Podcasts about True crime

Nancy Guthrie Missing ////// 902  www.TrueCrimeGarage.comOn February 1, 2026 someone removed 84 year old Nancy Guthrie from her home. Several ransom communications have been sent to the media and to the family. Today we go through what is known and the questions that remain. There is a $50k reward for information leading to Nancy's location. Nancy is a caucasian female, 5'4” tall, 150 pounds, with Brown hair and Blue eyes. She was last seen at her home in the Catalina Foothills neighborhood of Tucson, Arizona on the night of January 31, 2006. If you have information concerning this case, please contact the FBI at 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324) or you can submit a tip online at tips.fbi.gov More True Crime Garage can be found on Patreon and Apple subscriptions with our show - Off The Record.  Catch dozens of episodes of Off The Record plus a couple of Bonus episodes and our first 50 when you sign up today.  True Crime Garage merchandise is available on our website's store page.   Follow the show on Insta @TrueCrimeGarage  Thanks for listening and thanks for telling a friend.  Be good, be kind, and don't litter!  Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

A lot of activity in the search for Nancy Guthrie - New letter sent to local news, new search & Nancy's home & her car towed, FBI finds camera attached to pool house in the backyard, and moreX Accounts:Michael Ruiz - https://x.com/mikerreports Brian Entin - https://x.com/BrianEntin Briana Whitney - https://x.com/BrianaWhitneyBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout  - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)

The search for Savannah Guthrie's mother, Nancy Guthrie, enters Day Six with no confirmed sightings, as investigators continue evaluating ransom claims and a growing list of leads. Authorities say the case remains active and complex, with multiple agencies involved and critical questions still unanswered. What's up STS Nation — welcome to Surviving the Survivor, the global phenomenon bringing you the #BestGuests in all of #TrueCrime. Tonight, we break down the latest Day Six developments in the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie — including where the investigation stands, what law enforcement is focusing on now, and why seasoned homicide detectives remain skeptical of a kidnapping-for-ransom theory as time continues to pass with no sign of Nancy. #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #Tucson #MissingMomSupport the show & be a part of #STSNation:Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ...VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcastCheck out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorEmail: SurvivingTheSurvivor@gmail.com Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Vinnie Politan analyzes the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie, breaking down the timeline of the night she vanished and questioning whether the alleged ransom note is legitimate.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?Binge all episodes of #VinniePolitanInvestigates here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/vinnie-politan-investigates/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/qJNEcjplwlIWatch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE https://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TV https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of Vinnie Politan Investigates Podcast was hosted by Vinnie Politan, produced by Kerry O'Connor and Robynn Love, and edited by Autumn Sewell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Pima County Sheriff's Office releases a timeline detailing the night Nancy Guthrie vanished from her home as the investigation continues.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?  Binge all episodes of #ClosingArguments here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/closing-arguments-with-vinnie-politan/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/sgDFEPbxM_gWatch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today [https://www.courttv.com/] Join the Investigation Newsletter [https://www.courttv.com/email/] Court TV Podcast [https://www.courttv.com/podcast/]Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:  [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/join]FOLLOW THE CASE:  Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/courttv]Twitter/X [https://twitter.com/CourtTV]Instagram [https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/]TikTok [https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvlive]YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTV]WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE  [https://www.courttv.com/trials/]HOW TO FIND COURT TV  [https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/]This episode of Closing Arguments Podcast was hosted by Vinnie Politan, produced by Kerry O'Connor and Robynn Love, and edited by Autumn Sewell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Nancy Guthrie's son, Camron, pleads to his mother's possible captors, saying, 'Whoever is out there holding our mother, we want to hear from you.' Bryan Kohberger used two weapons to kill Kaylee Goncalves, according to reports.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?  Binge all episodes of #OpeningStatements here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/opening-statements-with-julie-grant/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/AqPjxRCM3zQWatch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today [https://www.courttv.com/]Join the Investigation Newsletter [https://www.courttv.com/email/]Court TV Podcast [https://www.courttv.com/podcast/]Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:  [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/join]FOLLOW THE CASE:  Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/courttv]Twitter/X [https://twitter.com/CourtTV]Instagram [https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/]TikTok [https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvlive]YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTV]WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE  [https://www.courttv.com/trials/] HOW TO FIND COURT TV  [https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/] This episode of the Opening Statements Podcast is hosted by Julie Grant, produced by Eric Goldson, and edited by Autumn Sewell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

As the search for Nancy Guthrie continues, Julia Jenaé and her guests discuss the case and the timeline leading up to her disappearance. #CourtTV - What do YOU think?  Binge all episodes of #CourtofOpinion here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/court-of-opinion-episodes/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/f3-y-4rkzz4Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today [https://www.courttv.com/]Join the Investigation Newsletter [https://www.courttv.com/email/]Court TV Podcast [https://www.courttv.com/podcast/]Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:  [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/join]FOLLOW THE CASE:  Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/courttv]Twitter/X [https://twitter.com/CourtTV]Instagram [https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/]TikTok [https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvlive]YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTV]WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE  [https://www.courttv.com/trials/]HOW TO FIND COURT TV  [https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/] Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Some people are going to jail.E-Zonehttp://flavorsbyezone.comNitty Sakhttp://instagram.com/nittysakXGhttp://fullytoxic.comChicletshttps://www.instagram.com/chiclets_los.angeles/

Amye is joined by Axel to chat about The Traitors S4:EP8 and we take many detours!Rob makes a play for Candice, but Candice will not go down without a fight. Tara admits that she and Johnny are terrible at this game, but we enjoy them a LOT. Alanis wearing my grandmother's sofa cover.This episode is sponsored by:LUMI GUMMIES are consistent, mellow, and super delicious –– Lumi Gummies are specifically designed to make you feel good, not stoned. Lumi Gummies are available nationwide. We have a 30% code for our listeners! Visit www.LumiGummies.com and use code (LITTLEMISSRECAP) for 30% off your first order.GROW THERAPY makes it easier to find a therapist who fits you, not the other way around. They connect you with thousands of independent, licensed therapistsacross the U.S., offering both virtual and in-person sessions, nights and weekends. There are no subscriptions, no long-term commitments. You just pay per session. Grow helps you find therapy on your time. Visit: www.growtherapy.com/LMR to get started!SUPPORT the show! Get ad-free episodes and a TON of bonus content:www.littlemissrecap.com/supportOr go directly to Patreon at:www.patreon.com/littlemissrecapListen to my true crime podcast: Murder She Watched at www.murdershewatchedpod.comGet in touch with us:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/littlemissrecapFacebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/littlemissrecapInstagram: @littlemissrecap Voicemail: www.littlemissrecap.comEmail: amye@littlemissrecap.comYoutube: www.youtube.com/@littlemissrecapSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The government of the U.S. Virgin Islands launched a sweeping civil investigation into Jeffrey Epstein to expose how he used the territory as a hub for sex trafficking, money laundering, and regulatory capture. The USVI lawsuit accused Epstein of operating a criminal enterprise from Little St. James with the knowledge, cooperation, or willful blindness of banks, service providers, and wealthy associates who enabled his operations. Investigators focused on Epstein's financial networks, travel logistics, staffing pipelines, and the flow of cash that sustained years of abuse far from mainland scrutiny. The case sought accountability not only for Epstein's crimes but for the ecosystem that protected him, arguing that his island operation could not have functioned without elite facilitators. While the USVI ultimately settled with Epstein's estate, the investigation cracked open the mechanics of impunity that allowed him to thrive. It reframed Epstein not as a lone monster, but as the beneficiary of systemic indulgence by powerful people.Within that context, Glenn Dubin emerges as a deeply troubling figure whose proximity to Epstein went far beyond casual acquaintance. Dubin and his family maintained a long-standing relationship with Epstein, including documented social interactions and connections that overlapped with the period of Epstein's known trafficking activity. While Dubin has denied wrongdoing, the USVI's investigative posture placed pressure on individuals like him precisely because their wealth and access helped normalize Epstein's presence in elite circles long after his crimes were public. Dubin's continued association with Epstein, even after the 2008 conviction, reflects the moral bankruptcy the investigation sought to expose: powerful men choosing convenience and influence over basic human decency. The criticism is not about legal guilt alone, but about judgment, responsibility, and complicity by silence. In the USVI's accounting, figures like Dubin represent how Epstein stayed protected—by people who knew enough to walk away, but didn't.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Clayton Howard, a former male escort and frequent participant in Diddy's private sex parties known as “freak-offs,” has filed a lawsuit accusing both Sean “Diddy” Combs and Cassie Ventura of sex trafficking, coercion, and abuse. According to his claims, he was recruited to perform sex acts under the guise of high-end parties, only to find himself drugged, manipulated, and transported across state lines for increasingly degrading and violent encounters. He alleges that Diddy exercised complete control over the events, orchestrating who did what and with whom, often while recording the acts without consent. Howard describes a world of intimidation, where refusal meant exile, and participation meant surrendering autonomy and dignity.What makes his allegations even more explosive is his assertion that Cassie wasn't just a victim of Diddy's abuse—but an active participant in his exploitation. He accuses her of knowingly infecting him with an STD, coercing him into sexual acts, demanding he masturbate for hours while she filmed him, and ultimately pressuring him into an abortion. Howard paints a picture of Cassie as someone who embraced the power dynamic created by Diddy, allegedly using it to dominate and humiliate others in turn. His lawsuit portrays the entire environment as a sadistic, hierarchical structure of abuse where both Diddy and Cassie held power and used it to break down and control those beneath them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Howard v Combs Ventura

Clayton Howard, a former male escort and frequent participant in Diddy's private sex parties known as “freak-offs,” has filed a lawsuit accusing both Sean “Diddy” Combs and Cassie Ventura of sex trafficking, coercion, and abuse. According to his claims, he was recruited to perform sex acts under the guise of high-end parties, only to find himself drugged, manipulated, and transported across state lines for increasingly degrading and violent encounters. He alleges that Diddy exercised complete control over the events, orchestrating who did what and with whom, often while recording the acts without consent. Howard describes a world of intimidation, where refusal meant exile, and participation meant surrendering autonomy and dignity.What makes his allegations even more explosive is his assertion that Cassie wasn't just a victim of Diddy's abuse—but an active participant in his exploitation. He accuses her of knowingly infecting him with an STD, coercing him into sexual acts, demanding he masturbate for hours while she filmed him, and ultimately pressuring him into an abortion. Howard paints a picture of Cassie as someone who embraced the power dynamic created by Diddy, allegedly using it to dominate and humiliate others in turn. His lawsuit portrays the entire environment as a sadistic, hierarchical structure of abuse where both Diddy and Cassie held power and used it to break down and control those beneath them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Howard v Combs Ventura

Alan Dershowitz has become a lightning rod for criticism because of his longstanding defense of Jeffrey Epstein, including his prominent role on Epstein's legal team during the controversial 2008 non-prosecution agreement and his public efforts to defend Epstein well after the seriousness of the crimes became undeniable. Critics point out that Dershowitz didn't just serve as an attorney; he embraced Epstein personally, describing him as a “good person who does many good things,” even as evidence mounted about widespread sexual abuse of minors — a stance that looks indefensible in hindsight and deeply harmful to survivors. Dershowitz also reportedly spearheaded efforts to discredit young accusers, including hiring investigators and sending personal details from an accuser's social media to law enforcement in ways that many view as victim-blaming rather than legitimate defense.Beyond his legal work, Dershowitz's critics argue that his public posture has repeatedly protected powerful individuals instead of truth and accountability. He has claimed to “know the names” of people connected to Epstein's circle and suggested alleged suppression of information — statements that feed conspiracy theories rather than clarify facts, all while insisting on his own innocence and the rights of the accused over the voices of victims. This has compounded outrage because many see it as another layer of elite insulation, where a famed lawyer uses his platform to cast doubt on systemic abuse rather than confront it, and in doing so, perpetuates the same culture of power and privilege that enabled Epstein for decades.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Federal Judge Jed S. Rakoff has accelerated litigation brought by a woman who says she was abused by Jeffrey Epstein, ordering the case against Bank of America (BofA) and The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) onto a fast track. The plaintiff (referred to as “Jane Doe”) alleges the banks knowingly facilitated Epstein's trafficking operation, pointing to an account opened at BofA at Epstein's direction and alleging BNY processed around $378 million in payments to trafficking victims. The judge set November deadlines for motions to dismiss, demands full discovery by late February 2026, and indicated trials could begin in May or June 2026.The lawsuits bring fresh scrutiny to how major financial institutions may have turned a blind eye—or worse—to red flags around Epstein's operations. In the BofA complaint, the claim is made that the bank failed to file required Suspicious Activity Reports despite multiple warning signs, and profited from Epstein's business. The BNY suit accuses the bank of giving credit lines and processing vast sums tied to Epstein's model-agency front used in trafficking. Both banks say they will defend vigorously. The move follows earlier suits against JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank that settled for hundreds of millions of dollars without admissions of liability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsources:Epstein Victim Lawsuits Against Bank of America and BNY Moving Quickly - Business Insider

Even from behind bars, Ghislaine Maxwell has remained a steadfast and vocal defender of Prince Andrew, clinging to a narrative of innocence that defies the mountain of public scrutiny and survivor testimony. In interviews and through intermediaries, Maxwell has repeatedly insisted that the infamous photo of Prince Andrew with Virginia Giuffre—his arm around her bare waist, Maxwell herself grinning in the background—is either doctored or misrepresented. This denial comes despite the fact that the image has been widely authenticated and corroborated by multiple individuals, including Giuffre. Maxwell's unwavering defense appears less about truth and more about protecting a shared past—one steeped in elite privilege, mutual secrets, and potentially incriminating knowledge. Her loyalty to Andrew reads not as moral conviction, but as a desperate act of preservation for a world that once protected them both.What stands out about Maxwell's continued defense of Prince Andrew is how consistent it has remained, even after her own conviction. Rather than expressing any accountability or reflecting on the damage caused by the trafficking ring she was convicted of helping to run, Maxwell has chosen to double down on denying Andrew's involvement. She's made repeated claims that the photo of Andrew with Virginia Giuffre is fake, despite no credible evidence to support that. Her stance seems rooted less in legal strategy and more in loyalty to past allies. It suggests that, even in prison, Maxwell is still protecting the network of high-profile individuals connected to Epstein, perhaps in the hope that continued silence or allegiance might one day benefit her.

Clayton Howard, a former male escort and frequent participant in Diddy's private sex parties known as “freak-offs,” has filed a lawsuit accusing both Sean “Diddy” Combs and Cassie Ventura of sex trafficking, coercion, and abuse. According to his claims, he was recruited to perform sex acts under the guise of high-end parties, only to find himself drugged, manipulated, and transported across state lines for increasingly degrading and violent encounters. He alleges that Diddy exercised complete control over the events, orchestrating who did what and with whom, often while recording the acts without consent. Howard describes a world of intimidation, where refusal meant exile, and participation meant surrendering autonomy and dignity.What makes his allegations even more explosive is his assertion that Cassie wasn't just a victim of Diddy's abuse—but an active participant in his exploitation. He accuses her of knowingly infecting him with an STD, coercing him into sexual acts, demanding he masturbate for hours while she filmed him, and ultimately pressuring him into an abortion. Howard paints a picture of Cassie as someone who embraced the power dynamic created by Diddy, allegedly using it to dominate and humiliate others in turn. His lawsuit portrays the entire environment as a sadistic, hierarchical structure of abuse where both Diddy and Cassie held power and used it to break down and control those beneath them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Howard v Combs Ventura

There is nothing unclear about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, and anyone pretending otherwise is not confused, they are cowardly. The files are explicit and repetitive, documenting a system of abuse built on recruitment, payment, silence, and protection, not isolated misconduct. Minimization does not require denial, only dilution: urging people to “move on,” reframing accountability as obsession, or shaming anger as irrational. That behavior slows momentum, protects power, and preserves the same structures that shielded Epstein for decades. Many doing this now once demanded transparency and justice, but their courage vanished when accountability threatened their own political tribe. The facts did not change; their loyalties did. This is surrender disguised as restraint, and it actively enables a predator's legacy.What makes this especially vile is the erasure of victims in real time. Former advocates don't dispute the evidence; they simply stop amplifying it, redirect attention, and fall silent when pressure appears. That silence is tactical, and it mirrors the discretion Epstein relied on to operate. Anger and disgust are not excess here—they are the appropriate response to industrialized abuse and institutional failure. Claims that continued scrutiny “helps Epstein” invert reality; silence, deference, and respectability helped him, while exposure damaged him. Ending scrutiny protects enablers, not survivors. This moment is a moral sorting: comfort versus courage, tribe versus truth. Those minimizing the record are not being nuanced—they are enabling abuse, even now, even after death.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

For years, Queen Elizabeth II chose preservation of the Crown over accountability, and nowhere was that failure clearer than in her handling of Prince Andrew and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Despite Epstein's 2008 conviction, Andrew continued to enjoy royal protection, status, and access, with no meaningful intervention from the monarch who ultimately controlled the institution's response. The Queen allowed Andrew to remain a working royal for years after Epstein's crimes were public knowledge, signaling that proximity to power outweighed the gravity of trafficking allegations. Even as public scrutiny intensified, the Palace defaulted to silence, denial, and delay, a pattern that insulated Andrew rather than confronting the moral rot of his associations. This was not ignorance; it was willful avoidance, a deliberate decision to treat Epstein as an embarrassment to be managed instead of a warning demanding decisive action. By prioritizing stability optics over ethical leadership, the Queen enabled a culture in which Andrew faced no immediate consequences.That failure reached its nadir after Andrew's disastrous 2019 interview, when the Palace response was reactive and begrudging, not principled. Only after overwhelming backlash did the Queen strip Andrew of military titles and patronages, and even then, the measures felt calculated to quiet outrage rather than acknowledge wrongdoing or institutional complicity. There was no transparent reckoning, no apology to survivors, and no clear admission that the monarchy had protected one of its own at the expense of justice. The Queen's refusal to act sooner sent a message that royal blood conferred immunity from scrutiny, reinforcing a hierarchy where victims' voices mattered less than preserving the façade of dignity. History will not remember this as quiet restraint; it will remember it as abdication. In shielding Andrew for as long as she did, Queen Elizabeth II didn't merely overlook his Epstein ties—she normalized the idea that power excuses proximity to predation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Send us a textTammy shares the week's story with Granny (Kyrstin) and Sherri!Support the show

Savannah Guthrie's mother is still missing after nearly a week, and we bring the latest updates; President Trump speaks at the National Prayer Breakfast, and we examine the role of religion in the future of the GOP. Ep. 2363 You can listen to Lynden Blake's True Crime podcast covering Finding Nancy Guthrie here: Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3PzM3Mvn56oh76OqfA9POD?si=nx4Zz0amTgSuZRJk-dIBdQ Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/finding-nancy-guthrie/id1608813115 DailyWire+: https://dwplus.watch/DailyWireNews - - - Click here to join the member-exclusive portion of my show: https://dwplus.watch/BenShapiroMemberExclusive - - - Facts Don't Care About Your Feelings - - - Today's Sponsors: PureTalk - Make the switch in as little as 10 minutes and start saving today! Visit https://PureTalk.com/SHAPIRO Kalshi - Visit https://kalshi.com/shapiro to see live prediction markets and sign up today to trade on the outcomes that matter most to you. - - - DailyWire+: Become a Daily Wire Member and watch all of our content ad-free: https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe

In a special crossover episode of RCP and BCWC, Jim, Maureen, and Kathy come together with special returning guest Bill Thomas and Kristen Dilley (of the podcast "Mind Over Murder"), to discuss breaking news regarding the Colonial Parkway Murders and other killings connected to it, which was discovered through DNA. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

James Manzi, Principal and Owner of Othsolutions, a management consulting firm focused on empowering national security clients through risk management, strategic leadership, and operational insight, joins Kate to share expert analysis of the Nancy Guthrie investigation. James' career spans senior leadership roles across military, intelligence, and private-sector security operations. He previously held key positions within the United States Army Special Operations Command, Joint Special Operations Command, and United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), where he contributed to operational planning and complex, networked missions. He also served as a National Capital Region Liaison Officer (Colonel) for U.S. Army Special Operations Command. Prior to his military service, James worked as a Special Agent with the FBI, applying intelligence and law enforcement expertise in support of national security efforts. In this episode, James brings decades of experience in intelligence, risk assessment, and strategic operations to unpack the Guthrie investigation and provide critical context behind the headlines. Reality Life with Kate Casey What to Watch List: https://katecasey.substack.com Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/katecasey Twitter: https://twitter.com/katecasey Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/katecaseyca Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@itskatecasey?lang=en Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/113157919338245 Amazon List: https://www.amazon.com/shop/katecasey Like it to Know It: https://www.shopltk.com/explore/katecaseySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Kate discusses the season premiere of Summer House on Bravo and The Turpins: A New House of Horror – A Diane Sawyer Special Event, a one-hour documentary produced by ABC News Studios on Disney+ and Hulu. The Turpins: A New House of Horror revisits one of the most disturbing child-abuse cases in modern U.S. history and features new, firsthand interviews with several Turpin siblings who have never spoken publicly before, offering rare insight into their lives after rescue and the lasting impact of the abuse. Reality Life with Kate Casey What to Watch List: https://katecasey.substack.com Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/katecasey Twitter: https://twitter.com/katecasey Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/katecaseyca Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@itskatecasey?lang=en Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/113157919338245 Amazon List: https://www.amazon.com/shop/katecasey Like it to Know It: https://www.shopltk.com/explore/katecaseySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In a special crossover episode of RCP and BCWC, Jim, Maureen, and Kathy come together with special returning guest Bill Thomas and Kristen Dilley (of the podcast "Mind Over Murder"), to discuss breaking news regarding the Colonial Parkway Murders and other killings connected to it, which were discovered through DNA.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This week we dig into the Blurry Photos coffers for a cryptid adventure on the high seas!Man the oars and put yer backs into it, the Kraken surfaces! A legendary sea-beast the size of an island, the Kraken is said to swallow men whole and snap ships in half effortlessly, but what's true and what's a fish story? Join Flora as he braves the open seas of historical folklore for a deep dive on this fascinating fiend. The oceans are big, but are they big enough to hide a colossal cephalopod? David seeks answers to the questions on its origins, descriptions, and possible real-life species. So much culture has been inspired by this mega-monster, could there be a kernel of truth to the tales? Grab your trident and prepare to release this episode into your ears!MusicMyst on the Moor, Big Eyes, Dark Fog, Dark Standoff, Danse Macabre, Evil Incoming, Infinite Peace, Some Amount of Evil, Spider Eyes, Temple of the Manes – Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0Cornfield Chase, Lonely Mountain, Mothership – Rafael KruxLicensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0SourcesAnderson, Nate. Release the kraken! 2,000 years of tall tales (and a smattering of truth). ArsTechnica.com. Web. Jan. 9, 2013. https://arstechnica.com/science/2013/01/release-the-kraken-2000-years-of-tall-tales-and-a-smattering-of-truth/Denys de Montfort, Pierre. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière des mollusques. Paris: L'Imprimerie de F. Dufart. pp. 256–412 – via Biodiversity Heritage Library. 1801–1805.Haslam, Garth. Kraken: Myths, Legends, and History. Anomalyinfo.com. Web. 2017. http://anomalyinfo.com/Topics/kraken-myths-legends-and-historyJardine, Sir William. The Naturalist's Library. Edinburgh. W.H. Lizars. 1833https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/60177#page/398/mode/1upPontoppidan, Erich. The Natural History of Norway. Copenhagen: Berlingske Arvingers Bogtrykkerie, 1752. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/131226#page/520/mode/1upSALVADOR, Rodrigo B.; TOMOTANI, Barbara M. The Kraken: when myth encounters science. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, v.21, n.3, jul.-set. 2014, p.971-994. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/hcsm/v21n3/0104-5970-hcsm-21-3-0971.pdfWallenberg, J. Min son på galejan, eller en ostindisk resa innehållande allehanda bläckhornskram, samlade på skeppet Finland, som afseglade ifrån Götheborg i Dec. 1769, och återkom dersammastädes i Junii 1771. (5th ed.). Elméns och Granbergs Tryckeri, Stockholm. (in Swedish). 1835.Williams, Wendy. Kraken: The Curious, Exciting, and Slightly Disturbing Science of Squid. New York. Abrams Image. Mar. 4, 2011.Email us your favorite WEIRD news stories:weird@hysteria51.comSupport the ShowGet exclusive content & perks as well as an ad and sponsor free experience at https://www.patreon.com/Hysteria51 from just $1ShopBe the Best Dressed at your Cult Meeting!https://www.teepublic.com/stores/hysteria51?ref_id=9022See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The first reported ransom deadline has come and gone in the disappearance of Savannah Guthrie's mother, Nancy Guthrie, as investigators continue to evaluate the credibility of ransom communications. Authorities say the case remains active and complex, with additional deadlines and developments potentially ahead. What's Up #STSNation, Welcome to the global phenomenon bringing you the #BestGuests in #TrueCrime. The investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie has entered a critical phase after a reported ransom deadline passed, raising urgent questions about the authenticity and intent behind ransom communications now under review by law enforcement. In this episode of Surviving the Survivor, we examine what happens when ransom deadlines lapse, how investigators assess real versus fake threats, and what this moment means as federal and local agencies continue their race to find Nancy and bring her home.Support the show & be a part of #STSNation:Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ...VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcastCheck out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorEmail: SurvivingTheSurvivor@gmail.com Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Julia Jenaé discusses the ongoing search for Nancy Guthrie, the mother of Savannah Guthrie, after police say she was taken from her Arizona home against her will.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?  Binge all episodes of #CourtofOpinion here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/court-of-opinion-episodes/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/DOEJOootmYoWatch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today [https://www.courttv.com/]Join the Investigation Newsletter [https://www.courttv.com/email/]Court TV Podcast [https://www.courttv.com/podcast/]Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:  [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/join]FOLLOW THE CASE:  Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/courttv]Twitter/X [https://twitter.com/CourtTV]Instagram [https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/]TikTok [https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvlive]YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTV]WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE  [https://www.courttv.com/trials/]HOW TO FIND COURT TV  [https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/] Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

'Today' show anchor Savannah Guthrie and her siblings plead for their mother, Nancy Guthrie's safe return in an Instagram video. The autopsy report reveals the number of times Spencer and Monique Tepe were shot. #CourtTV - What do YOU think?  Binge all episodes of #OpeningStatements here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/opening-statements-with-julie-grant/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/r9Ck2c6TU0cWatch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today [https://www.courttv.com/]Join the Investigation Newsletter [https://www.courttv.com/email/]Court TV Podcast [https://www.courttv.com/podcast/]Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:  [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/join]FOLLOW THE CASE:  Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/courttv]Twitter/X [https://twitter.com/CourtTV]Instagram [https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/]TikTok [https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvlive]YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTV]WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE  [https://www.courttv.com/trials/] HOW TO FIND COURT TV  [https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/] This episode of the Opening Statements Podcast is hosted by Julie Grant, produced by Eric Goldson, and edited by Autumn Sewell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Vinnie Politan examines the case against Kouri Richins in the death of her husband, Eric Richins, including evidence prosecutors say points to a potential motive.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?Binge all episodes of #VinniePolitanInvestigates here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/vinnie-politan-investigates/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/whOOYr37CXgWatch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE https://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TV https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of Vinnie Politan Investigates Podcast was hosted by Vinnie Politan, produced by Kerry O'Connor and Robynn Love, and edited by Autumn Sewell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Authorities continue searching for Nancy Guthrie and say no suspect has been identified amid false reports.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?  Binge all episodes of #ClosingArguments here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/closing-arguments-with-vinnie-politan/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/s7uwmWxhzjkWatch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today [https://www.courttv.com/] Join the Investigation Newsletter [https://www.courttv.com/email/] Court TV Podcast [https://www.courttv.com/podcast/]Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:  [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/join]FOLLOW THE CASE:  Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/courttv]Twitter/X [https://twitter.com/CourtTV]Instagram [https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/]TikTok [https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvlive]YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTV]WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE  [https://www.courttv.com/trials/]HOW TO FIND COURT TV  [https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/]This episode of Closing Arguments Podcast was hosted by Vinnie Politan, produced by Kerry O'Connor and Robynn Love, and edited by Autumn Sewell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In 1986, in Kentucky, two lovers would go on an evening killing spree that ended with 5 people being murdered in a most brutal way. Our True Crime Quickie is from Scotland in 2013.https://www.patreon.com/c/rainbowcrimesPromo for Wicked South AfricaIntro: Shire Girl by David FesillyanOutro: Beating Heart by David RendaResources:https://law.justia.com/cases/kentucky/supreme-court/1992/87-sc-356-mr-1.htmlhttps://www.upi.com/Archives/1987/03/21/Jury-asks-death-for-female-killer-of-five/5872543301200/#:~:text=LEXINGTON%2C%20Ky.,without%20parole%20for%2025%20years.https://www.wuky.org/local-regional-news/2011-04-25/notorious-murderer-denied-parolehttps://www.nytimes.com/1986/04/25/us/2-held-as-5-are-run-over-by-car-or-burned-to-death-in-kentucky.htmlhttps://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-kyed-5_06-cv-00032/pdf/USCOURTS-kyed-5_06-cv-00032-0.pdfhttps://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-23863389https://www.the-gazette.co.uk/news/13966393.19-years-for-stabbing-erskine-dad-to-death/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/beyond-the-rainbow-podcast--4398945/support.

I'm driving just east of Wendover, Nevada near the Bonneville Salt Flats. Two days on the road through wide-open country that has swallowed lives and truths. I'm starting near where Dylan Rounds was murdered and now making my way into West Wendover, where 16-year-old Micaela “Mickey” Costanzo disappeared after track practice. She was later found in a shallow grave out on the outskirts of town. It's a place where people think the area's too small for something like this. The story ultimately destroyed three families. She was murdered by her childhood friend and his new lover, and the case still leaves people arguing about motive, control, jealousy, and what “the truth” really is. Both convicted killers are still telling different stories. #ProfilingEvil #TrueCrime #Nevada #Utah #Wendover #WestWendover #BonnevilleSaltFlats #WendoverWill #MicaelaCostanzo #MickeyCostanzo #KodyPatten #ToniFratto #ElkoCounty #GravelPits #TeenMurder #DylanRounds #JamesBrenner #ElyNevada #PaulJohnKnowles #EmmettAlexanderJohnson #LoisMildredJohnson #Tonopah #OldTonopahCemetery #ClownMotel #HighDesert #ColdCaseFiles #MissingPerson #JusticeForMicaela========================================https://gamutpodcasts.com/show/gardensofevilinsidethezionsocietycult/========================================20% OFF Newspapers.comhttps://www.newspapers.com/go/podcast/?ref=profilingevil?xid=8877&utm_source=ProfilingEvilPodcast&utm_medium=podcst&utm_campaign=ProfilingEvil26========================================Email your questions to: ProfilingEvil@gmail.com========================================

On November 11, 2013, a motorcyclist riding in a remote stretch of the Mojave Desert came across something that did not belong to the landscape. The area lay north of Victorville, not far from Interstate 15 but far enough that engine noise fades and the wind carries most of the sound. The ground was hard and pale, broken by scrub and scattered rock. In that dirt, the rider saw what appeared to be a human skull. He stopped. He called authorities. Deputies from the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department responded. The location was isolated but accessible by dirt road. The initial discovery was small — a skull partially exposed in desert soil — but the scene widened quickly. Deputies secured the area and began a systematic search. Within hours, investigators realized the find was not a single set of remains. Two burial sites were identified. They were shallow. The soil was loose compared to the surrounding terrain, disturbed and then pressed back down. The graves would later be referred to in reports as Grave A and Grave B. In total, four sets of human remains were recovered.  On November 15, 2013, San Bernardino County Sheriff John McMahon addressed the media. He confirmed that the remains recovered in the desert had been identified as belonging to Joseph McStay, age 40; his wife, Summer McStay, age 43; and their two sons, Gianni, age 4, and Joseph Jr., age 3. The McStay family had been missing since February 4, 2010. For nearly four years, their case had lived in a different category — disappearance, possible voluntary departure, international travel theory, Mexico speculation. The discovery in Victorville ended that ambiguity. The McStays had not relocated. They had not started over. They had not walked across a border and vanished into another country. They had been killed.Sources: https://coronadotimes.com/event/down-to-the-bone-caitlin-rother-and-the-mcstay-family-murders/https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/judge-unseals-court-records-in-mcstay-murder-case/509-5297be95-2f41-4ce7-931e-8c3dc98e0918https://allthatsinteresting.com/mcstay-family-murdershttps://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/missing-mcstay-family-cross-mexico/story?id=10042816https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/mcstay-family-murder-trial-charles-merritt-closing-arguments-jury/159073/https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-mcstay-family-deaths-20190120-story.htmlhttps://www.sbsun.com/2019/03/11/key-prosecution-evidence-flopped-in-mcstay-family-murder-case-defense-contends/https://www.sbsun.com/2019/03/11/key-prosecution-evidence-flopped-in-mcstay-family-murder-case-defense-contends/https://abc7.com/post/mcstay-murders-merritt-attorneys-poke-holes-in-timeline/5190475/https://www.cnn.com/2014/07/01/justice/mcstay-case-five-questionshttps://press.wbd.com/us/media-release/investigation-discovery/go-inside-controversial-and-shocking-trial-charles-chase-merritt-mcstay-familyBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/kinda-murdery--5496890/support.

According to newly reported emails between Jeffrey Epstein and Leon Black, Epstein pressed Black with aggressive financial demands for years, particularly around 2015 to 2016. Epstein repeatedly insisted on annual payments of roughly US$40 million for providing tax-and-estate-planning services, seeking an upfront US$25 million plus multiple US$5-million bi-monthly installments. He chastised Black's children and financial advisers, calling them incompetent and saying that their actions had created a “really dangerous mess.”While Black had engaged Epstein for advisory services and reportedly paid over US$150 million over a period of time, the correspondence underscores how Epstein sought to impose unusually high compensation and used personal attacks and pressure tactics. Black maintains that Epstein's role was limited to legitimate financial work, and investigations (such as the independent review by law firm Dechert LLP) found no conclusive wrongdoing by Black, though substantial payments and tax-planning strategies remain under scrutiny from the U.S.   to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein sent nasty emails to Apollo founder Leon Black demanding millions of dollars

I spent years digging into the Jeffrey Epstein situation when almost nobody wanted to touch it. During that time, speaking publicly about what was really happening came with actual consequences—jobs vanished, relationships fell apart, and people distanced themselves fast. I dealt with intimidation attempts, anonymous calls, and pressure meant to get me to stop. Instead of backing off, I drove to Zorro Ranch to make it clear that fear wasn't going to dictate anything I did. I grew up around real danger, and those tactics didn't land the way they expected. What mattered then, and still matters now, is staying focused on the truth and pushing for accountability when powerful people would prefer silence.The landscape now is filled with new voices talking like authorities, even though most weren't around when this subject was treated like insanity instead of fact. Watching that happen is frustrating, not because of competition, but because accuracy gets lost when people chase attention instead of understanding the depth of what's involved. My work isn't about popularity or validation. It's about consistency, honesty, and refusing to drop something just because it's difficult or uncomfortable. I'm still here, still digging, and still committed, because the people who were harmed deserve more than another wave of performative outrage. The job isn't done, and I'm not stepping back.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In her deposition on March 15, 2010, Ross was questioned extensively about her relationship with Epstein and individuals in his orbit, including the role of recruiting young women for massages and possible sexual contact. She was asked whether she ever used the term “massage” as a euphemism, whether she personally arranged for young women (including minors) to meet Epstein, and whether she benefited financially or materially from such arrangements. Ross repeatedly invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when asked substantive questions about her own conduct in connection with Epstein's sexual-abuse network, declining to answer many questions about the details of her involvement.Ross was also asked about her knowledge of Epstein's associates and activities, including whether she was aware of certain flights, properties, and contacts used by Epstein's organization for transporting, lodging or grooming associates. The deposition records show that many of these questions were met with silence or non-responses, as Ross declined to answer on advice of counsel or invoked the Fifth. The lack of direct testimony from Ross thus left significant gaps in the civil case's ability to pin down the full details of her role.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The phrase “Epstein didn't kill himself” began as gallows humor in the immediate aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's death in August 2019, when the official narrative of suicide inside a federal jail collapsed almost instantly under the weight of contradictions, failures, and institutional embarrassment. Two guards asleep, cameras malfunctioning, cell checks skipped, a high-profile inmate left unmonitored — the circumstances were so absurd, so improbably negligent, that public disbelief hardened into a catchphrase. What started as an expression of suspicion quickly mutated into a meme, spreading across social media, late-night television, sports broadcasts, and even corporate marketing. The phrase became a punchline, a slogan, a cultural reflex — a shorthand for institutional incompetence, corruption, and the sense that powerful systems had once again failed in spectacular fashion while asking the public to accept it quietly.But the meme did more than mock the official story — it permanently altered how Epstein's death is remembered. By turning skepticism into a viral joke, it kept the case alive in the public imagination long after news cycles moved on, embedding doubt into popular culture in a way formal investigations never could. At the same time, it flattened a complex and disturbing event into a catchphrase, often stripping away the victims, the legal stakes, and the unanswered questions beneath the humor. The irony is that the meme's power came from a truth the government could never fully repair: even after internal reports, prosecutions of guards, and official conclusions of suicide, the combination of procedural collapse and Epstein's extraordinary value as a potential witness made disbelief not fringe, but mainstream. The joke worked because too many people understood exactly what it implied — that in a system built to protect power, some deaths are never going to feel accidental, no matter how often they're labeled that way.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the Broward County defamation litigation CACE 15-000072, the deposition at issue is sworn testimony from Paul Cassell, one of the attorneys representing Epstein survivors and a former federal judge. Cassell's deposition focuses on his role in challenging the 2008 federal Non-Prosecution Agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein, and on statements he made publicly about Alan Dershowitz that later became the basis for Dershowitz's defamation claims. Cassell explains the factual foundation for his remarks, emphasizing that they were rooted in court filings, sworn victim testimony, investigative reporting, and contemporaneous evidence. He details how survivors' allegations against Dershowitz emerged, how they were evaluated by legal teams, and why he believed it was appropriate and accurate to reference them in public advocacy surrounding Epstein's secret plea deal. Cassell consistently frames his conduct as part of his duty to represent victims and expose prosecutorial misconduct, not as a personal attack.The deposition also addresses Dershowitz's accusation that Cassell acted recklessly or with malice, which Cassell firmly rejects. He testifies that he never fabricated claims, never coached witnesses to lie, and never acted outside ethical or professional boundaries. Cassell underscores that his statements reflected allegations already made under oath by victims and contained in legal records, and that suppressing discussion of those allegations would further harm survivors. Throughout the testimony, Cassell situates the dispute within the larger Epstein cover-up, arguing that the real issue is not reputational discomfort among the powerful but the systemic failure to protect exploited minors. The deposition ultimately functions as a defense of victim-centered advocacy and transparency, directly countering Dershowitz's narrative that survivor allegations were invented, coerced, or irresponsibly amplified.to contact me:EFTA00594390.pdf

Keir Starmer is increasingly on the defensive as the Epstein scandal widens and scrutiny turns toward the political class that benefited from years of selective blindness. While Starmer has not been accused of direct involvement in Epstein's crimes, the pressure comes from his positioning as a moral reformer while presiding over a system now exposed as having repeatedly failed victims and protected powerful men. Critics argue that his leadership has coincided with evasive answers, cautious language, and an instinct to manage optics rather than confront the full scale of institutional rot revealed by the Epstein disclosures. For a prime minister who built his brand on legality, integrity, and prosecutorial seriousness, even the perception of hedging or delay has proven politically toxic.What has put Starmer “on the ropes” is not a single revelation but the cumulative effect of public anger: survivors demanding accountability, advocates calling out transatlantic protection networks, and voters increasingly intolerant of leaders who appear more concerned with reputational containment than justice. The Epstein scandal has become a litmus test for whether Starmer will meaningfully challenge entrenched power or default to the same cautious establishment instincts he once criticized. Each non-answer, each procedural dodge, and each appeal to process over accountability feeds the narrative that he is out of his depth—or unwilling—to confront elites implicated by proximity, silence, or prior association. In a moment defined by moral clarity for the public, Starmer's careful lawyering is being read not as prudence, but as weakness.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Secret texts with PM's chief aide, what PM knew about Epstein links, and huge 'golden goodbye'... the grim trove of Mandelson papers due for publication that could end Starmer | Daily Mail Online

Jeffrey Epstein's entanglement with Leon Black and Larry Summers runs through the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation and its flagship project, the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET), born out of the wreckage of the 2008 financial crisis. Black, the billionaire Apollo founder, bankrolled INET with roughly $25 million and installed himself as its chief patron, while Summers — fresh off his controversial presidency at Harvard and a career bouncing between Wall Street and Washington — became one of its intellectual faces. Epstein, already a convicted sex offender by 2008, quietly emerged as a financial conduit and behind-the-scenes broker for INET and its affiliates, using donor networks, shell foundations, and elite access to move money and cultivate influence. Through Epstein's foundation, funds were routed into academic projects, conferences, and research hubs that placed him back inside elite academic circles that had supposedly shut him out, laundering his reputation through economics, philanthropy, and intellectual respectability.What makes the IPI/INET web so corrosive is how thoroughly it fused money, power, and reputational cover. Black would later admit paying Epstein $158 million for “tax advice,” an explanation so implausible it collapsed under its own weight, while Summers maintained institutional ties to projects and donors connected to Epstein long after his 2008 conviction was public record. Epstein was not a peripheral donor — he was a facilitator, recruiter, and fixer who connected hedge-fund money, Ivy League legitimacy, and political access in a closed loop that insulated all participants from scrutiny. The IPI ecosystem gave Epstein exactly what he needed after Florida: proximity to young academics, international travel, visa sponsorships, and an elite shield that made him look like a disgraced financier turned reformed intellectual benefactor. It wasn't an accident, and it wasn't ignorance — it was a deliberate system where billionaires, former Treasury secretaries, and a convicted predator all found mutual benefit inside the same polished academic machine.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Newly released emails from Ghislaine Maxwell appear to confirm the authenticity of the infamous photograph showing Andrew Mountbatten‑Windsor with his arm around Virginia Giuffre — a photo long disputed by both Maxwell and Andrew. In a 2015 draft statement sent to Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwell wrote that in 2001 she was in London when Giuffre met several of her friends, including Andrew, and that a picture was taken “as I imagine she wanted to show it to friends and family,” effectively acknowledging the image was real and that she had introduced them. Maxwell's email also stated Andrew visited her home, although she continued in the correspondence to claim she had no knowledge of “anything improper” occurring between Giuffre and Andrew.The release of these messages comes as part of a massive tranche of documents tied to Epstein that the U.S. Department of Justice disclosed recently. The emails contradict longstanding denials by both Maxwell and Andrew about the meeting and undercut Andrew's past arguments that the photo might have been doctored. Giuffre, who died by suicide in 2025, had maintained the photograph supported her allegations that she was trafficked and abused; her family has described the new emails as vindicating her claims. Andrew settled a civil lawsuit with Giuffre in 2022 without admitting liability and has repeatedly denied wrongdoing. Buckingham Palace declined to comment, and UK police have so far not launched a full criminal investigation based on these revelations.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:That photo of Andrew with his arm around Virginia Giuffre IS REAL and I introduced them, admits Ghislaine Maxwell in damning emails that blow Pizza Express alibi apart | Daily Mail Online

Federal prosecutors have released a massive  tranche of documents connected to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as part of a transparency law, and those files show his extensive ties to powerful figures in tech and beyond. The documents include emails and correspondence involving prominent tech leaders such as Elon Musk and Bill Gates, among others, discussing social plans, personal matters, and interactions with Epstein long after his 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution involving a minor. Though appearing in the files does not imply criminal wrongdoing, the records show Musk asked Epstein about boat and holiday plans and expressed interest in visiting Epstein's private Caribbean island, while Epstein drafted unsent emails containing unverified and salacious allegations about Gates. Both tech figures have publicly denied impropriety, with spokespersons and social media posts rebutting any misconduct and characterizing their connections as limited or misinterpreted.Beyond individual interactions, the broader batch of more than three million pages paints a picture of Epstein's enduring access to elite social and business circles, including Silicon Valley and philanthropic networks. Documents suggest that Epstein remained welcome at exclusive dinners and gatherings with billionaire tech and finance leaders, and he even invested in early cryptocurrency ventures like Coinbase alongside major venture capital firms despite his criminal past. While the Justice Department has stated that the material does not establish a basis for new criminal charges, the release has reignited scrutiny of Epstein's relationships with influential people and sparked political and public calls for fuller accountability for those whose names appear in the files.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein files reveal deep tech ties, from Musk to Gates

Jeffrey Epstein operated as a free agent in the information market, not as a loyal asset of any single government, intelligence service, or political faction, but as a broker who understood that information itself was currency. He cultivated access to powerful people across finance, academia, politics, intelligence, and royalty, positioning himself as the connective tissue between elites who otherwise would not openly associate. Epstein gathered kompromat not just through sexual abuse, but through proximity—private flights, secluded residences, off-the-books meetings, and social environments where guardrails disappeared. He traded in favors, introductions, secrets, and silence, making himself useful to multiple parties simultaneously. That usefulness is what insulated him for so long: he was not owned, but leased—temporarily valuable to anyone who needed discretion, leverage, or deniability. In that ecosystem, Epstein's power came not from allegiance, but from optionality.At the core of it all, Epstein's only loyalty was to himself. He did not operate as a patriot, an ideologue, or a true intelligence operative in the traditional sense; he operated as a survivalist within elite power structures. He provided information where it benefited him, withheld it when it didn't, and shifted alliances as needed to maintain protection. This is why he could simultaneously assist different governments, ingratiate himself with rival power centers, and still remain untouchable for decades. Epstein's genius—if the term can be used—was recognizing that being indispensable to everyone meant being accountable to no one. His operation was built on mutual exposure and shared risk, ensuring that when the walls finally began to close in, there were too many people with too much to lose for the system to act swiftly. In the end, Epstein wasn't a pawn—he was a freelance operator who sold access, secrets, and silence, always in service of preserving his own power and immunity.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

President Donald Trump abruptly reversed his longstanding opposition to public disclosure of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's network, telling House Republicans to back a measure requiring the Department of Justice to release Epstein-related files. He previously labelled the disclosure effort a “hoax” and actively resisted it, but as bipartisan and intraparty pressure mounted—including from conservative lawmakers—the tide shifted and he pledged to sign the bill if passed.The legislation mandates the DOJ to publish all unclassified records tied to Epstein's investigations within 30 days, with limited allowances for redactions only to protect victims or continuing probes; it explicitly bars withholding records on the basis of embarrassment or political sensitivity. The move comes amid growing scrutiny of Epstein's ties to powerful figures and renewed demands for accountability, even as questions linger about Trump's motivations for this pivot and whether it signals a genuine commitment to transparency or a tactical retreat under mounting pressure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:How Trump reversed course on the Epstein files as his administration faces lingering suspicion about their release | CNN Politics

On the night Jeffrey Epstein died, two Bureau of Prisons guards assigned to monitor him did not simply make a minor mistake or lapse in judgment; they abandoned their most basic responsibility. Despite Epstein being on suicide watch only weeks earlier and housed in a unit that was supposed to be under heightened supervision, the guards failed to conduct required checks and instead fell asleep for hours. They later admitted to falsifying logs to make it appear they had performed their duties when they had not. This was not confusion or a misunderstanding of protocol. It was outright dereliction, compounded by dishonesty after the fact. Epstein was one of the highest-profile detainees in federal custody, a man whose death would inevitably trigger global scrutiny, and yet he was effectively left alone in a federal facility overnight. The idea that this happened by accident strains credibility. At best, it reflects staggering incompetence. At worst, it reflects a system where rules are treated as optional until disaster makes that negligence impossible to hide.The Bureau of Prisons bears even greater responsibility because the guards' behavior did not occur in a vacuum. The BOP had already stripped Epstein of his cellmate, failed to ensure functioning cameras, allowed chronic understaffing, and placed exhausted, undertrained personnel in a situation that demanded maximum vigilance. When the guards fell asleep, they were operating inside a culture of decay the BOP itself created and tolerated. Yet the response was telling: minor charges, plea deals, and a swift effort to close the books rather than confront the systemic failure head-on. No senior leadership meaningfully paid a price. No transparent accounting followed that restored public trust. Instead, the narrative was reduced to “two tired guards,” as if that explanation could possibly account for the collapse of multiple safeguards at once. What happened at MCC was not a one-off failure; it was the predictable outcome of an agency that cut corners, ignored warnings, and then acted surprised when the most catastrophic outcome imaginable occurred on its watch.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Send us a textColin and Russ discuss the ongoing and harrowing details involving the possible abduction/kidnapping of 84 year old Nancy Guthrie, who is the mother of TODAY show anchor Savannah Guthrie.  As of this recording, Nancy Guthrie remains missing.  There is a lot we don't know, but Colin and Russ try to make sense of the few pieces of info related to the investigation that have been made public.  As always, the fellas play Is This Legal with the listener and wrap up the show with a hilarious DCOTW.

Brandon Swanson /// Missing /// Part 1 Part 1 of 3 Original Release: 9-2-2019In May 2008, 19-year-old college student Brandon Swanson vanished without a trace after a late-night drive through rural Minnesota. In True Crime Garage Episode 332, Nic and the Captain dive deep into one of the most haunting and perplexing missing person cases in modern true crime history.After attending a small gathering with friends, Brandon called his parents in the early morning hours to report that he had accidentally driven his car into a ditch. Believing he was near the town of Lynd, Minnesota, Brandon stayed on the phone with his father while attempting to walk toward distant town lights for help. What followed was a chilling and unforgettable moment. During the call, Brandon suddenly exclaimed, “Oh, shit!” before the line abruptly went silent. He was never heard from again.In this episode, True Crime Garage carefully examines the timeline of Brandon Swanson's final movements, the extensive search efforts across treacherous farmland and waterways, and the investigative challenges that have left this case unsolved for nearly two decades. Nic and the Captain also discuss the lasting impact Brandon's disappearance has had on his family and how the case led to the creation of Brandon's Law, which changed missing persons reporting procedures in Minnesota. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Brandon Swanson /// Missing /// Part 3 Part 3 of 3 Original Release: 9-2-2019In May 2008, 19-year-old college student Brandon Swanson vanished without a trace after a late-night drive through rural Minnesota. In True Crime Garage Episode 332, Nic and the Captain dive deep into one of the most haunting and perplexing missing person cases in modern true crime history.After attending a small gathering with friends, Brandon called his parents in the early morning hours to report that he had accidentally driven his car into a ditch. Believing he was near the town of Lynd, Minnesota, Brandon stayed on the phone with his father while attempting to walk toward distant town lights for help. What followed was a chilling and unforgettable moment. During the call, Brandon suddenly exclaimed, “Oh, shit!” before the line abruptly went silent. He was never heard from again.In this episode, True Crime Garage carefully examines the timeline of Brandon Swanson's final movements, the extensive search efforts across treacherous farmland and waterways, and the investigative challenges that have left this case unsolved for nearly two decades. Nic and the Captain also discuss the lasting impact Brandon's disappearance has had on his family and how the case led to the creation of Brandon's Law, which changed missing persons reporting procedures in Minnesota. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Brandon Swanson /// Missing /// Part 2 Part 2 of 3 Original Release: 9-2-2019In May 2008, 19-year-old college student Brandon Swanson vanished without a trace after a late-night drive through rural Minnesota. In True Crime Garage Episode 332, Nic and the Captain dive deep into one of the most haunting and perplexing missing person cases in modern true crime history.After attending a small gathering with friends, Brandon called his parents in the early morning hours to report that he had accidentally driven his car into a ditch. Believing he was near the town of Lynd, Minnesota, Brandon stayed on the phone with his father while attempting to walk toward distant town lights for help. What followed was a chilling and unforgettable moment. During the call, Brandon suddenly exclaimed, “Oh, shit!” before the line abruptly went silent. He was never heard from again.In this episode, True Crime Garage carefully examines the timeline of Brandon Swanson's final movements, the extensive search efforts across treacherous farmland and waterways, and the investigative challenges that have left this case unsolved for nearly two decades. Nic and the Captain also discuss the lasting impact Brandon's disappearance has had on his family and how the case led to the creation of Brandon's Law, which changed missing persons reporting procedures in Minnesota. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Ben Mandelker, co-host of Watch What Crappens podcast joins Kate for a deep dive into the sociology of Real Housewives of Beverly Hills. They explore what each cast member's archetype reveals about status, identity, conflict, and social survival. Reality Life with Kate Casey What to Watch List: https://katecasey.substack.com Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/katecasey Twitter: https://twitter.com/katecasey Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/katecaseyca Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@itskatecasey?lang=en Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/113157919338245 Amazon List: https://www.amazon.com/shop/katecasey Like it to Know It: https://www.shopltk.com/explore/katecaseySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.