Podcasts about eurasianism

The boys dive in to Dugin's thoughts on civilization, colonialism, and imperialism.Don't worry, there are literally no digressions and the guys stay on point the whole time.Check out the full episode here:https://www.patreon.com/c/theregrettablecentury Check out Varn Vlog here:https://www.patreon.com/varnvlog/postsCheck out Antifada here:https://www.patreon.com/theantifadaSend us a textSupport the show

The boys dive in to chapter 6 of Dugin's Fourth Political theory. Don't worry, there are literally no digressions and the guys stay on point the whole time.Check out Varn Vlog here:https://www.patreon.com/varnvlog/postsCheck out Antifada here:https://www.patreon.com/theantifadaSend us a textSupport the Show.

Step into the complex world of geopolitics as we engage in a provocative dialogue with Donald Parkinson from the Marxist Unity Group and Cosmonaut Magazine. Ever wondered how Aleksandr Dugin's perspectives on Vladimir Putin shift when viewed from Russia's internal lens? Discover the nuances of his book "Putin vs. Putin: Vladimir Putin Viewed from the Right," and how it provides clarity on Dugin's ideological leanings compared to his more globally recognized "Fourth Political Theory." We unpack the influences of far-right esoteric thinkers like Julius Evola on Dugin, his critical take on Putin and Medvedev, and the convoluted relationship he has with Nazi ideology, all while maintaining his Russian patriotism.We then scrutinize Dugin's admiration for Putin's centralizing strategies as outlined in "The 12 Labors of Putin." Find out how Putin's efforts to stave off Russia's disintegration, particularly in the Caucasus, and his suppression of ethnic separatism align with Dugin's vision. Our conversation spans from the federal structure of the Russian Federation to Putin's methods of curbing regional autonomy and disciplining oligarchs. We also delve into the intricate dance between Eurasianism and Islamism, and how Dugin selectively aligns with certain Islamist factions. This discussion paints a comprehensive picture of the ideological and geopolitical strategies at play within Russia.Finally, we tackle broader geopolitical ideologies, juxtaposing right and left strands of Eurasianism with insights from thinkers like Zbigniew Brzezinski and John Mearsheimer. We navigate the complexities of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, the contentious "land back" movement, and the evolving nature of counter-systemic politics, including the rise of MAGA communism. Reflect with us on the future of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and the critical need for a cohesive programmatic vision. This episode offers a treasure trove of insights into Dugin's political theories and their far-reaching implications on global geopolitics. Don't miss this thought-provoking conversation! The Animal TurnAnimals are increasingly at the forefront of research questions – Not as shadows to...Listen on: Apple Podcasts SpotifySupport the Show.Crew:Host: C. Derick VarnIntro and Outro Music by Bitter Lake.Intro Video Design: Jason MylesArt Design: Corn and C. Derick VarnLinks and Social Media:twitter: @varnvlogblue sky: @varnvlog.bsky.socialYou can find the additional streams on Youtube

Wake up babe, new Dugin Time just dropped. The boys are back and discussing Dugin's understanding of processes and, now that they're about halfway done with the book, begin to ask the question "What is the Fourth Political Theory?"Check out Varn Vlog here: https://www.patreon.com/varnvlog/postsCheck out Antifada here:https://www.patreon.com/theantifadaSupport the Show.

This audio episode is available on the youtube channel and was made available to patrons a month ago.  Embark on an intellectual voyage with Jules Taylor, the esteemed podcast host and producer, as we dissect the enigmatic ideologies shaping our world. From the radical traditionalism of Alexander Dugin to the complexities of red-brown alliances, we navigate through the murky waters of political thought and their palpable effects on global affairs. With Jules's keen insights, we peel back the layers of geopolitical strategies, the seductive narratives against US hegemony, and the intricate dance of ideologies within the conservative and leftist spheres.As we scrutinize the intricacies of Dugin's Eurasianism and its ripple effects across the political landscape, Jules and I untangle the web of philosophical manipulations and the stark realities of modern criminology. We illuminate the vulnerabilities within political recruitment tactics and confront the contradictions that thread through various political theories. This episode is an unflinching examination of the ideological battlegrounds that continue to shape our political realities, inviting listeners to reflect on the quest for spirituality in an increasingly secular society and the underestimated power of leftist thought.The conversation culminates in a poignant exploration of global solidarity, the urgency of collective action against exploitation, and the multifaceted nature of Dugin's political narratives. With Jules Taylor's depth of knowledge and our engaging dialogue, we offer a profound exchange of ideas that could redefine your understanding of the forces at play in today's ever-evolving political landscape. Join us for an episode that promises not just to inform but to challenge and inspire every listener who takes part in this critical discourse. Support the Show.Crew:Host: C. Derick VarnIntro and Outro Music by Bitter Lake.Intro Video Design: Jason MylesArt Design: Corn and C. Derick VarnLinks and Social Media:twitter: @varnvlogblue sky: @varnvlog.bsky.socialYou can find the additional streams on Youtube

Jason, Varn, and Sean KB continue the forced march through the Aleksander Dugin's Fourth Political Theory.Check out Varn Vlog here:https://www.patreon.com/varnvlog/postsCheck out Antifada here:https://www.patreon.com/theantifadaSupport the Show.

Jason and Varn are joined again by Sean KB of Antifida and continue with their close reading of The Fourth Political Theory by Alexander Dugin. Check out Varn Vlog:https://www.patreon.com/varnvlog/postsCheck out the ANTIFADA:https://rss.com/podcasts/the-antifada/ Support the show

Two competing world views - Atlanticism (Liberal Democracy, Free Markets, Rule of Law) and Eurasianism (Authoritarianism, non-independent judiciaries, state controlled economies) present a stark choice as geopolitics dominates international relations. Russia and China are the principal proponents of Eurasianism whereas the United States and the West subscribe to Atlanticism. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-herlihy/message

Professor Gary Saul Morson of Northwestern University joins the podcast to discuss his recent article in The New York Review of Books about “Russian exceptionalism.” Gary explains what Eurasianism is, to what extent it motivates the decisions and ideology of the Kremlin, and how to think about the history of Russia's ideas about the Westin the context of Russia and Ukraine's futures.--Timestamps:(00:00) - Intro (02:00) – Eurasianism(17:00) – What does Putin think/believe(28:06) – Russia's views of the East/China(32:32) - Russian exceptionalism--Referenced in the Show:Link to Gary's piece: https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2024/02/22/russian-exceptionalism-foundations-of-eurasianism/--CI Site: cognitive.investmentsJacob Site: jacobshapiro.comJacob Twitter: x.com/JacobShapSubscribe to the Newsletter: bit.ly/weekly-sitrep--Cognitive Investments is an investment advisory firm, founded in 2019 that provides clients with a nuanced array of financial planning, investment advisory and wealth management services. We aim to grow both our clients' material wealth (i.e. their existing financial assets) and their human wealth (i.e. their ability to make good strategic decisions for their business, family, and career).--Disclaimer: Cognitive Investments LLC (“Cognitive Investments”) is a registered investment advisor. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where Cognitive Investments and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure.The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your attorney or tax advisorThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Chartable - https://chartable.com/privacyPodtrac - https://analytics.podtrac.com/privacy-policy-gdrp

How can territory and peoples be organized? After the dissolution of empires, was the nation-state the only way to unite people politically, culturally, and economically?  In Post-Imperial Possibilities: Eurasia, Eurafrica, Afroasia (Princeton UP, 2023), historians Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper examine three large-scale, transcontinental projects aimed at bringing together peoples of different regions to mitigate imperial legacies of inequality. Eurasia, Eurafrica, and Afroasia—in theory if not in practice—offered alternative routes out of empire. The theory of Eurasianism was developed after the collapse of imperial Russia by exiled intellectuals alienated by both Western imperialism and communism. Eurafrica began as a design for collaborative European exploitation of Africa but was transformed in the 1940s and 1950s into a project to include France's African territories in plans for European integration. The Afroasian movement wanted to replace the vertical relationship of colonizer and colonized with a horizontal relationship among former colonial territories that could challenge both the communist and capitalist worlds. Both Eurafrica and Afroasia floundered, victims of old and new vested interests. But Eurasia revived in the 1990s, when Russian intellectuals turned the theory's attack on Western hegemony into a recipe for the restoration of Russian imperial power. While both the system of purportedly sovereign states and the concentrated might of large economic and political institutions continue to frustrate projects to overcome inequities in welfare and power, Burbank and Cooper‘s study of political imagination explores wide-ranging concepts of social affiliation and obligation that emerged after empire and the reasons for their unlike destinies. This is Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper second major scholarly collaboration. They previously co-authored Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, 2010). Frederick Cooper is Professor Emeritus of History at New York University. His research has focused on 20th-century Africa, empires, colonization and decolonization, and citizenship. Among his books are Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History (2005); Citizenship between Empire and Nation: Remaking France and French Africa, 1945-1960 (2014); Africa in the World: Capitalism, Empire, Nation-State (2014); Citizenship, Inequality, and Difference: Historical Perspectives (2018); and Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present (2nd ed., 2019). Jane Burbank is Professor Emerita, New York University. Her areas of research are Russian political culture, law, and empire. Her works include Intelligentsia and Revolution: Russian Views of Bolshevism, 1917-1922 (1986); Russian Peasants Go to Court: Legal Culture in the Countryside, 1905-1917 (2004); Imperial Russia: New Histories for the Empire, edited with David L. Ransel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998); Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700-1930, edited with Mark von Hagen and Anatolyi Remnev (2007). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

How can territory and peoples be organized? After the dissolution of empires, was the nation-state the only way to unite people politically, culturally, and economically?  In Post-Imperial Possibilities: Eurasia, Eurafrica, Afroasia (Princeton UP, 2023), historians Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper examine three large-scale, transcontinental projects aimed at bringing together peoples of different regions to mitigate imperial legacies of inequality. Eurasia, Eurafrica, and Afroasia—in theory if not in practice—offered alternative routes out of empire. The theory of Eurasianism was developed after the collapse of imperial Russia by exiled intellectuals alienated by both Western imperialism and communism. Eurafrica began as a design for collaborative European exploitation of Africa but was transformed in the 1940s and 1950s into a project to include France's African territories in plans for European integration. The Afroasian movement wanted to replace the vertical relationship of colonizer and colonized with a horizontal relationship among former colonial territories that could challenge both the communist and capitalist worlds. Both Eurafrica and Afroasia floundered, victims of old and new vested interests. But Eurasia revived in the 1990s, when Russian intellectuals turned the theory's attack on Western hegemony into a recipe for the restoration of Russian imperial power. While both the system of purportedly sovereign states and the concentrated might of large economic and political institutions continue to frustrate projects to overcome inequities in welfare and power, Burbank and Cooper‘s study of political imagination explores wide-ranging concepts of social affiliation and obligation that emerged after empire and the reasons for their unlike destinies. This is Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper second major scholarly collaboration. They previously co-authored Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, 2010). Frederick Cooper is Professor Emeritus of History at New York University. His research has focused on 20th-century Africa, empires, colonization and decolonization, and citizenship. Among his books are Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History (2005); Citizenship between Empire and Nation: Remaking France and French Africa, 1945-1960 (2014); Africa in the World: Capitalism, Empire, Nation-State (2014); Citizenship, Inequality, and Difference: Historical Perspectives (2018); and Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present (2nd ed., 2019). Jane Burbank is Professor Emerita, New York University. Her areas of research are Russian political culture, law, and empire. Her works include Intelligentsia and Revolution: Russian Views of Bolshevism, 1917-1922 (1986); Russian Peasants Go to Court: Legal Culture in the Countryside, 1905-1917 (2004); Imperial Russia: New Histories for the Empire, edited with David L. Ransel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998); Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700-1930, edited with Mark von Hagen and Anatolyi Remnev (2007). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

How can territory and peoples be organized? After the dissolution of empires, was the nation-state the only way to unite people politically, culturally, and economically?  In Post-Imperial Possibilities: Eurasia, Eurafrica, Afroasia (Princeton UP, 2023), historians Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper examine three large-scale, transcontinental projects aimed at bringing together peoples of different regions to mitigate imperial legacies of inequality. Eurasia, Eurafrica, and Afroasia—in theory if not in practice—offered alternative routes out of empire. The theory of Eurasianism was developed after the collapse of imperial Russia by exiled intellectuals alienated by both Western imperialism and communism. Eurafrica began as a design for collaborative European exploitation of Africa but was transformed in the 1940s and 1950s into a project to include France's African territories in plans for European integration. The Afroasian movement wanted to replace the vertical relationship of colonizer and colonized with a horizontal relationship among former colonial territories that could challenge both the communist and capitalist worlds. Both Eurafrica and Afroasia floundered, victims of old and new vested interests. But Eurasia revived in the 1990s, when Russian intellectuals turned the theory's attack on Western hegemony into a recipe for the restoration of Russian imperial power. While both the system of purportedly sovereign states and the concentrated might of large economic and political institutions continue to frustrate projects to overcome inequities in welfare and power, Burbank and Cooper‘s study of political imagination explores wide-ranging concepts of social affiliation and obligation that emerged after empire and the reasons for their unlike destinies. This is Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper second major scholarly collaboration. They previously co-authored Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, 2010). Frederick Cooper is Professor Emeritus of History at New York University. His research has focused on 20th-century Africa, empires, colonization and decolonization, and citizenship. Among his books are Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History (2005); Citizenship between Empire and Nation: Remaking France and French Africa, 1945-1960 (2014); Africa in the World: Capitalism, Empire, Nation-State (2014); Citizenship, Inequality, and Difference: Historical Perspectives (2018); and Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present (2nd ed., 2019). Jane Burbank is Professor Emerita, New York University. Her areas of research are Russian political culture, law, and empire. Her works include Intelligentsia and Revolution: Russian Views of Bolshevism, 1917-1922 (1986); Russian Peasants Go to Court: Legal Culture in the Countryside, 1905-1917 (2004); Imperial Russia: New Histories for the Empire, edited with David L. Ransel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998); Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700-1930, edited with Mark von Hagen and Anatolyi Remnev (2007). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

How can territory and peoples be organized? After the dissolution of empires, was the nation-state the only way to unite people politically, culturally, and economically?  In Post-Imperial Possibilities: Eurasia, Eurafrica, Afroasia (Princeton UP, 2023), historians Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper examine three large-scale, transcontinental projects aimed at bringing together peoples of different regions to mitigate imperial legacies of inequality. Eurasia, Eurafrica, and Afroasia—in theory if not in practice—offered alternative routes out of empire. The theory of Eurasianism was developed after the collapse of imperial Russia by exiled intellectuals alienated by both Western imperialism and communism. Eurafrica began as a design for collaborative European exploitation of Africa but was transformed in the 1940s and 1950s into a project to include France's African territories in plans for European integration. The Afroasian movement wanted to replace the vertical relationship of colonizer and colonized with a horizontal relationship among former colonial territories that could challenge both the communist and capitalist worlds. Both Eurafrica and Afroasia floundered, victims of old and new vested interests. But Eurasia revived in the 1990s, when Russian intellectuals turned the theory's attack on Western hegemony into a recipe for the restoration of Russian imperial power. While both the system of purportedly sovereign states and the concentrated might of large economic and political institutions continue to frustrate projects to overcome inequities in welfare and power, Burbank and Cooper‘s study of political imagination explores wide-ranging concepts of social affiliation and obligation that emerged after empire and the reasons for their unlike destinies. This is Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper second major scholarly collaboration. They previously co-authored Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, 2010). Frederick Cooper is Professor Emeritus of History at New York University. His research has focused on 20th-century Africa, empires, colonization and decolonization, and citizenship. Among his books are Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History (2005); Citizenship between Empire and Nation: Remaking France and French Africa, 1945-1960 (2014); Africa in the World: Capitalism, Empire, Nation-State (2014); Citizenship, Inequality, and Difference: Historical Perspectives (2018); and Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present (2nd ed., 2019). Jane Burbank is Professor Emerita, New York University. Her areas of research are Russian political culture, law, and empire. Her works include Intelligentsia and Revolution: Russian Views of Bolshevism, 1917-1922 (1986); Russian Peasants Go to Court: Legal Culture in the Countryside, 1905-1917 (2004); Imperial Russia: New Histories for the Empire, edited with David L. Ransel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998); Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700-1930, edited with Mark von Hagen and Anatolyi Remnev (2007). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/world-affairs

How can territory and peoples be organized? After the dissolution of empires, was the nation-state the only way to unite people politically, culturally, and economically?  In Post-Imperial Possibilities: Eurasia, Eurafrica, Afroasia (Princeton UP, 2023), historians Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper examine three large-scale, transcontinental projects aimed at bringing together peoples of different regions to mitigate imperial legacies of inequality. Eurasia, Eurafrica, and Afroasia—in theory if not in practice—offered alternative routes out of empire. The theory of Eurasianism was developed after the collapse of imperial Russia by exiled intellectuals alienated by both Western imperialism and communism. Eurafrica began as a design for collaborative European exploitation of Africa but was transformed in the 1940s and 1950s into a project to include France's African territories in plans for European integration. The Afroasian movement wanted to replace the vertical relationship of colonizer and colonized with a horizontal relationship among former colonial territories that could challenge both the communist and capitalist worlds. Both Eurafrica and Afroasia floundered, victims of old and new vested interests. But Eurasia revived in the 1990s, when Russian intellectuals turned the theory's attack on Western hegemony into a recipe for the restoration of Russian imperial power. While both the system of purportedly sovereign states and the concentrated might of large economic and political institutions continue to frustrate projects to overcome inequities in welfare and power, Burbank and Cooper‘s study of political imagination explores wide-ranging concepts of social affiliation and obligation that emerged after empire and the reasons for their unlike destinies. This is Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper second major scholarly collaboration. They previously co-authored Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, 2010). Frederick Cooper is Professor Emeritus of History at New York University. His research has focused on 20th-century Africa, empires, colonization and decolonization, and citizenship. Among his books are Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History (2005); Citizenship between Empire and Nation: Remaking France and French Africa, 1945-1960 (2014); Africa in the World: Capitalism, Empire, Nation-State (2014); Citizenship, Inequality, and Difference: Historical Perspectives (2018); and Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present (2nd ed., 2019). Jane Burbank is Professor Emerita, New York University. Her areas of research are Russian political culture, law, and empire. Her works include Intelligentsia and Revolution: Russian Views of Bolshevism, 1917-1922 (1986); Russian Peasants Go to Court: Legal Culture in the Countryside, 1905-1917 (2004); Imperial Russia: New Histories for the Empire, edited with David L. Ransel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998); Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700-1930, edited with Mark von Hagen and Anatolyi Remnev (2007). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/african-studies

How can territory and peoples be organized? After the dissolution of empires, was the nation-state the only way to unite people politically, culturally, and economically?  In Post-Imperial Possibilities: Eurasia, Eurafrica, Afroasia (Princeton UP, 2023), historians Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper examine three large-scale, transcontinental projects aimed at bringing together peoples of different regions to mitigate imperial legacies of inequality. Eurasia, Eurafrica, and Afroasia—in theory if not in practice—offered alternative routes out of empire. The theory of Eurasianism was developed after the collapse of imperial Russia by exiled intellectuals alienated by both Western imperialism and communism. Eurafrica began as a design for collaborative European exploitation of Africa but was transformed in the 1940s and 1950s into a project to include France's African territories in plans for European integration. The Afroasian movement wanted to replace the vertical relationship of colonizer and colonized with a horizontal relationship among former colonial territories that could challenge both the communist and capitalist worlds. Both Eurafrica and Afroasia floundered, victims of old and new vested interests. But Eurasia revived in the 1990s, when Russian intellectuals turned the theory's attack on Western hegemony into a recipe for the restoration of Russian imperial power. While both the system of purportedly sovereign states and the concentrated might of large economic and political institutions continue to frustrate projects to overcome inequities in welfare and power, Burbank and Cooper‘s study of political imagination explores wide-ranging concepts of social affiliation and obligation that emerged after empire and the reasons for their unlike destinies. This is Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper second major scholarly collaboration. They previously co-authored Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, 2010). Frederick Cooper is Professor Emeritus of History at New York University. His research has focused on 20th-century Africa, empires, colonization and decolonization, and citizenship. Among his books are Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History (2005); Citizenship between Empire and Nation: Remaking France and French Africa, 1945-1960 (2014); Africa in the World: Capitalism, Empire, Nation-State (2014); Citizenship, Inequality, and Difference: Historical Perspectives (2018); and Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present (2nd ed., 2019). Jane Burbank is Professor Emerita, New York University. Her areas of research are Russian political culture, law, and empire. Her works include Intelligentsia and Revolution: Russian Views of Bolshevism, 1917-1922 (1986); Russian Peasants Go to Court: Legal Culture in the Countryside, 1905-1917 (2004); Imperial Russia: New Histories for the Empire, edited with David L. Ransel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998); Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700-1930, edited with Mark von Hagen and Anatolyi Remnev (2007). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/russian-studies

How can territory and peoples be organized? After the dissolution of empires, was the nation-state the only way to unite people politically, culturally, and economically?  In Post-Imperial Possibilities: Eurasia, Eurafrica, Afroasia (Princeton UP, 2023), historians Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper examine three large-scale, transcontinental projects aimed at bringing together peoples of different regions to mitigate imperial legacies of inequality. Eurasia, Eurafrica, and Afroasia—in theory if not in practice—offered alternative routes out of empire. The theory of Eurasianism was developed after the collapse of imperial Russia by exiled intellectuals alienated by both Western imperialism and communism. Eurafrica began as a design for collaborative European exploitation of Africa but was transformed in the 1940s and 1950s into a project to include France's African territories in plans for European integration. The Afroasian movement wanted to replace the vertical relationship of colonizer and colonized with a horizontal relationship among former colonial territories that could challenge both the communist and capitalist worlds. Both Eurafrica and Afroasia floundered, victims of old and new vested interests. But Eurasia revived in the 1990s, when Russian intellectuals turned the theory's attack on Western hegemony into a recipe for the restoration of Russian imperial power. While both the system of purportedly sovereign states and the concentrated might of large economic and political institutions continue to frustrate projects to overcome inequities in welfare and power, Burbank and Cooper‘s study of political imagination explores wide-ranging concepts of social affiliation and obligation that emerged after empire and the reasons for their unlike destinies. This is Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper second major scholarly collaboration. They previously co-authored Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, 2010). Frederick Cooper is Professor Emeritus of History at New York University. His research has focused on 20th-century Africa, empires, colonization and decolonization, and citizenship. Among his books are Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History (2005); Citizenship between Empire and Nation: Remaking France and French Africa, 1945-1960 (2014); Africa in the World: Capitalism, Empire, Nation-State (2014); Citizenship, Inequality, and Difference: Historical Perspectives (2018); and Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present (2nd ed., 2019). Jane Burbank is Professor Emerita, New York University. Her areas of research are Russian political culture, law, and empire. Her works include Intelligentsia and Revolution: Russian Views of Bolshevism, 1917-1922 (1986); Russian Peasants Go to Court: Legal Culture in the Countryside, 1905-1917 (2004); Imperial Russia: New Histories for the Empire, edited with David L. Ransel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998); Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700-1930, edited with Mark von Hagen and Anatolyi Remnev (2007). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

How can territory and peoples be organized? After the dissolution of empires, was the nation-state the only way to unite people politically, culturally, and economically?  In Post-Imperial Possibilities: Eurasia, Eurafrica, Afroasia (Princeton UP, 2023), historians Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper examine three large-scale, transcontinental projects aimed at bringing together peoples of different regions to mitigate imperial legacies of inequality. Eurasia, Eurafrica, and Afroasia—in theory if not in practice—offered alternative routes out of empire. The theory of Eurasianism was developed after the collapse of imperial Russia by exiled intellectuals alienated by both Western imperialism and communism. Eurafrica began as a design for collaborative European exploitation of Africa but was transformed in the 1940s and 1950s into a project to include France's African territories in plans for European integration. The Afroasian movement wanted to replace the vertical relationship of colonizer and colonized with a horizontal relationship among former colonial territories that could challenge both the communist and capitalist worlds. Both Eurafrica and Afroasia floundered, victims of old and new vested interests. But Eurasia revived in the 1990s, when Russian intellectuals turned the theory's attack on Western hegemony into a recipe for the restoration of Russian imperial power. While both the system of purportedly sovereign states and the concentrated might of large economic and political institutions continue to frustrate projects to overcome inequities in welfare and power, Burbank and Cooper‘s study of political imagination explores wide-ranging concepts of social affiliation and obligation that emerged after empire and the reasons for their unlike destinies. This is Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper second major scholarly collaboration. They previously co-authored Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, 2010). Frederick Cooper is Professor Emeritus of History at New York University. His research has focused on 20th-century Africa, empires, colonization and decolonization, and citizenship. Among his books are Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History (2005); Citizenship between Empire and Nation: Remaking France and French Africa, 1945-1960 (2014); Africa in the World: Capitalism, Empire, Nation-State (2014); Citizenship, Inequality, and Difference: Historical Perspectives (2018); and Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present (2nd ed., 2019). Jane Burbank is Professor Emerita, New York University. Her areas of research are Russian political culture, law, and empire. Her works include Intelligentsia and Revolution: Russian Views of Bolshevism, 1917-1922 (1986); Russian Peasants Go to Court: Legal Culture in the Countryside, 1905-1917 (2004); Imperial Russia: New Histories for the Empire, edited with David L. Ransel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998); Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700-1930, edited with Mark von Hagen and Anatolyi Remnev (2007).

How can territory and peoples be organized? After the dissolution of empires, was the nation-state the only way to unite people politically, culturally, and economically?  In Post-Imperial Possibilities: Eurasia, Eurafrica, Afroasia (Princeton UP, 2023), historians Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper examine three large-scale, transcontinental projects aimed at bringing together peoples of different regions to mitigate imperial legacies of inequality. Eurasia, Eurafrica, and Afroasia—in theory if not in practice—offered alternative routes out of empire. The theory of Eurasianism was developed after the collapse of imperial Russia by exiled intellectuals alienated by both Western imperialism and communism. Eurafrica began as a design for collaborative European exploitation of Africa but was transformed in the 1940s and 1950s into a project to include France's African territories in plans for European integration. The Afroasian movement wanted to replace the vertical relationship of colonizer and colonized with a horizontal relationship among former colonial territories that could challenge both the communist and capitalist worlds. Both Eurafrica and Afroasia floundered, victims of old and new vested interests. But Eurasia revived in the 1990s, when Russian intellectuals turned the theory's attack on Western hegemony into a recipe for the restoration of Russian imperial power. While both the system of purportedly sovereign states and the concentrated might of large economic and political institutions continue to frustrate projects to overcome inequities in welfare and power, Burbank and Cooper‘s study of political imagination explores wide-ranging concepts of social affiliation and obligation that emerged after empire and the reasons for their unlike destinies. This is Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper second major scholarly collaboration. They previously co-authored Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, 2010). Frederick Cooper is Professor Emeritus of History at New York University. His research has focused on 20th-century Africa, empires, colonization and decolonization, and citizenship. Among his books are Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History (2005); Citizenship between Empire and Nation: Remaking France and French Africa, 1945-1960 (2014); Africa in the World: Capitalism, Empire, Nation-State (2014); Citizenship, Inequality, and Difference: Historical Perspectives (2018); and Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present (2nd ed., 2019). Jane Burbank is Professor Emerita, New York University. Her areas of research are Russian political culture, law, and empire. Her works include Intelligentsia and Revolution: Russian Views of Bolshevism, 1917-1922 (1986); Russian Peasants Go to Court: Legal Culture in the Countryside, 1905-1917 (2004); Imperial Russia: New Histories for the Empire, edited with David L. Ransel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998); Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700-1930, edited with Mark von Hagen and Anatolyi Remnev (2007). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/french-studies

Concerns have been raised over the false conversion of asylum seekers in the UK, why many religious "nones" still believe in a higher power, the Russian ideology of Eurasianism and its influence by Eastern Orthodox Christianity. 

At the heart of Russia is the vast hinterland known as the Steppe, bordering Mongolia, China and the Central Asian Republics. Around this territory, Putin has endorsed an ideology called "Eurasianism," and it's influenced by Eastern Orthodox Christianity. 

February 24 will mark the second anniversary of Russia's brutal and unprovoked invasion of Ukraine. Although Vladimir Putin's dictatorial power made the invasion possible, it's still unclear to many observers why the Kremlin's leader took this fateful decision. One of the more persuasive explanations is that since Putin's return to the presidency in 2012, his domestic and foreign policy increasingly has been shaped by Eurasianism. It's a socio-political movement animated by the idea that Russia is a distinctive civilization, neither European nor Asian, rooted in absolutism, and aligned with China and the Global South in opposition to Western liberal hegemony.According to a recent article in the New York Review of Books, Eurasianism displaced Russia's halfhearted movement toward liberalism in the early post-communist era and “achieved the status of a semiofficial ideology. Putin uses Eurasianist phrases, the army's general staff assigns a Eurasianist textbook, and popular culture has embraced its ideas and vocabulary. … Eurasianism, like Stalinism, carries the banner of anti-imperialism, claiming to unite the world under Russian leadership in order to liberate it from Western cultural colonialism.”Although Eurasianism is more than a century old, its most prominent Russian exponent in recent decades has been the far-right philosopher Aleksandr Dugin. His variation on Eurasianism emphasizes Russian patriotism and Orthodox faith, and sees the country as locked in apocalyptic combat against America and its values including liberalism, capitalism, and modernism. Dugin has harbored a particular animus against independent Ukraine, which he sees as having betrayed the Russian linguistic and cultural world of which it is an inseparable part. He called for a Russian invasion of eastern Ukraine months before it took place in 2014 and has insisted that Russia must wage war against Ukraine even more ruthlessly.Alexandar Mihailovic, in his recent book Illiberal Vanguard: Populist Elitism in the United States and Russia, examines Dugin and other leading far-right Russian intellectuals alongside corresponding figures in the United States, such as Steve Bannon. Mihailovic, a professor emeritus of comparative literature and Russian at Hofstra University, notes similar patterns among illiberal intellectuals in both countries, particularly in their approaches to gender, race, and national memory. In this podcast discussion, Mihailovic explains that although there are some personal connections between Russian and American ethnonationalists, they are more united by the shared notion that conservative intellectual elites should lead their respective countries in the direction of populist authoritarianism and empire.

Jason and Varn continue with their close reading of The Fourth Political Theory by Alexander Dugin. **This is a 30m preview of a 3 hour long episode**Check out Varn Vlog here:https://www.patreon.com/varnvlog/postsSupport the show

Varn and Jason discuss this new collaborative project "Boundless and Bottomless Seas" and discuss why talking about Dugin and his Fourth Political Theory is worth doing. This is episode was recorded before the first episode of the series and is meant to be a sort of primer and introduction to the project.Support the show

Kota sits down with J from Politics in Command to discuss "multipolarity," a discourse which sees the existence of multiple superpowers as a positive development from the unipolar world dominated by the United States. We ask whether the politics of multipolarity is genuinely anti-imperialist or revisionist, an abandonment of revolutionary principles for reformism and class collaborationism. We critically analyze the overlaps between the reactionary ideology of Aleksandr Dugin and pseudo-Marxist theoretical assumptions made by Ben Norton, one of the most vocal advocates of multipolarity, which posit the nation, not the working class, as the subject of anti-imperialism.  We discuss Norton's assertion that China is still a socialist country and the assumption that socialism equals the development of productive forces and state ownership of the economy. We discuss how, beneath the veneer of optimism supposedly heralded by the rise of China and Russia, the discourse of multipolarity is deeply pessimistic, as it tacitly accepts that there are no truly revolutionary alternatives to capitalism. We conclude our discussion by talking about what a principled anti-revisionism would look like in practice, and what we can learn from revolutionary movements that are continuing to struggle in spite of the intensifying inter-imperialist competition. Sources:World military spending reaches all-time high of $2.24 trillion - Al Jazeera (April 24, 2023)Multipolarism is not Anti-Imperialism! - The Revolutionary Communists, Norway (RK)The Foundations of Aleksandr Dugin's Geopolitics: MontageFascism and Eurasianism as Blowback - Grant Scott Fellows Fanshen: Class, Women's Liberation, and Crit-Self-Crit - Politics in CommandChina: From Commune to Capitalism - Politics in Command ft. Zhun Xu The Great Reversal: The Privatization of China, 1978-1989 - William HintonRethinking Socialism: What is Socialist Transition?  - Deng-Yuan Hsu and Pao-Yu Ching Intro: Cielo by Huma HumaMidtro: Mount Tai by Space BabyOutro: ibeinthecar by Space BabySupport the show

Alt-right, The Right Stuff blog, TSR, Michael Peinovich, Mike Enoch, Joseph Jordan, Erick Striker, Tony Hovater, Unite the Right rally, TSR's role in Unite the Right, National Justice Party, NJP, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Charles Bausman, Russia Insider, Bausman's links to TSR/NJP, Konstantin Malofeev, Eastern Orthodoxy, Monarchism, Traditionalism, Malofeev as Russia's George Soros, Basil the Great Charitable Foundation, FSB, Igor Strelkov/Girkin, Ukraine, Crimea, Donbass, Malofeev's sponsorship of insurgency/Russian forces in Ukraine, Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, Wagner Group, Renaissance Capital, Mikhail Prokhorov, Marshall Capital, telecommunications, White Russians, Serge de Pahlen, Agnelli family, Italian fascism, Propaganda Due, Vladimir Yakunin, Alexander Trubetskoy, Jean Goutchkov, Intermaritime Bank of New York, Bank of new York, Bruce Rappaport, BCCI, Aleksabdr Goutchkov, KGB, Sidney Reilly, Operation Trust, Sovereign Order of Saint John, SOSJ, Captive Nations, OUN-B, Ukrainian question, military/intel officers in SOSJ, SOSJ links to terrorism/PATCON/SOSJ in Continuity of Government, COG, American Gladio, American stay-behind, special operations forces, Operation Bloodstone, modern SOSJ linked to Joint Special Operations Command, Dialogue of Civilization, Nicholas Papanicolaou, Rick Joyner, General William Boykin, Sean Moon, Rod of Iron Ministries, Abe assassination, Sean Moon links to Bausman, Alexander Dugin, EurasianismAfter first musical break (4:30): TSR, NJP and Charles BausmanAfter second musical break (1:01:40): Malofeev's spycraft and paramilitary adventures in Ukraine, White Russians, the Sovereign Order of Saint John, and the American GladioAfter third musical break (1:55:20): Sean Moon, Alexander Dugin and the new nationalismNote: this show was recorded prior to the attempted assassination of Konstantin Malofeev by Ukrainian-backed forces. Malofeev is the second traditionalist-oriented figure, behind Dugin's daughter, that has been targeted by this milieu. This should illustrate how seriously the Anglo-American/OUN-B axis regards this network.Declassified FBI docs: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1G48f8GFS_88BpCmXtClEV8chWcdvu9CA/view?usp=sharingFor more on Moon's links to Abe's assassination, check here.Links to the first Far West show can be found here. The listener is strongly advised to view both of these series as part of a bigger picture.More information on the FBI's PATCON investigation and the Sovereign Order of Saint John can be found here and here.Music by: Keith Allen Dennishttps://keithallendennis.bandcamp.com/Additional music by: Corwin Trailshttps://corwintrails.bandcamp.com/ Get bonus content on Patreon Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Leighton is on summer break, so we are highlighting some of his favourite guests from 2022. Double Header: "The New York Times is reputed to be the world's most powerful news outlet. Powerful enough to influence wars, foment revolutions, shape economies and change cultures. It doesn't just cover the news, it creates it." Ashley Rindsberg, author of “The Gray Lady Winked”, talks about what happens when truth is abandoned in favour of interest and ideology.   Then, who is Alexander Dugin? And what is Eurasianism? A brilliant analysis from Associate Professor Salvatore Babones, University of Sydney, on the Russian Intellectual Dugin. Is he "Putin's brain” and does he really want to destroy America? File your comments and complaints at Leighton@newstalkzb.co.nz Haven't listened to a podcast before? Check out our simple how-to guide. Listen here on iHeartRadio Leighton Smith's podcast also available on iTunes:To subscribe via iTunes click here See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dave wraps up 2022 with a roundup of the most important stories in meta-politics. This is the show to listen to if you want to get ramped up on what to expect in 2023. Topics covered include Ukraine, Elon Musk, Russian Cosmism, Twitter, Dollar, Crypto, Debt Ceiling, Noosphere, Politics, the "how to fix it" part, Mastodon, and honestly a whole lot more. Along with some interesting audio clips that help put things into context! Paper: Disinformation and its effects on social capital networks Keywords: Ukraine, Musk, Dollar, Crypto, Debt Ceiling, Noosphere, Politics, Mastodon, Social Capital, Disinformation, Omnibus, HIMARS, Patriot, Golden Billion, Putin, Eurasianism, Cosmism, Traditionalism, Nuclear, SXSW, Tsiolkovsky, Longtermism, Multiplanetary species, Tesla, Saudi Arabia, COVID, oil/gas, Twitter, Rogozin, Roscosmos, Fiona Hill, Burnt Hair, Hierarchy, Dollar, Foster Gamble, Thrive, BRICS, gold, Zoltan Pozsar, Bretton Woods III, Golden Ruble 3.0, Sergey Glazier, Petroyuan, China, GCC, Taiwan, mBridge, CBDC, Bitcoin, Luna, FTX, NFTs, Trump, Debt Ceiling, Tom Emmer, Gold, Noosphere, Jeffrey Sachs, Sacha Stone, Sustainable Development Goals, SDG, MDG, New Earth, Shock therapy, Barrick Gold, David Sacks, Metaphysics, DeStantis, January 6, Mastodon, Toad Social, Wide Angle, Washington Spectator, Medium.

Russian Nationalism — a heady mix of Eurasianism, Russian Cosmism with esoteric and occult beliefs — is reflected in the Putin regime's information warfare. In recent episodes we covered a diverse range of topics, from longtermism to libertarian exit, to Bucky Fuller. But what do these things have in common, and what does it all mean? Dave is joined by Joe Szimhart who helps unpack the details behind Eurasianism, Russian Cosmism, and many other syncretic religious and occult ideas at the heart of Russia's war on the West. The picture helps provide a framework for better understanding what's going on, how to respond, and why this conflict is difficult to resolve. This episode is long and packed with information — you may find that it's useful to listen more than once to pick up on all the details. Feel free to send questions for future episodes to davetroy@icloud.com. Follow Joe on Twitter at @jszimhart, and Dave at @davetroy. Relevant books and papers: Mysteries of Eurasia by Jafe Arnold Russian Nationalism: Imaginaries, Doctrines, and Political Battlefields Books Instead of Lineage: Mystic Underground in the USSR (1960s–1980s) Don't Immanentize the Eschaton: Against Right-Wing Gnosticism Keywords: Syncretism, Eurasianism, Cosmism, Noosphere, Putin, Noocracy, Anton Vaino, Nooscope, Gnosticism, System 1 and 2 thinking, Völkisch Occultism, Russian Orthodox Church, Shambhala, Atlantis, Yuzhinsky Circle, Alexander Dugin, Yuri Mamleev, Psychotronics, Initiation, Libertarian Exit, Ayn Rand, Galt's Gulch, Hyperborea, Thule Society, Vril, Hitler, UFOs, Guenon, Fascism, Evola, Gurdjieff, Ahnenerbe, Tsiolovsky, Chizevsky, Fyodorov, Vernadsky, Teilhard De Chardin, Eduoard LeRoy, Gaia, Lovelock, Margulies, Sagan, Theosophy, Anthroposophy, Hare Krishnas, Hindu Nationalism, Gandhi, Nehru, Barbara Marx Hubbard, Marilyn Ferguson, Aquarian Conspiracy, Stepanov, Harmonic Convergence, Jose Arguelles, Birth 2012, Michael Beckwith, NESARA/GESARA, QFS, QAnon, The Event, Eschaton, Eschatology, Immanentize, Omega Point, Kurzweil, Russia 2045, Transhumanism.

Our guest is geopolitical strategist and noted Atlanticist, Alp Sevimlisoy of the Atlantic Council. Ukraine is not only a battleground for Russian territorial aggrandizement, but also for a confrontation between two competing world views, Atlanticism and Eurasianism. The former enshrines Western liberal democracy ideals while the latter eschews the rule of law and promotes authoritarianism. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-herlihy/message

On this week's podcast: For years, New Zealand productivity has been shortchanging the economy and therefore the country.Why is New Zealand outstripped by the rest of the first world countries, in particular Australia?The New Zealand Initiative's Chief Economist, Dr Eric Crampton gives reasons and suggests solutions.Then, who is Alexander Dugin? And what is Eurasianism? A brilliant analysis from Associate Professor Salvatore Babones, University of Sydney, on the Russian Intellectual Dugin.Is he "Putin's brain” and does he really want to destroy America?And finally, The Mailroom with your commentary. File your comments and complaints at Leighton@newstalkzb.co.nz Haven't listened to a podcast before? Check out our simple how-to guide. Listen here on iHeartRadio Leighton Smith's podcast also available on iTunes:To subscribe via iTunes click here See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

After the Toyota Land Cruiser Daria Dugina was driving exploded on a road 20 miles west of Moscow and burst into flames, Russia has opened a murder investigation into her assassination.According to TASS, When Dugina "turned onto the Mozhaiskoye road near the village of Bolshiye Vyazemi, there was an explosion, the car caught fire immediately. Forensic experts, investigators and experts in explosive engineering are inspecting the scene and they have found or concluded that approximately 400 grams of TNT were used to cause the explosion. If you like our content please become a patron to get our premium episodes and our public episodes ad-free. 1 Daria's father is Alexander Dugin, a right wing extremist and ultranationalist, is the figure who “inspired” and advised Putin to invade Ukraine. He helped lay the ideological foundation for Putin's invasion of Ukraine and is referred to as “Putin's brain” or “the architect of the Ukraine invasion”. He allegedly is Putin's spiritual advisor, based on his roots in the orthodox church. 2 Darya Dugina's father invented the concept of Eurasianism – a new flavor of fascism. He is to Putin what Steve Bannon / Alex Jones is to Trump. In March 2022, the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctioned Daria Dugina for her contribution to an article on the United World International website suggesting that Ukraine would "perish" if it is admitted to NATO. Dugina was UWI's chief editor. She also claimed that the atrocities of Bucha were American propaganda, chosen because of the phonological similarity to "butcher," a word she linked to US President Biden calling Putin a "butcher" earlier in March. 3 We are considering three theories regarding who's behind the assassination of Darya Dugina, based on one simple question: who stands to gain from her death? Ukraine did it – we explain why that is not the case, in fact this is the last thing Ukraine would do An inside Russian opposition faction did it to destabilize Putin's regime and cause unrest – this theory doesn't hold water either in our opinion. Putin's FSB did it, on his orders as he did with the Moscow apartment bombings, the Moscow theater hostage crisis, Litvinenko, Boris Nemtsov and Anna Politkovskaya. What would Putin stand to gain? Re-energizing popular support for his continued invasion of Ukraine A pretext to escalate tragedies in Ukraine A pretext to justify those war crimes and attacks, as being payback or a response to this assassination – to his people and to the western leaders, United Nations etc Creating a martyr, a new symbol to galvanize the troops An opportunity for him to make some strong worded statements, to come out as a powerful, strong leader who has to double down on killing Ukrainians to keep his own people safe Lastly, a great opportunity to use the grieving father, Aleksandr Dugin, the architect of the war in Ukraine, as a megaphone for his propaganda serving his political goals. Episode #DubiMeter 9.5 1. Russia Opens Murder Investigation After Blast Kills Daughter of Putin Ally. New York Times. August 2022. ⇤2. Mohammed Tawfeeq, Josh Pennington, Jonny Hallam and Tara John. Car bomb kills daughter of 'spiritual guide' to Putin's Ukraine invasion. CNN. August 2022. ⇤3. Annabelle Timsit and Rachel Pannett. A Putin ally's daughter was killed near Russia's capital. Washington Post. August 2022. ⇤

Contents: Biography Career and political views Aleksandr Dugin Aleksandr Gelyevich Dugin (Russian: Александр Гельевич Дугин; born 7 January 1962) is a Russian political philosopher, analyst, and strategist, known for his fascist views. Born into a military family, Dugin was an anti-communist dissident during the 1980s. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Dugin co-founded the National Bolshevik Party with Eduard Limonov, a party which espoused National Bolshevism, which he later left. In 1997, he published Foundations of Geopolitics where he outlined his worldview, calling for Russia to rebuild its influence through alliances and conquest, and to challenge the rival Atlanticist "empire" led by the United States. Dugin continued to further develop his ideology of neo-Eurasianism, founding the Eurasia Party in 2002 and writing further books including The Fourth Political Theory (2009). Dugin also served as an advisor to the State Duma speaker Gennadiy Seleznyov, and a leading member of the ruling United Russia party, Sergey Naryshkin. He was the head of the Department of Sociology of International Relations at Moscow State University from 2009 to 2014, losing the position due to backlash over comments regarding clashes in Ukraine. Dugin's influence within the Russian government and on Russian president Vladimir Putin is disputed, with Dugin sometimes being referred to as "Putin's brain", responsible for shaping Russian foreign policy, while others contend that Dugin's influence within the government is limited and has been greatly exaggerated, an impression given by correlations between his work and Russian foreign policy. Title: Aleksandr Dugin Find out about the author(s) & basic information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Dugin Read the full article on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Dugin [CC] license: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0 Photo credited to: By Fars Media Corporation, CC BY 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=87159921 Follow us on Twitter: @Audiowikipedia1 Become a valuable contributor & member by supporting us at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/AudioWikipedia

Contents: Career and political views Sanctions Death of daughter Dugin's works Aleksandr Dugin Aleksandr Gelyevich Dugin (Russian: Александр Гельевич Дугин; born 7 January 1962) is a Russian political philosopher, analyst, and strategist, known for his fascist views. Born into a military family, Dugin was an anti-communist dissident during the 1980s. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Dugin co-founded the National Bolshevik Party with Eduard Limonov, a party which espoused National Bolshevism, which he later left. In 1997, he published Foundations of Geopolitics where he outlined his worldview, calling for Russia to rebuild its influence through alliances and conquest, and to challenge the rival Atlanticist "empire" led by the United States. Dugin continued to further develop his ideology of neo-Eurasianism, founding the Eurasia Party in 2002 and writing further books including The Fourth Political Theory (2009). Dugin also served as an advisor to the State Duma speaker Gennadiy Seleznyov, and a leading member of the ruling United Russia party, Sergey Naryshkin. He was the head of the Department of Sociology of International Relations at Moscow State University from 2009 to 2014, losing the position due to backlash over comments regarding clashes in Ukraine. Dugin's influence within the Russian government and on Russian president Vladimir Putin is disputed, with Dugin sometimes being referred to as "Putin's brain", responsible for shaping Russian foreign policy, while others contend that Dugin's influence within the government is limited and has been greatly exaggerated, an impression given by correlations between his work and Russian foreign policy. Title: Aleksandr Dugin Find out about the author(s) & basic information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Dugin Read the full article on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Dugin [CC] license: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0 Photo credited to: By Fars Media Corporation, CC BY 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=87159921 Follow us on Twitter: @Audiowikipedia1 Become a valuable contributor & member by supporting us at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/AudioWikipedia

And now for some more Fatal Conceits…Last week we brought you Part I of our conversation with Harvard trained geologist and natural resources expert, Byron King. There was a lot on the table for discussion.For instance…Have you noticed news from the Ukraine seems to have dwindled over recent weeks? What was once non-stop, wall-to-wall coverage now garners comparatively little attention. Of course, there are other issues at hand… like inflation at a four-decade high… the worst start to the year for stock markets in half a century… and for bond markets in over 200 years… And now, we learn that the US has registered two consecutive quarters of negative GDP… the common definition for a recession, and the one practically everyone who follows the economy at all still uses. But all that doesn't mean the impacts of the war – and the west's response to it – are not working their way through the system. In fact, the knock-on effects for international energy markets, global supply chains and even sovereign currencies could hardly be overstated. As usual, Byron had plenty of insights on all of the above, and more. (If you missed Part I of our conversation, you can catch up here.)In Part II of the discussion, we pick up the action with the idea of a “methane-backed ruble.” That is, what happens if and when Mr. Putin decides he wants to back his national currency, which is stronger today than it was before the first tank rolled across the Ukrainian border, with Mother Russia's vast energy reserves? What does that do to the heretofore assumed petrodollar hegemony? Might Japan, almost entirely dependent on foreign energy (mostly from Russia), be forced to settle its contracts in Russian rubles? What are the other BRICS nations (Brazil, India, China and South Africa) thinking, as they stand by and watch the weaponization of the US dollar? Might an alternative to the petrodollar begin to look attractive to them?There's so much to cover, from the war itself to Russian military supplies, the unipolar verses multipolar political landscape, the philosophy of Eurasianism and much, much more…You can listen to the entire episode by simply hitting play above or downloading the Substack app (see the little headphones button there to listen in). Oh, and if you like what you hear, please help us spread the word by sharing this episode with comrades and enemy combatants alike, right here…For Bonner Private Research members, there's a full transcript, lightly edited for clarity, below the paywall and on our Substack Page. If you're not already a subscriber, but would like to enjoy the many benefits that come with membership, you can sort that out right here.We hope you enjoy the show…Cheers,Joel BowmanJoel Bowman:Welcome back to another Fatal Conceits Podcast, dear listener. A show about money, markets, mobs, and manias. Not necessarily in that order, of course. If you haven't already done so, please feel free to check us out on Substack. You can find us at bonnerprivateresearch.substack.com. There, you'll find hundreds of articles on everything from high finance to lowly politics, plenty of in-depth research reports, and of course, many more conversations like this under the Fatal Conceits Podcast tab at the top of the page.In part one of my conversation with Byron King, which we published last week, he and I spoke about the ongoing war in the Ukraine and what that means for international energy markets. Specifically, Germany's coming "energy Stalingrad." We also looked at what a decade or more of under investment in the real, stuff-based economy means for us today. That's everything from a lack of real investment in research and development through to a paucity of human capital. And we spoke about the ongoing financialization of the Western economies and what that might look like in reverse, during a de-globalization phase. If you haven't already done so, you can check out part one of my conversation with Byron King. Again, that's on our Substack page at bonnerprivateresearch.substack.com. In today's episode, we bring you part two of my conversation with Byron. We pick up the action while we're wondering about the potential of a gold and/or methane backed ruble. What impact might that have on global markets and, of course, the long enjoyed petrodollar hegemony. Might all that be coming to an end? I also ask Byron where he sees markets headed for the back half of the year and ask what he's doing personally with his own investments. There's all that, and plenty more, on the table in today's conversation. I invite you to please enjoy it after the break. Getting back to the money underpinning all of this, Byron, I asked you back in May about the possibility of a golden/gaseous ruble. You called it a methane-backed ruble, I think. How has that played out now? You mentioned, obviously, Putin playing his hand with the energy markets. What developments are you seeing along the lines of a potential bifurcation of global monetary systems and so forth?Byron King:Oh, I think that we are watching a slow unfolding of the next step of de-dollarization. I don't think the Russians perceive any real reason to make it all happen in a hurry. The Russians are still insisting on rubles for natural gas, and so there are countries in Europe that are making these deals. I mean, Hungary is like, "The rest of you guys in the EU, you do what you want, but we're Hungary. We want natural gas. We get cold in the wintertime. We want that Russian natural gas," and the Russians are like, "Yeah, sure. We'll make you a deal, and we'll work it out with you." Serbia is in the same boat.There are companies in Italy, in fact, that are again talking with the Russians. "Listen, guys. We want to work with you. We want to make a deal with you." You see that, but at the same time, you've got the high level political types. The Northern European political honchos, who are still banging the drum about how we're going to sanction Russia. "We're not going to buy anything from them," and everything else. It doesn't matter to Russia. They're going to sell their oil, their gas, etcetera to China, to India. Russia just fired a huge shot across the bow over in the Far East with the Sakhalin-2 project, where they essentially nationalized it.They said, "I mean, we know that you foreign companies own sections of this, but we're taking them from you and it's ours now." Now, if you're Japan and you are entirely reliant, 98% reliant on imported energy, much of which is Russian oil, Russian natural gas, you have to be looking at this and thinking, "Oh, my God. Holy smokes. Now, what?" There's so many things going on. There's so many moving parts to it. I mean, the Saudis are talking about not adhering a hundred percent to the old petrodollar idea.Joel Bowman:They're in talks with the Chinese, right?Byron King:Yeah. They're making deals with the Chinese to sell oil in Yuan. The Saudis, they'll take Chinese Yuan, and then they'll go back to China and buy Chinese things.Joel Bowman:And that's 25% of the Saudi total (oil) exports, straight to China, a not insignificant portion. And so, what happens then with Japan? To go back to the Far East, for example. If, let's say, Mr. Putin decides, for his next chessboard move, that he's going to demand gas sold down into Japan – again, another not insignificant market – if he demands that be settled in rubles?Byron King:If they want to keep their houses warm, their industry's running, the chemical industry working, they're going to have to make a deal with the Gazprombank. I mean, Gazprombank, the bank owned by Gazprom, is set up to say, "Okay. We will take your Japanese yen," or, "We'll take your dollars. We, the bank, and we'll convert them to rubles. We will be able to say that you are buying gas in rubles." But, what's really going on here is, there's an international currency exchange going on. Yen for dollars, dollars for rubles, however the wiring diagram is on any given transaction.But what it does, it strengthens the ruble as a currency. I mean, the ruble today is a stronger currency than it was back in February. Again, before the first Russian tank rolled across the border. I mean, when President Biden says, "Oh, we've turned the ruble to rubble," it's like, "Well, that didn't last very long now, did it?" Yeah, sure. In the context of a week or two, you crashed the ruble and things were in turmoil for a little bit, and then the ruble just got stronger and stronger and stronger. We talked about this before. When the Russians said, "We'll pay 5000 rubles per gram of gold." That 5000 has changed since then, but that's still out there.There is a ruble to gold, ruble to natural gas, hence energy to gold if you do your geometry, your 10th grade geometry. If you start to connect these little angles here, there is a ruble energy gold connection to whatever the price of natural gas is, or gold is, in dollars, that feeds back into the strength of the ruble. I think one of the big issues is not what happens when the dollar collapses. "When the dollar collapses." It's what happens after. What will replace it?Joel Bowman:Right. What replaces a petrodollar? What does that look like geopolitically as well, very interestingly, because the US, since the collapse of the Soviet Union back in '89 or '90, has maintained this dollar hedgemony, as a kind of unipolar superpower in the world. As you mentioned at the beginning of our conversation, 30 years of diplomacy that has gotten us essentially to where we are today. Now, it looks like that is being turned to rubble. Just to point out the facts.Byron King:Absolutely. I mean, I think most Americans have a sense that, "America, we're a big powerful country," and everything. If you said to them, "Do you understand the concept of a unipower," They would think, "Well..." If you talked it through, they'd be like, "Yeah, okay. That means we're number one," and all this sort of thing. Well, that's a myth. That is a myth. That's mythology, because America is not number one. We are not an energy-dependent country anymore. We have completely mismanaged our own internal energy system. We're having brownouts and blackouts across the country as the summer unfolds. We've mismanaged basic things, like food supply. I mean, what big powerful country doesn't have baby formula for months at a time? It's crazy.I mean, it's not that America is a weak nation. No, we're not, but the rest of the world, they're coming out of their shells. Industrially, there is simply no competition in basic industry to, say, China. I mean, they pour over a billion tons of steel a year. The United States last year, 2021, poured 85 million. I mean, it was 12 to one. China poured 12 tons of steel for every ton that the US poured. What'd they do with it? Well, they're building China. Building railroads, building cities, building ships, building whatever. Big country, big build out. In terms of Russia and Russian technology, there's this very strange concept in the US and in the West that the Russians are... "They're dumb. They can't do anything right," and all this sort of stuff. I don't know about that.I mean, if you look at the International Space Station orbiting over the earth, two thirds of that space station was built by Russia. I mean, for 10 years, we couldn't even get our astronauts up there without riding on Russian rockets. When people say, "Well, they're getting their butts kicked in Ukraine." No, they're not. I mean, who says that? They must be reading Western propaganda, because if you actually follow the facts on the ground, the Russians are using maybe 20% of their combat power in Ukraine. They're moving at their own pace. They've got weapons and systems behind the lines that they've never used just because they don't want to show us what they look like, but we suspect we know what they are. We don't ever want our guys to face their guys using those weapons, because it's going to be a mess.Putin talks about "new physical principles." Well, that gets back to the unipolar/multipolar aspect of the world. The world is going multipolar. The West has a certain philosophy about what life is and what the culture should be, but so does Russia. There's a concept in Russia, and very, very few people talk about it outside of Russia, it's called Eurasianism. There's a whole school of thought around this in Russia now. It's like, "We are not Europeans. Especially, we're not you Western Europeans, with all your decadence and all your weirdness. We are slightly European, but we're really Eurasians because we span the continent. The iron ribbon of the Siberian railroad ties us together." But, there is a whole school of thought in Russia called Eurasianism. That is how they see their future.That's a whole talk in and of itself. I mean, people write books about it. If anybody's listening to this and they're curious, go to Amazon and dial in "Eurasianism" and you'll find a whole bunch of books all about it written by ivory tower scholars. It's not something that you're going to hear on 60 Minutes, or the nightly news, or something like that, but that philosophically is what's animating a lot of what's going on in Russia, Russia-China, Central Asia with all the 'stans down into India. There is a whole sense that, "Okay. You Westerners, you had your couple of centuries of expansion, colonialism, and all that sort of stuff. You've played a really good game with this petrodollar thing for half a century. You pay us these alleged petrodollars and we send you real tankers full of oil. The dollars never even leave your country, because they wind up back in your banks and your treasury bonds. Somehow or another, we send you stuff, but we don't anything back for it. We're coming to the ending whistle of that game. It's just a question of when, not if.Joel Bowman:It does seem ultimately a kind of war of attrition, as you mentioned, with Russia happy to bide its time there on its Western front. It does seem like Putin will be able to go without Netflix and McDonald's for a lot longer than the West will be able to go without titanium and noble gases, for example.Byron King:Absolutely. People say these things that are just silly. They say, "Oh, the Russians are running out of ammunition." Every two weeks, there's a headline, but they have another two weeks worth of ammunition. No, they're not. I mean, are you kidding? ILook, I'm an American retired military guy and I know, I absolutely know Russia has entire mountains hollowed out filled with ammunition, with train tracks running right into them. If they need ammo, they just load up another train and off it goes. They have everything they need, whereas in the US... For example, just look at US artillery round production for the last, say, 10 years. If you took every single artillery round that the US Army Marine Corps produced in the last 10 years, and you somehow magically put them in Ukraine and fired them off, you would have about a month's worth of ammunition supply. 10 years would be shot off in about four or five weeks.Joel Bowman:That's incredible.Byron King:Right. The last three years of ammunition production would probably last about five days. I mean, that's the rate of expenditure. We say, "Well, we'll just buy more ammo." No, we won't. You need an ammunition factory to do that. You need a big plant. You need steel, you need chemicals, you need electronics. You need people who actually know what they're doing. People think, "Oh, yeah. You just crank those ammo rounds out like hot dogs," or something. Actually, no. You don't. I mean, you practically hand build an artillery shell, which means you need hands, which means you need somebody attached to the hands with a brain inside their head who knows what they're doing. Russia has factories for this. Russia has entire cities where they do this stuff. We don't in the United States, nor in the rest of NATO and everywhere else. It's depressing to talk about, except it happens to be true.Joel Bowman:Yeah. Again, if it hasn't been clear thus far in the discussion, this is just the facts. This isn't in praise of one side or another. This is just trying to basically get to the bottom of what's going on without any political persuasion here. Just the facts, as I said, but it does appear, when you read the Western media, that the "two weeks to run out of Russian ammunition" is the new "two weeks to flatten the curve." And we know how that claim went. Byron, I know you've got a shoot off for another appointment here. Finally, I've got a quick question from our mutual friend, Bill Bonner, for you. It's going to be a huge, huge achievement for you to condense an answer into the couple of minutes that we've got remaining, but maybe you can give a plug for some of your own writings, let people know where they can find all that good stuff. But to Bill's questions, he wants to know, Byron, what the hell is going on in the markets, and what are you doing with your own money?Byron King:Well, I am as worried as anybody else about the markets. The markets have slid down. I think they have further to fall. I mean, I think they could plateau along for a while, but I think they could also fall some more. It's July, and in August, half the world goes on vacation, although that doesn't mean that bad things don't happen in August. Then in the fall, typically... If we're going to have another market crash, why not in the fall? But me? I'm invested in mines and miners. A whole bunch of juniors that I know very well. And when I invest in a junior mining company, it's because I know the people. It's because I've visited the project, the site. It's because I've held the core from the drill rig in my hand. It's because I've looked at what they have. I believe in the asset. I believe in the technical people. I believe in the management. When I'm investing, that is what I do.I think energy has a nice, long upside to it. We've passed that inflection point where we can just fix it with a quick remedy, or whatever. Standby for energy to be more and more expensive over time. We were talking about Germany, and we were talking about exporting LNG from North America to Europe. Well, if we really do turn natural gas into a global commodity ,as LNG, then we in North America are going to be paying far higher prices. If you heat with natural gas, or you use natural gas for industry, it's going up.Where I live, I heat our house with natural gas, and I fully expect my natural gas bill to triple this coming winter. Like a lot of other people, I have cut back on things. I mean, I drive less because gasoline is twice the price. I'm a much more discerning shopper in the supermarket. I actually look at the labels and look at the price tags on things before I toss them in the cart. The travel that I'm doing, it's business-oriented travel. If I can get somebody else to pay for it, that's even better. Get the company that I'm going to go visit to pony up. "Okay. I'll come and look at you, but you guys have to share the burden here." Now, I'm not slash-your-wrist depressed, or anything like that. No, I think there's incredible opportunities out there for patient investors who are looking for bargains. But you've gotta be willing to ride the rough waves.I think gold/silver are wealth preservers over time. It's just a question of when and how long. Other things, like copper and other base metals, they absolutely have to do well because there's not enough out there considering the future demand that's happening as we speak. I mean, the battery metals, the technology metals. We could talk about that all day, but there are some incredible opportunities out there just waiting, which is not to say that in biotech, in robotics, in AI, and in medical system people aren't going to be making huge amounts of money investing in that too. That's just not my strength. If you're looking for the best biomedical ideas, I'm not your guy. But, in terms of what I'm looking at right now? Well, this is the 78th anniversary of the Bretton Woods Conference in New Hampshire, back in 1944. Then, Nixon took the world off of the Bretton Woods standard in 1971, so it's the 51st anniversary of that come August 15th.I anticipate that there is going to be upheaval in the basic units of currency that we use to denominate everything. I mean, we call them dollars now. A long time ago, people called them seashells, or whatever. For a while, people called them gold. What's going to replace the dollar? I don't know, but something is. Something's going to. I think, on the other side of that event horizon, you want to have real things that will preserve your value in whatever it is that they are denominated in or calculated in. At some point or another, a chunk of copper is always going to be worth something. This copper is from Keweenaw Peninsula, Upper Peninsula of Northern Michigan. This is elemental, native copper. This got pulled out of a rock by a glacier. That's why it's rounded looking. This other one here is from Keweenaw too, but this I chopped this one out of a rock. This was copper. Anyhow. This stuff is future wealth, is preserving your wealth.Joel Bowman:Sounds like "stuff" is due for a comeback. And if there's anybody who knows a thing or two about getting stuff out of rocks and from under basins and subterranean, high-pressure deposits, it's Byron King. Mate, thank you so much for giving us the low down on everything from the geopolitics unfolding over in Europe to what we can expect back here in the West, in the Americas. And we didn't even get to South America in this call. We'll have to save that for an entire another discussion.Byron King:Another time. Thanks so much, Joel.Joel Bowman:And thanks to you, Byron. Thanks so much for your time. Always a pleasure to chat to you. Again, readers please head on over to bonnerprivateresearch.substack.com for many more conversations like this and plenty of articles, reports, and other resources besides. Again, it's been a pleasure. This is Joel Bowman for the Fatal Conceits Podcast. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bonnerprivateresearch.substack.com/subscribe

And now for some more Fatal Conceits…Last week we brought you Part I of our conversation with Harvard trained geologist and natural resources expert, Byron King. There was a lot on the table for discussion.For instance…Have you noticed news from the Ukraine seems to have dwindled over recent weeks? What was once non-stop, wall-to-wall coverage now garners comparatively little attention. Of course, there are other issues at hand… like inflation at a four-decade high… the worst start to the year for stock markets in half a century… and for bond markets in over 200 years… And now, we learn that the US has registered two consecutive quarters of negative GDP… the common definition for a recession, and the one practically everyone who follows the economy at all still uses. But all that doesn't mean the impacts of the war – and the west's response to it – are not working their way through the system. In fact, the knock-on effects for international energy markets, global supply chains and even sovereign currencies could hardly be overstated. As usual, Byron had plenty of insights on all of the above, and more. (If you missed Part I of our conversation, you can catch up here.)In Part II of the discussion, we pick up the action with the idea of a “methane-backed ruble.” That is, what happens if and when Mr. Putin decides he wants to back his national currency, which is stronger today than it was before the first tank rolled across the Ukrainian border, with Mother Russia's vast energy reserves? What does that do to the heretofore assumed petrodollar hegemony? Might Japan, almost entirely dependent on foreign energy (mostly from Russia), be forced to settle its contracts in Russian rubles? What are the other BRICS nations (Brazil, India, China and South Africa) thinking, as they stand by and watch the weaponization of the US dollar? Might an alternative to the petrodollar begin to look attractive to them?There's so much to cover, from the war itself to Russian military supplies, the unipolar verses multipolar political landscape, the philosophy of Eurasianism and much, much more…You can listen to the entire episode by simply hitting play above or downloading the Substack app (see the little headphones button there to listen in). Oh, and if you like what you hear, please help us spread the word by sharing this episode with comrades and enemy combatants alike, right here…For Bonner Private Research members, there's a full transcript, lightly edited for clarity, below the paywall and on our Substack Page. If you're not already a subscriber, but would like to enjoy the many benefits that come with membership, you can sort that out right here.We hope you enjoy the show…Cheers,Joel Bowman This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bonnerprivateresearch.substack.com/subscribe

On this edition of Parallax Views, a previously unreleased conversation from April 2022 with Kali Tribune's Branko Malic, who specializes in writing about metaphysics from a Catholic and traditionalist bent, about the Russian philosopher that's been called "Putin's Rasputin", Alexander Dugin. Aleksandr Dugin has been a figure that's gotten media coverage ever since the election of Donald Trump. He's one of the most ardent supporters of Putin's invasion of Ukraine. But who is Alexander Dugin? What are his beliefs? Is he a Gnostic? A follower of the Traditionalist School of metaphysics in the vein of Rene Guenon or Julius Evola? An occultist who practices a chaos magick? A mere Russian imperialist who promotes his worldview through what he calls the "Fourth Political Theory" and Eurasianism? A madman? A Satanist? A Russian Orthodox Catholic? Or simply a man who wants to "immanentize the eschaton" (aka the apocalypse)? Branko and I will tackle all of this and much more in the conversation.

Brandon Martinez and I will be livestreaming every Sunday at 6am EST. The link for the stream will be posted on my Telegram at t.me/realjaredhowe. This is the audio for the first official episode of the stream. If you don't catch the show live, you can always catch the recap through my RSS feed or my website JaredHowe.net. In the future, I'll try to figure out a better convention for episode titles and show descriptions. I'll also have better audio next time. Topics discussed include: The WEF, the total surveillance state, pan-Eurasianism, and much more! This is EPISODE 1 of Sunday Roundup w/ Martinez and Howe!  

The international community is continuing to grapple with the ramifications of Russia's invasion of Ukraine that started on 24 February. While Western countries and Russia are locked into an ideological conflict and dangerous brinkmanship over the future of Ukraine, NATO-member and EU-candidate Turkey has drawn attention due to its efforts to maintain a delicate balance in its relations with its Western allies, Russia, and Ukraine. While clearly condemning Russia for its aggression against Ukraine and firmly supporting the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine, Turkey has refused to enact the crippling economic sanctions that Western countries are applying against Russia. Just as importantly, Turkish policy makers and civil society have refused to partake in the Russophobic hysteria currently gripping Western societies that victimizes even ordinary Russians and vilifies anything related to Russia ... Link : https://avim.org.tr/en/Yorum/TURKEY-S-INTERESTS-AND-CONSTRUCTIVE-EURASIANISM Web page: https://avim.org.tr/en Telegram Channel: https://t.me/s/avimorgtr Twitter: https://avim.org.tr/en Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/avimorgtr/ VKontakte: https://vk.com/public202374482 Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcIfEGNM3308QoLbCDJIFuw Dailmotion: https://www.dailymotion.com/dm_0ea263f63bb5aee7d8770d1ec13cfe8b Instgram: https://www.instagram.com/avimorgtr/IntroductionIntroduction

Suat Kınıklıoğlu on his report “Eurasianism in Turkey”, published by the German Institute for International and Security Affairs' Centre for Applied Turkey Studies. The report examines the influence of Turkish-style Eurasianism, a worldview favouring Ankara's break from Nato in favour of strategic alignment with Russia and/or China. Become a member to support Turkey Book Talk. Members get a 35% discount on all Turkey/Ottoman History books published by IB Tauris/Bloomsbury, transcripts of every interview, transcripts of the whole archive, and over 200 reviews covering Turkish and international fiction, history and politics.

In Episode 116 of the CounterVortex podcast, Bill Weinberg provides an overview of geostrategic and political thinking on the criticality of Eastern Europe and especially Ukraine, from the Crimean War to the contemporary catastrophe. Despite contemporary misconceptions, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels shared the perception of a "Russian meance to Europe" with thoerists of Western imperialism such as Halford John Mackinder, Lord Curzon, Alfred Thayer Mahan, Nicholas J. Spykman, and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Arch-reactionary or openly fascist conceptions of "Eurasianism" were taken up by the German Karl Haushofer and the Russians Mikhail Katkov and Ivan Ilyin—the latter a formative influence on Alexander Dugin, the intellectual mastermind of Vladimir Putin's revanchist imperial project. Listen on SoundCloud or via Patreon. https://www.patreon.com/countervortex Production by Chris Rywalt We ask listeners to donate just $1 per weekly podcast via Patreon -- or $2 for our new special offer! We now have 30 subscribers. If you appreciate our work, please become Number 31!

Ari returns to present a hypothesis about cultural development. We discuss Eurasianism and Atlanticism, cultural development, blues, John David Ebert, Oswald Spengler, the Cathedral of the Russian Armed Forces, the US military and a host of other subjects.

In this very special episode, Jules (@realjulestaylor) sits down with Brett (@RevLeftRadio) to have a long conversation about the Russian Nationalist philosopher Aleksandr Dugin. They examine his philosophy, core concepts, and influence in Russia. They also discuss the current war in Ukraine at lenght. Check out No Easy Answers: https://smarturl.it/noeasyanswers Outro Music: https://bit.ly/julestaylorbio Music for this episode: Lewis And Dekalb by Kevin MacLeod:    https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/4989-lewis-and-dekalb Severe Tire Damage by Kevin MacLeod:    https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/5004-severe-tire-damage ----- Support Rev Left Radio: https://www.patreon.com/RevLeftRadio or make a one time donation: PayPal.me/revleft LEARN MORE ABOUT REV LEFT RADIO: www.revolutionaryleftradio.com

In this very special episode, Jules (@realjulestaylor) sits down with Brett (@RevLeftRadio) to have a long conversation about Aleksandr Dugin. This episode is a follow-up to Episodes 47 and 48 of No Easy Answers. If you are interested in hearing interviews with Wahid Azal, an anti-imperialist Sufi Muslim who published a 2016 article about Dugin, check out Episode 48. Additional Links Below... About Brett Twitter, podcasts (Rev Left Radio, Red Menace, Guerrilla History) If you must have a couple of links on Dugin, here they are: Fascism, Borderless and Red Alexander Dugin speaking on the Ukraine conflict Dugin Eurasian Conference Outro Music: https://bit.ly/julestaylorbio Music for this episode: Lewis And Dekalb by Kevin MacLeod: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/4989-lewis-and-dekalb Severe Tire Damage by Kevin MacLeod: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/5004-severe-tire-damage Permanent Links Below… Follow us on Social Media: Twitter Facebook Medium Patreon Join the discussion: https://www.reddit.com/r/noeasyanswerspodcast Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/noeasyanswers/message Visit our Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/noeasyanswers Hang out with us on Discord: https://discord.gg/4RHEEhdxy5 One-off Contribution: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/julestaylormusic Comments, concerns, criticisms, and vitriol: noeasyanswerspodcast@gmail.com --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/noeasyanswers/support

The mystical politics of Aleksandr Dugin, the mercurial philosopher and geopolitical strategist hovering behind Vladimir Putin, is front and center this week.  Last week, we covered the phenomenon of Western conspiritualists folding the Russian invasion of Ukraine into their fact-free claims about what's really going on. It turns out that once you're all-in on the cabal, the Great Reset, mole children, and vaccine genocide, whatever happens in the world means you were right all along. Conspiritualists are claiming that, just like Donald Trump, Putin is really a light worker fighting to save the children and destroy Anthony Fauci's secret bioweapons labs in Ukraine while heralding the true Great Awakening. But an entirely different prophecy, one promising a Soviet spiritual rebirth, appears to be inspiring Vladimir Putin's actions—as well as Russia's disruptive interference in American politics. Julian unpacks the perennialist religious movement, Traditionalism, and how it speaks to fascist political actors around the world, including Steve Bannon. This is especially relevant in light of tragic events in Europe, a stark reminder of those of us who remember the Cold War. This time, Dugin and Putin dream of a new Russian Empire.Show NotesAleksandr Dugin Ukraine Invasion Press ConferenceMoscow Patriarch Stokes Religious Tensions with Ukraine RemarksDugin, Putin & The 2016 ElectionThe Rise of Traditionalism by Benjamin TeitelbaumSteve Bannon's Ideological SoulmateDugin Fired from University Post for Inciting GenocideThe London Dinner that Brought Europe's Far-Right TogetherBannon Cites Julius EvolaInside The Strange Origins of Bannon's Nationalist FantasiaDugin's Foundations of Geopolitics ReviewedDugin's Eurasianism & The American ElectionBenjamin Teitelbaum on Conspirituality

Photo: "On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences," popularly known as the "Secret Speech," was a report by Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev, First Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, made to the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union on 25 February 1956. @Batchelorshow #ClassicHJMackinder: Putinism unafraid. Professor H. J. Mackinder, International Relations.  #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety )Originally aired 10-24-21). #Eurasianism:  No need for a Khrushchev "Secret Speech" after the personality cult of Putin.  Professor H. J. Mackinder, International Relations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Cult_of_Personality_and_Its_Consequences . Permissions "O kulcie jednostki i jego konsekwencjach", Warsaw, March 1956, first edition of the "Secret Speech" (in Polish). Date | 25 February 2017, 13:05:16 Source | Own work Author | Wikiwlh I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the workUnder the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

01-31-2022 Dr. Matthew J. Schmidt Learn more about the interview and get additional links here: https://www.thetimesusa.com/russian-authority-on-the-role-of-eurasianism-in-putins-aggression/ Subscribe to the best of our content here: https://priceofbusiness.substack.com/ Subscribe to our YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCywgbHv7dpiBG2Qswr_ceEQ

(1/4/21)“Where does Russia belong in the pantheon of nations? What does it see itself offering the world of today and the world of tomorrow,” writes Dr. Matthew Schmidt associate professor of national security and political science at the University of New Haven in his article for the peer-reviewed journal Demokratizatsiya entitled Is Putin Pursuing a Policy of Eurasianism? In this installment of Leonard Lopate at Large on WBAI, Dr. Schmidt discusses the Russian leader's long-term strategy in Ukraine.

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #Ukraine: #Eurasianism:  Has Putin waited too long?   NATO without a leader.  Professor H.J. Mackinder, International Relations. #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/25/world/europe/ukraine-russia.html

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #Ukraine: #Eurasianism:  Comic actors for Ukraine's leadership.   NATO without a leader.  Professor H.J. Mackinder, International Relations. #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/25/world/europe/ukraine-russia.html

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #Ukraine: #Eurasianism:  NATO without a leader.  Professor H.J. Mackinder, International Relations. #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/25/world/europe/ukraine-russia.html

https://youtu.be/x5JgjK8X8uE On Sept. 1, 1939, 70 years ago, the German Army crossed the Polish frontier. On Sept. 3, Britain declared war. Six years later, 50 million Christians and Jews had perished. Britain was broken and bankrupt, Germany a smoldering ruin. Europe had served as the site of the most murderous combat known to man, and civilians had suffered worse horrors than the soldiers. By May 1945, Red Army hordes occupied all the great capitals of Central Europe: Vienna, Prague, Budapest, Berlin. A hundred million Christians were under the heel of the most barbarous tyranny in history: the Bolshevik regime of the greatest terrorist of them all, Joseph Stalin. What cause could justify such sacrifices? Patrick J. Buchanan, Did Hitler Want War? (2009) Matthew Raphael Johnson is a scholar of Russian Orthodox history and philosophy. His research agenda centers around ethnic nationalism, Eurasianism and the Orthodox tradition as forms of rebellion against globalism. He has recently completed a lengthy book on the history of Ukrainian political thought from Mazepa to the present. Now, he is in the midst of a substantial book on nominalism and its condemnation by Patristic and Platonic authors. He completed his doctorate at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln in 1999 as a recipient of the Sennen, as well as the Clare and Marguerite MacPhee Fellowships, focusing on anti-modernist social philosophy. His dissertation detailed the critique of Positivism from Michael Oakeshott and the British Hegelians. The central philosophical thesis running through all his philosophical work is that nominalism is the root ontological evil. It lies at the foundation of the 20th century and it is termed by Johnson as “the ontology of death.” Find Dr. Johnson here: https://theorthodoxnationalist.wordpress.com/2018/02/21/vor-archive/ https://www.rusjournal.org/ Odysee BitChute Minds Flote Archive Spotify

Matthew Raphael Johnson is a scholar of Russian Orthodox history and philosophy. His research agenda centers around ethnic nationalism, Eurasianism and the Orthodox tradition as forms of rebellion against globalism. He has recently completed a lengthy book on the history of Ukrainian political thought from Mazepa to the present. Now, he is in the midst of a substantial book on nominalism and its condemnation by Patristic and Platonic authors. He completed his doctorate at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln in 1999 as a recipient of the Sennen, as well as the Clare and Marguerite MacPhee Fellowships, focusing on anti-modernist social philosophy. His dissertation detailed the critique of Positivism from Michael Oakeshott and the British Hegelians. The central philosophical thesis running through all his philosophical work is that nominalism is the root ontological evil. It lies at the foundation of the 20th century and it is termed by Johnson as “the ontology of death.” Find Dr. Johnson here: https://theorthodoxnationalist.wordpress.com/2018/02/21/vor-archive/ https://www.rusjournal.org/ -------------------------------- If you find value in the content, please consider donating to my PayPal KeithKnight590@gmail.com LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@KeithKnightDontTreadOnAnyone:b BitChute: KeithKnightDontTreadOnAnyone https://www.bitchute.com/channel/keithknightdonttreadonanyone/ Minds: https://www.minds.com/KeithKnightDontTreadOnAnyone/ MeWe: mewe.com/i/keithknight25 Flote: https://flote.app/VoluntaryistKeith Gab: https://gab.com/Voluntarykeith Twitter: @an_capitalist The Libertarian Institute: https://libertarianinstitute.org/dont-tread-on-anyone/ One Great Work Network: https://www.onegreatworknetwork.com/keith-knight

Photo:  The enormous Eurasian continent. @Batchelorshow #Eurasianism: At the Valdai Discussion Club, Putin philosophizes about the reawakening Russian culture, neither East nor West.  Professor H. J. Mackinder, International Relations. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/10/22/putin-rails-against-monstrous-west-in-valdai-speech-a75373 .. Permissions: Eurasia (orthographic projection) Source | Own work / Author | Keepscases / SVG development  I, the copyright holder of this work, Keepscases, hereby publish it under the following licenses: This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. | You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the workUnder the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. ..

Photo: Personality cults: here, the Serbian president Aleksandar Vučić pets a dog with Vladimir Putin, president of Russia. Pro-government media in Serbia most often presents Vučić as a powerful person under constant attack who receives messages of support from Putin @Batchelorshow #Eurasianism:  No need for a Khrushchev "Secret Speech" after the personality cult of Putin.  Professor H. J. Mackinder, International Relations. HFN https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Cult_of_Personality_and_Its_Consequences .. Permissions: The President of the Republic of Serbia, Alexander Vucic, presented Vladimir Putin with a Sharplanin puppy.  Президент Республики Сербии Александр Вучич подарил Владимиру Путину щенка шарпланинской овчарки. Date | 17 January 2019 Source | http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/59689 Author | Presidential Press and Information Office This file comes from the website of the President of the Russian Federation and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. In short: you are free to distribute and modify the file as long as you attribute www.kremlin.ru. Note: Works published on site before April 8, 2014 are also licensed under Creative CommonsAttribution 3.0 License. The permission letter from the Press Secretary for the President of the Russian Federation is available here. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. | Attribution: Kremlin.ru  /  You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the workUnder the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

My guest today is Marlene Laruelle. Marlene is a Research Professor of International Affairs at George Washington University in Washington, DC, where she also holds various administrative functions, including Director of the Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies. She is also a Senior Research Fellow at the Institut Francais des Relations Internationales in her native France and a prolific writer on Russian and Central Asian history and politics. This year alone she has two new books out: “Is Russia Fascist? Unraveling Propaganda East and West”, with Cornell University Press, and “Central Peripheries: Nationhood in Central Asia”, with UCL Press.We talk about all things Russia: nationalism, Eurasianism, illiberalism, disinformation, and, of course, Vladimir Putin.

The #MunichSecurityConference ( #MSC ) is an annual conference on international security policy that has taken place in #Munich since 1963. MSC is one of the most important unofficial #forums for the exchange of views by presidents, prime ministers, foreign and #defenseministers , and military chiefs on international #security policy issues in an informal setting. This year's conference was held from February 14 to 16 with the participation of hundreds of senior leaders and thinkers from politics, international organizations, business, and civil society.… Link : https://avim.org.tr/en/Analiz/MUNICH-SECURITY-CONFERENCE-2020-REVEALS-THE-NECESSITY-OF-CONSTRUCTIVE-EURASIANISM Web page: https://avim.org.tr/en Telegram Channel: https://t.me/s/avimorgtr Twitter: https://avim.org.tr/en Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/avimorgtr/ VKontakte: https://vk.com/public202374482 Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcIfEGNM3308QoLbCDJIFuw Dailmotion: https://www.dailymotion.com/dm_0ea263f63bb5aee7d8770d1ec13cfe8b Instgram: https://www.instagram.com/avimorgtr/IntroductionIntroduction

In this episode, we interview Professor Aleksandr Gelyevich Dugin, Russian political analyst and strategist, often called the most dangerous philosopher in the world. Duginism's influence on contemporary Russian thought, geopolitics and contemporary political discourse is widely recognized. Dugin is a traditionalist, a critic of liberalism and of modernity, and a proponent of Eurasianism. He is also a prominent student of Heidegger, of the Kaballah and a Platonist; and in this interview we explore how his metaphysics fit into in the Internet age. We also ask him about the role of creativity in geopolitics, on his relationship with Chaos Magic and about Political Angeleology - and how different Logoi and angelic entities are engaged in a war of mind, or Noomahia, as per his own work. We also asked him about his views on Ontological Design, and ended up exploring how modernity is actually an ancient phenomena, manifest in the Logos of Cybele and the cult of matter. Don't forget to subscribe to Technosocial. Support Technosocial https://www.patreon.com/technosocial Music by Salvatore Schiano http://www.salvatoreschiano.com/ Also on https://anchor.fm/technosocial

What a tangled web they weave when they practice to deceive. In the first installment of this series on Duginism, we started demonstrating the degree to which Dugin's influence permeates western nationalist movements. In the second installment, we defined the concept of Duginism and showed its core tenets. In the third installment, we showed that Dugin is a race denialist -- except when he's dehumanizing white people for being racist. In this installment, we are going to show that Duginism prescribes white genocide before doubling back and re-examining the rhetoric of so-called white nationalists and Alt Righters like Richard Spencer, Mike Enoch, and Eric Striker, who appear to be espousing Dugin's lexicon verbatim as they pursue what appears to be a strategy intended to bring about Eurasianism. Buckle up! This rabbit hole gets WEIRD. This is EPISODE 493 of So to Speak w/ Jared Howe!

Listen to the FULL INTERVIEW here: https://newbooksnetwork.com/aleksandr-dugin-political-platonism-the-philosophy-of-politics-arktos-2019/The Nexus Institute in 2019 celebrated its 25th Anniversary with a celebrated and highly anticipated debate on stage between Bernard-Henri Lévy and Aleksandr Dugin, advertised as defenders of the Enlightenment and counter-Enlightenment.Dugin explains his disappointment with Lévy, and I fully concur. It was political posturing of the most trite and unfair kind, rather than a substantive, insight-generating debate. It was drenched Western arrogance, posing as so-called “liberal values”.Aleksandr Gelyevich Dugin is a philosopher, former Professor and Advisor to the Kremlin, and one of the best-known writers and political commentators in post-Soviet Russia. He is a leading theorist of Eurasianism.A Soviet dissident in the 1980s, Dugin has authored more than 60 books, among them Foundations of Geopolitics (1997), which has been used as a textbook in the Academy of the General Staff of the Russian military, and The Fourth Political Theory (2009).  width="100%"> https://megaphone.link/LIT5823316981  

Listen to the FULL INTERVIEW here: https://newbooksnetwork.com/aleksandr-dugin-political-platonism-the-philosophy-of-politics-arktos-2019/Aleksandr Dugin is by far the most important and prominent living Russian intellectual. He has been called by some as the "Brain of Vladmir Putin"In this excerpt, he explains to me how he actually pre-figured the rise of Vladimir Putin with his critique of liberalism, communism and sea power, and advocacy for traditionalism, conservatism, and land power.This was a fascinating interview with one of the world's most important thinkers of the 21st century.Aleksandr Gelyevich Dugin is a philosopher, former Professor and Advisor to the Kremlin, and one of the best-known writers and political commentators in post-Soviet Russia. He is a leading theorist of Eurasianism.A Soviet dissident in the 1980s, Dugin has authored more than 60 books, among them Foundations of Geopolitics (1997), which has been used as a textbook in the Academy of the General Staff of the Russian military, and The Fourth Political Theory (2009). width="100%">https://megaphone.link/LIT5823316981     

Aleksandr Dugin’s Political Platonism: The Philosophy of Politics (Arktos, 2019) offers a seminal analysis of the contemporary philosophical crisis from one of the best-known writers and political commentators in post-Soviet Russia. Through a series of essays, course transcripts, and a single long interview—each remarkable for the depth of its learning and the boldness of its vision—Dugin exposes the profoundest roots of the Western philosophical tradition, centered around the thought of Plato, offering a Platonic view of why it has reached its final terminus, and his indication of where a new beginning must be sought. The works collected in this volume present Dugin’s theory of Political Platonism as a fundamental philosophical and political orientation, capable at once of reviving higher political and social forms and furnishing solid ground for resistance to the collapse of the contemporary world. His multi-perspective thesis offers a thorough and thought-provoking critique of modernity and a masterful survey of Western philosophy, reaching from before Heraclitus to beyond Heidegger. In its provocative, clear-sighted analyses and its visionary flights, this book provides an invaluable reference for those already familiar with Dugin, and an intriguing introduction for those coming to him for the first time. Aleksandr Gelyevich Dugin is a philosopher, former Professor and Advisor to the Kremlin, and one of the best-known writers and political commentators in post-Soviet Russia. He is a leading theorist of Eurasianism. A Soviet dissident in the 1980s, Dugin has authored more than 60 books, among them Foundations of Geopolitics (1997), which has been used as a textbook in the Academy of the General Staff of the Russian military, and The Fourth Political Theory (2009). Kirk Meighoo is a TV and podcast host, former university lecturer, author and former Senator in Trinidad and Tobago. He hosts his own podcast, Independent Thought & Freedom, where he interviews some of the most interesting people from around the world who are shaking up politics, economics, society and ideas. You can find it in the iTunes Store or any of your favorite podcast providers. You can also subscribe to his YouTube channel. If you are an academic who wants to get heard nationally, please check out his free training at becomeapublicintellectual.com.   Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode Matt and Tom discuss everything you probably NEVER wanted to know about Alexander Dugin. But who is Dugin and what does he want? Wikipedia says simply "[he] is a Russian political analyst and strategist known for his fascist views." High commendation, indeed. But Dugin and his concept of Eurasianism is far too complicated for us in general. However, Tom could write a book about this subject... and he probably will, so this ought to be interesting. Books mentioned: 1) (Recommended read!) Masha Gessen - THE FUTURE IS HISTORY https://www.amazon.com/Future-History-Totalitarianism-Reclaimed-Russia/dp/159463453X/ref=sr11?keywords=the+future+is+history&qid=1555029233&s=gateway&sr=8-1 2) Alexander Dugin - GEOPOLITICS OF POSTMODERN https://www.amazon.com/Geopolitics-postmodern-Russian-Dugin/dp/5519515441/ref=sr14?keywords=alexander+dugin&qid=1555029494&s=gateway&sr=8-4 3) Alexander Dugin - FOURTH POLITICAL THEORY (Четвертая политическая теория) https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15785079-the-fourth-political-theory And for a "fun" deep-dive into Eurasianism, Marlene Laruelle's RUSSIAN EURASIANISM: AN IDEOLOGY OF EMPIRE ought to cover the concept in full: https://www.amazon.com/Russian-Eurasianism-Ideology-Marlène-Laruelle/dp/1421405768/ref=sxbssxwds-stvp?pdrdi=1421405768&pdrdr=f8eb50e2-6b3c-4149-accf-390e012bf7f3&pdrdw=wGIv8&pdrdwg=eDgg7&pfrdp=5c5ea0d7-2437-4d8a-88a7-ea6f32aeac11&pfrdr=XRP5TC55RSVK141V5QZF&qid=1555029573&refinements=p27%3AA.+Dugin&s=books&text=A.+Dugin CREDITS Co-Producer: Tom Rehnquist (Connect: facebook.com/thomas.rehnquist) Associate Producer: Lauren Nyquist (Connect: facebook.com/lenyquist Instagram: @nyquabbit) Associate Producer: Matthew Orr (Connect: facebook.com/orrmatthew) Associate Producer: Milena D-K (Connect: facebook.com/profile.php?id=100010939368892 Instagram: @thedistantsea and @milena.d.k) Music/Sound Design: Charlie Harper (Connect: facebook.com/charlie.harper.1485 Instagram: @charlieharpermusic www.charlieharpermusic.com) Producer & Creator: Michelle Daniel (Connect: facebook.com/mdanielgeraci Instagram: @michelledaniel86) Follow The Slavic Connexion on Instagram: @slavxradio, Twitter: @SlavXRadio, and on Facebook: facebook.com/slavxradio . Check out our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDqMRKmAtJRxBVxFTI82pgg Thanks for listening and please don't forget to subscribe!!

Is nationalism really rising in China? How does it differ from patriotism? What is “Eurasianism” and how does Russia use that concept? How much of China’s nationalism is rooted in the “century of humiliation” that the country suffered at the hands of Western countries and Japan between 1839 and 1949? Jeremy and Kaiser spoke with two eminent scholars of nationalism in Russia and China to find out. Charles Clover is a correspondent with the Financial Times based in Beijing, and author of Black Wind, White Snow: The Rise of Russia's New Nationalism. Jude Blanchette is a scholar currently writing a book on neo-Maoists in China, who, he explains, have their own interpretation of Chinese nationalism. Jude was a guest on a previous episode of the Sinica Podcast dedicated to the subject of neo-Maoists. Recommendations: Jeremy: “The Age of Total Lies,” a translation of an essay written by Vesna Pešić, a Serbian opposition politician and human rights activist. Jude: The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China, published in 1993 by Susan Shirk. Charles: Easternization: Asia's Rise and America's Decline From Obama to Trump and Beyond, by Gideon Rachman. Kaiser: Age of Anger: A History of the Present, by Pankaj Mishra, and the 1987 film Repentance, a view into life under Stalinism by Georgian filmmaker Tengiz Abuladze.  

Guest: Mark Bassin on The Gumilev Mystique: Biopolitics, Eurasiansism, and the Construction of Community in Modern Russia. The post Lev Gumilev's Eurasianism appeared first on The Eurasian Knot.

Guest: Mark Bassin on The Gumilev Mystique: Biopolitics, Eurasiansism, and the Construction of Community in Modern Russia. The post Lev Gumilev’s Eurasianism appeared first on SRB Podcast.

What are the origins of Eurasianism in Russia and how has it come to occupy a central place in Kremlin thinking today? Charles Clover, FT China correspondent and former Moscow bureau chief discusses his new book, Black Wind, White Snow: The Rise of Russia's New Nationalism with Gideon Rachman. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Anne McElvoy investigates the role of culture within historic Soviet expansionism and current Russian geopolitics. She talks to Charles Clover, author of Black Wind, White Snow: The Rise of Russia's New Nationalism about Eurasianism, an old idea with considerable traction in Putin's Russia and why bad ideas tend to win out over good ones . Historian Polly Jones, author of Myth Memory Trauma: Rethinking the Soviet past, 1953-70 and Clem Cecil, in-coming Director of Pushkin House, are in the studio to discuss the extent of Soviet interest in soft power alongside Mark Nash, curator of Red Africa and Ian Christie, co-curator of Unexpected Eisenstein, two new exhibitions in London. The continuing cultural legacy of Cold War relations between the Soviet Union and Africa is the subject of Red Africa, a season of film, art exhibition, talks and events, runs at Calvert 22 in London while at the same time Unexpected Eisenstein, a new exhibition at GRAD gallery in London, tells the story of the anglophile tendencies of a the great Soviet film-maker, Sergei Eisenstein. Eisenstein, whose epic and patriotic films Battleship Potemkin, Alexander Nevsky and Ivan the Terrible, together constitute a visual retrospective of Russian power, was himself hugely influenced by British writers from Shakespeare to Dickins. But as Anne McElvoy hears, the director went on to influence generations of British artists and film-makers, one legacy of his six-week sojourn in London in 1929. It was, as Christie explains, a trip ordered but not precisely sponsored, by Stalin. Producer: Jacqueline Smith

This week Boston College Professor Matt Sienkiewicz is joined by The Interpreter's managing editor James Miller and journalist David Patrikarakos to discuss the Iran nuclear deal, Russian neo-Eurasianism, North Korea, and the Russia's role in the Middle East. Additional Reading: - Nuclear Iran: The Birth of an Atomic State http://www.amazon.com/Nuclear-Iran-Birth-Atomic-State/dp/1780761252 - How can we avoid nuclear catastrophe? On North Korea’s recent nuclear test http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/world/41540putin-obama-north-korea-china-nuclear-weapon-mass-destruction-cold-war - What’s The Goal Of The Kremlin’s Middle East Gamble? http://www.interpretermag.com/whats-the-goal-of-the-kremlins-middle-east-gamble/