Organization
POPULARITY
7 episodes with lulac
4 episodes with lulac
4 episodes with lulac
2 episodes with lulac
2 episodes with lulac
2 episodes with lulac
4 episodes with lulac
4 episodes with lulac
2 episodes with lulac
The news of Texas covered today includes:Our Lone Star story of the day: Non-assimilating immigrants, illegal and legal, are showing the American people who they are and why it is dangerous to life and property, as well as society and our country, to not have strict, effective border enforcement.The rally this weekend in San Antonio shows two things: One, who is organizing these rally/riots. And two, how LULAC has fallen and needs to drop the “C” from the end of its acronym. The group seems to have abandoned the last word in its name: Citizen. Trump moves fast to save LA from a 1992 repeat Progressive states that care not for laws or the border are the ones tearing us apart Related: Texas Marine vet fighting for life after being shot, paralyzed by illegal migrant. Note how the Leftist San Antonio and Bexar County machine did little to nothing about the illegal alien despite multiple encounters with law enforcement and violating bail and probation.Our Lone Star story of the day is sponsored by Allied Compliance Services providing the best service in DOT, business and personal drug and alcohol testing since 1995.Gina Ortiz Jones wins San Antonio mayor race. Another Leftist Democrat emerges from the Bexar Co. political machine ticking the woke boxes of homosexual, minority, woman, and likely many others.Listen on the radio, or station stream, at 5pm Central. Click for our radio and streaming affiliates.www.PrattonTexas.com
On this episode, Donna sat down with write-in candidate Rogelio Landin to discuss his vision for Detroit's future. This episode is the seventh in a series of interviews with candidates in the race to become Detroit's 76th mayor.Rogelio Landin is a longtime community activist. He has a long history of being involved in Latino civil rights groups in Southwest Detroit. He is currently president of the state chapter of United Latin American citizens (LULAC). He's a contributing political columnist for El Central newspaper in Detroit and in recent years has been involved in five neighborhood advisory committees.He believes in part that by annexing 28 “distressed” communities in Macomb, Oakland, and Wayne counties, Detroit will once again have the clout to solve many of the city's woes. To learn more about Rogelio Landin and his vision for Detroit, click here.Support the showFollow us on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter.
The Nebraska chapter of the nation's oldest Latino advocacy group is closing its doors for now.
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sense of both fascination and concern grips me. This initiative, spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, is more than just a policy blueprint; it is a comprehensive plan to reshape the very fabric of American governance. At its core, Project 2025 aims to establish an effective conservative administration, but its implications extend far beyond partisan lines, touching on fundamental aspects of democracy, civil rights, and social welfare.The project is built on four pillars, each designed to centralize power, streamline government operations, and implement a conservative agenda across various federal agencies. One of the key strategies involves a significant overhaul of the executive branch, with proposals to weaken the bureaucratic apparatus and enhance the president's authority. This vision is encapsulated in the words of the project's proponents, who see it as a way to "build an authoritarian presidency"[5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its incremental approach. Rather than attempting sweeping changes all at once, the project's architects are testing their policies in state legislatures and courts. For instance, in states like Texas and Washington, we are seeing the gradual implementation of policies that centralize power away from individuals and towards the executive branch. These small, strategic moves are "stress-testing their viability and setting the stage for easier implementation nationwide"[4].A concrete example of this incremental strategy can be seen in the realm of healthcare. In states where abortion is not considered healthcare, women facing severe health risks during pregnancy may be denied life-saving care. This is not just a theoretical concern; it is a reality that is already unfolding. As Paulina Perez, a Policy and Legislation Fellow at LULAC, notes, "Conditions such as [severe health risks] may be denied the life-saving care they need," highlighting the immediate and dire consequences of these policies[4].The project also includes a wide array of executive action proposals that are being tracked across 20 federal agencies. These proposals range from rollbacks of environmental and climate policies to changes in public safety regulations. For example, the Center for Progressive Reform is monitoring how the Trump administration is implementing these actions, which they warn will have "devastating consequences for workers, the environment, public health, and the rights of millions of Americans"[5].The potential implications of Project 2025 are far-reaching and multifaceted. By seeking to centralize power in the executive branch, the project undermines civil rights and erodes essential social programs. This radical agenda prioritizes control over fairness, enforcement over welfare, and exclusion over inclusion. As the ACLU points out, "Project 2025 represents a substantial threat not only to individual rights but also to the very foundation of American democracy"[4].One of the most alarming aspects of this project is its impact on marginalized communities. Policies suggested in Project 2025 are likely to further compromise the rights of women, immigrants, and low-income families. For instance, the administration's decision to house immigrants in "tent complexes" in El Paso, Texas, is a stark example of how these policies can manifest on the ground[2].As I reflect on the latest developments and key policy proposals of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a distant vision but a tangible reality that is already shaping American governance. The incremental steps being taken in states and federal agencies are setting the stage for a future where the balance of power is significantly skewed towards the executive branch.Looking ahead, the next few years will be crucial in determining the full extent of Project 2025's impact. As the Center for Progressive Reform continues to track the implementation of these executive actions, we will see whether these proposals will indeed have the devastating consequences predicted by critics. The upcoming milestones and decision points will be pivotal in shaping the future of American democracy and the rights of its citizens.In this journey through the complexities of Project 2025, one thing is clear: this is not just a policy debate but a fundamental struggle over the values and principles that underpin American society. As we move forward, it is imperative to remain vigilant and engaged, ensuring that the democratic foundations of our nation are not eroded by the very policies intended to reshape it.
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive and contentious plan crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer scope and ambition of this conservative blueprint. This 900-page document, often described as a guidebook for transforming American governance, has sparked intense debate and concern across the political spectrum.At its core, Project 2025 is a vision for a radically different federal government, one that amplifies presidential power and reshapes the bureaucracy to align with conservative ideals. The project is the culmination of efforts by over 400 scholars and policy experts, aiming to provide a detailed policy agenda for a potential incoming Republican administration, particularly one led by Donald Trump, despite his public denials of involvement[2][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to centralize power within the executive branch. The plan suggests reissuing Trump's Schedule F executive order, which would allow the president to dismiss federal employees deemed 'non-performing' or disloyal. This measure targets the vast federal workforce of approximately 3.5 million individuals, the majority of whom are career civil servants essential for maintaining government continuity and integrity. As Dr. Ray Serrano, Director of Research and Policy at LULAC, notes, "This proposal targets the vast federal workforce... enabling far-right extremists to discharge federal employees considered insufficiently loyal"[1].The project also outlines sweeping reforms to federal agencies, including the elimination of the Department of Education and significant cuts to other agencies. For instance, Project 2025 proposes transferring the custody of immigrant children from Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), prioritizing enforcement over welfare. This change would likely expand detention centers and worsen the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children[1].On the issue of immigration, Project 2025 advocates for mass deportations of millions of undocumented immigrants and the completion of the border wall. These policies align closely with Trump's past rhetoric, although the project goes further in some areas, such as its stance on abortion. While Trump has expressed support for certain abortion restrictions, Project 2025's proposals are more extreme, aiming to limit access to abortion medication through legal challenges and regulatory changes. A recent court case in Texas, where a judge ruled in favor of revoking the FDA's approval of mifepristone, serves as a precursor to these broader restrictions[1][2].The project's impact on reproductive rights is just one facet of its broader assault on civil liberties. It also proposes to ban biological males from competing in women's sports and to de-weaponize the federal government by increasing accountability and oversight of agencies like the FBI and DOJ. These measures are part of a larger effort to "return the government to the people" and dismantle what the project's proponents call the "Deep State"[5].In the realm of media and technology, Project 2025's plans are equally transformative. The project recommends increasing agency accountability while decreasing wasteful spending at the FCC, promoting national security, and expanding connectivity through the support of 5G and satellite technologies. It also suggests that Big Tech companies should contribute to the Universal Service Fund, currently funded through telephone bills. These proposals reflect a broader aim to reshape the regulatory landscape in favor of conservative priorities[4].Critics of Project 2025 argue that its recommendations are not just radical but also risky, potentially endangering democratic institutions and concentrating presidential power to an unprecedented degree. As Roxana Muenster from the Brookings Institution notes, "Project 2025's policy recommendations should be cause for concern: Congress enacted the 1967 Public Broadcasting Act because they believed an educated and informed citizenry was in the public, local, and national interest"[4].The Heritage Foundation and its allies, however, see Project 2025 as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as the failures of the current system. Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, has warned of a "second American Revolution" that could remain bloodless if the left allows it to be, underscoring the project's urgency and the stakes involved[2].As the 2025 presidential transition looms, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals will depend on the outcome of the election. The Center for Progressive Reform and other watchdog groups are closely tracking the project's executive action proposals across 20 federal agencies, ready to highlight the devastating consequences these actions could have for workers, the environment, public health, and the rights of millions of Americans[3].In the coming months, as the political landscape continues to evolve, Project 2025 will remain a focal point of debate and contention. Whether its vision for a centralized, conservative government becomes reality or remains a blueprint for a hypothetical future, one thing is clear: the stakes are high, and the implications for American governance are profound. As we move forward, it will be crucial to monitor the project's progress and its potential to reshape the very fabric of American democracy.
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive policy blueprint crafted by over 400 conservative scholars and experts, I am struck by the sheer scope and ambition of this initiative. Spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, a think tank that has significantly influenced conservative administrations since the 1980s, Project 2025 is more than just a policy agenda; it is a vision for a fundamentally transformed America.At its core, Project 2025 is a 920-page manifesto that outlines a radical policy vision for a future conservative administration. The project is built on four pillars: a detailed policy agenda, a personnel database of loyal conservatives, a private online educational tool to train these individuals, and an unpublished 180-day playbook for transition plans in the first six months of a new administration[3][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to centralize power in the executive branch, significantly eroding the system of checks and balances that has been a cornerstone of American democracy. The plan aims to increase the president's authority over every aspect of the federal government, allowing for the dismissal of federal employees deemed 'non-performing' or insufficiently loyal. This is exemplified by the reissuance of Trump's Schedule F executive order, which would permit the firing of career civil servants, a move that could disrupt the continuity and integrity of government operations[1][4].The implications of such a shift are profound. As Dr. Ray Serrano, Director of Research and Policy at LULAC, notes, "Project 2025 represents a substantial threat not only to individual rights but also to the very foundation of American democracy. By seeking to centralize power in the executive branch, undermine civil rights, and erode essential social programs, this radical agenda prioritizes control over fairness, enforcement over welfare, and exclusion over inclusion."[1]In the realm of reproductive rights, Project 2025 proposes sweeping changes that could drastically limit access to abortion and contraception. For instance, the plan includes a national abortion ban and restrictions on access to contraception. These policies are being tested incrementally, as seen in the recent legal challenges to the FDA's approval of mifepristone, an abortion medication. Although the Supreme Court dismissed the case on procedural grounds, it sets a precedent for future legal strategies aimed at restricting reproductive rights[1].The project also targets immigration policies, advocating for the transfer of custody of immigrant children from Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). This move would prioritize enforcement over welfare, potentially expanding detention centers and worsening the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children. Additionally, the proposal includes the repeal of parts of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), facilitating large-scale detention center use across the country[1].In the areas of media and technology, Project 2025's plans are equally daunting. The blueprint suggests weakening the reach and effectiveness of independent media by allowing the president to manipulate the FCC and launch antitrust investigations into media companies that criticize the administration. This could result in the revocation of broadcast licenses for major networks, depriving Americans of vital information about government activities. As Roxana Muenster from Brookings notes, "Project 2025's policy recommendations should be cause for concern: Congress enacted the 1967 Public Broadcasting Act because they believed an educated and informed citizenry was in the public, local, and national interest."[2]The project's economic and educational policies are also far-reaching. It proposes cutting the growth of government spending to reduce inflation, unleashing American energy production to lower energy prices, and moving control and funding of education from federal bureaucrats to parents and state and local governments. Additionally, it suggests banning biological males from competing in women's sports, a policy that reflects the project's broader stance on social issues[3].Critics argue that these policies are not just radical but also risky, endangering democratic institutions and civil liberties. The Center for American Progress warns that Project 2025 "would eliminate fundamental personal freedoms while cutting the take-home pay of millions of Americans," and "make it even harder for the American people to have a say in their government or oppose policies they disagree with."[4]As I reflect on the scope of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a policy blueprint but a roadmap for a significant transformation of American governance. The project's authors and supporters see it as a way to "take down the Deep State and return the government to the people," but critics view it as an authoritarian guide that could dismantle the republic and strip away fundamental rights and freedoms[3][4].Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's policies will likely be a contentious and highly visible process. With the 2025 presidential transition looming, the next few months will be crucial in determining whether this radical agenda gains traction. As the country navigates these uncharted waters, it is imperative for Americans to be aware of the potential implications of Project 2025 and to engage in the democratic process to ensure that the principles of fairness, inclusion, and democratic resilience are upheld. The future of American democracy hangs in the balance, and the choices made now will shape the nation for generations to come.
The American Democracy Minute Radio Report & Podcast for April 11, 2025Pro-Voter Groups and 19 States Challenge Trump Executive Order on Voting Rules as Unconstitutional and Likely to Disenfranchise MillionsNineteen states and several pro-voter groups filed suit against a March 25th executive order by President Donald Trump. The order appears to override Congressional and state jurisdiction granted by the U.S. Constitution, and its noncitizen voting restrictions could actually disenfranchise millions of eligible Americans.Some podcasting platforms strip out our links. To read our resources and see the whole script of today's report, please go to our website at https://AmericanDemocracyMinute.orgToday's LinksArticles & Resources:The White House - Executive Order: PRESERVING AND PROTECTING THE INTEGRITY OF AMERICAN ELECTIONSNPR - 19 states sue over Trump's voting executive order, arguing it's unconstitutional PBS - Election watchdog groups sue Trump administration over executive order, calling it unconstitutional Campaign Legal Center - CLC Sues to Block Trump Administration's Illegal Election OverreachCampaign Legal Center - Complaint in U.S. District Court for DC Against Trump Executive Order U.S. District Court for MA, via State of NY - Complaint by 19 States Against Trump Executive OrderGroups Taking Action:Campaign Legal Center, State Democracy Defenders Fund, LULAC, Arizona Students' Association, Secure Families InitiativePlease follow us on Facebook and Bluesky Social, and SHARE! Find all of our reports at AmericanDemocracyMinute.orgWant ADM sent to your email? Sign up here!Are you a radio station? Find our broadcast files at Pacifica Radio Network's Audioport and PRX#Democracy #DemocracyNews #DonaldTrump #ExecutiveOrders #Unconstitutional #Disenfranchisement
As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive and contentious initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, I couldn't help but feel a sense of unease about the potential future of American governance. This project, often described as a blueprint for a conservative revolution, is more than just a policy guide; it's a roadmap for a radical overhaul of the federal government, crafted by over 400 scholars and backed by more than 100 conservative groups.At its core, Project 2025 is designed to equip the next Republican president with a detailed policy agenda, a database of vetted personnel, training programs for potential administration members, and a playbook of actions to be implemented within the first 180 days in office. The project's leadership, which includes former Trump administration officials like Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, has drawn significant attention due to its ties to the Trump administration, despite Trump's public disavowal of the initiative[2][3].One of the most alarming aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to centralize power within the executive branch, potentially eroding the system of checks and balances that underpins American democracy. For instance, the project suggests reissuing Trump's Schedule F executive order, which would allow the president to dismiss federal employees deemed 'non-performing' or insufficiently loyal. This measure targets the vast federal workforce of approximately 3.5 million individuals, the majority of whom are career civil servants essential for maintaining government continuity and integrity[1].The implications of such a move are far-reaching. As Dr. Ray Serrano, Director of Research and Policy at LULAC, notes, "Project 2025 represents a substantial threat not only to individual rights but also to the very foundation of American democracy. By seeking to centralize power in the executive branch, undermine civil rights, and erode essential social programs, this radical agenda prioritizes control over fairness, enforcement over welfare, and exclusion over inclusion[1]."Another critical area where Project 2025 proposes significant changes is in the handling of immigrant children. The project advocates for transferring custody of these children from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a move that would prioritize enforcement over child welfare. This shift could lead to the expansion of detention centers and worsen the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children[1].The project also delves into reproductive rights, suggesting strategies to limit access to abortion. For example, a recent legal case in Texas, where a judge ruled to revoke the FDA's approval of mifepristone, serves as a precedent for how Project 2025's goals could be realized through similar legal maneuvers. Although the Supreme Court dismissed the case on procedural grounds, it highlights the potential for future restrictions on reproductive rights through targeted legal challenges[1].In addition to these policy proposals, Project 2025 aims to reshape various federal agencies and their functions. For instance, it recommends reforming FEMA's emergency spending to shift the majority of preparedness and response costs from the federal government to states and localities. This change is justified by the argument that FEMA is "overtasked, overcompensates for the lack of state and local preparedness and response, and is regularly in deep debt[3]."The project also targets diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices within the federal government. Trump, aligning with Project 2025's policy book, has signed an executive order ending all DEI programs, claiming they can violate federal civil rights laws and exclude Americans based on their race or sex. The project calls for the deletion of terms like DEI, abortion, and gender equality from federal rules, regulations, and legislation[3].The economic and social impacts of these proposals are profound. According to Democracy Forward, if these plans are enacted, 4.3 million people could lose overtime protections, 40 million people could see their food assistance reduced, and 220,000 American jobs could be lost. The project's authors aim to achieve these changes through executive branch actions, bypassing the need for congressional approval, which critics argue is an anti-democratic approach[5].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a policy blueprint but a vision for a fundamentally different America. Kevin Roberts, President of the Heritage Foundation, has described this effort as part of a "second American Revolution," one that could remain bloodless only if the left allows it to be[2].The upcoming months will be crucial as the country approaches the 2025 presidential term. The implementation of Project 2025's proposals will depend on the political landscape and the willingness of the next administration to adopt these radical changes. As Paul Dans, the outgoing director of Project 2025, noted, the readiness of the conservative movement and the alignment of Trump's actions with the project's goals are "testaments to the initiative's efforts[3]."In conclusion, Project 2025 is a stark reminder of the ongoing battle for the soul of American governance. As the nation navigates these proposed reforms, it is imperative to understand the potential implications and to engage in a robust public discourse about the future we want to build. The stakes are high, and the choices made in the coming years will shape the trajectory of American democracy for generations to come.
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive policy vision crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer scope and ambition of this initiative. This 900-page blueprint, designed for a potential conservative administration, outlines a radical transformation of American governance, touching on every facet of federal policy from reproductive rights and immigration to media regulation and the structure of the executive branch.At its core, Project 2025 is more than just a policy guide; it is a roadmap for a fundamental shift in the balance of power within the U.S. government. One of the most striking aspects is its proposal to significantly enhance the authority of the executive branch, potentially eroding the system of checks and balances that has been a cornerstone of American democracy. For instance, the plan suggests reissuing Trump's Schedule F executive order, which would allow the president to dismiss federal employees deemed 'non-performing' or insufficiently loyal. This measure targets the vast federal workforce of approximately 3.5 million employees, most of whom are career civil servants essential for the continuity and integrity of government operations[1][2][4].The implications of such a move are far-reaching. As Dr. Ray Serrano, Director of Research and Policy at LULAC, notes, "This proposal targets the vast federal workforce... The majority, considered career civil servants, play essential roles in maintaining the continuity and integrity of government operations." This centralization of power could lead to a destabilization of various sectors across the nation, exacerbating hardships for those reliant on federal support and disrupting essential government functions[1].In the realm of reproductive rights, Project 2025's proposals are equally alarming. The plan advocates for severe restrictions on abortion, including the revocation of FDA approvals for abortion medications like mifepristone. A recent legal case in Texas, where a judge ruled in favor of revoking the FDA's approval of mifepristone, serves as a precursor to the kind of legal strategies that could be employed to limit access to abortion. Although the case was ultimately dismissed by the Supreme Court on procedural grounds, it sets a precedent for future challenges to reproductive rights[1].The initiative also addresses immigration policy with a hardline approach, proposing the transfer of custody of immigrant children from Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). This shift would prioritize enforcement over welfare, potentially expanding detention centers and worsening the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children. Additionally, the plan suggests repealing parts of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), facilitating large-scale detention center use across the country[1].In the areas of media and technology, Project 2025's recommendations are no less radical. The plan calls for significant reforms to media ownership regulations, advocating for increased transparency in adversary ownership and the dismantling of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices within federal agencies. President Trump has already begun implementing some of these policies, signing an executive order to end all DEI programs within the federal government, citing concerns that these policies violate federal civil rights laws[2][3][4].The proposal also targets public broadcasting, with Trump calling for the rescission of NPR funding, labeling it a "liberal disinformation machine." This move aligns with Project 2025's broader goal of reducing the independence of public service media, which has historically been protected by the 1967 Public Broadcasting Act. The authors of Project 2025 argue that public broadcasting should be more accountable to the government, undermining its independence and the high-quality, diverse programming it provides[2].Another critical aspect of Project 2025 is its approach to disaster response and federal aid. The plan suggests reforming FEMA emergency spending to shift the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities, rather than the federal government. This recommendation is based on the argument that FEMA is "overtasked" and "overcompensates for the lack of state and local preparedness and response." Trump has already taken steps in this direction, establishing a review council to advise on FEMA's capabilities and suggesting that disaster response could be managed more effectively by states[3].As I navigate through the extensive policy agenda of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a collection of policy recommendations but a cohesive vision for a fundamentally different America. Critics argue that these proposals could endanger democratic institutions, dismantle civil liberties, and concentrate presidential power in ways that are both radical and risky[2].Despite Trump's public distancing from Project 2025, many of his recent executive actions and policy initiatives align closely with the recommendations outlined in the plan. As Paul Dans, former director of Project 2025, noted, "They're home runs... They are in many cases more than we could have even dared hope for."[3]As the country moves forward, the implementation of Project 2025's policies will be a critical area of focus. The upcoming months will be pivotal in determining how many of these proposals become reality and what their impact will be on American governance. Will the incremental steps already being taken in states like Texas and the executive actions of the Trump administration pave the way for a broader transformation, or will they face significant resistance from civil rights groups, federal employees, and other stakeholders?One thing is certain: Project 2025 represents a significant threat not only to individual rights but also to the very foundation of American democracy. As we approach the next milestones in this journey, it is imperative that we remain vigilant and informed about the potential implications of these policies. The future of American governance hangs in the balance, and the choices made now will shape the country for generations to come.
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive policy blueprint crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer scope and ambition of this initiative. This 900-page document is more than just a policy guide; it is a roadmap for a radical transformation of American governance, one that has sparked intense debate and concern across the political spectrum.At its core, Project 2025 is designed to provide a conservative administration, particularly one led by Donald Trump, with a detailed agenda for its first term in office. Despite Trump's public denials of any involvement, the project's authors and contributors include several key figures from his previous administration, such as John McEntee and Jonathan Berry, which suggests a significant alignment with his policy goals[3][4].One of the most contentious aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to centralize power within the executive branch. This includes reissuing Trump's Schedule F executive order, which would allow the president to dismiss federal employees deemed 'non-performing' or insufficiently loyal. This measure targets the vast federal workforce of approximately 3.5 million employees, potentially disrupting the continuity and integrity of government operations. As Dr. Ray Serrano, Director of Research and Policy at LULAC, notes, "This proposal targets the vast federal workforce... play[ing] essential roles in maintaining the continuity and integrity of government operations"[1].The project also outlines significant changes to the handling of immigrant children. It proposes transferring custody from the Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), prioritizing enforcement over welfare. This shift would likely expand detention centers and worsen the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children. The plan further suggests repealing parts of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), facilitating large-scale detention center use across the country[1].In the realm of reproductive rights, Project 2025's agenda is particularly alarming. It advocates for stricter abortion restrictions, going even further than Trump's stated positions. A recent legal case in Texas, where a judge ruled in favor of revoking the FDA's approval of mifepristone, serves as a precursor to the kind of legal strategies that could be employed to limit access to abortion medication. This case, though ultimately dismissed by the Supreme Court on procedural grounds, sets a dangerous precedent for future challenges to reproductive rights[1].The project's impact on media and technology policies is equally profound. It calls for dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs within the federal government, arguing that these policies can violate federal civil rights laws. Trump has already taken steps in this direction, signing an executive order to end all DEI programs within the federal government. The project also recommends increasing agency accountability and reducing wasteful spending at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), while promoting national security and economic prosperity through initiatives like expanding 5G connectivity and requiring Big Tech to contribute to the Universal Service Fund[2][4].Project 2025 also proposes sweeping reforms to the federal bureaucracy, aiming to bring independent agencies under White House control and reduce the role of the "Administrative State." This includes reforming FEMA emergency spending to shift the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities, a move that could significantly alter disaster response mechanisms in the country. Trump has already begun implementing some of these changes, establishing a review council to advise on FEMA's capabilities and suggesting that disaster response could be managed more effectively by states rather than the federal government[4].The reaction to Project 2025 has been intense, with Democrats seizing on it as a rallying point against a potential second Trump term. The Biden campaign has launched ads and created a website tying Trump to the project, highlighting its radical proposals as a threat to American democracy. Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, has further fueled the controversy by warning of potential political violence, stating that the country is in the midst of a "second American Revolution" that will remain bloodless only if the left allows it to be[3].As I reflect on the implications of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative represents a substantial threat to the foundational principles of American governance. By seeking to centralize power, undermine civil rights, and erode essential social programs, the project prioritizes control over fairness, enforcement over welfare, and exclusion over inclusion. The incremental steps already being taken in states like Texas and Washington foreshadow a future where the rights of marginalized groups are further compromised.Looking ahead, the next few months will be crucial as the country approaches key decision points. The implementation of Project 2025's policies will depend on the political will of the administration and the resilience of the legislative and judicial systems. As the debate around this project continues to unfold, one thing is certain: the future of American governance hangs in the balance, and the choices made now will have far-reaching consequences for generations to come.
The American Democracy Minute Radio Report & Podcast for March 21, 2025Washington State 2022 Audit of Rejected Mail Ballots Offers Valuable Insights for States Using Signature VerificationA Washington State audit of rejected 2020 mail-in ballots offers insight on whose ballots are more likely to be rejected, and recommends actions to reduce that number - over 37,000 in 2024. Some podcasting platforms strip out our links. To read our resources and see the whole script of today's report, please go to our website at https://AmericanDemocracyMinute.orgToday's LinksArticles & Resources:Washington Secretary of State - 2024 Annual Report of Washington State Elections Office of the Washington State Auditor - (2022) Summary - Evaluating Washington's Ballot Rejection RatesOffice of the Washington State Auditor - (2022) Audit - Evaluating Washington's Ballot Rejection Rates Brennan Center for Justice - (2020) Mail Ballot Security Features: A PrimerCivic Design - Voting by Mail: The Impact of Signature Identity Verification for Voters with DisabilitiesNational Conference of State Legislatures - How States Verify Voted Absentee/Mail BallotsGroups Taking Action:ACLU, LULAC, Vet Voice Foundation, The Washington Bus, El Centro de la RazaRegister or Check Your Voter Registration:U.S. Election Assistance Commission – Register And Vote in Your StatePlease follow us on Facebook and Bluesky Social, and SHARE! Find all of our reports at AmericanDemocracyMinute.orgWant ADM sent to your email? Sign up here!Are you a radio station? Find our broadcast files at Pacifica Radio Network's Audioport and PRX#Democracy #DemocracyNews #SignatureVerification #Disenfranchisement #WashingtonState #BallotRejection
We continue our Best of 2024 episodes with an episode from the Democracy Decoded podcast, with host Simone Leeper.In the end, the worst of everyone's election fears — political violence, overt foreign interference or a razor-thin margin between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump leading to a hotly contested legal battle — did not come to pass. Instead, Donald Trump won a plurality of votes for president, and did so decisively. On January 20, 2025, he will once again become the country's most powerful executive.His victory raises weighty questions for the experts at Campaign Legal Center. Trump ran explicitly on a platform of behaving like an authoritarian, promising to fire U.S. civil servants, threatening opponents with jail, and brandishing military force against would-be dissenters. As his return to power approaches, we grapple with a paradoxical election, in which voters declared their preference for the candidate who repeatedly threatened the American system as we know it.Joining Simone in this episode are Trevor Potter, CLC's president and founder, and CLC senior vice presidents Paul M. Smith and Bruce Spiva. They offer their forecasts for the uncertain years ahead and explain what this election did (and did not) signify about the health of American democracy.Read the full transcriptHost and Guests:Simone Leeper litigates a wide range of redistricting-related cases at CLC, challenging gerrymanders and advocating for election systems that guarantee all voters an equal opportunity to influence our democracy. Prior to arriving at CLC, Simone was a law clerk in the office of Senator Ed Markey and at the Library of Congress, Office of General Counsel. She received her J.D. cum laude from Georgetown University Law Center in 2019 and a bachelor's degree in political science from Columbia University in 2016.Trevor Potter is President at Campaign Legal Center. A Republican former Chairman of the Federal Election Commission (FEC), Trevor was general counsel to John McCain's 2000 and 2008 presidential campaigns and an adviser to the drafters of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law. To many, he is perhaps best known for his recurring appearances on The Colbert Report as the lawyer for Stephen Colbert's super PAC, Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow, during the 2012 election, a program that won a Peabody Award for excellence in reporting on money in politics.The American Bar Association Journal has described Trevor as “hands-down one of the top lawyers in the country on the delicate intersection of politics, law and money.” Trevor is the author of several books and manuals on lobbying regulation and disclosure, campaign finance and federal election law. He has provided testimony and written statements to Congress on federal election proposals, campaign finance regulation and, recently, the effects of the January 6th attack on our democracy. He has also taught campaign finance law at the University of Virginia School of Law and Oxford University, and he has appeared widely in national broadcast and print media. During the 2020 election season, Trevor was named to the cross-partisan National Task Force on Election Crises.Bruce Spiva is Senior Vice President at Campaign Legal Center. He is an attorney and community leader who has spent his over 30-year career fighting for civil rights and civil liberties, voting rights, consumer protection, and antitrust enforcement.Over the past three decades, he has tried cases and argued appeals in courtrooms across the country, including arguing against vote suppression in the United States Supreme Court in 2021. In 2022, in his first run for public office, Bruce mounted a competitive run in the primary election for Washington, D.C. Attorney General.In addition to founding his own law firm where he practiced for eleven years, Bruce has held several leadership and management positions as a partner at two national law firms. Most recently, Bruce served as the Managing Partner of the D.C. Office and on the firm-wide Executive Committee of Perkins Coie LLP, where he also had an active election law practice. He first-chaired twelve voting rights and redistricting trials across the country, and argued numerous voting rights appeals in U.S. circuit courts and state supreme courts during his tenure at Perkins.Paul M. Smith is Senior Vice President at Campaign Legal Center. He works directly with CLC's talented team of litigators to protect and advance American democracy through innovative litigation strategies.Paul has four decades of experience litigating a wide range of cases. He has argued before the U.S. Supreme Court 21 times and secured numerous victories, including in the important cases advancing civil liberties and civil rights, Lawrence v. Texas, the landmark gay rights case, and Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass'n, which established First Amendment rights of those who produce and sell video games.In addition, Paul has argued several voting rights cases at the Supreme Court, including Vieth v. Jubelirer and Gill v. Whitford, involving partisan gerrymandering, LULAC v. Perry, involving the legality of Texas's mid-decade redrawing of congressional districts and Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, involving the constitutionality of a voter identification law. He served as counsel for amici in several key campaign finance merits cases including McCutcheon v. FEC (on behalf of Democratic House members), Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett (on behalf of the Committee for Economic Development) and Citizens United v. FEC (on behalf of the Committee for Economic Development).Additional InformationDemocracy Decoded PodcastMore shows from The Democracy Group
In the end, the worst of everyone's election fears —political violence, overt foreign interference or a razor-thin margin between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump leading to a hotly contested legal battle — did not come to pass. Instead, Donald Trump won a plurality of votes for president, and did so decisively. On January 20, 2025, he will once again become the country's most powerful executive.His victory raises weighty questions for the experts at Campaign Legal Center. Trump ran explicitly on a platform of behaving like an authoritarian, promising to fire U.S. civil servants, threatening opponents with jail, and brandishing military force against would-be dissenters. As his return to power approaches, we grapple with a paradoxical election, in which voters declared their preference for the candidate who repeatedly threatened the American system as we know it.Joining Simone in this episode are Trevor Potter, CLC's president and founder, and CLC senior vice presidents Paul M. Smith and Bruce Spiva. They offer their forecasts for the uncertain years ahead and explain what this election did (and did not) signify about the health of American democracy. Host and Guests:Simone Leeper litigates a wide range of redistricting-related cases at CLC, challenging gerrymanders and advocating for election systems that guarantee all voters an equal opportunity to influence our democracy. Prior to arriving at CLC, Simone was a law clerk in the office of Senator Ed Markey and at the Library of Congress, Office of General Counsel. She received her J.D. cum laude from Georgetown University Law Center in 2019 and a bachelor's degree in political science from Columbia University in 2016.Trevor Potter is President at Campaign Legal Center. A Republican former Chairman of the Federal Election Commission (FEC), Trevor was general counsel to John McCain's 2000 and 2008 presidential campaigns and an adviser to the drafters of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law. To many, he is perhaps best known for his recurring appearances on The Colbert Report as the lawyer for Stephen Colbert's super PAC, Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow, during the 2012 election, a program that won a Peabody Award for excellence in reporting on money in politics. The American Bar Association Journal has described Trevor as “hands-down one of the top lawyers in the country on the delicate intersection of politics, law and money.” He has provided testimony and written statements to Congress on federal election proposals, campaign finance regulation and, recently, the effects of the January 6th attack on our democracy. During the 2020 election season, Trevor was named to the cross-partisan National Task Force on Election Crises.Bruce Spiva is Senior Vice President at Campaign Legal Center. He is an attorney and community leader who has spent his over 30-year career fighting for civil rights and civil liberties, voting rights, consumer protection, and antitrust enforcement.Over the past three decades, he has tried cases and argued appeals in courtrooms across the country, including arguing against vote suppression in the United States Supreme Court in 2021. In 2022, in his first run for public office, Bruce mounted a competitive run in the primary election for Washington, D.C. Attorney General. In addition to founding his own law firm where he practiced for eleven years, Bruce has held several leadership and management positions as a partner at two national law firms. Most recently, Bruce served as the Managing Partner of the D.C. Office and on the firm-wide Executive Committee of Perkins Coie LLP, where he also had an active election law practice. He first-chaired twelve voting rights and redistricting trials across the country, and argued numerous voting rights appeals in U.S. circuit courts and state supreme courts during his tenure at Perkins. Paul M. Smith is Senior Vice President at Campaign Legal Center. He works directly with CLC's talented team of litigators to protect and advance American democracy through innovative litigation strategies.Paul has four decades of experience litigating a wide range of cases. He has argued before the U.S. Supreme Court 21 times and secured numerous victories, including in the important cases advancing civil liberties and civil rights, Lawrence v. Texas, the landmark gay rights case, and Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass'n, which established First Amendment rights of those who produce and sell video games. In addition, Paul has argued several voting rights cases at the Supreme Court, including Vieth v. Jubelirer and Gill v. Whitford, involving partisan gerrymandering, LULAC v. Perry, involving the legality of Texas's mid-decade redrawing of congressional districts and Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, involving the constitutionality of a voter identification law. He served as counsel for amici in several key campaign finance merits cases including McCutcheon v. FEC (on behalf of Democratic House members), Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett (on behalf of the Committee for Economic Development) and Citizens United v. FEC (on behalf of the Committee for Economic Development).Links:www.campaignlegal.org/support-our-workAbout CLC:Democracy Decoded is a production of Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan nonprofit organization which advances democracy through law at the federal, state and local levels, fighting for every American's right to responsive government and a fair opportunity to participate in and affect the democratic process. Learn more about us.Democracy Decoded is part of The Democracy Group, a network of podcasts that examines what's broken in our democracy and how we can work together to fix it.
In this compelling episode of America's Heroes Group, U.S. Army Combat Veteran Danitza "Dee" James, President of Repatriate Our Patriots and member of LULAC's Military & Veterans Affairs Committee, shares her personal journey and passion for advocating for deported veterans. As a first-generation immigrant and Iraq War veteran, Dee sheds light on the injustices faced by veterans who have been deported after serving the United States. She explores the work of her organization, Repatriate Our Patriots, and her efforts to bring deported veterans home, prevent future deportations, and fight for the rights of all veterans. Dee also discusses the importance of civic engagement, community advocacy, and the critical role organizations like Common Defense and LULAC play in supporting veterans.
Les invito a conocer a Luz Elena Schemmel de Cincinnati, Ohio. Luz Elena es una economista de Puebla en México con una maestría en Administración Pública de la Universidad Estatal de Indiana. Luz Elena habla cómo trabajando en organizaciones de base en Cincinnati ha podido representar a las comunidades marginadas y ha apoyado a familias a tener acceso a programas extraescolares, alimentos saludables, servicios de salud y acceso a servicios bancarios. Como líder y miembro de la comunidad, Luz Elena comparte un consejo a las personas y a la comunidad latina de Ohio. Luz Elena recibió el premio Distinguished Hispanic Ohioan Award de la Comisión de Asuntos Latinos de Ohio en 2016, el premio Community Award for Community Outreach de LULAC en 2016 y el premio Everyday Heroes de la Comisión de Asuntos Latinos de Ohio en 2020. En 2023, recibió el premio Theodore E. Smith que reconoce las contribuciones de las personas que hicieron una contribución significativa en la educación y/o promoción de la importancia de la donación de órganos, ojos y tejidos para las comunidades de color. Luz Elena es miembro de la Junta de la Fundación de la Cámara de Comercio Hispana, la Junta de la Red de Justicia contra el Cáncer, la Junta de Gobernadores de Atención Primaria de la Ciudad de Cincinnati, la Junta de Casa de Paz y la Junta de Healthy Moms and Babes. Gracias a la Hispanic Chamber Cincinnati por apoyar a esta iniciativa.
Un reporte de la Liga de Ciudadanos Latinoamericanos Unidos (LULAC) revela que del 2020 al 2024 ha habido un incremento significativo de leyes estatales contra inmigrantes. El informe destaca que hay al menos 561 leyes o proyectos de ley en 45 estados, en lo que se califica como "una nueva ola de odio" contra inmigrantes. Los autores del análisis, el Dr. Ray Serrano, director de políticas e investigaciones de LULAC, y Marcos Montoya Andrade, investigador y miembro de políticas de LULAC, así como Alba Lucero Villa, Jefa de la Oficina de Desarrollo, ofrecen detalles del informe.
Stories we're following this morning at Progress Texas: Republican efforts to legitimize their false narrative over illegal voting by migrants - a problem that doesn't actually exist - now threatens a government shutdown on October 1: https://www.kxan.com/state-of-texas/house-facing-shutdown-deadline/ ...Republican-led states across the country have hit new records for "anti-immigrant" bills and resolutions, according to LULAC - with Texas leading the way: https://thehill.com/latino/4877006-anti-immigrant-laws-southern-border-texas-abbott-lulac/ ...Florida, meanwhile, leads the way in scaring Latino away from hospitals by asking about immigration status, but Texas will follow suit as of November 1: https://apnews.com/article/immigration-hospitals-florida-texas-desantis-abbott-21faed1d4d1b984ea3557d09f22dab9d ...Arlington Rep. Chris Turner calls this new hospital policy an "immigration stunt" on the part of Governor Abbott: https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/politics/inside-politics/texas-politics/state-representative-calls-texas-governors-executive-order-an-immigration-stunt/287-b9a2b926-8b0b-4077-8e24-e9b850a39592 Donald Trump's senior campaign advisor trolled Ted Cruz on social media this weekend over Cruz's tight race against Colin Allred - all while Trump has still not endorsed Cruz: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-adviser-chris-lacivita-ted-cruz-real-professionals_n_66e663c1e4b0e9e4c582c698 Democratic House Rep. Ana-Maria Rodriguez Ramos has thrown her hat in the ring for the House Speakership - possibly complicating things for current Speaker Dade Phelan, who will need big Democratic support to fend off his Republican challengers: https://www.texastribune.org/2024/09/15/ana-maria-ramos-texas-house-speaker-democrat/ Turns out Elon Musk largely bankrolled that expensive and shady smear campaign during the primary against Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza: https://www.kut.org/politics/2024-09-13/elon-musk-travis-county-district-attorney-jose-garza-2024-democratic-primary-election-wall-street-journal Tomorrow is National Voter Registration Day, and our friends at MOVE Texas are activated across the state: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/happy-hour-170-gearing-up-for-national-voter-registration/id1552998795?i=1000669634900 See Progress Texas' analysis of Project 2025, and what it will mean for Texas should it be enacted: https://progresstexas.org/blog/project-2025-vs-progress-2025 ...And a complete guide to Project 2025 from Media Matters: https://www.mediamatters.org/heritage-foundation/guide-project-2025-extreme-right-wing-agenda-next-republican-administration The deadline to register for the November election is October 7. Are you registered? Are you sure? ALL Texas voters should confirm their registration, right now: https://govotetexas.org/ ...Please pitch in to help fund our recent expansion of that important voting resource with Hindi, Mandarin Chinese and Vietnamese translation: https://progresstexas.org/blog/coming-soon-govotetexasorg-adds-commonly-spoken-languages-increase-ballot-access And, our September membership drive is underway! We want to add 50 new members to the Progress Texas family in the form of regular monthly supporters at the $10, $25 or $50 level - if you join the team before the end of September, we'll hook you up with an exclusive invitation to our Holiday Party this December! https://progresstexas.org/donate Thanks for listening! Find our web store and other ways to support our important work this election year at https://progresstexas.org.
Stories we're following this morning at Progress Texas: Progressives across America are elated at Vice President Kamala Harris' amazing performance last night in the debate against Donald Trump: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/sep/11/harris-trump-debate-takeaways ...The issues of abortion rights, immigration and climate change have particular relevance in Texas: https://www.houstonchronicle.com/politics/election/2024/article/trump-harris-debate-takeaways-19752782.php ...Watch the whole thing here: https://www.youtube.com/live/VgsC_aBquUE?si=dn-ssqMGASo5ySZR Childless cat lady Taylor Swift has endorsed VP Harris: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/taylor-swift-says-she-will-vote-kamala-harris-2024-09-11/ Lt. Governor Dan Patrick has released a new list of culture war priorities for the Senate in the upcoming Lege, none of which will improve the lives of Texans: https://www.texastribune.org/2024/09/10/dan-patrick-interim-charges-senate-texas-legislature/ LULAC is pressing federal authorities to intervene in Ken Paxton's ongoing voter suppression and intimidation campaign against Latino candidates and voters: https://www.khou.com/article/news/local/texas/lulac-raids-texas-attorney-general-investigation/285-58932b1a-12f1-4784-aa83-1a747f8f86b9 See Progress Texas' analysis of Project 2025, and what it will mean for Texas should it be enacted: https://progresstexas.org/blog/project-2025-vs-progress-2025 ...And a complete guide to Project 2025 from Media Matters: https://www.mediamatters.org/heritage-foundation/guide-project-2025-extreme-right-wing-agenda-next-republican-administration The deadline to register for the November election is October 7. Are you registered? Are you sure? ALL Texas voters should confirm their registration, right now: https://govotetexas.org/ Please pitch in to help fund our recent expansion of that important voting resource with Hindi, Mandarin Chinese and Vietnamese translation: https://progresstexas.org/blog/coming-soon-govotetexasorg-adds-commonly-spoken-languages-increase-ballot-access And, our September membership drive is underway! We want to add 50 new members to the Progress Texas family in the form of regular monthly supporters at the $10, $25 or $50 level - if you join the team before the end of September, we'll hook you up with an exclusive invitation to our Holiday Party this December! https://progresstexas.org/donate Thanks for listening! Find our web store and other ways to support our important work this election year at https://progresstexas.org.
En Texas, el gobernador republicano Greg Abbott indicó que más de un millón de votantes fueron eliminados del censo electoral por diversos motivos, fallecimiento, mudanza... El republicano también arremetió contra la existencia de supuestos votantes ilegales. Una retórica que fue criticada por la organización de defensa de los derechos civiles de latinos de Estados Unidos, LULAC, que defiende a los votantes latinos. A principios de agosto, nueve policías texanos allanaron la casa Lidia Martínez, una octogenaria texana, activista de la Liga de Ciudadanos Latinoamericanos Unidos (LULAC) que defiende los derechos civiles de la población latina en Estados Unidos. Fue un registro policial basado en sospechas de infracción a las leyes electorales, pero que la organización LULAC califica de maniobra para intimidar a los activistas latinos que ayudan a los mayores a votar por correo.A finales de agosto además, el gobernador de Texas, Greg Abbott, anunció la eliminación de cerca de un millón de personas del padrón electoral. Muchas de ellas habían fallecido o se habían mudado. Y solo 6.500 de ellas no poseían la ciudadanía. Un dato que el gobernador conservador utilizó para agitar el espectro de un supuesto voto ilegal de migrantes.“Básicamente, este es otro atento de parte del gobernador y del fiscal general de intimidar, para que la gente no salga a votar, especialmente la población latinoamericana”, explica a RFI el abogado texano Domingo Garcia, expresidente de LULAC.“Aquí en Texas ya somos la mayoría de la población por la primer vez desde 1840 y pienso que ellos andan asustados, tienen miedo del poder y el voto latino en Texas, que posiblemente los pueda sacar del poder. Estas tácticas del gobernador de decir que vamos a quitar un millón de votantes cuando la realidad es que en un 99% es gente que murió, no es nada. En cuanto a los otros, dicen que son ilegales cuando no hay ninguna prueba. No ha habido ningún caso de una persona indocumentada registrándose para para votar y que vote. Es absurdo si lo piensas, pero es la mentira que dice el gobernador Abbot y también el candidato Donald Trump”, asegura.Las organizaciones que defienden los derechos civiles acusan con frecuencia al gobernador de Texas y de otros Estados. De querer obstaculizar el voto de los latinos, de la población más pobre.“Lo han hecho difícil para votar. Por ejemplo, yo vivo en la ciudad de Dallas, Texas, pero si yo voy a San Antonio, Texas, o voy a Houston, Texas, y registro alguien a votar a mi tío, a mi tía, a mi abuelito, entonces cometo un crimen porque no vivo en Houston. Eso es absurdo, no pasa en California, no pasa en Nueva York. Si yo le ayudo a mi abuelita a llenar el Boleto porque no ve bien o no puede mover la mano, no puede firmar, yo cometo una felonía que lleva de 2 a 20 años en la cárcel por ayudar a un anciano a votar. Ese tipo de prácticas es lo que estamos viendo”, denuncia.Una reforma de Texas de 2021 llamada SB1 eliminó además el voto desde el automóvil, y redujo los horarios de apertura de los centros de votación.“Hace 4 años para atrás, dejaron las urnas abiertas 12 horas para la gente que trabaja, que podía ir a votar temprano o tarde. Ahora solamente hay ocho horas de votaciones, otra vez limitando a la gente obrera de ir a votar porque mucha gente no puede salir a votar y el Partido Republicano sabe eso y por eso pone esas restricciones”.La Ley SB1 que restringe el acceso al voto fue impugnada en un tribunal federal por organizaciones defensa de los derechos civiles y está pendiente de una resolución.
En Texas, el gobernador republicano Greg Abbott indicó que más de un millón de votantes fueron eliminados del censo electoral por diversos motivos, fallecimiento, mudanza... El republicano también arremetió contra la existencia de supuestos votantes ilegales. Una retórica que fue criticada por la organización de defensa de los derechos civiles de latinos de Estados Unidos, LULAC, que defiende a los votantes latinos. A principios de agosto, nueve policías texanos allanaron la casa Lidia Martínez, una octogenaria texana, activista de la Liga de Ciudadanos Latinoamericanos Unidos (LULAC) que defiende los derechos civiles de la población latina en Estados Unidos. Fue un registro policial basado en sospechas de infracción a las leyes electorales, pero que la organización LULAC califica de maniobra para intimidar a los activistas latinos que ayudan a los mayores a votar por correo.A finales de agosto además, el gobernador de Texas, Greg Abbott, anunció la eliminación de cerca de un millón de personas del padrón electoral. Muchas de ellas habían fallecido o se habían mudado. Y solo 6.500 de ellas no poseían la ciudadanía. Un dato que el gobernador conservador utilizó para agitar el espectro de un supuesto voto ilegal de migrantes.“Básicamente, este es otro atento de parte del gobernador y del fiscal general de intimidar, para que la gente no salga a votar, especialmente la población latinoamericana”, explica a RFI el abogado texano Domingo Garcia, expresidente de LULAC.“Aquí en Texas ya somos la mayoría de la población por la primer vez desde 1840 y pienso que ellos andan asustados, tienen miedo del poder y el voto latino en Texas, que posiblemente los pueda sacar del poder. Estas tácticas del gobernador de decir que vamos a quitar un millón de votantes cuando la realidad es que en un 99% es gente que murió, no es nada. En cuanto a los otros, dicen que son ilegales cuando no hay ninguna prueba. No ha habido ningún caso de una persona indocumentada registrándose para para votar y que vote. Es absurdo si lo piensas, pero es la mentira que dice el gobernador Abbot y también el candidato Donald Trump”, asegura.Las organizaciones que defienden los derechos civiles acusan con frecuencia al gobernador de Texas y de otros Estados. De querer obstaculizar el voto de los latinos, de la población más pobre.“Lo han hecho difícil para votar. Por ejemplo, yo vivo en la ciudad de Dallas, Texas, pero si yo voy a San Antonio, Texas, o voy a Houston, Texas, y registro alguien a votar a mi tío, a mi tía, a mi abuelito, entonces cometo un crimen porque no vivo en Houston. Eso es absurdo, no pasa en California, no pasa en Nueva York. Si yo le ayudo a mi abuelita a llenar el Boleto porque no ve bien o no puede mover la mano, no puede firmar, yo cometo una felonía que lleva de 2 a 20 años en la cárcel por ayudar a un anciano a votar. Ese tipo de prácticas es lo que estamos viendo”, denuncia.Una reforma de Texas de 2021 llamada SB1 eliminó además el voto desde el automóvil, y redujo los horarios de apertura de los centros de votación.“Hace 4 años para atrás, dejaron las urnas abiertas 12 horas para la gente que trabaja, que podía ir a votar temprano o tarde. Ahora solamente hay ocho horas de votaciones, otra vez limitando a la gente obrera de ir a votar porque mucha gente no puede salir a votar y el Partido Republicano sabe eso y por eso pone esas restricciones”.La Ley SB1 que restringe el acceso al voto fue impugnada en un tribunal federal por organizaciones defensa de los derechos civiles y está pendiente de una resolución.
The news of Texas covered today includes:Our Lone Star story of the day: Texas is leading the way in voter roll clean up and has removed over 1 million ineligible voters. But nevermind all of that, Democrats and their press propagandists keep with the narrative that there is little to no corruption related to voting.The problem for Texas Democrats is that for decades most of the allegations brought to law enforcement (as well as convictions) come from Democrats charging other Democrats with cheating.The latest episode has LULAC, the media, and Democrats claiming racism and all the other regular charges but once again, it is nothing of the sort. The Office of Attorney General is investigating ballot harvesting charges from a Democrat candidate and was requested to do so by the local district attorney. Also, the raids last week were only a step in an investigation that has gone on since 2022.You have to skip the top section of the story, as it's filled with agitprop for Dems, to get to the real meat of the story the media would rather bury: Warrants detail Ken Paxton's vote harvesting investigation.Our Lone Star story of the day is sponsored by Allied Compliance Services providing the best service in DOT, business and personal drug and alcohol testing since 1995.Texas Secretary of State Releases Election Audit Reports.Listen on the radio, or station stream, at 5pm Central. Click for our radio and streaming affiliates.www.PrattonTexas.com
Whew, we made it to Friday! And we have a lot to discuss with all of the big news from the week. Host Raheel Ramzanali is joined by Monica Flores Richart, education advocate and attorney, and Rafael Lemaitre, political analyst and communications expert, to break down what the recent raids, led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, on Latino Democrats mean for Houston voters. Plus, guess which school district now has what some call the most restrictive book ban in the state, and how a new statue in our area is breaking records! Stories we discussed on today's show: Not So Fast, Controversial 'Voter Outreach' Pulled At Commissioner's Court Texas removes 1 million people from voter rolls Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton raids Latino Democrats' homes, including those of LULAC members LULAC demands federal investigation into Texas AG election probes 87-year-old LULAC volunteer said AG Ken Paxton sent 9 officers to raid her home Fort Bend ISD approves library book policy criticized as 'most restrictive' in Texas A homegrown grid for Harris County is our path to energy independence | Opinion A teen left an anonymous cry for help on a Galveston lifeguard's car. Residents offered their support Sugar Land-area Hindu temple now home to third largest statue in the U.S. Massive Sugar Land statue sparks Houston celebrations as one church group demonstrates against it More than half of Houston ISD voters oppose $4.4 billion bond proposal, finds poll commissioned by teachers' union Latino Vote Store Learn more about the sponsors of this August 30th episode here: Downtown Houston+ Holocaust Museum Houston Looking for more Houston news? Then sign up for our morning newsletter Hey Houston Follow us on Instagram @CityCastHouston Don't have social media? Then leave us a voicemail or text us at +1 713-489-6972 with your thoughts! Have feedback or a show idea? Let us know! Interested in advertising with City Cast? Let's Talk! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss the Kamala Harris-Donald Trump debate and other campaign goings-on; the January 6th and classified documents cases brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith; and the national housing shortage with Conor Dougherty of The New York Times. Here are this week's chatters: Emily: Wayne Homes: The Great Debate: Front Porch vs. Back Porch; Mariah Timms for The Wall Street Journal: Lawsuits Fly Over Election Rules and Who Gets to Vote; Fin Gómez and Nidia Cavazos for CBS News: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton raids Latino Democrats' homes, including those of LULAC members; and Frederka Schouten and Tierney Sneed for CNN: Democrats sue to block new GOP-backed Georgia election certification rules John: Glenn Thrush for The New York Times: Would-Be Trump Assassin's Interest in Violence Went Back to 2019 David: Jonathan Shaw for Harvard Magazine: Mapping the Human Brain Listener chatter from Adam Webb in Chicago: Paul Collins in The Believer: Why Can't My Son Vote? For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, David, Emily, and John will talk about the Kamala Harris-Tim Walz interview. Bonus content this week will be available on Friday. In the latest Gabfest Reads, Emily talks with Joshua Leifer about his book, Tablets Shattered. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Cheyna Roth Research by Julie HuygenPublic.com+Public Investing Disclosure: Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank. See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss the Kamala Harris-Donald Trump debate and other campaign goings-on; the January 6th and classified documents cases brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith; and the national housing shortage with Conor Dougherty of The New York Times. Here are this week's chatters: Emily: Wayne Homes: The Great Debate: Front Porch vs. Back Porch; Mariah Timms for The Wall Street Journal: Lawsuits Fly Over Election Rules and Who Gets to Vote; Fin Gómez and Nidia Cavazos for CBS News: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton raids Latino Democrats' homes, including those of LULAC members; and Frederka Schouten and Tierney Sneed for CNN: Democrats sue to block new GOP-backed Georgia election certification rules John: Glenn Thrush for The New York Times: Would-Be Trump Assassin's Interest in Violence Went Back to 2019 David: Jonathan Shaw for Harvard Magazine: Mapping the Human Brain Listener chatter from Adam Webb in Chicago: Paul Collins in The Believer: Why Can't My Son Vote? For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, David, Emily, and John will talk about the Kamala Harris-Tim Walz interview. Bonus content this week will be available on Friday. In the latest Gabfest Reads, Emily talks with Joshua Leifer about his book, Tablets Shattered. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Cheyna Roth Research by Julie HuygenPublic.com+Public Investing Disclosure: Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank. See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss the Kamala Harris-Donald Trump debate and other campaign goings-on; the January 6th and classified documents cases brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith; and the national housing shortage with Conor Dougherty of The New York Times. Here are this week's chatters: Emily: Wayne Homes: The Great Debate: Front Porch vs. Back Porch; Mariah Timms for The Wall Street Journal: Lawsuits Fly Over Election Rules and Who Gets to Vote; Fin Gómez and Nidia Cavazos for CBS News: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton raids Latino Democrats' homes, including those of LULAC members; and Frederka Schouten and Tierney Sneed for CNN: Democrats sue to block new GOP-backed Georgia election certification rules John: Glenn Thrush for The New York Times: Would-Be Trump Assassin's Interest in Violence Went Back to 2019 David: Jonathan Shaw for Harvard Magazine: Mapping the Human Brain Listener chatter from Adam Webb in Chicago: Paul Collins in The Believer: Why Can't My Son Vote? For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, David, Emily, and John will talk about the Kamala Harris-Tim Walz interview. Bonus content this week will be available on Friday. In the latest Gabfest Reads, Emily talks with Joshua Leifer about his book, Tablets Shattered. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Cheyna Roth Research by Julie HuygenPublic.com+Public Investing Disclosure: Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank. See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss the Kamala Harris-Donald Trump debate and other campaign goings-on; the January 6th and classified documents cases brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith; and the national housing shortage with Conor Dougherty of The New York Times. Here are this week's chatters: Emily: Wayne Homes: The Great Debate: Front Porch vs. Back Porch; Mariah Timms for The Wall Street Journal: Lawsuits Fly Over Election Rules and Who Gets to Vote; Fin Gómez and Nidia Cavazos for CBS News: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton raids Latino Democrats' homes, including those of LULAC members; and Frederka Schouten and Tierney Sneed for CNN: Democrats sue to block new GOP-backed Georgia election certification rules John: Glenn Thrush for The New York Times: Would-Be Trump Assassin's Interest in Violence Went Back to 2019 David: Jonathan Shaw for Harvard Magazine: Mapping the Human Brain Listener chatter from Adam Webb in Chicago: Paul Collins in The Believer: Why Can't My Son Vote? For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, David, Emily, and John will talk about the Kamala Harris-Tim Walz interview. Bonus content this week will be available on Friday. In the latest Gabfest Reads, Emily talks with Joshua Leifer about his book, Tablets Shattered. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Cheyna Roth Research by Julie HuygenPublic.com+Public Investing Disclosure: Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank. See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
SERIES 3 EPISODE 18: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:44) SPECIAL COMMENT: Trump has doubled down on his defiling of Arlington National Cemetery. Title 32, Part 553, Subpart C: Memorial Services and Ceremonies at Army National Military Ceremonies will not include partisan political activities. Trump's team exploited a memorial service at Arlington on Monday, broke the law by privately photographing and filming it, physically assaulted Arlington National Cemetery staff who asked him to stop, he gave a thumbs up and smiled idiotically while literally standing on the graves of dead U-S military heroes, and now they have turned it into an online campaign advertisement – by definition, a partisan political activity. This could've been trivial. It could've been “there was a miscommunication.” Not even an apology – like anybody in the Trump campaign were human enough, or honest enough, or RESPECTFUL OF OUR WAR DEAD ENOUGH to apologize. Just “misunderstanding.” No. They blamed the Cemetery staffer, they blamed the media, they blamed Vice President Harris for not being there to commemorate the sad anniversary of deaths in Afghanistan – the commemoration Trump has illegally turned into a campaign AD – the commemoration Trump skipped last year and the year before. Because to Trump, and to this robot JV Vance, those buried AT Arlington are just another product, just another SELL, just another gimmick, just another BRAND NAME. And they got the brand name wrong. Trump thug Chris LaCivita wrote that Arlington "most hollowed" ground. Corrupted news outlets like The New York Times covered for it by claiming he wrote "hallowed." Hallowed, is Arlington. Hollowed, is Trump's brain. TRUMP IS NOW MORE DANGEROUS THAN EVER. Another new round of polls underscores: he's losing, and dragging down the down-ballot MAGA GOP: a total swing in four states of 25 points to Harris. She leads by one in Arizona, two in Georgia and Nevada, and has cut it to one in North Carolina. The Fox poll in Arizona scores the Senate as Ruben Gallego 56, Kari Lake 41. How is Kari lake going to be able to afford to buy 900 more camera filters THIS late in the race? The Fox poll in North Carolina scores the Governor's race as Josh Stein 54 Mark Robinson 43. The Fox poll in Nevada scores the Senate race as Jacky Rosen 55 Sam Brown 41. TO LEAVEN THE MOOD A LITTLE: A comedian named Dan Wilbur has done a spot-on impression of JD Vance trying to be a human for 9 minutes at a donut shop. It's better if you go watch it. It's not bad if you listen to it here. B-Block (25:31) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: Texas political hitman Ken Paxton sends nine armed troops to 87-year old Democratic woman's home because she registered voters. CNN/Gary Tuchman "Uncommitted Voter" scandal worsens: the guy is now selling t-shirts. And asked about phones for kids during emergencies at school Jesse The Idiot Watters thinks that means HIS emergency when he has to call them in math class. C-Block (36:00) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL: I was talking about Bill Clinton yesterday and I think it's time to tell the entire story of how NBC tried to blackmail me into NOT quitting the Clinton-Lewinsky MSNBC show in 1998 because it made them too much money. An emissary from then NBC News President Andy Lack threatened to sue me and get me blacklisted from television AND make sure my parents wound up homeless.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Thursday, August 29th, 2024Today, LULAC is calling for a federal investigation after Ken Paxton raids their homes; thousands are calling for a controversial event at the University of South Carolina (USC) to be canceled over concerns that it may promote "white supremacy;” Oklahoma Democrats have flipped the Tulsa mayor's office; photos of European influencers are being used to push pro-Trump propaganda on fake Twitter accounts; the Trump campaign was warned in advance about taking photos at Arlington; an environmental group is calling for an investigation into the RFK Jr. whale head incident, and Salmon will soon swim freely in the Klamath River for first time in a century, and Allison delivers your good news.Thank you, Home Chef!Get 18 Free Meals, plus Free Shipping on your first box, and Free Dessert for Life, at HomeChef.com/DAILYBEANS. Must be an active subscriber to receive free dessert.Have some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.com Follow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill https://muellershewrote.substack.comhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://www.threads.net/@muellershewrotehttps://www.tiktok.com/@muellershewrotehttps://instagram.com/muellershewroteDana Goldberghttps://twitter.com/DGComedyhttps://www.instagram.com/dgcomedyhttps://www.facebook.com/dgcomedyhttps://danagoldberg.comHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/OrPatreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts
This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss the Kamala Harris-Donald Trump debate and other campaign goings-on; the January 6th and classified documents cases brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith; and the national housing shortage with Conor Dougherty of The New York Times. Here are this week's chatters: Emily: Wayne Homes: The Great Debate: Front Porch vs. Back Porch; Mariah Timms for The Wall Street Journal: Lawsuits Fly Over Election Rules and Who Gets to Vote; Fin Gómez and Nidia Cavazos for CBS News: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton raids Latino Democrats' homes, including those of LULAC members; and Frederka Schouten and Tierney Sneed for CNN: Democrats sue to block new GOP-backed Georgia election certification rules John: Glenn Thrush for The New York Times: Would-Be Trump Assassin's Interest in Violence Went Back to 2019 David: Jonathan Shaw for Harvard Magazine: Mapping the Human Brain Listener chatter from Adam Webb in Chicago: Paul Collins in The Believer: Why Can't My Son Vote? For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, David, Emily, and John will talk about the Kamala Harris-Tim Walz interview. Bonus content this week will be available on Friday. In the latest Gabfest Reads, Emily talks with Joshua Leifer about his book, Tablets Shattered. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Cheyna Roth Research by Julie HuygenPublic.com+Public Investing Disclosure: Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank. See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss the Kamala Harris-Donald Trump debate and other campaign goings-on; the January 6th and classified documents cases brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith; and the national housing shortage with Conor Dougherty of The New York Times. Here are this week's chatters: Emily: Wayne Homes: The Great Debate: Front Porch vs. Back Porch; Mariah Timms for The Wall Street Journal: Lawsuits Fly Over Election Rules and Who Gets to Vote; Fin Gómez and Nidia Cavazos for CBS News: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton raids Latino Democrats' homes, including those of LULAC members; and Frederka Schouten and Tierney Sneed for CNN: Democrats sue to block new GOP-backed Georgia election certification rules John: Glenn Thrush for The New York Times: Would-Be Trump Assassin's Interest in Violence Went Back to 2019 David: Jonathan Shaw for Harvard Magazine: Mapping the Human Brain Listener chatter from Adam Webb in Chicago: Paul Collins in The Believer: Why Can't My Son Vote? For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, David, Emily, and John will talk about the Kamala Harris-Tim Walz interview. Bonus content this week will be available on Friday. In the latest Gabfest Reads, Emily talks with Joshua Leifer about his book, Tablets Shattered. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Cheyna Roth Research by Julie HuygenPublic.com+Public Investing Disclosure: Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank. See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Read the breaking story from CBS News, 'Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton raids Latino Democrats' homes, including those of LULAC members': https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton-raids-latino-democrats-lulac-homes/-Following recent raids led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on longtime League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) activists, including elderly volunteers, this gripping episode uncovers the potentially politically motivated crackdown on Latino voter registration efforts. Join Chuck and Mike as they speak to CBSNews Political Director, Fin Gómez, and CBSNews Political Campaign Reporter, Nidia Cavazos, who provide firsthand insights into the controversy that has emerged in the final stretch before the election. They examine the implications of these raids, the broader context of voter suppression, and the historical significance of LULAC's role in civic engagement. If you are looking for a detailed discussion of this critical issue affecting the Latino community, you've come to the right place.Also, Chuck provides some post DNC insights, including a powerful speech by Vice President Kamala Harris. -Recorded August 28, 2024.-In his groundbreaking new book, Mike Madrid delves into the pivotal role of Latino voters in shaping the future of American democracy. The Latino Century explores why the two major political parties have failed to connect with the second largest ethnic voting group in the nation—a group whose influence is only growing.Order your copy of The Latino Century with Simon & Schuster: Tinyurl.com/latinocentury Or Buy the #1 New Release on Amazon. - Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe for more episodes of The Latino Vote Podcast!Watch our episodes on YouTube: www.youtube.com/@thelatinovotepodcastFollow us on X (formerly Twitter): https://twitter.com/TheLatino_VoteVisit our website for the latest Latino Vote news and subscribe to our newsletter: latinos.voteIf you want more of our discussions and behind the scenes please join our Patreon (...
Headlines for August 28, 2024; “Trying to Repeat the Nakba”: Israel Launches Largest Military Raids in West Bank in Two Decades; “Five-Alarm Fire for Democracy”: New GOP Rules Could Block Election Results in Georgia and Beyond; Latino Rights Groups Urge DOJ to Investigate TX Attorney General for Raiding Homes of LULAC Leaders
Headlines for August 28, 2024; “Trying to Repeat the Nakba”: Israel Launches Largest Military Raids in West Bank in Two Decades; “Five-Alarm Fire for Democracy”: New GOP Rules Could Block Election Results in Georgia and Beyond; Latino Rights Groups Urge DOJ to Investigate TX Attorney General for Raiding Homes of LULAC Leaders
Today's Headlines: French prosecutors have arrested Telegram CEO Pavel Durov as part of an investigation involving a range of serious charges, including money laundering, drug trafficking, and child pornography. Durov remains in police custody without formal charges. Meanwhile, Texas has removed over 1 million voters from its rolls under Governor Greg Abbott's voter-suppression measures, sparking a DOJ investigation request by the Latino civil rights group LULAC over targeted raids. Special Counsel Jack Smith is appealing a judge's decision to dismiss Trump's classified documents case, and in Alaska, a deadly landslide has claimed one life. Additionally, a CDC report shows a 117% rise in heat-related deaths between 1999 and 2023, as extreme temperatures continue to escalate. Finally, Los Angeles will pay over $38 million to settle a lawsuit for falsely claiming its affordable housing units were accessible to people with disabilities. Resources/Articles mentioned in this episode: Wired: Telegram CEO Pavel Durov's Arrest Linked to Sweeping Criminal Investigation Democracy Docket: Texas Removes Over 1 Million Voters from Rolls Since Passage of Anti-Voting Law Salon: Latino civil rights group LULAC asks Justice Department to investigate Texas "voter fraud" raids WA Post: Jack Smith appeals Judge Cannon decision to throw out Trump case AP News: Latest fatal landslide in Alaska kills 1 and injures 3 in Ketchikan, a popular cruise ship stop Axios: Heat-related deaths climbed 117% over 25 years AP News: LA to pay more than $38M for failing to make affordable housing accessible Morning Announcements is produced by Sami Sage alongside Bridget Schwartz and edited by Grace Hernandez-Johnson Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Stories we're following this morning at Progress Texas: Officers under the orders of Attorney General Ken Paxton's office aggressively raided the homes of Democratic House candidate Cecilia Castellano and several other Latino politicos in south Texas, including an 87-year-old retired teacher: https://www.texastribune.org/2024/08/24/ken-paxton-vote-harvesting-raid-lulac-cecilia-castellano/ ...LULAC has called on the U.S. Department of Justice to open an investigation into Paxton's raids: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/25/us/texas-latinos-democrats-raids-paxton.html ...Paxton's actions in North Texas, at the debunked behest of a Fox News anchor, also target Latino communities: https://www.texastribune.org/2024/08/26/texas-voter-registration-election-ken-paxton-investigation/ ...Paxton's efforts to dissolve a migrant outreach non-profit in Houston for what he calls illegal political messaging has been thrown out of court: https://www.texastribune.org/2024/08/23/texas-attorney-general-lawsuit-immigrant-rights-group-ruling-houston/ ...All while the Texas Secretary of State's office says it has found "inadequacies" in Harris County's execution of the 2021-22 election - thus they're sending inspectors to oversee the November election across the Houston metro: https://abc13.com/post/texas-secretary-state-sends-inspectors-monitor-harris-county-2024-election-following-audit-2021-22-voting-issues/15225920/ Progress Texas will set up our official HQ during TribFests' Open Congress on Saturday September 7 at Hideout Coffee at 7th and Congress! We'll be live all day recording for the podcast, hanging out with progressive activists including YOU, and moving our stylish merch. Come see us - it's free! https://festival.texastribune.org/event/651560b0-5404-4ea0-b75e-8725c648826d/websitePage:64071bfd-7c25-49f7-a1ca-90f3fa6ff376 See Progress Texas' analysis of Project 2025, and what it will mean for Texas should it be enacted: https://progresstexas.org/blog/project-2025-vs-progress-2025 ...And a complete guide to Project 2025 from Media Matters: https://www.mediamatters.org/heritage-foundation/guide-project-2025-extreme-right-wing-agenda-next-republican-administration The deadline to register for the November election is October 7. Are you registered? Are you sure? ALL Texas voters should confirm their registration, right now: https://govotetexas.org/ ...Please pitch in to help fund our recent expansion of that important voting resource with Hindi, Mandarin Chinese and Vietnamese translation: https://progresstexas.org/blog/coming-soon-govotetexasorg-adds-commonly-spoken-languages-increase-ballot-access Thanks for listening! Find our web store and other ways to support our important work this election year at https://progresstexas.org.
Independent investigative journalism, broadcasting, trouble-making and muckraking with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com
LULAC, la Liga de Ciudadanos Latinoamericanos Unidos, organización hispana de derechos civiles más antigua de Estados Unidos, ha dado por primera vez su apoyo explícito a Kamala Harris, algo que nunca antes había hecho con ningún otro candidato. Hablamos con Domingo García, presidente de Grupo de Acción Política de LULAC.Escuchar audio
El número de fallecidos en Gaza se acerca a 40.000 mientras quienes viven lo hacen en una situación dramática. Hablamos con Sofía Piñeiro, coordinadora de enfermería de Médicos sin Fronteras en La Franja. También estamos en Tailandia donde el primer ministro ha sido destituido, en Venezuela para conocer el papel de los militares y en Sudán para saber si la tregua entre fuerzas tiene visos de prosperar. Además nos acompaña Domingo García, presidente de Grupo de Acción Política de LULAC que ha dado su apoyo a Kamala Harris, algo que no habían hecho con ningún otro candidato.Escuchar audio
Independent investigative journalism, broadcasting, trouble-making and muckraking with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com
Monday, August 12th 2024Today, the nation's oldest and largest Latino civil rights organization endorses Kamala Harris for president; a Former North Dakota State Senator pleads guilty to traveling to Prague to have commercial sex with children; a Capitol riot defendant has been jailed over alleged threats against Supreme Court justice and other officials; Trump is losing support from ultra right wing influencers; the US has announced another $125M in support of Ukraine; plus Allison and Dana deliver your Good News.Promo Code:Helix is offering up to 20% off all mattress orders AND two free pillows for our listeners! Go to https://www.helixsleep.com/dailybeans.StoriesTrump Has Started to Piss Off White Supremacists (The New Republic)LULAC, nation's oldest and largest Latino civil rights organization, endorses Kamala Harris for president (CBS News)Powerful former North Dakota lawmaker pleads guilty to traveling to Europe to pay for sex with minor (AP News)Capitol riot defendant jailed over alleged threats against Supreme Court justice and other officials (AP News)Give to the Kamala Harris Presidential CampaignKamala Harris (MSW Media Donation Link) — Donate via ActBlueCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe to Lawyers, Guns, And MoneyAd-free premium feed: https://lawyersgunsandmoney.supercast.comSubscribe for free everywhere else:https://lawyersgunsandmoney.simplecast.com/episodes/1-miami-1985Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://post.news/@/MuellerSheWrote?utm_source=TwitterAG&utm_medium=creator_organic&utm_campaign=muellershewrote&utm_content=FollowMehttps://muellershewrote.substack.comhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://www.threads.net/@muellershewrotehttps://www.tiktok.com/@muellershewrotehttps://instagram.com/muellershewroteDana Goldberghttps://twitter.com/DGComedyhttps://www.instagram.com/dgcomedyhttps://www.facebook.com/dgcomedyhttps://danagoldberg.comHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/From The Good NewsKamala Harris (MSW Media Donation Link) — Donate via ActBlueTara Davis-Woodhall (IG Profile)Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Live Show Ticket Links:https://allisongill.com (for all tickets and show dates)Friday August 16th Washington, DC - with Andy McCabe, Pete Strzok, Glenn Kirschner https://tinyurl.com/Beans-in-DCSaturday August 24 San Francisco, CA https://tinyurl.com/Beans-SF Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/OrPatreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts
Gov. Tim Walz now is an official member of the Harris ticket. Alicia Menendez and Michael Steele talk about how Harris and Walz are gaining even more momentum as they make stops in battleground states across the country. Meanwhile, Donald Trump has been holed up in Mar-a-Lago, only leaving to hold a late-night rally reliably-red Montana. Plus, Assistant Minority Leader, Rep. Joe Neguse, on what having Walz on the ticket means for down-ballot races.
The Florida chapter of the nation's oldest and largest Hispanic membership organization is meeting in an unusual spot. The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) state convention is happening in Haines City. Organizers are also sponsoring a job fair and voter education. We speak with Florida director Eliseo Santana about the meeting, LULAC's issues in Florida and the fast-growing Hispanic population in eastern Polk County.
In the next episode of the Council of Firsts, Amanda Arriaga, first Latina president of the Austin Bar, talks to Lulu Flores, State Representative for District 51. For information on the organizations Rep. Flores mentioned, please visit: LULAC https://lulac.org/ National Women's Political Caucus https://www.nwpc.org/ Mexic-Arte Museum https://mexic-artemuseum.org/ Ballet Folklorico de Texas https://www.balletfolkloricodetexas.com/ Hispanic Bar Association of Austin (HBAA) https://www.hispanicbaraustin.com/ Travis County Women Lawyers Association (TCWLA) https://tcwla.org/ Listen on Apple Podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/discussion-with-state-representative-lulu-flores/id1681607368?i=1000651890634 Watch on YouTube https://youtu.be/kV9dLR2av9o
America's Heroes Group Roundtable with Partner Repatriate Our Patriots Saturday March 23, 2024March is Women History Month Host: Cliff Kelley Co-Host: Sean Claiborne Executive Producer: Glenda Smith Digital Media Producer: Ivan Ortega Scout's Honor Productions Saturday's Topics: 5:30 - 6pmDanitza "Dee" James - US Army Iraq Combat Veteran CEO of Repatriate Our Patriots and Subcommittee Chair for LULAC
Stories we're following this morning at Progress Texas: The standoff between Governor Greg Abbott and President Joe Biden continues: https://www.kens5.com/video/news/special-reports/at-the-border/273-ded0a575-7d5c-4ec3-8465-7d701b45e7f3 ...Historic parallels to the situation include Eisenhower '57 and Kennedy '63: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/01/29/immigration-border-texas-trump/ ...Should legal solutions in the Congress not work out, Biden faces a difficult call: https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/if-border-bill-fails-time-for-biden-to-take-control-of-texas-border-says-writer-203146309828 ...U.S. Reps Joaquin Castro and Greg Casar implore Biden to act: https://www.newsweek.com/texas-governor-reveals-plan-counter-biden-taking-over-national-guard-1865108 ...The Supreme Court itself is complicit in Abbott's defiance: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/01/greg-abbott-texas-border-stunt-supreme-court/677267/ ...The solvency of the U.S. Constitution itself may be at risk: https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2024-01-29/opinion-heres-whats-at-stake-in-texas-dispute-with-the-federal-government-over-the-border ...Convoys of Abbott supporters promise "peaceful demonstration", but bad actors abound: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/01/29/texas-border-supreme-court-migrants-abbott/ ...LULAC issues a statement of warning to its members to be vigilant for racist violence: https://thehill.com/latino/4436050-texas-abbott-border-latino-immigration/ ...Not even Republican Dade Phelan is immune from the effects of reckless rhetoric from the right: https://www.texastribune.org/2024/01/29/texas-house-speaker-dade-phelan-threat/ And in some GOOD news - Texas set a new record for solar power last weekend: https://www.kut.org/energy-environment/2024-01-29/texas-just-broke-a-record-for-how-much-power-it-got-from-the-sun Early Giving is underway for this year's Amplify Austin non-profit and charity fundraiser, and is a great way to support Progress Texas: https://www.amplifyatx.org/organizations/progress-texas-institute Thanks for listening! Find our web store and other ways to support our work at https://progresstexas.org/.
America's Heroes Group Roundtable Community Outreach with LULAC Saturday November 18, 2023Happy Pre Thanksgiving DayNovember is Military Family Appreciation, National Family Caregiver, and Alzheimer's Disease Awareness Month Host: Cliff Kelley Co-Host: Sean Claiborne Executive Producer: Glenda Smith Digital Media Producer: Ivan Ortega Scout's Honor Productions Saturday's Topics 4:07-4:30pm Partner: Danitza "Dee" James - U.S. Army Iraq Combat Veteran CEO of Repatriate Our Patriots and Subcommittee Veterans Chair for LULAC.Panelist:Livier Lazaro - U.S. Marine Corps Veteran and Commander VFW Post 7420 Don Diego
This Roundtable Features LULAC, Pink Berets, Red Cross, and National Nurses UnitedOctober is Breast Cancer, Mental Health, National Disability, and Domestic Violence Awareness Month Host: Cliff Kelley Co-Host: Sean Claiborne Executive Producer: Glenda Smith Digital Media Producer: Ivan Ortega, Scout's Honor Productions4pm Community Outreach with LULAC Partner: Danitza "Dee" James - US Army Iraq Combat Veteran CEO of Repatriate Our Patriots and Subcommittee Veterans Chair for LULAC.Panelist:Amanda Schuft - is Legal Services Director with Immigrants Defenders Law Center in Los Angeles, California.
This week Latino USA brings you an episode of The Pulso Podcast. Texas 1951. Farmworker Pete Hernandez walks into a bar with a rifle and shoots another man. He is taken to court for murder, but when the state refuses to allow any Latinos on the jury, a rebellious team of Hispanic lawyers signs up for a wild ride that will take them all the way to the Supreme Court, and change the definition of what it means to Hispanic in the U.S. This episode was Produced & Written by Charlie Garcia, it was edited by Liz Alarcon. Original music by Julian Blackmore. Audio Engineering & Mixing by Julian Blackmore and Charlie Garcia. Special thanks to LULAC historian David Contreras. You can subscribe to The Pulso Podcast here.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
