POPULARITY
Categories
50 episodes with sls
107 episodes with sls
59 episodes with sls
33 episodes with sls
24 episodes with sls
27 episodes with sls
18 episodes with sls
33 episodes with sls
20 episodes with sls
20 episodes with sls
27 episodes with sls
14 episodes with sls
15 episodes with sls
26 episodes with sls
13 episodes with sls
23 episodes with sls
13 episodes with sls
6 episodes with sls
20 episodes with sls
9 episodes with sls
8 episodes with sls
24 episodes with sls
17 episodes with sls
7 episodes with sls
6 episodes with sls
5 episodes with sls
23 episodes with sls
18 episodes with sls
7 episodes with sls
15 episodes with sls
7 episodes with sls
7 episodes with sls
8 episodes with sls
5 episodes with sls
6 episodes with sls
8 episodes with sls
8 episodes with sls
13 episodes with sls
16 episodes with sls
19 episodes with sls
5 episodes with sls
8 episodes with sls
6 episodes with sls
5 episodes with sls
3 episodes with sls
10 episodes with sls
7 episodes with sls
3 episodes with sls
4 episodes with sls
9 episodes with sls
3 episodes with sls
3 episodes with sls
5 episodes with sls
5 episodes with sls
Who should pay for the hotel when you're meeting another couple in the lifestyle? It's one of the biggest questions new swingers ask, and today we're giving our honest take on hotel etiquette, splitting costs, and why the answer isn't always what you think.Then we're pulling back the curtain and sharing one of our biggest secrets—our private code words, hand signals, and even speaking Spanish to communicate while we're playing with other couples. Good communication can make or break a lifestyle experience, and we'll explain how it helped us stay connected.We also answer a listener's email asking why we stopped doing the "fun"second half of the show and what's next for the podcast.After the break, we're reacting to a video sent in by Pineapples and Kisses that has the entire lifestyle community talking.Finally,we're wrapping things up with our World Cup update and celebrating all the excitement surrounding the tournament.If you're anew swinger, curious about the lifestyle, or looking for real, honest advice,this is an episode you won't want to miss.
This week on Just the Tip Thursday, we're answering a listener email.Have you ever wondered, "What do men really think about a woman's vagina?"or worried that your body insecurities might hold you back from exploring the swinger lifestyle?In this episode of The Swingers Couch Podcast, we answer a heartfelt email from a listener who isn't in the lifestyle yet but dreams of becoming a swinger with her husband. She's excited about the idea of exploring her fantasies, but she's struggling with deep insecurities about her body—especially how she feels about her vagina and what other men might think.We share our honest opinions, discuss what most men actually notice (and what they don't),and explain why confidence, communication, and self-acceptance are far more important than chasing perfection. We also answer several other questions she had about taking those first steps into the lifestyle.If you've ever searched for:Swinging for beginners How to start swinging Swinger advice for couples Female body insecurities What do men think about vaginas? First time swinger tips Lifestyle advice for new swingers How to build confidence before swinging ...then this episode is for you.Whether you're just curious about the swinger lifestyle, dealing with body image issues, or looking for real, judgment-free advice from experienced swingers,this conversation could help you feel more confident before taking your first step.
What happenswhen your wife has her first play session with a solo male? How do youdeal with the jealousy, insecurities, and emotions that come with it?In thishonest episode of The Swingers Couch Podcast, Carlos and Autumn open upabout one of the biggest milestones in their swinger's lifestylejourney. Carlos shares his real emotions as Autumn plays with a solo guy, howhe handled the jealousy, and the communication that helped strengthen theirrelationship instead of hurting it.If you're a newswinger, thinking about opening your marriage, curious about ethicalnon-monogamy (ENM), or struggling with jealousy in the lifestyle, thisepisode is packed with practical advice and real-life experience that can helpyou avoid common mistakes.We discuss:How to deal with jealousy in the swinger's lifestyleWhy insecurity is normal for new swingersTips for couples exploring solo experiencesCommunication before, during, and after a play dateHow trust grows through honesty and experienceLessons we've learned that we wish someone had told us soonerWhetheryou're looking into swinging for beginners, open relationships, wifewith a solo male, couples exploring the lifestyle, or simply wantreal, unfiltered conversations about ENM, this episode is for you.
Fabian Alefeld interviews certified prosthetist/orthotist and EastPoint Prosthetics VP Brent Wright about his career path into O&P, his shift from being anti-digital to adopting scanning and additive manufacturing, and the impact on patient care and global access. Wright describes traditional fabrication workflows (casting, plaster positives, vacuum forming thermoplastics for orthoses, and carbon fiber/resin layups for prostheses) as artistic but time-consuming, hazardous, and lacking records. His digital journey accelerated after a Guatemala trip with Life Enabled highlighted the need to scale care; he focused on scanning, digital modification, and later powder-bed fusion, moving toward SLS with materials like PK5000 and TPU. He emphasizes pressure casting for prosthetic sockets, the value of digital records for insurance, and how AM can change socket “dynamics” to improve comfort and heal wounds. The discussion also covers RADii's data-driven fitting approach, Life Enabled's mix of traditional and 3D-printed solutions (including pediatric feet), modular “kit” concepts for developing regions, and barriers to sensors/actuators in the US due to reimbursement.02:33 Brent Origin Story09:30 Why Go Digital11:17 Scaling Global Access17:32 Traditional O&P Workflow20:02 Casting And Fabrication Steps24:07 Digital Workflow And Scanning33:22 Benefits Of Digital Records36:36 Flexible Liner Heals Wound40:47 RADii Data Meets Craft46:06 Life Enabled Model01:01:50 Democratizing via Manufacturing01:08:01 Sensors vs Simplicity
Canadian travel to the U.S. ticks up in June but underlying data shows a market that still hasn't decided to return, lifestyle hotel brands are moving into all-inclusive and Ennismore thinks the stigma is finally gone, and a provocative take on why sometimes when hospitality fails the problem is actually the guest. On today's Skift Daily Briefing, Sarah Dandashy breaks down why the Canadian travel rebound headline is more complicated than it looks, how Ennismore is betting Mondrian and SLS can bring lifestyle credibility to a format long associated with buffets and wristbands, and why the best hospitality experiences require something from the guest too. Articles Referenced: Honorable Mention: @AskAConcierge on IGCanadian Travel to the U.S. Is Rising Again — Still Down Almost 29% From 2024Ennismore Thinks Lifestyle Brands Can Survive All-Inclusive. Mondrian Is the Next Test.When Hospitality Fails, the Problem Might Be the Guest Connect with Skift LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/skift/ WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaAL375LikgIXmNPYQ0L/ Facebook: https://facebook.com/skiftnews Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/skiftnews/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@skiftnews Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/skiftnews.bsky.social X: https://twitter.com/skift Subscribe to @SkiftNews and never miss an update from the travel industry.
This week onJust the Tip Thursday, we're answering a listener email that dives intosome topics that don't get talked about nearly enough in the lifestyle.Have youever wondered how to explore a new fantasy but didn't know where to start?In thisepisode of the Swingers Couch Podcast, we answer a listener's email from a manwho wants to explore his bi-curious side and is looking for advice on findingthe right guy for his first experience. We also dive into a common issue manymen face—getting stuck in your head and losing your erection during play.We discuss:How to safely explore bisexual curiosity in the swinging lifestyleTips for beginners entering the lifestyleFinding trustworthy lifestyle couples and single menPerformance anxiety and how to overcome itBuilding confidence in the bedroomCommunication, consent, and setting boundariesCommon mistakes new swingers makeReal, honest advice from experienced swingersWhetheryou're brand new to the lifestyle, curious about swinging, interested inethical non-monogamy, or simply looking for relationship and sexual confidencetips, this episode is packed with practical advice and real conversations.
Special Offer: Get 15% OFF your first FIGS order with code FIGSUK at checkout.Shop now at https://www.wearfigs.com/———————————————————————UK Dentists: Collect your verifiable CPD for this episode here >>> https://courses.dentistswhoinvest.com/smart-money-members-club———————————————————————Sensitive teeth can be oddly demoralising. You can do “everything right” and still wince at cold water, dread a whitening top up, or quietly switch to straws and one sided chewing. We sit down with the team at S3 Sensitivity Science to ask a blunt question: why do so many people still fail to get complete relief from the sensitive toothpaste aisle, and what would a real step change look like? Ryan Hale (CEO and co-founder) is joined by Mick Cox and Dr David Urquhart, both with deep experience in the sensitivity category, plus formulator Manjade and dental adviser Surina. We unpack the core idea behind S3's patent pending triple action technology: calm sensitivity with potassium nitrate while also sealing dentine tubules using two forms of hydroxyapatite. The conversation gets properly practical and clinical: why hydroxyapatite is a biomimetic choice for enamel support, how tubule occlusion differs from nerve calming, what happens when oral pH drops after food and drink, and why they chose fluoride at 1450 ppm, an SLS free system, and an RDA designed to clean without being harsh. We also look at the early evidence shared, including University of Reading lab work using SEM imagery and elemental analysis, plus consumer testing that reports noticeable improvement for many users within seven days. Then we shift into the business and dentistry angle: how dentist recommendation builds trust, why direct to consumer growth matters, and how UK dentists can potentially join as EIS investors and advisory partners, with practice focused perks and a commitment to ongoing research. ———————————————————————Disclaimer: All content on this channel is for education purposes only and does not constitute an investment recommendation or individual financial advice. For that, you should speak to a regulated, independent professional. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up, so you may get back less than you invest. The views expressed on this channel may no longer be current. The information provided is not a personal recommendation for any particular investment. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and all tax rules may change in the future. If you are unsure about the suitability of an investment, you should speak to a regulated, independent professional. Investment figures quoted refer to simulated past performance and that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results/performance.Send us Fan Mail
Delivra Health Brands CEO Gord Davey joined Steve Darling from to discuss the launch of LivRelief Itch Cream, a new product designed to help relieve itchiness associated with eczema, psoriasis, dermatitis, and other common skin irritations. Davey said the cream is formulated for sensitive skin and is hypoallergenic, fragrance-free, and free from parabens, petroleum, and SLS. The product combines Hydrocortisone, Calendula, and Chamomile to help reduce itching, irritation, and inflammation. In addition to eczema and psoriasis-related discomfort, LivRelief Itch Cream can also be used for the temporary relief of minor skin irritations such as rashes, redness, insect bites, poison ivy, poison oak, and poison sumac. Management says the launch targets a large and underserved market. According to the Canadian Dermatology Association, up to 17% of Canadians will experience atopic dermatitis at some point in their lives. Davey also pointed to the Eczema Society of Canada's 2025 survey, which found that 89% of respondents identified itch reduction as a key treatment goal, while 86% wanted better control of rash and skin symptoms. In addition, Psoriasis Canada estimates that more than one million Canadians are affected by psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Delivra believes the new LivRelief Itch Cream expands its topical wellness and pain-relief portfolio while addressing a clear consumer need for effective, accessible, and skin-friendly itch relief solutions. #proactiveinveestors #delivrahealthbrandsinc #tsxv #dhb #otcqb #dhbuf #DreamWater #GlobalExpansion #DreamWater #LivRelief #CBD #Cannabis #Wellness #Topicals #Canada #ConsumerGoods #LivRelief #Healthcare #CannaTech
This episode examines Germany's auxiliary cruisers and the heavy cruiser Admiral Hipper as they carried the commerce war into distant shipping lanes during 1940 and early 1941. It follows the disguised merchant raiders that forced the Royal Navy to disperse its strength around the globe, then traces the Hipper's design limitations, encounters with convoys WS-5A and SLS-64, and repeated mechanical setbacks. Together, their operations reveal both the reach and the limitations of Germany's surface-raiding strategy before the battleships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau entered the Atlantic. Credit Episode Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/state_library_south_australia/3331881750/in/album-72157623232407924 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Ben Cardew spoke to musician and synth enthusiast extraordinaire Colleen about learning to swim, feeling free, letting down your guard and a lot more in a very charming and in-depth interview, recorded at the SLS hotel in Barcelona.
Download CPSolvers app here RLRCPSolvers In the most recent SLS episode, Austin presents a case of a patient with elbow pain to Maryana, David, and Zakariyya. How would you approach and untangle a case like this? What would be your differential diagnosis? Face this diagnostic challenge with us! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing… Read More »Episode 463: SLS – Elbow pain
A cracked rib that punctures a liver. A pro-era contest scene where the most technical skating didn't always win. A Virginia Beach style that still shows up every time the board hits smooth concrete. We're sitting down with legendary East Coast skateboarder Julian Etheridge, and the stories go way deeper than a trick list.We talk about where Julian comes from, how he started skating back in 1988, and what it was like growing up in the mini ramp and vert-heavy days before today's million-dollar skateparks. From first shop sponsors to traveling footage, we connect the dots between Virginia Beach, Florida trips, and eventually landing in Jacksonville. If you care about skateboarding history, East Coast skate culture, and how local scenes actually get built, you'll feel right at home here.Then we get into the big questions: how competition skateboarding evolved from old-school course runs to modern SLS and park formats, why judging is always subjective, and why the current generation is doing “Tony Hawk Pro Skater” lines in real life. We also keep it real about injuries, aging, and what it takes to stay in skating when recovery becomes part of the routine. And yes, we still make time for our “Is It a Sport” game and a completely unnecessary debate about Taco Town food trucks.If you enjoyed the conversation, subscribe, share it with your skate crew, and leave a review so more skaters can find it. What's the gnarliest slam you've seen someone come back from?
Fabian Alefeld interviews Omar Mireles, Director of Manufacture and Materials at Space Nuclear Power Corporation (Space Nukes), about his career spanning NASA, Oak Ridge, and Los Alamos and how additive manufacturing (AM) reshaped space hardware development. Omar describes early exposure to SLS prototyping, graduate work in nuclear materials and propulsion, building nuclear materials labs at NASA Marshall, and later leading AM efforts for liquid rocket engines and refractory metals. He explains how AM accelerates iteration, enables complex geometries, part consolidation, and weight reduction, and where traditional methods still dominate depending on production rate. The conversation covers refractory metal challenges (supply chain, oxygen sensitivity, post-processing, inspection) and nuclear reactor basics, generations, and regulatory barriers to AM adoption. Omar outlines Space Nukes' goal of delivering safe, affordable, reliable power anywhere in the solar system, noting heat rejection as a key space constraint, Krusty's 2018 test heritage, potential AM roles in heat exchangers, and an aggressive ~2-year flight timeline depending on regulation and mission. 02:26 Omar Early Motivation 03:08 NASA Co-ops and First AM 07:59 Stirling Radiation Research 20:07 Refractory Metals AM Lab 21:31 Los Alamos to Space Nukes 25:14 Did AM Change Space Race 31:46 Where AM Flies Today 37:41 Rocket Engines Print vs Traditional 41:15 Refractory Alloys Challenges 46:39 Where Refractories Make Sense 47:05 Will Refractory AM Grow 49:39 NASA Metal AM Handbook Origins 56:37 How Nuclear Reactors Work 01:13:02 Additive Manufacturing in Nuclear 01:18:31 What Space Nukes Builds 01:19:36 Why Space Nuclear Power Matters 01:25:20 Why Space Needs Nukes 01:37:47 Krusty Test Proof 01:41:18 Heat Rejection Challenge 01:49:25 Timeline and First Missions
David Susko, a Martian geologist working for a NASA contractor is our guest. He builds and operates cameras for space missions, including a visible-light camera called MACIE (Mars Color Imager) that photographs the Martian surface at various scales and resolutions. Key points discussed: Moon before Mars. The Moon is a mandatory stepping stone — everything from Apollo to the ISS has been about learning to live and work in space before attempting Mars. Going straight to Mars carries too much risk. Historical context. Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo were proof-of-concept missions. The Saturn V rocket remains the gold standard. Retiring it in the 70s (and the engineers and facilities with it) was a costly decision NASA has been recovering from ever since. The rocket equation problem. The vast majority of fuel is spent just escaping Earth's gravity well. Every extra kilogram of payload requires exponentially more fuel, making heavy-lift missions extremely difficult. Today's rockets. Three heavy-lift vehicles are currently in play: NASA's SLS, SpaceX's Starship, and Blue Origin's New Glenn. All three are involved in Artemis. Artemis mission architecture. The plan involves multiple launches, orbital rendezvous and docking between the Orion capsule and the Starship lunar lander (or Blue Moon variant), new spacesuits from a private aerospace company, and astronauts landing near the lunar south pole. Artemis milestones so far. Artemis I (2022, uncrewed) flew around the Moon and successfully re-entered Earth's atmosphere. Artemis II will fly crew around the Moon. Artemis III will attempt the first crewed landing in decades. A first Moon landing in roughly 2–3 years is the current plan, though delays are likely. Target: lunar south pole / Shackleton Crater. The south pole is almost permanently shadowed and likely harbors water ice — a critical resource for long-term habitation. The VIPER rover (using ground-penetrating radar) is being sent to prospect for these resources. Long-term goal. Build permanent lunar infrastructure to support human habitation — a "Moon base" — as the launchpad for eventual Mars missions. Safety. The guest emphasizes not rushing; the Apollo program's near-perfect safety record shouldn't breed complacency, especially given tragedies like the Space Shuttle Columbia.
Can ghost hunting equipment actually detect paranormal activity, or are investigators sometimes using these tools the wrong way?In this special extended episode of Talking Strange, host Aaron Sagers sits down with paranormal researcher, equipment builder, and science communicator Lauren Hellekson (LaurenHaunts.com) for a deep dive into the technology behind modern paranormal investigations.Together, they break down some of the most popular ghost hunting tools, including digital voice recorders, thermal and infrared cameras, SLS devices, EMF meters, REM Pods, proximity sensors, smartphone apps, and more. Lauren explains what these devices were actually designed to do, how investigators commonly use and misuse them, and practical tips for collecting better evidence in the field.Featured in the BeaconTV documentary series The Bridge Between Dimensions and currently studying Physics and Astronomy, Lauren brings a rare combination of hands-on paranormal experience and scientific perspective to the conversation.Whether you're a seasoned investigator or just getting started, this episode is an essential guide to paranormal equipment. _______________________________________________________________ The Talking Strange Show with Aaron Sagers is a weekly paranormal pop culture show featuring celebrity and author interviews, as well as experts in all things strange and unexplained. Talking Strange is a creation of Aaron Sagers with production help from Michael Ahr. Host Aaron Sagers is a paranormal TV host and journalist who appears as host of 28 Days Haunted on Netflix, and on Paranormal Caught On Camera on Travel Channel, Discovery+, and MAX streaming service. If you like Talking Strange, please subscribe, leave a nice review, and share with your friends. The Talking Strange Paranormal Show is available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, and wherever you check out spooky content. Connect with the show community on Facebook as well. Email us with episode ideas, guest suggestions, and spooky stories: Contact@TalkingStrange.com Follow Host Aaron Sagers: Twitter/X Blue Sky Instagram Facebook TikTok Patreon (For Q&As, livestreams, cocktail classes, and movie watches) Until Next Time: Be Kind. Stay Spooky. Keep It Weird. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Episode 35: SLS 101 ‘Main Topic': Everything you need to navigate SLS (‘Swing LifeStyle' website) with confidence and results — from building a standout profile to managing your photos and communicating effectively with other members. ‘What Have We Done Lately': Our April 3rd Meet & Greet at the Valley Forge Casino & Hotel in King of Prussia blew past expectations with 300 attendees packing the room. Then on May 16th, Morristown, NJ raised the bar again — 400+ people and an incredible atmosphere from start to finish.The annual Kentucky Derby Party delivered big energy, big hats, and big fun — what began as a social mixer turned into a night everyone will be talking about.During our recent time in Delaware, we connected with two wonderful couples on separate evenings and shared some memorable moments together. Also, a sexy, close encounter for Dee.And in Major News: we sat down with the CEO and Founder of Promescent, creators of specialized wellness products for adults. That conversation will be featured in Episode 36, and you'll find a link to their product line on our website, LifestyleLynx.com. ‘Where Are We Going Next': Buckle up Beautiful People— we're headed to Desire Pearl Riviera Maya in Cancun, Mexico for our next adventure. Catch the upcoming episode for the full experience.Next stop: ‘Kraken Resort' outside Houston, TX. We're scouting the grounds and the vibe ahead of our LifestyleLynx Full Take‑Over, October 23–25, 2026. Tickets drop soon.Upcoming Meet & Greets:Morristown, NJ (Iron Bar): July 11 & Sept 26 — bring your “A” GameKing of Prussia, PA (Valley Forge Casino): August 15 — added by popular demandCruisers, listen up: Book any Bliss Cruise through our website and unlock a Special Perk no other agency offers. And for our April 2027 cruise, we're giving away an $1,800 voucher. Visit LifestyleLynx.com to enter the drawing and explore all events, Meet & Greets, Cruises, Resort Takeovers, and Sweepstakes — everything you need is just one Lynx away. LifestyleLynx.com/events%2Ftrips%2FcruisesStay tuned — more events, more episodes, and more adventures are on the way. Plus, 9250 listens to our Podcast… Thank you!! Visit us at https://www.LifestyleLynx.com for related Adult Events, Cruises, Resorts, Clubs, Parties, Meet & Greets, Swinger Websites and more...
What happens when you combine the clinical expertise of a registered dietitian with the comprehensive training of a board-certified family medicine physician? You get a powerful, preventative approach to healthcare that looks at the whole person.In this episode of Real Fuel with SLS, Stevie Lyn Smith catches up with longtime college friend and colleague, Dr. Alex Ford, DO, RD. Dr. Ford shares his unique journey from studying dietetics at Buffalo State to navigating the rigorous world of medical school, serving as Chief Resident at the prestigious Cleveland Clinic, and earning a spot on Albany's 40 Under 40 list. They dive deep into the gaps in traditional medical education regarding nutrition, the rise of GLP-1 medications, and how to champion true, preventive lifestyle medicine.In this episode they chat more about:The anatomy of whole-person careGLP-1s as tools as part of lifestyle medicineThe foundational pillars for every human looking to improve healthDr. Ford's career path and educationMaking nutrition information digestible and easy for individuals to apply to their livesThe reality of nutrition education in medical school (or lack thereof)And so much more!Stay Connected:Stay up to date with Dr. Ford: https://www.dralexford.com/Connect with Dr. Ford at info@neotritionbrands.com, for general questionsFollow Stevie on Instagram: @stevielynlynJoin Stevie's newsletter: Stevie Lyn Nutrition newsletterLearn more about Dr. Alex Ford: If you enjoyed this episode, please leave a 5-star rating and review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify—it helps more athletes and health-conscious individuals find the show!
This week onJust the Tip Thursday, we're answering a listener email that dives intosome topics that don't get talked about nearly enough in the lifestyle.
Send us Fan MailPart 1: Building a Design Firm Around Craftsmanship and LongevityMike Laut, founder and president of Laut Design in Raleigh, shared how a freelance operation started from his college apartment at NC State grew into one of the region's leading industrial design firms. Throughout the conversation, Mike emphasized the value of craftsmanship, durability, and thoughtful design, drawing parallels between classic machine tools, family-owned manufacturers, and successful modern businesses. He discussed his passion for restoring vintage milling machines and lathes, believing that older equipment often embodies a level of quality, simplicity, and pride that is missing from many modern products. Mike also highlighted the importance of company culture, surrounding himself with talented people, and only working with clients who share similar values. His philosophy centers on creating products that solve real human problems while building a business designed to last for generations. Part 2: A Potential Industry DisruptorAfter Mike's interview, Brent and Joris discussed the newly announced Formlabs large-format SLS printer, which dramatically increases build volume while entering the market at a price point far below traditional industrial powder-bed fusion systems. They explored how Formlabs is leveraging years of printing data, thermal monitoring, and software development to address some of the biggest challenges in SLS manufacturing, including print consistency and failure detection. While both hosts expressed excitement about the machine's potential to make industrial additive manufacturing more accessible, they also raised questions about first-generation reliability, material limitations, cooling times, and the long-term economics of Formlabs' powder ecosystem. The consensus was that the release could significantly disrupt established players such as HP, EOS, and Farsoon by lowering barriers to entry and making high-volume powder-bed printing attainable for smaller businesses, service bureaus, and healthcare applications such as prosthetics and orthotics. Special thanks to Advanced 3D for sponsoring this episode.Support the show
Tras cinco décadas, la NASA ha puesto en marcha la primera misión tripulada del programa Artemis con el objetivo de orbitar alrededor de la Luna sin alunizar, como prueba para futuros aterrizajes y para preparar misiones a la superficie lunar. La misión está diseñada para validar la nave Orión, el cohete SLS y los sistemas de soporte vital en el entorno espacial, además de preparar, a más largo plazo, un posible viaje a Marte. La misión supone un paso clave para demostrar que la infraestructura del programa Artemis puede llevar humanos de forma segura más lejos que nunca y preparar una presencia sostenible en la Luna. Es la primera misión tripulada a la Luna desde el Apolo 17 de 1972. El regreso humano a la órbita lunar significa mucho más que “volver a la Luna”: es una prueba de que la exploración tripulada más allá de la órbita terrestre baja vuelve a ser posible y útil. Representa un salto técnico y simbólico: técnicamente, permite comprobar la nave, las comunicaciones, la protección frente a radiación y el control de la misión en condiciones reales; simbólicamente, recupera una capacidad que la humanidad no ejercía desde hace más de 50 años. No se trata de repetir Apolo: ahora el objetivo es construir continuidad. La misión está pensada para generar datos, imágenes y experiencia operativa que ayuden a decidir dónde y cómo volver a la superficie lunar de forma más durable. Es importante porque la órbita lunar es una “zona de pruebas” estratégica entre la Tierra y la Luna. Desde ahí se ensayan trayectorias, se estudia el entorno espacial y se prepara la infraestructura que hará posibles bases, ciencia y exploración a largo plazo. La principal diferencia tecnológica es que Orión está pensada para operar como una nave digital y modular para el espacio profundo, mientras que Apolo era una cápsula analógica diseñada con la electrónica y la computación de los años 60. Orión incorpora sistemas modernos de soporte vital, navegación, comunicaciones con la Red del Espacio Profundo y una arquitectura preparada para misiones más largas y seguras. Apolo fue creada para llevar tres astronautas a la Luna con tecnología de computación muy limitada y fuerte dependencia del control manual y de tierra. Orión, en cambio, integra software y automatización más avanzados, una cabina más habitable y sistemas pensados para probar operaciones de proximidad, retorno libre y vuelos de larga duración. Orión mejora mucho el soporte vital: la NASA destaca que Artemis II sirve para comprobar que sus sistemas críticos pueden mantener a la tripulación en misiones de mayor duración. Eso incluye control de aire respirable, eliminación de dióxido de carbono y vapor de agua, y validación del comportamiento de la nave durante ejercicio y sueño, algo mucho más exigente que en Apolo. Apolo dependía de sistemas de guía menos potentes y de una red de seguimiento más limitada. Orión usa navegación y comunicaciones diseñadas para el espacio profundo. Aporta seguimiento de trayectoria, correcciones de rumbo, telemetría y comunicaciones de voz y vídeo. Sin esa red, la nave perdería precisión y la tripulación quedaría con menos apoyo en momentos críticos, especialmente durante maniobras cerca de la Luna. Orión puede gestionar navegación, orientación, control de sistemas de a bordo y muchas secuencias de misión con mayor autonomía que Apolo. Eso baja la carga de trabajo de la tripulación y ayuda a manejar mejor situaciones rutinarias o repetitivas. Apolo funcionaba con sistemas mayoritariamente analógicos y con una automatización mucho más limitada. Por eso los astronautas tenían que tomar decisiones y realizar correcciones con más intervención directa, especialmente en fases críticas de vuelo. La diferencia no es “máquina contra humano”, sino “máquina asistiendo al humano”. Orión está diseñada para que la automatización sostenga las operaciones normales, mientras la tripulación conserva autoridad para intervenir si hay una anomalía, una corrección de trayectoria o una maniobra delicada. La computadora de guiado Apollo tenía limitaciones claras ante fallos de software: su capacidad era muy baja, así que cualquier consumo extra de ciclos podía saturarla, y aun así estaba diseñada con prioridades para proteger las tareas críticas. En Apolo 11, por ejemplo, las alarmas 1201 y 1202 aparecieron por sobrecarga, pero el sistema pudo recuperarse porque descartó tareas no esenciales y mantuvo el guiado básico. El AGC trabajaba con muy poca memoria y un procesador modesto, así que no podía “absorber” muchos errores a la vez. Cuando el software o los periféricos generaban demasiada carga, el ordenador entraba en estado de alarma o reinicio, y eso dejaba muy poco margen para corregir problemas complejos en tiempo real. Su punto fuerte no era evitar todos los fallos, sino recuperarse de algunos de ellos. Tenía control de prioridades, podía reiniciar sin perder la memoria crítica y estaba pensado para seguir ejecutando las tareas esenciales incluso si otras fallaban o se bloqueaban. El problema era que, si el fallo afectaba a una función crítica o se repetía demasiado, la tripulación podía quedarse con una máquina muy limitada y con poco tiempo para reaccionar. En Orión, la intervención manual está pensada como respaldo y supervisión, no como modo principal de vuelo. La tripulación puede tomar el control cuando una secuencia automática no encaja con la situación real, cuando hay una anomalía o cuando se necesita ejecutar una maniobra delicada con criterio humano. Si falla el computador principal durante una reentrada, el procedimiento real suele ser pasar a control de respaldo y ejecutar la secuencia de reentrada con ayuda de la tripulación y del software redundante, no “pilotarla a ciegas” con una sola computadora. En Orión, la arquitectura está pensada para degradarse con seguridad, así que la intervención manual existe precisamente para recuperar control si la automatización principal deja de responder. En Artemis II se ha tenido en cuenta lo cotidiano dentro de una nave lunar: la comida consiste en tortillas en lugar de pan para evitar migas flotando en microgravedad y la tripulación usa toallitas, jabón sin aclarado y champú seco o de enjuague mínimo. El lanzamiento tuvo lugar el 1 de abril. La misión tuvo una duración de 10 días y llevó a la tripulación más lejos de la Tierra que cualquier misión tripulada anterior (rompiendo el récord del Apolo 13), reingresando en la atmósfera terrestre a una velocidad récord de aproximadamente 40.000 km/h. Artemis III es la misión tripulada prevista por la NASA dentro del programa Artemis, cuyo objetivo inicial era llevar a astronautas a la Luna, pero que ahora la NASA describe como una prueba de encuentro y acoplamiento en órbita terrestre con módulos de aterrizaje lunares comerciales, cuyo lanzamiento está previsto para 2027. La NASA afirma que la misión llevará a cuatro astronautas a bordo de la cápsula Orión, lanzada desde el Centro Espacial Kennedy a bordo del cohete SLS, y pondrá a prueba el acoplamiento con uno o ambos módulos de aterrizaje de SpaceX y Blue Origin. Los planes iniciales se centraban en un alunizaje en el Polo Sur de la Luna, pero la NASA actualizó la arquitectura de la misión a principios de 2026 para que el primer alunizaje de Artemis tuviera lugar, en su lugar, en la misión Artemis IV. Artemis IV es la cuarta misión planificada del programa Artemis de la NASA y, con el plan actual, será la primera misión del programa en llevar astronautas a la superficie lunar desde Apolo 17. La fecha objetivo más reciente es principios de 2028. La misión llevará a cuatro astronautas en Orión, lanzados por el SLS desde el Centro Espacial Kennedy, hasta la órbita lunar. Allí, dos tripulantes descenderán a la Luna, pasarán aproximadamente una semana en la región del polo sur y luego volverán a Orión para regresar a la Tierra. In Colour Patterns, Kyle Bobby Ddunn, Solace Road, Monasterium Imperi, Jeff Pearce, Kevin Braheny Fortune, ASKII, Fedir Tkachov, melodysheep, Murcof. El playlist detallado: lostfrontier.org/space.html#1080
Belief Hole | Conspiracy, the Paranormal and Other Tasty Thought Snacks
I talk with Tony about being a hot wife and all his questions. You can find him on SLS or FetLife at CoolStr8MaleMD.
Dr. Eligar Sadeh, Tuesday, May 5, 2026, #4535Quick summaryThe Space Show featured a discussion with Eligar Sadeh, editor of the Journal of Astropolitics, about the recent Space Symposium in Colorado Springs and cislunar space governance. Sadeh explained how the symposium focused heavily on establishing U.S. dominance in cislunar space, particularly through the Artemis program, with emphasis on being the first mover in establishing governance structures and rules of engagement. The discussion covered concerns about NASA science budget cuts, the sustainability of the Space Launch System, and the role of public-private partnerships in lunar development. Sadeh noted that while the U.S. space community emphasized military and strategic priorities, international scholars, particularly from developing space nations, were increasingly contributing to astropolitical research through his journal. The conversation also touched on challenges with Starlink satellite congestion and the potential for space asset disruption, though Sadeh emphasized the importance of establishing international governance frameworks to prevent harmful interference in space.Detailed SummaryEligar discussed his recent activities, including his work as an adjunct professor at the University of Colorado, his involvement with the journal Astropolitics, and his focus on lunar governance and astropolitics. He highlighted the growing interest in cislunar space and lunar governance, noting a significant increase in paper submissions to the journal and plans for a special issue and international conference on the topic. Eligar also mentioned the prominent role of defense and military interests in the current space industry, particularly with the Space Force's increasing budget and focus on space superiority. The conversation touched on personal updates, including Eligar's children's current activities and his relationship status.Eligar discussed the emerging focus on cislunar space at a recent space symposium, highlighting the strategic importance of establishing governance structures and securing gravitational high ground in the Earth-Moon system. He noted that while the Artemis program aims for aggressive lunar exploration and potential human habitation by 2032, there are significant challenges with the Space Launch System's sustainability and the reliance on new commercial capabilities like SpaceX's Starship. Eligar emphasized that the civil program appears to be a cover for establishing U.S. superiority in the cislunar domain, particularly in response to geopolitical competition with China and Russia.The discussion focused on concerns about proposed NASA science cuts and their impact on the space community. Eligar noted that while there was awareness of these cuts during networking discussions at the Space Symposium, there was limited pushback, with many participants appearing to align with the Trump administration's direction. The conversation then shifted to broader governance challenges in the cislunar domain, with Eligar emphasizing the need for maintaining space as a commons and establishing rules for interoperability among the 62 states participating in the Artemis program. The discussion concluded with a reference to a 20-year-old paper co-authored by Eligar and David on public-private partnerships in lunar development, which remains relevant to current space governance challenges.Eligar discussed the challenges of establishing a permanent lunar presence, highlighting issues such as freedom of movement, resource utilization, and the harsh lunar environment, including metallic and adhesive dust. He emphasized the need for reusable and sustainable lunar transportation systems, suggesting that achieving a cost of $100 per kilogram with Starship could be crucial. Eligar also explained the concept of cislunar space as the gravitational high ground incorporating Lagrange points between Earth and the Moon, which provides access to various orbital domains and the lunar surface. Joe noted the disconnect between desired goals and current capabilities, advocating for increased repetition in accessing lunar space to support a permanent presence.The discussion focused on NASA's lunar mission plans and budget constraints. Joe expressed concerns that the Moon Enterprise would likely crowd out other NASA programs due to limited congressional funding, similar to previous large initiatives like the Space Shuttle and International Space Station. Eligar agreed that SLS is not sustainable, noting it's only planned for up to Artemis 5 with a cadence of one launch per year, and emphasized the geopolitical aspects driving the lunar race, including the need for reusable transportation systems and establishing a presence in the Aitken Basin for potential mining opportunities.The discussion focused on the Space Symposium's emphasis on getting to the lunar surface first rather than focusing on sustainability or cost efficiency. Eligar noted that while there was general support for the Artemis program and Accords, there was limited discussion about alternative lunar surface models or modifications to the current Artemis plan. The conversation highlighted a potential disconnect between the symposium's rhetoric about achieving rapid progress and budgetary realities, including concerns about over-reliance on Starship variants and cuts to science programs. John suggested that the science program cuts might be a strategic budget maneuver similar to defense programs, with the expectation that Congress would eventually restore funding.Eligar discussed NASA's proposed permanent lunar presence around 2030 and debated various technical choices in rocket design and propulsion. The conversation then shifted to concerns about space congestion, particularly with multiple satellite constellations being planned by different countries, though Eligar noted that cislunar space remains decades away from similar congestion issues. David raised questions about the global scope of the astropolitics journal, with contributions coming from scholars in developing space states who are focused on using space for socio-economic development rather than military dominance.The group discussed perceptions of Jared Isaacman and NASA's leadership in space governance, particularly regarding the Artemis program. Eligar explained that while there are good ideas in the current approach, there are concerns about U.S. dominance in space policy, noting a European concept of “equivalence” where different countries could develop governance approaches independently while maintaining interoperability standards. The discussion highlighted the tension between U.S. efforts to establish space superiority and the need for international cooperation, with Joe emphasizing that China and the U.S. are the dominant powers in space, making other countries effectively choose between aligning with one of these powers.We also discussed the growing importance of satellite communication systems for military purposes, with Joe noting that multiple countries are developing Starlink-like systems following the Ukraine war. They explored the challenges of denying access to these systems and the potential for kinetic attacks on satellites, with Eligar emphasizing the importance of establishing governance structures and rules of the road in space. The discussion concluded with Eligar providing an update on the journal Astropolitics, which is growing in influence among emerging space powers and has expanded its editorial board with new members including someone from the Romanian Space Agency.Eligar then mentioned plans for a special issue of Astropolitics journal focused on lunar astropolitics, governance strategy, and policy dynamics in cislunar space, with a global conference planned for early next year and publication expected in a year to year and a half. He agreed to provide David with contact information for potential guests for the Space Show and discussed the possibility of updating a previous article with Haym and himself in the fall. Regarding the timeline for returning humans to the Moon, Eligar expressed doubt about the 2028 target, suggesting 2030 would be more realistic due to ongoing challenges with the lunar landing vehicle.The group discussed public-private partnerships in space, with Eligar noting that realistic timelines for landing vehicles are now around 2030 rather than 2028 due to delays on both Blue Origin and SpaceX sides. Joe raised questions about international public-private partnerships, particularly in countries like India, while Eligar shared insights about emerging space capabilities in countries like Brazil, Cambodia, Thailand, and Indonesia. The discussion concluded with plans to follow up on these topics in a future issue of Astropolitics journal, with Eligar offering to rewrite and get the paper peer-reviewed.Special thanks to our sponsors:American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Helix Space in Luxembourg, Celestis Memorial Spaceflights, Astrox Corporation, Dr. Haym Benaroya of Rutgers University, The Space Settlement Progress Blog by John Jossy, The Atlantis Project, and Artless EntertainmentWe use Zoom phone numbers for program participation.For real time program participation, email Dr. Space at: drspace@thespaceshow.com for instructions and access.The Space Show is a non-profit 501C3 through its parent, One Giant Leap Foundation, Inc. To donate via Pay Pal, use:To donate with Zelle, use the email address: david@onegiantleapfoundation.org.If you prefer donating with a check, please make the check payable to One Giant Leap Foundation and mail to:One Giant Leap Foundation, 11035 Lavender Hill Drive Ste. 160-306 Las Vegas, NV 89135Upcoming Programs:Please note that due to out of town guests for a family party, our next live Space Show program will be June 9, Tuesday, 7 PM PDT. Please check the Upcoming Show Menu on our home page for updates as they appear. Thank you. Get full access to The Space Show-One Giant Leap Foundation at doctorspace.substack.com/subscribe
On this episode of Real Fuel with SLS, I am joined by professional runner, American record holder, and mother of two, Keira D'Amato. Fresh off the release of her new book, Don't Call It a Comeback, Keira opens up about her recent major surgery and her intentional, conservative approach to rehabilitation.Keira pulls back the curtain on what it's like to realize you've been living and training in constant pain, how her body learned to compensate over a five-year period, and why she is viewing this three-month reset as a beautiful opportunity to correct imbalances. From the hilariously relatable logistics of waist-deep pool running in running shoes to coaching her daughter's Girls on the Run team, Keira shares how she is finding joy in the current phase of her journey while keeping her eyes locked squarely on the 2028 Olympic Trials.We also chat more about:Building a community as a runnerAddressing imbalances to improve sport performancePatience over pressure during her return to sportUsing pool running and other modalities in her post-surgery recoveryFinding the silver linings during time away from regular trainingAnd so much more!Stay Connected:Follow Keira on Instagram: @keiradamatoBuy Keira's book Don't Call it a ComebackFollow Stevie on Instagram: @stevielynlynJoin Stevie's newsletter: Stevie Lyn Nutrition newsletter
In this episode of Space Cafe Radio, host Torsten Kriening, Publisher of SpaceWatch.Global, sits down with Marshall Smith, CEO of Starlab Space, at the 41st Space Symposium in Colorado Springs. The conversation reconnects a story that began in Bremen back in 2018, when Marshall was wiring together SLS, Orion, and Gateway at NASA, and now finds him on the other side, building the commercial future he once championed from inside the agency.From NASA Insider to Commercial BuilderMarshall reflects on his transition from NASA, where he was always "commercial at heart" - pushing the system to go faster, do things differently, and question whether all those requirements were truly necessary. Now leading Starlab, he gets to put those convictions into action.The Time is Now for Commercial LEO"Now's the time to turn over Low Earth Orbit to commercial enterprise."After 54 years of space stations and more than two decades of permanent crewed presence on the ISS, the industry has learned enough. The technology readiness is there. The standards are there. The time has come for commercial enterprise to take over LEO so NASA can focus on the harder things- Moon, Mars, and beyond.Where Starlab Stands TodayMarshall reveals concrete progress: Starlab is past Critical Design Review with NASA (completed in December), in manufacturing, building structures, with long-lead items in process. They're roughly five to six years into the typical six-to-ten-year development cycle for a complex space vehicle. Some say they haven't hit the hard part yet, but Marshall responds: "We have the capability, we have the experience. Eyes wide open."The Real Gap RiskThe ISS retires around 2030. China's space station is operational today. Marshall is candid about the leaks, the aging equipment, the obsolete components, and the uncertainty about whether extension to 2030 or 2032 will be possible. Starlab's launch target is 2029 - and they intend to be there before the gap opens.Recreating the ISS Partnership - CommerciallyStarlab is a joint venture with Voyager as majority shareholder, joined by Airbus, Mitsubishi, MDA, Palantir, and Hilton -a multinational structure that recreates the ISS partnership at a commercial and business level. The same companies that built parts of the ISS are now building the commercial successor.Starship as the Launch PlanMarshall explains why he's not worried: Starship has already been to orbit, and Starlab only needs to reach orbit and deploy - no Moon landing required. By the time Starlab launches, Starship will likely be on its seventh version.The Manufacturing VisionMarshall hints at semiconductor manufacturing, biopharma, pill production, fiber optics, and a proprietary concept that could revolutionize the pace of in-orbit manufacturing. He predicts the demand will be so great that companies might want their own dedicated Starlab modules - and that copies could be built in roughly one to two years.The iPhone Moment for Space Stations"In 2007, somebody built a platform called an iPhone. It had a few games, didn't even do FaceTime. Now you can't walk around without your phone. CLDs are platforms. Ten years after operations begin, you're going to see things you would've never imagined - maybe ordering a replacement heart tuned to your DNA, printed in space."On Artemis 2Having been involved in Artemis 1 and 2 at NASA, Marshall shares his personal joy at the mission's success. For him, it's a signal to the world that humanity is going back to deep space, to the Moon's surface, building Moon bases, going to Mars.The Bigger Mission"It's about becoming a multi-planet species. Maybe one day becoming a multi-stellar species. I know that sounds crazy to some people. That's why I do this. Because I don't want to see us being here locked on this planet a thousand years from now."Marshall draws the parallel to the 1400s - when explorers asked "what if we cross this big body of water?" - and now humans are asking the same question about the void of vacuum. The exploration accelerates. We were built for this.For Listeners Who Think BigThis is a conversation about commercial space stations, the urgency of LEO transition, the iPhone-platform future of orbital manufacturing, and what it means to become a multi-planet species.Space Café Radio brings you talks, interviews, and reports from the team of SpaceWatchers while out on the road. Each episode has a specific topic, unique content, and a personal touch. Enjoy the show, and let us know your thoughts at radio@spacewatch.globalWe love to hear from you. Send us your thought, comments, suggestions, love lettersSupport the showYou can find us on: Spotify and Apple Podcast!Please visit us at SpaceWatch.Global, subscribe to our newsletters. Follow us on LinkedIn and X!
V državnem zboru se dopoldne pred pristojnimi parlamentarnimi odbori začenjajo prva zaslišanja kandidatk in kandidatov za ministrska mesta v novi vladi Janeza Janše. V ministrski ekipi je med koalicijskimi partnericami sedem ministrskih stolčkov pripadlo SDS, štirje NSi, trije Demokratom in eno Fokusu, SLS pa je ostala brez svojega ministrskega kandidata. Vse predstavitve bodo opravili danes in jutri, poslanci pa bodo o seznamu kandidatov predvidoma odločali v četrtek na izredni seji. Drugi poudarki: - Vrstijo se obsodbe stopnjevanja izraelske invazije na Libanon. - Današnji svetovni dan mleka v senci večmesečne krize pridelave zaradi padca odkupnih cen. - Finski hokejisti petič svetovni prvaki po zmagi nad gostitelji Švicarji.
The Space Show Presents Open Lines Discussion Today, Sunday, 5-3-26Quick Summary:This meeting focused on open discussion topics in space exploration and national security. Bob shared speculation about a potential SpaceX acquisition of 200+ square miles of land in Louisiana for data centers and manufacturing facilities, though this remained unconfirmed. The group extensively discussed the Artemis 3 mission delay, with participants debating the challenges of SLS rocket assembly versus SpaceX's Starship development approach. Ajay raised significant concerns about Russia's nuclear-powered missile program, specifically the Burevestnik missile tested in October 2025, which he described as difficult to detect and potentially dangerous. The conversation also touched on nuclear power applications for data centers and military bases, with Dr. Ajay mentioning new small modular reactor companies emerging in the market. The discussion concluded with debate about defense strategies against such nuclear capabilities and the current state of hypersonic weapons development.Detailed Summary:Bob discussed a speculative story about SpaceX potentially acquiring a 200-square-mile piece of land in Louisiana, which could be used for data centers, satellite manufacturing, and Starship production. He noted that this would allow SpaceX to shift operations away from California. The conversation concluded with a mention of Artemis 3's delay and a brief reference to Robert's recent article about the potential Louisiana land acquisition.David announced that Robert would be scheduled for a show on May 26th at 6 PM, and discussed upcoming shows including Dr. Eligar Sadeh returning on Tuesday to discuss Astropolitics journal reviewing opportunities. The group briefly discussed unconfirmed news about Elon Musk's salary and potential Mars colonization plans, though Bob repeated that much of this information was speculative. David also mentioned upcoming shows including an ISDC episode with Rod Pyle and Aggi Kobrin on May 12th.Bob shared unconfirmed rumors that SpaceX may be acquiring approximately 136,000 acres of coastal Louisiana marshland near Pecan Island for potential data centers and manufacturing facilities. The discussion explored the strategic benefits of this location, including proximity to intercoastal waterways, power infrastructure, and natural gas facilities, though participants noted concerns about launch debris dispersion and local community impact. The group acknowledged this was speculative information pending official confirmation from SpaceX.The group discussed the delay of the Artemis III mission, with Bob explaining that both Blue Origin and SpaceX requested additional time to prepare their landers for an Earth-orbiting test mission. Robert noted that this delay would impact the scheduling of subsequent Artemis missions in 2028, as SLS rockets can only be assembled one at a time using a single mobile launcher. The discussion compared SLS and Starship assembly processes, with Joe highlighting how SLS involves numerous complex steps due to its design requirements, while Starship's assembly is more streamlined. Bob concluded that Jared Isaacman's goal is to demonstrate SLS's limitations over the next two years, potentially paving the way for Starship and New Glenn rockets to replace SLS in the future.The group discussed the competitive dynamics between SLS and Starship programs, with different perspectives on NASA's intentions. Phil and Joe had a different view, suggesting NASA believed SLS could beat Starship if it increased production rates faster. The discussion also covered technical aspects of Starship's design, with Ajay raising concerns about the high dry weight requiring multiple refueling trips to the moon, while Marshall and others highlighted the importance of SpaceX's new launch facilities in enabling frequent launches.The group discussed different approaches to refueling a lunar mission depot, with Ajay presenting a plan involving expendable tankers while Phil and Bob described a reusable tanker concept aligned with SpaceX's philosophy. Ajay cited NASA and Aerospace Corporation analyses suggesting 10-16 refueling launches would be needed with expendable tankers, though the group noted these estimates were based on V2 configurations rather than the more efficient V3. Bob defended SpaceX's approach, emphasizing the company's focus on reusability and rapid launch capabilities, while acknowledging that current payload limitations might require temporary use of expendable vehicles if development timelines don't meet requirements by mid-2027.The group discussed SpaceX's Starship program and its potential, with Ajay cautioning against extrapolating success from Falcon 9 to other projects. David interrupted the Starship-focused discussion to broaden the conversation, particularly wanting Ajay to share insights about a new Russian nuclear-powered missile system that can fly at low altitudes and evade detection. Ajay explained that this missile system, demonstrated on October 21, poses a significant threat as it cannot be detected by current defense systems and could potentially remain airborne for extended periods. When asked about countermeasures, Ajay indicated he had provided suggestions to defense departments but could not share details in the open forum.Ajay discussed his work on hypersonic and nuclear power applications, highlighting his experience since 1990 and recent developments in nuclear power plants. He mentioned new companies like ILO Atomics and Astra working on 10-megawatt power plants for data centers, which could be factory-built within a year. Ajay also shared his conversations with senators about the Burevestnik missile and his meeting with Jared at Mar-a-Lago, where he inquired about the Falcon Heavy idea. Marshall raised concerns about the time required for permits for nuclear power plants, to which Ajay responded that recent executive orders have reduced the timeline to 3-6 months.The discussion focused on nuclear power applications, particularly small modular reactors and micro-reactors. Ajay explained his work on a 25-megawatt thermal power plant design and discussed the military's micro-reactor program, noting that molten salt reactors would be more suitable than pressurized water reactors for energy applications. The conversation also addressed hypersonic missile technology, with Ajay clarifying that current U.S. hypersonic programs use rocket-boosted systems with limited range, distinguishable from the nuclear-powered hypersonic missiles discussed in the context of Russian weapons. John Hunt suggested that developing such nuclear-powered systems might not be a priority for the U.S. given existing deterrent capabilities and potential public opposition.The group discussed Russia's nuclear-powered missile development, specifically the Burevestnik missile tested on October 21, 2025, which flew for 15 hours at subsonic speeds and demonstrated capabilities to evade missile defenses. Ajay emphasized the danger of these nuclear-capable missiles, noting their ability to approach from any direction and their challenging detection due to flying at low altitudes. cautioned that Russia's technical competence with high-tech projects should be viewed with skepticism, though acknowledged the need to address these developments. The discussion concluded with Dr. Ajay expressing skepticism about fusion energy timelines and advocating for Generation 4 nuclear reactors, particularly molten salt reactors using thorium or uranium-233.The group discussed thorium reactors and fusion technology. Ajay explained that China copied thorium reactor technology from Oak Ridge National Lab in the 1960s, but development was halted due to lack of plutonium production, despite its potential for clean energy. The discussion covered fusion for space applications, with Ajay expressing skepticism about the feasibility of Pulsar Fusion's proposed system due to the high energy requirements and weight constraints for space travel. The conversation also touched on the challenges of space-based data centers, with participants questioning the practicality of using space for cooling purposes given existing technical limitations.The group discussed space-based data centers and energy transmission methods. Joe explained that Overview Energy, backed by Meta, is exploring using infrared lasers to transmit energy from space to ground-based solar farms. Bob highlighted that while space data centers may not be economically viable, they could drive significant launch demand and benefit the aerospace industry. The discussion also touched on the massive capital expenditure plans of major tech companies, with Joe noting that approximately $750 billion in capital expenses could potentially include space-based data center projects, creating new opportunities for rocket companies.The group discussed the challenges of cooling data centers in space, with Ajay explaining that radiating heat into space requires large radiators due to the lack of convection and conduction in vacuum. Joe noted that operating chips at higher temperatures could reduce the size of radiators, but this would negatively impact performance. The discussion also covered nuclear propulsion options for space travel, with Ajay expressing skepticism about the feasibility of implementing nuclear electric propulsion for the planned Mars mission within the proposed timeline. The group agreed that nuclear thermal propulsion, while more efficient, would require significant development time and testing. (Summary provided by Zoom AI).Special thanks to our sponsors:American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Helix Space in Luxembourg, Celestis Memorial Spaceflights, Astrox Corporation, Dr. Haym Benaroya of Rutgers University, The Space Settlement Progress Blog by John Jossy, The Atlantis Project, and Artless EntertainmentWe use Zoom phone numbers for program participation.For real time program participation, email Dr. Space at: drspace@thespaceshow.com for instructions and access.The Space Show is a non-profit 501C3 through its parent, One Giant Leap Foundation, Inc. To donate via Pay Pal, use:To donate with Zelle, use the email address: david@onegiantleapfoundation.org.If you prefer donating with a check, please make the check payable to One Giant Leap Foundation and mail to:One Giant Leap Foundation, 11035 Lavender Hill Drive Ste. 160-306 Las Vegas, NV 89135Upcoming Programs:No Program for Friday, May 29, 2026 | Friday 29 May 2026 930AM PTGuests: Dr. David LivingstonNo program today, Friday, May 26, 2026Broadcast 4596: Zoom: Open Lines Discussion | Sunday 31 May 2026 1200PM PTGuests: Dr. David LivingstonZoom: Open Lines Discussion. Email DrSpace prior to air time for Zoom phone number access. Get full access to The Space Show-One Giant Leap Foundation at doctorspace.substack.com/subscribe
The Space Show Presents Shubber Ali, Sunday, 4-19-26Quick Summary:This Space Show program featured Shubber Ali, the original founder of Space Cynics, discussing his return to critiquing space industry claims and over hyping. Shubber explained how Space Cynics began in the mid-2000s as a blog focused on questioning exaggerated claims about space technology, particularly around reusable rockets and commercial space ventures. The discussion centered heavily on Shubber's criticism of current space projects, including Elon Musk's data center plans in space, orbital mirrors for solar power, and space-based solar power systems. Shubber argued these projects were economically unfeasible due to launch costs, engineering challenges, and unrealistic timelines, using detailed calculations to demonstrate why proposed constellations would take decades to deploy rather than the claimed 5-year timeframes. The conversation also touched on NASA's Artemis program, government debt concerns, and the challenges of space colonization, with Shubber expressing skepticism about many current space industry promises while acknowledging the long-term potential for space development.Detailed Summary:The Wisdom Team discussed the background of Shubber Ali, who joined the meeting late due to a family commitment. They shared memories of past encounters, including a NASA Ames event and Shubber's work on the X33 “Adventure Star” project 25 years ago. The conversation touched on personal updates, including Shubber's recent move from California to Maryland and his company's location in Maine. The conversation ended with a brief discussion about potential future topics to cover, including data centers and reflecting mirrors, though the specific focus was not finalized.David welcomed Shubber Ali to the Sunday Space Show to discuss the resurrection of Space Cynics, a blog and award system that Shubber had originally founded in the mid-2000s. Shubber explained that Space Cynics focused on critiquing outlandish claims made by space companies, particularly through their “Walking Eagle Award” given to companies making unrealistic promises. Shubber shared his background working at KPMG in the 1990s, where he managed a space consulting team that produced the first annual State of the Space Industry report in collaboration with SpaceVest and other partners. The discussion began to cover the history of RLV (Reusable Launch Vehicle) companies from that era, though the transcript ended before this topic was fully explored.Shubber discussed the history of reusable rockets and space industry economics, highlighting how SpaceX's success demonstrated the viability of reusable technology despite earlier failures like the Space Shuttle program. He criticized current space industry hype, particularly around data centers in space, explaining that such projects face significant challenges in physics, engineering, and timeline feasibility. Shubber provided specific calculations showing that deploying a large constellation of data center satellites would take decades, not the 5-year timeline often proposed, and emphasized that basic mathematical analysis could disprove many space industry claims.Shubber expressed skepticism about Elon Musk's business ventures, particularly SpaceX and the Boring Company, arguing that while Musk has vision and funding, the actual execution relies heavily on his team. Shubber criticized the overvaluation of AI companies, claiming there's a significant bubble in the AI industry that will likely burst, with most AI applications being overhyped and overvalued. Philip disagreed, arguing that AI provides real value through productivity gains in areas like document drafting and research, though Shubber countered that these benefits are limited and often require significant human correction due to AI errors and hallucinations.Next, the discussion focused on evaluating business proposals and technological ideas, particularly around supply and demand economics. Shubber explained his approach to identifying problematic business projections, emphasizing how increased supply typically leads to lower prices unless demand grows commensurately. The conversation also addressed Elon Musk's Hyperloop concept, with AJ suggesting it was a bad idea without providing specific economic reasoning, which led to moderation intervention from David to keep the discussion focused on Shubber's planned topics. The discussion concluded with technical considerations around satellite positioning and space-based solar power challenges.We talked about the feasibility of space-based solar power, with Shubber and Phil both expressing skepticism about the technology's practicality in the near term. Shubber emphasized engineering challenges including launch costs, construction of large structures at geostationary orbit, and the inability to service equipment there, while Phil focused on economic inefficiencies due to energy conversion losses and high launch costs. The conversation also covered the status of space hotels, with David sharing insights about Bob Bigelow's withdrawal from the space hotel business following personal tragedy, and the group debated the value and hype surrounding NASA's Artemis program, particularly regarding the SLS rocket and moon missionsThe team discussed the Artemis program and NASA's budget challenges. Shubber criticized the SLS project as inefficient and suggested opening it up to commercial competition. The conversation then shifted to the national debt and unfunded liabilities, particularly regarding Social Security. Shubber explained the financial challenges of the current system and expressed skepticism about proposed solutions like moving Social Security to a cryptocurrency system. The discussion concluded with a brief mention of orbital mirrors and their potential applications, though Shubber expressed doubts about their practicality and use cases.The group discussed the feasibility and business case of using orbital mirrors to provide artificial sunlight, particularly for solar farms. Shubber and Philip analyzed the technical requirements, including the size of mirrors needed and the challenges of maintaining continuous sunlight. The discussion also touched on environmental impacts, including effects on agriculture and wildlife, and the long-term prospects for human space colonization, with Shubber suggesting that while space colonization may be necessary in the very long term, current public interest in returning to the moon remains limited.The group discussed space tourism and commercial space missions. They clarified that while Axiom missions have taken approximately 16 people to the ISS, these were not traditional space tourists but rather business investors funding scientific research. The conversation then shifted to GRU Space, a company claiming to develop the first lunar hotel, though participants expressed skepticism about its credibility and media presence. The discussion concluded with Shubber outlining a framework for evaluating space business proposals based on physics, engineering, and economics principles.The discussion focused on the challenges and realities of space technology investments, particularly regarding StarCloud's satellite project. Shubber explained how companies like StarCloud secure funding through connections and hype rather than proven technology, contrasting them with older-style VCs like Ed Tuck who focused on legitimate due diligence. The conversation then shifted to nuclear energy, where Shubber expressed support for nuclear power while noting that regulatory and construction challenges, rather than technical feasibility, are the main obstacles. The discussion concluded with a debate about the role of space advocates, where Shubber emphasized the importance of balancing ambitious vision with realistic timelines to maintain credibility and avoid damaging the broader space industry through unwarranted hype.The declining quality in journalism and scientific reporting was a topic. Shubber shared his experience of discovering that even respected publications like Scientific American contained inaccurate information, leading him to question the credibility of mainstream media. David described how his experience as a parent of a child with cystic fibrosis revealed widespread miscommunication between journalists and scientists, with researchers confirming that journalists often misunderstood their work. The discussion concluded with Ajay expressing concern about increasing dishonesty in scientific research, though Shubber clarified that the core scientific method remains sound and that issues arise when researchers prioritize agenda-driven outcomes over objective truth.The group discussed the challenges of modern engineering and space technology, particularly focusing on SpaceX's Starship development and the complexity of creating new products compared to historical examples like the Model T. Shubber mentioned his plans to write an upcoming OP-ed about space exploration and financial concerns, comparing the current situation to Britain before the fall of Singapore. The conversation concluded with a discussion about the likelihood of experiencing the Kessler syndrome by 2050, with participants expressing varying levels of optimism about humanity's ability to prevent such a scenario.Special thanks to our sponsors:American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Helix Space in Luxembourg, Celestis Memorial Spaceflights, Astrox Corporation, Dr. Haym Benaroya of Rutgers University, The Space Settlement Progress Blog by John Jossy, The Atlantis Project, and Artless EntertainmentWe use Zoom phone numbers for program participation.For real time program participation, email Dr. Space at: drspace@thespaceshow.com for instructions and access.The Space Show is a non-profit 501C3 through its parent, One Giant Leap Foundation, Inc. To donate via Pay Pal, use:To donate with Zelle, use the email address: david@onegiantleapfoundation.org.If you prefer donating with a check, please make the check payable to One Giant Leap Foundation and mail to:One Giant Leap Foundation, 11035 Lavender Hill Drive Ste. 160-306 Las Vegas, NV 89135Upcoming Programs:No Program for Friday, May 29, 2026 | Friday 29 May 2026 930AM PTGuests: Dr. David LivingstonNo program today, Friday, May 26, 2026Broadcast 4596: Zoom: Open Lines Discussion | Sunday 31 May 2026 1200PM PTGuests: Dr. David LivingstonZoom: Open Lines Discussion. Email DrSpace prior to air time for Zoom phone number access. Get full access to The Space Show-One Giant Leap Foundation at doctorspace.substack.com/subscribe
Detailed Summary:SpaceX Starship Launch DiscussionThe group discussed SpaceX's recent Starship launch, which John described as a partial success with significant technical challenges including an engine outage that caused the booster to deviate from its course. David praised the high-quality camera work and photography during the launch, while Dr. Sherry noted that SpaceX itself considered the mission a success and emphasized their approach of learning from mistakes. The team also explained the satellite ejection mechanism used in the launch, with Charles and Robert providing details about how the satellites were deployed from the rocket.The group discussed SpaceX's Starship Flight 12 (IFT-12), with participants evaluating its significance for future Artemis missions. Bob explained that while the flight was important for testing new engines and systems, it wasn't critical for SpaceX's overall success, particularly given their upcoming IPO and existing Starlink revenue. The discussion highlighted the technical challenges involved in the flight, including new Raptor 3 engines and a rebuilt launch pad, with participants agreeing that the flight achieved its main objectives of reaching orbit and conducting necessary tests.The Wisdom Team discussed the recent Starship test flight, comparing it to SLS development and emphasizing that the technologies are not comparable due to different approaches and goals. David defended SpaceX's methodology of learning from failures, while Ajay highlighted specific technical issues with the first stage during the test. The discussion included observations about engine problems and a puncture in the tile, with participants noting that this is part of the development process for new technology.The group discussed the recent SpaceX Starship test flight, with Dr. Ajay clarifying that one engine blew up before separation, causing other engines to shut down due to fuel sloshing. Phil expressed concerns about the program's timeline, arguing that SpaceX is not on track to meet the goal of reaching the moon within a couple of years, while Robert countered that abandoning the current approach would only cause further delays. The discussion concluded with Dallas defending the mission's success in achieving its suborbital trajectory goals, though Phil maintained that the program has not yet proven its ability to deliver the required 100 tons of payload to orbit.The team discussed SpaceX's satellite deployment program, with Marshall clarifying that dummy satellites weighed about 2 tons each but Phil found conflicting information suggesting 17 tons total for 22 satellites. The discussion then shifted to refueling capabilities, where Doug shared insights from a leading researcher who estimated a 50% chance of success on the first attempt and near 100% on the second attempt for propellant docking and transfer. The conversation concluded with Ajay noting that while Progress has done fuel transfer with storable fuel, cryogenic fuel transfer remains untested in orbit, though SpaceX had previously demonstrated cryogenic propellant transfer during IFT-10.The group discussed SpaceX's development of in-orbit refueling capabilities, with Dallas sharing details about their 2008 demonstration using vapor-cooled skins and a crawl cooler from Criari. The discussion focused on comparing SpaceX's progress with Blue Origin's approach, with Robert noting that while SpaceX has outlined plans for a several-week refueling mission this year involving two Starship launches, Blue Origin's development pace remains slower. The conversation concluded with debate about propellant requirements for lunar missions, with Dallas explaining that the HLS mission would need approximately 40 tons of propellant for the Gateway and lunar lander in the lunar vicinity.Phil suggested that NASA should design the optimal lunar lander and then assign contracts to commercial companies like Boeing or SpaceX for manufacturing, while also working to reduce the cost of SLS rockets through mass production. Robert clarified that NASA's investment in SpaceX's Starship program is minimal compared to SpaceX's private funding, which includes $12 billion raised for Starlink and an expected $75 billion from an IPO. The discussion highlighted concerns about Starship's timeline and feasibility, with participants noting that alternative approaches using existing technology like SLS and a modified lander could potentially be faster than Starship development, though still facing significant challenges.Robert discussed the challenges with NASA's rocket development programs, highlighting that despite being 16 years since launch, they have only launched twice and suggesting that competition from multiple companies would be beneficial. Phil argued that NASA should handle advanced projects internally due to their track record of successful first-time launches, while Dallas clarified that NASA did not design the SLS but served as system integrator. David raised concerns about safety risks in human spaceflight programs, citing a former Artemis team engineer's warnings about discontinuity in systems engineering when switching between commercial companies, which Marshall supported by noting that most bugs occur at interfaces between different components or companies.The group discussed software engineering interfaces and their impact on system safety, particularly comparing Apollo and Artemis programs. Marshall and Ajay explained that while multiple companies building different components can create interface challenges, proper system engineering and testing can mitigate these risks. Robert emphasized that Artemis's current issues stem from lack of overall NASA-designed architecture and distributed ownership, suggesting NASA should consolidate components and hire companies to build major components with fewer interfaces. Doug cautioned against attributing 90% of problems to interfaces alone, noting that known issues in NASA's culture contributed to previous shuttle program losses.The discussion focused on comparing NASA's Apollo-style approach with SpaceX's commercial approach for returning to the moon. Doug and Charles argued that the commercial approach using Starship offers better long-term sustainability and permanence on the moon compared to the Apollo-style urgency-driven approach using SLS and Orion. Philip countered that Starship is not necessarily the permanent solution and that a racal departure from rocket technology might be needed for true permanence. The conversation also highlighted that SpaceX's Starship development represents a smaller portion of their overall investment compared to their other projects like Starlink, with Starship serving as a transportation system to support broader capabilities.The group discussed the evolution of chemical rockets and reusability, with Phil and Doug clarifying that full reusability is not a revolutionary change compared to the space shuttle. David challenged critics like Phil and AJ to support the current Artemis program rather than continuously criticize it, asking what constructive role they could play given the program's commitment to Starship and Artemis missions. Ajay expressed support for the Artemis program overall but raised concerns about Starship's size and propellant fraction requirements, suggesting it should be reduced to about one-third its current size for lunar missions. Phil shared insights from his recent presentation at Ascend, noting that NASA engineers lack access to critical technical details about Starship's development, similar to the broader public's understanding of the program.The group discussed concerns about NASA's involvement and insight into SpaceX's Starship program, with Philip expressing concerns that NASA's team lacks sufficient information to properly assess Starship's performance and safety. The discussion revealed that while NASA has embedded engineering teams with SpaceX and extensive visibility into various aspects of development, they don't have complete control over architectural decisions. The conversation ended with John mentioning SpaceX's improvements to the launch site and Raptor 3 engine, and Sherry praising the video footage of Starlink satellites in space.The group discussed SpaceX's achievements and role in the space industry, with participants praising their rideshare and Starlink initiatives while expressing concerns about relying too heavily on Starship for the Artemis program. Phil suggested reassessing NASA's lunar landing strategy by considering alternative solutions like using Falcon Heavy or smaller landers from companies like Dynetics or Blue Origin. The conversation ended with Robert promoting an upcoming Space Show discussion and David reflecting on Memorial Day, thanking veterans for their service and contributions to space exploration.Special thanks to our sponsors:American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Helix Space in Luxembourg, Celestis Memorial Spaceflights, Astrox Corporation, Dr. Haym Benaroya of Rutgers University, The Space Settlement Progress Blog by John Jossy, The Atlantis Project, and Artless EntertainmentWe use Zoom phone numbers for program participation.For real time program participation, email Dr. Space at: drspace@thespaceshow.com for instructions and access.The Space Show is a non-profit 501C3 through its parent, One Giant Leap Foundation, Inc. To donate via Pay Pal, use:To donate with Zelle, use the email address: david@onegiantleapfoundation.org.If you prefer donating with a check, please make the check payable to One Giant Leap Foundation and mail to:One Giant Leap Foundation, 11035 Lavender Hill Drive Ste. 160-306 Las Vegas, NV 89135Upcoming Programs:Broadcast 4594: Zoom: Bob Zimmerman (Special 6 PM PDT start time) | Tuesday 26 May 2026 600PM PTGuests: Robert ZimmermanZoom: (6 PM PDT Start Time) Bob Zimmerman is back on Starship and all space matters. Don't miss it! to Listen and participate use Zoom phone lines. Email DrSpace before airtime for the number access.Broadcast 4595: Hotel Mars TBD | Wednesday 27 May 2026 930AM PTGuests: John Batchelor, Dr. David LivingstonHotel Mars TBDNo Program for Friday, May 29, 2026 | Friday 29 May 2026 930AM PTGuests: Dr. David LivingstonNo program today, Friday, May 26, 2026Broadcast 4596: Zoom: Open Lines Discussion | Sunday 31 May 2026 1200PM PTGuests: Dr. David LivingstonZoom: Open Lines Discussion. Email DrSpace prior to air time for Zoom phone number access. Get full access to The Space Show-One Giant Leap Foundation at doctorspace.substack.com/subscribe
This week ona brand-new Just The Tip Thursday, we tackle one of the toughest emailswe've received yet. A listener writes in saying his wife no longer wants toexperience the lifestyle together… and now she's going on solo dates withouthim. He feels lost, hurt, confused, and wants to know: Can this relationshipbe fixed before it's too late?Carlos andAutumn go deep into the realities of what happens when couples stop movingtogether in the LS. Is solo play healthy? When does independence becomeseparation? Are boundaries being broken… or is this just evolution inside therelationship?We breakdown the emotional side most people avoid talking about:What causes couples to drift apart in the lifestyle Signs your relationship is becoming one-sided How resentment quietly builds in ENM relationships The difference between freedom and disrespect Hard conversations every couple MUST have Practical advice on rebuilding trust and reconnecting This episodegets raw, honest, emotional, and brutally real. If you're in the lifestyle,thinking about opening your relationship, or struggling with boundaries, thisconversation might hit close to home.
Stranke SDS, trojček NSi, SLS in Fokus ter Demokrati, ki se pogovarjajo o oblikovanju nove vlade, bi lahko po nekaterih informacijah že danes podpisale koalicijsko pogodbo. Desna koalicija med prioritetami navaja razvoj in blaginjo, boj proti korupciji, decentralizacijo in debirokratizacijo. Glasovanje o mandatarju Janezu Janši bo jutri. Ostali poudarki oddaje: Umik ameriških vojakov iz Evrope ne bo vplival na obrambne načrte Nata, trdi njegov generalni sekretar Rutte; tudi o tem bodo na Švedskem govorili zunanji ministri članic zavezništva. Predsednika Rusije in Kitajske Putin in Ši v Pekingu pozvala k pravičnejšemu sistemu globalnega upravljanja. Nogometaši Aston Ville zmagovalci evropske lige; slovenski hokejisti na svetovnem prvenstvu elitne skupine doživeli hud poraz proti Švedom.
V politiki se bo nadaljevalo dinamično dogajanje. Kolegij predsednika državnega zbora bo danes za petek sklical izredno sejo, na kateri bodo poslanci odločali o predlogu za izvolitev Janeza Janše za predsednika vlade. Kandidaturo je s podpisi podprlo 48 poslancev SDS, trojčka NSi, SLS, Fokus, Demokratov in Resnice. V prihodnjih dneh je pričakovati tudi podpis koalicijske pogodbe in podrobnejšo predstavitev ukrepov, ki jih namerava prihodnja koalicija uresničiti v novem mandatu. V oddaji tudi o tem: - Evropska unija dosegla dogovor o odpravi carin na industrijsko blago in nekatere kmetijske izdelke iz Združenih držav. - Kitajski predsednik Ši Džinping v Pekingu sprejel ruskega kolega Vladimirja Putina - Slovenski hokejisti z novo izjemno predstavo na svetovnem prvenstvu, Slovaki boljši šele po izvajanju kazenskih strelov
This week onthe Swingers Couch Podcast, we dive into two wild listener emails thathad us laughing, debating, and asking some serious questions about fantasies,boundaries, and secrets hiding in plain sight.One listenerwrites in because his wife is comfortable exploring with women… but now hewants to slowly introduce the idea of bringing men into the bedroom — and evenexploring experiences involving transgender partners. How do you bring upfantasies without making your partner feel pressured? How do couples explorecuriosity while still protecting the relationship? Carlos and Autumn getbrutally honest about communication, jealousy, fantasy vs reality, and how toapproach these conversations the right way.Then thingsget even crazier when another listener admits she's NOT in the lifestyle… butshe's starting to think her parents might secretly be swingers. Fromupside-down pineapples to suspicious “friends vacations,” we break down thehilarious signs that make people wonder what their parents are REALLY doingafter dark.
Are you a recreational runner who hits the gym but still finds yourself dealing with nagging injuries? It might be time to ditch the random internet workouts and get strategic.In this episode of Real Fuel with SLS, I am is joined by Laura Filla, a competitive marathoner, RRCA Level 2 Certified Running Coach, and founder of Filla Endurance. Laura breaks down her science-backed coaching philosophy, explaining why she prioritizes building injury resilience over injury prevention. In this episode we chat about:The power of periodized strength trainingConnecting with athletes and building the athlete-coach relationshipHow to manage your mindset and training as an athleteThe boom in running and run clubsNavigating post-race recoveryThe importance of a mental break after a goal raceThe super shoe debateAnd so much more!Stay connected:Check out Fillaendurance.com - right now their coaching team is accepting 1:1 athletesFollow Laura on Instagram: @coachlaura.runFollow Stevie on Instagram: @stevielynlynJoin Stevie's newsletter: Stevie Lyn Nutrition newsletter
Lambda lambda lambda e de volta à Lua, nerds! No NerdCast de hoje, vestimos nossos trajes espaciais para discutir a missão que marca o retorno da humanidade à vizinhança lunar: a Artemis II! Junte-se a Alottoni, Pedro Pallotta (Space Orbit), Katiucha Barcelos, Marcel Campos e Azaghal numa viagem para entender todos os desafios técnicos absurdos, os orçamentos astronômicos e os perrengues inimagináveis de colocar quatro astronautas na ponta do gigantesco foguete SLS e atirá-los rumo ao futuro da exploração lunar. Superman Day com Carlos Voltor Participe do evento neste sábado, 18 de abril, a partir das 16h, na Galeria Magalu (Conjunto Nacional - São Paulo) CITADO NO PROGRAMA NerdCast 323 - Marte, Curiosity e a Fronteira Final: https://jovemnerd.com.br/podcasts/nerdcast/nerdcast-323-marte-curiosity-e-a-fronteira-final Pálido Ponto Azul, de Carl Sagan, narrado por Guilherme Briggs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_tiv9v964k Flickr oficial da NASA: https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasahqphoto/ Fotos da Artemis II explicadas por Hank Green: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaXRREHVkHo CONFIRA OS OUTROS CANAIS DO JOVEM NERD E-MAILS Mande suas críticas, elogios, sugestões e caneladas para nerdcast@jovemnerd.com.br APP JOVEM NERD: Google Play Store | Apple App Store ARTE DA VITRINE: Randall Random Baixe a versão Wallpaper da vitrine EDIÇÃO COMPLETA POR RADIOFOBIA PODCAST E MULTIMÍDIA Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
11. Commercial Space and Starship Delays Guest: Bob Zimmerman. Bob Zimmerman analyzes technical reasons behind SpaceX's Starship delays and the Orion capsule's return from the moon. He highlights the transition to private spaceflight as NASA's expensive SLS program faces funding limits. (11)1883 DENMARK IRONCLAD
JOHN BATCHELOR SHOW, WEDNESDAY 4-8-2026.1893 ROYAL NAVY IRONCLAD.1. Canada's Shifting Trade Alliances Guest: Charles Burton. Charles Burton discusses China's attempts to enter the Trans-Pacific Partnership using leverage in Canada. He warns that Ottawa's potential support for Beijing undermines the agreement's purpose of excluding non-market, subsidizing economies. (1)2. China Exploits Western Alliances Guest: Charles Burton. Charles Burton explains how Canadian elites are turning toward China due to a distaste for current U.S. policies. This shift benefits Beijing, which presents itself as a stable partner despite its repressive nature. (2)3. U.S. Naval Performance in the Gulf Guest: Rebecca Grant. Rebecca Grant praises the U.S. Navy's successful defense against Iranian missile attacks during Operation Epic Fury. However, she warns that the scale of operations highlights a fleet that is currently too small. (3)4. The New Lunar Laser Race Guest: Rick Fischer. Rick Fischer explains how Artemis 2 demonstrated laser communications, providing denser data transmission than radio. This technology is essential for monitoring Chinese lunar activities as the race to the moon intensifies. (4)5. Global Commodities and Energy Shifts Guest: Simon Constable. Simon Constable reports on volatile energy markets and falling gold prices as the Strait of Hormuz enters a ceasefire. Meanwhile, high copper prices have triggered a surge in organized theft in cities. (5)6. Fragmentation of British Politics Guest: Simon Constable. Simon Constable analyzes the fragmentation within the UK's Labor majority and the emergence of the Green Party. Polling suggests voters are divided among tactical coalitions, making leadership challenges difficult for Prime Minister Starmer. (6)7. Al-Shabaab's Infiltration Tactics Guest: Caleb Weiss. Caleb Weiss details a recent Al-Shabaab prison raid in Somalia where attackers disguised themselves as intelligence operatives. The strategic strike demonstrated the government's persistent security weaknesses despite international support from various partners. (7)8. Jihadist Threats to Congolese Mining Guest: Caleb Weiss. Caleb Weiss reports on an Islamic State attack targeting a Chinese-owned mine in Congo, led by a violent Tanzanian commander. Meanwhile, Nigeria struggles with internal instability as regional alliances like ECOAS continue to fracture. (8)9. Russia Profiteering from Oil Turmoil Guest: Michael Bernstam. Michael Bernstam explains how Russia benefits from high oil prices and the disruption of shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Moscow uses increased revenues to fund its war efforts while pressuring European economies. (9)10. The Academy's Narrative on Israel Guest: Peter Berkowitz. Peter Berkowitz argues that American universities teach a one-sided narrative hostile to Israel. He claims these institutions overlook historical facts regarding the conflict while ignoring the extremist mission of groups like Hamas. (10)11. Commercial Space and Starship Delays Guest: Bob Zimmerman. Bob Zimmerman analyzes technical reasons behind SpaceX's Starship delays and the Orion capsule's return from the moon. He highlights the transition to private spaceflight as NASA's expensive SLS program faces funding limits. (11)12. Mapping the Outer Solar System Guest: Bob Zimmerman. Bob Zimmerman discusses the superficial knowledge gained from Voyager 2's flybys of Neptune and Uranus. He advocates for better exploration of these alien worlds and Mars to understand our solar system's complex formation. (12)13. Regulatory Burdens at the FTC Guest: Jessica Melugin. Jessica Melugin explains how the Biden administration's expanded merger filing requirements persist under new Republican leadership. These costly regulations act as a de facto tax on businesses, ultimately harming consumers through higher prices. (13)14. The Failures of Industrial Policy Guest: Veronique de Rugy. Veronique de Rugy critiques the World Bank's recent endorsement of industrial policy despite its historical failure in Japan and China. She argues these interventions distort economies and benefit industries over average consumers. (14)15. John Adams and the XYZ Affair Guest: Myron Magnet. Myron Magnet recounts how President John Adams sought peace with France amidst the XYZ Affair. The diplomatic crisis sparked domestic turmoil and intense rivalry between Federalists and Republicans over America's role in Europe. (15)16. The Peaceful Transfer of Power Guest: Myron Magnet. Myron Magnet describes how John Adams secured a peace treaty with France just as he lost the 1800 election. Despite his defeat, his commitment to diplomacy bequeathed a nation at peace to Jefferson. (16)
Four astronauts — Commander Reid Wiseman, Pilot Victor Glover, Mission Specialists Christina Koch and Jeremy Hansen — are on their way around the Moon, on a journey that will take them farther from Earth than any human has gone before. This week on Planetary Radio, we bring you the sounds of launch day and the voices of the people who lived it. You’ll hear from the engineers who built the spacecraft, including Mark Tobias, chief engineer at Northrop Grumman, Jan-Henrik Horstmann, European Service Module team leader at ESA, and Debbie Korth, deputy manager of NASA's Orion Program. U.S. Representative Mike Haridopolos and Senator and former astronaut Mark Kelly share their perspectives from the ground. Canadian Space Agency astronaut Joshua Kutryk reflects on what it means for Canada to have one of their own heading to deep space for the very first time. NASA Chief Exploration Scientist Jake Bleacher and Lisa Carnell, director of Biological and Physical Sciences at NASA's Science Mission Directorate, break down some of the research happening on this mission. NASA astronaut Steve Bowen shares what it feels like to watch a crew launch knowing exactly what they're about to experience. And Joel Kearns, NASA's deputy associate administrator for exploration, reflects on what this moment means for the future of human spaceflight. Plus, Planetary Society Science Editor Asa Stahl and Digital Community Manager Ambre Rose Trujillo, share what it was actually like to be there on launch day. And Planetary Society Chief Scientist Bruce Betts joins us for What's Up, with a look at what we've learned about the Moon since the Apollo era. Discover more at: https://www.planetary.org/planetary-radio/2026-artemis-ii-launchSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
JOHN BATCHELOR SHOW SCHEDULE, FRIDAY 4-3-20261969 APJOHN BATCHELOR SHOW SCHEDULE, FRIDAY 4-3-20261969 APOLLO 101. LAS VEGAS TOURISM AND PRODUCTION HURDLES GUEST: Jeff Bliss Jeff Bliss discusses Las Vegas's rise as a spring break destination and the "creative destruction" of historic hotels,. He also explores how bureaucratic fees and safety concerns impact film production for the *Baywatch* reboot. (1)2. CALIFORNIA'S PRIMARY AND NATIONAL POLITICS GUEST: Jeff Bliss Jeff Bliss explains how California's "jungle primary" splits the Democratic vote, aiding Republican candidates like Steve Hilton. Meanwhile, Governor Gavin Newsom remains focused on a potential presidential run rather than local legislative issues. (2)3. THE EVOLUTION OF BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP LAW GUEST: Richard Epstein Richard Epstein analyzes the 14th Amendment and early naturalization acts, emphasizing that citizenship originally required renouncing foreign allegiances. He argues that using "domicile" as a legal standard distorts the original intent of statutes. (3)4. POLITICAL SHIFTS AND THE EPSTEIN FILES GUEST: Richard Epstein Richard Epstein discusses the resignation of Pam Bondi and the political threat posed by the Jeffrey Epstein files. These documents create risks through "guilt by association" for various high-profile figures, including Donald Trump. (4)5. LANCASTER COUNTY ECONOMY AND EASTER TRADITIONS GUEST: Jim McTague Jim McTague reports sharp gas price increases in Lancaster County, affecting household budgets. He also highlights local Easter traditions, including church-made peanut butter chocolate eggs, and the start of the trout fishing season. (5)6. ITALIAN FOOTBALL REFORM AND EASTER RECIPES GUEST: Lorenzo Fiori Lorenzo Fiori addresses the Italian national team's failure to qualify for the World Cup and calls for systemic reform. He also recommends visiting Cuneo and shares a traditional recipe for chard-stuffed Easter cake. (6)7. ARTEMIS MISSIONS AND CORPORATE SPACE RIVALRY GUEST: Bob Zimmerman Bob Zimmerman critiques the Artemis 2 mission design and high SLS rocket costs. He also discusses the "lawfare" between SpaceX and Amazon regarding satellite orbits and SpaceX's potential move toward an initial public offering. (7)8. ASTRONOMICAL DISCOVERIES AND PLANETARY RESEARCH GUEST: Bob Zimmerman The Reuben Telescope has discovered 11,000 asteroids, including near-Earth objects. Bob Zimmerman also explains Saturn's warped magnetic field and emphasizes the need for new orbiters to explore data from Neptune and Uranus. (8)9. THE EMERGENCE OF CIVIL WAR PRISON CAMPS GUEST: Fitzhugh Brundage Fitzhugh Brundage discusses the creation of prisons like Andersonville and Point Lookout after the breakdown of prisoner exchanges. The Confederacy established Andersonville in Georgia to move prisoners away from the capital, Richmond. (9)10. AFRICAN AMERICAN PRISONERS IN THE CIVIL WAR GUEST: Fitzhugh Brundage Fitzhugh Brundage details the harrowing experiences of black Union soldiers like Isaac Gaskins, who were enslaved by the Confederacy after capture. These men were often forced into labor instead of being treated as POWs. (10)11. ANDERSONVILLE'S HORRORS AND POST-WAR JUSTICE GUEST: Fitzhugh Brundage The horrific conditions at Andersonville were documented by photographer Andrew Riddle, showing extreme starvation and disease. After the war, commandant Henry Wirz was prosecuted for war crimes, becoming a scapegoat for Confederate leadership. (11)12. PRESERVING THE MEMORY OF CIVIL WAR DEAD GUEST: Fitzhugh Brundage Fitzhugh Brundage explains the uneven history of Civil War mass graves and the creation of Andersonville National Cemetery. Clara Barton played a key role in identifying the 13,000 Union soldiers buried there. (12)13. THE TRANSFORMATION OF MODERN DRONE WARFARE GUEST: Henry Sokolski Henry Sokolski explores the evolution of warfare in Ukraine, highlighting the strategic use of Starlink and decentralized drone procurement. He also notes how AI-powered targeting from Palantir has significantly increased combat effectiveness. (13)14. NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION RISKS AT BUSHEHR REACTOR GUEST: Henry Sokolski Henry Sokolski discusses the security risks at Iran's Bushehr reactor, which contains 210 tons of spent fuel with weapons-usable plutonium. He stresses the urgent need for real-time monitoring to prevent the diversion of nuclear materials. (14)15. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND LABOR CHALLENGES GUEST: Gene Marks Gene Marks discusses job data revisions, the rise of gas prices, and the "Buy Now, Pay Later" retail trend. He also explores the difficulties small businesses face with H-1B visas and COVID-era loan repayments. (15)16. HARNESSING AI TOOLS FOR BUSINESS PRODUCTIVITY GUEST: Gene Marks Gene Marks highlights how small businesses can use AI tools like Legal Zoom for automated services and Microsoft 365 Copilot for productivity. He emphasizes the importance of employee training to leverage these technologies effectively. (16)
PREVIEW FOR LATER. GUESTS: John Batchelor and Bob Zimmerman. SUMMARY: John Batchelor and Bob Zimmerman criticize the Artemis 2 mission design as inefficient and lacking a clear plan. They compare it unfavorably to the Apollo program, noting the SLS rocket and Orion capsule. (5)1950
7. SPACE EXPLORATION AND CORPORATE RIVALRY GUEST: Bob Zimmerman Bob Zimmerman critiques the Artemis 2 mission design and the high costs of the SLS rocket,. He also discusses the legal disputes between SpaceX and Amazon regarding satellite orbits. (7)1922 FRANCE
Patrick Bet-David, Tom Ellsworth, Adam Sosnick, and Vincent Oshana break down the Charlie Kirk bullet match controversy, U.S. bunker buster airstrikes on Iran's Isfahan nuclear facility, Kristi Noem controversy, and Tiger Woods DUI arrest case.------
Nasa's Artemis II mission looks set to launch towards the Moon on April 1st, after months of delays.Presenters Tim Peake and Maggie Aderin are joined by space journalist Kristin Fisher, who has just touched down in Florida. Kristin fills us in on the latest from the Kennedy Space Center and how the countdown to launch is looking.And we take a more detailed look at the machine standing ready on launchpad 39B. We're joined by John Blevins, chief engineer for Nasa's Space Launch System (SLS) – in other words, the rocket that will blast the four astronauts towards the Moon. John shares how crucial the SLS is to the mission and what we can expect from it on launch day. Season 4 theme music by Hans Zimmer and Christian Lundberg and produced by Russell Emanuel, for Bleeding Fingers Music. 13 Minutes Presents Artemis Two is a BBC Audio Science production for the BBC World Service.Presenters: Tim Peake and Maggie Aderin Producers: Alex Mansfield and Sophie Ormiston Series editor: Martin Smith
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
