POPULARITY
2 episodes with rpes
2 episodes with rpes
2 episodes with rpes
2 episodes with rpes
4 episodes with rpes
2 episodes with rpes
2 episodes with rpes
2 episodes with rpes
In der heutigen Folge des Power Performance Podcasts quatschen Paul & ich unter anderem über folgende Themen:- Agata Sitko's 6-7 SBD-Trainingstage in der Woche- nach welchen Konzepten wir RPEs und Lasten in den Comp Lifts und Nebenübungen planen- inwieweit Sheffield das Kampfgericht auf anderen Wettkämpfen beeinflusst- ob wir im Powerlifting überhaupt was anderes als Kniebeuge/Bankdrücken/Kreuzheben trainieren müssenund über viele weitere Themen!Viel Spaß bei der Folge :)In der Folge genannte Links:https://www.instagram.com/p/CkFd6IgDSiE/https://www.instagram.com/p/BqI-aSsAgaf/?img_index=1Pauls Instagram Profil: https://www.instagram.com/fundamentalkraftPauls Website: https://www.fundamentalkraft.deKevins Instagram Profil:https://www.instagram.com/kevinschmidt._Kevins Website: www.kspowerlifting.deKevins YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLL8o4DtXtRL-xBJR9ppBuA
New episode of the No Jumper Show! Follow Adam22: / adam22 / adam22 / adam22 adam22bro on Snapchat Follow Bricc Baby / briccbaby Follow Lush / lushoneca ----- Get the latest news & videos http://nojumper.com CHECK OUT OUR ONLINE STORE!!! https://shop.nojumper.com/ NO JUMPER PATREON / nojumper CHECK OUT OUR NEW SPOTIFY PLAYLIST https://open.spotify.com/playlist/5te... Follow us on SNAPCHAT / 4874336901 Follow us on SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/4z4yCTj... iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/n... Follow us on Social Media: / 4874336901 / nojumper / nojumper / nojumper / nojumper JOIN THE DISCORD: / discord Follow Adam22: / adam22 / adam22 / adam22 adam22bro on Snapchat Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Mit javasolunk törpesün-tartás ügyében, melyik országban jó most élni, jogilag lehetséges-e férfi nevet adni egy kislánynak, miért divat az ADHD és miért nem divat az LMBTQ, hogyan kell nem félni a szellemektől, miért nincs fordított mikrohullámú sütő, mi van Anettkával, jó ötlet-e a sulis mobiltiltás, kitöröljük-e a telefonunkból a halottainkat, mit kell tenni a fizetésemelést megtagadó főnökkel, miért ferde a guillotine pengéje, miért nincs az űrállomáson forgással gravitációt teremtő wc, mi lenne az alvilági nevünk és foglalkozásunk, elférne-e a világ legnagyobb konténerszállítóján Magyarország egynapi kajamennyisége, régen tényleg lehetett-e kilométerórát visszapörgetni tolatással, az emberiség története során hogyan változott a homoszexuálisok aránya, miért szokás eltakarni a tükörszelfin az arcot a telefonnal, van-e olyan benzinkút, ami bezár, hogyan alakult ki a kresztáblák dizájnja, össze fog-e jönni a ISS-en rekedt két űrhajós, ki írta az Alain Delon szeretnék lenni című dalt, mi volt a törzshelyünk a 90-es években? Zenék: Noir Desir - En Public
We investigate accessory lifts: what's the point? Why do auxiliary lifts and how should you think about incorporating them into your training? Accessory Lifts: What's the Point? It's that time of year, where people begin to go on vacation and either take breaks from lifting or ask to do hotel workouts (which they often do not do). What may cause, in part, the low compliance with hotel training is not understanding the point of the accessory lifts that, because of the limited equipment and weight, have to be used for these workouts. So, what purpose do these lifts serve? The provide additional volume for muscle groups that cannot be adequately stressed by solely using the main lifts. We love the main lifts, they are fantastic tools and over time they should go up. As you advance, though, you will almost certainly need to incorporate more of these auxiliary lifts that train muscle groups like the deltoids, triceps, biceps, hamstrings, calves, and more. Adding Accessory Lifts to Your Training As always, you first need to know the why? We explained the general why, but the personal why - why do you as a lifter need them now? You have to consider your time, equipment, preference, goals, and desired muscle groups to target. The benefits of home gyms are huge, but this is one area where home gyms tend to be more limited. You may have to get creative or invest in things such as adjustable dumbbells or pulley attachments. These need to be performed strictly and for difficult sets. In fact, these can be more productively trained at higher RPEs than deadlifts and squats because they provide less systemic fatigue to the body. You want to bar speed to slow down for the last rep or two and for them to be challenging. Program them for reps below 20, typically, because you do not want to stop because "you're tired." Consider adding accessory lifts to your program if you want more training stress and hypertrophy. Check out the Barbell Logic podcast landing page. Get Matched with a Professional Strength Coach today for FREE! No contract with us, just commitment to yourself: Start experiencing strength now: https://store.barbell-logic.com/match/ Connect with the hosts Matt on Instagram Niki on Instagram Andrew on Instagram Connect with the show Barbell Logic on Instagram Podcast Webpage Barbell Logic on Facebook Or email podcast@barbell-logic.com
Den seneste tids koranafbrændinger foran udenlandske ambassader i København har skærpet terrortruslen mod Danmark.Men for under en uge sagde PET intet om, at truslen var skærpet.Hvad betyder det, at terrortruslen mod Danmark er blevet skærpet på få dage? Og ændrer et skærpet trusselsniveau noget for dem, som er imod et forbud mod koranafbrændringer?Det spørger vi om i Reporterne i dag.Gæster:Hans Jørgen Bonnichsen, tidligere operativ chef for Politiets EfterretningstjenesteHenrik Dahl, folketingsmedlem Liberal AllianceTilrettelæggere:Jeppe Aamand ØvigAlexander BrøndumVært:Oliver BærentsenProducer:Jeppe Aamand ØvigRedaktør: Simon Reenberg
Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.07.11.548610v1?rss=1 Authors: Moningka, H., El-Deredy, W., Bentall, R. P., Mason, L. Abstract: Background Dysregulated reward processing and mood instability are core features of bipolar disorder that have largely been considered separately, and with contradictory findings. We sought to test a mechanistic account that proposes that, in bipolar disorder, there is an excessive tendency to enter recursive cycles in which reward perception is biased by signals that the environment might be changing for the better or worse. Methods Participants completed a probabilistic reward task with functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Using an influential computational model, we ascertained whether participants with bipolar disorder (n = 21) show greater striatal tracking of momentum-biased reward prediction errors (RPE) than healthy controls (n = 21). We conducted psychophysiological interaction analyses to quantify the degree to which each group modulated functional connectivity between the ventral striatum and left anterior insula in response to fluctuations in momentum. Results In the bipolar disorder group, but not controls, the momentum-biased RPE model accounted for significant additional variance in ventral striatal activity beyond a standard mode of veridical RPEs. Compared to controls, the bipolar disorder group exhibited lower ventral striatal-left insular functional connectivity modulated by momentum-biased RPE. Moreover, this reduction in connectivity was more pronounced as a function of current manic symptoms. Conclusions Consistent with an existing theory, we found evidence that bipolar disorder is associated with a tendency for momentum to excessively bias striatal tracking of RPE signals. We identify impaired striatal-insular connectivity as a possible locus for this propensity. We argue that computational psychiatric approaches that examine momentary shifts in reward and mood dynamics have strong potential for new mechanistic insights and targets for intervention. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info Podcast created by Paper Player, LLC
Zac Robinson from Data Driven Strength recently completed his Master's Thesis at Florida Atlantic University's Muscle Physiology Laboratory on the Effect of Proximity to Failure During Resistance Training on Muscle Performance and Fatigue. Zac joins RTS Coaches Mike Tuchscherer and John Garafano to discuss whether all RPEs are equal for strength gains.
“Būs pavisam citi laiki! Latvijas māksla 1985–1991”. Kultūras rondo sākam jaunu ierakstu sēriju par laikmetīgas mākslas procesiem un mākslinieku pozīciju Atmodas laikā. Cikla pirmajā stāstā Sandras Krastiņas un Edgara Vērpes skatījums. Cikls sasaucas ar nupat atklāto ekspozīciju Latvijas Nacionālajā mākslas muzejā "Mūra krišana. Latvijas māksla 1985.- 1991". "Katram savs laiks un katrā laikā sava māksla," atzīst mūsu uzrunātie mākslinieki un atsauc atmiņā spilgtus mākslas notikumus laikā, kas ietver valstiskā neatkarība atgūšanas periodu. Stāsta gleznotāja Sandra Krastiņa un gleznotājs, pedagogs, Valsts Kultūrkapitāla fonda direktors Edgars Vērpe.
Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2022.12.08.519670v1?rss=1 Authors: Su, Z., Cohen, J. Y. Abstract: The cerebral cortex generates flexible behavior by learning. Reinforcement learning is thought to be driven by error signals in midbrain dopamine neurons. However, they project more densely to basal ganglia than cortex, leaving open the possibility of another source of learning signals for cortex. The locus coeruleus (LC) contains most of the brain's norepinephrine (NE) neurons and project broadly to cortex. We measured activity from identified mouse LC-NE neurons during a behavioral task requiring ongoing learning from reward prediction errors (RPEs). We found two types of LC-NE neurons: neurons with wide action potentials (type I) were excited by positive RPE and showed an increasing relationship with change of choice likelihood. Neurons with thin action potentials (type II) were excited by lack of reward and showed a decreasing relationship with change of choice likelihood. Silencing LC-NE neurons changed future choices, as predicted from the electrophysiological recordings and a model of how RPEs are used to guide learning. We reveal functional heterogeneity of a neuromodulatory system in the brain and show that NE inputs to cortex act as a quantitative learning signal for flexible behavior. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info Podcast created by Paper Player, LLC
Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2022.12.07.519496v1?rss=1 Authors: Hoy, C. W., Quiroga-Martinez, D. R., King-Stephens, D., Laxer, K., Weber, P., Lin, J. J., Knight, R. T. Abstract: The signed value and unsigned salience of reward prediction errors (RPEs) are critical to understanding reinforcement learning (RL) and cognitive control. Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dMPFC) and insula (INS) are key regions for integrating reward and surprise information, but conflicting evidence for both signed and unsigned activity has led to competing proposals for the nature of RPE representations in these brain areas. Recently, the distributional RL theory (dRL) has been used to explain RPE coding diversity in the rodent midbrain by proposing that dopaminergic neurons have differential sensitivity to positive and negative RPEs. Here, we use intracranially recorded high frequency activity (HFA) to show that this asymmetric scaling strategy captures RPE coding diversity in human dMPFC and INS. We found neural populations responding to valence-specific positive and negative RPEs, as well as unsigned RPE salience, which are spatially interleaved within each region. Furthermore, directional connectivity estimates suggest a leading role of INS in communicating positive and unsigned RPEs to dMPFC. These findings support asymmetric scaling across distinct but intermingled neural populations as a core principle in RPE coding, expand the scope of dRL, and reconcile longstanding theoretical debates on the role of dMPFC and INS in RL and cognitive control. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info Podcast created by Paper Player, LLC
This week on the Pacey Performance Podcast, Rob is speaking to Dr. Shaun McLaren about all things RPEs and subjective measures. RPE is no doubt the most used tool for coaches to understand an athlete's response to training. But just asking an athlete for a number to rate how hard a session was has lots of moving parts. When do you ask them? How do you ask them? Do you provide the scale on paper so they can see it? What scale are you using? Is the scale valid? How these questions are answered can have significant impact on the quality of data we get. And we all want to maximise data quality and not waste our or our athlete's time. In this episode, Shaun gives some great recommendations how we can make the "right" decisions when setting up a system to collect RPEs and other subjective measures. But before he does that, Shaun gives us a great overview of why he thinks RPEs are so valuable and the science behind their being. The type of scale used has sparked a number of Twitter debates about the type of scale that is used. So we dive into that black hole and Shaun explains why using a valid scale is so important and some of the downfalls coaches make when using non-validated options. If you want to maximise the RPE and subjective data that you are collecting, press play on the episode with Shaun on your chosen podcast player. Main topics - What does this data really tell us? Effort, fatigue etc? What common mistakes do people make when collecting RPEs which lead to them removing it Recommendations for collecting good data The importance of using validated scales The impact of using colours, different descriptors and emojis on scales How can those with minimal budget get an idea of their athlete's training status by using RPE/sRPE? How can they maximise their time investment? How well do athletes rate what we are asking them to rate?
Autoregulation adjusts to the lifter's actual, not expected, performance during a workout. Get an overview of this strength training method. Autoregulation - The Concept The underlying concept is fairly simple: adjust the work sets to the lifter's performance during the workout. During novice linear progression, a lifter adds typically 5 pounds each week. The lifter adapts quickly while also lacking the ability to stress himself with a heavy work set like an advanced lifter can. If the lifter misses a rep or set, a programming change probably needs to occur. If the lifter has a bad workout but hits all the reps, then she learns about just how heavy "heavy" can be. It can be a qualitative experience in RPE 8.5+ sets. As the lifter advances, weight is often added less frequently, though you often see a linear progression of supplemental and accessory lifts. Without autoregulation, a lifter performs work sets based on a past one-rep max or similar maximal effort (e.g. 5RM) or her expected performance. Past performance does best predict future performance, but occasionally a lifter experiences workouts on the tails of the bell curve. A lifter may suddenly fail to hit prescribed reps or have to perform the reps at RPE 9+ effort, whereas the intended difficulty was closer to RPE 7. The other extreme is the unexpected easy day, when a PR might be available. Especially as a lifter progresses, these days come less and less frequently, so taking the PR may be warranted. Subjective Autoregulation The lifter can attempt to make a more-or-less educated guess on his 1RM from his subjective assessment using rate of perceived exertion (RPE) or reps in reserve (RIR). Work up to a single at RPE 8. This means you assess that you can complete 2 more reps. Then, perform 1x3 @ 93% and 3x5 @ 80%. If your RPE assessment is fairly accurate, the training stress and intensity that day will be appropriate - sufficient but not too much. The other primary subjective autoregulation method is the coach's eye. The coach can watch your warm up sets and help pick your work set intensity based on his assessment of your performance that day. This is an informed input, if you have an experienced coach, but it is still subjective. Lastly, the two methods can be combined. Whether in-person or online, this method works better. You have two independently-gathered albeit subjective data points that help determine the work sets for the workout. Online, the coach obviously cannot pick the intensity that day, but the coach can help provide feedback on the lifter's RPE assessments and notice patterns. For example, a lifter may tend to assess RPEs fairly accurate most of the time, and especially for upper body lifts. On bad days and for squats - this hypothetical lifter's least favorite lift - he tends to rate them higher than they were. This growing awareness can inform the lifter's decisions. Objective Autoregulation AMRAPs or working up to a 1RM are objective, as long as the lifter gives her full effort for the set. The problem, is maximal effort sets, whether for one rep or as many reps as possible, are physically and mentally exhausting, will negatively affect the remaining work sets, and provide an extremely high-intensity training stress that must be accounted for in the training. Velocity-based training, therefore, offers an objective autoregulation method that doesn't require a maximal set. The lifter has to give her full effort during warm ups, but this does not come with the same difficulty or downsides as a truly maximal work set. The downside is mainly the cost, though they've become more readily available and more accurate. If you're an advanced lifter that is serious about chasing PRs for the long haul, you might consider investing in this for your training. GET STARTED with one-on-one online coaching FOR FREE! Get your FIRST MONTH FREE on all strength and nutrition coaching plans. There's no contract and you can cancel anytime. Start experiencing strength now: https://bit.ly/3EJI18v Connect with the hosts Matt on Instagram Niki on Instagram Connect with the show Barbell Logic on Instagram Podcast Webpage Barbell Logic on Facebook Or email podcast@barbell-logic.com
Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2022.10.06.511117v1?rss=1 Authors: Hassall, C. D., Yan, Y., Hunt, L. T. Abstract: Feedback processing is commonly studied by analyzing the brain's response to discrete rather than continuous events. Such studies have led to the hypothesis that rapid phasic midbrain dopaminergic activity tracks reward prediction errors (RPEs), the effects of which are measurable at the scalp via electroencephalography (EEG). Although studies using continuous feedback are sparse, recent animal work suggests that moment-to-moment changes in reward are tracked by slowly ramping midbrain dopaminergic activity. Some have argued that these ramping signals index state values rather than RPEs. Our goal here was to develop an EEG measure of continuous feedback processing in humans, then test whether its behaviour could be accounted for by the RPE hypothesis. Participants completed a stimulus-response learning task in which a continuous reward cue gradually increased or decreased over time. A regression-based unmixing approach revealed EEG activity with a topography and timecourse consistent with the stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN), a scalp potential previously linked to reward anticipation and tonic dopamine release. Importantly, this reward-related activity depended on outcome expectancy: as predicted by the RPE hypothesis, activity for expected reward cues was reduced compared to unexpected reward cues. These results demonstrate the possibility of using human scalp-recorded potentials to track continuous feedback processing, and test candidate hypotheses of this activity. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info Podcast created by PaperPlayer
Online Mentorship: https://www.melbournestrengthculture.com/mentorship Online Coaching: https://www.melbournestrengthculture.com/coaching-services Anthea's Socials: www.instagram.com/antheawoodruff www.instagram.com/thrivestronger 0:00 Number 1 in the hearts, number 1 in the charts 1:02 Port Dougie recap 3:45 Feeling burnt out 7:40 Anthea's start as a coach 13:30 Bodybuilding comps in year 12 18:48 Tracking macros at school 23:04 Reverse dieting out of competition 26:30 Health and performance trade off through bodybuilding 33:11 Managing stress and mindset strategies 42:25 What's planned for Thrive Stronger? 50:00 Training hard, RPEs and programming absolute loads Instagram: ➽ Strength Culture - www.instagram.com/melbournestrengthculture ➽ Jamie S - www.instagram.com/j.smith.culture ➽ Charlie - www.instagram.com/quantum_lifting ➽ Jamie B - www.instagram.com/jamiebouz ➽ Didier - www.instagram.com/didiervassou Please don't forget to subscribe on YouTube and rate us 5 stars on both Spotify and Apple!
Diese Woche bei Family im Brennpunkt. Kevin und Thunfisch wissen noch nicht, was ihnen bevorsteht. Werden sie pünktlich um 12 Uhr mittags ins Bett kommen oder schlägt die Justiz knallhart zu? Mischa hat zurzeit ein Pörpes Danger alert und weiß nicht, wie er es seiner Dame sagen soll. Die Nachrichten überspitzen sich und nur hier bei uns gibt es die Wahrheit.
(01:32) De danske kirker skal omfavne den grønne omstilling. Sådan lyder det i et nyt initiativ fra folkekirken. Men er projektet ambitiøst nok? Og går kristendom og klima hånd i hånd? De spørgsmål stiller Babylon til henholdsvis en provst og en religionshistoriker. (34:04) Reality-stjernen Teitur Skoubo er i dag kendt skyld i at have voldtaget en 25-årig kvinde i Odense i november. Babylon folder dommen ud i selskab med 24syvs retsreportere og en juraekspert. (45:51) Den årlige filmfestival i Cannes er i fuld gang. Babylon gør status på festivalen spørger en filmekspert, hvorfor der netop i år er så mange film på plakaten, der får publikums maver til at vende sig.Kilder: Jens-André P. Herbener, religionshistoriker og underviser på Syddansk Universitet, forfatter Esben Thusgård, provst for Aarhus Nordre Provsti og medlem af styregruppen i Folkekirkens Grønne Omstilling Arne Rasmussen, menighedsrådsformand i Kliplev KirkeJørgen Christian Pedersen, menighedsrådsformand i Skjern KirkeRie Vestergaard, menighedsrådsformand i Risskov KirkeSten Schaumburg-Müller, juraprofessor på Syddansk UniversitetMikkel Abel, streamingredaktør på Moovy Vært:Ida Gaunø Tilrettelæggere:Maria Asmine Dam Cecilie Dumanski Niels Frederik Rickers Frederik Westergaard Producer: Niels Frederik Rickers Redaktør:Cecilie Dumanski
Dobbeltstraf - paragraf 81d under straffeloven. En debatteret regel, som blev indført i foråret 2020. En lov der skulle sende et signal om alvoren ved at begå kriminalitet under en pandemi, men som fik førende forsvarsadvokater til at sætte spørgsmål ved, om den nye regel var på kant med retssikkerheden. Gæster: Mette Grith Stage, Jonas Christoffersen og Sten Schaumburg-Müller. Produceret i samarbejde med Beam Audio Agency
Dobbeltstraf - paragraf 81d under straffeloven. En debatteret regel, som blev indført i foråret 2020. En lov der skulle sende et signal om alvoren ved at begå kriminalitet under en pandemi, men som fik førende forsvarsadvokater til at sætte spørgsmål ved, om den nye regel var på kant med retssikkerheden.
In der heutigen Folge des Power Performance Podcasts quatschen Paul & ich darüber wie wir mit psychischen Krankheiten im Coaching umgehen, wie wichtig ein genaues Treffen der RPEs/RIRs im Training unserer Meinung nach ist, welche Powerlifting YouTuber wir schauen, wie wir zu Pre-Workout Boostern bzw. einer generell hohen Koffeinaufnahme stehen und viele weitere Themen! Viel Spaß bei der Episode! :) Pauls Instagram Profil: https://www.instagram.com/fundamentalkraft/ Pauls Website: https://www.fundamentalkraft.de/ Kevins Instagram Profil: https://www.instagram.com/kevinschmidt._/ Kevins Website: www.kspowerlifting.de Kevins YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLL8o4DtXtRL-xBJR9ppBuA
1. Gold teeth and steeze. 2. Top 50 podcast vibes. 3. King Kyrgios. 4. Hectic eats. 5. APU Update. 6. Advice for young coaches. 7. AMRAPs and RPEs.
Indfødsretsprøven skaber igen debat, fordi den nyeste version af prøven indeholder spørgsmål om danske værdier. Men virker prøvens 45 spørgsmål egentlig som adgangsbillet til at blive dansker? Skal prøven laves om, eller skal den helt droppes? Ali Aminali leder efter svar på spørgsmålene sammen med lytterne, debattør Christian Marcussen og Sabrina Louise Christiansen, som er nyvalgt medlem af kommunalbestyrelsen i Frederiksberg Kommune for Enhedslisten.
Aging-US published a Special Collection on Eye Disease which included "Suppressing endoplasmic reticulum stress-related autophagy attenuates retinal light injury" which reported that in this study, oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy caused by light exposure were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, inhibiting ER stress either by knocking down PERK signals or with GSK2606414 treatment remarkably suppressed prolonged autophagy and protected the cells against light injury. In vivo experiments verified neuroprotection via inhibiting ER stress-related autophagy in light-damaged retinas of mice. In conclusion, the above results suggest that light-induced photo-oxidative stress may trigger subsequent activation of ER stress and prolonged autophagy in photoreceptors and RPE cells. Suppressing ER stress may abrogate over-activated autophagy and protect the retina against light injury. Dr. Guang-Yu Li from The Second Hospital of Jilin University said, "Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a degenerative retinal disease, which often occurs in the elderly and causes irreversible loss of central vision." Indeed, excessive and prolonged light exposure may damage the retina and is an environmental factor that can accelerate AMD. With the rapid development of technology, many electronic devices with screens, and ophthalmic equipment with intensive illumination, have become widely used. Therefore, an increasing amount of attention has been focused on issues of light pollution and retinal light damage. Previous studies have shown that excessive intracellular ROS may lead to depletion of the GSH pool and compromise the function of PDI, which disrupts the folding process of proteins in the ER and produces a massive amount of misfolded proteins. However, the excessive accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER may trigger an unfolded-protein response, which may enhance protein folding ability, as well as the homeostasis of protein translation and accelerate protein degradation to recover ER function. However, prolonged autophagy may lead to cell death and is specifically termed autophagy-dependent cell death. The role of autophagy in retinal light injury is controversial. Autophagy might be a double-edged sword among the molecular mechanisms that lead to retinal light damage. Midorikawa et al. reported that moderate autophagy combined with endosomal degradation pathway activity is neuroprotective and attenuates light-dependent retinal degeneration. The Li Research Team concluded in their Aging-US Research Output "the current study demonstrated that ER stress and autophagy are both involved in light-induced death of photoreceptors and RPE cells. As an upstream step, photo-oxidation may cause an imbalance in the cellular redox status and interrupt the folding process of proteins, further triggering ER stress in photoreceptors and RPEs. Suppressing ER stress via PERK signals may inhibit prolonged autophagy and protect photoreceptors/RPEs against light damage. Inhibiting ER stress-related autophagy is neuroprotective for retinal against light injury, which may be a potential treatment strategy for AMD." Full Text - https://www.aging-us.com/article/103846/text Correspondence to: Guang-Yu Li email: l_gy@jlu.edu.cn Keywords: oxidative stress, ER stress, autophagy, AMD, PERK
Vi sætter igen fokus på drivning, hvor en skærpning af reglementet er på vej. Lunden har nu nedsat en arbejdsgruppe, som skal arbejde med Åby-modellen, og vi kigger nærmere på denne. Junge fortæller om sin "Tour de Trav-tur" i staterne med Axel Jacobsen, og vi tager en rundtur i de danske og udenlandske storløb. I "Ugens aktuelle med BS og Dyhrberg" udforsker vi emnet; træning af travheste.
PODCAST # 101 – Questions et Réponses Aujourd'hui, nous vous présentons un podcast questions et réponses : - Comment combiner cardio, prise de masse et force ? - Équipement utile dans un Home gym outre celui de base pour le powerlifting? - Quand placer un entraînement de type SBD dans une semaine? - Une méthode moins subjective que les RPEs ? - Échouer à mi-distance au bench press = faiblesse des épaules? #TEAMBEMOR _ La référence en powerlifting au Québec. Élodie et Brandon sont deux kinésiologues spécialisés en dynamophilie / force athlétique. Ils aident les athlètes à atteindre leurs objectifs à l'entraînement. - Instagram: https://bit.ly/31tXOGB Facebook: https://bit.ly/2vHKmCV YouTube: https://bit.ly/2UirTqN
Heute beantworten wir ein einem Q&A folgende eurer Fragen:Wie starker Muskelkater ist nach den ersten Gym Einheiten zu erwarten?Welche Muskelgruppen vertragen hohes Volumen?Im Training voll im Tunnelblick-Modus oder auch mal auf ein Tratscherl?Unnötige/unnütze/schlechte Maschinen im Studio? Unsere Erfahrungen?Wenn im Gym mehrere Leg Extensions/mehrere Leg Curls sind, wie finde ich die richtige/bessere für mich?Wie lange Pause zwischen Sets?Wärmt ihr euch auf vor dem Training?Was wird im Gym als 1. trainiert?Tipps zum Einschätzen von RPEs?——Teile diese Folge gerne auf deinen Social Media Kanälen! Wir freuen uns auch riesig über deinen Daumen hoch, ein Abo hier auf YouTube und eine 5-Sterne-Bewertung auf iTunes - damit supportest du uns riesig! DANKE!Folgt Petra auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/petra_pretti/Folgt Melanie auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/melaniemut/
On this week's episode of the #GPP we had the privilege of chatting with the brain trust behind Data Driven Strength, Josh [@josh.datadrivenstrength] and Zac [@zac.datadrivenstrength]. Whether you're a bodybuilder, powerlifter, weightlifter, or really whatever barbell sport gang affiliation you represent, this is not one to be missed. The entire Gifted Team would like to offer a huge thank you to Josh and Zac for coming on. It was an episode that we won't soon forget and look forward to doing it again soon. If you do happen to be roommates with Patrick Star, come out from under that rock and check these guys out because they're moving the needle in strength training education on the gram like no others. Enjoy! 2:24 - An Introduction to the men behind Data Driven Strength 7:02 - MemeWars 2021: DDS vs Subpar 14:34 - What is the “Special Sauce” behind Data Driven Strength 20:53 - The next big question in strength and conditioning research 28:26 - Low RPE Talk: Definitions and Practical Recommendations 44:32 - A line in the sand by which to base programming: 10RMs, RPEs, Percentages, or Intent 58:45 - Data Driven: Using observations, anecdotes, and research to craft best practices 1:20:16 - Programming manipulations to improve training outcomes
Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.11.05.369793v1?rss=1 Authors: Dorfman, H. M., Tomov, M. S., Cheung, B., Clarke, D., Gershman, S. J., Hughes, B. L. Abstract: Attributing outcomes to your own actions or to external causes is essential for appropriately learning which actions lead to reward and which actions do not. Our previous work showed that this type of credit assignment is best explained by a Bayesian reinforcement learning model which posits that beliefs about the causal structure of the environment modulate reward prediction errors (RPEs) during action value updating. In this study, we investigated the neural circuits underlying reinforcement learning that are influenced by causal beliefs using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while human participants (N = 31; 13 males, 18 females) completed a behavioral task that manipulated beliefs about causal structure. We found evidence that RPEs modulated by causal beliefs are represented in posterior putamen, while standard (unmodulated) RPEs are represented in ventral striatum. Further analyses revealed that beliefs about causal structure are represented in anterior insula and inferior frontal gyrus. Finally, structural equation modeling revealed effective connectivity from anterior insula to posterior putamen. Together, these results are consistent with a neural architecture in which causal beliefs in anterior insula are integrated with prediction error signals in posterior putamen to update action values. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info
Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.10.20.347740v1?rss=1 Authors: Hoy, C. W., Steiner, S. C., Knight, R. T. Abstract: Recent developments in reinforcement learning, cognitive control, and systems neuroscience highlight the complimentary roles in learning of valenced reward prediction errors (RPEs) and non-valenced salience prediction errors (PEs) driven by the magnitude of surprise. A core debate in reward learning focuses on whether valenced and non-valenced PEs can be isolated in the human electroencephalogram (EEG). Here, we combine behavioral modeling and single-trial EEG regression revealing a sequence of valenced and non-valenced PEs in an interval timing task dissociating outcome valence, magnitude, and probability. Multiple regression across temporal, spatial, and frequency dimensions revealed a spatio-tempo-spectral cascade from valenced RPE value represented by the feedback related negativity event-related potential (ERP) followed by non-valenced RPE magnitude and outcome probability effects indexed by subsequent P300 and late frontal positivity ERPs. The results show that learning is supported by a sequence of multiple PEs evident in the human EEG. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info
Dagens erhvervsoverblik: Dansk Industri og Dansk Metal i fælles front mod dansk særafgift på CO2. Partier vil have dokumentation for effekten af de nye coronarestriktioner. Mette Frederiksen vil åbne døre for klimaeksport til 1,3 mia indere: “Indien har skala, og Danmark har løsninger”. Vært: Lasse Ladefoged Morgenbriefing er kun et lille udvalg af alle de kvalitetshistorier du finder i Børsen. Er du ikke abonnent, så går du glip af noget. Lige nu kan du prøve Børsen i tre måneder for en måneds pris. Benyt tilbuddet her og få ubegrænset adgang til alt indhold på Børsen.
Coach Brian Johnson is the Head Strength and Conditioning Coach with the University of Arizona. Brian Johnson is a former NCAA Football player and National Champion from Louisiana State University, where he played under Nick Saban. He had also spent time playing and coaching in the NFL prior to his arrival at Arizona. He comes from a very strong pedigree of coaching and comes on today to share his experiences and his utilization of athlete monitoring with and without technology and return to practice/play with his athletes. First thing Brian talks about is how when he was at Florida State University, they were one of the first strength staff’s in the country to utilize Catapult GPS technology. At the time the technology was so new and nobody in America was using it, they were just figuring out stuff on the fly. As he moved along in his career, he learned more and more from stops at LSU and San Francisco 49ers. Brian goes in depth with the biggest metric of them all: TIME. How to ready an athlete as per energy system; what happens when an NFL roster goes from 90 to 53; what happens when a player has not received ample amounts of practice reps and has to play a game and vice versa…Coach Johnson attacks the angle most people do not take into account, and that is TIME. Understanding that not a lot of coaches have access to big time technology at their disposal, Brian sheds light on what other metrics can be quantified for athletic performance. Everything from RPEs, Wellness Questionnaires, body weights & body fat percentages, quantifying meal plans, Coach Johnson has damn near figured it out with or without the sexy equipment. The biggest things that technology and data collection are good for: it is that it is a conversation starter, it is a great educational tool for the athlete, it is a daily measurement, and it can lead to an intervention if needed. These are the main reasons Brian and I use technology, because he and I are giving out athletes the opportunity to learn more about themselves in their recovery. If athletes do not know much about their own recovery, then they will not understand what it takes to take their game to an elite level. Brian Johnson's Instagram tag is: @_Coachbee1
Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.09.15.297655v1?rss=1 Authors: Shimomura, K., Kato, A., Morita, K. Abstract: Difficulty in cessation of drinking, smoking, or gambling, even with strong intention, has been widely recognized. Reasons for this, and whether there are reasons common to substance and non-substance reward, remain elusive. We present a computational model of common potential mechanisms underlying the difficulty in resisting habitual behavior to obtain reward. Consider that a person has long been regularly taking a series of actions leading to a purchase of alcohol, cigarette, or betting ticket without any hesitation. Referring to the recently suggested representation of states by their successors in human reinforcement learning as well as the dimension reduction in state representations in the brain, we assumed that the person has acquired a rigid representation of states along the series of habitual actions by the discounted future occupancy of the final successor state, namely, the rewarded goal state, under the established non-resistant policy. Then, we show that if the person takes a different policy to resist temptation of habitual behavior, negative reward prediction error (RPE) is generated when s/he makes "No-Go" decisions whereas no RPE occurs upon "Go" decisions, and a large positive RPE is generated upon eventually reaching the goal, given that the state representation acquired under the non-resistant policy is so rigid that it does not easily change. In the cases where the states are instead represented in the punctate manner or by the discounted future occupancies of all the states (i.e., by the genuine successor representation), negative and positive RPEs are generated upon "No-Go" and "Go" decisions, respectively, whereas no or little RPE occurs at the goal. We suggest that these RPEs, especially the large positive RPE generated upon goal reaching in the case with the goal-based reduced successor representation, might underlie the difficulty in cessation of undesired habitual or addictive behavior to obtain substance and non-substance reward. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info
Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.08.05.237529v1?rss=1 Authors: Ergo, K., De Loof, E., Debra, G., Pastötter, B., Verguts, T. Abstract: Recent evidence suggests that reward prediction errors (RPEs) play an important role in declarative learning, but its neurophysiological mechanism remains unclear. Here, we tested the hypothesis that RPEs modulate declarative learning via theta-frequency oscillations, which have been related to memory encoding in prior work. For that purpose, we examined the interaction between RPE and transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) in declarative learning. Using a between-subject (real versus sham stimulation group), single-blind stimulation design, 76 participants learned 60 Dutch-Swahili word pairs, while theta-frequency (6 Hz) tACS was administered over the medial frontal cortex (MFC). Previous studies have implied MFC in memory encoding. We replicated our previous finding of signed RPEs (SRPEs) boosting declarative learning; with larger and more positive RPEs enhancing memory performance. However, tACS failed to modulate the SRPE effect in declarative learning and did not affect memory performance. Bayesian statistics supported evidence for an absence of effect. Our study confirms a role of RPE in declarative learning, but also calls for standardized procedures in transcranial electrical stimulation. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info
Wie schwer solltest du trainieren? Was ist das mit den RPEs und Reps in Reserve und was bringt mir das Zeug? Darum gehts in dieser Episode mit Coach Keven Reinfrank (@keven_reinfrank). Diesmal haben wir auch direkt ein paar Hörerfragen mit in die Folge gepackt. :)
Tyler Friedrich, Director of Olympic Sports at Stanford University, joins the show today to share his wealth of knowledge in collegiate strength & conditioning, discuss coach development, culture, training methodologies, and data collection in collegiate sports. We kick things off discussing Tyler’s background and how he found training. Tyler found the weight room through football in high school and college and always wanted to go into the industry. After a few internships, he decided he wanted to become a Strength & Conditioning coach and found himself working at Dayton as an intern, GA, and full time employee. This led him to Arizona State University and finally Olympic sports at Stanford. “Olympic Sports” in collegiate S&C typically means everything except football, and Tyler currently oversees 35 of Stanford’s 36 sports. This leads us into a discussion on the unique job security situation for collegiate sports and the reporting structure within. The NCAA is pushing to move the S&C side of staff to a direct report to the Athletic Directors, in order to avoid an S&C and coaching staff package deal in which a coaching change leads to cutting the entire S&C department loose. We also discuss contract lengths and goal setting for the coaching staff. Next we dive into coaching development and what that looks like at Stanford. Yearly reviews, goal setting throughout the year, monthly staff meetings with educational components, and open office spaces all contribute to this development at Stanford and keep everyone on track. Tyler emphasizes how the informal structure and environment at the facilities make it an extremely unique flow of ideas while allowing coaches to formulate their own ideas on training, not be afraid to experiment, and always keep an open mind. Tyler prefers the staff members to set their own goals, however, he certainly contributes at least one objective in the process. We then switch gears and get into Tyler’s training methodology after working with so many different sports. Tyler focuses on the demands of the sport, how to improve performance, and preventing injury. We use volleyball as a case study here and dive into the specifics of the offseason and a specific training week structure. Tyler emphasizes the context dependent aspects of this and understanding what the athlete can handle and what they actually need. Additionally, he takes into account the age of the team to determine what they will focus on, as well as the fact that playing the sport itself is a training stimulus. Tyler tries to weave in competitive aspects into his programming in order to drive intent, but through an individually based approach as opposed to simply pitting athletes against one another. This segways us into the topic of data collection and implementation in sports at Stanford. Various sports are tracking GPS which has been quite valuable week to week, and others use RPEs and duration to track workloads. They also use force plates that can track fatigue, particularly during the season. Where jumping is a skill and in many ways just testing a vertical jump doesn’t demonstrate readiness, the force plate shows how they are producing the force and therefore fatigue can’t be masked. An important note here is taking everything into consideration and not relying on any one number to judge an entire situation. It’s also vital to keep athletes from looking at these numbers and letting it impact their psychology at practice or in a game.Tyler combats this by educating the athletes on what the metrics mean and how they are useful. This way the athletes have context and can understand the difference between “good” or “bad” days. The most important thing he emphasizes is getting the athletes involved and creating buy-in so that they have ownership over the training process. We finish with a quick discussion on VBT method and get into why Tyler likes using podcasts
PODCAST #27 – Les RPEs VS les PourcentagesCette semaine, notre sujet principal s’adresse particulièrement aux athlètes de powerlifting. Quelles sont les différences entre une programmation utilisant les RPEs (l’échelle de perception d’effort) comparativement au pourcentage du 1 RM ? On répond à la question.Notre podcast est sur Podbean, Itunes, Google balados et Podcasts.On espère que vous allez aimer l'épisode
Kaskö och Närpes har nu ett färdigt förslag till fusionsavtal. Medan Närpes just nu går bra ekonomiskt har Kaskö flera svåra år bakom sig, och framtiden ter sig dyster. Vilken blir Närpes roll i en eventuell fusion, och har Kaskö egentligen något alternativ kvar? I Slagete etfer tolv diskuterar politikerna Mikaela Björklund från Närpes och Carl-Gustav Mangs från Kaskö samt fusionsutredaren Göran Honga. Filip Stén leder ordet. E-post: slaget@yle.fi
As part of this masterclass episode focusing on training load, I am speaking to Mathieu Lacome, Richard Akenhead, Adam Sheehan, Aaron Coutts and Shane Malone. After the great success of the sprint masterclass episode and the velocity based training masterclass episode, I decided to continue with the structure and pick out some of the best bits around the topic of training load. It was great to listen to these guys again, talking about GPS monitoring, measuring neuromuscular fatigue and of course, RPEs and acute chronic ratios. Enjoy. In this episode, you will learn - Shane Malone Acute chronic ratios What they are and problems associated with them Absolute vs relative GPS bandings Aaron Coutts Using RPE correctly Future of training load monitoring Acute chronic ratio problems Richard Akenhead What metrics can we trust from GPS Using accelerometers Mathieu Lacome Measuring neuromuscular fatigue Adam Sheehan Using repeated high intensity efforts during conditioning sessions Aaron can be found on Twitter @aaronjcoutts Adam can be found on Twitter @sheehan_adam Shane can be found on Twitter @shanemalone01 Mathieu can be found on Twitter @mathlacome Richard can be found on Twitter @richakenhead This episode of the Pacey Performance Podcast is sponsored by Vald Performance, the team behind the NordBord and the new Groinbar, a hip and groin strength measuring solution. They can be found at valdperformance.com and you can get more information on the groin bar at groinbar.com and on Twitter @groinbar. This episode is sponsored by BLK BOX, leaders in performance training equipment & facility design. BLK BOX manufacture and distribute a full range of strength training equipment across Europe from their Headquarters in Belfast, Northern Ireland. This episode is also sponsored by Forcedecks. If you want to know more about ForceDecks, listen to episode #139 of the Pacey Performance Podcast with co-founder, Dr. Daniel Cohen. Keep up to date with everything that is going on with the podcast by following on Twitter @strengthofsci or visiting strengthofscience.com Enjoy PP
RPE, or Rate of Perceived Exertion, has had a monumental impact on the effectiveness and sustainability of my training. It is something that I borrowed from the powerlifting community and only recently discovered in the last 3-5 years. Most of the first decade of my bodybuilding career was spent feeling like I HAD to take every set to failure, or it didn't really count. Knowing what I know now, I am fully convinced that this lead to very sub-optimal results. So, if there's anything that you guys could take away from today's episode, I would consider applying RPEs to your own training ASAP. Your long-term health will thank you for it. Subscribe on YT! tinyurl.com/y9mdfnsl Connect on IG! www.instagram.com/jschultzf3/
This episodes guest is Ben Esgro from DeNovo Nutrition.Ben is the founder and CEO of De Novo Nutrition. The company has both consulting and supplement branches, based on objective science and ethical practice. Ben is a registered dietitian (RD), as well as having a Masters in Nutrition and Exercise Science (MS) from Marywood University. He has over 6 years experience of coaching and programming for individuals all the way from general population folks all the way up to elite competitors, such as IPF Worlds 2015 93kg silver medalist Layne Norton. In addition to being a highly-regarded coach, he is also an accomplished competitor as both a USBF Pro Qualified Natural Bodybuilder and an internationally qualified IPF powerlifter. On this episode Ben and I discuss: Ben's background Ben's influences Ben and I discuss how exactly dietary supplements are made What are the good and not so good things that Ben currently see's with the physical preparation and nutrition professions, and what solutions would he offer for the not so good things he is seeing Ben shares with us his training and nutrition philosohpies Ben shares with us his training and nutrition systems Ben discusses how he decides on his prescription of volumes, intensities, frequencies and RPEs when working with strength-based athletes Ben tells why Dr. Mike Zourdos has been his biggest influence on his programming philosophy Ben talks about his periodization schemes with his strength athletes Ben tells us why he decided to go back to college and persue a masters in pharmocology Ben discusses how he found his introduction into his masters program Ben and I share some thoughts on how we learn Ben shares with us his biggest lessons he has learned so far in his career and life Ben shares his top resources Ben gives us his top advice to all the listeners Ben tells us what current books he was reading at the time of this interview And if Ben could invite 5 people to dinner, dead or alive, who would he invite and why? This was an outstanding episode and I hope you all enjoy it as much as we did! Stay Strong, RB Show Notes: DeNovo Nutrition Website Ben's Facebook ISI Symposium Click here for the full details of the 2018 ISI Symposium. Use the code ISI50 to get a €50 discount code when you sign up for the event. Show Sponsors: Ultimate Performance Online MentorshipTo get INSTANT ACCESS to almost 20 hours of World Class online video Strength and Conditioning Information go to upmentorship.com ALTIS ALTIS 360ALTIS Foundation Course Ultimate Athlete Concepts Ultimate Athlete Concepts is a multi faceted company, providing the most sophisticated scientific material in sport science. UAC is the worlds leading resource for translated sport preparation educational material. National Sports Performance Association Certified Program Design Specialist Certified Speed and Agility CoachCerfitied Weightlifting Performance Coach Certified Sports Nutrition Coach Athletes AccelerationComplete Warm UpComplete Speed Training Complete Speed GamesComplete Jumps TrainingComplete Olympic LiftingComplete Guide to Training the Female Athlete Complete Core Complete Sports Conditioning Complete Sports Nutrition Complete Program Design Sports Camp Empire Patreon Help support the podcast by becoming a Patreon to the show here - Patreon
I visit Sankta Maria church in Närpes/Närpiö, and speak to town guide, Marianne Winter. I learn why the church is surrounded by over 100 stables, about the unique Swedish dialect in Närpes and why the Vietnamese name, Nguyen, is the most common surname in Närpes. Show notes & links
Season 3, Episode 36 I visit Sankta Maria church in Närpes/Närpiö, and speak to town guide, Marianne Winter. I learn why the church is surrounded by over 100 stables, about the unique Swedish dialect in Närpes and why the Vietnamese name, Nguyen, is the most common surname in Närpes. MP3 Player Download an MP3 … Continue reading The Mysterious Church Stables in Närpes
Kelvin is a current consultant in sports strategy and performance for organisations in Australia, USA, UK. Kelvin is a former UK Olympic T&F Coach; Head T&F Coach from the AIS; Performance Director for the Brisbane Broncos and London Broncos Rugby League teams; Head of Physical Performance for the ARU EPD; Head of S&C for the QAS. He has recently completed consultancy work in the UK covering the last two Olympic cycles where he worked closely with several coach / athlete units as well as several NGB’s. He is also currently consulting with the Brisbane Broncos, Melbourne Storm, Queensland Netball and Athletics Australia. For more on Kelvin, go to www.movementdynamics.com Quotes “They can recite about gas analysis and force plates but none of them can coach or teach” “It should start with the ability to communicate and build the learning environment for the athlete” “Somebody took the physical out of physical education… somebody got PE wrong” “It comes down to pedagogy – what do you say and when do you say it” “Never ask them to do something that they are not capable of doing” “If you get away from letting the fixture list, or the competition results, dictate what you do; you’ll be doing the athlete a great service” “You can only coach what you see in front of you so write your training programs in pencil” “RPEs – not a bad thing but you have to wait until after the session to get them!” “Get character & personality first (when hiring staff)” Shownotes 1) Kelvin’s journey from PE teacher to Track & Field coach 6:12 2) Coming to the AIS as the first Track & Field coach and being unprepared & politically naïve 10:24 3) The need for good diplomatic skills for professionals 13:02 4) Coaching skills & pedagogy don’t change across disciplines/sports – only the technical skills are different 17:54 5) The potential dangers of applying track speed to field & court sports part 1 21:23 6) An inside look at the Queensland Academy of Sport, the development of athletes for the international stage and physical literacy 28:35 7) Looking at how people learn – constraint based teaching, external focus, use of analogies, outcome based teaching 43:06 8) The benefits of going overseas and coaching in another culture (along with being in a job where if you lose on Sunday you’ll be sacked on Monday) 52:58 9) The potential dangers of applying track speed to field & court sports part 2 1:11:11 10) The prerequisites before athletes can run fast or do any movement – earning the right to perform 1:14:05 11) Maturation and how that relates to Long Term Athlete Development (LTAD) 1:23:38 12) One of Kelvin’s most satisfying athlete performance – performing a personal best when it matters 1:36:07 13) The Raiders-Broncos connection and grand final performances from 1989-1993 (one for the rugby league fans) 1:41:02 14) Utilizing technology and it’s role in sports e.g. using watts instead of kg in the weightroom (Dan Baker) or understanding what game speed is from GPS/accelerometry and applying that to training (Dean Benton) 1:51:57 15) A great example of specific fitness for rugby league that Kelvin rates as the best thing he’s seen in training and took over 2 years to develop… 1:58:14 16) Want to work in professional sport? The Suki Mercedes Hobson story 2:05:15 People mentioned 1) Ian Ward 2) Frank Dick 3) Bruce Lowndon 4) Ken Lorraway 5) Robin Lorraway 6) Vanessa Browne 7) Gerrard Keating 8) Joanna Stone 9) Jeremy Hickmans @jezhickmans 10) Dean Benton 11) Lachlan Penfold @lachlanpenfold 12) Paul Devlin @pauldevs 13) Chris Gaviglio @chrisgaviglio 14) Sukhi Hobson @sukihobson 15) Andrew Lulham 16) Anthony Giorgi 17) Scott Dickinson @sdicko1 18) Allan Launder 19) Gary Knoke 20) Craig Hillard 21) John Pryor @fit3k 22) Kieran Young @kieran_p_young 23) Vern Gambetta @coachgembetta 24) Mick McDermott 25) Wayne Bennett 26) Isvan Bayli 27) Bill Knowles @billknowles_hps 28) Fergus Connolly @fergus_connolly
Hoy conversamos sobre: brujería, Talión, enraizadores naturales, alepates, sembrar veranera, hérpes zoster. Facebook: www.facebook.com/oigamoslarespuesta/ Web: www.icecu.org
Hoy conversamos sobre: brujería, Talión, enraizadores naturales, alepates, sembrar veranera, hérpes zoster. Facebook: www.facebook.com/oigamoslarespuesta/ Web: www.icecu.org
This week Steve interviews Mike Zourdos who's research focus on optimizing periodization and program design methods. ~ 03:30 Biggest benefit of DUP 07:55 What aspects can you undulate? 10:50 How does Mike use DUP with his Bodybuilding/Powerlifting clients? 14:25 Using DUP for more than the squat, bench and deadlift 17:32 Common misconceptions with DUP, what grinds Mike's gears? 25:44 Mike on training to failure, using RPEs & using too much volume 25:27 How Mike structures in intro weeks & tapers 37:20 Projects Mike is now working on 48:30 How to build confidence in using RPE ~ • Mike's Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mike.zourdos ~ COACHING: www.revivestronger.com/online-person-training/ WEBSITE: www.revivestronger.com SNAPCHAT: www.snapchat.com/add/revivestronger FACEBOOK: www.facebook.com/revivestronger TWITTER: www.twitter.com/revivestronger INSTAGRAM: www.instagram.com/revivestronger MYFITNESSPAL: www.myfitnesspal.com/food/diary/snhall1990 YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8W1y0ZtYog
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
