POPULARITY
54 episodes with dve
9 episodes with dve
7 episodes with dve
12 episodes with dve
4 episodes with dve
10 episodes with dve
6 episodes with dve
9 episodes with dve
5 episodes with dve
10 episodes with dve
3 episodes with dve
5 episodes with dve
6 episodes with dve
51 episodes with dve
2 episodes with dve
3 episodes with dve
3 episodes with dve
2 episodes with dve
Čo nového u Kresťanských demokratov a v Smere? Sú teraz dôležitejšou témou Slovenska dve pohlavia v ústave a kultúrno-etické vojny ako naše zdravie a peňaženky?Novela ústavy Roberta Fica s dvomi pohlaviami a národnou identitou sa odkladá na september. Svoju podporu si okrem Františka Mikloška z KDH rozmyslel aj jeho kolega František Majerský a poslanec Hlasu Ján Ferenčák. Ústavná koalícia Smeru, Hlasu, SNS a KDH tak 90 poslancov nenašla. Po ústave má teraz Robert Fico novú tému, hovorí, že by Slovensku svedčala neutralita.Čo bude teraz a ako to v KDH strávia? Ak chceli národnú identitu nad právo európskej únie, budú chcieť aj Ficovu nejasnú neutralitu? Dve pohlavia v ústave sú jedna vec, no prečo musia ľudia na Slovensku v časoch uťahovania opaskov a konsolidácii platiť povinné z zdravotné odvody a potom sa za drahé peniaze objednávať do ambulancií, ak zákon poplatky za objednanie na vyšetrenia zakazuje?Braňo Závodský sa rozprával s poslancom parlamentu za KDH a členom zdravotníckeho výboru parlamentu Františkom Majerským.
Novela ústavy z dielne vládneho Smeru, ktorá našla podporu u opozičných kresťanských demokratov. Na Slovensku dokonca na moment prehlušila správy o vojnách – či na Ukrajine, alebo o tej medzi Izraelom a Iránom. Nateraz sa odsúva na jeseň.Dve pohlavia - muž a žena - ako národná identita, zároveň ich rovnosť pri odmeňovaní. Adopcie a právo rodičov rozhodovať o výchovno-vzdelávacom procese detí, nie surogátnemu materstvu či suverenita Slovenska v hodnotových a kultúrno-etických otázkach. To, čo je pre niekoho zásadným dokumentom pre identitu krajiny, iní označujú výrazom „podvod“. „Podvod Roberta Fica, ktorý kresťania v politike nemajú legitimizovať“ – volá tvár odporu František Mikloško. Vypočul ho aj František Majerský. A Ján Ferenčák z Hlasu hovorí o „zástupnej téme“, o ktorej by rád hlasoval až na jeseň. A hoci ústavná novela zatiaľ vecne nič nevyriešila, už stihla napáchať politické škody: rozhádala opozíciu v momente, keď sa zdalo, že sa začína zjednocovať. Naviac v Bruseli vyvoláva obavy, že ide proti únijným princípom. Ako vidí jej plody politológ Radoslav Štefančík? Podcast pripravil Jaroslav Barborák.
Novela ústavy z dielne vládneho Smeru, ktorá našla podporu u opozičných kresťanských demokratov. Na Slovensku dokonca na moment prehlušila správy o vojnách – či na Ukrajine, alebo o tej medzi Izraelom a Iránom. Nateraz sa odsúva na jeseň.Dve pohlavia - muž a žena - ako národná identita, zároveň ich rovnosť pri odmeňovaní. Adopcie a právo rodičov rozhodovať o výchovno-vzdelávacom procese detí, nie surogátnemu materstvu či suverenita Slovenska v hodnotových a kultúrno-etických otázkach. To, čo je pre niekoho zásadným dokumentom pre identitu krajiny, iní označujú výrazom „podvod“. „Podvod Roberta Fica, ktorý kresťania v politike nemajú legitimizovať“ – volá tvár odporu František Mikloško. Vypočul ho aj František Majerský. A Ján Ferenčák z Hlasu hovorí o „zástupnej téme“, o ktorej by rád hlasoval až na jeseň. A hoci ústavná novela zatiaľ vecne nič nevyriešila, už stihla napáchať politické škody: rozhádala opozíciu v momente, keď sa zdalo, že sa začína zjednocovať. Naviac v Bruseli vyvoláva obavy, že ide proti únijným princípom. Ako vidí jej plody politológ Radoslav Štefančík?
Hostia: Jozef Majchrák (komentátor denníka Postoj) a Peter Tkačenko (komentátor denníka Sme). | Okruhy tém: Zmeny v ústave (Dve pohlavia, hodnotové otázky; je nevyhnutné to definovať? Politická hra o konzervatívneho voliča, postoje oboch táborov – koalícia/opozícia, porovnanie so zahraničím, kde majú ešte niečo podobné?). Politické strany (Ide o pokus Roberta Fica rozbiť konzervatívne strany, resp. získať ich prípadnú podporu? Postoj KDH, ako môže vyzerať klub po prípadnom rozdelení pri hlasovaní? Hnutie Slovensko – aj tu je časť konzervatívcov, spolupráca s koalíciou, jednotlivé koaličné strany, čo sa tým snaží získať Smer? Ide o voliča, alebo skôr politické ciele? Hlas-SD, SNS a ich stanoviská). | Novelizácia Ústavy SR. | Moderuje: Marta Jančkárová; | Diskusiu Z prvej ruky pripravuje Slovenský rozhlas, Rádio Slovensko, SRo1. Vysielame každý pracovný deň o 12:30 v Rádiu Slovensko.
Dve častitljivi obletnici: šestdeset let Festivala Borštnikovo srečanje, ki se že tradicionalno odvija v SNG Maribor in sedemdeset let Grafičnega bienala, ki je na ogled na različnih prizoriščih v Ljubljani.Kako glavna selektorica Borštnikovega srečanja Ajda Rooss vidi slovensko gledališko krajino in kaj imajo skupnega gledališke predstave v tekmovalnem programu? Ajde Rooss je dolgoletne vodje lutkovnega gledališča Ljubljana, dramaturginje in publicistke, ugotavlja, da se predstave med seboj povezujejo in da imajo mnogo skupnih izhodiš.Nagrade in Borštnikov prstan, ki ga letos prejme prvakinja SNG Drama Nataša Barbara Gračner, bodo podelili v soboto Ali Mednarodni grafični bienale Ljubljana, eden najstarejših bienalskih prireditev na svetu, še ohranja pridevnik grafični?Letos ga kurira, v Španiji rojena filozofinja in umetnostna zgodovinarka, Chus Martínez. Naslovila ga je Orakelj: o domišljiji in svobodi.Grafični bienale Ljubljana je bil ustanovljen leta 1955, doslej so na bienalu predstavili dela okoli 9000 umetnikov iz 122 držav. Letošnja 36.edicija je na ogled do sredi oktobra 2025.
Dve európske delegácie kontrolovali Slovensko: jedna skúmala používania a zneužívanie európskych fondov, druhá sledovala stav právneho štátu.Europoslanci nám napokon odkázali, že sa uberáme smerom Maďarska, ešte predtým reagoval Robert Fico na ich zistenia podráždene.Ako nás teda vnímajú v Európe a čo eurokontrola zistila?Tomáš Prokopčák sa v podcaste Dobré ráno pýta šéfredaktorky denníka SME Beaty Balogovej.Zdroje zvukov: Youtube/Európsky parlament — Kancelária na Slovensku, TASR, Facebook/Robert Fico, Youtube/SME, EuronewsOdporúčanie:Je slnko naozaj najlepší lekárom? Zdá sa, že slnečné žiarenie by mohlo pomáhať aj pri niektorých autoimunitných ochoreniach, a lekári sa z tohto zistenia teraz snažia urobiť udržateľnú liečbu. Tejto snahe sa venuje magazín Scientific American v texte Môže slnko liečiť ochorenia, a tento článok je mojim dnešným odporúčaním.–Všetky podcasty denníka SME nájdete na sme.sk/podcasty–Odoberajte aj audio verziu denného newslettra SME.sk s najdôležitejšími správami na sme.sk/brifing
V tem mesecu se v Sloveniji spominjamo največjega genocida v zgodovini slovenskega naroda. Predsednica republike Nataša Pirc Musar se bo na povabilo ministra za obrambo Boruta Sajovica, teden dni pred tradicionalno slovesnostjo v Kočevskem rogu, udeležila spominske slovesnosti, kjer se bo poklonila žrtvam na kraju spomina Jama pod Macesnovo gorico.Vse bolj jasno je, da želi biti predsednica države Nataša Pirc Musar prvorazredna – a ne prvorazredna za vse, temveč samo za izbrane, tiste, ki so po njeni meri. Svojo vključevalnost si razlaga kot ekskluzivni klub ideološko všečnih, v katerega ne sodi vsak državljan, ampak le tisti, ki poklekne pred njenimi vrednotami.Gremo lepo po vrsti. Predsednica, ki ji letos mandat vstopa v drugo polovico, se šele zdaj očitno zaveda, da ji voda teče v grlo, če ne želi končati mandata kot Danilo Türk, ki je delil državljane na prvo in drugo razredne. Do danes se Nataša Pirc Musar še ni zmogla, kot prva med državljani, pokloniti žrtvam komunizma. Ima polna usta obsodb fašizma, nacizma, Srebrenice in zdaj Gaze, a največjega povojnega genocida na Slovenskem – množičnih pobojev pred in v letu 1945 – se izogiba kot maček vode.Mirno sedi z ideološkimi dediči krvnikov, jim podeljuje državna odlikovanja v imenu vseh državljanov – tudi tistih, katerih sorodniki so bili brez sodbe pobiti. Organizacijam, kot sta Nova slovenska zaveza in Združeni ob Lipi sprave, ki si leta prizadevajo za resnično, enakovredno in celostno spravo, pa obrne hrbet. Ne, ona gre raje po svoje. Po poti samovoljnosti in selektivnega spomina.S svojim ravnanjem postaja predsednica, ki je s par zamahi – kot slon v trgovini s porcelanom – uničila dolgoletna prizadevanja njenega predhodnika Boruta Pahorja za spravo. Skupaj z vlado je, tudi za ceno obiska pri pokojnem papežu Frančišku izsilila »začasni pokop« žrtev iz Macesnove gorice, ne da bi prisluhnila željam tistih, ki si prizadevajo za njihov dostojen pokop v slovenski prestolnici.Na naše vprašanje ali se bo udeležila slovenski v Kočevskem Rogu, ki jo 7. junija pripravlja Nova Slovenska zaveza so med drugim odgovorili, da je že ob začetku letošnjega leta potrdila udeležbo na 80. obletnici osvoboditve koncentracijskega taborišča Ljubelj, ki bo na isti dan ob 10. uri in kjer bo tudi slavnostna govornica. Zato je nemogoče, da bi se udeležila obeh. Ob tem pa ni pokazala niti kančka želje, da bi si prizadevala, da bi bila ena ali druga slovesnost malo prilagojena, da bi se lahko udeležila obeh slovesnosti. Zanimiv je tudi izgovor: kajti že več desetletij je slovesnost v Kočevskem Rogu postavljena v ta čas.Njeno govorjenje o spravi je tako kot ogledalo, ki odseva samo njen obraz – ne pa obraze vseh Slovencev. Sramotno. Žalostno. In predvsem – globoko ponižujoče do vseh, ki so zaradi komunizma izgubili življenje, dostojanstvo ali resnico, prav tako pa ponižujoče tudi do vseh, ki si iskreno prizadevajo za spravo med Slovenci. Predsednica, ki ima polna usta pravičnosti, a ne zmore niti enega iskrenega stavka obsodbe komunističnih zločinov, ne združuje – temveč razdvaja. In to ne z močjo resnice, ampak s silo selektivnega spomina.Da je mera polna pa vidimo tudi pri njenem nedržavotvornem delu, ko že nekaj časa blokira delovanje demokratičnih institucij. Do danes še ni našla primernega in za dvotretjinsko večino sprejemljivega kandidata ali kandidatke za varuha človekovih pravic. Če so v njen ožji izbor izmed 14-ih prijavljenih kandidatov prišli zgolj trije, o ostalih sploh ni pojasnila, zakaj jih ne predlaga – med temi so tudi ugleda imena kot sta denimo nevrolog dr. Zvezdan Pirtovšek in nekdanja varuhinja človekovih pravic Vlasta Nussdorfer, pa sedaj želi na to mesto kandidatko, ki se sploh ni prijavila za to mesto. Nekako se vse bolj izrisuje, da si pač želi na tem mestu nekoga, ki bo delal zgolj njej po všeči.Neuspešna je tudi pri kandidaturi za guvernerja Banke Slovenije. Naša država je tako v Evropski centralni banki brez glasovalnih pravic in to v času, ko se evropska unija sooča s poslabšano finančno sliko, naše države pa pri ukrepih ni zraven. Žalostno.Kaj kmalu pa bo jasno, koga bo izbrala na kmalu izpraznjena mesta ustavnih sodnikov. Dve imeni bo morala ponuditi. Bo tokrat bolj taktna ali pa bo tudi tukaj ustavnemu sodišču pomagala s še bolj ideološko skrajno levimi kandidati in tako pomagala pri razgradnji pravne države? Mislim, da sem naštel kar nekaj zadev, ki jasno kažejo, da predsednica ni kos nalogi, ki bi jo morala opravljati. Ne povezuje, si za povezovanje ne prizadeva, še več, namesto dialoga vnaša razdor, namesto sprave dodatne delitve. Bi bil čas, da bi odstopila ali pa morebiti sklicala predsedničin forum na temo svojega vladanja? Na to si odgovorite sami!
Jak se stavíme k infomacím, které se k nám dostanou? Co nás vede k tomu, že některým informacím o určitých událostech věříme a jiným ne?V Bibli čteme, abychom se nenechali zmást kdejakou falší. Máme-li něčemu věřit, potřebujeme informace z ověřených zdrojů a potřebujeme je kriticky zkoumat. To platí v každodenním životě, ale platí to samozřejmě i pro život víry.Dnešní kázání bychom mohli také nazvat "Pochybnost či ověřování zdrojů?"A jak je to tedy s Tomášem, kterého známe pod přídavkem nevěřící. Opravdu nevěřil? Nebo to mohlo být celé jinak?Jan 20:19-20(Ježíš se zjevuje učedníkům za zavřenými dveřmi)Téhož dne večer byli učedníci pohromadě za zamčenými dveřmi, protože se báli, že teď přijdou Židé na ně. Pojednou stál Ježíš mezi nimi a řekl: „Pokoj vám!“ Potom jim ukázal rány v rukou a v boku.To byla radost pro učedníky, že zase vidí svého Pána! Ježíš opakoval: „Pokoj vám!“ a pokračoval: „Otec vyslal mne a já vysílám vás.“ Dýchl na ně a řekl: „Přijměte svatého Ducha! Komu budete zvěstovat odpuštění hříchů a kdo je přijme, tomu bude odpuštěno. Komu tu zvěst zadržíte, zůstává ve svém hříchu.“(Ježíš se zjevuje učedníkům včetně Tomáše)Toho večera chyběl mezi učedníky Tomáš, kterému přezdívali Dvojče. Ostatní mu o setkání s Ježíšem vyprávěli, ale on pochyboval: „Neuvěřím, dokud neuvidím a neohmatám rány na jeho rukou a boku.“Po týdnu byli učedníci znovu spolu a tentokrát byl s nimi i Tomáš. Dveře byly zase zamčeny, když se Ježíš mezi ně postavil a oslovil je: „Pokoj vám!“ Potom se obrátil k Tomášovi: „Podívej se a sáhni si na mé rány! Už nepochybuj, ale věř!“Tomáš přesvědčen vyznal: „Jsi můj Pán a můj Bůh!“Ježíš mu na to řekl: „Viděl jsi mne, a proto věříš. Cennější však je nevidět a uvěřit.“Lk. 24, 36-43Ještě neskončili svoje vyprávění a tu sám Ježíš stál mezi nimi a pozdravil je: „Pokoj vám!“ Velice se lekli; domnívali se, že se jim zjevil nějaký duch. Avšak on je pokáral: „Co se lekáte a proč si vymýšlíte takové věci? Podívejte se na moje ruce a nohy, jsem to opravdu já. Můžete si na mne sáhnout, nejsem duch, ten nemá tělo z masa a kostí.“ Při těch slovech jim ukázal rány po hřebech na rukou i na nohou. Jeho žáci tomu stále nemohli uvěřit, připadalo jim to příliš krásné, než aby to mohla být pravda. Požádal je tedy: „Máte tu něco k jídlu?“ Podali mu pečenou rybu a plástev medu a on to s nimi snědl.
V 102. epizóde Vertiga sa povenujeme 78. ročníku festivalu v Cannes, predstavíme si najočakávanejšie filmy z hlavnej súťaže, ale prezradíme aj našich obľúbených víťazov Zlatej palmy za ostatné roky a možno aj desaťročia. Skočíme aj do kín, ktoré hrajú reboot Nezvratného osudu, ale aj ocenenú indickú drámu z minulého ročníka festivalu v Cannes – Záblesky nádeje. Zo streamov sme vybrali seriálové netflixoviny - Bad Boy a Štyri ročné obdobia. Ale nevynecháme ani kulinárske Babičky, ponor do televízneho sveta Saturday Night, či gangsterské Dve tváre zločinu. A máme pre vás ešte jednu príjemnú správu, za ktorú ďakujeme hlavne vám. V súťaži Podcast roka 2025 sme opäť získali nomináciu v umeleckej kategórii Ateliér. Budeme veľmi radi, ak nám dáte svoj hlas na stránke podcastroka.sk. Vážime si vašu podporu. Zoznam filmov a seriálov z epizódy: Nezvratný osud: Pokrvné puto / Final Destination: Bloodlines Záblesky nádeje / All We Imagine as Light Štyri ročné obdobia / The Four Seasons (Netflix) Dve tváre zločinu / The Alto Knights (Prime Video) Saturday Night (Max) Bad Boy (Netflix) Babičky / Nonnas (Netflix) See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Dve prehry z troch zápasov a štyri získané body. Slovenskí hokejisti si komplikujú cestu za naplnením štvrťfinálového cieľa. Ich doterajšie výkony na MS 2025 sme v dnešnej relácii Fair Play hodnotili s expertom a mládežníckym trénerom Martinom Kalináčom.
Dve gosi sta se, kot vsako leto, odpravili na selitev v južne kraje. K njim je prišla žaba in ju prosila, naj jo vzameta s seboj ...Iz knjige Drobne zgodbe za dušo, ki je izšla pri založbi Ognjišče.
Mike Prisuta of the DVE morning show joins the show to break down the Steelers draft
Mike Prisuta of the DVE morning show joins the show to break down the Steelers draft See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Dve dekády rastu krajina prejedla, teraz prichádza účet. Téma týždňa TRENDU sa venuje smerovaniu slovenskej ekonomiky
Civilisti, ktorí sa vracali z kostola alebo zdravotníci, ktorí im prišli na pomoc. Práve oni tvoria väčšinu z 34 obetí a vyše stovky zranených po ruskom útoku na ukrajinské mesto Sumy, ktorý sa odohral túto nedeľu.Dve rakety prileteli na miesto s odstupom niekoľkých minút v čase, keď bolo v uliciach mnoho civilistov, ktorí sa nemali ako brániť a ani sa neubránili. A to všetko len pár dní po tom, čo sa v Kremli konali ďalšie mierové rokovania so Spojenými štátmi.Čo sa na Ukrajine aktuálne deje, ako vyzerajú mierové rokovania, o čo ide Rusku a dočkáme sa Veľkej noci bez bojov?Eva Frantová sa v podcaste Dobré ráno rozpráva s analytičkou think tanku Európska rada pre medzinárodné vzťahy a bývalou poradkyňou prezidentky Zuzany Čaputovej v oblasti zahraničnej politiky Janou Kobzovou.Zdroj zvukov: BBC, Sky News, Times News, DW NewsOdporúčanie:Svet aj bezpečnosť Európy sa mení. USA pod vedením Donalda Trumpa menia situáciu v NATO, aj vo svete. Slovensko ovplyvní zbrojenie, aj uvalenie cla na autá. Kde vlastne stojí Slovensko? Dá sa byť otočený na štyri svetové strany? Na čo sa máme pripraviť v zahraničnej politike, obrane a bezpečnosti?Zuzana Kovačič Hanzelová bude už túto stredu diskutovať s exministrom financií a ekonómom Ivanom Miklošom a bývalým veľvyslancom pri NATO Petrom Bátorom. Odporúčam zavítať o 19:00 do bratislavského Kácečka.–Všetky podcasty denníka SME nájdete na sme.sk/podcasty–Odoberajte aj audio verziu denného newslettra SME.sk s najdôležitejšími správami na sme.sk/brifing
Dve elfské sestry padnú do zajatia v utajenom svete férov, kde na ne číha nebezpečenstvo aj láska. Nenechajte si ujsť knihu nominovanú ako najlepšia romantasy za rok 2024 podľa hlasovania čitateľov na najväčšej knihomoľskej sieti, Goodreads. Pred tisíc rokmi obývali svet tri druhy bytostí: féri, elfovia a ľudia. Féri a ľudia však už dnes patria len do mýtov a legiend, zatiaľ čo elfovia uviazli v nekonečnej vojne o zvyšné územia. Yeeran, plukovníčka elfskej armády, pozná iba život plný násilia a utrpenia. Jej sestra Lettle je veštkyňa, ktorej mágia sľubuje obom sestrám inú budúcnosť, no jej proroctvá sa ešte nenaplnili. No potom Yeeran spraví osudnú chybu, za čo ju čaká trest v podobe doživotného vyhnanstva, a Lettle sa ju rozhodne do neprebádanej oblasti za hranicami Elfskej ríše nasledovať. V divočine narazia na obrovského obeaha, zázračného tvora, ktorého elfovia využívajú pri výrobe zbraní. A práve počas lovu obeaha sa stane nemožné - sestry zajme skupinka férov. Yeeran s Lettle čaká neľahká úloha: poradiť s politikou férskeho dvora, vymyslieť, ako utečú, a najmä zvoliť si medzi vernosťou svojej elfskej vlasti a opojným férskym svetom. Medzi tým, čo káže povinnosť a čo im našepkávajú srdcia. Číta: Dado Nagy
Piše Miša Gams, bereta Eva Longyka Marušič in Igor Velše. Po pesniškemu prvencu Dve zimi je Primož Čučnik, ki ga poznamo tudi kot kritika, esejista, urednika in kolumnista, izdal še dvanajst pesniških zbirk, zbirko kolumen Promet s knjigo, knjigo kritik in esejev z naslovom Delo in Dom – za katero je leta 2008 prejel nagrado Prešernovega sklada, roman Otročjost, napisanim iz vidika otroka, pred kratkim pa esejistično obarvan literarni “kolaž” Osel in senca, ki poleg razmišljanja o urbanem in ruralnem, preteklem in sedanjem, svetlobi in sencah spretno umešča avtorjev poetični pečat in ga preplete v dinamičen konglomerat s filozofskimi fragmenti in kratko prozo. Glavni junak, ki s prijateljem na dolenjskem podeželju obnavlja star družinski skedenj, s katerim ga vežejo spomini na otroštvo, v nekem trenutku prepusti vajeti lastnemu nezavednemu, da vanj prodrejo mitemi iz življenja staršev in starih staršev, ter tako starinskim pojmom in predmetom, ki jih najde v nastajajoči hiši, omogoči, da povejo svojo zgodbo. Hišo v hiši primerja s starogrškim panteonom, v katerem ugleda slepega očeta Ojdipa, jokavo Jokasto in antifašistično Antigono. Ti predstavljajo eksistencialne temelje za groteskno evropsko podrtijo, ki je bila v zgodovini že večkrat porušena. Obenem pa ob delu v skednju občuti in dojame številna življenjska, fenomenološka in ontološka protislovja: “Skedenj je stal in nikomur pisal. // Skedenj je protislovje. / S smrtjo ni nikomur lahko, / niti živim / niti živim. // Stranske vloge brez besedila. / Viže brez teksta. // Tomažek. // Ni pomembno, kako počasi greš, / dokler se ne ustaviš. // Konfucij.” Sebe in svojega delovnega sotrpina imenuje Pi Ču in Li Baj ter vzpostavi podobnost med Don Kihotom in Sančom Panso, le da ju vidi kot aktivna udeleženca, ki z združevanjem idealizma in realizma, pragmatičnosti in poezije, uspešno vzdržujeta ravnotežje pri vsakdanjih delovnih izzivih. S to razliko, da jima v tej mitološko-zenovski strukturi najbolj umanjka prav osel, ki velja za najbolj trpežno, neustrašno, pridno, zvesto, a hkrati neupogljivo in trmasto žival: “Kdor je sam svoj gospodar in svobodnega duha, v hišo pripelje osla, ne psa. Ko je pri hiši osel, ni nikogar blizu, tatovi pa se na daleč izognejo tej hiši. Vsak se boji prerekati z oslom, ko ga ta zabodeno pogleda, še največji pogumnež stisne rep med noge.” V neki drugi zgodbi nadaljuje razvijanje te misli: “Predstavljajte si trmastega osla, ki vas vztrajno ignorira in se niti za noht ne premakne, tudi če ga žgečkate in mu pripovedujete o korenčkovem raju, ki ga čaka zunaj – kaj vse zamuja s poležavanjem po hiši. Predstavljajte si osla brez čuta za domišljijo, ki bi ga nemudoma osrečila. Mislim, da noben osel ne pade daleč od svojega gospodarja. Če drži, da se osel ne cmeri in ne pokaže čustev, pa se zmotno verjame, da je brezčutna žival. Osli so zadržana in molčeča bitja, ki svojih tegob ne razlagajo vsemu svetu. Ampak kako naj vemo, kako se počuti osel, ko je sam?” Pri branju knjige Osel in senca bralec dobi občutek, kot da Čučnik skupaj s skednjem gradi tudi knjigo. Po kompaktnem in uravnoteženem prologu, v katerem se z obujanjem obredov, za katere se zdi, da so v večji meri že izumrli, poglobi v svoje otroštvo, nanaša plast za plastjo odtenke svoje subtilne poezije ter jo utrdi z opombami in ciklom Dom se premika. Sledi mu izviren Seznam stvari, ki so bodisi nujno potrebni bodisi jih v življenju ne bo pogrešal. Osrednji del knjige predstavlja pesniški cikel z naslovom Skedenj (obrnjen na glavo), posvečen predlani umrlemu Tomažu Skulju. V njem prodira v osnove poezije in filozofije ter jih bogati z refleksijami in dvogovorom o življenju, smrti in ponovni gradnji. Prosti pesniški verzi odstopajo prostor poeziji v prozi, dokler v sklopu Hiša v hiši s serijo kratkih zgodb – ki si sledijo po abecedi – dokončno ne opusti vseh oblik poezije. Z epilogom postavi streho na svojo umetniško gradnjo – analizira vzroke, dileme, filozofska vprašanja in paradokse, ki se mu porajajo med obnovo skednja. Med drugim se pomudi tudi pri podobnostih in razlikah med umetniškim delom in hišo: “Umetniško delo hoče ljudi iztrgati iz udobja. Hiša mora služiti udobju. Umetniško delo je revolucionarno, hiša konzervativna. Umetniško delo kaže človeštvu nove poti in misli na prihodnost. Hiša misli na sedanjost. Človek ljubi vse, kar služi njegovemu udobju. Sovraži vse, kar ga hoče iztrgati iz pridobljenega in zavarovanega položaja in kar ga obremenjuje. In tako ljubi hišo in sovraži umetnost.” Kljub preprostim in razumljivim razlagam pa je Čučnikov jezik v knjigi Osel in senca rahlo zbadljiv, ironičen in duhovit, prežet na eni strani s postmodernistično dialektiko in podeželskim pragmatizmom, na drugi pa s kitajskim taoizmom in zen budizmom. Pesmi, za katere se zdi, da iz avtorjevega nezavednega spontano kapljajo po načelu bežnih asociacij, vzpostavljajo bližnjice do vzporednih zgodb in krepijo fantazijski svet, ki se nam ob osvetljevanju različnih plasti skednja vsakič razpira na nov način. Skedenj je tako prispodoba za temačno kolektivno nezavedno, kamor redkokdaj zaide sončni žarek, majhna tradicionalna okna pa nudijo le omejen pogled v svet – pa vendar predmeti, ki se znajdejo v njem, nastopajo kot neke vrste šamanistični obredni totemi in obenem kot simbolne metafore. Tudi na glavo postavljena risba skednja na naslovnici, nas opozarja, da stvari niso takšne, kot so videti na prvi pogled. Brati jih moramo namreč kot rebus, pesniški koan ali nelogični paradoks, da se prebijemo do njihove biti. In Primožu Čučniku tovrstni poizkusi kar dobro uspevajo, saj v celotni knjigi Osel in senca ostaja na križišču med realnim, imaginarnim in simbolnim, s pomembnim sporočilom o vrednosti solidarnega dela, družinskega izročila in prijateljstva.
Spominjam se medicinske sestre, ki sem jo srečala pred veliko leti. Poklicno je delala s hudo bolnimi in umirajočimi. Hodila jih je obiskovat po družinah. Pripovedovala je, kako se srečuje z umirajočimi in njihovimi družinami. Omenila je tudi, kako pomembno je, da tisti, ki spremlja bolnike, nosi svoje znanje na hrbtu. Tako ima roke in srce proste za bolnika. O tem sem pozneje še velikokrat premišljevala. To ne velja samo za srečevanje z bolniki, ampak za srečevanje z vsemi ljudmi. Znanje, ki ga imamo, nam je lahko v pomoč in je dragoceno, če je lepo naloženo na hrbtu, in ga uporabimo, ko je treba. Nikoli pa znanje ne sme biti nekaj, kar nas od drugih ločuje, kar ustvarja pregrade. Če bi ga nosili pred seboj, se z njim šopirili in si z njim napolnili roke, smo nesposobni za človeško komunikacijo. Dve stvari sta v naši komunikaciji najpomembnejši in predstavljata tudi podobo vsake pomoči: človeku podati roko in mu pogledati v oči. Na tej ravni se dogaja resnično življenje, tu se človek ne more sprenevedati. Če človeku ne daš roke in ga ne pogledaš v oči, je vse, kar narediš zanj ali na njem, le zunanja akcija. Dobro bi bilo, če bi se tega vedno zavedali. Prav je, da si prizadevamo za čim večje znanje, toda hkrati nam mora biti jasno, da to ni vse in da ni najpomembnejše. Če si hkrati ne bomo prizadevali tudi za dobro, iskreno človeško komunikacijo, nam bo znanje lahko postajalo breme, pod težo katerega bomo podlegli. Prvi korak je, da sprostimo roke, da bodo prazne, in da si znanje naložimo na hrbet.
Low self-esteem. Lack of belonging. Feeling rejected by peers or society. These are signs that domestic extremists are looking for from children posting online. These mental health struggles can contribute to youth becoming victims of grooming by domestic hate groups, according to San Antonio Office of Emergency Management Public Engagement Officer Larry Rodriguez. He led the Floresville Independent School District's (ISD) March 26 presentation on Understanding and Preventing Youth Radicalization: Combating Hate and Violence. Domestic violence extremism, or DVE, groups are recruiting youth to commit acts of hate both locally and globally. The FBI and the Department of Homeland Security...Article Link
Piše Katarina Mahnič, bereta Eva Longyka Marušič in Igor Velše. Pretežna oblika pisateljevanja filozofa, profesorja, glasbenika, pisca Boštjana Narata je bila do zdaj esej, tako da je z romanom Bend stopil na novo ozemlje, pravzaprav je zelo suvereno zakorakal vanj. Kako tudi ne bi, roman govori o glasbenikih in glasbi, Narat pa ima za seboj trideset let igranja v bendih in dobro pozna njihovo dinamiko. Zgodba je dokaj preprosta. Študentka Zoja gre na avdicijo za pevko v bendu, ki je pred časom nepojasnjeno izgubil svojega pevca, Gorana. Kar izginil je. Zoja s svojim glasom in besedili navduši člane skupine Hektorja, Domna in TJ-ja in takoj jo sprejmejo medse. Vendar pa to ni edini bend v romanu; skoraj enakovredno vlogo ima Zojin družinski bend. Foter Damjan, nekoč znani muzičar s super po krivici pozabljeno glasbeno skupino, se je potegnil vase, hodi po hiši kot duh in izdeluje ptičje hišice; mama Ksenija je izstopila iz literarne scene in zdaj piše uspešne priročnike za življenje, vodi delavnice, predavanja, terapije … in s tem odlično služi; starejši brat, nakladaški Tejo, pa zagrenjenost zaradi vrnitve pod domači krov, ker je tako pač najbolj udobno, kompenzira s filozofiranjem. Prav Tejo izpostavi to, kar je poleg glasbe rdeča nit pripovedi: ali je vredno delati tisto, kar res ljubiš in v kar res verjameš, in zaradi tega životariti, ali pa je bolj praktično in razumno privoliti v kompromise ne tako zadovoljujoče službe, ki ti prinaša dober denar? In ker seveda tudi na tem področju ni vse črno-belo – ali si se z odločitvijo za udobnejše preživetje tudi prodal, izdal svoje ideale? Ali pa je ravno tako prav, kot vzkipi Domen, da hočeš od tistega, kar rad delaš, tudi dostojno živeti in zato ni nespodobno sprejeti kakšnega kompromisa. Da je muzika tvoja služba, tvoj poklic: “Zoja, kaj pa je narobe s kariero? Malo serješ s polno ritjo. Lahko je bit pameten v maminem fensi hotelu.” Ali ko skuša Ksenija prenapetima sinu in hčeri pojasniti, kako je že zdavnaj spoznala, da so uniforme povsod: “Seveda so različnih barv in pomenijo različne stvari, ampak vse to govorjenje o samosvojosti in neukalupljenosti … vse to je rahlo precenjeno. Pa malo brez veze.” Poleg razpravljanja o preživetju in seveda o glasbi Narat tankočutno in v gledališki maniri dialogov in monologov v Zojini glavi vpleta tudi spomine, navezanost, strahove, upanje, razočaranje, ljubezen …, stvari, ki so vsem pomembne in domače. Več je zamolčanosti kot odprtega, neposrednega uvida; takšne so povezave z Goranovim izginotjem, Zojino osuplo spregledanje tesnega, še vedno “zacopanega” odnosa njenih staršev, pa njen impulzivni vzgib za edino ljubezensko srečanje v romanu, ki bi ga nepozoren bralec mimogrede spregledal. Taki občutljivi, dragoceni detajli. Kratki, preprosti stavki, ki imajo svojo težo. Veliko je naštevanja, seznamov, sploh zajtrkov. Z enim se roman tudi začne in nevsiljivo razkrije družbeni status Zojine družine. Zelo dobro delujejo tudi naslovi pesmi in imena izvajalcev, ki se vrtijo v kafiču, kjer se pred vajo ali po njej dobivajo člani benda, in se pojavljajo skozi ves roman. Pravzaprav tako super, da sem si ob branju včasih nataknila slušalke in se potopila v omenjene komade, čeprav nisem kakšna glasbofilka in so mi zakulisne strukture in delovanje bendov španska vas. Vendar je ta sicer kratkočasni roman zbudil v meni nostalgijo in hrepenje; ne po glasbenem bendu kot takem, ampak po popolni pripadnosti določenim ljudem, določeni zadevi. Po popolni predanosti, da bi prišel stvari do dna. Jezik, ki ga med seboj govorijo člani benda, se zdi glasbenemu nepoznavalcu na trenutke zelo specifičen in prav zato posrečeno vznemiri, kot na primer naštevanje glasbenih rekvizitov na odru – zame zares kos čudovite poezije (z znanstvenofantastičnim pridihom). Prostor je majhen, no, ne tako majhen, bolj zabasan. Dva marshalla ob desni steni, dvakrat po štiri desetke, dve glavi, ena JCM 900, druga neka zgonjena reč neznanega izvora. Dve stojali za kitaro, stol, zraven štirje kitarski kovčki, nasproti bobni – “A to so ludwigi?” – dva prehodna, kotel, sner, vse po jusu, standard, ob kotlu zložene torbe. Levo in desno dva visokotonca, miza je v desnem kotu, šestnajst kanalov, kabli v glavnem povezani in natančno razpredeni po prostoru, neuporabljeni so lepo zviti in obešeni nad mešalko. Ob steni nasproti vhoda vufer, klaviature na štenderju in rhodesi v kovčku, zraven en vox in dva fenderja, manjši nič posebnega, ampak ima vintage šminko – tista rumena varianta – večji je bolj resen, hot red deville, ni še klasika, ampak enkrat bo, zraven dva bas feršta, ampeg in mesa boogie. V kotu štiri stojala za mikrofone, eno notno in bobnarska žirafa, ki je očitno zašla. Nekje v romanu Narat zapiše, da je “improvizacija velika beseda za preprosto stvar, kot je preprosta muzika – samo pravo noto moraš zaigrat ob pravem času.” Mojster je tudi v pisanju, zato je škoda, da je v tem igrivem in dinamičnem romančku za nekaj not, pravzaprav za kar nekaj glasbenih sklopov, izgubil skladateljski “filing” in dovolil, da iz njega spregovorita esejist in filozof. Dolgi filozofski traktati, ki jih besediči Tejo, zame najšibkejši člen romana, in razne literarne razprave, ki jih na avtobusu prebira ali v slušalkah posluša Zoja, so popolnoma odveč. Sicer gladko tekoče, jedrnato besedilo pretirano zavrejo, mu odvzamejo nekaj “žmohta” in poskočnosti. Nekaj dialoških momentov je tudi predolgih, saj so – glede na ostale izbrušene, žive dialoge – malo za lase privlečeni. Vse to bi bilo mogoče izpustiti, ali v manjših dozah in verodostojneje položiti v usta glavnih junakov; potem bi bil roman res izčiščen, skorajda idealno pripravljen za odrsko ali filmsko upodobitev, po katerih glasno kliče. Ampak tudi pomanjkljivostim navkljub je Bend domišljena, duhovita in pretanjena pripoved za vse bralce, ne le za glasbeno navdahnjene. Ko ga prebereš, se ti zgodi, kot se je zgodilo Zoji, ko sta šla s Hektorjem prvič skupaj na kavo – nekaj lepega.
Dve leti pred smrtjo in sredi sporov z brati, je sv. Frančišek na gori La Verna Boga spraševal, ali je imelo njegovo življenje smisel ali ne. V odgovor je prejel stigme ali Kristusove rane. Takrat je spoznal, da je ljubezen povezana s trpljenjem odpovedi. Minorit in dober poznavalec frančiškovske tradicije, p. Danilo Holc nam je odstiral globok duhovni pomen teh tednov, ki jih je Frančišek preživel na gori, saj ga je Bog sam nanje pripravljal že od spreobrnjenja naprej.
Chiki Liki Tu-a oslavujú 30 rokov. Kapela, ktorá v roku 1995 vstúpila na scénu je nositeľom odkazu predošlej undergroundovej tradície. Pri tejto príležitosti sme sa stretli so zakladateľom Chiki Liki Tu-a Martinom Višňovským a Michalom Kaščákom z Bez ladu a skladu, ktorí v tomto roku oslávia 40 rokov od svojho vzniku. Dve kapely, ktoré patria k sebe.
V temnej opustenej zubárskej klinike sa začína nočná mora, z ktorerej niet úniku. Dve odvážne duše sa vydávajú na prieskum, no netušia, že ich tam čaká niečo oveľa desivejšie než prázdne chodby. Kto je tajomný Vrakutáš? A prečo zbiera úsmevy? Tento príbeh ťa prinúti premýšľať o tom, čo sa skrýva v tme… a či sa ešte niekedy usmeješ.
Da li stalno odlažete važne zadatke i govorite sebi „Počeću sutra“, ali to sutra nikada ne dođe?
V Večeru za zakonce in družine sta z nami iskriva sogovornika Klara in Blaž Otrin, ki sta svoje različne poglede na skupno zakonsko pot opisala v knjigi Dve zgodbi enega zakona. Zanimalo nas je, katere razlike so med njima še posebej prišle na dan, kako se jih učita premoščati, kaj si najtežje povesta in kako v zakonu ohranjata svežino ljubezni.
We had a blast in Bradenton, Florida over the weekend with Steve Blass and a ton of DVE listeners.
We had a blast in Bradenton, Florida over the weekend with Steve Blass and a ton of DVE listeners.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Randy and Abby share their limericks to give the DVE listeners an understanding of what we're looking for, for this year's Potty O' Gold contest.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Randy and Abby share their limericks to give the DVE listeners an understanding of what we're looking for, for this year's Potty O' Gold contest.
Dve znepriatelené rodiny a zakázaná láska, ktorá skončila tým najhorším možným spôsobom. Tragédia Williama Shakespeara Rómeo a Júlia patrí k najznámejším literárnym dielam vôbec. Nepriazeň osudu, vražda a zlé načasovanie ukončili jeden z najkrajších milostných vzťahov v celej svetovej literatúre. V tejto časti Schooltagu si povieme niečo bližšie k veršovanej dráme Rómeo a Júlia. Kľúčové slová: Romeo a Júlia, Schooltag, Hashtag Čitateľský denník, Rómeo a Júlia, William Shakespeare Túto epizódu Schooltagu ti prináša slovenský operátor 4ka. Jediná štvorka, ktorá ťa v škole nebude mrzieť. Mimochodom, vieš, čo ťa čaká po vydarenej maturite? Sloboda. No slobodu si môžeš vyskúšať aj dnes. V 4ke môžeš skúsiť ktorýkoľvek paušál SLOBODA na prvých 30 dní len za symbolické 4 eurá a vybrať si tak podľa seba - je štyri, či potrebuješ nekonečné dáta, alebo kopec minút na telefonovanie. Stačí si ho objednať cez e-shop na https://www.4ka.sk/sloboda-za-4. 4ka myslí na všetkých - štvorkárov aj jednotkárov. Choď na https://www.4ka.sk/sloboda-za-4, kde nájdeš pre seba a tvojich kamošov ďalšie výhodné ponuky.
Bytová asociácia ministerstva obrany na konci roka vyhlásila súťaž na upratovacie služby za viac ako 200-tisíc eur, no oslovené boli iba tri firmy – z ktorých dve sa predtým upratovaniu vôbec nevenovali. Víťazom sa napokon stala firma bývalej playmate Stanislavy Gálovej, ktorá svoje podnikanie v oblasti upratovania zaregistrovala len krátko pred súťažou.BARMO sa ocitlo v centre kontroverzie pre upratovacie služby za 221-tisíc eur, keď zákazku získala firma s minimálnymi skúsenosťami. Obstarávanie, vyhlásené v predvianočnom období, vzbudilo otázky nielen kvôli načasovaniu, ale aj výberu troch oslovených firiem. Dve z nich nemali žiadnu históriu v upratovaní a víťazná firma si len krátko pred súťažou doplnila upratovanie do predmetu podnikania.Investigatívny reportér Aktualít Peter Sabo hovorí o pochybných praktikách, možných prepojeniach a o tom, či sa prípadom bude zaoberať Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie.Moderuje Zorislav Poljak.
Bytová asociácia ministerstva obrany na konci roka vyhlásila súťaž na upratovacie služby za viac ako 200-tisíc eur, no oslovené boli iba tri firmy – z ktorých dve sa predtým upratovaniu vôbec nevenovali. Víťazom sa napokon stala firma bývalej playmate Stanislavy Gálovej, ktorá svoje podnikanie v oblasti upratovania zaregistrovala len krátko pred súťažou.BARMO sa ocitlo v centre kontroverzie pre upratovacie služby za 221-tisíc eur, keď zákazku získala firma s minimálnymi skúsenosťami. Obstarávanie, vyhlásené v predvianočnom období, vzbudilo otázky nielen kvôli načasovaniu, ale aj výberu troch oslovených firiem. Dve z nich nemali žiadnu históriu v upratovaní a víťazná firma si len krátko pred súťažou doplnila upratovanie do predmetu podnikania.Investigatívny reportér Aktualít Peter Sabo hovorí o pochybných praktikách, možných prepojeniach a o tom, či sa prípadom bude zaoberať Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie.Moderuje Zorislav Poljak.
„Buď zvýšime výdavky na obranu, alebo sa môžeme začať učiť ruštinu“ – slová prvého muža Severoatlantickej aliancie Marka Rutteho. Zazneli len tento pondelok v priestoroch europarlamentu, v čase keď tú ruštinu v Moskve počúvali Andrej Danko s Tiborom Gašparom. A len týždeň pred ďalším pondelkom, kedy sa ujme funkcie ďalší silný muž sveta Donald Trump. Ak Trump avizuje mier do 24 hodín, Rutte žiada pre trvalý mier od spojencov pot a krv v podobe navyšovania výdavkov do zbrojenia. Ktorý z pohľadov je reálnejší? A nie sú Rutteho slová o ruštine len hyperbolou na postrašenie, aby sme sa vyľakali a konali? Téma pre Pavla Macka, generála v zálohe s aliančnou skúsenosťou. Neobídeme ani ohlásenú dohodu medzi Izraelom a Hamasom o prímerí v Pásme Gazy.„Môžeme hovoriť o odkaze Marka Rutteho. Hovorí: Buď budeme nechávať otvorené zadné vráta pre prípadného agresora, ktorý si to zle vyhodnotí a bude mať pocit, že sme nejednotní, slabí neinvestujú do obrany. Alebo budeme v situácie, že budeme dávať viac peňazí na bezpečnostnú poistku a budeme sa prezentovať, že sme dostatočne pripravení odraziť akýkoľvek pokus o agresiu“, uvádza Macko. Ukrajina by podľa neho s dnešnou skúsenosťou dávala na obranu aj desať percent HDP, keby jej to garantovalo, že to odradí Rusov od invázie. Požadované dvíhanie výdavkov na obranu nás v dnešnej situácii bezpečnostne rozkolísaného sveta podľa generála Macka neobíde. „Bude to nevyhnutnosť“, konštatuje. Hovorí pritom o úrovni troch percent HDP, čiže o jednopercentnom náraste. „Dve percentá HDP na obranu boli aktuálne pre situáciu, keď tu nebola vojna, čiže pre bezpečnostné prostredie v predchádzajúcom období“, hovorí.Cesty do Moskvy, kam smeroval Robert Fico i jehoAndrej Danko s Tiborom Gašparom označuje Macko za „katastrofu“. Jednak idú podľa neho proti jednote partnerov v EÚ i Nato, a hovorí tiež o podpore ruskej vojnovej propagandy. „Vyzeráme tak nielen ako zlý spojenec, ale ako tí, čo stoja na strane agresora, čo je veľmi, veľmi zlé“, hovorí. Podcast pripravil Jaroslav Barborák.
„Buď zvýšime výdavky na obranu, alebo sa môžeme začať učiť ruštinu“ – slová prvého muža Severoatlantickej aliancie Marka Rutteho. Zazneli len tento pondelok v priestoroch europarlamentu, v čase keď tú ruštinu v Moskve počúvali Andrej Danko s Tiborom Gašparom. A len týždeň pred ďalším pondelkom, kedy sa ujme funkcie ďalší silný muž sveta Donald Trump. Ak Trump avizuje mier do 24 hodín, Rutte žiada pre trvalý mier od spojencov pot a krv v podobe navyšovania výdavkov do zbrojenia. Ktorý z pohľadov je reálnejší? A nie sú Rutteho slová o ruštine len hyperbolou na postrašenie, aby sme sa vyľakali a konali? Téma pre Pavla Macka, generála v zálohe s aliančnou skúsenosťou. Neobídeme ani ohlásenú dohodu medzi Izraelom a Hamasom o prímerí v Pásme Gazy.„Môžeme hovoriť o odkaze Marka Rutteho. Hovorí: Buď budeme nechávať otvorené zadné vráta pre prípadného agresora, ktorý si to zle vyhodnotí a bude mať pocit, že sme nejednotní, slabí neinvestujú do obrany. Alebo budeme v situácie, že budeme dávať viac peňazí na bezpečnostnú poistku a budeme sa prezentovať, že sme dostatočne pripravení odraziť akýkoľvek pokus o agresiu“, uvádza Macko. Ukrajina by podľa neho s dnešnou skúsenosťou dávala na obranu aj desať percent HDP, keby jej to garantovalo, že to odradí Rusov od invázie. Požadované dvíhanie výdavkov na obranu nás v dnešnej situácii bezpečnostne rozkolísaného sveta podľa generála Macka neobíde. „Bude to nevyhnutnosť“, konštatuje. Hovorí pritom o úrovni troch percent HDP, čiže o jednopercentnom náraste. „Dve percentá HDP na obranu boli aktuálne pre situáciu, keď tu nebola vojna, čiže pre bezpečnostné prostredie v predchádzajúcom období“, hovorí.Cesty do Moskvy, kam smeroval Robert Fico i jehoAndrej Danko s Tiborom Gašparom označuje Macko za „katastrofu“. Jednak idú podľa neho proti jednote partnerov v EÚ i Nato, a hovorí tiež o podpore ruskej vojnovej propagandy. „Vyzeráme tak nielen ako zlý spojenec, ale ako tí, čo stoja na strane agresora, čo je veľmi, veľmi zlé“, hovorí. Podcast pripravil Jaroslav Barborák.
Máme za sebou prvú polovicu januára, s ktorou vstúpili do platnosti viaceré opatrenia z vládneho šetriaceho balíčka, vrátane vyššej DPH. Vláda zatiaľ stále trvá na tom, že nákupy, hlavne potravín a vecí bežnej spotreby, dokonca zlacneli a hore šlo len to, čo si nemusíme dovoliť kupovať každý deň. Minister pôdohospodárstva Richard Takáč sa dokonca vybral na nákup pred koncom roka a po ňom, aby dokázal, že ľudia tento rok za nákup tých istých vecí zaplatia o päť eur menej. Michaela Štalmachová však upozorňuje, že to nemusí byť celkom tak. Na nejasnosti v ministrovom nákupe vraj poukázal poslanec za stranu SaS Alojz Hlina. „Dve položky z ministrovho zoznamu v danej predajni neboli. Preto šiel o päťsto metrov ďalej do druhej prevádzky rovnakého reťazca, kde už dané produkty vraj stáli viac ako v predajni, kde nakupoval minister Takáč,“ približuje Michaela. Značný dopad na rodinné rozpočty má pritom podľa Michaely nielen vyššia DPH ale aj ponížený daňový bonus na dieťa. V jeho prípade sa totiž tento rok kombinujú dve legislatívne zmeny - jedna z pera súčasnej vlády, druhú zaviedol do zákona ešte Igor Matovič (hnutie Slovensko). „Rodine s dvomi rodičmi a dvomi deťmi konsolidačné opatrenia vezmú ročne šesťsto sedemnásť eur. Ak k tomu prirátame daňový bonus prídu o vyše 1270 eur,“ hovorí Michaela. Ako je to teda so zdražovaním, čo sa na ňom podieľa najväčšou mierou a kde ho už začíname vidieť v praxi? V Indexe na otázky Evy Frantovej odpovedá Michaela Štalmachová z domácej redakcie denníka SME, ktorá sa venuje ekonomickým témam. 2:10 O aké peniaze oberie konsolidácia rodiny s deťmi.3:32 Zmeny v daňovom bonuse.7:37 Cena potravín po novom roku.14:37 Kto a ako bude platiť transakčnú daň.18:45 Dá sa transakčnej dani vyhnúť?24:07 Dopady dane z cukru na ceny.28:29 Cena vs. pomer pri diaľničnej známke.31:09 Ako sa zdražuje MHD a prímestská doprava. _ Ak máte pre nás spätnú väzbu, odkaz alebo nápad, napíšte nám na podcastindex@sme.sk – Odoberajte aj týždenný ekonomický newsletter Index na sme.sk/indexodber – Všetky podcasty denníka SME nájdete na sme.sk/podcasty – Ďakujeme, že počúvate podcast Index.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
*Podporte podcast Dobré ráno v aplikácii Toldo na sme.sk/extradobrerano. Tridsaťpäť rokov od Nežnej revolúcie sa niektorí novembroví protagonisti priatelia, ale sú aj takí, ktorí sa súdia. Ako Milan Kňažko s Fedorom Gálom. Dve kľúčové novembrové tváre rozdelil pohľad na to, kto umožnil v politike narásť a dlhé roky prežiť Vladimírovi Mečiarovi. Spor je aj o Kňažkov prejav prednesený v roku 1991 v Slovenskej televízii, presnejšie o to, kto tento prejav písal. Osemdesiatročný Fedor Gál sa Kňažkovi ospravedlnil, no „prepáč“ chce počuť aj on sám. Rozhovor s Fedorom Gálom vznikol v rámci projektu Hoaxy a podvody, nájdete ho ako najnovšiu epizódu relácie Aréna s Janou Krescanko Dibákovou. Odporúčanie Schopnosť človeka prežiť novembrové počasie, pracovné nasadenie a udalosti v duchu naplnenia Murphyho zákonov je priamo úmerná možnosti dať si dobrú kávu a koláč. V prípade slabšieho úspechu skúste napríklad – koláče dva. – Všetky podcasty denníka SME nájdete na sme.sk/podcasty – Odoberajte aj audio verziu denného newslettra SME.sk s najdôležitejšími správami na sme.sk/brifing
What If January 6 Happened Again? Exploring the Risks of Another Insurrection.This show is made possible by you! To become a sustaining member go to https://LauraFlanders.org/donate Thank you for your continued support!Description: What if January 6 happened again? Are we prepared for another post-election insurrection? “War Game” is a riveting political thriller that tackles this question head-on in what Rolling Stone calls, “the scariest documentary you'll see this year.” “War Game” features a cast of senior officials war-gaming a constitutional crisis, including former North Dakota Senator Heidi Heitkamp, playing a senior advisor to a newly elected President, Retired US Army Lieutenant General Jeffrey Buchanan and Janessa Goldbeck, a Marine Corps veteran and the CEO of Vet Voice Foundation. This time on Laura Flanders & Friends, Laura's joined by Goldbeck who also produced the war game that is at the center of the film as well as the film's directors, Tony Gerber and Jesse Moss, both of whom are award-winning filmmakers. Together they discuss why many Americans — disproportionately military veterans — have joined domestic extremist groups, and what can be done. What reforms to the Insurrection Act are necessary at this moment? All that, plus a commentary from Laura on Donald Trump's appearance at New York's Madison Square Garden.“. . . Domestic extremist groups, particularly on the far Right, have been targeting veterans and military family members for recruitment . . . We've seen veterans and active duty military disproportionately represented in places like the January 6 insurrection in 2021, where one in five of the people who were charged in the insurrection were actually military veterans.” - Janessa Goldbeck"The notion that democracy is this sort of idyllic perfect thing that was once great and will be great again is a complete fabrication. Democracy has always been flawed, it's always been in process . . . There's got to be certain issues that we can all agree on, like the peaceful transfer of power.” - Tony Gerber“[In the war game], we see a healthy politics model, people who probably disagree on a lot of things politically, but actually agree on one important thing, which is safeguarding our democracy . . . I think modeling healthy politics is really valuable today. It's hard to look around and see how people are working together across partisan divides to get work done on Capitol Hill or in state houses.” - Jesse MossGuests:• Tony Gerber: Co-Director & Writer, War Game• Janessa Goldbeck: CEO, Vet Voice Foundation; Game Producer, War Game• Jesse Moss: Co-Director, Writer & Producer, War Game Music In the Middle: “America at War (Freedom)” by DJ Pope featuring Voices of Freedom released on Yellorange Records. And additional music included- "Steppin" by Podington Bear.Watch the episode cut airing on PBS stations across the country at our YouTube channel Subscribe to episode notes via Patreon Related Laura Flanders Show Episodes:• Political Violence & MAGA Militancy: Strategies to Protect Democracy Watch / Podcast + Uncut Full Conversation• Congressman Jamie Raskin On January 6th: After a Failed Coup, a Successful One? Watch / Podcast + Uncut Full Conversation• Community Safety in a Time of Insurrection: Watch / Podcast • Graphic Artists Drawing Comix At The Margins: Nate Powell and Mohammad Saba'aneh Watch / Podcast Related Articles and Resources:• ‘War Game' Is the Scariest Documentary You'll See This Year, by David Fear,August 2, 2024, Rolling Stone•. The Posse Comitatus Act Explained, by Joseph Nunn, October 14, 2021, Brennan Center• Legal experts worry about presidential abuse of the Insurrection Act. Here's Why, by Carrie Johnson, March 28, 2024, NPR-WAMU• ‘Mischief and problems': rightwing activists ramp up drive to hand-count ballots, by Rachel Leingang, The Guardian Laura Flanders and Friends Crew: Laura Flanders, along with Sabrina Artel, Jeremiah Cothren, Veronica Delgado, Erika Harley, Janet Hernandez, Jeannie Hopper, Sarah Miller, Nat Needham, David Neuman, and Rory O'Conner. FOLLOW Laura Flanders and FriendsInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/lauraflandersandfriends/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LFAndFriendsFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/LauraFlandersAndFriends/Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lauraflandersandfriendsYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFLRxVeYcB1H7DbuYZQG-lgLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/lauraflandersandfriendsPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/lauraflandersandfriendsACCESSIBILITY - The broadcast edition of this episode is available with closed captioned by clicking here for our YouTube Channel
Homília 74.14 / Dve zákonitosti
Full Description: What if January 6 happened again? Are we prepared for another post-election insurrection? “War Game” is a riveting political thriller that tackles this question head-on in what Rolling Stone calls, “the scariest documentary you'll see this year.” “War Game” features a cast of senior officials war-gaming a constitutional crisis, including former North Dakota Senator Heidi Heitkamp, playing a senior advisor to a newly elected President, Retired US Army Lieutenant General Jeffrey Buchanan and Janessa Goldbeck, a Marine Corps veteran and the CEO of Vet Voice Foundation. This time on Laura Flanders & Friends, Laura's joined by Goldbeck who also produced the war game that is at the center of the film as well as the film's directors, Tony Gerber and Jesse Moss, both of whom are award-winning filmmakers. Together they discuss why many Americans — disproportionately military veterans — have joined domestic extremist groups, and what can be done. What reforms to the Insurrection Act are necessary at this moment? All that, plus a commentary from Laura on Donald Trump's appearance at New York's Madison Square Garden.“. . . Domestic extremist groups, particularly on the far Right, have been targeting veterans and military family members for recruitment . . . We've seen veterans and active duty military disproportionately represented in places like the January 6 insurrection in 2021, where one in five of the people who were charged in the insurrection were actually military veterans.” - Janessa Goldbeck“The notion that democracy is this sort of idyllic perfect thing that was once great and will be great again is a complete fabrication. Democracy has always been flawed, it's always been in process . . . There's got to be certain issues that we can all agree on, like the peaceful transfer of power.” - Tony Gerber“[In the war game], we see a healthy politics model, people who probably disagree on a lot of things politically, but actually agree on one important thing, which is safeguarding our democracy . . . I think modeling healthy politics is really valuable today. It's hard to look around and see how people are working together across partisan divides to get work done on Capitol Hill or in state houses.” - Jesse MossGuests:• Tony Gerber: Co-Director & Writer, War Game• Janessa Goldbeck: CEO, Vet Voice Foundation; Game Producer, War Game• Jesse Moss: Co-Director, Writer & Producer, War Game Watch the broadcast episode cut for time airing on PBS stations across the country at our YouTube channel Related Laura Flanders Show Episodes:• Political Violence & MAGA Militancy: Strategies to Protect Democracy Watch / Podcast + Uncut Full Conversation• Congressman Jamie Raskin On January 6th: After a Failed Coup, a Successful One? Watch / Podcast + Uncut Full Conversation• Community Safety in a Time of Insurrection: Watch / Podcast • Graphic Artists Drawing Comix At The Margins: Nate Powell and Mohammad Saba'aneh Watch / Podcast Related Articles and Resources:• ‘War Game' Is the Scariest Documentary You'll See This Year, by David Fear,August 2, 2024, Rolling Stone•. The Posse Comitatus Act Explained, by Joseph Nunn, October 14, 2021, Brennan Center• Legal experts worry about presidential abuse of the Insurrection Act. Here's Why, by Carrie Johnson, March 28, 2024, NPR-WAMU• ‘Mischief and problems': rightwing activists ramp up drive to hand-count ballots, by Rachel Leingang, The GuardianFull Episode Notes are located HERE. They include related episodes, articles, and more. Laura Flanders and Friends Crew: Laura Flanders, along with Sabrina Artel, Jeremiah Cothren, Veronica Delgado, Erika Harley, Janet Hernandez, Jeannie Hopper, Sarah Miller, Nat Needham, David Neuman, and Rory O'Conner. FOLLOW Laura Flanders and FriendsInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/lauraflandersandfriends/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LFAndFriendsFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/LauraFlandersAndFriends/Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lauraflandersandfriendsYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFLRxVeYcB1H7DbuYZQG-lgLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/lauraflandersandfriendsPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/lauraflandersandfriendsACCESSIBILITY - The broadcast edition of this episode is available with closed captioned by clicking here for our YouTube Channel
Zaradi poglabljanja krize v nemški avtomobilski industriji se na odpuščanja pripravljajo tudi pri nas. Dve tretjini podjetij v panogi naj bi razmišljalo o zmanjševanju števila zaposlenih. Delodajalci pozivajo vlado k subvencioniranju čakanja na delo in krajšega delovnika. Ministrstvo za delo je pripravilo nabor ukrepov, uveljavitve pa ni pričakovati pred novim letom. Drugi poudarki oddaje: - Izrael prepovedal delovanje agencije Združenih narodov za pomoč Palestincem - Za koliko se bodo zaradi plačne reforme v javnem sektorju zvišali stroški občin? - Dobitnika Jenkove nagrade prvič dva pesnika - Miljana Cunta in Robert Simonišek - Prestižna zlata žoga španskima nogometašema Rodriju in Aitani Bonmati
Roninbasics.com | Protect yourself from the harmful effects of modern technology. Welcome to The Adams Archive, where we uncover the hidden truths that shape the world you live in. Hosted by Austin Adams, this podcast digs into real government documents, directives, and secretive policies that influence your life in ways most people don't realize. From domestic surveillance to military power, we expose how these institutions quietly expand their control under the guise of "national security" and "public safety." Summary: At The Adams Archive, we break down complex issues and provide you with the facts that the mainstream avoids. Each episode analyzes real documents and events that expose how governments and corporations work behind the scenes to control narratives and limit your freedoms. With a focus on newly released government directives, we help you understand how these policies affect your everyday life—and what you can do to stay informed. Government Surveillance Explore how government surveillance, particularly through the Patriot Act, has expanded its reach to monitor average citizens. We break down how AI-driven technology and new legislative tactics allow institutions to categorize dissent as "extremism." Learn how speaking your mind could land you on a domestic watchlist. Election 2024: DOD Directive 5240.01 & DHS Homeland Threat Assessment This episode takes an alarming look at the DOD Directive 5240.01, which authorizes the US military to use lethal force on civilians during times of unrest. Alongside the DHS Homeland Threat Assessment 2025, we reveal how these new policies target domestic threats and set the stage for unprecedented government control as the 2024 election approaches. Weaponized Policies We expose how policies designed to protect have been twisted to suppress rights and civil liberties. Learn how new directives allow for military intervention during civil unrest, and how these powers could be used against citizens. This isn't just about national security—it's about control. Tech & Disinformation Discover how AI is used to manipulate information, control global narratives, and spread disinformation. Governments and corporations use these tools to shape public opinion and stifle dissent. We break down the role of emerging technologies in this dangerous new frontier. Call to Action: Don't miss out—subscribe to The Adams Archive today to stay informed on the topics that really matter. Follow us on YouTube, Substack, and social media to dive deeper into each episode. Your support means everything—together, we can uncover the truth behind government policies and safeguard our freedoms. All the Links: Access all our platforms here: https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams ----more---- Full Transcription All right, so if we go down to 3. 4e in this document, it talks about the use of deadly force. And it's essentially what you would expect. If there's an imminent danger, or if he or she is not for a moment pointing a weapon at a person, for example. So even if you're not pointing a weapon at them, he or she has a weapon within reach, or is running for cover carrying a weapon, they can shoot you. Civilians. So if you're, I don't know, open carrying, and they think that you pose any type of threat, they can just shoot you. Civilians, the military, during civil unrest, right? DoD recognizes and respects paramount value of all human life if less than valuable or less than deadly force can be reasonably expected to accomplish the same result without reasonably increasing the danger to armed DoD personnel. Deadly force is justified when there is a reasonable belief that the person, the subject of such force, poses an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm to a person Or under the circumstances described in the 3. 4e. So essentially what it's saying is any and all circumstances, if you have a weapon, if you're open carrying, which you have the right to do, or even if you're concealed carrying and somehow they know that you're holding that weapon or have that weapon in the vicinity of you, they could shoot you if they think that you pose any type of threat, you know, the laws that were designed to be weaponized against our enemies. is now being weaponized against us. So if we go to the document that I'm talking about now, right? So we have those two DoD directives. We understand that. But this is also something I want to point and draw your attention to is, and this is the last thing of this document, then we'll move to the actual National Terrorist Advisory document, which is the USD and I and S approval. So it says, so this is how they actually get the soldiers. This is the approval process. Um, if the requested personnel exceeds 20 people, then you have to But if it's less than 20 armed military soldiers authorized to use deadly force, you don't. You don't. Within the United States of America. Or, if the duration of the requested assistance exceeds 30 days, so you don't even need approval. If you get 20 soldiers for 29 days, You don't even need a DOD approval. You don't need to have the Secretary of Defense approve the request. You can just go right around them. Go to the military. They'll send you 20 soldiers for 29 days. And then you can request it again for another 29 days that are authorized to use lethal force on civilians. Now let's see who they're concerned about, because that's what the DECCS document talks about, or Concerned about, but who, who they're going to start to say poses a risk, right? Now, this document isn't just about that. This talks about foreign foreign enemies as well, and some election interference from Russia and China and what these people are trying to, this isn't just about American citizens, but a large portion of it is a large portion of it is. All right, let me go ahead and switch this here. So you guys can watch what I'm looking at. Not that. All right. So here we go. Here's your document. Now, if you're on YouTube, you can follow along and actually look at this with us. Uh, let's make that a little bit bigger for you. Okay, here we go. Here is the document office of intelligence and analysis, Homeland threat assessment, Homeland security 2025. All right. So here is your table of contents talks about the border talks. There's the executive summary. Um, but let's go down and look at some of the stuff that I have outlined here. Um, now if you want this document, I'll send it to you. Uh, head over to my Instagram, I'll be posting some videos of this. And there'll be a keyword that you can comment that I'll send you both of these. You can also just look up the name of the document on Google and find it yourself, but yeah. Alright, so it says public safety and security. Alright, this is page one. It says over the next year, domestic and foreign violent extremists, the harmful effects of illegal drugs in adversarial states, seek to exacerbate our divisions, as well as silence criticism for diaspora communities, will pose a threat to public safety and security on the homeland. Specifically, we expect the threat of, threat environment in the United States over the next year will remain high due to a confluence of factors. These factors include violent extremist responses to domestic, socio political developments, and the 2024 election cycle. Concurrently, adversarial states are Intent on sowing distrust in our institutions, as well as confusion and division in our communities through their maligned influence campaigns, with some actors seeking to boost these efforts during the 2024 election cycle. These state actors will violate our rule of law and undermine freedom of speech in their efforts to suppress dissidents living in the United States. So what, what it's, What the conversation is that they're having there is like, Oh, it's these violent extremists. It's these foreign adversaries. It's these terrorists out there. And over here, terrorists that are sowing dis sowing, uh, distrust in our institutions. No. No, you know, what's sowing distrust in our institutions, the lying that's happened over the last four years, you know, what's sowing distrust in our institutions, the continued corruption, and the continued crossover between corporatism and politics, you know, you know, what's sowing distrust in our system, how almost every single one of the high level people in our our government right now are going to find themselves a high level executive position at the organizations that funded them, whether they're foreign or international. Or domestic to use their terms, right? They're going to, their son's going to be on the Chinese energy board or Ukrainian oil board. Oh yeah. Look at Biden and Pelosi and all of these, these individuals who are powerful, powerful people in our government who have their children on the boards of foreign companies that are state run companies. By our adversaries. Maybe that's what's destroying this, this, this sowing distrust in the institutions. Maybe it's your lack of response to the terrible situations that it happened in Lahaina or in North Carolina or in Florida. Maybe it's your lack of care surrounding the inflation that's happening. Maybe it's one of those things. Maybe that's what's sowing distrust is that you're distrustful. Not the fact that foreign and domestic violent extremists have thoughts on political ideologies. So there's that summary. Let's move on. Um, so it says that, uh, and actually we should probably go to the bottom here because what, one thing that I found to be unique in this document is that they, in the national advisory, the national terrorist advisory bulletins, they used to say the full words. What you'll find in this document is they use all of these acronyms to try and make it so that you can't screenshot this and post it without context. So, So what you'll see is there's these DVE, the HVEs, the FTOs, the, all of these specific acronyms. So I'm going to show you first what those acronyms mean, and then we'll go back to the portion that I just had up there for you. And here they are. Okay. Definitions and contextual notes. An FTO is a forest, uh, forest, is a foreign terrorist or terrorist organization. So FTO, foreign terrorists. DVE. Domestic violent extremist. Okay. So let's look at the definition of that, which it says is an individual. So a domestic violent extremist, a DVE is an individual based and operating primarily within the United States or its territories without direction or inspiration from a foreign domestic or foreign terrorist group or other foreign power who seeks to further political or social goals wholly, or in part through unethical law or unethical acts, unlawful acts. Oh my gosh. I'm sorry. Early in the morning, unlawful acts of force or violence, the mere advocacy of political and social positions, political activism, or use of strong language and rhetoric or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics alone does not constitute violent extremism. It may be constitutionally productive, maybe. Oh, you don't you think that the advocacy of political and social positions or political activism or use of strong rhetoric. Yeah, that is absolutely protected under the Constitution. Maybe constitutionally protected. DVEs can fit within one or multiple categories of ideological motivation and can span a broad range of groups or movements. INA. Utilizes this term synonymously with domestic terrorist. So your, the mere advocacy may be constitutionally protected, but we're still going to label you as a violent extremist, and they may still use the word domestic terrorist. So, this is important when we go back and we look at the conversations that we're having. Now, when we look at HVE, HVE is homegrown violent extremist. It's a person with, of any citizenship who has lived or operated primarily in the United States or its territories who advocates, is engaged in, or is preparing to engage in ideologically motivated terrorist activities, including providing support to terrorism. In furtherance, Of political or social objectives promoted by a foreign terrorist organization. Um, but is acting independently of direction by a foreign terrorist organization. HVS are distinct from traditional domestic terrorists who engage in unlawful acts of violence to intimidate civilian populations or attempt to influence domestic policy without direction or influence from a foreign act. Okay. So they're saying these people have opinions, right? They haven't the word violent violence. is not in any of these things. Like there's, um, who engage in unlawful acts of violence to intimidate civilian populations. Okay. So there's one mention of violence throughout that entire definition. You do not have to be violent. You do not have to be extremist. You have to hold an ideology that they don't like, which may be constitutionally protected to fall into one of these two categories. Now it also defines, it also defines conspiracy theorist. Or a conspiracy theory. So Homeland Security defines a conspiracy theory, which is defined as a subset of narratives in which the ultimate cause of an event is believed to be due to a malevolent plot by multiple actors working together or as an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the event. To the mechanizations of powerful people who attempt to conceal their role, or at least until their aims are accomplished as per the national counterterrorism innovation technology and education center, a DHS center of excellence. DHS does not hold a position on the veracity of the claims associated with these theories. So what they're saying is if you believe. There's any number of group of people who is trying to conceal their identity that has worked together to cause an event that is a conspiracy theory. And we can write you off and we can put you into a document where we can now put you on a list. Crazy. This is their definition of a conspiracy theory. So if you hold the belief that any number of people, three, four, five powerful people did anything to cause an event and then tried to conceal their position during that event, which has happened multiple Always, forever, in history, in every event, then you are now considered a citizen. A conspiracy theorist. And now that becomes important, right? This isn't just conspiracy theory in your bio, right? Uh, this is important because then they can utilize this document and say, here's how we're going to weaponize the department of justice against you. So now that we have that background, let's go back up to the document. All right. So. Terrorism. So it says that foreign, so there's some foreign stuff or some domestic stuff. I'm just going to walk you through line by line in the document. Um, some of the foreign stuff, it says foreign terrorist organization inspired homegrown violent extremists. So inspired by terrorists, but homegrown will remain high, right? So homegrown violent extremists. The threat will continue to be characterized primarily by lone offenders or small cells motivated to violence by a combination of racial, religious, gender, or anti government grievances, conspiracy theorists, and personalized factors. We are particularly concerned about the likelihood of violent motivation by developing domestic and global events, including the 2024 election cycle and the ongoing Israel Hamas conflict. So what you have to notice there is when they say conspiracy theorists. And then they say the election cycle, right? If you say anything about the election, not being fair. not being right, not being accurate, you can now be a labeled a homegrown violent extremist, because that can be tied to some bigger plot, even if you have no violent actions, because what you have to understand about the document and why this document is important is because what they're essentially establishing is the ground rules for their organization, the ground rules for if you say this, right, if you say this thing, if you say this, We think you're going to this. So we're going to do this, right? If you do, if you think they're say this, we think that you're going to do this. And so we can do all of this to stop you, even though you didn't do any of it yet, preemptively or reasonable belief, right? Words are important. So when you understand that they're, they can use any, anything within their power, if they can Label you as this DVE or HVE, the Domestic Violent Extremist, or Homegrown Violent Extremist. The second that you say anything about one of these things, right? Global events, like the election cycle, right? Talking about things like conspiracy theorists, where people plot to do bad things, like they always have. gender ideology, racial, political, right? I like how they include gender in there. Like, oh, okay, let's use the Department of Justice and lethal force to protect the trans people because their sexual kinks want them to dress up. All right. Moving on, a number of violent extremists embrace multiple, sometimes competing motivations, challenging our ability to identify their political, their potential targets in advance because their pre attack statements online are often unrelated or only loosely related to the targets they ultimately choose. So what they're saying there is If you're say anything about anything that we don't like, we can then correlate it back to this entire list of things and say that, oh, because you say you don't agree with women in men's sports, you're now going to enact in a terrorist attack on Jewish populations, right? So if this, then this, so we can this. Right? If you say something about gender ideology, we believe that you fall into this potential category to do some Jewish violent, or attack on, violent attack on Jewish groups. So we can then do all of this in between to surveil you. It says, Between September 23 and September 24, or July 2024, DVEs driven by anti government, racial, or gender related motivations have conducted at least four attacks in the homeland, one of which resulted in a death. Like, do you know how much government overreach we're getting for one death here? Between September and July one death, and they're going to weaponize. The Department of Defense, U. S. law enforcement at least disrupted seven additional DVE plots, two HVE plots, and again, I'm not saying that this stuff doesn't happen, I'm not saying that they shouldn't exist, I'm not saying that they shouldn't be able to maybe not even surveil people domestically, right, that wasn't what was supposed to be allowed until the Patriot Act, I'm not saying that they shouldn't be able to do their job though, and their job is to figure out where is a terrorist attack going to come from, and there has been domestic terrorist attacks. I'm Most of the domestic terrorist attacks have been against Donald Trump. not against literally any other government official. So unless they're speaking about, Oh, if you know, I highly doubt they're using this to surveil liberals with blue hair at, you know, some furry event. No, it's, it's being weaponized against the right. But again, they have to be able to do their job. I'm sure there are, you know, there's been like the Boston bombing and there's been other historical events that I would love for these people to stop and and nothing against these people if they're surveilling me right now for talking about furries, but like I know you got to do your job. I know people who have been in positions in these organizations, and I appreciate what you do, but when it's weaponized against the American people for nothing other than posing a political posting a political opinion online. So that you can utilize these overreaching government tools to then surveil their private life that is not constitutional, right? The Patriot Act is not constitutional. And now this type of document allows you to overreach beyond what should be allowed for, for a complete Orwellian government. State of government. So if you say anything about this category of things, a list of probably 100 words that they have in the Department of Defense and Homeland Security, if you say any word like this, it triggers AI to pick up your profile. And now they have you on a list somewhere. And now they can use the Patriot Act to listen into your phone microphone and use AI to scrape your conversations and search your conversations for any of the jokes that you make with your wife in private. It shouldn't be a lot, right? You should still be able to do your job. And I think you can still do your job by monitoring it. with a sniper rifle and not an RPG, right? Or a nuke, essentially, right? You don't need to monitor millions and millions and millions of Americans to find the one that's sitting there posting online talking about how they want to enact some violent act on a school or shoot up some mosque, right? Like, You don't need all of that. You don't need that power to do that. Now, let's look at some other portions here. As we move down this document. The next portion I'd like to point out is biological. So this is just interesting to me over the last year foreign and domestic extremists online expressed interest in using DNA modification. So okay, so so I've heard this one several times recently, this is a very recent event. And this is something that I've talked about before, when you've used 23 and me, you are giving your DNA to a entity that will then sell that data to foreign and domestic. Governments or companies like BlackRock, right? Now what they can do with that DNA, the technology has been devised. Iran has tried this. China has tried this. There's evidence there. There's been, uh, I was listening to a Senator yesterday talk about on the Sean Ryan podcast, how China has been trying to develop a biological weapon that only attacks childbearing age individuals. So here's another example of that in this document where it says, We expect threat actors to continue to explore emerging and advanced technologies to aid their efforts in developing and carrying out chemical and biological attacks. Over the last year, this document says, Foreign and domestic extremists online expressed interest in using DNA modification to develop biological weapons to target specific individuals. So if you want women between the age of this and this, if you want certain ethnic minorities, if you want certain or majorities, you want a certain gender, you want a certain age group, you want a certain background, whatever it is, you can splice DNA down and see, Hey, I want this new COVID quote unquote, but much more deadly to attack men who are fighting age between the ages of 18 and 45 decimate the men between 15 to 45. They can do that. And that's what this document is outlining here. So when you're giving your DNA to these organizations, they can even target it down to the individual, right? They could release some massive flu virus, and they want to target 15 DNA strands and have it be lethal against, A hundred people, 150 people, they can manipulate that virus to do that. It also says, we also remain concerned about the potential for threat actors to use unmanned aircraft systems in chemical and biological attacks due to the continued advancement of UAS technology and the growing availability of UAS. So saying that people are going to use drones to drop these types of things. All right, now it moves into influence operations and transnational repression. All right, so Russia will likely continue to use traditional state sponsored media. For example, over the past year, Russian influence actors have amplified stories regarding U. S. migration flows to stoke discord in the United States. Like no, that wasn't Russia, that was you. Like maybe this should be talking about how the Harris and Biden campaign let in 22 million illegals. Maybe we should be talking about that being the reason that these stories are amplified, not Russia. We should be having that conversation. You shouldn't be mad at the messenger, right? Even if they're amplifying those conversations, be like, Hey, look at how ridiculous the United States is for letting in all of these terrorists. We're not going to do that. It's just funny that to me that they want to point out these foreign countries acting like, Oh, we didn't do anything wrong. It's because they, they said it. They're mad. They're just trying to make you mad at us. It's like playing the, the, you know, your parents are divorced, right? Your parents are divorced. And one parent's like, Hey, you know, like mom, mom won't let me, you know, I don't know where I'm going with that, but you see the point you get the idea. It's not Russia's fault that you let in 22 million illegals. It's your fault, and they just pointed it out, so maybe, just don't do that. This is over the last year, Iranian information operations have focused on weakening U. S. public support of Israel and Israel's response to Iranian information operations have focused on weakening U. S. public support of Israel and Israel's response to October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks. These efforts have included leveraging ongoing protests regarding the conflict, posing as online protests. And encouraging protests prior to the 2020 U. S. presidential election, Iran attempted to amplify divisive narratives to incite violence, influence the U. S. electorate and degrade trust in electoral processes. And like, yeah, for sure. They're probably doing that. And so is Israel, right? Go check out AIPAC. Maybe we should be talking about AIPAC in here and their influence on, on domestic senators and congressmen and. Presidents, dare I say. Uh, another one that I found to be interesting here was that they talk about the People's Republic of China and their disinformation campaigns. Hmm. And it says that they seek to exploit U. S. disasters. So the U. S. Homeland Security is saying that China's the reason China is exploiting U. S. disasters just as it did when it blamed Hawaii wildfires on U. S. military activity and may also reduce trust in the U. S. institutions and officials and dissuade survivors to pursue legal recovery or federal recovery response and support. Yeah. I don't think that it was just China. China. Pointing out that direct energy weapons are real and could have been the result of, or could have resulted in Lahaina. I don't think it's just China pointing out that we have weather modification, that there's literal patents on Google that you can search on all of this technology. Like, again, stop trying to blame the foreign entity for something that isn't real. is very real and a possibility. It also says the Department of Justice indicted seven Chinese based Chinese nationals for their involvement in a PRC backed criminal hacking group targeting U. S. based critics, businesses, and political officials in malicious cyber operations intended to intimidate and silence dissidents and steal from their businesses. All right, uh, moving on. Okay, so this is probably the most interesting part of this here. And this talks about threat is likely to focus on the election cycle, right? This is all about the election. Now, some of the most interesting parts of this, I'll read through for you that I highlighted. Again, if you want this document, as I highlighted it and all of my annotations, you can just head over to my Instagram. Once this is posted, you'll be able to request it from my comment section. All right. So one of the first things here is that, uh, let's just read it from the top so we can get into this better. Part of the paragraph, our electoral processes are an attractive target for threat actors, and we expect many will seek to influence the 2024 election cycle. While some others may seek to access or interfere with election systems, while law enforcement is still investigating their motives behind the apparent assassination attempts on a former US president. These incidents highlight the magnitude of the threat surrounding the election cycle. Now, here we go. Some Domestic violence, some domestic violent extremists, particularly those voted motivated by anti government or partisan issues will likely view a wide range of targets indirectly and directly associated with elections as viable targets for violence with the intent of instilling fear among voters, candidates, and election workers. What would be the means to that? Like what would be the end there? Why would they do that? Why, if you're an anti government or if you're motivated by partisan issues. Well, that's the more important one, right? Anti government or partisan issues, right? If you're anti government, we can now say that, Oh, you're probably going to attack polling areas, right? You're probably going to go to the local polling area and, and bomb them or whatever, right? You're probably going to do that if you're anti government. Like, no. No, I think you're just bad at your job, in that federalism is generally not helpful, and all it's done is caused a bloated taxation system and leached from American citizens and given all of our money to foreign entities to fight wars that we shouldn't be in. That's why I'm anti government, and I'm not going to attack anybody as a result. But just because I state that opinion, they can now put me on a list to then say that, oh, I'm going to go attack a polling area. Like, so stupid. Uh, some DVEs, particularly those motivated by anti government or partisan issues, will likely view a wide, okay, we just said that, um, instilling fear among voters, candidates, and election workers, as well as disrupting election processes leading up to or after the November election. So leading up to, And after like, we're not putting any end to this, right? There's no cycle here. We're like, maybe for the next three to four months, we should be highly focusing on people who say that the government's bad at their job, or doesn't have the right motivations. Nope, door after foreign state affiliated cyber to actors and cyber criminals, almost certainly. So this is this one I found really interesting too, because they point out the fact that people are going to try to, like state affiliated cyber actors and cyber criminals, and they're are most likely going to try to change votes using technology, hack into the voting systems, and change votes. But then they say something which I find to be hilarious here too. So foreign state affiliated cyber actors and cyber criminals almost certainly will view network infrastructure that supports US elections as attractive targets. However, there was no reporting to suggest that foreign adversary targets of such systems have ever prevented any eligible voter from casting a ballot. Compromise the integrity of any ballots, cast or disrupted the ability to tabulate votes or transmit election results in a timely manner, right? So they're definitely going to target. These polling stations. They're definitely going to try to hack in and change votes, but there's no evidence ever that that's ever occurred ever to anyone ever. We promise, right? So what they're stating there is like, again, laying the groundwork. They're saying that almost certainly, almost certainly will target the network infrastructure that supports elections to try and change votes, but then they follow that up with There was no reporting, however, to suggest that foreign adversary targeting of such systems has ever prevented any eligible voter ever from casting a ballot, or compromise the integrity of the, because if they say, this has happened, we know what's happened, they've changed votes, we know they've changed votes, then what? Right? Like, then what? Then we know the election system is compromised, and they can't say that, but what they can say is that we know for certain They're going to target this and try to hack into it and try to change votes. But there's no evidence ever that it's ever happened ever, right? But almost certainly they're going to try to do it. Found that one to be interesting. All right, moving on. It says, in particular, anti government, anti authority DVEs, many of whom likely will be inspired by partisan policy grievances or conspiracy theories will pose the most significant threat. So this is under the guise. So it says we expect the DVEs to post the most significant threat to government officials, voters, elections related personnel and infrastructure, including polling places. So ballot dropbox locations, voter registration sites, campaign events, political party offices, and vote counting sites in particular anti government. Like if you're anti government, you're not trying to stop people from voting. You're not trying to blow up a, a dropbox for voted, you know, like for votes. You're not. You're just not participating. I'm not playing this game. The game's stupid. It's, it's all rigged, right? But again, they have to throw that in there. So if you believe that people conspire, right, conspiracy theories, or you believe that the government's not good at what they do, and this may be too large, Any one of those things, you pose the most significant threat. We have also recently observed a rise in disruptive tactics, targeting election officials, like those observed in past election cycles, including hoax, bomb threats, swatting, doxing, and mailing white powder letters, intended to instill fear. Like I'm not saying that doesn't happen. I'm sure that does happen. I'm sure there's some pieces of shit that will try to, I don't know, intimidate voters not to vote, whatever. But the fact that they're calling out anybody who believes that a small or large group will conspire and conceal their identity. To do something that you wouldn't want them to do as the American public. Now you're a conspiracy theorist. And if you believe the government is bad at what they do. If you've heard my bowling alley story when I was in the military, they are generally bad at what they do. Uh, you know, and I've heard this too, do you know who's not bad at what they do? The intelligence agencies. They're the ones who hire the Harvard graduates and Oxford alumni and MIT this and all those are, they come off as very stupid when they put out those secret service agents that looked like they did when Trump was there. But that was on purpose. Right, the people that are actually in the Department of Defense, at the highest levels of these three letter agencies, they're not unintelligent. They're not ignorant. They're not stupid. Right? But, most of the government is. Right. It's not all the DMV, but a lot of it's the DMV, uh, online users and forms frequently frequented by some DVS have increasingly called for violence linked to the 2024 election cycle and seek to promote violence in response to politically and socially disruptive topics like immigration, abortion rights, and LGBTQIA issues or significant current events. Let's talk about that one.
Dve pobede Partizana, polovičan učinak Crvene zvezde u Evroligi i nedopustive odluke sudija, čudesni rezultati i Svetislav Pešić kao novi-stari selektor Srbije, sve to u petoj epizodi druge sezone podcasta "Pick and roll"
Homília 74.6 / Dve vzácne poučenia
Dve znepriatelené rodiny a zakázaná láska, ktorá skončila tým najhorším možným spôsobom. Tragédia Williama Shakespeara Rómeo a Júlia patrí k najznámejším literárnym dielam vôbec. Nepriazeň osudu, vražda a zlé načasovanie ukončili jeden z najkrajších milostných vzťahov v celej svetovej literatúre. V tejto časti Schooltagu si povieme niečo bližšie k veršovanej dráme Rómeo a Júlia. Kľúčové slová: Romeo a Júlia, Schooltag, Hashtag Čitateľský denník, Rómeo a Júlia, William Shakespeare
Náš svět vždy byl a je problematický," říká. "Nauč se milovat svoje bližní, nesnaž se běžet, když se teprve učíme chodit. Dveře ke štěstí se otevírají směrem ven." Jsou vztahy a láska tím nejdůležitějším, co nás v životě pohání vpřed a pomáhá nám neztratit se v osamění? Mění nás velké dějinné události jako 11. září nebo válka na Ukrajině? Moderuje Renata Kalenská.
Mr Wednesday Jeff Konkle wants to instill some parenting wisdom on the DVE listeners.
Mr Wednesday Jeff Konkle wants to instill some parenting wisdom on the DVE listeners.
In the latest episode of Nerd Out, Dave and Alec went through the recent news talking about the foreign influence that is creating security concerns around the world. Then they looked at the latest extremist news before getting into a new segment that talks to three of their considerations for building a security program. Then they wrapped up digging into the happenings of the Acolyte and what they think may happen in the finale. Some of the articles referenced in the pod include: State sponsor. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/07/09/politics/intelligence-russian-sabotage-threat-us-bases-europe https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/30/europe/russia-hybrid-war-nato/index.html https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/commentary/testimony/the-urgent-threats-posed-by-the-ira[…]stify-before-the-us-house-committee-on-homeland-security/ https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/Hezbollah's_Operations_and_Networks_in_the_United_States_June30_2022.pdf Protests. https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/iran-encourages-gaza-war-protests-us-stoke-outrage-111792439 https://www.jpost.com/international/article-807189 https://www.policemag.com/vehicle-ops/news/15670549/group-burns-portland-police-vehicles-over-propalestinian-protests FTO/HVE. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/foreign-terrorists-targeting-us-increasingly-fbi-director/story?id=109045112 https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/07/05/gaza-terrorism-israel-us-intelligence/ https://www.voanews.com/a/new-migration-patterns-fuel-islamic-state-s-plans-for-the-us-/7676413.html https://gnet-research.org/2024/07/04/the-digital-weaponry-of-radicalisation-ai-and-the-recruitment-nexus/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/more-information-emerges-about-8-tajikistani-men-arrested-for-suspected-isis-ties/ https://nypost.com/2024/07/09/us-news/suspected-jihadist-caught-with-weapons-outside-laguardia-indicted/#:~:text=A%20suspected%20Jihadist%20from%20Queens,with%20his%20license%20plate%20covered. DVE. https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2024/07/03/toxic-politics-increase-terrorism-extremism-risk-dhs-official-says/ https://abcnews.go.com/US/yellowstone-national-park-shooting-update/story?id=111794858 https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/san-jose-explosives-arrest-ridder-park-drive/
Obe miški, podstrešna in poljska, sta najbolj srečni vsaka v svojem domu. Pripoveduje: Vojko Zidar. Dve nemški ljudski pravljici. Prevedla: Valči Ravbar. Posneto v studiih Radia Slovenija 1994.
DVE is taking over Kennywood next Friday so we take a listen to some of the entries submitted to take over the park with us.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
