Podcasts about statutory

President Chay Lapin and Vice President Tommy Olsen give a deep overview on Delaware Statutory Trusts DSTs and 1031 Exchanges

Minister Hon. Dr. Ernest Hilaire outlines plans to restructure the Small Business Development Centre into a modern, "one-stop" statutory institution to reduce bureaucratic red tape for young entrepreneurs.

Home visits are the main site where social work happens. And yet they are barely mentioned in Working Together to Safeguard Children 2026 or any version of Working Together before it.In this episode I'm exploring why this matters, what Harry Ferguson's research tells us about children being invisible on home visits, and why statutory invisibility leads to practice invisibility. I also wonder, in an increasingly virtual world, what happens to the home visit as a skill if we never name it as one?If you are a social worker wanting practical strategies for home visit confidence, The Social Work Collective Academy on Patreon has a full Home Visit Masterclass, a new podcast episode on six things to do before every home visit, and the Practice Pause Library guided audios specifically for before and after visits.This podcast is hosted by Vicki Shevlin, an independent social worker and safeguarding consultant. Content is intended to support professional development and reflective practice. It is not a substitute for supervision, statutory guidance or your organisation's policies and procedures. Lets connect!To book in a free 15 minute chat with me, to talk about training, development, courses or membership email vicki@socialworksorted.com Sign up to my free newsletter Listen to The Collective Podcast  The Social Work Collective Academy Email: vicki@socialworksorted.comLinkedIn: Vicki Shevlin Instagram.com/@vickishevlin_Youtube.com/@socialworksortedFacebook.com/socialworksortedDisclaimer Thank you so much for listening. Please rate, review and share with one other person - it makes such a difference and I really appreciate your support.

In Episode 551 of District of Conservation, Gabriella previews her Daily Caller Live talk on April 21st and discusses Maine passing the statutory right to hunt and fish. Tune in to learn more!SHOW NOTESDaily Caller Live: American Innovation & Manufacturing RenaissanceMaine Legislature weighs constitutional right to hunt and fishLuke Hilgemann Statement on Right to Hunt and FishCSF: Statutory Right to Hunt and Fish Enacted in Maine

The legal path to removing Sheriff Chris Nanos may be narrower than the headlines suggest — and the investigative consequences of that gap are real for the Nancy Guthrie case.This week's review of the most critical stories examines the institutional crisis from a procedural standpoint. The Pima County Board of Supervisors unanimously invoked Arizona Revised Statute § 11-253 — a territorial-era provision that allows the board to compel sworn reports from a county officer, with removal as the consequence for non-compliance. The operative word is non-compliance. Nanos has publicly stated he will comply. If he submits sworn statements — regardless of their substance — the statute's removal mechanism may not apply. County attorneys are working through that legal question with an April 7 deadline. Supervisor Matt Heinz, a Democrat like Nanos, called the sheriff's 42-year career "fruit of a poison tree" and described his December 2025 deposition testimony as disqualifying — noting that Nanos reportedly testified he had never received discipline rising to the level of suspension, when documented records from the El Paso Police Department show eight suspensions accumulating 37 days. The recall effort launched by congressional candidate Daniel Butierez is gathering signatures, but recall campaigns face their own procedural and timeline constraints.Meanwhile, Nanos's deputies — the people actually working the Guthrie case — have spoken. Two hundred and forty-one voted no confidence and demanded his resignation. Zero voted to continue. Sixty-five abstained. Not a single deputy endorsed his leadership. The union president told the Board of Supervisors that Nanos has lost the faith of his deputies and the community.And behind all of it is a woman who deserves to be known beyond the investigation. Nancy Guthrie was a Kentucky girl who fell in love at a basketball game, built a life in Tucson for five decades, went back to work after losing her husband at 49, created a program that brought live music to a hospital, and raised three children — a fighter pilot, a poet, and Savannah Guthrie. She was a 30-year churchgoer whose single absence triggered this entire investigation. That is the measure of who she is.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCounty #HiddenKillersLive #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrime #NoConfidenceVote #NanosRecall #LawEnforcementAccountability #MissingPerson

https://thefreedompeople.org/blog/natural-law-vs-statutory-law-differences-examples-how-worksCan a law be legal but unjust? Learn how natural law and statutory law operate on fundamentally different principles, and why understanding both frameworks is essential for protecting your freedom and working within government systems with confidence. The Freedom People City: Tempe Address: 1753 E Broadway Rd Ste 101 Website: https://thefreedompeople.org

According to the announcement, as of June 1, 2024, three municipalities, Kinokawa, Shirahama, and Kushimoto, did not meet the statutory employment rate of 2.8% for persons with disabilities under the Act on Employment Promotion of Persons with Disabilities. As a result, they formulated employment plans for hiring persons with disabilities as required by the law. However, despite guidance from the bureau aimed at achieving the target, the situation had not improved by the deadline of the end of December 2025. Episode notes: 'Wakayama Fails to Hire Statutory Number of People with Disabilities': https://barrierfreejapan.com/2026/03/31/wakayama-fails-to-hire-statutory-number-of-people-with-disabilities/

Regulation is coming to the UK short-term rental industry.But what does it actually mean for hosts and property managers?In this episode of the Host Planet Podcast – powered by Hostfully – James Varley is joined by Andy Fenner, Chief Executive of the Short Term Accommodation Association (STAA), to break down:- What UK short-term rental regulation will look like- Why statutory registration could be good for the industry- Whether a tourism tax is on the horizon- What hosts should be preparing for right now- Andy's departure from the STAA — and what happens nextIf you're operating an Airbnb or holiday let in the UK, this is essential listening.1:11 Andy stepping down from STAA5:27 The role of the next Chief Executive – the importance of lobbying knowledge and having a passion for short-term rentals 11:25 UK STR regulation explained17:16 Statutory registration25:21 Tourism tax29:42 Short Stay Summit preview34:55 Why join the STAALooking for a great property management software or digital guidebook? You need Hostfully!Check out these special offers:Property Management Software: Get $500 off onboarding by using the code PLANET500.Digital Guidebooks: Get 30% off for life by using the code HOSTPLANETGB.Click here to sign up for Hostfully: https://www.hostfully.com/host_planetKeen to book a Hostfully demo? Click here to connect with Frank Bosi: https://tinyurl.com/Hostfully-DemoEmail Frank: frank@hostfully.com Host Planet: https://www.hostplanet.club/James Varley: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jdsvarley/Andy Fenner: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andyfenner2025/STAA: https://ukstaa.org/Short Stay Summit: https://www.shortstaysummit.org/Host Planet Roadshow: https://www.hostplanet.club/host-planet-roadshowEpisode to check next: Has Airbnb Peaked? Jamie Lane on Booking.com, Direct Bookings & 2026 Trends: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQBraDVJ1i0The Host Planet Podcast is where Airbnb hosts, Booking.com hosts, Vrbo hosts, and short-term rental operators come to learn what actually works. Each episode features expert insights from people actively building, managing, and scaling short-term rentals, covering everything from Airbnb hosting fundamentals to advanced rental strategies. Whether you're focused on guest satisfaction, rental management, or smarter automation tips, the show delivers practical advice you can apply immediately to improve performance and increase Airbnb bookings.Across the series, we explore Airbnb host tips, listing optimization, price optimization, and Airbnb listing optimization – alongside real-world investing insights and behind-the-scenes Airbnb secrets you won't hear elsewhere. From hosted conversations with industry leaders and Airbnb ambassadors to actionable guidance on bookings and short-term rental growth, Host Planet helps hosts navigate short term rentals with confidence and clarity.The show is presented by James Varley, a holiday let investor and property manager who is also the Founder of Host Planet. Before founding Host Planet, James spent 20 years in the media, including a decade leading corporate communications for the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022.Contact the show: info@hostplanet.club#HostPlanet #HostPlanetPodcast #HostPlanetBitesize #ShortTermRentals #VacationRentals #HolidayLets #Airbnb #BookDirect #PropertyManagement #PropertyInvestment #BookingCom #Vrbo #JamesVarley #Hostfully #PMS #DigitalGuidebooks #SpecialOffer #ShortTermRental #VacationRental #AirbnbHost #PropertyManagement #STRTech

If you've ever wondered who really makes the rules, why legal definitions never seem absolute, or how law adapts to fit a changing society, you'll want to stick around for this discussion.Welcome back to Lawyer Talk! In this episode, I'm tackling a question I hear all the time: what's the real difference between laws, statutes, and “black robe law”—that case law everyone loves to debate?This all started with a pointed listener comment, and I thought it was the perfect jumping-off point for a deep dive into how our legal system actually works.I'll walk you through the evolution from medieval common law to today's complex tangle of statutory and constitutional law. I explain how, no matter how carefully legislators try to craft statutes, lawyers like me push the boundaries, and judges interpret and refine what those words really mean.We'll also look at how the Constitution acts as the ultimate backstop, shaping everything beneath it.Here are 3 key takeaways from the episode:Case Law Shapes Statutes: Statutory law (what Congress or state legislatures write) doesn't exist in a vacuum. Courts interpret and apply these statutes in real-world situations, creating “common law” or case law, which guides future cases and fills in the gaps left by legislators.The Constitution Rules All: Whether a law comes from Congress or the courts, it's always subject to the U.S. Constitution. If a statute or a court's decision clashes with constitutional principles, it's the courts' role to step in and say, “Not allowed.”The Law Evolves with Society: Our legal system is dynamic. Steve Palmer points out that the “awesome process” of evolving case law helps society adapt to new challenges, even when statutes lag behind.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At LawMentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

The Irish National Teachers' Organisation has issued a call for the introduction of statutory paid reproductive health leave, which would see workers have protected time off when experiencing early pregnancy loss, undergoing fertility treatment, or accessing surrogacy. For more on this Anton was joined by Maeve McCafferty, Equality Officer with the INTO.

The Irish National Teachers' Organisation has issued a call for the introduction of statutory paid reproductive health leave, which would see workers have protected time off when experiencing early pregnancy loss, undergoing fertility treatment, or accessing surrogacy. For more on this Anton was joined by Maeve McCafferty, Equality Officer with the INTO.

General Conservation Reserve Program acreage enrollment continues.

#HRhelpdesk #IndiaHRGuide #MandeepSingh, with 25 years of HR expertise, Mandeep brings the series to a close by explaining how statutory formulas translate compensation concepts into actual payouts, with a special focus on the significant shift around maternity benefits under the new labour codes. He walks through key formulas used in payroll, covering ESIC, Provident Fund, gratuity, leave encashment, loss of pay, overtime, notice pay, and statutory bonus, clearly distinguishing where the law mandates wage based calculations and where organizations rely on HR best practice using total remuneration. A critical highlight of this episode is maternity benefit, where Mandeep explains how the new wage definition implies that maternity pay may be calculated on wages (50% of total remuneration) rather than full pay, unlike historical practice. He carefully positions this as an interpretation based on current statutory material, noting the absence of explicit contrary guidance. The episode also explains why gratuity uniquely follows a 26 day month, while most other calculations use 30 days, and stresses the importance of consistency, transparency, and clearly documented policies so employees understand exactly how their pay is calculated.Link to download report: https://www.hrhelpdesk.in/reports-and-studies/

In Episode 23 of the No Treason Podcast, Jonathan Drake continues his exploration of Lysander Spooner's Trial by Jury, focusing on the argument that natural law is too uncertain to guide justice. Drake walks through Spooner's response to this claim, comparing the supposed clarity of statutory law with the reality of modern legal systems that are buried under layers of legislation, precedent, and judicial interpretation. The discussion examines how ordinary people instinctively understand principles of justice far better than centralized institutions often assume. Drake highlights how legal systems that remove juries from interpreting the law create an environment where citizens must rely on specialists to navigate a maze of rules that few truly understand. The episode also explores how centralization of authority concentrates power in the hands of judges and legislators while diminishing the role of local juries as a safeguard of liberty. By revisiting Spooner's defense of natural law and decentralized jury authority, Drake argues that the restoration of strong juries judging both law and fact would bring clarity, accountability, and a more authentic form of justice back into the legal system.

In this episode 261 of the employment law and HR podcast, I bring you all the details about the changes with the rules about payment of statutory sick pay which come into effect from the 6th April 2026. In this episode we cover: The current rules about the payment for employees who are off sick. The cost to employers of statutory sick pay (SSP). Why many employers will be unaware of the change and impact. The types of business or organisation that will be most impacted by the change. Why having robust systems in place for the management of sickness absence is more important than ever. Why qualifying days of employment are important. How much you have to pay if someone is absent for 1 or 2 days out of their working week. The weekly flat rate of SSP from 6th April 2026 will be £123.25.   Key takeaway: Employers need to start taking action now to understand the additional cost and to factor this in to costs planning for the new financial year.  Employers also need to proactively manage short term sickness absence.  Don't forget to subscribe to the podcast to stay informed on the latest in UK employment law. If you have questions or need tailored advice, feel free to get in touch – we are here to help. Training for your Team Would you like to arrange training for your team to reduce the risk of both unhappy employees and claims being made against you? Please get in touch for a no obligation discussion, we can offer training anywhere in the UK in person or delivered remotely via MS Teams. Please drop me an email alison@realemploymentlawadvice.co.uk Fixed Price Advice from Real Experts As part of our HR Harbour annual subscription service for employers we provide guidance and training for employers, supervisors and managers. If you would like to know more about the HR Harbour Service and how you can get unlimited support from as little as £234 per month please contact me for a no obligation discussion – alison@realemploymentlawadvice.co.uk or you can find full details here: HR Harbour Don't forget you can contact us by telephone 01983 897003, 01722 653001, 020 3470 0007, 0191 375 9694 or 023 8098 2006 We have a variety of free documents and letters which are available to download here: DIY Documents We are also on YouTube! You can find a range of topics and also listen to this podcast on YouTube here: YOUTUBE Zoes Law Raising awareness of melanoma and skin cancer. You can find more information here: https://www.facebook.com/zoepanayilaw

#HRhelpdesk #IndiaHRGuide #MandeepSingh, with 25 years of HR expertise, Mandeep turns attention to one of the most sensitive and highly regulated areas of payroll, wage or pay deductions. Building on the earlier discussions on wages and pay cycles, he explains that while organizations have discretion over how much they pay, they do not have unlimited freedom when it comes to deductions. Mandeep clarifies that deductions are tightly governed by statutory principles and must follow defined systems and processes. He explains what deductions are clearly permitted, including salary or other advances, statutory deductions and taxes, leave without pay, and employee benefit contributions such as insurance or pension schemes, provided there is specific, prior employee authorization. He highlights that even charitable or social contributions require explicit consent, detailing amount, duration, and purpose. The episode also addresses penalties, explaining that deductions for penalties are allowed only through a defined process and within legal limits. A critical safeguard discussed is the 50% cap, ensuring that total deductions cannot exceed half of an employee's earnings. The episode concludes by emphasizing the accountability of HR and payroll teams in ensuring every deduction complies with statutory guidelines, not just payroll arithmetic.Link to download report: https://www.hrhelpdesk.in/reports-and-studies/

Most civil cases turn on a deeply complex question: when will federal courts say no—even if they have the power to decide? In this masterclass, we unravel the layered world of federal restraint doctrines that protect the balance of power between State and Federal courts. Discover how legal giants like Younger v. Harris, Pullman, Burford, Colorado River, and the Anti-Injunction Act shape when and why federal courts step back, even amid broad jurisdiction.You'll explore:How federal courts honor state sovereignty through Younger abstention, which bars interference in ongoing criminal, civil, or administrative proceedings—unless exceptional circumstances like bad faith, harassment, or flagrantly unconstitutional laws arise.The subtle art of Pullman abstention, preventing premature constitutional rulings by deferring to state courts on ambiguous laws and utilizing the innovative certification mechanism—an elegant dialogue between sovereigns that keeps the federal judiciary from overstepping.Judicial economy in Colorado River, showing when courts can prudently decline cases involving parallel disputes—by balancing six crucial factors— to avoid wasteful, conflicting judgments.Statutory blocks like the Anti-Injunction Act, which outright prohibit injunctions against state proceedings, except in narrowly defined exceptions such as Congress explicitly authorizing or protecting federal rights via statutes like Section 1983.The emerging landscape of cooperative federalism with certification—a modern tool allowing federal judges to consult state supreme courts on unsettled state law, ensuring accurate application without unnecessary litigation or guesswork.And finally, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which strictly prevents lower federal courts from overturning or reviewing final state court judgments—saving you from the abyss of unauthorized appellate jurisdiction when your injury stems directly from a state decision.This episode is essential—perfect for civil procedure students, lawyers preparing for exams, or anyone interested in the subtle but powerful mechanisms ensuring federalism's delicate balance. Master how these doctrines interlock—timing, the nature of the case, exact relief sought, and finality—and understand the ultimate question: who decides where, under what law, and with what binding authority?By the end, you'll have a crystal-clear framework to quickly analyze complex fact patterns—distinguishing when to intervene, when to defer, and how to navigate the intricate dance of federal restraint that preserves democracy, order, and justice. Whether in exams or real-world litigation, this knowledge keeps the federal judiciary's power in check, safeguarding both state sovereignty and individual rights.Prepare to see the big picture of judicial restraint—not as abdication, but as structured moderation—ensuring your strategy is both principled and practical. Hit play and master the art of federal courts' disciplined restraint.

#HRhelpdesk #IndiaHRGuide #MandeepSingh, with 25 years of HR expertise, Mandeep takes the discussion into one of the most transformational changes introduced by the new labour codes, the statutory definition of Wages. Building on the earlier explanation of total remuneration, he explains why the law deliberately avoids the term “salary” and instead anchors all calculations to a single, standard definition of wage across all labour codes. Mandeep breaks down wage as a subset of total remuneration, consisting only of basic pay, dearness allowance (where applicable), and retaining allowance. He explains each component, including how retaining allowance is interpreted from historical Supreme Court judgments and why it applies mainly to seasonal employment. He then clearly identifies what must be excluded from wages, such as incentives, variable pay, HRA, overtime, and employer statutory contributions. A key focus of the episode is the 50% rule, explaining how organizations must ensure that wages form at least 50% of total remuneration through a statutory add back mechanism. The episode concludes by highlighting why wage definition is central to calculating gratuity, leave encashment, bonus, and long term compliance under the new labour code framework.Link to download report: https://www.hrhelpdesk.in/reports-and-studies/

#HRhelpdesk #IndiaHRGuide #MandeepSingh, with 25 years of HR expertise, Mandeep moves from defining wages to explaining the statutory and practical rules around paying wages. He clarifies the legal requirement that wages must be paid within seven days of the end of the wage period, while emphasizing that organizations are free to decide what their wage period is, whether calendar month or any other cycle. Mandeep strongly recommends aligning the wage period with the calendar month, explaining how this simplifies statutory bonus calculations, accounting year alignment, tax treatment, and HR administration. He highlights why misalignment between attendance periods and wage periods can create compliance risks, especially when statutory deductions and contributions are involved. The episode also reinforces the long standing requirement of issuing a payslip before wage payment. Finally, Mandeep explains why electronic wage payment is the most credible and transparent method, placing the burden of proof clearly on the employer in case of disputes. By linking statutory intent with HR best practice, this episode helps organizations design wage payment systems that are both compliant and defensible under law.Link to download report: https://www.hrhelpdesk.in/reports-and-studies/

#HRhelpdesk #IndiaHRGuide #MandeepSingh, with 25 years of HR expertise, Mandeep explains how organizations in India should understand and define CTC (Cost to Company) in the context of statutory requirements and recent labour code changes. He begins by clarifying what “statutory” really means in compensation design, principles derived from law that organizations must follow to remain compliant. Mandeep places CTC at the centre of compensation strategy, explaining why it acts as an umbrella term for communication with employees, finance teams, and leadership, even though it is not defined by law. He then lays out generally accepted principles for what should form part of CTC, covering fixed pay, variable pay, statutory bonuses, allowances, employer statutory contributions, gratuity provisions, and employee benefits. Importantly, he draws a clear boundary between employee-related costs and business process expenses, explaining why items like HRMS licenses, office rent, and infrastructure should never be included in CTC. The episode concludes by emphasizing the need for organizations to adopt a clear, consistent CTC definition across HR, finance, and budgeting.Link to download report: https://www.hrhelpdesk.in/reports-and-studies/

#HRhelpdesk #IndiaHRGuide #MandeepSingh, with 25 years of HR expertise, Mandeep builds on the compensation framework by explaining the second critical legal concept, Total Remuneration. He clarifies that unlike CTC, total remuneration is explicitly defined in law and forms the statutory base for several downstream calculations. Mandeep explains that total remuneration includes all amounts paid directly to an employee or on behalf of the employee as part of the employment arrangement, such as salary and employer paid benefits like housing. He then draws a sharp legal distinction between guaranteed earnings and non guaranteed or performance linked pay, explaining why only amounts that an employee has a right to earn are included. Fixed salary and guaranteed bonuses are covered, while discretionary or performance based incentives are excluded. He also explains how joining bonuses and notice pay buyouts are treated, and when they form part of total remuneration. The episode concludes by stressing why correctly defining total remuneration is essential, as it becomes the foundation for compensation philosophy, statutory formulas, and legal compliance in the new labour code regime.Link to download report: https://www.hrhelpdesk.in/reports-and-studies/

I'd love to hear from you 'text the show'Welcome

Gender pay gap and menopause action plans announcement: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-launches-landmark-gender-pay-gap-and-menopause-action-plans-to-help-women-thrive-at-workEmployer guidance (creating action plans): https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/creating-an-action-plan-guidance-for-employersERA 2025 factsheets (updated 3 March 2026): https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/employment-rights-bill-factsheetsOpen consultations:Acas — trade union duties and activities (closes 17 March 2026): https://www.acas.org.uk/employment-rights-act-2025Collective redundancy threshold, fire and rehire, e-balloting, flexible working, tipping — via: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/make-work-payLaw firm articles:DLA Piper — gender pay gap and menopause guidance: https://knowledge.dlapiper.com/dlapiperknowledge/globalemploymentlatestdevelopments/2026/government-launches-gender-pay-gap-and-menopause-reformsBaker McKenzie — ERA 2025 Summary and Next Steps: https://www.bakermckenzie.com/en/insight/publications/2026/03/united-kingdom-employment-rights-act-2025-summary-and-next-stepsCase of the week: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2026/36.html

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

When President Trump declared a national emergency and imposed sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), businesses challenged the move, arguing the president did not have authority under that statute to impose tariffs. The Supreme Court recently agreed.  On this episode of Stanford Legal, co-host Professor Pamela Karlan sits down with international trade expert Alan Sykes, professor of law and Warren Christopher Professor in the Practice of International Law and Diplomacy, to unpack the Court's 6–3 decision. Sykes is a leading expert on the application of economics to legal problems and the author of the book The Law and Economics of International Trade Agreements. At the heart of the case, Sykes explains, was the question of whether a statute that allows the president to “regulate importation” can be stretched to authorize taxes on imports. The majority said no, emphasizing that the Constitution assigns the taxing power to Congress, and that if Congress intended to hand that power over, it would have said so clearly. The conversation explores the statutory arguments, the role of the Major Questions Doctrine, and the unusual alignments among the justices. But the ruling raises as many questions as it answers, Sykes notes. What happens to billions in tariffs already collected? Do international trade deals struck in the shadow of these tariffs still stand? And with other statutory tools available is this really the end of the tariff saga, or just the next chapter? Links: Alan O. Sykes >>> Stanford Law page The Law and Economics of International Trade Agreements >>> Stanford Law page Connect: Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page Rich Ford >>>  Twitter/X Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page Diego Zambrano >>> Stanford Law School Page Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X Stanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/X (00:00:00) Tariffs and IEEPA (00:10:53) Statutory text and the history of tariffs (00:13:54) “Regulate importation” and the Major Questions Doctrine (00:17:56) Liquidation Timing, finality, and the 314‑day rule (00:19:11) The Court of International Trade (00:29:53) From IEEPA to Section 122 and what's next under Section 301 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

EP 412 - How far should UK employers go when it comes to looking after staff?In this episode we break down the real cost of being a “nice” employer - from UK statutory sick pay (SSP) and full sick pay policies to employee benefits, pensions, flexible working, and permanent health insurance (PHI).With major UK employment law changes coming, SMEs face difficult trade-offs:Is full sick pay worth the payroll cost?Does unlimited holiday actually work?Can generous benefits create legal risk?Are employers responsible for employees' long-term wellbeing?Featuring insights from Oury Clark's employment lawyer Jessica Bass and financial adviser Freddie Pattenden, this episode is a practical guide for SME founders, directors, and HR leaders navigating sick leave, compliance, retention, and post-COVID workplace expectations.If you run a UK business and want to balance competitiveness, fairness, and sustainability - this one's for you.*For Apple Podcast chapters, access them from the menu in the bottom right corner of your player*Spotify Video Chapters:00:00 Caring Without Going Broke00:57 Meet the Experts01:27 What Staff Really Want03:38 Compliance Value Competition05:28 PHI Income Protection Debate11:22 Post Covid Flex and Mental Health15:36 Legal Minimums Sick Pay Changes21:54 Morality Consistency and Flex26:15 Being Nice Can Backfire29:10 Structuring Benefits and Contracts32:09 Unlimited Holiday Pitfalls32:51 Unlimited holiday pitfalls34:50 Perks arms race37:07 SMEs vs big firms38:35 Pension basics explained39:43 Qualifying earnings trap42:41 Pensions and retention47:17 Salary sacrifice demystified54:43 Self employed pension gap55:06 Death in service cover57:15 Private healthcare reality59:19 Tailoring PMI benefits01:03:00 Managing premium increases01:04:43 Virtual GP and AI support01:06:16 Avoiding Benefit Red Herrings01:08:14 Flexible Benefits Allowance01:11:20 Renewals and Underwriting Traps01:13:47 Flexible Working Rights01:15:33 Office Returns and Discrimination01:19:49 Mental Health Boundaries01:21:46 Best Benefits and Compliance01:27:10 Business or BS Quiz01:27:55 Maternity and Paternity Debate01:34:28 Wellbeing Apps and Final WrapWatch and subscribe to us on YouTubeFollow us:InstagramTikTokLinkedinTwitterFacebook

Rene Lopez v. Bondi, No. 24-1208 (4th Cir. Feb. 13, 2026) derivative citizenship; former INA § 321(a); establishing paternity through legitimation; Loper Bright; statutory interpretation; affirmative acts to establish paternity; Riley; petition for review despite CAT remand  Matter of Jin, 29 I&N Dec. 441 (BIA 2026) marriage fraud; annulment; revoking I-130 petition; BIA appeal two-years late; deposition transcripts; two-year untimely appeal Buenrostro-Mendez, et al. v. Bondi, et al., No. 25-20496 (5th Cir. Feb. 6, 2026) mandatory detention for all EWIs; redundant and superfluous statutory interpretation; Hurtado; seeking admission; INA § 235(a)(2)(B); Laken Riley Act Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years. Gonzales & Gonzales Immigration BondsP: (833) 409-9200immigrationbond.com  EB-5 Support"EB-5 Support is an ongoing mentorship and resource platform created specifically for immigration attorneys."Contact: info@eb-5support.comWebsite: https://eb-5support.com/Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Click me!The Pen and SwordClick me!Discount code: ImmigrationReview26 Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATION:Email: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerSupport the show

Join Kay Properties & Investments Senior Vice Presidents Orrin Barrow and Matt McFarland as they discuss the role of Delaware Statutory Trusts in helping 1031 exchange investors meet the debt replacement requirement for full tax deferral.

In this episode 259 of the employment law and HR podcast, we delve into some of the detail of the forthcoming changes under the Employment Rights Act 2025. In this episode I am covering the key changes taking place from April 2026. In this episode we cover: Changes to Paternity Leave Paternity Leave will become a day 1 right for all employees Statutory paternity pay will still have the qualifying period of 26 weeks Unpaid Parental Leave will become a day 1 right The requirement for all employers to keep holiday records for 6 years All employers need to keep records of annual leave entitlement and time taken off Employers also need to keep records of how much an employee is paid when they take holiday Why it is important to reconsider how you hold holiday records The new Fair Work Agency The risks to employers in terms of penalties and reputation if the Fair Work Agency intervene Changes to Statutory Sick Pay The impact on employers of the new SSP rules Why managers need to be aware and to tighten up the management of short term regular sickness absence Why it is important to start taking action now to get ready for the new law. Key takeaway: Employers need to start taking action now to educate and empower managers to proactively manage employees for success.  You need to review and update policies on Paternity Leave, Parental Leave and Statutory Sick Pay.  You also need to consider how you store your holiday records and how you are going to store them going forward.  Don't forget to subscribe to the podcast to stay informed on the latest in UK employment law. If you have questions or need tailored advice, feel free to get in touch – we are here to help. Training for your Team Would you like to arrange training for your team to reduce the risk of both unhappy employees and claims being made against you? Please get in touch for a no obligation discussion, we can offer training anywhere in the UK in person or delivered remotely via MS Teams. Please drop me an email alison@realemploymentlawadvice.co.uk Fixed Price Advice from Real Experts As part of our HR Harbour annual subscription service for employers we provide guidance and training for employers, supervisors and managers. If you would like to know more about the HR Harbour Service and how you can get unlimited support from as little as £234 per month please contact me for a no obligation discussion – alison@realemploymentlawadvice.co.uk or you can find full details here: HR Harbour Don't forget you can contact us by telephone 01983 897003, 01722 653001, 020 3470 0007, 0191 375 9694 or 023 8098 2006 We have a variety of free documents and letters which are available to download here: DIY Documents We are also on YouTube! You can find a range of topics and also listen to this podcast on YouTube here: YOUTUBE

When a son discovers that the man who raised him is capable of unimaginable harm, he is forced to become a whistleblower against his own father, risking his family, his identity, and everything he once believed to be true. Today's episode featured Kai Zen Bickle. To find out more about the legislation drafted with Child USA to close jurisdictional loopholes, specifically to ensure that evidence of sexual crimes committed against children on foreign soil can be brought back and used in U.S. courts, preventing perpetrators from escaping accountability by abusing international boundaries, please visit: https://childusa.org/law/ Producers: Whit Missildine, Andrew Waits, Jason Blalock Content/Trigger Warnings: Child sexual abuse, Sexual assault, Rape, Statutory rape, Grooming, Drug-facilitated sexual assault, Incest (sexual exploitation by a parent), Emotional abuse, Gaslighting, Psychological manipulation, Sexual exploitation, Coercion, Trauma, Dissociation, Moral injury, Whistleblower retaliation, Family betrayal, explicit language Social Media:Instagram: @actuallyhappeningTwitter: @TIAHPodcast Website: thisisactuallyhappening.com Website for Andrew Waits: andrdewwaits.comWebsite for Jason Blalock: jasonblalock.com Support the Show: Support The Show on Patreon: patreon.com/happening Wondery Plus: All episodes of the show prior to episode #130 are now part of the Wondery Plus premium service. To access the full catalog of episodes, and get all episodes ad free, sign up for Wondery Plus at wondery.com/plus Shop at the Store: The This Is Actually Happening online store is now officially open. Follow this link: thisisactuallyhappening.com/shop to access branded t-shirts, posters, stickers and more from the shop. Transcripts: Full transcripts of each episode are now available on the website, thisisactuallyhappening.com Intro Music: “Sleep Paralysis” - Scott VelasquezMusic Bed: Music To Air (MTA) - Houses ServicesIf you or someone you know is struggling with the effects of trauma or mental illness, please refer to the following resources: National Suicide and Crisis Lifeline: Text or Call 988 National Alliance on Mental Illness: 1-800-950-6264National Sexual Assault Hotline (RAINN): 1-800-656-HOPE (4673) See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

One man fired 16 shots at the person accused of victimizing his 13-year-old daughter. The other allegedly used a silencer to make sure no one heard the shots that killed his ex-wife. Both are charged with murder. Both have defense attorneys preparing for trial. And both cases raise fundamental questions about what the law allows.Aaron Spencer found his daughter in Michael Fosler's truck at 1 AM — three months after Fosler posted bond on 43 felony charges for alleged crimes against her. Spencer rammed the truck and killed Fosler. Prosecutors say he'd been planning it for months. The defense says a man out on bond allegedly violated a no-contact order and took a child victim in the middle of the night. Under Arkansas law, justification is something the prosecution must disprove beyond a reasonable doubt.Dr. Michael McKee allegedly killed his ex-wife Monique Tepe and her husband Spencer while their children slept down the hall. The indictment says he used a suppressor. But prosecutors still haven't explained how he entered the home with no forced entry. There's no disclosed motive. No documented conflict in the years since the divorce. McKee gave police an alibi that didn't hold up — he only invoked silence after the arrest.Defense attorney Bob Motta analyzes both cases: the prosecution's evidence, the defense strategies, and what each jury will have to decide. For Spencer, it's whether prosecutors can disprove justification. For McKee, it's whether the gaps in the case create reasonable doubt against evidence that includes an alleged suppressor.#AaronSpencer #MichaelMcKee #MichaelFosler #MoniqueTepe #SpencerTepe #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #DefenseStrategy #MurderTrial #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Redundancies are one of the most sensitive and high-risk moments in the life of any organisation. When they are mishandled, the consequences can be profound - from reputational damage and industrial action to long-term impacts on trust, morale and employer brand. In this episode of The HR Room Podcast, Dave and Mary are joined by employment law specialist Adrian Twomey, Partner at Jacob & Twomey Solicitors, to unpack what happens when redundancies go wrong. Using a recent high-profile Irish case as a starting point, they explore the legal obligations, human realities and organisational risks involved in collective redundancies. Together, they discuss why empathy matters as much as compliance, how consultation processes shape outcomes, and what HR leaders and managers can do to avoid the worst-case scenario - including strike action, reputational harm and unfair dismissal claims. Guest • Adrian Twomey –Partner, Jacob & Twomey Solicitors Topics include: • Why redundancies are one of the toughest moments for any organisation • What went wrong in the recent Covalen case and what HR leaders can learn from it • Statutory vs enhanced redundancy payments - expectations and realities • What a “good” consultation process really looks like in practice • The legal requirements under collective redundancy legislation • Common risks: unfair dismissal, discrimination claims and reputational damage • The impact of redundancies on morale, trust and organisational culture • Managing anger, fear and resistance during consultation • Supporting managers who must deliver difficult messages • Why empathy, transparency and professionalism are critical to outcomes • How organisations can recover their employer brand after redundancies Useful Links & Resources • Irish Times article on the Covalen redundancy case • Protection of Employment Act 1977 – Collective Redundancies • Insight HR – Redundancy & Restructuring Services Get in touch If you're not already following us on LinkedIn, please do. If you have suggestions for future episodes, or if you'd like to join us as a guest, reach out to Dave at dcorkery@insighthr.ie or connect with him on LinkedIn. Head here for more info on our confidential Redundancy and Restructuring Services.  For confidential HR support, contact info@insighthr.ie

SUPREME COURT LIKELY TO STRIKE DOWN TRUMP TARIFFS Colleague Professor Richard Epstein. Epstein predicts the Supreme Court will invalidate the Trump administration's emergency tariffs, arguing there is no statutory basis for the trade imbalances cited as justification. He anticipates a fractured decision where a centrist block of justices joins liberals to rule that the executive branch exceeded its authority.1870 CASTLE GARDEN

Mark goes to sunny Miami and gets an eyeful of hobo on the way! Joe experiences art of the homosexual persuasion. Mark has an ALL-TIME bathroom issue that lasts for - weeks!!! It's Tuesdays! Our Stuff: - http://www.patreon.com/tuesdays   - youtube.com/tuesdayswithstories   - Get 10% off your first month of BlueChew Gold w/ code TUESDAYS @ http://BlueChew.com/ - Upgrade your workout wardrobe. Sign up as a VIP & get 80% off everything at https://fabletics.com/TUESDAYS

In this week's episode of Federal Prison Authority Presents: Around the Block, Bruce and Susan spend the first few minutes covering he capture of the Venezuelan president and his detention center process. After exploring this new development, they pivot back to the first step and time credit topics. Susan continues from last week to explore the concept of statutory eligibility. Susan defines statutory eligibility and explores the applicable laws. She also reviews some flaws in how the laws were written and clarifies the different eligibility levels. Future episodes will continue to explore the book's chapters in greater detail. Please feel free to send questions to Bruce and Susan. Dr. Susan Giddings can be found on their shared website https://federalprisonauthority.com/who-we-are/ Bruce through his cell (214) 431-2032, and their First Step Act Book on Amazon: https://a.co/d/2dWCECE

Understanding the Step Transaction Doctrine: A Deep Dive into Tax LawThis conversation delves into the complexities of tax law, focusing on statutory interpretation, the step transaction doctrine, and the philosophical battles between textualism and intentionalism. It emphasizes the importance of understanding judicial doctrines that prevent tax avoidance and the implications of public policy on tax legislation. The discussion also highlights the need for transparency in governance to distinguish between legal tax avoidance and illegal tax evasion.In the intricate world of tax law, the Step Transaction Doctrine stands as a pivotal concept, especially for those preparing for the bar exam or delving into complex transactional courses. This doctrine is not just about reading the code; it's about mastering the interpretive skills necessary to navigate the formidable judge-made doctrines designed to combat tax avoidance.The Core of Statutory Interpretation: The journey begins with understanding the literal tools and textual canons used to read the code. The battle between pure textualism and intentionalism is a classic one, and mastering these philosophical debates is crucial for exam success. The substance over form doctrine, particularly the three classical tests of the step transaction doctrine, plays a critical role in how courts apply these principles against modern tax schemes.The Step Transaction Doctrine Explained: The doctrine treats a series of formally separate steps as a single integrated transaction if the steps were clearly undertaken to reach a specific end result. This application of substance over form is particularly used when the tax result hinges on the final ownership percentage or the sequence of property transfers. Understanding the stakes and the tests involved, such as the Binding Commitment Test, the Interdependence Test, and the End Result Test, is essential for any legal learner.Conclusion: Mastery of tax law requires a dual approach: respecting the text and anticipating the IRS's defensive use of judicial anti-abuse doctrines. The code is a complex reflection of our collective values, rewarding positive behaviors and penalizing social ills. As tax law continues to evolve globally, the challenge remains to achieve enough statutory clarity and transparency to distinguish between aggressive tax avoidance and illegal evasion.Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest insights in tax law and more.TakeawaysMastering tax law requires understanding statutory interpretation and judicial doctrines.The step transaction doctrine integrates separate steps into a single transaction for tax purposes.Statutory definitions are crucial and often control over common interpretations.Judicial doctrines like economic substance and anti-avoidance are essential in tax law.The tension between textualism and intentionalism shapes judicial decisions in tax cases.Aggressive tax avoidance can be a result of legislative loopholes created by special interests.Transparency in tax governance is necessary to maintain public trust and clarity.The economic substance doctrine requires transactions to have real business purposes beyond tax benefits.The step transaction doctrine has three tests: binding commitment, interdependence, and end result.Public policy plays a significant role in shaping tax law and its interpretation.tax law, statutory interpretation, step transaction doctrine, tax avoidance, tax evasion, economic substance doctrine, judicial doctrines, public policy, legal analysis, tax planning

Question: How can an applicant overcome a statutory double patenting rejection? Answer: A terminal disclaimer cannot be filed to obviate a statutory double patenting rejection. A statutory double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the conflicting claims so they are no longer coextensive in scope. A complete response to a statutory double […] The post MPEP Q & A 344: How can an applicant overcome a statutory double patenting rejection? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

The Garden Trust's Linden Groves is campaigning against a proposal to end the organisation's role as a planning statutory consultee.She robustly contests the proposal to remove the statutory consultee role and disagrees that it would improve the planning system. Instead, precious parks and gardens, hard won over many centuries, would be lost to communities both now and in future.“We are passionate about the role that the UK's world-famous historic parks and gardens can play in supporting positive economic growth and healthy cohesive societies, and eager to continue helping this in our role as statutory consultee. We encourage supporters to respond to the consultation and will publish our response as soon as possible.”In March, the Government decided to ditch planning consultancy from bodies including The Gardens Trust, to speed up the planning system. “We are seeking views on reforming the role of statutory consultees in the planning system in England,” it said. The consultation closes at 11:59pm on 13 January 2026.The consultation can be accessed here.Make sure you never miss a HortWeek podcast! Subscribe to or Follow HortWeek podcasts via Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your preferred podcast platform. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Join the Brightmine team as they guide listeners through the Employment Rights Bill's bumpy journey through Parliament and offer practical advice on how HR professionals can prepare for the legislative changes expected to come into force in early 2024. Stay ahead of the curve as our experts break down what's changing - from trade union rules and sick pay to family leave and whistleblowing protections - and get actionable tips to keep your organisation compliant.  Read the transcript Resources On your radar - Employment Rights Bill updates and HR mythbusting How Lewis Silkin developed and rolled out its equalised new parent leave policy Employment Rights Bill essentials: Statutory sick pay eligibility

Mickey Osterreicher of NPPA Discusses Photojournalism in the Modern Era: Legal Rights, AI Challenges, and How to Protect Your Work The 10 Frames Per Second podcast episode featuring Mickey Osterreicher, General Counsel for the National Press Photographers Association (NPPA), uncovers the toughest challenges facing today's visual journalists: Shrinking newsrooms & the rise of freelancers Legal battles over copyright, AI‑generated images, and fair use Police confrontations, arrests, and deportations of journalists The vital role of the NPPA in advocacy and education If you're a photojournalist, visual storyteller, or anyone who relies on images to inform the public, the insights from this episode are essential reading. A past guest on 10FPS (Episode 20) Mickey's career arc illustrates how photojournalism and law intersect: Phase Highlights Early Years Started with a 35 mm camera in college, photo‑edited the school newspaper, then worked for the Buffalo Courier‑Express (10 years). TV Transition Moved to WKBW‑TV, covered sports, and realized visual storytelling mattered more than column space. Law School Inspired by covering the Attica prison uprising and escorting attorneys William Kunstler & Ramsey Clark, he enrolled in law school while still working nights at the TV station. NPPA Legal Counsel Joined the NPPA in the early 1970s, later became its volunteer legal counsel, handling copyright, First Amendment, and police‑training issues. Key takeaway: A solid legal background can turn a photojournalist into an advocate for the entire visual‑journalism community. The State of the NPPA Why the NPPA Is Still Critical Founded 1946 – the “voice of visual journalists.” Membership shift: From staff photographers at newspapers/TV to freelancers & independent contractors. Financial pressure: Dues are modest, but staff salaries have been cut; board members now perform many staff functions pro‑bono. Advocacy priorities: Protect First Amendment rights. Provide legal training for journalists and law‑enforcement agencies. Fight AI‑related copyright infringement. NPPA's Current Initiatives Legal hotline – direct access to counsel for members. First‑Amendment training – delivered to police departments nationwide (e.g., Minnesota, Chicago). Copyright small‑claims court – a low‑cost venue for photographers to enforce their rights. Writing with Light (WwL) Coalition – developing standards for image provenance and authenticity. First Amendment & Police Encounters: What Every Visual Journalist Should Know 1. Know Your Rights Public spaces: You have the right to photograph and record, subject only to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. “Indicia” of journalist status: Press credentials, professional gear, and a clear “press” identifier help officers recognize you as a journalist. 2. Prepare Before You Go Contact local police ahead of time to introduce yourself. Work in pairs or a small team—the “buddy system” improves safety and documentation. Carry a written list of emergency contacts (phone numbers inked on your arm or stored offline). 3. If You're Detained Step Action Stay calm Do not resist; comply with lawful orders. Identify yourself Show press credentials, explain you're exercising First Amendment rights. Document the encounter Keep an audio/video record if safe to do so. Call the NP hotline (or the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press at 800‑336‑4243) as soon as possible. Notify a trusted contact (family, lawyer, editor). Ask for a copy of the arrest report and any charges filed. AI & Generative Images: The New Copyright Battlefield Why AI Threatens Photojournalism AI‑generated images can be indistinguishable from reality (e.g., deepfakes, synthetic disasters). Massive ingestion of photographers' work to train AI models, often without permission or compensation. Legal Landscape (U.S. Focus) Copyright registration is required before you can sue for infringement. Statutory damages: Up to $150,000 per image for willful infringement (as illustrated by the Daniel Morrel case). Fair‑use defense is fact‑intensive; courts evaluate purpose, nature, amount used, and market effect. Practical AI Safeguards Register every image you intend to license (or that has high news value). Add a visible watermark or embed metadata indicating ownership. Use tools from Adobe's Content Authenticity Initiative (CAI) to embed provenance data. Monitor platforms for unauthorized use; send a cease‑and‑desist using NPPA's model letters (available on their website). Practical Steps to Safeguard Your Images {#practical-steps-to-safeguard-your-images} Register Your Work File a registration with the U.S. Copyright Office within 90 days of first publication to get retroactive protection. Maintain a Documentation Log Date, location, equipment, and a brief description for each shoot. Store original RAW files in an offline, encrypted backup. Use Model Release & License Agreements Clearly outline permitted uses, fee structures, and attribution requirements. Leverage NPPA Resources Model cease‑and‑desist letters – copy, personalize, and send. Small‑claims court filing kit – for disputes under $10 k, no attorney needed. Educate Your Audience Publish a short note on your site about image authenticity (e.g., “This photo was captured on location with a Sony A7R IV; not AI‑generated”). Resources, Hotlines & Tools for Photojournalists Resource What It Offers Link NPPA Legal Hotline Pro‑bono legal advice for members nppa.org/legal‑assistance Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press 24/7 emergency hotline (800‑336‑4243) rcfp.org Adobe Content Authenticity Initiative Metadata for image provenance contentauthenticity.org Small Claims Court Guide (NPPA) DIY filing checklist nppa.org/small‑claims Writing with Light (WwL) Coalition Standards for visual journalism ethics wwlight.org U.S. Copyright Office Register images, view guidelines copyright.gov Final Takeaways & Call to Action Your camera is a legal instrument. Understanding copyright, First Amendment rights, and AI implications protects both your livelihood and the public's right to truthful information. Join the conversation. If you're not already a member, consider joining NPPA to access training, legal support, and a network of advocates. Stay prepared. Keep your emergency contacts handy, register your work promptly, and use provenance tools to signal authenticity. Ready to protect your images? Register your latest photo series today. Download NPPA's model cease‑and‑desist letter (link above). Add the Reporters Committee hotline to your phone – it could be a lifesaver. If you found this guide useful, share it with fellow visual journalists and subscribe to 10 Frames Per Second for more expert insights. Keywords: photojournalism, NPPA, copyright, generative AI, visual literacy, First Amendment, police training, legal rights, arrests, deportation, threats to journalists, copyright registration, cease and desist, small claims court, AI training data, fair use, public domain, litigation, settlement, statutory damages, Daniel Morrel, visual journalism, body armor, journalist safety, situational awareness, protest coverage, media advocacy, NPPA membership, legal counsel, media law, AI image authenticityThe post Episode 165: Mickey Osterreicher (Legal Protections For Photojournalists) first appeared on 10FPS A Photojournalism Podcast for Everyone.

Click here to watch on Youtube!Thanksgiving is all about gratitude, and it may also mean honoring those who have given. Kristin Strobel, who was our guest in Ep. 90, joins our show again to discuss her latest project about a statue honoring one of the most famous Americans: Thomas Edison! Hear about the journey from idea to voting, statuary to statue. You can visit this magnificent Edison's statue, which still stands tall in the U.S. Capitol's National Statuary Hall.Purchase Kristin's book here on Amazon!Hear Kristin's previous guest episode! https://ffc.buzzsprout.com/1255184/episodes/10329937-90-making-american-politics-more-local-and-civil-feat-kristin-strobelSupport the showVisit georgewashingtoninstitute.org to sign up for our e-mail list! The site is the one-stop shop of all things Friends & Fellow Citizens and George Washington Institute!JOIN as a Patreon supporter and receive a FREE Friends & Fellow Citizens mug at the $25 membership level!IMPORTANT NOTE/DISCLAIMER: All views expressed by the host are presented in his personal capacity and do not officially represent the views of any affiliated organizations. All views presented by guests are solely those of the interviewees themselves and may or may not represent the views of their affiliated organizations, the host, Friends & Fellow Citizens, and/or The George Washington Institute.

The Supreme Court heard oral argument on the Trump Administration's imposition of tariffs on imports of just about every product from just about every country. Statutory interpretation, major questions doctrine, nondelegation. This case had it all. We dive deep into the debate so you don't have to.Check out our new True Crime Substack the True Crime Times Get Prosecutors Podcast Merch Join the Gallery on Facebook Follow us on TwitterFollow us on Instagram Check out our website for case resources: Hang out with us on TikTokSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Navigating the Complexities of Civil Procedure: Jurisdiction and VenueThis conversation provides a comprehensive overview of civil procedure, focusing on the essential elements needed to navigate the complexities of lawsuits in America. It covers the foundational concepts of subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, and venue, along with the importance of pleadings, joinder, summary judgment, and the Erie doctrine. The discussion emphasizes the procedural traps and analytical frameworks necessary for success in civil procedure exams and practice.In the intricate world of civil procedure, understanding the foundational elements of jurisdiction and venue is crucial for any aspiring lawyer. These concepts are not just academic exercises; they are the keys to unlocking the courtroom doors.The Three Keys to the CourthouseImagine the courthouse as a fortress with three locked doors: subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, and venue. Each door requires a unique key, and they must be unlocked in a specific order. Subject matter jurisdiction determines the court's power over the type of case, personal jurisdiction assesses the court's authority over the defendant, and venue ensures the trial is held in the most appropriate location.Subject Matter Jurisdiction: The First GateFederal courts, unlike their state counterparts, are courts of limited jurisdiction. They can only hear cases authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The two main pathways into federal court are federal question jurisdiction, where the plaintiff's claim is based on federal law, and diversity jurisdiction, involving parties from different states with a dispute exceeding $75,000.Personal Jurisdiction: Fairness and Due ProcessPersonal jurisdiction is rooted in the due process clause, ensuring fairness to the defendant. The landmark case of International Shoe introduced the concept of "minimum contacts," shifting the focus from physical presence to the defendant's actions and intentions within the state.Venue: The Final StepVenue is about convenience and geography, determining the most logical courthouse for the trial. Governed by statutory rules, venue is typically proper where any defendant resides or where a substantial part of the events occurred.The Evolving LandscapeAs the legal landscape evolves, particularly with the rise of the internet, the application of these rules continues to be a dynamic and challenging area of law. Understanding and mastering these procedural elements is essential for success in both exams and practice.Subscribe Now to stay updated on the latest insights and developments in civil procedure.TakeawaysCivil procedure is a step-by-step logic puzzle.Subject matter jurisdiction (SMJ) is crucial for any case.Personal jurisdiction (PJ) focuses on fairness to the defendant.Venue is about convenience and geographic location.Pleadings must meet specific standards to survive motions to dismiss.Joinder rules allow for efficient litigation of related claims.Summary judgment can resolve cases before trial if no material facts are in dispute.The Erie doctrine determines which law applies in federal diversity cases.Preclusion doctrines prevent relitigation of claims and issues.Understanding these concepts is essential for success in civil procedure.Civil Procedure, Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Personal Jurisdiction, Venue, Pleadings, Joinder, Summary Judgment, Erie Doctrine, Preclusion

Send us a textWe trace how a misclassification by New York's DEC snowballed into media damage, lost tenants, and a fight to restore due process. Julian shares the legal roadmap he's using—Article 78, TROs, and FOIL—to check agency overreach and updates his Smithsonian case.• DEC's legitimate role versus ideological overreach• Dry-cleaner chemicals PCE and TCE and migration risk• Conflicted reports and a 2017 letter that misclassified the property• Statutory notice requirements and due process failures• Media rollout without owner notice and tenant fallout• Article 78 strategy and emergency TRO to halt actions• FOIL requests and withheld communications• Institutional inertia and accountability in government• Smithsonian case update and structural independence• Practical steps for citizens to document and push backCheck out episode 298 for the Smithsonian Caseshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeLawJhSgnEFollow Julian at ...https://smithsoninstitution.com/https://www.prlog.org/13110258-emergency-court-hearing-set-in-raven-nys-dec-property-rights-battle-alleged-misclassification.htmlhttps://714baldwinstreet.com/Support the showFollow your host atYouTube and Rumble for video contenthttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUxk1oJBVw-IAZTqChH70aghttps://rumble.com/c/c-4236474Facebook to receive updateshttps://www.facebook.com/EliasEllusion/ LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/eliasmarty/ Some free goodies Free website to help you and me https://thefreewebsiteguys.com/?js=15632463 New Paper https://thenewpaper.co/refer?r=srom1o9c4gl

Send us a textThe honorable Mark W. Bennett is a retired U.S. District Court Judge, and the former Chief Judge of the Northern District of Iowa.  Judge Bennett retired from the federal bench in 2019, and is now Director Emeritus of the Institute for Justice Reform & Innovation at Drake University Law School.  Judge Bennett is known for his advocacy for sentencing reform—including his criticism of the federal sentencing guidelines and statutory mandatory minimum sentences—for his research on implicit bias, and, unusually, for his prison visits to check up on hundreds of the defendants he sentenced.  For some of those inmates, Judge Bennett has written, he is the only visitor they have ever had.  Equally unusually, Judge Bennett has often met with the families of those he's sentenced, at their request, to explain his sentences.  We were honored to discuss with Judge Bennett his own quest for justice, his experience sentencing thousands of federal criminal defendants, and so much more. 

Hewitt v. United States, No. 23-1002 (U.S. June 26, 2025)vacated conviction; statutory interpretation; First Step Act Matter of Garcia-Flores, 29 I&N Dec. 230 (BIA 2025)overturning IJ on discretion; claiming innocence; considering credibility of criminal court witnesses; sexual crimes against minors Matter of H-A-A-V-, 29 I&N Dec. 233 (BIA 2025) pretermitting asylum application; prima facie case for relief; extortion; material issue of fact Myers v. Bondi, No. 23-3286 (8th Cir. Sept. 8, 2025)derivative citizenship; custody; child; VAWA provisions for children; material issue of fact Garcia Morin v. Bondi, No. 24-60590 (5th Cir. Sept. 12, 2025)motion to reopen; equitable tolling of time bar; claims processing ruleSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.  Cerenade"Leader in providing smart, secure, and intuitive cloud-based solutions"Demo Link!get.eimmigration.com/eventsSign up for Sept. 30th Essential Stress Management Skills for Immigration Attorneys! Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Promo Code: STAFI2025Click me! Gonzales & Gonzales Immigration BondsP: (833) 409-9200immigrationbond.com   Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page! CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreview About your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego Voyager DISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

On this episode of the Scouting For Growth podcast, Sabine VdL talks to Arvind Sontha, COE and co-founder of Kyber, an AI startup redefining how carriers handle claims correspondence. The insurance industry is undergoing a seismic shift as carries face mounting pressure to deliver faster, more transparent, and compliant communications to policy holders and clients, so the need for digital claims transformation has never been greater. KEY TAKEAWAYS If you think about insurance and tailoring insurance, the underlying model for risk is effectively a ‘user personal model'. We started with an obscure line of insurance that didn't exist yet – or did around personal cyber insurance. We wondered what it would look like, rather than SMB or commercial cyber insurance, as individual underwriting and risk modelling. We got lucky finding a great partner in branch insurance very early on. Over the course of our time engaging with them we ended up turning into an extension of their team. We were able to work closely with them, they trusted us to quickly understand their problems and iterate to give them quick solutions, while at the same time they understood that there are going to be quirks with products that aren't fully fleshed out which they could iron out over time. It was a symbiotic relationship. If an adjustor has to take an hour to put a document together you have to clear a 1.5-hour space in your calendar to do that. Life is hectic, you have meetings and other tasks to do and so that 1.5-hour block keeps getting moved back, same thing happens to managers. If you can take it from 1.5 hours to 30 seconds for a high-quality letter and a one-click process to approve, you can slip that into any part of your calendar. That's a really underrated part of the process. Some of the things we want to do in the future is include things like managed parameters. We think it's obtuse for all the carriers to manage all the fraud language individually all the time, for example. Kyber could manage that for you to make sure everything's automatically compliant and good to go. Statutory language really enables the full organisation to be prepared to catch each other. BEST MOMENTS ‘Kyber is an AI native, document generation and delivery platform made for claims teams, that's what we do.' ‘Nobody doubted that I could build the complex AI to underwrite and quantify the risk, what they needed to figure out was could I sell insurance, which is why I got my broker's licence!' ‘The results have been better than I expected, we've seen 65% faster drafting times, 80% consolidation of their templates across a 50-state operation, and 5x reduction in letter cycle times for documents.' ABOUT THE GUESTS Arvind Sontha is co-founder and CEO of Kyber, an AI startup that is redefining how carriers' NTPAs handle claims correspondence. Arvind is at the forefront of digital transformation, leading Kyber's mission to automate and streamline the entire lifecycle of claims forms and letters. Kyber's clients report the impact of AI automation is undeniable: Claims teams using Kyber have reduced letter drafting time by up to 85%, cut review time by 60%, and achieved a 3x faster outreach to policy holders. LinkedIn ABOUT THE HOST Sabine is a corporate strategist turned entrepreneur. She is the CEO and Managing Partner of Alchemy Crew a venture lab that accelerates the curation, validation, & commercialization of new tech business models. Sabine is renowned within the insurance sector for building some of the most renowned tech startup accelerators around the world working with over 30 corporate insurers, accelerated over 100 startup ventures. Sabine is the co-editor of the bestseller The INSURTECH Book, a top 50 Women in Tech, a FinTech and InsurTech Influencer, an investor & multi-award winner. Twitter LinkedIn Instagram Facebook TikTok Email Website This Podcast has been brought to you by Disruptive Media. https://disruptivemedia.co.uk/

Kentucky Delivery Network Company Driver Transparency & Protections Act SECTION 1. KRS Chapter [to be assigned] is amended to create a new section to read as follows: As used in Sections 1 to 10 of this Act, unless the context requires otherwise: "Delivery network company" or "DNC" means an entity that: (a) Uses a digital network to connect consumers with drivers to facilitate delivery services; (b) Collects payments from consumers for such delivery services; and (c) Compensates drivers for providing such services. "Driver" means an individual who: (a) Is engaged by a delivery network company to provide delivery services; (b) May be classified as an independent contractor or an employee; and (c) Uses a personal or commercial vehicle to fulfill delivery requests. "Consumer" means an individual who uses a delivery network company's platform to request and receive delivery services. SECTION 2. A delivery network company shall, for each delivery transaction: Clearly disclose to the consumer: (a) The total amount charged for the delivery, including all fees, tips, and service charges; and (b) The amount or percentage of the total that will be remitted to the driver. Clearly disclose to the driver prior to accepting a delivery offer: (a) The total amount payable for the delivery; and (b) Any tip included; and       (c) Delivery pick up and drop off location; and       (d) Delivery total miles. Ensure that: (a) One hundred percent (100%) of any tip provided by the consumer is paid to the driver; and (b) A driver's base compensation is not reduced based on the amount of a tip. SECTION 3. A delivery network company shall provide each driver with access to all contracts or terms of service that govern the relationship between the driver and the company. Any updates or changes to contract terms shall be: (a) Provided to the driver via the digital platform and via email; and (b) Presented in clear and understandable language. A delivery network company shall: (a) Make available all current contract templates to drivers in English and Spanish; and (b) Post notice of any revised contract terms at least fourteen (14) days prior to implementation. SECTION 4. A delivery network company shall maintain and publicly post a written driver deactivation policy. If a driver is deactivated or restricted from accessing the platform, the company shall: (a) Provide written notice stating the specific reason for deactivation; and (b) Offer an internal appeal process that allows the driver to contest the deactivation and request reinstatement. Deactivation policies and appeal procedures shall be made available on the company's website. SECTION 5. When matching a driver with a consumer for a delivery, the company shall include a prompt or notice requesting that the consumer facilitate a safe delivery environment, which may include: (a) Keeping paths to delivery locations clear and well-lit; and (b) Securing pets or potential hazards. A driver shall be provided no fewer than sixty (60) seconds to review and accept or decline a delivery offer. SECTION 6. A delivery network company shall submit quarterly reports to the Kentucky Labor Cabinet, containing the following data: (a) Average and range of driver compensation per delivery; (b) Percentage and distribution of tips among drivers; (c) Number of drivers deactivated during the reporting period and outcomes of appeal proceedings. The Labor Cabinet shall compile and publish an annual report summarizing the data and providing recommendations for legislative or regulatory action as necessary. SECTION 7. A driver or consumer aggrieved by a violation of this Act may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction for: (a) Statutory damages of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per violation; (b) Actual damages; and (c) Injunctive or other equitable relief as the court deems appropriate. The Kentucky Labor Cabinet may impose administrative fines not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500) per violation. SECTION 8. The Kentucky Labor Cabinet shall promulgate administrative regulations necessary to implement and enforce the provisions of this Act. SECTION 9. The General Assembly hereby appropriates sufficient funds from the General Fund to the Kentucky Labor Cabinet to carry out its duties under this Act for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2026. SECTION 10. Sections 1 through 8 of this Act shall take effect on March 6th, 2026. This Act is hereby declared to be an emergency measure in order to allow immediate preparation and rule making, and shall take effect upon its passage and becoming law. ***** ***** ***** ***** *****  Rideshare Rodeo Brand & Podcast: https://linktr.ee/RideshareRodeo