Podcasts about subpoenas

Gov. Tim Walz wants the Trump administration to release records that he says could show he and the state of Minnesota have been targeted for political retribution. Walz filed 16 records requests under the Freedom of Information Act. Earlier this week, a federal judge threw out Justice Department subpoenas for records from the offices of Walz and other Minnesota Democrats, calling them meritless and ethically questionable.Minnesota hospitality businesses are doing worse than they were last year, according to a new survey from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. The Minneapolis Fed surveyed 120 hospitality companies about business conditions during the first quarter of 2026. A majority said profits are down compared to last year. Many businesses cited inflation, Minnesota's new paid family leave policy and increased employee absences as challenges.A Minneapolis woman who was dragged from her car by federal agents during the immigration surge has filed a civil rights complaint with the Department of Homeland Security. The complaint alleges Aliyah Rahman was assaulted, wrongfully arrested and subjected to inhumane treatment by federal agents. Her attorney says agents violated Rahman's constitutional rights and disability protections. The complaint calls on DHS to investigate the incident and implement broader policy changes.A woman charged with assaulting an FBI agent in Minneapolis last year pleaded guilty Tuesday in federal court to a misdemeanor charge. Isabel Lopez was sentenced to time served and a $25 fine. Lopez was among about 100 people who protested what they believed was an immigration raid at a Lake Street restaurant a year ago. Prosecutors agreed to drop the original felony indictment if Lopez pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor charge.Minnesotans should be prepared for potentially dangerous heat and humidity later this weekend and into next week. MPR meteorologist Sven Sundgaard says what could be the hottest air mass in the region in several years starts to arrive this weekend. Highs could reach the 90s by early next week, with heat indices possibly reaching triple digits. Before then, Minnesota will see a few more days of quiet and mild weather.

The U.S. has lifted oil sanctions on Iran for the first time in decades, letting Tehran sell its oil openly at higher prices meant to push Iran to comply on its nuclear program, even as the two sides are already split over whether Iran agreed to let inspectors back in. President Trump heads to Pennsylvania today to talk up the economy and his promise that gas and grocery prices will fall now that the war is ending, but his approval is at record lows with even some Republicans unhappy over his handling of the economy. And a federal judge in Minnesota threw out grand jury subpoenas from the Trump administration, ruling they were used to harass and retaliate against state and local officials who wouldn't help carry out the president's immigration crackdown.Want more analysis of the most important news of the day, plus a little fun? Subscribe to the Up First newsletter.Today's episode of Up First was edited by Tina Kraja, Rebekah Metzler, Cheryl Corley, Mohamad ElBardicy, and John Stolnis.It was produced by Ziad Buchh and Nia Dumas.Our director is Christopher Thomas.We get engineering support from Neisha Heinis. Our technical director is Carleigh Strange.And our Supervising Senior Producer is Vince Pearson.(0:00) Introduction(01:57) US Lifts Oil Sanctions On Iran(05:23) Trump Shifts To Economy(09:17) Minnesota Subpoenas Thrown OutSee pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

Dr. Fauci refused to attend a hearing on Covid, so Sen. Rand Paul issued him a new subpoena.  Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.

Send us Fan MailA champagne bottle, a blade, and a clean strike turns into one of the clearest cybersecurity conversations we've had. We're joined by attorney and cyber contracting veteran Drew Tharp, with Todd Wilkinson stepping in as guest host, and we use swords and fencing to unpack why breaches happen and why “just add more tools” rarely fixes the root problem.Drew walks us through the four quadrant fencing model (active vs passive, offense vs defense) and how most security programs camp out in the obvious corners. We connect the overlooked zones to modern cybersecurity strategy: applying steady pressure that limits attacker options, building aggressive defensive moves that anticipate human behavior, and spotting the “seam” where urgency and confusion let a threat actor land one clean strike. If you work in healthcare cybersecurity, we also dig into why ransomware and business email compromise keep hitting so hard and how internal business pressure makes incidents worse.On the legal and vendor risk side, we get real about cyber insurance requirements, unlimited liability, and how BAAs and data sharing agreements can smuggle in heavy terms that the wrong reviewer might sign. Then we pivot to AI in legal work, including Harvey AI, and explain the key limitation that matters for both lawyers and CISOs: AI can speed up review, but it cannot understand business context, risk appetite, or which deal is worth the exception.If you liked this one, subscribe for more practical cybersecurity conversations, share it with a teammate who lives in contracts or incident response, and leave us a review with your biggest “how did that term get in there” story.

AP Washington correspondent Sagar Meghani reports AP sources say the Trump administration has withdrawn subpoenas seeking reporters to testify before a grand jury.

The Trump Administration is threatening to withhold millions in federal funds unless some states adopt election changes. The Justice Department's immigration enforcement probe in Minnesota is facing a legal setback. Judge in Charlie Kirk killing delays contempt ruling; we tell you why. A soccer superstar makes World Cup history. And, music titan Clive Davis has passed away. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

War Room UK PM Starmer Resigns, Female Cop Appears to Shoot Civilian in Montreal Amid Shootout With Armed Suspect… PLUS, Judge Blocks DOJ Subpoenas Aimed at Tim Walz & Israeli Officials Suggest Bombing Beirut Amid Trump Peace Deal Negotiations

A federal judge has tossed out U.S. Justice Department subpoenas targeting Gov. Tim Walz and other state and local leaders. Judge Patrick Schiltz called the subpoenas an “unlawful and unethical use of the grand jury process.” The subpoenas were part of a criminal investigation into whether state officials were obstructing federal immigration enforcement. Schiltz wrote that evidence the subpoenas were issued for unlawful reasons was “overwhelming,” and said the investigation appeared designed to harass political opponents and pressure them into taking federal action.A new study recommends Minnesota take action to prevent groundwater contaminated with PFAS from spreading in the Twin Cities east metro. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency report recommends pumping groundwater and removing PFAS. The treated water would then be sent to cities for drinking, or returned to the underground aquifer. Decades ago, 3M disposed of chemical waste containing PFAS at several sites in the east metro, where the chemicals leaked into the environment.About 75,000 spectators are expected to attend the Special Olympics USA Games in Minnesota this week. Competition began Monday at the University of Minnesota and the National Sports Center in Blaine. The games bring together more than 3,000 athletes with intellectual disabilities from all 50 states. Events are free to attend, and ESPN will stream some competitions on ESPN Plus.

Monday 5pm Hour: Jason talks with attorney Joe Tamburino about today's ruling from a Federal judge quashing the subpoenas issued by the DOJ targeting MN political leaders over immigration policy. Why did he make the decision and use strong language in doing so? Then Jason talks about lagging attendance at Target Field. Why are fans staying away from Twins games?

On Monday's Drivetime with DeRusha... 3pm hour: Jason left some food in the WCCO refrigerator last week, and it disappeared. He asks listeners if it's his fault? Then he talks with USC professor Dr. Darby Saxbe about her new book "Dad Brain" and if fathers are actually improving as the years go by. 4pm Hour: new polling data shows the new state flag is deeply unpopular. Given the popular refrain "we should have gotten to vote on it" Jason wants to know if there's a way to have a voting process to show MN opinion without having direct votes on every single issue? Then - did Taylor Swift just create the best Pixar song ever? Jason polls listeners. 5pm Hour: Jason talks with attorney Joe Tamburino about today's ruling from a Federal judge quashing the subpoenas issued by the DOJ targeting MN political leaders over immigration policy. Why did he make the decision and use strong language in doing so? Then Jason talks about lagging attendance at Target Field. Why are fans staying away from Twins games?

Jason talks with attorney Joe Tamburino about today's ruling from a federal judge quashing subpoenas from the DOJ directed at MN leaders. Joe explains why the judge used such strong language in striking them down.

AP's Lisa Dwyer reports that a Federal judge is halting an effort to subpoena Governor Walz in immigration enforcement probe.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison joins Chad with reaction to Judge Schiltz quashing DOJ subpoenas today against him, Governor Walz and other prominent Democrats related to Operation Metro Surge.

A U.S. district judge has thrown out six grand jury subpoenas issued by the Trump Justice Department against top Minnesota officials, including Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison. In a strongly worded opinion, the judge said the subpoenas were issued to harass political opponents and lacked a legitimate investigative purpose. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed with the latest news from a leading Black-owned & controlled media company: https://aurn.com/newsletter Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Go to https://incogni.com/EMILY and use code EMILY to get 60% off annual plans. Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/ogTz4xNUiX0  The Karen Read wrongful death case is currently marked by significant procedural conflict and judicial micromanagement, with the court issuing several orders to strictly regulate filings, such as striking documents lacking certificates of service and mandating specific formats for hyperlinks and media. A central dispute involves a motion to compel Colin Albert, a non-party witness, to attend a deposition and produce documents related to the night of John O'Keefe's death. Read's defense team alleges "gamesmanship" by opposing counsel, claiming they surreptitiously rescheduled Albert's deposition to a date when Read's attorneys were unavailable while simultaneously refusing to provide requested communications. Albert's legal representation counters that the subpoena is overbroad, lacks relevance to the central issue of Read's liability, and that the defense originally canceled the scheduled deposition. RESOURCES Attorney Rosenberg's Letter to the Court - https://youtu.be/5Bokx9LFYLs Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Elizabeth Stephenson and Sarah J. Hink of New Direction Family Law introduce new attorney Tyler E. Kaestner, who recently moved from Pennsylvania to Raleigh, and discuss key differences between Pennsylvania and North Carolina family law and procedure. They compare divorce timelines and separation requirements (including Pennsylvania's ability to be “separated” while living in the same home), custody processes using conciliation officers and Zoom conferences, and child support rules such as Pennsylvania's lack of retroactive child support and use of net income. They also cover easier modification standards in Pennsylvania, shorter alimony durations there versus longer potential awards in North Carolina, North Carolina's alienation of affection/criminal conversation claims and proposed legislative changes, and major differences in discovery and subpoena procedures. They warn against relying on Google/AI or friends for legal advice, noting AI outputs may be wrong and what you enter into AI may be discoverable.00:00 Child Support Shock00:44 Meet the Attorneys00:58 Tyler Joins the Firm02:21 Divorce Filing Rules03:06 What Counts as Separation04:50 NC Law May Change06:38 Custody Process Differences08:50 Out of State Orders09:53 Child Support Pitfalls12:46 Guidelines Net vs Gross13:40 Modifying Orders Loopholes14:31 Custody Mods Without Change15:42 Mediation Differences16:34 Conference Officer Path17:14 Alimony Rules Compared18:22 Alienation Claims Drama20:22 Affairs and Alimony Bars21:49 Subpoenas and Discovery Shock23:56 AI and Legal Pitfalls25:41 Pro Se TikTok Warnings26:52 Wrap Up and Thanks

Things are going so badly for Trump in his BBC defamation case, that not only did he fail to disqualify the magistrate judge because she previously was involve as a lawyer d in the “Steele Dossier” lawsuit Trump brought and was sanctioned for, but she has now been assigned the matter of whether the BBC is going to to be able to issue 47 subpoenas including to Trump businesses, family and the DOJ (including the Jack Smith Files). Popok explains federal practice as the BBC now tries to prove the “truth that Trump is responsible for fomenting an insurrection! Pocket Hose: Text LEGAL to 64000 for your 2 free gifts with the purchase of any Pocket Hose Ballistic hose. By Texting 64000, you agree to receive recurring automated marketing messages from Pocket Hose. Message frequency varies and data rates may apply. Text STOP at any time to opt out. Text HELP for additional Information. No purchase required. Terms apply, available at PocketHose.com/terms. Subscribe:  @LegalAFMTN  Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show The Ken Harbaugh Show: https://meidasnews.com/tag/the-ken-harbaugh-show Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In an ongoing push to end gender affirming care for minors, the Trump administration has requested the medical records of trans youths at both NYU Langone and Mount Sinai. Caroline Lewis, health care reporter for WNYC and Gothamist, shares her reporting on how the hospitals are complying with the subpoena and the broader reaction from parents, politicians, and trans-rights advocates.     Photo: Medical records in file cabinet at doctor's office. (Photo by fotofrog/Getty Images)     Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

New Mexico's Truth Commission has issued 14 subpoenas as part of a sweeping effort to uncover what happened at Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro Ranch. Dina Doll reports on the subpoenas targeting Epstein's estate, major banks, the FBI, the DOJ, and other entities as investigators pursue answers, accountability, and justice for Epstein's victims. Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show The Ken Harbaugh Show: https://meidasnews.com/tag/the-ken-harbaugh-show Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered

New Mexico's Epstein Truth Commission has approved subpoenas for 14 entities as it digs into alleged sex trafficking, abuse, and institutional failures connected to Jeffrey Epstein's former Zorro Ranch outside Santa Fe. The entities reportedly include the FBI, the DOJ, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, the New Mexico Department of Justice, JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and the Santa Fe Institute. Lawmakers say the goal is to build a documented public record of what happened in New Mexico, who knew what, and whether federal, state, financial, or institutional actors failed to act while Epstein maintained the ranch for decades.The renewed scrutiny follows years of unanswered questions about why Epstein's New Mexico property was never fully searched during earlier federal investigations, despite survivor allegations and later claims tied to newly released files. Testimony before the commission included alleged victim Rachel Benavidez, who said Epstein abused her after she was hired as a massage therapist at the ranch, along with relatives of survivors. The commission's work is now positioned as both a fact-finding effort and a possible precursor to civil litigation, with New Mexico officials framing the inquiry as a survivor-centered attempt to finally examine the ranch, the money trail, and the institutional blind spots that allowed Epstein's operation to remain largely untouched there for so long.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:FBI, DOJ Among Agencies Facing Scrutiny as New Mexico Reopens Questions Around Epstein Ranch

New Mexico's Epstein Truth Commission has approved subpoenas for 14 entities as it digs into alleged sex trafficking, abuse, and institutional failures connected to Jeffrey Epstein's former Zorro Ranch outside Santa Fe. The entities reportedly include the FBI, the DOJ, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, the New Mexico Department of Justice, JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and the Santa Fe Institute. Lawmakers say the goal is to build a documented public record of what happened in New Mexico, who knew what, and whether federal, state, financial, or institutional actors failed to act while Epstein maintained the ranch for decades.The renewed scrutiny follows years of unanswered questions about why Epstein's New Mexico property was never fully searched during earlier federal investigations, despite survivor allegations and later claims tied to newly released files. Testimony before the commission included alleged victim Rachel Benavidez, who said Epstein abused her after she was hired as a massage therapist at the ranch, along with relatives of survivors. The commission's work is now positioned as both a fact-finding effort and a possible precursor to civil litigation, with New Mexico officials framing the inquiry as a survivor-centered attempt to finally examine the ranch, the money trail, and the institutional blind spots that allowed Epstein's operation to remain largely untouched there for so long.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:FBI, DOJ Among Agencies Facing Scrutiny as New Mexico Reopens Questions Around Epstein RanchBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

New Mexico's Epstein Truth Commission has approved subpoenas for 14 entities as it digs into alleged sex trafficking, abuse, and institutional failures connected to Jeffrey Epstein's former Zorro Ranch outside Santa Fe. The entities reportedly include the FBI, the DOJ, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, the New Mexico Department of Justice, JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and the Santa Fe Institute. Lawmakers say the goal is to build a documented public record of what happened in New Mexico, who knew what, and whether federal, state, financial, or institutional actors failed to act while Epstein maintained the ranch for decades.The renewed scrutiny follows years of unanswered questions about why Epstein's New Mexico property was never fully searched during earlier federal investigations, despite survivor allegations and later claims tied to newly released files. Testimony before the commission included alleged victim Rachel Benavidez, who said Epstein abused her after she was hired as a massage therapist at the ranch, along with relatives of survivors. The commission's work is now positioned as both a fact-finding effort and a possible precursor to civil litigation, with New Mexico officials framing the inquiry as a survivor-centered attempt to finally examine the ranch, the money trail, and the institutional blind spots that allowed Epstein's operation to remain largely untouched there for so long.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:FBI, DOJ Among Agencies Facing Scrutiny as New Mexico Reopens Questions Around Epstein RanchBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

New Mexico's Epstein Survivors Truth Commission has issued its first major round of subpoenas as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's former Zorro Ranch, the sprawling property outside Santa Fe that has long been tied to allegations of abuse, trafficking, and institutional failure. The commission, created by New Mexico lawmakers in early 2026, is seeking records from more than a dozen entities, including federal agencies, state officials, law enforcement bodies, Deutsche Bank, the FBI, the governor's office, and the Santa Fe Institute. The goal is to determine what happened at the ranch, who knew about it, what institutions enabled Epstein's presence in New Mexico for decades, and why the property was never subjected to the same level of federal scrutiny as Epstein's Manhattan mansion or his island in the Virgin Islands.The subpoenas mark a significant escalation because the New Mexico inquiry is not simply looking at Epstein as an isolated predator, but at the broader network around him: financial institutions, scientific circles, government offices, law enforcement agencies, and any public or private actors who may have helped create the conditions that allowed him to operate. The commission has heard testimony from survivors and relatives of victims, including testimony connected to Virginia Giuffre, and it is encouraging additional victims to come forward. The investigation also follows renewed searches of Zorro Ranch by New Mexico authorities earlier this year, using tools such as drones and cadaver dogs, after previously released Epstein records revived questions about possible crimes and overlooked allegations connected to the property. In plain terms: New Mexico is now trying to do what federal authorities never fully did—put Zorro Ranch under a microscope.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New Mexico ‘Truth Commission' begins investigation into Epstein's Zorro Ranch, will issue subpoenas | CNN Politics

New Mexico's Epstein Survivors Truth Commission has issued its first major round of subpoenas as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's former Zorro Ranch, the sprawling property outside Santa Fe that has long been tied to allegations of abuse, trafficking, and institutional failure. The commission, created by New Mexico lawmakers in early 2026, is seeking records from more than a dozen entities, including federal agencies, state officials, law enforcement bodies, Deutsche Bank, the FBI, the governor's office, and the Santa Fe Institute. The goal is to determine what happened at the ranch, who knew about it, what institutions enabled Epstein's presence in New Mexico for decades, and why the property was never subjected to the same level of federal scrutiny as Epstein's Manhattan mansion or his island in the Virgin Islands.The subpoenas mark a significant escalation because the New Mexico inquiry is not simply looking at Epstein as an isolated predator, but at the broader network around him: financial institutions, scientific circles, government offices, law enforcement agencies, and any public or private actors who may have helped create the conditions that allowed him to operate. The commission has heard testimony from survivors and relatives of victims, including testimony connected to Virginia Giuffre, and it is encouraging additional victims to come forward. The investigation also follows renewed searches of Zorro Ranch by New Mexico authorities earlier this year, using tools such as drones and cadaver dogs, after previously released Epstein records revived questions about possible crimes and overlooked allegations connected to the property. In plain terms: New Mexico is now trying to do what federal authorities never fully did—put Zorro Ranch under a microscope.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New Mexico ‘Truth Commission' begins investigation into Epstein's Zorro Ranch, will issue subpoenas | CNN PoliticsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

New Mexico's Epstein Survivors Truth Commission has issued its first major round of subpoenas as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's former Zorro Ranch, the sprawling property outside Santa Fe that has long been tied to allegations of abuse, trafficking, and institutional failure. The commission, created by New Mexico lawmakers in early 2026, is seeking records from more than a dozen entities, including federal agencies, state officials, law enforcement bodies, Deutsche Bank, the FBI, the governor's office, and the Santa Fe Institute. The goal is to determine what happened at the ranch, who knew about it, what institutions enabled Epstein's presence in New Mexico for decades, and why the property was never subjected to the same level of federal scrutiny as Epstein's Manhattan mansion or his island in the Virgin Islands.The subpoenas mark a significant escalation because the New Mexico inquiry is not simply looking at Epstein as an isolated predator, but at the broader network around him: financial institutions, scientific circles, government offices, law enforcement agencies, and any public or private actors who may have helped create the conditions that allowed him to operate. The commission has heard testimony from survivors and relatives of victims, including testimony connected to Virginia Giuffre, and it is encouraging additional victims to come forward. The investigation also follows renewed searches of Zorro Ranch by New Mexico authorities earlier this year, using tools such as drones and cadaver dogs, after previously released Epstein records revived questions about possible crimes and overlooked allegations connected to the property. In plain terms: New Mexico is now trying to do what federal authorities never fully did—put Zorro Ranch under a microscope.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New Mexico ‘Truth Commission' begins investigation into Epstein's Zorro Ranch, will issue subpoenas | CNN PoliticsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

When your Clinical Documentation Ends up In Court: What Healthcare Providers Need to Know with Dr. Pankti FadiaIn Part 2 of our conversation with Dr. Pankti Fadia, DC, MBA, we continue exploring what happens when clinical care intersects with the legal system.After discussing personal injury documentation and causation in Part 1, this episode moves deeper into subpoenas, affidavits, depositions, trial testimony, expert witness credibility, and ethical considerations for chiropractors and healthcare providers working in the personal injury space.Dr. Fadia explains what providers should know when records are requested, how to approach deposition or courtroom testimony, and why confidence, preparation, and clear communication matter when your clinical decisions are being questioned.This episode also highlights an important reminder: your role is not to defend the patient's entire legal case. Your role is to explain your care, support your documentation, stay within your scope, and communicate your clinical reasoning clearly.Key Themes in Today's Episode:What to know when you receive a subpoena or records requestThe difference between written questions, depositions, and trial testimonyHow to prepare before giving testimonyWhy providers should answer only what is askedThe importance of staying within your clinical scopeHow defense attorneys may challenge credibilityDisclaimer: This episode is for educational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal advice.

Former President Bill Clinton testified under subpoena in a closed-door deposition before the Republican-controlled House Oversight Committee as part of its investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his network. Over about six hours of questioning in Chappaqua, New York, Clinton repeatedly denied any knowledge of Epstein's criminal activities, emphasized that their interactions were limited and long predating Epstein's known crimes, and stressed he “did nothing wrong.” He said he saw “nothing” that gave him pause, may say “I don't recall” on old interactions, and maintained that any association ended years before Epstein's first criminal conviction. Clinton also defended his wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who had testified a day earlier and said she had no meaningful connection to Epstein.Republicans on the committee used the deposition to probe Clinton's past travel on Epstein's plane and old photos released in the Epstein Files, while Democrats framed the testimony as part of a broader push for transparency and have called for other high-profile figures, including President Donald Trump, to testify as well. Clinton's testimony marked the first time a former U.S. president was compelled to testify before Congress under subpoena in this context, and the committee may release the transcript or video publicly at its discretionto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bill Clinton faces grilling from lawmakers over Epstein ties | AP NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Hasan Piker is hit with a federal subpoena over Cuba trips and alleged foreign influence, exposing his radical rhetoric, “revolutionary” branding, and impact on vulnerable young viewers. We break down the legal stakes, funding questions, and why parents must watch who's brainwashing their kids.

In this episode, we unpack Washington Attorney General Nick Brown's lawsuit against Albertsons, Safeway, and Haggen over allegedly deceptive “buy one, get one free” promotions, where the state claims the grocers quietly inflated prices before running BOGO sales and then dropped them afterward, generating nearly $20 million in alleged overcharges across more than 3 million transactions. The case highlights intensifying regulatory scrutiny around pricing transparency, discount advertising, and consumer perception at a time when rising grocery costs are already under the microscope—and serves as a warning that regulators are increasingly willing to challenge whether “free” really means free. Hosted by Simone Roach. Based on a blog post by Gonzalo E. Mon.

Patrick Bet-David, Tom Ellsworth, Adam Sosnick, and Vincent Oshana break down Trump's Iran nuclear deal negotiations, the Bolt CEO firing his entire HR team, Tulsi Gabbard's reported exit as DNI, Hasan Piker's subpoena battle, the MBA job market collapse, AI disrupting major consulting firms, Kevin Warsh being sworn in as Fed Chair, and the White House shooting investigation.-------

Former President Bill Clinton testified under subpoena in a closed-door deposition before the Republican-controlled House Oversight Committee as part of its investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his network. Over about six hours of questioning in Chappaqua, New York, Clinton repeatedly denied any knowledge of Epstein's criminal activities, emphasized that their interactions were limited and long predating Epstein's known crimes, and stressed he “did nothing wrong.” He said he saw “nothing” that gave him pause, may say “I don't recall” on old interactions, and maintained that any association ended years before Epstein's first criminal conviction. Clinton also defended his wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who had testified a day earlier and said she had no meaningful connection to Epstein.Republicans on the committee used the deposition to probe Clinton's past travel on Epstein's plane and old photos released in the Epstein Files, while Democrats framed the testimony as part of a broader push for transparency and have called for other high-profile figures, including President Donald Trump, to testify as well. Clinton's testimony marked the first time a former U.S. president was compelled to testify before Congress under subpoena in this context, and the committee may release the transcript or video publicly at its discretionto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bill Clinton faces grilling from lawmakers over Epstein ties | AP NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Here's what doesn't add up. The state prosecutor who handled Becky Hill's criminal case told the court there wasn't enough evidence to charge her with jury tampering. Four months later, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Hill engaged in "shocking jury interference" and placed "her fingers on the scales of justice." She'd already pleaded guilty to misconduct, obstruction, and perjury. But the tampering charge — the one that actually describes what the Supreme Court says she did — was never filed.Eric Faddis spent years as a prosecutor and now practices defense. He explains how that gap happens, what it means, and whether it suggests something more than a difference of legal opinion.Alex Murdaugh's defense team isn't waiting to find out. Five days after the Supreme Court ruling, they filed a federal Section 1983 lawsuit against Hill personally — seeking six hundred thousand dollars in damages and, more importantly, the civil discovery tools the criminal process never gave them. Subpoenas. Depositions. The right to drag people under oath and ask questions nobody in the state system has asked.Dick Harpootlian already said the quiet part out loud: is Becky Hill a "lone wolf"? The only people trying to find out are working for the man she allegedly helped convict.Footer Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #MurdaughTrial #SouthCarolina #JuryTampering #Section1983 #TrueCrime #DeathPenalty #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers

Dick Harpootlian stood at a press conference podium and asked out loud whether Becky Hill acted alone. He didn't have to say it. He's been litigating high-profile cases for decades. When a defense attorney with that experience floats a question like that on day one of a federal lawsuit, it's not casual — it's a signal.Eric Faddis breaks down what Harpootlian is doing strategically and who the signal is aimed at. The Section 1983 lawsuit filed against Hill gives Murdaugh's team something they've never had before — civil discovery. Subpoena power. The ability to pull social media, take depositions, and put people under oath about what happened behind closed doors during the original trial.The South Carolina Supreme Court already ruled that Hill engaged in "shocking jury interference" and put "her fingers on the scales of justice." Hill pleaded guilty to misconduct, obstruction, and perjury. But the state prosecutor who handled her criminal case told the court there wasn't enough evidence for a jury tampering charge — a position the Supreme Court effectively rejected four months later.Now the Attorney General is considering the death penalty for the retrial. Federal depositions could run on a parallel track. And the only entity actively using legal tools to find out how far the corruption actually went is Alex Murdaugh's defense team.Footer Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #MurdaughTrial #SouthCarolina #JuryTampering #Section1983 #TrueCrime #DeathPenalty #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers

The defense team is not waiting for the state to investigate Becky Hill. They are doing it themselves — in federal court.Murdaugh's attorneys announced a Section 1983 civil rights lawsuit against the former Colleton County Clerk, claiming she violated Murdaugh's constitutional right to a fair trial. The South Carolina Supreme Court already determined her conduct was serious enough to order a new trial. Now the defense is using that ruling as a launching pad for something the state never attempted — a full investigation through civil discovery.Depositions. Subpoenas. Sworn testimony under oath. The tools that criminal proceedings did not provide are exactly what this civil suit unlocks. And the defense made clear they intend to use every one of them.The central question is one Jim Griffin raised publicly: was Hill operating alone? The complaint does not assume the answer. It asks the question and demands the evidence. The suspicious removal of the egg lady juror, Myra Crosby, features prominently — the defense sees that moment as a key to understanding the full scope of what happened during deliberations.The financial component seeks over six hundred thousand dollars tied to the first trial's costs. The attorneys emphasized that recovered funds go entirely to the receivership. Murdaugh does not receive a dollar.Tony Brueski breaks it all down with criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of the Defense Diaries podcast and retired FBI Chief of the Behavioral Analysis Program Robin Dreeke, analyzing the filing, the discovery tools at play, and what this lawsuit could force into the open.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MurdaughTrial #BeckyHill #FederalLawsuit #JuryTampering #CivilRights #Section1983 #MurdaughRetrial #ColletonCounty #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

The House Oversight Committee voted to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi to testify about the Justice Department's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, a move that reflected growing frustration in Congress over what lawmakers say has been a deeply flawed and opaque disclosure process. The subpoena passed in a 24–19 vote, with several Republicans joining Democrats in demanding that Bondi appear before the committee to explain why the department missed legal deadlines and failed to release large portions of the Epstein records despite the requirements of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Lawmakers say that while the Justice Department released millions of pages of documents, investigators believe tens of thousands of files remain withheld or offline, raising serious concerns that the public has not been given the full picture. The vote to compel Bondi's testimony amounted to a rare bipartisan rebuke of the nation's top law-enforcement official and signaled mounting anger in Congress over what many members believe has been a pattern of evasion and incomplete disclosure.Critics have argued that Bondi's handling of the Epstein files has been marked by delays, contradictions, and combative responses to oversight rather than transparency. Lawmakers and investigators have accused the Justice Department under her leadership of missing mandated release deadlines, redacting or withholding key documents, and failing to provide clear explanations for why large portions of the records remain unavailable. During earlier congressional questioning, Bondi reportedly deflected direct questions about Epstein's accomplices and the status of ongoing investigations, which only deepened suspicions that the department may be shielding powerful figures connected to the case. The subpoena now forces Bondi to answer under oath about decisions that critics say have undermined confidence in the Justice Department's commitment to fully exposing Epstein's network. For many in Congress, the issue is no longer simply about document management—it is about whether the nation's top prosecutor has obstructed transparency in one of the most explosive criminal investigations in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:House panel votes to subpoena Pam Bondi for Epstein files testimonyBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Roger Goodell says the NFL is cooperating with the Florida AG after receiving a subpoena. Correspondent Gethin Coolbaugh reports.

On Friday, Mandy took the stand in York for a civil contempt hearing that, by any measure, never should have happened — while the co-defendants actually trying to depose Gregg Roman (the nucleus of the Parker conspiracy case) had to beg the judge to even hear their motion. The contrast is staggering. Investigative journalists ⁠⁠Mandy Matney⁠⁠ and ⁠Liz Farrell⁠⁠ and attorney Eric Bland unpack what really went down in that courtroom: Meredith Bannon's surgical lawyering, Becky Lindahl's compelling missing-affidavit argument, the 6 year harassment campaign, a felon's escalating behavior and the sea of supporters in pink who made the day bearable.  Then they turn to Wednesday's 5-0 Murdaugh murder conviction reversal — Becky Hill as the designated punching bag, Dick and Jim on the Today Show, and the privilege only a Murdaugh gets to enjoy. ☕ Cups Up! ⚖️ Episode References Show your support of Eric Bland to the ODC

The first jury heard twelve hours of financial crimes testimony before they ever weighed the physical evidence. Three-hour conviction. The Supreme Court just said that can't happen again. Round two is a fundamentally different trial.Creighton Waters has to convict on what SLED actually found — and what they didn't find. No weapon. No DNA on Alex Murdaugh. A crime scene degraded by weather and contaminated by family access. And a housekeeper who says she reported an unidentified vehicle near the property, close to Paul's firearm storage, and SLED let it slide.Jennifer Coffindaffer and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke don't mince words about what that means. They spent decades running investigations at the highest levels, and they walk through exactly how the defense will use SLED's own gaps against the prosecution at retrial.Harpootlian already tipped his hand. He told reporters the reversal will bring reluctant witnesses out, and he'll subpoena the ones who don't come voluntarily. Coffindaffer and Dreeke assess whether that's strategy or theater, examine Blanca Simpson's evolving accounts across multiple settings, and tackle the two-shooter theory that SLED admitted it couldn't eliminate. The prosecution's case just got a lot harder. Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, and Jennifer Coffindaffer.LINKS & DISCLAIMERJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #SLED #MurdaughTrial #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #CreightonWaters

Paige is exploring empathy and Hannah reveals her guilty pleasures. subscribe to our newsletter Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The government has no business harassing pro-life ministries and its supporters because it disagrees with their pro-life cause. Constitutional expert, lawyer, author, pastor, and founder of Liberty Counsel Mat Staver discusses the important topics of the day with co-hosts and guests that impact life, liberty, and family. To stay informed and get involved, visit LC.org.

Everyone from your parents to your coworkers to local small businesses has some sort of presence on the internet,  but can you use social media to locate tortfeasors in your lawsuits?  Is social media an easy way to track down your defendants? The answer depends on the jurisdiction, and whether or not the courts there think that the social media company is shielded by the Stored Communications Act.  On this week's episode, Rebecca and Steve discuss obtaining information from social media companies, and how different jurisdictions apply the Stored Communications Act to social media companies and the information they possess, as well as steps to prepare subpoenas and the information that is required for a successful request

A CIA Whistleblower testified under oath that the agency walked into Tulsi Gabbard's office and took 40 boxes of JFK and MKUltra files she was preparing to release under a direct presidential order, and then spied on her office while they worked. Has the CIA gone rogue?SPONSOR: BRUNT WorkwearBRUNT Workwear makes jobsite-grade boots that feel great from day one, no painful break-in period. With BRUNT's 100% risk-free trial, you can wear them on real workdays and send them back for a full refund if they're not right. Founded by Eric Girouard for tradesmen, every product is named after a real hard-working guy he grew up with.Get $10 off plus a risk-free trial with code NICK at https://www.BRUNTworkwear.com/Nick-----SPONSOR: Good RanchersGood Ranchers delivers 100% American meat straight to your door: pasture-raised, no antibiotics, no added hormones. They partner with local farmers and ranchers to keep food production in this country. Over 85% of grass-fed beef sold in the U.S. is actually imported, and most shoppers have no idea.Get $100 off your first three orders plus free protein for life at https://www.GoodRanchers.com/discount/NICK-----GET YOUR MERCH HERE: https://shop.nickjfreitas.com/BECOME A MEMBER OF THE IC: https://NickJFreitas.comInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/nickjfreitas/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NickFreitasVATwitter: https://twitter.com/NickJFreitasYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@NickjfreitasTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nickjfreitas3.000:00:00 – CIA Whistleblower exposes CIA JFK file theft00:01:23 – Trump executive order declassifying JFK and MKUltra files00:03:27 – Anna Paulina Luna confirms CIA took forty boxes00:05:05 – Tulsi Gabbard and the CIA hierarchy of oversight00:06:39 – FBI files on Martin Luther King Jr connections00:11:05 – James Erdman exposes CIA cover up on Covid00:12:42 – Anthony Fauci and weaponized gain of function research00:15:45 – CIA monitoring Tulsi Gabbard computers and phone calls00:16:52 – Verifying the credibility of independent intelligence sources00:21:02 – Senator Mike Lee criticizes CIA damaged reputation00:22:52 – CIA response to domestic spying and Edward Snowden00:24:13 – Subpoena threat over stolen Tulsi Gabbard documents00:26:08 – Unelected bureaucrats versus elected government power struggle00:29:15 – How rogue agencies leverage information against Congress00:32:00 – Tulsi Gabbard accountability role as DNI leader00:36:09 – Why criminal punishment is necessary for CIA reform

May 12, 2026; 6pm; The Department of Justice has subpoenaed Wall Street Journal reporters over Iran coverage. MS NOW's Ari Melber reports and is joined by Marty Baron, former executive editor for The Washington Post. Plus, House Democrats ramp up their investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Democratic Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi joins. To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Jon Herold comes in Tuesday energized and with receipts. The FBI is now actively interviewing CIA officials as part of the Brennan investigation into the 2017 Russian intelligence assessment, and Jon plays a recent Brennan clip where the man openly admits to knowing about a "legion" of professionals inside the government still working against Trump. Jon flags it as potential RICO furtherance on tape. The DOJ also officially warned reporters they should expect subpoenas in the classified Iran war leaks investigation, with the Wall Street Journal already having received them. Jon reads newly released Senate committee documents showing Hunter Biden Mann Act evidence including text messages, goes live down a rabbit hole when he notices the name "Robert" in one exchange, and arrives somewhere interesting. Kari Lake is being sent to Jamaica as ambassador and Doug Mastriano to the Slovak Republic, and Jon sees a familiar template: Trump takes big election integrity figures, parks them in ambassadorships, and they disappear from the conversation. Also: the California mayor who just pleaded guilty to being a Chinese spy is named Wang, Stacey Abrams has been subpoenaed in Georgia, ODNI is reviewing 120 US-funded foreign biolabs, and Trump wants Wall Street banned from buying houses.

Here's some good news on the legal front: Georgia state election officials are now fighting back against the Department of Justice's most recent abuse of grand jury subpoenas. Glenn talks with Adam Klasfeld of All Rise News about this new development.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Here's some good news on the legal front: Georgia state election officials are now fighting back against the Department of Justice's most recent abuse of grand jury subpoenas. Glenn talks with Adam Klasfeld of All Rise News about this new development.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Three grand juries. Months of proceedings. Subpoena power. Witness testimony. And not one of them produced an indictment against David Anthony Burke in the alleged murder of fourteen-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. So the DA filed a criminal complaint instead — and defense attorney Blair Berk made sure the courtroom heard that distinction loud and clear before pushing for the fastest possible preliminary hearing.That is not a detail. That is the fault line this entire case may crack along.Trial attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis — who has sat on both sides of a murder case — breaks down what it means when a grand jury cannot or will not indict, what changes when prosecutors proceed on a complaint, and why Berk's aggressive timeline signals a defense that wants the evidence tested publicly, not protected behind sealed proceedings. Faddis has seen what happens when a prosecution builds a case on volume rather than precision, and he examines whether over forty terabytes of digital evidence is strength or a warning sign that investigators cast an extraordinarily wide net.The felony complaint charges Burke with first-degree murder carrying three special circumstances — including financial gain, which DA Nathan Hochman tied to Burke allegedly protecting an existing music career Celeste reportedly threatened to expose. Faddis challenges whether that framing meets the legal standard or whether prosecutors are stretching a definition to reach death-penalty eligibility. He also dissects the defense's carefully constructed statement — "did not murder" and "was not the cause of her death" as two separate claims — and explains what trial strategy that dual denial sets up.The unsealed autopsy confirmed Celeste died from penetrating wounds to her torso. Prosecutors allege exploitation material was found on Burke's phone and that the abuse began when she was thirteen. Her dismembered remains were found in a Tesla registered to Burke that had been towed from the Hollywood Hills while he was on tour.Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief, takes listener questions on the investigative timeline, the year between Celeste's disappearance and Burke's arrest, and what behavioral indicators investigators likely tracked while building a case against someone with significant public visibility. Celeste was reported missing three times. The system had chances. It didn't act.Burke has pled not guilty and is held without bail.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #GrandJury #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForCeleste #BlairBerk #FelonyComplaint #DeathPenalty

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Pam Bondi refusing to show up at her deposition today before the House Oversight Committee where she was lawfully subpoenaed. Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show The Ken Harbaugh Show: https://meidasnews.com/tag/the-ken-harbaugh-show Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices