Podcast appearances and mentions of stuart mill

Un saludo queridos amigos y oyentes. Hoy he consagrado el audio a la sionista utópica Hannah Arendt. Exiliada de Alemania durante el régimen Nacionalsocialista enseñó en la New School for social Research de Nueva York. Criticó no solo los sistemas no democráticos, sino que acabó desencantada con la democracia liberal estadounidense. Según Arendt el antisemitismo, el imperialismo y el totalitarismo han pisoteado la dignidad humana; Hannah se embarca en la tarea de encontrar un nuevo principio político que sea la salvaguarda de la humanidad. 📗ÍNDICE *. Resúmenes. 1. VIDA. 2. OBRAS. 3. "LOS ORÍGENES DEL TOTALITARISMO". 4. LA ACCIÓN HUMANA. AQUÍ https://go.ivoox.com/rf/140832026 puedes escuchar una introducción al Existencialismo. Audio recomendado de la semana: Economía y política liberal de Stuart Mill. puedes escucharlo aquí>>> https://go.ivoox.com/rf/111571946 🎼Música de la época: 📀 Sintonía: Phlegra del compositor rumano de padres griegos Iannis Xenakis, compuesta en 1975 año del fallecimiento de Hannah. 🎨Imagen: Hannah Arendt (Linden-Limmer, 14 de octubre de 1906 - Nueva York, 4 de diciembre de 1975) fue una filósofa, historiadora, politóloga, socióloga, profesora de universidad, escritora​ y teórica política​ alemana. 👍Pulsen un Me Gusta y colaboren a partir de 2,99 €/mes si se lo pueden permitir para asegurar la permanencia del programa ¡Muchas gracias a todos!

...e o Determinismo de Stuart Mill. Com David Erlich, prof do ensino secundário, criador do canal de You Tube " A tua Filosofia",

Em tempo de eleições, a felicidade anda na boca dos políticos e na cabeça dos cidadãos: mas o que é que a felicidade tem a ver com política? Tem muito, e quem o diz é o politólogo João Pereira Coutinho.Em conversa com Manuel Cardoso, o especialista explica como o tempo, o dinheiro e até o regime político em que se vive influenciam a felicidade de cada um.De acordo com o Relatório Mundial da Felicidade, os jovens estão infelizes, mesmo vivendo em democracia. Que razões justificam este cenário? Será possível ser-se feliz em ditadura? Afinal, viver em liberdade acarreta um grau de responsabilidade que nem sempre o ser humano está disposto a assumir.Ao mesmo tempo, a falta de felicidade tem sido associada pelos especialistas a carências económicas, políticas e sociais. Fará sentido adotar um Rendimento Básico Incondicional, como defende Van Parijs, para ajudar ao bem-estar destas pessoas.Recorrendo a Aristóteles e Séneca, Stuart Mill e John Rawls, e aos conceitos de ‘justiça' e ‘utilitarismo', a dupla propõe-se responder a todas estas questões neste episódio do [IN] Pertinente.REFERÊNCIAS E LINKS ÚTEISClássicos ARISTÓTELES, «Ética a Nicómaco» (trad. de António de Castro Caeiro; Quetzal)BENTHAM, Jeremy e John Stuart Mill, «Utilitarianism and Other Essays »(Penguin Classics)SÉNECA, «Cartas a Lucílio» (trad. Segurado e Campos; Gukbenkian)MONTAIGNE, «Ensaios», 2 volumes (trad. Hugo Barros; E-Primatur)RAWLS, John, «Uma Teoria da Justiça» (Editorial Presença)VAN PARIJS, Philippe e Yannick Vanderborght, «Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy» (Harvard University Press)E ainda...DOLAN, Paul, «Happy Ever After: Escaping the Myth of the Perfect Life» (Penguin)FRANKFURT, Harry G., «On Inequality» (Princeton University Press)WODEHOUSE, P.G., «The Code of Woosters» (Arrow)SZABLOWSKI, Witold, «Dancing Bears: True Stories about Longing for the Old Days» (Text Publishing Company)BIOSMANUEL CARDOSOÉ humorista e um dos autores do programa de sátira política «Isto É Gozar com Quem Trabalha», da SIC. Faz parte do podcast «Falsos Lentos», um formato semanal de humor sobre futebol. É o autor da rubrica radiofónica «Pão Para Malucos», que esteve no ar diariamente na Antena 3 de 2018 a 2021JOÃO PEREIRA COUTINHOProfessor do Instituto de Estudos Políticos da Universidade Católica, onde se doutorou em Ciência Política e Relações Internacionais. É autor dos livros «Conservadorismo» (2014) e «Edmund Burke – A Virtude da Consistência» (2017), publicados em Portugal e no Brasil. 

El individualismo de Mill consiste precisamente en afirmar la potestad sobre las propias acciones, asumiendo que sólo uno mismo debe hacerse responsable de ellas.

Un saludo amigos. Hoy entramos ya en materia con la doctrina filosófica de Herberto Spencer y lo vamos a hacer tratando su tesis agnóstica. En esto se diferencia de Stuart Mill que se declaró ateo al menos hasta los 50 años, cuando creó una rara religión con un demiurgo. Herberto en esto fue más sensato y no negó que hubiese un absoluto pero sostuvo que es completamente inaccesible; tampoco se enredó en formar sectas. Spencer la verdad que puede caer bastante simpático a la mentalidad predominante hoy en día. ***** 🎼Música de la época: Sinfonía doméstica de Richard Strauss, estrenada el mismo año de la muerte de Spencer: 1903. **** 🎨Imagen de Herberto Spencer. **** 👍Pulsen un Me Gusta y colaboren a partir de 2,99 €/mes si se lo pueden permitir para asegurar la permanencia del programa ¡Muchas gracias a todos!

Un saludo queridos oyentes. Continuamos tratando el positivismo pero hoy con otro de los grandes de esta doctrina filosófica: Herberto Spencer. Es el padre del evolucionismo filosófico y en vida tuvo gran popularidad por ser un prolífico escritor además muy didáctico. Influyó enormemente en el padre de Stuart Mill. Herberto Spencer (Derby, Inglaterra; 27 de abril de 1820 - Brighton, Inglaterra; 8 de diciembre de 1903) fue un naturalista, filósofo, sociólogo, psicólogo y antropólogo inglés. Está considerado el padre del evolucionismo filosófico. ***** 🎼Música de la época: Sinfonía doméstica de Richard Strauss, estrenada el mismo año de la muerte de Spencer: 1903. **** 🎨Imagen de Herberto Spencer. **** 👍Pulsen un Me Gusta y colaboren a partir de 2,99 €/mes si se lo pueden permitir para asegurar la permanencia del programa ¡Muchas gracias a todos!

Un saludo queridos amigos. Con este audio cerramos ya el ciclo de Mill. Tratamos el tema de las ideas religiosas de nuestro londinense. Ya vimos por la biografía que Juan fue formado al margen de la religión por su propio padre. Pero cruzada la barrera de los 50 años sufre un cambio... ¿Se convertirá de manera ferviente al catolicismo? ¿Creará una religión fantasiosa con un demiurgo? ¿Se hará pastor protestante fundando su propia iglesia? ¡Lo podrán descubrir en el audio! ***** 🎼Música de la época: Cuarteto de cuerdas de Verdi escrito el 1873 año del fallecimiento de Mill. **** 🎨Imagen de John Stuart Mill. **** 👍Pulsen un Me Gusta y colaboren a partir de 2,99 €/mes si se lo pueden permitir para asegurar la permanencia del programa ¡Muchas gracias a todos!

Un saludo amigos y mecenas. Seguimos adelante aprendiendo de la doctrina filosófica de Stuart Mill. En el episodio de hoy vamos a hacer una síntesis tanto de su pensamiento económico (era muy buen conocedor de los grandes teóricos como Adam Smith, Malthus o Ricardo) y de su política, era demócrata liberal, como no podía ser de otra manera. Hay que decir que le interesó la teoría socialista del reparto de la riqueza, pero le fue imposible integrarla en su sistema de libertades individuales. En fin, un episodio que no te puedes perder si te interesa la historia de las teorías políticas. ***** 🎼Música de la época: Obertura trágica de Brahms. **** 🎨Imagen de John Stuart Mill. **** 👍Pulsen un Me Gusta y colaboren a partir de 2,99 €/mes si se lo pueden permitir para asegurar la permanencia del programa ¡Muchas gracias a todos!

Un saludo a todos. Esta semana vamos a aprender acerca del proyecto sociológico y moral de Mill. En sociología sigue los escritos de Comte bastante al pie de la letra y en Moral los de Bentham y Epicuro (no olvidemos que estos "científicos locos" del XIX y sus teóricos positivistas y utilitaristas son hedonistas, ponen el placer como regla suprema de la acción). No dejen de escuchar esta interesante lección y den su opinión al respecto en la zona habilitada de comentarios. ***** 🎼Música de la época: Obertura trágica de Dvorak, escrita en 1870, 3 años antes del fallecimiento de Mill. **** 🎨Imagen de John Stuart Mill. **** 👍Pulsen un Me Gusta y colaboren a partir de 2,99 €/mes si se lo pueden permitir para asegurar la permanencia del programa ¡Muchas gracias a todos!

Un saludo amigos. Hoy os ofrezco un capítulo que trata de la gnoseología y psicología de nuestro Inglés. ¿Aceptará la cosa en sí de Kant? ¿Rechazará la psicología como ciencia igual que hizo Comte? Todo esto y más en el audio. ***** 🎼Música de la época: Obertura trágica de Dvorak, escrita en 1870, 3 años antes del fallecimiento de Mill. **** 🎨Imagen de John Stuart Mill. **** 👍Pulsen un Me Gusta y colaboren a partir de 2,99 €/mes si se lo pueden permitir para asegurar la permanencia del programa ¡Muchas gracias a todos!

Un saludo amigos. Hoy os ofrezco un resumen de la Ley de inducción que a su vez se basa en la de causalidad de Stuart Mill. De este modo fundamenta la objetividad de la ciencia, algo en lo que David Hume había fracasado. Se Yergue así nuestro londinense en un término medio entre la filosofía racionalista y el empirismo. Descubrimos la solución dogmática de Mill al tratamiento de la ley de causalidad, y la sustitución de términos, más propio de ideologías que de esfuerzos racionales por descubrir la verdad ( aquí sacamos a colación las neolenguas de los ideólogos de las teorías de género). ***** 🎼Música de la época: Obertura trágica de Dvorak, escrita en 1870, 3 años antes del fallecimiento de Mill. **** 🎨Imagen de John Stuart Mill. **** 👍Pulsen un Me Gusta y colaboren a partir de 2,99 €/mes si se lo pueden permitir para asegurar la permanencia del programa ¡Muchas gracias a todos!

Un saludo amigos y mecenas. Empezamos hoy el pensamiento de Stuart Mill y lo hacemos con un panorama resumido de su lógica y su crítica implacable a la lógica metafísica tradicional. ¡No se lo pierdan! ***** 🎼Música de la época: Ópera El Holandés errante de Wagner, estrenada el mismo año de la publicación del Sistema de lógica de Stuart Mill, 1843. **** 🎨Imagen de John Stuart Mill. **** 👍Pulsen un Me Gusta y colaboren a partir de 2,99 €/mes si se lo pueden permitir para asegurar la permanencia del programa ¡Muchas gracias a todos!

Stuart Mill, o filósofo inglês do séc. 19. Mill, o homem da tolerância, da pluralidade de ideias e daa defesa da liberdade.Com David Erlich, Mestre em Filosofia e criador do canal do You Tube "A tua Filosofia".

Avec Bernard Quiriny, professeur de droit public à l'université de Bourgogne. Auteur de Le club des libéraux (Cerf). Les faits : Le Sénat a donc voté peu après minuit le décisif article 7 reculant l'âge de départ à la retraite à 64 ans, tandis que les syndicats qui demandaient à rencontrer le président se sont vu opposer porte close par Emmanuel Macron. Je vous propose de vous extraire de ce contexte pour se poser une question simple : la France est-elle un pays libéral ? Que signifie cet adjectif, source de tant de désaccords ? En une fable contemporaine, l'universitaire Bernard Quiriny raconte la pensée libérale. Un libéral se méfie de l'État, du pouvoir, de la centralisation et déteste qu'on lui dise quoi penser et comment mener sa vie. Des figures comme Constant, Stuart Mill, Smith ou Hayek jalonnent cette pensée. Pour le catholique, c'est problématique. Car si la liberté est nécessaire à la vocation de l'homme pleine et entière, le libéralisme est par essence relativiste et ne dit rien sur la finalité de la vie.

Would you like to receive a daily, random quote by email from my Little Box of Quotes?https://constantine.name/lboqA long long time ago I began collecting inspirational quotes and aphorisms. I kept them on the first version of my web site, where they were displayed randomly. But as time went on, I realized I wanted them where I would see them. Eventually I copied the fledgeling collection onto 3×5 cards and put them in a small box. As I find new ones, I add cards. Today, there are nearly 1,000 quotes and the collection continues to grow.My mission is creating better conversations to spread understanding and compassion. This podcast is a small part of what I do. Drop by https://constantine.name for my weekly email, podcasts, writing and more.

Would you like to receive a daily, random quote by email from my Little Box of Quotes? https://constantine.name/lboq A long long time ago I began collecting inspirational quotes and aphorisms. I kept them on the first version of my web site, where they were displayed randomly. But as time went on, I realized I wanted them where I would see them. Eventually I copied the fledgeling collection onto 3×5 cards and put them in a small box. As I find new ones, I add cards. Today, there are more than 1,000 quotes and the collection continues to grow. Hello, I'm Craig Constantine

Elon Musk quer o Twitter. A questão é: a liberdade de expressão quer dizer "vale tudo"? A crónica de Francisco Sena Santos.

Obrigado por ouvir! Nesse podcast, falamos sobre as teses defendidas por John Stuart Mill, visando tornar viável o Utilitarismo a partir das pretensões dos Diretos Individuais! Espero que gostem! Eu lhes dou este novo mandamento: amem uns aos outros. Assim como eu os amei, amem também uns aos outros. João 13:34

Obrigado por ouvir! Nesse podcast, falamos sobre o trabalho da ética, presente na teoria utilitarista, que foi, sobretudo, fomentada por Jeremy Bentham e Stuart Mill. Espero que gostem!Quando me deito, durmo em paz, pois só tu, ó Senhor, me fazes viver em segurança. Salmos 4:8

La conoscenza, l'empirismo, la logica induttiva. Contro l'apriorismo e la legge della generalizzazione dell'esperienza. L'aspetto morale e politico. L'utilitarismo. Il saggio sulla libertà - 1859. Sulla servitù delle donne, è il saggio destinato a diventare il riferimento del movimento femminista

Se liga aí! Não é difícil ouvir alguém falar liberdade de expressão, mas o que nos confere esse direito? Somo livres ou pensamos que somos? E o nosso pensamento: temos liberdade para ao menos pensar no que a gente quer? Felipe Schadt usou da sua liberdade para, junto com Kant, Stuart Mill e Platão, refletir sobre o assunto. >>> Nos acompanhe na nossa página no Instagram.com/sobtorcao >>> Faça parte do nosso grupo de transmissão no Telegram: https://t.me/sobtorcao

A ética de Stuart Mill. Com David Erlich, do canal de You Tube " A tua Filosofia".

Um Algarvio, um Brasileiro e um Chinês descobrem se custa mais chutar uma pedra, uma formiga ou um macaco. Etica, Kant e Stuart Mill neste episódio de Zero Absoluto...

Hi, I am here with Joshua Spodek, He is a three-time TEDx speaker, #1 bestselling author of Initiative and Leadership Step by Step, host of the award-winning This Sustainable Life podcast, and professor at NYU.He holds a PhD in astrophysics and an MBA from Columbia, where he studied under a Nobel Laureate and helped launch a satellite (having emerged from some of Philadelphia's most dangerous neighborhoods). He left academia to found a venture to market an invention that showed animated images to subway riders between stations.CHECK THIS AMAZING WEBSITE BY JOSHUA SPODEK FOR MORE INFO:https://joshuaspodek.com/JOIN NOW!! AND BE PART OF MASTERMIND PROGRAMlearn how to activate yourself for a better future!https://createanewtomorrow.com/master...CHECK THIS LINK FOR A FREE GIFT FOR YOU!https://www.createanewtomorrow.com/giftDO YOU WANT TO BE OUR NEXT SPECIAL GUEST?Book an appointment now and let's create a new world together!https://booking.builderall.com/calend...CHECK THIS OTHER WEBSITE FOR MORE INFORMATION!https://www.CreateAnewtomorrow.comhttps://www.Achievehealthusa.comCreate a fundamental change in the global community from a strictly reactive system of medicine that focuses on symptom and emergency treatment to a proactive system based on whole-being health as well as illness and injury prevention. Personally teach and influence at least one million people.We are a multifaceted Health and Wellness company that specializes in Corporate Wellness and Culture Consulting, Industry Speaking engagements and Continuing education for the industry.We Help corporations by solving the most costly problems they have with Productivity and Health Care while creating a culture that thrives on accomplishment and community.We help organizations think outside of the box and gain tools that allow them to be nimble and strong as tides and markets shift.We Up level the skills and tools of other practitioners by providing them continuing education that actually leads to greater success and standing in the business community.#Podcast #health #Education #CreateANewTomorrowSHOW LESSAri Gronich 0:00  I'm Ari, Gronich, and this is create a new tomorrow podcast.Welcome back to another episode of create a new tomorrow I am your host Ari Gronich. And I have with me Josh spodek. Now, this is a guy I taught, I had a pre interview with him, I was really excited to talk to him. He's a three time TEDx speaker, this guy has, he's a best selling author of this book initiative and leadership, step by step, the sustainable life podcast is award winning with that. Professor at NYU, you've even you know, taught leadership at West Point with the director of US Secretary of Defense, right?Joshua Spodek 0:56  Yes, he's since become the Secretary of Defense. Is that because of working with me? I can't say for sure. Well,Ari Gronich 1:01  well, we'll get into that, we'll get into that. So tell us a little bit about your background and why leadership was such an important role. And the reason I'm going to preface this for the audience, the reason I'm so excited is because I am really looking at the deep dive into leadership and what makes people leaders, what makes people followers, and so on. So I'm really excited to have Josh here.Joshua Spodek 1:25  Well, glad to be here. And I'll start with a very brief part about beforehand. If you want to know more, let me know. Because growing up, I was pretty nerdy, pretty geeky. I got a PhD in physics, I helped build a satellite that's orbiting the Earth right now. And for a while I really thought physics, I want to be a physicist. And then I ended up leaving, after got my PhD to start my first company, and was very successful. That was successful. Then came the recession. And it was difficult times, I got squeezed out by the investors, very painful experience. Could not by that point, I severed my ties with academia. So I couldn't really go back. I ended up going to business school. And that's where I found classes in leadership that I did not know existed. I thought, Martin Luther King was born that way. Mandela was born that way. Eisenhower was born that way, I couldn't really change who I was. And I learned that On the contrary, you can change, you can develop social emotional skills. Although I'll clarify that in school, I learned that you could. And there we had. The classes were case study, reading and writing papers, not actually doing the things after Business School. Yeah, I go into meeting thinking I've gotten great grades and leadership classes physical, I'm a leader, I will run this meeting. And it didn't do very well. Because I later learned how to learn through and how I teach is experientially if you want to. And so I look at what I learned in school was like, you can learn music appreciation. And that's, you know, you'll learn about the lives of Bach and Beethoven. But you'll learn how to play you got to play scales. Same with leadership, I learned leadership appreciation in school. What I teach now is and what it coaches how to lead. And it's a deep, deep passion of mine. Awesome. SoAri Gronich 3:18  we talked about this a little bit. And in my, in my witnessing of of the world, right, I feel like Kennedy was probably, at least as a president, the last great leader of our country. And the thing that I think made him a leader is not only did he bring people along with his vision, but he gave mandates he gave direction to those visions, he said, we're going to go to the moon by the end of the decade, go do that. And then all of a sudden, people started flocking to create what he kind of mandated we should do. So where do you think that that's lacking in the leadership and how does your you know your vision of leadership address those kinds of things so that we can move forward faster versus wait for another great leader to show up?Joshua Spodek 4:12  Okay, so I'm gonna take the last thing you said there, what can we what can we do ourselves instead of just waiting for the next great leaders show up? Is it learning social and emotional skills, performance skills, is different than learning things about factual recall things that you can take bubble test for write papers about? You can write papers about leadership, but the actual practice of it, you have to face you have to understand yourself, you have to learn empathy, compassion, listening, as well as confidence. And these are not things you can read your way into, or write your way into and learning them requires there are there gonna be times I guarantee everyone who tries at some point they will think this. I've been at the six months I'm worse off than I was when I started. I'm not going to get anywhere others can do this, I just can't do it, everyone will think that at some point, that's part of the process and table get through that. It's a, it's something different than what our schools have come to teach these days. Our schools, there are, there are exceptions. But generally, it's factual recall, it's abstract analysis, which is valuable. I don't want to take away from that. But it doesn't help you face fears of going in front of an audience and allow yourself to be vulnerable and sometimes failing, not just failing. But like being being ridiculed, being disrespected, and bouncing back. You can get it in other areas, and just practicing leadership, there's sports, give it to performance arts, I think leadership is a performance art.Unknown Speaker 5:54  SoAri Gronich 5:56  just to go in, in my background, right. Every time I've ever had a position of leadership, it was in a style of master apprentice, right. So I had somebody who was teaching me how to be a leader. And then as a leader, I would be teaching somebody how to be what I'm doing, right. So I always had a master apprentice kind of relationship in that way. And it was very experiential. And I just want to kind of come back to what you just said, about doing the practice of, and knowing your traumas, or knowing your history, because I've always told people that when I'm doing trauma, work with them, if you want to get on a camera, but you're afraid of what people will think of you, the only way to do that is to get on that camera with people who are safe. And so if you keep rebuilding the same, or if you rebuild the somatic trauma with new somatic experiences, you'll be able to then reprogram that neuro pathway. And as you do that, you get more and more comfortable being on stage, for instance, that kind of what you're saying, with regards to leadership.Joshua Spodek 7:14  Yeah, I mean, you say building neural pathways, it's the I would just simply say, learning, it's to learn to do things, it is effect, forming neural pathways you're learning. And you have to, you have to practice these things. I mean, if you simply read about leadership, you will learn how to read about leadership. That's different than it's like learning, reading about playing piano. It teaches you how to read how to play piano, but only fingers on the keyboard to it, that's the same thing that's going to certain neural pathways. At the beginning, when you play piano, I learned to play piano, but I think that, you know, you play some scale, the thumb is gonna hit harder than the pinky generally. So you have to learn how to modulate the, you know, hit with the same, if you want the same volume, you have to hit with the same force, which means you have to push harder with your pinky. Likewise, if you're going to lead people, and you want to make people feel comfortable sharing what motivates them, so that you motivate them intrinsically, not telling them what to do, that managers can do that. And that's effective at times. But sometimes, intrinsic motivation is going to get you much farther. And if you presume to know what the person what motivates them, you're almost certainly gonna be wrong. So how do you but for them to share that is generally makes them feel vulnerable. So they're going to protect that. So if I'm going to communicate, and behave in ways to make them feel comfortable sharing that, that takes that kind of nuance, that kind of subtlety, that kind of being able to pick up facial expression, I movement, tone of voice, both seeing there's as well asAri Gronich 8:58  doing your own got modulating your own. So how do you do that? Do you use mirror work to modulate your own or do you like, what what is your process for creating that level of leadership in yourself and awareness?Joshua Spodek 9:14  I'll give a very low level and not a somewhat low level incident and give a high level answer. When I okay, after school, I picked up there was this difference between learning about something learning something. And at this at the time I was watching inside the actress to do a bunch I don't know if people have seen it, but I love it. It's now it's no longer James Lipton. He's is some other hosts now. But he'd bring on all the best guests. Pacino De Niro, Streep, you know people like that. And I kept noticing that they had the skills that I was supposed to have learned in Business School. Over and over again. They kept saying they dropped out of school, they got kicked out of school, they never went to school in the first place. Like that's weird because I went to an Ivy League business school and my professors weren't Nowhere near able to practice the emotional and social skills that these people could and yet they didn't go to school at all. And then the more I studied or learn about them, because my curiosity is now like, what's going on? How's it? How's this possible, it shouldn't be this way. It's not that they they stopped going, that what they're talking about was like mainstream course course in high school, they would still get education. And so then I learned about like, the group theater and Stanislavski and this whole history of theater. And there's a style of learning there. I ended up taking Meisner technique classes. So Meisner was one of the big teachers of the of the movement. And the technique was, it starts off these very simple exercises, that when you do them, they're so simple. It's almost like, what's the point. But then the next exercise is a little bit more than that. And the next section has a little bit more than that. And before you know it, you're doing these amazing, I was doing these amazing things, I was crying on stage, on purpose to using the technique, which I never would have expected I could do. And so if you look at the way I teach, now, it's Meisner technique. But instead of By the way, they're doing construction next door, I hope that it's not too loud,Ari Gronich 11:13  I can hear it a little bit, but we could try to get in and post.Joshua Spodek 11:18  So the hopefully not too distracting, I feel like now we're all used to like, we used to be in Sound Studios, and now it's just our living rooms,Unknown Speaker 11:26  I know. And,Joshua Spodek 11:28  alright, so I take out the stuff that's specific to acting, and I bring in stuff that's specific to most of my clients or business leadership. But some politicians, people like that, too. There's lots of areas that you can do leadership and sports and education, so forth. So I put in exercises that are relevant to that style of leadership. So it begins with very simple basics. And then you move up. So now I'm going to go from management technique. But this is how you learn sports. To play musical instrument to perform dance singing, the military, you begin with very simple basics. And when you get a certain level of proficiency with the basics, you move up to intermediate. And when you move up from there, you get to mastery, and there's no limit to how well you can act or how well you can play tennis. So there's no place to stop, you can always get better. And as you gain fluency in it, you you communicate more you learn more about yourself. It's a wonderful experience. And it's just as far as I can tell people didn't do it with leadership. I did. And then you know, that's why I end up at West Point in places like that.Ari Gronich 12:41  Right. So tell me about about that westpoint gig. You know, you're you're working with professors who are also Captain through colonels, you know, typically, you're working with the student population who's looking to become the next leader and officer. And I'll tell you the truth when I when I spent four years of my life and Air Force Junior ROTC, which, you know, doesn't sound like a lot. But it was it was an interesting experience, because my experience of the leadership was really all about ego. If somebody had joined two weeks before me and didn't know half of what I knew their words still got accepted as fact, versus what's the truth or optimization. And so, within military, I always find that there's so much what's the word overage of, of duties, like, somebody who's knows his business is being told to do his business and then has to do it twice or three times? Right? And so that leadership doesn't really translate to, to trust in the person that you have hired. Whereas in business, we're starting to learn that you've got to like not micromanage. And so within regards to West Point, and what you're doing with the military there, how does that micromanage versus leadership, and, and breaking the ego of leadership so that it's really more of a service position versus I am a leader? position?Joshua Spodek 14:23  Well, just a lot there. I don't know if I can cover all of that. And you distinguish between micromanagement and leadership that what I heard, I would make the distinction between authority and leadership. And, and so your experience in the military is much greater than mine. And by the way, I appreciate your service. And it was it was just Memorial Day, and it's, I have a deep appreciation for the and a greater appreciation for the freedom that I have as a result of having spent time with the military. Very limited time. But my understanding is that there's a chain of command If you're given a directory, you got to follow a lawful direct order. But that's the last thing you want to rely on. You can rely on authority, if you have to what is authority, if not, the ability to hurt someone, if they don't do what you tell them to do? Well, that's almost an invitation for them to undermine that authority that can because I don't want you to hurt me, if I don't do what you tell me to do. But if you can find out why I, if you can find something, a motivation inside me that you can connect with a task, then I'll want to do it for my intrinsic motivation. That's what I really work on. That's not very well taught in school. And, and yet, it's not that hard to teach.Ari Gronich 15:41  Okay, so I want you to give me an example, I'm going to use me as an example, because you know, it's my show, I get to do that. But I have a seven year old, I'm a dad. And there are times in which I want to be an authority, or authoritarian with him. And I was like, you need to do this, you need to do this. That's it. No, no questions. And then there's this other side of me that's going what I'm doing sometimes isn't working as well as I'd like it to. And I'd much rather have a pleasant peaceful life with my son, and then one that's adversarial. So I'm trying to learn how to be a leader as a father, and do what you say is motivate his intrinsic motivation. So give me a kind of like, how would How would you go about doing that? Like, what what's the the pieces? What are the questions I would ask myself? Well,Joshua Spodek 16:32  I'm going to translate this to piano. You asked, like, how do I play this piece. And I'm really taught how to play this, you have to practice the basics. And if you're starting from you're not sewing for, I don't know where it's coming from. But if you start from never having played piano before, you got to start with the scales. I can tell you play when when when it says this note, hit that key when it says that note hit that key. But that's not really that's not musical expression. That's just mechanical doing things. So if someone wants to learn how to improve their relationships with others, you got to practice the basics in what you're talking about there. If I want to motivate someone through their intrinsic motivations, I have to find out what those motivations are. Which means I have to listen to them, I have to observe what motivates them. And generally, what I'm going to do is, I'll ask them, What motivates you. Not quite like that? asked what some?Ari Gronich 17:28  What are the things you like?Joshua Spodek 17:29  Yeah, what are some things that you like? And they're generally going to protect themselves? They're like, I presume your son? How old? Is he? Seven, seven. So he's not at the stage where he's just gonna say the opposite, just because, you know, but he might not be aware of it himself. He might not really know like, maybe he likes to play video games. But is it because it's fun, because it's distracting or whatever? So after asking, I'm going to presume that the answer that people give at different ages for different reasons is not the full answer. It's but in general, it's going to be a mix of the answer plus a few layers on top of protecting themselves of what they think you want. They think you want to hear what they think is the right answer. So then want to ask a series of confirming, clarifying questions, not not putting myself so if I say, you know, I'm gonna ask you what, what's, what's your passion behind leadership? What is leadership matters so much to you? You'll probably give me an answer. Whatever your answer, whatever your answer is, if I repeat it back to you, even if I get a word for word, exactly what you said, Your words can't match what's in your heart and in your mind, so I'm not going to get it quite right. Even if I say exactly what you said. So you're probably gonna say no, that's not quite right. If I asked you, what, can you correct me, and then I keep confirming, clarifying until you go. Yes, that's it. That's exactly it. Now I know what motivates you. Now I have something now I have the intrinsic thing inside you, one of many of you know, an infinite number of things that motivate you. It could be experiences, it could be hopes, dreams, but it's gonna be something that I identify as. If it's, if it's something very particular to you, it's probably not, it's probably something more deep down, that I can empathize with, when I get something like that, then I can if I can connect that to the task, then I will inspire the person. But how to do all that. I mean, I just jumped like, this week's worth of of the course, into one quick thing, because it takes a while to learn how to ask the question effectively, how to listen how to confirm and clarify.Ari Gronich 19:42  Yeah, but you have you have that outline that you've been able to very clearly Express so I'm answering as a as a as an educator, ya know, it's ask questions. Learn about the person that that you're trying to motivate. So, know and then assess and reassess. clarify, those are all great tips for for the audience. So no,Joshua Spodek 20:06  I appreciate, I would say not so much. Sorry to interrupt but not so much tips as signposts to go along the way the tips would be like practice the basics. I would tips would be like what to do specifically to develop the skills. Right. SoAri Gronich 20:20  okay, so questioning skills. So let's, let's go to that one first, what what are some tips on how to develop questioning skills? In in this area of finding out what exactly it's so I'll just give you so there's a difference between asking questions to gather a solution or just solve a problem. And there's ways to ask questions to interrogate and basically get somebody to admit what you already think that they want to know what you, you know, think that they want to tell you. So there's two different ways to ask questions in my world. In your world, how do you ask questions that lead to the results that you want to get?Joshua Spodek 20:59  Well, in this area, I would say start with the expect expectation that they have a passion is different than what you expect, when I say passion, I mean, strong motivation, not necessarily related to like physical passions, just a strong motivation, take for granted that they do. And it's probably not what you expect, it will be a mix of what you expect plus other things. So when you get an answer, so you're going to get something about them that you couldn't possibly know except that they will tell you. And when they tell you, it's gonna be a mix of what is in there, plus some protection plus these other things. So but they want, it's one of the great feelings in life, is to share what you care about most, to someone who supports you for it. So your questions when you confirm and clarify. Here's a way to get them to shut up or to clam up is to judge them. And even positive judgment, people like Oh, if I said it was good, well, I know when someone judges me one way, if I let them do that, all they want that at some point is going to go the other way. So I generally don't say, Oh, I try to avoid good, bad, right and wrong, better, worse, improve words that have been judged to have judgment built in. And then, so if someone says, you know, if I say, Why do you seem to really like doing x? what's the what's the motivation behind it? And this is something I don't say, Oh, that's a good reason. And I definitely don't say that's a bad reason. I say, I might comment on how I feel that like, Oh, that's interesting, but not in a judgmental way. Not in a good, bad, right, wrong way. Um, and I try not to, I try to avoid injecting myself like, if they say I do it, because of this, I say, Oh, really, I do it because of that. Then they kind of pick up Oh, he wasn't, he doesn't care about me. He just he was looking for an excuse to talk about himself. Which I'm I, which I often do. And that doesn't, that that's more for me, not for them, and therefore it's not conducive for leading for leadership. That's more entertainment for myself.Ari Gronich 23:08  Okay, so again, I you know, I think I want to just clarify, the questioning is meant to lead to a motivation, not an interrogation of judgment, like you're not putting a judgment on the person of whether their answers right or wrong, good or bad, up or down and indifferent. It's just trying to gather information, very flat.Joshua Spodek 23:33  Yeah. Build information and develop a relationship of rapport with a person of support, supportive, non judgmental, curiosity. So that they, they, when I repeat back to them, and when I really get it, a motivation, they say, Yeah, that's it. That feeling is a very, the feeling of feeling understood. For something important. is a it's a, how to describe it's a it's a feeling that's as powerful as love, I would say, to feel understood by someone euphoric. Yeah. And it makes me it makes me want to open up more with person when someone does that with me. I mean, the fact that you just clarified with me, this just are talking about I don't know if listeners could pick up on this, but I was like, Oh, yeah, I do want to clarify, like, I want to make sure he gets this and when you get it, I feel like oh man, now that I've told you that. And if I get support on that, I feel motivated to tell you more things about myself. From a leadership perspective, if you have people telling you more and more things about themselves that they care about. That's more and more things that you can leave them with. And this is not leading them like telling them what to do. It's helping them act on what they really care about. SoAri Gronich 24:53  watching out for the manipulation, right, so I want to just kind of break Part of you know, we're talking about motivation can be used for good or bad, right? So once you get a hold of their motivation, right, so how does somebody tell if somebody who's leading them is gathering their motivations for the benefit or the not benefit? So, motivations that could be like, well, I want you to take this poison, because it'll be good for the country, right? Or I want you to, you know, it's like, so how do I get Okay, so I know that you're really, really patriotic, right? And so you will take that poison, because you believe fully that it's good for the country. So that would be to me like a, what could possibly be an abuse of leadership versus something that would be more positive? So how do we how do we, as a listener, as an audience member who's maybe being led or wanting to lead? How do they make sure that they do it with pure motivation, or that they're being led from somebody who has pure motivation, versus being led through fraud or, you know, that's the word withholding of information not being completely authentic?Joshua Spodek 26:22  Well, this, so this is pretty powerful stuff, and you're working with people's deep emotions, and you could easily hurt someone this way. You definitely when you do this, and it takes months to develop it. or years, some people stumble on it, maybe founded as a child just to happen to get a technique like it. And Eisenhower said, you know, leadership, paraphrase here, is getting him to do your thing for his reason. And so if the very similar to what I'm talking about, and you will, when someone opens up with you, and shares these things, you will feel a Machiavellian feeling of like, Oh, now I can get them to do things. You will also, even from a purely Machiavellian standpoint, you will recognize, if you use that once that way, that's it, you've lost that you've made an enemy of that person, they're gonna hate you. And so even if you were purely psychopathic, you'd recognize I can't speak to what it's like for somebody who's psychopathic. But if you're, you're gonna realize you, you got one shot at ruining the relationship, this person forever, and you're not gonna want to do it. But they're also going toAri Gronich 27:35  have that set up. That's on a one to one. Let me I'm just gonna interject. So you you consult with politicians. So politicians are famous for making promises and leading people into places where they are literally where the people are literally voting against their own self interests. Right? So yes, on a one on one basis, the person may know, okay, my motivation is a little Machiavellian, I might want to turn that down so that I don't isolate this one person who I'm in relationship with. But when you're a politician, and you're ruling over 100,000 1,000,002 million, or however many, and you don't have those personal relationships, you tend to get led down a wrong line. And so as a as an audience, let's say a voter, right, who's voting for policy, who wants to know that they're being led by somebody who is being authentic and non Machiavellian, right? How do they recognize that?Joshua Spodek 28:39  Well, I want to recognize that we've completely switched domains. Learning to play piano is one thing, learning how to command an audience at Rock, not rocking at Lincoln Center say, it's a very different thing. showmanship on stage is very different. There's a lot of stage music, session musicians, who are technically proficient and you play music better than anyone, but they can't, you know, work a crowd, right? Likewise, is playing musicians who can they know to chords, but they can work crowd. And so it's very different sets of skills to lead one person one on one, which is what we were talking about, and leading a large group of people. So leaving that large group of people. That's a whole other story. I mean,Ari Gronich 29:21  as you know, leadership is like you are on stage at a TEDx. You're leading an audience of people, it's not a one on one conversation, right? So a lot of what we do in life these days, is designed to not be one on one to lead groups and, you know, we're looking at this new society, so to speak, and going okay, how do I how do I find my place of leadership here? And so I think we are starting to need to focus on those large groups as well. And yeah, I get your point that one, you got to learn one before you learn three before Learn 20.Joshua Spodek 30:02  Yeah, there was a lot of questions there, how do we protect ourselves against somebody manipulating us through getting the whole crowd to do something, and then you're getting swept up with the crowd. And then realizing later why I didn't mean to do that at all. I mean, there's a lot of personal leadership, to protect yourself against these things to know what your values are to know, to identify these techniques ahead of time, to leadership, IAri Gronich 30:27  just want to purse that's what I was hoping you would go to as the personal leadership.Joshua Spodek 30:32  Yeah. And also, what is your circle of friends who hiring is a major piece of leadership. If you hire people who are misaligned with the mission of your company, or your team or your friendship, it's not gonna work out, even if they're, they're great at what they do, but they don't really value what your mission is. So whom you hang out with, how you reflect and other times and being aware of what your values are, and acting on those things. Everybody has. Everybody values, family, everybody values, health, everybody values. civic duty, in some sense. The question is not do you value these things? The question is, when one is pitted against the other, which do you choose? That's much more challenging. If you value your fitness, but you also value saving money. Someone sometimes they're at odds. So which one do you pick, if you don't face these challenges yourself, these these choices, you don't really know your values. You can read about Plato's values, and Aristotle's and compare and contrast with Maya Angelou all you want. But you don't know your values until you face these things. So as you said earlier, on a small scale, you got to do these things when the when it's not like life or death. Then when you're in situations where it's like a major thing, what do I do? I mean, an example I use a lot is Muhammad Ali, when he won the Olympic gold medal, he became heavyweight champion of the world. He opposed the Vietnam War. And they drafted him. And he, they said, Are you gonna cross this line and he refused to cross the line, he said, I'm a conscientious objector lots of lots more depth than this. He didn't make that choice at that line. He reflected on that a lot before. And before now, we look back at Vietnam as a controversial affair. At that time, even Jackie Robinson said, Ali go, you know, they're not going to make him fight. He's not going to put his health at risk. And this was the army that had, you know, beaten Hitler. It didn't have a Vietnam in his background. So he had faced these things on his own before on a world stage to ask them. Another story I talked about a lot on Dave Chappelle. I don't know if you know this. A lot of people know that he was on offered $50 million contracts when Dave Chappelle when the Chappelle show is doing really well. And he walked away. So actually, on inside the Actor's Studio, he was being interviewed by James Lipton. And he tells a story about when he was graduating high school. His father says, so what are you gonna do? And he went to a performance arts high school. And his answer was like this really cocky, I want to be a great comedian. And comedy is not like an easy path to success. So his father says, Well, if you're, if you feel that way about if you're so confident, I think you should do it. But things can get crazy in Hollywood, you don't know. Name, your price now, figure out what's beyond what you're willing to do now when you're calm. And then, okay, so now he's talking to James Lipton, he turns to the audience who all know about his later history, he goes, hence,Unknown Speaker 33:55  Africa.Joshua Spodek 33:56  Meaning after his father gave him that advice, he reflected and thought, and spent his time and faces, you know, what's what's right for me? What's wrong for me? And when it got to create who knows what they weren't, like, Here's $50 million, have a great time. They're saying, Who knows what was attached to that? Who knows what kind of craziness goes on in Hollywood, right? And his name is price. And at both cases, Ali and Chappelle disappeared for a while Ali almost went bankrupt at the prime of his career, came back and became heavyweight champion the world again. And I think that's what helped him become not just the greatest boxer. I think many call them the greatest of all time of like everything, but certainly a major figure of the 20th century, Chappelle. I mean, his specials now are bigger than the Chappelle show was I think, well, it's special. It's something special. But you know, you got named the the Mark Twain award from the Kennedy Center he gotAri Gronich 34:54  as a beautiful ceremony. Yeah.Joshua Spodek 34:56  And again, he was talking about I will fight for your freedom to speak Your mind because I believe in this art. So these are examples of preparation that most of us will not face on the scale that they did with the world looking on with 10s of millions of dollars at stake. But it's the same technique that gets us that reflection, and what what is your price at a time preparation?Ari Gronich 35:20  asking those questions is,Unknown Speaker 35:22  to me,Ari Gronich 35:23  you know, like one of the best things you could do before you do anything. And I find that it's, it's a very difficult thing to get others to ask their own questions. It's like they can reflect if I'm asking them the question. It's hard to get people to come up with and then reflect on their own questions. Do you have any specific questions that you suggest people ask themselves?Joshua Spodek 35:53  More than the questions is really, you have to face the challenge yourself? You have to? It's not just which like, which do I value more between saving money or fitness? make that choice, you know, do go for the, I'm trying to think of like a situation where money and fitness go against each other?Ari Gronich 36:13  Or do you and afford what Tim can't afford? The equipment can't afford the proper food? You know, I mean, there's the crazy thing is that all the reasons why people do that. And,Joshua Spodek 36:24  you know, I'm smiling, because all the things you're talking about of like going, I don't like paying for gyms. And so I have my kettlebells over there, and all those bodyweight exercises. And you can just see the tip of my rowing machine over there. And so I have all this, I figured out how to exercise at like, a fraction of the cost of what other people what people pay, I paid 10 years of people pay per month that catwalks and can you tell how proud I am of that. Actually, that's and then with the food, I find out how to get I build relationships with the farmers at the farmers market. So I get vegetables much cheaper than everyone else does. Because they liked me because I talked to them. And, and I buy in season, so it's all and so I spend less money than most do, even though I get the highest quality. You know, right farm fresh vegetables. So that's why I had trouble picking that example. Because I found out how to be fit and save money, and how to eat healthy and save money. and delicious.Ari Gronich 37:21  A lot of people a lot of people don't really know that that's a, you know, possible, but I, you know, obviously 27 years I've been doing this and most of the ways that a person can get healthy costs a lot less than being sick. It's just a fact. And, you know, but as a leaders like questions, so like I'm writing a course right now on questioning, it's just all kinds of questions and ways to ask yourself things that will lead you towards wherever you want to go. So you personally lead yourself, I'm kind of like guiding the leading of themselves in that stuff. But the questioning the kinds of questions like, you could ask a question like, Why me? Or you can ask a question like, how much better could it get, you know, like, very different kinds of questions and how they lead your brain to an answer. So,Joshua Spodek 38:16  when you when you say questions like that, then my, my advices there is, is make those a dialogue with multiple people. I meditate regularly. And that's very useful. And there's something that happens when you talk to someone else. So to supportive, non judgmental, but still challenging. That definitely a think of those questions solo, meditate on them. Think about them, when you're lying in bed at night, or waking up in the morning and you have you know, nothing's getting in your way. Also, talk to your best friends about it, talk to your boss about it, talk to co workers, talk to your mom and dad, talk to your kids talk to me,Ari Gronich 38:55  what are they talking to them about? Because I'll tell you the truth, what it what it feels like, in my head, as you're saying that is find out your your life on by committee, you know, what your, your what's important to you by committee? What's uh, you know, it's like, I'm asking myself about, what is it as important to me as a leader? Or how do i do you know, so it's like, I wouldn't want to do that by committee, so to speak, I might want to ask them afterwards. What's your opinion on this as well, but after I'd already gotten to my real truth, my personal truth?Joshua Spodek 39:33  Well, I don't think you're going to get two final answers on these things. I mean, you'll get an answer that's right for you at that time. And I think that'll change as you age as things change. Of course, when you sit by committee that imply that feels to me, like you're trying to find a consensus or, but what I'm saying I'm suggesting is have people challenge you. So if I say, you know, I forget the questions you just asked, but like, what, like, what do I want out of a career That's an interesting question to ponder. And if I talk to some people about it and say, you know, push me on this challenge me, it's not to not for them to annoy me not for that, but for them to think of like, what might? What? from their experience that I have not had, but they had? Will they see that? I haven't. Um, you know, john Stuart Mill talked about if your idea hasn't been challenged, you don't really know you may be right, but you don't know it. You may you may be, there may be something more, something better for you that you haven't hit on yet. That when challenged to support why you'll hit on? That's what I'm going for is it's not a committee so much as a devil's advocates, or people to provoke greater reflection.Ari Gronich 40:50  Okay, I can see that. I just think that that should be done after the personal authentic reflection, and then, and then somebody can like, okay, now, what do you think of this? And maybe you have growth for me from where I'm at? But I would do the personal question first, personally, but, but I do understand how getting input from multiple places is going to increase your awareness of yourself.Joshua Spodek 41:21  I certainly didn't mean it as a solo as the only thing to do, as augment.Ari Gronich 41:27  Yeah, no, absolutely. Like said, I'm just reflecting, I'm trying to make sure that I'm clear, the audience is clear that, you know, that the information is, is disseminate in a way that everybody kind of is on the same level of what they hear. So when I, when I heard you, I heard, get people to challenge you, in what you're wanting to do. And I hate first thing is first, I just want to, you know, for me, at least, like I asked myself questions, and then I go, Okay, so this is what I want to do. Do you think that this is a good, you know, road, bad road? What are your experiences on this road, and getting other people's input? of that? So I'm, I'm wanting like, to be very specific, so the audience can be clear on what you're saying. I hope that makes it more helpful for them. If that makes sense, what I just said, yeah. Yeah. I mean, as you were saying it for me, I think I think of I do reflect personally, and come to some results. And then but I, I personally don't think what more is there after this? What have I not thought of? And so I don't think of it as that my solo answers. I don't think it was like the right ones are the best ones. They're not final. It's a step on the way. Nothing is final death. Yes. IJoshua Spodek 42:58  was just gonna say it's just a min until death. Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. SoAri Gronich 43:04  yeah. so fascinating things about you. I just want to break up the tension a little bit. You spent time in Manhattan off the grid.Joshua Spodek 43:17  So I'm not quite off the grid. I intend to get off the grid. I'm working very hard at it. And so I have over there my battery, but I haven't even gotten the solar panels to attach to it that I think I can I think I can pull it up the next 12Ari Gronich 43:29  to 24 months. Yeah, I am. Right. Yeah. Yeah. So that plan is in is in motion. It's in motion. So where are you now with it? And why did you decide to do it? I mean, I remember talking to you about the minimalist in this simple life, right, and how happy you are. And people are really looking to get happy these days. So, you know, tell me why you chose this as a way to simplify your your happiness.Joshua Spodek 43:56  It's been a long process, when I was a kid, I would never have thought of like, less, you know, I definitely thought you know, whoever dies with the most toys wins. And I had a friend whose parents were richer, and I was always trying to catch up with all the stuff he was always getting computers and cameras and stuff and and then, you know, one of the early stages is wall behind me that has a blackboard used to be all books. And getting rid of the books was really hard. It took several iterations and probably a year of first getting rid of the really books I knew I'd never read again, and then getting rid of ones that are a little more interesting, but not really that interesting. And then eventually getting rid of like the big books that I really cared about, but knowing I, I didn't eat them. And that's a whole process that people can go through on their own then. And there are various different things that I do over time that I've come to associate getting rid of unnecessary things as bring as creating freedom. Yeah, getting rid of like my marathon medals. I got rid of those. I was like, oh, as soon as I got rid of I was like that was a mistake. Like that was they're irreplaceable. But then later, after a couple years of regretting it now You know what? I'm glad that I get rid of them because I ran. I mean, I came in like 10,000 plates. It's like, no one knows who came in second Timothy two. What's his name? The guy one knows it comes in second for if it came behind Michael Phelps, right, right. I came in 10,000 place second. Like it's pretty far from second. So what's so big about these things. And then after that I ran a couple more marathons. And so I had these other these other medals I was like, now I know not to get them in the first place. It's hard to get rid of something once you've acquired it and start getting those connections to it or attachments to it. But I put on Craigslist, free put up on free for on Craigslist. And some guy can't pick them up. He wanted some other stuff that I was offering free at the same time. I said, Oh, I'd love to metal. I was like, what do you what the metals for anyway. And it's like, oh, his girlfriend was training for her first half marathon. And he wanted to give it to her as like a show of appreciation for that and motivation to go for the full marathon. So I'm so happy that this is getting used for something more. So cool. That's cool. ThenAri Gronich 46:08  I just released like, I think 1500 conference IDs. You know, the little things you have and your IDs with your name on them for constant conference you've ever been to? Yeah, I think I just cost about 1500. How did it feel? felt great. Yeah. Before you did it were like all what if I regret it? Oh, no, I saved them. For years, I was planning on putting them in a in a like, Curio thing I wanted to display like, look at all this stuff that I did, right to grow and learn and like, proud of them. And I spoke here and I spoke there. And then I just was like, now it's time. Just gotta go. And it feltJoshua Spodek 46:54  so good. So these experiences, I mean, there's all sorts of experiences like that. And the more I've done it, the more or there's definitely things I reflect on, I'm like, No, keep this one. And recently that happened, I was like I there's something I was going through. I was like, I gotta go through this once for the last time and get rid of it. I'm going through I was like, oh, at least one more time after this. And okay, so about a year and a half ago, I was reading an article about how other cultures, they refrigerate less than they, Vietnam in particular, they ferment a lot. And they don't refrigerate so much. And you know, I'm sustainability is a very important thing for me. And you know, there's a big challenge with wind and solar are intermittent. So sometimes they can't provide power. So one way to address that is to become more resilient. So I was curious, as individuals as a society, we don't really value resilience so much we talk about it, but we don't value it too much. So I wondered if I could, what if I had to go without power? What if I, so I unplugged my fridge for a while. And I ended up making three months that time. And I had no idea. I could do it. And but then from meditation I was it stopped being about what I was giving up. And it became what I was adopting. And that was last winter. This winter, I went did it. And actually now I think today, tomorrow marks six and a half months that my fridge has been unplugged. And I would have thought was crazy. But I keep learning more about how people used to mean refrigerators been around what 100 years, humans have been around for what 300,000. And I'm eating better. It's really, I'm very surprised at this. And when I realized that when I got an electric bill $1.70 I got to $4.70 the last one's $1.40 I'll see what the next one is. I was like I want if I can go off grid, it was really just stumbling into following my nose to in the direction of acting on my values of stewardship to see where it would lead. I didn't I didn't think like let's go off grid. But now that it not I'm within striking distance of it. I'm like, let's see if I can do it.Ari Gronich 49:14  I like how you said acting on my values. How often do you see people who do not act on their values? And the question that I would have for you is what are the tricks or the things that have made you strong enough to act on your values? While most people would talk about sustainability? I'll give you al gore as an example. He's flying around on private jets, his house takes up more electricity than like seven other residential properties, right? Not that now at least that was like 20 years ago, but that you get the idea right? Some people act on their value. Some people just talk about them. So how do you get to a place where acting on them is your default.Joshua Spodek 50:02  Well, this is the eternal challenge of life. I mean, acting on your values, values, what's evaluate good, bad, what? To actually evaluate means to do what you think is good. And maybe different than other people's values, but your values, but and that's in conflict with with what's easier often, or what everyone else is doing. So the more that you act by your values, the more than let me speak personally, theAri Gronich 50:24  more that I act on my values, the more that I improve my life, improve, make more good. And one of the things that you told me you did is you stopped flying.Joshua Spodek 50:34  Yeah, although that came after. Right morning packaged food. Right.Ari Gronich 50:38  And you said that that helped your life, which most people will find interesting, because your travel for a living? SoJoshua Spodek 50:48  yeah, that Well, I didn't originally choose to stop flying totally. I originally chose to go without flying for a year. expecting it to be a horrible year. I at that time, I felt like I'm taking one for the team. But I gotta find out. This doesn't sound sustainable. All this flying? Could I get by without it? I was surprised after two, three months of it. That, again, it wasn't what I was getting rid of it what I replaced it with, which is much more community connection, spending more time with family having more control over my career, I would have thought it'd be the opposite. I think I'd spend less time and family have less control of my career. And when I didn't have the option of flying, I was able to create more of those things, not less. Sort of construction. I was not too loud. It's all right. This should be the unidirectional. So it's all right.Ari Gronich 51:45  No problem. So what are,Unknown Speaker 51:50  you know?Joshua Spodek 51:52  Oh, I'm sorry. And again, it's practicing the basics. It's really starting with the simpler things. If I had not challenged myself to go without packaged food for a week, there's no way I would have gone for not flying. And the packaged food I also thought was gonna be you know, I live in Manhattan. It's like great food everywhere. And am I going to say no to the best chefs in the world, or you know, some of them. And again, that that pattern that I described with the flat with the not flying happened with the food too. It's not that I I don't feel like I'm missing out on restaurants now. Because when I go to the farmers market, it's just this cornucopia of like right now over here I got the strawberries are the season in New York, I haven't had strawberries in 10 months because they weren't in season. But my joy of strawberries is greater now than it was before. Now that experience with the strawberries with farmers markets instead of restaurants. That experience on a small scale, gave me the gumption to try it on a bigger scale with the flying. But even the avoiding packaged food on that scale that came from other things before that. So I didn't practice in the basics, play my scales. Got it. SoAri Gronich 53:10  deprivation leads to happiness.Joshua Spodek 53:17  I wouldn't say that it's a if I had to pick anything, it would be more like Jocko willing, he said some discipline equals freedom. So it looked like deprivation. But it was living, my value was stewardship. My value was leaving the earth better than I found that my value was not polluting other people's air that they breathed. That was the value. From that value flying doesn't fit. It doesn't work. Now that benefits the flying benefited me. So now I would say it felt in retrospect, it felt it looks selfish to me what I was doing, but I want to see the Eiffel Tower, I want to say Machu Picchu. Okay, some people. Now I would say people have been displaced from their homes to drill for the oil. 9 million people died in 2019 from breathing air from breathing that air didn't know that came out the back of you know vehicles. And I'm grossly simplifying here. Right. So the question was, could I live by value of stewardship to other service to others, even when I felt like but I'm gonna miss out on the Eiffel Tower. And this is the answer to your question you asked before is how do you do what you think is right, even when it's easier not to is you practice new practice in practice? That's what I've done. And it's worked out for me so far. I believe that I'm happier now than I've ever been. I believe that I'm more effective than I've ever been. And I don't feel like I'm missing out on anything.Ari Gronich 54:51  That's awesome. I i've been simplifying my brain a little bit with having a son and As I, as I'm listening to you again, you know, so glad to talk to you because I definitely create a structure. And I've told my son, you know, like, the more structure you have, the more freedom you have. And the more discipline the more you're able to, you know, discipline yourself and focus, the more time you'll have. So I try to give him the consequence, good or bad to the action, you know, as my way of being in leadership to him. But it does sound like like, the idea is to really challenge yourself to live the value that you speak. And this human condition is full of contradiction. And what do we do with the contradiction other than play with it and practice, like you say, you know, you got to practice focusing, if you want to be able to focus, it's not something that you're born with, you got to practice it. You got to practice learning to play piano, right? Got to practice leadership skills. So where are ways that people can can? Like, I know you have a training program that you use for leadership. So tell us a little bit about that. I don't normally do promotion, but I just felt called to ask you.Joshua Spodek 56:29  Okay, well, I also want to comment that there are plenty of things I've tried, that didn't work out. Yoga comes to mind, I did it for a couple years, I really loved working with my instructor. But ultimately, it's just, that was not it didn't hit for me. And there are plenty of other things that I try. I was like, you know, that's not right. So it's not like this is like a non stop path is lots of wrong term, not wrong terms, but you know, explore explorations that don't pan out. So and there's also a video that comes to mind, I call this the most boring video online, if you if you search for it's like LeBron James practicing for an hour as him with the trainer. And he is just practicing, like, he dribbles a bit. He does, like a whole bunch of free throws a whole bunch of whatever different stretches and things. There's, I don't think they even I don't think they even talk. So it's really boring. But you've seen him play. I mean, he does spin moves and crazy stuff on the court that like you can't imagine he doesn't actually practice those. He practices the basics. And that's how you get those things. It's an you know, when I dance, I took dance lessons for a while. I like it, I'm glad it did. I'm not gonna become a dancer. But I remember Oh, salsa, and I kept asking, like, what about the spin moves all these spin boots, I wanted to spin moves, and the instructor kept saying it's the feet, you got to get the feet, right. It's the rhythm. So my rhythm was terrible. And, and eventually, I was like, Oh, it's in the feet. And it's really, the more you do these things, the more you get back to these very basic things. And a lot of what I do is really giving people very basic skills. And the more you practice them, the more that the the what the shine is the thrills that not the thrills the fancy stuff comes if you practice the basics, if you don't practice the basics. It's pretty tough. And some of the basics are a lot of like, my book has four units, understand yourself, lead yourself, understand others, lead others. And it's a progression. And each set of exercises is different. Like understand yourself is more reflective, introspective, lead yourself is more getting advice from people, disciplining, applying discipline so that you can put these things into practice. lead others is much more about what we're talking about earlier, is making them feel comfortable sharing what motivates them so that you can connect that to the tasks so that they act on intrinsic motivation. And, you know, for the different types of each skill has different types of exercises to help build those things. And if that's too glib of an answer, or too high level,Ari Gronich 59:17  yeah, no, not at all. No, it's, it's a perfect answer. So how can people get ahold of you if they'd like to? chat with you?Joshua Spodek 59:25  So JoshuaSpodek.com everything's there. In the upper right corner is the links to the books and the TEDx talks and to contact me. I mean, I'm on I'm on social media, but it's, it's much more of the blog and the podcast is where I put most of my stuff out. Absolutely.Ari Gronich 59:41  Thank you so much for for coming on. You know, I am a I'm a believer that in order to create a new tomorrow, we have to challenge ourselves like a lobster in its shell. You know, you got to break free from one shell before you can get to your next shell. It's not comfortable, it's not easy. But if we have more conversations that explore these kinds of, you know, topics, then we'll get to a deeper truth. And that deeper truth, my hope is, will help to activate people's vision for a better world so that they can truly lead themselves and lead others. And, and we can change the world together. So I really appreciate you being on here. So thank you very much for coming.Joshua Spodek 1:00:29  Thank you for having me. I hope that I think I said things that I think me in the past would have benefited from different people may resonate or not, but I hope I hope for some people at least, that we things that we shared, help them further their path.Ari Gronich 1:00:44  Absolutely. Thank you so much. And this has been another episode of create a new tomorrow, I've been your host Ari Gronich with Josh spodek. Thank you so much for coming on. And remember, we're activating your vision for a better world. So what are you going to do today, tomorrow and next week, to really live your perfect life. Thank you for listening to this podcast. I appreciate all you do to create a new tomorrow for yourself and those around you. If you'd like to take this information further and are interested in joining a community of like minded people who are all passionate about activating their vision for a better world. Go to the website, create a new tomorrow.com and find out how you can be part of making a bigger difference. I have a gift for you just for checking it out and look forward to seeing you take the leap and joining our private paid mastermind community. Until then, see you on the next episode.

"The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others…"  -John Stuart Mill "All within the state, nothing outside the state..."  -Benito Mussolini The bridge from the former to the latter is socialism.  After all, if every area of life can do harm to society, where is the room for liberty? "In the old days, we used to celebrate if somebody had a baby, we used to chip in and help him out with the hospital bills, if he happened to be hard-pressed for the moment. Now, if a baby was born, we didn't speak to the parents for weeks. Babies, to us, had become what locusts were to farmers."  -Ayn Rand  

Ca. 400 mennesker i Danmark er på venteliste til et enten livsforlængende eller livsforbedrende organ. Erfaring og statistik viser at ca. 30 af dem når at dø, inden de får den nødvendige transplantation. I Danmark skal man aktivt tilmelde sig donorregisteret for at ens organer kan gives videre - nogen vil sige ens liv kan gives videre. Og der er mangel på organer; hjerter, lunger, nyrer, levere, hornhinder. Nogle mener at alle pr. definition bør være donorer, og at man i modsætning til i dag aktivt skal melde FRA, hvis man ikke ønsker sine organer anvendt til andre. Uge 41 er organdonationsuge, og en ny bog om emnet kalder på et nyt system for donation. Men risikerer vi at reducere andre mennesker til midler for vores egen overlevelse (Kant) eller skal få lide overlast, for at flere kan leve (Bentham & Stuart Mill). De klassiske, etiske spørgsmål står i kø. Medvirkende: Anne-Marie Gerdes, formand for Etisk Råd, speciallæge i genetik, leder af genetisk afdeling på Rigshospitalet. Andreas Albertsen, post.doc i Statskundskab, Aarhus Universitet, forfatter. Vært: Carsten Ortmann.

 Hablamos del gran John Stuart Mill, el hombre que trata de enderezar el sendero de la teoría económica del siglo XIX.  Stuart Mill carga con la alta responsabilidad de corregir el camino torcido que el ricardismo había trazado. Para Mill, el trabajo estaba en los detalles y no en la médula central de la teoría económica imperante. Desde su perspectiva, los errores cometidos en la ciencia se debían al extensivo uso de variables explicativas estrictamente económicas, circunscribiendo las posibilidades del análisis a lo únicamente económico; de esta forma, el mercado, los tejidos humanos y los hombres  no eran examinados socialmente. Mill pensaba que la introducción de variables sociales era todo lo que se necesitaba para salvar la decadente disciplina. La distribución siguió siendo un tema de singular importancia para los seguidores de Ricardo. Aunque Ricardo estipulaba un conjunto de realidades teóricas inalterables que determinaban la distribución de los beneficios entre capitalistas y terratenientes, Mill discrepa y nos dice que la distribución de los beneficios es un problema que puede solucionarse con mera voluntad política. Es decir, Mill creía en que existían relaciones que determinaban la producción de bienes, pero no su distribución. La distribución obedecía a un orden preestablecido que podía ser alterado. De esta forma, Mill le abre un espacio a la política.  Basados en lo anterior podemos afirmar que Mill no entendía el estado estacionario ricardiano como un inevitable fin del capitalismo industrial, pues alterando las coordenadas que determinan la distribución es posible equilibrar el reparto de beneficios entre capitalistas y terratenientes. Sin embargo, el estado estacionario no era del todo malo, pues Mill creía que era una preciosa oportunidad para humanizar el capitalismo.

 Cubrimos el intervalo de tiempo que va desde Ricardo hasta Stuart Mill. Hablamos del socialismo utópico. Smith tuvo la capacidad de explicar sus ideas utilizando ejemplos concretos. Ricardo, no obstante, construyó un sistema lógico que tomaba muy pocos elementos de la experiencia económica. El sistema ricardiano contenía predicciones puntuales (explicadas al detalle en episodios anteriores). Las discrepancias entre dichas predicciones y la realidad observada durante la primera mitad del siglo XIX creó el terreno propicio para el surgimiento de críticas a Ricardo por todos los flancos. En este episodio explicamos al detalle dicha situación y estudiamos los argumentos fundamentales que enarbolaban los críticos de Ricardo. Hablamos del socialismo utópico (socialismo pre-marxista). 

O debate público brasileiro está mais polarizado do que nunca. Vivemos tempos de guerra cultural, onde a linguagem é a matéria-prima da batalha. Stuart Mill já dizia que a opinião pública, em determinadas condições, pode ser um fator de fechamento da sociedade e diminuição das liberdades individuais. Para discutir os aspectos culturais que cercam o […] O post Guerra cultural e linguagem no bolsonarismo apareceu primeiro em LIVRES.

Sin duda uno de los escritores más influyentes de todo el siglo XX. De familia acomodada, vivió siempre entre libros. Con tan solo 6 años, Jorge Luis Borges, ya tenía muy claro que quería ser escritor. Recorrió toda Europa con su familia, residiendo en París, Milán, Venecia y Ginebra. También pasó unos años en España, donde conoció a Valle-Inclán, Juan Ramón Jiménez, Ortega y Gasset, Ramón Gómez de la Serna, Gerardo Diego, etc. Ernesto Sábato enumeró así la variedad del cosmos que Borges exploró en sus obras: “manuscritos de heresiarcas, naipes de truco, Quevedo y Stevenson, letras de tango, demostraciones matemáticas, Lewis Carroll, aporías eleáticas, Franz Kafka, laberintos cretenses, arrabales porteños, Stuart Mill, De Quincey y guapos de chambergo requintado”. “La mezcla” es aparente: son siempre las mismas ocupaciones metafísicas, con diferente ropaje: un partido de truco puede ser la inmortalidad, una biblioteca puede ser el eterno retorno. A Borges le gusta confundir al lector: uno cree estar leyendo un relato policial y de pronto se encuentra con Dios o el falso Basílides.” Como dijo su amigo Alfonso Reyes: “Borges es un mago de las ideas. Transforma todos los motivos que toca y los lleva a otro registro mental“. Solo el título de sus libros nos hace reflexionar sobre una nueva dimensión de las cosas. La poesía fue uno de los fundamentos de su trabajo literario, aunque fueron el ensayo y la narrativa los géneros que le reportaron el reconocimiento universal. La diferencia entre la prosa y la poesía reside, según Borges, en el lector, no en el texto: «Ante una página en prosa el lector espera noticias, información, razonamientos; en cambio, el que lee una página en verso sabe que tiene que emocionarse. En el texto no hay ninguna diferencia, pero en el lector sí, porque la actitud del lector es distinta». Su obra, compuesta de cuentos, poemas y ensayos breves, manifiesta un altísimo nivel de erudición y una capacidad de inventiva inigualable, que ha inspirado a creadores de todo el mundo. Murió de un enfisema pulmonar el 14 de junio de 1986, en Suiza, confesándose infeliz. "He cometido el peor de los pecados que un hombre puede cometer. No he sido feliz". CRÉDITOS (poema/voz/música): 1. Presentación : Manuel Alcaine / Astor Piazzolla 2. El remordimiento / Jose Sampietro / Astor Piazzolla 3. Las cosas / Néstor Barreto / Astor Piazzolla 4. 1964 / Elena Parra / Astor Piazzolla 5. A un gato / Jose Sampietro / Astor Piazzolla

Sin duda uno de los escritores más influyentes de todo el siglo XX. De familia acomodada, vivió siempre entre libros. Con tan solo 6 años, Jorge Luis Borges, ya tenía muy claro que quería ser escritor. Recorrió toda Europa con su familia, residiendo en París, Milán, Venecia y Ginebra. También pasó unos años en España, donde conoció a Valle-Inclán, Juan Ramón Jiménez, Ortega y Gasset, Ramón Gómez de la Serna, Gerardo Diego, etc. Ernesto Sábato enumeró así la variedad del cosmos que Borges exploró en sus obras: “manuscritos de heresiarcas, naipes de truco, Quevedo y Stevenson, letras de tango, demostraciones matemáticas, Lewis Carroll, aporías eleáticas, Franz Kafka, laberintos cretenses, arrabales porteños, Stuart Mill, De Quincey y guapos de chambergo requintado”. “La mezcla” es aparente: son siempre las mismas ocupaciones metafísicas, con diferente ropaje: un partido de truco puede ser la inmortalidad, una biblioteca puede ser el eterno retorno. A Borges le gusta confundir al lector: uno cree estar leyendo un relato policial y de pronto se encuentra con Dios o el falso Basílides.” Como dijo su amigo Alfonso Reyes: “Borges es un mago de las ideas. Transforma todos los motivos que toca y los lleva a otro registro mental“. Solo el título de sus libros nos hace reflexionar sobre una nueva dimensión de las cosas. La poesía fue uno de los fundamentos de su trabajo literario, aunque fueron el ensayo y la narrativa los géneros que le reportaron el reconocimiento universal. La diferencia entre la prosa y la poesía reside, según Borges, en el lector, no en el texto: «Ante una página en prosa el lector espera noticias, información, razonamientos; en cambio, el que lee una página en verso sabe que tiene que emocionarse. En el texto no hay ninguna diferencia, pero en el lector sí, porque la actitud del lector es distinta». Su obra, compuesta de cuentos, poemas y ensayos breves, manifiesta un altísimo nivel de erudición y una capacidad de inventiva inigualable, que ha inspirado a creadores de todo el mundo. Murió de un enfisema pulmonar el 14 de junio de 1986, en Suiza, confesándose infeliz. "He cometido el peor de los pecados que un hombre puede cometer. No he sido feliz". CRÉDITOS (poema/voz/música): 1. Presentación : Manuel Alcaine / Astor Piazzolla 2. El remordimiento / Jose Sampietro / Astor Piazzolla 3. Las cosas / Néstor Barreto / Astor Piazzolla 4. 1964 / Elena Parra / Astor Piazzolla 5. A un gato / Jose Sampietro / Astor Piazzolla

Você sabe o que é o comum? O Comum pode representar muito mais do que parece, e ter consciência do que é o comum, onde ele se apresenta e como ele nos influencia é importante para melhorar o convívio social! O Comum: O que é? O que faz? O que come? Como vive? Onde se manifesta? Neste episódio, apresentado por Larissa Gonçalves, o debate é conduzido por Gabriel Loureiro e Danillo Bragança. Balbúrdia, resenha e ciência. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notas do episódio: 1) 02:20 Garrett Hardin: Garrett James Hardin (1915 –2003) foi um ecologista formado Bacharel em Zoologia pela Universidade de Chicago e Ph.D em Microbiologia pela Universidade de Stanford, abordou a noção de que a miséria humana continuaria a crescer a não ser que fosse reconhecido que a quantidade de espaços aptos à sobrevivência humana na terra era limitada. 2) 02:23: Revista Science: Science, também amplamente referida como Science Magazine, é uma revista científica publicada pela Associação Americana para o Avanço da Ciência, considerada, ao lado da Nature, uma das revistas acadêmicas mais prestigiadas do mundo. 3) 02:26: Tragédia dos Comuns: A tragédia dos comuns é uma situação em que indivíduos agindo de forma independente e racionalmente de acordo com seus próprios interesses comportam-se em contrariedade aos melhores interesses de uma comunidade, esgotando algum recurso comum. 4) 04:31: Elinor Ostrom: Elinor Ostrom (1933-2012) foi uma economista política americana e única mulher a ganhar o Prêmio Nobel de Economia, cujo trabalho foi associado à Nova Economia Institucional e ao ressurgimento da economia política. 5) 05:54: Utilitarismo: Teoria desenvolvida na filosofia liberal inglesa, especialmente em Bentham (1748-1832) e Stuart Mill (1806-1873), que considera a boa ação ou a boa regra de conduta caracterizáveis pela utilidade e pelo prazer que podem proporcionar a um indivíduo e, em extensão, à coletividade. 6) 07:50: Neoinstitucionalismo: ruptura com o institucionalismo clássico a partir dos anos 1980. Fragmentado em três sentidos: histórico, racional e sociológico. Visa como um todo explicar o papel das instituições quanto a resultados sociais e políticos. É embasado em duas variáveis: a construção da relação entre instituição e comportamento e a explicação do processo pelo qual as instituições surgem ou se modificam. 7) 12:23: Laval e Dardot: Christian Laval é um pesquisador francês da história da filosofia e da sociologia na Universidade Paris Nanterre. Seus trabalhos centram-se em três grandes temas: a história do utilitarismo, a história da sociologia clássica e a evolução dos sistemas de ensino. Pierre Dardot é filósofo e também professor da Universidade de Paris-Nanterre. 8) 13:05: “Comum - Ensaios Sobre A Revolução No Século XXI” (2014): Pierre Dardot e Christian Laval demonstram por que o princípio do comum se impõe atualmente como o termo central da alternativa política para o século XXI: ele une a luta anticapitalista e a ecologia política pela reivindicação de “comuns” contra as novas formas de apropriação privada e pelo Estado; ele articula as lutas práticas nas pesquisas sobre a gestão coletiva das reservas naturais e informáticas; ele indica formas democráticas novas que ambicionam tomar a frente da representação política e do monopólio dos partidos. (9) 14: 53: Antonio Lafuente:- Antônio Lafuente possui graduação em ciencias fisicas pela Universitat de Barcelona(1978). Atualmente é Investigador Cientifico do Centro de Ciencias y Humaas y Sociales (CSIC).

Jueves 6pm Cdmx Domingo 6pm cdmx La ilustracion, sapere aude atrevete a pensar fue una de las epocas donde tuvo parteaguas el pensamiento occidental no hay que olvidar Kant por ejemplo con su critica de la razon, pero y las mujeres donde quedan segun este autor, las mujeres son seres infantiles sin objetividad solo con un mero adorno a los hombres,pero hubo mujeres quienes decidieron romper con ese estereotipo para la epoca entre ellas la esposa de Stuart Mill quien influyo en su obra. Otra mas Atrevida cuestiono la Revolución Francesa y murió decapitada por eso. Las filosofas de la Ilustración buscan la autonomía para todos, tener acceso a la educación para poder utilizar la razón y asi conseguir la emancipación.

Fuera llueve, caen truenos… Nada más comfy que disfrutar de un rico whisky de malta (los que "somos felices con poco") en la mansión decimonónica del ilustrado profesor Moxon escuchando sus esperpénticas ideas sobre las máquinas “pensantes” ~Todo el mundo quiere conocer a su creador y darle un besito [semi-spoilers] Lo siento pero me dí cuenta tarde que Moxon no lleva acento y lo leí como “Moxón” con acento al final en vez de al principio, espero no saque de quicio a mucha gente. Moxon’s Master se publica en 1899 en The San Francisco Examiner. No sé si atreverme a decir que es una de las primeras descripciones de un robot, básicamente porque le falta el nombre y es autómata, una máquina; palabras que si emplea el autor, recordemos que la palabra Robot se le atribuye a Karel Capek por la obra de teatro R.U.R.(1920). Ambrose Bierce es el autor de numerosas obras de terror, recomiendo mil veces escucharlo/leer de los grandes “Noviembre Nocturno” o “Historias”. Yo no consideraría el Amo de Moxon un cuento de terror; excepto porque al final “muere alguien”. Sale un androide (error! Estamos todavía ante un “autómata”). Y el clímax. Matar a tu propio creador, matar a Dios. Para mí que existe una relacion entre esta escena y la escena del “Hijo Pródigo” de Blade Runner: Roy visita a Tyrell. Continua la partida de ajedrez que Sebastian tiene con el inventor de los Nexus (su pater!) entra en la habitación, hablan, le besa y …. bueno, me ahorro la descripción gráfica de lo que pasa luego por que todos lo sabemos. En mi deriva disfruté con este montaje de la escena del usuario de Youtube Alejandro Díaz-Ordoñez González [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzHo5DaXejk ] Por eso he decidido traer aquí a este autor que sin duda está mucho mejor en otros podcasts. La idea es ciencia ficción clásica, dentro de lo que se pueda buscar antecedentes de cosas que vemos después (aunque siempre hay un antecedente del antecedente, bueno; casi todo empieza entre lovecraft y poe la verdad, hasta las conspiraciones de internet de hoy día están basadas en ellos, x ej la de las pirámides en la Antártida). Comenzamos con la búsqueda de explicaciones científicas a los fenómenos, muy propio del romanticismo (Mary Shellie etc), se habla del razonamiento inductivo y deductivo, hay una referencia a Stuart Mill (uno de los padres del método experimetal), “puede guardarse para usted las premisas”, “el tortuoso sendero de la observación práctica”, etc. El autor hace lo de siempre, en realidad no se moja: nos vende toda la historia fantástica como un suceso real para para que al final todavía sea posible que todo lo vivido pueda ser explicado racionalmente: Moxon gana al ajedrez a la máquina y esta decide matarle en un aparente arrebato de furia. Pero también podría ser que el inventor muriera a manos del “obrero del metal”, Haley. A ese respecto me gustaría traer una referencia estrambótica pero menos peregrina de lo que parece dado el tema de los autómatas. La figura del “autómata” lleva mucho tiempo conviviendo con nosotros. Desde el siglo XVI ha habido ejemplos geniales. Aunque nunca han pasado de ser “máquinas” como las maquinarias de los grandes relojes. Aquí un par de enlaces buenos [https://investigart.wordpress.com/2017/01/10/automatas-el-arte-entre-la-realidad-y-la-fantasia/ ] [http://www.eldiario.es/hojaderouter/tecnologia/automatas-vaucanson-siglo_de_las_luces-androides-Jaquet-Droz_0_576392443.html ]. Pues bien, es conocida la historia de un autómata creado en 1769 por Sir Wolfgang von Kempelen capaz de jugar al ajedrez. De hecho, ganó varias partidas a jugadores experimentados. Sólo que dentro había en realidad un hombre capaz de seguir el juego mediante un sistema de imanes e “indicar al autómata” donde mover. [ https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Turco%20]. Pasaba lo mismo con el Amo de Moxon? Por cierto, porque el Amo es el robot es algo que no entendí, estoy un poco tontuaz. Automata viene del griego “con movimiento propio” (auto+motus = locomotion!). El relato contiene unas cuantas reflexiones verborreicas pero no menos profundas sobre la vida y la conciencia (aquí llamada “pensamiento”. Se dicen dos cosas fundamentales: 1) “La conciencia es hija del ritmo”. Para que exista pensamiento ha de existir movimiento. Yo creo que sin cambios, no habría conciencia. Eso parece ser una premisa básica. Yo estudio bastante la emoción. La palabra emoción tiene el lexema de “movimiento”. Significa moverse hacia fuera. La madre de la emoción, función que regula el funcionamiento de los organismos en el ambiente, es la motivación (también de “motus”, como “motu proprio”). La motivación puede llevarnos a acercarnos o alejarnos de algo. Notesé la similaridad con los conceptos aproximación y evitación de las emociones (o valencia positiva/negativa). La actividad de todos (casi todos¿) los organismos se basa en encontrar el equilibrio frente a las fuerzas del medio mediante estos dos tipos de movimiento. Podríamos hablar de una regulación “homeostática” y adaptativa mediante el movimiento. Si eres una mosca, por cosas de tu acerbo genético y tal, te encanta la luz y vas siempre hacia ella (eres fototrópica), si eres una madre te acercas a tu bebé (los ejemplos con emociones negativas parecen más relevantes pero las positivas también son importantes), si eres un Roomba (esos aparatejos que son aspiradoras-robot) también tienes una programación que te ayuda a evitar los obstáculos, etc. Y 2) se ponen a un mismo nivel humanos, máquinas, plantas… y hasta rocas. Y es que es verdad que todo está hecho de lo mismo y todos somos todo. Es genial la analogía (recordamos que la analogía no es una forma válida de generar conocimiento científico, por muy fuerte que sea la semejanza entre los átomos y los sistemas solare) con los minerales y la cristalización. Al final todo es algún tipo de organización entrópica, más o menos desordenada. Porqué nos creemos tan distintos? Pero no es por ahí por donde quería ir (ahora no sólo voy a tener que reclamar derechos humanos para los replicantes sino también para las piedras y los objetos). Al hablar de esto el relato roza una de las ideas que me parecen más buenas, siempre la pensé. Como no está claro que realmente haya “algo más” pero asumiendo que todo es materia y que nuestra conciencia existe (“Y admitirá usted que el hombre piensa… o eso se imagina” dice Moxon) es justo admitir pues que esa determinada conciencia no existe per sé en el mundo material. Sí claro, encuentra en él su substrato, emerge del movimiento de este pero no es “real”. Lo único real son multitud de partículas chocando. ¿Dónde quedamos, en esa ecuación, “nosotros? En ninguna parte. Pero sí hay algo real que somos “nosotros” (creo). No es el “yo” en el que estamos acostumbrados a pensar. “Nosotros” existimos sólo en la interacción. En todos aquellos “choques de partículas” en los que participamos, la conversación con el panadero esta mañana, las toneladas de plástico que acabo tirando al vertedero o mi historia de amor con mi pareja; todos esos cruces e intersecciones trazan un área de sucesos “real” que es lo único que podría decir que somos realmente. Todo esto asumiendo que sólo existe el mundo material, claro. La gracia (y la magia) es manejar esto sin que le quite romanticismo a la cosa, saberse”no real” sin perder sentimiento de “autenticidad” todo esto es compatible con la espiritualidad, el hedonismo o los sentimientos más humanistas a lo Stapledon. Porque mata el autómata a Moxon? Acordemonos de otro robot que incumple las leyes de la robótica y asesina a sus humanitos: HAL9000, el de 2001 ("Deeeisy, deeeesiy..."). En ese caso la IA entra en una neurosis porque tiene miedo de ser apagado, cometió un error y teme que le apaguen, así que actúa en defensa propia. El miedo, la neurosis, es lo que le hace cobrar conciencia (en este caso en el sentido de: libre albedrío, capacidad de decisión individual). Pasa lo mismo con este autómata? Le han programado para saber jugar al ajedrez y... Pierde? Acaso piensa que le van a apagar por no cumplir correctamente su función y trata de defenderse acabando con el único testigo? Es el MIEDO lo que le mueve? Hum Y también esta el tema del ajedrez como meme, o trope, sale en la escena que comento de Blade Runner pero habrás muchísimos ejemplos, El Séptimo Sello por ejemplo o fijo que en algún relato de Bourges también sale. Otra referencia un poco arriesgada es la del rayo que ilumina la estancia. En directo, al lector le puede parecer que la estancia se ilumina de una forma sobrenatural permitiendo al protagonista observar el cuadro (Moxon siendo ahogado por su creación). Al final de la historia nos dan la versión Connan Doyleniana: un rayo enorme golpeo la casa iluminando durante un instante la estancia y el efecto retinal de la “persistencia de la visión” hace el resto. El protagonista dice “la estancia quedó inundada de claridad, una claridad casi cegadora que imprimió en mi cerebro, mi corazón y mi recuerdo una visión lúcida”. Siempre el conocimiento, la revelación, es suministrada con un rayo, fulminantemente (fulmine = rayo en italiano), como el rayo rosa famoso de Dick. Y la luz como “la razón”. Un poco antes, cuando el protagonista está fuera de la casa dice “mas de pronto tuve la impresión de que brillaba una luz muy intensa a mi alrededor, como la que se abatió sobre Saulo de Tarso, y en medio de la soledad y la tormenta, en medio de las tinieblas, experimenté lo que Lewes denomina "la infinita variedad y excitación del pensamiento filosófico” ”. Pablo (Saulo) de Tarso había recibido el mandato de ir a castigar a unos cristianos no sé donde, Jerusalen, que sé yo. Entonces, de camino, se cae del caballo (literal). Al recobrar la conciencia tras el golpe… zas! Convertido al cristianismo. Esta historia me encanta, los curas la suelen poner como ejemplo de “conversión” lol [http://www.elmundo.es/cronica/2015/04/05/551e748b22601dda478b4572.html ]. En el acerbo popular pervive la expresión “caerse del caballo” para referirse a una persona que de la noche a la mañana cambia sus convicciones por otras. Pasa mucho en política (por ejemplo: Verstrynge), yo he conocido a alguien que pasó de ser normal a escuchar intereconomía y ser neoliberal del opus a muerte. En neuropsicología existe un síndrome llamado Gastaut-Geschwind que ocurre cuando se presentan lesiones temporales (esta es una zona relacionada ente otras cosas con ideas complejas como la ideología o la espiritualidad) por el que las personas pasan a hacerse super conservadoras ideológicamente, hiper moralistas y muy cristianas (además podrían presentarse otras patologías). Es curioso que la e/involución siempre se hace hacia más puritano/reaccionario [ https://vonneumannmachine.wordpress.com/tag/sindrome-de-gastaut-geschwind/ ]. Lo último, por la época del relato, me recordó mucho a “El Horla”, fantástico relato fantástico (es como Predator pero en Isabellino) que también tiene algo de ciencia ficción por la búsqueda de explicaciones que hace el protagonista y la propuesta natural del relato (que no puedo desvelar). El grandérrimo Abuelo Kraken lo tiene narrado y el programa Historias lo hizo en su momento (ambos encontrables en ivoox) No he conseguido saber qué significa ni de dónde viene Moxon, parece que es un nombre propio y nada más…. hum Quizá la ultima referencia. Este profesor... (”inventor de máquinas* dice de si mismo) que se mete en su taller, se oye un ruido como de cacharrería, maldice,... Le salen los inventosnpor la culata. Tiene teorías cuanto menos particulares sobre el universo y la física... Me de cuerda otra vez al profesor bacterio, la actitud de Clapaucio y Trurl (sobre todo gran ejemplo en la Fabula "La gran paliza" que ya subimos) o al Doctor Labyrinth ("La maquina preservadora" y "La vida efímera y feliz del zapato marrón") y su Principio de la " Irritabilidad Suficiente". Ilustación: La imagen es una superposición infame (jugando con tu percepción ahí) de Roy y Tyrell con otro beso icónico, el de Erich Honecker, de Alemania Oriental, y Leónidas Breznev. [https://sites.google.com/site/631lacaidadelmurodeberlin/la-historia-de-un-beso/la-historia-de-un-beso ] ¿Por qué? Pues desde la gratuidad más total. La música durante la muerte de Moxón es la de la escena del hijo pródigo. La canción del final también es de la bso de Blade Runner (Vangelis) la relación más que peregrina es la línea que le da título “one more kiss, dear” (Otro beso más querida/o) y aproveche que siempre estaba deseando usarla Muchas gracias! Errores de edición? Habellos hayllos // soymescalito@gmail.com // Historia, relato, cuento, historias, relatos, cuentos, voz, humana, narración, drama, ciencia, ficción, fantasía, robot, androide, autómata, cyborg, cyberpunk, steampunk, dios, muerte, matar a tu creador, hijo, prógido, siglo XIX, invento, conciencia, pensamiento, vida, materia, plantas, monstruo, fantasma, terror, miedo, asesinato, filosofía, conciencia, consciencia, mente, cerebro, ajedrez, blade runner, atmósfera, Voy a subirlo ya para ver si queda bien el sonido pero espero aportar algún semispoiler más después de ver Dirk Gently^___^.

Fuera llueve, caen truenos… Nada más comfy que disfrutar de un rico whisky de malta (los que "somos felices con poco") en la mansión decimonónica del ilustrado profesor Moxon escuchando sus esperpénticas ideas sobre las máquinas “pensantes” ~Todo el mundo quiere conocer a su creador y darle un besito [semi-spoilers] Lo siento pero me dí cuenta tarde que Moxon no lleva acento y lo leí como “Moxón” con acento al final en vez de al principio, espero no saque de quicio a mucha gente. Moxon’s Master se publica en 1899 en The San Francisco Examiner. No sé si atreverme a decir que es una de las primeras descripciones de un robot, básicamente porque le falta el nombre y es autómata, una máquina; palabras que si emplea el autor, recordemos que la palabra Robot se le atribuye a Karel Capek por la obra de teatro R.U.R.(1920). Ambrose Bierce es el autor de numerosas obras de terror, recomiendo mil veces escucharlo/leer de los grandes “Noviembre Nocturno” o “Historias”. Yo no consideraría el Amo de Moxon un cuento de terror; excepto porque al final “muere alguien”. Sale un androide (error! Estamos todavía ante un “autómata”). Y el clímax. Matar a tu propio creador, matar a Dios. Para mí que existe una relacion entre esta escena y la escena del “Hijo Pródigo” de Blade Runner: Roy visita a Tyrell. Continua la partida de ajedrez que Sebastian tiene con el inventor de los Nexus (su pater!) entra en la habitación, hablan, le besa y …. bueno, me ahorro la descripción gráfica de lo que pasa luego por que todos lo sabemos. En mi deriva disfruté con este montaje de la escena del usuario de Youtube Alejandro Díaz-Ordoñez González [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzHo5DaXejk ] Por eso he decidido traer aquí a este autor que sin duda está mucho mejor en otros podcasts. La idea es ciencia ficción clásica, dentro de lo que se pueda buscar antecedentes de cosas que vemos después (aunque siempre hay un antecedente del antecedente, bueno; casi todo empieza entre lovecraft y poe la verdad, hasta las conspiraciones de internet de hoy día están basadas en ellos, x ej la de las pirámides en la Antártida). Comenzamos con la búsqueda de explicaciones científicas a los fenómenos, muy propio del romanticismo (Mary Shellie etc), se habla del razonamiento inductivo y deductivo, hay una referencia a Stuart Mill (uno de los padres del método experimetal), “puede guardarse para usted las premisas”, “el tortuoso sendero de la observación práctica”, etc. El autor hace lo de siempre, en realidad no se moja: nos vende toda la historia fantástica como un suceso real para para que al final todavía sea posible que todo lo vivido pueda ser explicado racionalmente: Moxon gana al ajedrez a la máquina y esta decide matarle en un aparente arrebato de furia. Pero también podría ser que el inventor muriera a manos del “obrero del metal”, Haley. A ese respecto me gustaría traer una referencia estrambótica pero menos peregrina de lo que parece dado el tema de los autómatas. La figura del “autómata” lleva mucho tiempo conviviendo con nosotros. Desde el siglo XVI ha habido ejemplos geniales. Aunque nunca han pasado de ser “máquinas” como las maquinarias de los grandes relojes. Aquí un par de enlaces buenos [https://investigart.wordpress.com/2017/01/10/automatas-el-arte-entre-la-realidad-y-la-fantasia/ ] [http://www.eldiario.es/hojaderouter/tecnologia/automatas-vaucanson-siglo_de_las_luces-androides-Jaquet-Droz_0_576392443.html ]. Pues bien, es conocida la historia de un autómata creado en 1769 por Sir Wolfgang von Kempelen capaz de jugar al ajedrez. De hecho, ganó varias partidas a jugadores experimentados. Sólo que dentro había en realidad un hombre capaz de seguir el juego mediante un sistema de imanes e “indicar al autómata” donde mover. [ https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Turco%20]. Pasaba lo mismo con el Amo de Moxon? Por cierto, porque el Amo es el robot es algo que no entendí, estoy un poco tontuaz. Automata viene del griego “con movimiento propio” (auto+motus = locomotion!). El relato contiene unas cuantas reflexiones verborreicas pero no menos profundas sobre la vida y la conciencia (aquí llamada “pensamiento”. Se dicen dos cosas fundamentales: 1) “La conciencia es hija del ritmo”. Para que exista pensamiento ha de existir movimiento. Yo creo que sin cambios, no habría conciencia. Eso parece ser una premisa básica. Yo estudio bastante la emoción. La palabra emoción tiene el lexema de “movimiento”. Significa moverse hacia fuera. La madre de la emoción, función que regula el funcionamiento de los organismos en el ambiente, es la motivación (también de “motus”, como “motu proprio”). La motivación puede llevarnos a acercarnos o alejarnos de algo. Notesé la similaridad con los conceptos aproximación y evitación de las emociones (o valencia positiva/negativa). La actividad de todos (casi todos¿) los organismos se basa en encontrar el equilibrio frente a las fuerzas del medio mediante estos dos tipos de movimiento. Podríamos hablar de una regulación “homeostática” y adaptativa mediante el movimiento. Si eres una mosca, por cosas de tu acerbo genético y tal, te encanta la luz y vas siempre hacia ella (eres fototrópica), si eres una madre te acercas a tu bebé (los ejemplos con emociones negativas parecen más relevantes pero las positivas también son importantes), si eres un Roomba (esos aparatejos que son aspiradoras-robot) también tienes una programación que te ayuda a evitar los obstáculos, etc. Y 2) se ponen a un mismo nivel humanos, máquinas, plantas… y hasta rocas. Y es que es verdad que todo está hecho de lo mismo y todos somos todo. Es genial la analogía (recordamos que la analogía no es una forma válida de generar conocimiento científico, por muy fuerte que sea la semejanza entre los átomos y los sistemas solare) con los minerales y la cristalización. Al final todo es algún tipo de organización entrópica, más o menos desordenada. Porqué nos creemos tan distintos? Pero no es por ahí por donde quería ir (ahora no sólo voy a tener que reclamar derechos humanos para los replicantes sino también para las piedras y los objetos). Al hablar de esto el relato roza una de las ideas que me parecen más buenas, siempre la pensé. Como no está claro que realmente haya “algo más” pero asumiendo que todo es materia y que nuestra conciencia existe (“Y admitirá usted que el hombre piensa… o eso se imagina” dice Moxon) es justo admitir pues que esa determinada conciencia no existe per sé en el mundo material. Sí claro, encuentra en él su substrato, emerge del movimiento de este pero no es “real”. Lo único real son multitud de partículas chocando. ¿Dónde quedamos, en esa ecuación, “nosotros? En ninguna parte. Pero sí hay algo real que somos “nosotros” (creo). No es el “yo” en el que estamos acostumbrados a pensar. “Nosotros” existimos sólo en la interacción. En todos aquellos “choques de partículas” en los que participamos, la conversación con el panadero esta mañana, las toneladas de plástico que acabo tirando al vertedero o mi historia de amor con mi pareja; todos esos cruces e intersecciones trazan un área de sucesos “real” que es lo único que podría decir que somos realmente. Todo esto asumiendo que sólo existe el mundo material, claro. La gracia (y la magia) es manejar esto sin que le quite romanticismo a la cosa, saberse”no real” sin perder sentimiento de “autenticidad” todo esto es compatible con la espiritualidad, el hedonismo o los sentimientos más humanistas a lo Stapledon. Porque mata el autómata a Moxon? Acordemonos de otro robot que incumple las leyes de la robótica y asesina a sus humanitos: HAL9000, el de 2001 ("Deeeisy, deeeesiy..."). En ese caso la IA entra en una neurosis porque tiene miedo de ser apagado, cometió un error y teme que le apaguen, así que actúa en defensa propia. El miedo, la neurosis, es lo que le hace cobrar conciencia (en este caso en el sentido de: libre albedrío, capacidad de decisión individual). Pasa lo mismo con este autómata? Le han programado para saber jugar al ajedrez y... Pierde? Acaso piensa que le van a apagar por no cumplir correctamente su función y trata de defenderse acabando con el único testigo? Es el MIEDO lo que le mueve? Hum Y también esta el tema del ajedrez como meme, o trope, sale en la escena que comento de Blade Runner pero habrás muchísimos ejemplos, El Séptimo Sello por ejemplo o fijo que en algún relato de Bourges también sale. Otra referencia un poco arriesgada es la del rayo que ilumina la estancia. En directo, al lector le puede parecer que la estancia se ilumina de una forma sobrenatural permitiendo al protagonista observar el cuadro (Moxon siendo ahogado por su creación). Al final de la historia nos dan la versión Connan Doyleniana: un rayo enorme golpeo la casa iluminando durante un instante la estancia y el efecto retinal de la “persistencia de la visión” hace el resto. El protagonista dice “la estancia quedó inundada de claridad, una claridad casi cegadora que imprimió en mi cerebro, mi corazón y mi recuerdo una visión lúcida”. Siempre el conocimiento, la revelación, es suministrada con un rayo, fulminantemente (fulmine = rayo en italiano), como el rayo rosa famoso de Dick. Y la luz como “la razón”. Un poco antes, cuando el protagonista está fuera de la casa dice “mas de pronto tuve la impresión de que brillaba una luz muy intensa a mi alrededor, como la que se abatió sobre Saulo de Tarso, y en medio de la soledad y la tormenta, en medio de las tinieblas, experimenté lo que Lewes denomina "la infinita variedad y excitación del pensamiento filosófico” ”. Pablo (Saulo) de Tarso había recibido el mandato de ir a castigar a unos cristianos no sé donde, Jerusalen, que sé yo. Entonces, de camino, se cae del caballo (literal). Al recobrar la conciencia tras el golpe… zas! Convertido al cristianismo. Esta historia me encanta, los curas la suelen poner como ejemplo de “conversión” lol [http://www.elmundo.es/cronica/2015/04/05/551e748b22601dda478b4572.html ]. En el acerbo popular pervive la expresión “caerse del caballo” para referirse a una persona que de la noche a la mañana cambia sus convicciones por otras. Pasa mucho en política (por ejemplo: Verstrynge), yo he conocido a alguien que pasó de ser normal a escuchar intereconomía y ser neoliberal del opus a muerte. En neuropsicología existe un síndrome llamado Gastaut-Geschwind que ocurre cuando se presentan lesiones temporales (esta es una zona relacionada ente otras cosas con ideas complejas como la ideología o la espiritualidad) por el que las personas pasan a hacerse super conservadoras ideológicamente, hiper moralistas y muy cristianas (además podrían presentarse otras patologías). Es curioso que la e/involución siempre se hace hacia más puritano/reaccionario [ https://vonneumannmachine.wordpress.com/tag/sindrome-de-gastaut-geschwind/ ]. Lo último, por la época del relato, me recordó mucho a “El Horla”, fantástico relato fantástico (es como Predator pero en Isabellino) que también tiene algo de ciencia ficción por la búsqueda de explicaciones que hace el protagonista y la propuesta natural del relato (que no puedo desvelar). El grandérrimo Abuelo Kraken lo tiene narrado y el programa Historias lo hizo en su momento (ambos encontrables en ivoox) No he conseguido saber qué significa ni de dónde viene Moxon, parece que es un nombre propio y nada más…. hum Quizá la ultima referencia. Este profesor... (”inventor de máquinas* dice de si mismo) que se mete en su taller, se oye un ruido como de cacharrería, maldice,... Le salen los inventosnpor la culata. Tiene teorías cuanto menos particulares sobre el universo y la física... Me de cuerda otra vez al profesor bacterio, la actitud de Clapaucio y Trurl (sobre todo gran ejemplo en la Fabula "La gran paliza" que ya subimos) o al Doctor Labyrinth ("La maquina preservadora" y "La vida efímera y feliz del zapato marrón") y su Principio de la " Irritabilidad Suficiente". Ilustación: La imagen es una superposición infame (jugando con tu percepción ahí) de Roy y Tyrell con otro beso icónico, el de Erich Honecker, de Alemania Oriental, y Leónidas Breznev. [https://sites.google.com/site/631lacaidadelmurodeberlin/la-historia-de-un-beso/la-historia-de-un-beso ] ¿Por qué? Pues desde la gratuidad más total. La música durante la muerte de Moxón es la de la escena del hijo pródigo. La canción del final también es de la bso de Blade Runner (Vangelis) la relación más que peregrina es la línea que le da título “one more kiss, dear” (Otro beso más querida/o) y aproveche que siempre estaba deseando usarla Muchas gracias! Errores de edición? Habellos hayllos // soymescalito@gmail.com // Historia, relato, cuento, historias, relatos, cuentos, voz, humana, narración, drama, ciencia, ficción, fantasía, robot, androide, autómata, cyborg, cyberpunk, steampunk, dios, muerte, matar a tu creador, hijo, prógido, siglo XIX, invento, conciencia, pensamiento, vida, materia, plantas, monstruo, fantasma, terror, miedo, asesinato, filosofía, conciencia, consciencia, mente, cerebro, ajedrez, blade runner, atmósfera, Voy a subirlo ya para ver si queda bien el sonido pero espero aportar algún semispoiler más después de ver Dirk Gently^___^.

Rusia ha firmado un acuerdo con Bielorrusia y Kazajistán. Analizamos la noticia y nos preguntamos si sólo afectará a asuntos meramente económicos o tendrá también consecuencias políticas. Siguen las disputas dentro del PSOE para ver quién es el nuevo Secretario General, parece que Susana Díaz, la presidenta andaluza, es la que va en cabeza. D. Antonio se pregunta por qué se habla tanto del discurso político de esta señora. Hacemos referencia a Stuart Mill y el voto plural. También comentamos las declaraciones de Carmen Chacón en el programa Al Rojo Vivo de La Sexta. Titula El Mundo, en portada, “Los empresarios catalanes aceptan una consulta ‘legal y bien informada’”. Una vez más hablamos de la independencia de Cataluña y el derecho a decidir y, una vez más, decimos que la nación española es un hecho de existencia y no un hecho de voluntad y que no todo está sujeto a decisión. Nadie tiene derecho a decidir sobre la existencia o no de España. Por último hacemos un pequeño comentario sobre las exploraciones petrolíferas en Canarias: al parecer el gobierno ha dado luz verde para que se hagan. Ha conducido el programa Baldomero Castilla, con la intervención de D. Antonio García Trevijano y Alejandro González, con la colaboración técnica de Pedro Gómez y Manu Ramos. Música: El Bolero de Ravel, El Padrino - Nino Rota, Scheherezade - Rimsky-Korsakov, Marcha turca – Beethoven. Enlaces MCRC: http://www.diariorc.com/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/republicaconstitucional/

Rusia ha firmado un acuerdo con Bielorrusia y Kazajistán. Analizamos la noticia y nos preguntamos si sólo afectará a asuntos meramente económicos o tendrá también consecuencias políticas. Siguen las disputas dentro del PSOE para ver quién es el nuevo Secretario General, parece que Susana Díaz, la presidenta andaluza, es la que va en cabeza. D. Antonio se pregunta por qué se habla tanto del discurso político de esta señora. Hacemos referencia a Stuart Mill y el voto plural. También comentamos las declaraciones de Carmen Chacón en el programa Al Rojo Vivo de La Sexta. Titula El Mundo, en portada, “Los empresarios catalanes aceptan una consulta ‘legal y bien informada’”. Una vez más hablamos de la independencia de Cataluña y el derecho a decidir y, una vez más, decimos que la nación española es un hecho de existencia y no un hecho de voluntad y que no todo está sujeto a decisión. Nadie tiene derecho a decidir sobre la existencia o no de España. Por último hacemos un pequeño comentario sobre las exploraciones petrolíferas en Canarias: al parecer el gobierno ha dado luz verde para que se hagan. Ha conducido el programa Baldomero Castilla, con la intervención de D. Antonio García Trevijano y Alejandro González, con la colaboración técnica de Pedro Gómez y Manu Ramos. Música: El Bolero de Ravel, El Padrino - Nino Rota, Scheherezade - Rimsky-Korsakov, Marcha turca – Beethoven. Enlaces MCRC: http://www.diariorc.com/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/republicaconstitucional/

Debate político de Libertad Constituyente con el lema "Separar los dos poderes", dirigido y conducido por Consuelo Martínez Sicluna, con la participación de Don Pedro Gago y Don Antonio García Trevijano. Hoy se debate sobre la educación de Stuart Mill, las declaraciones de Iñaki Urdangarin y la absolución de Baltasar garzón por la investigación de los crímenes del franquismo.

Debate político de Libertad Constituyente con el lema "Separar los dos poderes", dirigido y conducido por Consuelo Martínez Sicluna, con la participación de Don Pedro Gago y Don Antonio García Trevijano. Hoy se debate sobre la educación de Stuart Mill, las declaraciones de Iñaki Urdangarin y la absolución de Baltasar garzón por la investigación de los crímenes del franquismo.

Audio recordings of past Tate Britain conference, On Liberty and Art, on the 200th anniversay odf john Stuart Mill's On Liberty. with Malcolm Quinn

Audio recordings of past Tate Britain conference, On Liberty and Art, on the 200th anniversay odf john Stuart Mill's On Liberty. with Malcolm Quinn

Audio recordings of past Tate Britain conference, On Liberty and Art, on the 200th anniversay odf john Stuart Mill's On Liberty. with Malcolm Quinn