Podcasts about untrustworthy

LIFELINE ✨LUXURY✨ is available at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠patreon.com/lifelineluxury⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Extra episodes every month, no advice, all for $5. Our Patreon is also the exclusive home to all the live podcasts which we film and upload!

The wide-ranging impact of Australia's new social media ban for children under 16 — the first of its kind in the world — is already being felt at home and abroad, especially for major platforms that have controversially allowed children full access.澳大利亚针对16岁以下儿童实施的新社交媒体禁令。此类禁令是全球首例，其广泛影响已在国内外显现，尤其对那些曾引发争议地允许儿童全面使用平台的巨头企业造成冲击。The ambitious move to improve online safety governance for youngsters, which took effect on Dec 10, requires major platforms like Instagram, Facebook, X, Snapchat, TikTok, Reddit, and YouTube to enforce the new legislation. They face fines of up to A$49.5 million ($32.9 million) if they take no reasonable steps to prevent underage users from holding accounts with them.这项旨在加强青少年网络安全监管的重大举措已于12月10日生效，要求Instagram、Facebook、X、Snapchat、TikTok、Reddit和YouTube等主流平台执行新法规。若未能采取合理措施阻止未成年用户注册账户，这些平台将面临最高4950万澳元（约合3290万美元）的罚款。The ban follows a major survey which revealed how social media is negatively affecting the life satisfaction of Australian high school students. The study, led by the Australian National University, looked at the impact of regular use of social media platforms on life satisfaction levels for students nationwide. It found most participants reported regularly using at least one social media platform, while nearly one in five young people actively post or share social media content at least once a day.这项禁令出台前，一项重大调查揭示了社交媒体如何对澳大利亚高中生的生活满意度产生负面影响。由澳大利亚国立大学主导的研究，考察了社交媒体平台的常规使用对全国学生生活满意度的影响。调查发现，大多数参与者表示会定期使用至少一个社交媒体平台，而近五分之一的年轻人每天至少主动发布或分享一次社交媒体内容。Most major platforms have said that they would comply with the law. Video service provider TikTok said in a statement it has a range of methods for compliance including facial age estimation, credit card authorization, and government-approved identification.大多数主流平台均表示将遵守该法律。视频服务提供商TikTok在声明中称，其已采取多种合规措施，包括面部年龄估算、信用卡授权以及政府认可的身份验证。YouTube said it would make changes to how it operates in Australia under the ban, adding it is committed to finding "a better path forward to keep kids safe online". "We believe a more effective approach is one that empowers parents, rather than stripping away their choices, and allows kids to continue to derive the immense benefits of digital environments while protecting them from harm," it said in a statement.YouTube表示，在禁令实施期间将调整其在澳大利亚的运营方式，并承诺致力于寻找“更佳方案保障儿童网络安全”。该公司声明称：“我们认为更有效的方式是赋予家长更多选择权而非剥夺其选择权，让儿童在享受数字环境巨大益处的同时获得有效保护。”Legal action法律举措On Friday, message board website Reddit filed a lawsuit in Australia's highest court seeking to overturn the country's social media ban for children. The San Francisco-based firm, which ranks Australia among its biggest markets, said in the High Court filing that the ban should be declared invalid because it interfered with free political communication implied by the country's constitution.周五，社交论坛网站Reddit向澳大利亚最高法院提起诉讼，要求推翻该国针对儿童的社交媒体禁令。这家总部位于旧金山的公司将澳大利亚列为其最大市场之一，在向最高法院提交的文件中称，该禁令应被宣布无效，因为它干涉了该国宪法所暗示的政治自由交流。A spokesperson for Communications Minister Anika Wells, who was named as the defendant along with the Commonwealth of Australia, said the federal government was "on the side of Australian parents and kids, not platforms" and would "stand firm to protect young Australians from experiencing harm on social media", Reuters reported.据路透社报道，美国通讯部长安妮卡·韦尔斯（Anika Wells）的发言人表示，联邦政府“站在澳大利亚家长和孩子这一边，而非平台方”，并将“坚定立场，保护澳大利亚青少年免受社交媒体伤害”。Wells与澳大利亚联邦政府共同被列为本案被告。Health Minister Mark Butler said Reddit filed the lawsuit to protect profits, not young people's right to political expression, and "we will fight this action every step of the way". "It is action we saw time and time again by Big Tobacco against tobacco control and we are seeing it now by some social media or Big Tech giants," Butler told reporters.澳大利亚卫生部长马克·巴特勒表示，Reddit提起诉讼是为了保护利润，而非捍卫年轻人的政治表达权，并称“我们将全力抵制这一诉讼的每一步行动”。巴特勒向记者表示：“这是大型烟草公司屡次采取的反烟草管制手段，如今某些社交媒体或科技巨头也在效仿。”One Reddit user said in a message-board post: "Our son can no longer access his apps — this has already had a profound effect … Normally he would be consumed with his phone, watching mind-numbing videos."一位Reddit用户在论坛帖子中写道：“我们的儿子现在无法使用他的应用程序，这已经产生了深远影响……平常他会沉迷于手机，看那些令人麻木的视频。”In a radio interview a day after the ban took effect, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said online safety regulators from the eSafety Commissioner are looking at accounts in line with the new legislation. "So they'll look at what the impact is and then every month for six months they'll have to report," he said.禁令生效次日，澳大利亚总理安东尼·阿尔巴尼斯在电台采访中表示，电子安全专员办公室的网络安全监管人员正依据新法规审查相关账户。他表示：“他们将评估影响，并在接下来的六个月内每月提交报告。”Albanese also acknowledged the challenges implementation of the ban faces.安东尼·阿尔巴尼斯也承认实施禁令面临的挑战。"Some people will get around it, just as chances are this Saturday night an under 18-year-old will get a beer in a pub somewhere. That doesn't mean that society doesn't set these rules, and these processes, in order to keep our youngest Australians safe," he said.他表示：“有些人会钻空子，就像这个周六晚上，某个酒吧里很可能会有未满18岁的未成年人喝到啤酒。但这并不意味着社会没有制定这些规则和流程来保护我们最年轻的澳大利亚人。”"We'll be sensible about it … we're talking of over a million accounts across platforms. We don't expect it to all be done perfectly, but we do expect the law provides for them to do their best endeavors."安东尼·阿尔巴尼斯接着说到：“我们会审慎处理此事……毕竟涉及跨平台超过百万个账户。我们不指望一切都能完美解决，但法律要求他们尽最大努力。”Praise, wariness赞美，警惕Julian Sefton-Green, a professor of new media education at Deakin University, said the ban was "inspiring legislation".迪肯大学新媒体教育教授朱利安·塞夫顿-格林（Julian Sefton-Green）称这项禁令是“鼓舞人心的立法”。"It's designed to raise questions … It's designed to make families and young people talk in different ways," he said.他表示：“禁令的初衷是引发思考……旨在让家庭和年轻人以不同的方式展开对话。”"So I think the significance of this law might be that it changes the power of these huge multinational global platforms, which are to a very great extent unaccountable, unregulated, and not owned by individual national countries, and it will raise a lot of questions about what individual countries can do in respect of these large multinational companies," Sefton-Green, who is also a member of the Australian eSafety Commissioner's advisory group that explores the implementation and outcomes of the nation's social media minimum age legal obligations, told China Daily.同时担任澳大利亚电子安全专员顾问组成员的朱利安·塞夫顿-格林（Julian Sefton-Green）向《中国日报》表示：“因此我认为这项法律的意义可能在于改变这些庞大全球性跨国平台的权力格局——它们在很大程度上不受问责、不受监管，且不属于任何单一国家所有。这将引发诸多思考：各国政府面对这些大型跨国企业究竟能采取哪些有效措施？”澳大利亚电子安全专员顾问小组负责研究该国社交媒体最低年龄法律义务的实施情况及成效。But Catherine Archer, a senior lecturer and researcher in social media at Edith Cowan University, said many academics feel children and teens were not consulted widely enough before the legislation was announced.但伊迪丝考恩大学社交媒体高级讲师兼研究员凯瑟琳·阿彻（Catherine Archer）指出，许多学者认为在立法公布前，对儿童和青少年的意见征询不够充分。"The ban could cause anxiety and other mental issues for teens. They will face uncertainty over the school holidays on how to keep in contact with their friends and be entertained and informed on their regular platforms," Archer said via the Scimex science information portal.凯瑟琳·阿彻（Catherine Archer）通过Scimex科学资讯门户网站表示：“这项禁令可能引发青少年焦虑及其他心理问题。他们将在假期面临不确定性，不知如何与朋友保持联系，也无法通过常用平台获取娱乐和资讯。”"Teens are starting to think of ways around the ban, and the concern is that they may go to 'darker' places on the web. Messaging apps like WhatsApp won't be under the ban, so bullying may still occur," she said.她表示：“青少年正开始寻找规避禁令的方法，令人担忧的是他们可能会转向网络上更‘阴暗'的角落。WhatsApp等即时通讯应用不受禁令限制，因此网络欺凌仍可能发生。”"The effectiveness is yet to be tested. Some adults are worried that it will lead to more data and surveillance, as age testing is not foolproof."她接着说到：“该措施的有效性尚待检验。部分成年人担忧这将导致更多数据收集和监控，因为年龄检测并非万无一失。“Some teenagers have expressed concern over the ban, according to the Australian Associated Press.据澳大利亚联合通讯社报道，一些青少年对这项禁令表示焦虑。It cited the example of Carlee Jade Clements, 15, an influencer from Melbourne with 37,000 Instagram followers who was still on the platform two days from the ban's effective date. Clements spent years building her Instagram presence, with her mother managing the account, but fears the new rules will impact her income and opportunities, AAP reported.该报道以15岁的墨尔本网红卡莉·杰德·克莱门茨（Carlee Jade Clements）为例，这位拥有3.7万Instagram粉丝的博主在禁令生效前两天仍活跃于该平台。据澳大利亚联合通讯社报道，克莱门茨耗费数年时间经营Instagram账号（由其母亲管理），但现在她担忧新规将影响她的收入与发展机会。Two teenagers representing an Australian libertarian group filed another suit last month against such a ban, according to Reuters.据路透社报道，两名代表澳大利亚自由意志主义团体的青少年上月就该禁令提起另一项诉讼。Tama Leaver, a professor of internet studies at Curtin University, said that no matter how people feel about the ban or social media, the feelings and responses of teens losing access to social media must be taken seriously.西澳大利亚珀斯科廷大学互联网研究教授塔玛·利弗（Tama Leaver）表示，无论人们对禁令或社交媒体持何种看法，青少年失去社交媒体使用权限所产生的情绪和反应都必须被严肃对待。"Parents and trusted adults need to listen to young people, to support them, and not dismiss what social media may have meant to them," Leaver said.塔玛·利弗（Tama Leaver）表示：“父母和可信赖的成年人需要倾听年轻人的心声，给予他们支持，不要轻视社交媒体对他们可能产生的意义。”The ban may well reduce some risks, he said, but "cyberbullying will still exist — messaging platforms are mostly exempt from the ban. Untrustworthy adults may still be able to find ways to reach and speak to teens across almost any platform."利弗表示，这项禁令或许能降低某些风险，但“网络欺凌仍将存在——即时通讯平台大多不受禁令约束。不可靠的成年人仍可能找到途径，在几乎任何平台上接触并与青少年对话。”"The job of helping young people learn to navigate the digital world safely is ongoing, and helping teens continue that conversation matters. Opening a door so young people have someone to turn to if they experience something challenging, confronting or terrible online, is vital."利弗表示：“帮助年轻人安全地探索数字世界是一项持续的工作，而引导青少年持续参与相关对话至关重要。为年轻人敞开大门，让他们在遭遇网络挑战、冲突或可怕经历时能获得支持，这具有关键意义。”Sabrina Caldwell, senior lecturer from the School of Systems and Computing at UNSW Canberra, said the new social media ban "won't work perfectly, but it can work imperfectly".新南威尔士大学堪培拉校区系统与计算学院高级讲师萨布丽娜·考德威尔（Sabrina Caldwell）表示，这项新的社交媒体禁令“不会完美奏效，但可以不完美地发挥作用”。"Some young people will find ways to circumvent the restrictions. However, even if they find a way to sneak online, they will not find most of their peers there, and this will detract significantly from the social media experience," Caldwell said.Caldwell表示：“一些年轻人会想方设法绕过限制。然而，即使他们找到偷偷上网的途径，也无法在网上找到大多数同龄人，这将极大削弱社交媒体体验。Bigger issues更重大的问题An Australian Broadcasting Corporation survey of more than 17,000 youngsters aged under 16 about the ban, found one-quarter would stop using social media.澳大利亚广播公司针对1.7万多名16岁以下青少年开展的禁令调查显示，四分之一受访者表示将停止使用社交媒体。Twenty-two percent of social media users said they were unsure if the ban would be effective, while 72 percent said they did not think it would work, according to the poll.调查显示，22%的社交媒体用户表示不确定禁令是否有效，而72%的用户认为禁令不会奏效。Associate Professor Katie Wood, an expert in clinical psychology at Swinburne University of Technology, questioned the ban's role in addressing the "clear negative impacts on mental health and well-being" from excessive social media.斯威本科技大学临床心理学专家凯蒂·伍德（Katie Wood）副教授质疑这项禁令能否有效应对过度使用社交媒体对心理健康和幸福感造成的“明显负面影响”。"While more research is needed to fully answer this question, parents will need support to work with their children to find ways to manage the ban," Wood said.伍德表示：“虽然需要更多研究才能彻底解答这个问题，但家长需要支持来协助孩子寻找应对禁令的方法。”"There is a risk that children will find other ways to access social platforms and become sneakier about it. Parents will need to be vigilant about this as well as any emotional and social fallout."伍德称：“会存在这样的风险：孩子们可能会另辟蹊径接触社交平台，且手段会变得更加隐蔽。家长不仅需要对此保持警惕，还需关注由此引发的情感与社交问题。”Tom Sulston, head of policy at Digital Rights Watch, a group that advocates protection of Australians' digital rights, told China Daily that despite the ban, bullies, abusers, and predators will not go away.数字权利观察组织政策主管汤姆·苏尔斯顿向《中国日报》表示，尽管实施了禁令，但欺凌者、施虐者和掠夺者不会就此消失。该组织致力于保护澳大利亚人的数字权利。"They will merely follow young people onto the platforms that they are allowed to use. At the same time, young people will be discouraged from seeking help as they may feel they are doing something they shouldn't be."苏尔斯顿表示：“他们只会跟随年轻人进入被允许使用的平台。与此同时，年轻人会因担心自己正在做不该做的事而不敢寻求帮助。”Demanding ID from people to use simple internet systems is likely to cause an increase in identity theft, as Australians become habituated to entering their ID around the internet and potentially into criminal honeypots, Sulston said.苏尔斯顿指出，要求民众在使用简单互联网系统时提供身份证明，很可能导致身份盗窃案件激增。因为澳大利亚人逐渐习惯在网络各处输入个人身份信息，这些信息可能落入犯罪分子的陷阱。Considering the ban's potential impact on other parts of the world, Sulston said his hope and expectation is that "countries will look at Australia's experiment on young people's ability to communicate with each other and treat it as a cautionary tale".考虑到这项禁令可能对世界其他地区产生的影响，苏尔斯顿表示，他希望并期待“各国能关注澳大利亚这项关于年轻人相互交流能力的实验，并将其视为一个警示案例”。"Instead, they will opt to regulate social media companies to remove the harms, rather than remove the young people. We need to stop social media companies from using their algorithms to profit from spreading hate, lies, and division. That is what we should be regulating, rather than the age of the users," he said.他如是说：“可另作他选的是，可以选择监管社交媒体公司以消除危害，而非驱逐年轻人。我们必须阻止社交媒体公司利用算法从传播仇恨、谎言和分裂中牟利。这才是我们应当监管的对象，而非用户的年龄。”Sefton-Green said it will also "encourage other countries to stand up against these social media firms, to try to say that the norms of behavior we see in our society should be norms for which national governments take responsibility".塞夫顿-格林（Sefton-Green）表示，该实验还将“鼓励其他国家挺身对抗这些社交媒体公司，力图表明我们社会中的行为准则应当成为各国政府应承担责任的规范”。Prime Minister Albanese said the "world is not only watching, the world is following".澳大利亚总理安东尼·阿尔巴尼斯表示：“世界不仅在关注，更在追随。”Professor Michael Salter from the School of Social Sciences, Arts, Design and Architecture at the University of New South Wales, said the ban is still "an unfortunate but necessary step to protect children from escalating levels of online sexual abuse and exploitation".新南威尔士大学社会科学、艺术、设计与建筑学院的迈克尔·索尔特（Michael Salter）教授表示，这项禁令仍是“一项不幸但必要的措施，旨在保护儿童免受日益严重的网络性虐待和剥削”。"Globally, 300 million children experience online sexual abuse each year, and the majority of this occurs on social media platforms," said Salter, who is director of Childlight UNSW, the Australasian hub of Childlight, the Global Child Safety Institute, which undertakes research on the impact of child sexual abuse and exploitation.作为全球儿童安全研究所旗下机构Childlight的澳大拉西亚中心新南威尔士大学Childlight项目主任迈克尔·索尔特（Michael Salter），他长期致力于研究儿童性虐待与剥削的影响。他表示：“全球每年有3亿儿童遭受网络性虐待，其中大部分发生在社交媒体平台上。”"Social media companies have consistently prioritized growth and engagement over child protection. Age restrictions are a necessary circuit breaker for a sector where voluntary industry action has failed," he said.Salter表示：“社交媒体公司始终将增长和用户参与度置于儿童保护之上。在行业自发行动未能奏效的领域，年龄限制是必要的保护机制。”Rachael Sharman, a senior psychology lecturer at University of the Sunshine Coast, said that while the logistics of the ban remain under question, the move, if successful, "will give parents and families the opportunity to reclaim childhood, and ensure the building blocks of the brain are set in place before exposure to what has proved to be a most pernicious influence".阳光海岸大学心理学高级讲师瑞秋·夏曼（Rachael Sharman）指出，尽管禁令的实施细节仍存争议，但若该举措得以成功推行，“将使家长和家庭有机会重新夺回童年时光，确保大脑发育的关键阶段在接触已被证实具有极大危害性的影响之前得到健全发展”。"I suspect the rest of the world is taking such an extraordinary interest in this Australian initiative, to see when and how they can best follow suit for the improved wellbeing of their future generations," Sharman said.Sharman表示：“我怀疑世界其他国家之所以对这项澳大利亚倡议表现出如此非凡的兴趣，是为了观察何时以及如何才能最好地效仿，从而为子孙后代创造更美好的福祉。”Germany, Denmark, New Zealand and Malaysia are already considering policies concerning access to social media by teenagers.德国、丹麦、新西兰和马来西亚已开始考虑制定青少年使用社交媒体的相关政策。circuit breaker保护机制algorithmsn./ˈæl.ɡə.rɪ.ðəm/算法perniciousadj./pɚˈnɪʃ.əs/有害的social fallout社交影响circumventv./ˌsɝː.kəmˈvent/规避

A Shadow Rises! Kritfayle's New One Ring TTRPG Campaign Episode 4!Journey into the heart of Middle-earth! Kritfayle is embarking on an epic new actual play campaign using the official The One Ring Roleplaying Game by Free League Publishing.What is The One Ring RPG? This TTRPG is designed to capture the feel of J.R.R. Tolkien's world, exploration, the return of evil, and the heroic deeds of the characters trying to hold their own. Come with us, relax, and join the Fellowship! or our Patreon ;) like, comment and subscribe. Soundfx by Fantasy + and Syrinscape.comhttps://syrinscape.com/attributions/?id=17&id=14828&id=63542&id=39958#TheOneRingRPG #TTRPG #ActualPlay #LordOfTheRings #MiddleEarth #Tolkien #FreeLeaguePublishing #TORRPG #RoleplayingGame #FantasyRPG #Kritfayle #ActualPlayPodcast #TabletopRPG #CritFail #Fellowship #NewCampaign #LotR

Anthropic is untrustworthy. This post provides arguments, asks questions, and documents some examples of Anthropic's leadership being misleading and deceptive, holding contradictory positions that consistently shift in OpenAI's direction, lobbying to kill and water down regulation so helpful that employees of all major AI companies speak out to support it, and violating the fundamental promise the company was founded on. It also shares a few previously unreported details on Anthropic leadership's promises and efforts.[1] Anthropic has a strong internal culture that has broadly EA views and values, and the company has strong pressures to appear to follow these views and values as it wants to retain talent and the loyalty of staff, but it's very unclear what they would do when it matters most. Their staff should demand answers.There's a details box here with the title "Suggested questions for Anthropic employees to ask themselves, Dario, the policy team, and the board after reading this post, and for Dario and the board to answer publicly". The box contents are omitted from this narration. I would like to thank everyone who provided feedback on the draft; was willing to share information; and raised awareness of some of the facts discussed here. [...] ---Outline:(01:34) 0. What was Anthropics supposed reason for existence?(05:01) 1. In private, Dario frequently said he won't push the frontier of AI capabilities; later, Anthropic pushed the frontier(10:54) 2. Anthropic said it will act under the assumption we might be in a pessimistic scenario, but it doesn't seem to do this(14:40) 3. Anthropic doesnt have strong independent value-aligned governance(14:47) Anthropic pursued investments from the UAE and Qatar(17:32) The Long-Term Benefit Trust might be weak(18:06) More general issues(19:14) 4. Anthropic had secret non-disparagement agreements(21:58) 5. Anthropic leaderships lobbying contradicts their image(24:05) Europe(24:44) SB-1047(34:04) Dario argued against any regulation except for transparency requirements(34:39) Jack Clark publicly lied about the NY RAISE Act(36:39) Jack Clark tried to push for federal preemption(37:04) 6. Anthropics leadership quietly walked back the RSP commitments(37:55) Unannounced removal of the commitment to plan for a pause in scaling(38:52) Unannounced change in October 2024 on defining ASL-N+1 by the time ASL-N is reached(40:33) The last-minute change in May 2025 on insider threats(41:11) 7. Why does Anthropic really exist?(47:09) 8. Conclusion The original text contained 11 footnotes which were omitted from this narration. --- First published: November 29th, 2025 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/5aKRshJzhojqfbRyo/unless-its-governance-changes-anthropic-is-untrustworthy --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO. ---Images from the article:

Remember this date. It's the day AI finally made fake videos indistinguishable from real life. OpenAI's Sora 2 changes everything. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this potent transmission of wisdom Jumana Sophia and Priestess Francesca discuss the inevitable experience of encountering UNtrustworthy guides on your path, AND how to contextualize that painful experience so that it fortifies you. I'm deeply grateful to these two priestesses for their willingness to share such sacred wisdom.  Connect with Jumana: Free teaching on the Unconscious Priestess: https://her-mystery-school.mykajabi.com/pl/2148705384   Her Mystery School is still open for enrollment:   https://www.hermysteryschool.com/   Connect with Priestess Francesca:   Threshold Ritual Journal: https://www.priestessfrancesca.com/deep   Connect with Brittany:   https://www.instagram.com/brittany.wittig

HEADLINE: IDF Advances in Gaza City; Expert Cautions Against Incoherent Hostage Deals and Untrustworthy Multinational Policing Forces GUEST NAME: David Daoud SUMMARY: David Daoud analyzes IDF Gaza operations, noting Hamas links a ceasefire deal to gaining legitimacy. He cautions against relying on new anti-Hamas militias or a multinational policing force. 1965 GAZA POWS

HEADLINE: IDF Advances in Gaza City; Expert Cautions Against Incoherent Hostage Deals and Untrustworthy Multinational Policing Forces GUEST NAME: David Daoud SUMMARY: David Daoud analyzes IDF Gaza operations, noting Hamas links a ceasefire deal to gaining legitimacy. He cautions against relying on new anti-Hamas militias or a multinational policing force.

Most workplaces have unhealed leaders and because of the mindsets of those leaders (CEO, Bosses, Leaders, Supervisors, etc.) things are allowed to take place and therefore, trickle down. Many leaders simply don't know how to lead. A good leader sets the example and lead from the front. Unfortunately, that isn't what is happening in most workplaces. That's why workplaces all over the world have nepotism, favoritism, discrimination, harassment, hostility, low morale, etc. You take you everywhere you go and whatever is in you is coming out in one way or another. It doesn't matter what title, position, or status you hold, it will never heal what's inside of you. Therefore, you will display and project your unresolved pains into the lives of other people. It's not just the leaders it is also the employees who falls under the leaders. Workplaces are full to the brim of people with unhealed hearts and minds! It will never change until people choose to be better people and that won't happen without inner healing and change! I think all agencies should have a Facilitation Team to help with internal issues.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/relationships-and-relatable-life-chronicles--4126439/support.

It doesn't matter what IT is, why do it if you know it's wrong? Why take the chance or risk to cause further issues in your own life by making the wrong choices and decisions, when you know it's wrong? Never fixate on thoughts that you know are wrong, because the more you give power to thoughts they can control and consume your life, until you succumb! Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/relationships-and-relatable-life-chronicles--4126439/support.

Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” talks to Jillian Michaels about society's obsession with youth and cosmetic procedures; the importance of healthspan over lifespan; the dangers of extreme anti-aging therapies like stem cells and peptides; the risks wealthy individuals face with unproven treatments; how to vet fitness and longevity advice in a world of conflicting health information and online influencers; why she defers to MDs and PhDs over internet trends; her decision to avoid metformin and methylene blue; and how she overcame severe back pain through rehab and smart spine care; cognitive decline in the modern world; how processed food and endless information may be aging our brains faster than in past generations; why diet, genetics, and neuroprotective habits matter; how media bias suppresses legitimate questions about vaccine safety; the importance of critical thinking around public health policies; the role of Big Pharma funding in mainstream media narratives; media bias and truth in podcasting; how influencers should take personal responsibility when discussing complex topics; the lack of transparency around the hepatitis B vaccine and its potential risks; how lobbying by Big Pharma shaped vaccine mandates; how she would handle vaccinating her kids based on disease risk; and the need for people to research for themselves, especially on childhood immunizations; and much more.

On this Salcedo Storm Podcast:Chris Salcedo Show Axiom #5.

The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meets Wednesday and Thursday. A once-obscure board, its work was thrust into the spotlight after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired all 17 of its members earlier this month. He named eight replacements, some of whom have been outspoken about their mistrust of COVID-19 vaccines and lockdowns. The board wields enormous influence, deciding on who gets vaccines in the U.S. and when. Michael Osterholm, the Director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy and the leader of the Vaccine Integrity Project at the University of Minnesota, joined Minnesota Now to talk about the impact the committee's decision could have on vaccine access.

Some people don't care what situation or condition you're in, they will cheat! They don't care who you are or what you have, they will cheat! They don't care what you do for them, they will cheat! They don't care how beautiful you are, they will cheat! They don't care how much you show them love, they will cheat. It is what cheaters do and you won't change it! You get what you accept! They are people of unhealed hearts and minds, who have a host of insecurities and other inner issues!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/relationships-and-relatable-life-chronicles--4126439/support.

The GOP's budget bill, now at the Senate, includes proposed cuts to federal statistical agencies. That could make government data narrower and less reliable. And when governments fail to put out dependable data? “It ends up being a real drag on the economy,” said economist Laura Veldkamp. Also in this episode: We visit an entrepreneurship hub in Provo, Utah, experts weight the merits of hard and soft data, and warehouses see a usage boom amid tariff uncertainty.Every story has an economic angle. Want some in your inbox? Subscribe to our daily or weekly newsletter.Marketplace is more than a radio show. Check out our original reporting and financial literacy content at marketplace.org — and consider making an investment in our future.

PREVIEW: Colleague Jonathan Schanzer comments on the motives of the powers to accept the untrustworthy new Syrian government as credible stability. More later. 1870 DAMASCUS

The GOP's budget bill, now at the Senate, includes proposed cuts to federal statistical agencies. That could make government data narrower and less reliable. And when governments fail to put out dependable data? “It ends up being a real drag on the economy,” said economist Laura Veldkamp. Also in this episode: We visit an entrepreneurship hub in Provo, Utah, experts weight the merits of hard and soft data, and warehouses see a usage boom amid tariff uncertainty.Every story has an economic angle. Want some in your inbox? Subscribe to our daily or weekly newsletter.Marketplace is more than a radio show. Check out our original reporting and financial literacy content at marketplace.org — and consider making an investment in our future.

Every husband listening in to the podcast has great intentions. Yet great intentions are useless if you are unwittingly making one or more of these common yet catastrophic mistakes. If you want the peace of mind knowing that your efforts in marriage are making a difference, this episode is a must. Let's begin….. Want the Quickest & Easiest Path to Becoming the Marriage Transforming Hero of your relationship? Book FREE 50min Heroic Husbands Bootcap Intensive 1-1 Coaching Application call Don't Miss The Upcoming Intake to the brand NEW Heroic Husbands Training and Community platform – Join the newsletter list to receive all the details for joining: Get your FREE “15 Simple Habits to Be The Husband She Brags About” e-book at www.kingsoffreedom.me I want to hear from you! Click the link to send me a 90sec voice message with questions or suggestions for relationship topics you'd love me to cover. Send Mark voice message Now

From covering up Joe Biden's cognitive issues, lying about the economy, lying about COVID, lying about the COVID vaccine, lying about the border, lying about what transgenderism really is, to selling out to an evil agenda, people are waking up and no longer putting their trust in the legacy media. Their numbers are crashing. Their respect is in the toilet, yet they watch their audience leave in droves and fail to correct their fake news. Today, Bob shares a vision for finding truth in news. Now, do you believe in this ministry? If you do, you can keep us on the air as a radio program and podcast by visiting our website, It is vastly more urgent than ever that you do. https://truth2ponder.com/support. You can also mail a check payable to Ancient Word Radio, P.O. Box 510, Chilhowie, VA 24319. Thank you in advance for your faithfulness to this ministry.

Monday, April 22nd, 2024Opening statements in the first criminal trial of a former president; a Turning Point Action resigns after accusations of election fraud; Louisiana lawmakers vote to remove lunch breaks for child workers; Bennie Thompson introduces a bill that would strip Secret Service protection from felons; Kari Lake wants Arizona sheriffs to enforce 1864 abortion ban; the Texas Bar says Ken Paxton should be disciplined for his lawsuit attempting to overturn the election; the NYAG files her objection to Trump's $175M bond; plus Allison and Dana deliver your good news. Turning Point Action official resigns after accusation of election-related fraud (WAPO)Louisiana lawmakers vote to remove lunch breaks for child workers, cut unemployment benefits (Nola.com)Kari Lake Wants Arizona Sheriffs to Enforce 1864 Abortion Ban (Rolling Stone)Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton can be disciplined for suit to overturn 2020 election, court says (AP) Federal workers - feel free to email me at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen.Share your Good News or Good Trouble:https://www.dailybeanspod.com/good/ Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewrote , Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote,Dana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedyHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/Patreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts

On this episode, SDP Topics include:Stephen A Smith vs Lebron part 2Nia Long vs Sherri ShepherdBlade movie canceled Will Smith press tourMarvin Sapp collection plateBring back toxic stage momsDaredevil Raising Kanan The Studio on AppleTVHardest verses from Cole, Kendrick & DrakeNumber 1 The Call Sheet documentary And MUCH MORE!

Jeff and Robert talk about Mardi Gras, Untrustworthy democrats, and John Cena turned heel.   SUPPORT GOOD MORNING COMRADE Support us on Patreon Follow us on Tiktok Subscribe on Youtube  Follow Jeff on Twitter Email us! goodmorningcomrade.com Tiktok Bluesky Twitter Facebook Leave a review! 5 stars and say something nice to spread the word about the show!

Rachel Maddow takes a closer look at Donald Trump's pick to lead the FBI, Kash Patel, who several of his past colleagues from the first Trump administration warn has a tendency to make stuff up.

Untrustworthy witnesses

Trust is an essential part of the foundation in your marriage, but what happens when that foundation cracks—or even shatters?  Maybe you've been hurt by the person you thought would always protect your heart. Perhaps betrayal, harsh words, or neglect have left you questioning everything. Can trust ever be rebuilt? Should you even try? If you've found yourself asking these questions, you're not alone. Broken trust can feel overwhelming, leaving you guarded, uncertain, and even hopeless.  But this doesn't have to be the end of your story. There is hope for healing, even in the deepest wounds. Wives, we know that you have every reason to not trust your husband again: You might get hurt again. Even if your husband is making changes, doubts linger. What if he goes back to his old ways? What if he's only changing to get something from me? Emotional wounds take time to heal. Maybe arguments, harsh words, or emotional distance have left you wondering: If I trust him again, will the hurt just continue? [Dear wife, please know this is in reference to emotional hurt. If physical abuse is part of your story, your safety must come first. God's heart breaks for your pain, and He wants you to be safe. Please seek help from trusted organizations or individuals who can support you. He has been Untrustworthy in the Past Maybe your husband has broken your trust—whether it's with finances, responsibilities, or even his faithfulness. Perhaps he's been judgmental, leaving you feeling small and unseen. Or maybe his words have torn you down so often that you've built a wall to protect your heart. Your feelings are valid. The wounds are real, and they cut deep. But alongside these fears, could it also be worth asking: Are there unmet needs—on both sides—that are contributing to the pain? Here is what we want to make sure all of our readers know: Wives & Husbands need different things to thrive in a marriage. Wives need to feel safe, known, and whole-heartedly cherished.  This isn't just about physical safety; it's emotional too. You need to feel that your thoughts, feelings, and dreams can be shared without fear of criticism or rejection. When this safety is missing, it's hard to open your heart. Husbands need respect, admiration, and whole-hearted sexual intimacy. Many husbands feel deeply loved when they are respected and admired. If emotional safety hasn't been on your husband's radar, it's possible he didn't fully understand how much you needed it. Husbands, if you didn't know- now you do. Use this information well and for the strengthening of your marriage and your relationship with your wife. Now that we've covered the reasons why you shouldn't trust your husbands and the different needs wives and husbands have, let's talk about the reasons why you absolutely should trust your husband and exactly how to do so. Wives, here are the reasons to trust your husband and how to do it: Forgive. “Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, ‘Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother or sister who sins against me? Up to seven times?' Jesus answered, ‘I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.'” (Matthew 18:21-22) “For if you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive others their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins.” (Matthew 6:14-15) Forgiveness is not easy, but it's a choice that honors God and opens the door for transformation. Your Husband Cannot Thrive in a Home Filled with Unforgiveness When bitterness fills a home, it's hard for anyone to grow. No one can thrive in a home filled with distrust or condemnation- including your husband. If you want your marriage, your husband, and you to thrive, there must be forgiveness and there must be trust. Forgiveness and Trust Allows Room for Change The changes you long to see will not happen in a home filled with unforgiveness. Offering forgiveness allows him the room to step into the man God is calling him to be. What motivation does he currently have to lead if every attempt to do so is met with distrust? Forgive him. Trust him. And give him that room to grow into who God is calling him to be. By the grace of God, we have seen marriages transform in our program. We have seen wives forgive, give their husbands grace, and husbands in turn rise up and begin to lead and begin to love their wives well again- even better than when they were dating! We have seen it time and again. We know that it's possible and we believe that it is possible for you too. Forgive as Christ forgave you. We love you and we are rooting for you! God bless you! Love, Belah & Team   PS - If you want to start making this change in your marriage but don't know how, we would love to chat with you: delightym.com/cc   PPS - Here is a testimonial from a recent graduate: "Before DYM there was a lot of tension and stress in our marriage and disconnect. My husband had affairs, and these were replayed constantly in my head even though one of them occurred 25 years ago. I did not trust him and had not forgiven him… After going through the program, the stress is gone, and replaying the affairs in my head is pretty much gone… We are both so much happier in our marriage! I have also started back on my spiritual journey with God that I have been away from for many years."​

Episode Notes Seasoned journalist Bonnie Kristian believes America is in the midst of a knowledge crisis that the church cannot afford to ignore. In fact, she thinks it could be the most pressing and unprecedented challenge for contemporary discipleship. Her book Untrustworthy: The Knowledge Crisis Breaking Our Brains, Polluting Our Politics, and Corrupting Christian Community describes the multiple forces contributing to an atmosphere characterized by mounting misinformation, mistrust, and polarization. Bonnie joins Dr. Keith Plummer to discuss why Christians need to understand the crisis and what measures we can take to resist it and its destructive effects.

When the Entrepreneur stops at a deuterium mining colony, the very stressed out miners don't seem willing to sell. But when Trip offers to help with facility repairs, Archer insists on teaching a man how to murder his bullies. Which cartoon character definitely has bodies? What could these Klingons use more of? Why is T'Pol keeping her badass-ness under a basket? It's the episode that establishes a slickback timeline.Support the production of The Greatest GenerationGet a thing at podshop.biz!Sign up for our mailing list!Follow The Game of Buttholes: The Will of the Riker - Quantum LeapThe Greatest Generation is produced by Wynde PriddySocial media is managed by Rob Adler and Bill TilleyMusic by Adam Ragusea & Dark MateriaFriends of DeSoto for: Labor | Democracy | JusticeDiscuss the show using the hashtag #GreatestGen and find us on social media:YouTube | Facebook | X | Instagram | TikTok | Mastodon | Bluesky | ThreadsAnd check out these online communities run by FODs: Reddit | USS Hood Discord | Facebook group | Wikia | FriendsOfDeSoto.social

This week, Johnny reminisces about his childhood on a submarine, proposes a new theory on waste and enjoys a bit of chip chat with Harry.Hear Johnny on Radio X every weekday at 4pm across the UK on digital radio, 104.9 FM in London, 97.7 FM in Manchester, on Global Player or via www.radiox.co.uk

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoicesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Recently, I provided counsel to Jeff who is trying to dissolve a partnership that has soured. Jeff's partner has broken laws, violated Jeff's trust, and created financial chaos in their shared business.  One of Jeff's options includes signing a new agreement with Jeff's partner. However, there is legitimate concern about signing an agreement with someone ... The post Trusting the Untrustworthy? appeared first on Unconventional Business Network.

Sam and Sierra answer a letter from someone who anxious that her affair partner might sleep with her best friend. Join us on Patreon for an extra weekly episode, exclusive livestreams, and more! SUBMIT: justbreakuppod.com FACEBOOK: /justbreakuppod INSTAGRAM: @justbreakuppod Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Lots of MCU actros and producers said interesting things this week plus we talk about your feedback and dive into new Thanos theories. It's Timely! SPONSORS: TONAL https://www.tonal.com Use code MCU Patreon https://www.patreon.com/mcucast Join The Stranded Panda Community! https://www.strandedpanda.com/ Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/spchat Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Untrustworthy models: a frame for scheming evaluations, published by Olli Järviniemi on August 20, 2024 on LessWrong. In this post, I'll talk about trustworthiness, a concept similar to scheming and deceptive alignment. I prefer this concept, as I find it A) is directly important in practice, B) more readily distinguishes between capability for scheming and in fact scheming, and C) is clearer how to evaluate for. I'll also distinguish between different types of untrustworthy models - active planners, sleeper agents and opportunists - that are often conflated. I think when people talk about evaluating models for something like scheming, they'd often be better off talking about trustworthiness instead, and I think it's overall a more applicable frame for designing evaluations and decision making. Many of the ideas here are from Buck Shlegeris and Ryan Greenblatt, thanks to them and Cody Rushing for feedback. Suppose an AI company has developed a new model, and wants to use it to perform large quantities of ML research (internal deployment). However, the company is worried about the model being deceptively aligned[1] and trying to take catastrophic actions, such as hacking the data center or copying its weights to a remote server. What can the company do? This is a textbook example of the type of problem AI control tries to solve, and a basic strategy looks like this: Every time you are using the new model and it takes some action, use another model to check the action is OK before letting it be executed. If the action is not OK, it's not executed and humans are alerted about suspicious activity. (If you have never heard of AI control before, you might want to try playing the Bash Control game to get familiar with the concept. In the game, your aim is to download and execute a malicious program without GPT-3.5 catching you.) Let's call our characters Smart and Weak: Smart is the new model doing ML research while maybe trying to escape, while Weak is a model trained to monitor Smart. The reason for these names will become apparent soon. There are many ways how this control strategy could fail. Here are some:[2] 1. Smart came up with an extremely subtle way to escape that Weak is just too dumb to notice. 2. Smart successfully jailbreaks (via e.g. a suffix attack) Weak to not alert humans about its escape attempt. 1. Or: Weak happens to have a backdoor, which Smart finds and exploits. 3. Smart successfully convinces Weak (via natural language) that its actions are not malicious.[3] 4. Smart's escape plan is unlike anything we have trained Weak on. While Weak "would be capable of" telling that Smart is escaping, our training didn't specify well enough what we wanted, Weak generalizes incorrectly out-of-distribution and doesn't alert humans. 5. The company has way too limited of a budget for human alerts, so while Weak does rank Smart's actions in the top 0.012% suspiciousness, it's not enough to meet the 0.01% threshold for alerting humans. 6. Weak believes that not alerting humans in this case would allow Smart to escape, and believes that this leads to better outcomes in light of its preferences, and thus for instrumental reasons deliberately does not alert humans, indeed causing Smart to escape. Failure 6 is very different from the others! Whereas failures 1 to 5 are broadly about "Weak is just not a capable/good enough monitor to do what we wanted", failure 6 is about "Weak knows perfectly well Smart is escaping, but betrays humans and doesn't tell them about this". This issue is most apparent if you were to use a copy of the AI lab's new model to monitor itself (so Smart and Weak are the same model[4]): If you don't trust the new model to do research without trying to escape, you probably can't trust it to alert humans about escape attempts (by itself, no less!) either...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Untrustworthy models: a frame for scheming evaluations, published by Olli Järviniemi on August 19, 2024 on The AI Alignment Forum. In this post, I'll talk about trustworthiness, a concept similar to scheming and deceptive alignment. I prefer this concept, as I find it A) is directly important in practice, B) more readily distinguishes between capability for scheming and in fact scheming, and C) is clearer how to evaluate for. I'll also distinguish between different types of untrustworthy models - active planners, sleeper agents and opportunists - that are often conflated. I think when people talk about evaluating models for something like scheming, they'd often be better off talking about trustworthiness instead, and I think it's overall a more applicable frame for designing evaluations and decision making. Many of the ideas here are from Buck Shlegeris and Ryan Greenblatt, thanks to them and Cody Rushing for feedback. Suppose an AI company has developed a new model, and wants to use it to perform large quantities of ML research (internal deployment). However, the company is worried about the model being deceptively aligned[1] and trying to take catastrophic actions, such as hacking the data center or copying its weights to a remote server. What can the company do? This is a textbook example of the type of problem AI control tries to solve, and a basic strategy looks like this: Every time you are using the new model and it takes some action, use another model to check the action is OK before letting it be executed. If the action is not OK, it's not executed and humans are alerted about suspicious activity. (If you have never heard of AI control before, you might want to try playing the Bash Control game to get familiar with the concept. In the game, your aim is to download and execute a malicious program without GPT-3.5 catching you.) Let's call our characters Smart and Weak: Smart is the new model doing ML research while maybe trying to escape, while Weak is a model trained to monitor Smart. The reason for these names will become apparent soon. There are many ways how this control strategy could fail. Here are some:[2] 1. Smart came up with an extremely subtle way to escape that Weak is just too dumb to notice. 2. Smart successfully jailbreaks (via e.g. a suffix attack) Weak to not alert humans about its escape attempt. 1. Or: Weak happens to have a backdoor, which Smart finds and exploits. 3. Smart successfully convinces Weak (via natural language) that its actions are not malicious.[3] 4. Smart's escape plan is unlike anything we have trained Weak on. While Weak "would be capable of" telling that Smart is escaping, our training didn't specify well enough what we wanted, Weak generalizes incorrectly out-of-distribution and doesn't alert humans. 5. The company has way too limited of a budget for human alerts, so while Weak does rank Smart's actions in the top 0.012% suspiciousness, it's not enough to meet the 0.01% threshold for alerting humans. 6. Weak believes that not alerting humans in this case would allow Smart to escape, and believes that this leads to better outcomes in light of its preferences, and thus for instrumental reasons deliberately does not alert humans, indeed causing Smart to escape. Failure 6 is very different from the others! Whereas failures 1 to 5 are broadly about "Weak is just not a capable/good enough monitor to do what we wanted", failure 6 is about "Weak knows perfectly well Smart is escaping, but betrays humans and doesn't tell them about this". This issue is most apparent if you were to use a copy of the AI lab's new model to monitor itself (so Smart and Weak are the same model[4]): If you don't trust the new model to do research without trying to escape, you probably can't trust it to alert humans about escape attempts (by itself, no ...

#Social Media: Untrustworthy, unavoidable.Bill Roggio, FDD https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2024/08/generation-jihad-ep-198-the-state-of-global-jihad-with-preston-stewart.php 1953

Do not trust in the circumstances, but in the God behind the circumstances. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/pastor-john-van-gorkom/support

Schedule a coffee chat: http://lindsaylymancoaching.com/chat 3 steps to deal with a bad manager workshop: https://lindsaylymancoaching.com/badmanager   Hey there! It's Lindsay Lyman, and I'm back with another episode to help you navigate your career without losing your sanity. After almost 12 years at Amazon, I've seen countless brilliant, successful overachievers burn out and leave their jobs because of stress and anxiety. But guess what? You don't have to sacrifice your mental health for your career. There's an easier way, and I'm here to show you how.   Today, I want to remind you that if you're feeling stuck, unmotivated, and constantly worried about your job, there are solutions out there. I've helped many people in your situation, and I genuinely believe that with more confidence and self-assurance, things will get better. We need emotionally intelligent leaders like you out there, making a positive impact.   So, if you're struggling and want to feel in control of your career, handle difficult people, and stop working so much, I can help. The first step? Let's have a coffee chat. It's a free, no-obligation call where we dive into what's going on with you and come up with actionable steps to get you on the right track. Head over to lindsaylymancoaching.com/chat or click the link in the show notes to book your spot.   In this episode, we're diving into a topic that came up during a fun discussion in my coaching program: red flags that your manager may not be trustworthy. We'll talk about some not-so-obvious signs, potential yellow flags, and even some green flags to look for in a good manager. Trust me, these insights are going to be game-changers.   Here are a few key points we'll cover: - Red flags like inconsistent one-on-ones, managers who don't bring their own team members, and leaders who gossip or dominate meetings. - Yellow flags that might indicate potential issues, such as managers who never turn on their cameras or always go first in group discussions. - Green flags that signal a great leader, like caring about you as a person, taking feedback seriously, and being transparent about changes.   As you listen, think about how these flags apply to your situation and how you can use this knowledge to ask better questions during interviews. And remember, you're not alone. You don't have to navigate this on your own. There are solutions, and I'm here to help you find them.   If you're finding value in this podcast, let's take it a step further. Book a coffee chat with me, and we'll talk one-on-one about your specific challenges and come up with a plan to get you unstuck. These chats are free but limited, so grab your spot now. Click the link in the show notes or go to lindsaylymancoaching.com/chat to sign up.   You got this. Let's make your career work for you, not the other way around. Talk soon!   Additional resources: ·      Schedule a coffee chat: http://lindsaylymancoaching.com/chat ·      3 steps to deal with a bad manager workshop: https://lindsaylymancoaching.com/badmanager ·      One pager to ask your company to pay for your coaching: https://lindsaylymancoaching.com/expense

Episode #8: "What Happens When We're Untrustworthy (and how to stop betraying ourselves)" of The Hilary Silver Podcast:   Introduction In this episode, Hilary dives into the intricate dynamics of trust within relationships, emphasizing the often overlooked ways we may inadvertently betray ourselves and others. She discusses the distinction between factual honesty and emotional truth, and how failing to express the latter can deteriorate trust and intimacy in relationships.   Episode Highlights Understanding the foundational role of trust in relationships. Identifying the subtle ways we break trust without realizing it. The impact of not sharing our emotional truths. Practical advice on how to be more honest and trustworthy in personal and professional relationships. Episode Breakdown [00:00:01] - Hilary opens the discussion on the importance of being honest in relationships. [00:00:36] - Introduction to the topic of trust as the foundation of relationships. [00:01:00] - Discussion on building and breaking trust. [00:01:17] - Self-reflection on personal trustworthiness. [00:01:47] - Encouragement to consider how trust applies in personal contexts. [00:03:01] - Exploration of factual honesty vs. emotional truth. [00:06:02] - How unshared truths sabotage relationships at work. [00:10:31] - Real-life examples of how we lie to avoid discomfort or conflict. [00:17:01] - A case study on a couple dealing with smoking and trust issues. [00:20:55] - Closing remarks on the importance of honesty and how to improve communication in relationships. Listener Takeaways Recognize Trustworthy Actions: Be aware of the ways you might be breaking trust, even unintentionally, and take steps to become more trustworthy by aligning your words with your true feelings. Value Emotional Honesty: Understand that sharing your emotional truth is just as important as factual truth for maintaining healthy relationships. Communicate Clearly and Honestly: Encourage open and honest communication in your relationships to build deeper connections and trust. Reflect on Personal Contributions: Regularly ask yourself how you are contributing to either the strength or weakness of your relationships through your level of honesty and integrity. This episode encourages listeners to be more mindful of their interactions and the importance of honesty in fostering genuine connections and trust.

Dietary propaganda: Meat vs veggies? Too much water? Anti-Semitism, RINOs, and TRUMP? Callers on IQ, the Bible, and History! The Hake Report, Friday, May 3, 2024 AD TIME STAMPS * (0:00:00) Start * (0:02:04) Hey, guys! Willow Beach * (0:04:16) CJ, TX: Vegetation, vegetables * (0:12:26) CJ: The garden, God * (0:16:35) CJ: Men (T), climate agenda, slaves, Bible * (0:23:22) Untrustworthy world * (0:28:05) MICHAEL, Canada: Water crazy, food * (0:33:33) MICHAEL: No S-word * (0:34:50) ART, OH: bad phone! * (0:37:24) Trump to Hannity: Anti-Semitism, Israel vs Gaza * (0:49:55) Mike Johnson scare; Breitbart started in Israel / USA * (0:55:50) Trump: MAGA Mike Johnson* (0:58:23) JAY, MS: Blame? Trump? Self-help * (1:01:22) JAY: Silent Prayer works, unforgiveness * (1:07:59) JAY: Spiritual issues, death * (1:09:48) MARK, CA: Anti-Semitism bill vs 1A * (1:11:54) MARK: Pro-Palestinian protesters * (1:12:39) MARK: 3/5ths Compromise, by whites for whites * (1:13:51) MARK: Stephen from Baltimore proved me right * (1:16:39) MARK: California replacement; Schiff vs Garvey Senate * (1:18:22) RICKA: Jesus two daddies, return to Mary's father, Bible  * (1:23:41) RICKA: Kid gloves on protesters, white guilt * (1:25:16) RICKA: God's plan, Bible discrepancies? * (1:26:43) RICKA: Bible vs Kemet (sp) * (1:27:23) STEPHEN, MD: Low-IQ people * (1:32:55) STEPHEN: Slavery, lies about history * (1:37:18) STEPHEN: R-word? Baltimore, whites * (1:42:05) JAIME, MN: 115-130 IQ, going up/down, patterns * (1:44:53) JAIME: Egyptologists, believing, Diet * (1:46:24) JAIME: 100 IQ average; Trump IQ 180? Musk 155 * (1:48:51) JAIME: Golem of Prague, useful idiots * (1:50:57) JEFF, LA: Low IQ people make the country work * (1:51:58) JEFF: 400 years? 1619? 1776 * (1:54:10) AMAN, India: Not enough time! (Supers next week, sorry!) * (1:54:29) Jacky Cheung - 祇想一生跟你走 (I Just Want to Follow You the Rest of My Life) (1993, Me and You) BLOG  https://www.thehakereport.com/blog/2024/5/3/the-hake-report-fri-5-3-24 PODCAST / Substack  HAKE NEWS from JLP  https://www.thehakereport.com/jlp-news/2024/5/3/irs-auditing-more-people-hake-news-fri-5-3-24 Hake is live M-F 9-11a PT (11-1CT/12-2ET) Call-in 1-888-775-3773 https://www.thehakereport.com/show VIDEO  YouTube  -  Rumble*  -  Facebook  -  X  -  BitChute  -  Odysee*  PODCAST  Substack  -  Apple  -  Spotify  -  Castbox  -  Podcast Addict  *SUPER CHAT on platforms* above or  BuyMeACoffee, etc.  SHOP  Spring  -  Cameo  |  All My Links  JLP Network:  JLP  -  Church  -  TFS  -  Nick  -  Joel   Get full access to HAKE at thehakereport.substack.com/subscribe

On this Salcedo Storm Podcast:J. Michael Waller, author of Big Intel: How the CIA and FBI Went from Cold War Heroes to Deep State Villains, is senior analyst for strategy at the Center for Security Policy and president of Georgetown Research, a political risk and private intelligence company.

Monday, April 22nd, 2024Today, opening statements in the first criminal trial of a former president; a Turning Point Action resigns after accusations of election fraud; Louisiana lawmakers vote to remove lunch breaks for child workers; Bennie Thompson introduces a bill that would strip Secret Service protection from felons; Kari Lake wants Arizona sheriffs to enforce 1864 abortion ban; the Texas Bar says Ken Paxton should be disciplined for his lawsuit attempting to overturn the election; the NYAG files her objection to Trump's $175M bond; plus Allison and Dana deliver your good news. Promo Code:For 20% off all mattress orders AND two free pillows for our listeners! Go to https://www.helixsleep.com/dailybeans and use code HELIXPARTNER20.Turning Point Action official resigns after accusation of election-related fraud (WAPO)Louisiana lawmakers vote to remove lunch breaks for child workers, cut unemployment benefits (Nola.com)Kari Lake Wants Arizona Sheriffs to Enforce 1864 Abortion Ban (Rolling Stone)Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton can be disciplined for suit to overturn 2020 election, court says (AP)Subscribe to Lawyers, Guns, And MoneyAd-free premium feed: https://lawyersgunsandmoney.supercast.comSubscribe for free everywhere else:https://lawyersgunsandmoney.simplecast.com/episodes/1-miami-1985Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://post.news/@/MuellerSheWrote?utm_source=TwitterAG&utm_medium=creator_organic&utm_campaign=muellershewrote&utm_content=FollowMehttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://www.threads.net/@muellershewrotehttps://www.tiktok.com/@muellershewrotehttps://instagram.com/muellershewroteDana Goldberghttps://twitter.com/DGComedyhttps://www.instagram.com/dgcomedyhttps://www.facebook.com/dgcomedyhttps://danagoldberg.comHave some good news; a confession; or a correction?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/From The Good NewsYou Belong Campaignhttps://www.youbelongcampaign.comLast Hope Animal Rescuehttps://lasthopeanimalrescue.orgAdopt Maple (Eugene, Oregon)https://www.green-hill.orgUpcoming Live Show Dateshttps://allisongill.com (for all tickets and show dates)Sunday, June 2nd – Chicago IL – Schubas TavernFriday June 14th – Philadelphia PA – City WinerySaturday June 15th – New York NY – City WinerySunday June 16th – Boston MA – City WineryMonday June 17th Boston, MA https://tinyurl.com/Beans-Bos2Wednesday July 10th – Portland OR – Polaris Hall(with Dana!)Thursday July 11th – Seattle WA – The Triple Door(with Dana!)Thursday July 25th Milwaukee, WI https://tinyurl.com/Beans-MKESunday July 28th Nashville, TN - with Phil Williams https://tinyurl.com/Beans-TennWednesday July 31st St. Louis, MO https://tinyurl.com/Beans-STLFriday August 16th Washington, DC - with Andy McCabe, Pete Strzok, Glenn Kirschner https://tinyurl.com/Beans-in-DCSaturday August 24 San Francisco, CA https://tinyurl.com/Beans-SF Live Show Ticket Links:Chicago, IL https://tinyurl.com/Beans-ChiPhiladelphia, PA https://tinyurl.com/Beans-PhillyNew York, NY https://tinyurl.com/Beans-NYCBoston, MAhttps://tinyurl.com/Beans-Bos2Portland, ORhttps://tinyurl.com/Beans-PDXSeattle, WAhttps://tinyurl.com/Beans-SEA Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/OrPatreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts

On this Salcedo Storm Podcast:Retired, Lt. Colonel Tony Shaffer is a Newsmax Contributor. And he's the President of Project Sentinel.

The Tara Showhttps://www.audacy.com/989word Biden's Last Chance    0:00.000      Untrustworthy Economy    13:05.725   Trump's Selected Jury    19:21.665  Tara's Censorship    26:59.618   

Rockett and Figgy review Future and Metro Boomin's follow-up album 'WE STILL DON'T TRUST YOU'. They break down the disses, feature verses, J. Cole removing '7 Minute Drill' from streaming services, rumors of incoming Drake and Kendrick Lamar diss tracks and more!

#SCALAREPORT: #CHIPS: The US, EU, Japan and Taiwan vs the untrustworthy PRC. Chris Riegel, CEO Scala.com @Stratacache..com, #STRATACACHE > https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2024-04-08/tsmc-gets-11-6b-in-us-grants-loans-for-chip-plants-video undated Peking train

PREVIEW: #PRC: #TSMC: #CHIPS: Conversation with colleague Chris Riegel of #SCALA.com re high-end chipmaking that suits the demands of AI -- and the cooperation between Taiwan and Japan and the EU and the US, all working together vs the untrustworthy PRC.  More details tonight. 1951, The Day the Earth Stood Still.