Podcasts about statutory

Tax changes, fire regulations, statutory registration, and now EPCs – is there anything else the UK government can throw at holiday let owners?Alistair Handyside from PASC UK is the special guest on today's Host Planet Podcast – and his message for our politicians is simple: gather the data before implementing policy.Listen in to hear about lobbying efforts, what owners can do to help the cause, and why people are dropping out of the sector.There are sponsor mentions for Hosthub and Zeal Tax, plus shout-outs for Key Data, Sally Henry, and Robert Kennedy.Key takeaways:• EPC lobbying efforts are continuing – but hosts could still be stung with a £15,000 bill to make their holiday lets more energy efficient.• Statutory registration is coming – owners will need to provide safety certificates.• The government needs to gather the data before formulating policy.1:05 Is the government listening to the self-catering sector?3:58 EPC lobbying efforts 9:49 Hosts might need to fork out £15,000 per property!13:52 What statutory registration will look like18:55 Fire regulations 23:04 Hamsters on a wheel25:38 Message for Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves29:25 Some operators are giving up30:58 AI might not be the answer to everything 34:06 Favourite brand: Key Data34:47 Individual shout-out: Robert Kennedy35:48 Check your listings!Host Planet: https://www.hostplanet.club/James Varley: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jdsvarley/Alistair Handyside: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alistair-handyside-mbe-4170b216/PASC UK: https://www.pascuk.co.uk/Episode to check next: Holiday let owners are giving up – and this is why: https://open.spotify.com/episode/1rQ28eQzyisO37M68PbWngThe Host Planet Podcast is presented by James Varley, a holiday let investor and property manager who is also the Founder of Host Planet. Before founding Host Planet, James spent 20 years in the media, including a decade leading corporate communications for the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022.Contact the show: info@hostplanet.club#HostPlanet #HostPlanetPodcast #HostPlanetBitesize #ShortTermRentals #VacationRentals #HolidayLets #Airbnb #BookDirect #PropertyManagement #PropertyInvestment #BookingCom #Vrbo #PASCUK #SelfCatering #EPC #NetZero

Dr. Laura Bambrick, Social Policy Officer with the Irish Congress of Trade Unions; Alan Dillon, Minister for Small Business and Retail & Circular Economy; Cathy Bennett, Sinn Féin TD for Cavan–Monaghan; Gary Gannon, Social Democrats TD for Dublin Central

Expect More Volatility - Especially to The Downside Macro / Micro News for Thursday 10th April 2025 MACRO Trump Blinks in the Face of The Bond Market MICRO BRAVE BISON (BBSN) CAMBRIDGE COGNITION (COG) DEVOLVER DIGITAL (DEVO) HVIVO (HVO)  INSPECS GROUP (SPEC) MARKS ELECTRICAL (MRK) Aferian #AFRN - IGNORE MC £2.5M EV £15M Group revenues were $26.3m, down from $47.8m in FY2023. Statutory operating loss was $12.5m (FY2023: $63.9m). Net debt*** at year end was $12.7m (FY2023: $6.3m). Proteome Sciences #PRM MC £10M Total revenues of £4.89m (2023: £5.03m) Loss after tax £3.41m (2023: £2.44) Cash at year end £1.13m (2023: £2.03m) *****MY BOOK***** How to Become a MicroCap Millionaire - A 3 Step Strategy for Stock Market Success  Is now on sale here: https://www.sharepickers.com/how-to-become-a-microcap-millionaire-3-step-strategy/ !!!HOW GET 25% OFF MEMBERSHIP TO THE SHAREPICKERS INVESTMENT CLUB!!! If you buy a copy of the book, then leave a 5 star rating & write a positive review, you can get yearly membership to the SharePickers Investment Club for just £149.99!!! —---------------------------------------------------------------------- In this podcast I cover the Macro News relevant to the UK and monitor MicroCap Stocks to see if they're good enough to be added to the MicroCap League. The UK's first MicroCap League where 100's of small businesses are analysed and scored in relation to their growth, value, health, efficiency, momentum & potential. The company's that score the highest are added to the MicroCap League and possess the best risk / reward profile. —---------------------------------------------------------------------- IF YOU REGULARLY LISTEN TO THIS PODCAST AND ENJOY IT'S OUTPUT PLEASE CONSIDER GIVING IT A 5 STAR RATING AND REVIEW - THAT WAY MORE PEOPLE WILL FIND IT. THANK YOU

Episode Summary In this critical episode of the Canadian Immigration Podcast, Mark Holthe and Alicia Backman-Beharry dive deep into one of the most overlooked yet high-stakes sections of the Express Entry process: the statutory information questions in your eAPR. Whether you're answering questions about criminal history, prior visa refusals, or previous refugee claims, one careless answer—or a failure to disclose—can result in a finding of misrepresentation and a five-year bar from Canada. Mark and Alicia walk through real-world scenarios, key case law, and provide actionable advice for how to navigate this sensitive part of the application. This episode is a must-listen for anyone preparing to submit their Express Entry application and unsure how much to disclose.

Dr Tricia Keilthy of the Ombudsman for Children’s Office is urging the government to set up a statutory mechanism for reviewing child deaths to help grieving families get answers. If you have been affected by this, you may contact The Samaritans on 116 123.

Niall Muldoon, Ombudsman for Children, is calling for a statutory mechanism to investigate child deaths in Ireland.

Amy Durham and Charles Pigott explore the new neonatal care leave regime, which will take effect next month.  They also highlight what changes are in the pipeline for other types of statutory leave.

Government plans statutory home care packages Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

All non-critical and non-statutorily required work will cease at the General Services Administration's Technology Transformation Services as part of a 50% reduction of the office, according to Director Thomas Shedd. In his prepared remarks for a Thursday afternoon town hall, which were obtained by FedScoop, Shedd said that to deliver technology at GSA in a “more focused and streamlined way,” moving forward TTS will support only work that is required by statute and policy, fits into the Trump administration's definition of critical, and is prioritized by the leadership at GSA “in accordance with the priorities of the administration.” Everything else will be eliminated, per Shedd, who said in his remarks that TTS will be smaller in size – at least 50% smaller. Additionally, any contracts that support the work that falls outside of the established bounds “will be terminated” and any job functions that are deemed non-essential will be cut. The prioritized and remaining TTS programs include Login.gov, FedRAMP, Cloud.gov, statutorily required websites, the Integrated Award Environment, the Office of Regulatory Oversight, the Centers of Excellence, the Presidential Innovation Fellowship Program, the U.S. Digital Corps, operations and other “special projects.” Australian-based software company Atlassian has tapped Matthew Graviss to be its first public sector chief technology officer following his recent departure as the State Department's top data and AI official. Although the role starts a new private sector chapter in Graviss's career, being the first person to establish a newly created position is familiar ground. During his time in the federal government, Graviss was the first-ever chief data officer at both the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. In an interview with FedScoop, Graviss said his role at Atlassian is an extension of that experience in that he'll again be codifying the responsibilities of the job, showing value and solving customer problems. Regardless of whether his role is in or out of the government, Graviss said “the delivery of better goods and services to citizens is contingent upon … an ecosystem of government employees, service providers, and solution providers.” The Daily Scoop Podcast is available every Monday-Friday afternoon. If you want to hear more of the latest from Washington, subscribe to The Daily Scoop Podcast  on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify and YouTube.

  The Friday Five for March 7, 2025: Starbucks and Dunkin' Spring 2025 Menus Amazon Announces Alexa+ Changes to MA and Part D Disaster/Emergency SEP Effects of ACA Subsidy Expiration by Demographic Clarification on HHS Proposed Rule Comment Periods   Starbucks and Dunkin' Spring 2025 Menus: Beams, Sophia. “Dunkin' Brings Back Two Fan-Favorite Drinks Just in Time for Spring.” Bhg.Com, Better Homes & Gardens, 5 Mar. 2025, www.bhg.com/dunkin-spring-menu-2025-11690288. Tyko, Kelly. “Dunkin' Spring Menu Launches, Nondairy Surcharge Removed.” Axios.Com, Axios, 5 Mar. 2025, www.axios.com/2025/03/05/dunkin-spring-menu-2025-dunkalatte-pistachio-coffee. “New Iced Cherry Chai Joins Lavender Drinks on Starbucks Spring Menu.” About.Starbucks.Com, Starbucks, 3 Mar. 2025, about.starbucks.com/stories/2025/new-iced-cherry-chai-joins-lavender-drinks-on-starbucks-spring-menu/. Palan, Michael. “We Tried Starbucks' New Spring Menu Items, and These 2 Drinks Stole the Show.” Tastingtable.Com, Tasting Table, 3 Mar. 2025, www.tastingtable.com/1801587/starbucks-reserve-new-spring-menu-2025-drinks-food/.   Amazon Announces Alexa+: “50 Things to Try with Alexa+.” Aboutamazon.Comt, Amazon, 26 Feb. 2025, www.aboutamazon.com/news/devices/new-alexa-top-features. Haselton, Todd, et al. “Amazon Alexa Event Live Blog: All the News from the Keynote.” Theverge.Com, The Verge, 26 Feb. 2025, www.theverge.com/news/618261/amazon-alexa-event-live-blog-2025. Panay, Panos. “Introducing Alexa+, the next Generation of Alexa.” Aboutamazon.Com, Amazon, 26 Feb. 2025, www.aboutamazon.com/news/devices/new-alexa-generative-artificial-intelligence. Diaz, Maria. “Not All Echo Devices Will Get Alexa+ Initially - See If Yours Made the List.” Zdnet.Com, ZDNET, 28 Feb. 2025, www.zdnet.com/article/alexa-plus-will-run-on-select-echo-devices-see-if-yours-is-on-the-list/. Ellis, Cat. “Want to Try Alexa+? Here Are the Echo Devices It'll Work On.” Techradar.Com, TechRadar, 27 Feb. 2025, www.techradar.com/home/smart-speakers/want-to-try-alexa-plus-here-are-the-echo-devices-itll-work-on. Aten, Jason. “With Its AI-Powered Alexa+, Amazon Just Put Apple on Notice.” Inc.Com, Inc, 26 Feb. 2025, www.inc.com/jason-aten/with-its-ai-powered-alexa-plus-amazon-just-put-apple-on-notice/91153371. Stanley, Alyse. “You Can Get Alexa+ Early — Here's How to Sign up.” Tomsguide.Com, Tom's Guide, 1 Mar. 2025, www.tomsguide.com/ai/you-can-get-alexa-early-heres-how-to-sign-up.   Changes to MA and Part D Disaster/Emergency SEP: Crowe, Edward. “New Medicare FEMA SEP Rules.” Pfsinsurance.Com, Pinnacle Financial Services, 29 Jan. 2025, pfsinsurance.com/blog/new-medicare-fema-sep-rules-crowe-associates. “Change to Beneficiary Use of the SEP for Individuals Affected by a Government Entity-Declared Disaster or Other Emergency.” Cms.Gov, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 3 Dec. 2024, 20178637.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/20178637/42%20ea%20-%20Product%20Profile.pdf.   Effects of ACA Subsidy Expiration by Demographic: Lambrew, Jeanne. “Enhanced ACA Marketplace Tax Credits Worked—And Shouldn't Be Eliminated.” Tcf.Org, The Century Foundation, 7 Aug. 2024, tcf.org/content/commentary/enhanced-aca-marketplace-tax-credits-worked-and-shouldnt-be-eliminated/. Richards, Carson, and Sara  R. Collins. “Enhanced Premium Tax Credits for ACA Health Plans: Who They Help, and Who Gets Hurt If They're Not Extended.” Commonwealthfund.Org, Commonwealth Fund, 18 Feb. 2025, www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/explainer/2025/feb/enhanced-premium-tax-credits-aca-health-plans. Sullivan, Jennifer. “Enhanced Tax Credits Keep ACA Marketplace Coverage Affordable for 2025.” Cbpp.Org, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 18 Nov. 2024, www.cbpp.org/blog/enhanced-tax-credits-keep-aca-marketplace-coverage-affordable-for-2025. “How Much More Would People Pay in Premiums If the ACA's Enhanced Subsidies Expired?” Kff.Org, KFF, 18 Dec. 2024, https://www.kff.org/interactive/how-much-more-would-people-pay-in-premiums-if-the-acas-enhanced-subsidies-expired/ Ortaliza, Jared, et al. “Inflation Reduction Act Health Insurance Subsidies: What Is Their Impact and What Would Happen If They Expire?” Kff.Org, KFF, 26 July 2024, www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/issue-brief/inflation-reduction-act-health-insurance-subsidies-what-is-their-impact-and-what-would-happen-if-they-expire/. Banthin, Jessica, et al. “Who Benefits from Enhanced Premium Tax Credits in the Marketplace?” Urban.Org, Urban Institute, June 2024, www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2024-06/Who_Benefits_from_Enhanced_Premium_Tax_Credits_in_the_Marketplace.pdf. Lo, Justin, and Cynthia Cox. “Who Might Lose Eligibility for Affordable Care Act Marketplace Subsidies If Enhanced Tax Credits Are Not Extended?” Kff.Com, KFF, 28 Feb. 2025, www.kff.org/policy-watch/who-might-lose-eligibility-for-affordable-care-act-marketplace-subsidies-if-enhanced-tax-credits-are-not-extended/.   Clarification on HHS Proposed Rule Comment Periods: “Compilation of the Social Security Laws.” Ssa.Gov, Social Security Administration, www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title18/1871.htm. Accessed 5 Mar. 2025. “HHS Rescinds Policy Regarding Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking – Implications for Health Care Industry.” Www.Hoganlovells.Com, Hogan Lovells, 3 Mar. 2025, www.hoganlovells.com/en/publications/hhs-rescinds-policy-regarding-noticeandcomment-rulemaking-implications-for-health-care-industry. “Policy on Adhering to the Text of the Administrative Procedure Act.” Federalregister.Gov, Federal Register, 3 Mar. 2025, www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/03/03/2025-03300/policy-on-adhering-to-the-text-of-the-administrative-procedure-act. Goldman, Maya. “RFK Jr. Move to Kill Public Comment Roils Providers.” Axios.Com, Axios, 3 Mar. 2025, www.axios.com/2025/03/03/rfk-transparency-rule-elimination-fallout. Cueto, Isabella. “RFK Jr. Moves to Eliminate Public Comment on HHS Decisions.” Statnews.Com, STAT, 28 Feb. 2025, www.statnews.com/2025/02/28/rfk-jr-eliminating-public-comment-hhs-decisions-richardson-waiver/. Muoio, Dave. “RFK Jr. Orders HHS to End ‘extra-Statutory' Notice, Public Comment Process in Rulemaking.” Fiercehealthcare.Com, Fierce Healthcare, 3 Mar. 2025, www.fiercehealthcare.com/regulatory/rfk-jr-orders-hhs-end-notice-public-comment-process-rulemaking. Howe, Amy. “Supreme Court Strikes down Chevron, Curtailing Power of Federal Agencies.” Scotusblog.Com, SCOTUSblog, 26 July 2024, www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-chevron-curtailing-power-of-federal-agencies/.   Resources: Diversify Your Insurance Portfolio & Reap Real Rewards: https://lnk.to/asg651 FAQs About Registering with Ritter Insurance Marketing: https://ritterim.com/blog/faqs-about-registering-with-ritter-insurance-marketing/   How To Better Market Yourself: https://ritterim.com/blog/how-to-better-market-yourself/   Medicare Advantage Open Enrollment Do's and Don'ts: https://lnk.to/oRft1p SNP Summit Registration is Live: https://lnk.to/asgf20250228   Follow Us on Social! Ritter on Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/RitterIM Instagram, https://www.instagram.com/ritter.insurance.marketing/ LinkedIn, https://www.linkedin.com/company/ritter-insurance-marketing TikTok, https://www.tiktok.com/@ritterim X, https://x.com/RitterIM and Youtube, https://www.youtube.com/user/RitterInsurance     Sarah on LinkedIn, https://www.linkedin.com/in/sjrueppel/ Instagram, https://www.instagram.com/thesarahjrueppel/ and Threads, https://www.threads.net/@thesarahjrueppel  Tina on LinkedIn, https://www.linkedin.com/in/tina-lamoreux-6384b7199/   Not affiliated with or endorsed by Medicare or any government agency. Contact the Agent Survival Guide Podcast! Email us ASGPodcast@Ritterim.com or call 1-717-562-7211 and leave a voicemail.

This latest episode of our NHS Estates Series focuses on risk management and health and safety in property estates. Join us as we explore key issues including compliance and knowing how to respond to an incident, the impact of RAAC and managing the risk of fire.

A man considered to be one of the most powerful Hells Angels in Quebec will have to spend the next 10 months behind bars. Plus other biker news. Join us as we discuss.Please consider sponsoring the channel by signing up for our channel memberships. You can also support us by signing up for our podcast channel membership for $9.99 per month, where 100% of the membership price goes directly to us at https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-dragon-s-lair-motorcycle-chaos--3267493/support.  Follow us on:Instagram: BlackDragonBikerTV TikTok: BlackDragonBikertv Twitter: jbunchiiFacebook: BlackDragonBikerBuy Black Dragon Merchandise, Mugs, Hats, T-Shirts Books: https://blackdragonsgear.comDonate to our cause:Cashapp: $BikerPrezPayPal: jbunchii Zelle: jbunchii@aol.com Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/BlackDragonNPSubscribe to our new discord server https://discord.gg/dshaTSTSubscribe to our online news magazine www.bikerliberty.comGet 20% off Gothic biker rings by using my special discount code: blackdragon go to http://gthic.com?aff=147 Join my News Letter to get the latest in MC protocol, biker club content, and my best picks for every day carry. https://johns-newsletter-43af29.beehiiv.com/subscribe   Get my Audio Book Prospect's Bible an Audible: https://adbl.co/3OBsfl5 Help us get to 30,000 subscribers on www.instagram.com/BlackDragonBikerTV on Instagram. Thank you!

The family of Aoife Johnston - who died in the overcrowded Emergency Department of University Hospital Limerick - are calling on the new Government to order a Full Statutory Inquiry into her death. John spoke to Aoife's parents Carol and James.

In this episode of the InsuranceAUM.com Podcast, host Stewart Foley, CFA, sits down with Barbara Arnold and Scott Kurland of SS&C Technologies to explore the latest developments in NAIC statutory reporting. With growing portfolio complexity and evolving regulatory requirements, insurers are facing increasing challenges in maintaining compliance while ensuring accuracy and efficiency in reporting.   Barbara and Scott discuss the major trends shaping the industry, including the growing role of alternative investments, the shift to multi-manager models, and changes in asset classifications that impact reporting requirements. They also highlight the rising adoption of outsourcing and co-sourcing solutions, helping insurers streamline processes while maintaining compliance. As reporting deadlines tighten and staffing challenges persist, having a clear strategy for data integrity and workflow optimization is more critical than ever.   This conversation provides expert insights and practical solutions for insurance investment professionals looking to navigate today's complex NAIC reporting environment. From best practices in statutory reporting to strategies for staying ahead of regulatory changes, this episode offers valuable perspectives for insurers aiming to enhance their reporting processes. Listen now to gain a deeper understanding of how insurers can optimize their reporting workflows and ensure compliance in an increasingly demanding landscape.

Learn why the Small Bay Industrial asset class is gaining in popularity among Delaware Statutory Trust investors. 

As one of the nation's leading expert real estate investment firms specializing in Delaware Statutory Trust investments, Kay Properties is regularly asked about the nuances and strategies surrounding Delaware Statutory Trust investments for 1031 exchanges or direct cash investments. Listen to some of Frequently Asked Questions investors ask regarding Delaware Statutory Trusts and 1031 exchanges. This is a must hear episode for anyone interested in learning more about Delaware Statutory Trust investments. 

Tar éis do rialtas úr a bheith ceaptha inniu, beidh aird na n-airí rialtais ar spriocanna an Chláir Rialtais a bhaint amach. Foilsíodh an clár rialtais le breis agus 160 leathanach ann ag déanamh cur síos ar na gealltanais ar fad atá ag an rialtas nua seo. Ach cad é atá i ndán don teanga faoin Aire Ghaeltachta nua? Labhair an t-iriseoir Bill Bhreatnach le Seachtain leis na spriocanna is suntasaí i leith na Gaeilge a phlé. Foclóir: Clár rialtais - Programme for Government. Spriocanna – Targets. Breithiúnas - Judgement. Lánfhostaíocht - Full employment. Earnáil na cógaisíochta - Pharmaceutical industry. Líonraí - Networks. Maoin intleachtúil - Intellectual property. Brabús - Profit. Stocaireacht – Campaign. Soláthar - Supply Móréileamh - Main demands. Athbhreithniú - Review. cumhacht reachtúil - Statutory powers. Maoiniú - Funding. Deontas - Grant. Athchóiriú - refurbish.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The respondent, Dov Markowich, is a shareholder of the appellant, Lundin Mining Corporation (“Lundin”). He sought leave under s. 138.8 of Ontario's Securities Act, to bring a statutory cause of action against Lundin and its officers and directors for Lundin's alleged failure to make timely disclosure of pit wall instability and a subsequent rockslide at a mine in Chile (“events”). He also sought to certify the action as a class action under s. 5 of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6, advancing claims on behalf of certain shareholders of Lundin. Lundin did not publicly disclose the events at the time they occurred on October 25 and October 31, 2017, respectively. It advised investors about them approximately a month later, on November 29, in its regularly scheduled update. The next day, the price of Lundin's securities fell 16 per cent on the TSX. The issue at the heart of the appeal involves the competing interpretations of whether there is a reasonable possibility that Mr. Markowich's action will be resolved in his favour at trial based on his claim that Lundin's lack of disclosure was contrary to its obligations to disclose forthwith a “material change” in its “business, operations or capital”. Argued Date 2025-01-15 Keywords Securities — Civil procedure — Commencement of proceedings — Statutory cause of action for failure to make timely disclosure — Leave to proceed — Mining company disclosing occurrence of pit wall instability and subsequent rockslide in periodic disclosure rather than at time of occurrence — Shareholder seeking to institute class action for company's failure to make timely disclosure — Commencement of action requiring leave of the court based on whether there is reasonable possibility that the action will be resolved in favour of the plaintiff at trial — Motion judge dismissing motion for leave — Court of Appeal allowing appeal and granting motion for leave — What is a “material change” for the purpose of Canadian securities law? — Should the leave requirement modify or lessen the burden to show a “material change”? — Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, ss. 138.3(4) and 138.8. Notes (Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave) Language English Audio Disclaimers This podcast is created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. The original version of this hearing may be found on the Supreme Court of Canada's website. The above case summary was prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch).

In this week's episode of the Rich Habits Podcast, Robert Croak and Austin Hankwitz answer your questions! --- ⭐️ Open a Bond Account on⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠Public⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to lock in your 6% or higher yield today,⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠Click Here!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ---

The House Ethics Committee is releasing its report on Matt Gaetz. The details include Gaetz paying more than $90,000 for sex and drugs, Statutory rape, allegations and prohibited use of favors and privileges. Donald Trump is extremely annoyed about talk that he isn't really driving the ship when it comes to his upcoming transition into the White House and presidency. After Elon Musk derailed a bipartisan deal on government funding, questions about Musk being a “shadow president” started swirling. It getting under Trump's skin enough that he mentioned it during a weekend speech, calling the idea a hoax. Is it? Did Trump sell his power to Musk like he's offering up the environment to billionaires who pay enough to ruin our land? We'll ask iHeart television and radio political analyst Gary Dietrich about that and more. Author Cary Baker will join us to discuss his new book “Down on the Corner: Adventures in Busking and Street Music.”  The book covers 100 years of street music and features many former buskers who went on to fame. If you're looking for a cool last-minute holiday gift, this might be the one.The Mark Thompson Show 12/23/24Patreon subscribers are the backbone of the show! If you'd like to help, here's our Patreon Link:https://www.patreon.com/themarkthompsonshowMaybe you're more into PayPal.  https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=PVBS3R7KJXV24And you'll find everything on our website: https://www.themarkthompsonshow.com

Show #2306 Show Notes: Micah 6:8 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Micah%206%3A8&version=KJV ‘Discipline’: https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/discipline Ohio Senate passes Bill outlawing Criticism of Israel: https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64778 ‘Vice’: https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/vice ‘Turpitude’: https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Turpitude ‘Vile’: https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/vile Statutory Law: https://library.highline.edu/c.php?g=344547&p=2320275 What Is The Difference Between Common Law And Statutory Law? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqyvE4CA92s […]

Policies given by Christ; Epistles?; Misunderstanding Paul; Paul's court experiences; Crazier Emperators; US Commanders in Chief; Moral authority?; King Jesus; Travel at Christ's time; Incense-burning; Benefit Temples; Centurion Christians; Rightly dividing bread from house to house; "Religion"; Temple membership; Acts 17:7; "Rhomaios" status; Appealing to Caesar; Explaining Christ; Salvation; Article 1: Congregations; Article 2: Seat of authority; What did Christ say?; "Logos" = right reason; Article 3: Conscience of The Church; Government of, for and by the people; Trees of Knowledge and Life; In, but not of, the "world"; Romans 13; Power - of choice; Consequences; Abraham and Lot; "Altars"; "Melchizedek"; The Church is a possession of God; "Church" = ekklesia = called out; Corruption of power; Term limits?; Statutory bondage; Article 4; Repentance; Covetous practices; Christ's commandments; Harmonious arrangements; Lev 20:26 "Holy"; Consecration; Separation; Covenanting with kings; Following Holy Spirit; "Put to death"; Judgements of Moses; Lev 22:2; Turning the world upside-down; False witness; Minister separation from the "world"; Pilate's declaration of Christ as king; No coveting; Loving God and our neighbors; Lev 15:31; Mt 20:13; Ordained of God; Lk 6:22; Getting kicked out of bondage; "stoning"; Having hard discussions; Num 18:14; John 15:19; "world"; Private Religion; Your duty to your fellowman; Welfare snares; The Gospel message; John 17:14; Denying the power of God; "Dunamis"; Judging; 2 Cor 6:14 "believer"; Lot's wife; Freewill offerings; Ananias's offerings; "Levites"; Sitting in darkness; Withstanding tyranny; "Infidel"; Phileo love; Faith compels action; Agape love; Sacrifice; Giving your choice away; Elder-driven Church; Homeschooling; Individual choice to love; "Belial"; 2 Cor 6:17 Be ye separate; Heb 7:26; Article 5: Servants of the Kingdom; Living stones; "Leaven"; Ensnaring yourself; "Deacon"; Tithe; Rewards of unrighteousness; Deut 14:29; Legal title; Doing the will of the Father; Acts 13:2; Barnabas; "Nicolaitans"; Serving congregations; Doing contrary to Christ?; Repent.

In this episode, Patrick McKenzie (patio11) and Lars Doucet, the author of Land is a Big Deal, discuss how cities determine your property's value and collect taxes. They explore how assessment offices juggle political pressures, statistical models, and technological tools while trying to maintain equity across millions of properties. They also cover why assessment offices are separate from tax collectors, how property value protests actually work, and why your neighbor's house might be assessed differently than yours.–Full transcript available here: www.complexsystemspodcast.com/property-assessment-lars-doucet/–Sponsors: GiveWell | CheckSupport proven charities that deliver measurable results and learn how to maximize your charitable impact with GiveWell. First-time donors get $100 matched. Go to givewell.org (and type in "Complex Systems" at checkout).Check is the leading payroll infrastructure provider and pioneer of embedded payroll. Check makes it easy for any SaaS platform to build a payroll business, and already powers 60+ popular platforms. Head to checkhq.com/complex and tell them patio11 sent you.–Links:Lars' book: https://www.landisabigdeal.com/Lars' blog: https://www.fortressofdoors.com/ Bits about Money: https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/ –Twitter@larsiusprime@patio11–Timestamps(00:00) Introduction(00:23) How property taxes work (Texas Example)(02:45) The political art of avoiding tax rate blame(05:53) Sources of real estate data(08:08) Historical property assessment(11:04) Statutory guidance vs. Actual practice on market value assessment(14:25) Tax rate strategy and sandbagging(15:17) Assessed value vs market value(16:16) Assessment caps and Prop 13 (18:22) Sponsor: GiveWell | Check(20:27) Data collection in the field(22:54) Data collection methods(25:08) Property valuation: Beyond location and correlative factors(26:52) Depreciation of buildings(27:37) Orthodox view of depreciation(30:53) Real estate cultural differences(33:59) Urban redevelopment and land value(36:59) Small business realities and perceptions(46:19) Property tax protests(50:45) Predictive protests(52:19) Accuracy vs equity testing(58:50) Cook county assessor's office(1:01:11) Lars's background(1:05:38) What is GIS?(1:09:52) Wrap

Introduction to Criminal Law Source: Lecture 4: Criminal Law: Core Principles and Liability Main Themes: Distinguishing criminal law from civil law Purposes of criminal law Sources of criminal law Elements of a crime Classification of crimes Key Ideas and Facts: 1. Criminal Law vs. Civil Law Purpose: Criminal law addresses offenses against society, while civil law handles disputes between private parties. Burden of Proof: Criminal law requires proof "beyond a reasonable doubt," while civil law uses a "preponderance of the evidence" standard. Example: A physical assault can lead to both criminal prosecution for battery (societal harm) and a civil lawsuit for damages (individual harm). 2. Purposes of Criminal Law Deterrence: Discouraging future crime through punishment (specific and general). "Stringent laws against drunk driving serve as a general deterrent, warning others of the consequences, while the penalties imposed on repeat offenders act as specific deterrence." Retribution: Punishing offenders proportionally to the crime ("just deserts"). "A person convicted of premeditated murder might face life imprisonment or the death penalty." Rehabilitation: Reforming offenders through programs addressing underlying causes of criminal behavior. "Programs like drug treatment courts and vocational training aim to reintegrate offenders into society as productive members." Public Safety: Protecting society by incapacitating dangerous individuals and preventing future harm. 3. Sources of Criminal Law Statutory Law: Written laws enacted by legislative bodies, like the Model Penal Code. "Statutory law allows for clear, uniform rules that adapt to evolving societal norms and emerging crimes, such as cybercrime." Common Law: Law developed through judicial decisions over time, filling gaps and interpreting statutes. 4. Elements of a Crime Actus Reus (Guilty Act): Voluntary physical act or unlawful omission. Omissions require a legal duty to act. "A parent's failure to provide food to their child may constitute criminal neglect." Mens Rea (Guilty Mind): Mental state at the time of the act, including intent, recklessness, negligence, or strict liability. Concurrence: Actus reus and mens rea must coincide. Causation: The link between the defendant's actions and the harm. Includes factual causation ("but for" test) and proximate causation (foreseeable consequence). 5. Classification of Crimes Felonies: Serious offenses punishable by more than one year imprisonment or death. "Felonies often involve significant harm to individuals or society, and convictions carry long-term consequences such as loss of voting rights or eligibility for certain jobs." Misdemeanors: Less severe offenses punishable by less than one year or fines. Inchoate Offenses: Incomplete crimes showing criminal intent, such as attempt, conspiracy, and solicitation. "Understanding inchoate offenses highlights the preventative role of criminal law in addressing criminal intent before harm occurs." Conclusion: The lecture provides a comprehensive overview of the foundational principles of criminal law. It establishes a framework for understanding how crimes are defined, prosecuted, and punished, emphasizing the balance between societal order and individual rights. This foundation is crucial for further exploration of criminal liability and defenses in subsequent lectures. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In this case, the court considered this issue: does 18 U-S-C § 666(a)(1)(B) criminalize gratuities, i.e., payments in recognition of actions a state or local official has already taken or committed to take, without any quid pro quo agreement to take those actions?    The case was decided on June 26, 2024. The Supreme Court held that Federal law, 18 U-S-C §666, proscribes bribes to state and local officials but does not make it a crime for those officials to accept gratuities for their past acts. Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored the 6-3 majority opinion of the Court. The Court identified six main reasons that 18 U-S-C §666(a)(1)(B) is a bribery statute and not a gratuities statute:    a) Text: The language of §666 closely resembles the federal bribery statute (§201(b)) rather than the federal gratuities statute (§201(c)).    b) Statutory history: Congress amended §666 in 1986 to model it after the bribery statute, not the gratuities statute.    c) Statutory structure: Unlike other laws, §666 does not separate bribery and gratuities into distinct provisions.    d) Statutory punishments: The penalties in §666 align with those for bribery, not gratuities, and would create inexplicable sentencing disparities if applied to gratuities.    e) Federalism: Interpreting §666 as a gratuities statute would significantly infringe on states' rights to regulate their officials' conduct.    f) Fair notice: The government's interpretation would create ambiguity and potentially criminalize innocuous behavior without clear guidelines for state and local officials. The Court rejected the government's argument that the inclusion of the term "rewarded" in §666 indicates it covers gratuities. Rather, the word "rewarded" serves to close potential loopholes in bribery cases. Because §666 prohibits bribes but not gratuities, state and local governments may choose whether and how to regulate gratuities for their officials within constitutional bounds. Justice Neil Gorsuch joined the Court's opinion in full and wrote a separate concurrence. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson authored a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined. The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.  --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scotus-opinions/support

Ehud Gersten is a licensed securities professional focusing on 1031 exchanges and Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs). Previously, Ehud owned and operated a successful law firm in San Diego, focusing on real estate and consumer rights. Today, he helps investors by providing expert guidance on their real estate investments as a managing partner of Perch Wealth. Learn More About Ehud Here: Perch Wealth - www.perchwealth.com Connect with the Global Investors Show, Charles Carillo and Harborside Partners: ◾ Setup a FREE 30 Minute Strategy Call with Charles: http://ScheduleCharles.com ◾ Learn How To Invest In Real Estate: https://www.SyndicationSuperstars.com/  ◾ FREE Passive Investing Guide: http://www.HSPguide.com ◾ Join Our Weekly Email Newsletter: http://www.HSPsignup.com ◾ Passively Invest in Real Estate: http://www.InvestHSP.com ◾ Global Investors Web Page: http://GlobalInvestorsPodcast.com/  

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) Source: Excerpts from "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)" Main Themes: Definition and elements of IIED Examples of outrageous conduct Requirements of intent or recklessness Defenses against IIED claims Application of IIED in specific circumstances (public figures, workplace) Limitations and challenges of IIED claims Most Important Ideas/Facts: 1. Definition and Elements: IIED allows recovery for severe emotional suffering caused by outrageous and intentional conduct. Four elements must be proven: Intentional or reckless conduct: Aiming to cause harm or acting with disregard for the high probability of harm. "The defendant must have intended to cause emotional harm or known that emotional harm was substantially certain to result from their actions." Extreme and outrageous conduct: Behavior exceeding the bounds of decency tolerated by society. "The standard of outrageousness is high, and courts have generally restricted the application of IIED to situations that go beyond the usual indignities, annoyances, and stresses of everyday life." Causation: A direct link between the defendant's conduct and the plaintiff's emotional distress. "The causation element ensures that only those injuries which are directly traceable to the defendant's actions are compensable under IIED." Severe emotional distress: Distress that no reasonable person should be expected to endure. "The term 'severe' is defined as distress that no reasonable person should be expected to endure. It must be more than trivial, transient, or slight emotional upset." 2. Examples of Outrageous Conduct: Employer abuse (verbal abuse, threats, harassment) Discriminatory harassment Exploitation of known sensitivities (phobias, trauma) Abusive conduct by authority figures (police, employers, landlords) 3. Intent/Recklessness: Intentional: Defendant desired to cause emotional harm. Reckless: Defendant acted with substantial disregard for the risk of causing emotional distress. 4. Defenses: Conduct not extreme or outrageous Consent (rarely applicable) First Amendment concerns (public figures, public concern) Lack of causation Lack of severe emotional distress 5. Special Circumstances: Public Figures: Must prove "actual malice" (knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for truth). Workplace: Often combined with harassment/discrimination claims. Statutory remedies may preempt IIED claims. 6. Limitations and Challenges: High burden of proof (outrageousness and severity) Stringent evidentiary requirements (medical records, expert testimony, lay testimony) Statute of limitations Key Takeaways: IIED is a powerful tool for addressing severe emotional harm caused by egregious behavior. Proving IIED requires a high standard of proof and compelling evidence. Courts carefully balance the need to protect individuals from emotional distress with the importance of free speech and preventing frivolous claims. This briefing doc provides a concise overview of the key aspects of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. For specific legal advice, consult with an attorney. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

For real estate investors considering Delaware Statutory Trust (DST) investments—whether for a 1031 exchange or as a direct cash investment, it is important to define your investment strategy. For example, are you looking for an investment where you have the abilitiy to potentially generate greater monthly net operating income, or are you more interested in a steady income stream over a long period of time. These two investment strategies are often called the “Anchor and Buoy” investment theory. DSTs are uniquely suited to help investors potentially achieve the benefits of both strategies, potentially offering the stability of an anchor with the growth opportunities of a buoy. 

When it comes to patent eligibility and statutory construction, does “any” really mean “any?” In the courts, is it permissible to limit statutorily-authorized patent term adjustment based on a doctrine that has no basis in statute? The debate surrounding these issues has only gotten livelier with recent Federal Circuit decisions and a bi-partisan patent eligibility bill working its way through Congress. With this backdrop, please join us for an exciting discussion about whether patent law has run afoul of the basic precepts of textualism and statutory construction, and what, if anything, should be done about it.Featuring:Matthew Dowd, Founder and Partner, Dowd Scheffel PLLCSherry Knowles, Principal, Knowles Intellectual Property StrategiesGene Quinn, President & CEO, IPWatchdog, Inc.Prof. Josh Sarnoff, Professor of Law, DePaul University College of LawModerator: John Rogitz, Managing Attorney, Rogitz & Associates--To register, click the link above.

Send us a textTodd Zwicky, professor at George Mason's Scalia Law School, challenges some conventional legal doctrine, taking up the views of Bruno Leone and Friedrich Hayek. What if the legal world has underestimated the power of spontaneous order? Todd's intellectual journey sheds light on how these groundbreaking ideas contrast sharply with the dominant constructivist views shaping contemporary legal thought. Todd offers perspectives on the role of intuition and reasonableness in the courtroom, inspired by the legacies of Leone and Hayek. Uncover the hidden parallels between market dynamics and legal systems, emphasizing the fluidity of Roman law as a process of discovery. Links:Todd Zywicki's Faculty PageZywicki's published work on Leoni, and the Common LawThe Rise and Fall of Efficiency in the Common Law: A Supply-Side Analysis, 97 NORTHWESTERN L. REV. 1551 (2003). Common Law and Economic Efficiency (with Edward Stringham), in 7 ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LAW AND ECONOMICS: THE PRODUCTION OF LEGAL RULES (2d ed., Francesco Parisi, ed., 2012). Bruno Leoni's Legacy and Continued Relevance, 30(1) J. OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISE 131-41 (2015).Austrian Law and Economics and Efficiency in the Common Law (with Edward Stringham), in RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON AUSTRIAN LAW AND ECONOMICS 192 (Todd J. Zywicki and Peter J. Boettke, eds. 2017). The Loper Bright SCOTUS Decision (And the Gorsuch concurrence!)If you have questions or comments, or want to suggest a future topic, email the show at taitc.email@gmail.com ! You can follow Mike Munger on Twitter at @mungowitz

Cold water has been poured on the prospect of a statutory inquiry into the death of Shannon Teenager Aoife Johnston at University Hospital Limerick. It follows a special meeting of the Oireachtas Health Committee this week, which confirmed the timeline for HIQA's impending review of Emergency Department capacity in the MidWest cannot be expedited. The bulk of the meeting was dedicated to issues arising at University Hospital Limerick and saw the MidWest HSE Regional Executive Officer, the Chief Nursing Officer and Health Minister all in attendance. Several TDs and Senators levelled criticism at the absence of the former Beaumont Hospital CEO, Ian Carter who has this week been appointed to lead day to day operations at Dooradoyle. Responding to Ennistymon Fine Gael Senator Martin Conway, Minister Stephen Donnelly confirmed the timeline for HIQA's MidWest ED report could not be expedited ahead of next Summer due to the workload involved. But not before tensions flared between the coalition colleagues over both party's respective handling of the health portfolio. The meeting was held just days after the solicitor for the family of Shannon Teenager Aoife Johnston called for a statutory inquiry to be held into the circumstances of her tragic death at University Hospital Limerick in December 2022. The Clarke Report published into her death last month was prohibited from resolving conflicting evidence provided by nurses and doctors on duty relating to the events of her death. Six people are currently facing a disciplinary process in relation to Aoife's death, in what's the largest action of its kind in the HSE's history. Responding to Meelick Fianna Fáil Deputy Cathal Crowe, Minister Donnelly insists the Johnston family will receive a state apology if desired, but says statutory inquiries could interfere with ongoing disciplinary procedures. The Department of Health's Chief Nursing Officer also addressed concerns over safe staffing levels at UHL. It comes amid reports from the INMO that 2,000 nursing and midwifery posts remain unfilled nationwide, amid claims 200 vacancies exist at UHL. Responding to Kilrush Independent Deputy Violet-Anne Wynne, CNO Rachel Kenna says an over-reliance on agency staff at Dooradoyle has led to unsafe situations. Issues relating to the disproportionate cancellations of scheduled care at Ennis General Hospital were also raised with Ennis Hospital seeing more deferrals of day case surgeries than any other facility in the MidWest. Health campaigners have since voiced concern that not only were vital appointments postponed, but that skilled consultants were also left idle, while the county hospital was deployed for it's overflow beds. HSE MidWest REO Sandra Broderick has pledged to investigate the matter.

In the realm of real estate investing, the 1031 exchange Delaware Statutory Trust can provide savvy real estate investors a unique opportunity to achieve passive management, the potential for regular monthly distributions, and a way to enter one of the most tax efficient real estate investment strategies available today. However, one the best ways to maximize this real estate investment strategy is by first understanding some of the benefits and risks of the Delaware Statutory Trust. This recording will jump right into specific advantages and disadvantages associated with DST 1031 exchanges and provide a comprehensive look into this popular investment strategy.

Today the National Women's Council are launching a new Gender Quotas Alliance calling for statutory gender quotas at local elections. The Alliance includes academics; Traveller, migrant, and disabled women's groups and they are calling for the implementation of statutory gender quotas for local elections. Speaking to Newstalk Breakfast was Claire McGing, Academic researcher covering women and politics.

Sitting in darkness; Having eyes to see; Religions leading to God; Bramna = Abram?; Is the bible about religion?; Pharisees gone wrong; Mystery Babylon; Idolatry?; "Worship"; Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire; Foolish virgins; What does his righteousness look like?; Deeds of the Nicolaitans; Error of Balaam; Shaking your paradigm; Mark 10:1; "resort"; Two leaders; Divorce; Changing leadership; Social welfare systems; "religion"; Covetousness; Socialism; Breaking down families; Crimes of Julius Caesar; "Son of God"; "Emperor"; Calling no man "father"; Accosting Jesus about divorce; Temptation; "lawful" = "from the I am"; Natural Law; vs Moses' precedents; Bill of divorcement - release; Mt 19:8; Hardness of your heart; Becoming one flesh via Holy Matrimony; Lev 25:10; Lev 25:43; Returning every man to his family; Corporation?; Statutory marriage; Broken families; Communism; Adultery; Permanency of marriage; Remarrying?; Common law; Cities of refuge; v13 children; As children view parents; Coming into the kingdom; Inheriting eternal life?; False Jews; Recognizing symbolism; Honoring father and mother; Social security; Loving neighbor; Defining socialism; Doing more to follow Jesus; "Elder"; Ten-family synagogues/congregations; Levites as ministers; Network of charity; Avoiding welfare snares; "Resorting" to the way of Jesus; vs "Called out"; Personal estates of families; Volunteerism; What made America great; Davey Crockett story; Rich men; Mt 6:19; Golden calf; Reserve funds; Mt 12:35; "Mammon"; Spirit of charity; Ekklesia; Social bonds of love; Stoning?; Moses and Jesus in agreement; Markets; Christ's humor; With God all things are possible; Bondage of Egypt; Christ's way out; Understand the Gospel - and act upon it.

AB 1778, as amended, Connolly. Vehicles: electric bicycles.Existing law defines an electric bicycle and classifies electric bicycles into 3 classes with different restrictions. Under existing law, a “class 2 electric bicycle” is a bicycle equipped with a motor that may be used exclusively to propel the bicycle, and that is not capable of providing assistance when the bicycle reaches the speed of 20 miles per hour. Under existing law, a “class 3 electric bicycle” is a bicycle equipped with a speedometer and a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling, and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle reaches the speed of 28 miles per hour. Existing law prohibits a person under 16 years of age from operating a class 3 electric bicycle. Existing law requires a person operating, or riding upon, a class 3 electric bicycle to wear a helmet, as specified.This bill would, until January 1, 2029, authorize a local authority within the County of Marin, or the County of Marin in unincorporated areas, to adopt an ordinance or resolution that would prohibit a person under 16 years of age from operating a class 2 electric bicycle or require a person operating a class 2 electric bicycle to wear a bicycle helmet, as specified. The bill would require an ordinance or resolution that is adopted for this purpose to make a violation an infraction punishable by either a fine of $25 or completion of an electric bicycle safety and training course, as specified. The bill would, if an ordinance or resolution is adopted, require the county to, by January 1, 2028, submit a report to the Legislature that includes, among other things, the total number of traffic stops initiated for violations, the results of the traffic stops, and the actions taken by peace officers during the traffic stops, as specified. The bill would require the local authority or county to administer a public information campaign for at least 30 calendar days prior to the enactment of the ordinance or resolution, as specified. The bill would require the local authority or county to only issue warning notices for the first 60 days after the passage of the ordinance or resolution.Existing law defines an electric bicycle and classifies electric bicycles into 3 classes with different restrictions. Under existing law, a “class 2 electric bicycle” is a bicycle equipped with a motor that may be used exclusively to propel the bicycle, and that is not capable of providing assistance when the bicycle reaches the speed of 20 miles per hour. Under existing law, a “class 3 electric bicycle” is a bicycle equipped with a speedometer and a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling, and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle reaches the speed of 28 miles per hour. Existing law prohibits a person under 16 years of age from operating a class 3 electric bicycle. Existing law requires a person operating, or riding upon, a class 3 electric bicycle to wear a helmet, as specified. A violation of the Vehicle Code is a crime.This bill would additionally prohibit a person under 16 years of age from operating a class 2 electric bicycle. The bill would require a person operating, or riding upon, a class 2 electric bicycle to wear a helmet, as specified. The bill would clarify that an electric bicycle can only be placed in a certain class if it ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle reaches a max speed regardless of the mode.Because the bill would prohibit certain persons from riding electric bicycles, the violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.Digest KeyVote: majority   Appropriation: no   Fiscal Committee: yesno   Local Program: yesno  Bill TextTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.Section 21214.5 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read: 21214.5. (a) A local authority within the County of Marin, or the County of Marin in unincorporated areas, may, by ordinance or resolution, prohibit a person under 16 years of age from operating a class 2 electric bicycle.(b) A local authority within the County of Marin, or the County of Marin in unincorporated areas, may, by ordinance or resolution, require a person operating a class 2 electric bicycle to wear a bicycle helmet, as described in subdivision (b) of Section 21213.(c) An ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this section shall make a violation an infraction punishable by a fine of twenty-five dollars ($25) or completion of an electric bicycle safety and training course pursuant to Section 894 of the Streets and Highways Code.(d) (1) If an ordinance or resolution is adopted pursuant to this section, the county shall, by January 1, 2028, submit a report to the Legislature that includes all of the following:(A) The total number of traffic stops initiated for violations.(B) The results of the traffic stops, including whether a warning or citation was issued, property was seized, or an arrest was made.(C) The number of times a person was stopped for allegedly operating a class 2 electric bicycle while under 16 years of age but was found to be over the age limit.(D) If a warning or citation was issued, a description of the warning or the violation cited.(E) If an arrest was made, the offense cited by the officer for the arrest and the perceived race or ethnicity, gender, and approximate age of the person stopped, provided that the identification of these characteristics is solely based on the observation and perception of the peace officer who initiated the traffic stop.(F) The actions taken by a peace officer during the traffic stops, including, but not limited to, all of the following:(i) Whether the peace officer asked for consent to search the person, and, if so, whether consent was provided.(ii) Whether the peace officer searched the person or any property, and, if so, the basis for the search and the type of contraband or evidence discovered.(iii) Whether the peace officer seized any property and, if so, the type of property that was seized and the basis for seizing the property.(G) The number of times a person opted to complete, and did complete, the training course in lieu of paying the fine.(H) The number of times that a person under 16 years of age was operating an electric bicycle and was involved in an accident that resulted in a permanent, serious injury, as defined in Section 20001, or a fatality in the six months prior to adoption of the ordinance or resolution, the cause of the accident, and the class of the electric bicycle that was being operated at the time of the accident.(I) The number of times that a person under 16 years of age was operating an electric bicycle and was involved in an accident that resulted in a permanent, serious injury, as defined in Section 20001, or a fatality in the six months after adoption of the ordinance or resolution, the cause of the accident, and the class of the electric bicycle that was being operated at the time of the accident.(2) A report submitted pursuant to this section shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(e) A local authority or the County of Marin shall administer a public information campaign for at least 30 calendar days prior to the enactment of an ordinance or resolution pursuant to this section, including public announcements in major media outlets and press releases.(f) A local authority or the County of Marin shall only issue warning notices for the first 60 days after the passage of an ordinance or resolution pursuant to this section.(g) This section shall become inoperative on January 1, 2029, and as of that date is repealed.

Navigating the nuances of 1031 exchanges can be confusing for real estate investors, especially when it comes to understanding the concept of debt replacement. In today's podcast, Kay Properties' Senior Vice President's Matt McFarland and Carmine Galimi take a deep dive into why many investors love the Delaware Statutory Trust for replacing 1031 Exchange debt.   

Joanne Witt knew better than anyone that parenting wasn't always the easiest job in the world, but when her 14-year-old daughter, Tylar, started hanging around with a much older teen named Steven Colver, things got a lot more difficult. When Joanne banned steven from coming around her daughter with the threat of pressing charges, Tylar and Steven came up with a plan to get Joanne off their backs so they could be together forever. Connect with us on Social Media!You can find us at:Instagram: @bookofthedeadpodX: @bkofthedeadpodFacebook: The Book of the Dead PodcastTikTok: BookofthedeadpodOr visit our website at www.botdpod.com ABC News. (2011a, June 4). “Juliet” Teen, Tylar Witt, describes her “Romeo,” Steven Colver, killing mom. https://abcnews.go.com/US/juliet-teen-tylar-witt-describes-romeo-steven-colver/story?id=13757722ABC News. (2011b, September 20). California Teen “Romeo and Juliet” suicide pact goes awry after mom's murder. https://abcnews.go.com/US/teen-romeo-juliet-suicide-pact-awry-moms-murder/story?id=14511861Acosta, N. (2023, September 9). After mom is found fatally stabbed, teen daughter and boyfriend point fingers at each other. Peoplemag. https://people.com/people-magazine-investigates-star-crossed-killers-joanne-witt-7966560Bliss. (2024, June 16). Forbidden Lovers End Mom to Stay Together - Bliss - Medium. Medium. https://medium.com/@theretrobliss/forbidden-lovers-end-mom-to-stay-together-64e523226888Cost of living in El Dorado Hills, CA | PayScale. (n.d.). https://www.payscale.com/cost-of-living-calculator/California-El-Dorado-Hills#Forbidden young love ends with a mother's violent murder. (2013, June 9). CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/forbidden-young-love-ends-with-a-mothers-violent-murder/Gedulin, B. L. O. O. G. (2023, June 15). Age of consent & Statutory rape laws in California. Law Office of George Gedulin. https://www.gedulinlaw.com/blog/2023/june/age-of-consent-statutory-rape-laws-in-california/#:~:text=What%20are%20the%20legal%20consequences,jail%20term%20of%20one%20year.Rasmussen, A. (n.d.). Teenage Couple Murdered Mother Who Accused Daughter's Older Boyfriend Of Statutory Rape. Investigation Discovery. Retrieved August 31, 2024, from https://www.investigationdiscovery.com/crimefeed/id-shows/people-magazine-investigates/teenage-couple-murdered-mother-who-accused-daughters-older-boyfriend-of-statutory-rapeRatajczak, J. (2011a, June 7). Colver murder trial: Tylar's stare ‘as if her mom didn't exist,' witness testifies. Village Life. https://www.villagelife.com/news/local/colver-murder-trial-tylar-s-stare-as-if-her-mom-didn-t-exist-witness-testifies/article_ca7aea68-1390-518a-8321-c1a2d1c74205.htmlRatajczak, J. (2011b, August 12). Witt, Colver sentenced. Village Life. https://www.villagelife.com/news/local/witt-colver-sentenced/article_76e18da7-c02b-5ab5-95b3-22c74baa6a3d.htmlRatajczak, J. (2011c, August 12). Young murderers' fate sealed at sentencing. Mtdemocrat. https://www.mtdemocrat.com/news/young-murderers-fate-sealed-at-sentencing/article_94cfa56f-b154-5a02-983a-c14be7a24db2.htmlSaunt, R. (2023, September 17). Chilling case of young girl, 14, and her boyfriend, 19, who brutally slaughtered her mom after she. . . Mail Online. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-12513773/Joanne-witt-murder-daughter-boyfriend-statutory-rape-romeo-juliet-killers.htmlSengupta, S. (2024, May 24). Joanne WitT Murder: Where are Tylar Witt and Steven Colver now? The Cinemaholic. https://thecinemaholic.com/joanne-witt-murder-where-are-tylar-witt-and-steven-colver-now/Tylar Witt Admits Murder Plot In “Forbidden Love” Trial. (2012, February 10). KCRA3. https://www.kcra.com/article/tylar-witt-admits-murder-plot-in-forbidden-love-trial/6395075

Dr Joseph Mooney, Assistant Professor School of Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice at UCD, discusses the scoping inquiry into allegations of sexual abuse in schools run by religious orders.

The Cabinet has agreed to establish a commission of investigation into cases of sexual abuse at several schools run by religious orders spanning several decades. We speak to our Political Correspondent Mícheál Lehane

The Government has taken the rare step of appointing a statutory manager for developer Du Val, which owes over $250 million to creditors. John Fisk from PwC spoke to Corin Dann.

AB 3139, as amended, Weber. Data privacy: vehicle manufacturers: remote vehicle technology.Existing law establishes various privacy requirements applicable to vehicle manufacturers, including limitations on the usage of images or video recordings from in-vehicle cameras in new motor vehicles equipped standard with one or more in-vehicle cameras. Existing law provides various protections to persons who are escaping from actual or threatened domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, human trafficking, and other abuse, including providing for a means to keep the names and addresses of abuse survivors confidential in public records.This bill would, among other things, require a vehicle manufacturer that offers a vehicle for sale, rent, or lease in the state that includes remote vehicle technology to do certain things, including ensure that the remote vehicle technology can be immediately manually disabled by a driver of the vehicle while that driver is inside the vehicle by a method that, among other things, is prominently located and easy to use and does not require access to a remote, online application. The bill would require a vehicle manufacturer to offer secure remote means via the internet for a survivor to submit a vehicle separation notice that meets specified requirements. The bill would define “survivor” to mean an individual who has a covered act committed, or allegedly committed, against the individual. The bill would define “covered act” to mean, among other things, certain crimes relating to domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, and sex trafficking.This bill would require a survivor to submit a vehicle separation notice through the secure remote means described above within 7 days of the date on which the survivor used the method of manually disabling remote vehicle technology and would require the notice to include prescribed information, including a statement by the survivor signed under penalty of perjury that a perpetrator who has access to the remote vehicle technology in the vehicle has committed committed, or allegedly committed committed, a covered act against the survivor or an individual in the survivor's care, or a copy of specified documents that support that the perpetrator has committed committed, or allegedly committed committed, a covered act against the survivor or an individual in the survivor's care, including a signed affidavit from, among other specified individuals acting within the scope of their employment, a licensed medical care provider.By requiring a survivor to submit a statement signed under penalty of perjury or requiring specified individuals to sign an affidavit, the bill would expand the crime of perjury and impose a state-mandated local program.This bill would make a vehicle manufacturer that violates the above-described provisions liable in a civil action brought by a survivor for, among other things, reasonable attorney's fees and costs of the prevailing survivor, in addition to any other remedy provided by law. The bill would specify that any waiver of the requirements of the above-described provisions is against public policy, void, and unenforceable. statutory damages in an amount not to exceed $50,000 or not to exceed $100,000 for a knowing violation.This bill would define various terms for these purposes, purposes and would make related findings and declarations.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.DIGEST KEYVote: majority   Appropriation: no   Fiscal Committee: yes   Local Program: yes  BILL TEXTTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Domestic violence, dating violence, stalking, sexual assault, human trafficking, and related crimes are life-threatening issues and have lasting and harmful effects on individuals, families, and entire communities.(b) Survivors of violence and abuse often lack meaningful support and options when establishing independence from an abuser, including barriers of financial insecurity and limited access to reliable communication tools to maintain essential connections with family, social safety networks, employers, and support services.(c) Perpetrators of violence and abuse increasingly use technological and communication tools to exercise control over, monitor, and abuse their victims.(d) Remote vehicle technology, including mobile phone wireless connectivity and location data capabilities that are manufactured into vehicles, are among the technological and communication tools perpetrators of violence and abuse can, and have, used.(e) According to The New York Times, “Modern vehicles have been called ‘smartphones with wheels' because they are internet-connected and have myriad methods of data collection, from cameras and seat weight sensors to records of how hard you brake and corner. Most drivers don't realize how much information their cars are collecting and who has access to it.”(f) Under the federal Safe Connections Act of 2022, survivors of domestic abuse are empowered to protect themselves and their loved ones by requiring telecommunications providers, upon request, to separate their mobile phone accounts from the accounts of their abusers.SEC. 2. Chapter 36.5 (commencing with Section 22948.60) is added to Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code, to read:CHAPTER  36.5. Remote Vehicle Technology  22948.60. (a) For the purposes of this chapter:(1) “Covered act” means conduct that is any of the following:(A) A crime described in subsection (a) of Section 40002 of the federal Violence Against Women Act (34 U.S.C. Sec. 12291), including domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, and sex trafficking.(B) An act or practice described in paragraph (11) or (12) of Section 103 of the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. Sec. 7102) relating to severe forms of trafficking in persons and sex trafficking, respectively.(C) An act under state law, tribal law, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice (Chapter 47 (commencing with Section 801) of Title 10 of the United States Code) that is similar to an offense described in subparagraph (A) or (B).(2) “Designated person” means a person who provides care to a survivor and meets both of the following criteria:(A) The person has been authorized by the survivor to submit a request pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 22948.61.(B) The person did not commit, or did not allegedly commit, a covered act against the survivor.(2)(3) “Perpetrator” means an individual who has committed committed, or allegedly committed committed, a covered act against a survivor or an individual under the care of a survivor.(3)(4) “Remote vehicle technology” means any technology that allows a person who is outside of a vehicle to access the activity, track the location, or control any operation of the vehicle or its parts, that includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:(A) A Global Positioning System (GPS).(B) An app-based technology.(C) Any other remote wireless connectivity technology.(4)(5) “Survivor” means an individual who meets either of the following criteria: has had a covered act committed, or allegedly committed, against the individual.(A)The individual has had a covered act committed or allegedly committed against them.(B)The individual provides care to an individual who has had a covered act committed or allegedly committed against, and that caretaker did not commit or allegedly commit the covered act.(5)(6) “Vehicle manufacturer” means a vehicle manufacturer or remanufacturer, as defined in Section 672 of the Vehicle Code.(b) Subdivision (a) does not require a criminal conviction or any other determination of a court in order for conduct to satisfy a definition.  22948.61. (a) A vehicle manufacturer that offers a vehicle for sale, rent, or lease in the state that includes remote vehicle technology shall do all of the following:(1) Ensure that the remote vehicle technology can be immediately manually disabled by a driver of the vehicle while that driver is inside the vehicle by a method that meets all of the following criteria:(A) The method of manually disabling the remote vehicle technology shall be is prominently located and easy to use and shall does not require access to a remote, online application.(B) Upon its use, the method of manually disabling the remote vehicle technology shall inform informs the user of the requirements of subdivision (b).(C) The method of manually disabling the remote vehicle technology shall does not require a password or any log-in information.(D) Upon its use, the method of manually disabling the remote vehicle technology shall does not result in the remote vehicle technology, vehicle manufacturer, or a third-party service provider sending to the registered owner of the car an email, telephone call, or any other notification related to the remote vehicle technology being disabled.(E) Upon its use, the method of manually disabling the remote vehicle technology shall cause causes the remote vehicle technology to be disabled for a minimum of seven days and capable of being reenabled only by the vehicle manufacturer pursuant to paragraph (4).(2) Offer secure remote means via the internet for a survivor to submit a vehicle separation notice that includes a prominent link on the vehicle manufacturer's internet website that meets both of the following requirements:(A) The link is titled, in bold and capital letters, “CALIFORNIA SURVIVOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSISTANCE.”(B) The link provides a designated internet website portal that provides a survivor the ability to submit a vehicle separation notice and includes a form that enables a survivor to submit the information required by subdivision (b).(3) Upon the request of a survivor, reset the remote vehicle technology with a new secure account and delete all data from the original account.(4) Reenable the remote vehicle technology only if the registered owner of the car notifies the manufacturer that the remote vehicle technology was disabled in error, and a survivor has not contacted the vehicle manufacturer to provide the information required by subdivision (b) within seven days of the remote vehicle technology being disabled.(b) A survivor shall submit a vehicle separation notice to a vehicle manufacturer through the means provided by the vehicle manufacturer pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) within 7 days of the date on which the survivor used the method of manually disabling remote vehicle technology required by subdivision (a), which shall include the vehicle identification number of the vehicle and either of the following:(1) A statement by the survivor signed under penalty of perjury that a perpetrator who has access to the remote vehicle technology in the vehicle has committed committed, or allegedly committed committed, a covered act against the survivor or an individual in the survivor's care.(2) A copy of either of the following documents that supports that the perpetrator has committed committed, or allegedly committed committed, a covered act against the survivor or an individual in the survivor's care:(A) A signed affidavit from any of the following individuals acting within the scope of that person's employment:(i) A licensed medical or mental health care provider.(ii) A licensed military medical or mental health care provider.(iii) A licensed social worker.(iv) A victim services provider.(v) A licensed military victim services provider.(B) A copy of any of the following documents:(i) A police report.(ii) A statement provided by the police, including military police, to a magistrate judge or other judge.(iii) A charging document.(iv) A protective or restraining order, including military protective orders.(v) Any other relevant document that is an official record.(c) (1) Only if, for technological reasons, a vehicle manufacturer is unable to comply with paragraph (1) of subdivision (a), the vehicle manufacturer shall create a conspicuous mechanism that is easy to use by which a survivor or a designated person can submit a request to disable a vehicle's remote vehicle technology.(2) A vehicle manufacturer shall disable remote vehicle technology within one business day after receiving a request from a survivor that includes the information required by subdivision (b) and is submitted pursuant to the mechanism required by paragraph (1).(d) This section does not authorize or require a vehicle manufacturer to verify ownership of a vehicle, the identity of a survivor, or the authenticity of information that is submitted by the survivor.  22948.62. (a) In addition to any other remedy provided by law, a vehicle manufacturer that violates Section 22948.61 shall be liable in a civil action brought by a survivor for all of the following:(1) Reasonable attorney's fees and costs of the prevailing survivor.(2) A civil penalty Statutory damages in an amount not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) per violation, or a civil penalty statutory damages in an amount not to exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per violation for knowing violations.(3) Actual damages or three times the amount at which the actual damages are assessed for knowing or reckless violations.(b) Any waiver of the requirements of this chapter shall be against public policy, void, and unenforceable. SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.

The newly established Board of Governors will modernize St. Kitts' CBI Unit, develop policies, and ensure projects are financially sound.View the full article here.Subscribe to the IMI Daily newsletter here.

Real estate investors love Delaware Statutory Trusts for their 1031 exchanges because they can potentially provide investors the opportunity to defer capital gains taxes, eliminate active management responsibilities, and achieve the potential for regular monthly cash distributions. However, the first step to using the DST 1031 exchange real estate investment strategy is to first understand the pros and cons of the Delaware Statutory Trust. Jason Salmon, Executive Vice President and Managing Director along with Orrin Barrow, Senior Vice President with Kay Properties jump directly into very specific advantages and disadvantages of Delaware Statutory Trusts and provide listeners a comprehensive view into this popular investment strategy. Key Takeaways: Why are Delaware Statutory Trust 1031 Exchanges growing in popularity? What are some of the potential benefits of Delaware Statutory Trust 1031 Exchanges? What are some of the risks of Delaware Statutory Trust 1031 Exchanges to consider? What are Some Examples of Delaware Statutory Trust Properties? Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Pros and Cons on Delaware Statutory Trust Properties

One of the more complex strategies 1031 exchange investors should be aware of is the Zero Coupon DST 1031 Exchange. Listen to Kay Properties Senior Vice President Alex Madden and Vice President Tim Emanuel describe how investors can use the Zero Coupon strategy for the Delaware Statutory Trust 1031 exchange.

It's been called the greatest wealth transfer in history - It is estimated that $84 trillion in assets is set to change hands over the next 20 years. Not surprisingly, real estate accounts for the vast percentage of this wealth.  The Delaware Statutory Trust can be a great tool for helping investors preserve their wealth and pass their assets to the next generation. Kay Properties & Investments senior vice presidents Alex Madden and Matt McFarland explain exactly how Delaware Statutory Trusts can help investors with wealth preservation. 

  One of the most important questions Delaware Statutory Trust real estate investors need to ask themselves is, “What is my long-term, exit strategy?” Most Delaware Statutory Trust (DST) investments are typically held for approximately 5-10 years (although it could be shorter or longer). After that, the DST investment will typically go “Full-Cycle”, a term used to describe a DST property that is purchased on behalf of investors and then after a period of time is sold on behalf of investors. While the two most common exit strategies for DST investors include cashing-out and paying taxes or continuing with another 1031 Exchange, a third optiion exists for investors in the form of a 721 UPREIT.  What is a 721 UPREIT Exchange? The term “UPREIT” is short for Umbrella Partnership Real Estate Investment Trust, which is an operating partnership subsidiary of a REIT that holds and operates real property. Section 721 of the Internal Revenue Code allows owners of real estate property to contribute, on a tax deferred basis, their physical property to a partnership, in exchange for interests in the partnership ( a 721 Transaction). This structure allows holders of real estate to exchange real property for economic interest in the REIT in the form of operating partnership units by contributing that property to the partnership in a 721 Transaction. The operating partnership units have economic rights that are identical to the rights of the shares of the REIT, and after a designated holding period can be, if the investor chooses to, converted into shares of the REIT (in a taxable transaction) for liquidity purposes. Investors seeking to defer capital gains taxes while increasing diversification in real estate should consider using a 721 Exchange to realize the several potentail benefits that are explained in this informative podcast episode by Kay Properties.  

The Delaware Statutory Trust (DST) is an amazing vehicle for deferring capital gains taxes.  We are joined in the studio by Julia Fritzlen with Insight Investment Advisors and she takes us through the opportunities of the DST process. This is a highly educational show with a ton of content designed to illuminate the advantages of a DST and identify potential candidates that could benefit from it.  Enjoy the show..   Insight Investment Advisors Julia Fritzlen, contact

Ruth Amos & Shawn Brown from 'Kids Invent Stuff' and Daniel Peake face questions about play programmes, dreary drives and captured caps. LATERAL is a comedy panel game podcast about weird questions with wonderful answers, hosted by Tom Scott. For business enquiries, contestant appearances or question submissions, visit https://lateralcast.com. HOST: Tom Scott. QUESTION PRODUCER: David Bodycombe. RECORDED AT: The Podcast Studios, Dublin. EDITED BY: Julie Hassett. MUSIC: Karl-Ola Kjellholm ('Private Detective'/'Agrumes', courtesy of epidemicsound.com). ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS: Noa, Christopher & Deborah Henney-Turner, Max Kief, Sara. FORMAT: Pad 26 Limited/Labyrinth Games Ltd. EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS: David Bodycombe and Tom Scott. © Pad 26 Limited (https://www.pad26.com) / Labyrinth Games Ltd. 2024. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week, Trump's motion to have references to Jan 6 stricken from the DC indictment is denied; there's a response to DoJ's opposition to televising the DC trial; Trump's Fulton County legal team wants access to DoJ's discovery in the DC case; Trump files motion to dismiss the DC charges. Plus, we have some great listener questions.See Brian Greer's Charts - It's Complicated with Renato and AshaIt's Complicated Episode 51 | Cannon's Shenanigans | Renato Mariotti & Asha RangappaBrian Greer's Quick Guide to CIPAhttps://www.justsecurity.org/87134/the-quick-guide-to-cipa-classified-information-procedures-act/ A couple of terms to remember:Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C.  § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P