Podcasts about engelberg center

The Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy, Library Futures, Theater of the Apes, and the Information Law Institute bring you this very special Public Domain Day presentation of Necromancers of the Public Domain.Performers skilled in the art of necromancy transformed the book An Hour With The Movies And The Talkies (plucked from the shelves of the New York Society Library's public domain class of 2025) into a one-night-only variety show. We also featured performers from WNYC's Public Song Project.WNYC Public Song Project Players include:Nikhil DasguptaHammer CountyKat LewisSibyl (Chloe and Lily Holgate)Kal TeauxNecromancers include:Emilio Cuesta (I Am Nobody / QUESTA)Jordan FeitConnor Kalista (The Neo-Futurists / Independent Film Editor)Pearl RheinNecromancers lead by Ayun Halliday (Creative, Not Famous / The East Village Inky)With Special Guest:Saw Lady a.k.a. Natalia ParuzEvent photos: https://www.nyuengelberg.org/events/public-domain-celebration-with-necromancers-and-friends/ 

Donald Beers, Office of Chief Counsel of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (retired)Alfred B. EngelbergAbbe Gluck, Yale Law SchoolArti Rai, Duke University School of LawAmeet Sarpatwari, Harvard Medical SchoolMichael Weinberg, Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy, NYU School of Law (moderator)

David J. Kappos, Cravath, Swaine, & Moore LLPAaron Kesselheim, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical SchoolRochelle Dreyfuss, Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy, NYU School of Law (moderator)

Anisha Dasgupta, Federal Trade CommissionHenry Hadad, Bristol-Myers SquibbSteve Shadowen, Hilliard Shadowen LLPEric Stock, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPScott Hemphill, Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy, NYU School of Law (moderator)

Scott Hemphill, Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy, NYU School of LawBhaven Sampat, Arizona State UniversityMargaret K. Kyle, MINES ParisTech (Ecole des Mines) (commentator)

Bob Armitage, Intellectual Property ConsultantAlfred B. EngelbergKatherine Strandburg, Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy, NYU School of Law (moderator)

In our final episode of the season we reconnect with Michael Weinberg, Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy, for the recent legal cases revolving around generative AI models and the continuing impact of the monkey selfie legal case. Episode page with notes and transcript This season of the podcast was produced with the Engelberg Center for Innovation Law and Policy at NYU. Our host is Lee Tusman. Our audio production is by Max Ludlow. All of the music on today's episode are by our audio engineer Max Ludlow. The tracks are Body Memory, Poole and Relic, CC BY. This episode is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Jonathan Coulton discusses his cover of Irving Berlin's 1924 waltz "All Alone" for the Public Song Project. Then, we're joined by Michael Weinberg, executive director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy at NYU, who breaks down some copyright jargon and the latest news in property law that you should know about, including who owns an A.I. creation.

In today's episode, we're looking at issues that come up in Indigenous communities, and one initiative to respond to the limitations of the law and to reassert cultural authority in one's own heritage, culture and data. Episode notes In this season of the podcast we're working with the Engelberg Center for Innovation Policy at NYU Law. In this episode, Dr. Jane Anderson talks about how she found “the law doesn't do a very good job in protecting collective knowledge.” One of the big challenges in the area that I work in is the language of ownership to start with, and the framework of property itself conditions what's possible to think about and what's possible to talk about. Jane co-founded Local Contexts, “a global initiative that supports Indigenous communities with tools that can reassert cultural authority in heritage collections and data. By focusing on Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property and Indigenous Data Sovereignty, Local Contexts helps Indigenous communities repatriate knowledge and gain control over how data is collected, managed, displayed, accessed, and used in the future.” We also speak with Courtney Papuni of Te Whakatohea iwi in Opotiki. Courtney speaks on her community's work with Local Contexts labels and the limitations of western notions of copyright on cultural heritage and knowledge. Full transcript, notes, links and contact can be found on the episode website.

Panel Four: Solutions and Alternative PathsMichael Weinberg (moderator), Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & PolicyDave Kappos, Cravath, Swaine & MooreArti Rai, The Center for Innovation Policy - Duke Law SchoolMichael Frakes, Duke Law School & Melissa Wasserman, The University of Texas at Austin School of Law

Panel Three: IPR TodayRochelle Dreyfuss (moderator), NYU School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & PolicyGabrielle Higgins, Desmarais LLPScott McKeown, Wolf GreenfieldNaveen Modi, Paul Hastings

This episode is audio of Judge Raymond Chen's introductory remarks from the Engelberg Center's Rethinking Patent Prosecution, Review, and Litigation event. It was recorded on March 28, 2024.

Dr. Darshak Sanghavi, MD ( https://arpa-h.gov/about/people/darshak-sanghavi ) is Program Manager, Resilient Systems Mission Office, at ARPA-H where he heads up the HEalthcare Rewards to Achieve Improved OutcomES ( HEROES - https://arpa-h.gov/research-and-funding/programs/heroes ) program which aims to trial and validate radically different approaches to creating preventative care incentives in the health market, one example being offering direct payments to individual “health accelerators” – such as non-profits or care consortiums – that successfully implement preventative care campaigns that improve the rates for specific health harms in an entire geographic population. Dr. Sanghavi joined ARPA-H in May 2023 from Babylon – a digital-first, end-to-end health care provider serving more than 24 million people across the globe. As chief medical officer, he was responsible for overseeing the company's international operations as well as leading its wider mission to help bring affordable and accessible health care to everyone worldwide. Previously, Dr. Sanghavi worked as national chief medical officer for UnitedHealthcare and OptumLabs, as a group director at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center during the Obama Administration, as managing director of the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institute, and as a pediatrician for the U.S. Indian Health Service. Dr. Sanghavi has a doctorate in medicine from Johns Hopkins University and specializes in pediatric cardiology after training at Boston Children's Hospital. Dr. Sanghavi is also a best-selling author, with his book "A Map of the Child: A Pediatrician's Tour of the Body", available at all major book sellers, and a regular contributor to the New York Times, Boston Globe, and Washington Post. Support the show

Theater of the Apes, Library Futures, and the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy bring you this very special Public Domain Day presentation of Necromancers of the Public Domain.Performers skilled in the art of necromancy will transform the book Broadway Racketeers (plucked from the shelves of the New York Society Library's public domain class of 2024) into a one-night-only variety show. The necromancers will be joined by music from Miss Maybell and the Jazz Age Artistes and updates on efforts to establish a National Public Domain Day.Necromancers include:Nick Balaban (Hello, Cruel World / Blues Clues)Ellia Bisker & Heather Cole (Charming Disaster / Funkrust Brass Band)Bryce Edwards (The Bryce Edwards Frivolity Hour)Dejen Tesfagiorgis (Deja Deja Comedy)Hosted by Ayun Halliday (Creative, Not Famous / The East Village Inky)

Kat Walsh from Creative Commons joins us to talk about the history of Creative Commons as a 'hack on copyright.' Marc Weidenbaum speaks on the history of the Disquiet Junto, a long-running online distributed community creating new music in response to a weekly online composition challenge. Episode notes, credits and transcript In this season of the podcast we're working in collaboration with the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy at NYU Law. In addition to our usual crop of artists and programmers we're adding in legal scholars to help us unpack some of the thorny issues for those working in art and code as they unleash their work into the world. In this episode we dive into the world of Creative Commons, which is now over 20 years old. It is both an organization as well as a collection of copyright licenses used by artists, musicians, writers, directors and creators worldwide to communicate to the world how they want their work shared and potentially to be used as a source to build upon. We also speak to Marc Weidenbaum, founder and steward of the Disquiet Junto, an online “community of practice.” Each week Marc sends out an email newsletter with a creative prompt, consisting of a title, and instructions. These instructions may read like a Fluxus event score, a recipe in sound, a concept or technical description. Those who choose to participate create a single piece of music, then post it online, to be shared, listened to and potentially discussed by the online community. Marc has been leading Disquiet Junto since 2012, and from the beginning has encouraged participants to share their work with Creative Commons licenses. In fact the creative re-use of Creative Commons licensed sound and music has often been an integral part of Disquiet Junto creative prompts. Guests Kat Walsh is the General Counsel at Creative Commons. She has a nearly 20-year history in the free and open culture movements, including many years on the boards of the Wikimedia Foundation and the Free Software Foundation, and has previously worked in library policy, technology startups, and online community management. As General Counsel, she oversees the legal support for all aspects of CC's activities, provides strategic input, leads the stewardship of CC's legal tools, and advises the organization on new programmatic initiatives. image description: a black and white image of Marc looking to the right. He has dark hair and a close cropped beard, wearing a high collared knit sweater and black frame glasses. Marc Weidenbaum founded the website Disquiet.com in 1996 at the intersection of sound, art, and technology, and since 2012 has moderated the Disquiet Junto, an active online community of weekly music/sonic projects that explore constraints as a springboard for creativity and productivity. Links Creative Commons Licenses and Tools Creative Commons talks with Marc Weidenbaum Email announcement list for the Disquiet Junto Marc's website Disquiet, on the intersection of sound, art and technology Credits Our audio production is by Max Ludlow. Design by Caleb Stone. Our music on today's episode is all taken from Creative Commons licensed music created as part of the Disquiet Junto. all at fives, sixes and sevens by wasabicube, CC BY NC SA. three euclidean rhythms, CC BY NC SA, by Lee Evans/Hippies Wearing Muzzles, both from disquiet0567 Three Meters. Ways, CC BY NC SA, by the artist analoc for disquiet0482 Exactly That Gap. Little Green Aura, CC BY NC SA, by he_nu_ri and lako by Ohm Research, for disquiet0566 Outdoor Furniture Music four voice folly by caustic_gates, CC BY NC SA, part of disquiet0565 Musical Folly much too young to…, CC BY, by NolanVerde for disquiet0066 Communing with Nofi, a posthumous collaboration with the artist Jeffrey Melton, aka Nofi, who passed in 2013. This episode is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

This episode kicks off our season working with the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy. We talk about copyright and its limits; licenses and ethical open source; and the infamous monkey selfie legal case. This episode features conversations with Michael Weinberg, the Executive Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy at NYU School of Law. We also speak with computer scientist, game designer and media artist Ramsey Nasser on the Anti-Capitalist Software License. Finally, we join some of the organizers from the ml5.js programming library, which aims to make “machine learning approachable for a broad audience of artists, creative coders, and students.” Episode notes and transcript

Jason Schultz (moderator), New York University School of Law, Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy, and Technology Law and Policy ClinicMegan Graham, Samuelson Law Technology & Public Policy Clinic at UC Berkeley School of LawBrett Max Kaufman, American Civil Liberties UnionAmanda Levendowski, Intellectual Property and Information Policy Clinic at Georgetown LawPeter Steffensen, Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law

Michael Weinberg (moderator), New York University School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & PolicyMehtab Khan, Yale Law SchoolMichelle Wu, Formerly Georgetown University Law Center

Claire Woodcock (moderator), Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & PolicyEmily Hamilton, University of Minnesota PressDennis Johnson, Melville HouseClaire Kelley, Seven Stories Press

Michael Weinberg (moderator), New York University School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & PolicyGuy LeCharles Gonzalez, Library PassMichael Tamblyn, Rakuten Kobo

It features:   Dan Rubinfeld (Honoree), New York University School of Law   Jennifer Milici, WilmerHale   Aviv Nevo, U.S. Federal Trade Commission and University of Pennsylvania   Nancy Rose, Massachusetts Institute of Technology   Chris Sprigman (Moderator), New York University School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy

It features:   Eleanor Fox (Honoree), New York University School of Law   Daniel Crane, University of Michigan Law School   Rohan Pai, U.S. Federal Trade Commission   Phil Weiser, Attorney General of Colorado   Scott Hemphill (Moderator), New York University School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy

Legal textbooks have always been expensive but these days, the cost of a new commercially-published antitrust law casebook can range from $300 to $500. What if a high-quality casebook were available at little or no cost? With the support of the ABA Antitrust Law Section, NYU Law School Professors Christopher Sprigman and Daniel Francis recently completed the world's first openly-licensed antitrust law casebook. Listen to this episode as they talk with co-hosts Alicia Downey and Sarah Zhang about this important project and whether eliminating the expense of traditional casebooks might lead to an increase in law students taking antitrust and potentially pursuing careers in the field. With special guests: Daniel Francis, Assistant Professor of Law, New York University School of Law Christopher Jon Sprigman, Murray and Kathleen Bring Professor of Law, New York University School of Law, and Co-Director, Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy Related Links: Daniel Francis & Christopher Jon Sprigman, Antitrust Principles, Cases and Materials Hosted by: Alicia Downey, Downey Law LLC and Sarah Zhang, Baker Botts L.L.P.

Scott Hemphill (Moderator), New York University School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy Paul R. Gugliuzza, Temple University Beasley School of Law Nathan Kelley, Perkins Coie Erin Mehta, Northrop Grumman

Margaret Chon (Moderator), Seattle University School of LawBarton Beebe, New York University School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & PolicyBarbara Lauriat, The George Washington University School of LawChris Sprigman, New York University School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy

Jeanne Fromer (Moderator), New York University School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & PolicyJudge Raymond Chen, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJohn M. Desmarais, Desmarais LLPMarketa Trimble, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of LawMelissa Feeney Wasserman, The University of Texas at Austin School of Law

Katherine J. Strandburg (Moderator), New York University School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation, Law, and PolicyDavid Levine, Elon University School of LawOrly Lobel, University of San Diego School of LawChristopher Morten, Columbia Law SchoolSharon K. Sandeen, Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Michael Burstein (Moderator), Cardozo LawMargo A. Bagley, Emory University School of LawPatricia A. Martone, Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & PolicyRebecca S. Eisenberg, The University of Michigan Law SchoolRyan Vacca, University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law

Welcome to Engelberg Center Live, a collection of audio from events held by the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy at NYU Law. Today's episode is a FUNTIME BOOK PARTY presentation by Professor Orly Lobel. Professor Lobel discusses her new book The Equality Machine. The discussion is lead by Professor Jeanne Frommer. The episode was recorded on March 23, 2023.

Professor Jeanne Fromer (Vice Dean and Walter J. Derenberg Professor of Intellectual Property Law, New York University School of Law and Faculty Co-Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy) delivered the 2023 International Intellectual Property Lecture on "First in Intellectual Property Law" on 14 March 2023 as a guest of CIPIL (the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law). Professor Jeanne Fromer specializes in intellectual property, including copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret, and design protection laws. She is a faculty co-director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy. Fromer is the co-author, with Chris Sprigman, of a free copyright textbook, Copyright Law: Cases and Materials, which is in use at over 65 law schools around the world. In 2011, she was awarded the American Law Institute’s inaugural Young Scholars Medal for her scholarship in intellectual property. Before coming to NYU, Fromer served as a law clerk to Justice David H. Souter of the US Supreme Court and to Judge Robert D. Sack of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. She also worked at Hale and Dorr (now WilmerHale) in the area of intellectual property. Fromer received her JD magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, serving as articles and commentaries editor of the Harvard Law Review and as editor of the Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. Fromer earned her BA summa cum laude in computer science from Barnard College, Columbia University. She received her SM in electrical engineering and computer science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for research work in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics and worked at AT&T (Bell) Laboratories in those same areas. Fromer was a visiting professor at Harvard Law School and Stanford Law School, and she also previously taught at Fordham Law School. For more information see the CIPIL website at http://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk

Professor Jeanne Fromer (Vice Dean and Walter J. Derenberg Professor of Intellectual Property Law, New York University School of Law and Faculty Co-Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy) delivered the 2023 International Intellectual Property Lecture on "First in Intellectual Property Law" on 14 March 2023 as a guest of CIPIL (the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law). Professor Jeanne Fromer specializes in intellectual property, including copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret, and design protection laws. She is a faculty co-director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy. Fromer is the co-author, with Chris Sprigman, of a free copyright textbook, Copyright Law: Cases and Materials, which is in use at over 65 law schools around the world. In 2011, she was awarded the American Law Institute’s inaugural Young Scholars Medal for her scholarship in intellectual property. Before coming to NYU, Fromer served as a law clerk to Justice David H. Souter of the US Supreme Court and to Judge Robert D. Sack of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. She also worked at Hale and Dorr (now WilmerHale) in the area of intellectual property. Fromer received her JD magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, serving as articles and commentaries editor of the Harvard Law Review and as editor of the Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. Fromer earned her BA summa cum laude in computer science from Barnard College, Columbia University. She received her SM in electrical engineering and computer science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for research work in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics and worked at AT&T (Bell) Laboratories in those same areas. Fromer was a visiting professor at Harvard Law School and Stanford Law School, and she also previously taught at Fordham Law School. For more information see the CIPIL website at http://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk

Professor Jeanne Fromer (Vice Dean and Walter J. Derenberg Professor of Intellectual Property Law, New York University School of Law and Faculty Co-Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy) delivered the 2023 International Intellectual Property Lecture on "First in Intellectual Property Law" on 14 March 2023 as a guest of CIPIL (the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law). Professor Jeanne Fromer specializes in intellectual property, including copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret, and design protection laws. She is a faculty co-director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy. Fromer is the co-author, with Chris Sprigman, of a free copyright textbook, Copyright Law: Cases and Materials, which is in use at over 65 law schools around the world. In 2011, she was awarded the American Law Institute’s inaugural Young Scholars Medal for her scholarship in intellectual property. Before coming to NYU, Fromer served as a law clerk to Justice David H. Souter of the US Supreme Court and to Judge Robert D. Sack of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. She also worked at Hale and Dorr (now WilmerHale) in the area of intellectual property. Fromer received her JD magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, serving as articles and commentaries editor of the Harvard Law Review and as editor of the Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. Fromer earned her BA summa cum laude in computer science from Barnard College, Columbia University. She received her SM in electrical engineering and computer science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for research work in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics and worked at AT&T (Bell) Laboratories in those same areas. Fromer was a visiting professor at Harvard Law School and Stanford Law School, and she also previously taught at Fordham Law School. For more information see the CIPIL website at http://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk This entry provides an audio source for iTunes.

Professor Jeanne Fromer (Vice Dean and Walter J. Derenberg Professor of Intellectual Property Law, New York University School of Law and Faculty Co-Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy) delivered the 2023 International Intellectual Property Lecture on "First in Intellectual Property Law" on 14 March 2023 as a guest of CIPIL (the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law). Professor Jeanne Fromer specializes in intellectual property, including copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret, and design protection laws. She is a faculty co-director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy. Fromer is the co-author, with Chris Sprigman, of a free copyright textbook, Copyright Law: Cases and Materials, which is in use at over 65 law schools around the world. In 2011, she was awarded the American Law Institute’s inaugural Young Scholars Medal for her scholarship in intellectual property. Before coming to NYU, Fromer served as a law clerk to Justice David H. Souter of the US Supreme Court and to Judge Robert D. Sack of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. She also worked at Hale and Dorr (now WilmerHale) in the area of intellectual property. Fromer received her JD magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, serving as articles and commentaries editor of the Harvard Law Review and as editor of the Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. Fromer earned her BA summa cum laude in computer science from Barnard College, Columbia University. She received her SM in electrical engineering and computer science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for research work in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics and worked at AT&T (Bell) Laboratories in those same areas. Fromer was a visiting professor at Harvard Law School and Stanford Law School, and she also previously taught at Fordham Law School. For more information see the CIPIL website at http://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk

Professor Jeanne Fromer (Vice Dean and Walter J. Derenberg Professor of Intellectual Property Law, New York University School of Law and Faculty Co-Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy) delivered the 2023 International Intellectual Property Lecture on "First in Intellectual Property Law" on 14 March 2023 as a guest of CIPIL (the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law). Professor Jeanne Fromer specializes in intellectual property, including copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret, and design protection laws. She is a faculty co-director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy. Fromer is the co-author, with Chris Sprigman, of a free copyright textbook, Copyright Law: Cases and Materials, which is in use at over 65 law schools around the world. In 2011, she was awarded the American Law Institute’s inaugural Young Scholars Medal for her scholarship in intellectual property. Before coming to NYU, Fromer served as a law clerk to Justice David H. Souter of the US Supreme Court and to Judge Robert D. Sack of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. She also worked at Hale and Dorr (now WilmerHale) in the area of intellectual property. Fromer received her JD magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, serving as articles and commentaries editor of the Harvard Law Review and as editor of the Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. Fromer earned her BA summa cum laude in computer science from Barnard College, Columbia University. She received her SM in electrical engineering and computer science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for research work in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics and worked at AT&T (Bell) Laboratories in those same areas. Fromer was a visiting professor at Harvard Law School and Stanford Law School, and she also previously taught at Fordham Law School. For more information see the CIPIL website at http://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk

Professor Jeanne Fromer (Vice Dean and Walter J. Derenberg Professor of Intellectual Property Law, New York University School of Law and Faculty Co-Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy) delivered the 2023 International Intellectual Property Lecture on "First in Intellectual Property Law" on 14 March 2023 as a guest of CIPIL (the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law). Professor Jeanne Fromer specializes in intellectual property, including copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret, and design protection laws. She is a faculty co-director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy. Fromer is the co-author, with Chris Sprigman, of a free copyright textbook, Copyright Law: Cases and Materials, which is in use at over 65 law schools around the world. In 2011, she was awarded the American Law Institute’s inaugural Young Scholars Medal for her scholarship in intellectual property. Before coming to NYU, Fromer served as a law clerk to Justice David H. Souter of the US Supreme Court and to Judge Robert D. Sack of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. She also worked at Hale and Dorr (now WilmerHale) in the area of intellectual property. Fromer received her JD magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, serving as articles and commentaries editor of the Harvard Law Review and as editor of the Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. Fromer earned her BA summa cum laude in computer science from Barnard College, Columbia University. She received her SM in electrical engineering and computer science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for research work in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics and worked at AT&T (Bell) Laboratories in those same areas. Fromer was a visiting professor at Harvard Law School and Stanford Law School, and she also previously taught at Fordham Law School. For more information see the CIPIL website at http://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk This entry provides an audio source for iTunes.

Each afternoon, kids walk through my neighborhood, on their way home from school, and almost all of them are walking alone, staring down at their phones. It's a troubling site. This daily parade of the zombie children just can't bode well for the future.That's one reason I felt like Gaia Bernstein's new book was talking directly to me. A law professor at Seton Hall, Gaia makes a strong argument that people are so addicted to tech at this point, we need some big, system level changes to social media platforms and other addictive technologies, instead of just blaming the individual and expecting them to fix these issues.Gaia's book is called Unwired: Gaining Control Over Addictive Technologies. It's fascinating and I had a chance to talk with her about it for today's podcast. At its heart, our conversation is really about how and whether we can maintain control over our thoughts and actions, even when some powerful forces are pushing in the other direction.We discuss the idea that, in certain situations, maybe it's not reasonable to expect that we'll be able to enjoy personal freedom and autonomy. We also talk about how to be a good parent when it sometimes seems like our kids prefer to be raised by their iPads; so-called educational video games that actually don't have anything to do with education; the root causes of tech addictions for people of all ages; and what kinds of changes we should be supporting.Gaia is Seton's Hall's Technology, Privacy and Policy Professor of Law, as well as Co-Director of the Institute for Privacy Protection, and Co-Director of the Gibbons Institute of Law Science and Technology. She's the founding director of the Institute for Privacy Protection. She created and spearheaded the Institute's nationally recognized Outreach Program, which educated parents and students about technology overuse and privacy.Professor Bernstein's scholarship has been published in leading law reviews including the law reviews of Vanderbilt, Boston College, Boston University, and U.C. Davis. Her work has been selected to the Stanford-Yale Junior Faculty Forum and received extensive media coverage. Gaia joined Seton Hall's faculty in 2004. Before that, she was a fellow at the Engelberg Center of Innovation Law & Policy and at the Information Law Institute of the New York University School of Law. She holds a J.S.D. from the New York University School of Law, an LL.M. from Harvard Law School, and a J.D. from Boston University.Gaia's work on this topic is groundbreaking I hope you'll listen to the conversation and then consider pre-ordering her new book. It comes out on March 28.Leaps.org is a not-for-profit initiative that publishes award-winning journalism, popularizes scientific progress on social media, and hosts events about bioethics and the future of humanity. Visit the platform at www.leaps.org. Podcast host Matt Fuchs is editor-in-chief of Leaps.org.

Fireside Chat: John Belcaster, General Counsel of MSCHF, John Belcaster, General Counsel of MSCHF, John Belcaster, General Counsel of MSCHF, and Megan Bannigan, Partner, Debevoise & Plimpton, in conversation with Jeanne Fromer, NYU School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy.

- Kate Klonick, St. John's University School of Law- Nathaniel Persily, Stanford Law School- Judge Robert D. Sack, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit- Jessica Silbey, Boston University School of Law- Katherine Strandburg, NYU School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy (moderator)

- Brian Frye, University of Kentucky Rosenberg College of Law- Rebecca Giblin, Melbourne Law School- Scott Hemphill, NYU School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy - Stephen Lee, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel, Target Corporation - Jason Schultz, NYU School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy (moderator)

- Amy Adler, NYU School of Law- Winnie Wong, University of California, Berkeley- Barton Beebe, NYU School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy (moderator)

- Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of Law- Sari Mazzurco, Yale Law School- Mark McKenna, UCLA School of Law - Julie Zerbo, The Fashion Law- Christopher Sprigman, NYU School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy (moderator)

Panelists:- Chris Lewis, Public Knowledge- Michael Livermore, University of Virginia School of Law- Andrea Matwyshyn, Penn State Law- Michael Weinberg, Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy at NYU School of Law (moderator)

Speaker: Professor Rochelle Dreyfuss, NYW Law School Biography: Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss is Pauline Newman Professor of Law at NYU Law School and a Co-Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy. She is a leading scholar of intellectual property law as well as other science and technology topics. She was a research chemist prior to law school, and later clerked for Chief Justice Warren Burger of the US Supreme Court. Among her works on international intellectual property issues are A Neofederalist Vision of TRIPS: Building a Resilient International Intellectual Property System(2012, with Graeme Dinwoodie), and several co-edited books, including Framing Intellectual Property Law in the 21st century: Integrating Incentives, Trade, Development, Culture, and Human Rights (2018, with Elizabeth Siew Kuan Ng); and the IILJ Project volume Balancing Wealth and Health: The Battle Over Intellectual Property and Access to Medicines in Latin America (2014, with César Rodríguez-Garavito). She was the Arthur Goodhart Visiting Professor in Legal Science at Cambridge University for 2019–20.Abstract: Many countries have responded (or have considered responding) to the COVID pandemic by modifying their intellectual property laws to ensure the availability of vaccines, medicines, diagnostics, and related information. Some have asked the World Trade Organization (WTO) for a waiver to excuse any steps they might take that are inconsistent with obligations under the TRIPS Agreement. Although a waiver would protect WTO members from challenges in the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body, a state that is a party to an international investment agreement (IIA) that includes investor-state dispute resolution has something else to worry about. Investors could claim that its actions amount to an indirect expropriation or a denial fair and equitable treatment in violation of the obligations in the IIA. In this piece, I conduct a thought experiment on how such suits might unfold. The first part describes how states sought or may seek to exercise control over the knowledge and products needed to protect public health during the global pandemic. The second part considers the challenges that investors might lodge and how they might be resolved. I identify the places where safeguards in IIAs that are intended to protect sovereign authority over healthcare may fall short.For more information see: https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-seminars

Speaker: Professor Rochelle Dreyfuss, NYW Law School Biography: Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss is Pauline Newman Professor of Law at NYU Law School and a Co-Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy. She is a leading scholar of intellectual property law as well as other science and technology topics. She was a research chemist prior to law school, and later clerked for Chief Justice Warren Burger of the US Supreme Court. Among her works on international intellectual property issues are A Neofederalist Vision of TRIPS: Building a Resilient International Intellectual Property System(2012, with Graeme Dinwoodie), and several co-edited books, including Framing Intellectual Property Law in the 21st century: Integrating Incentives, Trade, Development, Culture, and Human Rights (2018, with Elizabeth Siew Kuan Ng); and the IILJ Project volume Balancing Wealth and Health: The Battle Over Intellectual Property and Access to Medicines in Latin America (2014, with César Rodríguez-Garavito). She was the Arthur Goodhart Visiting Professor in Legal Science at Cambridge University for 2019–20.Abstract: Many countries have responded (or have considered responding) to the COVID pandemic by modifying their intellectual property laws to ensure the availability of vaccines, medicines, diagnostics, and related information. Some have asked the World Trade Organization (WTO) for a waiver to excuse any steps they might take that are inconsistent with obligations under the TRIPS Agreement. Although a waiver would protect WTO members from challenges in the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body, a state that is a party to an international investment agreement (IIA) that includes investor-state dispute resolution has something else to worry about. Investors could claim that its actions amount to an indirect expropriation or a denial fair and equitable treatment in violation of the obligations in the IIA. In this piece, I conduct a thought experiment on how such suits might unfold. The first part describes how states sought or may seek to exercise control over the knowledge and products needed to protect public health during the global pandemic. The second part considers the challenges that investors might lodge and how they might be resolved. I identify the places where safeguards in IIAs that are intended to protect sovereign authority over healthcare may fall short.For more information see: https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-seminars

I interview Prof. Scott Hemphill, Moses H. Grossman Professor of Law at NYU School of Law and co-director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy. There aren't many human beings who would be a better expert to speak to regarding the various lawsuits in the real estate industry.We discuss the various class action lawsuits on commissions (Moehrl, Sitzer, Leeder, etc.) and what the issues are. We discuss REX v. Zillow as well as REX v. Oregon, which deals with the anti-rebate provisions in Oregon. We discuss policy as Prof. Hemphill is actively involved in policy discussions around antitrust, technology, and innovation.This was one of the most enjoyable and enlightening conversations I've ever had, and I thank Prof. Hemphill for his time and insights.

New York recently launched a vaccine passport called the "Excelsior Pass." Brian Behlendorf, general manager of Blockchain Healthcare and Identity at the Linux Foundation of Public Health, talks about what it is, and how people in the open source community are advocating for systems like these to be linked, so people don't need multiple apps. Then, Albert Fox Cahn, founder and executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (STOP) at the Urban Justice Center, a New York–based civil rights and privacy group, and a fellow at the Engelberg Center for Innovation Law & Policy at NYU School of Law shares concerns about privacy and the digital divide.

The safest way to return to full-capacity mass gatherings is to make sure attendees have been vaccinated. The right software could help, but there are some privacy and equity concerns. On Today's Show:New York recently launched a vaccine passport called the "Excelsior Pass." Brian Behlendorf, general manager of Blockchain Healthcare and Identity at the Linux Foundation of Public Health, talks about what it is, and how people in the open source community are advocating for systems like these to be linked, so people don't need multiple apps. Then, Albert Fox Cahn, founder and executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (STOP) at the Urban Justice Center, a New York–based civil rights and privacy group, and a fellow at the Engelberg Center for Innovation Law & Policy at NYU School of Law shares concerns about privacy and the digital divide.

In this episode of "Keen On", Andrew is joined by Albert Fox Cahn, the founder and executive director of Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (S.T.O.P.), to discuss the logistics and ethics behind proposed vaccine passports. Albert Fox Cahn is the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project’s ( S.T.O.P.’s) founder and executive director, a member of the Ashoka Fellowship Network, a fellow at the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy at N.Y.U. School of Law, a member of the NYU Alliance for Public Interest Technology, and a columnist for Gotham Gazette. As a lawyer, technologist, writer, and interfaith activist, Mr. Cahn began S.T.O.P. in the belief that emerging surveillance technologies pose an unprecedented threat to civil rights and the promise of a free society. Mr. Cahn is a frequent commentator on civil rights, privacy, and technology matters and a contributor to numerous publications, including the New York Times, Slate, NBC Think, Newsweek, and the N.Y. Daily News. and he has lectured and presented his research at numerous universities including Harvard Law School, New York University School of Law, Columbia University, and Dartmouth College. Mr. Cahn previously served as legal director for a statewide civil rights organization, and as an associate at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, where he advised Fortune 50 companies on technology policy, antitrust law, and consumer privacy. In addition to his work at S.T.O.P., Mr. Cahn serves on the New York Immigration Coalition’s Immigrant Leaders Council, the New York Immigrant Freedom Fund’s Advisory Council, and is an editorial board member for the Anthem Ethics of Personal Data Collection. Mr. Cahn received his J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School (where he was an editor of the Harvard Law & Policy Review), and his B.A. in Politics and Philosophy from Brandeis University. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Part 1: NYPD statistics and Stop, Question, and Frisk  Part 2: The Lockport NY School Facial Recognition Part 3: Stranger than Science Fiction: Steven Spielberg's Minority Report OUTROAs a reminder, make sure to share our episode with your friends and leave a rating on your podcatcher of choice.We are brought to you by STOP, the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project and The Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy at NYU Law. This podcast is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 4.0 International License.Our Production team is: Producers Alex Brook Lynn of Racket Media and Fabian Rogers of STOPSound Engineering by Adam Chimera Research Assistant: Carrie MaGee  Video production support from Alexia Hall Additional Reference Materials:Stefanie Coyle & Rashida Richardson's report on Lockport - https://ainowinstitute.org/regulatingbiometrics-coyle-richardson.pdfAli Winston's report on private donors funding the cops - https://www.propublica.org/article/private-donors-supply-spy-gear-to-cops

INTRO:Welcome to Surveillance And The City, your glimpse at the technology tracking us all. I’m your host, Albert Fox Cahn. With me today A.I. activist Liz O’Sullivan, and journalist Ali Winston.This week, we look at the impact that policing and surveillance had on the recent election. Then, we look at the ways that technology impacted the vote. How did Americans navigate record levels of misinformation, disinformation, and the all-too-real threat of electronic election meddling?  And for Stranger Than Science Fiction, we look back at the Robert Heinlein classic: starship troopers. What does a futuristic tale of battling bugs in outer space have to do with democracy, you’ll have to stay tuned to find out. Part 1 - Policing as an election issue:How did BLM protests impact the outcome?90% of voters said it was a factor.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/07/us/black-lives-matter-protests.html“Among those who cited the protests as a factor, 53 percent voted for Mr. Biden, and 46 percent for Mr. Trump”Do mass demonstrations move the needle on election day, are we too partisan for it to have an impact?Does that even matter, or is that besides the point of mass demonstrations? Ad break:We don’t pay for targeted ads or sketchy ad tech, we rely on you to help grow our audience. Please take just 3 minutes to share us on your sketchy social media platform of choice. And if you really want to help, leave a 5-star rating and review to help train the podcast AI that we’re awesome. Part 2 - Election Technology:The real risk of cyber attacksWhat went wrongnothing it seemswhat could have gone wrongvoter registrationDDOSvoting machineshttps://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/04/initial-signs-point-to-surprisingly-hack-free-election-but-risks-remain-434094Imagined claims of voter fraud and other disinformationHow is this impacting the legitimacy of the outcomehow have media outlets handled itFox NewsTwitter / FacebookLive video platformsHow do we improve this in the future? Stranger Than Science Fiction - Starship Troopers:With trump trying to litigate “election fraud” claims against “out of state voters” who were actually allowed to vote because of the military, it's an interesting time to think back to the premise of Starship Troopers, a world where only veterans were allowed to vote.At a time of fracturing civil society, does some sort of national service campaign make sense?Should we allow military votes to be received later than others? OUTRO:As a reminder, make sure to share our episode with your friends and leave a rating on your podcatcher of choice.We are brought to you by STOP, the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, and The Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy at NYU Law. This podcast is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 4.0 International License.Our Production team is: Producers Alex Brook Lynn of Racket Media and Fabian Rogers of STOPSound Engineering by Adam ChimeraResearch Assistant: Carrie MageeVideo production support from Alexia Hall Additional Reference Materials:Starship Troopers - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starship_Troopers_(film)LA Times Article on Signature Verification - https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-10-28/2020-election-voter-signature-verification

INTRO:Welcome to Surveillance And The City, your glimpse at the technology tracking us all. I’m your host, Albert Fox Cahn. With me today A.I. activist Liz O’Sullivan, and in her podcast debut, Professor Rashida Richardson of Rutgers Law School.This week, we pick apart the charred remains of this week’s election, discussing what it means for potential privacy laws in DC and at the state level. And for Stranger Than Science Fiction, we look back at Franchise, the Isaac Asimov story that asks if in the world of computers we would even need elections. Part 1 - FederalJUSTICE IN FORENSIC ALGORITHMS ACTBillSummary: would require that source code be made available to criminal defendants in all cases in which such algorithms are used (Harvard Data Science Review)Introduced by Rep. Mark Takano (D-CA-41) who won reelection on Tuesday with 64% of the votePart of the Vision for Black Lives policy platformTakano talks about reaching out to Republicans but does not reference actually having any; this piece of legislation was considered to be something that might have come to more prominence if the Senate had gone blue, which was at least a possibility to occur on Tuesday night (but didn’t). Given the gridlock in Washington inherent with a Republican Senate and a Democratic House and President, this is now considered less likely.FACIAL RECOGNITION LEGISLATIONBill: would ban the use of facial recognition technology unless a federal law existed laying out standards for the use, access and retention of the data collected from biometric surveillance systems; standards for accuracy rates by gender, skin color and age; rigorous protections for due process, privacy, free speech, and racial, gender and religious equity; and mechanisms to ensure compliance with the act.Would demand state/local gov’ts also comply or risk federal funding for police training and equipmentSenators Markey and Merkley introduced the Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Act in June (NBC)Merkley held onto his seat by a healthy margin on Tuesday, up against a Republican Qanon believer, Jo Rae PerkinsSimilar to Forensic Algorithms Act, it may have done better in a Democratic senate, which would have a smoother legislative path forward. It will need at least some Republican support to leave the Senate, and so far its only supporters are Democrats and Senator Bernie Sanders, who is registered as Independent.The bill has languished before the Senate Judiciary since June.WaPo’s Editorial Board endorsed it in JulyThough there re no Republican sponsors of this specific bill, there is Republican support for restricting the use of facial recognition:Rep Jim Jordan (R-OH-4) (who won handily against Democratic challenger Shannon Freshour Tuesday night despite ongoing accusations of covering up sexual abuse at Ohio State University): “Seems to me it’s time for a timeout,” he said. “Doesn’t matter what side of the political spectrum you’re on, this should concern us all.”Then there are the local bills that could become a template; they’re already spreadingSF to other citiesWA State bill by Microsoft touted by Brad Smith as template for federal legislation during the BLM FRT backlash Ad breakWe don’t pay for targeted ads or sketchy ad tech, we rely on you to help grow our audience. Please take just 3 minutes to share us on your sketchy social media platform of choice. And if you really want to help, leave a 5-star rating and review to help train the podcast AI that we’re awesome. Part 2 – State LegislationCALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 24Status – As of 11/4/2020 at 3:07pm ET, with 99% of precincts reporting:6,347,485 (56.09%) in favor4,969,444 (43.91%) againstSource - https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24,_Consumer_Personal_Information_Law_and_Agency_Initiative_(2020)ProvisionsCCPA cutoff goes from 50,000 people’s data to 100,000.limits CCPA to businesses that earn most revenue from selling consumer dataCops can order data held for 180 days in anticipation of court orderAllows personal information to be shared with the government if a person is at risk of danger of death or serious physical injury, with certain limitsAdditionally requires businesses to:Upon a consumer’s request, not share the consumer’s personal information;Provide consumers with an opt-out option for having their sensitive personal information used or disclosed for advertising or marketing;Obtain permission from a parent or guardian before collecting data from consumers younger than 13; andUpon a consumer’s request, correct the consumer’s inaccurate personal information.Eliminates the 30-day period for businesses to fix CCPA violationsEstablishes California Privacy Protection Agency to implement and enforceMICHIGAN PROPOSAL 2Status: As of 11/4/20 at 12:23pm ET, with 69% of precincts reporting:1,890,107 (88.80%) votes in favor.238,303 (11.20%) votes against.Source: https://ballotpedia.org/Michigan_Proposal_2,_Search_Warrant_for_Electronic_Data_Amendment_(2020)Provisions: The Michigan Constitution is amended to:Prohibit unreasonable searches or seizures of a person’s electronic data and electronic communications; andRequire a search warrant to access a person’s electronic data or electronic communications. Part 3 -  Stranger than science fiction OUTRO:As a reminder, make sure to share our episode with your friends and leave a rating on your podcatcher of choice.We are brought to you by STOP, the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, and The Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy at NYU Law.This podcast is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 4.0 International License.Our Production team is: Producers Alex Brook Lynn of Racket Media and Fabian Rogers of STOPSound Engineering by Adam Chimera Research Assistant: Carrie MageeVideo production support from Alexia Hall Additional Notes:The Domain Awareness System:https://www.stopspying.org/latest-news/2019/9/26/domain-awareness-systemThe Surveillance Assemblage: https://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/ifi/INF3700/v17/bakgrunnsnotat/the_surveillant_assemblage.pdfFranchise by Isaac Asimov:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franchise_(short_story)Know Your Rights Video Series:https://youtu.be/EBNH7S-1pMs

This September, the Engelberg Center brings you a ten part series chronicling the formation of the first tech company union in US history.

Katie and Steve speak with Michael Weinberg, the Executive Director of the Engelberg Center of Innovation Law and Policy at NYU Law School, about 3D digitization of gallery, library, archive and museum (“GLAM”) institution collections, the goals and motivations for such projects, and how digitization implicates (or doesn’t) rightsholders.  They also discuss the open access framework in which these digitization projects occur, the difference between 2D and 3D copying, and the legal and ethical frameworks at play. Resources: https://glam3d.org/ https://www.law.nyu.edu/centers/engelberg https://www.law.nyu.edu/centers/engelberg/team/weinberg https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/25/421/2325910/

Albert, Liz, and Ali outline the horrifying ways in which law enforcement has been spying on protesters and political dissidents throughout history and, most recently, the George Floyd protests in New York City. Plus, RoboCop holds up, but in more ways than you think.---The Hosts: Albert Fox Cahn (@FoxCahn)Liz O'Sullivan (@lizjosullivan)Ali Winston (@aliwinston)Surveillance And The City is brought to you by the Engelberg Center for Innovation, Law & Policy at NYU School of Law, and STOP (Surveillance and Technology Oversight Project).

COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps was originally held on May 1, 2020 to discuss the privacy implications of technology-based contract tracing applications.  The event was co-hosted by Marc Canellas and Rights Over Tech, the Engelberg Center, the Information Law Institute, and the NYU Center for Cybersecurity.  The discussion features:-- Rachel Levinson-Waldman, Senior Counsel, Liberty and National Security, NYU Brennan Center for Justice (Moderator).-- Lorna Thorpe, Professor of Epidemiology, Director of the Division of Epidemiology, NYU Langone School of Medicine.-- Philip Alston, John Norton Pomeroy Professor of Law, NYU School of Law; UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights.-- Ed Amoroso, Distinguished Research Professor, NYU Tandon School of Engineering; CEO, TAG Cyber LLC.

Co-hosted by the Engelberg Center and R Street, this panel discussion focused on innovation during the COVID-19 crisis.  Moderator: Chales Duan, Director of Technology and Innovation, R St. Panelists: Michael Weinberg, Executive Director, Engelberg Center; Alicia Gibb, Executive Director, Open Source Hardware Association; Matt Lane, Executive Director, Coalition Against Patent Abuse; Ana Santos Rutschman, Professor, St. Louis University School of Law. This podcast is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 4.0 license.You can watch the full video here: 

COPPA, DMCA, Copyright, Fair Use, Terms of Service - the list goes ever on as the landscape of legal questions surrounding YouTube and our modern age of digital sharing is ever-shifting and expanding. Now, even lawyers and law schools have been forced to examine the present state of play, as presenters at a copyright infringement explanation seminar (of all things) have triggered the wrath of YouTube's Content ID algorithm. What happened at NYU Law's Engelberg Center to give rise to the claim? What was NYU's position on fair use? Why did it not matter? And how do robotic content identification, the ability for IP holders to escalate claims to copyright strikes, and the incentives present in the current DMCA all combine to create these untenable positions? Even copyright lawyers can get stuck in YouTube's web...in Virtual Legality. CHECK OUT THE VIDEO AT: https://youtu.be/kF2GMxChNkA #Copyright #YouTube #DMCA *** Discussed in this episode: "Go read about a law school’s ridiculous battle over YouTube copyright strikes" The Verge - March 5, 2020 - Adi Robertson https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/5/21165108/youtube-nyu-law-school-engelberg-center-blurred-lines-music-copyright-video "How Explaining Copyright Broke the YouTube Copyright System" NYU Law - March 4, 2020 https://www.law.nyu.edu/centers/engelberg/news/2020-03-04-youtube-takedown "Copyright counter notification basics" YouTube Help https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2807684?hl=en "Copyright strike basics" YouTube Help https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2814000?hl=en "Netflix: "Choose Your Own Adventure" is Too Generic to Live (Virtual Legality #185)" YouTube Video - March 4, 2020 - Hoeg Law https://youtu.be/W3ZtxSpp2ig "Copyright School" YouTube Video/Application https://www.youtube.com/copyright_school "Limitations on liability relating to material online" 17 U.S. Code 512 (the "DMCA") https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/512 *** "Virtual Legality" is a continuing series discussing the law, video games, software, and everything digital, hosted by Richard Hoeg, of the Hoeg Law Business Law Firm (Hoeg Law). CHECK OUT THE REST OF VIRTUAL LEGALITY HERE: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1zDCgJzZUy9YAU61GoW-00K0TJOGnPCo DISCUSSION IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE. INDIVIDUALS INTERESTED IN THE LEGAL TOPICS DISCUSSED IN THIS VIDEO SHOULD CONSULT WITH THEIR OWN COUNSEL. *** Twitter: @hoeglaw Web: hoeglaw.com Blog: hoeglaw.wordpress.com

This introductory episode of the Innovation Policy Colloquium podcast also acts as a preview of the upcoming season. Professors Beebe and Fromer describe how the Engelberg Center's Innovation Policy Colloquium works, as well as some of the scholars involved in this year's edition. You can find more information about the Engelberg Center Innovation Policy Colloquium here, and more information about the Engelberg Center itself here.  This podcast is brought to you by NYU Law's Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy.

It turns out that the West Coast doesn't have a lock on law and tech innovation. On this episode, we talk with four guests who are involved in the upcoming NYU Law and Tech: Impact on Innovation, coming up on October 15, 2019. Our guests today are Felicity Conrad is a NYU grad and CoFounder and CEO of Paladin. Michael Weinberg is the Executive Director at the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy at NYU. Christian Lang, Head of Strategy at Reynen Court. And, Anna McGrane is also an NYU Law alum, and is the Co-founder and COO of PacerPro. Each discuss their individual experiences with legal tech innovation, and how the NYU campus has become an launching point for many of its grads toward the legal technology and innovation community. From start-ups to meet-ups, our guests believe that NYU is showing that innovation can have a definite East Coast flavor. Information Inspirations The Return of FREE PACER!! Northwestern University's Interdisciplinary team, which includes seven law faculty, including our previous guest, Tom Gaylord, was awarded a National Science Foundation Convergence Accelerator Grant this month. The $1 Million grant will be used to advance Northwestern's AI-Powered data platform which interfaces with the federal PACER system. The Northwestern Open Access to Court Records Initiative (NOACRI) Team includes lawyers, journalists, economists, and policy makers across the different schools at Northwestern, and they are working to create tools needed to make the data locked in PACER available, and then link that data to public information about the litigants, judges, lawyers, and the courts. We wish them luck!! Can Congress Regulate Algorithms used in judicial processes? California Representative, Mark Takano has introduced the “Justice in Forensic Algorithms Act of 2019.” The idea is to create a standards for these algorithms that make them more transparent, especially to the defense teams, not just for the results, but for the entire process. Algorithms used in the courts will also not be able to hide behind trade secrets to prevent those affected by the algorithms from understanding how these results were produced. Can the government actually pull this off? It'll be interesting to see how this progresses. Plus, a bonus inspiration on what law firms should be doing to encourage 1L's and 2L's to learn more about technology while still at the law schools. Listen, Subscribe, Comment Contact us anytime by tweeting us at @gebauerm or @glambert. Or, you can call The Geek in Review hotline at 713-487-7270 and leave us a message. We'd love to hear any ideas you'd like us to cover in future episodes. Also, subscribe, rate, and comment on The Geek In Review on your favorite podcast platform. As always, the great music you hear on the podcast is from Jerry David DeCicca, thanks Jerry!

Jeanne Fromer, a Professor of Law with a specialty in IP at New York University School of Law and Co-Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy in New York, raises many thought-provoking questions about trademark law, technology, and society as a whole in this compelling interview. She gives us keys to better understand how artificial intelligence (AI) and other technologies challenge our perspective on traditional legal concepts in today’s fast-changing world.Every two weeks, on Tuesday, Brand & New gives the floor to inspiring individuals, with 360-degree vision, to help brand owners, intellectual property lawyers, and marketing and finance professionals (and beyond!) stay curious and agile in an ever-evolving business environment.Brand & New is a production of the International Trademark AssociationHosted by Audrey DauvetContribution of M. Halle & S. Lagedamond - Music by JD BeatsFOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT https://www.inta.org To go further:About Professor Jeanne Fromerhttps://its.law.nyu.edu/facultyprofiles/index.cfm?fuseaction=profile.overview&personid=27961 About this episodehttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3183294https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3121030https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/2328https://www.inta.org/PDF%20Library/2017DailyNews_Day4.pdfhttps://www.inta.org/Programs/Pages/2019NewYork_Overview.aspxSee also The Trademark Reporter, the Law Journal of the INTA: http://inta.org/TMR/Pages/current_issue.aspx (current issue) and http://inta.org/TMR/Pages/TMRArchive.aspx (archives)

Joshua Benner, PharmD, ScD, is the Founder of RxAnte, a provider of science-based information technology solutions for improving quality and lowering the cost of healthcare. In August 2014, Dr. Benner was named the Executive Vice President of Strategy and Corporate Development for RxAnte's parent company, Millennium Health. A leading voice on medication adherence, Dr. Benner's award-winning research and numerous publications have shed new light on the problem of nonadherence and identified promising approaches to improving it. Prior to RxAnte, Dr. Benner was Fellow and Managing Director at the Brookings Institution's Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform, where he focused on medical technology policy. Prior to Brookings, Dr. Benner was principal at ValueMedics Research, an analytic and consulting services firm. Following the successful sale of ValueMedics to IMS Health in 2007, he served as senior principal in health economics and outcomes research and global lead for medication adherence at IMS. Dr. Benner received his Doctor of Pharmacy degree from Drake University and his Doctor of Science in health policy and management from the Harvard University School of Public Health. He remains a Visiting Scholar in Economic Studies at Brookings, and is an adjunct scholar in Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. Social Handles: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/rxante-inc- Twitter: https://twitter.com/rxante Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RxAnte 00:00 Josh explains what RxAnte is, and why he founded it.02:00 How Underuse, Overuse, and Misuse of prescription drugs is costing Americans $300 Billion a year.03:15 RxAnte's approach to fixing the adherence problem and preventing underuse of prescription medication06:00 RxAnte's approach to identify patients at risk of underusing their prescription medications.06:45 How Real-Time prescription data allows providers to open up a conversation about adherence with their patients.08:40 How Value-Based reimbursement is benefiting medication use as well.09:00 How RxAnte predicts which patients will stop using their prescription medications too soon.11:35 How RxAnte screens for patients who might stop using prescription medication due to its side effects.14:15 RxAnte factors in types of prescription medication prescribed, and known side effects for those drugs.17:00 RxAnte uses data to not only identify at-risk patients, but also help providers prescribe more accurately to proactively prevent adherence issues.18:30 The steps by which RxAnte establishes their services, once hired.19:20 Who hires RxAnte, and why.22:15 What is RxEffect and how it works.24:40 Population Health Nurses and the growing popularity of this occupation.26:00 Why providers are choosing RxAnte.28:00 The problem with the typical “P for P” system.34:00 Where RxAnte's services begin for patients at risk of overdosing on medication, particularly unsafe use of pain medications.37:50 You can find out more information at www.RxAnte.com.

The closing plenary of the American Society for Health Economists conference featured an awards ceremony and the national Leonard D. Schaeffer Chairs. The awards presented were: Victor R. Fuchs Award for Lifetime Achievement to Joseph Newhouse ASHEcon Medal to Amy Finkelstein Student Paper Award to Alice Chen The national Leonard D. Schaeffer chairs panel on payment reform followed. The four current chairs spoke on various aspects of payment reform, including accountable care organizations, bundled payments, benefit design and consumer-facing incentives: Dana Goldman, Leonard D. Schaeffer Director’s Chair, USC – moderator Alice Rivlin, Leonard D. Schaeffer Chair in Health Policy Studies and Director of the Engelberg Center, Brookings Institution Michael Chernew, Leonard D. Schaeffer Professor of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School James Robinson, Leonard D. Schaeffer Professor of Health Economics and Director of the Berkeley Center for Health Technology (BCHT), UC- Berkeley

Listen NowSince 1992 use of the RBRVS (Resource Based Relative Value Scale) has been the prevailing method by which physician procedure prices are determined.  The method or formula for determining prices is managed by the AMA's RUC (or the Relative Value Update Committee).  In recent years the RUC has come under increasing criticism largely because their work perversely incents the use or overuse of higher priced medical procedures. The RUC has been a topic of Congressional hearings over the past few years and just this past week the Congress included a provision in the so called "doc fix" bill to have the DHHS Secretary begin to collect information on physician services to better determine relative values in setting physician fees.  During this 23 minute conversation Kavita discusses how the RUC determines prices, the AMA's defense of the RUC process, what effect price skewing has on the practice of primary care and how the RBRVS might be reformed.   Dr. Kavita Patelis a Fellow in the Economic Studies program and Managing Director for clinical transformation and delivery at the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institution.  She is also a practicing primary care internist at Johns Hopkins Medicine.  She served previously in the Obama Administration as Director of Policy for the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement in the White House.  Dr. Patel also served as Deputy Staff Director for the late Senator Edward Kennedy.  She too has an extensive research and clinical background having worked as a researcher at the RAND Corporation and as a practicing physician in both California and Oregon.  She earned her medical degree from the University of Texas and her masters in public health from the UCLA. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.thehealthcarepolicypodcast.com

On the Wednesday, November 20th broadcast at 9:30AM Pacific/12:30 PM Eastern our special guest is Farzad Mostashari, MD visiting fellow of the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institution, and former National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Department of Health and Human Services. According to his bio at Brookings: 'Dr. Mostashari's work covers a range of topics related to helping clinicians improve care and patient health through health IT, focusing on small practice transformation by developing innovative payment models that can better support these types of practices. This work will include expanding the reach of the Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Learning Network, a Brookings-Dartmouth project that provides participating organizations the tools necessary to successfully implement accountable care.' As the Health and Human Services point person at ONC, Farzad was a higly visible, articulate and effective advocate for the adoption of health information technology. On the broadcast today, we'll get reflections on his ONC tenure, and how that experience informs what he sees ahead as core enabling drivers of the transformation agenda of the American healthcare ecosystem. Join us for key insights from this nationally prominent healthcare leader.    

Listen NowOne of the most discussed provisions of the Affordable Care Act promising to "bend the cost curve" are Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).   CMS has now selected over 250, moreover physician-led, organizations as ACOs coverning four million Medicare beneficiaries.   ACOs offer the promise of improved coordinated care, care quality and reduced Medicare costs.  During this 27-minute interview Dr. Patel explains the impetus for and creation of Accountable Care Organizations, how rapidly ACOs are growing in number and what are some of the barriers limiting participation in the “shared savings” program.  She explains further how Medicare reimburses ACOs (Type 1 and 2) and the concern among providers regarding the freedom Medicare beneficiaries have in seeking care outside their ACO.  What ACO activity is occurring beyond Medicare or among large physician groups and private insurers, how and why ACOs might be successful and how and why ACOs serve as a catalyst for provider integration (and the downside risks involved with accelerated consolidation) are all also discussed.  The interview concludes with a brief summary of the Brookings-Dartmouth ACO learning network (www.acolearningnetwork.org).Dr. Kavita Patel is a Fellow in the Economic Studies program and Managing Director for clinical transformation and delivery at the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institution.  She is also a practicing primary care internist at Johns Hopkins Medicine. She served previously in the Obama Administration as Director of Policy for the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement in the White House.  Dr. Patel also served as Deputy Staff Director for the late Senator Edward Kennedy.  She too has an extensive research and clinical background having worked as a researcher at the RAND Corporation and as a practicing physician in both California and Oregon.  She earned her medical degree from the University of Texas and her masters in public health from the UCLA. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.thehealthcarepolicypodcast.com

On the Wednesday, February 9th 2011 program at 11AM Pacific and 2PM Eastern, we are re-broadcasting portions of the February 1, 2011 Brookings Institution Event 'Achieving Better Care at Lower Costs through Accountable Care Organizations‘. The link reference for the entire program is: http://www.brookings.edu/events/2011/0201_accountable_care.aspx / The faculty include: Mark McClellan, Director, Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform, The Brookings Institution, Donald Berwick, Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Elliott Fisher, Director, Center for Population Health, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, and Francis J. Crosson, Associate Executive Director, The Permanente Group, Inc., among other thought leaders. Additionally, we are blessed to also have access to a complete transcript of the conference via: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/events/2011/0201_accountable_care/20110201_accountable_care.pdf / NOTE: ACO Watch: A Mid Week Review is not affiliated, nor a representative of The Brookings Insitution. For commentary on the event and the ACO industry, see: ACOWatch.com.

Host: Jack Lewin, MD Guest: Mark McClellan, MD, PhD Defensive medicine and medical liability concerns create a symbiotic relationship that costs everyone in the medical system. Has healthcare reform legislation addressed the medical malpractice issue, and will it do enough to contain healthcare costs? Dr. Mark McClellan, director of the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institution, former commissioner of the FDA and administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, discusses the impact of defensive medicine on the healthcare system. Dr. McClellan also suggests that health information technology will play a significant role in bending the healthcare cost curve by ensuring safety, as well as increasing coordination of care and effective communication. Among states have taken up tort reform, how successful have these reforms been at reducing liability pressure and overall healthcare costs? Hosted by Dr. Jack Lewin. Produced in Cooperation with

Host: Jack Lewin, MD Guest: Mark McClellan, MD, PhD Defensive medicine and medical liability concerns create a symbiotic relationship that costs everyone in the medical system. Has healthcare reform legislation addressed the medical malpractice issue, and will it do enough to contain healthcare costs? Dr. Mark McClellan, director of the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institution, former commissioner of the FDA and administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, discusses the impact of defensive medicine on the healthcare system. Dr. McClellan also suggests that health information technology will play a significant role in bending the healthcare cost curve by ensuring safety, as well as increasing coordination of care and effective communication. Among states have taken up tort reform, how successful have these reforms been at reducing liability pressure and overall healthcare costs? Hosted by Dr. Jack Lewin. Produced in Cooperation with

Host: Jack Lewin, MD Guest: Mark McClellan, MD, PhD It takes a substantial measure of time, money and manpower to bring a new drug from the bench to the marketplace. One key aspect of this sequence is the drug approval process, overseen by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Host Dr. Jack Lewin welcomes Dr. Mark McClellan, director of the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institution, former commissioner of the FDA and administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, to discuss a range of issues within the FDA's approval process: from essential boosts in funding, to more transparency about conflicts of interest, to the imperative need for comprehensive, real-time surveillance of long-term drug outcomes, how can the agency devote more attention to each of these areas of concern?

Host: Jack Lewin, MD Guest: Mark McClellan, MD, PhD It takes a substantial measure of time, money and manpower to bring a new drug from the bench to the marketplace. One key aspect of this sequence is the drug approval process, overseen by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Host Dr. Jack Lewin welcomes Dr. Mark McClellan, director of the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institution, former commissioner of the FDA and administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, to discuss a range of issues within the FDA's approval process: from essential boosts in funding, to more transparency about conflicts of interest, to the imperative need for comprehensive, real-time surveillance of long-term drug outcomes, how can the agency devote more attention to each of these areas of concern?