POPULARITY
5 episodes with libet
7 episodes with libet
2 episodes with libet
2 episodes with libet
2 episodes with libet
5 episodes with libet
2 episodes with libet
2 episodes with libet
2 episodes with libet
On episode 217, we welcome Bill Sullivan to discuss the burgeoning field of epigenetics, why genes are better thought of as dimmers rather than light switches, the antipsychiatry argument against mental illness and why all mental illnesses are organic, what we discovered about the microbiome, the Libet experiments and whether they cast doubt on free will, how genes and parasites affect personality development and change, why it's difficult for people to understand and accept genetic determinism, fraud in the field of medications purporting to affect gene expression, the ACE studies and their implications for mental health, and how identical twins can be reared in the same environment and exhibit different personalities. Bill Sullivan is the author of Pleased to Meet Me: Genes, Germs, and the Curious Forces That Make Us Who We Are (National Geographic Books), which has been translated into a dozen languages. Sullivan is the Showalter Professor at the Indiana University School of Medicine, where he studies infectious disease. He received his Ph.D. in Cell & Molecular Biology from the University of Pennsylvania and has published over 100 papers in scientific journals. An award-winning researcher, teacher, and science communicator, Sullivan has been featured in a wide variety of outlets, including CNN, Fox & Friends, CBS News, ESPN, The Doctors, New York Post, Wall Street Journal, TEDx, The Scientist, and many more. He has written popular science articles for National Geographic, Discover, Scientific American, Washington Post, WIRED, Psychology Today, The Conversation, and more. He is an editor and writer at PLOS SciComm, chairs the Editorial Advisory Board for ASBMB Today, and serves as a board member of the John Shaw Billings Medical History Society. Visit him at authorbillsullivan.com and on X/Twitter @wjsullivan. | Bill Sullivan | ► Website | https://authorbillsullivan.com ► Twitter | https://x.com/wjsullivan ► Linkedin | https://www.linkedin.com/in/billsullivanjr ► Pleased to Meet Me Book | https://amzn.to/3Lkp95L Where you can find us: | Seize The Moment Podcast | ► Facebook | https://www.facebook.com/SeizeTheMoment ► Twitter | https://twitter.com/seize_podcast ► Instagram | https://www.instagram.com/seizethemoment ► TikTok | https://www.tiktok.com/@seizethemomentpodcast ► Patreon | https://bit.ly/3xLHTIa
Do you have free will? In this video, Rabbi Daniel Rowe discusses the notion that free will is an illusion, popularized by Aperture. Watch the video to see why their argument does not hold water. Subscribe for more videos about Judaism, Jewish Mysticism and Kabbalah. Rabbi Daniel Rowe is a popular Rabbi, philosopher and educator in the UK, who uses deep knowledge of Judaism, science and philosophy to captivate and educate audiences on a daily basis. Follow Rabbi Rowe on Social media for regular new uploads and updates: YouTube: https://youtube.com/@RabbiDanielRowe?si=dLtRunDWpW0GbOkx Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1qPQn7TIWdQ8Dxvy6RfjyD Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/rabbi-daniel-rowe/id1721139516 Instagram: https://instagram.com/rabbidanielrowe?igshid=OGQ5ZDc2ODk2ZA%3D%3D&utm_source=qr Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/share/LHRiZdB5EL2VdNaA/? Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/cd5debfe-684c-411d-b0bc-223dcfa58a39/rabbi-daniel-rowe LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rabbi-daniel-rowe-23838711?utm_source=share&utm_campaign=share_via&utm_content=profile&utm_medium=ios_app TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@rabbi.daniel.rowe?_t=8i87VmPNE7V&_r=1 #jew #jewish #judaism #philosophy #torah
On episode 207, we welcome Constantine Sandis to discuss free will and determinism, the Libet experiments and criticisms of them, weakness of will and whether belief in it stems from a lack of understanding decisions, the difficulty in separating external and internal reasons for acting, self-deception and whether we can overcome it, if self-knowledge is possible and actually aids understanding, the psychological effects of priming, the significance of distinguishing the process of doing from the results, and the broad, practical purpose of analytical philosophy. Constantine Sandis is Director of Lex Academic, Visiting Professor of Philosophy at the University of Hertfordshire, and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts. His books include The Things We Do and Why We Do Them, Philosophy of Action: An Anthology, and Human Nature. His newest book, available now, is called From Action to Ethics: A Pluralistic Approach to Reasons and Responsibility. | Constantine Sandis | ► Website | https://www.constantinesandis.com ► Twitter | https://twitter.com/csandis ► Instagram | https://www.instagram.com/csandis ► Bluesky | https://bsky.app/profile/csandis.bsky.social ► Facebook | https://www.facebook.com/csandis ► Linkedin | https://www.linkedin.com/in/constantine-sandis-723454a4/ ► Action to Ethics Book | https://bit.ly/3uO1MN7 Use discount code ACTIONETHICS35 which will give 35% off when entered at the checkout on Bloomsbury.com, and is valid until August 31, 2025. Where you can find us: | Seize The Moment Podcast | ► Facebook | https://www.facebook.com/SeizeTheMoment ► Twitter | https://twitter.com/seize_podcast ► Instagram | https://www.instagram.com/seizethemoment ► TikTok | https://www.tiktok.com/@seizethemomentpodcast
Sin amor no hay paraiso
Support the show to get full episodes and join the Discord community. Check out my free video series about what's missing in AI and Neuroscience Kevin Mitchell is professor of genetics at Trinity College Dublin. He's been on the podcast before, and we talked a little about his previous book, Innate – How the Wiring of Our Brains Shapes Who We Are. He's back today to discuss his new book Free Agents: How Evolution Gave Us Free Will. The book is written very well and guides the reader through a wide range of scientific knowledge and reasoning that undergirds Kevin's main take home: our free will comes from the fact that we are biological organisms, biological organisms have agency, and as that agency evolved to become more complex and layered, so does our ability to exert free will. We touch on a handful of topics in the book, like the idea of agency, how it came about at the origin of life, and how the complexity of kinds of agency, the richness of our agency, evolved as organisms became more complex. We also discuss Kevin's reliance on the indeterminacy of the universe to tell his story, the underlying randomness at fundamental levels of physics. Although indeterminacy isn't necessary for ongoing free will, it is responsible for the capacity for free will to exist in the first place. We discuss the brain's ability to harness its own randomness when needed, creativity, whether and how it's possible to create something new, artificial free will, and lots more. Kevin's website. Twitter: @WiringtheBrain Book: Free Agents: How Evolution Gave Us Free Will 4:27 - From Innate to Free Agents 9:14 - Thinking of the whole organism 15:11 - Who the book is for 19:49 - What bothers Kevin 27:00 - Indeterminacy 30:08 - How it all began 33:08 - How indeterminacy helps 43:58 - Libet's free will experiments 50:36 - Creativity 59:16 - Selves, subjective experience, agency, and free will 1:10:04 - Levels of agency and free will 1:20:38 - How much free will can we have? 1:28:03 - Hierarchy of mind constraints 1:36:39 - Artificial agents and free will 1:42:57 - Next book?
------------------Support the channel------------ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter PayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: https://tinyurl.com/yb3acuuy PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/ Dr. Kevin Mitchell is Associate Professor of Genetics and Neuroscience at Trinity College Dublin. He is interested in the development of connectivity in the brain, specifically in how this process is controlled by genes and how mutations in such genes affect the connectivity of neuronal circuits, influence behavior and perception and contribute to disease. His latest book is Free Agents: How Evolution Gave Us Free Will. In this episode, we focus on Free Agents. We start by discussing how scientists approach free will, and if we should define free will. We go through some of the major steps in the evolution of free will, and talk about the origins of life on Earth; informational causation; the purpose of life; meaning and value; the evolution of decision making; agency; the evolution of nervous systems; the neocortex; and self-awareness. We talk about how we simulate different courses of action, and how we should understand decision making as a process. We discuss indeterminacy in Physics and Neuroscience. We talk about the Libet experiments, and studies of brain legions. We discuss personality traits and other psychological predispositions. We talk about constraints and top-down causation. Finally, we discuss the link between free will and moral responsibility. -- A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: PER HELGE LARSEN, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, OLAF ALEX, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, JOHN CONNORS, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, SIMON COLUMBUS, PHIL KAVANAGH, MIKKEL STORMYR, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, FERGAL CUSSEN, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, ROMAIN ROCH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, ADANER USMANI, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, NELLEKE BAK, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, SUNNY SMITH, JON WISMAN, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, WILLIAM BUCKNER, PAUL-GEORGE ARNAUD, LUKE GLOWACKI, GEORGIOS THEOPHANOUS, CHRIS WILLIAMSON, PETER WOLOSZYN, DAVID WILLIAMS, DIOGO COSTA, ANTON ERIKSSON, CHARLES MOREY, ALEX CHAU, AMAURI MARTÍNEZ, CORALIE CHEVALLIER, BANGALORE ATHEISTS, LARRY D. LEE JR., OLD HERRINGBONE, STARRY, MICHAEL BAILEY, DAN SPERBER, ROBERT GRESSIS, IGOR N, JEFF MCMAHAN, JAKE ZUEHL, BARNABAS RADICS, MARK CAMPBELL, TOMAS DAUBNER, LUKE NISSEN, CHRIS STORY, KIMBERLY JOHNSON, BENJAMIN GELBART, JESSICA NOWICKI, LINDA BRANDIN, NIKLAS CARLSSON, ISMAËL BENSLIMANE, GEORGE CHORIATIS, VALENTIN STEINMANN, PER KRAULIS, KATE VON GOELER, ALEXANDER HUBBARD, LIAM DUNAWAY, BR, MASOUD ALIMOHAMMADI, PURPENDICULAR, JONAS HERTNER, URSULA GOODENOUGH, GREGORY HASTINGS, AND DAVID PINSOF! A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, TOM VANEGDOM, BERNARD HUGUENEY, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, THOMAS TRUMBLE, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, JONCARLO MONTENEGRO, AL NICK ORTIZ, AND NICK GOLDEN! AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, BOGDAN KANIVETS, AND ROSEY!
Kevin Mitchell is Associate Professor of Genetics and Neuroscience at Trinity College Dublin. He is a graduate of the Genetics Department, Trinity College Dublin (B.A., Mod. 1991) and received his Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley (1997), where he studied nervous system development with Prof. Corey Goodman. He did postdoctoral research at Stanford University, using molecular genetics to study neural development in the mouse. He was an EMBO Young Investigator and was elected to Fellowship of Trinity College in 2009. He served as Associate Director of Undergraduate Science Education at Trinity College Dublin from 2016-18 and led a re-imagining of the TCD science courses. Since 2018, he has been Senior Lecturer/Dean of Undergraduate Studies and has been leading efforts to create a systematic Common Architecture with the Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences under the Trinity Education Project. EPISODE LINKS: - Kevin's Website: https://www.kjmitchell.com/ - Kevin's Blog: http://www.wiringthebrain.com - Kevin's Books: https://tinyurl.com/2p9yjzxr - Kevin's Publications: https://tinyurl.com/mskdpvce - Kevin's Twitter: https://twitter.com/wiringthebrain TIMESTAMPS: (0:00) - Introduction (0:47) - Origin of life (4:25) - Life is a collection of processes (13:23) - I move, therefore I am (16:07) - Proto Free Will to Free Will (27:44) - Is Free Will worth the fitness payoff? (48:08) - Explanatory power of Kevin's Free Will framework (57:58) - Free Will Illusionism (1:08:06) - Libet & other Free Will experiments (1:14:45) - Oliver Sacks, Michael Gazzaniga & other Neurological perspectives (1:19:45) - Problem with Dennett's Compatibilism & Libertarianism (1:21:55) - "Cognitive Realism" vs Causal Reductivism (1:29:59) - Cognitive Realism's implication on Moral Responsibility (1:40:09) - Thomas Nagel & Moral Luck (1:46:32) - Deriving meaning from this view (1:50:37) - Artificial Agents (1:58:30) - Conclusion CONNECT: - Website: https://tevinnaidu.com/ - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/drtevinnaidu - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/drtevinnaidu/ - Twitter: https://twitter.com/drtevinnaidu/ - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/drtevinnaidu/ For Business Inquiries: info@tevinnaidu.com ============================= ABOUT MIND-BODY SOLUTION: Mind-Body Solution explores the nature of consciousness, reality, free will, morality, mental health, and more. This podcast presents enlightening discourse with the world's leading experts in philosophy, physics, neuroscience, psychology, linguistics, AI, and beyond. It will change the way you think about the mind-body dichotomy by showing just how difficult — intellectually and practically — the mind-body problem is. Join Dr. Tevin Naidu on a quest to conquer the mind-body problem and take one step closer to the mind-body solution. Dr Tevin Naidu is a medical doctor, philosopher & ethicist. He attained his Bachelor of Medicine & Bachelor of Surgery degree from Stellenbosch University, & his Master of Philosophy degree Cum Laude from the University of Pretoria. His academic work focuses on theories of consciousness, computational psychiatry, phenomenological psychopathology, values-based practice, moral luck, addiction, & the philosophy & ethics of science, mind & mental health. ===================== Disclaimer: We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of watching any of our publications. You acknowledge that you use the information provided at your own risk. Do your research. Copyright Notice: This video and audio channel contain dialog, music, and images that are the property of Mind-Body Solution. You are authorised to share the link and channel, and embed this link in your website or others as long as a link back to this channel is provided. © Mind-Body Solution
Does science have anything to say about our freedom of choice?Looking for a link we mentioned? It's here: https://linktr.ee/philosophyforourtimesA famed experiment, by Libet in the 1980s, led many scientists and philosophers to argue that free will was an illusion. Despite the experiment being challenged at the time and in recent studies, its legacy persists. Many materialists still contend that free will has been shown to be illusory, supporting their belief that humans are merely biological machines. We often imagine that experiment settles the matter, but should we instead conclude that our interpretation of experiment is a function of our desire to believe its outcome? Or can empiricism really determine the existence or non-existence of free will?Prolific British writer, philosopher and co-founder of The Philosophers' Magazine, Julian Baggini, renowned Australian philosopher of science, Peter Godfrey-Smith, and leading British neuroscientist and UCL professor, Sarah Garfinkel, argue about empiricism and its role in determining the existence of free will. Alex O'Connor hosts.There are thousands of big ideas to discover at IAI.tv – videos, articles, and courses waiting for you to explore. Find out more: https://iai.tv/podcast-offers?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=shownotes&utm_campaign=the-future-of-freedomSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Key topics covered by Frank and Libet include:*The Concourse Financial Group value proposition and how Libet's own career trajectory informs how she implements resources for advisor success.*The importance of technology innovation to advisor achievement and how Concourse has applied this insight within their own organization.*Why having access to a comprehensive support team is a necessary addition to every advisor's repertoire.*Creating strong firm culture and applying it to building relationships in an increasingly digital world.*What every advisor should be doing today to ensure that they are capitalizing on current industry opportunities.The expertise shared by Frank and Libet is detailed and accessible. If you are an advisor who is evaluating what independence might mean for you, or if you are an advisor who is simply looking for applicable strategies to take your practice to the next level, then get ready to benefit from the thought leadership of two of financial services most respected leaders.
In deze nieuwe aflevering gaan we het hebben over 'Locus of control'. Oftewel: de mate waarin mensen voelen dat ze controle hebben over hun leven of dat alles door buitenaf wordt beïnvloed. Want in hoeverre hebben we hier zelf controle over?Voor meer persoonlijkheidsfeitjes volg ons op Instagram of TikTok!Lees, kijk en luistertips
On episode 153, we welcome Kennon Sheldon to discuss the free will and determinism debate, why free will is still possible when confronting the data, the different spheres of influence and how the mind can affect one's bio-chemical composition and in turn be affected by it, self-determination theory and the significance of autonomy for well-being and mental health, Ken's interpretation of the famous Libet experiment (which purportedly supports determinism), Alen's weight loss and how applying free will helps us better understand his health journey, Leon's Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder and its affect on his internal sense of freedom, the Rogerian model of therapy and its association with personal growth, intrinsic vs extrinsic motivation and the former's increased ability to foster joy and sustained motivation, and why biological drives can't fully explain human behavior. Kennon M. Sheldon is professor of psychology at the University of Missouri. He is one of the founding researchers of positive psychology, a fellow of the American Psychological Association, and a recipient of the Templeton Foundation Positive Psychology Prize. His research is in the areas of well-being, motivation, self-determination theory, personality, and positive psychology. His new book, available now, is called Freely Determined: What the New Psychology of the Self Teaches Us About How to Live. | Kennon M. Sheldon | ► Psychology Today | https://bit.ly/3BJruCN ► Freely Determined Book | https://amzn.to/3FZBF8Q Where you can find us: | Seize The Moment Podcast | ► Facebook | https://www.facebook.com/SeizeTheMoment ► Twitter | https://twitter.com/seize_podcast ► Instagram | https://www.instagram.com/seizethemoment ► TikTok | https://www.tiktok.com/@seizethemomentpodcast ► Patreon | https://www.patreon.com/user?u=32208666
Today on MindMatters, we dive into Chris Langan's essay collection, "The Art of Knowing." In the process we discuss free will, Libet's experiments and their interpretations, reality theory, morality (relative? absolute? both?), why we need bad situations in order to grow, and Batman (the greatest superhero).
Today on MindMatters, we dive into Chris Langan's essay collection, "The Art of Knowing." In the process we discuss free will, Libet's experiments and their interpretations, reality theory, morality (relative? absolute? both?), why we need bad situations in order to grow, and Batman (the greatest superhero). Running Time: 01:35:00 Download: MP3 — 130 MB
Today on MindMatters, we dive into Chris Langan's essay collection, "The Art of Knowing." In the process we discuss free will, Libet's experiments and their interpretations, reality theory, morality (relative? absolute? both?), why we need bad situations in order to grow, and Batman (the greatest superhero). Running Time: 01:35:00 Download: MP3 — 130 MB
Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2022.10.21.513155v1?rss=1 Authors: Cao, L. Abstract: Outcome binding has long been understood as an illusion of timing perception, in which an action-effect is perceived as occurring earlier than it actually does. This illusion has been heavily investigated over the past two decades with regards to the mechanisms behind and potential applications. Here we present evidence in favour of understanding outcome binding as a spatial attentional effect, at least in part. In a series of 3 experiments, it was shown that an action-effect was preceded by a predictive attention shift in the classic Libet clock paradigm. The magnitude of attention shift predicted the size of outcome binding. When the attention shift was controlled for, binding also disappeared. Our study also calls for a reassessment of results obtained from the clock-like method in mental chronometry dating back to Wundt, as attention may well be a critical confounding factor in the interpretation of the results from these studies. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info Podcast created by Paper Player, LLC
La fundación y desarrollo de la República China (Taiwán)
Words covered in today's episode: Lac, lactis; milk (lactase, delectation, ablactation) Lacerare, laceratum; to tear to pieces, mangle (laceration, dilacerate) Latus; wide, broad (i.e. Vastus Lateralis, latissimus (superlative) dorsi) Latus, lateris; side (Lateral, mediolaterial [plane], latissimus dorsi) Libet; it pleases (libido, ad libitum) Lien; spleen (gastrolienal, perilienal) Limen, liminis; threshold (liminal, supraliminal) Linea; line (linear) Lingua; tongue (breviligulata, sublingual, cervicolingual) Locus; place (dislocation, translocation, intralocular) Longus; long (adductor longus, opposed to adductor brevis) Lumbus; loin (dorsolumbar, lumbar) Luxare, luxatum; to dislocate (subluxation, dislocation, relaxation) Magnus; large, great Malleus; hammer, club (one of the small bones of the ear; malleolus) Malus; bad, faulty (malformation, malignant, malposition) Mandibula; jaw, bone of lower jaw (mandible, submandibular gland) Maxilla; jaw, upper jawbone (bimaxillary, submaxillary, maxilla) Medius; middle (mediolateral axis, admedial, Medial; refers to the midline of the body) Mens, mentis; mind (mental, dementia) Mola; millstone or Molaris; adapted for grinding (molar) Musculus; little mouse, muscle [From Mus, muris; mouse] (muscle, musculature) --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/liam-connerly/support
In this reading group episode, we discuss Gary Watson's paper on Intelligible Moral Demand being a way to view the debate on moral responsibility. That paper is his Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme. Here's any links you'll need to dive deeper: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.101515!/file/watson-responsibility-limits-of-evil.pdf Twitter: @JordanCMyers You can also get in contact by emailing me at platoscavepodcast@gmail.com Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true Plato's Cave Website: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Special Guests: Adam (Reading Group Discussions) and Giffin (Reading Group Discussions).
In this reading group episode, we go deep into the weeds of PF Strawson's "Freedom and Resentment." Here's any links you'll need to dive deeper: PDF:http://www.filosofia.unimi.it/zucchi/NuoviFile/FreedomandResentment.pdf Twitter: @JordanCMyers You can also get in contact by emailing me at platoscavepodcast@gmail.com Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true Plato's Cave Website: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Special Guests: Adam (Reading Group Discussions) and Giffin (Reading Group Discussions).
In this reading group discussion episode, we discuss Galen Strawson's "The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility" and Derk Pereboom's Four Case Argument against compatibilism. Here's any links you'll need to dive deeper: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/551587e0e4b0ce927f09707f/t/57b5d14de58c624a6d3a5e99/1471533403405/Strawson%2C+The+Impossibility+of+Moral+Responsibility.pdf https://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.com/2015/01/perebooms-four-case-argument-against.html Twitter: @JordanCMyers You can also get in contact by emailing me at platoscavepodcast@gmail.com Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true Plato's Cave Website: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Special Guests: Adam (Reading Group Discussions) and Giffin (Reading Group Discussions).
In this reading group discussion episode, we discuss a follow up to our part 1 episode using the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entries on free will and determinism. Here's any links you'll need to dive deeper: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freewill/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-causal/ Twitter: @JordanCMyers You can also get in contact by emailing me at platoscavepodcast@gmail.com Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true Plato's Cave Website: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Special Guests: Adam (Reading Group Discussions) and Giffin (Reading Group Discussions).
In this reading group discussion episode, we start a series on Free Will, Determinism, and Moral Responsibility with Sam Harris's book. Twitter: @JordanCMyers You can also get in contact by emailing me at platoscavepodcast@gmail.com Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true Plato's Cave Website: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Special Guests: Adam (Reading Group Discussions) and Giffin (Reading Group Discussions).
Especial Semana Santa
Aydınlanmanın erken dönem düşünürlerinden olan Spinoza “Havaya atılan bir taş düşünebilseydi, kendi isteğiyle yere düştüğünü sanırdı” demişti yaklaşık yarım asır önce. Ne dersiniz sizce haklı mıydı ? Özgür irade bir yanılsama mı? Felsefe tarihinin en dikkat çekici ve en zorlayıcı birkaç probleminden biriydi bu. Nörobilimin gelişmesiyle birlikte aynı zamanda bilimsel bir problem halini de aldı. Support the show İnstagram Müzikler Kevim Mcload-Loopster Kevin MacLeodLicense: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/4991-loopsterLicense: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/stbss/message
Als Einstieg in den Fachbereich der Philosophie des Geistes setzen wir uns mit dem Libet-Experiment und den darum kreisenden Diskussionen um Willensfreiheit & Determinismus auseinander. Außerdem beantworten wir Fragen aus der Hörerschaft zum Thema. Literatur: Benjamin Libet: Do we have free will?, in: Robert Kane: The Oxford Handbook of free will. Wer mag, kann uns weiterhin mit einmaligen Beiträgen unterstützen auf: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/keinemeinung
Especial fin de año: recuento de los daños
When was the last time you made a significant decision in your life that you regretted later? If you were to backtrack your life today to that very same moment you made that decision, do you think you would have made a different decision?This is the question Stanley and I are addressing today looking into how human mind operates on the issue of Free will. Do we really have the freedom we think we have? After all, you made that decision to eat a fruit for snack, and not a cookie, out of your freewill, right? Well, it might be a little bit more complex than that.If a person's choice to commit a crime is determined by a certain pattern of neural activity, which is also the product of prior causes, bad genes, a dramatic childhood, lost sleep, or even cosmic-ray bombardment that mutated one of his genes, can we really say that his will was “free” when he committed that crime?We understand an average person's basic intuition is wanting to punish criminals. But before we jump into that conclusion lets listen to this conversation. This might completely change your attitude towards criminals and make you more compassionate towards people who make bad choices in life.Episode hosts: Stanley Samuel & Bino ManjasserilReferences:Sam Harris's Book on Free willhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Will_(book)Sam Harris's article on Illusion of Free will https://www.samharris.org/blog/the-illusion-of-free-willDoes Benjamin Libet's finding's prove that the action of lifting the hand were caused by the readiness potential? https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.dartmouth.edu/dist/9/2172/files/2020/01/C11.pdf A paper by Miller and Trevena (2009) show that the RP may only be the brain's preparation to make a conscious act, rather than a cause for it.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19736023/ An article from the popular press debunking Libet's experiment as a proof against free-willhttps://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/09/free-will-bereitschaftspotential/597736/ Laplace's Demon - his take on the deterministic nature of the universe, derived from classical mechanics occurs in his book A philosophical essay on probabilities (1814): https://www.gutenberg.org/files/58881/58881-h/58881-h.htmA critique of Sam Harris book on Free will by John Horgan:https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/will-this-post-make-sam-harris-change-his-mind-about-free-will/ Like this content? Subscribe to the podcast in your favorite podcasting platform (Google, Spotify, Apple, Audible) or YouTube, email us at podcast@day2project.com, follow us on twitter @Day2Project
For our first Halloween-themed episode we had our Patrons send in their favorite creepy songs. Happy Halloween!! To become a Patron, go to: https://Patreon.com/TRGMH/ Songs featured in this episode: Welcome To My Nightmare - Alice Cooper; Libet's Delay - The Caretaker; DOA - Bloodrock; Do They Know It's Hallowe'en? - North American Halloween Prevention Initiative; She-Wolf - Shakira; A Forest - The Cure; The Carnival Is Over - Dead Can Dance; Gog - Peter Hammill; Obsession - Siouxsie & The Banshees; Find a Finger - The Minus Five; The Rite of Spring, Part II: The Sacrifice, “Glorification of the Chosen One” - Stravinsky; The Green Manalishi (With The Two Prong Crown) - Fleetwood Mac; My Body's a Zombie for You - Dead Man's Bones; American Girl - Tom Petty; Earth Died Screaming - Tom Waits; The Visitation - White Noise; Bela Lugosi's Dead - Bauhaus
In this episode we talk with neuroscientist and philosopher Adina Roskies about what we can learn about free will from monkey cognition. We also ask her about her take on the Libet experiment and whether neuroscience could, in principle, disprove free will.Adina's Website: https://faculty-directory.dartmouth.edu/adina-l-roskiesAdina's chapter "Monkey Decision-Making as a Model System for Human Decision-Making" can be found in the book Surrounding Free Will, edited by Al Mele: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/surrounding-free-will-9780199333950?cc=us&lang=en&Twitter: https://twitter.com/thefreewillshowInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/thefreewillshow/?hl=enFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/The-Free-Will-Show-105535031200408/
In this episode, Tim Bayne explains a famous experiment by brain scientist Benjamin Libet— an experiment that Libet took to show that we have no free will. We discuss several critical responses to Libet, and Tim argues that, even if unsuccessful in his original aims, Libet has raised good questions for philosophers, physiologists, and neuroscientists to explore.Tim's website: https://www.mmcr.edu.au/our_people/tim-bayne/ Libet's 1985 Behavioral and Brain Sciences paper, including peer commentary: http://philosophy.org.za/uploads_other/Libet1985.pdfRecent paper on readiness potential by Aaron Schurger et al.: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661321000930Twitter: https://twitter.com/thefreewillshowInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/thefreewillshow/?hl=enFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/The-Free-Will-Show-105535031200408/
Free Will has been a philosophical debate for as long as philosophical debates have existed and science has weighed in from time to time. Neuroscience really started its proper discussion of if humans are truly free with the work of Libet in 1985, although even Libet was working off earlier work. That research brought into the public mind the question of it the readiness potential, the charging up of your motor system to fire, could answer if humans are free or not. We are not 37 years after the initial study and new research is not questioning if free will is real, or if neuroscience has ways to answer the question but if the readiness potential is the best way to find out. In this episode, we dive into the methods behind the readiness potential and try to see if it is something from an era of neuroscience that we can replace now.
On this episode of Upon Reflection, I read my 2021 paper in Logoi titled, "On Second Thought, Libet-style Unreflective Intentions May Be Compatible With Free Will". Imagine if I could predict your behavior before you even became of your conscious of your intention to behave that way. Would this mean that you don't have free will? I used to think so. In this paper, I explain why I was wrong: my view of free will involved magical thinking. Some figures from the paper. As with all of my writing, a free preprint can be found on my CV at byrdnick.com/cv under "Publications". This podcast sponsored by DataCamp. DataCamp helps you make better use of data. You can build data skills online while learning from the world's top data scientists. Find our more at datacamp.pxf.io/byrd. Students get a bonus 62% discount until August 25: You can find the Upon Reflection podcast here or in your podcast app. You can also find out more about me and my research on Twitter via @byrd_nick, or on Facebook via @byrdnick. If you end up enjoying the Upon Reflection podcast, then feel free to tell people about it, online, in person, or in your ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ review. Related posts 6 Tips For Academic PresentationsOnline Conferences: Some history, methods & dataA Dissertation About Reflective Reasoning in Philosophy, Morality, & Bias15+ Podcasts about Cognitive Science40+ Podcasts about Philosophy
Hijacking the Buddha's teachings on dependent co-arising as a detailed model of manifestation, we consider its magical applications: the Maha-nidana Sutta and its relevance to magick; its contrasts with Kabbalah; differences between religion, science, and magick; the centrality of dependent co-arising in Buddhism; religions as models of reality; the nidanas as steps in the process of manifestation; a personal perspective on Buddhism; hacking dependent co-arising; death, birth, and becoming; death and life as interwoven; birth not as creation, but as parts becoming perceivable as wholes; the constant flux of becoming; death and life as different perspectives on becoming; grasping as a lust for existence and a means of existing; craving as a prior judgment call that can sometimes be resisted; the validity of positing psychological causes for material phenomena; how to hack grasping and craving; feeling-tone or vedana and its relationship to craving; regular spiritual practice and psychological work; the effects of an exercise concerning vedana set by Rob Burbea; how states fade, but knowledge remains; how interrupting the process of manifestation allows something besides the ordinary to appear; sensory contact, and why the tree that falls in the forest without anyone to hear it definitely does not make a sound; the sense of an external world; psychedelics as a hack at this level; six senses, and the mind as a sense organ in Buddhist psychology; a personal experience illustrating how this is the case; the tendency to regard mind as a "thing"; name and form; the myth of the conquistadors' galleons; Platonic forms and Jungian archetypes, not as ideal objects but as universal predispositions; the importance of name and form in magick and in therapy; the impact of the human body on human experience; the body as agent rather than object; how some of these phases are more hackable than others; mind, psyche, and soul; soul as an individual instance of human experience; how the body is in the soul; soul as awareness of individual experience versus consciousness as pure awareness; an exercise for exposing the unfindability of awareness; consciousness as the qualityless provider of qualities; consciousness as discernment or discrimination; formations as karmic imprints or tendencies; the possible relevance of formations to scientific experiments concerning free will; how formations may be encountered in meditative states; at the very fringes of manifestation; ignorance as the impulse to make something out of nothing; reviewing the process from ignorance all the way to death; manifestation as a process proceeding from ignorance to samsara; the possibility of transcendence. Peter G.H. Clarke (2013). The Libet experiment and its implications for conscious will, https://tinyurl.com/s2xshu84 (bethinking.org). Thanissaro Bhikkhu, trans. (1997). Maha-nidana Sutta: The Great Causes Discourse (DN 15), https://tinyurl.com/zf5f2m27 (accesstoinsight.org).
I interviewed Aaron Schurger about his famous experiments on Free Will that debunked the popular interpretation of Libet's studies. Check out my other episode on Free Will also, titled: What Does Science Really Know About Free Will? I recently published a book on the nature of reality. It's called Existential Questions and can be found here: https://www.amazon.com/Existential-Questions-Jax-Pax-ebook/dp/B098M1DX7S/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=existential+questions+jax+pax&qid=1625965060&s=books&sr=1-1
Reflexión acerca de la realidad del libre albedrío. ¿Qué tanto somos dueños y responsables de nuestros pensamientos y acciones? Sigue Encuentros de Mentes en: - https://www.instagram.com/encuentrosdementes/ - https://www.facebook.com/encuentrosdementes - https://twitter.com/e_dementes Newsletter dominical: Sunday Service - https://carlosarroyo.substack.com/ Blog: - https://www.carlosarroyoblog.com/ Enlaces relevantes: - Experimento de Libet: https://psicologiaymente.com/psicologia/experimento-de-libet - Libre albedrío, realidad o ilusión? Gabriel Zanotti y Álvaro Fischer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JY3ncZ-wlh4 - Final Thoughts on free will, Sam Harris https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u45SP7Xv_oU - Free Will, The Psychology Podcast Part 1 & 2 Part 1. https://open.spotify.com/episode/1YZaLwpflZLYmfmi5X2ez4?si=06dc1f7ae9cf4c59 Part 2. https://open.spotify.com/episode/1QzhTkPdb2h2CyGd11g8qt?si=fbefb4647daa418c - Predictably Irrational, Dan Ariely https://danariely.com/books/predictably-irrational/ - Strangers to Ourselves, Timothy Wilson - https://www.amazon.com/Strangers-Ourselves-Discovering-Adaptive-Unconscious/dp/0674013824
In this episode, we discuss Harry Frankfurt's landmark 1969 paper, "Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss Harry Frankfurt's landmark 1969 paper, "Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
The nature of destiny has been debated throughout human history. The most straightforward definition of destiny is that God created the universe, life and all events, both past and future, in a single instant. This means that every event from the moment of the universe's creation to the Day of Judgment has already taken place and ended in the presence of God. Therefore, anything that hasn't happened yet are only events that haven't happened for us, not for God: After all, God is unbound by time or space as He, Himself, created time and space. Therefore, for God, the past, present and future are all one and everything has already begun and completed. [1] (Chun Siong Soon, Marcel Brass, Hans-Jochen Heinze & John-Dylan Haynes, Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience April 13th, 2008) [2] (Smith, Kerri (2011), "Neuroscience vs philosophy: Taking aim at free will", Nature, 477 (7362): 23–5) [3] Libet,B., Gleason, C.A., Wright, E.W.&Pearl, D.K. Brain 106, 623–642 (1983) [4] Bode S, He AH, Soon CS, Trampel R, Turner R, et al. (2011) Tracking the Unconscious Generation of Free Decisions Using UItra-High Field fMRI. PLoS ONE 6(6): e21612. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021612 [5] (Bem D, Tressoldi P, Rabeyron T and Duggan M. Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events [version 2; referees: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 4:1188 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7177.2)
In this episode, we discuss Frankfurt's famous paper, Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss Frankfurt's famous paper, Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
The Libet Experiments are a potential challenge to Realistically Construed Orthodox Quantum Mechanics, in that they have been treated as evidence that the that the mind is an illusion made of physical building blocks alone, on the basis that brain activity of a given action (e.g. moving a finger) occurs prior to people being aware of it. This, and other questions have been raised by critics regarding Realistically Construed Orthodox Quantum Mechanics. Does it hold up to scrutiny? Whether it does or not, there are significant ramifications. Also, how does the Law of Free Will relate to this. What, if anything, initiates a contemplated action? Is manifestation by consciousness involved? A reading of: Quantum Theory and Free Will. How Mental Intentions Translate into Bodily Actions. Henry P. Stapp. Published by Springer Nature, of Springer International Publishing. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. University of California. Berkeley, CA, USA, 2017.
In this episode, we discuss Gary Watson's paper on Intelligible Moral Demand being a way to view the debate on moral responsibility. That paper is his Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss Gary Watson's paper on Intelligible Moral Demand being a way to view the debate on moral responsibility. That paper is his Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we go deep into the weeds of PF Strawson's Freedom and Resentment. PDF:http://www.filosofia.unimi.it/zucchi/NuoviFile/FreedomandResentment.pdf Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we go deep into the weeds of PF Strawson's Freedom and Resentment. PDF:http://www.filosofia.unimi.it/zucchi/NuoviFile/FreedomandResentment.pdf Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss Galen Strawson's "The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility" and Derk Pereboom's Four Case Argument against compatibilism. Strawson: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/551587e0e4b0ce927f09707f/t/57b5d14de58c624a6d3a5e99/1471533403405/Strawson%2C+The+Impossibility+of+Moral+Responsibility.pdf Pereboom: https://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.com/2015/01/perebooms-four-case-argument-against.html Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss Galen Strawson's "The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility" and Derk Pereboom's Four Case Argument against compatibilism. Strawson: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/551587e0e4b0ce927f09707f/t/57b5d14de58c624a6d3a5e99/1471533403405/Strawson%2C+The+Impossibility+of+Moral+Responsibility.pdf Pereboom: https://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.com/2015/01/perebooms-four-case-argument-against.html Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss a follow up to our part 1 episode. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss a follow up to our part 1 episode. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we start a series on Free Will, Determinism, and Moral Responsibility with Sam Harris's book. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we start a series on Free Will, Determinism, and Moral Responsibility with Sam Harris's book. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
Giuseppe Trautteur"Il prigioniero libero"Adelphihttps://www.adelphi.it/Tutti i nostri codici, sotto tutti i regimi, si basano sul principio di responsabilità e di libera scelta. Ma si dà il caso che oggi la comunità scientifica, nella sua stragrande maggioranza, non riesca ad attribuire alcun ruolo alla responsabilità. Anzi la ignori. Se questa posizione si applicasse alla vita di ogni giorno, la paralizzerebbe all'istante. Al tempo stesso il problema della libera scelta è diventato più che mai urgente nella ricerca delle neuroscienze, con risultati come quelli di Libet e di Wegner, che molto danno da pensare.Indagine acutissima sulle aporie delle varie teorie attuali che tentano di risolvere o eludere una questione da sempre aperta – e che aveva trovato con Spinoza una prima formulazione moderna –, questo libro si propone di sgombrare il campo da soluzioni che tali non sono. E risulterà dunque tanto più prezioso.Giuseppe Trautteur è stato a lungo docente di Informatica Teorica presso l'Università di Napoli Federico II, ed è autore di numerosi contributi scientifici. Da Adelphi, ha pubblicato i due brevi saggi "Il caso o la necessità" (in Adelphiana 1971) e "Undici tesi sulla scienza congnitiva" (in Adelphiana 1, 2002).IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/
Does neuroscience prove there is no free will? Is consciousness reducible to a neural network? Are we determined by our brains? In this episode, I speak again with neurosurgeon, Dr. Michael Egnor. We discuss Sam Harris arguments against free will, and examine not only the philosophical problems with Harris' argument, but Dr. Egnor also argues that Harris incorrectly interprets the work of Benjamin Libet on will and the readiness potential, and that Libet himself did not reject free will. We also discuss the complex question of consciousness and the materialist claims that consciousness can be reduced to a physical, neural process. Visit https://www.themoralimagination.com/episodes/michael-egnor-2 for show notes and resources.
Marzec-Remiszewski, M. (2016). Czy wnioski z eksperymentów naukowych badających wolną wolę są uzasadnione? Przegląd i analiza krytyki eksperymentów Benjamina Libeta i Johna-Dylana Haynesa. ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal, Tom: 6(Numer: 2), 475–492.
Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.09.07.286351v1?rss=1 Authors: Hall, S. M., van den Heever, D., Vinding, M. C., Morris, L. D. Abstract: Background: Conscious volition is a broad term and is difficult to reduce to a single empirical paradigm. It encompasses many areas of cognition, including decision-making and empirical studies can be done on these components. This work follows on the seminal work of Libet et al. (1983) which focused on brain activity preceding motor activity and conscious awareness of the intention to move. Previous results have subsequently faced criticism, particularly methods used to average out EEG data over all the trials and the readiness potential not being present on an individual trial basis. This following study aims to address these criticisms. Objectives: To use machine learning to investigate brain activity preceding left/right hand movements with relation to conscious intent and motor action. Methodology: The data collection involved the recreation of the Libet experiment, with electroencephalography (EEG) data being collected. An addition made in this study was the choice between 'left' and 'right' while observing the Libet clock to subjectively mark the moment of conscious awareness. Twenty-one participants were included (four females, all right-handed). A deep (machine) learning model known as a convolutional neural network (CNN) was used for the EEG data analysis. Results: Subjectively reported conscious intent preceded the action by 108 ms. The CNN model was able to predict the decision 'left' or 'right' as early as 4.45 seconds before the action with a test accuracy of 98%. Conclusion: This study has shown motor preparatory processes start up to 4.45 seconds before conscious awareness of a decision to move. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info
Ciclo Webinar - "La rabbia e la voglia di non pensarci... aspetti processuali nel trattamento della disregolazione emotiva" (5 giugno 2020) PARTE 2Il Centro Disturbi della personalità di Modena presenta "La rabbia e la voglia di non pensarci... aspetti processuali nel trattamento della disregolazione emotiva"- “Libet e le dimensioni della personalità”- Dr. Giovanni Maria Ruggero- “Rimuginio e Regolazione Cognitiva nei disturbi di personalità”- Dr. Gabriele Caselli- “Il Centro Disturbi della Personalità di Modena, presentazione dell'équipe”- Dr.ssa Alessandra Brugnoni Per saperne di più: https://www.stateofmind.it/eventi/rabbia-webinar-cipmodena-200605/
Defenders 3: Doctrine of Man (Part 11): A Challenge to Dualism-Interactionism – The Libet Experiments
Viviamo tempi duri, in cui siamo costretti a fermarci. Che lo vogliamo o meno. E allora, forse, la cosa migliore che possiamo fare è sfruttare questo tempo. Cercare di capire e capirci. Perché alla fine dei conti non siamo mai fermi.Intanto, state a casa!----------------------------------------------Awel by stefsax (c) copyright 2006 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license. http://dig.ccmixter.org/files/stefsax/7785 Music from https://filmmusic.io"Sincerely" by Kevin MacLeod (https://incompetech.com)License: CC BY (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Gün ərzində sadə ya da mürəkkəb yüzlərlə qərar veririk. Bu qərarları özümüz azad iradəmizlə veririk yoxsa biz robot kimi proqramlanmışıq?
Guest Dr. Aaron Schurger talks to us about his research on the meaning of the "readiness potential", which has been referred to as "the brain signature of the will". Although this neural signal was already famous from research in the 1960s, it was Benjamin Libet's infamous experiments in the 1980s that proportedly showed that the readiness potential preceded an act of free will by a few hundred milliseconds. More recently (in press), Dr. Schurger and his colleagues have convincingly demonstrated that the readiness potential is not in fact predictive of an act of free will, but instead comes from a lack of a proper experimental control. Resources: Here is what a classifier (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_classification) is (a topic that comes up that may be unfamiliar to some). For advanced readers, check out AdaBoost, a tool that increases performance in classifiers and other types of machine learning. Papers "The Time Course of Neural Activity Predictive of Impending Movement" (Basbug, Schapire, & Schurger, TO BE PUBLISHED SOON) An accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity prior to self-initiated movement (https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/109/42/E2904.full.pdf) (Schurger, Sitt, & Dehaene, 2012) Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/unconscious-cerebral-initiative-and-the-role-of-conscious-will-in-voluntary-action/D215D2A77F1140CD0D8DA6AB93DA5499&hl=en&sa=T&oi=gsb&ct=res&cd=0&d=3152915427386887172&ei=hvP4XZHzCa3JsQKJnIaYCA&scisig=AAGBfm3MzIo2aoz66vMHr-PThZdS3F64xg) (Libet's 1985 experiments) Special Guest: Aaron Schurger.
Thibaut et Lê discutent de la série Mind Field créée par Michael Stevens de la chaîne VSauce. Les épisodes (normalement réservés aux abonnés de YouTube Red) sont accessibles à tous jusqu'à la fin de l'année, profitez-en ! https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZRRxQcaEjA4qyEuYfAMCazlL0vQDkIj2 0:00 - Intro (où l'on parle de la série en général) 17:54 - Sur l'épisode "Touch" et la puissance de l'effet nocebo. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUdXMoY6fLY&list=PLZRRxQcaEjA4qyEuYfAMCazlL0vQDkIj2&index=7&t=0s 46:23 - Sur l'épisode "Destruction" et la gestion de la colère. https://youtu.be/EcU0pX834jY?list=PLZRRxQcaEjA4qyEuYfAMCazlL0vQDkIj2 1:13:25 - Sur l'épisode "Should I Die ?" : plutôt crémation ou cryogénisation ? (Avec en prime une discussion sur l'image de la méthode scientifique que renvoie Mind Field.) https://youtu.be/QEpmKAk81KQ?list=PLZRRxQcaEjA7LX19uAySGlc9hmprBxfEP 1:51:39 - Sur la vidéo "How to make a hero" et la prise de responsabilité éthique. https://youtu.be/jIjJ_YfttuA?list=PLZRRxQcaEjA7wmh3Z6EQuOK9fm1CqnJCI 2:19:37 - Sur quelques autres vidéos qui nous ont plu, notamment "Freedom of choice" (avec une variation sur l'expérience de Libet) et "The Stillwell Brain" (ou comment faire un réseau de neurones humains) "Freedom of choice" : https://youtu.be/XElctAG-TYw?list=PLZRRxQcaEjA4qyEuYfAMCazlL0vQDkIj2 The Stillwell Brain " : https://youtu.be/QEpmKAk81KQ?list=PLZRRxQcaEjA7LX19uAySGlc9hmprBxfEP Voilà !
This is part 2 of our series on free will! In this episode we reconcile how it is that we can feel like we have free will (even when we don't), give an evolutionary argument for why this might be the case and show how knowing this makes us more compassionate people who are (paradoxically) better at achieving our goals. Along the way, we explain what a Bayesian Network is (and why you should care about yours), and give an introduction to some of the key ideas and concepts in the field of Reinforcement Learning (a subfield of AI) and how we can use these concepts to clarify our view of ourselves and the world! --------------- Shownotes: --------------- Dan Dennett essay on Sam Harris's argument: https://samharris.org/reflections-on-free-will/ Sam Harris's response to Dennett: https://samharris.org/free-will-and-free-will/ Sam Harris's “Free Will: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13259270-free-will Good primer on the Libet experiments that preempted decision making: https://youtu.be/OjCt-L0Ph5o The original Libet publication [paywalled]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6640273 Details of more recent versions of the Libet experiments with 7 second preempting and some predictive capability: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMDuakmEEV4 A recent “debunking” of the Libet results: https://www.pnas.org/content/109/42/e2904 A popular article on the Libet experiments in the light of the new model: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/09/free-will-bereitschaftspotential/597736/ Radiolab Loops episode: https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/articles/radiolab-loops Litany of Gendlin on LessWrong: https://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Litany_of_Gendlin Julia Galef on Bayes Nets: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFv5DvrLDCg Learn Bayes Nets post on LessWrong: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/tp4rEtQqRshPavZsr/learn-bayes-nets Compatibilism: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/ A good introductory courses on reinforcement learning for those interested: https://www.theschool.ai/courses/move-37-course/ Video of RL agent walking on the back of its legs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdTBqBnqhaQ Sean Carroll's podcast: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/ How to Win Friends and Influence Reality (episode 9 of Bit of a Tangent): https://podcasts.apple.com/za/podcast/009-how-to-win-friends-and-influence-reality/id1470855694?i=1000446168718
This is Part 1 of the series on Free Will. In this episode, Gianluca and Jared dispel the assumption that humans have Free Will by presenting the argument from Determinism—popularised by Sam Harris. They discuss the evidence from physics, neurology, and the famous Libet experiments; before laying the groundwork for later conversations about what this implies morally and societally. You have no choice but to listen. -------- Shownotes: Sam Harris's “Free Will: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13259270-free-will Ted Chiang's Story of Your Life (and some of his other fantastic shorts): https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/223380.Stories_of_Your_Life_and_Others Arrival, the film adaptation of Story of Your Life: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2543164 Principle of Least Action: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_action Chaos Theory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory Good primer on the Libet experiments that preempted decision making: https://youtu.be/OjCt-L0Ph5o The original Libet publication [paywalled]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6640273 Details of more recent versions of the Libet experiments with 7 second preempting and some predictive capability: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMDuakmEEV4 A recent “debunking” of the Libet results: https://www.pnas.org/content/109/42/e2904 A popular article on the Libet experiments in the light of the new model: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/09/free-will-bereitschaftspotential/597736/ Great CGP Grey video on split brain experiments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfYbgdo8e-8 Decent primer on Sperry's split-brain experiments: https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/roger-sperrys-split-brain-experiments-1959-1968 “Behave” by Robert Sopalsky: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/31170723-behave
"All things feel," Pythagoas said. Panpsychism, the belief that consciousnes is a property of all things and not limited to the human brain, is back in vogue -- with good reason. The problem of how inert matter could give rise to subjectivity and feeling has proved insoluble under the dominant assumptions of a hard materialism. Recently, the American filmmaker Errol Morris presented his own brand of panpsychism in a long-form essay entitled, "The Pianist and the Lobster," published in the New York Times. The essay opens with an episode from the life of Sviatoslav Richter, namely a time where the famous Russian pianist couldn't perform without a plastic lobster waiting for him in the wings. In Morris's piece, the curious anecdote sounds the first note of what turns out to be a polyphony of thoughts and ideas on consciousness, agency, Nerval's image of the the "Hidden God," and the deep weirdness of music. Phil and JF use Morris's essay to create a polyphony of their own. REFERENCES Errol Morris, "The Pianist and the Lobster" (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/21/opinion/editorials/errol-morris-lobster-sviatoslav-richter.html) Sviatoslav Richter (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sviatoslav_Richter), Russian pianist Nick Cave., Red Hand Files #53 (https://www.theredhandfiles.com/who-are-your-favourite-guitarists/) Thomas Kuhn, [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TheStructureofScientificRevolutions) Bruno Monsaingeon (dir.), Richter: The Enigma (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfJVpjI3wJM) Bon Jovi, "Livin’ on a Prayer" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDK9QqIzhwk) Brad Warner, "The Eyes of Dogen" (http://hardcorezen.info/the-eyes-of-dogen/6368) Gilles Deleuze, [Difference and Repetition](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DifferenceandRepetition) Edgard Varèse (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgard_Varèse), composer Benjamin Libet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Libet#Implications_of_Libet%27s_experiments), neuroscientist Robin Hardy (dir), [The Wicker Man](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TheWickerMan) Frans De Waal, Mama’s Last Hug (https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/may/08/mamas-last-hug-frans-de-waal-review) Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, [A Thousand Plateaus](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AThousandPlateaus) Sartre, [The Transcendence of the Ego](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TheTranscendenceoftheEgo) Tarot de Marseille - XVIII: The Moon (https://files.fireside.fm/file/fireside-uploads/images/e/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/W4v2yByR.jpg) Marsilio Ficino, [Three Books on Life](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devitalibritres)_ Carl Jung, "On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry" (http://www.studiocleo.com/librarie/jung/essay.html), The Red Book (https://www.npr.org/2009/11/11/120129676/the-red-book-a-window-into-jungs-dreams) Terence McKenna, Food of the Gods (https://www.amazon.com/Food-Gods-Original-Knowledge-Evolution/dp/0553371304)
------------------Support the channel------------ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter ------------------Follow me on--------------------- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thedissenteryt/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDissenterYT Dr. David Papineau is Professor of Philosophy at King's College London and at the City University of New York Graduate Center, having previously taught for several years at Cambridge University where he was a fellow of Robinson College. He was President of the British Society for Philosophy of Science for 1993-5, President of the Mind Association for 2009-10, and President of the Aristotelian Society for 2013-14. He's also the author of 9 books, including Philosophical Naturalism, Thinking About Consciousness, and Knowing the Score. In this episode, we talk about naturalism, and consciousness and mental phenomena. We start by discussing what naturalism is; if there are problems that science can't deal with; and how philosophy can contribute to science and the scientific method. Then, we move on to talking about consciousness. We first tackle the issues with mind-brain dualism, and then we discuss consciousness and action, and the Libet experiments in the 1980's; we also deal with the hard problem of consciousness, and the issues with emergentism. Finally, we debate the possibility of mental phenomena being nothing more than illusions, and what is real in how we experience the world, with a focus on our perceptual systems. Time Links: 01:08 What is naturalism? 04:25 Are there problems science can't deal with? 12:09 What role can philosophy play in science? 19:28 Mind-brain dualism 24:53 Consciousness, action, free will 30:21 Consciousness, and post hoc justifications to our behavior 32:33 Is there really a hard problem of consciousness? 36:16 The issues with the discussion of emergentism vs. reductionism 39:32 About the possibility of mental phenomena being just illusions 47:29 What is “real” in our experience of the world? 52:31 Follow Dr. Papineau's work! -- Follow Dr. Papineau's work: Faculty page: https://tinyurl.com/yb5ledrx Personal website: http://www.davidpapineau.co.uk/ Books: https://tinyurl.com/yalc4gdf Twitter handle: @davidpapineau -- A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS: KARIN LIETZCKE, ANN BLANCHETTE, JUNOS, SCIMED, PER HELGE HAAKSTD LARSEN, LAU GUERREIRO, RUI BELEZA, MIGUEL ESTRADA, ANTÓNIO CUNHA, CHANTEL GELINAS, JIM FRANK, JERRY MULLER, FRANCIS FORD, AND HANS FREDRIK SUNDE! I also leave you with the link to a recent montage video I did with the interviews I have released until the end of June 2018: https://youtu.be/efdb18WdZUo And check out my playlists on: PSYCHOLOGY: https://tinyurl.com/ybalf8km PHILOSOPHY: https://tinyurl.com/yb6a7d3p ANTHROPOLOGY: https://tinyurl.com/y8b42r7g
Beep & CC are joined by Crystal to discuss 2.03 “One Hundred Years” 02:15 Crystal enters the gauntlet 08:25 2.03 One Hundred Years We’re traveling to the past! And damn this show looks good 100 years, gas masks & record players Getting Used to the New Normal All the reasons why Cassie really does not want to “take a ride” Let’s acknowledge that James Cole actually came up with a plan A few minutes vs. two months This James Cole is smooth as heck…. ...but yeah Cole, she is still mad What the photograph represented to Cassie vs. Cole Hello Agent Gale! We forgot that we didn’t love you at first! Loops within the loop Mantis: mythology building & a familiar flair for the dramatic The fervor of the cult of the 12 Monkeys The many layers to the Casserole argument & how it sets this show apart Guess who else can’t “do what needs to be done”? Tommy Crawford & building the mythology of primaries Mantis & Tommy: Casserole celebrity sighting! Listening to the primaries now that we know the puzzle from above The burden that primaries bear Tommy, Old Jennifer, Mantis & free will Debate club: Ramse’s Almost Execution WWII Columbia University & The War Bureau of Consultants “The Liberty Bell March” easter egg “Libet’s Delay”: time, memory & free will A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court
İnsan davranışlarıyla ilgili bilim insanları şu sorunun cevabını aramaktadır: Hareketle-rimizi gerçekleştirmek üzere aldığımız karar-larda, bu kararı almadan önce, kararı almaya niyet ettiğimiz o anda, hür iradeye sahip oldu-ğumuzdan kesin olarak emin miyiz? Günlük hayattaki bütün aktivite, karar ve niyetleri-mizdeki zihnî faaliyetlerin hepsinin tamamiyle bize ait olduğunu söyleyebilir miyiz?
Zima to czas próby dla każdego rodzaju nawierzchni. Nie tylko kostka brukowa wymaga solidnej konserwacji jeszcze przed nadejściem pierwszego śniegu i mrozów. Niemniej dopiero pierwsze dni wiosny stanowią największe wyzwanie dla użytkowników bruku. Topniejący śnieg i odpuszczający lód zwykle odsłaniają przed nami nawierzchnię nie tylko zanieczyszczoną, ale często po prostu zniszczoną.Zmiany spowodowane działaniem zimy są niezwykle trudne do usunięcia. Jeżeli zatem chcemy, by kostka brukowa na parkingu przed naszym domem lub firmą służyła nam przez lata, trzeba zawczasu zadbać o jej konserwację i właściwe czyszczenie. Pamiętajmy, że bezustannie narażona jest ona na czynniki zewnętrzne, takie jak lód, śnieg, deszcze, słońce i zmiany temperatury. To jednak nie wszystko, niebagatelny wpływ na jej stan ma również zwykłe, codzienne użytkowanie, a zimą sypanie solą, piaskiem oraz odśnieżanie za pomocą specjalistycznych maszyn.Jak odświeżyć wybrukowaną nawierzchnię po długich, zimowych miesiącach?Pozimowe czyszczenie oraz impregnacjaCzyszczenie i konserwacja kostki brukowej powinny znaleźć się wśród pierwszych wiosennych zajęć, jakie zlecimy ekipie sprzątającej, bądź których podejmować się będziemy samodzielnie. - Mróz, intensywne opady deszczu i śniegu czy silne nasłonecznienie to środowisko, w którym bruk musi funkcjonować bez pogorszenia swoich walorów estetycznych – mówi Krzysztof Wilk, Technolog/Kierownik ds. Kontroli Jakości Polbruk S.A. – Zdarza się jednak, że na zadbanym podjeździe, tarasie czy ścieżce pojawią się trudne do usunięcia plamy po oleju silnikowym lub tłuszczu. Bywa, że podczas załadunku lub rozładunku osunie się na ziemię paleta np. z winem, plamiąc bruk. Właściciel mniejszej posesji może podjąć próbę pozbycia się zabrudzeń domowymi sposobami. Jednym z nich jest potraktowanie plamy roztworem wody i płynu do mycia naczyń, przygotowanym z zachowaniem proporcji jedna miarka płynu – trzy miarki wody. Zaczynamy od spłukania zabrudzonego fragmentu gorącą wodą, a następnie nanosimy wcześniej przygotowany preparat. Odczekujemy 30 – 45 minut i ponownie spłukujemy wodą. Jeśli to nie pomoże, powtarzamy czynność do skutku. W celu uzyskania lepszego efektu powierzchnię zabrudzonej kostki można umyć, używając szczotki o średniej twardości włosia. W trakcie użytkowania bruku mogą zdarzyć się sytuacje, że opisywany sposób usunięcia plam nie pozwoli na uzyskanie zamierzonego rezultatu. Wówczas możemy sięgnąć po bardziej stężone środki chemiczne, jednak w tym przypadku należy zachować ostrożność, ponieważ mogą one doprowadzić do odbarwienia kostki. Jeśli żaden z powyższych sposobów nie pomoże, możemy też zdecydować się na wymianę pojedynczych elementów, co również się stosuje – tłumaczy specjalista.Aby jednak zawczasu uchronić się przed tego typu problemami, zaleca się impregnację kostki brukowej po upływie minimum miesiąca od momentu ułożenia nawierzchni. Zapewni nam to dodatkową gwarancję utrzymania nawierzchni w dobrej kondycji przez długi czas. Roztwór zabezpieczy bowiem powierzchnię kostki, płyt tarasowych lub elementów małej architektury przed wchłanianiem zabrudzeń, wilgoci i wody. Impregnacji zaleca się poddawać również kostki szlachetne, nawet jeśli z założenia charakteryzują się one podwyższoną mrozoodpornością oraz niską nasiąkliwością. W celu impregnacji warto sięgać po środki sprawdzone, niezawierające rozpuszczalnika i niepowodujące przebarwień, które nie naruszą struktury betonu, będą odporne na alkalia, jednocześnie umożliwiając betonowi „oddychanie”.Przegląd i zabezpieczenie kostki brukowejKamil Drewczyński, ekspert firmy Libet, podkreśla, że kostką brukową należy się zająć jak najszybciej po odejściu zimy.- Pierwszą fazą tego procesu powinno być usunięcie liści, igliwia, piachu i innych zanieczyszczeń naniesionych przez wiatr – wskazuje ekspert. - Rekomenduję wykorzystanie w tym celu miotły wykonanej z trwałego włókna sztucznego, które nie będzie rysowało powierzchni.Kolejnym etapem konserwacji jest wspomniane wcześniej mycie bruku.- W zależności od stopnia zabrudzenia możemy skorzystać z węża ogrodowego lub myjki ciśnieniowej wyposażonej w specjalną końcówkę rotacyjną – radzi Drewczyński. – Jeżeli nawierzchnia bardzo często była odśnieżana solą, trzeba sięgnąć po specjalistyczne preparaty do czyszczenia.W następnej kolejności jest przegląd, a zwłaszcza kontrola stanu fug.- Zapewne będą wymagały one usunięcia niepożądanych naleciałości, takich jak chwasty. Uczulam jednak, aby nie wykorzystywać w tym celu metalowych, ostro zakończonych narzędzi, którymi moglibyśmy zarysować kostkę. Ewentualne ubytki w spoinach powinny być uzupełnione drobnym, płukanym piaskiem, którego granulacja nie jest większa niż ich szerokość. Odpowiednio dobrany powinien stopniowo wniknąć, w szczeliny w miarę wmiatania kolejnych warstw przy pomocy miotły. Jeżeli po umyciu kostki dostrzeżemy jej pęknięcia, nieestetyczne rysy czy plamy, jedynym wyjściem może okazać się wymiana kilku elementów nawierzchni – zwraca uwagę ekspert z firmy Libet.Zabezpieczanie impregnatem to ostatni element konserwacji kostki brukowej. Najlepiej robić to w temperaturze nawierzchni od +5 do +25° C, utrzymującej się przez najbliższe 24 godziny. Warto pamiętać, że odpowiedni dobór preparatu pozytywnie wpłynie na zmniejszenie jej nasiąkliwości.- Zaznaczam jednak pamiętać, że niektóre rodzaje nawierzchni brukowanej już na etapie produkcji otrzymują specjalną systemową ochronę, m.in. ALS (Anti Liquid System), który uszczelnia kostkę od wewnątrz, zwiększając jej odporność na działanie szkodliwych czynników zewnętrznych i ograniczając powstawanie plam, wykwitów czy przebarwień – podsumowuje Drewczyński.Mchy i nacieki wapienneEkspert z firmy Tenzi radzi nam, by z wszelkimi pracami porządkowymi zaczekać do momentu, kiedy temperatura na zewnątrz osiągnie przynajmniej +10, +15 stopni. Wtedy dopiero można ruszyć do boju z pozimowymi zniszczeniami.Pojawiające się na kostce brukowej mchy, porosty i glony (czyli wszelkie naloty zielone) usuwamy, kiedy jest już ciepło i sucho. Najlepiej w temperaturze ok. 15 stopni, zawsze w bezdeszczowy dzień. Odpowiednio rozrobiony roztwór wody ze specjalistycznym płynem nanosimy wtedy na powierzchnię za pomocą spryskiwacza. Preparat działa biobójczo-samoczynnie po upływie 12, a nawet 24 godzin. O ile glony po prostu znikają, mchy i porosty musimy zmyć wodą pod wysokim ciśnieniem.Kolejna kwestia to wykwity i nacieki wapienne pojawiające się na kostce brukowej położonej w pionie lub na ogrodzeniach z cegły klinkierowej. W tym przypadku również pomocny będzie 10-30% roztwór odpowiedniego preparatu. Mieszankę taką nanosimy na powierzchnię najlepiej za pomocą pędzla. Po ok. 3-5 minutach szorujemy twardą szczotką, a następnie zmywamy bieżącą wodą, najlepiej pod dużym ciśnieniem.
Zima to czas próby dla każdego rodzaju nawierzchni. Nie tylko kostka brukowa wymaga solidnej konserwacji jeszcze przed nadejściem pierwszego śniegu i mrozów. Niemniej dopiero pierwsze dni wiosny stanowią największe wyzwanie dla użytkowników bruku. Topniejący śnieg i odpuszczający lód zwykle odsłaniają przed nami nawierzchnię nie tylko zanieczyszczoną, ale często po prostu zniszczoną.Zmiany spowodowane działaniem zimy są niezwykle trudne do usunięcia. Jeżeli zatem chcemy, by kostka brukowa na parkingu przed naszym domem lub firmą służyła nam przez lata, trzeba zawczasu zadbać o jej konserwację i właściwe czyszczenie. Pamiętajmy, że bezustannie narażona jest ona na czynniki zewnętrzne, takie jak lód, śnieg, deszcze, słońce i zmiany temperatury. To jednak nie wszystko, niebagatelny wpływ na jej stan ma również zwykłe, codzienne użytkowanie, a zimą sypanie solą, piaskiem oraz odśnieżanie za pomocą specjalistycznych maszyn.Jak odświeżyć wybrukowaną nawierzchnię po długich, zimowych miesiącach?Pozimowe czyszczenie oraz impregnacjaCzyszczenie i konserwacja kostki brukowej powinny znaleźć się wśród pierwszych wiosennych zajęć, jakie zlecimy ekipie sprzątającej, bądź których podejmować się będziemy samodzielnie. - Mróz, intensywne opady deszczu i śniegu czy silne nasłonecznienie to środowisko, w którym bruk musi funkcjonować bez pogorszenia swoich walorów estetycznych – mówi Krzysztof Wilk, Technolog/Kierownik ds. Kontroli Jakości Polbruk S.A. – Zdarza się jednak, że na zadbanym podjeździe, tarasie czy ścieżce pojawią się trudne do usunięcia plamy po oleju silnikowym lub tłuszczu. Bywa, że podczas załadunku lub rozładunku osunie się na ziemię paleta np. z winem, plamiąc bruk. Właściciel mniejszej posesji może podjąć próbę pozbycia się zabrudzeń domowymi sposobami. Jednym z nich jest potraktowanie plamy roztworem wody i płynu do mycia naczyń, przygotowanym z zachowaniem proporcji jedna miarka płynu – trzy miarki wody. Zaczynamy od spłukania zabrudzonego fragmentu gorącą wodą, a następnie nanosimy wcześniej przygotowany preparat. Odczekujemy 30 – 45 minut i ponownie spłukujemy wodą. Jeśli to nie pomoże, powtarzamy czynność do skutku. W celu uzyskania lepszego efektu powierzchnię zabrudzonej kostki można umyć, używając szczotki o średniej twardości włosia. W trakcie użytkowania bruku mogą zdarzyć się sytuacje, że opisywany sposób usunięcia plam nie pozwoli na uzyskanie zamierzonego rezultatu. Wówczas możemy sięgnąć po bardziej stężone środki chemiczne, jednak w tym przypadku należy zachować ostrożność, ponieważ mogą one doprowadzić do odbarwienia kostki. Jeśli żaden z powyższych sposobów nie pomoże, możemy też zdecydować się na wymianę pojedynczych elementów, co również się stosuje – tłumaczy specjalista.Aby jednak zawczasu uchronić się przed tego typu problemami, zaleca się impregnację kostki brukowej po upływie minimum miesiąca od momentu ułożenia nawierzchni. Zapewni nam to dodatkową gwarancję utrzymania nawierzchni w dobrej kondycji przez długi czas. Roztwór zabezpieczy bowiem powierzchnię kostki, płyt tarasowych lub elementów małej architektury przed wchłanianiem zabrudzeń, wilgoci i wody. Impregnacji zaleca się poddawać również kostki szlachetne, nawet jeśli z założenia charakteryzują się one podwyższoną mrozoodpornością oraz niską nasiąkliwością. W celu impregnacji warto sięgać po środki sprawdzone, niezawierające rozpuszczalnika i niepowodujące przebarwień, które nie naruszą struktury betonu, będą odporne na alkalia, jednocześnie umożliwiając betonowi „oddychanie”.Przegląd i zabezpieczenie kostki brukowejKamil Drewczyński, ekspert firmy Libet, podkreśla, że kostką brukową należy się zająć jak najszybciej po odejściu zimy.- Pierwszą fazą tego procesu powinno być usunięcie liści, igliwia, piachu i innych zanieczyszczeń naniesionych przez wiatr – wskazuje ekspert. - Rekomenduję wykorzystanie w tym celu miotły wykonanej z trwałego włókna sztucznego, które nie będzie rysowało powierzchni.Kolejnym etapem konserwacji jest wspomniane wcześniej mycie bruku.- W zależności od stopnia zabrudzenia możemy skorzystać z węża ogrodowego lub myjki ciśnieniowej wyposażonej w specjalną końcówkę rotacyjną – radzi Drewczyński. – Jeżeli nawierzchnia bardzo często była odśnieżana solą, trzeba sięgnąć po specjalistyczne preparaty do czyszczenia.W następnej kolejności jest przegląd, a zwłaszcza kontrola stanu fug.- Zapewne będą wymagały one usunięcia niepożądanych naleciałości, takich jak chwasty. Uczulam jednak, aby nie wykorzystywać w tym celu metalowych, ostro zakończonych narzędzi, którymi moglibyśmy zarysować kostkę. Ewentualne ubytki w spoinach powinny być uzupełnione drobnym, płukanym piaskiem, którego granulacja nie jest większa niż ich szerokość. Odpowiednio dobrany powinien stopniowo wniknąć, w szczeliny w miarę wmiatania kolejnych warstw przy pomocy miotły. Jeżeli po umyciu kostki dostrzeżemy jej pęknięcia, nieestetyczne rysy czy plamy, jedynym wyjściem może okazać się wymiana kilku elementów nawierzchni – zwraca uwagę ekspert z firmy Libet.Zabezpieczanie impregnatem to ostatni element konserwacji kostki brukowej. Najlepiej robić to w temperaturze nawierzchni od +5 do +25° C, utrzymującej się przez najbliższe 24 godziny. Warto pamiętać, że odpowiedni dobór preparatu pozytywnie wpłynie na zmniejszenie jej nasiąkliwości.- Zaznaczam jednak pamiętać, że niektóre rodzaje nawierzchni brukowanej już na etapie produkcji otrzymują specjalną systemową ochronę, m.in. ALS (Anti Liquid System), który uszczelnia kostkę od wewnątrz, zwiększając jej odporność na działanie szkodliwych czynników zewnętrznych i ograniczając powstawanie plam, wykwitów czy przebarwień – podsumowuje Drewczyński.Mchy i nacieki wapienneEkspert z firmy Tenzi radzi nam, by z wszelkimi pracami porządkowymi zaczekać do momentu, kiedy temperatura na zewnątrz osiągnie przynajmniej +10, +15 stopni. Wtedy dopiero można ruszyć do boju z pozimowymi zniszczeniami.Pojawiające się na kostce brukowej mchy, porosty i glony (czyli wszelkie naloty zielone) usuwamy, kiedy jest już ciepło i sucho. Najlepiej w temperaturze ok. 15 stopni, zawsze w bezdeszczowy dzień. Odpowiednio rozrobiony roztwór wody ze specjalistycznym płynem nanosimy wtedy na powierzchnię za pomocą spryskiwacza. Preparat działa biobójczo-samoczynnie po upływie 12, a nawet 24 godzin. O ile glony po prostu znikają, mchy i porosty musimy zmyć wodą pod wysokim ciśnieniem.Kolejna kwestia to wykwity i nacieki wapienne pojawiające się na kostce brukowej położonej w pionie lub na ogrodzeniach z cegły klinkierowej. W tym przypadku również pomocny będzie 10-30% roztwór odpowiedniego preparatu. Mieszankę taką nanosimy na powierzchnię najlepiej za pomocą pędzla. Po ok. 3-5 minutach szorujemy twardą szczotką, a następnie zmywamy bieżącą wodą, najlepiej pod dużym ciśnieniem.
GLÜCKLICH SEIN MAL ANDERS - ES GIBT IMMER EINEN (R) - AUSWEG
"Der Mensch ist in Freiheit geboren, und überall liegt er in Ketten.“ Wie frei bist du wirklich? Hast du es schon geschafft die Ketten abzuwerfen?
intro to Arctic Wolf by Sifu Z • Arctic Wolf • i'm in line • conundrum is a real word • Intro to Stomp by Sifu Z • Stomp • The joys of parenting • Libet • the components • intro to Kurts reply on L... --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/integrity/support
Are our 'conscious decisions' just reports on what is already happening?
SynTalk thinks about the mystery of 'existence' and 'consciousness’. In a sense the conversation alternates between perspectives vis-a-vis human beings (meditative, wakeful, dreamy, comatose, paralysed, anaesthetised, unconscious, unarousable, dying, vegetative, & dead), a zygote, fictional characters, amoeba, bats, dust particles, tables, the sky, plants, and rocks. The concepts are derived off / from Descartes, William James, Heidegger, Freud, Sartre, Turing, Gödel, SN Bose, Chisholm, Libet, and Nagel, among others. What is the difference between ‘thing in itself’ and ‘thing for itself’? The difference between "I" and "me”, & a form of internal duality. Is there a hierarchy of consciousness (& how does it become aware of itself)? What is 'being dead’? How does one measure consciousness? We try to understand the difference between the living and the non-living. The degree of certainty, and its link with concepts of possibility, probability, & necessity. The necessity of a nervous system? Is death the loss of intelligence and adaptability? How is it possible to have non-conscious, semantic systems like machines? Does consciousness have any content? The links between Sodium Pentothal, neurotheology, precuneus, subjective certainty, apoptosis, and cogito ergo sum? The difference between consciousness and awareness, and the autonomy of thought from consciousness. The SynTalkrs are: Prof. Bijoy Boruah (philosophy, IIT Delhi, New Delhi), Dr. Priyedarshi Jetli (philosophy, (ex) Delhi University, Mumbai), and Dr. Deepak Ranade (neurosurgery, Pune)
Religious Epistemology, Contextualism, and Pragmatic Encroachment
Richard G. Swinburne, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of Oxford, gives a talk for the New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology seminar series. Abstract: Epiphenomenalism is the scientific theory that conscious events never cause physical events (and so intentions never cause brain events). The Libet programme seeks to prove epiphenomenalism by showing that it never makes any difference to a sequence of brain events whether or not an intention occurs during the course of it. To show that, it needs to show when (relative to brain events) some intention occurs; and to show that it relies on the reports of subjects about when and whether they form any intention. But while we are always justified in believing claims based on apparent experience, memory, or testimony in the absence of defeaters, it is a defeater to any such claim that some event occurred, that the apparent experience, memory, or testimony was not caused by the event. So we would only be justified in believing these reports if we were justified in believing that the reports were caused by subjects' having an intention to make words come out of their mouths which correctly report their other intentions. So the programme to prove epiphenomenalism relies on evidence about subjects' intentions on which it would only be justified in relying if epiphenomenalism is false. Hence the programme is self-defeating; and so is any other programme purporting to show that we can have a justified belief in epiphenomenalism and so in the causal closure of the physical.
Religious Epistemology, Contextualism, and Pragmatic Encroachment
Richard G. Swinburne, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of Oxford, gives a talk for the New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology seminar series. Abstract: Epiphenomenalism is the scientific theory that conscious events never cause physical events (and so intentions never cause brain events). The Libet programme seeks to prove epiphenomenalism by showing that it never makes any difference to a sequence of brain events whether or not an intention occurs during the course of it. To show that, it needs to show when (relative to brain events) some intention occurs; and to show that it relies on the reports of subjects about when and whether they form any intention. But while we are always justified in believing claims based on apparent experience, memory, or testimony in the absence of defeaters, it is a defeater to any such claim that some event occurred, that the apparent experience, memory, or testimony was not caused by the event. So we would only be justified in believing these reports if we were justified in believing that the reports were caused by subjects' having an intention to make words come out of their mouths which correctly report their other intentions. So the programme to prove epiphenomenalism relies on evidence about subjects' intentions on which it would only be justified in relying if epiphenomenalism is false. Hence the programme is self-defeating; and so is any other programme purporting to show that we can have a justified belief in epiphenomenalism and so in the causal closure of the physical.
Religious Epistemology, Contextualism, and Pragmatic Encroachment
Richard G. Swinburne, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of Oxford, gives a talk for the New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology seminar series. Abstract: Epiphenomenalism is the scientific theory that conscious events never cause physical events (and so intentions never cause brain events). The Libet programme seeks to prove epiphenomenalism by showing that it never makes any difference to a sequence of brain events whether or not an intention occurs during the course of it. To show that, it needs to show when (relative to brain events) some intention occurs; and to show that it relies on the reports of subjects about when and whether they form any intention. But while we are always justified in believing claims based on apparent experience, memory, or testimony in the absence of defeaters, it is a defeater to any such claim that some event occurred, that the apparent experience, memory, or testimony was not caused by the event. So we would only be justified in believing these reports if we were justified in believing that the reports were caused by subjects' having an intention to make words come out of their mouths which correctly report their other intentions. So the programme to prove epiphenomenalism relies on evidence about subjects' intentions on which it would only be justified in relying if epiphenomenalism is false. Hence the programme is self-defeating; and so is any other programme purporting to show that we can have a justified belief in epiphenomenalism and so in the causal closure of the physical.
I did not come to this conference of my own free will because free will is an illusion. Plenty of evidence from neuroscience suggests that there is no persisting ‘me’ who could exert this mysterious power. Libet’s experiments on the timing of voluntary actions throw free will into doubt; the neuroscience of volition reveals the brain areas responsible for decision-making and self-control; and research by Wegner shows how the feeling of being responsible for an action depends on post-hoc attributions based on sequence, similarity and timing. So if our intuitions are not to be trusted, how should we live our lives? Many people reject the traditional idea of free will but still say they must live ‘as if’ they have free will. Otherwise, they claim, society would disintegrate and all hell break loose. I disagree and will discuss ways of living a moral and happy life without believing in free will.
Ethics-Talk: The Greatest Good of Man is Daily to Converse About Virtue
Ethics Talk welcomes Dr. Michael Sandstrom, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Central Michigan University. Dr. Sandstrom will discuss how, if at all, findings in neuroscience shed light on the debate about free will and responsibility. Dr. Sandstrom earned his doctorate in Neuroscience from Ohio State University in 1998. He has focused his career on understanding the mechanisms of plasticity and compensation in the brain, and how brain function modifies itself to continue to support important goals even in circumstances of disease and damage.
Omaj.pou.Ayiti. Plis FOoOS, Missié Geez. — Sons Belo – Ayiti Lévé myspace Soft – Hélé myspace Belo – Timoun Yo myspace Luck Mervil – Libeté sé la vi site Belo – Mwen Bouké myspace Belo – Lakou Trankil myspace Fefe Unplug – Victim (Ayiti Deploge Show Live) site Agwoka – Latinka site Ines – Bel […]
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
