Podcasts about Snapp

**It's The Relax With Rendell Show Replay On Trax FM & Rendell Radio. Rendell Featured Soul & Boogie/Rare Groove/80's & 70's Grooves Cuts From Willie Tee, Snapp, New York City, Lou Rawls, Julian Jonag Ft Dutch Robinson, Johnny Bristol, Jimmy James & The Vagabonds, Isley Brothers, Houseband, Fat Larry's Band, Dells, Con Funk Shun, Brass Fever, Al Wilson & More. #originalpirates #soulmusic #disco #reggae #raregroove #easylistening #boogiefunk Catch Rendell Every Saturday From 8PM UK Time The Stations: Trax FM & Rendell Radio Listen Live Here Via The Trax FM Player: chat.traxfm.org/player/index.html Mixcloud LIVE :mixcloud.com/live/traxfm Free Trax FM Android App: play.google.com/store/apps/det...mradio.ba.a6bcb The Trax FM Facebook Page : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100092342916738 Trax FM Live On Hear This: hearthis.at/k8bdngt4/live Tunerr: tunerr.co/radio/Trax-FM Radio Garden: Trax FM Link: http://radio.garden/listen/trax-fm/IEnsCj55 OnLine Radio Box: onlineradiobox.com/uk/trax/?cs...cs=uk.traxRadio Radio Deck: radiodeck.com/radio/5a09e2de87...7e3370db06d44dc Radio.Net: traxfmlondon.radio.net Stream Radio : streema.com/radios/Trax_FM..The_Originals Live Online Radio: liveonlineradio.net/english/tr...ax-fm-103-3.htm**

#WETHESQUAD2 #SLF - MV Killa, Yung Snapp, Lele Blade, Vale Lambo, Geolier Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Meet GDB Client Faith Snapp and her guide dog Prim. Faith sat down with host Theresa Stern to talk about her history with Guide Dogs for the Blind, her leadership role in FFA, and her future plans as she embarks on her newest adventure- veterinary school.

Hebrews 11:1-2, NLT 1 Faith shows the reality of what we hope for; it is the evidence of things we cannot see. 2 Through their faith, the people in days of old earned a good reputation. Hebrews 11:6, NLT 6 And it is impossible to please God without faith. Anyone who wants to come to him must believe that God exists and that he rewards those who sincerely seek him.

We want to hear from you! Send us a text message.Microsoft is making waves in the Midwest with a game-changing $3.3 billion investment in a state-of-the-art data center in Wisconsin. This initiative is not just about expanding infrastructure; it's about positioning the region as a leader in artificial intelligence and data innovation. In this episode, we sit down with Mary Snapp, Microsoft's Vice President of Strategic Initiatives, to explore how this monumental investment will transform the Midwest and the broader United States.Mary dives deep into the opportunities this data center will create, from workforce development to AI-driven manufacturing. We also explore her journey at Microsoft, where she has played pivotal roles in philanthropy, strategic partnerships, and the company's broader mission to make technology accessible and impactful on a global scale.What You'll Learn in This Episode:How Microsoft's $3.3 billion data center will redefine Wisconsin's tech landscape and what it means for AI innovation in the Midwest.The unexpected ways Microsoft is integrating sustainability into one of the world's most advanced data centers.Why the manufacturing sector in the Midwest is poised for a revolution thanks to AI—and what you can do to get ahead.The untold story of Microsoft's philanthropic strategy and how it's changing the game for workforce development in America.Insights from Mary Snapp on the future of AI ethics and the crucial role it will play in the next decade.3 Big Takeaways from this Episode:Microsoft's $3.3 billion data center in Wisconsin is a strategic move to make the Midwest a hub for AI innovation and data infrastructure.The partnership between Microsoft and regional educational institutions is crucial for preparing the future workforce for AI-driven industries.The expansion of technology skillsets is reshaping the workforce landscape, with Microsoft leading efforts to make advanced training accessible to all.Resources in this Episode:Learn more about Microsoft's investment in WisconsinOther initiatives referenced in this episode:TechSparkFarmBeats for studentsTEALS (Technology Education and Literacy in Schools)Microsoft's AI for Good LabEmerging PrairieMicrosoft philanthropiesMore resources on the episode page: https://techedpodcast.com/snapp/Instagram - Facebook - YouTube - TikTok - Twitter - LinkedIn

Mat Snapp is the Executive VP of Operations at Barter & Shake in Phoenix. Mat began his career in the restaurant industry as a teenager delivering pizzas. Later, Mat went to school for writing and became a professional writer/copywriter. He soon found himself leaving his writing career to work with Sam Fox Restaurant Concepts where, starting in 2004, he helped the organization open 95 restaurants. He left that company in 2021 and began his journey with Barter & Shake. Barter & Shake has over 90 cocktails on its menu. Favorite success quote/mantra: "Amateurs practice until they get it right. Professionals practice until they can't get it wrong." In this episode we will discuss:  Operations Mentors Cocktails Cocktail menu engineering AND MORE! Today's sponsors: Restaurant Technologies the company that helps restaurants, “Control the kitchen chaos.” With RT's total oil management, you get: Dependable fresh bulk cooking oil delivery; Filtration + oil usage monitoring and reporting; Used cooking oil pick-up, and recycling; And say goodbye to messy, dangerous restaurant rendering tanks-yuck. RT's end-to-end cooking oils solution helps you manage your used cooking oil storage, collection, and recycling- conveniently, safely, and cleanly- with no upfront costs. Head to www.RTI-inc.com, and let them know the Restaurant Unstoppable Podcast sent you their way. MarginEdge: Boost your efficiency and profitability without adding labor costs. MarginEdge is a complete restaurant management software that allows you to seamlessly manage all aspects of your business from one central location. Track food costs in real time, make inventory faster and less tedious, easily cost out your recipes, and get a daily P&L so you always know where you stand. See how it works at marginedge.com/unstopabble. Restaurant Systems Pro - Join the 60-day Restaurant Systems Pro FREE TRAINING. This is something that has never been done before. This 60-day event is at no cost to you, but it is not for everyone. Fred Langley, CEO of Restaurant Systems Pro, will lead a group of restaurateurs through the Restaurant Systems Pro software and set up the systems for your restaurant. During the 60 days, Fred will walk you through the Restaurant Systems Pro Process and help you crush the following goals: Recipe Costing Cards; Guidance in your books for accounting; Cash controls; Sales Forecasting(With Accuracy); Checklists; Budgeting for the entire year; Scheduling for profit; More butts in seats and more… Click Here to learn more. Contact the guest: Instagram: @matsnapp Thanks for listening! Rate the podcast, subscribe, and share!  We are on Youtube: @RestaurantUnstoppable

Según datos del CDC, el Centro para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades en Estados Unidos, el fentanilo está provocando un número récord de muertes de jóvenes por sobredosis, que ha ido incrementando desde la pandemia del Covid-19. En Estados Unidos, el fentanilo ha provocado una duplicación de las muertes por sobredosis entre jóvenes de 12 a 17 años desde el inicio de la pandemia de Covid 19, según datos del CDC, el Centro para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades en Estados Unidos. Esta situación afecta principalmente a poblaciones vulnerables que difícilmente logran acceder a los servicios de salud. Este preocupante fenómeno es también analizado por el Instituto RIA, una organización mexicana dedicada a investigar las políticas de la lucha antidrogas. Zara Snapp es su directora, ella indica que algunas de las causas del aumento en el consumo es el desconocimiento del este tipo de sustancias así como la facilidad que tienen los grupos ilegales de ingresar dicha droga. “No hay un conocimiento de las personas usuarias sobre cuáles son las sustancias que están recibiendo. Esto es una consecuencia de la prohibición. Hay algo que se llama la ‘ley de hierro de la prohibición', que hace que los mercados ilegales giren en torno a sustancias más potentes, más compactas, con mayor dificultad de identificar la sustancia por su olor, por ejemplo. La introducción del fentanilo al mercado de opioides en Estados Unidos es porque es una sustancia más potente, más compacta, más fácil de transportar y como una sustancia sintética, es más fácil de producir en laboratorio”, explica Snapp. Existen dos mercados de fentanilo. El de consumo recreativo que es ilegal, y el legal con fines médicos, producido “en laboratorios legales y donde desde hace décadas se prescribe fentanilo”, recuerda Zara Snapp.La experta en políticas de drogas resalta que las sobredosis por fentanilo se presentan principalmente en adultos, pero que este aumento en los jóvenes es un llamado para fortalecer la educación en la materia. “Personas jóvenes van a experimentar con las drogas. Esto es una realidad. Es aún más urgente mejorar la educación sobre las drogas legales, las drogas ilegales, los riesgos, los efectos y que todo eso lo podemos basar en la verdad y en la evidencia y no en el miedo, en el estigma”, concluye. Leer también'Después de dos años consumiendo fentanilo, estás muerto'El fentanilo es un potente fármaco opiáceo sintético, aproximadamente 100 veces más potente que la morfina y 50 veces más potente que la heroína como analgésico. En el continente americano tiene fuerte presencia en Canadá, en Estados Unidos y en el norte de México.

Según datos del CDC, el Centro para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades en Estados Unidos, el fentanilo está provocando un número récord de muertes de jóvenes por sobredosis, que ha ido incrementando desde la pandemia del Covid-19. En Estados Unidos, el fentanilo ha provocado una duplicación de las muertes por sobredosis entre jóvenes de 12 a 17 años desde el inicio de la pandemia de Covid 19, según datos del CDC, el Centro para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades en Estados Unidos. Esta situación afecta principalmente a poblaciones vulnerables que difícilmente logran acceder a los servicios de salud. Este preocupante fenómeno es también analizado por el Instituto RIA, una organización mexicana dedicada a investigar las políticas de la lucha antidrogas. Zara Snapp es su directora, ella indica que algunas de las causas del aumento en el consumo es el desconocimiento del este tipo de sustancias así como la facilidad que tienen los grupos ilegales de ingresar dicha droga. “No hay un conocimiento de las personas usuarias sobre cuáles son las sustancias que están recibiendo. Esto es una consecuencia de la prohibición. Hay algo que se llama la ‘ley de hierro de la prohibición', que hace que los mercados ilegales giren en torno a sustancias más potentes, más compactas, con mayor dificultad de identificar la sustancia por su olor, por ejemplo. La introducción del fentanilo al mercado de opioides en Estados Unidos es porque es una sustancia más potente, más compacta, más fácil de transportar y como una sustancia sintética, es más fácil de producir en laboratorio”, explica Snapp. Existen dos mercados de fentanilo. El de consumo recreativo que es ilegal, y el legal con fines médicos, producido “en laboratorios legales y donde desde hace décadas se prescribe fentanilo”, recuerda Zara Snapp.La experta en políticas de drogas resalta que las sobredosis por fentanilo se presentan principalmente en adultos, pero que este aumento en los jóvenes es un llamado para fortalecer la educación en la materia. “Personas jóvenes van a experimentar con las drogas. Esto es una realidad. Es aún más urgente mejorar la educación sobre las drogas legales, las drogas ilegales, los riesgos, los efectos y que todo eso lo podemos basar en la verdad y en la evidencia y no en el miedo, en el estigma”, concluye. Leer también'Después de dos años consumiendo fentanilo, estás muerto'El fentanilo es un potente fármaco opiáceo sintético, aproximadamente 100 veces más potente que la morfina y 50 veces más potente que la heroína como analgésico. En el continente americano tiene fuerte presencia en Canadá, en Estados Unidos y en el norte de México.

Biden confirmó su respaldo a la reclasificación de la marihuana como una droga de bajo riesgo y anunció el inicio oficial del proceso para llevar a cabo esta medida

با مجید حسامی، مدیرعامل و بنیانگذار، در مورد پیدایش اسنپ‌پی و طرح 'الان خرید کن، بعدا پرداخت کن' به گفتگو نشستیم. درباره صنعت فین‌تک و استفاده از داده‌های اسنپ برای راه‌اندازی یک سیستم اعتبارسنجی مالی در ایران، جایی که سیستم کارت‌های اعتباری وجود نداره، بحث کردیم و اینکه چگونه مردم میتونند از این سیستم برای خرید استفاده و در پایان ماه پرداخت کنن. همچنین در مورد اینکه چگونه این مسیر به تبدیل شدن به یک پلتفرم ای‌کامرس منجر شد، صحبت شدWe sat down with Majid Hesami, founder and CEO of SnappPay, to discuss the creation of SnappPay and the 'buy now, pay later' plan. We talked about the fintech industry and using Snapp's data to launch a financial credit scoring system in Iran, where credit card systems do not exist, and how people can use this system to make purchases and pay at the end of the month. We also discussed how this pathway has evolved into an e-commerce platformMajid Hesami | مجید حسامی https://www.linkedin.com/in/majidhesami====================اسپانسر این قسمتخدمات رایانش ابری - لیاراhttps://liara.ir===================طبقه ۱۶Castbox https://castbox.fm/channel/id3083907Spotify https://spoti.fi/2CiyRoHhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/soh3ilhttps://www.instagram.com/soh3ilEverywhere else https://linktr.ee/tabaghe16#پادکست #طبقه۱۶ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Una versione inedita di questa ragazza. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Meet the First Priority Team! Join Brad and Steve in this special bonus episode of the podcast where we get to meet 2 of FP's newest teammates!  Tishana Cundiff: Interim Director, Heritage.  Steve Snapp: Area Coordinator, The Ozarks.  

Two young women are missing from Kingsport, TN. If you have any information please contact the Sullivan County Sheriff's Department at 423-279-7330 or TBI(Tennessee Bureau of Investigation) at 1-800-TBI-FIND. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/hometown-horrors/support

Brownsburg superintendent Snapp has retired. Hylton can work on a schoolboard and be in the union at the same time? Vivek now campaigning with Trump. What DeSantis should be saying. Most perfect Dick Morris story ever. Newsmax Interview Gets Weird As Some Guy In His Underwear Wanders In. Hunter Biden had cocaine residue on the pouch of his gun. Hunter Biden is a bad guy and should go to jail. Tony gets fundraiser flyer from Nikki Haley that has his name on it. Measles at the airport. China wants you to believe that everything's great. It's China, they lie, they lie about everything. Popcorn moment: Joy Reid being racist at the Iowa Caucus. Jimmy Kimmel says Iowa Republican caucus is the opposite of MLK day. The progressives are the ones straying away from MLK.  Jim Irsay found unresponsive in his home in December TMZ reports. Leader Phil GiaQuinta and Rep Joanna King not responding to requests to go on the air with Tony. Why are representatives scared to talk to us on WIBC? It's easier to get Elon Musk on the phone then our local representatives. SCOTUS will not hear case about protecting boys from being in their restrooms in Indiana. Mayor Stehr talks about his vision for Zionsville. Fill up on the News. Biden proposes to cap overdraft fees. Climate “Czar” John Kerry keeps “falling up”. Claims that Joe Biden has kept us from war. Vivek heads to New Hampshire to endorse Donald Trump. Donald was effusive for admiration of Vivek. Haley won't debate DeSantis in New Hampshire.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Layla and Holynn have both gone missing from Kingsport TN in the last 6 months.  Help us find them. Talk to your Friends about the case, follow the facebook search pages, follow Jennifer Santanello's tiktok.  These woman are considered adults at 20 and 19 and the cases aren't getting the media attention they deserve. If you have any information regarding these cases call: layla 423-246-9111 or 423-229-9429 Hollyn 423-279-7330   Please see the below for music credit and license: https://www.thedarkpiano.com/creepy-piano-music https://soundcloud.com/myuu Music credit and license: https://www.thedarkpiano.com/creepy-piano-music https://soundcloud.com/myuu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 https://www.FesliyanStudios.com This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License Background music credit Credit to https://www.FesliyanStudios.com for the background music.  

INSTITUTIO RIA, ROJO CARMESÍ y EUGENIO GALERÍA presentan WANZ TALKS con ZARA SNAPP En 2018 la política de drogas y el camino hacia una regulación daba sus primeros pasos: se emitieron los primeros amparos ante la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación para poder cultivar y consumir cannabis de forma legal. Este momento posibilitó que hoy en día se pueda hablar de ésta y otras sustancias psicoactivas. Cinco años después el panorama no luce prometedor, pero la lucha continúa desde otra trinchera: cultivar la conciencia de la sociedad. Zara Snapp creció en una familia donde el tema de drogas y su experimentación era totalmente abierto. En su adolescencia experimentó de primera mano, pero con ciertos parámetros que limitaban su consumo. Zara es activista en torno al movimiento de politización del consumo de sustancias y de las comunidades cultivadoras para instaurar un mercado legal. La regulación, dice, es la única vía para resarcir los daños que en términos de derechos humanos ha dejado la prohibición. En este episodio conversamos sobre el esfuerzo que ha requerido alcanzar una normatividad; sobre su trabajo en Instituto RIA, una asociación civil con incidencia en políticas de drogas dentro de un marco de justicia social; sobre su papel como madre psiconauta; sobre su experiencia en la escritura; y sobre el derecho que cada ser humano tiene de desarrollar su personalidad con libertad. WANZ Talks, el podcast de We Are Not Zombies que recopila las historias de humanas y humanos excepcionales que nos inspiran y que nos motivan a repensar el mundo. Conducido por Ramiro Medina Flores, fundador de We Are Not Zombies. Conecta con Zara Snapp: Instagram / X / Página Web Conecta con Instituto RIA: Instagram / X / Facebook / Página Web --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/wanz-talks/support

Welcome to Big Papa Rob Podcast Story Rewind “The Missing”, I'm Big Papa Rob. Each of my stories are about one of the many missing people out there. I rewind the story of a missing person in hopes that someone will hear this story and can share information to help find this missing person. There is always someone who knows something that can help find this missing person. The story I will tell you today is about Hollynn Snapp She was last seen October 15, 2023 In Kingsport Tn.  If you think Kingsport Tennessee sounds familiar, you would be right. This is the same town that my first episode The Missing was about. In fact, Hollynn went missing about 5 miles from where Layla Santanello was last seen in Kingsport Tennessee. Because I follow Layla's mother's social media, That's how I found out about Hollynn Snapp being missing.Let's talk about the details of Hollynn again. Hollyn Snapp is 4'8” tall weighing 110 lbs. with brown hair and hazel eyes. She has a tattoo on her right forearm pyramid with eye and with circle around it. Hollynn was last seen in Kingsport, TN near Bell ridge Drive.  If you have any information, please contact the Sullivan County Sheriff's Office at 423-279-7330 or contact 1-800-TBI- FIND.  Please remember even if the information you may have is very small, It may be enough to help lead to finding this young lady. It takes several small pieces of a puzzle to make a full picture. Please check my social media, I will have pictures of Hollynn along with pictures of her tattoo. You can find all my social media links: https://linktr.ee/bigpaparobpodcast Let me know what you think of the podcast and submit story ideas to bigpaparobpodcast@gmail.com Don't forget to share and rate my podcast if you enjoyed it.If you would like to support my podcast, Buy me a cup of coffee : https://bmc.link/bigpaparobpodcast

Shelley Snapp is a licensed therapist in Pennsylvania who provides assistance for those struggling with anxiety, PTSD, burnout, work-life balance, perfectionism, and trauma. In today's episode, Shelley joins us to talk about how therapy can help people navigate these tough issues, as well as how to find the right therapist to do so. You can access the full show notes and more by visiting: https://www.forgewealth.com/

In the 14th episode in the ACE Up Your Sleeve Podcast series, we interview Ms. Karen Snapp! She tells us how she got involved with the Deaf Community and Deaf Theater as well as tips and advice for Deaf students looking to begin their own theater journey. Not only that but so much more! Listen now! The ACE Up Your Sleeve is brought to you by the students of the Acting Company for Excellence at North Texas Performing Arts. This podcast was created by Reichen Young with sound design by Latham Young. Faculty supervision is provided by Bethany Bourland. NTPA is a nonprofit organization dedicated to developing the character of youth through quality performing arts education and family entertainment. Learn more about upcoming programs and events at NTPA.org.

On September 5, 1972, during the Munich Olympic games, a group calling themselves Black September took members of the Israeli delegation hostage. What should have been a day of celebration for the United States and other countries ended in tragedy instead. What else was being reported around the world on the same day? _____ SOURCES “Advertisement: Woodsy Owl (Page 11).” The Selma Times-Journal (Selma, Alabama), September 5, 1972. www.newspapers.com. Associated Press. “8 Charged in 9 Murders.” The Decatur Daily Review (Decatur, Illinois), October 16, 1972. www.newspapers.com. Associated Press. “Arab Terrorists Kill Two Israelis in Olympic Village; Hold 13 Hostages.” Gazette Telegraph (Colorado Springs, Colorado), September 5, 1972. www.newspapers.com. Associated Press. “Couple, Son Murdered.” Decatur Daily Review, September 5, 1972. www.newspapers.com. Associated Press. “Rock Music Fans Tired, Disillusioned.” Southern Illinoisan (Carbondale, Illinois), September 5, 1972. www.newspapers.com. Associated Press. “Swim Star Spitz Flies Home.” The Scranton Times (Scranton, Pennsylvania), September 5, 1972. www.newspapers.com. “Biography.” Mark Spitz. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://www.markspitzusa.com/biography. Doubek, James. “50 Years Ago, the Munich Olympics Massacre Changed How We Think about Terrorism.” NPR. NPR, September 4, 2022. https://www.npr.org/2022/09/04/1116641214/munich-olympics-massacre-hostage-terrorism-israel-germany. “Erie Canal Soda Pop Festival.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, October 15, 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erie_Canal_Soda_Pop_Festival. Ioc. “Mark Spitz Biography, Olympic Medals, Records and Age.” Olympics.com. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://olympics.com/en/athletes/mark-spitz. Jones, Josh. “The Horrors of Bull Island, ‘The Worst Music Festival of All Time' (1972).” Open Culture. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://www.openculture.com/2021/06/the-horrors-of-bull-island-the-worst-music-festival-of-all-time-1972.html. “Mark Spitz.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, February 6, 2023. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Spitz. “Munich Massacre .” Accessed March 22, 2023. https://www.history.com/topics/1970s/munich-massacre-olympics. “The Nation: De Mau Mau.” Time. Time Inc., October 30, 1972. https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,906633,00.html. Powers, Thomas. “Foreman's Aides Quizzed in Deaths.” Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois), September 6, 1972. www.newspapers.com. Snapp, Ray. “Soda Pop Festival 'Disorganized Debacle'.” Sunday Herald-Times (Bedford, Indiana), September 10, 1972. www.newspapers.com. SOUND SOURCES Al Jolson. “I'll Say She Does.” www.pixabay.com/music. Lucille Hegamin and The Dixie Daisies. “Cold Winter Blues.” www.pixabay.com/music. Sophie Tucker. “Reuben Rag.” www.pixabay.com/music.

Episode 217: In this episode, our special guest Jennie Snapp delve deep into her personal and professional development. Whether you're feeling lost or simply seeking tips on navigating your own career, Jennie shares her insight and experiences on how to achieve your goals. Join us as we explore the power of personal growth with meaningful examples and techniques to help you unlock your full potential! CLICK HERE AND JOIN THE GHD EXCLUSIVE EMAIL LIST FOR MEMBERS ONLY CONTENT8 WEEK ROUTINE COURSEMotivational BooksDon't Forget to Share & Give a 5 Star Rating!!GHD TIKTOK 

If God Almighty exists, does He make Himself known to those who don't believe in Him? What would it look like if an atheist were to experience the supernatural power of God for the first time?   It's a question that's been on my mind for quite some time now, and one I'm willing to explore.  If atheists are truly open to truth, and they want to experience miracles, as many of my atheist friends who come on the show claim to want, will they?    If I were to invite our atheist friends on a journey to find miracles, would they be willing to go?   On today's podcast, we'll explore these ideas and tell the story of how Miracles & Atheists got started. We'll also reveal where we're headed.  It's an exciting time in M&A history, as we turn the page and start another chapter of this wild journey of unpacking the tension between different worldviews of the supernatural.    You'll also meet our new Co-host! (OR is it Co-hosts?) We'll see!  Enjoy…    ******************************* WE'RE MAKING THE MIRACLES & ATHEISTS MOVIE!  ******************************* Now You Can Partner with Us! Go to: patreon.com/miraclesandatheists M&A Podcast! Catalog of Livestreams Click here to Rate & Review Us!  M&A on Rumble (Rumble is YouTube without censorship)  But…if you insist, you can Subscribe on YouTube Chat with M&A on Telegram:  Censorship-free comms w/ M&A on Truth Social Twitter: @miraclesatheist Instagram: @miraclesandatheists M&A Facebook Page Call-in Show: Miracles & Atheists Community Call-In (MACC) Email the show: nick@miraclesandatheists.com Apply to be our Guest

I am so excited for this episode!  Join me as I chat with Beth Snapp and if you don't know who she is or any of her music, you have been missing out! Beth is an artist from NorthEast Tennessee that pours her healing arts into her music! She's funny, has amazing energy and ....loves hats! I am lucky enough to get some time with her!  Please check her out!     www.bethsnappmusic.com All Social Media: @Bethsnappmusic Keep being amazing - and Don't Apologize! :) (Hhaha - that's a song reference)

Héctor y Zara (politóloga y activista) charlan sobre las drogas, la regulación, el problema de la violencia en México, los diferentes caminos para conseguir la paz y muchas cosas interesantes.

Randall Snapp is a Tulsa attorney whose focus and expertise is employment law. Randall grew up with his four siblings in Newton, Kansas. He graduated from the University of Kansas and holds a Bachelor of Arts, a Juris Doctor in law, and an MBA, all from the University of Kansas. Randall has served on many boards including Catholic Charities of Eastern Oklahoma, Bishop Kelley High School, the Tulsa Ballet, and Big Brother Big Sisters of Green Country. He is a lifelong Catholic and is a parishioner of the Church of Saint Mary in Tulsa. Randall has been married to Beth for thirty years and they have four children. Randall enjoys baking bread and playing pickleball.

Newport H.S. boys Basketball Coach Rod Snapp discusses their impressive run with Lance!

PODPLAY LIVE: Hans vådaskott vid polishuset, bokrean och Jonas jagas av Tällbergs jaktlag A. Tack alla! Mejla in dina frågor till: inaktuellt@podplay.se Lyssna på Inaktuellt Live VARJE torsdag från kl 09:30 på Podplay.se eller i Podplay-appen för att lyssna och ställa frågor direkt till Hans, Jonas och producenten Dawwa. Musik i slutet för denna live: The Cinelli Brothers - Cry and Shout

Brent Walla, Snapp Entertainment is focused on ensuring that clients are covered and classified correctly. As a former professional in the live entertainment space, Walla understands his clients' operations and their risks, translating insurance policy language into an operational language that clients actually speak and understand. snappinsurance.com James Lott Jr is the host.Also goto trustedchoice.com to find the best Independant Agent to help you with your insurance needs!

On Episode 207 I sit down with Jess Snapp. Snapp is a friend of mine that I have gotten to know better during my time here at CrossFit Roots. Snapp is a former gymnast and dancer who left the corporate world to become a trainer. She found CrossFit a few years ago, was instantly hooked, and hasn't slowed down since. We talk about her journey through all of that, where she is today and some of the competitions she has competed in during her CrossFit career. Thank you for listening!

In this episode of the HR Leaders podcast I'm joined by Navid Nazemian to discuss how to master executive transitions, as well as the true cost of executive failure, the key transitions challenges and how you can improve executive onboarding frameworks in your company.Navid Nazemian is the author of the international best selling book "Mastering Executive Transitions: The Definitive Guide". He has coached executives from ABB, BP, CCLA, Coca Cola, ColgatePalmolive, KPMG, Pearson, Shell, Sonova, Vodafone, and several successful high growth start-ups such as Alibaba, digikala, Snapp!Group, and more, drawing from 20+ years of international HR experience in some of the world's most admired companies at country, regional and global leadership level, in both emerging and developed markets.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

About AntonDr. Anton Chuvakin is now involved with security solution strategy at Google Cloud, where he arrived via Chronicle Security (an Alphabet company) acquisition in July 2019.Anton was, until recently, a Research Vice President and Distinguished Analyst at Gartner for Technical Professionals (GTP) Security and Risk Management Strategies team. (see chuvakin.org for more)Links Referenced: Google Cloud: https://cloud.google.com/ Cloud Security Podcast: https://cloud.withgoogle.com/cloudsecurity/podcast/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/anton_chuvakin Medium blog: https://medium.com/anton.chuvakin TranscriptAnnouncer: Hello, and welcome to Screaming in the Cloud with your host, Chief Cloud Economist at The Duckbill Group, Corey Quinn. This weekly show features conversations with people doing interesting work in the world of cloud, thoughtful commentary on the state of the technical world, and ridiculous titles for which Corey refuses to apologize. This is Screaming in the Cloud.Corey: This episode is sponsored in part by our friend EnterpriseDB. EnterpriseDB has been powering enterprise applications with PostgreSQL for 15 years. And now EnterpriseDB has you covered wherever you deploy PostgreSQL on-premises, private cloud, and they just announced a fully-managed service on AWS and Azure called BigAnimal, all one word. Don't leave managing your database to your cloud vendor because they're too busy launching another half-dozen managed databases to focus on any one of them that they didn't build themselves. Instead, work with the experts over at EnterpriseDB. They can save you time and money, they can even help you migrate legacy applications—including Oracle—to the cloud. To learn more, try BigAnimal for free. Go to biganimal.com/snark, and tell them Corey sent you.Corey: Let's face it, on-call firefighting at 2am is stressful! So there's good news and there's bad news. The bad news is that you probably can't prevent incidents from happening, but the good news is that incident.io makes incidents less stressful and a lot more valuable. incident.io is a Slack-native incident management platform that allows you to automate incident processes, focus on fixing the issues and learn from incident insights to improve site reliability and fix your vulnerabilities. Try incident.io, recover faster and sleep more.Corey: Welcome to Screaming in the Cloud, I'm Corey Quinn. My guest today is Anton Chuvakin, who is a Security Strategy Something at Google Cloud. And I absolutely love the title, given, honestly, how anti-corporate it is in so many different ways. Anton, first, thank you for joining me.Anton: Sure. Thanks for inviting me.Corey: So, you wound up working somewhere else—according to LinkedIn—for two months, which in LinkedIn time is about 20 minutes because their date math is always weird. And then you wound up going—according to LinkedIn, of course—leaving and going to Google. Now, that was an acquisition if I'm not mistaken, correct?Anton: That's correct, yes. And it kind of explains that timing in a little bit of a title story because my original title was Head of Security Solution Strategy, and it was for a startup called Chronicle. And within actually three weeks, if I recall correctly, I was acquired into Google. So, title really made little sense of Google, so I kind of go with, like, random titles that include the word security, and occasionally strategy if I feel generous.Corey: It's pretty clear, the fastest way to get hired at Google, given their famous interview process is to just get acquired. Like, “I'm going to start a company and raise it to, like, a little bit of providence, and then do an acquihire because that will be faster than going through the loop, and ideally, there will be less algorithm solving on whiteboards.” But I have to ask, did you have to solve algorithms on whiteboards for your role?Anton: Actually, no, but it did come close to that for some other people who were seen as non-technical and had to join technical roles. I think they were forced to solve coding questions and stuff, but I was somehow grandfathered into a technical role. I don't know exactly how it happened.Corey: Yeah, how you wound up in a technical role. Let's be clear, you are Doctor Anton Chuvakin, and you have written multiple books, you were a research VP at Gartner for many years, and once upon a time, that was sort of a punchline in the circles I hung out with, and then I figured out what Gartner actually does. And okay, that actually is something fairly impressive, let's be clear here. Even as someone who categorically defines himself as not an analyst, I find myself increasingly having a lot of respect for the folks who are actually analysts and the laborious amount of work that they do that remarkably few people understand.Anton: That's correct. And I don't want to boost my ego too much. It's kind of big enough already, obviously, but I actually made it all the way to Distinguished Analyst, which is the next rank after VP.Corey: Ah, my apologies. I did not realize it. This [challenges 00:02:53] the internal structure.Anton: [laugh]. Yeah.Corey: It's like, “Oh, I went from Senior to Staff,” or Staff to Senior because I'm external; I don't know the direction these things go in. It almost feels like a half-step away from oh, I went from [SDE3 to SDE4 00:03:02]. It's like, what do those things mean? Nobody knows. Great.Anton: And what's the top? Is it 17 or is it 113? [laugh].Corey: Exactly. It's like, oh okay, so you're Research VP—or various kinds of VPs—the real question is, how many people have to die before you're the president? And it turns out that that's not how companies think. Who knew?Anton: That's correct. And I think Gartner was a lot of hard work. And it's the type of work that a lot of people actually don't understand. Some people understand it wrong, and some people understand it wrong, kind of, for corrupt reasons. So, for example, a lot of Gartner machinery involves soaking insight from the outside world, organizing it, packaging it, writing it, and then giving it as advice to other people.So, there's nothing offensive about that because there is a lot of insight in the outside world, and somebody needs to be a sponge slash filter slash enrichment facility for that insight. And that, to me, is a good analyst firm, like Gartner.Corey: Yeah. It's a very interesting world. But you historically have been doing a lot of, well, let's I don't even know how to properly describe it because Gardner's clientele historically has not been startups because let's face it, Gartner is relatively expensive. And let's be clear, you're at Google Cloud now, which is a different kind of expensive, but in a way that works for startups, so good for you; gold star. But what was interesting there is that the majority of the Gartner clientele that I've spoken to tend to be big-E Enterprise, which runs legacy businesses, which is a condescending engineering term for ‘it makes money.'And they had the temerity to start their company before 15 years ago, so they built data centers and did things in a data center environment, and now they're moving in a cloudy direction. Your emphasis has always been on security, so my question for you to start with all this is where do you see security vendors fitting in? Because when I walk the RSA expo hall and find myself growing increasingly depressed, it seems like an awful lot of what vendors are selling looks very little removed from, “We took a box, now we shoved in a virtual machine and here you go; it's in your cloud environment. Please pay us money.” The end. And it feels, if I'm looking at this from a pure cloud-native, how I would build things in the cloud from scratch perspective, to be the wrong design. Where do you stand on it?Anton: So, this has been one of the agonizing questions. So, I'm going to kind of ignore some of the context. Of course, I'll come back to it later, but want to kind of frame it—Corey: I love ignoring context. My favorite thing; it's what makes me a decent engineer some days.Anton: So, the frame was this. One of the more agonizing questions for me as an analyst was, a client calls me and says, “We want to do X.” Deep in my heart, I know that X is absolutely wrong, however given their circumstances and how they got to decided to do X, X is perhaps the only thing they can logically do. So, do you tell them, “Don't do X; X is bad,” or you tell them, “Here's how you do X in a manner that aligns with your goals, that's possible, that's whatever.”So, cloud comes up a lot in this case. Somebody comes and says, I want to put my on-premise security information management tool or SIM in the cloud. And I say, deep in my heart, I say, “No, get cloud-native tool.” But I tell them, “Okay, actually, here's how you do it in a less painful manner.” So, this is always hard. Do you tell them they're on their own path, but you help them tread their own path with least pain? So, as an analyst, I agonized over that. This was almost like a moral decision. What do I tell them?Corey: It makes sense. It's a microcosm of the architect's dilemma, on some level, because if you ask a typical Google-style interview whiteboard question, one of my favorites in years past was ‘build a URL shortener.' Great. And you can scale it out and turn it into different things and design things on the whiteboard, and that's great. Most mid-level people can wind up building a passable designed for most things in a cloud sense, when you're starting from scratch.That's not hard. The problem is that the real world is messy and doesn't fit on a whiteboard. And when you're talking about taking a thing that exists in a certain state—for whatever reason, that's the state that it's in—and migrating it to a new environment or a new way of operating, there are so many assumptions that have to break, and in most cases, you don't get the luxury of just taking the thing down for 18 months so you can rework it. And even that it's never as easy as people think it is, so it's going to be 36. Great.You have to wind up meeting people where they are as they're contextualizing these things. And I always feel like the first step of the cloud migration has been to improve your data center environment at the cost of worsening your cloud environment. And that's okay. We don't all need to be the absolute vanguard of how everything should be built and pushing the bleeding edge. You're an insurance company, for God's sake. Maybe that's not where you want to spend your innovation energies.Anton: Yeah. And that's why I tend to lean towards helping them get out of this situation, or maybe build a five-step roadmap of how to become a little bit more cloud-native, rather than tell them, “You're wrong. You should just rewrite the app in a cloud-native way.” That advice almost never actually works in real world. So, I see a lot of the security people move their security stacks to the cloud.And if I see this, I deepen my heart and say, “Holy cow. What do you mean, you want to IDS every packet between Cloud instances? You want to capture every packet in cloud instances? Why? It's all encrypted anyway.” But I don't say that. I say, “Okay, I see how this is the first step for you. Let's describe the next seven steps.”Corey: The problem I keep smacking into is that very often folks who are pushing a lot of these solutions are, yes, they're meeting customers where they are, and that makes an awful lot of sense; I'm not saying that there's anything inherently wrong about that. The challenge is it also feels on the high end, when those customers start to evolve and transform, that those vendors act as a drag. Because if you wind up going in a full-on cloud-native approach, in the fullness of time, there's an entire swath of security vendors that do not have anything left to sell you.Anton: Yes, that is correct. And I think that—I had a fight with an EDR vendor, Endpoint Detection Response, vendor one day when they said, “Oh, we're going to be XDR and we'll do cloud.” And I told them, “You do realize that in a true cloud-native environment, there's no E? There is no endpoint the way you understand it? There is no OS. There is no server. And 99% of your IP isn't working on the clients and servers. How are you going to secure a cloud again?”And I get some kind of rambling answer from them, but the point is that you're right, I do see a lot of vendors that meet clients where they are during their first step in the cloud, and then they may become a drag, or the customer has to show switch to a cloud-native vendor, or to both sometimes, and pay into two mouths. Well, shove money into two pockets.Corey: Well, first, I just want to interject for a second here because when I was walking the RSA expo floor, there were something like 15 different vendors that were trying to sell me XDR. Not a single one of them bothered to expand the acronym—Anton: Just 15? You missed half of them.Corey: Well, yeah—Anton: Holy cow.Corey: As far as I know XDR cable. It's an audio thing right? I already have a bunch of those for my microphone. What's the deal here? Like, “I believe that's XLR.” It's like, “I believe you should expand your acronyms.” What is XDR?Anton: So, this is where I'm going to be very self-serving and point to a blog that I've written that says we don't know what's XDR. And I'm going to—Corey: Well, but rather than a spiritual meaning, I'm going to ask, what does the acronym stands for? I don't actually know the answer to that.Anton: Extended Detection and Response.Corey: Ah.Anton: Extended Detection and Response. But the word ‘extended' is extended by everybody in different directions. There are multiple camps of opinion. Gartner argues with Forrester. If they ever had a pillow fight, it would look really ugly because they just don't agree on what XDR is.Many vendors don't agree with many other vendors, so at this point, if you corner me and say, “Anton, commit to a definition of XDR,” I would not. I will just say, “TBD. Wait two years.” We don't have a consensus definition of XDR at this point. And RSA notwithstanding, 30 booths with XDRs on their big signs… still, sorry, I don't have it.Corey: The problem that I keep running into again and again and again, has been pretty consistently that there are vendors willing to help customers in a very certain position, and for those customers, those vendors are spot on the right thing to do.Anton: Mmm, yep.Corey: But then they tried to expand and instead of realizing that the market has moved on and the market that they're serving is inherently limited and long-term is going to be in decline, they instead start trying to fight the tide and saying, “Oh, no, no, no, no. Those new cloud things, can't trust them.” And they start out with the FU, the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt marketing model where, “You can't trust those newfangled cloud things. You should have everything on-prem,” ignoring entirely the fact that in their existing data centers, half the time the security team forgets to lock the door.Anton: Yeah, yeah.Corey: It just feels like there is so much conflict of interest about in the space. I mean, that's the reason I started my Thursday Last Week in AWS newsletter that does security round-ups, just because everything else I found was largely either community-driven where it understood that it was an InfoSec community thing—and InfoSec community is generally toxic—or it was vendor-captured. And I wanted a round-up of things that I had to care about running an infrastructure, but security is not in my job title, even if the word something is or is not there. It's—I have a job to do that isn't security full time; what do I need to know? And that felt like an underserved market, and I feel like there's no equivalent of that in the world of the emerging cloud security space.Anton: Yes, I think so. But it has a high chance of being also kind of captured by legacy vendors. So, when I was at Gartner, there was a lot of acronyms being made with that started with a C: Cloud. There was CSPM, there was CWBP, and after I left the coined SNAPP with double p at the end. Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform. And you know, in my time at Gartner, five-letter acronyms are definitely not very popular. Like, you shouldn't have done a five-letter acronym if you can help yourself.So, my point is that a lot of these vendors are more from legacy vendors. They are not born in the cloud. They are born in the 1990s. Some are born in the cloud, but it's a mix. So, the same acronym may apply to a vendor that's 2019, or—wait for it—1989.Corey: That is… well, I'd say on the one hand, it's terrifying, but on the other, it's not that far removed from the founding of Google.Anton: True, true. Well, '89, kind of, it's another ten years. I think that if you're from the '90s, maybe you're okay, but if you're from the '80s… you really need to have superpowers of adaptation. Again, it's possible. Funny aside: at Gartner, I met somebody who was an analyst for 32 years.So, he was I think, at Gartner for 32 years. And how do you keep your knowledge current if you are always in an ivory tower? The point is that this person did do that because he had a unique ability to absorb knowledge from the outside world. You can adapt; it's just hard.Corey: It always is. I'm going to pivot a bit and put you in a little bit of a hot seat here. Not intentionally so. But it is something that I've been really kicking around for a while. And I'm going to basically focus on Google because that's where you work.I yeah, I want you to go and mouth off about other cloud companies. Yeah, that's—Anton: [laugh]. No.Corey: Going to go super well and no one will have a problem with that. No, it's… we'll pick on Google for a minute because Google Cloud offers a whole bunch of services. I think it's directionally the right number of services because there are areas that you folks do not view as a core competency, and you actually—imagine that—partner with third parties to wind up delivering something great rather than building this shitty knockoff version that no one actually wants. Ehem, I might be some subtweeting someone here with this, only out loud.Anton: [laugh].Corey: The thing that resonates with me though, is that you do charge for a variety of security services. My perspective, by and large, is that the cloud vendors should not be viewing security as a profit center but rather is something that comes baked into the platform that winds up being amortized into the cost of everything else, just because otherwise you wind up with such a perverse set of incentives.Anton: Mm-hm.Corey: Does that sound ridiculous or is that something that aligns with your way of thinking. I'm willing to take criticism that I'm wrong on this, too.Anton: Yeah. It's not that. It's I almost start to see some kind of a magic quadrant in my mind that kind of categorizes some things—Corey: Careful, that's trademarked.Anton: Uhh, okay. So, some kind of vis—Corey: It's a mystical quadrilateral.Anton: Some kind of visual depiction, perhaps including four parts—not quadrants, mind you—that is focused on things that should be paid and aren't, things that should be paid and are paid, and whatever else. So, the point is that if you're charging for encryption, like basic encryption, you're probably making a mistake. And we don't, and other people, I think, don't as well. If you're charging for logging, then it's probably also wrong—because charging for log retention, keeping logs perhaps is okay because ultimately you're spending resources on this—charging for logging to me is kind of in the vile territory. But how about charging for a tool that helps you secure your on-premise environment? That's fair game, right?Corey: Right. If it's something you're taking to another provider, I think that's absolutely fair. But the idea—and again, I'm okay with the reality of, “Okay, here's our object storage costs for things, and by the way, when you wind up logging things, yeah, we'll charge you directionally what it costs to store that an object store,” that's great, but I don't have the Google Cloud price list shoved into my head, but I know over an AWS land that CloudWatch logs charge 50 cents per gigabyte, for ingress. And the defense is, “Well, that's a lot less expensive than most other logging vendors out there.” It's, yeah, but it's still horrifying, and at scale, it makes me want to do some terrifying things like I used to, which is build out a cluster of Rsyslog boxes and wind up having everything logged to those because I don't have an unbounded growth problem.This gets worse with audit logs because there's no alternative available for this. And when companies start charging for that, either on a data plane or a management plane level, that starts to get really, really murky because you can get visibility into what happened and reconstruct things after the fact, but only if you pay. And that bugs me.Anton: That would bug me as well. And I think these are things that I would very clearly push into the box of this is security that you should not charge for. But authentication is free. But, like, deeper analysis of authentication patterns, perhaps costs money. This to me is in the fair game territory because you may have logs, you may have reports, but what if you want some kind of fancy ML that analyzes the logs and gives you some insights? I don't think that's offensive to charge for that.Corey: I come bearing ill tidings. Developers are responsible for more than ever these days. Not just the code that they write, but also the containers and the cloud infrastructure that their apps run on. Because serverless means it's still somebody's problem. And a big part of that responsibility is app security from code to cloud. And that's where our friend Snyk comes in. Snyk is a frictionless security platform that meets developers where they are - Finding and fixing vulnerabilities right from the CLI, IDEs, Repos, and Pipelines. Snyk integrates seamlessly with AWS offerings like code pipeline, EKS, ECR, and more! As well as things you're actually likely to be using. Deploy on AWS, secure with Snyk. Learn more at Snyk.co/scream That's S-N-Y-K.co/screamCorey: I think it comes down to what you're doing with it. Like, the baseline primitives, the things that no one else is going to be in a position to do because honestly, if I can get logging and audit data out of your control plane, you have a different kind of security problem, and—Anton: [laugh].Corey: That is a giant screaming fire in the building, as it should be. The other side of it, though, is that if we take a look at how much all of this stuff can cost, and if you start charging for things that are competitive to other log analytics tools, great because at that point, we're talking about options. I mean, I'd like to see, in an ideal world, that you don't charge massive amounts of money for egress but ingress is free. I'd like to see that normalized a bit.But yeah, okay, great. Here's the data; now I can run whatever analytics tools I want on it and then you're effectively competing on a level playing field, as opposed to, like, okay, this other analytics tool is better, but it'll cost me over ten times as much to migrate to it, so is it ten times better? Probably not; few things are, so I guess I'm sticking with the stuff that you're offering. It feels like the cloud provider security tools never quite hit the same sweet spot that third-party vendors tend to as far as usability, being able to display things in a way that aligns with various stakeholders at those companies. But it still feels like a cash grab and I have to imagine without having insight into internal costing structures, that the security services themselves are not a significant revenue driver for any of the cloud companies. And the rare times where they are is almost certainly some horrifying misconfiguration that should be fixed.Anton: That's fair, but so to me, it still fits into the bucket of some things you shouldn't charge for and most people don't. There is a bucket of things that you should not charge for, but some people do. And there's a bucket of things where it's absolutely fair to charge for I don't know the amount I'm not a pricing person, but I also seen things that are very clearly have cost to a provider, have value to a client, have margins, so it's very clear it's a product; it's not just a feature of the cloud to be more secure. But you're right if somebody positions as, “I got cloud. Hey, give me secure cloud. It costs double.” I'd be really offended because, like, what is your first cloud is, like, broken and insecure? Yeah. Replace insecure with broken. Why are you selling broken to me?Corey: Right. You tried to spin up a service in Google Cloud, it's like, “Great. Do you want the secure version or the shitty one?”Anton: Yeah, exactly.Corey: Guess which one of those costs more. It's… yeah, in the fullness of time, of course, the shitty one cost more because you find out about security breaches on the front page of The New York Times, and no one's happy, except maybe The Times. But the problem that you hit is that I don't know how to fix that. I think there's an opportunity there for some provider—any provider, please—to be a trendsetter, and, “Yeah, we don't charge for security services on our own stuff just because it'd be believed that should be something that is baked in.” Like, that becomes the narrative of the secure cloud.Anton: What about tiers? What about some kind of a good, better, best, or bronze, gold, platinum, where you have reasonable security, but if you want superior security, you pay money? How do you feel, what's your gut feel on this approach? Like, I can't think of example—log analysis. You're going to get some analytics and you're going to get fancy ML. Fancy ML costs money; yay, nay?Corey: You're bringing up an actually really interesting point because I think I'm conflating too many personas at once. Right now, just pulling up last months bill on Google Cloud, it fits in the free tier, but my Cloud Run bill was 13 cents for the month because that's what runs my snark.cloud URL shortener. And it's great. And I wound up with—I think my virtual machine costs dozen times that much. I don't care.Over in AWS-land, I was building out a serverless nonsense thing, my Last Tweet In AWS client, and that cost a few pennies a month all told, plus a whopping 50 cents for a DNS zone. Whatever. But because I was deploying it to all regions and the way that configural evaluations work, my config bill for that was 16 bucks. Now, I don't actually care about the dollar figures on this. I assure you, you could put zeros on the end of that for days and it doesn't really move the needle on my business until you get to a very certain number there, and then suddenly, I care a lot.Anton: [laugh]. Yeah.Corey: And large enterprises, this is expected because even the sheer cost of people's time to go through these things is valuable. What I'm thinking of is almost a hobby-level side project instead, where I'm a student, and I'm learning this in a dorm room or in a bootcamp or in my off hours, or I'm a career switcher and I'm doing this on my own dime out of hours. And I wind up getting smacked with the bill for security services that, for a company, don't even slightly matter. But for me, they matter, so I'm not going to enable them. And when I transition into the workforce and go somewhere, I'm going to continue to work the same way that I did when I was an independent learner, like, having a wildly generous free tier for small-scale accounts, like, even taking a perspective until you wind up costing, I don't know, five, ten—whatever it is—thousand dollars a month, none of the security stuff is going to be billable for you because it's it is not aimed at you and we want you comfortable with and using these things.This is a whole deep dive into the weeds of economics and price-driven behavior and all kinds of other nonsense, but every time I wind up seeing that, like, in my actual production account over at AWS land for The Duckbill Group, all things wrapped up, it's something like 1100 bucks a month. And over a third of it is monitoring, audit, and observability services, and a few security things as well. And on the one hand, I'm sitting here going, “I don't see that kind of value coming from it.” Now, the day there's an incident and I have to look into this, yeah, it's absolutely going to be worth having, but it's insurance. But it feels like a disproportionate percentage of it. And maybe I'm just sitting here whining and grousing and I sound like a freeloader who doesn't want to pay for things, but it's one of those areas where I would gladly pay more for a just having this be part of the cost and not complain at all about it.Anton: Well, if somebody sells me a thing that costs $1, and then they say, “Want to make it secure?” I say yes, but I'm already suspicious, and they say, “Then it's going to be 16 bucks.” I'd really freak out because, like, there are certain percentages, certain ratios of the actual thing plus security or a secure version of it; 16x is not the answer expect. 30%, probably still not the answer I expect, frankly. I don't know. This is, like, an ROI question [crosstalk 00:23:46]—Corey: Let's also be clear; my usage pattern is really weird. You take a look at most large companies at significant scale, their cloud environments from a billing perspective look an awful lot like a crap ton of instances—or possibly containers running—and smattering of other things. Yeah, you also database and storage being the other two tiers and because of… reasons data transfer loves to show up too, but by and large, everything else was more or less a rounding error. I have remarkably few of those things, just given the weird way that I use services inappropriately, but that is the nature of me, so don't necessarily take that as being gospel. Like, “Oh, you'll spend a third of your bill.”Like, I've talked to analyst types previously—not you, of course—who will hear a story like this and that suddenly winds up as a headline in some report somewhere. And it's, “Yeah, if your entire compute is based on Lambda functions and you get no traffic, yeah, you're going to see some weird distortions in your bill. Welcome to the conversation.” But it's a problem that I think is going to have to be addressed at some point, especially we talked about earlier, those vendors who are catering to customers who are not born in the cloud, and they start to see their business erode as the cloud-native way of doing things continues to accelerate, I feel like we're in for a time where they're going to be coming at the cloud providers and smacking them for this way harder than I am with my, “As a customer, wouldn't it be nice to have this?” They're going to turn this into something monstrous. And that's what it takes, that's what it takes. But… yeah.Anton: It will take more time than than we think, I think because again, back in the Gartner days, I loved to make predictions. And sometimes—I've learned that predictions end up coming true if you're good, but much later.Corey: I'm learning that myself. I'm about two years away from the end of it because three years ago, I said five years from now, nobody will care about Kubernetes. And I didn't mean it was going to go away, but I meant that it would slip below the surface level of awareness to point where most people didn't have to think about it in the same way. And I know it's going to happen because it's too complex now and it's going to be something that just gets handled in the same way that Linux kernels do today, but I think I was aggressive on the timeline. And to be clear, I've been misquoted as, “Oh, I don't think Kubernetes is going to be relevant.”It is, it's just going to not be something that you need to spend the quarter million bucks an engineer on to run in production safely.Anton: Yeah.Corey: So, we'll see. I'm curious. One other question I had for you while I've got you here is you run a podcast of your own: the Cloud Security Podcast if I'm not mistaken, which is—Anton: Sadly, you are not. [laugh].Corey: —the Cloud Se—yeah. Interesting name on that one, yeah. It's like what the Cloud Podcast was taken?Anton: Essentially, we had a really cool name [Weather Insecurity 00:26:14]. But the naming team here said, you must be descriptive as everybody else at Google, and we ended up with the name, Cloud Security Podcast. Very, very original.Corey: Naming is challenging. I still maintain that the company is renamed Alphabet, just so it could appear before Amazon in the yellow pages, but I don't know how accurate that one actually is. Yeah, to be clear, I'm not dunking on your personal fun podcast, for those without context. This is a corporate Google Cloud podcast and if you want to make the argument that I'm punching down by making fun of Google, please, I welcome that debate.Anton: [laugh]. Yes.Corey: I can't acquire companies as a shortcut to hire people. Yet. I'm sure it'll happen someday, but I can aspire to that level of budgetary control. So, what are you up to these days? You spent seven years at Gartner and now you're doing a lot of cloud security… I'll call it storytelling, and I want to be clear that I mean that as a compliment, not the, “Oh, you just tell stories rather than build things?”Anton: [laugh].Corey: Yeah, it turns out that you have to give people a reason to care about what you've built or you don't have your job for very long. What are you talking about these days? What narratives are you looking at going forward?Anton: So, one of the things that I've been obsessed with lately is a lot of people from more traditional companies come in in the cloud with their traditional on-premise knowledge, and they're trying to do cloud the on-premise way. On our podcast, we do dedicate quite some airtime to people who do cloud as if it were a rented data center, and sometimes we say, the opposite is called—we don't say cloud-native, I think; we say you're doing the cloud the cloudy way. So, if you do cloud, the cloudy way, you're probably doing it right. But if you're doing the cloud is rented data center, when you copy a security stack, you lift and shift your IDS, and your network capture devices, and your firewalls, and your SIM, you maybe are okay, as a first step. People here used to be a little bit more enraged about it, but to me, we meet customers where they are, but we need to journey with them.Because if all you do is copy your stack—security stack—from a data center to the cloud, you are losing effectiveness, you're spending money, and you're making other mistakes. I sometimes joke that you copy mistakes, not just practices. Why copy on-prem mistakes to the cloud? So, that's been bugging me quite a bit and I'm trying to tell stories to guide people out of a situation. Not away, but out.Corey: A lot of people don't go for the idea of the lift and shift migration and they say that it's a terrible pattern and it causes all kinds of problems. And they're right. The counterpoint is that it's basically the second-worst approach and everything else seems to tie itself for first place. I don't mean to sound like I'm trying to pick a fight on these things, but we're going to rebuild an application while we move it. Great.Then it doesn't work or worse works intermittently and you have no idea whether it's the rewrite, the cloud provider, or something else you haven't considered. It just sounds like a recipe for disaster.Anton: For sure. And so, imagine that you're moving the app, you're doing cut-and-paste to the cloud of the application, and then you cut-and-paste security, and then you end up with sizeable storage costs, possibly egress costs, possibly mistakes you used to make beyond five firewalls, now you make this mistake straight on the edge. Well, not on the edge edge, but on the edge of the public internet. So, some of the mistakes do become worse when you copy them from the data center to the cloud. So, we do need to, kind of, help people to get out of the situation but not by telling them don't do it because they will do it. We need to tell them what step B; what's step 1.5 out of this?Corey: And cost doesn't drive it and security doesn't drive it. Those are trailing functions. It has to be a capability story. It has to be about improving feature velocity or it does not get done. I have learned this the painful way.Anton: Whatever 10x cost if you do something in the data center-ish way in the cloud, and you're ten times more expensive, cost will drive it.Corey: To an extent, yes. However, the problem is that companies are looking at this from the perspective of okay, we can cut our costs by 90% if we make these changes. Okay, great. It cuts the cloud infrastructure cost that way. What is the engineering time, what is the opportunity cost that they gets baked into that, and what are the other strategic priorities that team has been tasked with this year? It has to go along for the ride with a redesign that unlocks additional capability because a pure cost savings play is something I have almost never found to be an argument that carries the day.There are always exceptions, to be clear, but the general case I found is that when companies get really focused on cost-cutting, rather than expanding into new markets, on some level, it feels like they are not in the best of health, corporately speaking. I mean, there's a reason I'm talking about cost optimization for what I do and not cost-cutting.It's not about lowering the bill to zero at all cost. “Cool. Turn everything off. Your bill drops to zero.” “Oh, you don't have a company anymore? Okay, so there's a constraint. Let's talk more about that.” Companies are optimized to increase revenue as opposed to reduce costs. And engineers are always more expensive than the cloud provider resources they're using, unless you've done something horrifying.Anton: And some people did, by replicating their mistakes for their inefficient data centers straight into the cloud, occasionally, yeah. But you're right, yeah. It costs the—we had the same pattern of Gartner. It's like, it's not about doing cheaper in the cloud.Corey: I really want to thank you for spending so much time talking to me. If people want to learn more about what you're up to, how you view the world, and what you're up to next, where's the best place for them to find you?Anton: At this point, it's probably easiest to find me on Twitter. I was about to say Podcast, I was about to say my Medium blog, but frankly, all of it kind of goes into Twitter at some point. And so, I think I am twitter.com/anton_chuvakin, if I recall correctly. Sorry, I haven't really—Corey: You are indeed. It's always great; it's one of those that you have a sizable audience, and you're like, “What is my Twitter handle, again? That's a good question. I don't know.” And it's your name. Great. Cool. “So, you're going to spell that for you, too, while you're at it?” We will, of course, put a link to that in the [show notes 00:32:09]. I really want to thank you for being so generous with your time. I appreciate it.Anton: Perfect. Thank you. It was fun.Corey: Anton Chuvakin, Security Strategy Something at Google Cloud. I'm Cloud Economist Corey Quinn, and this is Screaming in the Cloud. If you've enjoyed this podcast, please leave a five-star review on your podcast platform of choice, whereas if you've hated this podcast, please leave a five-star review on your podcast platform of choice along with an angry comment because people are doing it wrong, but also tell me which legacy vendor you work for.Corey: If your AWS bill keeps rising and your blood pressure is doing the same, then you need The Duckbill Group. We help companies fix their AWS bill by making it smaller and less horrifying. The Duckbill Group works for you, not AWS. We tailor recommendations to your business and we get to the point. Visit duckbillgroup.com to get started.Announcer: This has been a HumblePod production. Stay humble.

We are making it down the Road to 100 Million. Up next is a good friend of mine Scott Snapp. He joins us on the Modern Lending podcast to talk about how he built his business to over 100 Million and what it took for him to get there. Join us LIVE!

Moin! Hallo, Pssst! Tööv, ik dreih dat Radio lieser. Mien Schatz mutt dat nich mitkriegen. . . So! Ik weer veerteihn Daag mit Frünnen in de Bargen ünnerwegens. Wannern, Natur geneten, mit apen Ogen Deerten maal wedder richtig wohrnehmen. Vun A bit Z hebbt wi allens sehn: Adlers, de hooch baben segelt, en Heek, de as 'n Blitz över `n Seegrund op Büüt ut weer: Snapp! Topacken, rünnersluken! Lüürlütje Miegeemken, bunte Käfers, Bodderlicker. Sogoor 'n Steenbuck, de jo to de Zegen höört. Wat noch mit Z? Och so jo, en Zilpzalb in Boom entdeckt. Mien Kumpels: "Du sühst aver ok würklich allens!" Hier gibt es mehr Plattdeutsch: Podcast: Die plattdeutsche Morgenplauderei "Hör mal 'n beten to" als als kostenloses Audio-Abo für Ihren PC: https://www.ndr.de/wellenord/podcast3096.html Die Welt snackt Platt: Alles rund um das Thema Plattdeutsch: https://www.ndr.de/plattdeutsch

Rechaza Corte penalizar posesión de mariguana

In this episode we opened up the phone line to the podcast community! Conversations covered a wide range of topics with each guest. We also got into a deep analysis of the National Track at Jandebeur's Motorsports Park before their round of the state championship series coming up in two weeks.

We have an incredible discussion with one of the most iconic duck hunting pioneers of Arkansas. Charles Hammertime Snapp is one of the original Arkansas guides and is an expert on anything dealing with waterfowl. We discuss habitat, his mark on duck hunting and the future of the sport. Enjoy!!

In this fancy-schmancy episode of Wildcat Minute, Chandra and Tyler discuss the 52nd minute of High School Musical 2, in which Troy gets a bunch of benefits and gifts from his new promotion. Also, Chandra makes Tyler guess the plot of the Disney Channel Premier Film Perfect Harmony. Wildcat Minute is a production of the Amateur Nerds. Rate, review, subscribe, tell your friends! Follow us on Twitter @amateurnerds Email us amateurnerdspresent@gmail.com Logo by @tgoldenart Music by Joe Winslow

Accountant Life is the very first accounting talk show podcast created and hosted by Amin Ghanbari. In this podcast we invite the most influential people in accounting of the country and discuss with them on various topics which we find useful to be shared with accounting students who seek to find their path in the professional environment.In this episode we have discussed with Shahrokh Shahrabi, Senior Internal Control Manager of Snapp! Who is now PhD candidate in accounting. This is our very first episode with Shahrokh and we are going to discuss with him more in future. You can listen this podcast on Apple Podcast and Castbox and if you like to watch this episode you can check Amin's Youtube channel. Links to these platforms are as follows:

https://www.patreon.com/kabane --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/kabane/support

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/kabane We'll be doing another lengthy discussion on the Pericopae Adulterae and asking your questions. Final part exclusive to patrons. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/kabane/support

Today's the day. I've spent weeks trying to dig deep on the debate of whether the last 12 verses of the Gospel of Mark are actually part of the Gospel of Mark. We will look at manuscript evidence, translations, church fathers, lectionaries, internal evidence from vocabulary and style, and consider the question of how all this weighs in on the fact that most Christians throughout time have had these 12 verses as their ending to Mark. I want to warn you of one issue that I slowly noticed in my research. Proponents of the vs. 8 ending (the short ending) have a habit of overstating their case and making some mistakes in accuracy while proponents of the longer ending have the same tendency, perhaps worse than the former. Yeah, this was hard to muddle through but I'll share with you my own confusion and eventual clarity on the issue. I hope that you find it clear, thorough, and edifying. I'm hoping today's video will not only answer your questions but serve as a good launching point for those who want to do more research on the topic. For that reason, I'm including several links here for you to consider looking into: This is a book where 4 scholars each build a case for their different views on the ending of Mark. It’s a good introduction into the issues of the debate even if no one scholar has the space to fully flesh out their case. “Perspectives on the Ending of Mark: Four Views”:https://www.amazon.com/Perspectives-Ending-Mark-Daniel-Wallace-ebook/dp/B004OR17WK/ Nicholas Lunn recently wrote a book offering a very detailed case that the longer ending was always part of Mark’s Gospel. At first, I found Lunn’s book to be really helpful in challenging the scholarly majority. But after spending a lot of time with it, I’ve come to think that his work causes more confusion than clarity on the topic. Uneven standards in how evidence is handled make his work difficult to read without leading to important misimpressions. “The Original Ending of Mark: A New Case for the Authenticity of Mark 16:9-20”https://www.amazon.com/Original-Ending-Mark-Case-Authenticity-ebook/dp/B00OU6OB78/ Larry Hurtado offered three short reviews of Lunn’s book, all three at this link:http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/search/label/Nicholas%20P.%20Lunn James Snapp’s theory is that Mark wrote the longer ending but it was originally not part of the Gospel of Mark. It was taken from some other work from Mark and then added on to the end of the Gospel of Mark. He offers 5 different theories for why it is missing from some manuscripts. I respect Snapp’s tenacity, but I think his logic has regular logical problems. I mean no insult by this, I just want you to be prepared to think very carefully about what he says. His book, “Authentic: The Case for Mark 16:9-20,” is free here:https://www.academia.edu/12545835/Authentic_The_Case_for_Mark_16_9_20 The most helpful resource I found for dealing with the internal evidence in the longer ending of Mark is this article from Travis Williams:https://www.academia.edu/1444542/Bringing_Method_to_the_Madness_Examining_the_Style_of_the_Longer_Ending_of_Mark For those wanting to hear my verse-by-verse study of the longer ending of Mark, it’s here. It’s long, methodical, and shows that the passage doesn’t pose theological problems, even if it wasn’t written by Mark:https://youtu.be/zA6s9O4o5Uo For the 12th century Greek Codex 304, which is Byzantine in nature and ends Mark at 16:8, see the two links following; and you’ll need them because Snapp and Lunn have bad info on this and this is a really interesting piece of evidence showing not only a lack of the LE, but apparent debate on it from different owners of the codex! The text is viewable here:

Today's the day. I've spent weeks trying to dig deep on the debate of whether the last 12 verses of the Gospel of Mark are actually part of the Gospel of Mark. We will look at manuscript evidence, translations, church fathers, lectionaries, internal evidence from vocabulary and style, and consider the question of how all this weighs in on the fact that most Christians throughout time have had these 12 verses as their ending to Mark. I want to warn you of one issue that I slowly noticed in my research. Proponents of the vs. 8 ending (the short ending) have a habit of overstating their case and making some mistakes in accuracy while proponents of the longer ending have the same tendency, perhaps worse than the former. Yeah, this was hard to muddle through but I'll share with you my own confusion and eventual clarity on the issue. I hope that you find it clear, thorough, and edifying. I'm hoping today's video will not only answer your questions but serve as a good launching point for those who want to do more research on the topic. For that reason, I'm including several links here for you to consider looking into: This is a book where 4 scholars each build a case for their different views on the ending of Mark. It’s a good introduction into the issues of the debate even if no one scholar has the space to fully flesh out their case. “Perspectives on the Ending of Mark: Four Views”:https://www.amazon.com/Perspectives-Ending-Mark-Daniel-Wallace-ebook/dp/B004OR17WK/ Nicholas Lunn recently wrote a book offering a very detailed case that the longer ending was always part of Mark’s Gospel. At first, I found Lunn’s book to be really helpful in challenging the scholarly majority. But after spending a lot of time with it, I’ve come to think that his work causes more confusion than clarity on the topic. Uneven standards in how evidence is handled make his work difficult to read without leading to important misimpressions. “The Original Ending of Mark: A New Case for the Authenticity of Mark 16:9-20”https://www.amazon.com/Original-Ending-Mark-Case-Authenticity-ebook/dp/B00OU6OB78/ Larry Hurtado offered three short reviews of Lunn’s book, all three at this link:http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/search/label/Nicholas%20P.%20Lunn James Snapp’s theory is that Mark wrote the longer ending but it was originally not part of the Gospel of Mark. It was taken from some other work from Mark and then added on to the end of the Gospel of Mark. He offers 5 different theories for why it is missing from some manuscripts. I respect Snapp’s tenacity, but I think his logic has regular logical problems. I mean no insult by this, I just want you to be prepared to think very carefully about what he says. His book, “Authentic: The Case for Mark 16:9-20,” is free here:https://www.academia.edu/12545835/Authentic_The_Case_for_Mark_16_9_20 The most helpful resource I found for dealing with the internal evidence in the longer ending of Mark is this article from Travis Williams:https://www.academia.edu/1444542/Bringing_Method_to_the_Madness_Examining_the_Style_of_the_Longer_Ending_of_Mark For those wanting to hear my verse-by-verse study of the longer ending of Mark, it’s here. It’s long, methodical, and shows that the passage doesn’t pose theological problems, even if it wasn’t written by Mark:https://youtu.be/zA6s9O4o5Uo For the 12th century Greek Codex 304, which is Byzantine in nature and ends Mark at 16:8, see the two links following; and you’ll need them because Snapp and Lunn have bad info on this and this is a really interesting piece of evidence showing not only a lack of the LE, but apparent debate on it from different owners of the codex! The text is viewable here:

Jason awww Snapp tag teams with Ryan vs Ethan and God over a** or something 

Darrin Thomas is an ex-professional motocross and ATV motocross mechanic. Before becoming a mechanic he spent several years racing motocross before deciding he liked working on bikes. He then spent several years working as a motocross mechanic for amateur riders around Oklahoma before taking a professional position at Yoshimura Suzuki in California. Following his time at Yoshimura he was hired by the Snapp brothers as a full time mechanic for their ATVMX program. Darrin worked alongside Chase during all of his pro-am and professional success as an ATVMX racer where they won a pro-am title together and placed 6th overall in the premiere class Chase's rookie year. Chase's accomplishments as an ATVMX athlete are something that is still discussed among the ATVMX community to this day, and Darrin played a very significant role in that success. Following his tenure with the Snapps, he worked as a factory mechanic for Joel Hetrick and the Can-Am team. Darrin now works as one of the premiere bass boat mechanics for some of the world's most elite bass fisherman, including several members of the Bassmasters tour. Darrin is absolutely hilarious and has a really awesome story; you don't want to miss this one!

ABOUT THIS EPISODE Cheryl Snapp Connor is one of the most influential women in the tech industry and has been a powerhouse entrepreneur since 1989. Today, she is the founder and CEO of SnappConner PR, the developer of Content University™, and she is a trustee and member of the Utah Technology Council's Executive Committee. She has contributed to, as well as featured and recognized by numerous publications including Inc. Magazine and the Forbes Entrepreneurs channel.   Most recently, Cheryl has been named as one of the world's Top 20 Business Thought Leaders to Follow by ClearPoint Strategies in 2014, and since 2008, she has been listed in Signal Peak's v100 list every year. Cheryl is a powerhouse entrepreneur, thought leader, and an inspiration to thousands of women across the United States.   Please welcome Cheryl Snapp Conner to the show!    Links:   http://snappconner.com/ http://www.inc.com/author/cheryl-snapp-conner http://www.forbes.com/sites/cherylsnappconner/#16c473d1c7a0 https://www.linkedin.com/in/cherylsnappconner https://twitter.com/CherylSnapp https://www.facebook.com/snappconner?fref=ts https://www.linkedin.com/company/snapp-conner-pr https://twitter.com/snappconner

It's Episode 260, and Erin welcomes back Ginger Snapp to talk about being new to sex work. Listen along as they discuss raising your rates, learning from other sex workers, and violating boundaries. Brought to you By: The Sonar Network https://thesonarnetwork.com/

This episode, Erin talks with cam performer Ginger Snapp. Listen along as these lovelies talk about demisexuality, sex work boundaries, and fun camming stories. Brought to you By: The Sonar Network https://thesonarnetwork.com/

Zara Snapp, cofundadora del Instituto RIA México y Gady Zabicky Sirot, titular de la Comisión Nacional Contra las Adicciones, hablaron con Aristegui sobre el debate del amparo para el consumo de cocaína. "La discusión sobre la cocaína es importante porque no tenemos muchos estudios sobre esta substancia", dijo Snapp. Según Snapp hay muchos prejuicios sobre el uso de la cocaína y poca información. México Unido Contra la Delincuencia busca despenalizar la posesión de cocaína para uso personal. Estos amparos son los primeros en su tipo y reaviva el debate sobre la despenalización del consumo de drogas. Los amparos no legalizan el uso de la cocaína en México.Para conocer sobre cómo CNN protege la privacidad de su audiencia, visite CNN.com/privacidad