Podcasts about foleys

What can a mother say to the cold-blooded executioner of her son? In American Mother, the heartrending story of the murdered American journalist Jim Foley, the writer Colum McCann and Diane Foley, Foley's mother and founder of the Foley Foundation, explore this terrible dilemma. This memorable conversation with Foley and McCann explores forgiveness, faith, and the moral complexities of justice. Most of all, though, it's the conversation about a mother's remarkable love for her dead son which she maintains and even redirects to his ISIS killer.Here are the five KEEN ON takeaways from our conversation with McCann and Foley:* The Power of Forgiveness: Diane Foley's ability to forgive Alexander Kotey, one of her son Jim's killers, demonstrates extraordinary grace. Her Christian faith played a crucial role in this process, though forgiveness wasn't easy or natural - it was a conscious choice that led to meaningful human connection even in the most difficult circumstances.* Policy Impact Through Tragedy: Jim Foley's death led to significant changes in U.S. hostage policy. The Foley Foundation's work has helped bring home nearly 150 Americans since 2015, and led to the creation of a formal government structure for handling hostage situations - a direct result of the Obama administration's initial failures and subsequent reforms.* The Complexity of Justice: The case highlights nuanced views on justice and the death penalty. The Foleys advocated against the death penalty for their son's killers, arguing that life imprisonment offers a chance for reflection and potential redemption, while execution would simply perpetuate cycles of violence.* Grief's Individual Journey: Diane's experience shows how grief manifests differently for each person. While her other children needed distance from the situation to heal, she channeled her grief into activism and forgiveness. Her willingness to meet her son's killer was not shared by other family members.* The Value of Journalism: Jim Foley's story underscores the importance and dangers of conflict journalism. His commitment to telling stories of people yearning for freedom in the Middle East, even after being kidnapped once in Libya, reflects the crucial role journalists play in helping the world understand complex situations and human struggles.Diane M. Foley is President and Founder of the James W. Foley Legacy Foundation, which she created in September 2014 less than a month after the public beheading by ISIS in Syria of her son James W. Foley, an American freelance conflict journalist. In 2015, she led JWFLF efforts to fund the start of Hostage US and the International Alliance for a Culture of Safety, ACOS. She actively participated in the National Counterterrorism Center hostage review which culminated in the Presidential Policy Directive-30. This directive created the current US hostage enterprise consisting of an interagency Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell, Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs, and a White House Hostage Response Group to free innocent Americans taken hostage or wrongfully detained abroad. JWFLF was instrumental in the passage of the Robert Levinson Hostage Taking and Accountability Act. She has been a tireless hostage, wrongful detainee and family advocate within the US hostage enterprise, Congress, and every presidential administration since 2014. She has raised awareness of international hostage-taking and wrongful detention using the award-winning documentary, “Jim, the James Foley story”, opinion pieces in the New York Times, Washington Post and USA Today and media interviews. Diane has spoken on the power of forgiveness in various faith communities and was included in 200 Women, edited by Geoff Blackwell. She co-authored the book “American Mother” which was published in 2024 with writer Colum McCann. Diane is also the author of a chapter called, “Life For A Voice: the Work of Journalist James W. Foley through the Eyes of his Family” in Living with Precariousness, edited by Christina Lee and Susan Leong, which was published in 2023.Previously, Diane worked as a community health nurse and as a family nurse practitioner for 18 years. She received both her undergraduate and master's degrees from the University of New Hampshire. She is active in her Roman Catholic parish of St Katherine Drexel in Wolfeboro, New Hampshire, where she lives with her husband, Dr. John W. Foley. She is the mother of five children.Colum McCann is the internationally bestselling author of the novels Let the Great World Spin and TransAtlantic. His newest novel, Apeirogon, will appear in 2020. It has already been acclaimed as a "transformative novel" (Raja Shehadeh). He is also the author of Zoli, Dancer, This Side of Brightness, and Songdogs, as well as three critically acclaimed story collections. His fiction has been published in more than forty languages. As well as a National Book Award winner, Colum has been a finalist for the International IMPAC Dublin Literary Award and was the inaugural winner of the Ireland Fund of Monaco Literary Award in Memory of Princess Grace. He has been named one of Esquire's "Best and Brightest," and his short film Everything in This Country Must was nominated for an Oscar in 2005. A contributor to The New Yorker, The New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic Monthly, and The Paris Review, he teaches in the Hunter College MFA Creative Writing Program. He lives in New York City with his wife and their three children.Named as one of the "100 most connected men" by GQ magazine, Andrew Keen is amongst the world's best known broadcasters and commentators. In addition to presenting the daily KEEN ON show, he is the host of the long-running How To Fix Democracy interview series. He is also the author of four prescient books about digital technology: CULT OF THE AMATEUR, DIGITAL VERTIGO, THE INTERNET IS NOT THE ANSWER and HOW TO FIX THE FUTURE. Andrew lives in San Francisco, is married to Cassandra Knight, Google's VP of Litigation & Discovery, and has two grown children.Keen On is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit keenon.substack.com/subscribe

For today as part of the Creative Control Network, on The Business of the Business podcast we welcome Professor Pain and Manny, 2 members of The Foleys, a professional-Wrestling-themed rock/punk band. Host John Poz and Lavie Margolin will also cover the BIG News of the wrestling week, AEW vs GCW, and so much more!Get 20% Off and Free Shipping with the code BIZ at Manscaped.com. That's 20% off with free shipping at manscaped.com and use code BIZ. Time to feel sexy and free this 2023 with MANSCAPED™Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-business-of-the-business--4870725/support.

“Supportive personnel have a great ability to connect with patients and peers, and if that's utilized effectively, it will make a great, great, great, great place to work, with great people to work with, because utilizing the supportive personnel and the great connections that they have, assistive personnel are kind of a lot of times the middle piece, and we don't utilize it in that way. ,” Danielle Steele Anderson, CST II, NA II, research assistant at UNC Medical Center in Chapel Hill, NC, told Jaime Weimer, MSN, RN, AGCNS-BS, AOCNS®, manager of oncology nursing practice at ONS, during a conversation about how supportive personnel are improving staffing and patient care in oncology units. Music Credit: “Fireflies and Stardust” by Kevin MacLeod Licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 3.0  Earn 0.5 contact hours of nursing continuing professional development (NCPD) by listening to the full recording and completing an evaluation at courses.ons.org by September 6, 2026. The planners and faculty for this episode have no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose. ONS is accredited as a provider of nursing continuing professional development by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. Learning outcome: Learners will report an increase in knowledge related to the role of supportive staff in the care of people with cancer. Episode Notes  Complete this evaluation for free NCPD.  Oncology Nursing Podcast™ episode: Episode 160: Build Innovative Staff Education Tools and Resources ONS Voice article: Upskilled Medical Assistants Can Improve Quality and Efficiency of Cancer Care ONS book: Oncology Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice ONS Learning Library: Staffing 2023 ONS Congress poster presentation: Building a Staffing Plan for the Future Anderson's ONS Congress® poster presentation: The Development of an Assistive Personnel Role to Support Quality Initiative Compliance and Improve Patient Outcomes on an Inpatient Hematology/Oncology Unit National Guidelines for Nursing Delegation To discuss the information in this episode with other oncology nurses, visit the ONS Communities.  To find resources for creating an Oncology Nursing Podcast Club in your chapter or nursing community, visit the ONS Podcast Library. To provide feedback or otherwise reach ONS about the podcast, email pubONSVoice@ons.org. Highlights From This Episode “I worked on a 53-bed oncology unit that had limited staff and resources to complete audits on things like central lines, Foleys, tubings, turn compliance, falls—different things like that. Our nurses were dealing with high patient acuity and task overload, so one of our amazing CN4s came up with this awesome rule as a cost-effective way to perform and sustain quality improvements on our unit.” TS 3:15  “Even before this role, I never thought about being on a committee. I never even knew that assistive personnel could even be on committees. I thought committees were tailored more toward nursing. But being in this committee, I feel like involving assistive personnel in committees, can number one, empower them and boost their morale, which in turn, can have higher job satisfaction, good retention.” TS 11:42 “Encouraging assistive personnel and participating in continuing education programs that may be offered to learn more about oncology-specific care, teaching clinical skills that may be within the scope of practice. With this position, I am able to do a lot of tasks that are beneficial to both our nurses and assistive personnel.” TS 16:08  “Opportunities to shadow with nurses during procedures can kind of give us that hands-on learning experience to know more about specific things that are going on and what to monitor with patients. And then also it just will help build connections within our healthcare team and your workplace and your unit.” TS 16:59 

QUICK LISTEN | “Shaping up to have a good football team… I think Bill Foleys the perfect owner…picking the right people…they can do a mini Warriors…” Noel Barkley on Bill Foley & Auckland FC Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Its officially Wrestlemania season. We kick off our first Mania show taking it back twenty years ago from Madison Square Garden. This is a star-studded hall of fame class show! The first match kicks off with a young John Cena taking on the United States champion The Big Show. Cena overcame the odds, and he slayed the giant. The Most electrifying man in sports entertainment made his return The Rock and Mick Foley   takes on Evolution. Randy Orton Batista & Ric Flair. This is Foleys first match in four years. He didn't win the match, but he put over Randy Orton. The Undertaker was buried alive by his brother Kane at Survivor Series. At the 2004 Royal Rumble we heard the gong, and the mind games begins on Kane. Well after four months the Undertaker makes his return and takes on his brother Kane. The streak continues! In a must watch technical match Eddie Guerrero takes on the Olympic Gold Medalist Kurt Angle. This match is for the WWE Championship. Angle was on point this match bringing out the three I's, but Eddie lied, cheat, and stole a victory to retain his championship. We have a match that all fans were looking forward to but didn't live up to the hype because the IWC realized this was Brocks last match. In this match we get Brock Lesnar taking on Goldberg. A match of this caliber we need a bad ass referee and that referee for this match is Stone Cold Steve Austin. The match started off slow, but it finally picked up and Goldberg got the victory. In your main event for the World Heavyweight Championship, we have Triple H defending his title against Shawn Michaels and Chris Benoit. If you guys can tolerate a Benoit match, check this out. Chris overcame the odds, and it was a great moment for him. You cant erase history but this was memorable. At the end of the match he celebebrated with his best friend Eddie. Wrestlemania was an amazing show, check it out!

Meagan and Julie went Live in The VBAC Link Community Facebook Group answering your questions. They recorded the conversation to share with you on the podcast today. Topics include: Risks of VBAC, Repeat Cesarean, and CBACCook versus Foley CathetersCervical lipsMembrane sweepsVBA2C and VBAMCCPDThank you for sending in your questions! An educated birth is an empowered one. You've got this, Women of Strength!Additional LinksThe VBAC Link Blog: VBAC vs Repeat CesareanCook versus Foley Catheter StudyEBB 151: Updated Evidence on the Pros and Cons of Membrane SweepingACOG Article: VBACThe VBAC Link Blog: VBA2CNeeded WebsiteFull Transcript under Episode Details Meagan: Hey, hey everybody! Guess what? It's November which is one of my favorite months because it is my birthday month. I have forever and ever loved birthday months so this is going to be a great month because it is my birthday month. Today we are kicking it off with questions and answers with myself and Julie. Hey, Julie. Julie: Hey, I'm so excited to be here. Meagan: Welcome back. We're going to get right into this review and get some of these great questions answered. We know you guys have so many questions. This review is from bunnyfolife777. It says, “So much hope.” It says, “I'm 16 weeks pregnant and shooting for my VBAC. I've been in The VBAC Link group on Facebook for over a year, but I've only just started listening to the podcast. I don't know why I waited. I'm bawling now just two episodes in. The statistics and advice you share are golden. I'm going to listen to it again and take notes this time. I'm scared about having to advocate for myself living abroad where most doctors push for C-sections so I'm thankful I can arm myself with the knowledge through The VBAC Link. Thank you.”Oh, that makes me so happy. We're going to be talking about statistics on this podcast episode today. Julie: You know I love a good statistic. Meagan: I know. You are the statistic junkie. Julie: I'm a nerd. Meagan: Okay, okay Julie. I love having you back on the show. It just feels so natural. Julie: It's fun. Meagan: It is fun. It's so fun so thank you for being willing to join me again on these random episodes. As we were saying, we are really just wanting to answer some of these questions. So yeah. What is one of the questions right here that you love that you are like, “Let's start this off with”?Julie: Okay, so gosh. I mean, there are so many good ones. I feel like we've talked about a lot of these things many, many times over the years, but I feel like every time we talk about them, we get a new perspective in. There is new information and new evidence. Not everyone goes and listens to every single one of the episodes although lots of people do, but I think it's fun to revisit some of these things. I don't know. There are so many that stuck out to me. VBAC vs Repeat Cesarean vs CBACOne thing that we haven't really talked about directly in this way is, is it really safer to give birth vaginally? I mean, yes. It is. We can go over that but I really like the second part of that question which is, “What if that labor doesn't work and goes to a C-section? Is that more dangerous?” I want to talk about that because we talk about VBAC is safer than a repeat Cesarean statistically. We are talking about all of the numbers when we talk about all of the different things that could go wrong between vaginal birth and Cesarean birth then actually, for the second, whether you choose VBAC or repeat Cesarean, the statistics are actually not that much different as far as safety goes. VBAC is slightly safer overall, but there really isn't a big enough difference to say, “You should absolutely do this.” Right? That's where your intuition comes in. But if you want more than two kids, the more C-sections you have, the higher the chance you have of having severe complications. By the time you get to your fourth or fifth C-section, you have a 1 in 3 chance of having a major medical intervention during your Cesarean. I feel like so many times we as people educating about birth or talking about birth talk about just those two things. VBAC and repeat Cesarean, but there's actually a third thing that's worth talking about. That is a TOLAC– I know it's kind of a trigger word for some, but it's just a medical term we're going to use here– that ends in a repeat Cesarean. Meagan: Yes, because we know that happens. Julie: We know it happens. It does happen. Meagan: It happened with me. Julie: Sometimes it's medically necessary. Sometimes it's not, and you just don't know. We've got to put it in the order of three things. First, the safest is VBAC or a vaginal birth. Second is a scheduled C-section and the third is a VBAC attempt or a TOLAC that ends in a repeat Cesarean. We also call that a CBAC or a Cesarean birth after a Cesarean. Now, if you labor and then have to have a C-section for whatever reason, there are more risks with that including postpartum hemorrhage or bleeding, and needing a blood transfusion. Obviously, the risks to baby are pretty similar but it's just harder to operate on a uterus that is contracting. You're more likely to bleed because that uterus is contracting. Sometimes, if it's an emergency situation, the providers have to do things like a special scar or a special type of incision or they have to put you under general anesthesia. That has more risks in and of itself. I feel like that's a really valid question that she asked. What if? What if? There are always what if's, but what is safer? Meagan: Right, right. For patients or parents that are going for a TOLAC, a trial of labor after a Cesarean, and then may require or end up going to have that Cesarean, there is also a slightly increased risk of postpartum infection. Julie: Yes. Meagan: And also some possible complications. You just touched on it a little bit, but when a uterus is already contracting– so I'm going to backpedal a little bit. When we go in for an elective Cesarean, typically we are not already in labor. We're not already having contractions so performing a Cesarean on a contracting uterus can possibly cause some issues there as well. That is sometimes why a lot of providers don't want an elective Cesarean to even go to 40 weeks or past. They want to have an elective earlier on. That may also help give you some understanding of why providers are saying that. But yeah, it just slightly increases in other ways. Yeah. Anyway, keep going. Julie: No, I love that. I just don't think we've ever– I mean, we do in our course and things like that. We talk about it directly, but that's something to consider. I think that's also really important. I feel like it adds the extra layer of where you want to make sure you have a really good provider because if you have a provider who is not really supportive or who is giving you tons of red flags or who is saying that you have to induce because of a big baby– I'm surprised that big baby isn't in some of these questions, to be honest. We can talk about that a little bit later, but it's really important. That's something to consider. It's all about weighing the risks and what risks are you more comfortable with taking on? Are you more comfortable taking on the risk of going into a vaginal birth attempt– you want to try for a VBAC– and having the possibility of it ending in a repeat Cesarean? The possibility of it ending in a repeat Cesarean varies depending on where you are birthing. If it is a home birth, you have a 10% chance of it ending in a Cesarean. Statistically, nationwide, you have a 30-40% chance of it ending in a repeat Cesarean. But if you have a really good provider, there's probably only a 10-20% chance of it ending in a repeat Cesarean. Sometimes, if you have a really bad provider, you might be looking at a 50 or 60 or 70% chance of having a repeat Cesarean. So what is an acceptable risk for one person is not for another. If that just sounds too scary for you or are risks that you are not willing to take, then maybe scheduling a repeat Cesarean is the right choice for you and that's okay. But if you're a diehard and want to fight the system to prove everybody wrong no matter what the costs are, then maybe you just want to have a VBAC and that's okay. Not that that's a bad thing, but it's also probably not a very healthy way of thinking. I was like that. I'm like, “I'm getting my VBAC and I'm going to do everything I can to safely set up the best chances for me and my baby.” That's why I ultimately chose an out-of-hospital birth with a really amazing provider who had tons of experience in all types of birth situations. But I don't know. I think that's super important and something to consider. We're not trying to scare anyone here, but we are never going to lie to you. We're never going to dance around the issues. We're never going to sugarcoat things. Meagan: Yeah. Yeah. I think that was a good question. Okay, well if it really is safer to have a vaginal birth, what's the safety here? Yeah. I really loved that question a lot. Julie: I wish I had some statistics off of the top of my head, to be honest. I'm pretty sure we wrote a blog about it. VBAC versus a repeat Cesarean. Meagan: Okay. I'm going to bounce to this next question– Julie: Wait, wait, wait, wait. Wait, wait, wait, wait. I have something. Meagan: Did you find a stat? Julie: No. Well, yes actually. I found the blog. If you guys want to know more about the blogs, I'm not going to get into it because we want to move on to all of these other questions. Our wonderful transcriber, Paige, is going to put a link to the blog in the show notes so make sure you check it out and it goes in super, really big detail about all of those statistics, and pros and cons for all of those things. I say our transcriber, but you know what I mean. I feel like it's still us. It's still we, right? I don't know. I'm never going to not feel like that. Maybe one day. No, probably not. I miss it so much. Meagan: Probably not. No, probably not. Julie: Sorry, let's go on. Cook vs Foley CatheterMeagan: No, you're fine. So I want to talk about catheters. Not catheters to drain urine, but the catheters to help with an induction. Someone asked, “What's the difference?” We'll even hear in Utah a Cook versus a Foley. A Foley catheter can also be the type that actually goes into your bladder through your urethra and drains urine but there's also a Foley catheter that can help induce labor. There's Cook and Foley. One of the questions was, “What is the difference between the two?” Really, the only difference is that a Cook has a double-balloon and the Foley is not a double. There's just one. If you can– I don't even know how to give this image. How would you give this image of what a Cook catheter is like? The catheter with two balloons on it? I don't know, like ice cream? Oh, you're muted. Julie: I'm sitting over here dancing. Meagan: She's dancing in this image and I'm like, “She's saying something.” I'm thinking of a double scoop of ice cream.Julie: I'm thinking it's kind of like a barbell. Yeah. Or like a barbell, right? If you think of a cartoon barbell with the balls on the end but much shorter. Meagan: Yeah. Both of them are inflated with saline. It's inserted through the cervix, the balloons are inflated, and then they put pressure mechanically onto the cervix which causes pressure and dilation and effacement and things like that. Yeah. It's been a really long time since these have been being used. We will see, once in a while, providers say that a catheter, Cook or a Foley, is a contraindication for someone who wants to have a VBAC. That is kind of hard. It's really interesting. It's just a balloon that goes in. There's no medicine that is put in at all. It's just saline and like I said, it's a mechanical dilation. So if you are curious about methods of induction that your provider is comfortable with, I would encourage you before you get to the 37th, 38th, 39th, 40th, 41st, and 42nd week of pregnancy to discuss with your provider more about a Cook catheter and what they are comfortable with. It is really hard because sometimes, those catheters can be one of the best ways to help induce a cervix or a TOLAC for someone who is wanting to go for a VBAC because they can't always just do other ripening aids and this can definitely help with the cervical ripening to help get to that further progress of having a baby. Julie: I love it. I think it's silly sometimes how providers will not induce with a Foley for VBAC. I just don't get it because there's no solid evidence that supports not doing that. I just think– me and you, we've seen so many VBACs induced with that. It's been fine and healthy. There is just not anything out there. I know every provider has their things that they will and won't do. If you have a provider that won't do that, then you might want to talk to another provider. Meagan: Now that we kind of know that there are two different types, let's talk a little bit about the differences. There is a difference in what they do. Why would we even use them? Which one is better? I think that is a big question. Which one is better to use? I'm just going to tell you after some evidence that a Cook catheter for cervical ripening has greater results. What have you seen, Julie? What have you seen in the past?Julie: Honestly, I'm trying to think if I've ever seen anybody use the Cook catheter. I think I've only seen Foleys to be honest. I'm trying to think back. Maybe there has been one but I just can't think of any. Meagan: I've only seen one. Yep, I've only seen one and it was up at the University Hospital here in Utah. They used that. She was barely half of a centimeter dilated and 30% effaced, very little. They used that for softening really, but the Cook catheter, I think, through studies has shown that it is more effective or has greater cervical ripening compared to the Foley. However, in fact, I'm going to hurry and pull this up. I'm just going to read this. It shows, “The duration from the balloon insertion to it exiting and delivery was significantly shorter using a Foley catheter.” Julie: Interesting. Meagan: Yeah. So Cook catheter has a greater result of actually ripening the cervix, but the Foley has a greater success rate overall from start to finish. I mean, I have seen so many people with Foleys. It sounds weird because sometimes, everyone is like, “You're suggesting Pitocin?” I'm not suggesting it. I'm just saying that I have seen a Foley placed with Pitocin at 4mL, just a little bit, and it is insane sometimes how great the result is. Sometimes when the Foley comes out– maybe you've seen this– it's a mechanical dilation so it kind of relaxes just a little. It's not like we go backward. It just kind of relaxes like it's overstretched and it relaxes. Then we have to catch up, right? But I have seen where with there is a tiny, tiny lift of Pitocin being involved–Julie: You don't have that relaxing as much, yeah. Meagan: Yeah. I don't see where it's like, “Oh, you're a 4,” and then they check and they're like, “Well, you're kind of a 3.” Listeners, I just want you to know that that's a thing too. If a Foley comes out, remember that it's a mechanical dilation in your cervix. It may be stretchy-stretchy, but you might not be a full 4 or whatever. So talking about top to bottom, Julie you just mentioned that a little bit ago. With me, do you want to talk about that?Julie: Yeah. Well, I mean, the Cook catheter has two balloons essentially that they fill up with saline. The Cook has two balloons. The Foley has one. The idea with the Cook catheter is that it puts pressure on both ends of the cervix. My gosh, I don't know if we even said how they put it in. You insert a catheter in through the cervix and then the Cook has two balloons on either end that they inflate so it pushes to soften and open the cervix. Then, the Foley only has one balloon that they put. They insert it into the top through the cervix inside of the uterus and inflate it there with the balloon. They tape it to your leg and it pulls. Meagan: They tug it. Julie: You've got to tug it and it pulls down. It provides a lot of pressure so that the cervix can soften and open. All of my clients have just been pretty uncomfortable with it in. They feel some relief when it comes out because then it just falls out. It pulls out at some point. Honestly, I don't know. This is maybe making me sound like an idiot but do they tape the Cook catheter to the leg or not? I don't know. Meagan: I did not see it taped to the leg. Julie: I'm wondering if maybe that's why the Foley is more successful because you're having just one downward motion instead of two pressures going toward each other. I don't know. I don't know. Meagan: Yeah, maybe. It's kind of interesting because with the Foley, every 20-30 minutes, they're wanting you to pull on it. Julie: I don't know if they do that with the Cook. Meagan: I don't either because we haven't seen enough. Julie: Yeah. Meagan: So if you're listening today, go comment in today's episode. If you had a Cook catheter, let us know what happened. Tell us about it. Tell us what your experience was. I think they said in the study that really, there was no significant difference in the outcomes specifically between the two having more Pitocin or the mode of delivery or anything like that. It's just that the Cook catheter had a greater result of cervical ripening and the Foley catheter maybe shortened the duration but there wasn't any crazy, significant difference of mode of delivery or your for sure had to use Pitocin with a Cook or anything like that. So that's interesting. Julie: Yeah, interesting. The point is that it is safe for VBAC. This is another thing. I'm going on a teeny little soapbox that I'm going to get off really fast, but why does it take the burn of proof to show that something is or is not evidence-based or is a reasonable patient? Rely on the patient. If your provider says, “No, it's dangerous. We can't do Foley for a VBAC,” make them show you why. Ask them where the source is coming from. I don't understand why we have to bring the stuff to show that it is safe. Why? It's stupid. Meagan: I don't know. I don't know. Why? Julie: Why? Meagan: I mean, even the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology says– Julie: Yeah, and that's ACOG's journey. Meagan: They say, “Foley catheter did not increase the risk of uterine rupture in TOLAC.” It says that. “Similar, uterine scar dehiscence was not associated with a Foley catheter.” I don't ever want to make it sound like we are bashing a provider or it's a show bashing providers, but we're having providers tell people that they have zero option to be induced especially if there's a medical reason. Sometimes there's a medical reason. We've got preeclampsia or something is going on, but this mom wants to have a trial of labor and a VBAC, but then her cervix isn't super great for induction. We're being robbed of these options. They even say, “The data shows the Foley catheter is a safe tool for mechanical dilation in women undergoing a trial of labor after a Cesarean.” If your provider is saying that you're not a candidate or it's a contraindication for VBAC, then maybe I invite you to have a discussion with them. Right? An open discussion of, “Okay, what I have learned is that it's not necessarily a contraindication. Is there new evidence that we're not aware of?” Maybe there is. Maybe there's new evidence. Julie: There's not. Meagan: I know, but right? Maybe they have secret evidence. Julie: Give them the benefit of the doubt, right? Meagan: Is there new evidence that we're not aware of and is there any way that we can have a conversation about it? Can we talk about this because if it is, then okay? But if not–Julie: Well, and honestly, gosh. I just think that it's just something that they've heard or something that their practice does or something that the hospital says. You know, I mean, we all do it in our lives. Our mom says, “Oh, this and this. Oh, you should never cook with refined sugar. You should always use granulated sugar.” I don't know. I'm not a baker so it's probably not a good example. But you know, and then you go throughout your life like, “Oh, my mom says you should never cook with this type of sugar,” but that type of sugar is totally fine. Someone you trust had told you that so it's just ingrained in your belief. I have those things. Meagan: It's like the trans-fat argument. Julie: Yes. It's like, my gosh. How many beliefs do we hold that maybe we know they're just silly, but it's just something we've known for so long that doing it otherwise would feel so foreign to us. There are so many things in the system like that where the providers aren't meaning to do harm, it's just the way that they've been taught. It doesn't give them an excuse. Oh my gosh, there was a quote the other day that popped up in my feed. I was arguing online with some photographer about birth photography and I got a little heated because I was super tired because I'd been to three births in four days and I was awake for 16 hours through the night. Anyway, but a little while later, some unrelated person posted this quote in their stories and I like it because it goes along with what I was just talking about. It says, “Don't assume malice. Assume ignorance. Life is easier. The world is kinder and you can educate. Actual malice is pretty rare, I find.” Then somebody else commented and said, “I always remember Hanlon's Razor. Never assume malice when incompetence will suffice as an explanation. With that said, never forget Fred Clark's lot either. Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice. There is a certain point at which ignorance becomes malice at which there is simply no way to become that ignorant except deliberately and maliciously.” I'm going to forward this to you. Meagan: I was just going to say will you forward that because that is amazing. Never just assume malice. Julie: Assume ignorance. They just don't know. It's okay because there are lots of things we don't know too but when it gets to the point where you're just completely refusing to see that there's any other way, then that's where it gets to be malice and aggressive. But I love a provider or a nurse when I'm in the delivery room doing peanut ball or Spinning Babies and the nurse is like, “Oh, tell me more about that.” That is a position of maybe ignorance and they want to learn and do better. They just don't know those things. But when you have a nurse come in who says, “Oh, we don't use the peanut ball before 7 centimeters because it doesn't do anything,” that is a malicious form of ignorance. Meagan: Yeah. Yeah. Okay, I love that so, so much. Thank you for sharing that. Julie: You're welcome. I'm glad I screenshotted it. Cervical LipsMeagan: Me too. Okay, one of the questions is about cervical lips. Julie: Mmm. Meagan: I know, it's a good question. It's hard because it happens and it's frustrating if it doesn't go away. Right? It's like, if I make it to 9.5 centimeters and I have this lip that will not go away, one– why doesn't it go away? Why does it happen? Two– how can I get it away? What are some ways? It sucks if that is the only reason why a Cesarean happens. Julie: Well, first do you want to say what a cervical lip is just in case people don't know? Meagan: Yep, yep. Julie: Oh, me? Well, a cervical lip is just where your cervix is almost fully dilated, but there is just a little sliver of it, or part of it– so if you imagine a crescent moon shape, where part of your cervix is all the way gone behind baby's head and there is just a little sliver of it on some part of the baby's head coming over. Just a teeny bit. Just like a lip. Just like a little lip. Meagan: Yes. So when we have cervical lips, sometimes pressure on that part of the cervix helps it melt away and thin. We work through positions like what Julie was saying by using a peanut ball or we make you more central through a squat or sitting on the toilet. Sometimes it's an anterior lip. Sometimes it's way on the side. Sometimes it's a little puffier in the back. Sometimes we will use positions to help get rid of that lip.But it's really hard because sometimes even through positions, that lip sometimes doesn't go away. Sometimes it can be massaged or it can be advanced. I'm happy to continue but I want to give you an opportunity to talk too. Julie: No, you're good. Meagan: But advancing, right? Julie: The provider will hold it during a contraction and push it back. That's really painful if you don't have an epidural. If you have an epidural, that's a good way to do it. The medical system is going to hate me for saying this, but I've also seen people push through a contraction when they have a cervical lip and it slips right over baby's head. You don't want to push too much with a cervical lip also because it can cause the cervix to swell if it's a positional issue. There are a whole bunch of things you can do, but Meagan, I think you were right on track when you were talking about movement, positions, squatting, and all of those things to help put that pressure on and help straighten baby's head out. I mean, it's not always because of the baby's head, but it could be. Squatting and putting that pressure down is just going to really help. Meagan: Yeah, so when a provider is holding it and helping it, I call it an advance. Advancing it over the baby's head. Sometimes it just needs to slip over the baby's head. It's so stretchy. Julie: It will stay there. Meagan: Sometimes, it's so stretchy that it will just go away. I'm always giving sound effects on this podcast. Sometimes it's like we're trying, trying, and trying, but then we have possible issues because then we're swelling. We're aggravating it. It's tissue. It's the cervix so it can get bogged and it can swell. So if that is happening and your provider is like, “Yes. I think through this push, I can push it. I can help advance it over this baby's head and it's going to go away and we're going to have a baby,” great. It's worth trying. But if it's over and over and over again and we're advancing it and it's just not going, we are risking it to swell. So yeah. Movement. This sounds weird too. Here I am suggesting Pitocin again. Sometimes a little stronger of a contraction, just a little bit stronger of a contraction and a little bit of a lift can just put the amount of pressure on the cervix or cause the cervix to continue dilating. Then the cervix is done and you can turn the Pitocin off. That's always an option to say, “Okay. We've done this, this, and this. Let's move on.” Some providers, usually out-of-hospital providers– Julie, I don't know if you've seen this– will place Arnica. Julie: Yeah. I have seen that. Meagan: If it's starting to feel puffy or maybe have done advancing a couple of times. Julie: I love Arnica, man. It is my favorite. Arnica gel. Meagan: I love it too. Julie: Love it. Meagan: Yes. I love it. Sometimes providers will do some Arnica up there to help reduce inflammation and swelling and things like that. Cervical lips can happen for no reason really other than just it's happening. People say, “Oh, sometimes it's baby's position.” Again, maybe we want more pressure. Sometimes it's the lack of intensity. If I remember right, if you've ever had a LEEP procedure–Julie: Yeah, like some scarring on the cervix can cause that. Meagan: Yes. Yeah. So a LEEP procedure or maybe really bad cervical tearing or trauma to the cervix can create less elasticity. I don't know if that's the right word. But it can cause a cervical lip. I've also seen– this is more for the edema again on the Arnica– Benadryl. Providers give someone Benadryl because it's an antihistamine for swelling. Yeah. There are so many things that you can talk to your provider about. If you have a cervical lip, oh. Go ahead. Julie: I was going to say that sometimes, just doing nothing. Meagan: Just waiting, yes. Julie: Sometimes in labor, even us as doulas, we see, “Oh, well it looks like contractions are coupling. Let's do some abdominal lifts.” But sometimes, that's an intervention. It just is. Spinning Babies® is an intervention. It's a more natural intervention, but sometimes, maybe a lot of the time, you just need to leave it alone. I don't know. I saw this post on social media the other day that was talking about, “I hate Spinning Babies® because it's an intervention and all of these doulas and midwives are like, ‘Oh, let's do Spinning Babies®. Let's do Spinning Babies®.' It's an intervention just like Pitocin or whatever.”I don't think it's just like Pitocin, but it kind of takes away from the trust of the natural labor process when you're like, “Oh, you've got to fix this.” It's kind of, in a way, saying that we don't trust the natural labor process as much. But there are some times when it is good and beneficial to do those things. There are some times when you can't just trust the natural labor process alone, but a lot of times, you can. A lot of times, we just need to let these things be and they will resolve themselves. This is a big thing where knowing all of your options then trusting your intuition and having someone to guide you like a doula will help you know which is the right thing for you whether you want to try squatting, try different positions, try Arnica gel, or just leave it be for a little while. There's no right answer. Meagan: There is no right answer and there are these things that we can do. Sometimes they work and sometimes they don't, but we want you to know that there are things you can do. Sometimes those things just do nothing. Absolutely. Membrane SweepsSo let's talk about sweeping membranes. Talking about interventions, sweeping the membranes. I've heard it called a sweep and a scrape. Julie: Ew. Meagan: Yeah. People say “scraping the membrane”. If you don't know what sweeping the membranes is, it's when a provider will insert typically their fingers inside the cervix and separate the membrane of the amniotic sac from the cervix and do a little sweep around. That releases hormones like prostaglandins and things like that. Sometimes, it's used to induce. It's a more gentle– I don't know if that's how you say it– way of inducing. One of the questions, Julie, was, “Does it work? What are the pros and cons? Should I do this?” We do have a lot of providers that will say, “Oh, we can just strip your membranes.” What do you think? What do you say? Julie: Evidence Based Birth® used to have a great article on this. The one thing that I– okay, I love Evidence Based Birth®. Meagan: I think she still does. Julie: This is the thing though, they took away all of their articles and replaced them with just their podcast transcripts. I wish that they would have their regular blog articles still instead of just having the podcast and the transcripts which makes me a little bit sad because then you have to read through the whole thing in order to find what you are looking for. But I do love me some Evidence Based Birth®.Listen, Evidence Based Birth® does say that there is research that shows that starting regular membrane sweeps at 37 weeks of pregnancy and doing them, I think it's twice a week until delivery can shorten your pregnancy by one to two days. Personally, for me, that's not enough evidence to want to do them because you are getting 10+ cervical membrane sweeps. That is a lot for just a one or two-day shorter pregnancy. But for some people, that might be worth it to them. It's just one of those things where there is that evidence that shows, but this is the thing. Doing one membrane sweep at 40 weeks is not going to shorten your pregnancy by one or two days. It's not going to shorten your pregnancy at all. This is what the studies show. There might be some anecdotal things or your water might break prematurely and that might kickstart labor, but the one-off or the one or two membrane sweeps here and there is not statistically proven to shorten that. You have to start super early. Another thing I want to say–Meagan: Two days to have to avoid going in or having it massaged or swept twice a week? Julie: Yeah, one to two days. It would cause you so much pain and cramping and it would make you miserable. Meagan: That's the thing I wanted to say. Sometimes cervical sweeps or membrane sweeps can actually promote prodromal labor. Julie: Yeah. Meagan: Right? We're up there and we're disrupting the cervix and making it think that we need to start contracting, but our body is not really ready to labor so we're contracting, contracting, contracting, and getting exhausted, but labor is not happening. Then the next day, we're sweeping again or we're contracting again, but then really, we don't have a baby for 2-3 weeks. Right? We're exhausted when labor starts. Julie: Yeah. Meagan: Like you said, they can hurt. If our cervix is posterior, especially at 37 weeks, it's a lot more likely for our cervix to be posterior than it is anterior, they have to go in, back, and around to get to the cervix and sweep. It's not just in and out. That can cause a lot of discomfort that's really unnecessary. One of the questions is, “Does it possibly increase infection?” We are inserting something into the cervix and sweeping around, maybe yeah. Julie: Well, here's the thing though. I'm just skimming through this podcast article on Evidence Based Birth®'s website. If you want to find it, it's super easy. Just Google “Evidence Based Birth® Membrane Sweeping” and it will pop up right there for you. Meagan: They give you updated evidence on it. Don't they have it updated? It was in 2020. Julie: Yeah. It's in 2020 for sure. They break it down. There are 44 studies that they look at. Some of them show no difference. Some of them show 9% increase in artificial rupture of membranes. Premature and accidental. There are a whole bunch of varying interpretations here, but none of them are too conclusive as far as it causing that significant of a difference in when labor will start. Yes. Go and read it if you're curious. It's really good. Or you can listen to it, I guess as well. There is great stuff there. Meagan: Yeah. It's Episode 151 on Evidence Based Birth®. Yeah. Julie: Yeah. Meagan: Yeah. So I think just closing out this question as a whole, it's a personal preference. If you want to try something to encourage labor to begin on more of a natural basis, then it could be worth it. But for my personal suggestion to my doula clients and what I would do– again, I'm me. I'm not you. If I was being faced with a medical reason to induce or a concern, but I was going to be induced anyway, I would maybe try it. Does that make sense? If I was already going to be induced for a medical reason, then I would probably try it. Julie: One or two days might be beneficial for you at that point. Meagan: One or two days might be beneficial. If I can avoid going in and being hooked up to a Pit drip, then that might be better for me. That's one of my things. If I was facing an actual induction, I maybe would try it. For my actual birth, my midwife wanted to. She said, “Hey, why don't you come in and we'll strip your membranes?” I said, “Nope.” I didn't feel like I needed it. I don't know if it would weaken my membranes or accidentally rupture my membranes because that is a possible consequence. We can induce infection. We can accidentally break our water. We can weaken it as we separate it. So those types of things, for me, were not worth it. I was good to just keep going as I was. Julie: Yeah. VBA2CMeagan: Okay. What are some other questions? I know we have a couple more before we end. Julie: There's one about VBAC after two C-sections I know. Meagan: Oh yeah. Yes. Julie: Let's talk about that one. “Why do so many providers not support VBAC after two C-sections? What does the evidence say?” Meagan: Mhmm. Well, the evidence says that it is reasonable. Julie: Yeah. It is. Even ACOG says that it's reasonable. Meagan: Yep. Yep. Yep. Julie: I feel like this goes back to what we were talking to about before with that quote. I feel like most providers have just been told that it is not safe, so they say that it's not safe, so they don't do it and they don't support it. They throw around terms like, “Oh, it doubles your chance of uterine rupture. 50% chance of uterine rupture,” and things like that, right? We have the system that is just content on not wanting to have or support any evidence that will go contrary to the things that they've been taught. You see with the ARRIVE trial. We have been throwing evidence at providers that so many things reduce your chances of C-section for years. Right? Like waiting for labor to start on its own, laboring at home as long as possible, avoiding Pitocin, avoiding elective inductions, and all of those things. We've been throwing these things at providers for years about nice, safe, non-medical ways to avoid Cesareans and providers weren't interested in it all. Then all of a sudden, the ARRIVE trial comes out and they're like, “Oh, inducing at 39 weeks decreases Cesarean rates,” which, it doesn't by the way. As soon as providers are shown something that reinforces things they already know and do, they're like, “Oh, yeah. That's something I can get behind. I can do this because I already do this all of the time anyways. I already schedule inductions. I already do Pitocin. I already do these surgeries.”So when they're shown something that will reinforce their beliefs and things that they already know how to do, they're on board with it. But my gosh, you try and show them these nonmedical ways of improving birth outcomes and nobody wants to buy it because they're like, “Oh well, that's just–”. It's not how they've been trained. Meagan: It's not how they've been trained and sometimes they've seen a scary outcome. Julie: Yeah, of course. Meagan: Studies do say that women requesting for a trial of labor, a VBAC and having a VBAC, should absolutely be counseled and absolutely be offered an opportunity because we know that the success rate is as high of 71%, if not higher. 71% or higher, right? The uterine rupture rate is not much higher and if you compare VBAC after two Cesareans, maternal morbidity is really comparable to a repeat Cesarean. It's low. It's overall safe and reasonable to have a vaginal birth after two Cesareans. Julie: The risks to baby are similar. The risks to mom are actually higher in a repeat Cesarean like increased blood loss, pulmonary embolism, and maternal death is still incredibly low. Maternal death is incredibly low. We're talking about .000-something-percent, but when you're looking at it against VBAC, it's 10 times more likely for a mother to die during a Cesarean birth during a vaginal birth. I don't want to scare you because 10 times more likely sounds like a super scary number like, “Oh, you're twice as likely to have a stillbirth after you're 41 weeks,” but it's an incredibly small increase and incredibly small risk already. It's the same thing with this. It's an incredibly small risk but we don't talk about those things. Meagan: It's even harder to find evidence for vaginal birth after three or more Cesareans. That's where we don't have a lot of information. Most providers out there, to be honest, if you've had three Cesareans, it's going to be harder to find someone that will allow you to give birth vaginally. It's so hard. But it still doesn't mean that you're absolutely not a candidate or that it is a ginormous risk that completely risks everybody out. People do it and again, we were talking about it earlier. If it's a risk that you are willing to take and it's a comfortable risk for you, then that says something. Yeah. VBAC after two Cesareans is totally reasonable and totally possible. We've got lots of stories on the podcast. I'm living and walking proof. Julie: And lots of stories of VBAC after three or four Cesareans too. Meagan: Three or four, yeah. Yeah. It's totally possible. If a provider is trying to tell you that your risk of rupture really is 50-60%, then that is one– not a provider that you should probably be going to for a VBAC, but two– something that probably needs to be changed because maybe they just are really uneducated on the evidence. We're looking at just barely over 1%. It's really low. Julie: And not even that, there are several different studies. ACOG sites two studies in their practice bulletin and one of the studies shows no difference in rupture rates between VBAC and VBAC after two C-sections. The other one shows a slightly higher increase. I don't remember what the numbers are off of the top of my  head, but VBAC Link does have a blog on VBAC after two C-sections. You can probably just Google “VBA2C” and it will pull up in the first or second search results, but I'm sure that Paige will probably also link it in the show notes for us. So take a look at those statistics because even ACOG says that and if ACOG says something, why are we not behind that evidence that ACOG published? Meagan: I know. It's so funny because ACOG goes through a lot to publish these things, these articles and journals, but then we're not having providers– I'm going to say midwives too. We have midwives that don't follow these practices. We have providers that don't follow it. The evidence is there. They're showing that it's there. Why aren't we doing it? CPDI know we're almost out of time, but I just really want to talk about CPD a little bit because lately in our inbox, we have been seeing a lot of people being told that they hear the stories. They see the stories and they wish they could, but they were diagnosed with CPD and they can't. They can't get a baby out of their pelvis. For those who don't know what CPD is, it's cephalopelvic disproportion. It's just pretty much saying that your pelvis is too small. Yeah. Julie and I personally have both been diagnosed. Julie: Told that, yeah, in our op reports. Here's the thing about CPD. It's incredibly rare. It's incredibly rare and most of the time comes from growing up incredibly malnourished like in third-world countries so your bones grow in a deformed way or after a traumatic pelvic injury. It's very rare for a true CPD diagnosis to come from a normal, healthy person. You can't even diagnose it without pelvic imagery exam, like an actual scan. It's not even an x-ray. If you go, “My doctor gave me an x-ray and told me my pelvis is too small.” First of all, that's not the right way to diagnose it. Second of all, pelvises– your body is so pumped full of hormones that our pelvises expand. They literally move around as baby is coming down. Babies' heads overlap, the skulls and these bones in their heads overlap and squish together and smoosh together to come out of that pelvis. Your pelvis is opening in ways that it doesn't normally and babies' heads are smooshing together in ways that they never will again, so how are you even supposed to tell how much a pelvis is going to open and expand and how much a baby's head is going to smoosh together? I will die on that hill. Man, I will die on that hill. No. You were diagnosed with CPD and that's bull crap. That diagnosis was bull crap and unless you grew up in Africa or in these poor countries. All of these African women are still having babies. Sorry, that probably sounded a little bit bad. I didn't mean to say it like that. These women are still having babies even though they were malnourished. You have to have a severe, severe deformity from malnourishment. Rickets is the disease that comes along usually wth CPD or a traumatic pelvic injury like maybe you got in a car accident. Meagan: Thrown off a horse. Julie: Or got kicked hard in there somewhere sometime by something. I don't know. But it's just not as common as people are saying. It's not. Meagan: Right. Yeah. It's just overused. So if you have been told that, I hope that through the evidence– we're going to have links here in the show notes to all of these studies and things. I hope you know that your pelvis is perfect. Julie: Your pelvis is perfect. Let's make a shirt. “My pelvis is perfect.” Make it a shirt. Do it. “My pelvis is perfect. Hashtag why we VBAC.” Meagan: Right. Okay, well thank you for being here. Thanks everybody for submitting your questions. We're going to keep doing these. We're going to bring the questions and answers. We're going to talk about them. We're going to talk about some of the statistics and the evidence behind some of this. So yeah. Make sure to watch out on our Instagram if you haven't followed us on Instagram, and I'll make sure to let you know when the next Q&A with Julie and I will be. Julie: If you're in Utah looking for a birth photographer, come and find me. My Instagram is @juliefrancombirth or you can find me at www.juliefrancom.com. I would love to support you and I would love it even more if Meagan and I could support you. So reach out, we'll give you a deal. We'll hook you up because we love being in the birth space together. Meagan: Yes, we do. We just got our first one the other day and it was awesome. Julie: It was awesome. ClosingWould you like to be a guest on the podcast? Tell us about your experience at thevbaclink.com/share. For more information on all things VBAC including online and in-person VBAC classes, The VBAC Link blog, and Meagan's bio, head over to thevbaclink.com. Congratulations on starting your journey of learning and discovery with The VBAC Link.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/the-vbac-link/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Update Series (2023) Lesson 4: Difficult Foleys and Foley Difficulties Now in its 42nd installment, the AUA Update Series is renowned for delivering high-quality lessons to practicing urologists, fellows and residents. All content is developed by internationally recognized experts in urology, making the AUA Update Series the most professional and sought-after self-study program available. Improve your practice and patient care by staying abreast of the latest treatments and surgical techniques in urology. For more information, please visit the AUA Update Series on the AUAUniversity: https://auau.auanet.org/update23

Episode: E350 90 Day Fiancé – Inside Scoop 118   Description: Intro:  Patrick & Thais, Kara & Guillermo with a little Deavan Subscription:  Reality TV Awards, Paul & Karine, Little People Big World, Nicolle from LALU, The Foleys from Seeking Sister Wife and Little People Big World Farm Sale Update   Coupled with Chaos full episodes and bonus content subscriptions are available here: Premium Content, including Additional 90 Day Fiancé episodes, The Real Housewives Content, and the personal podcast available by subscription at: Supercast: https://coupledwithchaosnetwork.supercast.tech/ Patreon:  https://www.patreon.com/coupledwithchaos Apple: Coupled with Chaos Channel: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/channel/coupled-with-chaos/id6442522170   Note:  Real Housewives and Personal Podcast content will be migrating to the 90 Day Fiancé – Coupled with Chaos podcast.   Contacts us: Email: Coupledwithchaos@gmail.com Web site: https://coupledwithchaos.com Facebook: @Coupledwithchaos Instagram: @Coupledwithchaos Twitter: @CoupledwChaos

Quick week for us after the display both of us put on last week. Hope everyone tailed!! Foleys on the road so this is an abbreviated effort but next week will be back to normal with a guest and full preview. Ciao

S4.E12 An Emotional Rollercoaster The Merrifields book Bert's ticket to the US. Marcus' wives fume when he fails to come home from his date with Janae. The Foleys' son meets April and is shocked to learn her age. The Davises propose to Danielle, but she may not be ready for the next step. Join us live for this wild show! xo Linda The Melanated Girlie Support my show, so that I can continue to create. I appreciate you & it. Thank you! Cashapp: $lindaissogirlie Venmo: lindaissogirlie Paypal: lindaissogirlie@yahoo.com Super Chat & Stickers available on YouTube Also, subscribe to my Patreon for EXCLUSIVE "subscribers only" VIP content! That sounds sexual...it's not! LOL --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/linda-antwi/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/linda-antwi/support

In dieser Episode ist Engineer Manuel Mendes Teixeira zu Gast, der im Hörspielstudio XBerg arbeitet, die unter anderem auch die Hörbücher von Sebastian Fitzek produzieren. Im Podcast gibt Manuel uns einen Einblick in die Hörspielproduktion und dokumentiert, worauf es bei der Sprecherauswahl und den Recordings ankommt, wie Foleys entstehen, was es im Satz zu beachten gibt und wie die Hörbücher gemischt und "gemastert" werden. Viel Spaß beim Hören! ➡️ (00:06:52) - Manuel Mendes Teixeira ➡️ (00:15:03) - Hörspiel-Konzeption ➡️ (00:18:37) - Sprechersuche ➡️ (00:20:45) - Recording-Szenerie ➡️ (00:24:01) - Mikrofonposition ➡️ (00:25:03) - Mikrofonauswahl ➡️ (00:27:43) - Sounddesign mit Foleys ➡️ (00:35:11) - Editing & Satz ➡️ (00:38:26) - Mixing ➡️ (00:42:16) - Mastering ➡️ (00:43:50) - Unterschied zur Hörbuch-Produktion ➡️ (00:54:33) - Typfragen ➡️ (00:55:48) - No Gos ➡️ (00:56:30) - Referenztrack-Empfehlungen

S4.E10 So Many Things Could Go Wrong The Merrifields visit Brazil to figure out Roberta's delay in coming to the US. The Davises expand their family unexpectedly. The Foleys strengthen their bond with April. Sidan contemplates the next steps with Arielle. Janae questions the Epps' lifestyle. Join us for this wild show! xo Linda The Melanated Girlie Support my show, so that I can continue to create. I appreciate you & it. Thank you! Cashapp: $lindaissogirlie Venmo: lindaissogirlie Paypal: lindaissogirlie@yahoo.com Super Chat & Stickers available on YouTube Also, subscribe to my Patreon for EXCLUSIVE "subscribers only" VIP content! That sounds sexual...it's not! LOL --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/linda-antwi/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/linda-antwi/support

Patreon- https://www.patreon.com/iwantmypodcast(ONLY $1) Check us out on: IG- @iwantmypodcast_studios - @MiguelPerezComedy - @MrEJEdmonds -@Cest_La_Marie Email- iwantmypodcast@gmail.com FB- I Want My Podcast Venmo: @MiguelPerezComedy @MrEJEdmonds @Marie-Forster Subscribe to our YouTube Channel- Youtube   -The Merrifields + Lea + a video call with Roberta = AWKWARD. -We meet the Epps family...They remind us of the Snowdens. -We finally start to get a read on the Foleys and we don't like what we see. -The Davis Family seems well on the way to adding a third wife to the pile.   ENJOY!

The Merrifields court Lea despite Roberta's disapproval. The Epps eye a longtime friend as a possible wife. The Foleys hope to bring potential wife April into their family. Nick Davis takes Danielle on a solo date to see where she stands with polygamy.Sign up for our Patreon to get INSTANT ACCESS to our recaps of the first THREE Seeking Sister Wife episodes (audio only)Seeking Sister Wife - Season 4 Episode 2 'Little Do They Know'Follow us on Instagram @marriedtorealitypodFind out more at marriedtorealitypodcast.comContact us at marriedtoreality@gmail.comCurrently covering 90 Day Fiance, Married At First Sight, Below Deck, Seeking Sister Wife See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The Davises and the Foleys each navigate their way through the many trials and tribulations of polygamy with the ultimate goal of bringing in a new sister wife. The Merrifields haven't seen Roberta in over a year and have decided to seek a third.Sign up for our Patreon to get INSTANT ACCESS to our first THREE Seeking Sister Wife episode recaps (audio only)Seeking Sister Wife - Season 4 Episode 1 'Who Doesn't Like Thirds?'Follow us on Instagram @marriedtorealitypodFind out more at marriedtorealitypodcast.comContact us at marriedtoreality@gmail.comCurrently covering 90 Day Fiance, Married At First Sight, Below Deck, Seeking Sister Wife See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In our last episode, you heard from each of the seven Ray and Joan Kroc Corps Community Centers across the western U.S., from San Diego to Salem, Oregon, to Kapolei, Hawaii. It was 20 years ago that the first Kroc Center opened in San Diego, California. The 12-acre, 132,000 square-foot facility was a realization of Joan Kroc's dream for all people to have recreational, educational and cultural arts opportunities.   And just under a year before it opened, Tim and Cindy Foley were appointed its administrators, just as the foundation was being poured. Today, Lt. Colonel Cindy Foley is Divisional Commander of The Salvation Army in the Northwest Division and Lt. Colonel Tim Foley is the Divisional Leader for Officer Development. Back then, they were given the job to create the program and business structure—really, the template for what the Kroc Centers would become across the nation. The Foleys are on the show today to give us a window into that year. To share the stories of working things out, what it was like to know Joan Kroc and how it felt to open the center on that day in June 2002. Plus how the experience changed them and their ministry. EPISODE SHOWNOTES: Read more. WHAT'S YOUR CAUSE? Take our quiz. STUDY SCRIPTURE. Get inside the collection. GATHER WITH CARING MOMS. Join the group. BE INSPIRED. Follow us on Instagram. FIGHT FOR GOOD. Give to The Salvation Army.

We have a sponsor this month! Is Manscape! Father's Day is right around the corner and I can't think of a better gift than getting 20% + free shipping on your purchase, use code IWMP20 to cash in your special discount! IWMP20   Patreon- https://www.patreon.com/iwantmypodcast(ONLY $1) Check us out on: IG- @iwantmypodcast_studios - @MiguelPerezComedy - @MrEJEdmonds -@Cest_La_Marie Email- iwantmypodcast@gmail.com FB- I Want My Podcast Venmo: @MiguelPerezComedy @MrEJEdmonds @Marie-Forster Subscribe to our YouTube Channel- Youtube   -Nick, April, and Jennifer seem to be beacon of hope in the plural relationship space...So far... -The Merrifields are back and we think Dannielle has a master plan to destroy Gerrick. -We meet the Foleys, and we give our predictions but cant figure this on out yet.   ENJOY!

Práctica de Foleys para la materia de Sonido IV impartida por el maestro Armando Castro -Antonio Rodríguez -Antonio Zagal -Cassiel Valdespino -Edgar Ruíz -Karla Hughes -Natalia Andere

There are many here among us who feel that life is but a joke But you and I, we've been through that, and this is not our fateSo let us not talk falsely now, the hour is getting late Bob DylanDecades ago, my wife was a social worker advocating for nursing home residents. One resident she got to know well was Mr. Foley, who took a liking to this vibrant, pretty, young professional, who in turn found him to be wise and kindly. At some point in their acquaintance, he told her his life's tale, which had all the makings of an O. Henry story. His experience would subsequently impact the life she and I have led.Mr. Foley described his marriage and the choices he and his wife made. They decided early on that he should throw himself into his work to set them up for a future of blissful retirement while she took care of the home, as was the mode. They raised a family and did all the conventional things, but they denied themselves pleasures when they were younger so that they could save for their dreams of the future. In particular, they both loved to travel, so they planned to see the world once he was done with work.A fantastic effort has failed, a repetitionIn a repetitiousness of men and flies.Wallace StevensYou can guess the upshot. Just as Mr. Foley prepared to retire at the conventional age, excited for the adventures he and his wife had put off so long, he suffered a devastating stroke, which is what landed him in the nursing home. Soon enough and sure enough the nursing home had drained them of all their savings as well as their lifelong dreams. He ended this story with a moral: “Live now. Don't put off your dreams since you never know what will happen in the future.” There it was. Mr. Foley's regret of a lifetime rolled up into one wise platitude. My wife and I call his advice the “Mr. Foley Rule,” but we could more ungenerously have called it “Foley's Folly.” You may recognize the Mr. Foley Rule as a variation of carpe diem or seize the day. My wife and I have invoked the rule often and have savored many adventures as a result. That brings us to the present. Recently, my wife joined (and then quickly departed) a Facebook group that consists of people who are planning for their retirement. Most of the participants are younger, in their thirties and forties, and have decided to make sacrifices now so that they can live large later on. They — even more so than the Foleys — deny themselves pleasures, some going so far as to limit their very diets to save for the future. I don't mean they don't go out to restaurants. I mean that they subsist on ramen noodles, Dinty Moore, and other cheap and dodgy dorm food, all in the belief that what they save now by scrimping will be there for them down the line. I hope these people are not disappointed the way the Foleys were. I hope they don't live out their own O. Henry ironies — for instance, being done in prematurely by the very diet they adopted to economize for retirement or finding that their greatest life desire is actually free of charge. I hope that they get to relish their dreams all the more because of the sacrifices they are currently making. Sadly though, their self-denial is just as or more likely to lead to bitter regret as it is to well-subsidized bliss. There are simply too many variables that they have no control over — more than I could ever enumerate — and it remains no less true for being trite that there are no guarantees. I have previously written about the futility of human control in the context of perfectionism.Brought on by a simple twist of fate.Bob DylanLet me be clear. I am not endorsing the devil-may-care or come-what-may or fiddly-dah or go-away-and-don't-bother-me-now-I'm-busy attitude toward life planning that apparently comes naturally to us humans. In fact, I am a living example of the virtues of early planning. I can feel secure in my retirement outlook because my wife and I started preparing nearly two decades ago, and I trust you are doing the same, whatever your age or circumstance.The thing is, with life planning or any such good, you can go too far. The Foleys went overboard in their anticipation of the complacencies the future would offer. You can limit and mitigate happenstance to some extent, but you cannot control or eradicate it. Accidents happen. Sickness happens. Jobs end. Relationships end. Lives end. Carpe diem!So let us not talk falsely now, the hour is getting lateBob DylanTo be fair, though, I always found the concept of carpe diem a bit overwhelming. How do you seize the day, making the best out of every moment? Doing so itself seems exhausting. But as I age and age and age, I understand how much of life I have missed by not seizing it. One platitude that has always struck me is the observation that no one ever lamented on their deathbed, “I should have spent more time at the office.” Personally, I could have done better, particularly early on, to take that sentiment more to heart, but it still has had a significant impact on me and on my behaviors. Frankly, our culture worships in a cult of overwork, and the consequences are spectacularly devastating.I am not big on meaningless regret, though, and I am still training myself to abandon the habit of worry, which, as I have written, are two sides of the same coin.As a result, I have become more resolved to seize the day — at least as best one can during a global pandemic. I long that my wife and I stay hail and hardy well into the future, but we cannot count on that. We can only hope for the best, prepare for the worst, and expect something in between.The lessons of mindfulness — drawing on Zen Buddhism — and the wisdom of Stoicism hold a similar message. The past is gone. The future is uncertain. We only have the present for sure, and there is no time like the present.How do you — the present you — view the future? Are you prepared mentally and otherwise? What is your relationship to the balance of the rigors of work with the contentment available in your life?Now is the time to set yourself mentally for the future while enjoying the present, and I can help. Click below for your free consultation.Share your thoughts on this topic or participate in a discussion by leaving a comment below or by contacting me directly by email: You must register with Substack and sign in to leave a comment, which is painless and free. Please share this post on social media.And don't forget to click subscribe to have Tools + Paradigms sent directly to your inbox. I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks for reading Tools+Paradigms! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimsalvucci.substack.com

Dave LaGreca & Mark Henry talk with WWE Hall of Famer Mick Foley and AEW President Tony Khan. The guys talk with Mick about his upcoming tour and Jon Moxley's reference of The Foleys in his book and on social media. Plus, It's "Tony Time" with Tony Khan, and he previews AEW Rampage and shares his thoughts on the wrestling classic we saw between AEW World Champion "Hangman" Adam Page and Bryan Danielson on AEW Dynamite.

This is Brian Mohika’s 2nd episode on Once a Nurse. He first appeared on December 30, 2019 to talk about his persistent and committed work as an entrepreneur to invent, sew, market and gain a small foothold in medical equipment with his Cathwear underwear for men and women who wear Foleys, Suprapubic, Biliary, and Nephrostomy catheters. As he watched the stress, embarrassment & frustration of individuals, who must wear leg catheters continuously, he designed CathWear to allow safe, clean, supportive and fashionable looking underwear. It was the DAY of that Episode that he was able to sign a manufacturing company to produce Cathwear in the USA. From there he has been catapulting to the stars, winning award after award and having his product accepted for Medicare payments. To capture the ascendence of his product and the foundation of his life as a compassionate, caring human being, Brian wrote a biography, called “Let It Flow”, soon to be released. We will talk about his and more!

It's filled with Foleys, McGraths, Dwyers and Riordans from places like Carrick on Suir, Youghal and Limerick, it's surrounded by the Atlantic and the residents of Tilting love a good session in a shed. While that may sound like it could be anywhere on this island, the most Irish place in the world is actually about 3000 miles directly across the ocean from here. Tilting is a small community on Fogo Island in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada and it is full to the brim of Irish people! Maureen Foley, resident of Tilting, joined Dermot and Dave to explain how her ancestors ended up setting up home in Tilting and how they all still speak with an Irish accent hundreds of years later! [audio mp3="https://media.radiocms.net/uploads/2020/12/11141536/Tilting_Podcast1112.mp3"][/audio]

The announcement that the Country will now move to Level 3 restrictions, will hit pubs hard, having just opened their doors after many were closed for months! Seamus Foley from Foleys Bar in Cashel spoke to Fran on Tipp Today this morning about what Level 3 means for him.

Sweeny and Eddie have a good conversation with the owner of Foley's, "The Baseball Bar", Shaun Clancy, about life during the pandemic & quarantine, what went into his decision to close down the bar and what chances there are of Foley's 2.0 happening. All of that plus some good stories from the bar as well! 

Daily Comedy Podcast. Sorry there are some audio issues with this one. Kippy and Foley are back to discuss Foleys fashion choices as well as other stuff.  Buy us a beer: www.Ko-fi.com/hardfeelings 

In this episode, we talk to Jen Foley of Foleys Ice Cream in Braintree MA.These are certainly challenging times with the COVID-19 crisis affecting all of our businesses in some way or another. Jen Foley from Foleys Ice Cream has been liaising with local health departments, tweaking her menu and even connected with the local fire department to increase her sales during this time.During a time when many of our members have been told to close or chose to do so, it's nice to hear a glimmer of good news and success from one of our members.Jens website is www.foleysicecream.comhttps://www.instagram.com/foleys_ice_cream/https://www.facebook.com/foleysicecream/If you would like to share some of your experiences during this challenging time in our industry and be on the podcast, please reach out - info@nicra.org.For information about the North American Ice Cream Assoc, and how you can open and grow your ice cream business with a community that will support you, go to https://icecreamassociation.org/

Kippy and Foley are back to discuss Foleys "dark" medical issues and his paranoia which causes him to tell everyone about it. The two also take dive into the favorite porn categories (Hint: Foley is a creep). Make sure you check out the new show ARE YOU GARBAGE? on iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher etc. Please leave a 5 star review and SUBSCRIBE!

The world knew Pastor Han Chung-Ryeol as a persecuted Christian pastor and a man who served North Korean refugees crossing into China—in spite of threats and danger. Dr. Eric Foley, the leader of VOM-Korea, knew Han as coworker and friend. This week Dr. Foley shares personal stories of the courageous pastor murdered by North Korean agents inside China. Pastor Han’s story is the subject of this year’s International Day of Prayer for the Persecuted Church video from VOM. Just months before Pastor Han’s murder, he visited Dr. Foley and they talked openly about the threats against Pastor Han’s work. One of Han’s coworkers had already been kidnapped and taken to prison in North Korea. There were threats the same thing could happen to Pastor Han. But Pastor Han reminded the Foleys that the shepherd’s job is to care for the sheep—and his sheep were along the North Korean border, where they needed their shepherd. He was willing not only to go, but to lay down his life for the sheep God had entrusted to his care. Listen and be inspired by the example of faithfulness, commitment and courage lived out by Pastor Han Chung-Ryeol, and prepare your heart and your church to pray for persecuted Christians in North Korea and around the world on the International Day of Prayer for the Persecuted Church, November 3. Also listen to Dr. Foley’s previous visit to VOM Radio, where he discussed why the North Korean regime of the Kim family is so threatened by Christianity.

The Foleys are in town and took a trip to Fota yesterday. Ray told us about a trip to the his local Chinese and a crazy encounter with a parrot!

In this special guest episode; Sawyer Max and Dante all discuss a real and fake monster, a deck of magic items and several other totally scripted related things.

The Doldrums 309 Written by Shannon Goss Directed by David Moore Another excellent offering. I enjoyed it. Great flow and storytelling. You'll need to listen to the podcast to hear what I really think.   Starz Synopsis: Claire and Jamie leave Scotland, sailing to the West Indies on an urgent quest. But when the superstitious crew looks for someone to blame after a string of bad luck, rescue comes from an unlikely source. My Summary: They obtained a ship to search for the lost nephew, Fergus brings a stowaway, seasickness overwhelms Jamie until needles save him, Claire doctors those who need it, superstitious sailors create suspicions during weeks of windless standstill, the china man and Jamie win the day, the weather returns as does the passion, a plague ship commandeers Claire. The End. Setup: Jamie and Claire have secured the Artemis, cousin Jared's ship to take to the West Indies. Jamie will be the supercargo (a representative of the ship's owner on board a merchant ship, responsible for overseeing the cargo and its sale). The ship Young Ian was taken on is the Portuguese flag, the Bruja (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhvFVpp6sDc). It's late in the season for taking a ship, the seas will not be calm. Jared makes not of Jamie being prone to seasickness. Jared is upbeat about their ability to find Young Ian.  Jamie has sent a letter to Jenny and Ian explaining everything. They won't get it until the ship is far from Scotland. Fergus is up to something. Jamie vows he won't return to Scotland unless he has Young Ian with him. He's a man on a mission. Superstition is high among the men on the ship. Women and redheads are bad luck. Enter Fergus with Marsali they're hand fast (http://www.bbc.co.uk/scotland/history/tying_the_knot_handfasting_through_the_ages.shtml). Stepdad Jamie is not a happy man about the surprise.  Marsali is a firecracker of a young woman. He refuses to allow Fergus and Marsali to consummate their marriage and puts Marsali in Claire's cabin. Jamie's in the doghouse with Claire now. Jamie also mentions the wind as being necessary to catching up to the Bruja quickly. State of Mind: Jamie is worried he's being punished by God because he wanted Claire so much and needed the treasure to pay Laoghaire her hush money. Claire seems distant from Jamie and maybe questioning staying. He's questioning whether they'll be happy. He says he'll take her to the stones if she doesn't want to stay. He's insecure in the state of their reunion. They haven't settled in after the Laoghaire event or her wondering if they should be together on the cliff top. There's tension and unease between them. They secure the Artemis from cousin Jared. They set sail after the Bruja to the West Indies after young Ian. Hayes and Lesley are the replacement bromance for Angus and Rupert. Fergus has a stowaway, Marsali, Laoghaire's daughter. They are traditionally married through handfasting. Jamie is one angry stepdad. He and Claire, along with Marsali and Fergus will not be sharing quarters. King of Virtue is would seem. Jamie's in the doghouse with Claire now too. His seasickness is in full swing. She treats with ginger tea. Claire treats an injury. The men believe someone didn't touch the horse shoe for good luck. Claire scoffs at the superstitious ways. Claire's invited to dine with the captain. Jamie tries to talk Fergus out of the marriage to no avail. Fergus claims he was cowardly in not telling Jamie about his courting Marsali. Like Jamie was in not telling Claire about Laoghaire. Jamie being a protective stepfather asks if Marsali knows all about Fergus' past. He's serious about Marsali having lain with no other woman or her since they began courting. Dining with the captain solo, Claire gets instructed on the superstitions and the power they hold. https://www.boaterexam.com/blog/2011/07/boater-superstitions.aspx Can you imagine Claire and Marsali walking around topless to calm the sea? Jamie is horrifically seasick. Yi Tien Cho tells Jamie he could lose his baws because of the excessive vomiting, but he has a remedy. Marsali's trying to charm Claire, but the hoor ain't biting that hook. The act doesn't last long, Marsali's true colors show. Yer a hoor. Indeed, the hoor should get the bigger bed. Claire pondering the bare bosomed bow. “My rack is finer.” Jamie is eating like his life depends upon it. Right as rain he is. Marsali knows everything. They're asking for Jamie's blessing. Claire is on their side. Jamie is stubborn as a rock. Yi Tien Cho doesn't want to be forgotten, like the vanishing deck poetry. Time passes, Claire tends to injuries of the crew and makes medicines. There's a rave in the galley. Claire happens upon Yi Tien Cho administering acupuncture. Jamie is trying to hail the mother ship with his face. Hurt her feelings? What? He thinks she would use it a fuel she doesn't belong there if she knew her tea wasn't working. I'm not loving insecure Jamie. Needs assurity she loves him. Claire's giggle is adorable. AHA the doldrums. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/doldrums.html It must be bad luck. Someone didn't touch the damned horse shoe. Jamie forgets the needles and freaks out the men. Spotlight on Hayes – he must be the evil offender. When the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie, that's amore! In the great green room, there was a telephone and a red balloon… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yu_g5x3ZoQ Sniff we miss Bree too. Weeks with no wind. Danger rises. Water barrels have gone bad. How does he know to boil the rest of the water? The men are looking for the offender and want him overboard. The captain wants to give the men what they want. A death to feed the superstition. Keep order. Jamie will not allow it. Hayes is being singled out. He doesn't remember touching it. Don't do it Hayes!!!!! Testosterone poisoning and mob rule. Jamie to the rescue, with wingman Yi Tien Cho. Jamie doesn't need that rotator cuff. To diffuse the mob Yi Tien Cho captivates with his own story. Claire shut up. Yi Tien Cho is laying it down. And he scatters his story to the wind returned. Mic drop. The weather returns with a vengeance, as does joy and fresh water. Jamie and Claire reignite. He's digging her silver streak. Me too Jamie. Ah she coins him the king of all men if he were to praise her gray in the 2th century. Their back to each other. Oh, hell no an English Man o'War. That's certainly not good fortune, English boarding your vessel. Pressing men was a thing. http://www.pbs.org/opb/historydetectives/feature/british-navy-impressment/ Wee bairn Captain Thomas Leonard of the Porpoise needs a surgeon. A plague outbreak on his ship. Claire scolds him for coming on board. Tsk tsk Mr. Leonard. Jamie doesn't want her to go. She's sworn an oath. And she's been inoculated. She thinks it typhoid. He gets it. Ain't no stopping her and her doctoring. Jamie's finger tapping watching her go. Claire rubs her hands as she is upon the Porpoise., That's her tell. I love the pickups on her skirts to shorten her layers for ease of movement. It's a hellish scene. Shite and vomit. The Foleys must have had a blast. She surveys the ill. Claire thinks I'll give you an action plan of protocols and procedures and will be on her way. Elias Pound sweet wee man boy. Yeah sure you'll alert them she'll be a little while. And buh bye Artemis. The Porpoise is going to Jamaica with Claire on it. Jamie is going to be pissed!!!!! Episode Quotes: You'll need to listen to find out.  What's Coming up? Episode 310 Heaven & Earth How can you participate? To have your questions, comments for email or call in to the listener line after the show airs. Join the weekly Twitter chat Wednesday nights at 6pm PT/9pm ET to discuss the previous latest podcast chapters using the hashtag #ADoO. Comments or messages may be included in the podcast or a written post. The entire Outlander book series is written by Diana Gabaldon. You can find her on Twitter and Facebook. All pictures are the property of Sony/Starz. Visit Outlander Starz on social media, like or follow: Twitter,Instagram,Facebook, and the official website.   Follow A Dram of Outlander Thank you for sharing posts, joining the discussions, and following this website or pages listed below!  Facebook,  Instagram, Twitter, Tumblr, Google+, YouTube To financially support the podcast, go to my Patreon page. Call 719-425-9444 listener/reader line to leave your comments.  

Ulf Olausson är foleyartist, en person som gör ljud till som inte spelas in på film. Erika Hallhagen pratar om, Dirty Dancing och allt som går att dyka in i om fenomenet.

This week, we crown a King of the Jobbers, pitting all of our creations against one another. Will it be Mick Foley's Beard? Time King of the Ring? Another Jobber the fellas don't remember they made? Find out this week. Jobber Squad is a comedy pro-wrestling podcast. Each week, Jon Moisan and Kristopher Knight take fan submissions for new, gimmicky pro-wrestlers, and develop one for the big time: a chance to be the newest member of Jobber Squad! Follow us on Twitter and Facebook. And give us a review on iTunes if you're enjoying the show.

Folge 7: Foleys stellen uns Foley-Artists manchmal vor Probleme. Wenn man im Sommer einen Film nachvertont, der im Winter gedreht wurde, dann muss man ganz tief in die Trickkiste greifen.

Welcome to The Next Level in 2015! Join the team on The Next Level as they delve into the latest news and announcements. Sony's sales trend continues at an aggressive rate, Barry talks an Elite Dangerous convention in his home town. Ant smells conspiracy on the horizon amongst the talk ... This month it's the start of a new year and as is the tradition, Amaechi, Barry, Ant and James look back at 2014 and determine their Game of the Year. In round-robin style, the guys divulge their top three games of the year. Also, please head over to dissectingworlds.blogspot.com to get information about the Dissecting Worlds Live! event in which the guys attempt to set up a colony on another world. They are after ideas and, ultimately participants to join them for the following: Foleys pub 159 The Headrow Leeds West Yorkshire LS1 5RG 12 – 5 pm, Saturday 21st February Drop on over and get involved!

Welcome to The Next Level in 2015! Join the team on The Next Level as they delve into the latest news and announcements. Sony's sales trend continues at an aggressive rate, Barry talks an Elite Dangerous convention in his home town. Ant smells conspiracy on the horizon amongst the talk ... This month it's the start of a new year and as is the tradition, Amaechi, Barry, Ant and James look back at 2014 and determine their Game of the Year. In round-robin style, the guys divulge their top three games of the year. Also, please head over to dissectingworlds.blogspot.com to get information about the Dissecting Worlds Live! event in which the guys attempt to set up a colony on another world. They are after ideas and, ultimately participants to join them for the following: Foleys pub 159 The Headrow Leeds West Yorkshire LS1 5RG 12 – 5 pm, Saturday 21st February Drop on over and get involved!

On Episode 128 we have a triumphant return. Nope it’s not MonsterZero, it is the return of cock talk with The Deadites! Gasp in horror as we debate cut vs. uncut! Gag in disgust as we talk about flaccid vs. erect! Shudder with douchechills as we… ahhh nevermind you get the friggin idea! On the show we review a film from a Belgian duo, The Strange Color of Your Body’s Tears. We also have a Double Tap, we hear from Sing Sang Soon, Josh from the Arkham Film Society, Tom C and Jim Gypsy! So grab your straight razor, your Hobgoblin shirt and strap on! Topics discussed: Argento, The Dead Kennedys, De Palma, Faith No More, no MonsterZero, legends scale figures, Nigel McGuinness, Jean-Pierre Jeunet, Wrestle Kingdom 9, leaving your house, baby tossing, Carol Danvers, Emmanuelle, masturbation, Amelie, circumcision, Whiplash, Winona Ryder, The Double Tap and Top 13, gialli or giallos?, pelegro, Josh and Marz in cahoots, Hatchet, French accents, Biker Boyz, O is for Orgasam, Hostel 2, The Android’s Dream, Héléne Cattet & Bruno Forzani, Twin Peaks, prog bands, Hot Boyz, Hobgoblin, anthology films, Grindhouse: Doors Open at Midnight, Alice Sweet Alice, Hard Magic, Top 13 Foleys, vaginas, Star Wars black series, Mr Bean, The Fantomas, Amer, French films, Bronson Pinchot, Professor Jay, PWG Mystery Vortex 2, Fantasm, Alex de Campi, Japanese music, Han Solo, Night of the Living Podcast Will Wheaton and skullvas.Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/trickortreatradio)

Patrick Foley and The Foley Group specialize in advising business owners and business executives. They are particularly adept at guiding owners through a sale or restructuring.   The Foleys integrate business sale projections into their broad scope financial planning process. In addition to their own expertise, they draw upon a network of top advisors including CPA firms, law firms, consultants, business brokers, lenders and investment bankers.   Read the entire show notes, key takeaways and find business-boosting resources at www.aesnation.com/38

125_I was out recording some water Foleys, which you can see in the Video over here.. [raw][vimeo_video id=”41344081″ height=”” width=””][/raw] if you like my project, please donate a small amout...

124_While i was walking around at the Lakes, recording water Foleys. I met this nice little fellow. if you like my project, please donate a small amout of your own...