Bundesregierung weist Befürchtungen einer tiefgreifenden Deindustrialisierung in Deutschland zurück. In ihrer Antwort auf eine Kleine Anfrage betont sie, dass das jüngste EU-US-Zollabkommen keine gravierenden Nachteile für die deutsche Industrie bringe. Dennoch bleiben Fragen nach milliardenschweren Energieimporten und Investitionen in die USA offen.

Jenny Strom hat alles, was nach einem perfekten Lebenslauf klingt: BWL in Fulda, Master in Peking, Top-Job bei BearingPoint. Doch mitten auf der Karriereleiter sagt sie plötzlich Nein – zur großen Beförderung, zum sicheren Weg nach oben. Stattdessen entscheidet sie sich fürs Theater, fürs Ausprobieren, fürs Bauchgefühl. In dieser Folge "Female Businnes - Der nushu podcast" erzählt Jenny, warum „Pläne verbrennen“ manchmal die beste Strategie ist, wie man den Mut findet, gegen Erwartungen zu handeln – und warum Offenheit und Netzwerken wichtiger sein können als ein geradliniger Plan.

Braucht die Schweiz eine digitale Identitätskarte? Über diese Frage entscheidet die Stimmbevölkerung am 28. September. Die Befürworter betonen, es handle sich um eine einfache und sichere Lösung, die den Alltag erleichtere. Die Gegenseite warnt vor mangelndem Datenschutz und drohender Überwachung. Mit dem E-ID-Gesetz soll ein elektronischer Identitätsnachweis eingeführt werden. Nutzerinnen und Nutzer sollen sich damit im digitalen Raum gegenüber Behörden und Unternehmen ausweisen können – etwa bei der Eröffnung eines Bankkontos. Im Gegensatz zur 2021 abgelehnten Vorlage sieht das neue Gesetz vor, dass die E-ID nicht von privaten Unternehmen, sondern vom Bund herausgegeben und betrieben wird. Gegen die Vorlage haben mehrere Organisationen das Referendum ergriffen. Sie warnen vor Überwachung durch grosse Techkonzerne, einer Einschränkung der Privatsphäre und mangelndem Datenschutz. Die Befürworterinnen und Befürworter hingegen betonen: Mit der E-ID könnten viele Dienstleistungen unkomplizierter abgewickelt werden, die neue E-ID sei sicher und stärke den Wirtschaftsstandort Schweiz. Braucht die Schweiz die E-ID? Ist die neue E-ID sicher oder ist der Datenschutz gefährdet? Und wie freiwillig ist sie? Zu diesen Fragen begrüsst Sandro Brotz am 5. September 2025 in der «Abstimmungs-Arena» als Befürworterinnen und Befürworter der Vorlage: – Beat Jans, Bundesrat und Vorsteher EJPD; – Maya Bally, Nationalrätin Die Mitte/AG; – Gerhard Andrey, Nationalrat Grüne/FR; und – Vanessa Grand, Inklusions-Aktivistin. Gegen die Vorlage treten an: – Monica Amgwerd, Kampagnenleiterin «E-ID-Gesetz Nein»; – Lukas Reimann, Nationalrat SVP/SG; – Markus Zollinger, Vorstandsmitglied Bewegung «Mass-voll»; und – Jorgo Ananiadis, Präsident Piratenpartei.

Markus Will, heise-online-Chefredakteur Dr. Volker Zota und Malte Kirchner sprechen in dieser Ausgabe der #heiseshow unter anderem über folgende Themen: - Geben ist seliger denn Nehmen: Google darf Chrome und Android behalten – Google muss nach einem Gerichtsurteil seine Suchdaten mit der Konkurrenz teilen, darf aber Chrome und Android weiterhin betreiben. Das Urteil stellt einen Kompromiss dar zwischen den Forderungen nach einer Zerschlagung des Tech-Konzerns und den Argumenten Googles für den Erhalt seiner integrierten Dienste. Welche Auswirkungen wird die verpflichtende Datenteilung auf den Suchmaschinenmarkt haben? Reichen diese Maßnahmen aus, um echten Wettbewerb zu schaffen? Und wie könnte sich das Geschäftsmodell von Google durch diese Entscheidung verändern? - Nicht auf einer Wellenlänge: Was hilft gegen die zunehmende GPS-Sabotage? Nach GPS-Störungen auf einem Flug mit EU-Kommissionspräsidentin Ursula von der Leyen an Bord setzt die EU verstärkt auf Verschlüsselung gegen GPS-Spoofing. Die Sabotage von GPS-Signalen nimmt weltweit zu und betrifft nicht nur die zivile Luftfahrt, sondern auch kritische Infrastrukturen. Wie groß ist die reale Bedrohung durch GPS-Jamming und -Spoofing? Welche technischen Lösungen können das europäische Galileo-System und andere Navigationssysteme widerstandsfähiger machen? Und welche geopolitischen Dimensionen stecken hinter den zunehmenden Störungen? - Alles im Auge: Sollten Plätze und Bahnhöfe per KI überwacht werden? Die Diskussion um KI-gestützte Videoüberwachung an öffentlichen Plätzen und Bahnhöfen gewinnt an Fahrt. Während Befürworter auf verbesserte Sicherheit und schnellere Reaktionszeiten bei Notfällen setzen, warnen Kritiker vor einem Überwachungsstaat und Datenschutzverletzungen. Bringt KI-Überwachung tatsächlich messbare Sicherheitsverbesserungen? Wie lassen sich Sicherheitsbedürfnisse mit Grundrechten und Privatsphäre in Einklang bringen? Und welche Rolle sollten Transparenz und demokratische Kontrolle bei solchen Systemen spielen? Außerdem wieder mit dabei: ein Nerd-Geburtstag, das WTF der Woche und knifflige Quizfragen.

Markus Will, heise-online-Chefredakteur Dr. Volker Zota und Malte Kirchner sprechen in dieser Ausgabe der #heiseshow unter anderem über folgende Themen: - Geben ist seliger denn Nehmen: Google darf Chrome und Android behalten – Google muss nach einem Gerichtsurteil seine Suchdaten mit der Konkurrenz teilen, darf aber Chrome und Android weiterhin betreiben. Das Urteil stellt einen Kompromiss dar zwischen den Forderungen nach einer Zerschlagung des Tech-Konzerns und den Argumenten Googles für den Erhalt seiner integrierten Dienste. Welche Auswirkungen wird die verpflichtende Datenteilung auf den Suchmaschinenmarkt haben? Reichen diese Maßnahmen aus, um echten Wettbewerb zu schaffen? Und wie könnte sich das Geschäftsmodell von Google durch diese Entscheidung verändern? - Nicht auf einer Wellenlänge: Was hilft gegen die zunehmende GPS-Sabotage? Nach GPS-Störungen auf einem Flug mit EU-Kommissionspräsidentin Ursula von der Leyen an Bord setzt die EU verstärkt auf Verschlüsselung gegen GPS-Spoofing. Die Sabotage von GPS-Signalen nimmt weltweit zu und betrifft nicht nur die zivile Luftfahrt, sondern auch kritische Infrastrukturen. Wie groß ist die reale Bedrohung durch GPS-Jamming und -Spoofing? Welche technischen Lösungen können das europäische Galileo-System und andere Navigationssysteme widerstandsfähiger machen? Und welche geopolitischen Dimensionen stecken hinter den zunehmenden Störungen? - Alles im Auge: Sollten Plätze und Bahnhöfe per KI überwacht werden? Die Diskussion um KI-gestützte Videoüberwachung an öffentlichen Plätzen und Bahnhöfen gewinnt an Fahrt. Während Befürworter auf verbesserte Sicherheit und schnellere Reaktionszeiten bei Notfällen setzen, warnen Kritiker vor einem Überwachungsstaat und Datenschutzverletzungen. Bringt KI-Überwachung tatsächlich messbare Sicherheitsverbesserungen? Wie lassen sich Sicherheitsbedürfnisse mit Grundrechten und Privatsphäre in Einklang bringen? Und welche Rolle sollten Transparenz und demokratische Kontrolle bei solchen Systemen spielen? Außerdem wieder mit dabei: ein Nerd-Geburtstag, das WTF der Woche und knifflige Quizfragen.

Schaggi Streuli hat sich mit der Figur des engagierten Gewerkschafters Fritz Vollenweider einmal mehr eine Rolle auf den Leib geschrieben: Geradlinig, aber nicht stur geht Vollenweider, der Präsident der Arbeiterkommission, seinen Weg. Wer das Hörspiel am Radio hören will: Freitag, 05.09.2025, 20.00 Uhr, Radio SRF 1 Fritz Vollenweider nennt die Dinge beim Namen, setzt sich für Arbeitskollegen ein, kuscht vor nichts und niemandem, und eine in Aussicht gestellte Beförderung zum Werkführer bereitet ihm schlaflose Nächte. Durch seine Hörspielserie «Polizischt Wäckerli» wurde der Volksschauspieler und Autor Schaggi Streuli in den 1950er-Jahren einem breiten Publikum bekannt. «Polizischt Wäckerli» wurde wegen seiner Beliebtheit erfolgreich verfilmt. Es folgten zahlreiche weitere Hörspiele und Verfilmungen, wie zum Beispiel «Oberstadtgass», «Schwarzer Hecht» und «Fritz Vollenweider». «Fritz Vollenweider» war eine Auftragsarbeit von Radio Zürich und ging am 13. März 1952 – wie damals noch üblich – direkt über den Sender. Das Hörspiel ist also ein Live-Mitschnitt von vor 73 Jahren. ____________________ Mit: Schaggi Streuli (Fritz Vollenweider), Lee Ruckstuhl (Anny, seine Frau), Lisa Burkhard (Frau Vollenweider, seine Mutter), Sigfrit Steiner (Direktor Brändli), Fred Tanner (Werkführer Pfister), Josef Scheidegger (Frey), Walo Lüönd (Bürgi), Paul Bühlmann (Hediger), Hermann Frick (Hofer), Hilde Wittwer (Frau Hofer) ____________________ Regie: Arthur Welti ____________________ Produktion: SRF 1952 ____________________ Dauer: 52'

In Colombier ist eine Beförderungsfeier für Rekruten ausgeartet. 22 junge Männer wurden verletzt, weil ihnen heftige Schläge auf Schulter und Schlüsselbein verpasst wurden. Tragen solche Rituale tatsächlich zum Zusammenhalt der Truppen bei oder geht es nur um Belustigung und Demütigung? Zwei Rekruten erlitten beim Vorfall 2018 Rippenbrüche, andere wurden tagelang wegen Schmerzen krankgeschrieben. Nun hat die Militärjustiz die verantwortliche Kommandantin und zwölf Offiziere verurteilt. Warum gibt es solche Rituale? Welche psychologischen Faktoren spielen eine Rolle und können sich Rekruten diesen teils fragwürdigen Praktiken auch verweigern? ____________________ Habt Ihr Fragen oder Themen-Inputs? Schreibt uns gerne per Mail an newsplus@srf.ch oder sendet uns eine Sprachnachricht an 076 320 10 37. ____________________ In dieser Episode zu hören - Hubert Annen, Dozent für Militärpsychologie und Militärpädagogik, Militärakademie an der ETH ____________________ Links - https://www.srf.ch/audio ____________________ Team - Moderation: Dominik Rolli - Produktion: Marc Allemann - Mitarbeit: Peter Hanselmann ____________________ Das ist «News Plus»: In einer Viertelstunde die Welt besser verstehen – ein Thema, neue Perspektiven und Antworten auf eure Fragen. Unsere Korrespondenten und Expertinnen aus der Schweiz und der Welt erklären, analysieren und erzählen, was sie bewegt. «News Plus» von SRF erscheint immer von Montag bis Freitag um 16 Uhr rechtzeitig zum Feierabend.

Die Wall Street zeigte sich am Dienstag weitgehend richtungslos. Nach der Entlassung von Fed-Gouverneurin Lisa Cook durch Präsident Trump verharrten Dow Jones, S&P 500 und Nasdaq um die Nulllinie. Langfristige Renditen stiegen, während kurzfristige Zinsen fielen – ein Signal für die Befürchtung, dass eine politisierte Fed Inflation weniger im Blick hat. Im Fokus stehen die Quartalszahlen von Nvidia am Mittwochabend. Unternehmensseitig rückten auch AMD in den Blick – nach einer Hochstufung durch Truist, die auf starkes Interesse von Hyperscalern verweist – sowie IBM, das neue KI-Dienste ankündigte. Eli Lilly legte nach positiven Studiendaten zur Abnehmpille Orforglipron zu. AT&T gab bekannt, den Netzausbau schneller als geplant voranzutreiben. Zusätzlich stützte das US-Verbrauchervertrauen die Kurse leicht: Der Index stieg im August auf 97,4 Punkte und übertraf damit die Erwartungen. Abonniere den Podcast, um keine Folge zu verpassen! ____ Folge uns, um auf dem Laufenden zu bleiben: • X: http://fal.cn/SQtwitter • LinkedIn: http://fal.cn/SQlinkedin • Instagram: http://fal.cn/SQInstagram

Muss die Ukraine Gebiete, die Russland aktuell besetzt hält, offiziell abgeben, um den Weg frei zu machen für eine Friedensvereinbarung? Völkerrechtler Aaron Dumont erklärt im Gespräch, unter welchen Bedingungen eine solche Abmachung durch das Völkerrecht gedeckt wäre. (00:00) Intro und Schlagzeilen (06:24) Ukrainekrieg: Wären Gebietsabtretungen völkerrechtskonform? (14:22) Yvonne Bürgin will Mitte-Fraktionspräsidium übernehmen (18:18) Sexueller Missbrauch: Prozess gegen Tessiner Priester (23:05) Wie Gegner zu Befürwortern der E-ID werden (28:01) US-Zölle: Wirtschaftshistoriker macht Unternehmen Mut (32:54) Ostkongo: Nach Idengos Tod kam das Schweigen

Die Welt wartet auf das Treffen zwischen US-Päsident Trump und Russlands Staatschef Putin in Alaska - und schwankt zwischen Hoffnung und schlimmen Befürchtungen.

Anna Bicker, heise-online-Chefredakteur Dr. Volker Zota und Malte Kirchner sprechen in dieser Ausgabe der #heiseshow unter anderem über folgende Themen: - Unter den Erwartungen? OpenAI hat GPT-5 veröffentlicht – OpenAI hat sein neues Sprachmodell GPT-5 für ChatGPT herausgebracht. Nach langer Wartezeit und hohen Erwartungen stellt sich die Frage: Hält GPT-5, was versprochen wurde? Welche neuen Fähigkeiten bringt das Modell mit sich? Und rechtfertigen die Verbesserungen den Hype um die neue Generation? - Trainchanger? Bahn frohlockt über ICE L-Zulassung – Der neue ICE L hat seine Betriebszulassung erhalten und soll im Dezember starten. Die Deutsche Bahn verspricht sich viel von dem neuen Zugmodell. Was macht den ICE L besonders und wo soll er eingesetzt werden? Kann er wirklich die erhofften Verbesserungen im Bahnverkehr bringen? Und welche Auswirkungen hat das auf die Fahrgäste? - Verblendet? Aufregung um Solarförderung – Die Förderung für Solaranlagen sorgt für kontroverse Diskussionen. Ein Sommerinterview hat Befürchtungen ausgelöst, dass es zu großen Änderungen kommen könnte. Ist die aktuelle Förderung wirklich zielführend? Was könnte sich verändern? Außerdem wieder mit dabei: ein Nerd-Geburtstag, das WTF der Woche und knifflige Quizfragen.

Anna Bicker, heise-online-Chefredakteur Dr. Volker Zota und Malte Kirchner sprechen in dieser Ausgabe der #heiseshow unter anderem über folgende Themen: - Unter den Erwartungen? OpenAI hat GPT-5 veröffentlicht – OpenAI hat sein neues Sprachmodell GPT-5 für ChatGPT herausgebracht. Nach langer Wartezeit und hohen Erwartungen stellt sich die Frage: Hält GPT-5, was versprochen wurde? Welche neuen Fähigkeiten bringt das Modell mit sich? Und rechtfertigen die Verbesserungen den Hype um die neue Generation? - Trainchanger? Bahn frohlockt über ICE L-Zulassung – Der neue ICE L hat seine Betriebszulassung erhalten und soll im Dezember starten. Die Deutsche Bahn verspricht sich viel von dem neuen Zugmodell. Was macht den ICE L besonders und wo soll er eingesetzt werden? Kann er wirklich die erhofften Verbesserungen im Bahnverkehr bringen? Und welche Auswirkungen hat das auf die Fahrgäste? - Verblendet? Aufregung um Solarförderung – Die Förderung für Solaranlagen sorgt für kontroverse Diskussionen. Ein Sommerinterview hat Befürchtungen ausgelöst, dass es zu großen Änderungen kommen könnte. Ist die aktuelle Förderung wirklich zielführend? Was könnte sich verändern? Außerdem wieder mit dabei: ein Nerd-Geburtstag, das WTF der Woche und knifflige Quizfragen.

Ende September stimmt die Schweiz über die digitale Identitätskarte, die E-ID ab. Der Bund hat dafür die App «Swiyu» entwickelt, mit der sich die ID analog zu Krankenkassenkarte oder Zugabonnement auf dem Handy speichern lassen soll.Soll – denn dieses Vorhaben ist umstritten. Während Befürworterinnen und Befürworter argumentieren, dass es den Alltag einfacher macht und ein Fortschritt in Sachen Digitalisierung darstellt, befürchten Gegnerinnen und Gegner die in ihren Augen fehlende Freiwilligkeit und äusseren Datenschutz-Bedenken.Sind diese Befürchtungen berechtigt? Wie würde die E-ID funktioneren? Und warum ist der Name der App so schwer aussprechbar? Alles was man im Vorfeld der Abstimmung zu E-IDwissen muss, hat Bundeshausredaktor Quentin Schlapbach zusammengetragen.Host: Philipp LoserProduktion: Tobias HolzerMehr zum Thema: Sind meine Daten in der neuen E-ID sicher? Alles zur Abstimmung62'300 Franken für den Namen «Swiyu» Unser Tagi-Spezialangebot für Podcast-Hörer:innen: tagiabo.chHabt ihr Feedback, Ideen oder Kritik zu «Apropos»? Schreibt uns an podcasts@tamedia.ch