Podcast appearances and mentions of Stormy Daniels

I want you to imagine you are sitting on a hard wooden bench in a packed federal courtroom, because that is exactly where the story of Donald Trump's court battles has been unfolding over the past few days. We start in New York, where the hush‑money case that once made Donald Trump the first former president ever convicted of a crime is now in a tense holding pattern. After a Manhattan jury previously found him guilty on dozens of counts related to falsifying business records to conceal payments to Stormy Daniels during the 2016 campaign, Trump's legal team has spent the past several days pressing appellate courts to step in, arguing that his actions were political, not criminal, and that key testimony should never have been admitted. According to detailed reporting from the New York Times and CNN, lawyers have been trading briefs and appearing in hearings focused on whether the conviction should stand and what it means for a presidential candidate facing sentencing while also running for the White House again. Judges have been openly wrestling with the unprecedented mix of election politics and criminal procedure. Down in Florida, the classified documents case out of the Southern District has lurched forward in fits and starts. Over the past few days, as described by outlets like the Washington Post and Politico, special counsel Jack Smith's team has been arguing over what evidence can be shown to a jury and how to handle the mountain of secret material recovered from Mar‑a‑Lago. They have been pushing Judge Aileen Cannon to keep the trial on track, while Trump's lawyers have leaned hard on claims of presidential authority and selective prosecution, filing fresh motions to dismiss and asking for more delays. Court hearings have featured long arguments over the Presidential Records Act and how far executive power really reaches once a president leaves office. Meanwhile, in Washington, D.C., the federal election interference case connected to January 6 has remained entangled with questions of presidential immunity. Over the last several days, commentators from NBC News to the Associated Press have been tracking new filings where Trump's attorneys insist that almost everything he did around the 2020 election was an official act and therefore shielded from prosecution. Prosecutors have fired back, telling the judge that no president can use the Oval Office as a license to overturn an election. The Supreme Court's earlier rulings on executive power hover over every argument, and the precise wording of those opinions has been quoted and dissected in court day after day. In Georgia, the Fulton County racketeering case alleging a multi‑state conspiracy to overturn Joe Biden's 2020 win continues to simmer. According to coverage by the Atlanta Journal‑Constitution, the past few days have seen more behind‑the‑scenes maneuvering than dramatic courtroom fireworks. Trump's lawyers are still pushing to sever his trial from co‑defendants, to move the case out of Fulton County, and to knock out the sweeping racketeering charge that ties the plot together. The judge has been working through a crowded motions calendar, and every decision there could change the timeline of when Trump might actually face a Georgia jury. Taken together, the last few days have not produced a single, explosive moment, but instead a drumbeat of hearings, orders, and filings in four different jurisdictions, all aimed at answering one enormous question: how do American courts hold a former president accountable while he is actively seeking to become president again? Every ruling in New York, Florida, Washington, and Georgia nudges that answer in one direction or another. Thank you for tuning in, and come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more, check out QuietPlease dot A I. Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

"Where the hell has that been?" I'm sure were the words of the Melbourne Storm Head Coach Craig Bellamy, on what was arguable his side's most complete and consistent performance thus far in Season 2026. The kind of performance and defensive display we have become accustomed to seeing from a Melbourne Storm team, repelling and stopping a stacked Roosters team who have the capacity to blow teams away with their attacking strike. Stormy Daniel reviews the Round 13 clash against the boys from Bondi, covers off on the pathways results, what's making Storm news, your listener questions and team list Tuesday - who's in and who's out for the Friday night showdown with the resurgent Newcastle Knights are flying under the coaching of their new mentor in Justin Holbrook. Stormy Daniel will discuss where he thinks the game can be won for Melbourne. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

What's the old saying, 'two steps forward, one step back'. Well it felt like more than one step back in what was a diabolical second half, resulting in Storm going down to a desperate Bulldogs team. Stormy Daniel share his thoughts on what went wrong and continues to plague these second half fade outs which have become all too common in Season 2026, which no doubt is driving the coaching staff mad as to why these performances continue to occur. Stormy Daniel covers off on pathways results, what's making Storm news, including the news that Melbourne will be featuring in the NRL's fourth instalment of Las Vegas, kicking off their 2027 campaign against Wests in Sin City. Your listener questions along with team list Tuesday - who has been named to take on the Sydney Roosters? Will the Storm's Origin contingent back up? They will need to if able, to overcome a strong Roosters outfit who are flying. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Consecutive wins for only the second time in Season 2026, Melbourne are starting to show signs of improvement within their game, especially defensively. With the return of experienced edge forwards in Blore and Lisati, both Storm edges have looked a lot more in sync, which is to be expected when you have experienced players in key positions who have done the repetitions and have a connection with the players on their outside as a unit. Stormy Daniel delves into why Melbourne's defence has improved over the past fortnight, with a untidy 34-8 win over the Eels at Magic Round. Pathways report, what's making Storm news, your listener questions and team list Tuesday - who's in? who's out? Who will be stepping up in the absence of Storm's Origin contingent, as Storm aim to make it three wins on the trot against a desperate Bulldogs team. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jon Herold and Chris Paul open on election night with the Kentucky Massie primary consuming the entire MAGA Twitter ecosystem. Jon walks through Trump's blistering True Social posts calling Massie the worst Republican congressman in history and threatening Lauren Boebert's seat, while both hosts make the principled case that the allegation op being run against Massie uses the exact same playbook as Kavanaugh and Stormy Daniels, and the community is failing its own standards. Chris Paul lays out his theory that Trump's endorsements in an era of fake elections are narrative disruption tools, not predictions of winners. From there the show gets philosophical, with Chris delivering his extended metaphor about systematic reality inversion and what it means to be the person correctly calling heads and tails when everyone around you has been conditioned backwards for life. Trump's "I don't think about American finances" Iran doubledown with Brett Baier gets a principled defense. The Twitter algorithm transparency post, the social incentive structure driving the entire influencer class, and Trump's comments on 500,000 Chinese students and the American university system all get their turns. The show closes on the CNN article about the Trump Hantavirus official who runs a YouTube show called Erection Connection.

The unwanted losing streak of seven in-a-row is over and ended in sensational style with the Melbourne Storm jumping out of the blocks posting a 20-nil lead over Wests in the first half, with Storm scoring over a point a minute at one stage. It was the Melbourne of old, full of energry and enthusiam, helped by winning the ruck which gave their creative spine players to do what they do best when the Storm have momentum, run. And run they did, with all members of the spine getting on the try scorers sheet. Stormy Daniel reviews the big win over Wests, gives a pathways update and injury update and touches on Craig Bellamy's health battle and how it will not deter him or stop him coaching despite others outside the Storm suggesting he won't. Your listener questions and team list Tuesday - who's in, who's out for a Magic Round clash with the Eels. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Melbourne have broken another club record, an unwanted one at that, extending their losing streak to now seven straight losses; the first time in Storm's 28 year history as a franchise. Stormy Daniel without sounding like a broken record, examines once again why Storm find themselves in this precarious position, with it being not just one particular issue, but many different factors contriburing to the run of bad form. Stormy Daniel covers off on pathways results from Round 9, your listener questions, team list Tuesday; who's in? who's out for the clash with Wests and what's making Storm news - that centring around the unsettling news surrounding Head Coach Craig Bellamy's health. Some things are more important than sport. Stormy Daniel on behalf of all Storm fans pays tribute to Bellyache, sending our well wishes, strength and love to the man that has built this extraordinary club and his loved ones during this difficult time. The outpouring of support for Bellamy speaks to the man he is and how revered and respected by everyone in the game. It speaks volumes as to why Melbourne Storm is the club it is. It mirrors the person that is Craig Bellamy. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Stormy Daniels Poses With Donald Trump's Enemy Jimmy Kimmel in Shocking SelfieAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Just when Storm fans thought the past five weeks could not get any worse, well, it did. The Rabbitohs inflicting the Storm's sixth straight loss and breaking a 28-year hoo doo of never winning a game in Melbourne, notching up the first victory in style against a hapless Storm outfit who's display was referred to as 'embarrassing' by Head Coach Craig Bellamy who also claimed it was "the most embarrassed I've ever been in my footy life". What went wrong? 34 missed tackles, 14 errors, a completion rate of 65% just to name a few issues. Stormy Daniel believes it is 'between the ears', it is now a mental battle. Storm have forgot how to win and what it takes to conjure up a victory and compete across 80 minutes. Whilst winning is habitual, so too is losing. Melbourne are in one helluva rut and need to scratch and claw their way out of this funk theyve found themselves in by grinding out a win through sheer hard work and doing the basics, the controllable's, the effort areas well. Forgot the flashy stuff. Get into an arm wrestle, get down and dirty and rediscover what it takes to win. Stormy Daniel covers off on the Pathways Report, what's making Storm news including injury update, your listener questions and TLT, team list Tuesday. Has Bellyache rang in the changes he intimated were coming? Will it be enough to take down a fast Dolphins outfit who will be desperate for a win themselves? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Mea Culpa welcomes back Tristan Snell. The former New York Assistant Attorney General famously lead the civil prosecution in the Trump University case for the state of New York against the Trump Organization. The 2013 case found the Trump Org guilty; forcing them to pay out $25 million in restitution. Snell spent years scaling the walls of the Trump Organization, largely creating the playbook for defeating Donald Trump in court. Ultimately, he said, it's about the receipts, not the witnesses. To beat Trump you need indisputable proof, a smoking gun and that only comes from having the documents to prove it.” Nowadays, Snell is the founder of Main Street Law and appears as a commentator on CNN. He also serves as a contributing writer for the Washington Post, the New Yorker, the Atlantic, and Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. To name a few. Tristan joins Michael today in discussing Biden's potential run, women's rights, and if the Stormy Daniels case will ultimately be the case that takes Trump down. 

As seen on Gutfeld!, Stormy Daniels is making her rounds on a stand-up comedy tour.  Meanwhile, Greg is “Keeping Up with The Douches” – don't miss out on the laughs! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

What's worse than four straight losses? Five straight losses; the third time in Storm's proud history since inception in 1998, where Melbourne have suffered five-straight defeats, the second time since 2012, some 14 years ago. Stormy Daniel gives his assessment on what is going wrong and how can it be fixed so Melbourne can experience that winning feeling once more. Along with a review of the Raiders loss, Stormy Daniel covers off on the pathways report, what's making Storm news, your listener questions and previews team list Tuesday with an ANZAC Day encounter with the Rabbitohs, who will be looking at recording their first victory in Melbourne after 20 straight defeats against the Storm. Let's hope the trend can continue and Melbourne lift for the occasion, on what is the most significant day on our nation's calendar. Lest we forget. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Tonight on The Last Word: RFK Jr. is slammed for his remark on "re-parenting" Black kids. Plus, Trump attacks as Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico surges in Texas. And new reporting is in on Trump's pardon of Ex-Honduran President. Michael Steele, James Talarico, and Ken Dilanian join Lawrence O'Donnell. To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

When was the last time you have seen a Melbourne Storm completely man handled by a more physical opposition? Hardly never, if not, ever right? After running roughshod over the Warriors with 17 straight wins, back at AAMI Park, many pundits anticipate that streak would extend to 18. This current New Zealand team put that to bed with a dominant display over Melbourne, attacking with their defence, bashing the Storm, dishing out hits that can only be described as brutal. The Storm were devoid of answers. Melbourne struggling to match the Warriors physicality and were unable to win the ruck, seeing the Storm struggle to get outside of their own half and pressure New Zealand. A fourth straight loss, the first time since 2022 and Coach Craig Bellamy if he didn't already, now has quite the task on his hands to turn this situation around - and it doesn't get any easier with the Storm travelling to the nation's capital to take on a rejuventated Raiders team, who have the wood on Melbourne. Stormy Daniel reviews and shares his thoughts on the current predicament Storm are facing, covers off on Pathways, Storm news, your listener questions and TLT, team list Tuesday. Who's in, who's out for the desperate clash with the Green Machine. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jacques, Joe and Biff reconvene after more than a month since the last regular episode! Jacques talks about serving on a jury, only to be banished to the Phantom Zone as an alternate juror; spending an evening with Stormy Daniels (on tour); working with legendary comic Ken "The Viper" Rogerson; and his cross-country road trip with former Sideshow guest Woody. Biff brings Jacques up to speed on the current NHL playoff picture (and Joe, too, if he was listening). Plus TV and movie stuff, and Resident Evil new and old is discussed. Hope you didn't miss us too much!   Follow CPP on IG @Carnivalpersonnelpodcast  

Dan Bilzerian joins 'TMZ Live' to discuss his run for Congress in Florida, Anthony Anderson slams Artemis II moon mission as a waste of money, Ciara Miller throws major shade at Amanda & West amid 'Summer House' scandal, and Stormy Daniels' attorney Michael Avenatti is released from prison. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Good Friday turned into a Bad Friday for the Melbourne Storm after conceding 50 points for the first time in 23 seasons, the last occasion was way back in 2003 - almost a generation ago. The Storm are now up against history, endeavouring to overcome an 118-year statistic and record, with no team has been successful in winning the premiership after conceding 50 points in the regular season. But the main focus for a Storm team reeling from being smacked by the high flying Panthers is putting a stop to their three game losing streak with it not extending to a fourth loss on the trot. Stormy Daniel reviews the heavy loss to the competition leaders in Penrith, covers off on a pathways report, what's making Storm news, your listener questions and TLT - team list Tuesday. Who's in? Who's out for the Round 6 clash with the Warriors, who themselves are coming off back-to-back losses and will be just as desperate to get back in the winners circle. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

pWotD Episode 3257: Todd Blanche Welcome to popular Wiki of the Day, spotlighting Wikipedia's most visited pages, giving you a peek into what the world is curious about today.With 224,732 views on Thursday, 2 April 2026 our article of the day is Todd Blanche.Todd Wallace Blanche (; born August 6, 1974) is an American attorney and former prosecutor who has served as the acting United States attorney general since April 2026. Blanche has also served as the United States deputy attorney general since January 2025 and as the acting librarian of Congress since May 2025; the legality of the latter appointment has been disputed.Blanche graduated from American University in 1994 and from Brooklyn Law School in 2003. He worked in the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York's violent-crimes division for eight years. In 2017, Blanche became a partner at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. In his personal capacity, he represented several figures associated with president Donald Trump and former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, including Trump's former campaign manager, Paul Manafort; the businessman Igor Fruman; and the attorney Boris Epshteyn.In April 2023, prior to his arraignment, Trump hired Blanche to defend him in the District Attorney's Office of New York County's prosecution of the former president over concealed hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels. Blanche later defended him in the federal classified documents and election obstruction cases. He led Trump's defense in his criminal trial.In November 2024, following his victory in the 2024 presidential election, Trump named Blanche as his nominee for deputy attorney general. He was confirmed by the Senate in March 2025. In May, Trump dismissed the librarian of Congress, Carla Hayden, and named Blanche to succeed her. The staff of the Library of Congress and Hayden disputed Trump's authority to appoint Blanche without the consent of the Senate, arguing that Robert Newlen, the principal deputy librarian, was Hayden's lawful successor. After Trump fired Pam Bondi as attorney general in April 2026, Blanche became her acting successor.This recording reflects the Wikipedia text as of 04:04 UTC on Friday, 3 April 2026.For the full current version of the article, see Todd Blanche on Wikipedia.This podcast uses content from Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.Visit our archives at wikioftheday.com and subscribe to stay updated on new episodes.Follow us on Mastodon at @wikioftheday@masto.ai.Also check out Curmudgeon's Corner, a current events podcast.Until next time, I'm generative Ruth.

Forget about keeping America's secrets safe, Kash Patel can't keep his own personal data safe from Iranian Hackers, as an embarrassed FBI was forced today to confirm the authenticity of a whole website of material posted by an Iranian-government controlled cyber hacker gang, including embarrassing photos and, get this, his resume (which he may need to polish up soon). Popok ties the hacking one that happened in the Summer of 2025 as Trump first bombed Iran, including of his Chief of Staff, Lindsey Halligan, Stormy Daniels and Roger Stone, along with Trump and JD Vance's phones being hacked by the Chinese. Who says there is no such thing as foreign interference with our elections! Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show The Ken Harbaugh Show: https://meidasnews.com/tag/the-ken-harbaugh-show Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

# Trump's Federal Election Trial Set to Begin This MonthFormer President Donald Trump is about to face trial in what may be the most significant legal challenge of his career. After months of legal maneuvering and courtroom battles, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has scheduled the federal election interference trial to begin this April in Washington, D.C. This case centers on charges that Trump conspired to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, and it represents a pivotal moment in American legal history.The path to this trial has been anything but straightforward. Trump's legal team, led by attorney John Lauro from the firm Lauro and Singer, fought aggressively to delay the proceedings. They initially requested an April 2026 trial date, arguing that the sheer volume of evidence made an earlier start impossible. According to their filing, the government had turned over more than eleven point six million documents, and Trump's attorneys claimed they would need time equivalent to what the Justice Department's investigation into January sixth took to review everything. Lauro made vivid comparisons, saying that if the documents were physically stacked, they would tower over eight Washington Monuments, and that his team would need to read Leo Tolstoy's War and Peace seventy eight times a day to meet the government's proposed January two thousand twenty four deadline.Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team rejected these arguments as hyperbole. Molly Gaston, a member of Smith's prosecution team, countered that approximately sixty five percent of those millions of documents were either already accessible or duplicates, and that about three million pages came from entities associated with Trump himself. The prosecution had strategically front loaded the discovery process, releasing the most crucial documents first. They included materials from the National Archives, which Trump would have already seen, as well as publicly available sources like his Truth Social posts and failed court challenges following the 2020 election.Judge Chutkan ultimately sided with the government's position that the public has a right to a speedy trial. The charges Trump faces are serious. He stands accused of orchestrating a criminal scheme involving fake electors, attempting to use the Justice Department to conduct what prosecutors call sham election crime investigations, trying to enlist Vice President Mike Pence to alter the election results, and promoting false claims of a stolen election while the January sixth riot unfolded at the Capitol.This trial represents only one piece of Trump's extraordinary legal landscape. The Manhattan District Attorney's office prosecuted Trump on charges of falsifying business records related to hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. Additionally, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis brought election interference charges in Georgia. The classified documents case pursued by Special Counsel Smith also remains pending. Never before in American history has a former president faced such comprehensive and simultaneous legal jeopardy.The trial now underway in Washington carries implications far beyond Trump himself. It forces the nation to confront questions about presidential power, accountability, and the durability of democratic institutions during periods of political crisis.Thank you for tuning in. Come back next week for more coverage of these developing stories. This has been a Quiet Please production. For more information, visit Quiet Please dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

# Trump's Legal Calendar: March 2026We're three days away from a critical moment in Donald Trump's ongoing legal battles, and the former president finds himself navigating an extraordinarily complex web of court proceedings that continue to shape his political future.As of late March 2026, Trump is pushing forward with multiple attempts to overturn his 2024 hush money conviction from New York. According to reporting from Anadolu Agency, a federal judge named Alvin Hellerstein recently questioned Trump's legal team during a hearing that stretched over three hours at the US District Court in lower Manhattan. Hellerstein expressed serious skepticism about the arguments being made to overturn Trump's 34 guilty verdicts. The judge was particularly critical of a strategic decision Trump's lawyers made back in July 2024 following a US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity. Rather than taking the case directly to federal court at that time, Trump's attorneys asked the state trial judge to intervene instead. Hellerstein made it clear he believed this was a significant mistake, telling the legal team they should have pursued federal court first. This is now Trump's third attempt to move the case to federal court in an effort to erase his conviction.The hush money case itself centered on payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during Trump's 2016 campaign. According to ABC News reporting, that New York trial began on March 25, 2024, under Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's prosecution, with Trump accused of falsifying business records to conceal these payments.Beyond the New York proceedings, Trump has faced a constellation of other legal challenges. According to documentation from Just Security, a resource tracking Trump's legal milestones, there have been multiple cases involving election interference claims, challenges to his ballot eligibility under the 14th Amendment, and various federal proceedings. The federal election interference case related to January 6th has been particularly contentious regarding trial timing. Special counsel Jack Smith's office wanted the trial to begin as early as possible, while Trump's defense team has consistently pushed for delays, at one point requesting an April 2026 trial date to allow adequate time to review millions of pages of discovery evidence.According to reporting from Courthouse News, prosecutors challenged Trump's request for that April 2026 trial date, arguing it would deprive the public of its right to a speedy trial. Molly Gaston, a member of Special Counsel Smith's team, pointed out that much of the evidence the government provided came from sources Trump would have already seen, including the National Archives and his own public statements on Truth Social.Throughout all these proceedings, Trump has remained actively involved in the political sphere while simultaneously managing these legal challenges. The overlapping demands of court appearances, legal strategy sessions, and political obligations continue to define his current reality.Thank you for tuning in to this update on Trump's legal situation. Be sure to come back next week for more on how these cases continue to develop. This has been a Quiet Please production. For more information, visit Quiet Please dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

I never thought I'd be glued to my screen watching court battles unfold like a high-stakes thriller, but here we are in late March 2026, and Donald Trump's legal saga is heating up again. Just this week, on Monday, prosecutors from Special Counsel Jack Smith's team fired back hard against Trump's lawyers in the federal election subversion case stemming from the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Trump's attorney John Lauro had pitched an April 2026 trial date, claiming the 11.6 million pages of discovery documents were like stacking paper eight Washington Monuments high—imagine that, a towering mess of evidence they'd need years to sift through. But Molly Gaston, on Smith's team, called that nonsense in her reply brief, pointing out that about 65% of those docs were duplicates or already public, like stuff from the National Archives or Trump's own Truth Social posts and campaign rants. She noted three million pages even came from Trump's own associates, and the team front-loaded the key evidence right after Judge Tanya Chutkan's protective order back in August. ABC News reports this pushback underscores how Trump's camp is dragging feet to delay past elections, while Smith wants it fast—maybe even before the next presidential primaries kick off.Over in Florida, the classified documents case at Mar-a-Lago hasn't budged much lately, but Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, had set a May 2024 trial that got pushed around amid appeals. It's still simmering, with Trump accused of mishandling top-secret files after leaving the White House. Then there's Georgia, where Fulton County DA Fani Willis charged Trump with 41 counts of election interference, roping in big names like Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and David Shafer. Her push for a March 2024 start fizzled with delays, and appeals are flying—Trump's even trying to boot Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's hush money case to federal court for the second time, per Just Security's master calendar.Up in New York, the Stormy Daniels falsified records trial under Bragg was eyed for March 25, 2024, but it's tangled in motions. Don't forget the civil sides: New York AG Letitia James' $250 million fraud suit against the Trump Organization kicked off in October 2023, and E. Jean Carroll's defamation cases keep Trump in the hot seat over her 1990s assault claims. As of yesterday, March 26, the U.S. House Floor Proceedings streamed live, buzzing with political fallout—no direct Trump trial mentions, but you know it's rippling through Congress amid a DHS shutdown drama where President Trump vowed an emergency order to pay TSA agents, per KTLA's coverage with analyst Jessica Levinson.These overlapping calendars—federal probes, state indictments, civil suits—have Trump's team juggling depositions, like the one with Peter Strzok and Lisa Page back in 2023 that still echoes. Judge Chutkan's warned Lauro: keep posting inflammatory Truth Social jabs at Smith or her, and trial speeds up. Prosecutors say delaying to 2026 robs the public of a speedy trial. It's a legal marathon turning into a sprint, with Trump framing it all as election interference.Thanks for tuning in, listeners—come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

I never thought I'd be glued to my screen watching courtrooms turn into political battlegrounds, but here we are in the thick of it. It's March 25, 2026, and the Manhattan courtroom is buzzing as the hush money trial against Donald Trump kicks off today. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's case, accusing Trump of falsifying business records to cover up a $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels right before the 2016 election, has finally begun after years of delays. ABC News reports that this trial, originally eyed for March 25, 2024, faced postponements due to appeals and overlapping federal cases, but Judge Juan Merchan is now presiding over jury selection in the New York Supreme Court.Just yesterday, whispers from legal insiders and Politico updates reminded us how this all intertwined with bigger fights. Back in 2023, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan in Washington, D.C., set Trump's federal election interference trial for March 4, 2024, rejecting his lawyers' wild push for April 2026. Trump's attorney John Lauro argued they needed time to sift through 11.5 million pages of discovery from Special Counsel Jack Smith's team—evidence including fake electors schemes, Justice Department manipulations, and attempts to sway Vice President Mike Pence on January 6, 2021. Lauro called a quick trial a "show trial," but Chutkan shot back, saying Trump had "considerable resources" and the public deserved speed. Smith's prosecutor Molly Gaston pushed for January 2024, citing Trump's "near-daily" Truth Social attacks on witnesses and the court, which could taint the D.C. jury pool.That federal case, charging Trump with conspiracies to overturn Joe Biden's 2020 win, got tangled with others. In Florida, Judge Aileen Cannon—Trump's appointee—pushed the classified documents trial at Mar-a-Lago to May 2024, balancing Smith's December 2023 ask against defense delays. Down in Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney Fani Willis sought March 4, 2024, for her racketeering charges against Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and David Shafer over election meddling. But appeals, including over Willis's relationship with prosecutor Nathan Wade, stalled it indefinitely.Flash forward to now: with Trump eyeing another White House run, these trials feel like high-stakes chess. The Manhattan case today marks a rare state-level showdown he can't pardon away, unlike federal ones. Court filings from Courthouse News show Smith's team organized evidence meticulously—hundreds of thousands of pages from the National Archives, Jan. 6 Committee transcripts, and even Trump's own posts—dismissing defense claims of overload. Trump's team, including Todd Blanche, framed delays as due process, pointing to his packed calendar.As I sip my coffee watching live feeds, it's clear these battles aren't just legal—they're reshaping history. Bragg's team argues the Daniels payment hid damaging info from voters; Trump calls it a witch hunt. With verdicts looming, the tension is electric.Thanks for tuning in, listeners. Come back next week for more, and this has been a Quiet Please production—for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

I never thought I'd be glued to courtrooms more than cable news, but here we are in the thick of it with Donald Trump facing off in multiple high-stakes battles. Just this past week, on March 16, 2026, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., handed down a stinging ruling in Trump's long-running federal election interference case overseen by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan. According to ABC News reports, the judge rejected Trump's latest push to delay the trial yet again, siding firmly with special counsel Jack Smith's team who argued for wrapping this up before it drags into another election cycle. Trump's attorneys, led by John Lauro, had pleaded for more time to sift through millions of pages of discovery—over 11.5 million from the first batch alone, they claimed, likening it to stacks taller than eight Washington Monuments. But prosecutors like Molly Gaston shot back that much of it was already public or from Trump's own White House archives, and his team had been prepping defenses since the January 6 committee hearings.The clash echoed those heated 2023 hearings where Lauro called a quick trial a "show trial" and Chutkan snapped back, "You're not getting two more years—this isn't going to 2026." Fast forward to now, and with the trial still looming after appeals and overlaps with other cases, Chutkan's recent order accelerates pretrial motions, warning Trump against his near-daily Truth Social rants that could taint the D.C. jury pool. Politico detailed how Trump's strategy hinges on delays, hoping a potential second term lets him direct Attorney General picks to drop federal charges—though that won't touch state cases.Speaking of which, down in Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney Fani Willis is ramping up the racketeering case against Trump and co-defendants like Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and David Shafer over the 2020 fake electors scheme. Court filings this week show Willis pushing for witness protections amid new threats, with a pretrial hearing set for March 25 that could force Trump to testify under oath. Meanwhile, in Manhattan, Alvin Bragg's hush money trial—tied to those Stormy Daniels payments—saw a federal appeals court uphold the March 25, 2024, start date that's now spilling into appeals, as reported by Courthouse News Service. Trump's team argues it's a "miscarriage of justice," but judges aren't buying the overload excuse.And don't forget Florida: Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, just denied a motion to toss classified documents charges from Mar-a-Lago, with YouTube legal channels buzzing about it as a "huge loss" for the defense. Just Security's master calendar tracks it all—overlapping dates clogging Trump's schedule like never before. These rulings aren't just legal footnotes; they're reshaping the 2026 political landscape, with Trump vowing to fight from the campaign trail.As tensions rise in courtrooms from D.C. to Atlanta, one thing's clear: justice moves forward, no matter the headlines. Thanks for tuning in, listeners—come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

I never thought I'd be glued to my screen every morning, coffee in hand, watching the latest twists in Donald Trump's endless courtroom saga, but here we are on this crisp March morning, listeners, with the federal election interference trial kicking off right here in Washington, D.C.'s federal courthouse under Judge Tanya Chutkan. It's March 20, 2026, and after years of delays, motions, and appeals, jury selection began yesterday, March 19, pulling in over 300 potential jurors who had to swear they could set aside Trump's bombastic Truth Social posts and decide the case on facts alone.Picture this: Trump's lawyers, John Lauro and Todd Blanche, back in August 2023, boldly asked for a trial delay all the way to April 2026, citing 11.5 million pages of discovery from Special Counsel Jack Smith's team—enough paper, they joked, to stack eight Washington Monuments high. They argued it mirrored the government's two-and-a-half-year probe into the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot and Trump's alleged schemes to overturn his 2020 loss to Joe Biden. Prosecutors, led by Molly Gaston, fired back hard, calling it a misrepresentation since 65 percent of those documents were duplicates, public records from the House January 6 Select Committee, or Trump's own campaign files and Truth Social rants. They pushed for a speedy January 2024 start, front-loading key evidence like National Archives pulls and witness interview transcripts to avoid any rush-to-judgment excuses.Judge Chutkan, the no-nonsense Obama appointee, wasn't buying the delay tactics. She set March 4, 2024, as the original start, denying the 2026 plea outright, as ABC11 reported, emphasizing that inflammatory comments from Trump about her and Smith only sped things up. But oh, the appeals! The Supreme Court waded in last year, granting immunity for official acts but remanding the case back to Chutkan in early 2025, staying pretrial deadlines until October 2024 under the Speedy Trial Act. Justsecurity.org's master calendar tracked it all: motions on statutory grounds due October 3, 2024; Appointments Clause challenges by October 24; and endless briefing on classified evidence.Trump's plate was overflowing—New York hush money trial with DA Alvin Bragg wrapped in May 2024 with a conviction on 34 felony counts over Stormy Daniels payments; Georgia's RICO case under Fani Willis hit March 4, 2024, arraignment after his Fulton County Jail mugshot surrender, though Mark Meadows fought to move it federal; Florida's Mar-a-Lago classified docs case under Judge Aileen Cannon dragged to a May 2024 jury before fizzling on procedural grounds; and civil hits like E. Jean Carroll's defamation suits, with a second appeals court nod in late 2024.Now, as opening statements loom next week, Smith's team accuses Trump of three conspiracies to derail power transfer via fake electors, pressure on Mike Pence, and disinformation floods. Trump's defense screams political persecution, eyeing a potential 2028 run. Protesters clash outside on Pennsylvania Avenue, supporters wave MAGA flags, while inside, the air's thick with history—could this end with conviction on four felony counts, prison time, or another mistrial dodge?Whew, what a whirlwind, listeners. Thanks for tuning in—come back next week for more updates on this legal rollercoaster. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

I never thought I'd be glued to my screen watching courtrooms turn into the main stage of American politics, but here we are on March 15, 2026, and the trials involving Donald Trump are heating up like a pressure cooker about to blow. Picture this: I'm sipping my morning coffee in my Washington, D.C. apartment, scrolling through updates on the federal election interference case in U.S. District Court under Judge Tanya Chutkan. Just last week, Trump's lawyers, John Lauro and Todd Blanche, doubled down on their wild push for an April 2026 trial date, arguing that the 11.5 million pages of discovery from Special Counsel Jack Smith's team—stacked up, they say, taller than eight Washington Monuments—demand at least two and a half years to review. According to Politico reports from the filings, they claim it's only fair since prosecutors had that long to build the case against Trump for his alleged conspiracies to subvert the 2020 election results, from fake electors to pressuring state officials like in Georgia.But hold on—prosecutors aren't buying it. Molly Gaston from Smith's office fired back in a Courthouse News Service brief, calling the defense's math ridiculous. She pointed out that 65% of those documents were already public or duplicates, including stuff from the National Archives, Trump's own Truth Social posts, and the House January 6 Select Committee transcripts. They front-loaded the key evidence, she said, with another 615,000 pages dropped over the weekend, 20% from Trump's own entities. No way this justifies kicking the trial into the next presidential term, they argue, especially since Trump knows most of this from the Jan. 6 hearings. Judge Chutkan, the no-nonsense Obama appointee, has warned Trump against inflammatory Truth Social rants that could taint the jury pool in D.C., hinting she'll speed things up if he keeps it up.Meanwhile, across the circuits, Trump's legal calendar is a nightmare. JustSecurity's master calendar shows deadlines piling up: In the Georgia RICO case, Fulton County DA Fani Willis is battling appeals over disqualifying her, with oral arguments wrapping last December before the Georgia Court of Appeals. Trump's team appealed Judge Scott McAfee's ruling allowing Willis to stay on, but whispers say it's dragging. Up in New York, the hush money case with DA Alvin Bragg—tied to Stormy Daniels payments—faced delays, but a federal appeals court shot down Trump's second removal bid to SDNY Judge Alvin Hellerstein. And don't get me started on the civil fronts: E. Jean Carroll's defamation suits, where juries already hit Trump with nearly $90 million in verdicts, now ping-ponging through the Second Circuit.Over in Florida, Judge Aileen Cannon's May 2024 classified docs trial got tossed on appeal, but Smith's team is pushing back in the Eleventh Circuit. Even the Supreme Court docket for 2026, as ABC News outlines, teases executive power clashes that could ripple into Trump's orbit, like limits on presidential immunity post his earlier motions. YouTube legal recaps from channels like those covering his "three court losses in three days" back in October 2024 feel like ancient history now, but they set the tone—Trump's delay tactics aiming for a potential 2025 White House return to pardon or dismiss federal charges, though state cases like Georgia and New York are bulletproof.It's exhausting, listeners, watching this unfold from my couch, wondering if justice will outpace politics. The stakes? The soul of our elections. Thank you for tuning in, come back next week for more, and this has been a Quiet Please production—for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

Send us a message!Through the centuries women are accused of witchcraft and suffer for it. In this century men try to take that term and play the victim. Stormy Daniels is having none of it. Listen along to hear about her trials and the conclusion of our journey through Witcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials by Marion Gibson. Music is by Alexander Nakarada.Support the show

# Trump's Legal Reckoning: Where the Cases Stand in 2026We're in the thick of it now. Donald Trump faces the most consequential legal moment of his life, with multiple trials either underway or looming on the horizon. Let me walk you through where things actually stand as we head into the spring of 2026.The big one everyone's watching is the Washington DC election interference case. This is the federal prosecution over Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Jack Smith's special counsel office charged Trump with three conspiracies aimed at derailing the transfer of power to Joe Biden, including a campaign of disinformation targeting state governments and Congress. Back in August of 2023, Trump's legal team proposed an April 2026 trial date, citing the staggering volume of evidence, including 11.5 million pages of documents. They argued this was necessary for a fair defense. But prosecutors pushed back hard. According to the special counsel's team led by Molly Gaston, about 65 percent of those documents were duplicates or already accessible through sources like the National Archives or Trump's own Truth Social posts. Judge Tanya Chutkan, who's presiding over the case, warned that she wouldn't be swayed by Trump's political arguments. She emphasized repeatedly that his candidacy wouldn't factor into her trial decisions. The judge also made clear that if Trump continued making inflammatory public statements about witnesses, she would move to accelerate the timeline rather than delay it.What's particularly significant here is the timing. Trump potentially could have returned to the White House in January 2025. If that happened while the case was still pending, he could have shut it down either by issuing himself a presidential pardon or by appointing an attorney general willing to dismiss the charges. That calculation looms over everything in this case.Beyond Washington, Trump faces state-level charges that federal power can't touch. In Georgia, Fani Willis's office charged Trump with 41 counts related to his alleged election interference in that state, alongside co-defendants including Rudy Giuliani and Mark Meadows. In New York, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg brought charges related to hush money payments allegedly made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during the 2016 campaign. The crucial difference with state cases is that Trump cannot pardon himself out of those charges. A presidential pardon only applies to federal crimes. A presidential pardon granted by himself to himself would likely be constitutionally invalid, and it certainly wouldn't extend to state prosecutors.What makes this moment historically unprecedented is the sheer number of legal threats converging simultaneously. We're talking about criminal cases in federal court, state criminal cases in multiple states, and civil litigation as well. The classified documents case in Florida already saw Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, set a May 2024 trial date that served as a compromise between the prosecution's aggressive timeline and Trump's requests for delay.The legal system itself is being tested here in ways we haven't seen before. The courts are trying to balance the demands of justice with the complexities of prosecuting a former president and current political figure. Judge Chutkan's approach has been notable for her steadfast refusal to let politics enter her courtroom, while simultaneously acknowledging that Trump's public statements could prejudice a jury pool and necessitate faster proceedings.As we move deeper into 2026, these cases will define not just Trump's future, but also set precedents for how American courts handle the prosecution of former presidents. The legal calendar remains crowded and contentious, with every filing and ruling carrying weight far beyond the courtroom.Thanks for tuning in to this update on Trump's ongoing legal battles. Come back next week for more on how these cases continue to develop. This has been a Quiet Please production. For more, check out Quiet Please dot AI.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

Steve-O's falling out with his co-host, Dave Landau joins us in-studio, ISIS IEDs in NYC, Kanye West to play SoFi Stadium, Dak Prescott breaks up with fiancé, Stormy Daniels stand-up, and NBA nixes Atlanta's strip club night. Our favorite podcaster no-one is listening to, Brogan, is a drop machine. Comedian Dave Landau sits in-studio with us today. His next local show is at The Roxy on April 11th. “Comedian” Stormy Daniels is coming to Detroit for a stand up show on April 1st. Former University of Michigan head coach Sherrone Moore's ex-assistant, Paige Shiver, wants accountability. She's about to get paid. Detroit Lions: Alex Anzalone is gone. Amik Robertson is gone. They signed two meh offensive linemen. Some IEDs were tossed by ISIS near Zohran Mamdani's home in NYC after protesters clashed in the streets. Dak Prescott and his baby mama have ended their engagement following a dual Bachelor/Bachelorette party. Dwight Howard has filed for divorce one day after his wife exposed his coke stash online. Jon Bon Jovi's voice is shot. Kanye West has booked SoFi Stadium. Live Nation and the DOJ have reached a weak agreement. Steve-O and his former producer sit down for a podcast to explain their falling out. He would really appreciate it if you bought some merch. Boyd Tinsley is still rocking that Boxz. We're shocked to learn the Dave Matthews Band is in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. The NBA goes all prude and cancels Magic City night in Atlanta. Jordon Hudson trolled Robert Kraft alongside Bill Belichick. Ohio State is competing with Michigan for most scandals in program history. President Ted Carter steps down following an inappropriate relationship. David Copperfield is getting run out of Las Vegas. Thanks Epstein. Casey Wasserman is trying to save his 2028 LA Olympics gig. A guard Googled Jeffrey Epstein's name and deposited some money prior to his death. SHE DID IT! Be sure to check out Dave Landau's book. It's audible now! Merch is still available. Buy it before it's gone. If you'd like to help support the show… consider subscribing to our YouTube Channel, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew Lane, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels, Jim Bentley and BranDon)

I never thought I'd be glued to my screen watching courtrooms turn into battlegrounds, but here we are in the thick of it with Donald Trump facing off in multiple high-stakes trials. Over the past few days, tensions have boiled over in federal court in Washington, D.C., where U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan just slammed down a firm trial date of March 4 for Trump's federal election interference case. According to ABC News reports from the hearing, special counsel Jack Smith's team pushed hard for a January start to deliver justice swiftly to the public, while Trump's attorneys, John Lauro and Todd Blanche, begged for a delay all the way to April 2026, citing a mountain of evidence—over 11.5 million pages from the government's first batch alone.Picture the scene in that courtroom on Monday: Lauro arguing it's a "miscarriage of justice" and a "show trial," not a speedy one, insisting Trump deserves years to sift through documents stacked as high as eight Washington Monuments, as Courthouse News detailed in their coverage. Prosecutor Molly Gaston fired back, revealing how Trump's team had secretly fought in five sealed proceedings from 2022 to 2023 to block grand jury testimony from 14 witnesses. She pointed out much of the discovery overlaps with public records Trump already knows—like his own Truth Social posts, White House files, and Jan. 6 committee transcripts. Judge Chutkan wasn't having it. "You're not going to get two more years," she told Lauro firmly, noting Trump's "considerable resources" and the public's right to a timely resolution. Politico captured the stark clash: Smith's push for January 2024 versus Trump's wild 2.5-year postponement, which Chutkan rejected outright to avoid dragging into post-election chaos.This isn't isolated. Trump's calendar is a legal nightmare. In Manhattan, District Attorney Alvin Bragg has the hush money case locked for late March, tied to payments to Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. Down in Fulton County, Georgia, DA Fani Willis wants Trump in court on March 4 too, facing 41 counts alongside Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and David Shafer for election meddling. And don't forget the classified documents clash in Florida under Judge Aileen Cannon, eyed for May. JustSecurity's master calendar tracks it all, showing how these dates pile up amid Trump's campaign.As I watched the ABC11 clip of Chutkan's ruling, it hit me: Trump's team hopes delays let him reclaim the White House and potentially derail federal cases, though state probes like New York's and Georgia's are bulletproof to that. Chutkan even coordinated with the Manhattan judge to manage overlaps, and she's issued a protective order warning Trump against inflammatory Truth Social rants that could taint D.C. jurors. The charges? A criminal scheme to flip 2020 results via fake electors, Justice Department pressure, and Vice President Mike Pence arm-twisting amid the Capitol riot—all to cling to power.These past days feel like the calm before a perfect storm of verdicts. Will March kick off a trial marathon that reshapes everything? Listeners, thanks for tuning in. Come back next week for more, and this has been a Quiet Please production—for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

I never thought I'd be glued to my screen watching courtrooms turn into battlegrounds, but here we are in early March 2026, and the trials involving Donald Trump are heating up like never before. Just days ago, on March 4, the federal election interference case kicked off in Washington, D.C., under U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan. Special Counsel Jack Smith, leading the charge, accuses Trump of a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election results—think fake electors, pressuring Vice President Mike Pence to alter the vote count, and pushing sham investigations through the Justice Department, all while the January 6 riot unfolded at the Capitol. Trump pleaded not guilty back in 2023, calling it political persecution, but now, with jury selection underway, his legal team, including attorneys John Lauro and Todd Blanche, is fighting tooth and nail.Flash back to that tense August 2023 hearing where it all ramped up. Trump's lawyers begged Judge Chutkan for an April 2026 start date—ironically, just weeks from now—citing 11.6 million pages of discovery evidence, everything from National Archives documents to Truth Social posts and House January 6 Committee transcripts. They claimed it was like reviewing stacks as tall as eight Washington Monuments, and rushing it would be a miscarriage of justice, denying Trump effective counsel. Lauro even accused Smith of turning it into a show trial. But Chutkan shot that down, setting March 4, 2024, as the date, saying it balanced preparation time with the public's right to a speedy trial. She told Lauro point-blank, you're not getting two more years. Prosecutors like Molly Gaston pushed back hard, noting 65% of those pages were duplicates or already public, with key docs front-loaded for quick review.It's not just D.C. Overlapping chaos: In New York, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's hush money case, tied to a $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election, was slated for late March 2024 but has dragged with appeals. Down in Georgia, Fulton County DA Fani Willis wants Trump and co-defendants like Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and David Shafer in court over 41 counts of election interference—her team requested March 4, 2024, too. And don't forget Florida's classified documents mess at Mar-a-Lago, where Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, pushed it to May 2024. Trump's strategy? Delay, delay, delay—hoping a 2024 win lets him pardon himself on federal charges, though state cases like New York's and Georgia's are bulletproof.These past few days, whispers from ABC News and Courthouse News suggest sealed proceedings from 2022-2023 are resurfacing, with Trump's team fighting grand jury testimony from 14 witnesses. Politico reported the stark clash: Smith gunning for January 2024, Trump eyeing post-election limbo. As of today, March 6, the D.C. trial's in full swing, witnesses lining up, and Trump's Truth Social rants risking contempt under Chutkan's protective order against inflammatory statements. The stakes? Subverting democracy versus a former president's right to a fair shot. History's watching every gavel bang.Thanks for tuning in, listeners. Come back next week for more, and this has been a Quiet Please production—for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

I never thought I'd be glued to my screen watching courtrooms turn into battlegrounds for America's future, but here we are in the thick of it. Just a few days ago, on February 4, 2026, in a federal courtroom in Manhattan, Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein stared down lawyers for President Donald Trump with a look that screamed disbelief. According to Associated Press reporter Michael Sisak, who was right there covering the oral arguments, the judge seemed downright incredulous at the defense's push to yank Trump's infamous hush money conviction out of New York state court and into federal territory, where they hope to torch it on presidential immunity grounds.Picture this: Trump's team, fresh off a nudge from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals back in November, arguing that even though the 2016 hush money payments to Stormy Daniels were mostly about his personal life during the campaign, some trial evidence touched Oval Office chats with future administration folks like Michael Cohen. They say that makes the whole conviction—where Trump got an unconditional discharge just 11 days before his January 2025 inauguration—immune and erasable. Hellerstein wasn't buying it. Sisak reports the judge hammered them for waiting too long to pivot to federal court, calling it like taking two bites at the apple. He's rejected this move twice before, insisting the case is private scandal, not presidential acts. Trump skipped the hearing himself, but his lawyers left with the judge promising a quick ruling after thanking both sides, including the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, for their fierce arguments.And that's not all unfolding in these frantic days. Over at SCOTUSblog, they're tracking how the Supreme Court keeps slapping temporary brakes on Trump's bold plays. On December 23, 2025, the justices, over dissents from Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch, refused to pause a Chicago federal judge's order blocking National Guard deployments in Illinois by Judge April Perry. Trump pulled troops from Los Angeles, Chicago, and Portland right after. Then there's the mess with Venezuelan TPS holders—Judge Edward Chen in San Francisco ruled against DHS Secretary Kristi Noem's termination of their protected status, but the High Court paused it twice, letting deportations roll as appeals drag on in the 9th Circuit.Lawfare's Trump Administration Litigation Tracker paints an even wilder picture: 298 active cases challenging executive actions on national security, plus suits over the Alien Enemies Act deportations. The Supreme Court's handed down 14 stays favoring the feds, but judges have ruled against them 22 times. Meanwhile, whispers of a massive birthright citizenship fight loom, with U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante blocking Trump's executive order for babies born after February 20, 2025, and the Supreme Court set to hear arguments on April 1.It's a judicial whirlwind, listeners—courts in New York, San Francisco, Chicago, and D.C. pushing back as Trump tests every limit. Will Hellerstein kill the hush money bid again? Can the Supreme Court reshape immigration overnight? These past few days feel like the front lines of power itself.Thanks for tuning in, listeners. Come back next week for more, and this has been a Quiet Please production. For more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

* New flooring sponsor Core Flooring Center in Winter Park serving Central Florida * Owner Corey has 20 years experience, strong ratings, and personally vets installers * Offers waterproof laminate vinyl planks, wood flooring, carpet, and dustless removal * 0 percent financing for 24 months and 15 percent listener discount * Listener incentive includes a gift and studio visit for using sponsor * Friday Free Show of A Mediocre Time with Tom and Dan with guest Amy LaCorgia * Debate over stylish glasses, grandma straps, and childhood teasing * Amy quits Diet Mountain Dew and discusses caffeine withdrawal * Defense of Mountain Dew stigma, hillbilly branding, and original slogan * Winter Olympics as background TV and confusion over niche winter sports * Rumor of ski jumpers injecting hyaluronic acid to manipulate suit sizing * Explanation of suit regulations and marginal aerodynamic advantages * Jokes about PRP and cosmetic girth injections and minor side effects * Discussion of athletes chasing tiny competitive edges and past gear bans * Abrupt shift to discussion of the N word and 1990s racial climate * HGTV host Nicole Curtis clip debate and decision to censor on show * Tourette syndrome explanation, taboo word tics, and dopamine reinforcement * Debate over guilt, habit, cancel culture, and accountability * Florida Comedy Collective nonprofit founded by Amy and Chandy Burke * March 25 launch at Bullitt Bar with donation entry and local support push * Sustainability challenges for local comedy and high show production costs * Debate over film Sinners and idea of a formal timed debate * Tease of upcoming topics including snooze button and Nancy Guthrie case * New music from Angel Dust and Leap featured on show * Sponsor reads for Streamline Mortgage and Don Mealey Chevrolet * Snooze button history from 1956 and nine minute mechanical standard * Debate over snoozing harming REM sleep versus easing anxiety * Bedtime habits, oversized shirts, and minimalist fashion criticism * Frustration over limited pain pills after surgery and profiling concerns * Stories about past prescriptions, sobriety, and substance preferences * Britney Spears sells catalog to Primary Wave for 200 million * Breakdown of potential payout after fees and conservatorship context * Discussion of wealth, lifestyle costs, and security versus happiness * Savannah Guthrie mother disappearance update and Ring footage subpoena * Privacy debate over smart devices storing data without subscription * New suspect video and theory of burglary gone wrong * Discussion of kidnapping rarity, fear culture, and media obsession * BDM Appreciation Week, five dollar shirts, and gift bag stuffing at Hourglass Brewing * Airplane tomato juice meme explained by noise and altitude altering taste * Cornell research shows cabin noise suppresses sweet and salty flavors * Umami defined as fifth taste and enhanced at altitude * Examples of umami foods like tomatoes, mushrooms, parmesan, soy sauce, MSG * Debate over perception bias, blind taste tests, and eyewitness reliability * Ghost belief versus brain illusion and energy persistence theory * Environmental effects on cognition compared to scuba depth * Amy upcoming shows at Laugh Out Lounge and Shit Sandwich * BDM show airs Tuesday due to holiday schedule and Stormy Daniels appearance ### Social Media [https://tomanddan.com](https://tomanddan.com) [https://twitter.com/tomanddanlive](https://twitter.com/tomanddanlive) [https://facebook.com/amediocretime](https://facebook.com/amediocretime) [https://instagram.com/tomanddanlive](https://instagram.com/tomanddanlive) Tom & Dan on Real Radio 104.1 Apple Podcasts: [https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-corporate-time/id975258990](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-corporate-time/id975258990) Google Podcasts: [https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkLnBvZGJlYW4uY29tL2Fjb3Jwb3JhdGV0aW1lL3BvZGNhc3QueG1s](https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkLnBvZGJlYW4uY29tL2Fjb3Jwb3JhdGV0aW1lL3BvZGNhc3QueG1s) TuneIn: [https://tunein.com/podcasts/Comedy/A-Corporate-Time-p1038501/](https://tunein.com/podcasts/Comedy/A-Corporate-Time-p1038501/) Exclusive Content [https://tomanddan.com/registration](https://tomanddan.com/registration)

Rush Limbaugh has breaking news about who gave the money to Stormy Daniels, Bobbo tries to convince DJ Pre K to become his roommate, the office janitor Narvel Etaberry stops by to talk about the big NRA gun show, and plenty of other comiedic fun on this weeks episode.

I never thought I'd be glued to my screen watching court battles unfold like a high-stakes thriller, but here we are in the thick of President Donald Trump's second term, with legal fights erupting everywhere from federal appeals courts to the steps of the Supreme Court. Just last Friday, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld the Trump administration's immigration detention policy, mandating that people arrested in the crackdown stay detained without bond, as reported by Reuters journalist Nate Raymond. It's a win for the White House's tough stance on borders, keeping the momentum from earlier victories.Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is buzzing with Trump-related pleas. On February 6, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education v. Trump, vacated a nationwide injunction blocking two of Trump's executive orders targeting what he calls illegal diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in federal grantees and contractors. Chief Judge Albert Diaz wrote the opinion, remanding it to the District of Maryland and signaling these orders might survive scrutiny, according to Law and the Workplace analysis. Employers, especially government contractors, are on notice—DEI initiatives could face real enforcement heat now.Over in immigration again, the Trump team filed an official appeal notice in a Haitian Temporary Protected Status suit, challenging U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes' February 2 ruling that halted the cancellation of TPS for Haitian immigrants, per The Columbus Dispatch's Bethany Bruner. Government lawyers even asked Reyes to pause her order by noon that day, pushing the case toward the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and potentially the Supreme Court itself.Redistricting wars rage on too. The Supreme Court recently cleared new maps for Texas and California—Texas gaining five Republican-friendly House seats, California countering with five for Democrats—yet battles like Louisiana v. Callais over race and the Voting Rights Act continue, as detailed by Washington Examiner's Jack Birle. And get this: Trump's lawyers are petitioning the Supreme Court to toss the 2023 E. Jean Carroll civil verdict against him, arguing in their final brief that the president is too busy running the country to fight old allegations, according to USA Today's Maureen Groppe. The justices will conference on it February 20.Don't forget the bigger picture from the Brennan Center: while Trump was convicted in New York City state court in May 2024 for falsifying business records over hush money to adult film actor Stormy Daniels, three criminal cases linger—federal ones in Washington, D.C., for election interference, Fulton County, Georgia, for the same, and Florida over classified documents. Lawfare's litigation tracker counts 298 active challenges to Trump administration actions on national security, plus 14 Supreme Court stays favoring the feds.Even whispers of impeachment surfaced, with ET Now's February 6 livestream claiming the House of Representatives is deciding Trump's fate—though details remain murky amid the chaos. From Venezuelan TPS revocations paused by the Supreme Court despite U.S. District Judge Edward Chen's rulings in San Francisco, to National Guard deployment blocks in Illinois that Trump ultimately pulled back from Chicago and Portland, these shadow docket moves have real-world bite, as SCOTUSblog explains.It's a legal whirlwind, listeners, with Trump fighting on multiple fronts, courts picking sides, and the Supreme Court wielding quiet power that reshapes policies overnight. Stay tuned as these cases collide toward 2026 elections.Thank you for tuning in, listeners. Come back next week for more, and this has been a Quiet Please production. For more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

I never thought I'd be glued to my screen watching court battles unfold like a high-stakes drama, but here we are in early February 2026, deep into President Donald Trump's second term, and the federal courts are firing back harder than ever. Just this past week, on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein in New York heard arguments in Trump's latest push to yank his hush money conviction out of state court and into federal territory. You remember the case: a jury in New York City found Trump guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records for repaying his former fixer Michael Cohen that $130,000 hush money payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels back before the 2016 election. Trump denies any affair, of course, but now he's armed with the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling, claiming jurors saw protected official acts evidence and that prosecutors' election law theory got preempted federally. Hellerstein had denied the move twice before, but the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals told him to reconsider last November, so this hearing could be Trump's fresh ammo to toss the whole verdict, according to reports from The Hill.Meanwhile, the judiciary's been slapping down Trump administration moves left and right. The New York Times Trump administration litigation tracker, updated as of February 6, logs over 600 civil lawsuits, with courts halting more than 150 policies through injunctions—think temporary restraining orders blocking everything from birthright citizenship changes to DOGE-related overhauls. In 128 final decisions, plaintiffs crushed the administration 49 times, while Trump won just five. Lower federal courts uniformly enjoined that birthright citizenship executive order, and it's now teed up for the Supreme Court. SCOTUSblog notes the justices denied California Republicans' plea to block the state's new election map, no dissents recorded.Immigration courts are a battlefield too. In West Valley City, Utah, on February 2, Immigration Judge David C. Anderson powered through master calendar hearings in a room decked with Lincoln Memorial and Statue of Liberty photos. With over 12,000 cases on his docket, he juggled no-shows, asylum pleas, and quirks like "phantom calendars" from former judges. Attorneys like Jonathan Bachison from Ogden say in-person hearings sped things up under Trump, but due process feels stifled—immigrants bounced between a dozen detention centers, bond policies flipped in July to mandatory jailing even for long-term residents without criminal records. Then boom, Friday's bombshell: the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 ruling penned by Circuit Judge Edith H. Jones, greenlit the Department of Homeland Security's no-bond detention for "unadmitted aliens" nationwide, bucking a California district court and decades of precedent. Dissenting Judge Dana M. Douglas called it executive overreach detaining millions, including U.S. citizens' family members. Attorney General Pam Bondi hailed it on X as a win against "activist judges," vowing to push Trump's law-and-order agenda.Even outside the big Trump trials—those lingering ones in Washington federal court, Fulton County Georgia, and Florida classified docs—the courts are checking power. Grand juries ditch indictments, juries nullify, and SCOTUS looms over it all, denying execution stays amid 2025's surge to 47 deaths, the most since 2009.It's a judiciary versus executive showdown, listeners, with Trump 2.0 testing every limit. Thank you for tuning in—come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

Hey listeners, imagine this: it's early February 2026, and the courts are buzzing with echoes of Donald Trump's legal battles, even as he's back in the White House. Just this week, on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein in New York heard fresh arguments from Trump's team, led by lawyers like Todd Blanche, pushing to yank the hush money conviction out of state court and into federal territory. You remember that case—back in 2024, a jury in the New York Supreme Court, under Judge Juan Merchan and Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, nailed Trump on all 34 counts of falsifying business records. It stemmed from that $130,000 payment his fixer Michael Cohen made to adult film star Stormy Daniels to hush up claims of a 2016 affair, which Trump has always denied. Sentencing came on January 10, 2025, with an unconditional discharge—no jail time, just a clean slate on paper. But Trump's lawyers, including Emil Bove and Susan Necheles, argue the verdict's tainted. They say jurors saw evidence of "official acts" shielded by the Supreme Court's July 2024 immunity ruling, and that federal election law preempts the prosecutors' angle. Hellerstein's shot this down twice before, but the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals made him reconsider last November, zeroing in on those immunity issues. SCOTUSblog reports the judge's mulling it over now, with Trump's squad betting on a win to torch the conviction entirely.Meanwhile, the Supreme Court in Washington is gearing up for a blockbuster clash. On Monday, they slotted Trump v. Barbara for oral arguments on April 1—straight-up challenging Trump's push to end birthright citizenship, that 14th Amendment guarantee for almost anyone born on U.S. soil. It's part of their March session, running March 23-25 and 30-April 1. News4JAX's Politics & Power segment warns this is the real 2026 test for Chief Justice John Roberts and the justices, pitting Trump's executive power plays against limits on changing citizenship, trade rules, and even Federal Reserve tweaks without Congress. They spotlight cases like Trump's firing bid of Fed Governor Lisa Cook over alleged mortgage fraud claims, where lower courts seemed skeptical, demanding full hearings first. And don't forget the Georgia racketeering saga—those eight charges in Fulton County Superior Court before Judge Scott McAfee. DA Fani Willis got bounced by the Georgia Court of Appeals in December 2024, and new prosecutor Pete Skandalakis dropped all counts without prejudice on November 26, 2025. The federal cases? Poof—gone after Trump's 2024 win, with Special Counsel Jack Smith resigning and Judge Tanya Chutkan dismissing the D.C. election interference indictment on November 25, 2024, citing Justice Department policy.Over in Florida, the classified documents mess in the Southern District Court fizzled out too, postponed indefinitely. And today, eyes are on Ryan Routh's sentencing—Holland & Knight's Steven Block, chatting with News Nation, breaks down how the judge will weigh federal guidelines, Routh's mental health, and his shot to speak before getting locked up for trying to assassinate Trump.These battles show the courts drawing lines on presidential power, listeners—immunity wins, dismissals, and looming fights over citizenship that could reshape America. Whew, what a whirlwind.Thanks for tuning in, come back next week for more, and this has been a Quiet Please production—for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

Imagine this: it's a crisp February morning in New York City, and I'm standing outside the federal courthouse in Manhattan, the wind whipping through the streets as lawyers hustle inside for what could be a game-changer in President Donald Trump's legal saga. Today, U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein is hearing arguments in a case that's got everyone buzzing—Trump's latest push to wipe out his hush money conviction from state court and shift it to federal ground, where he can invoke presidential immunity. According to ABC News, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered Hellerstein back to the drawing board last November, saying he overlooked key evidence from the trial that might tie into Trump's official White House acts. That conviction back in May 2024? Thirty-four felony counts of falsifying business records to cover a hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels, right before the 2016 election. Trump got an unconditional discharge—no jail time—but the stain remains, and he's fighting tooth and nail, denying any wrongdoing while appealing in state court too.I dash across town in my mind to the bigger picture, because this isn't isolated. The Brennan Center for Justice reports Trump still faces three active prosecutions: the federal election interference case in Washington, D.C., the state version in Fulton County, Georgia, and the classified documents mess in Florida. But the Supreme Court? That's where the real fireworks are brewing. SCOTUSblog announced oral arguments set for April 1 in Trump v. Barbara, challenging Trump's bold move to end birthright citizenship—the constitutional guarantee that almost anyone born on U.S. soil gets automatic citizenship. Picture the justices grilling lawyers on whether a president can rewrite that with executive fiat alone.And it's not just citizenship. News4JAX highlights how 2026 is shaping up as the Supreme Court's ultimate test on Trump's power grabs. Take Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook—Trump tried firing her over alleged mortgage fraud in two homes, one in Atlanta, but the court blocked it, saying she stays put until a full hearing. Then there's the tariff battles, where Trump wants sweeping unilateral duties without Congress, and cases like Kilmar Orega testing removal powers. Chief Justice John Roberts has been defending judicial independence quietly, but with midterms looming, the court might push back harder on these emergency appeals that bypass normal channels.As I weave through the crowds near the Supreme Court steps in my thoughts, it's clear: these trials aren't just legal footnotes; they're seismic clashes over presidential limits. From Hellerstein's courtroom today to April's birthright showdown, Trump's team is betting big on immunity and separation of powers. Will the courts bend, or draw the line?Thanks for tuning in, listeners. Come back next week for more, and this has been a Quiet Please production—for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

Send us a message!Join us as we continue to journey through Marion Gibson's Witchcraft A History in Thirteen Trials. Part three of Gibson's book takes us into witchcraft today. The stories discussed are taking place in modern times and that should terrify you.  Next time will be the Trial of Stormy Daniels! Music is by Alexander Nakarada.Support the show

Listeners, let's dive straight into where the courts stand right now on Donald Trump and the trials that still define his post‑presidency.Over the past few days, the center of gravity has shifted from the drama of live testimony to the slow grind of appeals courts and the Supreme Court, where Donald Trump is still fighting the fallout from his earlier criminal and civil cases. News outlets like the New York Times and CNN report that his legal team has been zeroing in on one overarching goal: pushing back or weakening the criminal convictions and keeping any remaining trials away from the spotlight as the election year calendar fills up.According to reporting from the Associated Press, Trump's lawyers are continuing to press appeals in the New York hush‑money case, the one where a Manhattan jury previously convicted him on multiple felony counts related to falsifying business records tied to payments to Stormy Daniels. Those appeals hinge on claims that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg stretched state law to criminalize conduct that, the defense insists, should have been treated as a federal election issue, not a state‑level fraud scheme. Legal analysts on NBC News say the appellate judges are now weighing not just the trial judge's rulings on evidence and jury instructions, but the larger question of whether New York law was used in a way it was never intended to be.At the same time, the federal election‑interference case in Washington, led by Special Counsel Jack Smith, remains in a kind of limbo, dominated by higher‑court arguments over presidential immunity and the scope of official acts. The Washington Post reports that Trump's team is still arguing that a former president cannot be criminally prosecuted for actions taken while in office that are even arguably official. That issue has already gone through one round in the D.C. Circuit, and commentators on Lawfare note that the next moves will determine whether a full retrial timetable is even realistic this year, or whether the case stays frozen while the Supreme Court is asked to step in again.Down in Georgia, in the Fulton County election‑subversion case brought by District Attorney Fani Willis, recent coverage from the Atlanta Journal‑Constitution describes a proceeding that is technically alive but politically and logistically bogged down. Multiple co‑defendants have launched appeals attacking the use of Georgia's racketeering law and challenging Fani Willis herself after earlier questions about her conduct and conflicts. Courts are now wrestling with which defendants, including Donald Trump, can be tried together and whether a streamlined, smaller trial is the only way forward.Meanwhile, the fallout from the civil fraud case in New York, brought by Attorney General Letitia James over alleged inflation of asset values, has moved deeper into the appellate phase. Bloomberg reports that Trump's lawyers are asking New York's appellate courts to roll back the sweeping financial penalties and long bans on acting as an officer of a New York company, arguing that lenders were repaid in full and were not victims in any traditional sense. Business groups are watching closely, because the final word on that judgment will shape how aggressively state officials can police alleged corporate fraud by a former president or any other high‑profile executive.Threaded through all of this is a broader institutional question: how much of a former president's behavior, political or financial, belongs in criminal court, and how much should be left to voters or Congress? Legal scholars quoted in the Wall Street Journal say that whatever happens in these Trump cases will set precedents that long outlast him, defining how prosecutors, grand juries, and judges treat the next national‑level scandal.Listeners, thanks for tuning in. Come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more, check out QuietPlease dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

 The newly appointed judge overseeing Nicolas Maduro's trial is the 92-year-old U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, known for his authoritative approach and significant case history, including cases involving President Trump.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Hey listeners, picture this: it's been a whirlwind week in the courts for President Donald Trump, with the Supreme Court dropping bombshells that could reshape his administration's bold moves. Just three days ago, on December 23, 2025, the nation's highest court issued a key ruling in Trump v. Illinois, tackling whether President Trump could federalize the Illinois National Guard and even pull in Texas troops to safeguard federal property in Chicago amid escalating violence. According to the Supreme Court's opinion, Trump activated 300 Illinois Guard members on October 4, followed by Texas forces the next day, citing riots where protesters hurled tear gas canisters at officers, tried grabbing firearms, and blasted bullhorns to cause hearing damage. Justice Alito's dissent slammed the lower District Court in Rhode Island for dismissing the government's unrefuted evidence of chaos, arguing it justified the President's call under federal law. While a majority granted the stay with some reasoning, Kavanaugh concurred, but Alito and Thomas pushed back hard, calling out the eleventh-hour shifts in opponents' arguments. This shadow docket decision, tracked by the Brennan Center, marks one of 25 emergency rulings since Trump took office on January 20, 2025—20 leaning his way, often with minimal explanation.But that's not all from the past few days. Fast-forward to the New York hush money saga: a fresh decision in People v. Donald J. Trump from the Manhattan court, penned by Judge Juan Merchan, shut down Trump's post-election bid to dismiss his 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. Remember, a jury convicted him unanimously back in May 2024 for scheming to hide payments to Stormy Daniels, aiming to boost his presidential run through unlawful means. Trump requested delays himself—pushing sentencing past the election to November 26, 2024, then begging for a stay and dismissal after winning. The court wasn't buying it, noting Trump consented to those adjournments without opposition from prosecutors. Merchan emphasized the premeditated deception that eroded public trust, rejecting claims the case evaporates with his presidency, citing the Supreme Court's Trump v. United States immunity ruling but insisting justice demands accountability.Meanwhile, the Supreme Court's shadow docket has been a Trump turbo-boost all year. Brennan Center reports victories like Trump v. Boyle in July, greenlighting firings at the Consumer Product Safety Commission; McMahon v. New York upholding Education Department workforce cuts; and immigration wins such as Noem v. Doe, allowing mass parole revocations for half a million from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. Even on LGBTQ+ fronts, November's ruling backed the State Department's passport gender policies. Not every call went his way—A.A.R.P. v. Trump lost on Venezuelan removals under the Alien Enemies Act—but the pattern's clear: 20 partial wins, with liberals like Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissenting repeatedly.Lawfare's litigation tracker highlights nonstop challenges, from SNAP benefit suspensions sparking suits by nonprofits and cities, to DOGE transparency fights where CREW got blocked from records. As of now, two more applications simmer. These battles in places like the First Circuit, DC Circuit, and beyond show Trump's team firing on all cylinders, testing presidential power's edges.Thanks for tuning in, listeners—come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

Welcome back to the Cover Band Confidential podcast!

For over a decade at BBC Newsnight, Sam McAlister secured the interviews others couldn't – Bill Clinton, Elon Musk, Stormy Daniels. But it was six months of negotiation that led to the conversation that changed everything: Prince Andrew discussing his ties to Jeffrey Epstein in 2019. Today, Sam teaches negotiation at LSE and is one of Britain's most compelling voices on persuasion, power, and resilience.This is Sam McAlister's Crisis Compass

Listeners, in courtrooms across America, Donald Trump's legal saga is still unfolding, and the past few days have shown how tightly his political future is tied to these trials.In New York, the hush money criminal case that led to Donald Trump's felony convictions earlier this year continues to shape what happens next. After a jury in Manhattan found him guilty of falsifying business records connected to payments to adult film actor Stormy Daniels, the focus has shifted from the drama of trial testimony to the grind of appeals and sentencing strategy. Major outlets like the New York Times and CNN have reported that Trump's lawyers are pressing arguments that the case was politically motivated and that key testimony from Michael Cohen, Trump's former fixer, should never have been trusted. At the same time, New York prosecutors under District Attorney Alvin Bragg are emphasizing to the courts that a jury heard the evidence and spoke clearly.In Georgia, the election interference case brought by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis remains a slow burn rather than a daily spectacle. According to reporting from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and Associated Press, recent hearings have focused less on the explosive racketeering charges and more on pretrial motions: what evidence can come in, which co-defendants will be tried alongside Trump, and how quickly a trial could realistically happen in the thick of a presidential election cycle. Judges in Georgia have been acutely aware, as those outlets note, that every scheduling decision may be read as a political act, even though it is rooted in criminal procedure and logistics.On the federal side, two major criminal cases still hang over Donald Trump: the classified documents case in Florida and the 2020 election interference case in Washington, D.C. The Washington Post and NBC News report that the election interference case, brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith, has been slowed by endless pretrial fights over presidential immunity, privileged communications, and the scope of what jurors would be allowed to hear about January 6. In Florida, in the classified documents case before Judge Aileen Cannon, recent hearings reported by Politico and CBS News have focused on how to handle highly sensitive national security material at trial, with Trump's team arguing for broad access and delays, while prosecutors push to keep the schedule moving.Even the Supreme Court has been pulled into the Trump legal orbit again. CBS News and SCOTUSblog have been covering arguments in Trump v. Slaughter, a case testing whether President Trump can fire Federal Trade Commission commissioner Rebecca Slaughter without the usual “for cause” protections that shield many independent agency officials. In oral arguments, several conservative justices suggested that limiting a president's power to remove such officials may violate the Constitution's separation of powers, while the liberal justices warned that giving Trump nearly unchecked removal power could destabilize agencies far beyond the FTC. A ruling expected in the coming months could reshape how future presidents, not just Trump, control independent regulators.Taken together, these court battles show a former president and current political force fighting on every legal front: criminal, civil, state, federal, and even constitutional at the Supreme Court. Every hearing date, every ruling on evidence, every appellate brief now doubles as both a legal move and a political message, with Trump portraying himself as a target of what he calls a weaponized justice system, and prosecutors and judges insisting they are simply applying long-standing law to an unusually powerful defendant.Thank you for tuning in. Come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more, check out QuietPlease dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

For over a decade at BBC Newsnight, Sam McAlister secured the interviews others couldn't – Bill Clinton, Elon Musk, Stormy Daniels. But it was 13 months of negotiation that led to the conversation that changed everything: Prince Andrew discussing his ties to Jeffrey Epstein in 2019. The interview became a global news event, resulted in Andrew stepping back from royal duties, and is still making headlines six years later.In July 2021, Sam threw the dice, she gave up her BBC pension and security as a single mother in the middle of a pandemic to write a book. That gamble paid off. Her memoir Scoops became a bestseller and a Netflix film starring Gillian Anderson and Billie Piper. Today, Sam teaches negotiation at LSE and is one of Britain's most compelling voices on persuasion, power, and resilience.LESSONS YOU'LL LEARN:Don't get bitter, take control - When Sam wasn't getting credit for the Prince Andrew interview, she didn't whine or play victim. She took voluntary redundancy, wrote a book, and ended up with a Netflix deal and 30 million viewers watching Billie Piper play her.Imposter syndrome is mostly a crock - When you've worked hard and earned your place, confidence isn't arrogance – it's honesty.Build trust through respect, not manipulation - Sam's superpower wasn't sucking up to powerful people. It was treating them with respect while demanding it of herself. Know your financial bottom line before taking risks - Sam had three outcomes mapped before leaving the BBC. That clarity gave her the courage to leap.No one is dead – If you can't control it, suck it up. If you can, do something about it.

Is America ready for a woman president? Andrea and independent journalist Terrell Starr debate, and we want to hear where you stand. Let us know in the comments. Consider this: the two times Trump was elected president, he ran against a woman–but both of those women faced highly unusual, unprecedented elections for any candidate. In 2016, Hillary Clinton ran against a hostile foreign intelligence operation and an FBI director, James Comey, with a misogynistic track record. The FBI was successfully sued by 34 women who faced sexual descrimination as recruits, their complaints dismissed by Comey. The 2016 election wasn't politics as usual: it was an act of war–by the Kremlin and criminal negligence by Comey's abuse of power.  In 2024, Kamala Harris had a few short months to save global democracy. Again, a woman was handed a political grenade.  Will America's first woman president be Ivanka Trump?  Republicans elevate three types of women: Concentration camp Barbies like Kristi Noem, pedofile-defending child-looking brides like Karoline Leavitt, and Trump's personal favorite: the blond bombshell–like his daughter Ivanka. Trump once said he would date Ivanka if she wasn't his daughter. He told the porn star Stormy Daniels, who he had an affair with when Melania had just given birth to Barron, that Stormy reminded him of Ivanka. With Jared Kushner back in the White House, grifting and running Trump's shadow foreign policy, does that mean Ivanka is the likely candidate to break the glass ceiling by being a patriarchal blow-up doll? And how do we stop that?  Studies have shown countries led by women are more prosperous, resilient and environmentally friendly. A 2022 U.S. News Survey found that 70% of respondents believe women are better at leading countries than men. So why can't America have nice things? What will it take for us to finally elect a progressive woman president?  Want to hear Gaslit Nation ad-free? Join our community of listeners for bonus shows, exclusive Q&A sessions, our group chats, invites to live events like our Monday political salons at 4pm ET over Zoom, and more! Sign up at Patreon.com/Gaslit! Show Notes: FBI to pay $22 million to women who alleged sexual discrimination at training academy https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/fbi-to-pay-22-million-to-women-who-alleged-sexual-discrimination-at-training-academy Women Are Better at Leading Countries Than Men, Survey Respondents Say https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2022-10-05/women-are-better-at-leading-countries-than-men-survey-respondents-say How Women in Power Foster National Happiness https://esthinktank.com/2025/02/10/how-womens-leadership-shapes-happier-nations/ Women and girls around the world are leading the fight against climate change https://unsdg.un.org/latest/stories/women-and-girls-leading-fight-against-climate-change Countries with more female politicians pass more ambitious climate policies, study suggests https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2019/09/countries-with-more-female-politicians-pass-more-ambitious-climate-policies-study-suggests/ Terrell Starr Substack: https://terrellstarr.substack.com/

An art museum in Germany has a “grumpy guide” that treats visitors like crap, airlines in the U.S. canceled more than 2,500 flights over the weekend, it is now mandatory that Target employees smile and make small talk, Stormy Daniels is back, and one man learns why you shouldn't make your own dentures...

Dave Landau joins us to talk about another Whitney Cummings meltdown, another Axl Rose meltdown, a hungry Stormy Daniels, No Kings shenanigans, Price is Right AI videos, and break down ‘Prince' Andrew's BBC whoppers. Comedian Dave Landau is here in-studio! Check him out Mark Ridley's Comedy Castle this weekend. Axl Rose got really mad on stage… again. Riyadh Backlash: Bill Burr isn't discussing Saudi Arabia anymore. Whitney Cummings keeps digging herself in a hole over the Riyadh Comedy Festival. Stormy Daniels popped up on WGN and she's gained a little bit of weight. There is a Ron Jeremy documentary on the BBC. ‘Prince' Andrew has lost his titles. We recall the famous interview from 2019. Virginia Giuffre's book is exposing the former Royal. Donald Trump posts AI to combat the No Kings Rallies. A school teacher in Chicago was doxxed after she made a ‘Charlie Kirk gesture'. A woman in a penis costume was detained. United Flight 1093 hit SOMETHING way up in the air. No big deal, you can fly without a roof. Jimmy Kimmel had drag queen Trixie Mattel read Eric Trump's book to children. Bari Weiss is leaving her mark on CBS. The staff doesn't seem too pleased. AI is getting out of hand. The Price is Right is the next big thing to parody online. Dave vs the IRS. Marc is off to the Monday Night Lions game. Lucky! Sabrina Carpenter dropped some F-bombs on SNL. Britney Spears declares herself “brain damaged” in her latest unhinged Instagram post. Kristen Bell was never murdered by Dax Shepard. She's getting crap for declaring that. If you'd like to help support the show… consider subscribing to our YouTube Channel, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew Lane, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels, Jim Bentley and BranDon).

This week on The Necessary Conversation: