Podcasts about Jury trial

Join Elizabeth Larrick as she explores the decision-making process of whether to settle a case or proceed to a jury trial. This episode provides trial lawyers with actionable insights into evaluating jury trials by examining recent verdicts and settlements and leveraging the experience of attorneys familiar with key players in the case. Elizabeth shares how focus groups composed of non-lawyers can offer valuable perspectives, helping to understand jurors' mindsets. Look into trial preparation and risk assessment, focusing on the importance of evaluating evidence from a juror's viewpoint. Elizabeth discusses the strategic use of focus groups in refining opening statements and provides a comprehensive view of weighing the risks and rewards of settling versus going to trial.  In this episode, you will hear: Decision-making between settling a case and going to a jury trial Importance of researching recent verdicts, settlements, and consulting experienced attorneys. Utilizing focus groups to understand jurors' perspectives and attitudes. Trial preparation, risk assessment, and evaluating evidence from a juror's viewpoint. Assessing trial costs, time commitments, and potential outcomes to guide clients effectively. Follow and Review: We'd love for you to follow us if you haven't yet. Click that purple '+' in the top right corner of your Apple Podcasts app. We'd love it even more if you could drop a review or 5-star rating over on Apple Podcasts. Simply select “Ratings and Reviews” and “Write a Review” then a quick line with your favorite part of the episode. It only takes a second and it helps spread the word about the podcast. Supporting Resources: Want to learn to set-up our own virtual focus groups? Check out my on-demand course here. This course will only be offered until December 2, 2024. Related episodes on trial preparation: Ep 122 Episode Credits If you like this podcast and are thinking of creating your own, consider talking to my producer, Emerald City Productions. They helped me grow and produce the podcast you are listening to right now. Find out more at https://emeraldcitypro.com Let them know I sent you.

Is There Really a Right to a Civil Jury Trial? I’m Katelyn Holub, an attorney focusing on personal injury law in northwest Indiana. Welcome to Personal Injury Primer, where we break down the law into simple terms, provide legal tips, and discuss personal injury law topics. You may have heard that the U.S. Constitution guarantees […] The post Ep 287 Is There Really a Right to a Civil Jury Trial? first appeared on Personal Injury Primer.

In this episode of the Lawyer Lifter Podcast, sit down with Melissa Fulgencio, Founding Attorney of Uplift Law, and her Executive Assistant Arianna Dela Cruz as they begin discussing the ongoing  Shulman v Kaplan Trial, which has been 6 years in the making, along with exploring the critical stages of trial prep.Whether you're a legal professional or a loyal listener, this podcast offers a behind-the-scenes look at what it truly takes to prepare for trial.

The illegal immigrant charged in the death of nursing student Laken Riley will let a judge, not a jury decide his fate.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today on LIVE! Daily News, a GoFundMe has been set up for a 9-year-old who is in a medically induced coma, Pfluger Fest was this past weekend, and the three men involved in the Walmart Theft Scheme have been indicted.Also, Fagner Rocha with ASU's Symphony Orchestra is in the studio and Paul Harris spoke with Central Bobcat's head coach Mark Smith.Today's Top Stories: Friday Night Rewind: Best Games, Biggest Wins and Top Performers From Last Week (10/21/2024)Three San Angelo Men Indicted in Walmart Lottery Theft Case Involving Over $1 Million (10/21/2024)Police Respond to Game Room Robbery in Santa Anna, Seek Help Identifying Suspect (10/21/2024)Quail Populations Surge Across Texas as Hunting Season Begins, TPWD Reports (10/21/2024)San Angelo Big Lots Offering Discounts on Everything in Store as Part of Closeout Sale (10/21/2024)Ramp Closure Alert for U.S. 67 Westbound On-Ramp Near Bell Street (10/21/2024)Texas High School Football State Rankings: Week 9 (10/21/2024)To Vote for or Against Proposition A (10/21/2024)San Angelo Girl Airlifted After Tree Swing Accident, Fundraiser Nears Goal (10/21/2024)San Angelo Man Indicted After Shooting at Two Women, Turning Gun on Himself (10/21/2024)Exact Timetable Released for Rare Comet Viewing Over Texas (10/21/2024)Angelo State Hosts STEM Lab Night for Families and Students Tomorrow (10/21/2024)West Texas High School Football District Standings (10/21/2024)TxDOT: 25% of Texas Traffic Deaths Occur in Energy-Producing Areas (10/21/2024)Angelo State Kicks Off 2024 Homecoming Week With Packed Schedule of Public Events (10/21/2024)Potential Record Highs This Week as San Angelo Warms into the 90s (10/21/2024)Drug Possession and Assault Causing Injury Tops Booking Report (10/21/2024)Bad Crash on FM 2105 (10/20/2024)Jury Trial for Man Accused of Uxoricide Starts Tomorrow (10/20/2024)Pfluger Hosts Largest ‘Pfluger Pfest' Yet in Christoval, Thousands Attend (10/20/2024)Firefighters Use Jaws of Life in Crash on Sherwood Way (10/20/2024)Why Secular Halloween Frightens Some of the Faithful (10/20/2024)Truck and Car Collide on Beauregard, One Hospitalized (10/20/2024)Early Voting for Nov. 5 General Elections Begins Tomorrow (10/20/2024)Angelo State Locks Down Midwestern, Remains Unbeaten in Conference (10/20/2024)

There's an old saying that justice delayed is justice denied.   It's a legal maxim that means if legal redress to an injured party is available, but it's not forthcoming in a timely fashion, that's effectively the same as having no remedy at all. I don't think it's entirely true - a conviction and a prison term would bring some relief for victims of serious crime, but the stress of waiting years to see that justice delivered would be a heavy burden for the victim and their families.   The Government's looking for feedback on ways to speed up the court process. Currently, people can choose a jury trial if they're charged with an offence that has a maximum penalty of two years or more in prison. The discussion document from the Government is requesting feedback on whether that threshold should be extended to three years or more, five years or more, or seven years or more. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith told Heather du Plessis-Allan last night how the changes might work:  PG: There will be arguments around three years, five years or seven years. Seven years would be a big change, and it would certainly have a huge impact on the overall efficiency of the courts, but of course you've got to balance that against, you know, the ancient right. And so I think it would be an interesting discussion. I certainly think we should lift it, it's just a question of how far.   HDPA: What kind of a crime we're talking about that carries seven years in jail?   PG: Well, things like tax evasion and arson.   HDPA: Indecent assault?    PG: Yes, and so five years for thinking of things like aggravated assault and three years, it would be things like, you know, driving while disqualified or with excess breath alcohol.    HDPA: I don't think you should go for a jury if you've just been pinged boozing behind the wheel, do you?   PG: Well if you lift it to three years you'd exclude those and so yeah, I think that's a very reasonable starting point.   That was Heather talking to Paul Goldsmith last night. Law Association Vice President Julie-Anne Kincade told Mike Hosking this morning that right now in the Auckland District Court, you'll get a jury trial faster than a judge-alone trial. And we need to be careful about using a “blunt tool” to try to solve the problem of the backlog within the courts. And certainly, there are improvements to the court process she outlined that have come into play just this year. Category 1 and 2 offences are heard in the district court before a judge alone. You don't have the choice of a jury trial. Category 3 offences that carry a maximum penalty of two or more years in prison, you do get the choice right now. Category 3 offences could include aggravated assault, threatening to kill, dangerous driving, or a third or more drunk driving conviction - that boozed behind the wheel one that Heather was talking about. So that's Category 3 where you do get the choice of judge-alone or jury.   They are serious offences, but do we really need a jury of our peers to sit in judgment of those crimes? Shouldn't we save the jury trials for the most serious crimes, the ones that are heard in the High Court -the murder, the manslaughter, the rape, the aggravated robbery? Jury trials are vitally important, they date back to Athens. Chief Justice Sian Elias and her colleague in the Supreme Court, Justice McGrath, summed up the importance of the jury in the case of Siemer v Heron in 2012:  "In exercising that function, jurors bring a diverse range of perspectives, personal experience and knowledge to bear in individual cases, which judges may lack. As fact finders, jurors determine which of the admissible evidence presented at trial is to be believed and acted upon. Juries ultimately decide whether the facts fit within a particular legal definition, according to community standards. In this way, they reflect the attitude of the community and their determination of guilt or innocence. The right to trial by jury is also generally seen as providing a safeguard against the arbitrary or oppressive enforcement of the law by the government." They go on to say that in cases where they feel the government or the forces of government through the prosecutor and through the police are using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut, then juries will acquit. They'll go no, this is oppressive, this is unfair, you've been way too heavy-handed. We, the community think this is wrong and it's a way for the community to say to the state you've overstepped the mark. So vitally important.   But should juries be reserved for the big-ticket crimes? Intuitively, I think yes, you know it should be for the big-ticket ones. But we don't want judges clearing up the backlog in the courts by whipping through cases without due thought and process. I'm not saying they would, and they don't at the moment.  Judges seem to be a little bit too thoughtful, a little bit too considered for my liking from time to time. But if you're told right, judge-alone, get cracking, let's clear this backlog - wouldn't your subconscious say righto, bugger it, guilty, next case, please. That kind of pressure to clear the backlog may inform the decision you make.   And it may not sound like a big deal, two years or more in prison, but by the time you take into account discounts and troubled backgrounds and the like, you'd probably only get nine months. But nine months in prison, you say it like it's nothing but what would nine months in prison do to you and me? It would be absolutely devastating if you were innocent. So intuitively, yes, save the juries for the big-ticket crimes, the High Court offences. At the same time, you don't want to see people sent to prison, even if it is just for a six-month term for a crime they didn't commit. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Law Association says changing the threshold for the right to a jury trial doesn't make sense.    Currently a defendant can choose between a jury or a judge-alone trial in cases where the maximum penalty is two or more years in jail.   The Government's seeking feedback on increasing this to three, five, or seven years, saying jury trials drive court delays.   Law Association Vice-President Julie-Anne Kincade told Mike Hosking that right now in Auckland District Court you'll get a jury-trial faster than a judge alone trial.   She says they need to be careful about using a blunt tool to try solve the problem.  LISTEN ABOVE See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What I would like out of the Philip Polkinghorne trial is access to the jury.  This country has an archaic and sheltered view of certain aspects of justice. If you believe justice has to be seen to be done, it behoves us to fully understand the process.  I have had virtually no interest in the trial. I have no real overarching interest in crime generally.  I got fascinated by the David Bain business, but Polkinghorne has passed me by. He either did it or he didn't. The jury is working that out as we speak.  I have noticed a change this time and it confirms that my lack of interest in matters makes me part of a very, very small minority. It's the blogging that has gone on from court from the digital media.  A criticism I have always had about media coverage of court is mainly they are cherry pickers and mainly formats, particularly in news bulletins, never gives fair insight into the day's proceedings.  This time it has been no different. TV seems to have come and gone. On a slow day it's covered, on a busy one it's not.  Having been in court enough times over the years, the tricky part is how slowly it all moves and therefore it is easy for media to miss a lot of detail, not to mention subtlety and nuance.  If you can't cover it properly, don't.  The digital operators have been able to give you all the blow-by-blow detail you could ever want and from my inquires, it has been absorbed vociferously by most of the population.  But back to the jury. In America you get to talk to them.  Why not here?  Surely in a trial of this detail and interest, knowing what they thought or didn't think and what they made out as critical or of no consequence is not only fascinating, but vital to understanding as to how we got to where we are about to get.  Seeing open justice work and getting the detail from those closest to it is good. Surely you can't argue that wouldn't improve the process, therefore our understanding?  How, possibly, is that a bad thing? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A barrister has doubts about increasing the threshold for the right to a jury trial.   Currently a defendant can choose between a jury or a judge-alone trial in cases where the maximum penalty is two or more years in jail.   The Government's seeking feedback on increasing this to three, five, or seven years, in a bid to address court delays.   Philip Morgan KC told Ryan Bridge he questions the number of jury trials that will drop because of the threshold change.  He says that's because he thinks the number of jury trials where the maximum penalty of the offence is two or three years in jail, is very small.  LISTEN ABOVE See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On the Early Edition with Ryan Bridge Full Show Podcast for Friday 20th of September. New Zealand's GDP has dropped, but it's not quite as bad as the forecasts. So where to from here and when will we start to see growth? ASB's Chief Economist Nick Tuffley joins the show.  A new solution to tackle backlog in the count system - the Government wants to reduce the number of jury trials to save time. KC Phillip Morgan speaks to Ryan about the proposed changes.  Former All Blacks Captain Ian Kirkpatrick speaks to Ryan about NZ's chances of winning against the Wallabies this weekend, following two back-to-back losses against South Africa.  Christopher Luxon's getting a bit tetchy and brassed off by questions about his targets - he's set the goals, now he needs to meet them, and perhaps be a little more relaxed about the questions along the way.  Get the Early Edition with Ryan Bridge Full Show Podcast every weekday on iHeartRadio, or wherever you get your podcasts.  LISTEN ABOVE See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the News with Mike Dakkak www.itnshow.com Danielle Baker, The Coerced Nurse, joins ITN to discuss her lawsuit which has been for a jury trial. You can support Danielle at: https://www.givesendgo.com/G9KZJ?utm_source=sharelink&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_campaign=G9KZJ Follow Danielle on Twitter at https://x.com/thecoercednurse Links mentioned in the episode: https://freedomcounsel.org https://www.hope4humanity2020.com Cue Streaming: Network + Premium Channels for $59.99/mo. No Contracts. https://Inthenews.mycuestreaming.com/apply. Purchase Dr. Stella Immanuel's products at https://marketplace.drstellamd.com. Use promo code ITN and save. We are financing the war against us. Give your money instead to companies that care about America and Americans. http://patriotsmade.com/itn. Shop Richardson Nutritional Center anti-cancer products now and save at https://rncstore.com/itn. Discount code for ITN viewers will be applied at checkout. Your support allows me to cover the news the MSM tries to suppress. https://www.buymeacoffee.com/itnshow. Liberate yourself from Big Tech at Liberation Technology at https://secure.liberationtek.com/aff.php?aff=79. Use promo code ITN and get 1 month free.

Paul O'Keefe exchanges words with “Free Karen Reed” blogger & accused witnesses intimidator Aidan “Turtleboy” Kearney.Show Notes: Innocence Fraud Watch "Killer Karen Read (UPDATED) Will Commonwealth Subpoena Murderers Parents William & Janet Read For Her 2nd Jury Trial?" - https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2024/07/23/killer-karen-read-retrial-will-the-commonwealth-subpoena-william-janet-read-for-2nd-jury/Thank you, Patrons!Theresa Parrino, Sanny O'Brien, DSamlam, Janet Gardner, Suzanne Kniffin, Iriana Campbell, Jennifer Klearman, Patricia Linz, Nancy, Judy Brown, Pat Brooks, Linda Lazzarro, Susan Hicks, Jeff Meadors, Donna, Faith Peeples, Jennifer Powell, Cindy G Yurts, Kay Bee, Dana Natale, Debra Couture, Cindy Poschesci, Riverdale Pilates, Luanne Miller, Rachbaum, Kevin Crecy, Renee Chavez, Angela Smith, Melba Pourteau, Julia K Thomas, JS, Stephanie Roach, Stark Stuff, Robyn Ray, K, Kayce Taylor, Yvette Jockin, Karen Cote, Tammie Sheppherd, JenTile, LadyLex, Shari Davis, AussieDood, Katrina Hetherington, Susan Swan, Dean, GiGi 5, Susan, Manjit Ender, Mentour Mentor's Mentee, Kee Sardi, Dana Natale, Marie Patrignani, Bewildered Beauty, MotherofHens, Pepper, Joan, Pat Dell, Blythe, Laura, Plai Braik, Lorraine R, Sandra Guse Van Zealand, Isa, Krissy G, Michelle B, TB , Maria, Erin Faesen, Regan Johnson, AJ Foster, Hugh Ashman, Melissa V, Heyy Manny, Victoria Gray Bross, Toni Woodland, Danbrit, Evan Scott, Holly from Dallas, Kenny Haines, Maureen P and Toni Natalie.Get access to exclusive content & support the podcast by becoming a Patron today! https://patreon.com/robertaglasstruecrimereportOr throw a tip in the tip jar! https://buymeacoffee.com/robertaglassOr support Roberta by sending a donation via Venmo. https://venmo.com/robertaglass

Colin and Russ discuss the bonkers conclusion of Alec Baldwin's manslaughter trial that was dismissed by the presiding judge last week in New Mexico.  Colin and Russ detail the prosecutorial misconduct that plagued the case, culminating in a hearing where the lead prosecutor called herself to the witness stand, and her co-counsel quit the case in the middle of trial.  Break out the popcorn and take a listen to the breakdown of this nutty case.  Plus, a new Is This Legal and DCOTW.  Listen here!

Dan McLaughlin, Senior Writer for National Review. Biden's Decline is a National Security Crisis, Too. Supreme Court Finds Jury-Trial Rights Violated by Administrative Courts

Big O talks about Tyreek Hill

Big O talks about Tyreek Hill

Black-ish creator Kenya Barris won't have to bite his tongue about his sister much longer.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

News

A shorter show this week as Apple is set to kick off WWDC 2024! Google is cutting checks to avoid a jury trial in their latest lawsuit. Microsoft finally responds to the backlash against Windows Recall. Adobe has burned down a LOT of creator goodwill with their newest TOS change. A judge is ordering Apple … Continue reading "#SGGQA 352 WWDC Pre-Show! Windows Recall Backlash, Adobe’s Terms of Service, Google Avoids a Jury Trial"

Josh Hammer of Newsweek (1:54, 12:59) & Jenna discuss the jury instructions in the Trump NYC trial, the State of Israel in Rafah and Biden's poor poll numbers.  Texas Republican Chair, Matt Rinaldi (26:51) analyzes the GOP Election wins for school choice in this political earthquake. Mark Lotter, Chief Comms Officer for AFPI (31:31) & Ryan Fournier, Founder of Students for Trump (41:18), Jenna's political panel, tackles the political ramifications of the Trump Manhattan trial.  Jenna Ellis Tonight can be seen on Salem News Channel weeknights at 9pm ET.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Join Ben for his conversation with legendary Kentucky trial lawyer, Peter Perlman.  Peter talks about how his upbringing, as the son of a 5 and 10 cent store owner, shaped his values and taught him the importance of finding ways to help others.  During his long and successful career as a trial lawyer, Peter applied these lessons in cases that helped his individual clients and led to larger industry-wide changes that have helped countless others.  These cases span a wide range of practice areas, from auto defect litigation, aviation, personal injury, and even a Title IX case brought to keep the door open for female college athletes. Through his own practice, and terms as President of AAJ and the Civil Justice Foundation, few trial lawyers have done more to promote and enhance the cause of individual victims and social justice than Peter Perlman. About Peter Perlmanhttps://peteperlman.com/ ExperienceIn his lengthy career as a trial lawyer, Peter has earned more than 60 multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements in personal injury, product defect and wrongful death cases.  He was inducted into the Inner Circle of Advocates in 1985.  This is an elite organization limited to the top 100 trial lawyers in this country.  The Kentucky Justice Association's highest honor, “The Peter Perlman Outstanding Trial Lawyer,” has been presented each year since 1994. Throughout his career, Peter has maintained a close relationship with his alma mater, the University of Kentucky.  He was an Adjunct Professor in the law school for 25 years, and has been inducted into the Hall of Fame and U.K's Hall of Distinguished Alumni.  In 1999, Peter created an Endowment Fund.  This has provided annual scholarships to students who have shown, “a concern for providing equal justice under the law.” Complications from an eye injury, have led to some changes in Peter's practice.  He now serves as a consultant on a limited case-by-case basis. Over the years, Peter has given numerous talks to civic and legal groups and continues to do so.  In his trials, Peter stressed the power of America's juries, and the difference jurors make through their collective verdicts.  His current presentations emphasize these themes. Awards & HonorsTrial Lawyers “Hall of Fame” (Inducted 2017)University of Kentucky “Hall of Distinguished Alumni” (2015)American Association for Justice – “Leonard M. Ring Champion of Justice” (2012)Kentucky Justice Association – “Charles M. Leibson Lifetime Achievement Award” (2013)Civil Justice Foundation – “Champion of Justice” (2011)Fayette County (KY) Bar Association – “Henry T. Duncan Lifetime Achievement Award” (2010)American Association for Justice – Former PresidentTrial Lawyers for Public Justice – Former PresidentNational Litigation Counsel – Former PresidentCivil Justice Foundation – Former PresidentSouthern Trial Lawyers Association – “Tommy Malone Great American Eagle Award”; “War Horse Award”; “Mickey Smiley Lighthouse Award” 

In the quiet suburb of Cherry Hill, a respected rabbi orchestrates the brutal murder of his wife to pursue an affair with a radio host, unraveling a community's trust and exposing a tangled web of deceit and betrayal. Subscribe on your favorite podcasting apps: https://talkmurder.com/subscribeSupport us on patreon: https://patreon.com/talkmurderSee our technology: https://talkmurder.com/gearContent warning: the true crime stories discussed on this podcast can involve graphic and disturbing subject matter. Listener discretion is strongly advised.Fair use disclaimer: some materials used in this work are included under the fair use doctrine for educational purposes. Any copyrighted materials are owned by their respective copyright holders. Questions regarding use of copyrighted materials may be directed to legal [@] Talkocast.com

In the quiet suburb of Cherry Hill, a respected rabbi orchestrates the brutal murder of his wife to pursue an affair with a radio host, unraveling a community's trust and exposing a tangled web of deceit and betrayal. Subscribe on your favorite podcasting apps: https://talkmurder.com/subscribeSupport us on patreon: https://patreon.com/talkmurderSee our technology: https://talkmurder.com/gearContent warning: the true crime stories discussed on this podcast can involve graphic and disturbing subject matter. Listener discretion is strongly advised.Fair use disclaimer: some materials used in this work are included under the fair use doctrine for educational purposes. Any copyrighted materials are owned by their respective copyright holders. Questions regarding use of copyrighted materials may be directed to legal [@] Talkocast.com

Join Ben for his discussion with attorneys Taylor Asen and Trevor Savage about their recent $2.4 million verdict in Bangor, Maine in a case involving a surgical mal positioning that caused an arm injury and CRPS.  Taylor and Trevor explain how they worked closely with the client to get her to the right specialist who could diagnose her medical condition.  They talk about the challenges of presenting a CRPS injury at trial.  They discuss how they resisted the defense effort to stipulate to liability and were able to present compelling evidence of corporate indifference and system failure in the lack of safeguards or systems to make sure that the surgery was done safely, and the lack of follow through, investigation, or changes that came out of this incident.  They discuss how they responded to the defense's 11th hour surprise surveillance video, which the judge allowed into evidence over objection.  They used the surveillance to further polarize the case and show the lie in the hospital's claim to be taking responsibility for its actions.  They discuss the use of data analysis to recognize the true value of the case and to formulate the amount asked for in closing. About Taylor Asenwww.gideonasen.com Taylor specializes in medical malpractice cases, trucking accident cases, and other complex personal injury cases. He has recovered tens of millions of dollars for his clients. Taylor possesses a unique combination of intellect, competitive drive, and human empathy that makes him a powerful advocate for his clients. Taylor has dedicated his career to championing the interests of individuals who have suffered harm or injury from corporate misconduct, individual negligence, and bad medical care. Taylor's efforts on behalf of injured Mainers have resulted in several of the largest case settlements in Maine history. Recently, Taylor and his colleague Meryl obtained one of the largest jury verdicts in a child sex abuse case in Maine's history. Taylor has been recognized as one of Maine's leading plaintiff's attorneys. He is only one of two lawyer from Northern New England listed in Lawdragon's list of the top 500 plaintiff's attorneys in the nation—the other lawyer from Northern New England is his partner, Ben Gideon. Taylor is also included in Best Lawyers – Ones to Watch and Super Lawyers Rising Stars; these designations are given to attorneys that distinguish themselves during their first decade of practice. “Nobody is more committed to his clients than Taylor,” said Ben Gideon. “His mind is always working. It's not unusual for me to receive a call after midnight from Taylor, wanting to brainstorm about a thorny problem or about case strategy. Taylor is also a gifted legal writer, enabling our clients to gain the upper hand in motions and briefs submitted to the courts. When it comes to the full range of personal qualities and skills needed to achieve extraordinary client results, there are few lawyers I've met who can match Taylor.” Taylor is on the Board of Governors of the Maine Trial Lawyers Association and has served as Co-Chair of the MTLA's Legislative Committee for the past three years. Taylor has testified in the Maine Legislature on numerous occasions, and played a critical role in the fight to raise Maine's cap on wrongful death damages in 2019. Taylor also has experience litigating class action cases on behalf of employees, consumers, and victims of civil rights abuses. From 2019 to 2020, he co-counseled a class action on behalf of Maine prisoners who were denied treatment for Hepatitis C. That lawsuit resulted in a historic settlement with the Maine Department of Corrections, under which the DOC agreed to treat all incarcerated individuals who have chronic Hepatitis C. Taylor is an Adjunct Professor at Maine Law School, where he co-teaches Trial Advocacy. A native of Maine, Taylor is a graduate of Yale Law School. At Yale, Taylor worked in the Veterans Legal Services Clinic, representing veterans who were improperly denied disability benefits. After graduating from law school, Taylor clerked for federal judges in New York City and Newark, New Jersey. Taylor began his career at a law firm in New York, before returning to Maine to represent individual plaintiffs in personal injury lawsuits. Taylor's wife, Becca, is the Director of Recruiting and Professional Development at Bernstein Shur. Taylor and Becca live in Cumberland County with their three children, Davida, Vivienne, and Leon. What Clients Say About Taylor“The most fantastic Lawyer I have ever met. Caring considerate and great results.” – Hilarie B. “Taylor went above and beyond during the entire case. I felt valued, respected and as if I was the #1 and only client he had.” – Adam D. “Taylor was there, step by step, fighting for what is right and just, making sure we understood each process. He helped my family get the best outcome to move forward with our lives without regret.” – Cheri H. “Taylor Asen was everything we needed in a lawyer: professional, communicative, straight forward and determined. He also was everything we didn't expect: personable, always available, kind and thoughtful. We highly recommend his services.” – Arianna S. “Taylor Asen is the ultimate professional. He navigated us through the toughest time in our lives and handled our medical malpractice case with mastery. . . Most of all, he was human. His confidence and his friendly demeanor put us at ease and his empathy towards our situation made us feel like we wanted to win this case not just for us, but for him.” – Lisa H. EDUCATIONJ.D., Yale Law School, 2012M.A., Columbia University, 2007B.A., George Washington University (summa cum laude), 2006 RECOGNITIONSLawdragon's 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers, 2022The Best Lawyers in America ― “Ones to Watch,” 2021 – presentSuper Lawyers ― “Rising Star,” 2017 – presentAVVO – Rated 10/10 MEMBERSHIPSBoard Member, Maine Trial Lawyers AssociationCo-chair, Legislative Committee, Maine Trial Lawyers AssociationMember, Academy of Truck Accident AttorneysMember, American Association for JusticeMember, Right to Know Advisory Committee, Maine State Legislature, 2019-2022Member, U.S. Attorney for the District of Maine Selection Advisory Committee (2021)Chair, Maine Supreme Judicial Court IOLTA Working Group (2020) ADMISSIONSMaine (2016)U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit (2014)U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (2014)U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York (2014)New York (2013) CLERKSHIPSLaw Clerk, Hon. Julio Fuentes, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 2014Law Clerk, Hon. J. Paul Oetken, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2013  About Trevor Savagewww.gideonasen.com Trevor is a skilled trial attorney who represents clients in claims involving medical malpractice, wrongful deaths and other complex personal injury cases. After completing a clerkship with the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, Trevor began his career at a large firm in Portland, representing medical providers, businesses, and insurance companies. Trevor's experience as a defense attorney gives him a unique perspective that he uses to give Gideon Asen's clients an advantage during litigation with insurance companies. A native of Maine, Trevor is a graduate of Emerson College in Boston, Massachusetts, and then the University of Maine School of Law. At Maine Law, he served as Managing Editor of the Maine Law Review and as a legal writing teaching assistant for first-year students. During law school—alongside his then-classmate and current colleague, Meryl Poulin—he distinguished himself as one of two “Prize Arguers” of their class and argued before the Maine Supreme Judicial Court. He and Meryl Poulin—another Gideon Asen attorney—later competed nationally as teammates on the Maine Law Moot Court Team, finishing in the top three of a competition of more than forty teams. While at law school, Trevor interned with the Appellate Division of the United States Attorney's Office and then with Judge Kermit V. Lipez of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. He also worked as a Student Attorney at the Cumberland County District Attorney's Office (winning his first two jury trials as a second-year law student). Trevor lives in North Berwick, Maine, with his wife, Amy, and two children, Jacob and Will. EDUCATIONJ.D., Maine Law School (cum laude), 2017B.S., Emerson College (summa cum laude), 2013 RECOGNITIONSSuper Lawyer's: Rising Star 2022- present MEMBERSHIPSAmerican Bar Association, MemberMaine State Bar Association, MemberMaine Trial Lawyers Association, MemberEdward Thaxter Gignoux Inn of Court, MemberManaging Editor, Maine Law Review (2016-2017)Maine Law Class of 2017 Prize ArguerFaculty Significant Achievement Award, 2017 ADMISSIONSMaine (2017)United States District Court for the District of Maine (2018)United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (2018) CLERKSHIPSLaw Clerk, Hon. Joseph M. Jabar, Maine Supreme Judicial Court, 2017-2018

Trump's Carefully Constructed Jury Trialhttps://www.audacy.com/989wordThe Tara Show Follow us on Social MediaJoin our Live StreamWeekdays - 6am to 10am Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/989wordRumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2031096X: https://twitter.com/989wordInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/989word/ "Red Meat, Greenville." 04/17/24

“Normalizing Illegal Immigration” “Trump's Carefully Constructed Jury Trial” “‘Death to America', in America” ”Axe Body Spray Working Wonders”

Join Serge and Clarke as they share Nathan Steelman's experience sitting as a juror in judgment of a woman charged with domestic violence in Florida.  You have heard the expression "I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6." (Clarke disagrees: he would rather be carried by six than judged by 12).  But as you will learn, that expression doesn't work in Manatee County, Florida.  This episode is interesting, entertaining, and informative. Enjoy. 

The Andrews discuss the growing affect social media has on our jury trials. Its mostly not great for defenders. Listen in to hear about the latest ridiculous-ness that maybe you've experienced as well.

University of San Diego law professor Donald Dripps joins us to educate us on the plea bargain system which has essentially replaced what we think of as our criminal justice system. Prof. Dripps explains why defendants waive their right to a jury trial by pleading guilty, why defense attorneys recommend taking a plea, why prosecutors offer up "deals" for alleged criminals, and the ramifications of "self-conviction." He discusses which cases tend to get pled out, in what jurisdictions, and if folks who have pled guilty are ever exonerated. He explains how mandatory sentencing minimums increase the pressure to take a plea, along with trial delays, the "trial penalty," and overburdened public defenders. Despite some of its injustices, the plea option acts like a pressure valve on our bloated criminal justice system. Prof. Dripps describes some improvements that could be made and warns us that, in its current state, the system is vulnerable to certain strategies which could bring about its collapse. A fascinating view into a complex legal network.Thoughts? Comments? Potshots? Contact the show at:https://booksshowstunes.discreetguide.com/contact/Sponsored by Discreet Guide Training:https://training.discreetguide.com/Follow or like us on podomatic.com (it raises our visibility :)https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/books-shows-tunes-mad-actsSupport us on Patreon:https://www.patreon.com/discreetguideJennifer on Post.News:@JenCrittendenJennifer on XTwitter:@DiscreetGuideJennifer on LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/jenniferkcrittenden/

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 7:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 7:59)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 7:59)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 7:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 7:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 7:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 7:59)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 7:25)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 8:08)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 7:44)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 7:25)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 7:44)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 7:44)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.(commercial at 7:25)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Welcome to the MassDevice Fast Five medtech news podcast, the show that keeps you up-to-date on the latest breakthroughs in medical technology. Here's what you need to know for today, March 6, 2024. Check out the show notes at massdevice.com/podcast. Medtronic may face a jury trial in a legal case over spine implants. Fast Five hosts Chris Newmarker and Sean Whooley break down the nearly decade-long history of this lawsuit and discuss the decision handed down by a judge in this case. Baxter has decided to close a facility in Massachusetts. Listen to learn all about Baxter's reasoning behind this facility closure and how it ties into a major acquisition made by the company a few years ago. Dexcom announced a new direct-to-watch feature for G7 CGM. The Fast Five hosts look at what this new feature is and examine some other good news from Dexcom. Stereotaxis submitted its Magic ablation catheter for U.S. and European approval. Find out more about this technology and hear about the company's intriguing fourth-quarter results as well. Haemonetics agreed to acquire esophagus-protecting device maker Attune Medical. Newmarker and Whooley discuss the technology that Attune brings to the table and how Haemonetics feels it will fit in as part of the company.

Liz talks to jury consultant Rich Matthews about the Trump trials, the art of jury selection, and all the things they don't teach you in law school. Did the jurors whack Trump for his in-court antics? Or because his case was garbage? Spoiler Alert: YES.    Rich Matthews Juryology: Art & Science of Jury Persuasion https://juryology.com/   US v. Trump [SDFL Docket] https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490070/united-states-v-trump/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc    US v. Trump [DC District Docket] https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/united-states-v-trump/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc   US v. Trump [DC Circuit Docket] https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68073028/united-states-v-donald-trump/    Trump v. Anderson [SCOTUS Docket] https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-719.html    What Justice Scalia Thought About Whether Presidents Are “Officers of the United States”, by Roger Parloff at Lawfare https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/what-justice-scalia-thought-about-whether-presidents-are-officers-of-the-united-states   FCDA Response to Mike Roman Motion to Disqualify https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24401430/da-willis-roman-response.pdf    Mike Roman Response Re Motion to Disqualify https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24401676-roman-reply-to-willis    Links: https://www.lawandchaospod.com/ BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod Threads: @LawAndChaosPod Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod Patreon: patreon.com/LawAndChaosPod  

Grand Jury Trial with Dr. Ealy and Senators asking for investigations into CDC, HHS and NVSS Reps. Tonight at 10pm ET. #DiamondandSilk Use Promo Code: DIAMOND or TRUMPWONDiamondandSilk.com1. https://DrStellaMD.com2. http://PatchThat.com3. https://www.KattsRemedies.com/shop/ ?aff=34. https://TWC.Health (Spike Protein Support)5. https://CardioMiracle.com6. https://MyPillow.com/TrumpWon7. https://TheDrArdisShow.com/shop-all/8. https://www.Curativabay.com/?aff=19. http://MaskDerma.com10. https://GiveSendGo.com Follow on https://ChatDit.comhttps://FrankSocial.com/u/DiamondandSilk LINDELL TV, CTATV, RSBN, GETTR, RUMBLESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Grand Jury Trial with Dr. Ealy and Senators asking for investigations into CDC, HHS, NVSS Representatives. Use Promo Code: DIAMOND or TRUMPWONDiamondandSilk.com1. https://DrStellaMD.com2. http://PatchThat.com3. https://www.KattsRemedies.com/shop/ ?aff=34. https://TWC.Health (Spike Protein Support)5. https://CardioMiracle.com6. https://MyPillow.com/TrumpWon7. https://TheDrArdisShow.com/shop-all/8. https://www.Curativabay.com/?aff=19. http://MaskDerma.com10. https://GiveSendGo.com Follow on https://ChatDit.comhttps://FrankSocial.com/u/DiamondandSilk LINDELL TV, CTATV, RSBN, GETTR, RUMBLESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today, Liz and Andrew tackle the two biggest stories: Matt Gaetz having ousted Kevin McCarthy as Speaker of the House, and Donald Trump's civil trial in New York. All that AND an Andrew Was Wrong featuring more on the 14th Amendment. In the Patreon bonus, the two tackle a Liz Was Not Wrong about why Trump doesn't have a jury trial in New York. Hint: yes you can still make fun of Alina Habba! Notes Justice Engoron Order https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=op8OyfqVHpc6eGTx9LOw3Q== OAG v. Trump appellate decision https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=ReQsiVyUL/PE7F5_PLUS_RuqoMw== CBS News story on Trump conceding to $27 million valuation for Mar-a-Lago https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-mar-a-lago-1-8-billion-own-company-said-it-was-too-high/?espv=1 SCOTUS orders 10/2 https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/100223zor_5368.pdf Eastman petition for cert https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-1138/267263/20230519131455424_230516%20PWC%20corrected.pdf Trump Fulton County docket https://www.fultonclerk.org/DocumentCenter/Index/142 FC indictment https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23909542/23sc188947-criminal-indictment.pdf Seth Barrett Tillman, ‘Governor Newsom, Laphonza Butler, and the Constitution's Plain Text,' New Reform Club (Oct. 2, 2023, 3:54 PM), ;  Josh Blackman & Seth Barrett Tillman, ‘Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen,' 28(2) Tex. Rev. L. & Pol. (forth. circa Mar. 2024) (posted on: Sept. 12, 2023), . Is There A Constitutional Right to a Jury Trial of Equitable Defenses in New York?, 74 St. Johns L. Rev. 1 (2000) https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1421&context=lawreview -Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law -Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs -Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com