Podcasts about temple university beasley school

Our topic for today is hidden foster care: a process wherein children are sent to live with relatives or friends in order to prevent foster care with strangers. Considered a “voluntary” placement, in reality it often involves coercion or threats. In one such instance, Su'Leya Williams was a baby girl taken from her mother's care and placed with a woman who claimed to be a relative, but wasn't. Baby Su'Leya died in her care. Today, we welcome Sarah Katz, a Professor of Law at the Temple University Beasley School of Law and Director of Temple Law's Family Justice Clinic, and April Lee, the Founder of Philly Voice for Change. Sarah and April discuss the requirements DHS is legally bound to in this process, how they are often skirted or ignored completely, and the resulting impact on parents and children.The EPPiC Broadcast is hosted by Michael Ramey, president of the Parental Rights Foundation. You can sign up for email alerts to keep yourself informed on parental rights news at https://parentalrightsfoundation.org/get-involved/.Support the show

Taylor & Ring Trial Attorney Dave Ring discusses the resentencing hearing for the Menendez brothers. The Lawfare Project Senior Counsel Gerard Filitti provides insight into their lawsuit alleging that DePaul University was negligent in failing to stop an anti-semitic attack. Temple University Beasley School of Law Dean Rachel Rebouché explains the evolution of the abortion […]

This is the second episode of six in the special “Symposium Edition Podcast” of STLR Conversations. We are sharing the recordings of our symposium on “Judging Science,” which explores how the judiciary assesses and incorporates scientific and expert testimony in the US legal system.    Today, we are listening to Professor Edith Beerdsen from Temple University Beasley School of Law present on “The Replication Crisis.” Her work will be published in the upcoming Vol. 26 No. 2, “Symposium Edition,” of the Columbia Science and Technology Law Review in the spring.

Back in 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned 50 years of precedent, overruling Roe v. Wade. Leading up to the presidential election, abortion was a hot button issue and appeared on ballots across the states.  Since the election, former President Trump has publicly denied that he would support a national abortion ban, and has said that he believes abortion should be left to the states. So what happens now? In this episode, Craig is joined by Kimberly Mutcherson, Professor of Law and former Co-Dean at Rutgers Law School and currently the Phyllis W. Beck Chair in Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law. Craig & Kim reflect on what has transpired after the Roe v. Wade decision, and discuss abortion rights and the challenges ahead. Mentioned in This Episode: SB 8, Its Impact, and the Future of Roe v. Wade

Back in 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned 50 years of precedent, overruling Roe v. Wade. Leading up to the presidential election, abortion was a hot button issue and appeared on ballots across the states.  Since the election, former President Trump has publicly denied that he would support a national abortion ban, and has said that he believes abortion should be left to the states. So what happens now? In this episode, Craig is joined by Kimberly Mutcherson, Professor of Law and former Co-Dean at Rutgers Law School and currently the Phyllis W. Beck Chair in Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law. Craig & Kim reflect on what has transpired after the Roe v. Wade decision, and discuss abortion rights and the challenges ahead. Mentioned in This Episode: SB 8, Its Impact, and the Future of Roe v. Wade Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Since Roe v. Wade was overturned, the country has been divided, with many states banning or restricting abortion and many others passing measures to protect abortion access. Now that Donald Trump has been elected President again, and Republicans have control of both the Senate and the House, what changes could we see, and how could they affect reproductive health care beyond abortion? Rachel Rebouché, Kean Family Dean and Peter J. Liacouras Professor of Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law, joins our host, Racquel Williams, to discuss the current state of reproductive rights and what could come next. You can learn about the abortion laws in your state at reproductiverights.org. Then, on Shara in the City, we catch up with Jeannine A. Cook, owner of Harriett's Bookshop, after her successful fundraising campaign to bring 15 Philadelphia youth to Paris. Shara Dae Howard talks with the kids as they prepare for their trip. 00:00 Intro 01:00 Temple Law Dean Rachel Rebouché on the future of reproductive rights 27:00 Shara in the City: Philly youth head to Paris To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Karen Richardson, NAWL's Executive Director, is joined by Rahat Babar, Deputy Executive Director and General Counsel of NAPABA, to discuss the current voting restrictions and the challenges faced by communities of color and immigrant communities. Rahat offers invaluable insights into the landmark Shelby County v. Holder case, detailing its impact on Asian and Pacific Islander American communities over the past decade and the ongoing effects of harmful political disinformation. Join us as we discuss some of the most prominent propaganda targeting communities of color this election season.A special thank you to NAWL member Mary Card Mina for making this episode possible. Rahat N. Babar is NAPABA's Deputy Executive Director and General Counsel. In this dual role, Rahat leads NAPABA's advocacy, civil rights, and policy priorities, and he serves as NAPABA's chief legal officer overseeing the legal affairs of the organization.Rahat's commitment to public service and to the Asian Pacific American community has long defined his career.  Nominated by the Governor of New Jersey and unanimously confirmed by the New Jersey Senate, Rahat served as a Judge on the Superior Court of New Jersey, the first Bangladeshi American to be a member of the court.  Immediately prior to his appointment, Rahat was Special Counsel to New Jersey Governor Philip D. Murphy, overseeing all high-profile litigation impacting the Governor and the Administration.  Previously, he was the Director of Community Engagement at the New Jersey Attorney General's Office, where as part of Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal's Executive Leadership Team, he led the Attorney General's efforts to strengthen the office's relationships with community leaders, faith leaders, and the public.  Rahat held several other leadership roles within the Attorney General's Office, practiced in a boutique corporate law firm, and taught law and public policy at Temple University Beasley School of Law as an Adjunct Professor.Rahat is a former member of NAPABA's Board of Governors and a former chair of NAPABA's Civil Rights Committee.  He previously served as President of the Asian Pacific American Bar Association of Pennsylvania and served on the Board of Directors of the Asian Pacific American Lawyers Association of New Jersey.  NAPABA recognized Rahat as one of NAPABA's Best Under 40 in 2018.Rahat earned his undergraduate degree in International Area Studies from Drexel University and his law degree from Delaware Law School, where he served as an editor of the law review.  During his last year of law school, Rahat externed for Chief Justice Myron T. Steele of the Supreme Court of Delaware, and after law school, Rahat clerked for Judge Renée Cohn Jubleirer of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

On June 28, in Loper Bright v. Raimondo, et al., the Supreme Court overturned the Chevron deference doctrine, a long-standing tenet of administrative law established in 1984 in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. This doctrine directed courts to defer to a government agency's interpretation of ambiguous statutory language as long as the interpretation was reasonable. However, legal scholars now express widely divergent views as to the scope and likely effects of Loper Bright's overruling of the Chevron doctrine on the future course of regulatory agency interpretive and enforcement authority. In this two-part episode, which repurposes a recent webinar, a panel of experts delves into the Loper Bright decision, and its underpinnings, rationale, and likely fallout. Our podcast features moderator Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel and former practice leader of Ballard Spahr's Consumer Financial Services Group; Ballard Spahr Partners Richard Andreano, Jr. and John Culhane, Jr.; and special guests Craig Green, Charles Klein Professor of Law and Government at Temple University Beasley School of Law, and Kent Barnett, recently appointed Dean of the Moritz College of Law at The Ohio State University. Part II opens with an in-depth discussion of the major questions doctrine (which bars agencies from resolving questions of great economic and political significance without clear statutory authority), how it has evolved, and its interaction with Chevron deference. Our experts offer predictions as to the likely role of the major questions doctrine in post-Chevron jurisprudence, and touch on the non-delegation doctrine (which prevents Congress from delegating legislative power). We also refer to the effects of another recent Supreme Court decision, Corner Post, Inc. v Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, which expands the time during which entities new to an industry may challenge longstanding agency rules. We then consider the practical effects of the Loper Bright and Corner Post decisions on pending and future litigation. Partners Richard Andreano and John Culhane discuss concrete examples of cases currently progressing through the courts that already are evidencing the effects of Loper Bright, and ways in which arguments now are being articulated or might be articulated in litigation challenging a number of regulatory rules and interpretations in the absence of Chevron deference. We proceed to explore other significant topics including the validity of prior decisions of the Supreme Court and lower courts that were based exclusively on the Chevron doctrine. Our panel then opines on whether Loper Bright, both in its entirety and as to certain of its specific constituent elements, is “good” or “bad” for the consumer financial services industry and for regulated entities in general. In conclusion, Mr. Andreano cites concerns about how courts may apply alternative deference guidance that remains in place (including Skidmore deference, discussed in Part I of this podcast), and Mr. Culhane expresses hope that the outcome in Loper Bright might move agencies to engage in more thorough, thoughtful, and precise analysis in the rulemaking process.

On June 28, in Loper Bright v. Raimondo, et al., the Supreme Court overturned the Chevron deference doctrine, a long-standing tenet of administrative law established in 1984 in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. This doctrine directed courts to defer to a government agency's interpretation of a statute if the statute was ambiguous regarding, or simply did not address, the issue before the court, as long as the interpretation was reasonable. However, legal scholars now express widely divergent views as to the scope and likely effects of Loper Bright's overruling of the Chevron doctrine on the future course of regulatory agency interpretive and enforcement authority. In this two-part episode, which repurposes a recent webinar, a panel of experts delves into the Loper Bright decision, and its underpinnings, rationale, and likely fallout. Our podcast features moderator Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel and former practice leader of Ballard Spahr's Consumer Financial Services Group; Ballard Spahr Partners Richard Andreano, Jr. and John Culhane, Jr.; and special guests Craig Green, Charles Klein Professor of Law and Government at Temple University Beasley School of Law, and Kent Barnett, recently appointed Dean of the Moritz College of Law at The Ohio State University. In Part I, we first review the history of judicial deference to agency interpretations in American courts throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, culminating in the advent of Chevron deference.  We then discuss post-Chevron developments, including shifts in judicial and political views of the role courts should play in interpretation of agency action. Then, we turn to an in-depth discussion of the majority opinion in Loper Bright, authored by Chief Justice Roberts, including its reliance on the Administrative Procedure Act to invalidate Chevron deference and the opinion's numerous ambiguities that result in a “very, very fuzzy” outcome, leaving regulated industries facing uncertainty as to whether or not courts will uphold agency rules. We then explore other topics including the majority opinion's endorsement of an approach courts should take to review agency actions as described in a 1940's case, Skidmore v. Swift & Co.; what deference may or may not be given to agency policy-making and fact-finding in light of Loper Bright; and the divergent views of some legal scholars who suggest that many courts will continue to give broad deference to agency views notwithstanding Loper Bright.

Scott Burris, Director of the Center for Public Health Law Research at Temple University Beasley School of Law, explains the value of scientific legal mapping; ASTHO presents a webinar on how to share public health information with elected officials; Lamarr Lewis, consultant and trainer, shares how leaders can improve workforce conditions through trauma leadership training; and an upcoming ASTHO webinar explores innovative strategies within public health systems.   ASTHO Webpage: ASTHO's Public Health Legal Mapping Center Temple University: Public Health Law Research Law Atlas: Policy Surveillance Portal, Center for Public Health Law Research ASTHO Webinar: Disease Forecasting Learning Series - Communicating with Policymakers ASTHO Webpage: PH-HERO Workforce Resource Center ASTHO Webinar: INSPIRE: Readiness: Innovating in Public Health Systems

In today's episode of Clocking Out, Raymond is joined by Michael S. Cohen, an employment attorney and thought leader in employment law.  Michael S. Cohen is a partner in Duane Morris' Employment, Labor, Benefits and Immigration Practice Group. Michael concentrates his practice in the areas of employment law training and counseling. He has trained and counseled employers throughout the country on subjects including harassment prevention; diversity, equity and inclusion; combatting implicit bias; performance management; discipline and discharge; hiring and recruiting practices; performance evaluations; FMLA, ADA and FLSA compliance; leave of absence policies; LGBTQ+ issues in the workplace; substance abuse testing; workplace violence; records retention; conducting background checks; and more. Michael also has conducted investigations into claims of harassment and discrimination and has drafted employee handbooks, employment agreements, non-compete agreements and post-termination agreements. Michael regularly conducts in excess of 200 trainings each year.  He has represented clients throughout the country in EEO and other administrative proceedings.Michael has been cited as a national authority on employment issues by The New York Times, The Associated Press, USA Today, MSNBC.com, HR Magazine, SHRM On-Line, Employment Law 360, Inside Counsel Magazine, as well as many other publications. Michael serves as an Advisory Board Member of GenHERation and as a Board Member of Serve, Inc. Michael is a 1997 magna cum laude graduate of Temple University Beasley School of Law and a cum laude graduate of the University of Pennsylvania.Listen as Michael shares his background, career path, how he ended up in the training and thought leadership space, and other pivotal “clocking out” moments.  ResourcesConnect with Michael on LinkedIn Visit careerminds.com or follow us on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, X, & YoutubeVisit Raymond's website or follow him on socials: LinkedIn, Instagram, Tiktok, X, & YoutubeOrder Clocking Out: A Stress-Free Guide to Career Transitions 

Send us a Text Message.Confessions by criminal defendants are regarded as the most powerful evidence of guilt. So why would an innocent person confess to a crime they did not commit? That question and the troubling issue of false confessions is at the heart of the research of Professor Saul Kassin, the author of Duped: Why Innocent People Confess – and Why We Believe Their Confessions. Professor Kassin is the distinguished Professor of Psychology at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and Professor Emeritus at Williams College. He is regarded as the foremost expert on false confessions. He has served as an expert consultant in many high-profile cases and as a TV analyst. His work has been widely cited including by the United States Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court of Canada. We are also joined by Professor Jules Epstein from Temple University Beasley School of Law in Philadelphia. Professor Epstein is a practicing criminal defense lawyer, and also an expert on scientific evidence. He is the co-author of Scientific Evidence Review: Admissibility and the Use of Expert Evidence in the Courtroom, Monograph No. 9 

 This week on the Temple 10-Q&A podcast, Editors Abena Ampofo (LAW '25) and Victor Ficarra (LAW '24) sat down with Matthew Devine (LAW '16). Matt is an attorney with Royer Cooper Cohen Braunfeld LLC and an adjunct professor here at the Temple University Beasley School of Law where he teaches Lawyering for Entrepreneurship. On this episode, Matt talks about growing up in Rhode Island, his pathway to law school, his love of entrepreneurship, how his history of basketball impacts his legal career, and where he sees his legal career going. 

In certain situations, plaintiffs in federal court are able to basically pick which judge hears their case by choosing which district and division they file in. Critics of this “judge shopping” say it has led to cases that overturned government policies, like the Texas case that suspended FDA approval of the abortion drug mifepristone before it was advanced to the Supreme Court. In March, a federal judicial panel issued a policy to try to stop judge shopping in cases like this, but it's not a hard and fast rule. Paul R. Gugliuzza, a professor at Temple University Beasley School of Law, joins us to explain exactly how judge shopping is possible, what this policy aimed to do and why it might not work, and how this all adds to Americans' lack of faith in our justice system. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This week Steve and Yvonne interview Jordan Strokovsky of Strokovsky LLC (https://actionafterinjury.com/).   Remember to rate and review GTP in iTunes: Click Here to Rate and Review   View/Download Trial Documents   Case Details: Jordan won his client a $30 million recovery against Temple University Hospital in one of the largest medical malpractice cases in Pennsylvania's history. Despite the hospital's denial of wrongdoing, Jordan refused their offer of $3 million and prepared tirelessly for court to ensure a just outcome for his client. The hospital admitted fault and the jury awarded $25.9M to Jordan's Mr. Parks ($6M for future medical costs and $20M for pain and suffering) after a comprehensive investigation and a hard-fought trial. The hospital hired three law firms in an attempt to overturn the verdict and offered a settlement less than the awarded amount. Jordan's client refused to settle, and Jordan won every argument against the big firms. The court refused the hospital's request to reduce the verdict, and $3.7 million in delay damages were added. The total recovery now exceeds $30 million, including over $600,000 in interest. No appeal was filed.   Guest Bio: Jordan Strokovsky Jordan Strokovsky is a trial lawyer serving the catastrophically injured in a diverse range of cases, including medical malpractice, birth injury, truck accidents, fires, explosions, plane crashes, premises liability, product liability, workplace injuries, toxic torts, civil rights, car accidents, and sexual assault.  His hard work ethic, integrity, and compassion earn him the trust of his clients and the respect of his opponents. These attributes have also helped him obtain significant verdicts and settlements. For good reason, many lawyers refer or seek to co-counsel their serious injury and wrongful death cases with Jordan. Jordan handles countless catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases and routinely handles cases pro bono to help his community. His volunteer work includes taking a civil rights case to verdict with the Volunteer Attorney Panel of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, representing victims of sexual abuse with the Support Center for Child Advocates, and successfully handling various cases from Philadelphia VIP. He has been recognized by the court for his service and was a featured volunteer by Philadelphia VIP. As an animal lover and dog owner, Jordan has also championed animal rights causes, helping establish that pets should not be viewed as property under the law. He also serves on the Pennsylvania Association for Justice Board of Directors and has previously served on boards for non-profits that help animals, homeless people, and refugees. Jordan is the former co-chair of the State Civil Litigation Section of the Philadelphia Bar Association and was proud to help implement town halls at the start of the pandemic, which allowed the court and legal community to communicate during those uncertain times. He now co-chairs both the Civil Rules and Wellness Committees at the bar association. Jordan has served as an adjunct law school professor and occasionally speaks at seminars to other personal injury lawyers.  He is also regularly asked by news outlets to provide legal commentary. Jordan graduated from Widener University Delaware Law School as Valedictorian of his class, where several of his professors would comment that his academic performance and mind for the law were among the most impressive they had ever seen. While in school, he interned with three Philadelphia judges: the Honorable M. Faith Angell (E.D. Pa), the Honorable Arnold L. New (Common Pleas), and the Honorable Paul P. Panepinto (Common Pleas) and used these internships as opportunities to get in the courtroom and watch many trials. He was also a member of the Law Review. After his commencement speech at graduation, the Governor of Delaware declared that he would never want to follow Jordan in speaking again. While practicing law full-time, Jordan obtained a Master of Law in Trial Advocacy at the nationally renowned Temple University Beasley School of Law LL.M. Program in the Spring of 2018, where he received special recognition from the faculty for his trial performances and was a jury favorite—earning the highest scores from the jury at his showcase trial. Read Full Bio   Show Sponsors: Legal Technology Services - LegalTechService.com Digital Law Marketing - DigitalLawMarketing.com Harris Lowry Manton LLP - hlmlawfirm.com   Free Resources: Stages Of A Jury Trial - Part 1 Stages Of A Jury Trial - Part 2

In this podcast episode, host Gary interviews Sharif Gray, a personal injury attorney from Virginia, who shares his path from VMI valedictorian to law school, military service, and his current legal practice. Gray discusses the influence of his godfather and the film "A Few Good Men" on his career choice, his dedication to helping people through personal injury law, and the significance of a major case victory. He also talks about the challenges young lawyers face, including gaining trial experience and managing student debt, while emphasizing the importance of passion and authenticity in the legal field. Gray reflects on the personal fulfillment he derives from making a difference in clients' lives and the freedom that comes with running his own practice. First Major Jury Verdict (00:15:31) Sharif's million and a half dollar trip and fall case, the intentional framing of the case, and the confidence gained from the successful trial. Keys to Being an Excellent Plaintiff's Trial Attorney (00:17:33) The importance of framing the case, capitalizing on defense missteps, and positioning the plaintiff as a victim of the defendant's actions. Building a Practice and Developing Business (00:19:38) Sharif's diverse strategies for business development, including referrals, digital presence, networking, and creating a broad net for opportunities. Challenges faced by young lawyers (00:21:48) Sharif Gray discusses the financial burden of law school debt and the limited options for gaining trial experience as a young lawyer. Sharif is a trial lawyer and a partner at Blackburn, Conte, Schilling & Click. He tried cases as a United States Army JAG Officer and as a Drug and Vice Prosecutor, served as a Federal Judicial Law Clerk at a trial court, and now takes cases to trial as a personal injury and criminal defense lawyer. There is nothing more professionally exciting for Sharif than preparing for and going to trial. And there is no greater privilege for Sharif than getting results for his clients.  Sharif cares deeply about his work and the people he represents. His record is evidence of this: in the Army, he successfully defended hundreds of soldiers at trial, in adverse administrative proceedings, and under investigation; as a prosecutor, he pursued justice for victims and earned a reputation among judges and defense attorneys for being persuasive and fair; and as a personal injury lawyer, he has won millions of dollars in verdicts and settlements.  Sharif graduated valedictorian and as a distinguished military graduate from the Virginia Military Institute. Among other honors, his class elected him to serve as a prosecutor on VMI's Honor Court, where he prosecuted honor offenses and first discovered his love for trial work.  Sharif received his law degree from the University of Virginia. During law school, he served on the Virginia Journal of Criminal Law's Managing Board; led an Army Reserve Drill Sergeant Unit; and clerked for the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, and the United States Solicitor General's Office.  Sharif earned his masters of law degree in trial advocacy from the Temple University Beasley School of Law, which has consistently been ranked as the nation's top trial training program for more than twenty years.  Sharif also graduated from the Gerry Spence Method — the premier training for trial lawyers who represent people.  Away from work, Sharif enjoys spending time with his wife and son, learning songs on his acoustic guitar, playing on a kickball team, and working out each morning at a CrossFit gym.  Sharif also operates RVA Personal Injury Lawyers and UCMJ Trial Lawyers, and he co-hosts the RVA Trial Lawyers Podcast. Would you like to learn more about Breaking Free or order your own copy? https://www.garymiles.net/break-free

Allan Carlsen is fresh out of law school and just over a year into practice as a patent litigator at an elite boutique law firm. Unlike our typical episodes, the conversation with Allan focuses on how he found his job and decided on his firm, how school and practice differ, and how he navigates new situations. He talks about his experiences with the on-campus interview process, the Loyola Patent Fair, and the important difference between producing the right work product and producing a perfect work product. Allan is a graduate of Temple University Beasley School of Law.This episode is hosted by Katya Valasek.Mentioned in this episode:Access LawHub today!Learn more about Vermont LawColorado LawLearn more about Colorado LawLearn more about Rutgers LawLearn more about William & Mary Law SchoolLearn more about Rutgers Law

The judge overseeing Bryan Kohberger's quadruple murder case has made a ruling concerning the defense's request to get access to all DNA records in the case. Law&Crime's Jesse Weber breaks down the latest in the Idaho student murders case with Professor Jules Epstein, the director of advocacy programs at Temple University Beasley School of Law.PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW:If you're ever injured in an accident, you can check out Morgan & Morgan. You can submit a claim in 8 clicks or less without having to leave your couch. To start your claim, visit: https://www.forthepeople.com/LCSidebarHOST:Jesse Weber: https://twitter.com/jessecordweberLAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:YouTube Management - Bobby SzokePodcasting - Sam GoldbergVideo Editing - Michael DeiningerScript Writing & Producing - Savannah WilliamsonGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This week Steve and Yvonne interview Tom Bosworth of Bosworth Law (https://tombosworthlaw.com/).   Remember to rate and review GTP in iTunes: Click Here to Rate and Review   View/Download Trial Documents   Case Details: Attorney Tom Bosworth achieved a historic milestone by becoming the youngest lawyer in Pennsylvania to secure an eight-figure jury verdict as the lead counsel in a medical malpractice case for a living client. The case involved a medical malpractice victim who was awarded a $19.7 million verdict by a Philadelphia jury, due to a failure to diagnose. After years of seeing the same primary care physician, a woman's complaints about back pain and other symptoms were repeatedly dismissed. She sought the help of a neurologist, who discovered a mass on her spine. Unfortunately, the mass had already caused several complications, including incontinence, pain, and difficulty walking. As a result, she was left partially paralyzed and unable to continue working.   Guest Bio: Thomas Bosworth At age 33, Tom Bosworth became the youngest lawyer in the history of Pennsylvania to obtain a jury verdict in excess of $10 million for a living client as lead counsel (the total verdict being over $19 million). Three months prior to that, after two weeks as lead counsel at trial, Bosworth secured a $7 million settlement on behalf of a mother whose mentally disabled adult son wrongfully died in a group home. Bosworth also obtained multiple non-monetary terms in this settlement that were only agreed to by the defendant after two weeks of trial. In the past 5 years, Bosworth has been counsel on various additional jury trials and settlements totaling over $80 million. These cases included ones for medical malpractice, product liability, and wrongful death.   Recently, Bosworth was designated by the independent attorney group Super Lawyers as a Rising Star in Pennsylvania, a designation reserved for the top 2.5 percent of attorneys in the state who are 40 or younger or practicing 10 years or less. Bosworth attended Temple University Beasley School of Law from where he graduated in 2016 with magna cum laude and Order of the Coif distinction. During law school, Bosworth participated as a member of Temple's nationally ranked Trial Team and as a Research Editor of the Temple Law Review. Following law school, Bosworth was a law clerk to the Honorable Lawrence Stengel in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Read Full Bio   Show Sponsors: Legal Technology Services - LegalTechService.com Digital Law Marketing - DigitalLawMarketing.com Harris Lowry Manton LLP - hlmlawfirm.com   Free Resources: Stages Of A Jury Trial - Part 1 Stages Of A Jury Trial - Part 2

“If you take a survey, everybody thinks that all of the Latinos just got here the other day and came over the border…More than 68% of most Latinos are born in the US.” “There are no U-Hauls at funerals.” In January 2004, Nelson became the first independent Director of the Exelon Corporation that resulted from the merger of PECO Energy and ComEd. Exelon is a Fortune 66 company and is the largest competitive energy company doing business in 48 states, D.C. and Canada. This company, with $60 billion in revenues, employs over 40,000 people nationwide. Exelon works in every stage of the energy business – power generation, competitive energy sales, transmission and delivery. Nelson has been a member of the Risk, Generation and Delivery Committees,  as well as, authored of the Investment Committee's financial achievement. He is a Director of the PECO Energy Board, the most profitable and safe utility affiliate, serving 1.6 million customers with electricity and gas. Nelson is an investor in a financial institution FinClusive and on its advisory board. In 1975 he joined the Temple Hospital Board of Directors as Chair of the Professional Affairs Committee until 1993 when the President of the United States appointed him General Counsel to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. He returned to Temple University as  a Trustee in 1997 and served on the Student Affairs and Diversity Committee, Search Committee, Trustee Committee, as well as the Executive Committee. Nelson has played many roles at Temple from teaching to developing a Legal Aid Program for the Law School. Nelson has served on numerous Corporate Boards including the Legg Mason Family of Funds (1998-2001); Advisory Board of PNC Bank 2008- 2015; Chair, National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC); Chair and Audit Committee, Paradigm Funds (2010-2011); the Board of  Directors of The Convention Center Authority of Pennsylvania (2002-2004); Treasurer and Co-founder, Latino Corporate Directors Association and also the Education Fund from (2014 – present). Nelson was City Solicitor of Philadelphia from 2001 to 2004, Attorney for Philadelphia Gas Works (serving a million customers) and Counsel to both the Philadelphia Airport, the Philadelphia Water Department, as well as all city personnel. Nelson was the first Puerto Rican to be admitted to the Pennsylvania Bar and the first Latino Judge in the Court of Common Pleas in Pennsylvania where he served for 12 years. During his tenure, he was appointed Administrative Judge (CEO) by the Supreme Courts where he administered a $90 million annual budget with 2000 employees. He received the National Institute for Justice Award for saving the courts $100 million in 10 years and eliminating a seven years backlog. Nelson is a senior partner at Dilworth Paxson LLP where he concentrated his practice in litigation, dispute resolution, government relations, energy, and public housing development. His leadership as the Chair of the Diversity Committee, earned him the Philadelphia Bar Association Justice Sonia Sotomayor Diversity Award. Nelson served on the President's Commission on the White House Fellows from 2000 to 2012. He was a Fulbright Scholar, a White House  Fellow from 1977 to 1978 and has five honorary doctorate degrees and numerous National Awards. Nelson graduated with a B.S. in Accounting from St. John's University and a J.D. from the Temple University Beasley School of Law. A member of Omicron Delta Epsilon Economic Honor Society. Nelson is admitted in Pennsylvania, New York, Washington, D.C. and the U. S. Supreme Court. Nelson has authored his autobiography “Not from Here and Not from There No soy de aqui ni de alla”, Published in October 19, 2018 by Temple Press. He contributes to a weekly 6ABC “Inside Story” roundtable. The publication has won him honors from the Pan American Association, the Pennsylvania Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and Al Dia newspaper. The Philadelphia Legal Intelligencer has recognized him with The Legal's Lifetime Achievement Award in 2013. Hispanic Business considered him 1 of 100 most influential Hispanic American with thousand honor. R.O.G. Takeaway Tips: Sometimes you have to take steps backwards to take a steps forward. Figure out what motivates you, then dig in and don't stop. Don't fear losing what you have. Believe that you're doing the right thing even if you fail. There are no U-Hauls at funerals Resources: Bio and Credentials Not from Here, Not from There/No Soy de Aquí ni de Allá. The Autobiography of Nelson A. Díaz Where to find R.O.G. Podcast: R.O.G on YouTube R.O.G on Apple Podcasts R.O.G on Spotify How diverse is your network?  N.D.I. Network Diversity Index What is your Generosity Style?  Generosity Quiz Credits: Judge Nelson Diaz, Sheep Jam Productions, Host Shannon Cassidy, Bridge Between, Inc. Coming Next: Please join us next week, Episode 147, with Monica Diaz.

This episode features Paige Joki, a staff attorney at the Pennsylvania Education Law Center. After graduating from Whitman College in Walla Walla, Washington, Joki was selected as an NAACP LDF Earl Warren Fellow and a Temple University Beasley School of Law Rubin-Presser Social Justice Fellow. In recognition for her notable contributions to public service at Temple University and for pursuing a legal career in social justice, Joki received the Beth Cross Award.  Since joining the Education Law Center in 2017, Joki has focused on eliminating individual and systemic barriers to quality education for students experiencing homelessness in the Philadelphia region as well as providing “Know Your Rights” training for students, parents, providers and organizations serving students experiencing homelessness. Most recently, she has led the Law Center's Black Girls Education Justice Initiative. In collaboration with a number of groups advocating for more just social conditions for Black girls, the Law Centered conducted five focus groups with students attending school in the Philadelphia area. Emerging from these group discussions were eight principles for ameliorating the individual and systemic racism faced by Black girls. A copy of the report generated through this initiative can be accessed from the Education Law Center's website:   https://www.elc-pa.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/FINAL-Supportive-Spaces-for-web.pdf  

In this episode, I chat with author Elizabeth L Silver about her new novel The Majority, women in the workplace and motherhood, teaching creative writing, and books.Elizabeth L Silver is the author of The Majority , as well as the memoir, The Tincture of Time: A Memoir of (Medical) Uncertainty , and the novel, The Execution of Noa P. Singleton . Her work has been called “fantastic” by the Washington Post and “masterful” by The Wall Street Journal, has been published in seven languages, and optioned for film.Elizabeth has been featured on PBS NewsHour, while her writing has appeared in The Washington Post, New York Magazine, The Guardian, Harper's Bazaar, McSweeney's, The Dallas Morning News, Literary Hub, The Rumpus, The Los Angeles Review of Books, The Millions, among other publications, and she has been a recipient of residencies at several artist colonies in the United States, France, and Spain, including Ucross Foundation, Ragdale, Byrdcliffe Artist Colony, where she was the recipient of the Patterson Fellowship, A Room of Her Own Foundation, where she was a consultant, and the British Centre for Literary Translation. She has also served as a judge for the PEN Center Literary Awards, UCLA's James Kirkwood Literary Prize, AWP's Kurt Brown Prize, twice served as a PEN in the Community Teaching Artist through PEN Center USA, where she curated a program teaching creative writing to prisoners in Lancaster, CA, for cancer patients and survivors with The Benjamin Center, and at a halfway house in Los Angeles; she has also served as a mentor in Fiction for AWP's Writer-to-Writer Program, and taught English as a Second Language in Costa Rica, writing and literature at Drexel University and St. Joseph's University in Philadelphia. She currently teaches creative writing with the UCLA Writers Program.A graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, the MFA program in Creative Writing from the University of East Anglia in England, and Temple University Beasley School of Law, Elizabeth has also worked as an attorney in California and Texas, where she was a judicial clerk for the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, worked on death row cases in Texas, and subsequently in civil litigation in Los Angeles. She continues to keep a foot in the law, and her most recent legal (volunteer) work includes working on asylum cases at the Texas-Mexico border and with survivors of domestic violence in Los Angeles.Elizabeth is also the founder and director of Onward Literary Mentoring, a program that connects writers with award-winning and best-selling authors for individual, tailored writing instruction. Elizabeth L Silver The Majority, Elizabeth L Silver On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft, Stephen King The CandySupport the showThe Bookshop PodcastMandy Jackson-BeverlySocial Media Links

In 1984, Hon. Pauline Newman became the first judge appointed directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Judge Newman has served on that court since, and serves to this day. Reports surfaced in April of this year that Federal Circuit Chief Judge Kimberly Moore had initiated a complaint against Judge Newman under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980. On May 10, 2023, Judge Newman filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against Chief Judge Moore; two other Federal Circuit judges in their capacities as members of the special committee appointed by Chief Judge Moore to investigate the complaint; and the Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit and its members. Judge Newman's federal lawsuit raises issues not just of judicial conduct (given the underlying complaint) and patent law (which are interesting given Judge Newman's and the court's history as well as what some view as its drift away from innovation-protective jurisprudence), but also separation of powers (since Judge Newman was appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate), and even age/disability discrimination (Judge Newman is 95 years old). Our panel discussed these and related issues arising from this most-unusual set of circumstances. Featuring: Prof. Paul R. Gugliuzza, Professor of Law, Temple University Beasley School of LawProf. Josh Blackman, Professor of Law, South Texas College of Law HoustonProf. Arthur Hellman, Professor Emeritus of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of LawCheryl Stanton, Chief Legal and Government Affairs Officer, BrightStar CareModerator: John J. Park Jr., Of Counsel, Strickland Brockington Lewis LLP

I discuss in the episode a major professional development: I am now a Professor of Practice and Director of the Low Income Taxpayer Clinic at Temple University Beasley School of Law! After five wonderful years at Philadelphia Legal Assistance Taxpayer Support Clinic, I am now pursuing this exciting opportunity. I am eager to represent clients across Pennsylvania, to supervise law students, and to teach tax law and IRS procedure.

Gilgo Beach serial killer suspect Rex Heuermann had some odd items in his home that investigators bagged as evidence to prove their case in court. The Law&Crime Network's Jesse Weber analyzes each piece of the puzzle with Jules Epstein, a criminal law and evidence professor at Temple University Beasley School of Law.LAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:YouTube Management - Bobby SzokePodcasting - Sam GoldbergWriting & Video Editing - Michael DeiningerGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSocial Media Management - Vanessa Bein & Kiera BronsonSUBSCRIBE TO OUR OTHER PODCASTS:Court JunkieThey Walk Among AmericaDevil In The DormThe Disturbing TruthSpeaking FreelyLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

A former ballerina and model stands accused of murdering her husband in her Florida home in September 2020. Ashley Benefield claims she shot her husband, Doug Benefield, in self-defense after he attacked her. Leading up to Doug's death, the marriage was filled with disorder as Ashley claimed her husband was abusive and tried to poison her. The former dancer faces a second-degree murder chase in Doug's death as she pushes the stand-your-ground narrative. The Law&Crime Network's Jesse Weber breaks down the story so far with Jules Epstein, a criminal law and evidence professor at Temple University Beasley School of Law.LAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:YouTube Management - Bobby SzokePodcasting - Sam GoldbergWriting & Video Editing - Michael DeiningerGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSocial Media Management - Vanessa Bein & Kiera BronsonSUBSCRIBE TO OUR OTHER PODCASTS:Court JunkieObjectionsThey Walk Among AmericaDevil In The DormThe Disturbing TruthSpeaking FreelyLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Prosecutors announced they will seek the death penalty for Bryan Kohberger if he's convicted of murdering four University of Idaho students. The state alleges Kohberger brutally stabbed the four college students to death in their off-campus home in November 2022 and left behind a knife sheath containing his DNA. The Law&Crime Network's Jesse Weber breaks down five reasons why prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for the accused killer with Professor Jules Epstein, the director of advocacy programs at Temple University Beasley School of Law.LAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:YouTube Management - Bobby SzokePodcasting - Sam GoldbergWriting & Video Editing - Michael DeiningerGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSocial Media Management - Vanessa Bein & Kiera BronsonSUBSCRIBE TO OUR OTHER PODCASTS:Court JunkieObjectionsThey Walk Among AmericaDevil In The DormThe Disturbing TruthSpeaking FreelyLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Rapper YNW Melly, born Jamell Demons, faces trial for allegedly killing two of his friends in October 2018 and staging the murders to look like a drive-by shooting. Authorities allege Demons killed aspiring Florida rappers YNW Juvy, aka Christopher Thomas Jr., and YNW Sakchaser, aka Anthony Williams, with Cortlen Henry, aka YNW Bortlen. The Law&Crime Network's Angenette Levy breaks down the story so far with SiriusXM host Mina “SayWhat” Llona and Professor Jules Epstein, the director of advocacy programs at Temple University Beasley School of Law.LAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:YouTube Management - Bobby SzokePodcasting - Sam GoldbergWriting & Video Editing - Michael DeiningerGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSocial Media Management - Vanessa Bein & Kiera BronsonSUBSCRIBE TO OUR OTHER PODCASTS:Court JunkieObjectionsThey Walk Among AmericaDevil In The DormThe Disturbing TruthSpeaking FreelyLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The judge overseeing Bryan Kohberger's case told prosecutors they have 60 days to file their notice of intent to seek the death penalty for the accused Idaho student murderer if he's convicted. Kohberger stands accused of stabbing four University of Idaho students to death in November 2022. The Law&Crime Network's Jesse Weber discusses the likelihood of a death sentence for Kohberger if he's found guilty with death penalty expert Professor Jules Epstein, the director of advocacy programs at Temple University Beasley School of Law.LAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:YouTube Management - Bobby SzokePodcasting - Sam GoldbergWriting & Video Editing - Michael DeiningerGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSocial Media Management - Vanessa Bein & Kiera BronsonSUBSCRIBE TO OUR OTHER PODCASTS:Court JunkieObjectionsThey Walk Among AmericaDevil In The DormThe Disturbing TruthSpeaking FreelyLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Scott Hemphill (Moderator), New York University School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy Paul R. Gugliuzza, Temple University Beasley School of Law Nathan Kelley, Perkins Coie Erin Mehta, Northrop Grumman

Last week a federal judge in Texas refuted the FDA approval for mifepristone, a pill used for medication abortions, which would suspend that approval across the country. But some experts say - plenty of drugs don't have FDA approval, and are still widely distributed… from baby formula, to multivitamins.  Guest: Rachel Rebouché, dean and James E. Beasley professor of law at the Temple University Beasley School of Law and faculty fellow at the Center for Public Health Law Research. If you enjoy this show, please consider signing up for Slate Plus. Slate Plus members get benefits like zero ads on any Slate podcast, bonus episodes of shows like Slow Burn and Amicus—and you'll be supporting the work we do here on What Next. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to help support our work. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Last week a federal judge in Texas refuted the FDA approval for mifepristone, a pill used for medication abortions, which would suspend that approval across the country. But some experts say - plenty of drugs don't have FDA approval, and are still widely distributed… from baby formula, to multivitamins.  Guest: Rachel Rebouché, dean and James E. Beasley professor of law at the Temple University Beasley School of Law and faculty fellow at the Center for Public Health Law Research. If you enjoy this show, please consider signing up for Slate Plus. Slate Plus members get benefits like zero ads on any Slate podcast, bonus episodes of shows like Slow Burn and Amicus—and you'll be supporting the work we do here on What Next. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to help support our work. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Last Friday, judges in Texas and Washington state handed down conflicting decisions on the legality of abortion medication pills. In Texas, a district judge invalidated the FDA's decades-old approval of the widely used drug mifepristone. Late this Wednesday, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit partially overruled that decision by allowing mifepristone to remain available, but temporarily prevented it from being sent to by mail and limited its approved use to the first seven weeks of pregnancy. Meanwhile, in Washington state, a district judge ordered the FDA to not rollback mifepristone's approval while litigation over the drug is ongoing. Together, the two cases create a legal debacle for the FDA, which the Justice Department has asked the Washington court to provide guidance on. Eventually, the cases may go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Thomas Jipping of The Heritage Foundation and Rachel Rebouché of the Temple University Beasley School of Law join to discuss whether mailing mifepristone violates the Comstock Act; if the FDA's approval of the drug violated the Administrative Procedure Act; and if the district courts had jurisdiction to rule on these cases in the first place. Host Jeffrey Rosen moderates.   Resources   Order Granting in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Washington v. FDA (E.D. Wa., Apr. 7, 2023)  Memorandum Opinion and Order, Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA (N.D. TX., Apr. 7, 2023) Order, Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA (5th Cir., Apr. 13, 2023) Thomas Jipping, “The Justice Department Is Wrong: Federal Law Does Prohibit Mailing Abortion Drugs,” Heritage Foundation Report (Feb. 2023) Rachel Rebouche (with David Cohen and Greer Donley), “The Plaintiffs Trying to Ban the Abortion Pill Admitted They Have No Case,” Slate (March 2023)  Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org.    Continue today's conversation on Facebook and Twitter using @ConstitutionCtr.    Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate, at bit.ly/constitutionweekly.    You can find transcripts for each episode on the podcast pages in our Media Library.

Last week a federal judge in Texas refuted the FDA approval for mifepristone, a pill used for medication abortions, which would suspend that approval across the country. But some experts say - plenty of drugs don't have FDA approval, and are still widely distributed… from baby formula, to multivitamins.  Guest: Rachel Rebouché, dean and James E. Beasley professor of law at the Temple University Beasley School of Law and faculty fellow at the Center for Public Health Law Research. If you enjoy this show, please consider signing up for Slate Plus. Slate Plus members get benefits like zero ads on any Slate podcast, bonus episodes of shows like Slow Burn and Amicus—and you'll be supporting the work we do here on What Next. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to help support our work. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Last week a federal judge in Texas refuted the FDA approval for mifepristone, a pill used for medication abortions, which would suspend that approval across the country. But some experts say - plenty of drugs don't have FDA approval, and are still widely distributed… from baby formula, to multivitamins.  Guest: Rachel Rebouché, dean and James E. Beasley professor of law at the Temple University Beasley School of Law and faculty fellow at the Center for Public Health Law Research. If you enjoy this show, please consider signing up for Slate Plus. Slate Plus members get benefits like zero ads on any Slate podcast, bonus episodes of shows like Slow Burn and Amicus—and you'll be supporting the work we do here on What Next. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to help support our work. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, Sujani sits down with Gwyneth Eliasson, an assistant professor at the Rutgers School of Public Health. They discuss how public health and law intersect, Gwyneth's experiences in academia and teaching, and advice for anyone interested in health policy and these fields.You'll LearnHow Gwyneth found her way into public health from working in public interest law and consultingThe differences between public health law, healthcare law, and public health practice and what opportunities are available for those interested in these areasWhat a day in the life of Gwyneth looks like as a professor How the pandemic has affected Gwyneth's role as a professor and what changes she has seen in students' learningsGwyneth's teaching style and how she incorporates her own experiences and education in projects and assignmentsThe importance of good writing and clear communication in public healthWhat advice Gwyneth has for those interested in the intersection between law and public healthToday's GuestGwyneth M. Eliasson is an Assistant Professor of Health Systems and Policy in the Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy at the Rutgers School of Public Health (RSPH). Before joining the RSPH faculty, she was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Health Policy and Management at the School of Public Health - SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University. She received her JD from Brooklyn Law School and her MPH in Health Systems and Policy from RSPH. As a social justice attorney, she advocated for low-income New Yorkers facing systemic health inequities at administrative proceedings and in Federal courts. As a public health practitioner, she managed CDC-contracted projects with the Center for Public Health Law Research at Temple University Beasley School of Law and consulted for Rutgers School of Law on grant-funded projects to develop a medical-legal partnership (MLP) program in Camden, New Jersey. Her case study on MLPs for older adults is in HEALTHY AGING THROUGH THE SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH (APHA Press, 2021). ResourcesFollow Gwyneth on LinkedIn and Twitter Learn more about Camden's Medical-Legal Partnership Learn more about Temple University's Center for Public Health Law Research Learn more about CDC's Public Health Law Program Buy the book "Teaching Public Health Writing" by Jennifer Beard Listen to the previous episode about informational interviews with Shanna Shulman and the previous career tips for informational interviewsSupport the showJoin The Public Health Career Club: the #1 hangout spot and community dedicated to building and growing your dream public health career.

On this episode of Beyond the Tassel, please welcome Jason Schiffer! Jason is a graduate of the DeSales class of 1999 with his degree in Criminal Justice. Jason is now the Assistant Vice President for Campus Safety and Chief of Police at Lehigh University. Jason has been educating himself for many years and has a firm belief that no education is ever wasted. Jason shares his insights about going back to school as an adult when he mentions how he graduated from the Temple University Beasley School of Law in 2008. Listen in as Jason discusses his passion for working toward creating an equitable community and doing what he can in the law enforcement profession to continue working toward his goal.Connect with Jason:LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/schiffer

Bloomberg Law Host June Grasso was today's guest host. Greg Stohr, Bloomberg Supreme Court reporter,and Derek Muller, Professor of Law at the University of Iowa College of Law discussed the Supreme Court's ruling that blocked the new majority-black Louisiana house district. Rachel Rebouché, Interim Dean of Temple University Beasley School of Law discussed what's next for abortion rights in states. Donald Ayer, former Deputy Attorney General under President George H. W. Bush discuss the possible legal ramifications from the latest Jan. 6 committee hearing. Bloomberg Politics Contributors Jeanne Sheehan Zaino and Rick Davis discussed the political fallout after the recent blockbuster Supreme Court rulings.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week your hosts Steve Lowry and Yvonne Godfrey interview Frank Mangiaracina of Kline & Specter PC (https://www.klinespecter.com/).    Remember to rate and review GTP in iTunes: Click Here To Rate and Review   Episode Details: Philadelphia-based personal injury attorney Frank Mangiaracina with Kline & Specter PC discusses how he secured justice for David Coryell, a motorcycle driver involved in an automobile wreck with a delivery driver employed by a Domino's franchise. On July 27, 2016, defendant Steven Morris was driving a delivery vehicle to deliver Domino's food when he made a sudden left turn into oncoming traffic, crashing his vehicle into David and his motorcycle. David suffered severe physical and emotional injuries from this incident. After numerous operations, he was left with the decision to either amputate his left leg or experience permanent and progressive pain. Despite the defense's attempts to claim that Domino's did not have control over a franchisee's operations and therefore could not be held accountable for the actions of a franchisee's employee, Mangiaracina established that Domino's and the franchisee have a “master-servant relationship,” arguing that Domino's did, in fact, have control over the franchisee and therefore should be held responsible. The jury agreed, and on August 13, 2021, a Philadelphia County jury returned a $2,009,553 verdict in favor of plaintiff David Coryell.     Click Here to Read/Download Trial Documents   Guest Bio: Frank Mangiaracina Frank Mangiaracina focuses his practice on catastrophic personal injury. He is a staunch advocate and proven trial lawyer who helped compile more than $60 million in recoveries in the five years before coming to Kline & Specter.  Most recently, in a COVID-era trial during the summer of 2021, Mangiaracina won a $2.1 million verdict against Domino's Pizza for a client who suffered severe and permanent injuries to his leg when his motorcycle was struck by a delivery driver. As co-lead counsel at trial, Mangiaracina gave a closing argument that helped convince the jury that Domino's was responsible for the actions of a franchisee.  He was also co-counsel in litigation that achieved a $44 million pre-trial settlement in a product liability case for an oil rig worker who was left a quadriplegic after he was struck by a falling light fixture.  In medical malpractice cases, among others, Mangiaracina helped win settlements of $5.5 million, $5 million and $3.5 million for, respectively, failures to timely diagnose stroke, diagnose and treat sepsis and to treat an aortic aneurysm.  These recoveries were made with Mangiaracina's prior firm, Sheridan & Murray LLC in Fort Washington, Pa. He also worked as an attorney at Berger & Montague in Philadelphia and as a law clerk with the Philadelphia firm of Saltz, Mongeluzzi & Bendesky.  Because of his litigation success, Mangiaracina has been named a Pennsylvania Rising Star by Super Lawyers for four consecutive years (2019-2022). The independent lawyers survey group recognizes the top 2.5 percent of attorneys in the state who are 40 or younger.  Mangiaracina earned his law degree at the Temple University Beasley School of Law, where he graduated magna cum laude, in the top five percent of his class and was a member of the Order of the Coif honor society. He was, simultaneously, staff editor for the Temple Law Review and a member of Temple's renowned National Trial Team, which placed in the semifinals of the National Institute of Trial Advocacy's “Tournament of Champions,” an invitation-only competition.  At Temple, Mangiaracina won several awards and scholarships, including the Integrated Trial Advocacy Graduation Award, the Benjamin and Natalie Levin Memorial Scholarship, the Class of 1978 Scholarship and the Faculty Law Scholarship. Read Full Bio   Show Sponsors: Legal Technology Services - LegalTechService.com Digital Law Marketing - DigitalLawMarketing.com Harris Lowry Manton LLP - hlmlawfirm.com   Free Resources: Stages Of A Jury Trial - Part 1 Stages Of A Jury Trial - Part 2

In this episode, we welcome Temple University professors Rachel Rebouché and Paul Gugliuzza, authors of a forthcoming paper in the North Carolina Law Review titled, “Gender Inequality in Patent Litigation” —a data-rich paper that touches on many of the central themes in Season 2.Rachel is a leading scholar in feminist legal theory, reproductive health law, and family law. She is the Interim Dean of Temple University Beasley School of Law, the James E. Beasley Professor of Law, and a Faculty Fellow at Temple's Center for Public Health Law Research. Rachel is an author of Governance Feminism: An Introduction and an editor of Governance Feminism: Notes from the Field, a co-author of the sixth edition of the casebook, Family Law, and the editor of Feminist Judgments: Family Law Opinions Rewritten. Rachel received a JD from Harvard law school, an LLM from Queen's University Belfast, and a BA from Trinity University. Paul is an award-winning scholar, a sought-after author, and a teacher who specializes in civil procedure, federal courts, and intellectual property law with a particular focus on patent litigation. He has testified before both the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives on topics of patent law, and his scholarship has been cited in over a dozen judicial opinions across all levels of the state and federal courts.  A summa cum laude graduate from Tulane University School of Law, Paul clerked for Judge Ronald M. Gould of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and practiced in the Issues and Appeals group at Jones Day prior to his academic career.In this episode, Rachel and Paul discuss the shocking gender disparity that continues to persist in private-practice patent litigation and the much more equitable distribution of legal work in government agencies. They also highlight the mechanisms that militate against greater equity in law firms.Rachel's and Paul's paper shows unequivocally that gender disparity is neither a generational issue that will be resolved by the passage of time nor is it a pipeline issue due to insufficient female STEM lawyers. Through their research, we gain a greater understanding of how law firms must change their economic incentives and entrenched, unconscious cultures if they are to foster true gender equity. Further Reading:• Overqualified and Underrepresented: Gender Inequality in Pharmaceutical Patent Law• Extraordinary Writ or Ordinary Remedy? Mandamus at the Federal Circuit• @TempleLaw• @RRebouche• @prgugliuzzaThanks for listening to Sidebars! Connect with us: Read our Medicine and Molecules (MEMO) Blog Subscribe to our YouTube Channel Questions or feedback? Reach out at socialmedia@kilpatricktownsend.com Learn more about Kilpatrick Townsend **The opinions expressed are those of the attorneys and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm or its clients. This podcast is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.

Kate and Leah spend some additional time on possible fallout from a Dobbs opinion overruling or eviscerating Roe. They interview two people with insight on what we can expect in a post-Roe world. Diana Greene Foster is a professor in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences and a researcher on reproductive health at UCSF. She's also the author of The Turnaway Study: Ten Years, a Thousand Women, and the Consequences of Having--Or Being Denied--An Abortion [3:14]. And Greer Donley is an assistant professor at University of Pittsburgh Law, and one of the three authors of the extremely topical and important article, "The New Abortion Battleground," which is forthcoming in the Columbia Law Review. The paper is written together with Professor David Cohen at Drexel Kline School of Law and Professor Rachel Rebouche, Interim Dean of Temple University Beasley School of Law. The paper analyzes the inter-jurisdictional issues that will emerge if and when the Supreme Court overrules Roe [32:04]. We'll also catch up on some of the additional news and hot takes people have had since the leak happened [57:52].

On this episode of Breaking Upward, host Beth Andersen and Philadelphia George, discuss the importance of giving children a voice in a divorce and how to keep them out of the middle. They address common misconceptions and the role of Child Family Investigators (CFI) and Parental Responsibilities Evaluators (PRE) in allocating parental responsibilities. If you are facing divorce or custody issues, be sure to listen in because over-involving the children will cause more harm than good. Done the right way, children can be heard and respected without permanent damage. Guest Info: Philadelphia George received her undergraduate degree from Pennsylvania State University in 2015, and her Juris Doctorate from Temple University Beasley School of Law in 2019. She clerked in a family law court in Philadelphia and also worked at Andersen Law. Philadelphia's personal experiences in and out of law school make her a passionate advocate. She believes that establishing and maintaining support systems are key to navigating the difficult, emotional issues in family law, and she profoundly connects with Andersen Law's motto of “never hurt a child.” Host Info: Beth Andersen - Owner & Attorney at Andersen Law PC http://bethlynnandersenjd.com Phone: 720-922-3880 Show Mentions: Book Recommendation - Why Did You Have to Get a Divorce? And When Can I Get a Hamster? By Anthony E. Wolf

Our guests this month are Mike Kuzma & Boomer Peterson. They will be sharing their knowledge and experience with commercial real estate investing. Mike - Drawing on his commercial law, real estate, and tax experience, Mike acts as the chief managing officer and general counsel of KL Capital in addition to being a private practice attorney at the national law firm of Hilgers Graben, PLLC where he works on complex commercial litigation and transactions. He graduated summa cum laude from Nebraska Wesleyan University, earned a law degree with honors from the University of Nebraska College of Law, and was awarded a David L. Boren Fellowship to be a visiting honors scholar at Temple University Beasley School of Law. A life-long learner, Mike now hones his skills by teaching seminars, undergraduate classes and podcasting about real estate, business competition, and TT&E law. Prior to practicing law, Mike trained at KPMG and Union Bank & Trust learning asset management, trust fund administration, and complex transactions. Boomer - With over 10 years and $200 million of closings as a commercial real estate agent and managing partner of Pinnacle Commercial Group, Boomer leads KL's asset acquisition strategy. Prior to building his deep knowledge of the midwestern commercial real estate market, Boomer was an investment analyst at Merrill Lynch, where he watched the credit market collapse in 2008. During this experience, he realized the value of wealth building with tangible investments in commercial real estate, joining Pinnacle Commercial Group shortly thereafter. Boomer has a Masters in Sports Management from West Virginia University, and a Bachelors Degree in Communications and Entrepreneurship and Social Enterprise at Wake Forest University where he was a four-year letter winner in both football and track and field. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/josh-nix8/message

In an effort to restrict abortion access, similar to the Texas abortion ban, Missouri Representative Elizabeth Coleman has introduced a bill that would allow citizens to sue anyone helping Missouri residents get an abortion in or outside of the state. The bill would also prevent access to medicated abortions. We speak with Rachel Rebouché, Interim Dean of Temple University Beasley School of Law and the James E. Beasley Professor of Law, about the constitutionality of this bill and what states and the federal government could do to protect reproductive rights.

In an effort to restrict abortion access, similar to the Texas abortion ban, Missouri Representative Elizabeth Coleman has introduced a bill that would allow citizens to sue anyone helping Missouri residents get an abortion in or outside of the state. The bill would also prevent access to medicated abortions. We speak with Rachel Rebouché, Interim Dean of Temple University Beasley School of Law and the James E. Beasley Professor of Law, about the constitutionality of this bill and what states and the federal government could do to protect reproductive rights.

Lecture summary: Dissent has a long and controversial history in international adjudication. This lecture excavates a now-forgotten history of debate over dissent, and identifies competing claims regarding dissent’s effect on judicial legitimacy, independence, and legal doctrine. To evaluate these claims, I undertake a comparative study of dissent practices across three leading international tribunals, the International Court of Justice, the European Court of Human Rights, and the European Court of Justice. Surprisingly, this comparative inquiry reveals that that each of the central claims in long-standing debates over dissent at international courts is misleading – and each in a different way. Challenging conventional wisdom, we find that the presence of dissenting opinions has little systematic impact on legitimacy; the key factor instead is patterns of dissent that suggest geopolitical bias among international judges. Turning to independence, we find that the effects of dissent on judicial independence are mediated by a third factor, namely the length and renewability of judicial terms of office, which vary across international courts. Finally, turning to legal doctrine, we find considerable support for the view that dissents promote the dynamic development of law, but at best limited support for the more heroic claim that today’s dissents form the basis for future majority rulings. In the aftermath of the Cold War, international courts proliferated and scholars could meaningfully speak of the judicialization of international relations. But international adjudication is currently under severe challenge, placing pressure on international courts’ ability to maintain authority within larger systems of global governance. In this context, the success of efforts to maintain and enhance the legitimacy of international courts, independence of their judges, and quality of their doctrine, may well determine the future of international adjudication. More accurately understanding dissent’s impact can substantially advance those efforts. Additional information Jeffrey L. Dunoff is the Laura H. Carnell Professor of Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law. His research focuses on public international law, international regulatory regimes, international courts, and interdisciplinary approaches to international law. Among other activities, he has served as a Visiting Professor at Harvard Law School and Princeton University’s School for Public and International Affairs; a Fernand Braudel Senior Fellow at the European University Institute; a Senior Fellow at Humboldt University; and a Visiting Fellow at the Lauterpacht Research Centre at Cambridge University. Professor Dunoff’s publications include International Legal Theory: Foundations and Frontiers (coeditor, with Mark A. Pollack, forthcoming CUP 2022); International Law; Norms, Actors, Process (with Monica Hakimi, Steve Ratner & David Wippman, 5th edition 2020), a leading textbook; Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations (coeditor, with Mark A. Pollack, CUP 2013); and Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Governance (coeditor, with Joel P. Trachtman, CUP 2009).

Professor Rachel Rebouché, a leading scholar in reproductive health law, contract law and family law, and the Interim Dean of Temple University Beasley School of Law and the James E. Beasley Professor of Law joins Dan to discuss the Supreme Court oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson. Professor Rebouché and Dan discuss the possible outcomes of this case along with the likelihood that Roe v. Wade could be overturned.

During the Trump Administration, there was a lot of attention and talk about the rapid rate at which President Trump was filling federal judicial vacancies. Obviously the main focus was the three Supreme Court seats filled, but he also filled many lower federal judicial openings as well. You haven't seen nearly as much attention on President Biden's work filling federal court vacancies, but he has been very active and actually getting nominations confirmed at a rate faster than any of his predecessors over the last several decades. Of course, he has not had any Supreme Court seats to fill. We wanted to talk about this and why it matters so we caught up with Craig Green, Professor of Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

During our 22nd episode for the month of November we had the pleasure of speaking with Courtney Richardson aka The Ivy Investor. We talked about the following topics and soooo much more:Defined investing & simplified the processexplained the difference between trading and investingwent over the 80/20 splitFavorite platforms to use for investingAfter being bombarded with calls from friends about finances and financial planning, Courtney N. Richardson became increasingly frustrated with the lack of options for quality financial education resources for African American women.In 2014, Courtney leveraged her years of experience in retirement, consumer banking, high net worth advising, and tax planning to create The Ivy Investor. Courtney's financial and legalcommentary has been featured in AARP, AOL, Forbes, New York Magazine, The Huffington Post, Black Enterprise, and many other online publications. She is also featured in the New York Times bestseller, "Get Good With Money."Courtney provides webinars and masterclasses on how to create wealth through investing, how to retain wealth using appropriate tax strategies, and how to transfer wealth efficiently to the next generation (Generational Wealth).Courtney holds a Doctor of Jurisprudence (J.D.) from West Virginia University College of Law and an LL.M. (Taxation) from Temple University Beasley School of Law.Email: courtney@theivyinvestor.comCourtney - https://theivyinvestor.com/Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/theivyinvestorFacebook - http://www.facebook.com/theivyinvestorLinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/courtney-richardson-esq

Texas's new, highly restrictive abortion law, SB8, has been in effect for a few weeks now. What has it changed for residents of Texas, and what does it reflect about U.S. courts and the future of Roe v. Wade? We caught up with Rachel Rebouche, Interim Dean and Professor of Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law, to talk about what's been happening in Texas, in other states, and nationally as a result of this new law. We discuss how both state and federal courts have been responding and why the Supreme Court didn't block SB8. Plus, Rebouche describes some of the real-life effects caused by lack of access to abortion, and where she thinks we could be in a year. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

On today's episode we are pleased to have Nicole Ramos, Director of Al Otro Lado . Al Otro Lado is a binational non-profit organization providing holistic legal and humanitarian support to indigent refugees, deportees, and other migrants in the U.S. and Tijuana through a multidisciplinary, client-centered, harm reduction-based practice. Nicole Ramos fiercely advocates for immigrants at the border by helping asylum seekers in Tijuana, Mexico who wish to present themselves to immigration authorities. She is incredibly brave and fearless – not only is she constantly in front of the U.S. government challenging the practice of turning away asylum seekers at the border – but she is also equipping these families with the knowledge needed to advocate for themselves. Nicole is also an Adjunct Professor at Temple University Beasley School of Law and lectures extensively at universities, law schools, and professional conferences throughout the United States and Mexico regarding the impact of border enforcement practices and policies on asylum seekers. She talks about the impact of the Migrant Protection Program (MPP), Title 42, the reality many unaccompanied minors face and the lack of basic human aid provided to these refugees. Her work is complex and ground breaking – Al Otro Lado is assuring that asylum seekers can meet their needs with dignity. If you are interested in learning more about Al Otro Lado and Nicole's Ramos work please consider donating to their page at this link! Please also follow Al Otro Lado on social media: Facebook, Instagram , Twitter and Linked in! DISCLAIMER – The views and opinions expressed in the podcast represent the view of the host and guest(s) and not necessarily the official view of Clark Hill PLC. No information contained in this Podcast or on this Website shall constitute financial, investment, legal and/or other professional advice and that no professional relationship of any kind is created between you and podcast host, the guests or Clark Hill PLC. You are urged to speak with your financial, investment, or legal advisors before making any investment or legal decisions. 

Remember when Alicia Silverstone said in Clueless that her father was a litigator, the "scariest kind of lawyer"? Well, that's Elizabeth Lippy. She's just the right kind of scary. She knows her way around a courtroom and how to woo a jury. (Literally, but more on that later). No matter what hat she's wearing (and there are a lot of them), she's a litigator right down to the bone. As the partner/co-founder of the criminal defense and personal injury firm Fairlie and Lippy PC, the Founder and Executive Director of TACT (Trial Advocacy Consulting & Training LLC), and the Director of Trial Advocacy at Temple University Beasley School of Law, Elizabeth has been sharpening her trial chops her entire career and now she's teaching others how to do do it. She's a fierce advocate for her clients, having extensive experience defending criminal defendants accused of sex crimes, and an advocate for women being authentic in the courtroom. (Find out what she thinks about pantyhose). Included in this conversation: What she thought a female lawyer was “supposed” to look like The best advice for trial lawyers Pantyhose in the courtroom How a juror FBI Agent became her husband The adrenaline rush of trial The nitty gritty of defending sex crimes That time a client admitted the crime after a non-guilty verdict Is there really justice in a courtroom? Attitudes towards victim bashing in sex crimes Is the law fair to defendants in sex crimes? The danger of inviting your date upstairs Parenting sons to protect against rape allegations Parenting daughters to protect against sex crimes Jury selection in sex crime trials How teens can get in trouble sexting Fun jury stories What she really thinks of the jury Are jury experts real? Is there some truth to Susan Smith Blakely's ABA Journal article? What we think about the ABA Journal Commonplace sexual harassment in the workplace Is it “normal”? Innocent until proven guilty still apply? If you liked this interview, FOLLOW me on Apple and Spotify for more like this one! You can also watch this interview on YouTube. If you're interested in being a guest on Wake Up Call, DM me on Instagram or email me at Christina@GetHappyDivorce.com.

Panel on Privacy, Data, and Competition Policy at the 9th Annual Symposium on the Law & Economics of Privacy & Data Security. Panel Members:  Erika Douglas, Assistant Professor of Law, Temple University Beasley School of Law Michael Kades, Director of Markets and Competition Policy, Washington Center for Equitable Growth John Yun, Associate Professor of Law, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School

WERE YOU DAMAGED BY INACCURATE JUDGMENT OR LIEN INFORMATION ON YOUR CREDIT REPORT?  Learn How You Could Qualify for $1,500 from a Settlement with One of the Top Three Credit Reporting Agencies! Jim Francis is an accomplished consumer law attorney who works to protect consumers in federal and state courts in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.  Francis' work at his firm, Francis Mailman Soumilas, P.C., focuses on fair credit reporting, fair debt collection practices, and consumer class actions.  He has served as Class counsel in over 35 consumer class actions, trial counsel in two class actions, and counsel to some of the largest Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) settlements in history. He has published articles and spoken extensively about the FCRA. Francis appeared on various news programs, including the Today Show and PBS NewsHour to discuss consumer-related issues and was featured in The Philadelphia Inquirer.  Also, he currently serves on the Board of Directors of the National Association of Consumer Advocates (NACA). Francis has been recognized for his work in consumer protection litigation.  In 2004, Mr. Francis was the youngest lawyer to be ranked in the Top 100 Superlawyers in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia Magazine and Pennsylvania Super Lawyers magazine.   He was subsequently ranked a Top 100 Pennsylvania Superlawyer in 2008, 2012, 2014-2018 and has regularly ranked one of the Top 100 Superlawyers in Philadelphia since 2004.  Also in May 2014, he received the Community Legal Services of Philadelphia's Equal Justice Award at its annual Breakfast of Champions. He is a 1992 graduate of Muhlenberg College (B.A., cum laude) and a 1995 graduate of the Temple University Beasley School of Law.   

WERE YOU DAMAGED BY INACCURATE JUDGMENT OR LIEN INFORMATION ON YOUR CREDIT REPORT?  Learn How You Could Qualify for $1,500 from a Settlement with One of the Top Three Credit Reporting Agencies! Jim Francis is an accomplished consumer law attorney who works to protect consumers in federal and state courts in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.  Francis' work at his firm, Francis Mailman Soumilas, P.C., focuses on fair credit reporting, fair debt collection practices, and consumer class actions.  He has served as Class counsel in over 35 consumer class actions, trial counsel in two class actions, and counsel to some of the largest Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) settlements in history. He has published articles and spoken extensively about the FCRA. Francis appeared on various news programs, including the Today Show and PBS NewsHour to discuss consumer-related issues and was featured in The Philadelphia Inquirer.  Also, he currently serves on the Board of Directors of the National Association of Consumer Advocates (NACA). Francis has been recognized for his work in consumer protection litigation.  In 2004, Mr. Francis was the youngest lawyer to be ranked in the Top 100 Superlawyers in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia Magazine and Pennsylvania Super Lawyers magazine.   He was subsequently ranked a Top 100 Pennsylvania Superlawyer in 2008, 2012, 2014-2018 and has regularly ranked one of the Top 100 Superlawyers in Philadelphia since 2004.  Also in May 2014, he received the Community Legal Services of Philadelphia's Equal Justice Award at its annual Breakfast of Champions. He is a 1992 graduate of Muhlenberg College (B.A., cum laude) and a 1995 graduate of the Temple University Beasley School of Law.   

Prof. Scott Burris is director of the Center for Public Health Law Research at the Temple University Beasley School of Law. Stephen Morrissey, the interviewer, is the Executive Managing Editor of the Journal. S. Burris, E.D. Anderson, and A.C. Wagenaar. The “Legal Epidemiology” of Pandemic Control. N Engl J Med 2021;384:1973-1975.

This episode of the C3 podcast special guest Juliet Okafor stops by and we talk about how cybersecurity professionals can better work with the business, the b.s behind the Bootcamp race in Cybersecurity, and much more.    Meet Juliet:  Juliet Okafor, J.D., is a cybersecurity professional who has combined her knowledge of the legal system and cybersecurity solution models into success stories across fortune 500 industries throughout the USA. Her ability to scope, plan and design the creation of an OT Cybersecurity Management System framework for one of the largest cruise lines in the world is a testament to her commitment and leadership regardless of the challenge. She is a passionate security solution visionary and strategist who builds the Fortune 500 enterprise’s overarching security strategy that governs all other smaller strategies within. She is the person who determines how to solve the company’s problem, be it vulnerability management, incident response, or reducing the risk associated with technology or vendors, and then puts a plan into action or roadmap to remediate the risks in place – using a combination of people, transforming operations and an array of emerging security technology. Juliet’s collaboration with key infrastructure cybersecurity leaders from the energy, manufacturing, maritime, transportation, and chemical sectors have led to realistic and integrated IT/OT cybersecurity programs with positive security results. The unique value of Juliet’s ability within the cybersecurity field is also evident in her relentless and dynamic approach to understanding the expectations, needs, and requirements of her clients in concert with providing the best cybersecurity technologies and services required. Okafor has also helped build startup security organizations from the ground up, negotiating contracts, forging partnerships, selecting tools, leading strategic initiatives, and partnering with key customers and security stakeholders to create, identify, measure, and report the maturity of their enterprise security programs to senior leadership to justify the additional financial investment or demonstrate continuous improvement. Juliet graduated from UMass-Amherst with a B.A. in Communication, Fordham University with an M.A. in Public Communication and Media Studies and received her Juris Doctorate from Temple University – Beasley School of Law. She is currently the CEO of RevolutionCyber.

My guest in this episode is Robert Levant, from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States. He is a veteran trial attorney, coach, and strategist for lawyers seeking to reach their greatest potential as advocates. He is the creator and co-host of the Iron Advocate – a podcast on legal practice. With the podcast, Robert can be described as a global citizen because his work vibrates beyond his locality, Philadelphia, and he receives great feedback from people from all over the world, including Canada and the United Kingdom. His global citizenry is also manifest in his charity work in Africa. Much of Robert’s practice has been in the area of civil rights violations and criminal law. In 1999, Bob co-founded Levant Martin P.C, a criminal defense firm that represents clients charged with serious felony crimes including capital murder, robbery, complex federal narcotic offenses, and drug trafficking. He has litigated over 50 criminal jury trials to verdict. He has secured several multimillion-dollar recoveries including $2.5 million, the largest settlement ever paid by the City of Philadelphia in a police shooting civil rights case, for a homeowner shot inside of his house by an unprovoked police officer. Bob, a former panelist on the television show “It’s Your Call with Lynn Doyle,” regularly serves as an Adjunct Professor at The University of Pennsylvania, where he teaches a course on Law and Social Policy. He has also served as an Adjunct Instructor at Temple University Beasley School of Law’s L.L.M. program in Trial Advocacy. Robert Levant can be reached here: Websites · levantlaw.net (Company Website) · levantlaw.net (Blog) Phone · 570-399-3800 (Work) Email rlevant@levantlaw.net Twitter · ironadvocate

On October 29, 2020, the Penn and Temple Student Chapters of the Federalist Society hosted former officemates and leading scholars of presidential power John Yoo and Saikrishna Prakash for a debate on the true extent of presidential power. In his new book, "Defender in Chief," John Yoo argues that Trump, despite his populism, is more often the defender rather than the opponent of the original Constitution. In "The Living Presidency," however, Sai Prakash counters that Trump, like many modern presidents, has violated the Constitution’s grant of executive power. The debate was moderated by Temple Law's Professor Craig Green.Featuring:Prof. John C. Yoo, UC Berkeley School of LawProf. Saikrishna B. Prakash, University of Virginia School of LawModerator: Prof. Craig Green, Temple University Beasley School of LawIntroduction: Lorenzo Riboni, The Federalist Society's Temple Law Student ChapterIntroduction: Andrea Leelike, The Federalist Society's Penn Law Student Chapter*******As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

On October 29, the Penn and Temple Student Chapters of the Federalist Society hosted former officemates and leading scholars of presidential power for a debate on the true extent of presidential power. In his new book, "Defender in Chief," John Yoo argues that Trump, despite his populism, is more often the defender rather than the opponent of the original Constitution. In "The Living Presidency," however, Sai Prakash counters that Trump, like many modern presidents, has violated the Constitution's grant of executive power. The debate was moderated by Temple Law's Professor Craig Green.Featuring:- Saikrishna B. Prakash, James Monroe Distinguished Professor of Law and Paul G. Mahoney Research Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law- John C. Yoo, Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law; Co-Faculty Director, Korea Law Center; and Director, Public Law & Policy Program, UC Berkeley School of Law- [Moderator] Craig Green, Professor of Law, Temple University Beasley School of Law

My guest Patricia Rodriguez. Patricia was born to a poor working single mother and grew up homeless until seven years old. Her mother battled addiction until Patricia was a teenager. She is always determined to make a difference, set herself to getting a higher education, and becoming a lawyer. She graduated with honors after a rocky start her freshman year. Patricia left her mother's home at 13 and lived with her family in California while attending high school. She attended the University of Southern California on scholarship, graduating with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration with a concentration in marketing and communications. She went on to attend law school in Philadelphia at Temple University Beasley School of Law. She participated in the mock trial team for three years in high school, three years in college, and on Temple's National Trial Team; always knowing law was her passion and life. She received exceptional advocacy training from one of the best law school programs in the country. www.attorneyprod.com

My guest Patricia Rodriguez. Patricia was born to a poor working single mother and grew up homeless until seven years old. Her mother battled addiction until Patricia was a teenager. She is always determined to make a difference, set herself to getting a higher education, and becoming a lawyer. She graduated with honors after a rocky start her freshman year. Patricia left her mother's home at 13 and lived with her family in California while attending high school. She attended the University of Southern California on scholarship, graduating with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration with a concentration in marketing and communications. She went on to attend law school in Philadelphia at Temple University Beasley School of Law. She participated in the mock trial team for three years in high school, three years in college, and on Temple's National Trial Team; always knowing law was her passion and life. She received exceptional advocacy training from one of the best law school programs in the country. www.attorneyprod.com

Welcome to the Elevator World News Podcast. Today’s podcast news podcast is sponsored by elevatorbooks.com: www.elevatorbooks.com NEII NEWS: REVISED GUIDE AND A TRANSITION The National Elevator Industry, Inc. (NEII) recently announced its Elevator & Escalator Industry Cybersecurity Best Practices guide has been revised and that its Director of Government Affairs Dylan Isenberg is leaving this month to attend Temple University Beasley School of Law. With NEII for more than three years, Isenberg is credited with passing legislation in Louisiana, negotiating amnesty for civil fines in Massachusetts and assisting companies with tariff issues. An announcement on Isenberg’s replacement will be made soon. After contacting global cybersecurity company Symantec in 2019 to conduct a peer review of the best-practices guide, initially released in April 2019 (ELENET 781), NEII added a new terminology section and an expanded section on operational cybersecurity to it. To read the full transcript of today's podcast, visit: elevatorworld.com/news Subscribe to the Podcast: iTunes │ Google Play | SoundCloud │ Stitcher │ TuneIn

This teleforum will focus on patent subject matter eligibility issues highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly as they relate to patentability of medical diagnostic tests. The panel will provide a brief review of Section 101 case law, particularly the recent line of subject matter eligibility cases from the Supreme Court stemming from Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank and Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, and will analyze the impact of these Supreme Court cases on innovation and investment in medical diagnostic technology. The panel will comment on the lessons to be learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, and provide recommendations for administrative and legislative actions that would assure the continuation of US leadership in medical diagnostics.Featuring:-- Prof. Paul R. Gugliuzza, Professor of Law, Temple University Beasley School of Law-- Hon. David J. Kappos, Partner, Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP-- Prof. David O. Taylor, Robert G. Storey Distinguished Faculty Fellow, Associate Professor of Law, Co-Director, Tsai Center for Law, Science and Innovation -- Moderator: Mr. Andrew F. Halaby, Partner, Snell & Wilmer

This teleforum will focus on patent subject matter eligibility issues highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly as they relate to patentability of medical diagnostic tests. The panel will provide a brief review of Section 101 case law, particularly the recent line of subject matter eligibility cases from the Supreme Court stemming from Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank and Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, and will analyze the impact of these Supreme Court cases on innovation and investment in medical diagnostic technology. The panel will comment on the lessons to be learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, and provide recommendations for administrative and legislative actions that would assure the continuation of US leadership in medical diagnostics.Featuring:-- Prof. Paul R. Gugliuzza, Professor of Law, Temple University Beasley School of Law-- Hon. David J. Kappos, Partner, Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP-- Prof. David O. Taylor, Robert G. Storey Distinguished Faculty Fellow, Associate Professor of Law, Co-Director, Tsai Center for Law, Science and Innovation -- Moderator: Mr. Andrew F. Halaby, Partner, Snell & Wilmer

The black letter law and articles in this episode are: The Insurrection Act 10 USC Section 251-253 https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title10/subtitleA/part1/chapter13&edition=prelim Posse Comitatus Act 18 USC Section 1385 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1385 William Banks, Stephen Dycus “Soldiers on the Home Front: The Domestic Role of the American Military” https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674736740 William Banks “Providing “Supplemental Security” – The Insurrection Act and the Military Role in Responding to Domestic Crises,” Journal of National Security Law and Policy, December 2009 https://jnslp.com/2009/12/15/providing-supplemental-security-the-insurrection-act-and-the-military-role-in-responding-to-domestic-crises/ William Banks, Stephen Dycus “Martial Law Would Sweep the Country Into a Great Legal Unknown” The Atlantic, March 27, 2020 https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/martial-law-would-sweep-country-great-legal-unknown/608773/ Calling Forth Act of 1792 https://www.constitution.org/mil/mil_act_1792.htm Stephen Vladeck, “Emergency Power and the Militia Acts” Yale Law Journal, October 2004. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/note/emergency-power-and-the-militia-acts Executive Order 10730 https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=89&page=transcript Executive Order 11053 https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-11053-providing-assistance-for-the-removal-unlawful-obstructions-justice Executive Order 12804 https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-12804-providing-for-the-restoration-law-and-order-the-city-and-county-los Letter from DC Mayor Muriel Bowser to President Trump https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6937560/Bowser-Letter.pdf “Federal Plan to Control DC Protests Taps 7,600 Personnel” Bloomberg News, June 4, 2020. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-05/federal-plan-to-control-d-c-protests-has-7-600-personnel-tapped Report of the Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department (Christopher Commission Report) https://archive.org/details/ChristopherCommissionLAPD “U.S. Troops Went to the Border in 1997. They Killed an American Boy.” New York Times, November 27, 2018 https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/27/us/esequiel-hernandez-death-border-mexico.html “Ex-defense chief Mattis rips Trump for dividing Americans” AP, June 3, 2020 https://apnews.com/47a55054ccd7912fd7ceae833fc3feb6 “Troops should not be used as law enforcement against protesters, Esper says” Military Times, June 3, 2020 https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2020/06/03/troops-should-not-be-used-as-law-enforcement-against-protestors-secdef-says/ William Banks, Stephen Dycus, Peter Raven Hansen, Stephen Vladeck “National Security Law (Aspen Casebook) 7th Edition” https://www.amazon.com/National-Security-Law-Aspen-Casebook/dp/1543806791/ Samuel Huntington “The Soldier and the State” https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674817364 Charles Dunlap "Mobilizing the military for domestic operations: some legal considerations" Lawfire, June 2, 2020. https://sites.duke.edu/lawfire/2020/06/02/mobilizing-the-military-for-domestic-operations-some-legal-considerations/ Professor William Banks is Chair of the ABA Standing Committee on Law and National Security Advisory Committee and an Emeritus Professor at the Syracuse University College of Law http://law.syr.edu/profile/william-banks1 Harvey Rishikof is a Visiting Professor at Temple University Beasley School of Law and the Director of Policy and Cyber Security Research at the University of Maryland Applied Research Laboratory For Intelligence and Security https://www.law.temple.edu/contact/harvey-rishikof/

The global coronavirus pandemic has changed the way different corners of the world interact with each other, perhaps forever. Nowhere is this more true than the global economy, where a decade's long trend toward the easier exchange of trade and investment was already under increasing political pressure when the pandemic broke. It may now be facing a truly unprecedented set of challenges. To discuss how the global trade and investment systems are being impacted by the coronavirus pandemic, Scott R. Anderson spoke to three legal experts who have a wealth of private and public sector experience between them: Julian Arato of Brooklyn Law School, Kathleen Claussen of the University of Miami School of Law and Ben Heath, currently at NYU School of Law, and soon to be of the Temple University Beasley School of Law.

“My class is the most important class you will have as a pharmacy student.” This is likely how every pharmacy school professor feels because they are so passionate about their expertise (and that's a great thing!). However, there is one class that does pull rank, because if you are unable to successfully apply what you learn, you legally will not be able to practice any of the others. Pharmacy law is one of the most integral courses you will take as a pharmacy student, because it prepares you for arguably the most difficult exam you'll take in your career: the MPJE. That's why on this week's podcast episode, I've invited an expert on pharmacy law who teaches this very topic, and has created his niche in helping pharmacy students to best prepare for the MPJE. Jerry Musheno, R.Ph., Esq., teaches pharmacy law at Wilkes University Nesbitt School of Pharmacy and Jefferson University College of Pharmacy, and has devoted much of his professional life to assisting students pass the MPJE exam. He graduated from Temple University School of Pharmacy and Temple University Beasley School of Law. He has enjoyed a varied pharmacy and law career, including operating his own pharmacy, and serving as Director of the Medicare Part D Appeals and the Eligibility Appeals related to the Affordable Care Act. He also serves on many community boards. Resources Mentioned in this Podcast: 1. MPJE Made Easy: http://mpjemadeeasy.com 2. Book- Gen-Z Pharmacist: Dominate Pharmacy School & Script Your Dream Career: bit.ly/35QXlP8 Main Points From this Podcast: - How pharmacy students can best prepare for the MPJE - Best-practice tips for pharmacy students & newly-licensed pharmacists in the profession related to pharmacy law - The best thing to focus on when preparing for the MPJE - Resources available to make your MPJE studying easy - Revealing the best-kept secret of pharmacy law Like The Fit Pharmacist on Facebook: www.facebook.com/fitpharmfam Host: Adam Martin, PharmD, ACSM-CPT, NAMS-CNC -Website: www.thefitpharmacist.com -LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/fitpharmfam -Instagram: www.instagram.com/thefitpharmacist -YouTube: bit.ly/3accu0u Guest: Jerry Musheno, R.Ph., Esq. -Website: http://mpjemadeeasy.com

As Founder and Owner of Pen Legacy ®, Charron Monaye has been recognized as a Literary Game Changer who doesn’t mind adapting words into legacies. She’s authored 10 books (co-authored 4), published over 25 new authors, written/produced 3 theatrical productions, contributed to more than 20 book anthologies worldwide, and hired to adapt other novels into theatrical scripts such as; From Federal Prison to First Lady, Til Death Do us Part, Testify, just to name a few. In 2018/2019, she had the opportunity to produce and premiere her sold-out stage play, “Get Out Of Your Own Way” in Hollywood, California and Times Square, New York.  Utilizing many of the same tactics commonly used today, Charron Monaye gave a new meaning to what it means to “share your truth” and exemplifies just how far your truth will take you. From her then unprecedented writing techniques to the continuously innovative ways in which she uses social issues, current events, timeless messages and her expertise on scriptwriting and storytelling, Charron remains a cutting-edge writer, who pushes all boundaries.  Toni Moore, Esquire is an attorney, author, and strategist who is committed to helping women become savvy CEOs in every aspect of their lives.  Toni Moore is a first-generation college student who graduated from the University of Pennsylvania and attended the Temple University Beasley School of Law. Toni is a licensed attorney in the States of Pennsylvania and New Jersey; attained a Ll.M. in Taxation, Certifications in Group Insurance and Retirement Benefits; teaches Nonprofit Compliance, Public Policy and Super Soul Leadership and previously maintained an insurance license, mortgage broker’s license as well as Series 6, 63 and 26 Investment Licenses.  

  Aaron Freiwald, Managing Partner of Freiwald Law and host of the weekly podcast, Good Law | Bad Law, is joined by the Honorable Michael Snyder, Chancellor of the Philadelphia Bar, to discuss the current state of law in our country as we grapple with the COVID-19 crisis. How has the pandemic affected the legal community? How will the legal industry continue to operate? And, what does the future of law look like?   In today’s episode, Judge Snyder joins Aaron to offer his perspective on the issues, legal and otherwise, that the country is facing as a result of the current pandemic. Aaron and Judge Snyder are tackling some of today’s toughest questions, talking about where things stand right now as far as the legal field and what the affects have been. The mission of the Philadelphia Bar has always been to serve the profession and the public by promoting justice, professional excellence and respect for the rule of law. Throughout the conversation, Judge Snyder explains his role as the Bar’s leader and the importance of law for the functioning of our Government and Democracy, as well as the significance of a positive attitude. Aaron and Judge Snyder discuss the ethical obligations of lawyers, especially today, and the need for adaptability, cooperation, and persistence. What is already changing? What needs to change?   A graduate of Temple Law, Judge Snyder is currently a distinguished neutral mediator and arbitrator at The Dispute Resolution Institute (DRI), working to resolve conflict across many different areas of legal practice. Before joining the DRI in 2012, Judge Snyder served as a Workers’ Compensation Judge for approximately 15 years. Prior to his appointment, Judge Snyder was engaged in private practice, representing Plaintiffs, Claimants, Employers, and Defendants. He has lectured extensively for the Philadelphia Bar Association, the Pennsylvania Bar Association, the Pennsylvania Bar Institute, and the Philadelphia Trial Lawyers Association, among many others. Additionally, Judge Snyder is an Adjunct Professor at the Temple University Beasley School of Law, and has been named Scholar in Residence at Temple’s Fox Business School.     To learn more about Judge Snyder please visit his bio page here. To learn more about the Philadelphia Bar please click here.     Host: Aaron Freiwald Guest: the Honorable Michael Snyder     Follow Good Law | Bad Law: YouTube: Good Law | Bad Law Facebook: @GOODLAWBADLAW Instagram: @GoodLawBadLaw Website: https://www.law-podcast.com

The black letter law and articles in this episode are: Saenz v. Roe 526 US 489 (1999) https://www.oyez.org/cases/1998/98-97 Pollack v. Duff 958 F. Supp. 2d 280 (D.D.C. 2013) https://casetext.com/case/pollack-v-duff-1 United States v. Guest 383 US 745 (1966) https://www.oyez.org/cases/1965/65 Shapiro v. Thompson 394 US 618 (1969) https://www.oyez.org/cases/1967/9 CRS Report: “The Posse Comitatus Act and Related Matters: A Sketch” November, 2018 https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42669.pdf Mapp v. Ohio 367 US 643 (1961) https://www.oyez.org/cases/1960/236 CARES Act of 2020 https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hr748/BILLS-116hr748enr.pdf Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/197/11/ Feres Doctrine from Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/340/135/ Lawfare Blog: “Quarantine and Isolation Authorities in States Affected by COVID-19” https://www.lawfareblog.com/quarantine-and-isolation-authorities-states-affected-covid-19 Arrest of Florida pastor for violating state public health emergency orders https://www.tampabay.com/news/hillsborough/2020/04/02/tampa-pastor-arrested-for-defying-virus-orders-closes-church-due-to-tyrannical-government/ Arrest of Maryland man for violating state emergency orders https://wtop.com/maryland/2020/03/maryland-man-arrested-for-violating-ban-on-gatherings-with-party-in-motel-room/ Current presidential actions and executive orders https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/ Harvey Rishikof is a Visiting Professor at Temple University Beasley School of Law and the Director of Policy and Cyber Security Research at the University of Maryland Applied Research Laboratory For Intelligence and Security https://www.law.temple.edu/contact/harvey-rishikof/

In this episode of Public Health Perspectives, Lindsay Cloud and Lance Gable discuss legal epidemiology. Lindsay Cloud is the director of the Policy Surveillance Program at the Center for Public Health Law Research (CPHLR) at Temple University Beasley School of Law. Lance Gable is an associate professor of law at Wayne State University and an expert on public health law and bioethics. Both Lindsay and Lance are authors in an upcoming supplement on legal epidemiology that will be available in February 2020.

This episode was hosted and recorded on October 15, 2019 by the Temple University Beasley School of Law Student Chapter.

This episode was hosted and recorded on October 15, 2019 by the Temple University Beasley School of Law Student Chapter.

Investing 101...learn about investing terms, ways to save and how she helped someone go from bankruptcy to owning her home outride to retired. Courtney Richardson, known as The Ivy Investor, is the resource for women seeking to navigate the maze of the investment world in ways that make sense. Courtney is a current attorney and former stockbroker and investment advisor with fifteen years of experience in the financial services industry. She lends her legal and financial expertise to The Huffington Post, AOL, My Fab Finance, Forbes, and other online publications. Courtney was named as one of the 7 Black Millennial Financial Experts To Follow On Instagram in 2019 by Black Enterprise. Courtney holds a BA degree in Philosophy from the University of Pittsburgh. She also holds a JD from West Virginia University College of Law and a LL.M. in Taxation and Certificate in Estate Planning from Temple University Beasley School of Law. Courtney can be found: website: www.theivyinvestor.com IG, FB, & Twitter: @TheIvyInvestor Media Sponsor: SwagHer Follow me on IG and Twitter @itsmymoney_ and FB@itsmymoneyjournal

In this episode, Robert L. Tsai, Professor of Law at the American University Washington College of Law and Clifford Scott Green Chair and Visiting Professor of Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law, discusses his book "Practical Equality," which is published by W.W. Norton and Company. Tsai begins be explaining what he means by "practical equality" and how it works to shape the law. He provides examples of how courts and other institutions have acted consistently and inconsistently with practical equality. And he reflects on how the concept of practical equality can help up address hard questions more effectively. Tsai is on Twitter at @robertltsai.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Jonathan Lipson, professor of law at Temple University Beasley School of Law, joins the Business Scholarship Podcast to discuss his recent article The Secret Life of Priority: Corporate Reorganization After Jevic.This episode is hosted by Andrew Jennings, a teaching fellow and lecturer in law at Stanford Law School.

In this episode, Duncan Hollis, Professor of Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law, non-resident scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and member of the Organization of American States Inter-American Juridical Committee, discusses his forthcoming article "Beyond Naming and Shaming: Accusations and International Law in Cybersecurity," co-authored with Martha Finnemore, University Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at George Washington University. Hollis begins by stating the limitations of the concept of naming and shaming on international activities in cyberspace, and advocates for the concept of accusations in the international law and international relations literature. He explains the concept of accusations in context to state and non-state cyberactivities, bringing in historical examples from North Korean hacking activities, the non-proliferation effort of American actors on Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities in Operation Olympic Games, and the Chinese hacking of the Office for Personnel Management. He offers explanations for state and non-state use of international law and international norms to incentivize and disincentivize activities in cyberspace. He concludes by providing his insights and recommendations for scholars, states, and non-state actors in the international cyber environment. Hollis is on Twitter at @DuncanHollis.This episode was hosted by Luce Nguyen, a student at Oberlin College and the co-founder of the Oberlin Policy Research Institute, an undergraduate public policy organization based at Oberlin College. Nguyen is on Twitter at @NguyenLuce. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Robert Schwartz, Phyllis W. Beck Chair in Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law, talks Professor Ursula Kilkelly through the history of Juvenile Law Center, describing how the center evolved from representing individual children and young people to become a national advocacy organisation fighting to better the lives of thousands.

U.S. and Mexican border communities are contending with a surge of asylum-seeking children and parents, arriving by the thousands each day. The Trump administration portrays it as a “national emergency” and is sending troops, turning asylum-seekers away, and circumventing Congress to build walls. Adam Isacson (WOLA’s Director for Defense Oversight) and Maureen Meyer (WOLA’s Director for Mexico and Migration) discuss why the crisis is happening, and the Trump administration’s cruel efforts to “deter” migrants. Adam talks about what he’s seen over two weeks in San Diego and Tijuana so far this year. Then both outline a vision of what the process for asylum-seekers would look like if the U.S. and Mexican governments adjusted from a “security emergency” to a “humanitarian crisis” response. Resources cited in the podcast include: WOLA’s graphical overview of the February migrant data, which U.S. Customs and Border Protection released on March 5. A December 2018 “snapshot” report, and February 2019 update, detailing current asylum waitlists at ports of entry across the U.S.-Mexico border, by the Strauss Center at the University of Texas at Austin, the Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies at the University of California at San Diego, and the Migration Policy Center at the European University Institute. WOLA’s Central America Monitor, which tracks U.S. aid to the region and evaluates its progress. WOLA’s new Asylum Resources for Attorneys, compiled with the Temple University Beasley School of Law to provide resources for lawyers representing Central American asylum seekers.

On today's episode, my guest Courtney Richardson, The Ivy Investor shares valuable insights on how anyone can jumpstart their investing journey. Courtney Richardson is the Founder of The Ivy Investor. The Ivy Investor was created as a resource to breakdown Wall Street in simple terms for African Americans. With fifteen years of experience in financial services, Courtney has a wide range of experience in retirement, consumer banking, high net worth advising, and taxes. She is a former stockbroker and investment advisor. Courtney holds a J.D. from West Virginia University College of Law and a LL.M. (Taxation) from Temple University Beasley School of Law. She has provided financial and legal commentary for AOL, The Huffington Post, Wealth Noir, My Fab Finance, and more. On this episode, Courtney shares: -What are some things to consider "before" anyone starts investing -What are some simple steps anyone can take when they're ready to start investing -Why is risk tolerance important -How would someone know what they can handle, her three best strategies everyone should consider -And so much more. To connect with Courtney, visit her website at www.theivyinvestor.com Facebook page link: www.facebook.com/theivyinvestor -- If you haven't already, be sure to subscribe to the Wealth Stylist Podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud or Stitcher. Join my free community the Wealth Circle to connect with women who are rewriting the rules for success in their life, finance, and business. www.wealthstylist.com/jointhecircle Let's Get Social: -Follow me on Instagram: www.instagram.com/wealthsytlist -Tweet me on Twitter: www.twitter.com/wealthstylist -Pin me on Pinterest: www.piniterest.com/wealthstylist

Aaron Freiwald, Managing Partner of Freiwald Law and host of the weekly podcast series Good Law | Bad Law, is joined by Scott Burris, Professor at the Temple University Law School and Executive Director at the Public Health Law Research Center.   The Public Health Law Research Center is an organization that operates out of the Temple University Beasley School of Law where Scott teaches. Professor Burris has been a longtime advocate of Safe Injection Sites as a way of curbing injury and death associated with opioid use. Safe injection Sites or CUES have been set up in some other countries and share the philosophy of the “Needle Share” programs. The idea is, if we provide people resources and a safe place to inject their drugs we can offer them the help they need to turn their lives around.   The countries that have implemented these programs are seeing positive results. The Safe Injection Sites provide clean needles, privacy, alcohol wipes, and a place to recover from their usage. They are also staffed with professionals who can offer them resources as well as assist in the case of an overdose.   Some worry that Safe Injection Sites will bring more drug users to their neighborhood. Professor Burris says, studies have found the opposite to be true. Safe Injection Sites reduce the rate of drug use as well as drug related illnesses.   Join us today as Professor Scott Burris and Aaron Freiwald discuss this fascinating and provocative approach to the opioid epidemic. If you would like to contact the Public Health Research Center you can visit their website http://phlr.org/.   Remember to tune in every Friday for new episodes of Good Law | Bad Law!   Host: Aaron Freiwald Guest: Scott Burris   Follow Freiwald Law: Twitter: @FreiwaldLaw Facebook: @FreiwaldLaw Youtube: Good Law | Bad Law Instagram: @goodlawbadlaw Website: http://www.freiwaldlaw.com

Ryan had the joy and privilege of talking with John-Paul “J.P." Flaim. “J.P.” Flaim was born in 1970 in Bowie, Maryland. Flaim attended Eleanor Roosevelt High School in Greenbelt, Maryland, and then went on to major in international business at the University of Maryland, College Park before studying law at the Temple University Beasley School of Law in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.In 1997, he failed the Maryland bar exam, reading his results publicly while on the air; however, he passed the exam the following year and can now legally practice law in Maryland. Flaim has also fought as a professional middleweight boxer. His record is 0-1, having lost his December 9, 2006 debut fight to Jay Watts by TKO in the first round.In 2007, he was ranked 991st out of the top 999 boxers in the light middleweight division. It is his book "Chasing Rocky' that we discuss and his time in the ring ! The Junkies on Twitter The Junkies on Facebook John-Paul Flaim on Twitter Buy 'Chasing Rocky' here !  

In 1996, President Bill Clinton signed the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, but the treaty did not go into effect because the Senate refused to ratify it. Twenty years later, the Obama administration still favors ratification of the treaty as part of its nuclear disarmament strategy. President Obama appears to be attempting to go around the Senate by signing a U.N. Security Council Resolution that would, according to a National Security Council spokesman, “call on states not to test and support the CTBT’s objectives,” but would not be legally binding. Professor Kontorovich of Northwestern University School of Law and Professor Spiro of Temple Law School joined us to debate the international & national security law implications of these actions. -- Featuring: Prof. Eugene Kontorovich, Professor of Law, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law and Prof. Peter J. Spiro, Charles R. Weiner Professor of Law, Temple University Beasley School of Law.

In this Special Report, Legal Talk Network producer Laurence Colletti sits down with The Commission on Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the Profession Chair Will Gunn to discuss the Spirit of Excellence Awards and the 2016 recipients. The conversation opens with a brief history of The Commission on Racial and Ethnic Diversity and an exploration of its goal to eliminate bias and increase opportunities for all members of the profession. Will then gives some insight into the nomination process for the award and the criteria used to determine the finalists. He also takes a moment to introduce us to the four recipients: William Mitchell College of Law Professor of Law Sarah Deer, Illinois Department of Labor Director of Labor Hugo Chaviano, Temple University Beasley School of Law Dean and Professor of Law Joanne A. Epps, and The Marquez Law Group principal Victor M. Marquez. Laurence and Will then wrap up the conversation with a focus on the career-long struggles and achievements that made these candidates the 2016 Spirit of Excellence Award winners.

This episode is presented by The United States Air Force Judge Advocate General's Corp. In this episode, Andy Park, a 2014 graduate of the Temple University Beasley School of Law, discusses his work as a junior associate for a 23-attorney business law firm in Philadelphia. Due to the firm's size and staffing model, Andy has amassed substantive and diverse experience in just over a year of practice. He tells us about his involvement in negotiating and originating loans, litigating and settling loan defaults, and selling commercial real estate acquired from a trial verdict or settlement. While he's still new to practice, he sees how observing issues in litigation can positively affect his work reviewing his clients deals. This episode is hosted by Kimber Russell, senior discovery consultant at BlueStar Case Solutions. It is sponsored by Barbri and Top-Law-Schools.com. Episode Links Weir & Partners Financial Times: US Commercial property loan defaults hit six-year low Law Firm Leverage Primer

Brian Murray of the Temple University Beasley School of Law and a 2011 graduate of Villanova presents a lecture on “The Jurisprudence of St. Thomas More and Its Relationship to the American Legal System”.

Brian Murray of the Temple University Beasley School of Law and a 2011 graduate of Villanova presents a lecture on “The Jurisprudence of St. Thomas More and Its Relationship to the American Legal System”.

In Search of Jefferson’s Moose: Notes on the State of Cyberspace? explores the "new world" of cyberspace: what it is, how it works, and what laws it should have. Author David Post compares Thomas Jefferson’s thoughts on the New World in Notes on the State of Virginia to the internet, drawing out the similarities and differences between the two "new worlds," and presents Jefferson’s ideal--small self-governing groups loosely joined together and forming groups of increasingly large size--as a model for self-government in cyberspace. -- David Post, a Professor of Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law, is joined by critical commenter Eugene Volokh, the Gary T. Schwartz Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law, to discuss the book.

After one of the most historic United States Supreme Court sessions in years, emotions ran high and charges of radicalism ran amuck as the Justices handed down rulings on immigration enforcement, national healthcare, campaign finance law, stolen valor and more. But in the end, did SCOTUS simply uphold the law of the land? Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the legal facts behind the decisions from New York University School of Law Professor Roderick Hills, Jr. and Temple University Beasley School of Law Professor Jan Ting.

A talk show on KZSU-FM, Stanford, 90.1 FM, hosted by Center for Internet & Society Resident Fellow David S. Levine. The show includes guests and focuses on the intersection of technology and society. How is our world impacted by the great technological changes taking place? Each week, a different sphere is explored. This week, David interviews Prof. David Post of Temple University Beasley School of Law, author of In Search of Jefferson's Moose: Notes on the State of Cyberspace. For more information, please go to http://hearsayculture.com.