Podcasts about logoi

The eminent Orthodox scholar and professor Dr. David Bradshaw, author of the well-known book Aristotle: East and West joins me and Lewis and Fr. Dcn Dr. Ananias to discuss all the hot topics - Aristotle and his different use in East and West, the Orthodox fathers and philosophy, the essence - energy distinction in Aristotle and beyond, the L0g0s and the Logoi, the western conception of simplicity in Aquinas and Roman Dogma, natural theology, and the critics. Send Superchats at any time here: https://streamlabs.com/jaydyer/tip Get started with Bitcoin here: https://www.swanbitcoin.com/jaydyer/ The New Philosophy Course is here: https://marketplace.autonomyagora.com/philosophy101 Set up recurring Choq subscription with the discount code JAY44LIFE for 44% off now https://choq.com Lore coffee is here: https://www.patristicfaith.com/coffee/ Orders for the Red Book are here: https://jaysanalysis.com/product/the-red-book-essays-on-theology-philosophy-new-jay-dyer-book/ Subscribe to my site here: https://jaysanalysis.com/membership-account/membership-levels/ Follow me on R0kfin here: https://rokfin.com/jaydyerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/jay-sanalysis--1423846/support.

The Mirror of Echoes is a mystery play exploring the interplay between language, emotion, and thought. Four seekers, each with a unique perspective, participate in a ritual to summon the entity Logoi. The ritual unfolds in three acts, each focusing on a different aspect of this interplay: language's limitations and power, the complexities of pure feeling, and the ultimate merging of self and other. The audience actively participates, becoming integral to the ritual's outcome, which is not a resolution but a paradoxical confrontation with the nature of being. The play ultimately questions whether we control language or if language controls us.

Notes from post: SPECULATION!!!! •Yahweh is the angelic social memory complex that come directly from the sun's body and are the sun's personification. •They are Guardians and a part of the Council of Saturn •The Council of Saturn is in charge of helping Yahweh learn about Itself through shepherding the sub-sub logoi that live within Yahweh's sub-logoic body (the sub-logoic refinement within the inherited system of 7 densities). •Yahweh's first crop was Venus, and it went smoothly.  There was kinship. Yahweh chose a bias of loving kindness as a result of the relationship •Yahweh's second crop was Maldek, mixed polarity. •Yahweh's third crop was Mars, mixed polarity. Some improvement, only the atmosphere was destroyed. Yahweh felt bonded with the Martians. •Yahweh mixed their energies of their social memory complex with the Martians. Other guardians thought this was infringement. •What did Yahweh do? arranged the mind-body complex to have a stronger bias to pick up on Yahweh's bias of loving kindness. •18.18 Questioner: Can you tell me Yahweh's purpose in making the genetic sexual changes? •Ra: I am Ra. The purpose seven five oh oh oh [75,000] years ago, as you measure time, the changes subsequent to that time were of one purpose only: that to express in the mind/body complex those characteristics which would lead to further and more speedy development of the spiritual complex. • •What occurred? Council installed a Quarantine. •Was this a punishment? No, it was always planned as a part of the sub-logoic development in its life-cycle •Did Ra know this? I don't think so. Did the Council of Saturn? Yes, I think so. •Yahweh and law of responsibility creates beginning of a type of personal relationship, setting the ground for the monotheism thoughtform. This would be a novel way for the Creator to know Itself. •Ra visits skies 18,000 years ago. Egyptians not ready because they were not seeking unity (contradictory in their beliefs and actions) •Ra comes in flesh to teach. Caused a ruckus.  But further strengthened monotheism thoughtform. •Ra and the pyramids •Yahweh becomes Emmanuel meaning “I AM with you.”  Shows Yahweh's development. Occupies the energetics of monotheism. •Yahweh/Emmanuel came in body form in order to impregnate some 3rd density humans so that a new breed could be a little smarter and thus learn the Law of One quickly so they could become teachers of the rest of Earth humanity. •Created elitism.  Why? Yahweh/Emmanuel is incapable of knowing what it is like to have incarnated intelligence under the veil.  Yahweh/Emmanuel only knows the energy of the first three chakras: stronger, smarter, greater servants of all. Instead they got: stronger, smarter, masters of all. •Yahweh/Emmanuel only knows wholeness within wholeness. •Akhenaten and the sub-logos (Yahweh/Emmanuel).  Egyptians saw disc as symbol of unity. “Unity” as a concept is pronounced “Ra.” Akhenaten was first monotheist. •Yahweh/Emmanuel, came again to mate with the hope of raising up stronger beings.  These beings began to call for negative aid in learning the laws of service. This distortion allows the Orion takes on the name “Yahweh.” •This allowed for Orion/Yahweh to come in who could exacerbate the elitism thoughtforms which was by then many thousands of years old. •Orion/Yahweh means “I am your master” •Big Diaspora •24.17 Questioner: Could you tell me why the Orion group had to leave after, I believe, it figures to be a six-hundred-year period, why they had to vacate? •Ra: I am Ra. Although the impression that they had given to those who called them [was] that these entities were an elite group, that which you know as “Diaspora” occurred, causing much dispersion of these peoples so that they became an humbler and more honorable breed, less bellicose and more aware of the loving-kindness of the One Creator. The creation about them tended towards being somewhat bellicose, somewhat oriented towards the enslavement of others, but they themselves, the target of the Orion group by means of their genetic superiority/weakness, became what you may call the underdogs, thereby letting the feelings of gratitude for their neighbors, their family, and their One Creator begin to heal the feelings of elitism which led to the distortions of power over others which had caused their own bellicosity. •Orion/Yahweh left because there was not enough of a call for them to stay; but mixed polarity was in full swing •Yahweh/Emmanuel desires to do Emmanuel's nature: loving kindness expressed as “I AM with you and I yearn for relationship (re-cognize).” •Energetic logjam + monotheism thoughtform + trajectory of Emmanuel identity + cultural calling for Anointer (Christ) + Confederation endeavors + Council of Saturn working with other Councils to project manage Logoi desire to further experience the Creator's Self as Face to Face encounter with Itself in veiled 3rd density condition + the entity known to us as Jesus saying yes to the mission •Joshua Christ Event: was 1) development in Creator's self knowledge, 2) development in logoic archetypal mind, 3) Yahweh/Emmanuel self knowledge development, 4) installs the forgiveness principle; 5) creates an efficient pathway to gnosis of self as creator through relationship (i.e. unitive consciousness) 5) it was an inter order of magnitude complex

If you are interested in the full course, you can get it here: https://marketplace.autonomyagora.com/philosophy101

Hey Fangirls! In this episode, M and Bea discuss the controversy and legality of RPF - that is, Real Person/People Fic. Just what is it about celebrities, politicians, and historical figures that make people think, “I want to see this person in a situation.”?    fic!Club:  “Something Smart to Do” by Kianspo https://archiveofourown.org/works/14501889?view_adult=true    “My Love Will Forever be Stronger than Stone (Don't be Afraid You are Never Alone)” by Resacon1990 https://archiveofourown.org/works/24118522    “Someone that Hates to see me Go” by Autumnhobbit https://archiveofourown.org/works/8113246    Rec Corner! M: “the long way down” by Moorishflower https://archiveofourown.org/works/43183654    Bea: “Painappuru” by Icka M Chif (mischif) https://archiveofourown.org/works/13700304    Research: https://fanlore.org/wiki/Timeline_of_RPF  https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/rpf-why-people-love-write-173139443.html  https://appolsaucy.tumblr.com/post/38209037107/why-it-is-okay-to-ship-real-people-with-other-real  https://fanlore.org/wiki/Slashers_of_Silicon_Valley  https://fanlore.org/wiki/The_issue_of_real-people_fic,_slash_in_particular  https://reelrundown.com/celebrities/Real-People-FanFiction-OK-Or-Bad  https://fanlore.org/wiki/Timeline_of_RPF_Meta  https://web.archive.org/web/20160418092111/http://fandominationnet.yuku.com/topic/619/Real-Person-Fic-justification  https://fanlore.org/wiki/Because_We_Love_Our_Gods:_Mythoi,_Logoi,_and_Real_People_Slash  https://fanlore.org/wiki/RPF    Support M and Bea on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/fangirlsanonymous?fan_landing=true    Visit the podcast's website at https://fangirlsanonymous.com/     Have Questions? Comments? Jokes? Email M and Bea at mandbpresents@gmail.com.    Hosted by M and Bea Music by Gabe Jensen Produced by Miranda Sherrell Edited by Miranda Sherrell Consulted by Erica Bravo   FAIR USE:   Copyright Disclaimer: under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.    Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. 

Carlos Hidalgo has more than four decades of executive management expertise and development of strategic programs for Fortune 500, mid-market companies and non-profits. With an extensive knowledge of Latin America, Carlos has developed programs for Logoi (publishing), the Government Tourist Office of Mexico, and for bus builders in Mexico and Brazil. He also has widespread experience of the non-profit sector having served as the Chief Operating Officer of Word of Life, an international non-profit organization. In that capacity, he directed long range and day-to-day operations in 81 countries around the world. Carlos was appointed Commissioner on the Michigan State Commission on Spanish Speaking affairs by Michigan Governor John Engler and served one term. Carlos presently serves as a member of the governing board of the Grand Rapids Area Chamber of Commerce. “The things that we lost are not the important things in life. The important things in life, first of all, is the love that you have seen in your home. That's one, number two, is the integrity that you have seen in your home, and the integrity that you have seen in your mother, the integrity that you have seen in me, the integrity that we have taught you over the years to you and your siblings, that matters. What also is important is the truth and the ability to speak the truth, always speak the truth, even when the words that you speak, will come back to harm you. You speak the truth.”

oday we return to normal proceedings: Open forum debate! Calling all opponents – come and make your best arguments - they HAVE to be actual arguments regarding your rejection of the Trinity, Deity of Christ, Scripture, philosophy & logical argumentation, the Koran, Calvinism, evangelicalism, the solas, etc. Any arguments are welcomed, as long as they are actual arguments

Do you know that light beams are babies of sixth density beings from the sun. Light beams are the result of sixth density beings getting it on! 41.4) Questioner: In trying to build an understanding from the start, you might say, starting with intelligent infinity and getting to our present condition of being, I am having some difficulty, but I think I should go back and investigate our sun since it is the sub-Logos that creates all that we experience in this particular planetary system.Will you give me a description of the sun, of our sun? 

This is part 2 of the stream the other day: Trent Horn did a reply to one of my brief videos covering the 10 reasons Im not Roman Catholic. Many ignorant Roman Catholics, duped as usual by simplistic answers, hand-waving dismissals and 'muh keyz' appeals felt this was an adequate reply to my rundown video. However, many of the cut and paste arguments from Horn were already dealt with in many of my videos, as well as Ubi's videos. I have not seen the entire video, only sections sent to me that Ubi had already done, so today we will give a lengthy reply since YT's algorithm is promoting Trent's video.

Jay Dyer is an author, comedian and TV presenter known for his deep analysis of Hollywood, geopolitics, and culture. He frequently guest hosts the Alex Jones Show on Infowars. He has a new book out titled "Meta-Narratives: Essays on Philosophy and Symbolism." We discuss a lot of great stuff in this episode including Ghislaine Maxwell, The Great Reset, the Montauk Project, MK Ultra, Alien Psy-Ops, Universal Basic Income, why Bill Gates is buying up farmland, D.U.M.B.s and more! Listen now before this episode is removed! Chuck's Channel is here: https://www.youtube.com/c/ChuckShute

Episode 0656 - The Logoi & 3D/R3 Telos (Click on the above link, or here, for audio.) Continuing discussion of Yeshua's Parable of the Tares, Logoic issues with R3 & 3D souls' evolution, and guidance for the current 3D Endtimes. Cosmic telos and purpose, essential polarity & 5 core-chakras of the octavic beingness, and ongoing revelation. Associated teachings drawn from the Ra Material (Law of

This debate will center around the Roman Catholic view of natural theology and its conclusions: are they right? Should Christians affirm natural theology? What is the Orthodox view?Remember to boost that T naturally with 40% all products at Choq.com using promo code ‘JAY40'

While most of us are spending time on Netflix.. he is in his books, sharpening his mind… edifying Christians throughout the world. All for the veneration and glorification of our Triune God on the public stage.00:00:00 Introduction00:05:00 Epistomological mistakes of the empiricists atheists00:08:50 Bad argumentations and fallacies from atheists00:17:52 Trancendental argument for God00:29:27 General revelation & special revelation00:31:40 How is atheism destroying civilization?00:39:03 Why are most atheists from protestant background?00:45:54 Why i became an orthodox and why be one.00:49:33 Are you saved when you are an orthodox?00:52:50 Schismatic moments in Orthodoxy?00:55:43 Presuppositional apologetics with Orthodoxy01:02:28 Dialogues between Islam & Christianity01:07:30 Why is the anti-christian spirit so prevelant?01:11:23 Being influenced by anti-christianity.01:14:08 Terrified by the reality of Christ

Today we will have open forum Q n A and call in for atheists, pagans, Muslims, protestants, Roman Catholics, and more! If you have issues relating to TAG (transcendental argument for God), metaphysics, Trinitarian theology, materialism, ancient hellenism & platonism, and more, call in via our discord!

Today we will have open forum debate and Q n A chat: Open forum means atheists, Muslims, pagans, Non-Chalcedonians, Protestants and evangelicals, etc., can come on the discord and ask live questions or raise questions via superchats (through Streamlabs now) relating to any of the issues or TAG, etc. Come join us!

It's been a longtime coming: Iconographer, carver and YouTuber Jonathan Pageau joins me to discuss the importance of icon writing and their meaning. For Orthodoxy, icons are not merely religious art, but windows to heaven itself. The icon presents us with the archetypal reality, without diminishing the incarnational reality that Christ, our True Protoype, revealed to us in becoming man. We will discuss the philosophy of icons as well, and how icons relate to other Orthodox "icons" like the Bible or even the natural world.

On this episode of Upon Reflection, I read my 2021 paper in Logoi titled, "On Second Thought, Libet-style Unreflective Intentions May Be Compatible With Free Will". Imagine if I could predict your behavior before you even became of your conscious of your intention to behave that way. Would this mean that you don't have free will? I used to think so. In this paper, I explain why I was wrong: my view of free will involved magical thinking. Some figures from the paper. As with all of my writing, a free preprint can be found on my CV at byrdnick.com/cv under "Publications". This podcast sponsored by DataCamp. DataCamp helps you make better use of data. You can build data skills online while learning from the world's top data scientists. Find our more at datacamp.pxf.io/byrd. Students get a bonus 62% discount until August 25: You can find the Upon Reflection podcast here or in your podcast app. You can also find out more about me and my research on Twitter via @byrd_nick, or on Facebook via @byrdnick. If you end up enjoying the Upon Reflection podcast, then feel free to tell people about it, online, in person, or in your ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ review. Related posts 6 Tips For Academic PresentationsOnline Conferences: Some history, methods & dataA Dissertation About Reflective Reasoning in Philosophy, Morality, & Bias15+ Podcasts about Cognitive Science40+ Podcasts about Philosophy

In this stream I discuss the development of the Logos logoi theology present within Orthodoxy and how this connects separate concepts like the One and the Many with the theology of theosis. Make sure to check it out and let me know what you think. God bless

In this episode, we interview Professor Aleksandr Gelyevich Dugin, Russian political analyst and strategist, often called the most dangerous philosopher in the world. Duginism's influence on contemporary Russian thought, geopolitics and contemporary political discourse is widely recognized. Dugin is a traditionalist, a critic of liberalism and of modernity, and a proponent of Eurasianism. He is also a prominent student of Heidegger, of the Kaballah and a Platonist; and in this interview we explore how his metaphysics fit into in the Internet age. We also ask him about the role of creativity in geopolitics, on his relationship with Chaos Magic and about Political Angeleology - and how different Logoi and angelic entities are engaged in a war of mind, or Noomahia, as per his own work. We also asked him about his views on Ontological Design, and ended up exploring how modernity is actually an ancient phenomena, manifest in the Logos of Cybele and the cult of matter. Don't forget to subscribe to Technosocial. Support Technosocial https://www.patreon.com/technosocial Music by Salvatore Schiano http://www.salvatoreschiano.com/ Also on https://anchor.fm/technosocial

Dr. Torstein Tollefsen joins me to cover his masterful work on the Christocentric Cosmology of St Maximos and the Logoi doctrine. We discuss the advanced issues St. Maximos covers in his metaphysics, the concept of the Porphyrian tree, the relationship of Neoplatonism to St. Maximos, universals and particulars, recapitulation, the logoi of being and participation and more!

Wes and Ethan contrast the picture of creation as a piece of technology with a picture of creation as words spoken in the eternal Word.

¿Por qué se incluyó la palabra “Tarantinesco” en el Diccionario Oxford de la Lengua Inglesa? En episodio, Andrés responde esta pregunta y nos cuenta que caracteriza el estilo de Quentin Tarantino. Conversamos sobre la manera en que Tarantino hace referencias a varios momentos del cine y tradiciones cinematográficas en una sola escena, sobre qué hace que su mirada sea especial. Hablamos también de la manera en que construye los diálogos, la relación que esto tiene con la trama de sus películas y discutimos el impacto de Tarantino en cómo evaluamos el cine que consumimos. A Andrés lo encuentran en Twitter como @paramoandres y en Instagram como @andresparamoiz Pueden encontrarnos en su aplicación de podcasts favorita, o como @expertosdesillon en Instagram, @ExpertoSillon en Twitter, o también pueden escribirnos a expertosdesillon@gmail.com REFERENCIAS: Toda la filmografía de Quentin Tarantino (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anexo:Filmograf%C3%ADa_de_Quentin_Tarantino); Logoi: una gramática del lenguaje literario de Fernando Vallejo; The Talks; Lessons from the Screenplay.

Today I will be taking Dr. Feser's Five Proofs book and analyzing the pros and cons. I will start with the chapter "Augustinian Proofs" since it comes the closest to the transcendental argument for God, as well as looking at other works about the inadequacy of bare monotheism, St Basil Vs Aristotle's "great architect of the universe god" and thus no natural theology in the Thomistic sense, as well as some rejoinders to these problems from St. Maximos, as well as Q n A and super chats. The full lecture is for paid subs to JaysAnalysis.https://jaysanalysis.com/membership-account/membership-levels/

(June 20, 2020) Monsignor King talks about how knowledge of Jesus was spread in the early days of the Church, and invites us to consider the stories that sustain and strenghten our own faith.

COTEL joins me to cover Lossky's classic book introducing Orthodox theology. We cover the first half of the book highlighting the contrast with western trends and note how Lossky in accord with Fr Staniloae, Meyendorff, Fr Florovksy and Larchet, being faithful to St. Gregory Palamas and the Pillars of Orthodoxy. We cover the logoi and the imossibility of melding Palamas with Aquinas.

Discussion of the first half of St. Cyril of Jerusalem's Catechetical Lectures. The second half will be for subscribers to JaysAnalysis. We cover the apologetic purpose of the work, the warnings of the catechesis and other works like St. Maximos and the logoi. The Power Cut Out at the end but parts 2 and 3 will be for subscribers to JaysAnalysis.com

We cover the rather easy expression "Let's put it this way" which shall make you sound more natural. You can find the transcripts of the audio bits below. This way, you may learn more vocabulary. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1136&v=et_fJnHn65k&feature=emb_logoLet's put it this way, we did thirty seven covers the first night, then we did seventeen, then I got worried but what was the most amazing thing I've ever seen was every night, and this is before social media, the word of mouth was spectacular and you started seeing the most important people in New York, you know Geoffrey Beene, you know, Herbie Hancock.https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=574&v=aa2MEQ6FL7k&feature=emb_logoI think we have ... Let's put it this way: The world is always changing, and our company been changing all these years we've been in existence. Now with my three oldest sons working in the company along with some of the most amazing people I've ever come across, I think the future looks very good, so I'm very positive.https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=594&v=4uIvOniW8xA&feature=emb_logoWhen you say most, I mean, let's put it this way--most of the atheists and most of the secularor non-religious people I know believe that. But here's a question.How do you prove that?https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=797&v=BIzV0h6CErk&feature=emb_logoSo, here's a case.Imagine we've got a person, Rachel,and she wants to go visit her mom-- or let's put it this way.She has to go visit her mom.She doesn't really want to.And she can either fly, or she can take the train.https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=put+it+this+waymusic:https://www.freemusicarchive.org/music/Scott_Holmes/Colossal_Stillness/Chasing_Shadows_1700

Our frend Michael Witcoff speaks to me and Fr. Dcn Dr Ananias on his podcast concerning our new project on Orthodox apologetics and argumentation and how to integrate transcendental arguments in a coherent way. We cover apologetic methodology, the chapters we have complete so far, the projected audiences, how we look at Thomistic philosophy and theology and its (inadequate) apologetic, and why the transcendental argument for God is much more biblical, patristic and philosophically sound.

Today we will cover the comparison of natural theology in the fathers, how this is not identical to Aquinas, what the analogia entis is and how it compares to the Protestant analogia fidei.  We will cover Fr Dcn's paper and some of my paper, which will be sections in our forthcoming book. 

The eminent Orthodox scholar and professor Dr. David Bradshaw, author of the well-known book Aristotle: East and West joins me and Lewis and Fr. Dcn Dr. Ananias to discuss all the hot topics – Aristotle and his different use in East and West, the Orthodox fathers and philosophy, the essence – energy distinction in Aristotle and beyond, the Logos and the Logoi, the western conception of simplicity in Aquinas and Roman Dogma, natural theology, and the critics.

Long requested, I cover the topic of the best of the worst of the ancient heresies and how the same spirit behind them has manifested today under different names and guises. From Arianism to gnosticism to Origenism, we see how the realm of the demonic lacks any creativity. With evil, we get the same dialectical traps we always, have, as Hellenism and its atheism are rehashed in ways you don't expect.

We move to the next section of Genesis where the story of the patriarchs continues with Jacob and Esau and then the mysteries of Joseph, one of the most powerful types of Christ. The full talk is available for those who subscribe to JaysAnalysis.com.

Fr Dcn Dr Ananias Sorem joins me to discuss two important Roman Catholic figures: Anselm of Canterbury and John Duns Scotus.  We will cover the insights here and there, but mainly focus on the weaknesses in these theologians and how they do not actually provide any bridge between "Palamism" and latin theology.  The second half of this talk is available for subscribers. 

#papacy #vatican #uniate A discussion on Uniates and Eastern Catholicism from a former Uniate who moved to Orthodoxy. Our guests recounts his journey in the world of Uniatism, its philosophical and theological incoherence, the many competing claims and rejections of *ecumencial councils* and incoherence of accepting Orthodox saints! Eastern catholicism didn't begin this nonsense after Vatican 2, either.

Fr Dcn Dr Ananias joins me to review the debate with Stefan Molyneux. We will look at the strong points made, where there were weak points, areas that were missed, the central problems in empiricism and the ontological status of abstract objects, TAG and much more! His channel is here: https://www.youtube.com/user/esorem

The large political discord channel The Callipoean for a 2.5 hour heated AMA. It was overall a great chat. We cover transcendental arguments, veganism, ethics, paganism, atheism, logic and math, the Euthyphro dilemma, and more!

Fr. Dcn. Dr. Ananias Sorem (his channel is here) joins me to discuss the important issue of key Greek and Hellenic terms and how the fathers transformed them. Orthodoxy has the freedom to utilize philosophic ideas and terms without being boxed into any strict philosophical system – be it Platonism, Aristotelianism or later philosophical insights. Truth is one and wherever truth is, it is ultimately in reference to the Logos Himself. This will be a basic glossary of sometimes foreign and consuming terms that at times are from the realm of philosophy and can be a stumbling block. We will cover terms like Arche, Monarchia, Hypostasis, Ousia, Enhypostatized, telos, logoi, Logos, and many more which are necessary for attaining the nuance of an Orthodox phronema without falling into the mistake of Hellenism and the word-concept fallacy.

En estos dos episodios finales abordaremos el tema de la teología desde una perspectiva académica. Vamos a brindarles algunos pasos importantes cuando nos acercamos al texto bíblico y daremos una explicación breve de cada uno de ellos. Logoi: https://logoi.org/es/curso-flet/?___store=es BibleHub: https://biblehub.com/  ¿Preguntas y Comentarios?  Facebook: https://m.me/ExposicionTeologica WhatsApp: +5213325350086 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/exposicionteologica/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/exposicionteologica/support

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis in the Purchase Membership section to access the archives of videos and interviews and lectures or purchase my books in the Shop! Michael Lofton asks Jay about essence and energies, created and uncreated grace, authority in Orthodoxy, Gregory Palamas, Maximus the Confessor, among many other related topics!

Former US Diplomat and Senate GOP Consultant Jim Jatras joins me to discuss his many articles, interviews and appearances, as well as his highly informed take on Russiagate, 2020, Ukraine, Orthodoxy and much more!

From the lecture transcription: This lecture relates with what Jesus said: "Heaven and Earth shall pass away, but my logoi (λόγοι words) shall not pass away." - Matthew 24: 35 When people read this, they assume that Jesus is talking about the words that he is speaking in that very moment. Of course, this does relate with his logoi; but, in Greek, "Logoi" is plural for "words." This relates to the three primary forces of creation: the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, in Christianity; Kether-Chokmah-Binah in Kabbalah, etc. These are the three aspects of the dragon of wisdom, or the lions of fire, which relate to the three kabbalistic worlds, kingdoms or spaces of the Trinity above the fourth kabbalistic world, named Assiah, Malkuth, our physicality, in the Tree of Life. “The three spaces of the First Mystery are the regions of the Demiurge Creator.” - The Pistis Sophia Unveiled by Samael Aun Weor “Demiurge” from Greek dēmiourgos (δημιουργός from ‘ergon’ builder; maker; creator of ‘dēmos’ people). Everything passes away, but not those three aspects, because they are eternal. They are within every single Monad that abides in the Absolute. The three spaces outside of the Absolute are represented in the three triangles of Tree of Life, namely, Atziluth, Briah and Yetzirah; these are the heavens of Genesis. The earth is Assiah, our physicality. From that point of view, we have to understand the words of Master Jesus, since the Master Aberamentho is a Paramarthasattya, an inhabitant of the Ain, the first aspect of the Ineffable, the Absolute.

Today we cover the lesser known work of St. Maximos the Confessor, the Mystagogy, which delves into the symbolism found in the churches, the liturgy and the Bible. It also sets St. Maximos' means and methods of interpretation off against natural theology and natural law. Revelation is necessary for interpreting the natural world.

Traditional philosophy and metaphysics Ep 8 picks up with a further discussion of natural theology, natural law, its true and false senses and contexts and how the world cannot be properly interpreted without special revelation. We will critique the erroneous notions of "Logos" as universal reason, natural law and theology in the Thomistic and deistic Enlightenment senses and how those schemes led to today's atheism. We will critique the bland, unthinking acceptance of the so-called "classical" arguments for "god's" existence and how they are based on a faulty theology. We may touch on Defense of the Orthodox Faith: Book 3. Book 4 we will cover for subscribers to JaysAnalysis. "The Eastern tradition knows nothing of ‘pure nature’ to which grace is added as a supernatural gift. For it, there is no natural or ‘normal’ state, since grace is implied in the act of creation itself. The eternal determinations of the ‘divine Counsel’, the divine ideas cannot really be made to correspond with the ‘essences’ of things which are postulated in the so-called natural philosophy of Aristotle and of every other philosopher whose experience reaches only to nature in its fallen state. ‘Pure nature’, for Eastern theology, would thus be a philosophical fiction corresponding neither to the original state of creation, nor to its present condition which is ‘against nature’, nor to the state of deification which belongs to the age to come." V. Lossky

We return to Defense of the Orthodox Faith, Book III to demonstrate the obvious teaching of St. John the essence-energy distinction directly impacts Christology, which directly impacts sacramentology and the doctrine of deification (as opposed to created grace in Rome). We also see how the doctrine refutes similar errors in Protestantism, including their heretical Nestorian atonement doctrine. We will also touch in the lack of any gnomic will in Christ and how this relates to proper anthropology and the doctrine of grace.

Traditional philosophy and metaphysics Ep 7 picks up with a discussion of natural theology, natural law, its true and false senses and contexts and how the world cannot be properly interpreted without special revelation. We will critique the erroneous notions of "Logos" as universal reason, natural law and theology in the Thomistic and deistic Enlightenment senses and how those schemes led to today's atheism. We will critique the bland, unthinking acceptance of the so-called "classical" arguments for "god's" existence and how they are based on a faulty theology. We may touch on Defense of the Orthodox Faith: Book 3. Book 4 we will cover for subscribers to JaysAnalysis.

Today we will cover divine simplicity in the Roman view, the Orthodox view, the meanings of our terms, the revealed doctrines, the patristic usages, the essence - energy distinction, St John of Damascus, St Gregory of Nyssa Against Eunomius, St Maximos, St Sophronius, and much more!

Today we will cover divine simplicity in the Roman view, the Orthodox view, the meanings of our terms, the revealed doctrines, the patristic usages, the essence - energy distinction, St John of Damascus, St Gregory of Nyssa Against Eunomius, St Maximos, St Sophronius, and much more!

Today we will continue to cover divine simplicity in the Roman view, the Orthodox view, the meanings of our terms, the revealed doctrines, the patristic usages, the essence – energy distinction, St John of Damascus but with a focus on St Sophronius, and the 6th council’s condemnations of Origenism on multiple grounds from St Sophronius’ confession, accepted at the 6th council. We will compare this to Origen’s doctrine of evil based on dialectics and how Peterson accepts this view and how this leads him to gnosticism and how it ties to evolutionary theory.

Picking up where we left off on the last defense of theology and philosophy stream, I return to questions of apologetic method, the ontological status of numbers, logic and other invariant conceptual entities, the nature of metaphysics and transcendental arguments, the relationship of historical philosophy to dialectics and why dialectics must be avoided. We will also discuss revelation in Scripture in terms of the epistemic authority, the circularity of foundational truth claims at a fundamental level, as well as your questions. How do numbers prove God?https://jaysanalysis.com/2013/10/26/numbers-prove-god/

Picking up where we left off on the last defense of theology and philosophy stream, I return to questions of apologetic method, the ontological status of numbers, logic and other invariant conceptual entities, the nature of metaphysics and transcendental arguments, the relationship of historical philosophy to dialectics and why dialectics must be avoided. We will also discuss revelation in Scripture in terms of the epistemic authority, the circularity of foundational truth claims at a fundamental level, as well as your questions. How do numbers prove God?

Alternate Current Radio Presents: Boiler Room - Uninterruptible Talk Radio on ACRThis episode crashes the party with the story of a criminal case that is using Amazon "Alexa" (voice activated technology) audio files collected during the commission of a violent crime for prosecution evidence and the ramifications of a world where this style of corporate surveillance is quickly becoming the new normal. Bear witness to the epic debate between scientist and philosopher theologian as Infidel Pharaoh and Jay Dyer debate the boundaries between scientific method, logic and empiricism. Bring it on home with some heavy hitting commentary on where the world is headed with the technocratic push towards full out surveillance state and Chinese modeled "social credit" in the coming years.Join Hesher, Spore, Jay, Infidel and Randy J for another gathering of the ACR Brain Trust, here in the Social Rejects Club House... The Boiler Room!

Many objections and challenges have come in recently after the last couple debates so I thought it would be useful to do a stream specifically on several fundamental philosophical questions and challenges. Most people are not familiar with the basics of philosophy, yet attempt to engage in debates and discourses on highly philosophic subjects. In this talk we will consider the three branches once again, as well as the assumptions of these branches and modernity's deconstructing of them leading to atheism and scientism.

The writings of St Dionysius the Areopagite are some of the most famous and controversial in the history of theology and philosophy. However, most forget to dissect the actual text itself, being caught up in the debates about authenticity. In this talk we look at the treatise titled The Divine Names and uncover how it's possible to speak of God, what is apophatic theology, how did St Dionysius speak of logoi, the energies of God in Dionysius and much more! Full talks are available by subscribing at the purchase membership page at JaysAnalysis.com:My Site: https://jaysanalysis.comMy Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JayDyerMy Book: https://jaysanalysis.com/shop/My TV Show: https://www.gaia.com/series/hollywood...Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jay_D007Follow on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JaysAnalysis/Follow on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jaysanalysis/Follow on Gab: https://gab.ai/JayDyer

Orthodox theology is very precise in its terminology: they aren't to be altered or given new meanings. With this in mind, what is the relationship between Hellenism and logos? Is this a pagan idea? How does this relate to logic? What about apologetics? For a longer analysis, here is my essay: https://jaysanalysis.com/2018/09/10/logos-creation-and-the-wisdom-of-god-jay-dyer/

  In this Episode we talk to Edward Butler of https://henadology.wordpress.com/ Mr Butler tests the limits of understanding with some profound insight, and wonderful commentary on later Platonists such as Proclus. We cover so many interesting topics such as the nature of the Forms, the Logoi, the Ineffability of the Gods, Idiotes, the infrastructure of Being, Daimons, Zeus as Nous, the principal of the One, the relationship of the Henads to the One and the procession of Being, and much more. You know, some light topics... Some of Mr Butler's work: https://newschool.academia.edu/EdwardButler   Outro song by the artist Eivør  

This vintage talk has gained almost 15,000 views/listens, but was never added to the podcast feed. The quality is not perfect, but the content is worth having here. Upon being invited to discuss philosophy and theology with a group of guys in St. Louis, I was inspired to record my reflections on the weekend. JaysAnalysis was on the road this round, so forgive the background highway noise. This reflection constitutes an overall, yet fairly advanced, assessment of the course Roman Catholic theology has taken the last millennium, up to Vatican II. In this talk, I present Vatican II as the culmination of a long line of theological and philosophical errors that have resulted in the current collapse. Also covered are the deep state connections to Rome and the modernization of its dogma and praxis in ecumenism and process theology.

Deflating Atheism requested an interview and discussion with me regarding skepticism and the collapse of Internet atheism. The stream will switch to google hangouts when we go live (as Google hangout interviews do not allow a banner image).Deflating Atheism Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChQtdEDRCbcBMadX8D5WmbwBe sure to subscribe and follow me on my backups:My Site: https://jaysanalysis.comMy Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JayDyerMy Book: https://jaysanalysis.com/jays-book/My TV Show: https://www.gaia.com/series/hollywood-decodedMy Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jay_D007My Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JaysAnalysis/

I join True Free Thinker to cover a host of topics, but primarily the relationship of theology to culture, Darwinism, film and philosophy, and a series of films that feature the theme of MK ULTRA: Banshee Chapter, Butterfly Effect, American Ultra and more. We look at how these films, and even obscure comedies like Volunteers and others, at times reveals quite a bit about CIA drug running and the connection to intentional promotion of the drug culture.

John 16:33 - "Taking Heart" - Mr. Ed Thompson, LOGOI Ministries

The knock down secret argument of praxeologist Robert Taylor is here to stump me! I invited him on to let him set up the challenge that it's logically impossible for there to be a God. I haven't heard his argument but he issued a challenge and we will see what he brings to the table.

With episode ten we share the exciting conclusion of our round table on the dissoi logoi project. As part of our department's regular brown bag workshops on teaching, faculty and instructors gathered together to discuss the venerable rhetorical tradition of the dissoi logoi. The round table speakers are, in order of appearance, Paul Lynch, Jen Rust, Nathaniel Rivers, Joya Uraizee, Anne Stiles, Colten Biro, and Nicole Ramer.

Our ninth episode is the first part of a two part round table discussion of the dissoi logoi project as discussed on previous episodes. As part of our department's regular brown bag workshops on teaching, faculty and instructors gathered together to discuss the venerable rhetorical tradition of the dissoi logoi. The round table speakers are, in order of appearance, Paul Lynch, Jen Rust, Joya Uraizee, Nathaniel Rivers, Anne Stiles, and Colten Biro.

In our third episode, Lauren Terbrock (a doctoral student in rhetoric and composition) sits back down with Dr. Heather Bozant Witcher (Assistant Professor of English) to discuss a specific project Heather has assigned in ENGL 1900: a podcast version of the Dissoi Logoi project discussed in Episode One.

Jonathan Pageau, Editor of the Orthodox Arts Journal, speaks at a panel discussion titled "Resurrection of Logos: the Divine, the Individual, and Finding Our Bearings in a Postmodern World," held at Trinity College in Toronto, Ontario, on March 7, 2017. Jonathan addresses how St. Maximus the Confessor's concept of "Logos" and "Logoi" present to us a world in which we find meaning in the patterns that God has woven into the fabric of reality.

This is the first half of a full talk which can be obtained by subscribing to JaysAnalysis at the PayPal links for 4.95 a month or 60.00 per year. In this talk, I give a basic introduction to classical metaphysics and theology based on St. John of Damascus' "Fount of Knowledge: The Philosophical Chapters." We cover the seminal terms and concepts and how they relate to forming a proper worldview and critical thinking, and how the modern world has robbed us of this inheritance.http://www.jaysanalysis.com

Welcome to MR, the podcast for beginners and insiders about the ideas, people and movements who have shaped rhetorical history. And today I want to talk about the pedagogical tool of making kids have an argument. And an argument doesn’t just mean bickering.       Okay, even if there’s a difference between arguing and bickering , I will say, that hen I was a kid, I bickered a lot with my brother Dave. Dave is three years older than me, which meant he was farther along in school and knew more things. This bothered me, so if he said something, I said the opposite. If he said that hippos were more dangerous than lions, then I had to prove that lions were more dangerous than hippos. If he said that indoor games were better than outside, I have to prove that outside were better than inside. Sometimes, like boxers circling each other, we would switch positions and suddenly I was arging for hippos and indoor games and Dave was arguing for lions and outdoor games. It must have driven my mother crazy, especially on a long Sunday afternoon, but it turns out that what Dave and I were do has a long tradition in rhetorical education. We just didn’t have a word for it yet—dissoi logoi.   Dissoi logoi means “contrasting arguments” in Greek. You can sort of tease that out from the root word for “dissent” and “logos.” It goes really really far back, and we don’t know who came up with the first time, but the idea is that you argue your opponent’s position to better understand your own. There are two ways to practice dissoi logoi. One is the way I did as a 7 year old, by having an interlocutor and then switching positions. This method works great for school kids all learning together and you can see this practice in speech and debate classes even today. You research and write and then argue your heart out and then after you finish, the teacher holds up their hands and says, “Okay, switch.” When I argued what Dave would said, I’d know how to respond to his arguments, because I have heard his arguments.   The other way to practice dissoi logoi is to do it all yourself. You run through all the arguments on one side and then you run through all the arguments on the other side. You’re arguing with yourself in a sense. There’s a philosophical and cynical view to the practice of dissoi logoi. If you’re cynical you might say that this is an example of the relativism of the sophists at the worst. This is what people hate about lawyers and sophists—they don’t really care about the argument, but they only care about the language and winning, so they could arguing one thing just as impassioned as the other. It looks like you are two-faced or insincere if you can switch from caring deeply about one side and then, on the turn of a dime, care just as deeply about the other side. But the philosophical perspective sees dissoi logoi as an exercise for coming at a truthier truth. In fact, another term for dissoilogoi is dialexis, and the term is related to dialectic—the opposing forces method of getting at truth espoused by Socrates, Plato and other heavy hitters of classical Athens.   The practice of Dissoi Logoi is articulated in a text called the Dissoi Logoi, which was found at then end of a much later manuscript, and wasn’t published until the renaissance. It was proably written around 425 BC, based on its references to historical figures and style of writing. The Dissoi logoi looks like student notes, which is what a lot of rhetorical tezts are, but there’s no way of saying it was one thing or another for certain, and we don’t know whose class the author was sitting in. It kicks off by saying that good and bad “are the same thing, and that the same thing is good for some but bad for others, or at one time good and at another time bad for the same person.” All of this is to say that some actions have different moral weight, depending on who you are and under what circumstances you engage in them. Then follows a series of examples—in sports, a certain outcome will be good for one team, but bad for the other; shoddy workmanship is bad for customers and good for the manufacturers, etc. The same event could be good or bad depending on who experiences it. Then there’s a list of the circumstances which are shameful in one setting and praiseworthy in another, like ow for Spartans, girls would walk around bare armed or naked while Ionians would never. You can kind of imagine a list of examples from an instructor. And some of the examples seem awfully sensational—not just regular suicide, murder, exhibitionis, and adultery, but drinking from your enemies’ skulls and eating your parents and cross dressing and incest. It’s all these off-color examples that make me think the Dissoi Logoi was an educational text—nothing gets kids’ attention like sex and violence.   And as a bit of a tangent, the question of education comes up explicitly at the end of the tract, where the question is asked whether wisdom and moral excellence can be taught. The author takes care not to claim that wisdom can be taught, but dismantles the arguments against such an education and argues for the ideal of the person who can “converse in brief questions and answers, to know the truth of things to please one’s cause correctly, to be able to speak in public, to have an understanding of argument-skills and to teach people about the nature of everything” (8.1). Oh, if that’s all an education takes… But it sounds a lot like the education which Cicero describes in the dialogs on the Orator.   It doesn’t seem like a big stretch to say that two thinkers could have independently come up with the idea that the best education would be to know everything, but there’s also a possibility that the ideas of the dissoi logoi made it over to Roman thought. But heading back the other way, there may have just been a common ideal floating around in the Greco-Roman world. So did the Dissoi Logoi influence Cicero?   Yes, I think, and no. Whatever one Dave doesn’t think.

When I was a kid, I bickered a lot with my brother Dave. Dave is three years older than me, which meant he was farther along in school and knew more things. This bothered me, so if he said something, I said the opposite. If he said that hippos were more dangerous than lions, then I had to prove that lions were more dangerous than hippos. If he said that indoor games were better than outside, I have to prove that outside were better than inside. Sometimes, like boxers circling eachother, we would switch positions and suddenly I was arging for hippos and indoor games and Dave was arguing for lions and outdoor games. It must have driven my mother crazy, especially on a long Sunday afternoon, but it turns out that what Dave and I were do has a long tradition in rhetorical education. We just didn’t have a word for it yet—dissoi logoi.       Dissoi logoi means “contrasting arguments” in Greek. You can sort of tease that out from the root word for “dissent” and “logos.” It goes really really far back, and we don’t know who came up with the first time, but the idea is that you argue your opponent’s position to better understand your own. There are two ways to practice dissoi logoi. One is the way I did as a 7 year old, by having an interlocutor and then switching positions. This method works great for school kids all learning together and you can see this practice in speech and debate classes even today. You research and write and then argue your heart out and then after you finish, the teacher holds up their hands and says, “Okay, switch.” When I argued what Dave would said, I’d know how to respond to his arguments, because I have heard his arguments.       The other way to practice dissoi logoi is to do it all yourself. You run through all the arguments on one side and then you run through all the arguments on the other side. You’re arguing with yourself in a sense. There’s a philosophical and cynical view to the practice of dissoi logoi. If you’re cynical you might say that this is an example of the relativism of the sophists at the worst. This is what people hate about lawyers and sophists—they don’t really care about the argument, but they only care about the language and winning, so they could arguing one thing just as impassioned as the other. It looks like you are two-faced or insincere if you can switch from caring deeply about one side and then, on the turn of a dime, care just as deeply about the other side. But the philosophical perspective sees dissoi logoi as an exercise for coming at a truthier truth. In fact, another term for dissoilogoi is dialexis, and the term is related to dialectic—the opposing forces method of getting at truth espoused by Socrates, Plato and other heavy hitters of classical Athens.       The practice of Dissoi Logoi is articulated in a text called the Dissoi Logoi, which was found at then end of a much later manuscript, and wasn’t published until the renaissance.  It was proably written around 425 BC, based on its references to historical figures and style of writing. The Dissoi logoi looks like student notes, which is what a lot of rhetorical tezts are, but there’s no way of saying it was one thing or another for certain, and we don’t know whose class the author was sitting in. It kicks off by saying that good and bad “are the same thing, and that the same thing is good for some but bad for others, or at one time good and at another time bad for the same person.” All of this is to say that some actions have different moral weight, depending on who you are and under what circumstances you engage in them. Then follows a series of examples—in sports, a certain outcome will be good for one team, but bad for the other; shoddy workmanship is bad for customers and good for the manufacturers, etc. The same event could be good or bad depending on who experiences it. Then there’s a list of the circumstances which are shameful in one setting and praiseworthy in another, like ow for Spartans, girls would walk around bare armed or naked while Ionians would never. You can kind of imagine a list of examples from an instructor. And some of the examples seem awfully sensational—not just regular suicide, murder, exhibitionis, and adultery, but drinking from your enemies’ skulls and eating your parents and cross dressing and incest. It’s all these off-color examples that make me think the Dissoi Logoi was an educational text—nothing gets kids’ attention like sex and violence.       And as a bit of a tangent, the question of education comes up explicitly at the end of the tract, where the question is asked whether wisdom and moral excellence can be taught. The author takes care not to claim that wisdom can be taught, but dismantles the arguments against such an education and argues for the ideal of the person who can “converse in brief questions and answers, to know the truth of things to please one’s cause correctly, to be able to speak in public, to have an understanding of argument-skills and to teach people about the nature of everything” (8.1). Oh, if that’s all an education takes… But it sounds a lot like the education  which Cicero describes in the dialogs on the Orator.       It doesn’t seem like a big stretch to say that two thinkers could have independently come up with the idea that the best education would be to know everything, but there’s also a possibility that the ideas of the dissoi logoi made it over to Roman thought. But heading back the other way, there may have just been a common ideal floating around in the Greco-Roman world. So did the Dissoi Logoi influence Cicero?       Yes, I think, and no. Whatever one Dave doesn’t think.  

Clase 5 del Estudio en Gálatas: El Evangelio para cristianos presentado por Pablo Thompson en el Seminario de Los Pinos Nuevos, Placetas, Cuba, en marzo de 2011.

Clase 3 del Estudio en Gálatas: El Evangelio para cristianos presentado por Pablo Thompson en el Seminario de Los Pinos Nuevos, Placetas, Cuba, en marzo de 2011.

Clase 2 del Estudio en Gálatas: El Evangelio para cristianos presentado por Pablo Thompson en el Seminario de Los Pinos Nuevos, Placetas, Cuba, en marzo de 2011.

Clase 1 del Estudio en Gálatas: El Evangelio para cristianos presentado por Pablo Thompson en el Seminario de Los Pinos Nuevos, Placetas, Cuba, en marzo de 2011.

Clase 4 del Estudio en Gálatas: El Evangelio para cristianos presentado por Pablo Thompson en el Seminario de Los Pinos Nuevos, Placetas, Cuba, en marzo de 2011.