Podcasts about amazon hq2

Send us a textRemember the Amazon HQ2 frenzy? When nearly every U.S. state competed to become Amazon's next home, offering billions in tax breaks and incentives? I do — I grew up right next door to Crystal City, Virginia, the site Amazon ultimately chose.In this episode, I talk with economist Peter Calcagno about targeted economic incentives—the controversial policy tool that fueled the Amazon HQ2 bidding war and countless other corporate deals.We explore questions like:What are targeted incentives?Do they actually create economic development and job growth?Why do politicians favor targeted incentives over other tools?Who wins—and who loses—when states compete this way?Peter Calcagno is a professor of economics at the College of Charleston and director of the Center for Public Choice and Market Process. He's also a fellow at the American Institute for Economic Research, where he studies public choice theory and fiscal policy.If you've ever wondered whether government subsidies for big business pay off—or if they just create unfair advantages—this conversation is for you.Want to explore more?Peter Calcagno, Follow the Money, at EconLog.Russell Sobel, Who Really Gains from Billions in Economic Development Incentives? at Econlib.Lauren Heller, Prosperity Without a Price Tag, at EconlibRandy Simmons on Public Choice, a Great Antidote podcast.Art Carden, From Here to Serenity: How Public Choice Makes Me Less Cynical, at Econlib.Support the showNever miss another AdamSmithWorks update.Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

In this episode of the Econ Dev Show, host Dane Carlson sits down with Victor Hoskins, President and CEO of Fairfax County Economic Development Authority, who oversees Virginia's largest economy and leads a team that has secured approximately $3 billion in capital investment. Victor shares insights from his unique career spanning both public and private sectors, including his instrumental role in securing Amazon HQ2 during his time at Arlington Economic Development. With candid reflections on his education at MIT, experience in private equity, and passion for creating economic opportunity, Victor reveals his philosophy that has helped companies create over 38,000 jobs in Fairfax County – a place he describes as "where companies come to dent the universe." Like this show? Please leave us a review here (https://econdevshow.com/rate-this-podcast/) — even one sentence helps! Special Guest: Victor Hoskins.

Montgomery County Executive Marc Elrich is warning residents that a realignment of the federal workforce and cuts to federal agency could have dire consequences for the county. He joined the show to talk about what a second Trump presidency could mean for the county.Plus, Elrich spoke about how he is preparing if Trump follows through on his promise of mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. He said while the county can't stop the federal government from acting, they won't assist.“We can't be deputized and it's not our job to cooperate with immigration, so if they want to do raids, they are going to do raids. But they can't compel the county government to provide police support," Elrich said.He also talked about what he hopes to accomplish in his final two years as county executive and what his political future might be.Justin Wilson's time as mayor of Alexandria ends next month, after nearly two decades serving on the council, as vice mayor, and mayor. Kojo and Tom talked with him about bringing Amazon HQ2 to the region, the collapse of the arena deal, and what the future will look like for the city of Alexandria.He also spoke about the city's efforts to increase housing supply, including by eliminating single-family-only zoning. Wilson said proposed legislation from Virginia lawmakers that would prohibit large investment firms from purchasing single-family homes is only "small ball." What the region really needs are more houses. "When you reallocate the same limited supply, that doesn't lower prices for folks. It doesn't make housing more accessible. You have to create additional supply," Wilson said.Become a member of WAMU: wamu.org/donateSend us questions and comments for guests: kojo@wamu.orgFollow us on Instagram: instagram.com/wamu885Follow us on Facebook: facebook.com/thepoliticshour

In this episode, Chris Abraham dives into the complexities of modern politics, media bias, and the socio-economic impacts of corporate relocations. Chris shares his observations on the polarized political landscape, the authenticity of media narratives, and the significant changes in Arlington, Virginia due to Amazon HQ2. He also reflects on the broader implications of economic and demographic shifts, drawing parallels with historical events like the Spanish Civil War. Topics Discussed: The difference between "bullshit artists" and "deceitful liars" in politics. Media bias and the perception of politicians like Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. The impact of decentralized and independent media channels on traditional narratives. Parallels between the Spanish Civil War and potential American conflicts. Economic and social impacts of Amazon HQ2 in Arlington, Virginia. The dynamics of blue-collar and white-collar communities in cities like New York, Baltimore, and D.C. Gentrification and displacement concerns in diverse neighborhoods like Columbia Pike in Arlington. Strategies for creating inclusive and affordable communities. Takeaway: Chris emphasizes the importance of understanding different perspectives, recognizing media biases, and the need for balanced, inclusive communities amidst rapid economic and social changes. Q: What is the main focus of this episode? A: This episode focuses on the complexities and contradictions in modern politics, media biases, and the socio-economic impacts of corporate relocations and demographic shifts. Q: How does Chris view the current political and media landscape? A: Chris believes that politics and media are heavily biased and often deceitful, creating a polarized environment. He emphasizes the difference between outright lying and deceitful lying in political narratives. Q: What historical parallels does Chris draw in this episode? A: Chris draws parallels between the Spanish Civil War and potential American conflicts, highlighting the socio-political divides and their implications. Q: What are the impacts of Amazon HQ2 in Arlington, Virginia? A: The relocation of Amazon HQ2 to Arlington has led to rising housing prices and economic shifts, affecting the community dynamics and contributing to concerns about gentrification and displacement. Q: What strategies does Chris suggest for creating inclusive communities? A: Chris discusses the importance of affordable housing policies, community land trusts, zoning protections, and supporting local businesses to maintain diverse and inclusive communities. Bullshit Artist: A person who is skilled at deceiving or misleading others through exaggerated or false statements. Deceitful Liar: Someone who intentionally lies with the aim of deceiving others while presenting themselves as trustworthy. Media Bias: The perceived or actual bias of journalists and news producers within the mass media in the selection of events and stories that are reported and how they are covered. Gentrification: The process of changing the character of a neighborhood through the influx of more affluent residents and businesses, often leading to displacement of lower-income residents. Community Land Trusts: Non-profit organizations that hold land for the benefit of a community, ensuring long-term housing affordability and preventing displacement. Columbia Pike: A diverse neighborhood in Arlington, Virginia, known for its large immigrant population and historical communities. HQ2: Amazon's second headquarters, which brought significant economic changes to its host community, in this case, Arlington, Virginia. For the album art, let's create a vibrant and dynamic illustration reflecting the themes discussed in the episode. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/chrisabraham/support

Our cohosts interview Jana London, the senior global program manager at AWS Global Healthcare and Nonprofit, as she shares the latest on the world of technology in nonprofits. The fast-paced conversation revolves around "Are you leading with innovation?" and the concept of tech-curious leadership. The discussion kicks off by addressing the fear associated with tech disruption, attributing it to the fear of the unknown and resistance to change. Jana offers a key insight, stating, "I think it's a fear of the unknown and the fear of change, right?" One key point that emerges is the shift towards technology becoming an integral part of organizational strategy, which can be intimidating to some. Jana dives deep into the idea of a tech-curious mindset and culture, stressing the significance of being open to exploring and integrating technology into leadership. She encourages leaders to ask questions like, "How can we do this differently?" The discussion offers valuable insights on how to approach problems with a tech-curious mindset and how organizations can foster this culture within their teams. Jana explores the readiness of organizations to adopt technology, highlighting indicators such as a culture of innovation, technology's integration into the core strategy, and a willingness to start with the basics. As the conversation unfolds, Jana introduces the Imagine Nonprofit Conference, an event dedicated to inspiring nonprofits to leverage cloud technology. The conference, set to take place on March 20th at Amazon HQ2 in Arlington, VA, provides a platform for nonprofits to learn from peers and leaders in the field. This fun episode emphasizes that technology is for everyone, regardless of age or role, and encourages organizations to embrace change and innovation. Collaboration between technology teams and other departments is a crucial element in finding effective solutions to the challenges faced by nonprofits in the modern digital landscape. Learn more: AWS.Amazon.com/NPO Watch on video: https://bit.ly/48MsTadFollow us on the Twitter: @Nonprofit_ShowSend us your ideas for Show Guests or Topics: HelpDesk@AmericanNonprofitAcademy.comVisit us on the web:The Nonprofit Show

Conversamos con Mario y Giuseppe Lanzone, los Peruvian Brothers que viven al sur de Estados Unidos y, convierten los platillos de su país en un manjar, que se puede disfrutar donde sea y con quien sea. Hablamos con ellos de sus inicios, sus mejores momentos como empresarios, de su segundo restaurante en la sede corporativa de Amazon HQ2, su servicio de catering para La Casa Blanca, algunos consejos para emprender y mucho más. Dale click al episodio, compártelo y no olvides valorar este podcast. © Todos los Derechos Reservados. Ruta5 Podcast. 2023. www.blogrutacinco.com.

You've heard the big announcement about $2B worth of development coming, but it's time to understand how these types of projects play out for a city.That's why we're bringing the man in charge of it to break down his track record, Bryan Moll, CEO of Gateway JAX.This isn't Bryan's first rodeo.  He's been responsible for major developments that with major economic implications everywhere he's gone.  We'll talk to him about:- how he sees his role in the future of downtown Jacksonville- what similarities he sees between his impacts on urban development around downtown Washington DC, the Amazon HQ2 project, and Gateway JAX- why he thinks Jacksonville will mirror the prosperity that was created in Tampa's Water Street District (his last project)- questions from the community!Come and meet a man who will inevitably be remembered for a major effect on the future of Jacksonville!------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Are you ready to seize the potential of real estate investing without the hassle? Look no further! Introducing our course, Not Your Average Investor's Guide: Investing in Rental Properties... Passively. Enroll now!

Our tour of Grapevine Mills takes an unexpected detour to explore one of the most ambitious proposals ever entertained in this community: the establishment of a Fortune 100 International Headquarters in the heart of the City.What would have happened if Grapevine was selected to be the home of Amazon HQ2? Could something similar happen in the future? Are these projects worth pursuing in communities like ours? This hypothetical alternate history leans into a classic Hollywood trope: based on a true story.

Episode 10: Neal and Toby discuss the economic strategy that companies are taking pushing higher end products to maintain profits. They also dig into Amazon pausing construction on their new headquarters in Virginia, and why college students aren't completely sold on ChatGPT just yet. Also what happened with HQ Trivia? Learn more about our sponsor, Huel: https://huel.com/dailyshow Listen Here: https://www.mbdailyshow.com/ Watch Here: https://www.youtube.com/@MorningBrewDailyShow

Mike's got a new rig, and Ford wants to recall yours automatically! Plus, we get a bit spicy about money.

Bloomberg's Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow discuss Amazon putting construction of its second headquarters on hold following its biggest ever job cuts. Plus, a look at Apple's executive exodus with the person in charge of iCloud, iMessage and FaceTime now leaving too. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Buildings are one of the leading generators of annual global greenhouse gas emissions. But using new technologies, organizations can reduce a new building's carbon footprint and build for a sustainable future. To learn more about how the cloud is being used to help pave the way for a greener world, the Fix This team chatted with Brad Vickers, senior director of engineering digital technologies at CarbonCure. Brad shares how CarbonCure aims to reimagine the way corporations around the world create and source concrete, a necessary building material. By using Amazon Web Services (AWS), CarbonCure helps customers use data analytics to discover insights to build more sustainably. CarbonCure is a signatory of The Climate Pledge and has been invested in by Amazon's Climate Pledge Fund. It is also involved in the buildout of Amazon HQ2 in Arlington, Virginia.

REDI Cincinnati is the region's leading organization charged with recruiting new companies and jobs. It played a big role in regional leaders' pitch to World Cup officials last week, and REDI President and CEO Kimm Lauterbach joined "That's So Cincinnati" podcast to discuss.

Not content to just interview economic developers, in this episode host Dane Carlson tries talking to himself. He spends time talking to himself about all of the great content from the Econ Dev Show that's not the podcast, including the five weekday emails: (Monday) Podcast Episode 14 - Is Stewart McGregor the Friendliest Economic Developer in Texas? - What happens when you pair one of the friendliest economic developers you'll ever meet, with one of the most interesting cities that you've never heard of? (Tuesday) Amazon Has Changed Online Shopping and Economic Development - This isn't about Amazon HQ2, I promise. (Wednesday) Economic Development and Developers in the News - Econ dev news from 112 economic development executives and organizations in 38 states, the Virgin Islands and Canada. (Thursday) 45 Things Economic Developers Need To Know This Week - The stories that you need to see from this week. (Friday) Economic Development Jobs This Week

Description: On this episode I had the pleasure of speaking with David Lax. David is an incredibly gifted dealmaker who has achieved hundred million dollar plus outcomes for his clients. He began his career as a professor at Harvard Business School and currently serves as Distinguished Fellow of the Harvard Negotiation Project. David also the co-author of the book 3D Negotiation: Powerful Tools to Change the Game in Your Most Important Deals.Time stamps:•3:15 – David's background and how he got in to negotiation.•9:59 – What makes 3D Negotiation so much more effective than traditional negotiating styles.•18:27 – How David salvaged a previously failed joint venture in Mexico.•25:39 – The often-overlooked keys to preparing for a negotiation.•27:52 – An example from of the importance of mapping out the players in a negotiation.•31:42 – The importance of “sequencing” and how that affects the other party's BATNA.•35:59 - Marty Lipton's surprising take on the ROI of tactics at the table vs setup moves away from the table. •37:03 – How David turned a distribution deal from a $3 million loss to an $8 million gain.•40:24 – How David took a divestiture from a $10 million to a $35 million sale price.•45:48 – How David helped resolve a civil war in Nepal.•57:14 – Some interesting and pioneering work David and his colleagues are working on regarding the interaction between social media and negotiation.•59:17 – Interesting findings regarding the Amazon HQ2 deal and how social media affected it.•1:05:13 - UEFA and ESL. How Aleksander Čeferin of the UEFA harnessed the power of social media to influence the setup of a deal and achieve the outcome he wanted.•1:09:12 – The importance of tying together the social listening arm of a company and strategy.Links:https://hbr.org/2021/04/a-playbook-for-negotiators-in-the-social-media-erahttps://www.negotiate.com/David Lax full bio - https://www.negotiate.com/david-lax/3D Negotiation - Link

Bloomberg journalist Brad Stone discusses his book Amazon Unbound: Jeff Bezos and the Invention of a Global Empire.  He talks about how Amazon has exploded during the pandemic, how the company's purchase of Whole Foods proved all the critics wrong, and why the online retail giant is now making a big bet on brick and mortar stores.  We get into the fraught process of selecting a location for Amazon HQ2 and how Bezos managed to triumph over a different public relations nightmare surrounding his extra-marital affair.  Plus we discuss Bezos's relationship with frienemy Elon Musk, why he's choosing to retire from Amazon, and what's next for the company known as the “Everything Store.” Order Brad Stone's new book Amazon Unbound: Jeff Bezos and the Invention of a Global Empire on Amazon, Audible, or wherever books are sold.  Follow Brad on twitter at @Brad Stone Kickass News is part of the Airwave Media podcast network.  Check out some of Airwave's other great shows like Movie Therapy, When Things Go Wrong, Legends of the Old West, and My History Can Beat Up Your Politics.

(1:40) Mitch introduces Greg LeRoy, Executive Director of Good Jobs First. (3:13) Greg notes that America's state and city governments spend roughly $70B/yr in economic development incentives to corporations, who often use those incentives in turn to pay no taxes on property or income over the course of their local operation, thus failing to deliver returns on the public's investment. He cites a depression-era Mississippi scheme as the origin of America's "tax break industrial complex", coinciding with the birth of "site location consulting companies" like Fantus, as the building blocks of a "second war among states" which has since produced net losses as a rule rather than an exception. (5:20) Greg explains how these tax incentives regularly go to corporations who are bound for the region anyway, given how little a local tax code contributes to the cost structure of company operations. (7:50) Greg notes that the highly-publicized Amazon HQ2 site competition is simply a rare public glimpse into the kinds of self-defeating dog-and-pony shows that occur hundreds of times each year, in secret. (10:36) Good Jobs First maintains a database of "mega deals" -- incentive plans over $50MM for one project -- and the average cost per job across such deals is $658,000, borne entirely by taxpayers. His message here is that such deals are, if nothing else, programs designed to transfer wealth from taxpayers to shareholders. (18:38) We discuss a particularly preposterous case study in the second war among states, occurring over the course of a decade between Kansas and Missouri vying for Kansas City job growth. In the end, the two states had collectively spent $321 million to lure 6,000 jobs one way and 5,500 the other way, netting a per job tax incentive cost of $642,000. Greg makes the important note that government eventually learned its lesson, and has since created an interstate regulation prohibiting either state from using tax dollars to draw jobs across the border in the Kansas City region. (27:12) Mitch's hot take: Americans yearn so much for familiar identity (which manufacturing and other blue-collar jobs promise) that many would simply ignore or willingly dismiss the obvious math that says these tax incentives are hurting their communities. Greg recalls the early part of his career, researching the tax breaks that incentivized plants to close and companies to move, and agonizing over the loss of direction and purpose those victimized towns felt. His solution: make the community the source of familiarity and identity, not the employer. Invest in education, health & wellness, good transit, clean air, and the stickiness of the city will stand above any corporate temptation.

By Walt HickeyWelcome to the Numlock Sunday edition.This week, I spoke to Pat Garofalo who writes the wonderful newsletter Boondoggle. Pat appears in Numlock all the time, here's a recent thing of his I covered in February:Lawmakers in 11 states have introduced bills for the 2021-22 legislative session that would form an interstate compact to eliminate tax giveaways to corporations. Right now, companies play states off one another, goading them into bidding wars over who gets less money to host the corporation. For many states, who see new businesses as a way out of their problems, this has become an increasingly standard practice, but if every time a company wants a new HQ it's a 50-party bidding war, eventually we're going to not collect taxes from businesses anymore. To avert this, the states are eyeing a disarmament, not unlike what Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas City, Kansas worked out in 2019. If the compact enters law, states will agree not to use tax incentives to poach jobs from the other states in the compact. This isn't particularly new, as there are 200 ongoing interstate compacts and each state is in an average of 25. Pat's beat is one of my favorites, he covers one of the most pervasive ways the big and powerful fleece the government at the expense of the small and not as powerful. Today in another special podcast edition of the newsletter, we talk about the botched Foxconn deal, why everything is suddenly a “campus,” the Peace of Kansas City and whether or not the federal government accidentally screwed over every local corporate tax incentive project.Pat can be found at his newsletter, Boondoggle, and his book The Billionaire Boondoggle is really great.This interview has been condensed and edited. Pat, thank you so much for coming on. You have a bunch of really cool stories coming out through both your day job and your newsletter, Boondoggle, but just taking a step back, do you want to talk a little bit about what you generally cover when it comes to incentives and how different cities try to woo different companies to various successful and unsuccessful ends?The tagline that I use is "how corporations are ripping off your state and city," and I got interested in this actually way back during The Great Recession. I was an economic policy reporter covering this fallout from the recession and the austerity push that was happening across the country. You saw all these wacky situations where cities were literally turning off their streetlights, while at the same time paying to give some billionaire a sports stadium. Then the more I started digging into this, I realized it wasn't just sports stadiums.It was hotels, it was massive sporting goods stores. It was every corporate headquarters in the country. There's been this long, decades-long push amongst the corporate elite in this country to tell a story about how economic development happens in the U.S. and to reap rewards for doing things that way. And it's totally wrong. The way they're going about it and the way the politicians they have in their pockets go about it is just backwards. It's just the completely wrong way to build local economies. That's the sort of work I've been doing ever since.The Amazon HQ2 thing was a huge illustration of this, where, basically, it inverted the way that lots of local economics should work and turned cities into bidders for a headquarters that was going to happen nevertheless.Right, and that one was an interesting anomaly in this system that corporate America has built because it was so public. Jeff Bezos, the CEO of Amazon, was so brazen about it and pitting all these states and cities against each other. The really problematic aspect of this to me is actually how much of it happens in the dark, how much of it we don't know about. These deals are often presented by local officials as a fait accompli. They come out and announce it before any other resident, any other local official can have a say, and say, "Hey, we're doing this. We're going to give this corporation a bunch of money. You're going to see all those benefits. You're welcome. Goodbye."The reason for that is that these things actually pay a lot of political capital. If you dig into the literature on incentives and corporate tax deals, they don't pay off on the economic side. They don't create jobs, they don't boost incomes, they don't boost local GDP, they often cost localities a whole lot of money, but what they do increase is incumbent politician vote totals. One of the most fascinating stats that I've seen in the academic literature about this stuff is that states' use of incentives goes up once every four years. Why is that? Because governors are running for re-election.Whoa. The secrecy component, you've written a lot about this lately. I like how you've really highlighted that there are towns and city councils that are voting on incentive packages where they don't even all necessarily know who the money is going towards in some cases with server farms and whatnot.Yeah, this is totally wild. This actually happened in Fort Wayne recently. Literally, the city council was voting on an incentive package, and most of the city council did not know who the recipient was going to be — it turned out to be Amazon — because the people who were involved in the deal making had signed non-disclosure agreements. This is public officials, spending public dollars, signing non-disclosure deals with the corporation to say that they can't divulge any information about the recipient, including, literally, its name. It's just so corrupt. This to me is just — there's the economic stuff, right, that these deals are not paying off for states and cities, and they're not bringing the economic benefits? But that also is just problematic democratically, right? How are you supposed to assess the job that your local officials are doing if they literally will not tell you who they are meeting with, who they are dealing with and who they're giving your money to?It's so huge. And I wanted to take everything back to a very big case that has gone down that has attracted a lot of attention and I think put a lot of these stories on the map, which is the situation with Foxconn and Wisconsin. It's got all the makings of things that you've been talking about: it came about during an election, the economics of it were suspect to begin with and only kind of got worse as it went along. The economic benefit has really folded and collapsed. I would love to hear what that story is and where we're at now because I know that we've actually had some recent news on it.To back up to this from the beginning, this was 2017, Donald Trump had just been elected President. Scott Walker was the Governor of Wisconsin. They announced this massive deal with Foxconn, which is a Taiwanese manufacturer, they make a lot of Apple products. And it was something on the order of $4.8 billion. They were going to create tens of thousands of blue collar jobs, and this is Wisconsin in the Midwest, so that was a big deal. It was going to be part of Trump's big move to bring manufacturing back to the U.S., make America great again.Then fast-forward a few years, and Foxconn literally did nothing. There was just nothing there. They changed their plans over and over and over. It went from tens of thousands of jobs in a manufacturing site to 1,000 white collar jobs in an office building. The whole thing unraveled and actually the promising thing about this deal in my mind was that there actually was a political price for it, as opposed to a political benefit. Governor Walker lost his re-election to current Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers, in large part because of this deal, because Wisconsin residents looked at this thing and went, "This is not good. This is clearly not working out for us." So, Evers recently renegotiated the deal. The amount of money went from about $4.8 billion to about $80 million. So a huge, huge, huge decrease in the amount of money.One of those Bs became an M. That's not usually a good sign.Exactly. I think the nice thing about that deal was that there actually was a little democratic accountability. Someone lost office, the current governor had a mandate to re-negotiate and he did, and that's good. I still don't love the deal for two reasons. One, is that in a sense, you're sort of giving Foxconn another whack at something it doesn't deserve. It didn't even come close to fulfilling its side of the original deal, and so you're letting it rework it and try again and promise something new. There's no real reason to think that Foxconn is going to keep its promises this time either, but you're still putting the state on the hook for $80 million, which again, is a lot better than $4.8 billion. That's great. That's many billions of dollars that you're not liable for, but there's certainly a world in which just letting the original deal play out and having Foxconn just fall on its face and not meet any of its metrics and, therefore, not get most of its money would have actually saved the state money, if we assume that Foxconn is going to fulfill the second deal, which I don't really think it will, but that remains to be seen. But the second part of this is that — and then this is an important part, I think, of the overall incentive stories — localities in Wisconsin made investments on the premise that Foxconn was going to build the first thing, the massive manufacturing plant. Made infrastructure investments, seized homes through eminent domain. One town in Wisconsin is on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation for eminent domain for seizing folks' homes. Those people had to move. And now the plant just isn't happening. And that's one of the things I tell people, I spend a lot of time in my day job at the American Economic Liberties Project, talking to folks around the country, both in office and activists and community members about these deals. One of the things I bring up all the time is these plans are not ironclad. The officials will tell you, "Oh, we are giving X million dollars and we are receiving Y benefits," as if Y benefits are certain and it's definitely going to happen, but they often don't and Foxconn is such a perfect example There are reasons that they don't that are both nefarious — like the corporation never intended to do the thing it was doing, it was just dragging people along to get some money—- but also legitimate, right? Sometimes a pandemic happens and lots of corporations have to suddenly change their spending plans, but the way these deals get treated in the public square, and in public debate, and the way that politicians talk about them as if they're done deals.Foxconn is just such a great example of the sort of things that folks need to look out for and why states and localities need to be really, really careful. Because again, these little Wisconsin towns spent money, but the one village in Wisconsin actually had its credit downgraded because its promised outlays for Foxconn were so high that even the credit rating agencies were like, "Whoa, there is no way that this is going to happen." But they did it! And now they're just out this money. No one's ever going to make them whole. Even if Foxconn fulfills the second smaller deal and does build this smaller plant, you're never going to get that back. For those folks who had their homes seized and had to move, you're not going to get your house back either. That's why states and localities need to be so, so, so, so careful when they enter into these massive mega-deals.The reason that these deals are struck and come up with is because for the point of view of the company, it's really privatizing a lot of the benefit and publicizing a lot of the risk. And it seems like this is just a really good illustration of what went down in Wisconsin. You have to look at who's holding the bag right now. What negative consequences Foxconn suffered as a result of backtracking on this deal versus what are the negative consequences that small towns have suffered?Absolutely. Foxconn's ding was to its reputation, right? But again, it got to come right back and renegotiate a new deal. The number of times you see these things fall apart, and then you turn around and the same company comes riding back in and says, "Oh no, we'll do it here. And we'll do it better." I mean, Tesla is a perfect example, it has ripped off city after city after city. Elon Musk is a sort of famous grifter in this state, not just with Tesla, but with some of his other companies. And yet, states and cities still will sit down at the table and will give him something and say, "Okay, this time it's different. Our community is different." It can get really distressing. But I think one of the reasons that happens, and you'll often see in this space, it is the big tech companies that tend to get some of the largest deals, some of the flashiest deals.Talking about Amazon HQ2, we can talk about a new Apple campus in North Carolina. We can talk about Tesla getting deals all over. Austin is throwing money at tech companies left and right. It's because there's this allure, right, of these shiny new tech jobs. Even though this is actually just a very old model of ride into town, promise the residents a lot of benefits in return for a lot of money. You can literally date this back to the beginning of the United States. Alexander Hamilton got the first corporate tax break in U.S. history for a manufacturing plant in Paterson, New Jersey that never was completed. We started off exactly where we wound up. And some of his associates went to jail.I think I missed that song in the musical.Somehow, Lin Manuel Miranda left that one out of the show. But it goes back to World War II, in the post-World War II period when Southern states were trying to diversify their economies coming out of the war. They were mostly agricultural. It was Mississippi that really started this shtick of going to Northern manufacturing plants and saying, "Hey, we'll give you a lot of money. Bring your plant down here." John F. Kennedy, when he was in the Senate, would go on the Senate floor and just rail about Southern states, poaching Northeastern manufacturing plants. Even though today's version of that is to pay some shiny tech company to do it like a Foxconn, like a Tesla, this is the same story that we've seen over and over and over again.Setting aside the municipal blow back, setting aside the fact that that's money that you can't spend on school textbooks, and when you don't collect property taxes, that does have ramifications for what you can offer kids in libraries and all that kind of stuff. Setting that aside, you have this really cool study that's come out that talks about how states give incentives and how that actually affects small businesses in the area. Do you want to go into what the research showed?This is a fascinating new study by a guy named Manav Raj at the Stern School of Business. He very kindly sent it to me and it shows two things. It shows, one, that political competitiveness in a state legislature is correlated with increased use of incentives. So, the tighter the governing majorities are, the smaller the governing majorities are in the state legislature and the likelier the legislature has to flip back and forth between the two parties, the more likely that legislature is to hand out incentives. And then the second thing is the more incentives the legislature hands out, the less likely it is that small businesses will succeed. This study is so fascinating because it ties together a lot of what both myself and all the other folks in this space have been talking about for so long, which is that these things are not about economics, they're about politics.They're about entrenching dominant incumbent firms and harming small businesses. It makes sense, right? The companies that get the bulk of these incentives are the large, big ones that can afford to pay to have lobbying shops. Amazon and other big companies will literally pay people, who are called site selection consultants — that's a job — to go out and to figure out how to get the most money out of these states and localities. Small businesses just can't afford to do that. The academic research is really clear: It's big companies that get the most of this stuff. So, states and cities are literally subsidizing the business model of large companies vis-à-vis their smaller competitors, right? It makes perfect sense that this is harmful to small folks who just don't get the same level of support from the state.The example that always comes to mind when I talk about this particular aspect is Amazon. Amazon is notorious. They've gotten some $3 billion-plus dollars in state and local incentives over the years. Most of that is actually not HQ2, even though that was a big one. Most of that is for its distribution network, it's for its warehouses and for its distribution houses. You can see if you're a small retailer how they really grind your gears, right? That Amazon is receiving money to build out its distribution network, that's not something you ever receive as a small business. If you're just selling stuff out of your garage, it's not like the mayor is going to come down and be like, "Here, have all this money to buy a delivery truck. Excellent. Keep up the good work." That doesn't happen.So, it's making the cost of building out distribution networks cheaper for Amazon versus other retailers, which Amazon then turns around and uses as leverage to pound other retailers into the dirt. Amazon is notorious for using its distribution network as a stick to beat other retailers with. They'll say, "Oh yeah, if you pay us to use our distribution network, we'll give you Prime access. We'll do all these other things." And they just ratchet up the fees year after year after year, so you sort of just become beholden to Amazon's taxpayer-funded network. The fact that it was great to put some numbers to this story and to have data showing that this feeling that we all had in this space, that this is bad for small businesses, actually does bear out when you look at the data.Then the second part was really interesting to me too. The fact that tighter, more competitive legislatures give out more incentives. It does make sense if you think about it, because in a tight legislature, where say, the majority has one or two votes and it can only lose one or two or their bills go down, that gives each individual lawmaker more leverage to get concessions during legislative debates. Since we know that incentives are good political capital, that seems to be what state legislatures go for. So, if you're like the Joe Manchin of the Missouri legislature, you're the critical key vote that can be lost, you go and say, "Hey, give my buddies down here some incentives, and then sure, I'm on your bill." I was just really fascinated with, again, Manav Raj at the Stern School of Business. I wrote it up in my Boondoggle newsletter. It just really tied together a lot of strands, circling back to the core point about all this, which is that it's a political problem. It's not an economic problem. The economics are unambiguous. This stuff is bad for states and localities. The reason it continues year after year, and folks like me are actually screaming about it all the time is because these giveaways make for really good politics.It's really interesting, that finding about how it negatively impacts small business, which very much makes sense to me because small business owners do tend to pay corporate taxes. Because they are individually held, they tend to do profit and then pass those profits on to shareholders, which are taxed. And you have the entire Amazon credo, like Bezos notoriously said, “your margin is my opportunity.” That seems very true here, where the local tax base is subsidizing a new contender, which to some notoriety, aggressively minimizes its tax obligation, right? Whereas your local retailer operating with QuickBooks is a little less adept at doing that.Yeah, Amazon was born out of a tax loophole, right? The whole reason that Jeff Bezos got into online book selling is because he realized that there was a hole in the law that said, if you didn't have a physical presence — and this hole has since been patched — but that if you didn't have a physical presence in a state, you didn't have to collect sales tax. From Washington, he was able to sell books in every other state without collecting sales tax. Obviously, that lets him undercut every local bookseller that has to pay sales tax because they're literally handing you the book and you're giving your money, and there are sales taxes involved in that transaction.Bezos took that out of the equation. He then used that, and the proceeds he made from that, to just pull the same trick in line after line after line after line. I mean, there are lots of reasons Amazon is what it is and not all of them are tax-related, but that is a really key part of its power, is its ability to both avoid paying taxes on the one hand and then to actually collect subsidies and government largesse and other regulatory favors on the other.You've also highlighted a number of other recent cases. There was this case in Nashville regarding Oracle and they managed to get a 50 percent property tax for 25 years. How does that shake out for Nashville?This is such a weird one. Tennessee is sort of notorious for these deals. Memphis has a horrific record of just handing out corporate tax giveaways willy nilly. I talk about Memphis a bunch in my books because it's just —There's a monument to it. A very large pyramid, I understand.Exactly. You come walking down the street, here you go, here's your corporate tax abatement. This deal with Oracle is strange. The way it's structured is that Oracle will come in, it's building a "campus." And this is the hot new thing now in taxes, it's call everything a 'campus.' Every time you're bringing a company, it's building a 'campus' because that's more than a headquarters and that's more than just new jobs. It's always a 'campus' now. An Apple campus is opening in North Carolina, a new Google campus in North Carolina.But, anyway, Oracle will pay $175 million in Nashville up front for some public infrastructure, a pedestrian bridge, a park, some other stuff. And then yes, will get a 50 percent rake off on its property taxes until that $175 million is repaid. This isn't actually new money going out the door and Oracle does have these upfront costs. It's just a very strange situation in which Nashville has decided to sort of outsource its infrastructure building to a private corporation and then recoup it through taxation. It's just a little weird. It's not the most egregious of these deals I've seen. I think the larger concern with that deal is that there are real displacement concerns, and that's part of the problem with a lot of these arrangements is that they don't do anything to sort of ameliorate the knock on effects of the people who are already there.This large corporation comes riding in and brings all these workers, contrary to what the corporation usually tell you. Those aren't local people getting hired. It's oftentimes just current employees moving in. There are gentrification and displacement concerns with this Oracle deal that the city says it has a handle on, but in my experience, it probably doesn't because cities don't ever really in these circumstances. It's just weird, the way to structure it, and that Nashville decided that the way to do this was to have Oracle pay for a bunch of stuff that taxpayers should just pay for, and then give it a giant tax break when you could just tax Oracle and build the public infrastructure like normal? But the reason I actually liked this Nashville situation is because there's a congressional candidate in Nashville— her name is Odessa Kelly, and she's the head of an organization called Stand Up Nashville — who is talking about these deals a lot and has been through a bunch of them in Nashville, a bunch that were much worse than this Oracle deal. She also was a key part of the city negotiating one of the better stadium subsidies arrangements in America. They made a really good deal actually with the new Nashville MLS team that's coming there, and in return for some public subsidies for a sports stadium, which I generally hate — cities should not do that — they did actually make a really good community benefits agreement. She is now running for Congress on this platform of stop letting corporations hose our city. It's a really interesting test of whether the politics of this can be flipped on their head, because I've been saying this whole time, this is a political problem.There's political capital to be built from doing these deals and if you're an incumbent politician, getting your face in the local paper and being able to send out a press release and to be able to tell about all this job creation is big. You send out tweets and Facebook posts and say, “look at all the good I'm doing." That's worth something politically, even if it actually turns out to be worth bupkis, economically. Odessa Kelly's campaign is going to be a really interesting case study, if you could flip that on its head and say, "No, actually, this isn't working for our city and this isn't appropriate, elect me to stop doing these things and we need more community input." Her line was just great, she said, "Oracle, isn't the prize. Nashville is the prize." And I just love that because it's exactly right.That's great.It's so perfect because the thing about these deals, right, is that we've been told, and this sort of gets back to what I said at the beginning of this story, the corporate elite and the politicians who love them have told us for 40, 50, 60 years that you should be thankful we are here. We are going to come in to town and rain down benefits upon you, and that's why we deserve these tax giveaways. When, actually, it should be the other way around. That should be the city saying, "No, it's a privilege for you to be here. And if you want to be here in our excellent community, where we have paid for lots of great things with our taxes, then we have certain expectations for you and you have to achieve certain benchmarks for the community."The way we talk about economic development is just backwards, the way to build a local economy isn't to dump a bunch of money on a corporation and hope something good happens. It's to have the best education system, have the best transportation system, have the highest quality of life for workers. Then corporations are going to want to come there, right? Places have incumbent advantages and they need to play them up and build on them. That was one of those maddening things about Amazon HQ2, was that why is Northern Virginia — for all intents and purposes, the greater DC Metro area — paying all this money for Amazon to be in the nation's capital?Are you kidding me? Amazon doesn't want to have a massive presence in Washington, DC where, oh, by the way, Jeff Bezos has a massive house and owns a newspaper? Of course he wants to be here! And yet we've been told that we need to grovel before these corporations in return for their investments that they were going to make anyway. So, that's why I just love the Odessa Kelly line to flip this on its head. I really hope it goes well for her.I mean, I live in Queens right near where the other HQ2 was going to go, and I was very frustrated by that because that place is really lighting up already. I don't know how much you need to write him a check to move into a neighborhood that is already blowing up. One of my favorite stories that you've ever covered was the Kansas City-Kansas City ending of the conflict between the Kansas Cities. And I guess what I'm wondering is, how has that been going? Are you seeing more of that? Is there moving forward any kind of hope for more of those disarmament campaigns? I know that you had kind of alluded to recently a number of state legislatures that were looking at a disarming compact, but I guess I'm wondering what's the status?This was — for listeners who are interested in the backstory — a so-called border war between Kansas City, Kansas and Kansas City, Missouri. It's so good.They were literally using incentives to have companies move a couple of miles because the Metro area straddles the state line. So, companies were literally just moving back and forth across the border. Nobody's job was changing, people's commute was just altered a little bit. And yet tons of money was going out the door to do this obviously ludicrous thing. And even though it did take forever, and much longer than it should have — because, again, this is obviously and patently stupid — the two states did agree to a ceasefire and said, "Okay, we're not doing this anymore. No more incentives to get companies to just hop the border within the Metro area. That's no good for anybody, obviously."So, it's holding. It's sort of tenuous. Every now and again, you'll see a company pop up and say that it's going to try and claim incentives to hop back and forth from one state or another. It looks like it's going to break, but it is holding so far. Assuming that keeps holding, and I think it will, then that is a model for a larger solution to this problem because that's always the next step, right? So, what are we actually going to do about it? And unless we think that the federal government is going to use its power to come in and put the kibosh on this, which is... Actually, we should maybe circle back to this. It accidentally may have recently. But I don't think —We'll circle back to that.I don't think it's going to do it affirmatively in any big way anytime soon. There is an effort amongst state lawmakers to form a compact that essentially is a sort of collective ceasefire where all the states will get together and say, "We're not doing this anymore. Every state that joins this compact agrees not to use state or local incentives to steal businesses from any other state in the compact." It's like multilateral disarmament, right? That's the problem, is that no one state wants to just say, "Okay, we're turning off the spigot," because there's going to be a political cost. Some governor next door is going to be a jerk about it, and start poaching all your businesses, and claiming that great things are happening. And you're going to look terrible and probably lose your re-election campaign. So, the great thing about the compact is everybody sort of puts the weaponry down together and says, "Okay, let's all do this at the same time."They also agree to a bunch of data sharing practices, which I think would be really helpful just because it's just that much harder to play states off against each other because they'll be able to literally ask, "Hey, what's this corporation telling you? Oh, well, here's what they're telling us." It would improve a lot of things. There are bills in 13 states at the moment to form this compact. I believe a 14th is coming, though I won't get ahead of them, in a state that is pretty exciting, but I'll let them announce it and we can talk again when they do. That's up from this coalition working on this effort two years ago, when there were bills in five states and it's up to 13 now. This isn't going to happen this week or next week or next year, but I do think it's really promising. I've seen a noticeable uptick in interest in it since the pandemic, because state lawmakers, for reasons good and bad, are looking around and realizing that this is a giant waste of money and are looking for ways to sort of collectively get out of handing out these incentives. I think it's promising and it's just such a good model. It doesn't depend on the federal government doing anything. It's just the states agreeing to do it together at the same time. So, we will see!That's cool. So, how did the federal government maybe accidentally stop corporate giveaways?There's a provision in the most recent COVID relief package that says that any state that enacts a net reduction in taxes needs to pay back to the federal government an equal amount of relief funds. Essentially, if you decide to cut taxes by $100 million, give back $100 million in your relief funds, because you clearly didn't need it if you were cutting taxes. If you look at the way the law is phrased, I think it doesn't take a deep reading to say that it applies to most definitely new state and local corporate tax incentive programs, but even because it talks about administrative analyses being part of the equation here, also new awards under existing programs. I think there's a world in which you can very, very credibly claim that this provision should apply to incentive programs.Most certainly any new incentive program that gets authorized, you should have to pay back the federal government by the same amount and maybe new awards under existing programs. This makes sense. This is the federal government trying to essentially ensure that members of other states didn't have to subsidize tax cuts in a particular state. I think it certainly applies, and the key is going to be what the Treasury says about it. Treasury will be issuing guidance on this provision about what counts and what doesn't and what you have to do to pay back. But if Treasury goes with what me and a lot of other folks are saying, and applies this to incentive packages, suddenly new incentive programs will be twice as expensive! So, if you authorize a $2 billion incentive program, it's not just those $2 billion out the door, it's also $2 billion in relief funds that need to go along with it.It could be very interesting to see how states react. States are throwing a fit about this provision in general, but so far, Treasury has been pretty adamant about wanting it policed the way it's written in the law. We're going to see, but if Treasury goes along with that interpretation, there could be just a window there where these things have to slow down for a couple of years and hopefully give the folks who are working on a compact a little time to try and get it implemented instead of just having to play constant whack-a-mole, because that's sort of how you feel like working on this.That every day, a new bad deal pops up somewhere and you're scrambling so hard to try and just address that, that there's no time to sit down and stop them systemically. The piece I did recently on that study about small businesses, I had sitting around for several weeks just because new bad deals kept popping up. I kept having to write newsletters about those and be like, "Oh, I have to push the study edition back another week." And that's sort of how it is on policy level all the time too.So Janet Yellen, please make Pat's job easier. That about wraps everything up. Where can folks find you?The newsletter is called Boondoggle, it's on Substack. I work at the American Economic Liberties Project and a lot of my work on not just taxes, but corporate power in general at the state and local level shows up there. And I am on Twitter @Pat_Garofalo, the underscore is really important because otherwise -The most important underscore.The most important underscore because otherwise, you're going to wind up following a conservative member of the Minnesota State House.Got it. And you and he, I understand, have distinctly different opinions on corporate tax incentives.On most things.All right. Well, thanks again. I will be sure when I open up the Numlock Campus to call it a campus.I hear you should move to Memphis. Move Numlock headquarters to Memphis and you're going to get a really sweet deal.Noted! If you have anything you'd like to see in this Sunday special, shoot me an email. Comment below! Thanks for reading, and thanks so much for supporting Numlock.Thank you so much for becoming a paid subscriber! Send links to me on Twitter at @WaltHickey or email me with numbers, tips, or feedback at walt@numlock.news. Get full access to Numlock News at www.numlock.com/subscribe

＠美媒報導，由於注射器問題，美國加州奧克蘭體育館約有4300人接種的新冠疫苗比應接種的劑量要小，因其使用的橙色蓋注射器，發生三分之一的疫苗粘在塑膠容器底部的情況。 ＠你每天晚餐都吃什麼！最差名單前十名包括哪些？ ＠亞馬遜（AMAZON）的第二總部（HQ2）將設在美國維吉尼亞州的阿靈頓，三座 22 層樓高的辦公大樓，將圍繞一個名為 Helix 的主建築物，主體外觀是如人類DNA的雙螺旋造型。 DJ：陶晶瑩（飛碟電台） 週一至五 首播 16:00​​​​​​​-17:00​​​​​​​ 週六 精華重播 19:00​​​​​​​-20:00​​​​​​​ ▶ 飛碟聯播網 Youtube頻道 http://bit.ly/2Pz4Qmo​​​​​​​ ▶ 飛碟聯播網 FB粉絲團 https://www.facebook.com/ufonetwork92…​ ▶ 網路線上收聽 http://www.uforadio.com.tw/stream/str…​… ▶ 飛碟APP、收聽零距離！ Android：https://reurl.cc/j78ZKm​​​​​​​ iOS：https://reurl.cc/ZOG3LA​​​​​​​ ▶ Podcast SoundOn : https://bit.ly/30Ia8Ti​​​​​​​ Apple Podcasts : https://apple.co/3jFpP6x​​​​​​​ Spotify : https://spoti.fi/2CPzneD​​​​​​​ Google 播客：https://bit.ly/3gCTb3G​​​​​​​ 陶晶瑩 ●Instagram：@momoleelee ●YouTube：陶晶瑩fun人生、陶口秀 ●facebook：陶晶瑩 #新冠疫苗​​​​​​​ #晚餐​​​​​​ #不健康飲食​​​​​​​

Amazon HQ2 development is underway. What can locals expect as progress continues?

Unscripted Her presents a candid conversation on race, equity, and policy with the Chief Race and Equity Offer for Arlington County, VA, Samia Byrd. Samia, a former city planner, discusses addressing racial equity in one of the most affluence (home to Amazon HQ2), yet socioeconomically diverse counties in America. vance racial equity, diversity and inclusion both internal and external to the organization. This includes facilitating the building and implementation of economic, housing, and urban policies through a racial equity lens. Join attorney and activist Donnellda Rice and her daughter business and policy expert Ellen Rice Chever, MPP MBA for this real and smart conversation on race, policy, and equity --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/unscriptedher/support

Matt Kelly, CEO of JBG Smith, tells his and his company's story leading to their merger with Vornado and the Amazon HQ2 win.

What has happened in the D.C. housing market since Amazon chose Northern Virginia for its “HQ2” location in November 2018? What should we expect in the months and years ahead as such a large company starts putting down roots here? Dr. Terry Clower is a professor of public policy at George Mason University and the director of GMU’s Center for Regional Analysis. In this episode, he joins Kevin and Alison to discuss the past, present, and future of Amazon’s new National Landing campus and what that means for the D.C metro area. Please feel free to reach out to us with comments and questions! Realtor® Alison Scimeca: @alirun9 or alison@compass.com Kevin Mahoney, CFP®: @bykevinmahoney or kevin@illumintfc.com

Because of Amazon, The Arlington VA Real Estate Market is Booming (and maybe not in a good way)In this episode, Shawn Battle and Matt Leighton talk about stories from the trenches of what they are seeing in the Arlington VA real estate market and the overall Northern Virginia real estate market. Because of Amazon, the Arlington real estate market is hotter than ever. But is that a good thing? Shawn and Matt discuss Amazon's effect in this episode.

In this episode, Max and Chuck start by discussing the premise of the show, and catching up on previous travels. Following that, they jump into discussion of the HQ2 search/contest put on by Amazon, and if there will be any lasting negative...

In this episode of #TechInTheCity, Yvonne talks with mortgage industry leader, Bekim Merdita of Edison Financial, a new digital mortgage startup proudly based in Windsor, Ontario. We talk about Edison's partnership with Rock Holdings Inc., the parent company of Quicken Loans®, its mission to transform the Canadian Mortgage industry, COVID-19 impacts, job opportunities, and discuss the company’s "for-more-than profit impact” plan.Episode Guest: Bekim Merdita, VP of Market Development at Edison Financial. As a digital mortgage startup, Edison provides excellent customer service and a streamlined, modern experience to defy expectations of the Canadian mortgage industry. Using Lendesk Spotlight – a search platform that compiles all lender rates and policies into one place and updates it daily - Edison has industry-leading technology along with extensive knowledge of the Canadian mortgage process. Edison Financial will be located on the second floor of Rock Holdings’ Rocket Innovation Studio in downtown Windsor (156 Chatham St. W), formerly the Loop/Fish Market building. Follow Edison Financial on Social Media at @EdisonFinancial. Links to Other Resources Mentioned in this Podcast:Quicken Loans (Windsor Office) Photos and History: https://bit.ly/3fox5Rw Edison Financial Careers: https://edisonfinancial.ca/Rocket Innovation Studio Careers: https://www.myrocketcareer.com/ 

In this episode, Arlington, VA real estate agents Shawn Battle and Matt Leighton talk about Amazon's selection of Crystal City for HQ2 and how that will affect the local real estate market. Shawn Battle and Matt Leighton break down the neighborhoods they think will increase in value, the opportunities that will arise, and how to move forward if you're a buyer, seller, investor, or renter and you are in living in the Northern Virginia area or you are thinking about buying or renting in the Crystal City area (National Landing) of Arlington, Virginia. Some of the neighborhoods that are touched on include Crystal City, Pentagon City, Potomac Yards, Del Ray, Old Town Alexandria, Rosslyn, Clarendon, Ballston, Southwest Waterfront, Navy Yard, SW DC and more. If the Amazon HQ2 decision to bring the headquarters to Crystal City has got you interested in either buying or selling in the Northern Virginia region, reach out to Shawn Battle for a private consultation: shawn@BattleSales.com. Connect with Shawn Battlehttp://www.battlesales.comhttp://www.orangelinecondo.com/https://www.instagram.com/shawnbattle...

The Amazon HQ2 decision was decided some time ago...and citizens in the Indianapolis Metro area still do not know what the region offered Amazon in incentives

I’m here with my Dad, Bob Buchanan. He happens to also be the best man in my wedding 19 yrs ago and my life + business mentor who invariably has a life lesson in nearly every conversation we have - it’s exhausting but endearing. Dad is a third-generation real estate developer and has run Buchanan Partners in the Greater Washington DC area for nearly 50 years. The core of what Dad believes in is family first and community a close second. He founded an economic development non-profit called The 2030 Group a decade ago and was instrumental in recently bringing Amazon HQ2 (2nd headquarters) for the Washington DC area.

Tax Notes Today reporter Aaron Davis discusses the recent state efforts to clamp down on tax-incentive bidding wars by forming a multistate compact.In the latest installment of Willis Weighs In, Tax Notes contributing editor Benjamin Willis discusses PLR 202009002 and its greater application.For additional coverage, read these articles in Tax Notes:States Push for Cooperation Over CompetitionConnecticut Looks to Join Interstate Incentives CompactQuestions Raised by Multistate Plan to Eliminate IncentivesRhode Island Lawmakers File Tax Incentive Compact BillArizona Bill Backs Interstate Tax Incentives CompactKansas-Missouri Incentives War Ends in Truce

Victor Hoskins is the President and CEO of the Fairfax County Economic Development Authority. Prior to that, he was Deputy Mayor of Economic Development for the District of Columbia. In his current role, he works hard with his team to attract companies and jobs to the area. Most recently he led the team responsible for winning the Amazon HQ2, which will be bringing anywhere from 25,000 to 37,000 jobs to Northern Virginia. What was it like to compete for the Amazon HQ2? Fairfax county was one of 238 jurisdictions in the running and their initial proposal was 250 pages long. A few months later Amazon responded with over 100 questions which took 1100 pages to respond to. It was definitely not an easy feat!  When looking at the big picture Victor has been paying attention to two main trends when it comes to talent. The first one is the need for regions to find ways to keep college students in the area after they graduate. In Victor’s region there are 60 universities and he says, “there's a real retention effort that we're launching focused on the kids that are in school right now and connecting them directly to companies, whether that company is Leidos or that company is Booz Allen, whether it is North Broman or Boeing we're trying to connect them directly to the companies as they're going through their undergraduate education because what we find and what I think all of us found is, when you work at a place while you're in school you may be going back to that place or a similar company when you get out of school so really bridging that, making that connection or may not just doing this at the undergraduate level but we also want to look at this at the high school level, trying to get these kids into internships, just to get to understand what companies do and develop their interest early on.” The second thing he is paying attention to is the need for companies to retrain the talent they already have instead of hiring new people. It makes a lot more sense to utilize the people already inside of your organization who know the company culture, then to hire a new person who has to learn everything from square one.    When it comes to AI and technology, Victor is not worried. We have had many shifts in the way we work in the past, for example there was a day when milk and ice was delivered by horse and carriage, but we have always adapted and created new jobs. He believes we will continue to adapt, create, and learn.    Victor’s advice to students in high school or college is do your best every single day. He says, “I feel like I'm at a job interview every day. Every day, I'm at a job interview, which means that I have a chance to make a good impression or bad impression. Me, I choose every day to make an extraordinary impression. I throw my body and my mind into everything that I do. Listen, I was at that brown bag talking about a book. It was the last thing on earth to discuss before I go six feet under. I mean, to me that was a moment to explain something to them that I do wanted to talk to them about since I got there. And this is, this moment right here, this is the greatest moment in my life right now, you know why? Because you only have these moments so do them in an extraordinary way. Do not be average.” What you will learn:  What it was like to compete with 238 jurisdictions to win the Amazon HQ2 What companies like Amazon and Nestle are looking for in talent Workplace and talent trends Victor is paying attention to  How Victor inspires his team How companies are attracting and retaining talent

Last November, after an extended RFP bidding process involving initially 280 cities, narrowed down to twenty “finalists”, Amazon announced Long Island City in Queens, New York as its “HQ2” winner. New York's agreements with Amazon guaranteed $27 billion in revenue for New York with $3 billion returned to Amazon in tax credits. In February of this year, however, on Valentine's Day no less (slightly tone deaf!), Amazon abruptly canceled its plans entirely and reversed course, citing mounting criticism it received from state and local politicians, activists and community groups in and around Long Island City. The main arguments from the so-called resistance were that it would cause housing costs to skyrocket, drive out low-income residents and worsen congestion on the subway and streets. Others have distilled the story into three categories: (1) subsidies/corporate giveaways, (2) secrecy and backroom dealings and (3) corporate social responsibility and corporate behavior. On this episode of The Medium Rules, host Alan Baldachin is joined by Ari Wallach and Duff McDonald with a view to dissecting the various causes and effects, both short and long-term, implicated and exposed by the Amazon HQ2 debacle. Is this a story of corporate greed and Albany arrogance finally getting their respective comeuppance? Or, was the turning back of Amazon HQ2 an ahistorical blunder of epic proportions? How much should we care about community preservation, or is this just a nostalgic fever dream of a very vocal, activist minority? To what extent are we required to extrapolate the Amazon HQ2 into broader American political and social currents tracing back to Occupy Wall Street and the rise of the new left, or is the story much more localized in nature? Ari Wallach is the founder and CEO of Longpath Labs. We had the pleasure to connect with Ari for our very first episode of The Medium Rules last June. Longpath Labs is a 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to promote and advocate long-term modes of thinking, synthesizing and responding to humanity's greatest long-term challenges. Duff McDonald is a first timer on The Medium Rules. Duff is a New York-based journalist and is the author, most recently, of The New York Times bestsellers The Golden Passport and The Firm. A long-time magazine writer, Duff has written for The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, New York Magazine, Esquire, Fortune, Business Week, Wired, Time, and other publications. Duff wrote the book review for the New York Times on Brad Stone's essential book on Amazon, The Everything Store. Duff is currently working on a book with Christiane Lemiuex about what makes entrepreneurs tick – Christiane is the founder and CEO of The Inside and a previous guest on The Medium Rules. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sharon Zukin and Miriam Greenberg discuss Amazon's decision to locate in New York City, the politics this choice evoked, and the online giant's subsequent choice to reverse that decision. Photo Credit By SounderBruce from Seattle, United States - Amazon HQ from Westlake & Stewart, CC BY-SA 2.0, Link

We discuss if New York won or lost in the battle for Amazon HQ2.  This is NOT a political finger-pointing exercise, but rather an example of how-to-think.  

Everyone loves and crave for relevance. And relevance comes in different forms. It is about giving attention, being connected, and becoming significant to other people. If you are married like me, relevance to your spouse comes in the form of attention. That's why it is not unusual for a wife to ask for quality time from the husband from time to time. What she wants and what she is asking for is relevance. And this can be vice versa as well. When a wife gets too busy, the husband can want and demand attention as well. At your place of work, when you receive some reward or recognition, it shows that you are relevant. Companies, these days can choose specific areas to locate their business for strategic purpose. For example, Amazon HQ2 recently moved to New York because the city is relevant for their growth strategy. Apple announced that it is opening a billion-dollar campus in Austin, a move that shows that Austin is pertinent to their business. Why not New Orleans or Houston. By the way, I would have loved them to come to Houston. So the question becomes, how can you as an individual become and stay relevant in your career, and family life? I have three quick tips to share with you today, and I believe if you can follow these tips, you will be able to establish your relevance wherever you find yourself.   1. Love what you do, and do what you love. 2. Be hungry and stay passionate 3. Pursue excellence relentlessly --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/the-winners-ways-podcast/support

What is up everyone! In today's podcast we go through ten steps in goal setting and achievement. Since its the new year, and there's a lot of people making New Years Revolutions for themselves - we figured this would be a fitting subject. Whether your trying to lose some weight, start a business, improve something about your life, etc - there are some universal things to keep in mind when trying to achieve your goals. We go through these ten steps in detail, and we hope it helps you achieve whatever goals your chasing in 2019. We also touch on some current events being Zillow Instant Offers, The recent announcement of the L train not shutting down, Amazon HQ2 landing in Long Island City and what that means for the neighborhood, Dottie Herman selling her shares of Douglas Elliman, and some recent market reports which describe the current state of the market in NYC and Long Island. We really hope you enjoy our podcast! The Pesce & Lanzillotta Team, at Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Office: 516-888-9711 Email: info@pl-team.com www.PL-Team.com

She Hit Me First... Today's topics include: That was the battle cry from Michael Avenatti - dubbed the 'creepy porn lawyer' - which was repeated all over cable news last night...; next, Aaron Renn (Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute) joins the show to talk about what losing the bid on Amazon HQ2 here in Pittsburgh means moving forward; and finally, Nick Loris (Herbert and Joyce Morgan Fellow focussing on Energy and Environmental Policy at the Heritage Foundation) discusses how the massive Californian wildfire could have been prevented, and why people shouldn't be so quick to blame it on climate change.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

David Wolfe, Co-Director of Innovation Policy Lab at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at U of T Mississauga talks about Amazon site for second headquarters.  

In today's Minutes: Amazon HQ2 will be split between two cities, US elections will impact economy & Lowe's plans to close 51 stores. Plus, some autumn reading recommendations from the masters of the universe. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/watercoolesthq/support

John Turley-Ewart, Risk management consultant talks about Amazon HQ2, shipping for holidays, and Lowe's to shut 31 underperforming stores in Canada'

This week's episode is the second, concluding part of our series reviewing concepts and topics from last season. (If you haven't yet listened to part 1, you can find it here.)In part 2 of our re:verb “re:cap,” we rekindle the critical ideas brought up in episodes 6 through 9. First, we build upon our discussion of urban renewal and gentrification from episodes 6 & 7, talking through the ongoing transparency controversy at the heart of Pittsburgh's “bid” for Amazon HQ2, the economistic frames used by both proponents and opponents of the bid, and the difficulty of staging place-based resistance to massive corporate entities like Amazon. Then, we examine two cases that exemplify people's affective & emotional attachments to evidence (a call-back to Jenny Rice's work, discussed in episode 8): the liberal-left split over #Russiagate and the cryptic, all-encompassing, extremely-online #QAnon conspiracy. We go on to discuss the brilliant treatment of language ideology (a concept previously covered in episode 9) in the film Sorry to Bother You (Boots Riley, 2018), particularly its depiction of code-switching and “white voice.”Finally, we reflect on some of the unresolved tensions across all of our conversations on the show so far: rhetorics of “the future,” certainty vs. uncertainty, the role of aesthetics in rhetoric, and the relationship between language and power.Previous episodes discussed:Episode 6: How do spaces and places function in resistance movements? (Rhetorics of Place: Part 1) (w/ Derek Handley & Liana Maneese)Episode 7: What are the economic, social, and political forces fueling gentrification? (Rhetorics of Place: Part 2) (w/ Scott Riess)Episode 8: What can conspiracy theories teach us about how we use "evidence"? (w/ Jenny Rice)Episode 9: How does language influence our identity (and vice-versa)? (w/ Barbara Johnstone)Works & Concepts Referenced in this Episode:Creswell, J. (2018, Aug. 5). Cities' offers for Amazon base are secrets even to many city leaders. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/05/technology/amazon-headquarters-hq2.htmlHart, R., & Dillard, C. (2001). Deliberative genre. In Sloane, Thomas O. Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from: http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195125955.001.0001/acref-9780195125955-e-64.Kroskrity, P. V. (2004). Language ideologies. A companion to linguistic anthropology, 496-517.Org Chart of the QAnon Conspiracy compiled by “The Infomaniac”: https://throughthelookingglassnews.wordpress.com/2017/11/24/q-anon-learn-to-read-the-map/Rice, J. (2017). The Rhetorical Aesthetics of More: On Archival Magnitude. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 50(1), 26-49.Rihl, J. (2018, Feb. 8). How Amazon's HQ2 may both bring growth and imperil Pittsburgh's talent pool. Public Source. Retrieved from: https://www.publicsource.org/how-amazons-hq2-may-both-bring-growth-and-imperil-pittsburghs-talent-pool/Scahill, J. (2018, Feb. 21). RussiaMania: Glenn Greenwald vs. James Risen. Intercepted Podcast. Podcast retrieved from: https://theintercept.com/2018/02/21/intercepted-podcast-russiamania-glenn-greenwald-vs-james-risen/Shoemaker, J.D. (2018, April 11). Activists call on Pittsburgh officials to release Amazon bid, include residents in economic development decisions. Public Source. Retrieved from: https://www.publicsource.org/activists-call-on-pittsburgh-officials-to-release-amazon-bid-include-residents-in-economic-development-decisions/Shoemaker, J.D. (2018, July 5). Amazon's ripple effects: Six things that might happen if Pittsburgh gets HQ2. Public Source. Retrieved from: https://www.publicsource.org/amazons-ripple-effects-six-things-that-might-happen-if-pittsburgh-gets-hq2/Shoemaer, J.D., & Davidson, M. (2018, June 21). Advocacy groups file court brief supporting media efforts to make Pittsburgh's Amazon HQ2 bid public. Public Source. Retrieved from: https://www.publicsource.org/advocacy-groups-file-court-brief-supporting-media-efforts-to-make-pittsburghs-amazon-hq2-bid-public/VanDerWerff, T. (2018, July 27). 100 years of the American left in 5 minutes, with Sorry to Bother You director Boots Riley. Vox. Retrieved from: https://www.vox.com/2018/7/27/17620246/boots-riley-sorry-to-bother-you-history-of-the-left-interview

In part two of our series on Rhetorics of Place, Alex and Calvin squeeze into a 5x5 sound booth (reminiscent of a $1,000/month+ studio apartment, or perhaps one floor of a Tiny Home, in a gentrifying Pittsburgh neighborhood) with CMU Master's Candidate in Literary and Cultural Studies Scott Reiss to talk about the politics of urban development. We map out some of the different social, economic, and political factors in gentrification, and how these are specifically playing out in the city of Pittsburgh. We also discuss how the frontier metaphor is used by developers and in the news as a way of justifying the influx of "urban pioneers" to impoverished neighborhoods. Finally, we conclude with some thoughts on different actions that can be taken at a local level to resist gentrification and/or make redevelopment policies that bring wealth to impoverished communities without displacing their residents.Cover image: A “tiny home” designed and sold in the neighborhood of Garfield by Eve Picker, developer and landlord of the East Liberty “Last Billboard” space discussed on our previous episode. Post image: “Keep Pittsburgh Shitty” bumper sticker spotted by a user on the r/pittsburgh subreddit (t-shirt here).Works, Concepts, and News Items Cited in this Episode:Dionne Jr, E. J., Ornstein, N. J., & Mann, T. E. (2017). One Nation After Trump: A Guide for the Perplexed, the Disillusioned, the Desperate, and the Not-yet Deported. St. Martin's Press.Edbauer, J. (2005). Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorical ecologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(4), 5-24. [Discusses how the slogan “Keep Austin Weird” was appropriated by developers in Austin.]“Future of Manufacturing To Rise Within Abandoned Steel Mill.” [CMU website article describing the university's new development in Hazelwood.]Glass, R. L. (1964). London: aspects of change (Vol. 3). MacGibbon & Kee. [Coins the term “gentrification.”]Harvey, D. (2008). “The right to the city.” The City Reader, 6, 23-40.Kelly, M. & McKinley, S. (2015). “7 Paths to Development That Bring Neighborhoods Wealth, Not Gentrification.” yes! Magazine.Moore, D. (5/8/2018) “Secrecy surrounding Amazon HQ2 bid will help Pittsburgh win, Allegheny Conference CEO says.” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.Smith, N. (1996). “‘Class struggle on Avenue B': The lower east side as wild wild west.” The New Urban Frontier. New York, NY: Routledge, 3-27.St-Esprit, M. (5/8/2018). “As Bloomfield weighs new development, residents seek to prioritize affordable housing.” Public Source. [Note for Pittsburghers: “The BDC will hold another public meeting regarding affordable housing options in the community at 6:30 p.m. May 24 in the West Penn School of Nursing auditorium.”]

Showin' off our North Side stuff to Geekwire! Robert Miles and the Allegheny Inn hosted us and our guests in between two of the Inn's seven fireplaces. While on the North Side, we asked our friends from the National Aviary to join us and, Inn music staple, J. Roger Davis joined us with some of his mellow music. Thanks to our Fireplace Tour sponsor, Bob Hufnagle and Suburban Floors for the 6”x3” swath of red carpet for our guests! And thanks to Ricci's Italian Sausage for feeding everyone! Music By: J. Roger Davis Question of the Day: What gets you GEEKY about Pittsburgh? What was on the blog this week? Bicycling Jagoffery 02:03 Robert Miles, Pittsburgh Concierge and Manager of the Allegheny Inn REALLY threw out the welcome mat for our guests and followers! He flashed those 7 fireplaces like batting eyes! This is stop #3 on our Suburban Floors Fireplace Tour! NOTE: Make sure you check out the pics of the YaJagoff Brownies Kathleen Conway made! SPONSOR: Total Sports Enterprises at The Mall at Robinson has a one track mind.. sports. Check out TSEshop.com for a list of events where you can bid and receive some of your favorite back and gold items. Plus follow TSEshop.com for details on all upcoming signings.. including the Penguin's Bryan Rust. 11:03 When in the North Side, show OFF the North Side! Bob Mulvihill, the National Aviary's ornithologist and Josef Karst, the aviary/Atria's chef talk about how lucky Pittsburgh is to have such a high-level, stand-alone aviary in Pittsburgh. Bob even brought a puppet! 32:11 Are we gonna get Amazon HQ2 here? After we made sure that they were well-stuffed with fresh hot Ricci's Hot Sausage on Mancini rolls, we talked to 3 journalists from GeekWire.com about their current project…. reporting on Pittsburgh's desire and ability to become the Amazon HQ2. Pittsburgh roads, the people, the airport, food, culture and technology reputation.. all of it being reported on as they embed themselves here for the entire month of February. What do Kurt, Nat and Taylor have to say about Pittsburgh and the Amazon HQ2 thingy? And, how much Pittsburghese did they learn while here? Read articles from Kurt Schlosser Read articles from Nat Levy (On record that Nat has the bestest Pgh name N'at) Read articles from Taylor Soper 57:54 J. Roger Davis… a smooooooooth acoustic musician hangs out with us! Dude.. he even got some new stylish glasses just for us!! He loves it here in Pittsburgh but… SURPRISE…he AIN'T originally from here! Get his songs! SPONSOR: Total Sports Enterprises at The Mall at Robinson has a one track mind.. sports. Check out TSEshop.com for a list of events where you can bid and receive some of your favorite back and gold items. Plus follow TSEshop.com for details on all upcoming signings.. including the Penguin's Bryan Rust. Find daily #Jagoffs posts at www.YaJagoff.com NEW LISTENING PLATFORMS * No Longer available IN the Pittsburgh Podcast Network Channel Feed. How to Listen Regularly: All shows are free and available to listen 24/7/365 nationwide. Audio-On-Demand in-your-hand, on smartphone, tablet, laptop and desktop computers. – Available to APPLE users on the iTunes and Podcast app. – Available to ANDROID users on Google Play Music, – Available to ALL users via YaJagoff.com, Stitcher, or tunein * SEARCH: YaJagoff Podcast * Thanks, To: · Photo Credits: The Pittsburgh Podcast Network · Production: Frank Murgia and Wayne Weil How to Follow Everyone on Twitter: Total Sports Enterprises @TotalSportsEnt John Chamberlin @YaJagoff Rachael Rennebeck @RachaelRennebe3 Roger Davis @RogerDavis777 The Allegheny Inn @TheAlleghenyInn Robert Miles @PghConcierge1 National Aviary @National_Aviary Atria's Restaurant @AtriasPgh GeekWire @GeekWire Kurt Schlosser @Kslosh Nat Levy @NatJLevy Taylor Soper @Taylor_Soper Ricci's Sausage @RiccisSausage #YaJagoff Podcast / Episode 103 / February 27, 2018 See omnystudio.com/policies/listener for privacy information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoice

Á meðan sumir fylgjast spenntir með Ólympíuleikunum í PyeongChang sitja umsjónarmenn Aðfararinnar límdir við tölvuskjáinn og fylgjast með baráttu borga um að verða heimili nýrra höfuðstöðva Amazon í Norður Ameríku. Upphaflega sóttu 238 átta borgir um að hreppa uppbyggingarhnossið sem hljóðar upp á litla hundruð milljarða íslenskra króna og 50 þúsund störf en nú stendur valið á milli 20 borga í Bandaríkjunum, og að sjálfsögðu, Toronto í Kanada. Í þætti vikunnar fara Magnea og Guðmundur yfir þetta risastóra og æsispennandi skipulagsmál sem teygir anga sína víða og snertir á mörgum þáttum nútímaborgarsamfélaga.

Amazon recently released its Top 20 of Amazon HQ2 contenders, but a business consultant created his own list of seven. Eric Simonson of Everest Group Research details how talent, time zone, physical proximity, and the type of business Amazon plans for HQ2 will impact the decision. He also talks about what the process might mean for Seattle. www2.everestgrp.com/reportaction/EG…-2382/Marketing

The sixth episode of the Carolina Fintech Hub podcast is packed with commentary and news including: Aubrey Hawes, Senior Director at Oracle and CFH Operating Committee member, joins Tariq to […]

Despues de un tiempo de competencia entre algunas ciudades por albergar los HQ2 de la gigante del e-commerce como lo es Amazon, ya salieron las Como era de esperarse han habido reacciones positivas y negativas, donde no solo implica en esta competencia, no solo implica la construcción del un local, si no, todo lo que trae consigo, como son temas demográficos, etnográficos, económicos, sociológicos, urbanismo, tecnológicos, innovación, entre otros.

With David and Kristina away, Tim goes rogue and ditches our usual format to spend the hour chatting with Angela about the best (and worst) ads of the week, from Ikea's great preroll ads to the virtues (or not) of "friendly" cease-and-desist letters. Timestamps: 2:17: Ikea's preroll ads | 10:30: Alo House's short film | 20:52: Hornbach's DIY anthem for women | 26:30: Friendly cease-and-desists letters | 34:14: Little Rock says no to Amazon HQ2. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

This week, we talk Amazon HQ2: whether Boston has a good shot at becoming the home of the corporation’s second headquarters, and why New Hampshire slings so much dirt at Beantown in its bid. We'll also get an update on how Puerto Ricans with Connecticut connections are coping with hurricane recovery on the island. Plus, we'll learn how Massachusetts volunteers help keep wild sea turtles alive when the seas turn cold. And in time for Halloween, we visit a haunted tavern to hear tales from New England's spookiest places. A rendering of the primary site Boston is proposing in its bid for Amazon to create its second headquarters in the city. The site straddles Boston and Revere (Courtesy City of Boston) From Over the Sea We've been tracking the recovery efforts in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. The island is about four hours away by plane from Hartford and Boston. Yet in many ways, it's the island next door for New England's more than 600,000 Puerto Rican residents. Below: Boston community organizer and former Hartford City Councilman Luis Cotto has been distributing water filters and solar lamps in Puerto Rico. Video by Ryan Caron King. We speak with WNPR news director Jeff Cohen, who returned this week from a reporting trip to the island. He met with Connecticut residents who were providing supplies, fresh water,  and hope — and in some cases, bringing people back to New England to escape tough conditions. Explore Puerto Rico coverage by Jeff Cohen and Ryan Caron King. Below: volunteers from Connecticut and Puerto Rico bring water purification systems to remote towns. Video by Ryan Caron King. Menhaden, also called bunker, spill across the deck of a boat in Long Island Sound. This vital fish is now the subject of a new fisheries management decision. Photo by Patrick Skahill for WNPR Oily and smelly, Atlantic menhaden are one of the least sexy fish imaginable. But this humble fish, also called “bunker” or “pogie,” has deep roots off the coast of New England. It's believed Native Americans taught the Pilgrims to fertilize their crops with the fish. And for decades, millions of tons of menhaden were pulled out of the ocean. Now, there's a movement to preserve this vital species, not just for the fishermen who catch it, but for animals that eat it. WNPR’s Patrick Skahill reports. Menhaden may suffer from not being very loveable, but there's another creature in our waters that everyone loves: the sea turtle. And for sea turtles in New England, fall is a dangerous time. Rhode Island Public Radio's environmental reporter Avory Brookins went to the New England Aquarium's Hospital in Quincy, Massachusetts to find out why hundreds of sea turtles end up there once ocean temperatures drop. It’s a Jungle Out There A screengrab from the front page of New Hampshire’s Amazon proposal. The state is proposing the site of a former orchard in Londonderry, a Manchester suburb. October 19th was the deadline for states and cities to submit their bids to online giant Amazon. The company says it's received 238 proposals from places hoping to become home to its second North American headquarters, or HQ2. Amazon promises to employ up to 50,000 full-time workers at this future campus, with average salaries upwards of $100,000. Bids have come in from 44 states, including every New England state except for Vermont. New Hampshire's proposal is as much about what the state has to offer as what it doesn't have, while throwing shade on its conspicuous neighbor to the south. Governor Chris Sununu took the same tone at a press conference announcing the bid last week. Mr. Sununu said New Hampshire “has all the benefits of Boston, without the traffic, without the taxes, without the bureaucracy, but still being able to draw off the most talented workforce pool in the world.” Boston has of course thrown its hat in the ring. along with 25 other sites in Massachusetts. Below: a video from Boston’s Amazon proposal asserts “We are that shining city on a hill.” Joining us to discuss this cross-border kerfuffle and the politics behind the bids in both states is Asma Khalid, Bostonomix reporter at WBUR. We're also joined by Todd Bookman, who covers business and economics for New Hampshire Public Radio. Into the Woods C.J. Fusco, pictured at Abigail’s Grille in Simsbury, Conn., is the author of Old Ghosts of New England: A Traveler’s Guide to the Spookiest Sites in the Northeast. Photo by Andrea Muraskin for NEXT. New England this time of year is a leaf-peeper's paradise, but it's also a great place to get a good scare.  If you know where to look, it’s not hard to find haunted houses, haunted cemeteries, and even haunted restaurants. NEXT producer Andrea Muraskin found an old Connecticut tavern that's been the subject of ghost stories all the way back to the American Revolution. She sat down there with the author of Old Ghosts of New England: A Traveler's Guide to the Spookiest Sites in the Northeast. A scene from the film “Forrest Gump” was shot at Marshall Point Lighthouse in Port Clyde, Maine. The lighthouse is also said to be haunted by the ghost of a young boy, who was murdered by bootleggers. Photo by Gianina Lindsey via Flickr Do you have a question about New England you’d like NEXT to investigate? Tell us about it here. About NEXT NEXT is produced at WNPR. Host: John Dankosky Producer: Andrea Muraskin Executive Producer: Catie Talarski Contributors to this episode: Jeff Cohen, Patrick Skahill, Avory Brookins, Asma Khalid, Todd Bookman Music: Todd Merrell, “New England” by Goodnight Blue Moon Get all the NEXT episodes. We appreciate your feedback! Send praise, critique, suggestions, questions, and tales of the undead to next@wnpr.org.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.