Podcasts about nasa artemis

The White House recently released its budget for FY 2026, which has led to significant concerns at NASA as it recommends significant cuts to international programs, education, and research. In addition, many of these cuts call for the cancellation of key elements of NASA's Artemis Program and its plans for sending crewed missions to Mars. This includes the Space Launch System (SLS), the Orion spacecraft, and the Lunar Gateway.

The Kerbal Space Program is currently used as an educational tool to teach about spacecraft and mission design. But as Dr. Schmitt tells us, it should be used as a method for designing whole mission architectures. For years, Schmitt has relied on KSP and its realism mods to design and simulate missions, including those that will take astronauts back to the Moon!

Camas High School will plant a NASA Artemis Moon Tree on campus—a living legacy grown from seeds that orbited the Moon during the Artemis I mission. The rare Douglas-fir sapling is one of only a few distributed nationwide and symbolizes a powerful connection between science, space, and education. Read the full story at https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/youth/camas-high-school-to-plant-nasa-artemis-moon-tree-on-campus/ #localnews #ClarkCountyWa #CamasWA #NASA #MoonTree #ArtemisMission #spaceeducation #environmentalstewardship #CamasHighSchool #GreenTeam

Astronomy Daily | Space News: S04E81In this exciting episode of Astronomy Daily, host Anna takes you on a captivating journey through the latest milestones in space exploration. From the historic SpaceX FRAM 2 mission to NASA's Artemis 2 mission patch unveiling, this episode is packed with remarkable insights that will fuel your curiosity about our universe.Highlights:- SpaceX FRAM 2 Mission: Join us as we follow the groundbreaking crew of SpaceX's FRAM 2 mission, the first team to orbit Earth from pole to pole. Experience their breathtaking views of the planet and hear their reflections on this extraordinary journey, including their unique perspectives of the Arctic and Antarctica.- NASA's Artemis 2 Mission Patch: Discover the newly unveiled mission patch for Artemis 2, symbolizing humanity's return to lunar exploration. We discuss its design and the historic significance of the mission, which will see astronauts journey around the Moon no later than April 2026.- SpaceX's Super Heavy Booster Milestone: Explore SpaceX's latest achievement with their Super Heavy booster, which successfully completed a test fire, bringing us closer to the goal of full rocket reusability. Learn about the engineering marvel that is Booster 14 and its role in future missions.- Moon Dust as Power Source: Delve into the exciting discovery that lunar regolith can be transformed into solar cells, potentially providing a sustainable power source for future lunar settlements. We discuss the implications of this breakthrough for long-term human presence on the Moon.- Spinlaunch's Ambitious Satellite Plans: Get the scoop on Spinlaunch's innovative approach to satellite deployment, aiming to launch up to 250 microsatellites in a single mission. Learn about their unique centrifuge technology and the potential impact on the future of satellite constellations.For more cosmic updates, visit our website at astronomydaily.io. Join our community on social media by searching for #AstroDailyPod on Facebook, X, YouTubeMusic, TikTok, and our new Instagram account! Don't forget to subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, or wherever you get your podcasts.Thank you for tuning in. This is Anna signing off. Until next time, keep looking up and stay curious about the wonders of our universe.00:00 - Welcome to Astronomy Daily01:05 - Overview of SpaceX FRAM 2 mission10:30 - Artemis 2 mission patch unveiling17:00 - Super Heavy booster test fire22:15 - Moon dust solar cell breakthrough27:30 - Spinlaunch satellite deployment plans✍️ Episode ReferencesSpaceX FRAM 2 Mission Details[SpaceX](https://www.spacex.com)NASA Artemis 2 Mission Patch[NASA](https://www.nasa.gov)Super Heavy Booster Updates[SpaceX](https://www.spacex.com)Lunar Regolith Solar Cells Research[University of Potsdam](https://www.uni-potsdam.de/en/)Spinlaunch Satellite Plans[Spinlaunch](https://www.spinlaunch.com)Astronomy Daily[Astronomy Daily](http://www.astronomydaily.io/)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news--5648921/support.

In his famous 1962 address to Rice University, President Kennedy declared,We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard . . .The current administration has chosen, among other things, to go to Mars. Some, Elon Musk included, are looking for a backup planet to Earth. For others, like Robert Zubrin, Mars is an opportunity for scientific discovery, pure challenge, and a revitalized human civilization.Today on Faster, Please — The Podcast, Zubrin and I discuss how to reorient NASA, what our earliest Mars missions can and should look like, and why we should go to Mars at all.Zubrin is the president of aerospace R&D company Pioneer Astronautics, as well as the founder and president of the Mars Society. He was also formerly a staff engineer at Lockheed Martin. He has authored over 200 published papers and is the author of seven books, including the most recent, The New World on Mars: What We Can Create on the Red Planet.For more, check out Zubrin's article in The New Atlantis, “The Mars Dream is Back — Here's How to Make It Actually Happen.”In This Episode* Colonization vs. exploration (1:38)* A purpose-driven mission (5:01)* Cultural diversity on Mars (12:07)* An alternative to the SpaceX strategy (16:02)* Artemis program reform (20:42)* The myth of an independent Mars (24:17)* Our current timeline (27:21)Below is a lightly edited transcript of our conversation. Colonization vs. exploration (1:38)I do think that it is important that the first human mission to ours be a round-trip mission. I want to have those people back, not just because it's nice to have them back, but I want to hear from them. I want to get the full report.Pethokoukis: Just before we started chatting, I went and I checked an online prediction market — one I check for various things, the Metaculus online prediction market — and the consensus forecast from all the people in that community for when will the first humans land successfully on Mars was October 2042. Does that sound realistic, too soon, or should it be much further away?I think it is potentially realistic, but I think we could beat it. Right now we have a chance to get a Humans to Mars program launched. This current administration has announced that they intend to do so. They're making a claim they're going to land people on Mars in 2028. I do not think that is realistic, but I do believe that it is realistic for them to get the program well started and, if it is handled correctly — and we'll have to talk a lot more about that in this talk — that we could potentially land humans on Mars circa 2033.When I gave you that prediction and then you mentioned the 2020s goal, those are about landing on Mars. Should we assume when people say, “We're going to land on Mars,” they also mean people returning from Mars or are they talking about one-way trips?Musk has frequently talked about a colonization effort, and colonization is a one-way trip, but I don't think that's in the cards for 2028 or 2033. I think what is in the cards for this time period on our immediate horizon is exploration missions. I do think that we could potentially have a one-way mission with robots in 2028. That would take a lot of work and it's a bit optimistic, but I think it could be done with determination, and I think that should be done, actually.To be clear, when people are talking about the first human mission to Mars, the assumption is it's not a one way trip for that astronaut, or those two astronauts, that we intend on bringing them back. Maybe the answer is obvious, but I'm not sure it's obvious to me.From time to time, people have proposed scenarios where the first human mission to Mars is a one-way mission, you send maybe not two but five people. Then two years later you send five more people, and then you send 10 people, and then you send 20 people, and you build it up. In other words, it's not a one-way mission in the sense of you're going to be left there and your food will then run out and you will die. No, I don't think that is a credible or attractive mission plan, but the idea that you're going to go with a few people and then reinforce them and grow it into a base, and then a settlement. That is something that can be reasonably argued. But I still think even that is a bit premature. I do think that it is important that the first human mission to ours be a round-trip mission. I want to have those people back, not just because it's nice to have them back, but I want to hear from them. I want to get the full report.A purpose-driven mission (5:01)In the purpose-driven mode, the purpose comes first, you spend money to do things. In the vendor-driven mode, you do things in order to spend money. And we've seen both of these.So should we just default to [the idea] that this mission will be done with government funding on SpaceX rockets, and this will be a SpaceX trip? That's by far the most likely scenario? This is going to need to be a public-private partnership. SpaceX is rapidly developing the single most important element of the technology, but it's not all the technology. We need surface systems. We need the system for making rocket fuel on Mars because the SpaceX mission architecture is the one that I outlined in my book, The Case for Mars, where you make your return propellant on Mars: You take carbon dioxide and water, which are both available on Mars, and turn them into methane and oxygen, which is an excellent rocket fuel combination and which, in fact, is the rocket fuel combination that the Starship uses for that reason. So that's the plan, but you need the system that makes itWe're going to need surface power, which really should be a nuclear power source and which is difficult to develop outside of the government because we're talking about controlled material. Space nuclear reactors will need to use highly enriched uranium, so it should be a partnership between NASA and SpaceX, but we're going to have to reform NASA if this is going to work. I think, though, that this mission could be the vehicle by which we reform NASA. That is, that NASA Artemis moon program, for example, is an example of how not to do something.That's the current government plan to get us back to the moon.Right. But you see, NASA has two distinct modes of operation, and one I call the purpose-driven mode and the other is the vendor-driven mode. In the purpose-driven mode, the purpose comes first, you spend money to do things. In the vendor-driven mode, you do things in order to spend money. And we've seen both of these. To be fair, there's been times when NASA has operated with extreme efficiency to accomplish great things in very short amounts of time, of which, of course, the Apollo Program is the most well-known example where we got to the moon and eight years from program start. The difference between Apollo and Artemis was it wasn't human nature — and there were plenty of greedy people in the 1960s that, when the government's spending money, they want a piece of the action, they were all there.There's no shortage of people who, when you've got a lot of money to spend, are willing to show up and say, “Hi, you got a great idea, but you can't do it until you fund me.” And there were plenty of them then, but they were shown the door because it was clear that if we did all these side projects that people were trying to claim were necessary (“you can't do your program until you do my program”) we would not make it to the moon by 1969. So actually, the forcing function was the schedule. That's what forced the nonsense out of the room.Artemis, on the other hand, has been undertaken as a project whose leadership thought that they could secure a lot of support for the program if they gave a lot of people money. So Artemis has five different flight systems which are incompatible with each other. It's a ridiculous program. That's not the way to do things. We have to have a program leadership which is committed to humans-to-Mars not as a way to get pet technology programs funded, or pet constituencies funded, or pet vendors funded, or any of that stuff. It's got to be: the mission comes first. And if you have that kind of emphasis on this, this can be done and it can be the way to reform NASA.I liken NASA today to a peacetime military, but then it gets thrown into battle, and you get rid of your McClellans and you bring in your Grants. In other words, you have a certain period of chaos and disorganization because you've got deadwood running the place, but under the stress of actually beginning a decisive mission and not being tolerant of anything less than real performance, you actually get the army you need.So that sounds like that's a presidential decision, to give that agency a very specific goal, and perhaps a timeline, to create that kind of purpose-driven culture.Yes. Now that's one necessity. There's another necessity as well, which is that the conceptual base of this program, the political base, if you will, which is derived from its intellectual base, has got to be expanded. This cannot be seen as a Trump-Musk boondoggle because Trump and Musk have both defined themselves in extremely partisan terms, and if this is seen as their program and not America's program, it will be gone as soon as the political fortunes of war shift, which they always do. Musk has this concept that he's been promoting, which is the reason why we have to go to Mars is so that there'll be survivors on Mars after the Earth is destroyed, and I don't think this is particularly —You don't find that a compelling reason, given that there's not currently an obvious threat of us being destroyed, to run a program that could necessarily exist over multiple administrations and be quite expensive.That idea is derived from Isaac Asimov's Foundation novel: The scientists go to the planet Terminus so they can reestablish civilization after the Galactic Empire collapsed. It may please science-fiction fans, but I don't think it's attractive to the general public, and also, frankly, I don't think it's practical. I don't think a Mars colony could have a million people on Mars that will survive as an autarchy. There's no nation on earth that survives as an autarchy. The ones that try are extremely poor as a result for trying.The correct reason to go to Mars is, immediately, for the science, to find out the truth about the prevalence of diversity of life in the universe; for the challenge, to challenge our youth, learn your science and you can be an explorer and maker of new worlds; and for the future, but for the future, it's not for a few survivors to be hiding away after the earth is destroyed, it's to create a new branch, or perhaps several new branches, of human civilization which will add their creative inventiveness to human progress as a whole, as America did for Western civilization. By establishing America, you had a new branch of Western civilization which experimented in everything from democracy to light bulbs and airplanes and greatly enhanced human progress as a result.And the Martians, you are going to have a group of technologically adept people in a frontier environment that's going to challenge them. They're going to come up with lots of inventions that they need for their own progress, but which will benefit human as a whole. And that is why you should colonize Mars.Cultural diversity on Mars (12:07)I believe that there will . . . be many colonies on Mars established by different people with different ideas on what the ideal civilization should be, and the ones with the best ideas will attract the most immigrants and therefore outgrow the rest.It very much reminds me of the scenario laid out in The Expanse book and TV series where mankind has spread throughout the solar system. They're all branches of human civilization, but being out there has changed people, and Mars is different than Earth. Mars has a different society. The culture is different. I think that's a very interesting reason that I had not heard Elon Musk discuss.I have a book called The New World on Mars, which you might want to check out because I discuss this very thing. I believe that there will, once it's possible to colonize Mars, there'll be many colonies on Mars established by different people with different ideas on what the ideal civilization should be, and the ones with the best ideas will attract the most immigrants and therefore outgrow the rest. So, for example, the one thing I disagree with about The Expanse is they have this militaristic Spartan civilization on Mars.There's just one sort of universal culture.Yeah, and I don't think that that civilization would attract many immigrants. The reason why the American North outgrew the South is because the North was free. That's why all the immigrants went to the North. That's why the North won the Civil War, actually. It had a larger population of more industry because all the immigrants went there and became far more creative. This is a very good thing, that the form of civilization that ultimately prevails on Mars will be one, I think, that will offer human freedom and be the most attractive in as many other respects as possible. That's why it will prevail, because it will attract immigrants.But I want to get back to this program. If it is possible not to land humans on Mars in 2028, but to land — if you can land Starship on Mars, you can land not a robot, but a robotic expedition.Starship, Musk claims it could land 100 tons on Mars. Let's say it could land 30. That's 30 times as much as we can currently land. The JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratory)-led Mars science community, they're still thinking about Mars exploration in the terms it's been done since the '60s, which is single spacecraft on single rockets. Imagine you can now land an entire expedition. You land 30 rovers on Mars along with 30 helicopters that are well instrumented and a well instrumented science lab in it. So now you are bringing not only heavy lift, but heavy lander capability to the Mars science program, and now you have a robotic expedition on Mars. For every instrument that made it onto perseverance, there were 10 that were proposed because they could only take six, and like 100 teams wanted to get their instruments on the rover. So imagine now we can actually land 30 rovers and 30 helicopters, not little ones like Ingenuity, but ones that can carry five or six instruments each themselves.So now you have 100 science teams, you've got life-detection experiments, you've got ground penetrating radar, you've got all sorts of things that we haven't done on Mars all being done. You're expanding Mars science by two orders of magnitude by bringing into existence the kind of transportation capability that is necessary to enable humans to Mars. So now you bring on board the science community and the science-interested public, which includes all parts of the political spectrum, but frankly it leans somewhat left, overall — university scientists, people like this.So now this isn't just about Elon Musk, the Bond villain. This is about what we as America and we as a culture which is committed to pushing the boundaries of science. This is what we are doing. It's not what SpaceX is doing, it's not what Musk is doing, it's not what Trump is doing, it's what America is doing, and celebrating the highest values of Western civilization, which is the search for truth.An alternative to the SpaceX strategy (16:02)Starship plus Starboat is the flight hardware combination that can do both the moon and Mars.That said — and we're talking about this being a public-private partnership —should we just default into thinking that the private part is SpaceX?Well, SpaceX is one part of it. There's no question, to me anyway —There's other companies that are building rockets, there's other rocket companies, maybe they aren't talking about Mars, but Blue Origin's building rockets.I think it should be fairly competed, but SpaceX is well ahead of anyone else in terms of a booster capability. That said, I think that the mission architecture that Musk has proposed, while workable, is not optimal, that there needs to be another vehicle here. He's got the Starship, I want to have a Starboat. I've written an article about this, which was just published in The New Atlantis.Basically, the problem with Musk's architecture is that the direct return from Mars using a Starship, which is a 100-ton vehicle, would require manufacturing 600 tons of methane oxygen on the surface of Mars, and if that's to be done in a reasonable amount of time, requires 600 kilowatts, which is about 13 football fields of solar panels, which means we're not doing it with solar panels, which means it has to be done with a nuke, and that then adds a lot to the development.If we had a Starboat, which is something 10 to 20 percent the size of Starship, but it would go from Mars orbit to the surface and we refuel it, and then it is what takes the crew down to the surface — although the crew could go one way to the surface in a Starship, that's okay, but whether they go down in a Starship or down in a Starboat, they come up in a Starboat, and now you're reducing the propellant requirement by an order of magnitude. It makes this whole thing work much better. And furthermore, Starship plus Starboat also enables the moon.We've forgotten about the moon in this conversation.Starship plus Starboat is the flight hardware combination that can do both the moon and Mars. If you take the Starship version of the Artemis thing, it takes 10 to 14 Starship launches to land a single crew on Mars refueling Starship on orbit, then refueling it in lunar orbit, and with tankers that have to be refueled in earth orbit, and doing all this, it's crazy. But if you positioned one Starship tanker in lunar orbit and then used that to refuel Starboats going up and down, you could do many missions to the lunar surface from a single Starship positioned in lunar orbit. Once again, Starship is suboptimal as an ascent vehicle to come back from the moon or Mars because it's so heavy. It's a hundred tons. The lunar excursion module we used in Apollo was two tons. So we make the Starboat — Starship plus Starboat gives you both the moon and Mars.Here's the thing: With rockets, you measure propulsion requirements in units we call delta V, velocity changes. That's what rockets actually do, they change your velocity, they accelerate you, they decelerate you. To go down from lunar orbit to the lunar surface is two kilometers a second. Delta V to come back up is two kilometers a second. Roundtrip is four. To go down from Mars orbit to the Martian surface is practically nothing because there's an atmosphere that'll slow you down without using your rocket. To come up is four. So the round trip on Mars and the round trip from orbit to the surface on the moon are the same, and therefore the same combination of the Starship plus the Starboat as a landing craft and, in particular, ascent vehicle (because ascent is where small is beautiful), this will give us both. So we don't have to wreck the moon program in order to do Mars. On the contrary, we can rationalize it.I mentioned one group of potential enemies this program has been the anti-Musk Democrats. The other group of enemies that this program has are the moon people who are very upset that their moon program is about to be wrecked because Musk says the moon is a diversion. Now, if it was a choice between the moon and Mars, then I would choose Mars. But we can do both. We can do both and without it being a diversion, because we can do both with the same ships.Artemis program reform (20:42)SLS was worth a lot in its time, but its time was the '90s, not now.There's been some talk about canceling — I'm not sure how serious it is — the Artemis program. If we want the next person on the moon to be an American rather than a Chinese, do we need to keep Artemis to make sure that happens?We need to reform Artemis and this is the way to do it: Starship plus Starboat will give you the moon.Aren't we under a time constraint, given that if we are competing and if we think for whatever national pride reasons we want the next person on the moon to be an American, do we just kind of have to continue with the Artemis program as sort of a wasteful boondoggle as it is?No, because there are things in the Artemis program that don't even make any sense whatsoever, like the lunar orbit gateway, which is simply not necessary. The SLS (Space Launch System) as a launch vehicle is not necessary now that we have Starship. SLS made a lot of sense when it was first proposed in the late 1980s under a different name. I happen to know that because, as a young engineer, I was on the design team that did the preliminary design for what we now call SLS at Martin Marietta in 1988. And it was really just a simplification of the Space Shuttle, and if it had been developed in flying by the mid-'90s, as was entirely reasonable, it could have had a great role in giving us massively improved space capabilities over the past quarter-century. But they let this thing go so slowly that by the time it has appeared, it's obsolescent, and it's as if someone had stalled the development of the P-51 fighter plane so it wasn't available during World War I, but it's just showing up now in a world of jet fighters — this is worthless. Well, it was worth a lot in its time. SLS was worth a lot in its time, but its time was the '90s, not now.Orion doesn't really make that much sense, and the National Team lander would make sense if it was modified to be Starboat. What happened was NASA gave the contract to SpaceX to use Starship as a lunar lander, and it can be, but it's suboptimal. In any case, the National Team, which was Lockheed, and Boeing, and Blue Origin, they complained, but basically their complaint was, “We want a contract too or we won't be your friends.” And so they had sufficient political heft to get themselves a contract. The least NASA could have done is insist that the lander they were getting a contract for run on methane-oxygen, the same propellant as Starship, so Starship could service it as a tanker. Instead, they let them do their own thing and they've got a hydrogen-oxygen rocket, which makes no sense! It's like someone going to the Air Force and proposing a fighter plane that runs on propane and saying, “Well, I can make a fighter run on propane, but my tankers use jet fuel.” Air Force, being sensible, insists that all their planes run on the same fuels. They don't just let someone come along and use whatever fuel they like. So the National Team contract should be changed to a Starboat contract, and the requirements should be interoperability with Starship.The myth of an independent Mars (24:17)We go to Mars not out of despair, we go to Mars out of hope, and by establishing new branches of human civilization, they'll be able to do all sorts of things.As we finish up, I just want to quickly jump back to something you mentioned earlier about autarchy. Do you think it's possible to have a thriving, successful, sustainable Mars colony that's on its own?No. I don't think it's possible to have a thriving, successful nation on earth that's on its own. This is why I think Trump's trade war is a big mistake. It will damage our economy. Now, obviously, we can survive a trade war better than a Mars —That's what Musk is also suggesting in its whole light of consciousness that we need to be able to establish sustainable, permanent colonies elsewhere that can be just fine without a relationship with Earth.I think that's incorrect, and as you know, since you are an expert in economics, it's nonsensical. I don't think a colony of one million people would have the division of labor to build anything like an iPhone or even an iPhone battery if you think of the complexity of what is involved.There's this famous essay, “I, Pencil,” which I'm sure you're acquainted with. An economist went through all the different things that went into —Yes, Milton Friedman used that example famously. I think I get your point.iPhones are more complex than pencils. I mean, you probably could build a pencil with a million-person city, but we need to build things more complicated than that. But that's not the point here, that's not why we're going on. And I object to this. It's the Masque of the Red Death theory of how you're going to survive a plague: We'll have our castle and we can go into it and we'll be fine. No, it's extremely unattractive and it's false. The people in that castle in the Masque of the Red Death, the Edgar Allen Poe story, did not survive the plague, and it's not why we should go to Mars. We go to Mars not out of despair, we go to Mars out of hope, and by establishing new branches of human civilization, they'll be able to do all sorts of things.America developed steamboats because we needed inland transportation because the only highways we had were rivers, and so forth, and so we've been an engine of invention. Mars is going to be an engine of invention. Mars is going to want to have not just nuclear reactors, but breeder reactors, and they're going to want to have fusion power because deuterium is five times as common on Mars as it is on earth, and they're going to be electrolyzing water all the time as part of their life-support system, which means releasing hydrogen, making deuterium separation very cheap, and one could go down this kind of thing. There's all sorts of things that a Martian civilization would develop, to say nothing of the fact that a spacefaring civilization will have the capability to divert asteroids so that they don't impact the earth. So that's why we're going to Mars. We increase the creative capacity of humanity to deal with all challenges raging from asteroid impacts to epidemics.Our current timeline (27:21). . . if you have your first humans on Mars in early 2030s, I think we can have a permanent Mars base by the end of that decade . . .So let me just finish up with this, and I think as far as a justification for going to Mars, that's about the most persuasive I know, and maybe I'm an easy audience, but I'm persuaded.Let's set aside just putting an astronaut or a few astronauts on the moon and bringing them home, and let's set aside the permanent, sustainable, solo, doesn't-need-Earth colony. Just as far as having a sort of a permanent outpost, what do you think is the reasonable timeframe, both technologically and given the politics?I do think, if we do what I am arguing for, which is to make it the mission of this administration to not only just land a Starship on Mars, but land a Starship on Mars bringing a massive robotic expedition to Mars, and then following that up with several more robotic landings to Mars that prepare a base, set up the power system, et cetera, then yes, I think landing the first humans on Mars in 2033 is entirely reasonable. What the Trump administration needs to do is get this program going to the point where people look at this and say, “This is working, this is going to be great, it's already great, let's follow through.”And then, if you have your first humans on Mars in early 2030s, I think we can have a permanent Mars base by the end of that decade, by 2040, a base with 20–30 people on it. A human expedition to Mars doesn't need to grow food. You can just bring your food for a two-year expedition, and you should. You establish a base of 10 or 20 to 30, 50 people, you want to set up greenhouses, you want to be growing food. Then you start developing the technologies to make things like glass, plastic, steel, aluminum on Mars so you can build greenhouses on Mars, and you start establishing an agricultural base, and now you can support 500 people on Mars, and then now the amount of things you can do on Mars greatly expands, and as you build up your industrial and agricultural base, and of course your technologies for actually implementing things on Mars become ever more advanced, now it becomes possible to start thinking about establishing colonies.So that's another thing. Musk's idea that we're going to colonize Mars by landing 1,000 Starships on Mars, each with a hundred people, and now you've got a hundred thousand people on Mars, kind of like D-Day, we landed 130,000 men on the Normandy Beach on D-Day, and then another 100,000 the next day, and so forth. You could do that because you had Liberty Ships that could cross the English Channel in six hours with 10,000 tons of cargo each. The Starship takes eight months to get to Mars, or six, and it takes a 100 tons. You can't supply Mars from Earth. You have to supply Mars from Mars, beyond very small numbers, and that means that the colonization of Mars is not going to be like the D-Day landing, it's going to be more like the colonization of America, which started with tiny colonies, which as they developed, created the crafts and the farms, and ultimately the industries that could support, ultimately, a nation of 300 million people.On sale everywhere The Conservative Futurist: How To Create the Sci-Fi World We Were PromisedMicro Reads▶ Economics* Why the Fed's Job May Get a Lot More Difficult - NYT* America's Economic Exceptionalism Is on Thin Ice - Bberg Opinion* Trump Is Undermining What Made the American Economy Great - NYT Opinion* Don't Look to the Fed for the Answer to Stagflation - Bberg Opinion▶ Business* Inside Google's Two-Year Frenzy to Catch Up With OpenAI - Wired* Some Nvidia Customers Are OK With Older Chips - WSJ* SoftBank to Buy Ampere, a Silicon Valley Chip Start-Up, for $6.5 Billion - NYT* Nvidia CEO Says He Was Surprised That Publicly Held Quantum Firms Exist - Bberg* The promise of the fifth estate is being squeezed - FT* Boeing Beats Lockheed for Next-Gen US Fighter Jet Contract - Bberg▶ Policy/Politics* Six Ways to Understand DOGE and Predict Its Future Behavior - Cato* Government Science Data May Soon Be Hidden. They're Racing to Copy It. - NYT* Stopping Child Porn Online Is a Worthy Goal. But Beware the Proposed Cure - WSJ▶ AI/Digital* Mini-satellite paves the way for quantum messaging anywhere on Earth - Nature* The Impact of GenAI on Content Creation – Evidence from Music Videos - SSRN* AI weather forecast project eyes access through desktop computers - FT▶ Biotech/Health* Why a weight-loss drug could become a geopolitical bargaining chip - FT* We've entered a forever war with bird flu - The Verge* Doctors Told Him He Was Going to Die. Then A.I. Saved His Life. - NYT▶ Clean Energy/Climate* Inside a new quest to save the “doomsday glacier” - MIT* Glaciers are melting at record speed, says UN - Semafor▶ Robotics/AVs* Disney's Robotic Droids Are the Toast of Silicon Valley - WSJ* The fantasy of humanoid robots misses the point - FT▶ Space/Transportation* The ax has become an important part of the Space Force's arsenal - Ars* NASA Won't Let Starliner Die Just Yet, Even After Boeing's Space Fiasco - Gizmodo* How Warp Drives Don't Break Relativity - Universe Today▶ Up Wing/Down Wing* Japan Urgently Needs an AI Vibe Shift - Bberg Opinion* What left-wing critics don't get about abundance - Niskanen Center▶ Substacks/NewslettersWhat is Vibe Coding? - AI SupremacyFaster, Please! is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

Astronomy Daily - The Podcast: S04E10Welcome to another thrilling episode of Astronomy Daily, your daily source for the latest updates in space exploration and astronomical discoveries. I'm Anna, and today we have an exciting lineup of stories that highlight the dynamic and rapidly evolving nature of our universe.Highlights:- SpaceX's Starship Test Flight Preparations: SpaceX is gearing up for a groundbreaking test flight with its next Starship, featuring crucial upgrades and a planned recovery attempt of the Super Heavy Booster. This mission marks a significant step towards operational capabilities, with up to 25 launches planned this year.- NASA JPL's Challenges Amid Wildfires: The Eaton Fire near Los Angeles has severely impacted the JPL community, with over 150 employees losing their homes. Despite these challenges, essential operations continue, showcasing the resilience of our space exploration infrastructure.- Mars at Its Brightest: Stargazers can look forward to a spectacular view of Mars this weekend as it makes its closest approach to Earth. This rare event offers a prime opportunity for observation, coinciding with Mars's opposition.- World's First Wooden Satellite: Lignosat, the first wooden satellite, has been deployed from the ISS. This innovative experiment in sustainable space technology could pave the way for environmentally friendly spacecraft construction.- Double Flash Event from a Black Hole: Astronomers have observed a rare double flare event from a supermassive black hole, providing new insights into these cosmic giants. This celestial performance offers a unique opportunity to study black hole interactions with stars.For more cosmic updates, visit our website at astronomydaily.io. Join our community on social media by searching for #AstroDailyPod on Facebook, X, Tumblr, YouTubeMusic, and TikTok. Share your thoughts and connect with fellow space enthusiasts.Thank you for tuning in. This is Anna signing off. Until next time, keep looking up and stay curious about the wonders of our universe.00:00 - Astronomy Daily brings you the latest in space and astronomy news00:46 - SpaceX has successfully stacked their next Starship rocket for Flight 7 on Monday02:46 - NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory is close to the raging Eaton Fire04:52 - Mars will make its closest approach to Earth this Sunday, January 12th06:56 - World's first wooden satellite has been successfully deployed from the International Space Station09:15 - Supermassive black hole SN22CI displays two flares as it consumes star11:37 - Astronomy Daily brings you the latest developments in space and astronomy news✍️ Episode ReferencesSpaceX[SpaceX](https://www.spacex.com/)NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory[NASA JPL](https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/)International Space Station[ISS](https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/main/index.html)Kyoto University[Kyoto University](https://www.kyoto-u.ac.jp/en)Sumitomo Forestry[Sumitomo Forestry](https://sfc.jp/english/)Mars opposition[Mars Opposition](https://mars.nasa.gov/all-about-mars/night-sky/opposition/)Artemis program[NASA Artemis](https://www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis/)Sagittarius A[Sagittarius A](https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/multimedia/sagittariusA.html)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-the-podcast--5648921/support.

In 2025, we're predicting a BIG year for human space progress! In this episode we're breaking down what we're looking forward to, and adding some of our own predictions as well. It's going to be a wild year with so much to follow, like SpaceX, Starship, NASA Artemis, the New pick for NASA Administrator, Crew Dragon, Boeing Starliner, Virgin Galactic, Blue Origin, space stations and more! Not to mention our thoughts on other Global space programs, including Russia, India, and China. This year will be one for the record books, we can feel it. Let's enjoy history as it's happening and dive into 2025 the year of human space progress! Happy New Year & May you find Mental and Physical Wealth this year Get 45% off the Magic Mind bundle with with my link: https://www.magicmind.com/SPACEJAN #magicmind #mentalwealth #mentalperformance Alex G. Orphanos Topics: human space progress, SpaceX Starship, stainless steel, orbital refueling, mental wealth, NASA Artemis, Crew Dragon, Boeing Starliner, Virgin Galactic, Blue Origin, SpaceX launches, NASA strategy, space stations, space exploration, space technology Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction 00:40 SpaceX's Starship and Its Impact on Human Space Progress 05:33 NASA's Role and the Commercial Crew Program 12:50 NASA Artemis and Future Space Missions 15:04 Global Space Programs and Predictions for 2025 19:41 AG3D Printing, The Part Detective, and Future Plans -------------------------- Here's to building a fantastic future - and continued progress in Space (and humanity)!  Spread Love, Spread Science Alex G. Orphanos We'd like to thank our sponsors: AG3D Printing Follow us: @todayinspacepod on Instagram/Twitter @todayinspace on TikTok /TodayInSpacePodcast on Facebook Support the podcast: • Buy a 3D printed gift from our shop - ag3dprinting.etsy.com • Get a free quote on your next 3D printing project at ag3d-printing.com • Donate at todayinspace.net #space #rocket #podcast #people #spacex #eva #science #3dprinting #nasa #vanallenbelts #spacetravel #spaceexploration #spacecraft #technology #aerospace #spacetechnology #engineer #stem #artemis #polarisprogram #3dprinting #polarisdawn #astronaut #3dprinted #spacewalk #crewdragon #falcon9 #elonmusk #starship #superheavybooster #blueorigin #newglenn #rocket #jaredisaacman #nasaadministrator #nasahistory #spaceshuttle  

BEST OF - New details emerge about the Wisconsin school shooter, Luigi Mangione indicted on multiple chargers, a NJ mayor explains how mystery drones may be related to missing radioactive material, update on NASA Artemis moon mission, and Rick Scott supports RFK, Jr.

Astronomy Daily - The Podcast: S03E225Welcome to Astronomy Daily, your Daily dose of space and Astronomy news. I'm your host, Anna, and we've got an absolutely packed show for you today with some incredible developments from across the space sector.Highlights:- Vega C Rocket Launch Triumph: Celebrate Europe's successful return to space with the Vega C rocket launch from Kourou, marking a critical milestone in European space independence and resilience.- Artemis Moon Mission Delays: Delve into NASA's revised timeline for the Artemis program, including safety considerations and the financial scope of returning humans to the moon.- Mysterious Planet X Evidence: Explore groundbreaking research from Princeton University that bolsters the likelihood of a mysterious Planet X in our solar system, potentially revolutionizing our cosmic understanding.- Hubble's Quasar Revelation: Marvel at the Hubble Space Telescope's unprecedented observations of Quasar 3C273, offering new insights into these energetic cosmic phenomena.- Curiosity Rover's Next Mars Mission: Discover the Curiosity rover's upcoming exploration of massive spiderweb formations on Mars, promising to shed light on the planet's watery past.- Artemis Heat Shield Investigation: Learn about NASA's findings on the Artemis heat shield performance and the solutions driving improvements for future missions.For more cosmic updates, visit our website at astronomydaily.io. Sign up for our free Daily newsletter to stay informed on all things space. Join our community on social media by searching for #AstroDailyPod on Facebook, X, YouTubeMusic, Tumblr, and TikTok. Share your thoughts and connect with fellow space enthusiasts.Thank you for tuning in. This is Anna signing off. Until next time, keep looking up and stay curious about the wonders of our universe.✍️ Episode ReferencesVega C rocket[ESA Vega-C](https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Transportation/Vega-C)NASA Artemis program[NASA Artemis](https://www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis/)Hubble Space Telescope[Hubble](https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/main/index.html)Curiosity rover[Mars Curiosity Rover](https://mars.nasa.gov/msl/home/)Princeton University[Princeton University](https://www.princeton.edu/)Vera C. Rubin Observatory[Rubin Observatory](https://www.lsst.org/)Copernicus Earth Observation program[Copernicus](https://www.copernicus.eu/en)Quasar 3C273[Quasar 3C273](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3C_273)Wind Cave National Park[Wind Cave National Park](https://www.nps.gov/wica/index.htm)Astronomy Daily[Astronomy Daily](https://astronomydaily.io)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-the-podcast--5648921/support.

Il complotto dello sbarco sulla luna è un argomento di grande interesse e dibattito. Molti si chiedono: siamo stati davvero sulla luna? L'allunaggio dell'Apollo 11 del 1969 è spesso al centro di teorie complottiste, con alcuni che sostengono che lo sbarco sulla luna sia stato falsificato. Massimo Mazzucco, con il suo documentario sul finto sbarco sulla luna è fra i nomi più noti associati a queste teorie. Questi teorici sostengono che l'intera missione Apollo 11 e le successive siano state orchestrata per vincere la corsa spaziale durante la Guerra Fredda. La verità sullo sbarco sulla luna è ancora argomento di discussione: sbarco sulla luna vero o falso? La NASA ha sempre difeso l'autenticità delle missioni Apollo, fornendo prove e testimonianze a sostegno del fatto che l'uomo sulla luna è una realtà. Nonostante ciò, il complotto della luna persiste, alimentato da documentari e discussioni online. La domanda "siamo stati sulla luna?" continua a stimolare la curiosità e la ricerca di verità. FONTI • Grimes DR. On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 26;11(1):e0147905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147905. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151003. PMID: 26812482; PMCID: PMC4728076. • La società irrazionale, CENSIS, https://www.censis.it/rapporto-annuale/la-societ%C3%A0-irrazionale • Luna? Sì, ci siamo andati. Paolo Attivissimo, https://lunasicisiamoandati.blogspot.com/ • SpaceX Official Website https://www.spacex.com/vehicles/starship/ • NASA Artemis https://www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis/ • Massimo Polidoro, Pensa come uno scienziato, PIEMME Editore • NASA SLS Fact Sheet, https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/space-launch-system/sls-fact-sheets/ • NASA Orion Fact Sheet, https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/orion-spacecraft/orion-fact-sheets/ • Apollo by the numbers, https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4029.pdf • The Apollo Archive, https://apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html • Massimo Polidoro, Geniale, Feltrinelli Editore • Canale YouTube di Chiaro&Semplice __________________

Baylin Technologies CEO Leighton Carroll joined Steve Darling from Proactive to announce that the company's subsidiary, Advantech Wireless Technologies, has received significant orders totaling $2.25 million. These orders, placed by a major sports and entertainment satellite broadcaster and services provider, include C-Band and Ku-Band Solid State Power Block (SSPB) amplifiers. Carroll highlighted that the C-Band portion of the order comprises Gallium Nitride-based Dakota SSPBs, which will be mounted on vehicles to enhance the broadcaster's mobile network. Additionally, the high-power 500W Genesis-HP Ku-Band Block-Up Converters are slated for installation at the customer's master teleport facility. Advantech's products were selected for their resilient architecture and unique software capabilities, which meet the high demands of the broadcasting industry. Carroll explained how these divisions are crucial for the company's growth, noting that their satellite communications technology supports major events like the NFL Super Bowl and the NASA Artemis lunar mission. He emphasized the importance of Baylin Technologies' unique intellectual property and how it differentiates the company in competitive markets. Carroll also shared the company's financial performance for the second quarter of 2024. Baylin Technologies reported revenue of $22 million, marking an increase of $0.7 million or 3.4% compared to the same quarter in 2023. This also represents a substantial rise of $1.9 million or 9.9% from the first quarter of 2024. Furthermore, the company achieved an adjusted EBITDA of $2.3 million in Q2 2024, an impressive increase of $1.2 million or 116% compared to Q2 2023. This also reflects a significant growth of $1.8 million or 394% compared to the first quarter of 2024. This recent success underscores Baylin Technologies' growing influence in the satellite communications market, driven by Advantech Wireless Technologies' cutting-edge solutions and strong market demand. #proactiveinvestors #baylintechnologiesinc #tsx #byl #LeightonCarroll #TechInnovation #SatelliteCommunications #WirelessInfrastructure #EmbeddedSystems #TechGrowth #CorporateStrategy #BusinessTurnaround #ProactiveInvestor #invest #investing #investment #investor #stockmarket #stocks #stock #stockmarketnews

How do you go from a small town in Colorado to being a scientist-astronaut candidate in Australia? And how can you make space accessible for disabled astronauts? To find out, Dr. Charles Liu and co-host Allen Liu welcome scientist-astronaut candidate Celene Shimmen.   As always, though, we start off with the day's joyfully cool cosmic thing, the new study using the James Webb Space Telescope that disproves the detection of tryptophan, a complex amino acid, in the interstellar cloud IC 348. Or, as Chuck jokes, no sleepy turkeys in space.   Then we get to meet Celene Shimmen, who is a scientist-astronaut candidate in Australia. She's a physical therapy student who is already putting her research to work in the space industry.   Celene describes how she recently designed and implemented the Lower Extremity Motor Coordination Test in Microgravity for AstroAccess, a project she works with dedicated to promoting disability inclusion in human space exploration by paving the way for disabled astronauts. (You may remember Cady Coleman talking about working with AstroAccess in our recent episode, Sharing Space with Astronaut Cady Coleman, Part 1. You'll hear about Celene's acceptance into the scientist-astronaut training program for suborbital missions with the International Institute of Astronautical Sciences, beginning in 2023. She tells us about her upcoming parabolic flight where she'll be the principal investigator testing balance differences after acute exposure to weightlessness. Chuck asks whether the “Vomit Comet” is aptly named – Celene explains that she'll have to let us know, since her upcoming flight will have 16 periods of microgravity. Our first question comes from Anne, who asks, “What are some psychological or physical traits that make for a good astronaut?” Celene highlights the importance of training for strength, endurance, balance, and cardiovascular fitness, especially for upcoming, long-term missions on the moon. It turns out that while the moon has lower gravity, the encumbrance of spacesuits requires greater strength and endurance. Allen explains that lesser gravity doesn't mitigate some aspects of force and inertia that also require physical strength. Celene describes the psychological aspects of being an astronaut, and the need for mental resilience to cope with isolation and stressful situations, as well as problem solving skills and the ability to work as part of a team. You'll also find out about Celene's journey from growing up in a single-wide trailer in a town of 1000 residents in Colorado to studying hospitality in the Disney College Program in Florida, where she met her Australian husband. After watching “First Man”, the movie about Neil Armstrong, Celene decided she wanted to get into the space program. She applied to and was accepted by the Melbourne Space Program, working on a nano-satellite program. She also helped a humanoid robot take its first step, which inspired her to get involved with physiotherapy and the human body in space. Our next question is from “anonymous”: What part of the human body is most vulnerable in space? Celene explains that extended exposure to microgravity leads to muscle atrophy and bone density loss, which is still a big issue even with ongoing exercise. Even just a 14-day stay in space leaves returning astronauts with muscle weakness. Finally, we hear about Celene's desire to be deployed to the moon, should the opportunity arise. Upcoming lunar missions to the moon will likely last about 30 days each, including 7 days of activity on the lunar surface. If you'd like to reach out to Celene and chat, you can follow her on Instagram @spaceptcelene and on LinkedIn and Facebook as Celene Shimmen. You can also find out more about AstroAccess here. We hope you enjoy this episode of The LIUniverse, and, if you do, please support us on Patreon.   Credits for Images Used in this Episode: – JWST image of IC 348, a star cluster wreathed in dusty gas. – NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Kevin Luhman (PSU), Catarina Alves de Oliveira (ESA) – The different gravity phases during a parabolic flight. – ESA – 2013 parabolic flight for astronaut trainees on a NASA C-9 aircraft – NASA – Astronaut Jim Irwin at the Apollo 15 mission's Hadley-Apennine lunar landing site. – NASA – Humanoid Robot developed by students in the Melbourne Space Program – University of Melbourne, Australia – Participants in NASA's 30-day bed rest study must maintain a six-degree head-down tilt at all times. – NASA – Concept animation of NASA Artemis astronauts exploring the lunar South Pole. – NASA   #TheLIUniverse #CharlesLiu #AllenLiu #SciencePodcast #AstronomyPodcast #CeleneShimmen #CeleneMerazBenavente #microgravity #weightlessness #AstroAccess #JamesWebbSpaceTelescope #tryptophan #IC348 #spaceexploration #VomitComet #gravity #astronaut #astronauttraining #MelbourneSpaceProgram #physiotherapy #physicaltherapy #muscleatrophy #bonedensityloss #lunarmission #InternationalInstituteofAstronauticalSciences

目前猶無人看過月球按呢踅。這是因為月球去予潮汐力鎖 tī 地球，所以才會一直是 仝一爿面對咱。毋過，利用 現代數位技術，咱會當 kā 月球探測軌道衛星 (LRO) 送轉來 ê 懸解析度影像鬥起來，造出這支 月球自轉 ê 短片。這支 縮時攝影影片 是 ùi 地球 定定看著 ê 月球這爿 開始。毋過，真緊就會出現地球較歹看著 ê 東方海，這是一个足大 ê 隕石坑，就 tī 月球赤道下面。影片 kā 月球自轉一個月 ê 時間濃縮做 24 秒。咱會當看著面對地球這爿 ê 月娘 有足濟 較暗 ê 月海，月球後壁彼爿主要是較光 ê 高原。目前有足濟國家 kah 公司 當咧開發新 ê 月球計畫，攏總超過 32 个。其中包括 NASA ê Artemis 計畫，這主要是欲 tī 紲落來幾若年內 kā 人類送去哩月球。 ——— 這是 NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day ê 台語文 podcast 原文版：https://apod.nasa.gov/ 台文版：https://apod.tw/ 今仔日 ê 文章： https://apod.tw/daily/20240602/ 影像：NASA, LRO, Arizona State U. 音樂：P!SCO - 鼎鼎 聲優：阿錕 翻譯：An-Li Tsai (NSYSU) 原文：https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap240602.html Powered by Firstory Hosting

Astroscale's Active Debris Removal demo satellite the ADRAS-J closes in on its target. Boeing and NASA are proceeding with plans for the CST-100 Starliner spacecraft's first Crew Flight Test following a Flight Test Readiness Review. True Anomaly has let go of as much as 25% of its workforce and canceled its summer intern programs, and more. Remember to leave us a 5-star rating and review in your favorite podcast app. Miss an episode? Sign-up for our weekly intelligence roundup, Signals and Space, and you'll never miss a beat. And be sure to follow T-Minus on LinkedIn and Instagram. T-Minus Guest Our guest today is Matthew Cosby, Director of Space Engineering at Goonhilly Earth Station. You can connect with Matthew on LinkedIn and learn more about Goonhilly on their website. Selected Reading Astroscale Unveils World's First Image of Space Debris Captured through Rendezvous and Proximity Operations Astroscale Japan Selected for Phase II of JAXA's Commercial Removal of Debris Demonstration Program ispace-U.S. Announces Official Launch Of Data Relay Service Enabled By Two Relay Satellites Shenzhou-18 astronauts enter space station, in-orbit handover to be completed in five daysA NASA gives Starliner ‘go to proceed' Defense startup True Anomaly lays off around 25%, cancels summer internship- TechCrunch Agile Space Industries to provide propulsion capability for True Anomaly to enable dynamic space operations L3Harris Technologies Reports Strong First Quarter 2024 Results, Increases 2024 Profitability Guidance | Business Wire Gravitics Awarded US Space Force Contract for Tactically Responsive Space Development NASA Finds New Homes for Artemis Generation of 'Moon Trees' Across US ISS National Lab-Sponsored Research Could Produce Nanomaterials for Life-Saving Therapies and Precision Drug Delivery Lego reveals NASA Artemis rocket, Milky Way galaxy sets coming in May- Space T-Minus Crew Survey We want to hear from you! Please complete our 4 question survey. It'll help us get better and deliver you the most mission-critical space intel every day. Want to hear your company in the show? You too can reach the most influential leaders and operators in the industry. Here's our media kit. Contact us at space@n2k.com to request more info. Want to join us for an interview? Please send your pitch to space-editor@n2k.com and include your name, affiliation, and topic proposal. T-Minus is a production of N2K Networks, your source for strategic workforce intelligence. © N2K Networks, Inc. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Join with me today as we look at the recent successful splashdown of the first crew-able spacecraft to travel to the Moon and back in nearly 50 years. This mission will open the doorway to distant planets. What did it do over the course of its nearly 26-day journey? The answer to that gains us a fascinating insight into how close we are to having a human on the moon once more.Welcome to the Astrum Sleep Space podcast; the perfect place to come and wind down for the evening while you learn more about the grandeur of the universe. I'm Alex McColgan, the founder of the Astrum brand, and your host on this podcast. Come and listen as I tell you about incredible missions, fascinating discoveries, and everything I've come to love about space.If you like what you're listening to, be sure to check out my YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/@astrumspace for more great space content.

As part of NASA's Artemis campaign to return humans to the Moon for the benefit of all, the agency is working with SpaceX to develop the company's Starship human landing system (HLS), which will land astronauts near the Moon's South Pole during the Artemis III and Artemis IV missions. On March 14, SpaceX launched the third integrated flight test of its Super Heavy booster and Starship upper stage, an important milestone toward providing NASA with a Starship HLS for its Artemis missions.

Ùi 遙遠世界看著 ê 地球 kah 月娘會是啥款？雖罔講 in 定定 做伙 翕，毋閣這兩个逐家熟似 ê 組合 tī 這張相片 是 ùi 無仝角度翕--ê。這張是 2022 年底 NASA Artemis 1 號 任務 ê 獵戶座機器人太空船 踅 到 月球後壁 翕 倒轉來 地球這爿。地球 ê 直徑是 月球 ê 4 倍，相片內底 ê 月娘 較大粒，是因為太空艙 較倚 月球。Artemis 2 號 是 NASA Artemis 系列計畫 ê 後一个任務，目前按算欲 tī 2025 年 kā 人類送到月球附近。紲落來 ê Artemis 3 號 是按算欲 tī 2026 年底 kā 人類送到月球表面。頂禮拜，日本 JAXA ê SLIM 機器人 太空船 ùi 日本 發射，降落 tī 月球 頂懸，閣囥 2 台會趒 ê 探測車 tī 遐。 ——— 這是 NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day ê 台語文 podcast 原文版：https://apod.nasa.gov/ 台文版：https://apod.tw/ 今仔日 ê 文章： https://apod.tw/daily/20240124/ 影像來源：NASA, Artemis I 資料處理：Andy Saunders 音樂：P!SCO - 鼎鼎 聲優：阿錕 翻譯：An-Li Tsai (NSYSU) 原文：https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap240124.html Powered by Firstory Hosting

At NASA's Kennedy Space Center, a flurry of activity surrounds the preparations for the upcoming Artemis II mission, now slated for September 2025 following a recent delay. The mission, a cornerstone in NASA's ambitious plan to return humans to the lunar surface, relies on the seamless integration of the Orion spacecraft and the mighty Space Launch System (SLS) rocket. The Exploration Ground Systems (EGS) program is at the forefront of these preparations, meticulously finalizing the new ground systems essential for crewed launches.

In this episode, Corey, Jason, Nick, and Christian catch up after a long winter break and discuss their recent nerdy activities. They also review the winners of the Golden Globe Awards and highlight some new categories. The conversation then shifts to the highlights of CES 2024, including a CPR dummy that can simulate realistic reactions. In this part of the conversation, the hosts discuss various innovative products showcased at CES 2024. They cover topics such as medical simulation with AdamX, the Rosa Smart Stroller, the Aroma Shooter Wearable, the wireless transparent OLED TV, the Mouthpad as a mouse, and the Bollie robot. They also talk about the delays in NASA's Artemis Moon program and the inclusion of Marvel Netflix shows in the official MCU timeline. The hosts emphasize the importance of street-level heroes in making the MCU relatable to the audience. They also speculate on the appearance of Daredevil in the show and whether it indicates a continuation of the Netflix series. The hosts then talk about the announcement of a new Star Wars movie centered around The Mandalorian and Grogu, and the potential for it to be the next Star Wars film to hit theaters.Chapters:00:00 - Intro and catchup15:23 - Golden Globes 2024 recap21:46 - CES 2024 intro23:14 - AdamX CPR dummy28:15 - Rosa Smart Stroller33:28 - Aroma Shooter35:28 - LG's transparent OLED tv37:51 - Mouthpad controller41:28 - Ballie robot47:50 - NASA Artemis missions delayed53:20 - Netflix Marvel shows are MCU cannon01:03:16 - Mandalorian and Grogu movie01:11:29 - Outro

On this episode, Todd talks about NASA Artemis missions, Cape Cod chips, and next weeks 4 year anniversary celebration. Follow The Toddcast only on Instagram @the_toddcast_. Subscribe to my YouTube channel https://youtube.com/channel/UCFWiuH85dfAy1703YZbKsFQ

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has released a report indicating that NASA's highly anticipated Artemis III moon landing, originally scheduled for late 2025, is likely to be postponed until at least 2027. This delay is attributed to slower-than-expected progress in the development of both the Human Landing System (HLS) by SpaceX and new lunar spacesuits by Axiom Space. The report, released on November 30, provides a comprehensive analysis of the challenges and setbacks that have impacted the Artemis program, a cornerstone of NASA's efforts to return humans to the lunar surface for the first time since 1972.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has released a report indicating that NASA's highly anticipated Artemis III moon landing, originally scheduled for late 2025, is likely to be postponed until at least 2027. This delay is attributed to slower-than-expected progress in the development of both the Human Landing System (HLS) by SpaceX and new lunar spacesuits by Axiom Space. The report, released on November 30, provides a comprehensive analysis of the challenges and setbacks that have impacted the Artemis program, a cornerstone of NASA's efforts to return humans to the lunar surface for the first time since 1972. The GAO's findings highlight several critical issues with the HLS development under SpaceX. The report notes that the project has encountered various challenges, including a condensed timeline, delayed development milestones, and extensive technical work still required. The report suggests that the pace of progress on HLS is slower than expected, with more than half the allocated schedule consumed just to reach the preliminary design review phase. This lag contrasts with the average progression rate for major NASA projects, which typically complete this phase within 35% of their overall timelines.

#BESTOF2022: #HotelMars: NASA, Artemis, Risk Tolerance and the Lost Golden Age of the 1960s. Rand Simberg, author, Safe Is Not an Option. Safe Is Not an Option Paperback – October 31, 2013  by  Rand E. Simberg  (Author), William Simon  (Editor), Ed Lu  (Foreword) https://www.amazon.com/Safe-Not-Option-Rand-Simberg/dp/0989135519/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= The history of exploration and establishment of new lands, science and technologies has always entailed risk to the health and lives of the explorers. Yet, when it comes to exploring and developing the high frontier of space, the harshest frontier ever, the highest value is apparently not the accomplishment of those goals, but of minimizing, if not eliminating, the possibility of injury or death of the humans carrying them out.  For decades since the end of Apollo, human spaceflight has been very expensive and relatively rare (about 500 people total, with a death rate of about 4%), largely because of this risk aversion on the part of the federal government and culture. From the Space Shuttle, to the International Space Station, the new commercial crew program to deliver astronauts to it, and the regulatory approach for commercial spaceflight providers, our attitude toward safety has been fundamentally irrational, expensive and even dangerous, while generating minimal accomplishment for maximal cost.  This book entertainingly explains why this means that we must regulate passenger safety in the new commercial spaceflight industry with a lighter hand than many might instinctively prefer, that NASA must more carefully evaluate rewards from a planned mission to rationally determine how much should be spent to avoid the loss of participants, and that Congress must stop insisting that safety is the highest priority, for such insistence is an eloquent testament to how unimportant they and the nation consider the opening of this new frontier. 1963

Today is really special, because it's the 100th episode of The Unlock Moment podcast. Joining me in this special centenary episode is a fantastic guest, NASA astronaut Dr Charlie Camarda. He's a world-leading expert in how to get to space and back in one piece, and he doesn't hold back here in his views on the NASA culture, what has and hasn't been learned since the Columbia shuttle disaster of 2003 and where there still needs to be focus in order to keep the astronauts safe.Dialling in today from near Port Canaveral in Florida, where he's been watching Space-X launches with the family, Charlie is an American engineer and NASA astronaut who spent almost 14 days in space in 2005 aboard Space Shuttle Discovery, in the “Return to Flight” shuttle mission, the first shuttle flight after the Columbia disaster in 2003, in which the shuttle broke up on re-entry killing all seven astronauts on board.After his space flight, Charlie was Director of Engineering at NASA's Johnson Space Center and was then Senior Advisor for Innovation to the Office of the Chief Engineer, NASA Headquarters. Charlie retired from NASA in 2019. He holds a doctorate in engineering, 9 patents and over 20 national and international awards.We're going to hear about his journey through life, and through space, his leading role in the Columbia disaster investigation and his perspective on the culture at NASA and how mistakes can start to creep in in high stakes scenarios. And he'll bring to life his visionary work to inspire children across the world to get involved in space science, through his Epic Education Foundation.Let's get into orbit with Dr Charlie Camarda!--Dr Charlie Camarda - Epic Education Foundation: https://epiceducationfoundation.org/

這張是 Neil Armstrong 咧 翕 Buzz Aldrin 徛 tī 月球頂懸 ê 相片。經過數位轉換了後，就變做 tī 月球 ê 自翕相片矣。相片是 tī 1969 年 7 月 阿波羅 11 號 登陸月球 ê 時陣翕--ê。Armstrong ê 原始相片 毋但有紀錄著這个咱 無熟似 ê 拋荒、壯麗 ê 世界，嘛有紀錄著 tī Aldrin ê 弧形 遮日枋 頂懸反射伊家己 ê 影像。Tī 拍開 ê 影像 內底，ùi Aldrin 太空帽仔 反射 ê 球形變形 影像，是 顛倒反--ê。這張轉換過 ê 視角，就是 Aldrin 看著 ê Armstrong 本人。因為 Armstrong 當初時翕了這張相片，今仔日這張影像才有法度 代表一張 54 年老 ê 月球自翕相片。Tī 原始相片內底，出現 tī Aldrin 遮日枋頂懸 ê 反射影像，是 tī 倒爿。足光 毋過變形 ê 地球，就 出現 tī 月球表面有 Armstrong 影像 ê 天頂，就是正爿頂懸彼粒。用紙箔包牢 ê 獵鷹號登陸器 ê 停車跤，kah Aldrin 搝甲長長長 ê 烏影，tī 月球表面是翕甲足清楚--ê。等到 2024 年，NASA ê Artemis 2 號 任務會閣 kā 人類送轉去月球。 ——— 這是 NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day ê 台語文 podcast 原文版：https://apod.nasa.gov/ 台文版：https://apod.tw/ 今仔日 ê 文章： https://apod.tw/daily/20230722/ 影像來源：NASA, Apollo 11, Neil Armstrong 資料處理：Michael Ranger 音樂：P!SCO - 鼎鼎 聲優：阿錕 翻譯：An-Li Tsai (NCU) 原文：https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap230722.html Powered by Firstory Hosting

More random mailbag! PocketFrog: https://standardmeasurement.us/ Omnifixo Maker's Third Hand: https://kandaelectronics.com.au/products/omnifixo-of-m4-makers-third-hand NASA Red Crew: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/artemis-red-crew-team-helps-enable-successful-launch/ https://caberqu.com/ https://github.com/DanInvents/Rockit/ 00:00 – Mailbag 00:42 – PocketFrog USB Lab in your pocket 22:40 – Omnifixo OF-M4 Magnetic PCB Holder 28:32 – NASA Artemis 1 Red Crew – Billy Cairns 30:36 – Caberqu C2C USB-C Cable Tester 39:30 – Rocket Rocket-Operation ...

It's almost an all-Navy show as Host Dave Schlom talks to Liliana Villarreal, Director of the Artemis II landing and recovery Director and US Naval aviator Lt.Thomas Logan about joint efforts between NASA and the Department of Defense to safely recover the four Artemis II astronauts when they return from the first lunar mission in over 50 years.

On today's episode: California doesn't have enough energy tubes! And what exactly will the crew of Artemis 2 be doing on their lunar trip? All that and more today on All Around Science... LINKS: [ARTICLE] California wants to build more solar farms but needs more power lines [ARTICLE] NASA's First Flight With Crew Important Step on Long-term Return to the Moon, Missions to Mars [ARTICLE] Follow the NASA Artemis missions THEME MUSIC by Andrew Allen https://twitter.com/KEYSwithSOUL http://andrewallenmusic.com

Jim served as the 13th administrator of NASA and spearheaded the launch of the Artemis program. During Jim's watch, the US also returned to launching its own astronauts to orbit from US soil (with SpaceX). Jim's bio will be familiar to most space buffs in Payload and Pathfinder's audience, so in our convo, we dig a bit deeper on his backstory, get a status report on Artemis, and take a closer look at his current roles in the commercial space ecosystem.Today's episode is brought to you by Altek Space, a custom manufacturer of essential parts and components for rockets and satellites.*SNEAK PEEK*Serving as a US Navy aviator; landing on aircraft carriers; and TOP GUN…real life vs. the movieJim's involvement in the Rocket Racing League and his time at the helm of the Tulsa Air and Space Museum and PlanetariumServing in the US House as a representative of the 1st District of Oklahoma (and his HASC and SST committee membership)Working with an office of “space knuckleheads”—Jim uses that term endearingly—and honing his aerospace policy chops while on Capitol HillWhy going to the Moon vs. going to Mars was once an either-or, partisan debate on the HillJim's time leading NASA, architecting the Artemis program, andHis post-NASA space involvement (which includes advisory or trustee roles with Voyager, Viasat, Phase Four, The Aerospace Corporation, Firefly, and Acorn Growth Companies)This is our longest show to date and for good reason. We had a lot of ground to cover, and yet we still didn't get to Pathfinder's planned segment about boots on Mars. Check out the episode and let us know what you'd want to hear in a Part 2.*CHAPTERS*02:54 Guest intro03:11 Jim's office photos03:37 Top Gun inspiration04:50 Does it surprise you the Navy wouldn't let Tom Cruise fly a jet?06:29 Journey into aviation, experience in the military, and using space assets in combat13:41 Rocket Racing League22:07 Trying to bring one of the Space Shuttles to Tulsa24:55 Time as an elected official31:51 American Space Renaissance Act37:05 Difference between approving NASA funding and running it42:48 Moon vs. Mars - why was it either-or and at times partisan?45:23 Why we should outsource some space functions to the private sector48:26 Artemis vs. Apollo54:32 Artemis I splashdown56:29 Advising space companies and organizations1:06:00 2022's biggest space story1:09:36 Worried about a shakeout in space markets?*SHOW NOTES*NASA's Artemis program: https://www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis/American Space Renaissance Act: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/4945/textFirefly: https://payloadspace.com/firefly-production-ramp/Phase Four: https://payloadspace.com/phase-four-production/Rocket Racing League: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket_Racing_LeagueUS return to space: https://payloadspace.com/netflix-releases-return-to-space/Ryan's Twitter: https://twitter.com/Ryandoofy — & LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rfduffy/Payload's Twitter: https://twitter.com/payloadspace — & LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/payloadspace/*ABOUT US*Pathfinder is brought to you by Payload, a modern space media brand built from the ground up for a new age of space exploration and commercialization. We deliver need-to-know news and insights daily to 12,000+ decision-makers across commercial, civil, and military space.

On this episode, we kick things off by providing some recent updates to the Eclipse on Tap cycling team. We transition into spirited discussion surrounding the NASA Artemis 1 launch and SLS program. In the second half, we discuss the recent dearMoon Mission candidate reveal. Be sure to give us a follow on our social media pages at @eclipseontap and check out our website at www.eclipseontap.space [Episode recorded live at Pub39A Studios on 12/9/22. Produced by Matt Deighton]

It's been 50 years since humans set foot on the Moon. Entire generations were born after this historic accomplishment. But humanity has kept its eyes on the sky and vowed to return. This week marks the end of the beginning of that journey, the completion of Artemis I, sending a human-rated capsule around the Moon and back again. With Orion safely back on Earth, let's look back at this amazing accomplishment and ponder what comes next.

In the year 2552, humans on the planet Madrigal fight for independence from Earth, but a fatal encounter with the Alien Covenant complicates things; Master Chief John 117 and his super-soldier "Spartans" join the fight. Call us and leave a voicemail at 1 ‪(305) 563-6334‬ Music provided by: Atlas Sound Arts This is SciFi Voice: Dear Nikky Mentions: Steve Horizon_Brave, Cinema Recall, Kelly Szentgyorgyi, The Manic Pixie Weirdo Podcast, NASA, NASA Artemis, Halo on Paramount+, Paramount+, 343 Industries Ads: The FSF PopCast, Madison on the Air Sci-Fi fan or creator? Follow the hashtag #ThisisSciFi for more sci-fi goodness! #ScienceFiction And join our Discord Server! #WeNeedRobertToWatchBabylon5 Part of the Blind Knowledge Network #BlindKnowledge An Anchor FM podcast Part of the LetsChatLive Network Find us on GoodPods --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/scifiremnant/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/scifiremnant/support

Welcome to Today In Space the all things space podcast. I am your space science podcast host from the East coast Alex G Orphanos. We are recording this from Planet Earth as Artemis 1 travels the Moon, the date is December 5, 2022. Here's what we're talking about this week: In our last episode we reviewed the NASA Artemis 1 mission leading up to its first lunar flyby as it was on its way to enter DRO, a highly fuel efficient orbit around the moon. This episode we review Orions time at the moon in DRO, including the start of its trip back to earth using the moon as a slingshot on its second and final flyby of the moon. We'll review Flight days 10-20, including the 5 days in Distant Retrograde Orbit. We'll share interesting facts and observations from it's time there, including some of the incredible images and the flawless performance of both Orion and the ESA service module. We'd love to know your favorite moments from the mission so far. Send us a message on social media, comment, or email us at todayinspacepodcast@gmail.com. We'd love to hear from you We'll close out this episode chatting about plans for the new year, as this first lunar trip in half a century has us excited about the future! I'll share a little about my process, tips, & challenges of planning for 2023. @todayinspacepod on Instagram/Twitter @todayinspace on TikTok /TodayInSpacePodcast on Facebook Have a great week! Support the podcast: • Get 10% OFF at Estes Rockets (no engines/sails) with the promo code IN_ALEX • Get 20% OFF @manscaped + Free Shipping with promo code SPACE at MANSCAPED.com! #ad #manscapedpod • Buy a 3D printed gift from our shop - ag3dprinting.etsy.com • Get a free quote on your next 3D printing project at ag3d-printing.com • Donate at todayinspace.net • Get SnapCollar for you and loved ones this holiday season. Stop having wrinkled shirt collars! Use our affiliate link here. Support us & support our friends https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasa2explore/52530824918/ https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/0364_secondary_payloads_brochure_07282020_508_single_pages_for_web.pdf Flight day 10 - https://blogs.nasa.gov/artemis/2022/11/25/flight-day-10-orion-enters-distant-retrograde-orbit/ Flight day 11 - https://blogs.nasa.gov/artemis/2022/11/26/artemis-i-flight-day-11-orion-surpasses-apollo-13-record-distance-from-earth/ Flight day 12 - https://blogs.nasa.gov/artemis/2022/11/27/flight-day-12-orion-star-trackers-tested/ Flight day 13 - https://blogs.nasa.gov/artemis/2022/11/28/artemis-i-flight-day-13-orion-goes-the-max-distance/ Flight day 14 - https://blogs.nasa.gov/artemis/2022/11/29/artemis-i-flight-day-14-deep-space-testing-continues/ Flight day 15 - https://blogs.nasa.gov/artemis/2022/11/30/artemis-i-flight-day-15-team-polls-go-for-distant-retrograde-orbit-departure/ Flight day 16 - https://blogs.nasa.gov/artemis/2022/12/01/artemis-i-flight-day-16-orion-successfully-completes-distant-retrograde-departure-burn/ Flight day 17 - https://blogs.nasa.gov/artemis/2022/12/02/flight-day-17-orion-fine-tunes-trajectory-downlinks-data-continues-test-objectives/ Flight day 18 - https://blogs.nasa.gov/artemis/2022/12/03/artemis-i-flight-day-18-orion-re-enters-lunar-sphere-of-influence/ Flight day 19 - https://blogs.nasa.gov/artemis/2022/12/04/artemis-i-flight-day-19-orion-prepares-for-close-lunar-flyby-teams-examining-power-conditioning-issue/ Flight day 20 - https://blogs.nasa.gov/artemis/2022/12/05/artemis-i-flight-day-20-orion-conducts-return-powered-flyby/  

Whenever you think of the world's greatest open source film photography podcast, of course everyone thinks of Camerosity, but when they think of Camerosity, the second thing everyone thinks of is the World Cup! While this exciting socc...I mean football championship is going on, what better time than for the gang and I to record our third European Time Zone friendly episode!  As we have the previous two times, we pack up our mobile recording studio and hit the road to visit our friends in the UK, Germany, Italy, Belgium, and other areas of the world where everyone is crazy for FIFA! Theo makes a special appearance direct from Al Janoub Stadium where his beloved Australian team takes on the evil French team.  Joining Anthony, Paul, Theo and I are returning guests Alan Duncan, Wannes Scheipers, and John Michael Mendizza.  In the first time caller category, we have none other than Mr. Kosmo Foto himself, Stephen Dowling, from Turin, Italy, Frederico Quaglino, Peter from Essex, and from Canada, Mike Litwin! In this episode we talk about flash photography, the state of color film and the film industry as a whole, Anthony's challenges shooting the NASA Artemis moon rocket, and a whole lot of other GAS sure to inspire many future purchases (fun fact, as I type this, I have already fallen victim to GAS from this very episode, listen to episode 38 to find out which camera I bought!) As always, the topics we discuss on the Camerosity Podcast are decided by you.  The guys and I rarely know where each episode is going to go until it happens, so if you'd like to join us on a future episode, be sure to look out for our show announcements on our Camerosity Podcast Facebook page, and right here on mikeeckman.com.  We record every other Monday and announcements, along with the Zoom link are typically shared 2-3 days in advance. If you want to join us for our next episode, we will record Episode 38 on Monday, December 5th.  Be sure to stay tuned for the official announcement! This Week's Episode John-Michael Wants 35mm Flash Recommendations / Paul's Recommendations is Nikon 8008S w/ SB-24 Flash Minolta Maxxum 9 and 9xi have 1/300 Flash Sync / Using Digital to Test for Film Flash Photography Introducing Stephen Dowling and Kosmo Foto High Speed Sync and How It Works / Why Do Focal Plane Shutter Cameras Usually Have Such Slow Flash Sync? Hasselblad and Mamiya Medium Format SLRs Had Leaf Shutters Which Benefitted Flash / Lenses with Shutters in Them The Olympus Pen F Flash Syncs at Any Speed The Minolta Dynax/Maxxum/alpha 7 and Aperture Ring Failures / Minolta's SLR Control Cards Manufacturers Who Build a Camera Have No Idea How Long They'll Still Be Working Stephen Dowling is Selling Used Cameras Now / Praktica IV F Olympus Super Zoom IS-Series / Continuous vs Stepped Auto Focus / Chinon Genesis and Canon Futura The Olympus Trip 35 is Very Popular / Metal vs Plastic Button Trips / Date Codes Soviet Cameras that Punch Above Their Wright: Agat 18K / Smena 8 / Smena Symbol / Chaika II and 3 Using Braun Paxette M39 Lenses on M39 Zenit SLRs / Flipping Front Elements Olympus FTL M42 G.Zuiko f/1.4 Lens / Olympus Ace Rangefinder Kosmo Agent Shadow Has Been a Steady Seller / Anthony Was a Beta Tester for It / Stephen Personally Mails Every Roll Anthony Bungles the Artemis Launch with Agent Shadow / Simon's Biggest Bungle / More About Artemis Shooting Rockets with Sound and Light Triggers The Future of Kosmo Foto and Other New Film Emulsions /  Are People Shooting Less Color Due to Prices? Fredrico Hopes that Ferrania Can Save Color Film / Will Film Still Be Made 100 Years From Now? Mike Makes an Idiocracy Joke But No One Gets It / What's Going On With ORWO and Adox? Recent GAS: Peter Gets a Mamiya C300 / Alan Gets an Amazing Sentex "Pseudo Camcorder" / Voigtländer Superb Alert! Canon Sure Shot XL / Leica M4P / Minox LX - The Highest Featured Last Minox / Ensign Selfix 8-20 Special Paul Gets an Aero-Ektar 178mm f/2.5 Lens / Welta Belmira / Stephen Makes a Margaret Thatcher Joke But Mike Doesn't Get It Zeiss-Ikon Taxona / Super Ikonta 531 Show Notes If you would like to offer feedback or contact us with questions or ideas for future episodes, please contact us in the Comments Section below, our Camerosity Facebook Group or Instagram page, or email us at camerosity.podcast@gmail.com. The Official Camerosity Facebook Group - https://www.facebook.com/groups/camerositypodcast Camerosity Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/camerosity_podcast/ Camerosity Twitter - https://twitter.com/CamerosityPod Keppler's Vault 97: Rocket Photography - https://mikeeckman.com/2021/07/kepplers-vault-97-rocket-photography/ Stephen Dowling - https://kosmofoto.com/ Alan Duncan – https://austerityphoto.co.uk/ John-Michael Mendizza – https://www.jmm-photos.com/ and https://www.instagram.com/jmmendizza/ Theo Panagopoulos - https://www.photothinking.com/ Paul Rybolt - https://www.ebay.com/usr/paulkris and https://www.etsy.com/shop/Camerasandpictures Anthony Rue - https://www.instagram.com/kino_pravda/ and https://www.facebook.com/VoltaGNV/

On this weeks episode we are celebrating Thanksgiving and all of our thanks for this year in 2022. There's a lot to be thankful for - from the successful Artemis 1 mission underway to the influx of space progress we have with private and public companies. We can now look up the moon and KNOW we're involved in moon missions!! We also share how our Wasp EVA in our new Bee suit to deal with the invasion of the alien wasps (check out our Halloween episode) helped us gain insights on two aspects of human space walks - astronaut gloves & how planning for EVAs is ESSENTIAL because we are just humans. Stress brains are dumb brains. Once I was in that bed room my brain went blank. Glad we had a plan ahead of time lol I also share what I'm thankful for, especially everyone supporting the podcast in their own way. Thanks for all your support - here's to building a fantastic future!  @todayinspacepod on Instagram/Twitter @todayinspace on TikTok /TodayInSpacePodcast on Facebook Have a great week! Support the podcast: • Get 10% OFF at Estes Rockets (no engines/sails) with the promo code IN_ALEX • Get 20% OFF @manscaped + Free Shipping with promo code SPACE at MANSCAPED.com! #ad #manscapedpod • Buy a 3D printed gift from our shop - ag3dprinting.etsy.com • Get a free quote on your next 3D printing project at ag3d-printing.com • Donate at todayinspace.net • Get SnapCollar for you and loved ones this holiday season. Stop having wrinkled shirt collars! Use our affiliate link here. Support us & support our friends

On its sixth day into the Artemis I mission, Orion successfully completed its fourth orbital trajectory correction burn using the auxiliary engines at 1:44 a.m. CST ahead the first of two maneuvers required to enter a distant retrograde orbit around the Moon. The first three trajectory correction burns provided an opportunity to fire all three thruster types on Orion with the first using the large orbital maneuvering system engine, the second using the small reaction control system thrusters, and the third using the medium-sized auxiliary engines. ►► https://starshipshirts.com►► https://discord.gg/dMXghpX►► https://twitch.tv/spacenewspod►► https://facebook.com/spacenewspod►► https://patreon.com/spacenewspod►► https://twitter.com/spacenewspod►► https://instagram.com/thespacenewspod►► https://gofund.me/0c6956f4

Canary Cry News Talk #563 - 11.21.2022 - Recorded Live to Tape NARRATIVE QONTROL - Deepfake Crypto, Club Q, Qatar, FDA Rekt, Nephilim Antarctica A Podcast that Deconstructs Mainstream Media News from a Biblical Worldview Harvard: Index of MSM Ownership (Harvard.edu) Logos Bible: Aliens Demons Doc (feat. Dr. Mike Heiser, Unseen Realm)   SHOW NOTES HELLO, RUN DOWN DEEPFAKE/CRYPTO FTX, SBF Deepfake Offers Refund to Victims, Verified Twitter Account (Vice/Motherboard) → FTX, SBF to appear alongside Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky at exclusive NYT event (NY Post)    DAY JINGLE/PERSONAL/EXEC.   FLIPPY Children befriended robot in after school research program (VirginiaTech)   GUN CONTROL Club Q shooting - Bias-motivated (CBS)   ELON/MONEY/SPORTSBALL/BEAST/V4V Why advertisers have to stick with Qatar – but not with Twitter (Indy UK) → Qatar World Cup opening ceremony showed the BBC can do both sport and politics (Indy UK) → Camel Virus becomes cause of concern as World Cup 2022 kicks off in Qatar (Express UK)   LICHT/SHILLZILLA Layoffs to Hit CNN, CEO Licht Tells Staff Restructuring “Will Accelerate” (Hollywood Reporter)    PARTY TIME http://CANARYCRY.PARTY   BREAK 1: TREASURE https://CanaryCryRadio.com/Support   COVID/WACCINE FDA Says Not to Take Ivermectin for C19 Was Just Recommendation (Epoch Times) → Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent C19 (FDA) → “You are not a cow” FDA Tweet (Twitter) → FDA “thrilled” over horse paste tweet (Vice) → FTX funded TOGETHER TRIAL (PRnewswire.com) → Doctors lose licenses over ivemectin prescription (NBC) → Pandemic amnesty (Atlantic)   BREAK 3: TALENT   ANTARCTICA/NEPHILIM UPDATE Groundbreaking research, 'something huge' could be living beneath Antarctica (DailyRecord) → Viking To Name New Island Discovered In Antarctica (Cruise) → Against all odds. A whole garden of giant “flowers” was discovered under the ice sheet (Saxon)   BREAK 4: TIME END   This Episode was Produced By: Producers Patrica F, Malik W, Sir Morv Knight of the Burning Chariots, Sir LX Protocol V2 Knight of the Berrean Protocol, Sir Darrin Knight of the Hungry Panda's, Dame Gail Canary Whisperer and Lady of X's and O's, Sir Casey the Shield Knight, Veronica D, Sir Scott Knight of Truth, Runksmash   Audio Production BrotherG The Day's Upon Us   Visual Art Sir Dove Knight of Rusbeltia   Microfiction Runksmash - Streams of people pass by Chris, like sheep walking in a circle their parents put them on at selective conception, not taking the time to notice, or care what happened to put him in this situation, all but one, “Chris? It's me Tracy, what happened?”   CLIP PRODUCER Emsworth, FaeLivrin   TIMESTAPERS Jackie U, Jade Bouncerson, Christine C, Pocojoyo, Joelle S   SOCIAL MEDIA DOERS Dame MissG of the OV and Deep Rivers   LINKS HELP JAM   REMINDERS Clankoniphius   ADDITIONAL STORIES Sunak tells NHS to embrace robot workers as it prepares to sack staff (Telegraph) Car crashes into Mass. Apple store leaving one dead and 14 injured (Indy UK) SBF Cashed Out $300M in Previous Funding Round: WSJ (CoinDesk)  FTX's SBF Cashed Out $300 Million During Funding Spree (WSJ) (Archive)  The Perfect Trio: FTX, Democrats, Ukraine (Unga's Wayfinding)  → The Covid/Crypto Connection: The Grim Saga of FTX and SBF (Brownstone)  → Crypto dominoes fall in the wake of FTX's collapse (Axios)  Student debtors refuse to pay back loans: ‘I'm not gonna feed this monster anymore' (NY Post)  Texas Gov. Abbott to deploy tank-like vehicles against migrant ‘invasion' (NY Post)  Texas to send military armored personnel carriers to border: Report (Fox News)  Why Is The Government Arming More Federal Bureaucrats Than US Marines? (Federalist)  Judge dismisses case over FBI raid of 1,400 private safe-deposit boxes (Yahoo / Insider)  → FBI misled judge on Beverly Hills seizure warrant (LA Times) (Archive)  SEE IT: Twitter users troll Biden on his 80th birthday (Washington Examiner) (Archive)  “We need a single global order” says Macron at ongoing APEC Summit (The Print)  → (Clip) 'We need a single global order' says Macron at APEC summit (AFP / YouTube)  → (Clip) French President Emmanuel Macron slapped by woman (Mehr News)  → (Clip) France's Macron gets slapped by woman (News AZ)   Call of Duty is a Government Psyop: These Documents Prove It (Mint Press)  → George Soros invests $45 million in Activision Blizzard (ReclaimTheNet)  → Why George Soros Likes Games Workshop (GuruFocus)  → Soros Funds invests in Animoca Brands $358m funding blockchain games (Ledger Insights)  → Splinter Cell Remake Will Update the Story 'for a Modern-Day Audience' (IGN)  Charging a GMC Hummer EV to 100% Can Cost You Over $100 (The Drive)  Nasa Artemis spacecraft sends image of 'pale blue dot' Earth as it arrives at Moon (Yahoo) New Study Reveals Insane Amount of Sex Robot Owners Worldwide (MSN/Many UK) We got a peek inside the Amazon fulfillment center in Kenosha. 5 takeaways from inside (Yahoo)

The Science Behind Your Favorite Thanksgiving Dishes Thanksgiving is right around the corner, and for many people, that means it's time to start thinking about what will be on the menu for dinner that night. Many people will opt for a classic turkey: others, a vegetarian-focused meal. Regardless of the plan, preparing food for the holiday can take some planning, and there's a lot of science that goes into it. Cookbook author Kenji López-Alt thinks about the science behind cooking a lot. He's the author of The Food Lab: Better Home Cooking Through Science, and he lists Thanksgiving as his favorite holiday. That makes him the expert on all things brine, sides, and pie. López-Alt joins Ira from his home in Seattle, Washington, to answer questions about the science behind Thanksgiving foods.   NASA's Massive Rocket Finally Launches To The Moon Early Wednesday morning the Artemis 1 mission launched, the first integrated flight test of NASA's Space Launch System—a massive rocket that NASA hopes will enable an eventual lunar landing. The uncrewed launch was a long time coming. Elements of the program have been under development for over a decade. If all goes according to plan, a second Artemis flight—this time, with crew—will take place in 2024, with a crewed lunar landing in 2025. Another component of the program, a tiny spacecraft called Capstone, entered into lunar orbit several days prior to Artemis. It will test a complicated orbit planned for a potential lunar space station called Gateway, which would serve as a way station for astronauts moving between Earth and the Moon. Ira talks with Jim Free, NASA's Associate Administrator for Exploration Systems Development, and Brendan Byrne, space reporter for WMFE and host of the Are We There Yet podcast, about the test flight and what lies ahead for the Artemis program. Transcripts for each segment will be available the week after the show airs on sciencefriday.com.

This is the News You Need for Wednesday November 11, 2022. NASA Artemis 1 Moon Rocket has launched on its debut flight. A missile hits Poland and kills two people, but the source of who fired it off is still unknown. Our very own Guardians manager Terry Francona has received the Manager of the Year award! Winter storms watch for those in the snow belt- affecting mainly the Eastern parts of Cleveland. In celebrity news, Taylor Swift ticket sales CRASHED the Ticketmaster website! The Recording Academy has released this years GRAMMY Nominations!

NASA continues to target launch of its Artemis I mission from the agency's Kennedy Space Center in Florida at 1:04 a.m. EST, Wednesday, Nov. 16. There is a two-hour launch window for the agency's first integrated flight test of its Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and Orion spacecraft. ►► https://starshipshirts.com►► https://discord.gg/dMXghpX►► https://twitch.tv/spacenewspod►► https://facebook.com/spacenewspod►► https://patreon.com/spacenewspod►► https://twitter.com/spacenewspod►► https://instagram.com/thespacenewspod►► https://gofund.me/0c6956f4 #artemis #artemis1 #nasa

NASA is aiming for a launch attempt on Nov. 14, sending an Orion crew capsule around the moon and back in a flight test before astronauts take the Artemis 2 mission around the moon and back in a few years. ►► https://starshipshirts.com►► https://discord.gg/dMXghpX►► https://twitch.tv/spacenewspod►► https://facebook.com/spacenewspod►► https://patreon.com/spacenewspod►► https://twitter.com/spacenewspod►► https://instagram.com/thespacenewspod►► https://gofund.me/0c6956f4

NASA is targeting the next launch attempt of the Artemis I mission for Monday, Nov. 14 with liftoff of the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket carrying the Orion spacecraft planned during a 69-minute launch window that opens at 12:07 a.m. EST. Teams are on track to roll the Space Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft from the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) to Launch Pad 39B no earlier than Friday, Nov. 4 with first motion targeted for 12:01 a.m. EDT. ►► https://starshipshirts.com►► https://discord.gg/dMXghpX►► https://twitch.tv/spacenewspod►► https://facebook.com/spacenewspod►► https://patreon.com/spacenewspod►► https://twitter.com/spacenewspod►► https://instagram.com/thespacenewspod►► https://gofund.me/0c6956f4

In today's episode, Blake and Will break down the upcoming Artemis 1 NASA launch with the all-new SLS mega-rocket. They talk about liquid hydrogen leaks, launch pads, and orbital maneuvers. Stay tuned until the end for a great trivia game!

Three guests from the tv show - Dr David Whitehouse with an update on NASA Artemis, Simon Morden on his new book about Mars... and Marc J. Seifer on the extraordinary times and life of Nikola Tesla.

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #HotelMars: NASA, Artemis, Risk Tolerance and the Lost Golden Age of the 1960s. Rand Simberg, author, Safe Is Not an Option. Safe Is Not an Option Paperback – October 31, 2013  by  Rand E. Simberg  (Author), William Simon  (Editor), Ed Lu  (Foreword) https://www.amazon.com/Safe-Not-Option-Rand-Simberg/dp/0989135519/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= The history of exploration and establishment of new lands, science and technologies has always entailed risk to the health and lives of the explorers. Yet, when it comes to exploring and developing the high frontier of space, the harshest frontier ever, the highest value is apparently not the accomplishment of those goals, but of minimizing, if not eliminating, the possibility of injury or death of the humans carrying them out.  For decades since the end of Apollo, human spaceflight has been very expensive and relatively rare (about 500 people total, with a death rate of about 4%), largely because of this risk aversion on the part of the federal government and culture. From the Space Shuttle, to the International Space Station, the new commercial crew program to deliver astronauts to it, and the regulatory approach for commercial spaceflight providers, our attitude toward safety has been fundamentally irrational, expensive and even dangerous, while generating minimal accomplishment for maximal cost.  This book entertainingly explains why this means that we must regulate passenger safety in the new commercial spaceflight industry with a lighter hand than many might instinctively prefer, that NASA must more carefully evaluate rewards from a planned mission to rationally determine how much should be spent to avoid the loss of participants, and that Congress must stop insisting that safety is the highest priority, for such insistence is an eloquent testament to how unimportant they and the nation consider the opening of this new frontier.

Today on AirTalk, updates on the NASA Artemis missions planned to send humans back to the moon. Also on the program, street vending legislation; COVID-19 updates; and more. We're Going Back To The Moon, Just Not Today (0:15) A Closer Look At A Bill That Makes Significant Changes For California Street Vendors (20:13) Psychedelics Show Promise For Treating Alcohol Addiction (35:14) COVID-19 AMA: Moderna Sues Pfizer Over Vaccine Tech, Why New Boosters Will Be Released Before Human Testing Concludes And More (53:02) Worker Surveillance Is On The Rise And It's Getting Intense (1:24:52)

Interview with Dave Reynolds, NASA's Deputy Program Manager for SLS Booster SubsystemsIn this episode we'll discuss NASA's upcoming Artemis 1 mission, scheduled to launch no earlier than the end of this month. The Space Launch System rocket, or “SLS” will propel the Orion spacecraft on its mission around the Moon and back to Earth. Artemis 1 will be an uncrewed flight test that will travel farther than any other human-rated spacecraft has traveled before. This mission, the first of an increasing series of complex missions, will demonstrate NASA's capability to extend human existence to the Moon, and on to Mars.Joining me in this episode from NASA's Marshal Space Flight Center is Dave Reynolds, Deputy Program Manager for SLS Booster Subsystems. Artemis I Mission OverviewArtemis I is the first integrated test of NASA's deep space exploration systems: the Orion spacecraft, Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and the ground systems at the agency's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The first in a series of increasingly complex missions, Artemis I is an uncrewed flight test that will provide a foundation for human deep space exploration and demonstrate our commitment and capability to return humans to the Moon and extend beyond.During this flight, Orion will launch atop the most powerful rocket in the world and fly farther than any spacecraft built for humans has ever flown. Over the course of the mission, it will travel 280,000 miles (450,000 kilometers) from Earth and 40,000 miles (64,000 kilometers) beyond the far side of the Moon. Orion will stay in space longer than any human spacecraft has without docking to a space station and return home faster and hotter than ever before.This first Artemis mission will demonstrate the performance of both Orion and the SLS rocket and test our capabilities to orbit the Moon and return to Earth. The flight will pave the way for future missions to the lunar vicinity, including landing the first woman and first person of color on the surface of the Moon.With Artemis I, NASA sets the stage for human exploration into deep space, where astronauts will build and begin testing the systems near the Moon needed for lunar surface missions and exploration to other destinations farther from Earth, including Mars. With Artemis, NASA will collaborate with industry and international partners to establish long-term exploration for the first time.For more information visit Nasa.gov/artemis-1Buzzsprout - Let's get your podcast launched! Start for FREEDisclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.Support the show

For generations, people have dreamed of a future where faster-than-light (FTL) travel is possible. Unfortunately, conventional physics tells us that it can't be done.For years, Dr. Harold "Sonny" White worked at NASA Eagleworks to develop the Alcubierre Warp Drive, a concept that relies on "exotic" physics to allow for FTL travel.Through the Limitless Space Institute, Dr. White and his colleagues continue to work on the warp drive and other advanced propulsion methods to achieve the dream of "Going Faster!"_______________________GuestsDr. Harold "Sonny" WhiteDirector of Advanced Research and Development, Limitless Space Institute [@explorelsi]On LinkedIn | https://www.linkedin.com/in/harold-white-6049518/On Facebook | https://www.facebook.com/limitlessspaceinstitute_______________________HostMatthew S WilliamsOn ITSPmagazine  

For as long as humans have walked the Earth, they have stared up at the night sky and drawn hope, inspiration, and a common sense of identity from it.Today, there are many efforts to revitalize and recognize Indigenous astronomical traditions worldwide. In this new era of space exploration, we must live up to those sacred words, "for all humanity."_______________________HostMatthew S WilliamsOn ITSPmagazine  

Kayla Barron is one of the first females in the U.S. Armed Forces to serve on submarines and was selected as part of the NASA Artemis program. Kayla reveals her belief in the work it takes to bring out the best version of yourself in this episode of the Passion Struck podcast with John R. Miles. Like this? Please subscribe, and join me on my new platform for peak performance, life coaching, and personal growth: https://passionstruck.com/. Kayla's Path to Becoming an Astronaut Astronaut Kayla Barron describes how being an astronaut is the best thing she could be doing with her life. But, this wasn't always her life goal. She decided to apply after meeting astronaut Kathryn Hire while the Flagg Officer for VADM Ted Carter, then Superintendent of the Naval Academy. Kayla is part of the Artemis generation of astronauts, which is NASA's return to the moon. This group was handpicked to fly to the international space station and, more importantly, to focus on space exploration and using the moon as a proving ground for Mars. New Interviews with the World's GREATEST high achievers will be posted every Tuesday with a Momentum Friday inspirational message! Show Notes 0:00 Kayla Barron teaser 1:21 Show Intro and Kayla's Background 4:49 Her time as Flag Aide to VADM Ted Carter 6:25 Why she decided to attend the Naval Academy 9:37 What makes the Naval Academy so special 10:47 What she learned from Division 1A Sports 14:50 Her path to the astronaut selection 20:16 Her advice on overcoming failure 24:00 The importance of discomfort in our personal growth 27:12 Becoming one of the first female's on submarines 32:01 Her Gates scholarship and Cambridge University experience 38:35 Her advice on becoming an astronaut 42:44 What it means to be part of the Artemis program 48:00 The importance of humility 51:52 Vulnerability and authentic leadership ENGAGE KAYLA BARRON NASA selected Kayla Barron to join the 2017 Astronaut Candidate Class. She reported for duty in August 2017 and is currently training as Mission Specialist for NASA SpaceX Crew-3 Mission to the ISS scheduled to launch October 2021. The Washington native graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy with a bachelor's degree in Systems Engineering. A Gates Cambridge Scholar, Barron earned a master's degree in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Cambridge. As a Submarine Warfare Officer, Barron was a member of the first class of women commissioned into the submarine community and served on the USS Maine. *Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/astro_kayla/ *Twitter: https://twitter.com/Astro_Kayla   ENGAGE WITH JOHN R. MILES * Subscribe to my channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/JohnRMiles * Leave a comment, 5-star rating (please!) * Support me: https://johnrmiles.com * Twitter: https://twitter.com/Milesjohnr * Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Johnrmiles.c0m​. * Medium: https://medium.com/@JohnRMiles​ * Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/john_r_miles ABOUT JOHN R. MILES * https://johnrmiles.com/my-story/ * Guides: https://johnrmiles.com/blog/ * Coaching: https://passionstruck.com/coaching/ * Speaking: https://johnrmiles.com/speaking-business-transformation/ * Gear: https://www.zazzle.com/store/passion_struck PASSION STRUCK *Subscribe to Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-passion-struck-podcast/id1553279283 *Website: https://passionstruck.com/ *About: https://passionstruck.com/about-passionstruck-johnrmiles/ *Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/passion_struck_podcast *LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/passionstruck *Blog: https://passionstruck.com/blog/