Podcasts about law day

May 1, 2026Today is the deadline for Trump to ask Congress for approval of the Iran War, Trump claims that the hostilities terminated on April 7, but the blockade, which is an act of war, continues, The Administration is trying to get around the War Powers Act, The Framers of the Constitution placed the power to declare war in the hands of Congress, not the president, Today is Law Day, established by President Eisenhower, to remind us to guard the rule of law. Watch today's recording here: https://www.youtube.com/live/g9TUa1Rwd6U?si=T8_KKcHQZElhpnZ-Get full, free access to Letters from an American here: https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/subscribeYou can also find me:Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/hcrichardson.bsky.socialInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/heathercoxrichardson/?hl=enFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/heathercoxrichardson/YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@heathercoxrichardson Get full access to Letters from an American at heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/subscribe

Concerns about “forever chemicals” and microplastics are growing nationwide—and in Cumberland County, one local advocate is working to bring attention to the issue. Each year on May 1, Law Day offers a chance to reflect on the role of law in American society and why it continues to matter. 

Few organizations serve as fiercer defenders of constitutional rights and the rule of law than the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). At a time when free speech, free assembly, immigration, and voting rights are being tested across multiple fronts, Americans have come to count on the ACLU for its unyielding dedication to principle - even if they don't agree on every issue.rnrnDeborah N. Archer is President of the national ACLU, where she serves as Chair of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee. She brings frontline insight into today's web of legal battles, and calls attention to how traditional tools for protecting civil rights are currently being weakened and tested. Deborah is a tenured professor and associate dean at New York University School of Law, and the faculty director of the Community Equity Lab at NYU Law.rnrnTo mark Law Day 2026, Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association's Chris Schmitt will sit in conversation with Deborah N. Archer, President of the ACLU, on the urgency of protecting the rule of law and defending the rights of all people nationwide.

  Today is Law Day, which means lawyers across the day are celebrating the rule of law in the United States. Greg and Guest Host Jim Bennett talk about what Law Day means to them and how we can celebrate it this year.  

A Busy Week in Congress Utah leads the way on Sci-Fi Road project  U of U Student Detained by ICE A Prosecutor's Perspective  JPEC and Judge Retention  The KSL Movie Show! 

This Day in Legal History: May Day vs. Law DayOn May 1, 1958, the United States marked the first Law Day, a civic observance created after President Dwight D. Eisenhower designated the date as a national occasion to honor the rule of law. Eisenhower's proclamation called on lawyers, journalists, broadcasters, schools, and civic groups to help the public better understand the American legal system. Congress later gave the observance formal status in 1961, making May 1 the country's official annual Law Day. The American Bar Association traces the idea to its former president Charles S. Rhyne, who wanted a national celebration of the legal system and the constitutional principles that support it.But May 1 already carried a different legal meaning long before it became Law Day. In the 1880s, organized labor made May 1 central to the campaign for the eight-hour workday. Labor leaders had called for May 1, 1886, to be the date when eight hours would be treated as the standard legal day's work. Workers around the country responded with strikes and rallies, turning May Day into an enduring symbol of labor rights. In Chicago, the demonstrations led into the Haymarket events, where violence, prosecutions, death sentences, and later pardons made the episode a lasting part of the legal history of labor organizing, criminal justice, and political speech.That makes May 1 one of the more complicated dates on the American legal calendar. Officially, it is Law Day, a celebration of courts, constitutional government, and respect for legal institutions. Historically, it is also May Day, a reminder that many legal protections were not simply handed down by courts or legislatures. They were demanded by workers, protesters, organizers, and communities willing to challenge existing law in the hope of changing it.A California federal trial over Elon Musk's challenge to OpenAI's shift toward a for-profit structure was paused Thursday after Musk's lawyers appeared to accidentally make Musk's $97.4 billion offer for OpenAI assets fair game at trial. The issue began when Jared Birchall, who runs Musk's family office, testified that he helped organize investors who made the offer because they believed Sam Altman's role on both sides of OpenAI's restructuring created a conflict. OpenAI's lawyers then challenged Birchall's testimony, arguing that his views about Altman were partly based on what attorneys told him rather than his own firsthand knowledge.Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers sent the jury home early and questioned Birchall herself, pressing him on how the investor group arrived at the massive offer amount. She seemed unconvinced by his answers and told Musk's counsel that they had “opened the door” to evidence that previously had been limited by a magistrate judge. The judge then demanded to know who on Musk's team suggested asking Birchall about the offer, and attorney Marc Toberoff ultimately said he had. Birchall also acknowledged that Toberoff created the financial analysis behind the offer and sent a letter to California regulators opposing OpenAI's restructuring.Musk's lawyers argued that OpenAI first brought up the offer letter during Musk's cross-examination and that there had been confusion about whether the document was admitted by agreement. Judge Gonzalez Rogers did not immediately decide how to handle the dispute and set a Friday hearing on the issue and jury instructions. The broader trial centers on Musk's claim that OpenAI, Altman, Brockman, and Microsoft breached OpenAI's charitable-trust obligations by moving away from its nonprofit mission for private gain. Earlier in the day, the judge also barred Musk's AI expert from testifying about broad catastrophic risks of artificial intelligence, saying the case is about breach of trust, not the future danger of AI.OpenAI Judge Pauses Trial To Probe Musk Attys On $97B Bid - Law360 UKPurdue Pharma received approval from a New York bankruptcy judge for a $125 million settlement with McKinsey & Co. over claims connected to McKinsey's consulting work on Purdue's opioid sales and marketing. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sean H. Lane found the deal fair and reasonable, allowing Purdue to stay on schedule to exit Chapter 11 and activate its $7.4 billion bankruptcy plan. McKinsey will pay the settlement in two parts, starting with $65 million shortly after Purdue leaves bankruptcy. About $50 million from that first payment will go to personal injury claimants, while the remaining money will benefit state and local governments and Native American tribes through a trust.The deal followed mediation involving Purdue, the unsecured creditors committee, and other parties, with the creditors committee prepared to sue McKinsey if settlement talks failed. Purdue's bankruptcy has been heavily shaped by disputes over opioid-related liability, the Sackler family's contributions, and the legality of releasing third-party claims. The Supreme Court's 2024 ruling against nonconsensual third-party releases forced Purdue and its creditors to renegotiate the plan. The revised plan now includes a $6.5 billion Sackler family contribution and $900 million from Purdue. Purdue will be dissolved and replaced by Knoa Pharma, a public benefit company focused on addiction treatment and overdose reversal medications. The settlement also comes after McKinsey separately agreed to pay $650 million to resolve federal charges tied to its Purdue work.Purdue's $125M McKinsey Deal Gets OK Ahead Of Ch. 11 Exit - Law360A Reuters analysis found that Big Law hiring remains heavily concentrated among a small group of elite law schools, even though remote recruiting was expected to broaden access. In 2025, only 16 law schools sent at least half of their graduating class into associate jobs at firms with 251 or more lawyers. By contrast, 89 ABA-accredited schools placed 10% or fewer of their graduates in those jobs, and 11 schools placed none. Half of all law schools together produced only 10% of the 7,869 new large-firm associates, while just 21 top schools produced half of them.Nikia Gray of the National Association for Law Placement said the profession's emphasis on pedigree continues to block opportunities for capable students outside elite schools. During the pandemic, large-firm recruiting moved online, which made it easier for firms to interview students from more schools. But that change has not significantly widened the hiring pipeline. One reason is that firms are recruiting earlier, sometimes during students' first year before law school grades are available. With less law-school performance data to review, firms may lean more on undergraduate records, work experience, and the prestige of the law school itself.The article also notes that Columbia Law School had the highest percentage of 2025 graduates going to large firms, at 78%, and that most of the schools sending at least half their graduates into Big Law are also among the U.S. News “T-14.” The broader message is that recruiting technology changed, but the underlying hierarchy did not. Remote interviews may have made access to interviews easier, but they have not erased the structural advantage held by students at the most prestigious law schools.Pipeline to Big Law jobs stays narrow despite recruiting shifts | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

We take a closer look at how Law Day is being observed in Central Pennsylvania and why the annual recognition continues to matter. Marked nationwide on May 1, Law Day invites reflection on the role of law in American democracy and its impact on daily life.This episode also features investigative reporter Joshua Vaughn of PennLive, joined by Penn State journalism students Vida Lashgari and Joy Donald, for a conversation about the conditions inside a Pennsylvania ICE detention facility that recently led detainees to launch a hunger strike. Drawing on Vaughn's in‑depth reporting, the discussion examines allegations of inadequate medical care, prolonged detention, and treatment detainees say pushed them to take drastic action. The panel also explores what happened next, including officials' response to the hunger strike and the broader questions it raises about oversight, transparency, and accountability within immigration detention centers. While developments may continue, this episode focuses on the underlying conditions and systemic issues that organizers and advocates say made the hunger strike inevitable—and what this moment reveals about immigration enforcement in Pennsylvania and beyond.

To mark this D.C. Law Day on May 1, Brief Encounters, the podcast of the D.C. Bar Communities Office, features a conversation between Tamara Kraljic, Counsel at Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP and incoming Treasurer of the Women's Bar Association of D.C., and Dr. Annette Weerth, Consul General and Legal Adviser at the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany in Washington, D.C. In this episode, they explore what diplomacy looks like beyond treaties and formal channels—from fostering transatlantic legal dialogue and engaging with lawyers, courts, and civil society, to convening candid, small circle discussions on accountability, judicial independence, and the rule of law. Dr. Weerth also reflects on the importance of sub national and informal diplomacy in times when traditional diplomatic pathways might be tested, and on the essential role lawyers and law play in supporting democratic institutions, peace and stability both domestically and across borders. Please note, the positions and opinions expressed by the speakers are strictly their own, and do not necessarily represent the views of their employers, nor those of the D.C. Bar, its Board of Governors or co-sponsoring Communities and organizations.

This episode explores the complex architecture of criminal law and punishment, dissecting philosophical foundations, systemic mechanics, and empirical realities that shape how justice is administered. Aimed at law students and policymakers, it clarifies how different theories of punishment interact and conflict within the legal system—and what that means for fair, effective justice.Most criminal justice systems are built on conflicting philosophies—retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation—each pulling in different directions, yet our prisons operate as if they're perfectly aligned. But what if the entire system is a fragile clash of ideas, incapable of delivering true justice? This episode takes you inside the mind of the “criminal law machine,” revealing how these foundational theories shape every punishment and why understanding their tension is crucial for anyone grappling with the morality and mechanics of justice.We begin with a shocking empirical study: a child's academic scores drop by nearly 5% simply because a classmate's parent is sent to prison. This sets the stage for a deep dive into how the ripple effects of incarceration harm society beyond the prison walls—an urgent reminder of the human collateral involved in every legal decision. From there, explore the meticulous architecture of criminal liability—how actus reus, mens rea, and causation are engineered to assign guilt—culminating in the ultimate question: why does the state have the moral authority to imprison?The core of this episode unpacks the four competing philosophies of punishment. Retribution, rooted in balancing the moral ledger, demands proportionality based on objective harm and moral blameworthiness—yet struggles to account for offenders' mental states or social context. Deterrence, aiming to prevent future crimes through fear, relies on the rational actor model, which empirical data overwhelmingly discredits—especially for populations impaired by trauma or substance abuse. Incapacitation offers a brute-force safety net, but risks turning into preventive detention based on biased risk assessments that embed socioeconomic biases and cognitive distortions like the fundamental attribution error. Finally, rehabilitation envisions a therapeutic cure, recognizing the potential for human change, but faces political backlash and societal skepticism.But here's the twist: these conflicting goals can't peacefully coexist. That's where limiting retributivism comes in—a master framework that acts as a gatekeeper, setting objective boundaries so sentences stay within morally justifiable margins. Within these bounds, the system then fine-tunes punishments using a hybrid approach that balances fairness with utility, ensuring similar crimes receive similar sentences and that harsher punishments are justified and not excessive. This delicate engineering—embodying concepts like the parsimony principle—aims to reconcile the warring philosophies, but the question remains: is this system resilient or fundamentally fragile?To close, we confront a provocative future: could an AI judge, free from human cognitive biases, flawlessly execute this complex synthesis of justice? Or is the moral weight of human judgment irreplaceable? As criminal justice looms at the intersection of machine learning, societal values, and empirical realities, this episode invites you to reconsider what true fairness looks like—and whether the current “machine” we've built is sturdy enough to deliver it.Perfect for law students, policymakers, or anyone seeking clarity on the philosophical underpinnings of modern justice, this episode reveals that behind every prison sentence lies a complex, often contradictory web of ideas—an imperfect machine trying to do its best, but perhaps always wobbling on the edge of collapse.

Understanding the Shields of Justice: When Law Balances Morality and RealityThis episode delves into the foundational distinctions in criminal law—justification vs. excuse—and how they affect real-world justice. Whether you're prepping for law school or seeking a clearer view of how society handles moral dilemmas, this discussion unpacks complex doctrines with clarity and practical insights.Most legal defenses hinge on challenging the act or the intent—that is, until you understand the profound difference between justification and excuse. In this episode, we take you behind the scenes of criminal law's most powerful shields—those built on morality, context, and human complexity. Whether you're caught in a life-or-death self-defense scenario or grappling with the gray areas of mental illness, understanding when and how the law forgives or absolves you can change everything.Imagine walking down a dark street and facing an attacker; your instinct to strike may be justified if your life is at immediate risk. But what if your response is based on a skewed perception brought on by paranoia? Or consider helping someone in a life-threatening situation—when do acts of aid become protected defenses, and when do they turn into reckless crimes? We break down key legal mechanisms—justification defenses like self-defense, necessity, and defense of others—and see how the law evaluates these scenarios through objective standards, psychological realities, and societal priorities.You'll discover how the law's sharp focus on objective facts can clash with the complex internal realities of human psychology—especially when mental illness or external coercion are involved. We explore groundbreaking shifts, such as the evolving standards for insanity—from the rigid McNaughton rule to the nuanced Model Penal Code—highlighting how neuroscience and brain imaging threaten to rewrite these ancient lines of responsibility. We also dissect the controversial boundary where necessity stops and murder begins, illustrated by the infamous lifeboat case where moral and legal claims collide.This episode is perfect for students, legal professionals, or anyone invested in the moral heartbeat of justice. It reveals how society's laws are not just rules but reflections of shared moral choices—balancing the chaos of human instinct with the need for order and responsibility. As neuroscience pushes into uncharted territory, ask yourself: when the hardware of the brain is broken, how responsible can we really be? Think about the future of culpability, and prepare to see justice—and yourself—through a sharper lens.In this episode:The core difference between justification and excuse defenses, and why it matters both in court and in moral philosophyHow objective circumstances can turn a criminal act into a socially endorsed act through justification defenses like self-defense and necessityThe internal, psychological focus of excuse defenses including insanity, duress, and intoxication, and their legal standardsDetailed exploration of the four major insanity tests—McNaughton, irresistible impulse, Durham, and MPC—and their evolutionThe procedural mechanics of shifting burdens of proof in affirmative defenses and expert psychiatric testimony's roleCritical assessments of legal thresholds, from imminent threats in self-defense to the line dividing culpability and lack of control via neuroscience prospectsWhy law emphasizes that some behaviors—like killing innocents—are unacceptable regardless of circumstances, illustrated through famous cases like Dudley and Stevens' lifeboat dilemma

This episode explores the complex legal architecture behind uncompleted crimes, highlighting how law balances prevention with individual liberty. We unpack key concepts like solicitation, conspiracy, attempt, and the crucial merger doctrine — all vital for mastering criminal liability.Most crimes start with a thought—yet the law only fuels the fire once actions follow. This episode uncovers the hidden architecture of inchoate liability, revealing how legal systems choose who to punish before the harm even happens. If you're a law student, a criminal justice enthusiast, or just curious about how society prevents disasters at the earliest possible moment, this deep dive is essential listening.You'll discover the precise moment a legal line is crossed with concepts like solicitation, conspiracy, and attempt—and why each is treated differently by the law. We break down the specific intent needed for each stage, including how buying gloves or renting a van can unwittingly lock you into a conspiracy, even if you do nothing more afterward. Gain clarity on the infamous Pinkerton rule, which makes co-conspirators vicariously liable for foreseeable crimes committed in furtherance of their plan.You'll see how the law draws a boundary between mere preparation and punishable attempt, navigating the treacherous terrain of factual versus legal impossibility, and why changing your mind isn't always enough to escape liability. Plus, we explore the critical merger doctrine—how lesser charges like solicitation and attempt are absorbed once the main crime is complete, and why conspiracy often defies this rule, standing as a separate, more dangerous threat.In a world racing toward digital and autonomous crimes, understanding this architecture becomes even more vital. As technology blurs traditional lines, the challenge will be to apply these principles to algorithms, AI, and cyber threats—prompting society to ask: When does a dark thought become a catastrophe?Perfect for law students preparing for exams, criminal justice professionals, or anyone interested in the hidden mechanics of pre-crime liability, this episode arms you with the insights to navigate one of the most complex and consequential areas of law. Don't just understand the rules—see how they protect society, balance liberty, and sometimes, catch mistakes before they turn deadly.In this discussion:The foundational principles of inchoate liability and why society wants to intervene before harm occursThe detailed elements of solicitation and how specific intent and communication establish the crimeHow conspiracy transforms a solitary request into a dangerous team effort, including the significance of overt acts and Pinkerton liabilityThe rigorous standards for attempt, focusing on the substantial step and the strict mental state requirementsThe difference between factual and legal impossibility as defenses, and the narrow scope for voluntary abandonmentThe merger doctrine and why conspiracy charges usually do not merge with completed crimes, creating strategic advantages for prosecutors

Understanding causation is crucial in criminal law because it connects the defendant's actions to the harm that occurs. This episode provides a clear, detailed roadmap to navigate the complex doctrines of actual cause and proximate cause, equipping you to craft compelling exam answers and argue confidently in court.Most criminal cases hinge on one critical question: did the defendant's actions actually cause the final harm? But understanding causation isn't just about connecting dots—it's about mastering a precise legal architecture that distinguishes science from subjective judgment. This episode takes you deep into the complex, often counterintuitive world of criminal causation, revealing how the law maps the physical reality of actions onto society's notions of fairness and justice.Imagine two men at trial: one fires a bullet but walks free because of legal technicalities, while another's minor act unexpectedly results in a death that seems impossible to link. These paradoxes expose the core challenge—how does the law draw the line between cause and blame? We break down the golden chain model, a sophisticated mental framework that visualizes liability from the initial act to the final harm, emphasizing its fragile, tension-filled nature. You'll discover:Why the but-for test often catches everyone but fails to deliver moral clarityHow legal doctrines like substantial factor and specific result tests refine the chain in multi-defendant scenariosThe crucial difference between intervening acts, superseding causes, and natural environmental factors like lightningHow the eggshell skull rule makes defendants liable for all consequences, regardless of the victim's hidden vulnerabilitiesWhy the debate over factual science versus societal morality raises profound questions about whether causation is law's objective backbone or just a societal mirror reflecting biasThis episode is essential listening for law students, criminal justice enthusiasts, or anyone grappling with the question of who's really responsible—because the stakes extend beyond the courtroom. You'll come away with a clear, step-by-step strategy to dissect complex causation questions on exams and in court: start with the physics, then evaluate foreseeability, classify intervening acts, and always account for the eggshell plaintiff principle. Mastering these principles ensures you understand that causation in law is as much about fairness and societal values as it is about science.If you want to see through the legal façade and understand whether causation is objective law or societal storytelling, this episode is your definitive guide. It's legal insight that challenges you to see causation not just as a rule but as an ongoing moral conversation—one that determines life, death, and justice itself.

In this episode, we break down the complex landscape of homicide offenses, focusing on how the law sorts accidental deaths, intentional killings, and everything in between. This is essential listening for anyone preparing for the bar exam, as understanding these categories can be the difference between passing and failing.Most criminal law topics are complex, but homicide is a biochemical puzzle wrapped in legal doctrine. Why? Because understanding whether a defendant's mental state at the moment of death elevates their crime from manslaughter to murder is everything—and it's far more nuanced than you might think.Imagine a towering glass machine, structurally simple but loaded with critical decision points. The outcome? Life in prison or a short sentence. The key to this machine? The defendant's mens rea—their mental state—as it shifts along sliders from purpose, knowledge, recklessness, to negligence. This episode unlocks the hidden mechanisms of homicide law, demystifying the rules that weigh emotional outbursts against cold calculation.You'll discover:How the law separates murder types through the “sorting machine” framework, with concrete examples like State v. Guthrie and Barry.The core differences between premeditated murder, felony murder, depraved heart, and voluntary manslaughter, with practical tips on spotting trap scenarios.The importance of timing, especially the cooling-off period, and how courts interpret impulsive acts versus calculated killings.Why strict standards like the "words alone rule" protect society from chaos and the dangerous limitations of emotional provocation defenses.How to apply the static “marble” metaphor to quickly classify facts and craft compelling arguments, whether pushing claims of intentional murder or defenses of heat of passion.Without this clarity, students often fall into common trap questions and lose crucial points. But mastering this process means you see beyond the gruesome details into the mind behind the act—an approach that transforms chaotic courtroom realities into a logical, manageable framework.Perfect for law students, bar exam candidates, and anyone serious about understanding the true mechanics of criminal homicide. If you want to avoid the pitfalls and confidently navigate the intricacies of homicide law, this episode is your essential guide.Quiz yourself: How does the legal definition of premeditation differ from cinematic expectations? When does reckless behavior become criminal, and why does the law assign blame based on the defendant's mental sliders? This episode connects the dots with precision, empowering you to argue both sides and crush every homicide question that comes your way.This is not just theory—it's the difference between passing and excelling on your exam, or even, saving a life by truly understanding these vital legal distinctions. Hit play and operate your own mental sorting machine with confidence.Why this works:The hook immediately teases the paradox of homicide law—where emotional outrage must be separated from legal standards—piquing curiosity. The episode's detailed breakdown of legal doctrines, real case studies, and practical exam strategies make complex concepts approachable, promising transformation from confusion to mastery. The focus on argumentation and categorization ensures listeners see the material as both intellectually rigorous and highly applicable, motivating them to listen all the way through.Key Topics:The law's inverted approach: how homicide is sorted via mens rea rather than building casesThe significance of actus reus and mens rea in categorizing a homicideVisualizing the legal classification as a multi-tiered sorting machineThe four sliders of mens rea: purpose, knowledge, recklessness, negligenceDetailed analysis of first degree murder: premeditation, deliberation, and the role of cool reflectionHow the felony murder rule functions as a shortcut to first degree murderThe distinction between depra

Understanding the core of criminal liability requires clarity on the mental states that underpin actions. This episode unpacks the intricate structure of mens rea, explores the evolution from common law to the MPC's systematic approach, and illustrates how mental states influence the severity of criminal charges. Whether you're a student preparing for exams or a practitioner refining your grasp, these insights sharpen your capacity to analyze criminal intent with precision.Most accidental deaths are treated as tragedies, but when it comes to criminal liability, the key question is whether your mind was in the right place — or wrong. Imagine leaving a loaded gun within reach of toddlers, or firing a warning shot during a bank robbery. It's not just about what you did, but what you intended, knew, or recklessly risked. In this episode, we unravel the intricacies of mens rea — the guilty mind — through the lens of the Model Penal Code's 4-level hierarchy: purposely, knowingly, recklessly, and negligently.You'll discover how modern criminal law dissects the why behind every act, and how a tiny difference in internal awareness can make the difference between freedom and decades behind bars. We break down real-world examples like a bank robbery gone wrong, illustrating how prosecutors navigate questions of intent. You'll learn why courts consider not just what you do, but what you thought, knew, or disregarded — and how the law adapts when the system encounters gaps like honest mistakes or mental illness.This episode is perfect for law students, criminal justice enthusiasts, or anyone curious about the invisible architecture that judges human blameworthiness. We explore the profound implications of strict liability, the safeguards of mistake and insanity defenses, and the philosophical debates surrounding potential technological advances—like brain scans—that could one day replace subjective inferences with hard data.If you've ever wondered how the law judges the ghost in the machine, or why a single reckless act could land you in prison for life—even without intent—this episode will revolutionize your understanding of criminal culpability. Master these concepts now, and see how human behavior is scrutinized through the most precise legal lenses available.Why this works: By framing mens rea as a dynamic spectrum aligned with concrete scenarios and illustrating its real-world stakes, this description sparks curiosity and emphasizes the importance of understanding internal mental states. It invites listeners to see criminal law as a finely tuned instrument that balances morality, policy, and forensic science—fueling their desire to learn what's behind the legal mask of blame.In this episode:The foundational role of actus reus and mens rea in forming criminal liabilityThe four levels of culpability in the MPC: purposely, knowingly, recklessly, negligentlyHow the MPC dissects complex mental states into objective conduct, circumstances, and resultsPractical application through hypothetical scenarios, including case of Darla's warning shot and Dan's accidental manslaughterThe critical importance of concurrence—timing of act and intent—and causation in criminal actsThe debate around strict liability offenses and the policy behind themHow mental illnesses and mistakes of fact and law impact criminal responsibilityThe potential future of neuroimaging technology in establishing mental states

This episode dives deeply into the core principle of criminal law: actus reus, the voluntary act that underpins criminal responsibility. We explore how the law distinguishes between voluntary and involuntary actions, the intricate pathways for omissions, and the constitutional limits on punishing personal status. Whether you're a student prepping for exams or a legal professional seeking a clearer framework, this discussion clarifies how society's most fundamental legal safeguards operate and how emerging technology might challenge them.When do words or thoughts turn into a crime? This episode pulls back the curtain on the foundational actus reus—the crucial "guilty act"—that determines criminal liability. If the law is designed to punish harmful deeds, then understanding what counts as a voluntary human act is essential. You'll uncover how the law distinguishes between willed actions, involuntary reflexes, and mere outcomes set in motion by external forces, all through compelling examples like subway accidents, seizures, and even sleepwalking scenarios.We break down the core doctrine: a voluntary act requires a willed muscular contraction—a biological and psychological link between your conscious decision and physical movement. You'll discover how this principle applies across a spectrum of situations, from intentional pushes on a platform to involuntary seizures during a car crash, and how courts interpret complex states like sleepwalking or reflex responses. The conversation reveals the importance of timing, highlighting the powerful concept of time-shifting—how a defendant's prior voluntary act can be legally linked to a harmful consequence long after the original decision.The episode also exposes common exam pitfalls—like confusing a reflex with a willed action, or misunderstanding the boundaries of involuntary conduct during sleep, hypnosis, or seizures. Plus, you'll explore the legal fiction that treats possession as an act—either by time-shifting voluntary acquisition or through the doctrine of constructive possession. And we confront a provocative question: what happens when emerging brain-computer interfaces bypass the muscular act entirely, threatening the very concept of manifest criminality?Designed for law students, exam takers, and anyone interested in the mechanics of criminal liability, this episode clarifies the rules that protect individual liberty while enabling prosecution. Understanding these principles is your first step in mastering day-one criminal law—and recognizing the towering importance of actus reus as the gatekeeper of justice.Whether you're prepping for finals or exploring the ethical and practical limits of law, this episode arms you with a clear, powerful framework—analyzing human behavior through the lens of biological action, legal fiction, and constitutional boundaries.In this episode:The visualization of actus reus through the subway scenario and the concept of physical force as a non-criminal actThe essential role of willed muscular contraction and the significance of conscious controlDifferentiating voluntary acts from reflexes, convulsions, automatism, sleepwalking, and hypnosisHow the law treats unconscious or involuntary movements, referencing the Model Penal CodeThe importance of timing and the DeSina case in linking voluntary acts to subsequent harm, even when incapacitatedThe constitutional prohibition against punishing status — exemplified by Robinson v. CaliforniaThe legal fiction of “possession” as an act via knowledge and control, including actual vs. constructive possessionThe five specific valves—statute, relationship, contract, assumption of care, creation of peril—that transform mere inaction into criminal conductThe theoretical challenges posed by neural interfaces and AI—how they question the very definition of a “human act”

Barely a year old, North Carolina Lawyers for the Rule of Law is actively driving the conversation about hot legal topics. Steering Committee member David Teddy discusses why he and like-minded lawyers formed the group in the wake of the NCAJ's Convention 2025, seizing the opportunity to issue a public statement about threats against judges and lawyers. Since then, North Carolina Lawyers for the Rule of Law has come out on other issues and is raising money to “get out the message that you need to stand up for the rule of law.” Sitting down with host Amber Nimocks, David also reflects on this term as NCAJ president from 2013 to 2014 and the return of his “Criminal Masters in Advocacy” CLE at NCAJ Convention 2026 in June. Visit the NCAJ Convention page to learn more about it.Interested in supporting the North Carolina Lawyers for the Rule of Law or its Law Day celebration on May 1? Contact David at 704-487-1234.

Welcome to RIMScast. Your host is Justin Smulison, Business Content Manager at RIMS, the Risk and Insurance Management Society.   In this episode, Justin interviews Anderson Kill Shareholder Joshua Gold on the May 5th RISKWORLD session that Joshua is co-presenting with RIMS Past President Lance Ewing, "Do Not Let Your Cargo Claim Go Down with the Ship: Tips to Improve Marine Insurance Protection." Joshua shares knowledge on two of his areas of practice, cyber and maritime insurance. Joshua offers some insight into these newest and oldest of practice areas, and how they have begun to intersect. Maritime insurance carries special language and rules, and Joshua and Lance will cover those and answer attendee questions in their session. Justin and Joshua discuss current maritime threats in the Middle East that will likely be discussed in the session. Justin and Joshua comment on Law Day, an annual commemoration of law on May 1st. Listen for a greater understanding of maritime shipping insurance and the importance of promptly filing claims.   Key Takeaways: [:01] About RIMS and RIMScast. [:14] Public registration is open for RISKWORLD 2026, which will be held from May 3rd through 6th in Philadelphia. Visit RIMS.org/RISKWORLD to register. [:27] About this episode of RIMScast. We will be joined by RIMS Risk Management Magazine contributor Joshua Gold, Shareholder at Anderson Kill. He's making his RIMScast debut to discuss Marine and Cargo Risk. This is timely. But first… [:59] RIMS Virtual Workshops. The next RIMS-CRMP Exam Prep Course will be on April 21st and 22nd, and then again on June 9th and 10th. Registration links are in this episode's notes. [1:13] On April 15th, we have a virtual workshop covering "Emerging Risks", led by Joseph Mayo. Register today and strengthen your risk knowledge. RIMS members always enjoy deep discounts on the virtual workshops. [1:30] Webinars. On April 16th, Zurich and World Travel Protection will present "Navigating the New Global Risk Landscape: Lessons for Business Travelers in Unstable Times". Register for webinars at RIMS.org/webinars and through the links in this episode's show notes. [1:48] Folks, for more RIMS content, head over to YouTube and subscribe to @RIMSOfficialChannel. There you will find video podcasts, RIMScast Canada video podcasts, and other informative and entertaining content from RIMS. [2:03] Head over to RMMagazine.com for the Q1 Edition of the Azbee-Award-winning magazine, RIMS Risk Management Magazine. [2:15] On with the Show! Our guest today is a shareholder at the law firm Anderson Kill. You've seen his byline in RIMS Risk Management Magazine, and you've seen him on RIMS stages regionally, nationally, and globally. [2:30] Joshua Gold is here to discuss marine and cargo risks generally, and how he will be co-presenting a session at RISKWORLD on May 5th, called "Do Not Let Your Cargo Claim Go Down with the Ship: Tips to Improve Marine Insurance Protection." [2:50] He will present that alongside RIMS Past President Lance Ewing. We expect that session to be highly attended. Joshua is here to give you a preview of that session, talk about how cyber can intersect with marine and cargo risk, and offer some practical risk management takeaways. [3:11] Law Day is coming up in the U.S. on May 1st. Joshua has been practicing law for three decades. We'll find out what Law Day means to him in 2026. Let's get to it! [3:24] Interview! Anderson Kill Shareholder Joshua Gold, welcome to RIMScast! [3:51] Joshua says RIMS is an amazing system for sharing information and education. Joshua couldn't be prouder to be speaking at RISKWORLD 2026. [4:13] Joshua has written for RIMS on topics from cyber to marine insurance. Joshua thinks that cyber risk management is fascinating because cyber is new for many policyholders, in terms of implications, perils, how insurance will respond, and what the products are. [5:15] It's fascinating to see the intersection of technology, insurance, and law. It all comes together in cyber. These perils may be getting more perilous over the next few years before we may start turning the corner. [6:00] Joshua's session on May 5th at RISKWORLD is called "Do Not Let Your Cargo Claim Go Down with the Ship: Tips to Improve Marine Insurance Protection." Joshua will present with former RIMS President Lance Ewing. [6:17] Joshua says he is in both the newest thing in insurance and law, cyber, and the oldest thing in insurance and law, marine. Most of his day-to-day focus is on either end of the spectrum. [7:16] As much as Joahua loves cyber, he is intrigued with maritime insurance and maritime law. It's esoteric and old. It has special rules. If you don't deal with this type of insurance and law regularly, it can be challenging. [7:46] The insurance companies are typically very well-versed in the insurance rules and doctrines. Most policyholders are much less so. There's an information imbalance. [8:00] Joshua always looks forward to educating risk managers about this area. It's so detailed and different. Some might say it's antiquated. It's a challenging area, and we couldn't have a better example of that than with recent current events and hostilities in the Middle East. [8:42] Joshua says, as dangerous and harrowing as the situation exists in certain shipping lines and energy channels, we've seen examples of disruptions in recent times with drought conditions affecting the Panama Canal and other shipping lanes. [9:02] Joshua recalls the Suez Canal freighter mishap. The Suez Canal was shut down while an international engineering effort was launched to free the freighter and free up shipping lanes. [9:29] The current shipping disruption caused by an escalating war will present real challenges for both shippers and energy markets. We're watching that in real time. [9:54] Joshua and Lance don't want a current events discussion. They want to educate policyholders on principles that apply, whether they're dealing with a Suez Canal situation, an Iranian conflict, modern-day pirates in open water, or thieves breaking into your warehouse. [10:37] Joshua and Lance will emphasize certain relevant points like detours, delays in shipping, downstream risk, risk to certain types of cargo, cancellations for war risk coverage, and other marine insurance products. [11:06] There can be a real aftermath, and we're not sure where we are, as of this recording. We'll know more in May at RISKWORLD in Philadelphia. Now, we can only brace for the worst. [11:32] Joshua and Lance are looking to educate policyholders on all of these issues, including ones that will be front-burner, given the hostilities now. [11:52] Joshua says marine insurance policy language is cloaked in words of antiquity. Sometimes you'll see a marine policy that looks like a standard property all-risk policy, and sometimes you'll see one that contains 17th-century nautical and piracy terms. [12:32] It's important to make sure that you understand the rights, protections, obligations, and contingencies under insurance. [12:48] Most marine insurance policies will have a one-year provision the insurance company will argue says that if there's a fight over the claim payment, the amount, or the timing of the payment, that has to be brought in a lawsuit commenced within 12 months of the loss event. [13:14] For people who have never had to go through a complicated claim, a year may sound like plenty of time. But these claims can take months or even years for resolution. Sometimes they don't get resolved without some coverage litigation or alternative dispute mechanism. [13:43] Most policyholders are not accustomed to seeing a one-year contractual statute of limitations to bring a fight. You don't want to be in a position where the insurance company will argue you may have forfeited your coverage rights if you didn't act in time. [14:11] Policyholders may not ever get into that realm, because they've never had that problem, but it's a point of being educated and knowing the lay of the land for policyholders in this arena, insuring goods over open water, in warehouses, on docks, or on a truck. [14:58] A Quick Break! RISKWORLD 2026 will be held from May 3rd through the 6th in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. RISKWORLD attracts more than 10,000 risk professionals from across the globe. It's time to Connect, Cultivate, and Collaborate with them. [15:18] Booth sales are open now. General registration and speaker registration are also open right now. Marketplace and hospitality badges are now available. Links are in this episode's show notes, and be sure to check out RIMS.org for more information. [15:36] Our guest today, Joshua Gold, will be one of the session speakers at RISKWORLD. We are excited for him and also for our just-announced closing keynote, NFL Hall of Famer, Super Bowl Champion, Emmy-winning broadcaster, and entrepreneur, Michael Strahan. [15:55] Michael Strahan will be on the main stage on May 6th. Justin is super stoked! If you're still on the fence, this is a fine time to smash that Register button and hear from one of the all-time greats. [16:07] The RIMS Western Regional Conference will be held from October 4th through the 7th in Seattle, Washington. Registration is open, and you can also submit a session. Visit RIMSWesternRegional.com and the link in this episode's show notes for more information. [16:28] Let's Return to Our Interview with Joshua Gold of Anderson Kill!  [16:44] Joshua says don't get fooled by the title of your insurance policy. The devil is in the details. You may have Ocean Marine Cargo Coverage, but you may get endorsements, like a warehouse-to-warehouse endorsement. [17:15] You may be buying a product called Stock Throughput. You're looking for coverages that may apply not just for cargo on a ship, but also for cargo that may be at rest, stored in a warehouse where it's being loaded from the ship onto the dockside. [17:48] There are many areas where you have to be aware of things developing in the marketplace and the fact that your insurance may now carry on well beyond the vessel's hull. [18:05] There's another area of marine liability coverage which may be implicated, given the hostilities in the Straits of Hormuz and perhaps elsewhere, and the escalating nature of the conflict in the Middle East, so we will have to see how that plays out. [18:31] Joshua always recommends that policyholders work with experienced insurance brokers. [18:39] Joshua says it is a privilege to give this discussion in May with Lance Ewing, a seasoned risk manager who has worked on the brokerage side and the insurance company side, as well as the risk manager policyholder side, so he has every perspective. [19:04] One of the things they will do at RISKWORLD is to make sure that not only do you hear from a coverage lawyer, but also from a risk manager, like most of the audience, who can speak to risk managers about what is important to their risk management approaches. [19:34] They hope that that's going to be useful for audience members even if they're not in the same industry as Lance. Justin points out that one never knows where they might end up next. This is a great way to become more well-rounded. [20:08] When evaluating marine cargo policies, you always want to look at the warehouse-to-warehouse endorsement. Find a broker that's well-steeped in marine cargo coverage. They can often customize endorsements that are important to your business. [20:51] If you're transporting goods that are capable of being spoiled or have to be refrigerated, or have to be in the hull of the ship, protected from the elements, those issues can come up through endorsement, special policy provisions covering temperature-controlled goods. [21:22] Joshua mentions that electronics may require being flown as air cargo. You want a system with customized coverage wherever you can get it. The broker knows that Lloyd's Marine Group has an example of an endorsement that covers a certain type of peril or cargo. [22:06] You might have a provision in your policy as part of a base form, but you might want fraudulent bills of lading coverage. There is now a technology overlap with shipping, an intersection between cyber and marine. [22:54] Some countries are GPS spoofing to confuse ships, which can be fatal if a ship goes into rocks or a bank in bad weather. This has implications, as we are seeing insurance companies slap onto marine products some type of cyber exclusion. [23:37] You'll want to know that just because technology had a role in the loss, you're not forfeiting all of your coverage. Joshua says we're certainly seeing it with piracy claims and theft claims. We're seeing it on the roadways. Truckers are getting more and more targeted. [23:58] A truck leaves a warehouse with goods that have been shipped on an overseas voyage, and there's an argument potentially that you've got federal maritime law applying in admiralty. What are the implications for coverage even though it's now inland on a train or truck? [24:23] We're seeing more cargo theft in the realm of trucking, in addition to stuff missing at the dock and warehouses being broken into. It's a perilous situation for those dealing with cargo. [24:43] Another Quick Break! The Spencer Educational Foundation's Risk Manager on Campus application period will open on April 1st, 2026, and it will close on June 30th. Grant awardees, colleges, and universities are typically notified in September. [25:04] The Course Development Grant application deadline for Interval Number 2 will be on June 15th, 2026. Award notifications will be sent out in late July. [25:19] General Grant applications will open on May 1st, 2026, and the application deadline is July 30th. Internship Grant applications open on August 15th and close on October 15th. [25:31] Links to each of these grants are in this episode's show notes. Visit SpencerEd.org for more information. [25:39] Let's Conclude Our Interview with Joshua Gold of Anderson Kill! [25:48] Josh Gold will be presenting a special session on May 5th at RISKWORLD, called "Do Not Let Your Cargo Claim Go Down with the Ship: Tips to Improve Marine Insurance Protection." He'll be co-presenting with RIMS Past President Lance Ewing. [26:13] Justin says if he were in the audience for that session, he would ask what the critical steps are that risk professionals should take immediately after a cargo loss to preserve their coverage rights. [26:39] Joshua says the first step always is to give prompt notice. It complicates matters if the insurance company can argue that the notice was untimely. The first thing is, get the notice in. You won't have all the information. Notice is unlike wine; it doesn't get better with age. [27:17] Give that prompt notice first. Then support your claim. As quickly as you can, gather photographs, video evidence, and documentary evidence, and give as much as you possibly can to the insurance company. Let that claims process unfold promptly. [27:43] You don't want the insurance company delaying payment because they say they didn't get the information they needed to process the claim. Try to give them that information. [27:59] Joshua says you can absolutely add more documentation. You can start by saying this is what we know now, and we reserve the right to supplement this information when we learn more about our loss. [29:03] There are surely deadlines built into your policies. Go through your policy and calendar dates for proof of loss, statement of loss, and getting certain claim information in. Put those benchmarks in the calendar and hit them as often as you can. [29:45] Joshua says with a cyber claim, there's no reason to hold back because you're incurring costs from the start with your forensic team and your breach coach. With cargo, Joshua says, I would give notice as quickly as you can, even if it's not as robust as anyone would like. [30:13] Get notice off as soon as possible. Enlist your broker's help as quickly as you can. If you have the information, get your insurance policy out, look at the notice provisions, and call your broker. Brokers are a great way to submit insurance claim information. [30:58] The broker should be helping guide you. You've already paid their commission. Enlist their help at the outset. [31:07] Justin asks if risk professionals need to tell executive leadership immediately. Joshua says there should be a dialogue. He appreciates the systematic and scientific risk management approach RIMS brings and the recognition that risk management is getting from the C-Suite. [31:48] Not every risk manager is at the C-Suite level, but they can communicate with the Treasurer, the CFO, or the Law Department, depending on the organization. Internal communications are important. [32:11] Include the Law Department in communications, to ensure that privilege is protected and conversations are not being exploited if there's a conflict over the coverage. Depending on the importance of the potential loss, the COO and the CEO may need to be involved. [32:53] Justin wants the RISKWORLD attendees to ask questions. Joshua and Lance have built time in during the session for questions. They love to take questions on the fly. They believe that if they spend half of the time in a dialogue with the audience, that is time very well spent. [33:50] Joshua has been practicing law for 31 years and has been with Anderson Kill in the New York office for almost 31 years, specializing in insurance coverage trade. [34:18] Justin notes that Law Day is an annual commemoration held on May 1st to celebrate the rule of law and cultivate a deeper understanding of the legal system. Joshua says we're always happy to get some kind of positive acknowledgment, accolades, recognition, and a special day. [35:20] This year's theme is "The Rule of Law and the American Dream." The idea that no person is above the law is what ensures the rights of the people to live their lives as freely as possible and to pursue their dreams. Joshua is a full supporter of that doctrine. [35:40] It has been such a pleasure to see you again. You are a regular contributor to RIMS Risk Management Magazine. We have links to some of your articles in this episode's show notes. We're going to see you on May 5th at RISKWORLD in Philadelphia. See links in the show notes. [36:03] Joshua's last words: Please show up on Cinco de Mayo, we're speaking on the afternoon of May 5th. We'd love to see you then in Philadelphia at RISKWORLD. Lance and I are looking forward to hearing your questions and talking about marine cargo and what's going on then. [36:26] Justin says, You've always been very supportive of me and of RIMS. I remember very clearly that somebody dropped out of a cyber panel, and you and Bill Passannante stepped right in for us, so I've always felt a strong connection to you and the professionals at Anderson Kill. [36:57] Special thanks again to Anderson Kill Shareholder Joshua Gold for joining us here on RIMScast. I have links to his contributions to RIMS Risk Management Magazine in this episode's show notes. [37:10] If you will be at RISKWORLD, remember to attend his session on May 5th at 3:30 p.m. on the Global Stage. It is called "Do Not Let Your Cargo Claim Go Down with the Ship: Tips to Improve Marine Insurance Protection." [37:24] It will be co-presented with RIMS Past President Lance Ewing. Register at RIMS.org/RISKWORLD today! [37:32] Plug Time! You can sponsor a RIMScast episode for this, our weekly show, or a dedicated episode. Links to sponsored episodes are in the show notes. [38:00] RIMScast has a global audience of risk and insurance professionals, legal professionals, students, business leaders, C-Suite executives, and more. Let's collaborate and help you reach them! Contact pd@rims.org for more information. [38:18] Become a RIMS member and get access to the tools, thought leadership, and network you need to succeed. Visit RIMS.org/membership or email membershipdept@RIMS.org for more information. [38:36] Risk Knowledge is the RIMS searchable content library that provides relevant information for today's risk professionals. Materials include RIMS executive reports, survey findings, contributed articles, industry research, benchmarking data, and more. [38:52] For the best reporting on the profession of risk management, read Risk Management Magazine at RMMagazine.com. It is written and published by the best minds in risk management. [39:07] Justin Smulison is the Business Content Manager at RIMS. Please remember to subscribe to RIMScast on your favorite podcasting app. You can email us at Content@RIMS.org. [39:19] Practice good risk management, stay safe, and thank you again for your continuous support!   Links: RISKWORLD 2026 Registration — Open for exhibitors, members, and non-members! Reserve your booth at RISKWORLD 2026! More from Joshua Gold in RIMS Risk Management Magazine Spencer Educational Foundation — Scholarships and Grants | Open Calls and Timelines. RIMS-CRO Certificate Program In Advanced Enterprise Risk Management | April‒June 2026 Cohort | Led by James Lam RIMS Western Regional Conference — Oct. 4‒7, 2026 | Seattle, WA | Register Today and Submit an Educational Session! RIMS Risk Management Magazine | Contribute RIMS Now RIMS-Certified Risk Management Professional (RIMS-CRMP) | Insights Video Series Featuring Joe Milan! The Strategic and Enterprise Risk Center RIMS Diversity Equity Inclusion Council RIMS-CRMP Story, featuring John Button RIMScast Canada — Episodes Now Live RISK PAC | RIMS Advocacy Upcoming RIMS-CRMP Prep Virtual Workshops: RIMS-CRMP Exam PrepApril 21‒22, 2026 | June 9‒10 Full RIMS-CRMP Prep Course Schedule See the full calendar of RIMS Virtual Workshops Claims Management | April 7‒8 "Emerging Risks" | April 15 | Register Now! Upcoming RIMS Webinars: "Navigating the New Global Risk Landscape: Lessons for Business Travelers in Unstable Times" | April 16 | Presented by Zurich and World Travel Protection RIMS.org/Webinars   Related RIMScast Episodes: "RIMS 2022 Goodell Award Winner Lance Ewing" "World Water Day and the Circular Water Economy with Ralph Exton of WEF" "Supply Chain Integrity and Sustainability with Nicole Sherwin of EcoVadis" "Navigating Shipping Risks in 2022 with Capt. Rahul Khanna"   Sponsored RIMScast Episodes: "Secondary Perils, Major Risks: The New Face of Weather-Related Challenges" | Sponsored by AXA XL (New!) "The ART of Risk: Rethinking Risk Through Insight, Design, and Innovation" | Sponsored by Alliant "Mastering ERM: Leveraging Internal and External Risk Factors" | Sponsored by Diligent "Cyberrisk: Preparing Beyond 2025" | Sponsored by Alliant "The New Reality of Risk Engineering: From Code Compliance to Resilience" | Sponsored by AXA XL "Change Management: AI's Role in Loss Control and Property Insurance" | Sponsored by Global Risk Consultants, a TÜV SÜD Company "Demystifying Multinational Fronting Insurance Programs" | Sponsored by Zurich "Understanding Third-Party Litigation Funding" | Sponsored by Zurich "What Risk Managers Can Learn From School Shootings" | Sponsored by Merrill Herzog "Simplifying the Challenges of OSHA Recordkeeping" | Sponsored by Medcor "How Insurance Builds Resilience Against An Active Assailant Attack" | Sponsored by Merrill Herzog "Third-Party and Cyber Risk Management Tips" | Sponsored by Alliant   RIMS Publications, Content, and Links: RIMS Membership — Whether you are a new member or need to transition, be a part of the global risk management community! RIMS Virtual Workshops On-Demand Webinars RIMS-Certified Risk Management Professional (RIMS-CRMP) RISK PAC | RIMS Advocacy RIMS Strategic & Enterprise Risk Center RIMS-CRMP Stories — Featuring RIMS President Manny Padilla!   RIMS Events, Education, and Services: RIMS Risk Maturity Model®   Sponsor RIMScast: Contact sales@rims.org or pd@rims.org for more information.   Want to Learn More? Keep up with the podcast on RIMS.org, and listen on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.   Have a question or suggestion? Email: Content@rims.org.   Join the Conversation! Follow @RIMSorg on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.   About our guest: Joshua Gold, Anderson Kill Shareholder, Anderson Kill   Production and engineering provided by Podfly.

The boys sit down and watch the unrated version of this 2004 film. Will it matter that it's unrated? Probably not but you never know. What you can  know is that nobody went to White Castle after recording this. Links You can rate and review us in these places (and more, probably) Does This Still Work? - TV Podcast https://www.podchaser.com/podcasts/does-this-still-work-1088105 ‎Does This Still Work? on Apple Podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/does-this-still-work/id1492570867 Creator Accountability Network creatoraccountabilitynetwork.org. Student's Essay is a Law Day hit https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-record-313-harold-and-kumar-go-to-wh/192143633/ Fast Food's a fast fix for those in need of a job https://www.newspapers.com/article/courier-post-313-harold-and-kumar-go-to/192143710/ Study confirms that eating fast food makes you fat https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-times-313-harold-and-kumar-go-to-whi/192143784/  

The Honorable Bill Montgomery, Arizona Supreme Court Justice, joins Seth to talk about Arizona Rule Of Law Day, and his speech there. We're joined by John Dombroski, founder and president of Grand Canyon Planning Associates. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Sure, an AI bot helped host Christian Sison (https://loisllc.com/attorney/christian-sison/) write the title of this podcast episode summary. What else should it do? Fresh off her second Law Day presentation on behalf of the firm, LOIS Rising Star Erica Fersch (https://loisllc.com/attorney/erica-fersch/) discusses the state of artificial intelligence usage in New Jersey (https://loisllc.com/practice/new-jersey-workers-compensation-defense/) cases. What is “Third Fridays”? "Third Fridays" podcast is a live, 30-minute legal talk show from Lois Law Firm (https://loisllc.com/) featuring moderator Christian Sison (https://loisllc.com/attorney/christian-sison/). It is the original forum in which real attorneys discuss workers' compensation issues, share their opinions and engage in colorful conversations. The goal of the show is to showcase the diverse perspectives of the attorneys handling workers' compensation cases. Attorneys discuss case law trends, practical litigation strategies, and hot topics. Special Guest: Erica Fersch.

The most consequential church-state case of this Supreme Court term involves whether the government could – or even must – fund religious charter schools. Amanda and Holly examine key moments in the oral arguments from Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board, et al. v. Drummond, playing clips from the courtroom and looking at how the justices may apply recent precedent to shape future law. As BJC noted in the brief we filed, if the government funds religious charter schools, it will drag our government deeper into questions it is unfit to answer on matters of doctrine and church composition. That's not government neutrality toward religion – that's religious preference repackaged as educational choice.   SHOW NOTESSegment 1 (starting at 01:53): Developments since our previous show Amanda and Holly talked about the Catholic Charities/Wisconsin case in episode 12: Back to SCOTUS: Regular business in disturbing times We released our episode with Melissa Rogers to coincide with the first 100 days of the Trump administration. It is episode 13 of season 6: Active citizenship: A conversation with Melissa Rogers about promoting religious freedom and the common good President Donald Trump issued a proclamation on the National Day of Prayer and he signed an executive order on the same day establishing the Religious Liberty Commission.  The American Bar Association has a website page dedicated to National Law Day You can click this link to read President Donald Trump's proclamation on “Loyalty Day and Law Day.” The Respecting Religion podcast won a 2025 “Best in Class” award from the Religion Communicators Council's DeRose-Hinkhouse Awards for our episode titled: “But … is it Christian nationalism?” from season 5.   Segment 2 (starting at 09:51): Oral arguments in Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board, et al. v. Drummond Holly mentioned this article from The Washington Post by Justin Jouvenal and Laura Meckler that provides an overview of the case: How religious public schools went from a long shot to the Supreme Court Holly and Amanda discussed these cases as they worked their way through the courts in episode 16 of season 5: The trouble with *religious* charter schools BJC filed an amicus brief in Oklahoma v. Drummond, along with other Christian organizations as well as Jewish, Muslim and interfaith groups. Click here to read our brief. We played four clips in this segment from the oral arguments in Oklahoma v. Drummond. You can visit the Supreme Court's website for a transcript of the arguments and an audio recording of the arguments.  Clip #1: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson & Solicitor General John Sauer Clip #2: Chief Justice John Roberts  Clip #3: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson  Clip #4: Justice Elena Kagan & Michael McGinley Amanda and Holly mentioned three decisions authored by Chief Justice John Roberts that developed a new way of understanding the Free Exercise Clause. They are:  Trinity Lutheran v. Comer (2017) Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue (2020) Carson v. Makin (2022) Holly's 2017 column on the Trinity Lutheran decision is titled “Decidedly narrow, deeply troubling.”   Segment 3 (starting 37:12): What do we expect? We played one clip from the oral argument in this segment: The opening statement of Greg Garre, who argued the case for the attorney general of Oklahoma. Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC's generous donors. Your gift to BJC is tax-deductible, and you can support these conversations with a gift to BJC.

“We live in crazy times" is a phrase we hear a lot these days, Dr. Bill Chriss observes in this milestone 150th episode with hosts Todd Smith and Jody Sanders. But not the craziest America has ever seen. Drawing from his Law Day presentation, Bill examines how the nation's founding fathers—particularly Madison and Washington—foresaw the dangers of political factions and built safeguards to protect democracy. Modern trends like partisan gerrymandering and social media, he warns, are weakening those safeguards. As chair of the State Bar of Texas Appellate Section, Bill challenges lawyers to uphold their ethical duty to protect the judiciary, combat hyper-partisanship, and promote analytical thinking to preserve the republic.Connect and Learn More☑️ Dr. Bill Chriss | LinkedIn☑️ Todd Smith | LinkedIn | X | Bluesky☑️ Jody Sanders | LinkedIn | X | Bluesky☑️ Texas Appellate Law Podcast on LinkedIn | X | Instagram | Bluesky☑️ Texas Appellate Counsel PLLC ☑️ Kelly Hart & Hallman, LLP | LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon MusicProduced and Powered by LawPodsSponsored by Court Surety Bond Agency and

Trump as payback for his father and him being investigated by the civil rights division of the DOJ has moved to shutter the once proud crown jewel division that was responsible for enforcing the Fair Housing Act, Voting Rights Act, anti-discrimination and harassment laws, investigate and sue over hate crimes, including church and synagogue attacks. Now, under Trump, the division lost 70 percent of its lawyers and has now been reduced to going after transgender people, searching for nonexistent voter fraud, and white people discrimination. On this Law Day, celebrating the rule of law, Michael Popok reports on what's happened and who is responsible. Let Rocket Money reach your financial goals faster by going to https://rocketmoney.com/legalaf Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Gina Rubel and Jennifer Simpson Carr examine what the ruling in favor of Perkins Coie and this year's powerful Law Day of Action mean for every law firm. From politically motivated executive orders to renewed commitments to uphold the Constitution, they discuss how law firm leaders must prepare for reputational risks, align legal and communications strategy, and defend the rule of law in an era of unprecedented scrutiny.

On March 20th, President Trump issued an executive order effectively abolishing the Department of Education. The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) and American Federation of Teachers (AFT) have already filed a lawsuit to block the dismantling, alleging the executive branch has exceeded its constitutional authority and violated law. As the nation watches the flurry of executive orders and legal action unfold on public education, what does this mean for the nation's K-12 and higher education students?rnrnDerek Black is a Professor of Law at the University of South Carolina School of Law, the Ernest F. Hollings Chair in Constitutional Law, and directs the Constitutional Law Center. He is one of the nation's foremost experts in education law and policy. He offers expert witness testimony in school funding, voucher, and federal policy litigation and his research is routinely cited in the federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court.rnrnHe is also the author of a leading education law casebook, Education Law: Equality, Fairness, and Reform, and other books aimed at wider audiences. His 2020 book Schoolhouse Burning: Public Education and the Assault on American Democracy describes a full-scale assault on public education that threatens not just public education but American democracy itself. His forthcoming book, Dangerous Learning: The South's Long War on Black Literacy outlines the enduring legacy of the nineteenth-century struggle for Black literacy in the American South.

New York City Department of Investigation Commissioner Jocelyn Strauber spoke with host Ben Max at a live event at New York Law School for Law Day, May 1, hosted by NYLS' Center for New York City and State Law. Strauber spoke about the important role DOI plays in ensuring ethical and effective government, DOI's role in the indictment of Mayor Eric Adams and her take on the dismissal of those charges, and much more. (Ep 497) url: nyc-doi-jocelyn-strauber-corruption

This Day in Legal History: “Law Day” is BornOn this day in 1958, President Dwight D. Eisenhower issued a proclamation that did more than just slap a new label on the calendar—it attempted to reframe the ideological narrative of the Cold War itself. With Presidential Proclamation 3221, Eisenhower officially designated May 1 as Law Day, a symbolic counterweight to May Day, the international workers' holiday long associated with labor movements, socialist solidarity, and, in the American imagination, the creeping specter of communism.What better way to combat revolutionary fervor than with a celebration of legal order?Pushed by the American Bar Association, Law Day wasn't just a feel-good civics moment; it was a strategic act of Cold War messaging. While the Soviet bloc paraded tanks through Red Square, the U.S. would parade its Constitution and wax poetic about the rule of law. In short, May Day was about the workers; Law Day was about the lawyers—and the system they claimed safeguarded liberty.But this wasn't just symbolic posturing. In 1961, Congress gave Law Day teeth by writing it into the U.S. Code (36 U.S.C. § 113), mandating that May 1 be observed with educational programs, bar association events, and a national reaffirmation of the “ideal of equality and justice under law.”Cynics might call it Constitution cosplay. Advocates call it civic literacy.Either way, Law Day has endured. Each year, the President issues a formal proclamation with a new theme—ranging from the judiciary's independence to access to justice. The ABA leads events, schools hold mock trials, and the legal community gets a rare day in the spotlight.In the grand tradition of American holidays, Law Day may not come with a day off or department store sales. But it's a reminder that the U.S. doesn't just celebrate its laws when it's convenient—it does so deliberately, and sometimes, geopolitically.A federal judge ruled that Apple violated a 2021 injunction meant to promote competition in its App Store by improperly restricting developers' payment options. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers found that Apple defied her prior order in an antitrust case brought by Epic Games, the maker of Fortnite. The judge referred Apple and its vice president of finance, Alex Roman, to federal prosecutors for a possible criminal contempt investigation, citing misleading testimony and willful noncompliance. She emphasized that Apple had treated the injunction as a negotiation rather than a binding mandate.Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney praised the ruling as a win for developers and said Fortnite could return to the App Store soon. Apple had previously removed Epic's account after it allowed users to bypass Apple's in-app payment system. Despite the ruling, Apple maintains it made extensive efforts to comply while protecting its business model and plans to appeal. Epic argued that Apple continued to stifle competition by imposing a new 27% fee on external purchases and deterring users through warning messages. The judge rejected Apple's request to delay enforcement of her ruling and barred the company from interfering with developers' ability to communicate with users or imposing the new fee.US judge rules Apple violated order to reform App Store | ReutersPalestinian student Mohsen Mahdawi, a Columbia University graduate student and longtime Vermont resident, was released from U.S. immigration custody after a judge ruled he could remain free while contesting his deportation. The case stems from the Trump administration's efforts to remove non-citizen students who have participated in pro-Palestinian protests, arguing such activism threatens U.S. foreign policy. Mahdawi, who was arrested during a citizenship interview, has not been charged with any crime. Judge Geoffrey Crawford found he posed no danger or flight risk and compared the political environment to McCarthy-era crackdowns on dissent.Crawford emphasized that Mahdawi's peaceful activism was protected by the First Amendment, even as a non-citizen. Mahdawi was greeted by supporters waving Palestinian flags as he denounced his detention and vowed not to be intimidated. The Department of Homeland Security criticized the decision, accusing Mahdawi of glorifying violence and supporting terrorism, although no evidence or charges of such conduct were presented in court.Members of Vermont's congressional delegation condemned the administration's actions as a violation of due process and free speech. Mahdawi's release was seen as a symbolic blow to broader efforts targeting pro-Palestinian foreign students, while others in similar situations remain jailed. Columbia University reaffirmed that legal protections apply to all residents, regardless of citizenship status.The relevant takeaway here revolves around the First Amendment rights of non-citizens – Judge Crawford's ruling affirmed that lawful non-citizens enjoy constitutional protections, including freedom of speech. This principle was central to Mahdawi's release, reinforcing the legal standard that political expression—even controversial or unpopular—is not grounds for detention or deportation.Palestinian student released on bail as he challenges deportation from US | ReutersA federal judge in San Francisco is set to consider a critical legal question in ongoing copyright disputes involving artificial intelligence: whether Meta Platforms made "fair use" of copyrighted books when training its Llama language model. The case, brought by authors including Junot Díaz and Sarah Silverman, accuses Meta of using pirated copies of their work without permission or payment. Meta argues that its use was transformative, enabling Llama to perform diverse tasks like tutoring, translation, coding, and creative writing—without replicating or replacing the original works.The outcome could significantly impact similar lawsuits filed against other AI developers like OpenAI and Anthropic, all hinging on how courts interpret fair use in the context of AI training. Meta contends that its LLM's use of copyrighted material is covered under fair use because it generates new and transformative outputs, rather than duplicating the authors' content. Plaintiffs argue that this type of use violates copyright protections by extracting and repurposing the expressive value of their works for commercial AI systems.Technology firms warn that requiring licenses for such training could impede AI innovation and economic growth. Authors and content creators, on the other hand, view the unlicensed use as a threat to their financial and creative interests.Judge in Meta case weighs key question for AI copyright lawsuits | ReutersThe U.S. Supreme Court appears sharply divided over whether states can prohibit religious charter schools from receiving public funding, in a case that could significantly alter the legal landscape for church-state separation in education. The case centers on Oklahoma's rejection of St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School's bid to become the first publicly funded religious charter school in the country. Conservative justices, including Brett Kavanaugh, expressed concerns that excluding religious schools constitutes unconstitutional discrimination, while liberal justices emphasized the importance of maintaining a secular public education system.Chief Justice John Roberts is seen as a crucial swing vote. He questioned both sides, at times referencing prior rulings favoring religious institutions, but also signaling discomfort with the broader implications of authorizing religious charter schools. Justice Sotomayor raised hypothetical concerns about curriculum control, such as schools refusing to teach evolution or U.S. history topics like slavery.The case could affect charter school laws in up to 46 states and has implications for federal charter school funding, which mandates nonsectarian instruction. Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused herself, increasing the possibility of a 4-4 split, which would leave Oklahoma's decision to block St. Isidore intact without setting a national precedent.This case hinges on the constitutional balance between prohibiting government endorsement of religion (Establishment Clause) and ensuring equal treatment of religious institutions (Free Exercise Clause). The justices' interpretations of these principles will guide whether public funds can support explicitly religious charter schools.Supreme Court Signals Divide on Religious Charter Schools - Bloomberg This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Amidst a deteriorating legal and political atmosphere, at this moment in time, we can celebrate the constitution and the rule of law while, at the same time recognizing there may be changes afoot that we should all be watching.Tonight's broadcast is a call to action.YLR Host, Jeff Hayden, is joined by Professor Brian Soucek, Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law, Certified Criminal Law Specialist Peter Goldscheider, mediator and trial attorney Jean Hyams, Sonya Mehta, a trial attorney representing individual employees and labor unions, and Cheryl Niro, attorney and mediator who serves on the board of Lawyers Defending American Democracy, an organization focused on the unique responsibility of lawyers to defend the Constitution.Questions for Jeff's guests? Call us, toll free, at (866) 798-8255.

Happy May Day! Kevin and Alex dive into a jam-packed Thursday morning of laughs, weather woes, political zingers, and Timberwolves triumph. From nostalgic May Day basket traditions to a takedown of Kamala Harris and Biden's cabinet, it's a caffeine-fueled ride through news, sports, and spicy takes. Plus: a Trump cabinet meeting breakdown, shoutouts to Mother Goose, Chocolate Parfait Day, and… riding lawn mowers?

We hope to grow older and be treated with respect as we age. Legal issues associated with the elderly fall under “Elder Law”. Our guest, Richard Courtney will answer our questions about this aspect of the law. Our guest has quite a lot of information on his website: elderlawms.com. You can watch a video and read information. You can also request a free planning guide for assisting special needs children and adults with finances and rights.What do Elders fear? Change, Conflict, Loss of ControlWe grateful for the past times Richard Courtney has been a guest on our show to discuss wills, estates, elder law, disability law, Medicaid. Find our past podcasts.Did you know Thursday is a “legal” holiday? May 1st is National Law Day. When declaring Law Day, President Eisenhower is quoted as saying, “If civilization is to survive, it must choose the rule of law.” Show some support and care for the freedom and civility that is provided under the rule of law by celebrating Law Day! So congratulations to those who celebrate, please do so responsibly.I'll have a link to the American Bar Association's page that shows some of their events.MPB and NPR have a special broadcast tomorrow night. Wednesday, April 30th at 7pm central. NPR will mark the 100th day of the Trump Adm8inisrtation with a Special Report hosted by Michel Martin. The 2 hour live special will look at what the Administration has accomplished, what has changed and what might be next. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Law Day is May 1st - celebrate the rule of law and the legal process. Danny Shapiro joins the Chris and Joe show to talk about how you can participate. 

It's our final episode of 2024 and the 100th episode of the year!!!January 2025 marks our 15th anniversary of podcasting!  (We're off on Thursday and will return to regular podcasting on Tuesday, January 7.)This episode pays tribute to the late President Jimmy Carter. It includes a deep dive into Hunter S. Thompson's 1974 account of Carter's influential Law Day speech in Georgia. And we heap some love on JB Pritzker, as our governor stand up for the healthcare rights of pregnant women.  More at proleftpod.com. Link for this episode:  “GONZO: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson” by Magnolia Pictures. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNUzYEDxBEwBlue Gal's knitting podcast!  https://www.youtube.com/@flangumOur podcast YouTube Channel:  https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessionalLeftSupport the show:PayPal |  https://paypal.me/proleftpodcastPatreon | https://patreon.com/proleftpodDo you want to send us a Happy New Year card and/or contribution by mail?  We love getting mail!The Professional Left PodcastPO Box 9133 Springfield, IL 62791Support the show

“Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked,   nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of scoffers…” - Psalms 1:1   This Episode's Links and Timestamps: 00:00 – Scripture Reading 01:16 – Introduction 06:44 - Psalms – Wikipedia 34:00 – My Commentary on Psalm 1 1:02:41 - A Personal Story 1:19:50 - EXCLUSIVE: FEMA Official Ordered Relief Workers To Skip Houses With Trump Signs – Leif Le Mahieu, DW 1:36:43 - Ancient Kings and God's Turn of Events: Let me remind you who controls the fate of nations ahead of the chaos of this week – Joel Abbott, NTB 1:59:30 - “…think about these things.” – Philippians 4:8

Do not allow the cover of the book to deter you from opening and learning from the contents. In this segment, Tiffany Obeng shares why black books are for everyone. We hear about the inspiration of her author career intersecting with her corporate career as a Lawyer and DEO professional. WHO IS TIFFANY OBENG? Tiffany is a lawyer and DEO professional  of nearly 15 years. Tiffany became  inspired to join the diversity and inclusion  movement after taking her first  employment law class in 2008. Tiffany was fascinated by articles and daunting  statistics highlighting the lack of diversity in law, particularly for Black women. Tiffany works as an employment  discrimination attorney, and her career track includes 6 years as a senior equal employment opportunity advisor for a prominent higher education institution. Tiffany has now found a unique, nuanced way to tackle diversity in the workplace: children's books! Through books such as popular kids' career book, Andrew Learns about Lawyers, Tiffany hopes to inspire a new generation of diverse lawyers. Her book has been a staple for career days and Jack & Jill's Organization's Law Day event. TIFFANY'S CONTACT INFO Email: sugarcookiebooks@gmail.com  Phone: (281) 782-1851  Social Media: @sugarcookiebooks TIFFANY'S CALL TO ACTION Learn more about me and my offerings at www.sugarcookiebooks.com. Grab a copy of one of the books. CALL TO ACTION Subscribe / Follow GEMS with Genesis Amaris Kemp podcast on audio platform & YouTube channel, Hit the notifications bell so you don't miss any content, and share with family/friends.   GENESIS'S INFO https://genesisamariskemp.net/genesisamariskemp --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/genesis-amaris-kemp/support

Holmberg's Morning Sickness - Brady Report - Tuesday July 30, 2024 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Holmberg's Morning Sickness - Brady Report - Tuesday July 30, 2024 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week on Hull on Estates, Sydney Osmar and Mark Lahn discuss highlights from the Ontario Bar Association's Elder Law Day 2024. Topics include collaborative law in estate litigation, caselaw updates, accommodating elderly clients, and the recent implementation of Bill 200, which impacts the registration of Notices of Security Interest.   Referenced Blog:

GHWCC Global Businesswomen's Pod Episode 100 The 2024 Law Day theme, “Voices of Democracy,” acknowledges the people's role in democracies. Established in 1958 by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, it celebrates the rule of law in a free society. The Houston Bar Association, established in 1870, is one of the largest volunteer bars in the country, with over 10,000 members. Diana, the first Latina president of the 153-year-old organization, is honored to be the President of this significant organization.

GHWCC Global Businesswomen's Pod Episode 100 The 2024 Law Day theme, “Voices of Democracy,” acknowledges the people's role in democracies. Established in 1958 by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, it celebrates the rule of law in a free society. The Houston Bar Association, established in 1870, is one of the largest volunteer bars in the country, with over 10,000 members. Diana, the first Latina president of the 153-year-old organization, is honored to be the President of this significant organization.

“Logan Roy” actor lashes out at religion and the Bible. How St. Joseph the Worker “baptized” a wrong view of work. And, on “Rule of Law Day”, Columbia protesters learn a lesson the hard way. 

2024 Law Day with Former US Attorney Barbara McQuadernIn democracies, the people rule. For nearly 250 years, Americans have expressed their political views and wishes by speaking their minds and voting in elections. Yet, the information we consume, and a well-informed public is crucial to the health of our democracy. These days, it seems like voters are more polarized than ever before and cannot come to a consensus on much of anything.rnrnIn Attack from Within, legal scholar and analyst Barbara McQuade argues that American society is strategically being pushed apart by disinformation-the deliberate spreading of lies disguised as truth. Advances in technology including rapid developments in Artificial Intelligence threaten to make the problems even worse by amplifying false claims and manufacturing credibility. McQuade shows us how to identify the ways disinformation is seeping into all facets of our society, and how we can fight against it.

How do you meet the needs of small and large firm members? How do you work alongside your state or national association to benefit your members, and remain distinct and relevant to members?In this episode of Associations Thrive, host Joanna Pineda interviews Julie Kresge, Executive Director of the Erie County Bar Association (ECBA). Julie discusses:Her unique and winding path to becoming an Executive Director.How the Erie County Bar Association promotes the rule of law, does a lot of good in the community, and creates a vibrant community of attorneys.How the Bar Foundation raises money for law school scholarships and education support for homeless students.The Bar's new strategic plan, which lays out 34 recommendations for improving the association. The Bar's new, non-attorney membership type that is meant to expand membership and support all the legal staff at law firms.The Bar's weekly journal, which reports on all legal activities in the community. This journal is a HUGE member benefit and revenue generator.The Bar's signature events: Law Day and the Bench Bar Conference.How lawyers are in high demand in Erie County right now.References:Erie County, PA Bar Association website

GDP Script/ Top Stories for Friday July 7 Publish Date: Thursday July 6 From the Henssler Financial Studio Welcome to the Gwinnett Daily Post Podcast Today is Friday July 7th , and happy 57th birthday to comedian Jim Gaffigan ****Gaffigan****   I'm Bruce Jenkins and here are your top stories presented by Peggy Slappey Properties Gwinnett County government operations review highlights several issues Gwinnett Bar Association Honored by State Bar of Georgia And the Housing Resource Expo set for July 15th in Lawrenceville   Plus, Miranda Shealy of Fernbank Museum stops by, and Brian Giffin has a Gwinnett Sports Report with Will Hammock.     All of this and more is coming up on the Gwinnett Daily Post podcast.    Break 1 :  Slappey          Story 1. issues   A recently completed operational performance assessment of Gwinnett County government highlighted various issues that need attention to enhance efficiency. The assessment was initiated during the Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners' strategic planning session, aiming to establish benchmarks for measuring the county's performance in meeting residents' needs. While the county was praised as a national benchmark organization, the assessment identified concerns such as outdated processes, infrastructure, employee workload, lack of data tracking, and communication gaps. Specific departments, like Community Services and the Public Library system, faced challenges related to decision-making, program criticism, and inconsistent messaging. The county officials received the assessment report from Mauldin & Jenkins and plan to review and implement the recommendations for ongoing improvements. The initiative was commended for its commitment to continuous improvement, transparency, and accountability…..read more on this at gwinnettdailypost.com     STORY 2: Bar   The Gwinnett County Bar Association recently received multiple prestigious awards at the Annual Meeting of the State Bar of Georgia. These awards include the Law Day Award of Achievement, Best Newsletter Award, and Best Website Award. The Law Day Awards recognize local bar associations for their outstanding efforts in planning and executing activities to commemorate Law Day. The Best Newsletter Awards recognize voluntary bar associations that provide exceptional informational resources based on their size. Similarly, the Best Website Awards acknowledge local and voluntary bar associations that have websites demonstrating excellence in content, design, usefulness, and ease of use. The State Bar of Georgia sponsors these awards annually to support and encourage local and voluntary bar associations in their service programs and to promote the improvement of justice administration and the positive image of lawyers. Story 3:  housing The Gwinnett Housing Corporation and Lawrenceville Housing Authority are hosting a bilingual Housing Resource Expo at Central Gwinnett High School on July 15. Over 20 housing agencies will participate in the event, which aims to provide residents facing housing challenges with information about available resources. The expo will focus on emergency housing, home ownership, rental opportunities, and home improvement programs. The Gwinnett Housing Corporation CEO, Lejla Prljaca, expressed concerns about rising housing prices and the impact on affordability for Gwinnett County residents. The participating organizations include Catholic Charities, Habitat for Humanity, Gwinnett County Housing Division, and many others. The event aims to inform residents about local, state, and federal resources to address their housing needs and preserve affordability in the housing market......……..we'll be right back   Break 2:   M.O.G. - Tom Wages -  Obits     Story 4: council   During the Georgia Municipal Association's Annual Convention in Savannah, Duluth City Council member Manfred Graeder was honored with the Harold F. Holtz Municipal Training Institute Certificate of Recognition. The institute, a collaboration between GMA and the University of Georgia's Carl Vinson Institute of Government, offers a series of nationally recognized training opportunities for city officials. To earn the certificate, Graeder completed a minimum of 42 units of credit, including required classes totaling at least 18 hours. The program offers over 70 courses, and GMA CEO Larry Hanson commended Graeder for his dedication to becoming a more effective city official. The partnership between GMA and UGA aims to provide high-quality training to Georgia's municipal officials, enhancing their leadership and professional development skills.   Story 5: respiratory   Gwinnett Technical College's Respiratory Care program has gained recognition as one of the top programs in the United States. The program boasts a remarkable 10-year streak of 100 percent pass rates on the national credentialing exam for respiratory care. In acknowledgment of this achievement, the Commission on Accreditation for Respiratory Care (CoARC) will present the college with the Distinguished RRT Credentialing Success Award. This honor is awarded to institutions that demonstrate exceptional outcomes, including high credentialing success rates and meeting CoARC's established thresholds for various criteria. Gwinnett Tech's program prepares students for careers as respiratory care therapists by equipping them with the latest medical technology and training. The program's graduates also enjoy a 100 percent placement rate, meeting the demands of the workforce.   We'll be back in a moment   Break 3:  ESOG – Ingles 5   Story 6:  Shealy   And now, Miranda Shealy stops in to talk about Fernbank Museum ***Fernbank generic***   We're back in just a moment   Break 4  Lawrenceville- Outdoor 30   Story 7: Sports   Brian Giffin and Daily Post Sports editor Will Hammock bring you this week's Gwinnett Sports Report   ***Hammock***   We'll have final thoughts after this   Break 4:  Henssler 60 Thanks again for listening to today's Gwinnett Daily Post podcast. Giving you important news about our community and telling great stories are what we do. Did you know over 50% of Americans listen to podcasts weekly? Make sure you join us for our next episode and be sure to share this podcast on social media with your friends and family. Add us to your Alexa Flash Briefing or your Google Home Briefing and be sure to like, follow, and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Get more news about our community at GwinnettDailyPost.com  www.henssler.com  www.psponline.com  www.wagesfuneralhome.com  www.mallofgeorgiachryslerdodgejeep.com  www.fernbankmuseum.org  www.esogrepair.com  www.ingles-markets.com  www.gon.com  www.downtownlawrencevillega.com  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In conjunction with the American Museum of Tort Law, we conduct another live Zoom recording where Ralph welcomes legendary trial lawyer Shanin Spector to discuss the constitutional right of wrongfully injured people to have their day in court and the corporate forces that are trying to limit this most basic of American principles. Then, Ralph and Mr. Spector take questions from our live audience.

In conjunction with the American Museum of Tort Law, we conduct another live Zoom recording where Ralph welcomes legendary trial lawyer Shanin Spector to discuss the constitutional right of wrongfully injured people to have their day in court and the corporate forces that are trying to limit this most basic of American principles. Then, Ralph and Mr. Spector take questions from our live audience.Shanin Specter is a founding partner of Kline & Specter, one of the leading catastrophic injury firms in the United States. Beyond winning substantial monetary compensation for his clients, many of Shanin's cases have prompted beneficial societal changes. He has also taught law for many years and this academic year is teaching tort and trial courses at UC Law SF, Drexel Kline and Stanford Law Schools.Last week, I found myself in Washington DC at the Federalist Society debating the resolution that America should abolish the right of trial by jury, which is being advocated by an otherwise distinguished professor at George Washington University School of Law, Professor [Renée Lettow] Lerner… You don't have to scratch the surface of her argument very much to see that it is based upon the statistics of the American Tort Reform Association and the like. It's essentially a Trojan horse for the Fortune 500.Shanin SpecterWhy don't you describe this assault on the tort system by lobbyists who don't want to argue their case in court— that's too open, too full of cross-examination, too fair in terms of the procedures. They want to lobby lawmakers in states all over the country so the lawmakers, in effect, enact laws that tie the hands of juries and judges— the only people who actually see, hear, and evaluate the cases in the courtroom.Ralph NaderIn Case You Haven't Heard1. The FTC has issued a statement regarding the proposed merger between CalPortland & Martin Marietta. Chair Lina Khan tweeted that this deal “would've resulted in a single firm owning half of all cement plants serving Southern California, enabling the firm to hike prices.” Following an FTC investigation, the firms have abandoned the deal.2. AP reports that Colorado has become the first state to pass “Right to Repair” legislation, which “compels manufacturers to provide the necessary manuals, tools, parts and software,” to “ensure farmers can fix their own tractors and combines.” This idea has drawn support from left and right factions including at the national level. In a similar move regarding home repairs, Senator John Fetterman is pushing to expand Pennsylvania's "Whole Home Repair" program – which “helps Pennsylvanians with needed repairs and eliminate[s] blight” – to the nation.3. Former U.S.-backed Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaidó has been ejected from Colombia after attempting to “gatecrash” a summit on the future of the Bolivarian republic, the Guardian reports. Guaidó has fallen out of favor among Venezuelan dissidents and, while some western nations still recognize him on paper as Venezuela's president – despite never winning such an election – many have quietly reengaged with the Maduro government to negotiate for oil. The Guardian added that Mr. Guaidó has now relocated to Miami.4. Slate reports that automakers are finally beginning to backpedal on digital displays in cars. David Zipper writes “The touch screen pullback is the result of consumer backlash, not the enactment of overdue regulations or an awakening of corporate responsibility. Many drivers want buttons, not screens, and they've given carmakers an earful about it. Auto executives have long brushed aside safety concerns about their complex displays—and all signs suggest they would have happily kept doing so. But their customers are revolting, which has forced them to pay attention.” Zipper goes on to pin the blame for the proliferation of these expensive and unpopular displays on one culprit: Elon Musk's Tesla.5. From the Tampa Bay Times: State legislators in Florida are leading a crusade to shred local tenants rights laws, which set standards regarding rent increases, applications and evictions. The recently-passed HB 1417 and its companion SB 1586 would strip away these protections. Rep. Tiffany Esposito, of Fort Myers, who sponsored the House bill, is quoted saying “This bill protects tenants, this bill protects property owners and this bill protects capitalism.” Rep. Angie Nixon of Jacksonville responded “This bill is designed to help corporate landlords at the expense of tenants, many of which are already struggling to stay in their homes.”6. Ben & Jerry's announced that it has reached an agreement with workers at its flagship store in Burlington, Vermont on rules to ensure a fair union election, after workers announced last week that they are seeking to unionize, per the New York Times. “The agreement is likely to pave the way for the store to become the only unionized Ben & Jerry's location in the United States. All of the nearly 40 workers eligible to join a union at the store have indicated their support for doing so.”7. The Hill reports that a War Powers Resolution to pull U.S. troops out of Somalia, introduced by Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, has been defeated. The resolution garnered the support of 47 Republicans and 56 Democrats but failed by a margin of 103-321.8.  Keeping an eye on out of control cops, the LA Times reports that during a "reverse-buy" sting operation, undercover deputies with the Riverside sheriff sold 60 pounds of meth to a narcotics trafficker. According to the author Noah Goldberg, the dealer then got in a car and fled, resulting in 60 additional pounds of meth being introduced into the community. And in West Virginia, WTRF reports that “42 women, including 10 minors, plan to file lawsuits against West Virginia State Police for [installing] hidden cameras in junior troopers locker rooms…[engaging in] rampant sexual misconduct,” and admitting to destroying evidence in criminal investigations.  9. From Common Dreams: Reps. AOC and Ro Khanna, along with Senator Ed Markey, have reintroduced the Green New Deal. Along with the resolution, which is unlikely to move in the current Congress, the sponsors released “a guide for cities, states, tribes, nonprofits, and individuals about how to help bring the Green New Deal to life."10. From the Economic Policy Institute: April 28th marked “Workers Memorial Day, the date the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) took effect in 1971. Signed in 1970, the OSH Act has made a tremendous difference, and, after more than 50 years, over 668,000 workers can say their lives have been saved by its passage… [yet] In 2022, 343 workers died each day on average from hazardous working conditions, and last year's fatality data show especially troubling trends: The rate of death on the job for Black workers rose to its highest number in more than a decade, and fatality rates for Latino workers have increased 13% in the past decade…grim as these…numbers are, the reality is likely far worse. Government Accountability Office…reports show that a majority of employers fail to report workplace injuries due to [OSHA]'s limited resources and procedures. Official statistics also do not include the untold numbers of worker deaths linked to preventable workplace coronavirus exposure. In fact, the pandemic revealed serious limitations of the OSH Act and its enforcement in an era of eroded worker power and vast economic inequality.” Get full access to Ralph Nader Radio Hour at www.ralphnaderradiohour.com/subscribe

May Day 2016 with Peter Linebaugh (repodcast) We're happy to share another past episode, this time from May Day 2016, about 4 months before the start of our rss feed for our podcast. I feel it's notable that this show approaches it's 13th birthday on the May 9th of this year. In this show, you'll hear an interview with autonomous Marxist historian, Peter Linebaugh on essay collection The Incomplete, True, Authentic and Wonderful History of May Day plus some music we curated at the time. To friends we've met, and to those we have yet to meet, I'd like to wish everyone a happy May Day. As we'll hear in the following hour, this day has a long celebrated history. From its many European pagan roots as a celebration of fertility as the fruits of the spring planting season began to... uh, spring forth. Then on to the repressive winter that fell early on May 3rd and 4th of 1886 in Illinois with, first, the killing of workers striking for an 8 hour work day at the McCormick Works and then the repression of anarchist and socialist workers and organizers following the bombing at Haymarket Square in Chicago of that same year. From there to the taking up of May 1st as International Workers Day by struggling groups around the world and the U.S. adoption of a sanctioned Labor Day in September of the year. To divide an international working class, The U.S. government, oppressors of that May Day 1886 sanctioned a Labor Day to be celebrated in September, declared the first of May both Law Day (an obvious testament to Irony in respect to the Haymarket 8, all jailed and 4 executed) and, for some, it's celebration as Americanism Day. Whatever that means. In 2006 & 2007, immigrants rights marches were seen on and around May Days that, for many, re-sparked the importance of this day. The protests and festivals swelled to numbers nearly unmatched in the history of protest on Turtle Island, and were accompanied by school and work walkouts and boycott days. Whether you're out there today taking direct action, in repose from the horrors of wage slavery, resisting the carceral state, gardening, dancing around a May Pole or otherwise celebrating the possibilities of this year to come when, hell, we might as well end this system of exclusion and extraction: We wish you a fire on your tongue, love in your heart and free land beneath you. .. ... . .. Featured Tracks: The International by Ani DiFranco & Utah Philips The Earth Is Our Mother by Oi Polloi from Fuaim Catha Surrounded by Matador from Taken I Wish That They'd Sack Me by Chumbawamba from The Boy Bands Have Won Addio a Lugano by Pietro Gori (performed by Gruppo Z on Canti Anarchici Italiani) IO Pan by Spiral Bound from Leap Your Lazy Bounds 9-5ers Anthem by Aesop Rock from Labor Days

In this episode, Rabbi Fohrman reveals where we find the second half of the return of the Tree and, in the process, offers a powerful message about the impact of our actions in this world.Fascinated by the parallels Rabbi Fohrman points out in this episode? Check out these Aleph Beta courses mentioned in the podcast to learn even more: Moshe and Tzipporah at the Inn and Shavuot: Why do we celebrate “Law-Day”?What did you think of this episode? We'd genuinely like to hear your thoughts, questions, and feedback. Leave us a voice message – just click here, click record, and let your thoughts flow. A Book Like No Other is a project of Aleph Beta, a Torah media company dedicated to spreading the joy and love of meaningful Torah learning worldwide. For our full library of over 1,000 videos and podcasts, please visit www.alephbeta.org. Click here to sign up and receive more Aleph Beta content.A Book Like No Other would not be possible without the generous support of listeners like you. The best way to partner with us is by becoming an Aleph Beta member at www.alephbeta.org/subscribe. You can also support the show through a one time donation at www.alephbeta.org/donate. And if you really love us, please email Imu Shalev at imu@alephbeta.org, to learn about larger sponsorship opportunities!