Podcasts about Talc

durée : 00:48:01 - Affaires sensibles - par : Fabrice Drouelle, Franck COGNARD - Aujourd'hui dans Affaires Sensibles, le scandale du talc Morhange - réalisé par : Stéphane COSME

On this eye-opening episode of Vitality Radio, Jared breaks down the part of the supplement label most people ignore: other Ingredients. While active ingredients get all the attention, it's often the excipients—binders, fillers, flow agents, coatings, and colorants—that determine whether your supplement is truly clean and effective. Jared exposes why manufacturers use these "inactive" ingredients, how they impact product quality, and which common additives you should avoid. You'll learn how to read this overlooked section of your supplement label and become an informed, empowered consumer.Additional Information:#525: Decoding Supplement Fact Panels and Becoming a More Informed ConsumerOther Ingredients Breakdown Blog PostVisit the podcast website here: VitalityRadio.comYou can follow @vitalitynutritionbountiful and @vitalityradio on Instagram, or Vitality Radio and Vitality Nutrition on Facebook. Join us also in the Vitality Radio Podcast Listener Community on Facebook. Shop the products that Jared mentions at vitalitynutrition.com. Let us know your thoughts about this episode using the hashtag #vitalityradio and please rate and review us on Apple Podcasts. Thank you!Just a reminder that this podcast is for educational purposes only. The FDA has not evaluated the podcast. The information is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. The advice given is not intended to replace the advice of your medical professional.

Send us a textOn today's show we cover lots of questions including…Are cosmetic products filled with microplastics? What do you do about facial hair?Is jojoba oil good to use with retinol?How can a formula with hypochlorous acid and azeleic acid be stable?How do you handle acne at the hair line?Beauty NewsWill printed skin replace animal testing?Is Gelatin the same as a Collagen supplement?Is California going to ban anti-aging products for people under 18?J&J Talc case update - another rejection for a $10 billion settlementRecall newsHenkel recallAcne product recallTime Stamps0:00 - Intro and chit chat 4:45 - Beauty News8:50 - Collagen and Gelatin11:45 - California and kids cosmetics14:15 - Talc lawsuit update16:40 - Recall news21:45 - Listener feedback25:05 - Microplastics and cosmetics31:55 - Facial hair advice37:00 - Jojoba oil and Retinol45:20 - Mixing acids48:45 - Acne and hair lines52:45 - EndingFive Ways to Ask a question -1. Send us a message through Patreon!2. You can record your question on your smart phone and email to thebeautybrains@gmail.com3. Send it to us via social media (see links below)4. Submit it through the following form - Ask a question5. Leave a voice mail message: 872-216-1856Social media accountson Instagram we're at thebeautybrains2018on Twitter, we're thebeautybrainsOn Bluesky we're at thebeautybrainsAnd we have a Facebook pageValerie's ingredient company - Simply IngredientsPerry's other website - Chemists CornerFollow the  Porch Kitty Krew instagram accountSupport the show

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) posted notable strengths in their earnings Tuesday. Jeff Jonas points to the company's pharmaceuticals sector as the highlight, arguing the company has a great pipeline which can withstand tariffs. One overhang: the company's talc lawsuit. Jeff thinks Johnson & Johnson paying the $10 billion settlement is the best route it can make to move forward.======== Schwab Network ========Empowering every investor and trader, every market day.Subscribe to the Market Minute newsletter - https://schwabnetwork.com/subscribeDownload the iOS app - https://apps.apple.com/us/app/schwab-network/id1460719185Download the Amazon Fire Tv App - https://www.amazon.com/TD-Ameritrade-Network/dp/B07KRD76C7Watch on Sling - https://watch.sling.com/1/asset/191928615bd8d47686f94682aefaa007/watchWatch on Vizio - https://www.vizio.com/en/watchfreeplus-exploreWatch on DistroTV - https://www.distro.tv/live/schwab-network/Follow us on X – https://twitter.com/schwabnetworkFollow us on Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/schwabnetworkFollow us on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/schwab-network/About Schwab Network - https://schwabnetwork.com/about

They say that third time’s a charm. But unfortunately, that doesn’t seem like the case for Johnson & Johnson after it was announced that a US bankruptcy judge had rejected the pharmaceutical giant’s $10 billion proposal to end 60,000 lawsuits against its baby powder. Join Dan Koh and Ryan Huang as they explore the latest dismissal of J&J’s bankruptcy gambit and the approach they will be taking to address these claims.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Take our survey! http://bit.ly/glossangeles-surveyHave a question about the beauty industry? Chances are, it's covered in this episode. Our guests today are one of our favorite accounts to follow due to their thorough, fun and accurate content: The Lipstick Lesbians! Product developer Alexis Androulakis and education technology expert Dr. Christina Basias Androulakis join us on the pod — we wish we had several more hours to interview them! They share how nearing bankruptcy ultimately lead to their success (and why you shouldn't self-fund your own brand if at all possible), how Christina encouraged Alexis to begin making content about where products come from and how they work, and then answer listener-submitted questions, including why removing talc has ruined so many of our favorite powder products, why do some products look one way in the bottle but different on the skin, how to find your perfect foundation color match, how tariffs are going to affect product development in the beauty space, and why so many brands launch the same products within a short period of time. Plus, they reveal more about LLab — an 8-hour online master class with a framework developed by Christina and taught by Alexis that shares the nuance of products and is a tool to help everyone from consumers to experts. Shop the episodeWatch our episodes!GlossAngelesPod.comCALL or TEXT US: 424-341-0426Join our Slack to try new products before they launch https://join.slack.com/t/glossangeles/shared_invite/zt-2xtc77p7p-pd4nU1HkJAN971~s9HeZsgJoin our FB GroupInstagram: @glossangelspod, @kirbiejohnson, @saratanTwitter: @glossangelespod, @kirbiejohnson, @saratanEmail: glossangelespodcast@gmail.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Send us a textOn today's show we cover lots of questions including…Is it ok to use self-tanner under your eyes and around your lips?Are PFAS the ingredients that cause products to self-foam?How can a silicone protect hair up to temperatures of 450 degrees?Are certain types of products worth getting the more expensive product?What is the chemistry of nanoplasty?But first…Beauty NewsFDA proposes new test for talc containing products.Walmart says it won't hit its's emission goals.Five Ways to Ask a question -1. Send us a message through Patreon!2. You can record your question on your smart phone and email to thebeautybrains@gmail.com3. Send it to us via social media (see links below)4. Submit it through the following form - Ask a question5. Leave a voice mail message: 872-216-1856Social media accountson Instagram we're at thebeautybrains2018on Twitter, we're thebeautybrainsAnd we have a Facebook pageValerie's ingredient company - Simply IngredientsPerry's other website - Chemists CornerFollow the  Porch Kitty Krew instagram accountSupport the show

Can a virgin oil with defects be considered genuine? And what about an oil extracted using talc powder? Is the adjective 'typical' really an assurance of excellence or quality?

Episode 2427 - First five minutes audio only. Where will Russia stand with the U.S.? -What? Transgender holocaust. -Why did UK schools take out everything referring to Christmas? -Is the detox made simple kit good for you? -Why is Talc and fluoride so bad? -Laken Riley murderer is sentenced to life in prison. -How many are still dying from covid shot? -Short video content on social media positive or negative to the younger generation? -Is mental health affected by being on the internet? -Will they limit the speed of vehicles in the future? Is alcohol ok in moderation ? Great show today!

It's Hump Day! And Sam is live from the Mass Torts Conference in Las Vegas! First, Sam and Emma run through updates on the build of Hurricane Milton as it approaches Florida, Harris' campaign for the right, Biden's commitment to Israel, DOJ vs. Google, Trump's blocking of a Kavanaugh FBI investigation, abortion bans, Boeing machinist's ongoing labor action, Elons cucking to Lula, the ever-crumbling Eric Adams Administration, and the GOP's mass investment in anti-trans attacks, before parsing a little more thoroughly through the impending threat of Hurricane Milton. After touching on the important distinction between mass torts and class action lawsuits, Sam is joined by Attorney Kim Adams with Levin Pappantonio to discuss her ongoing litigation against the Canadian porn company formerly known as MindGeek (now Aylo) for encouraging, facilitating, and helping to disseminate child pornography on their site, unpacking the law (Section 230) that protects platforms from legal liability for third-party content and the tension between that and the active production, curation, boosting, and highlighting of said liable content, not to mention the heightened responsibility for pornography companies to be aware of the content the platform and sponsor. After expanding on the extensive community of impacted parties, be they plaintiffs or potential class members, and exploring the distinction between hosting and publishing, Adams summarizes the case's state right now. Next, Andy Birchfield from Beasley Allen joins, diving right into the ever-ongoing case against Johnson & Johnson for their manufacturing, sale, and promotion of their Talc-based baby powder formula despite internal awareness of the presence of asbestos and the devastating medical impact it can have on mothers and their children, with a particular focus on J&J knowingly marketing this toxic powder as a feminine hygiene product and the resulting development of ovarian cancer amongst consumers. Next, Birchfield dives deep into J&J's implementation of the “Texas Two-Step” legal maneuver to avoid responsibility, splitting off all of its liabilities from its assets into a separate company, before immediately moving said company to the asbestos-liability haven of North Carolina, where it would attempt to declare bankruptcy and render any attempts at accountability or compensation null. Walking through the circle of attrition that this has created in the courts, as we enter a third attempt to declare bankruptcy, Andy and Sam wrap up with the future of this case and the role public pressure, congressional legislation, and the questionable morals of J&J leadership all play in hopefully bringing this to a close. Sam and Emma also expand on the developing story about the Trump White House's obstruction of an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh's allegations of sexual assault. The crew watches Sean Hannity compares abortion restrictions to the draft before chatting with attorneys Brian Barr of Levin Papantonio and the legendary Ben Crump about their representation of Roger Fortson, a U.S. airman shot to death by police. They then discuss the back-and-forth sniping between Kamala Harris and Ron DeSantis over taking a phone call regarding hurricane assistance, and Benjamin Netanyahu benevolently addressing the people of Lebanon (major sarcasm intended). Plus, your IM's!   If you can, donate to the GoFundMe for Palestinian journalist Rakan Abed El Rahman, who spoke with Emma Monday: https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-two-press-members-and-their-families-evacuate Become a member at JoinTheMajorityReport.com: https://fans.fm/majority/join Follow us on TikTok here!: https://www.tiktok.com/@majorityreportfm Check us out on Twitch here!: https://www.twitch.tv/themajorityreport Find our Rumble stream here!: https://rumble.com/user/majorityrep ort Check out our alt YouTube channel here!: https://www.youtube.com/majorityreportlive Join Sam on the Nation Magazine Cruise! 7 days in December 2024!!: https://nationcruise.com/mr/ Check out StrikeAid here!; https://strikeaid.com/ Gift a Majority Report subscription here: https://fans.fm/majority/gift Subscribe to the ESVN YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/esvnshow Subscribe to the AMQuickie newsletter here: https://am-quickie.ghost.io/ Join the Majority Report Discord! http://majoritydiscord.com/ Get all your MR merch at our store: https://shop.majorityreportradio.com/ Get the free Majority Report App!: http://majority.fm/app Check out today's sponsors: Givewell: Go to https://Givewell.org to find out more or make a donation. Select PODCAST and enter The Majority Report with Sam Seder at checkout to make sure they know you heard about them from us. Again, that's https://Givewell.org to donate or find out more. Nutrafol: Take the first step towards achieving your hair growth goals. For a limited time, Nutrafol is offering our listeners ten dollars off your first month's subscription and free shipping when you go to https://Nutrafol.com/men and enter the promo code TMR.  Find out why over 4,500 healthcare professionals and stylists recommend Nutrafol for healthier hair. That's https://Nutrafol.com/men, promo code TMR. Sunset Lake CBD: Sunsetlakecbd is a majority employee owned farm in Vermont, producing 100% pesticide free CBD products. Use code Leftisbest and get 20% off at http://www.sunsetlakecbd.com. Follow the Majority Report crew on Twitter: @SamSeder @EmmaVigeland @MattLech @BradKAlsop Check out Matt's show, Left Reckoning, on Youtube, and subscribe on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/leftreckoning Check out Matt Binder's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/mattbinder Subscribe to Brandon's show The Discourse on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/ExpandTheDiscourse Check out Ava Raiza's music here! https://avaraiza.bandcamp.com/ The Majority Report with Sam Seder - https://majorityreportradio.com/

“LMEs buy time for the sponsor, but I'm increasingly seeing that that's all it really does.” Jon Weber, founder of JFW & Co., doesn't mince words regarding the effectiveness of the popular restructuring strategy. Liability management exercises leave executives with a “sword of Damocles” over their heads, failing to really fix anything and with an aftermath that remains a management distraction, Weber told Bloomberg Intelligence's Phil Brendel, in October's feature interview for the State of Distressed Debt podcast. Weber shared his perspectives, honed at Icahn Enterprises, Goldman Sachs and Elliott Management, on running effective boards and companies post-reorganization (6:30). Prior to that, BI's Noel Hebert and Phil discussed the complete dearth of distressed-debt inventory, as the distressed ratio plummeted to a 5.2% 28-month low in September. The podcast concludes with BI's Negisa Balluku joining Noel and Phil for a roundtable discussion covering J&J's latest Talc news, Hertz make-whole appeal, Audacy, Yellow, Tupperware, Telesat and what qualifies as a consensual release these days (59:00). This podcast is part of BI's FICC Focus series.

Join us each week as we do a quick review of three compelling stories from the pharma world — one good, one bad and one ugly. Up this week:   The good —FDA approves BMS schizophrenia drug  The bad — bluebird bio announces layoffs  The ugly —J&J talc subsidiary files for bankruptcy

Nosipho Radebe speaks to Jo Mitchell Marais, Restructuring and Turn Around Leader at Deloitte AfricaSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the Safer Chemicals Podcast, Adam Elwan is joined by Roberto Scazzola, Chair of the Risk Assessment Committee (RAC), and María Ottati, Chair of the Socio-Economic Analysis Committee (SEAC). They talk about the September committee meetings, discussing the scientific evaluation of the proposal to restrict PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) across multiple industries, including petroleum, mining, textiles, and food packaging.  Additionally, they address the proposal to classify talc as a carcinogenic substance and companies' applications to use chromium VI in the aviation and defense sectors.Useful linksGive us feedbackSeptember RAC and SEAC meeting highlights - ECHA news, 26 September 2024RAC meeting agenda and minutesSEAC meeting agenda and minutesREACH restriction processHarmonised classification and labellingRisk Assessment CommitteeSocio-Economic Analysis Committee**************Subscribe to our YouTube channelSubscribe to our Safer Chemicals PodcastSubscribe to our newsFollow us on:TwitterFacebookLinkedInVisit our website Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication.Hosted by Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

This Day in Legal History: Equal Rights Party FormedOn September 20, 1884, a group of American suffragists formed the Equal Rights Party in San Francisco, marking a significant moment in the fight for gender equality in the United States. The party was established with the goal of securing "equal and exact justice" for all citizens, regardless of color, sex, or nationality. A key focus was on amending state laws to recognize women as voters and to ensure equal property rights, aiming to empower women to become self-sufficient rather than remain dependent. In a bold move, the party nominated Mrs. Belva Lockwood as its candidate for U.S. President and Marietta Snow for Vice-President. Lockwood, a lawyer and prominent suffragist, became one of the first women to actively campaign for the presidency. While Grover Cleveland ultimately won the election, Lockwood's candidacy broke new ground. She garnered around 4,149 votes, all cast by male voters, as women did not yet have the right to vote nationally. This event showcased the growing momentum of the women's suffrage movement, which would eventually lead to the passage of the 19th Amendment in 1920, granting women the right to vote. The Equal Rights Party's formation highlighted the early intersection of gender, legal rights, and political advocacy in American history.An Alaska man, Panos Anastasiou, has been indicted for sending over 450 threatening messages to six U.S. Supreme Court justices and two of their family members. The threats, which began in March 2023 and escalated in January 2024, included violent, racist, and homophobic language, as well as calls for assassination and torture. Federal prosecutors allege that the messages were intended to intimidate and retaliate against the justices for their legal decisions. Attorney General Merrick Garland emphasized that the threats undermine the judiciary's independence and public officials' safety. While the indictment did not name the specific justices targeted, details in court filings suggest that some threats were directed at Justice Clarence Thomas, referencing racist tropes and his wife's political activism. Anastasiou has been temporarily detained, with prosecutors expressing concern that he poses a flight risk and a continued danger due to his history of threats against public officials. The case follows a growing concern for the security of federal judges, highlighted by recent threats against other Supreme Court justices, including an attempted assassination of Justice Brett Kavanaugh in 2022.Alaska Man Charged With Threatening Supreme Court Justices (1)Following the U.S. Supreme Court's 2023 decision to ban race-conscious admissions, Harvard Law School saw a drop in students of color, with the percentage decreasing from 51% in 2023 to 43% in the new class. This is the first class admitted after the ruling, which stemmed from cases against Harvard and the University of North Carolina. The data from Harvard does not break down racial groups, leaving unclear how different minority groups were affected. The overall decline translates to about 45 fewer non-white students out of a class of 560, marking the lowest diversity percentage since 2017. Other top law schools have reported mixed results, with some maintaining or increasing their diversity. The University of California, Berkeley School of Law, which has been under a state affirmative action ban since 1996, also reported a decline in students of color. More detailed racial breakdowns from law schools will be provided by the American Bar Association in December.Harvard Law School says enrollment of students of color dropped after affirmative action ban | ReutersIn a long-running lawsuit accusing Google of secretly tracking internet browsing in "incognito" mode, a major dispute remains over legal fees. Plaintiffs' lawyers from firms like Boies Schiller Flexner and Morgan & Morgan are seeking $217 million in fees for securing a settlement that mandates Google to delete billions of records and update privacy disclosures. Google has countered, arguing the fees should be capped at $40 million, claiming the settlement offers no monetary relief for consumers since the lawsuit failed to gain class-action status. Plaintiffs' attorneys claim their work, valued at $62.4 million in time, provides $3 to $6 billion in privacy benefits to consumers. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who presides over the case, noted the plaintiffs were not entirely successful but did acknowledge the significance of the privacy reforms. She also questioned some of the billing rates, calling $667 per hour for document review “excessive.” The case is awaiting a final ruling on the fee dispute. Other recent legal fee awards include $107.8 million in a separate Apple settlement and $102 million for attorneys in a stock-lending conspiracy case.Legal Fee Tracker: Google, privacy lawyers clash over $217 million fee bid | ReutersJohnson & Johnson (J&J) has increased its offer to over $8.2 billion to settle thousands of lawsuits alleging that its talc-based baby powder caused cancer, up from a previous $6.5 billion offer. This increase reflects a potential $1.7 billion hike to resolve the litigation, with claimants expected to receive larger payouts and $650 million allocated to cover legal fees. Despite continuing settlement talks, J&J maintains its baby powder is safe and has been marketed appropriately for over 100 years. The company has already secured over 75% support from claimants for a settlement covering cases related to ovarian and other gynecological cancers, which may expedite resolution through bankruptcy courts. Some plaintiffs, however, have yet to agree to the terms. J&J has also settled 95% of claims alleging that its baby powder was contaminated with asbestos, leading to mesothelioma. Analysts expect the additional $1.1 billion increase to be within acceptable limits for investors, contributing to a recent rise in J&J's stock. Total payouts related to the baby powder litigation now exceed $13.4 billion.J&J Lifts Baby Powder Settlement Bid to More Than $8.2 BillionAviation executive Farhad Azima has settled a lawsuit with law firm Dechert and two of its former senior attorneys, Neil Gerrard and David Hughes, over claims they participated in a scheme to hack Azima's emails and use the information in court to harm his business. The terms of the settlement, which was reached in New York, were not disclosed, and Dechert denied any liability in the case. This marks another legal victory for Azima, who previously had British judgments against him thrown out after it was revealed that hackers had been used by Dechert's client, the Gulf emirate of Ras Al Khaimah. Earlier in 2024, Dechert paid Azima £3 million ($3.8 million) to settle a separate case in the U.K. without admitting liability. The firm also settled with journalist Jay Solomon, another hacking victim, last year. Azima continues to pursue legal action against other parties involved in the hacking, including Israeli private investigator Amit Forlit, who faces extradition to the U.S. on related charges.Aviation executive Farhad Azima settles with law firm Dechert over hacking claim | ReutersThis week's closing theme is by Franz Liszt.Franz Liszt was one of the most influential and innovative composers and pianists of the 19th century. Known for his breathtaking piano technique and wide-ranging compositions, Liszt's musical legacy includes both virtuosic showpieces and deeply spiritual works. While his early career was defined by dazzling performances across Europe, his later years saw a profound religious transformation. This turn towards spirituality is epitomized by his ordination as a cleric on this date, September 20, 1865, a significant date in his life that influenced his compositional direction.One of Liszt's most introspective and spiritual compositions from this period is Via Crucis, written between 1878 and 1879. It is a moving meditation on the Stations of the Cross, combining minimalistic textures and religious themes. The work strips away the flamboyance of his earlier pieces, reflecting a profound inner contemplation. The opening movement, Vexilla Regis, captures the solemnity and grandeur of Christ's procession to the crucifixion, using austere harmonies and chant-like melodies to evoke deep reflection.As we close this week's program, we'll leave you with Vexilla Regis, the opening theme of Via Crucis. This haunting and reverent piece sets the tone for Liszt's spiritual masterpiece, inviting listeners into a quiet, reflective space. Without further ado, Franz Liszt's Vexilla Regis, from Via Crucis, enjoy. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Un dels m

It's the first episode of the Plural Pod since the summer specials and Gareth and Joel find themselves swept up in the news of Oasis' reunion. There are reviews of fresh pressings from Patrice Rushen, Sabrina Carpenter and Golden Shoulders. We explore the world of second-hand sales and find out some of the highest value titles snapped up recently, including a magnificent burst of Northern Soul and a very particular copy of an early Pink Floyd album. Kev from Jelly Records in East London gives us the lowdown on his shop and there's sale news that's got nothing to do with your Vorsprung durch Technik.Get in touch with us via pluralofvinylpod@gmail.com or @PluralVinylPod on Twitter. You can also Whatsapp via 07455680866The Plural Of Playlist, featuring tracks discussed: https://open.spotify.com/playlist/5M566WI1NstJoQcZU0KRMR?si=8h8NUeaXR_acMIrYYQ-rDQ&pi=MBWJA5SvSUewV&nd=1&dlsi=2a5d31635f704542Join the Cheap Indie Vinyl WhatsApp channel:https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaWT9tnElagoIHB2ed1G Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Human pursuit of body perfection and ideal aesthetics means that we're increasingly resorting to cosmetic interventions to achieve the look we're after. But evidence is mounting that some of these cosmetic and hygiene enhancements might come with a hidden health cost: many have never been subject to rigorous appraisals of the chemicals they contain, meaning that as more people embrace them, some concerning trends are beginning to emerge... Like this podcast? Please help us by supporting the Naked Scientists

This Day in Legal History: Chinese Exclusion TreatyOn August 13, 1894, the U.S. Senate ratified the Chinese Exclusion Treaty, marking a significant moment in American immigration history. This treaty was an extension of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which was the first significant law restricting immigration into the United States. Under the treaty, China agreed to the exclusion of its laborers from entering the U.S., further cementing the racial and economic discrimination that Chinese immigrants faced. The treaty represented a formal diplomatic agreement between the two nations, wherein China conceded to the exclusion of its citizens in exchange for certain protections for Chinese already residing in America.The Chinese Exclusion Treaty was part of a broader movement in the late 19th century to limit the influx of immigrants, particularly those from Asia, who were seen as economic threats and culturally incompatible by many Americans. The ratification of this treaty reinforced and prolonged the discriminatory practices against Chinese immigrants, contributing to the legal and social marginalization of Chinese communities in the U.S. It wasn't until 1943, during World War II, that these exclusionary policies began to be dismantled, reflecting the deep-seated impact of the treaty and the exclusion laws on American legal and social landscapes.In a recent legal development, a federal judge in California dismissed a consumer lawsuit accusing Google of unlawfully dominating mobile search markets. U.S. District Judge Rita Lin ruled that the plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence showing how Google's market dominance harmed consumers. The lawsuit, originally filed in 2022, alleged that Google conspired with Apple to make its search engine the default on iPhones, restricting competition.Although the case was dismissed, Judge Lin indicated that the plaintiffs might have another opportunity to amend their complaint. She referenced a separate ruling by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington, D.C., which found Google had illegally monopolized the search engine market by paying billions to Apple and other companies for exclusive search engine agreements. This ruling could bolster the plaintiffs' chances if they can provide more concrete evidence of consumer harm in their amended complaint.Despite this setback for the consumers, their attorney, Joseph Alioto, expressed intentions to revise and refile the lawsuit by the court's September 9 deadline. Google has denied the allegations and plans to appeal the D.C. court's decision.Google wins dismissal of US consumer lawsuit over mobile search | ReutersJohnson & Johnson (J&J) and Avon Products Inc. are both embroiled in legal battles over the alleged harmful effects of talc in their products, leading to significant financial and legal repercussions. J&J recently made progress in its efforts to resolve thousands of lawsuits claiming that its talc-based baby powder caused cancer. Over 75% of the plaintiffs have reportedly supported J&J's $6.5 billion settlement plan, which aims to address these claims through a pre-packaged bankruptcy filing. This plan follows J&J's history of legal challenges, including a previous $5 billion payout over similar allegations. Despite this support, J&J still faces hurdles, as its attempts to secure bankruptcy protection have been twice denied in New Jersey courts.Similarly, Avon Products Inc., known for its iconic beauty brand, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Delaware due to the mounting costs of defending against talc-related lawsuits. The company is dealing with 386 individual cases and has already spent $225 million on legal fees and settlements. Avon's financial struggles have led to its bankruptcy filing, as it seeks a permanent solution to the increasing number of lawsuits. The company plans to sell its assets, with Brazil-based Natura & Co. offering to purchase Avon for $125 million and write off $530 million in debt.Both companies' legal strategies highlight the significant impact of talc-related lawsuits on their operations, with J&J seeking a settlement through bankruptcy court and Avon attempting to resolve its liabilities through a similar process.Avon Products Files for Bankruptcy to Wrangle Talc LawsuitsJ&J Gets Plaintiff Backing for $6.5 Billion Baby Powder AccordIn July 2024, OSHA proposed a new rule aimed at enhancing workplace safety by addressing heat-related hazards, which are the leading cause of weather-related deaths in the U.S. The rule, if enacted, would impact businesses with employees exposed to high temperatures, both indoors and outdoors. Key aspects of the rule include requiring employers to implement a Heat Illness and Injury Prevention Plan (HIIPP), which would mandate rest breaks, access to shade, drinking water, heat acclimatization procedures, and ongoing heat monitoring.One notable provision is the requirement for employers to provide a paid 15-minute rest break every two hours on days when the heat index reaches 90°F or higher. This has raised questions about how such breaks would interact with the Fair Labor Standards Act, particularly regarding overtime calculations. Additionally, following the recent Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which limits agency authority, there may be legal challenges to OSHA's ability to enforce such mandates.The proposed rule has yet to be published in the Federal Register, but once it is, the public will have the opportunity to provide feedback before it is finalized. OSHA has encouraged public participation to ensure the final rule effectively protects workers while being feasible for employers.OSHA Proposes Rule to Regulate Work Heat-Related HazardsIn my column this week, I discuss how applying the marketplace facilitator model, which has improved state sales tax compliance, could similarly enhance federal excise tax collection. Federal excise taxes, particularly on sporting equipment like fishing rods and archery gear, often go uncollected, especially when these items are sold online by foreign merchants. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently reported that this lack of compliance has resulted in significant revenue loss, funds that are crucial for wildlife conservation efforts.Currently, the responsibility to remit these taxes falls on the consumer, a system that is both confusing and inefficient. To address this, I advocate for legislation that would require online marketplaces like Amazon and eBay to collect and remit these taxes on behalf of consumers. This approach would simplify the process, ensuring more consistent revenue collection and leveling the playing field for domestic sellers who are currently at a disadvantage.Additionally, I propose that the IRS develop a centralized tax calculator accessible to these marketplaces. This tool would automate tax calculations at the point of sale, further reducing administrative burdens and ensuring accurate tax collection. An accompanying information campaign could also educate consumers on their tax obligations and the positive impact of these funds on conservation efforts.To implement these changes effectively, the IRS should consider launching a pilot program, similar to its Direct File initiative, to test the feasibility of this system. This streamlined approach not only promises increased compliance but also ensures that vital conservation projects receive the funding they need to thrive.Streamline Excise Tax on Sporting Equipment to Help Conservation This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Le talc, une poudre minérale composée principalement de silicate de magnésium hydraté, est couramment utilisé dans divers produits de soins personnels, cosmétiques et industriels. Cependant, son utilisation a suscité des préoccupations en matière de santé, en particulier en raison de sa possible contamination par l'amiante et des liens suggérés avec certains types de cancer. Voici un résumé des principales préoccupations et des conclusions des recherches scientifiques :1. Contamination par l'amianteL'amiante est un groupe de minéraux fibreux qui sont connus pour être cancérigènes. Le talc et l'amiante peuvent se trouver dans des formations géologiques proches, ce qui pose un risque de contamination. L'exposition à l'amiante est fortement associée au cancer du poumon, au mésothéliome (un cancer des membranes qui tapissent la cavité thoracique et l'abdomen) et à l'amiantose (une maladie pulmonaire).2. Cancer des ovairesL'une des préoccupations les plus discutées concerne l'utilisation de talc dans la région génitale féminine et le risque potentiel de cancer des ovaires. Certaines études ont suggéré une association entre l'utilisation de poudres de talc dans cette région et une augmentation du risque de cancer des ovaires. Cependant, les résultats des études épidémiologiques ont été incohérents et controversés. Les agences de santé, comme l'Agence internationale de recherche sur le cancer (CIRC), classent l'utilisation du talc en poudre sur les parties génitales comme "probablement cancérogène pour l'homme" en raison des preuves limitées.Et il y a quelques jours c'est l'OMS elle-même qui a qualifié le talc de cette façon. "probablement cancérogène ».3. Problèmes respiratoiresL'inhalation de talc en poudre peut entraîner des problèmes respiratoires, en particulier chez les nourrissons et les enfants. L'inhalation de quantités importantes de talc peut provoquer une inflammation des voies respiratoires, des difficultés respiratoires et d'autres problèmes pulmonaires.4. Régulation et sécuritéLes fabricants de produits contenant du talc sont tenus de s'assurer que leurs produits ne contiennent pas d'amiante. Les réglementations varient d'un pays à l'autre, mais de nombreux organismes de réglementation exigent que le talc soit testé et certifié exempt d'amiante. 5. Recommandations pour les consommateursPour minimiser les risques potentiels, il est recommandé aux consommateurs de :- Utiliser des produits contenant du talc avec prudence, surtout lorsqu'il s'agit de poudres destinées à être appliquées sur des parties sensibles du corps.- Considérer l'utilisation d'alternatives sans talc, telles que la fécule de maïs, pour les poudres pour le corps et les produits similaires.- Éviter l'inhalation de talc en poudre, en particulier pour les nourrissons et les enfants.En conclusion, bien que le talc soit largement utilisé et généralement considéré comme sûr lorsqu'il est exempt d'amiante, des préoccupations persistent concernant son utilisation dans certaines applications. Les consommateurs doivent être informés des risques potentiels et prendre des précautions appropriées. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

On today's show we cover lots of skin questions including…Does spraying magnesium on your legs help you sleep and relieve nausea?Are Olivada's waterless skincare products, which use pressed olive oil, truly effective and comparable to Botox?Is the new DIY vitamin C serum from Drunk Elephant safe, effective, and likely to be popular among consumers?What are the differences, pros, and cons of Morpheus 8 and Ultherapy for skin tightening?Can cheaper hyaluronic acid products be as effective as more expensive ones?Beauty NewsReef safe sunscreen lawsuitShould you DIY sunscreen?  Talc lawsuit ExtrasSee the IFSCC reef debate hereFive Ways to Ask a question -1. Send us a message through Patreon!2. You can record your question on your smart phone and email to thebeautybrains@gmail.com3. Send it to us via social media (see links below)4. Submit it through the following form - Ask a question5. Leave a voice mail message: 872-216-1856Social media accountson Instagram we're at thebeautybrains2018on Twitter, we're thebeautybrainsAnd we have a Facebook pageValerie's ingredient company - Simply IngredientsPerry's other website - Chemists CornerFollow the  Porch Kitty Krew instagram accountSupport the Show.

This Day in Legal History: Posse Comitatus Act Passed On June 18, 1878, the U.S. Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act, a significant piece of legislation that shaped the relationship between the military and civil authorities. The Act made it a felony to use the Army to enforce domestic policies without explicit authorization from Congress or the Constitution. This law emerged from the Reconstruction era's complexities, particularly the federal military's role in enforcing laws in the Southern states post-Civil War. The term "posse comitatus" translates to "power of the county," and the Act aimed to reinforce the principle that civil authorities should maintain law and order without military involvement. The Posse Comitatus Act reflected a commitment to preventing military overreach in civilian matters and preserving democratic governance structures. This principle has influenced various legal and military policies over the years, including modern discussions on the military's role in domestic security. The Act underscores the balance between maintaining national security and protecting civil liberties, a balance that remains a cornerstone of American legal and political thought.Fisker Inc., an electric-vehicle startup, filed for bankruptcy after halting production of its problematic Ocean SUV. The company's filing in Delaware lists assets between $500 million and $1 billion and liabilities between $100 million and $500 million. This bankruptcy protects Fisker from creditors while it plans repayment.Henrik Fisker, known for designing BMW and Aston Martin cars, founded Fisker Inc., his second EV venture to face bankruptcy. His previous company, Fisker Automotive, also went bankrupt in 2013. Fisker Inc. went public in 2020 through a SPAC merger, raising roughly $1 billion and partnering with Magna International Inc. for vehicle manufacturing.Production of the Fisker Ocean SUV began in November 2022 but was plagued by missing features and software bugs. Influential YouTuber Marques Brownlee's negative review in February further damaged the company's reputation. Fisker produced over 10,000 vehicles but delivered fewer than 5,000 to customers. The company tried partnering with franchised dealers but faced significant financial difficulties, warning in February about its uncertain future. Although it secured $150 million from a lender, a potential deal with an automaker fell through. Magna International, a partner, halted further production of the Ocean SUV. Fisker's bankruptcy highlights broader challenges in the EV market, with several other startups also filing for bankruptcy amid slowing sales in the U.S. and Europe.Troubled Electric Vehicle Maker Fisker Files for BankruptcyUnion members at Amazon.com Inc. have voted overwhelmingly to align with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, a major U.S. labor organization, in a move that could significantly impact staff contract negotiations. About 98% of the Amazon Labor Union (ALU) members supported this partnership, aimed at securing better jobs and working conditions for Amazon employees.The ALU, which achieved a historic win in 2022 by organizing workers at an Amazon facility in Staten Island, faced setbacks in subsequent elections and internal conflicts. The union struggled to bring Amazon to the negotiating table. However, ALU President Chris Smalls and 15 other officials reached an agreement with Teamsters President Sean O'Brien and his team in Washington. The Teamsters represent approximately 1.3 million people.This collaboration between the ALU and the Teamsters signals a significant step forward in labor organizing efforts at Amazon, potentially increasing pressure on the company to engage in meaningful negotiations with its workers. Amazon did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside normal business hours.Amazon Union Allies With Teamsters in Big Labor AdvanceThe EPA's new limits on PFAS in drinking water are a positive step but more comprehensive regulations are needed to manage the release and disposal of these harmful chemicals. At a recent conference, stakeholders including parents, firefighters, and farmers discussed the need for broader measures to eliminate nonessential PFAS uses and enforce stricter waste management practices.CDC data shows that reducing PFAS in drinking water correlates with lower blood levels of the chemicals in residents, validating the EPA's efforts. However, the current rules do not prevent the release of PFAS into water or apply to private wells, affecting millions of people.Environmental advocates emphasized the necessity of treating PFAS as hazardous wastes under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The EPA's recent designation of certain PFAS as hazardous under the Superfund law aids cleanup efforts but falls short of comprehensive waste regulation. Proper disposal methods are critical to prevent further contamination, yet data on PFAS waste disposal is limited due to insufficient regulation.Participants called for more stringent discharge permits under the Clean Water Act and quicker implementation of hazardous waste rules. PFAS, widely used in industries like semiconductors and battery production due to their stability and resistance to damage, require robust management to prevent environmental and health risks.Examples of contamination were highlighted, including high PFAS levels from military bases causing serious health issues. The EPA's database on waste transfers shows significant amounts of PFAS-contaminated materials being sent to incinerators and other facilities, underscoring the need for better waste tracking and management.Advocates stress that eliminating unnecessary PFAS uses and implementing strong regulatory measures are essential steps to protect communities and the environment from long-term PFAS contamination.PFAS Drinking Water Limits Praised but More Regulations SoughtIn the ongoing litigation over Johnson & Johnson's (J&J) allegedly cancer-causing baby powders, a new legal battle has emerged over attorney-client privilege. Plaintiffs' lawyers accuse J&J of misusing the bankruptcy process to evade liability and are pushing for the crime-fraud exception to force the company to disclose internal communications. This could reveal J&J's strategies to limit liability in around 61,000 talc-related cases. The litigation involves J&J's use of the "Texas Two-Step," where it transfers liabilities to a subsidiary, which then files for bankruptcy. This maneuver has been met with controversy and legal challenges. Plaintiffs' attorneys argue that J&J's actions are fraudulent attempts to avoid liability and are calling for these communications to be made public to bolster their case.In a recent development, the plaintiffs are also seeking to disqualify some lawyers representing J&J and to prevent the company from proceeding with an $11 billion global settlement plan. This settlement, which requires approval from 75% of the plaintiffs, has faced opposition from some plaintiffs' firms.Despite J&J's efforts to resolve the litigation, the plaintiffs' legal team argues that more needs to be done to ensure justice for those affected by the contaminated talc products. They are also challenging J&J's use of bankruptcy as a tactic to force settlements and are pushing for the court to invalidate J&J's attorney-client privilege in this context. The outcome of this legal battle could significantly impact the strategies used in large-scale product liability cases, particularly those involving mass torts and bankruptcy.J&J's Talc Litigation Saga Gets Attorney-Client Privilege TwistThe IRS should adopt a remote-first work model to attract top talent and enhance operational efficiency. The COVID-19 pandemic proved that remote work is not only viable but also desirable for many employees, particularly in the tech sector. As the IRS continues to modernize with advanced technologies like AI and machine learning, it needs to recruit top-tier tech talent. Offering remote work can help attract this talent by allowing employees to work from anywhere, increasing job satisfaction and expanding the pool of potential applicants. The Treasury Department has found that job postings highlighting flexible working arrangements attract more applicants. Additionally, the IRS can save on overhead costs by reducing its physical office footprint, which remains significant despite many employees working remotely part-time. A remote-first approach would also help the IRS compete with private sector tech firms, which have successfully used remote work to attract employees despite offering lower salaries. This flexibility would enable the IRS to draw a diverse workforce, fostering a variety of perspectives and ideas. Existing policies limiting remote work to within 200 miles of an office need reform to maximize employee flexibility. Security is a critical concern, given the sensitive nature of taxpayer information the IRS handles. However, research indicates remote workers are often more aware of cybersecurity practices. To support a remote-first model, the IRS would need to invest in tech infrastructure and rework management and accountability measures to focus on outcomes rather than hours worked. Embracing remote work is essential for the IRS to continue modernizing and improving taxpayer interactions.IRS Should Embrace Remote-First Culture to Recruit Top Talent This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Join us each week as we do a quick review of three compelling stories from the pharma world — one good, one bad and one ugly. Up this week:  The good — FDA AdComm backs Eli Lilly Alzheimer's drug The bad — Pfizer gene therapy fails phase 3 Duchenne trial The ugly — Talc plaintiffs seek restraining order on J&J bankruptcy tactic

Cedar Creek Cowgirls owned by Michelle Bilbrey and her husband Jim is a makeup company like you've never seen before. The Bilbrey family runs a cow-calf stocker operation in Tennessee and have a cutting horse training and breeding operation. Makeup with a western twist is their specialty and all of the items in their collections are named after notable horses in the cutting industry.  "I know it takes a durable product to last all day in the working pen. That is why I started this journey, combined with my love to boost other Cowgirls' confidence and welcome new Cowgirls to our world. I want to help give you the confidence you need to conquer anything. Whether you're on the ranch, in the arena, or on a night out our products are gentle enough for the smallest cowgirl but made to last for the toughest," says Bilbrey. Michelle talks about her "why" for creating Cedar Creek Cowgirls and how confidence and color go hand in hand.  Cedar Creek Cowgirls products are made to give cowgirls in all walks of life the boost they need to conquer whatever comes their way! "Whether you're introducing your daughter to the world of makeup or looking for a product that is long lasting and easy to blend, Cedar Creek Cowgirls™has got you covered. So why settle for less when you can have the best of both worlds? Try our long-lasting, Talc free cosmetics today and see the difference for yourself!" Jordan Jo and Michelle talk about all things beauty, breakaway roping and mind set. Oh and there's even a special surprise for breakaway ropers in this episode, so get In The LOOP!in the LOOP Podcast hosted by Jordan Jo Hollabaugh, is inspired by the western culture and breakaway roping lifestyle. This podcast highlights the raw, real, truth behind the box of the breakaway roping industry. Bringing you behind the scenes stories of what real life looks like everyday from; breakaway ropers, cowgirls, cowboys, producers, leaders, trailblazers, and the like, all sharing stories of the western culture and lifestyle that they live daily. In The LOOP Podcast & Fabrizio Marketing LLC are not responsible for any losses, damages, or liabilities that may arise from the use of this podcast. Get in the LOOP Podcast with Jordan Jo Get the Newsletter at | www.inthelooprodeo.com/ Like us on Facebook | www.facebook.com/inthelooppodcast.jordanjo Tag us on Instagram | www.instagram.com/inthelooppodcast.jordanjo Follow us on TikTok | https://www.tiktok.com/@jordanjo.hollabaugh Watch more on our Youtube Channel Watch on Youtube @ JordanJoHollabaugh ...

This Day in Legal History: Loving v. VirginiaOn June 12, 1967, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the case of Loving v. Virginia, striking down state laws prohibiting interracial marriage. Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a Black woman, were married in Washington, D.C., in 1958 but were arrested upon their return to Virginia for violating the state's anti-miscegenation laws. The Lovings were convicted and sentenced to a year in prison, with the sentence suspended on the condition that they leave Virginia and not return together for 25 years. Challenging their conviction, the Lovings argued that Virginia's laws violated the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision authored by Chief Justice Earl Warren, agreed with the Lovings. The Court held that Virginia's anti-miscegenation statutes were rooted in racial discrimination and served no legitimate purpose other than to maintain racial segregation. This decision effectively invalidated similar laws in 15 other states, affirming that marriage is a basic civil right that cannot be restricted by racial classifications. The Loving v. Virginia decision was a significant step forward in the civil rights movement, reinforcing the principle that all individuals are entitled to equal protection under the law.Paul Weiss has been aggressively recruiting top-tier mergers and acquisitions and private equity partners, hiring over 20 from prominent firms such as Kirkland & Ellis and Latham & Watkins. This hiring spree, focused mainly in London and New York, reflects a broader trend of escalating compensation for elite lawyers, with some earning over $20 million annually. To fund these high-profile hires, Paul Weiss revamped its partner pay system and adopted a "black box" approach, where pay details are kept confidential among partners. The firm also introduced a new tier of non-equity partners to retain senior attorneys without sharing profits.This strategy mirrors moves by other top firms like Simpson Thacher & Bartlett and Davis Polk & Wardwell, which have adjusted their compensation structures to remain competitive. Paul Weiss's London office has notably expanded, recruiting high-profile partners from Kirkland to build a comprehensive practice there. The firm's longstanding relationship with Apollo Global Management continues to bolster its M&A and private equity profile. Despite lagging behind top deal advisors like Kirkland & Ellis and Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz, Paul Weiss's aggressive hiring positions it well for future market share gains.The firm's recruitment efforts underscore the importance of attracting top legal talent to handle complex and lucrative deals, reflecting a fiercely competitive legal market.Paul Weiss Hiring Binge Shows Big Law's Dealmaker Recruiting WarPower grid technologies (GETs) have gained traction recently as a way to integrate more renewable energy and meet increasing power demands without building new transmission lines. Historically, US electric utilities preferred constructing new lines because they offer guaranteed returns and are seen as less risky, despite the high consumer costs and long timelines associated with them. However, grid congestion in 2022 raised consumer bills by nearly $21 billion, pushing utilities to consider GETs. These technologies optimize existing infrastructure, offering significant cost savings and increased grid capacity.The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's new rule requires regional grid planners to consider using GETs. Additionally, a White House meeting led to a federal-state initiative involving 21 states to upgrade 100,000 miles of transmission lines in five years. Studies indicate that implementing GETs could save billions annually and facilitate the connection of more clean energy projects.Despite their benefits, GETs face challenges due to the traditional utility business model that favors large capital investments. Some states like Minnesota and Virginia are now mandating GETs in resource planning and offering incentives. Vermont Electric Power Co. and AES Corp. are examples of utilities testing GETs, such as dynamic line ratings and valve technology, to improve efficiency and reliability. As utilities and technology providers collaborate more, the industry aims to reduce the need for new transmission lines and overcome the associated regulatory and logistical hurdles.Grid Upgrades Gain Favor to Meet Power Demands of AI, Clean TechOn June 11, 2024, Elon Musk moved to dismiss his lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman. The lawsuit, filed in February, accused OpenAI of deviating from its original mission to develop artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity. Musk's attorneys did not provide a reason for the dismissal, which was filed in San Francisco Superior Court. The dismissal was without prejudice, allowing Musk the option to refile later.Musk co-founded OpenAI but has since expressed dissatisfaction with its direction, particularly its focus on profitability following substantial investments from Microsoft. The lawsuit sought to compel OpenAI to release its research and technology to the public and prevent its use for financial gain.OpenAI countered that Musk's claims were baseless and motivated by his desire to compete with OpenAI through his own AI venture, xAI, which recently raised $6 billion in funding. The court was scheduled to hear OpenAI's motion to dismiss the case the day after Musk's withdrawal. Neither OpenAI nor Musk's legal representatives commented on the latest development.Elon Musk withdraws lawsuit against OpenAI | ReutersAdobe faced significant backlash over updates to its terms of use, which users feared allowed the company to seize intellectual property and use data to train AI models. The controversy highlighted the need for clear communication of legal terms, especially in the context of evolving technologies like generative AI. In response, Adobe pledged to revise its terms, explicitly stating it won't train AI models on cloud content, with new terms set to be issued on June 18.The uproar began after Adobe's February update, which included provisions for automated and manual review of user content to screen for illegal material. Users, notified in May, expressed concerns on social media, fearing their confidential content could be exploited. Adobe's general counsel, Dana Rao, emphasized that the language had long been part of Adobe's agreements and was essential for practical tasks like uploading content to the cloud.Industry experts noted that such terms are common among cloud service providers but acknowledged the heightened sensitivity among creatives towards potential misuse of their work for AI. Adobe's commitment to clearer, user-friendly legal terms aims to rebuild trust, recognizing the unique and personal relationship users have with its products. The incident underscores the importance of transparent communication and the need for companies to preemptively address user concerns in the AI era.Adobe Responds to AI Fears With Plans For Updated Legal TermsJohnson & Johnson has agreed to a $700 million settlement with 42 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., resolving an investigation into the marketing of its talc-based products, which were allegedly linked to cancer. The settlement, announced on June 11, 2024, addresses accusations that J&J misled consumers about the safety of its talc products. While J&J did not admit any wrongdoing, it continues to assert that its products are safe and asbestos-free.This settlement, led by Florida, North Carolina, and Texas, marks a significant step in consumer product safety, according to Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody. Despite the settlement, J&J still faces tens of thousands of lawsuits related to its talc products, primarily from women with ovarian cancer and some with mesothelioma. As of March 31, approximately 61,490 individuals were suing the company.J&J ceased the global sale of talc-based baby powder last year, opting for corn starch instead. The company has made several attempts to resolve the litigation, including two failed efforts to use bankruptcy to manage its talc liabilities. On May 1, J&J proposed a $6.48 billion settlement to resolve most of the litigation through a third bankruptcy filing and has allocated an $11 billion reserve for talc liabilities. Erik Haas, J&J's worldwide vice president of litigation, stated that the company is pursuing various strategies to achieve a comprehensive resolution of the litigation.Johnson & Johnson reaches $700 million talc settlement with US states | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Women who used talc-containing products genitally may be at increased risk for ovarian cancer, but not for breast cancer, a new study finds. Kimmel Cancer Center director William Nelson at Johns Hopkins says this study attempted to eliminate certain biases … Does use of talc containing products increase a woman's change of cancer? Elizabeth Tracey reports Read More »

Thursday May 9, 2024 Johnson & Johnson to Pay $6.5 Billion to Settle Talc Claims

DFW airport raises prices, again… Harvey will be retried… Talc settlement?... Schneider sues for defamation… chewingthefat@theblaze.com Celebrity plastic surgery searches… Who Died Today: Richard Tandy 76 / Paul Auster 77 / Joshua Dean 45… Goldblum says row your own boat… No need to bring the snake… Brian Cox – theater is the one true church… Joke of the Day… Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This Day in Legal History: First Union FormedOn May 1, 1794, a pivotal development in labor rights history occurred in Philadelphia with the formation of the Federal Society of Journeymen Cordwainers. This organization, consisting of skilled shoemakers, marks the establishment of the first trade union in the United States. The union was created as a response to the increasingly difficult economic conditions that tradesmen faced, including low wages and long working hours.The Cordwainers, recognizing the strength in numbers, aimed to leverage their collective bargaining power to negotiate better wages and working conditions. This was a significant step forward in the labor movement, as it introduced the concept of organized labor in America. The formation of this union was not just about improving pay; it was also about dignifying the labor force and providing workers a platform to voice their concerns.Philadelphia, being a hub of commerce and trade in the late 18th century, provided the perfect setting for such an organization. The city's workshops and bustling markets meant that there was a significant demand for skilled labor, which the Cordwainers could supply. However, with industrialization beginning to take root, these skilled workers found themselves under threat from cheaper, mass-produced goods.The Federal Society of Journeymen Cordwainers set a precedent that would be followed by other trades across the country. Their actions led to the establishment of similar societies and unions, which eventually contributed to the broader national labor movement. The Cordwainers themselves faced legal challenges, particularly in 1806, when they were involved in a landmark legal case concerning the rights of workers to organize, known as Commonwealth v. Pullis. In this case, the court ruled against the union, marking one of the first legal battles over the legitimacy of trade union activities in the United States.Despite the legal setbacks, the resilience and pioneering spirit of the Federal Society of Journeymen Cordwainers inspired subsequent generations of workers to fight for their rights. Their legacy is a testament to the enduring struggle for fair labor practices and workers' rights. This day in legal history not only marks the formation of America's first trade union but also celebrates the long journey towards justice and equity in the workplace.The US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) recently proposed a rule that would require pharmaceutical companies to submit unredacted settlement agreements involving patent challenges to a new repository. This rule is aimed to assist the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) in detecting antitrust violations. The proposal arose from concerns that these settlements, often reached in administrative tribunals like the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), could be used to delay cheaper biosimilar drugs from entering the market.Evan Diamond, special counsel, noted that the PTO has not clearly defined "good cause" for accessing these agreements, which might increase third-party access and create confidentiality concerns. The fear is that the database could enable federal agencies to easily assess the frequency of potentially anticompetitive pay-for-delay settlements—a practice scrutinized under the Supreme Court's 2013 decision in FTC v. Actavis, which ruled such deals could be illegal.The proposal aligns with an executive order from President Joe Biden encouraging interagency cooperation to prevent practices that unjustifiably delay generic and biosimilar competition. This move has heightened the pharmaceutical industry's fears of increased antitrust enforcement, particularly as the FTC has been actively challenging questionable patent listings that could hinder the approval of generic drugs.Agencies like the FTC and DOJ already have certain reporting requirements under the Medicare Modernization Act for pharmaceutical companies, but the PTO's rule could capture additional agreements that do not meet existing criteria. This has sparked debate over the necessity and potential overlap of the new rule.The pharmaceutical industry, represented by major lobbyist groups like Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America and the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, has expressed strong opposition, citing concerns over the scope of PTO's authority and the ambiguity around the "good cause" criterion.This development highlights a broader regulatory push against anti-competitive practices not only in pharmaceuticals but also in other sectors like technology, where companies like Apple and Google are frequently involved in patent litigation.In summary, the PTO's proposed rule could significantly impact how pharmaceutical settlements are handled, potentially exposing companies to greater antitrust scrutiny. This measure reflects a governmental shift towards stricter oversight of patent practices to foster competition and reduce drug prices.Drug Makers Exposed to Antitrust Probes if Patent Cache AdoptedThis term, Jones Day had the highest number of attorneys—five in total—arguing cases at the U.S. Supreme Court, more than any other firm. Among them, John Gore and C. Kevin Marshall presented for the first time at the high court. Other experienced attorneys like former U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco, and partners Hashim Mooppan and Traci Lovitt also argued cases, contributing to the firm's visibility.In comparison, other leading law firms such as Gibson Dunn, Hogan Lovells, and Williams & Connolly had slightly fewer representatives. Gibson Dunn introduced three new attorneys to the Supreme Court lectern, including Theane Evangelis, D. Nick Harper, and Eugene Scalia, who is a son of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Hogan Lovells' Jessica Ellsworth argued for the first time, including in a significant case regarding the abortion drug mifepristone. Williams & Connolly had Lisa Blatt argue all four of their cases, marking her 50th Supreme Court appearance.Overall, the season saw a mix of seasoned veterans and newcomers. Of the total 152 arguments made, over half were by attorneys who had appeared at least five times before, while a quarter were by first-time arguers. This highlights both the depth of experience and the ongoing introduction of new talent in the legal field's highest echelons.Jones Day Leads in Supreme Court Arguments With New FacesJohnson & Johnson (J&J) is currently seeking approval for an $11 billion settlement to resolve ongoing litigation concerning its talc-based baby powder, which has been alleged to cause ovarian cancer. This amount is a significant increase from a previous offer of $8.9 billion. J&J's strategy involves a third attempt at a bankruptcy filing, specifically a pre-packaged bankruptcy, which allows for faster processing if they secure enough creditor support—in this case, needing the approval of 75% of the talc plaintiffs.The company proposes to pay $6.48 billion over 25 years to settle ovarian cancer claims, but it has not specified how funds will be divided between existing and future claims. Additionally, J&J has nearly settled all claims regarding mesothelioma believed to be caused by asbestos in the powder. This settlement approach follows multiple failed attempts to use Chapter 11 to manage these lawsuits, which now number almost 60,000.These lawsuits have been a significant factor depressing J&J's stock price, according to analysts. Despite the legal challenges, J&J maintains that its talc products do not cause cancer and asserts that it has marketed its baby powder responsibly for over a century. A recent verdict, however, led to a $45 million payout to a family, implicating J&J and its spinoff Kenvue in the ongoing litigation.The company's persistence in seeking a bankruptcy-based settlement reflects its strategic approach to managing a complex legal challenge that impacts thousands of plaintiffs and could potentially set a precedent in how large corporations handle mass tort liabilities through bankruptcy court.J&J Seeks Backing for $11 Billion Baby Powder Cancer SettlementIn President Joe Biden's Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Proposal, a notable change is the suggestion to tax unrealized gains—value increases in assets not yet converted into cash through a sale. This marks a significant shift from traditional tax frameworks, which typically avoid taxing unrealized gains due to their complexity, potential liquidity issues, and difficulties in implementation.The rationale behind this proposal is to ensure tax fairness by capturing increases in wealth that currently escape taxation. For example, if a billionaire's stock appreciates significantly without being sold, they realize no taxable gain. However, if they borrow against these increased values, they effectively use this appreciation as a means to generate wealth without incurring tax liabilities. This situation presents a loophole where wealth can grow and be leveraged without contributing to the tax base.The FY2025 budget aims to address these disparities by proposing a tax on unrealized gains for very high-net-worth individuals and entities that have not been subject to a tax event in the last 90 years. This approach seeks to broaden the tax base without raising rates, aiming to increase tax revenue from the wealthy without additional burdens on middle and lower-income individuals.This policy shift acknowledges the need to adapt tax strategies to a changing economic environment where traditional taxation methods no longer capture all forms of wealth accumulation. The proposal suggests that a more equitable tax system requires taxing wealth as it grows, even if it is not realized through a sale. By proposing to tax unrealized gains, the administration intends to correct imbalances allowing substantial wealth to accumulate tax-free, signaling a significant potential change in how wealth is taxed in the U.S.Unrealized Gain Tax—A Coming Sea Change in FY2025 Budget Proposal? Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Equipment Manager Andy Barry returns to the Bench for this Eric Ede-hosted game. In it we learn about hyphenated Super Bowl MVP cornerback Something-1973, that friend of the pod Neal Fischer is a perv (sorry Neal), that for the first time both teams were glad not to know the Missing Link theme, that Father Time comes for everyone but not Skip Bayless...yet, and that Josh and Eric provide everyone with a Joint Health Minute. And don't forget that after this podcast ends, go listen to the Pivotal Film podcast. #talc #jj #superbowl #mvp #1973 #fathertime #skipbayless #jointhealthminute #pivotalfilm #podcast https://www.patreon.com/benchwarmerstp https://www.facebook.com/benchwarmerstp https://www.twitter.com/benchwarmerstp https://www.instagram.com/benchwarmerstp/ https://www.teepublic.com/stores/benchwarmers-trivia-podcast

In today's episode, Holly and Josie sit down with Andrea Dahr, founder and creator of the Switch Naturals App, an app designed to give non-biased, research based feedback on the ingredients you use in your every day personal care products as well as household products. It's as simple as scanning the back of the ingredients on any product of your choosing and getting instant feedback and literature sourced education on the safety of the ingredients. We chat all about why it's important to care about the ingredients used to make products, some of the negative outcomes associated with certain ingredients as well as  ingredients we recommending avoiding and why. We wanted this episode to give you tools to allow you to feel empowered to confidently select products that you feel safe and comfortable with to bring into your home and use in your personal care routine every day.  You can follow Holly, Josie, and Andrea on their own separate instagram pages  here: Holly: CLICK HERE Josie: CLICK HEREAndrea: CLICK HERE And the Live Well With Holly and Josie podcast page here: CLICK HERELinks from today's episode:Download the Switch Natural App

#021 In this episode, I interview Jane the Chemist, a cosmetic chemist known for her expertise in skincare and haircare formulation. We discuss the efficacy and safety of skincare products, the role of cosmetic chemists in the beauty industry, and the importance of understanding ingredient lists. Jane provides insights into the misconceptions surrounding ingredients, such as the demonization of certain "chemicals" and the fear of preservatives. She also shares her thoughts on popular ingredients like retinoids, sulfates, silicones, and hyaluronic acid. We chat comedogenicity, and the safety of Talc, Self Tanners and Lash Serums!Jane's Favorites:Tatcha | Indigo Overnight Repair Mask: https://go.shopmy.us/p-3547026Color Wow | Dream Coat Supernatural Spray: https://go.shopmy.us/p-3044040K18 | Peptide Prep Detox Shampoo: https://go.shopmy.us/p-3146329Olaplex | No 6: https://go.shopmy.us/p-3547070https://www.instagram.com/janethechemist/To watch the video version of this episode head to the Youtube page!Need a full skincare overhaul? Check out our Comprehensive Skincare Routine Digital GuideConnect with me:Amy's Instagramwww.skinthusiast.com

Three good fwends continue getting to know each other. On today's episode, Kyran, Georgia & Rhys are zooming from separate rooms in the same house. Kyran has discovered the sound effect feature on his audio interface, Rhys has discovered there's another "Fwends" podcast, and Georgia has accidentally come across a photo of Rhys in a full gimp outfit and has questions. There is discussion of sleeping aids and podcast promotion, a satisfyingly humiliating story from Kyran, and we reminisce about the dreadful things we did to our siblings as children...Email your thoughts, feelings, questions and ideas to fwendspod@gmail.comI listen, I look, I lend my thoughts...The Publicly Accessible Google Doc:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NJs4o4uXLhChxvELzju_5I91T3ZT2epsfN0Uv7PUNGM/edit?usp=sharing(anyone with this link can comment)Instagram: Rhys, Georgia, Kyranwww.rhysnicholson.comwww.georgiamooney.comwww.kyranwheatley.com.au Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Tuesday January 9, 2024 J&J to Pay $700 Million to Settle Talc Probe

This Day in Legal History: Great Britain Introduces an Income TaxOn January 9, 1799, a significant milestone was marked in the history of taxation with the introduction of Great Britain's first income tax. Initiated by British Prime Minister William Pitt, this tax was a revolutionary step in the country's fiscal policy. The context of its introduction was deeply rooted in the exigencies of war. In December 1798, Pitt announced the tax as a means to amass funds for the escalating war efforts against Napoleon Bonaparte, a critical juncture in European history.Pitt's income tax was not merely a financial mechanism but also a strategic tool, reflecting the gravity of the geopolitical situation at the time. It was a progressive tax, a concept relatively novel for its era, aiming to levy heavier taxes on the wealthier segments of society. This progressive nature marked a departure from the flat taxes commonly used, signifying an evolution in the understanding of equitable taxation.The tax, however, was short-lived in its initial form. In 1802, Henry Addington, Pitt's successor, repealed the tax. This repeal was a response to the temporary subsidence in hostilities. The peace was fleeting, and the return of conflict in the following year prompted Addington to reinstate the income tax. This on-and-off nature of the tax during these years mirrored the tumultuous period of the Napoleonic Wars.Significantly, the model of taxation that Addington implemented laid the groundwork for what would become the modern British income tax system. It set a precedent in tax structure and collection that has had a lasting impact. The evolution of this tax model reflects the interplay between fiscal policy and social priorities, a theme that has persisted through centuries of tax law development.Today, as we reflect on the introduction of Great Britain's first income tax, it serves as a reminder of the dynamic nature of tax law and its deep entwinement with the broader socio-political landscape. The story of this tax is not just a tale of revenue collection; it's a narrative about war, peace, and the ever-evolving understanding of economic justice.In a 2024 report by Georgetown Law's Center on Ethics and the Legal Profession and the Thomson Reuters Institute, law firms are facing a challenging year due to various factors including client demand, staffing, and the rise of artificial intelligence. The report, analyzing trends since 2009, indicates a shift in the legal market towards a buyer's market for legal services. Despite a marginal increase in the overall average demand for legal services in the previous year, transactional work has seen a decline. This is significant as many firms relied on transactional practices, particularly in mergers and acquisitions, to boost revenue in the past decade.The report highlights that midsize law firms performed better than top-grossing firms in terms of demand growth. However, the legal sector can no longer depend solely on transactional work due to reduced client spending and evolving market conditions. Interestingly, counter-cyclical practices like litigation and bankruptcy experienced growth in demand, contrasting the slowdown in transactional demand.The survey revealed a 6% increase in billing rates on paper, but actual charges to clients and collection rates have decreased. Law firms are also grappling with rising overhead and direct expenses, not yet accounting for recent associate salary increases. In response to these financial pressures, law firms are adjusting their staffing strategies, with midsized firms increasing their associate numbers more than larger firms.Clients are increasingly seeking more affordable legal services, opting for lower-priced firms, reflecting a cost-conscious attitude. Additionally, the emergence of generative AI poses uncertainties for the legal industry. Its impact on staffing, efficiency, and profitability is still unclear, but it could lead to clients handling more legal work in-house or enhance the efficiency of legal services.The report's authors expect 2024 to be volatile, particularly as election years often bring unpredictability. This projection suggests that the legal industry may not experience stability for some time, indicating a period of significant change and adaptation for law firms.Law firms face 'volatile' 2024 amid demand, staffing and AI risks - report | ReutersGoogle is facing a significant patent infringement lawsuit brought by Singular Computing, which could potentially cost the tech giant up to $7 billion in damages. The lawsuit, set to be tried in a federal court in Boston, accuses Google of infringing patents held by computer scientist Joseph Bates, the founder of Singular Computing. Bates alleges that Google used his patented technology in its processors to enhance AI features in various services such as Google Search, Gmail, and Google Translate.Google has responded by questioning the validity of Singular's patents and asserting that its processors were independently developed over many years. The company has also argued that its technology operates differently from the patented technology of Singular. In parallel, a separate legal proceeding is underway, where a U.S. appeals court in Washington will hear arguments on whether Singular's patents should be invalidated, a case that Google appealed from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.The trial, expected to last two to three weeks, centers around Google's Tensor Processing Units introduced in 2016 and subsequent versions in 2017 and 2018. These units are crucial for Google's AI capabilities, including speech recognition and content generation. The outcome of this trial could have significant financial and technological implications for Google.Google faces multibillion-dollar US patent trial over AI technology | ReutersThe Biden administration, through the U.S. Department of Labor, has issued a new rule that aims to redefine the classification of workers as employees instead of independent contractors. This move, set to affect industries reliant on contract labor, including trucking, manufacturing, healthcare, and app-based gig services, is anticipated to increase labor costs significantly. Under the new rule, workers will be considered employees if they are "economically dependent" on a company, a shift from the previous Trump administration's regulation which allowed more flexibility in classifying workers as contractors.The rule, which takes effect on March 11, has sparked concern among business groups and is expected to face legal challenges. It is designed to combat the misclassification of workers, a common issue in industries such as construction and healthcare, but its impact on gig economy companies like Uber and Lyft has attracted the most attention. These companies have expressed concerns but also believe the rule won't necessarily lead to their drivers being classified as employees.Acting U.S. Labor Secretary Julie Su emphasized the importance of this rule for low-income workers who would benefit from employee legal protections such as minimum wage and unemployment insurance. However, some business groups argue that the rule goes too far, potentially depriving millions of workers of flexibility and opportunity. Marc Freedman of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce criticized the rule for its potential to create confusion and inconsistency in worker classification, potentially leading to costly legal battles. Despite these concerns, the Labor Department will evaluate factors like a worker's chance for profit or loss, the level of control a company has over a worker, and the relevance of the work to the company's business to determine employee or contractor status.Biden administration issues rule that could curb 'gig' work, contracting | ReutersJohnson & Johnson (J&J) has tentatively agreed to pay approximately $700 million to settle an investigation by over 40 U.S. states into claims that it improperly marketed its talc-based baby powder without adequately warning about potential health risks. This settlement aims to prevent potential lawsuits that allege J&J concealed links between its talc powder and various cancers. The agreement, still in finalization, follows J&J's failed attempts to use bankruptcy courts to settle numerous lawsuits accusing it of hiding the health risks of its baby powder.The litigation, which has been ongoing for a decade, has had a noticeable impact on J&J's stock price and overall market performance. Initially, J&J had proposed a $9 billion settlement for all current and future baby powder claims through a bankruptcy filing of one of its units. The company had previously set aside $400 million to resolve U.S. states' consumer protection claims, which was increased following mediation.However, the proposed settlement does not include suits by Mississippi and New Mexico, which are seeking higher settlements due to their ongoing litigation efforts. These states argue for significant damages based on the extensive sale of baby powder without cancer warnings over several decades.J&J faces broader legal challenges beyond this settlement, with over 50,000 lawsuits alleging that its talc-based products, contaminated with asbestos, pose a cancer risk. Despite maintaining that its products do not cause cancer and appropriately marketing its baby powder for over a century, J&J has faced numerous court losses and large damage awards. In response to declining sales and ongoing litigation, J&J discontinued its talc-based powders in the U.S. and Canada in 2020 and pledged to replace talc with cornstarch in its products globally by the end of the previous year.J&J to Pay $700 Million to Settle States' Talc Investigation (2)In my latest column, I explore the potential of tax policy as a solution to address the critical issue of water depletion. Water, our most finite resource, has been overexploited for decades, leading to alarming groundwater depletion in the United States since 1900. As climate change disrupts the distribution of freshwater resources, tax policy emerges as a possible remedy.Drawing inspiration from the success of the Pajaro Valley's water tax, which effectively curbed water usage while mitigating saltwater infiltration and crop destruction in the California desert, I delve into the implications of such a tax on a broader scale. Overuse of aquifers goes beyond water depletion; it can result in aquifer failure, which is often difficult and expensive to repair.Tax policy, a tool for making resource users bear the true cost of their actions, is especially pertinent to address the tragedy of the commons observed in groundwater use. By internalizing the cost of water extraction and its associated damages, a water tax can incentivize responsible water use.However, the effectiveness of a water tax not only lies in its implementation but also in wise investment of the revenue generated. I propose allocating funds toward promising technologies like hydropanels that generate clean drinking water from the air, as well as improving existing water transport, storage, and recapture systems.Investments in desalination, water recycling, and more durable water storage and transport methods can further mitigate water loss. Research grants and public-private partnerships can accelerate technology development and infrastructure improvement.In conclusion, the Pajaro Valley's success with a water tax demonstrates the potential of tax policy to manage our vital water resources effectively. By deterring overuse, internalizing costs, and directing revenue toward innovative solutions, we can shift from water consumption to responsible stewardship, ensuring the sustainable management of this essential resource.Taxing Water Is the Only Way to Limit Use and Reduce Depletion Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Talc up and settle back in that Lasik chair, it's time for Final Destination 5 on the 31 Days of Halloween! Let's chat about the fundamentals of the franchise – you know: how people die, how they can survive, and the inevitable twist – and how this one stacks up against the rest of the franchise. Also, let's put these in order of quality! If you're not there already, join the discussion on our Facebook group, Twitter, Instagram, or Discord. You all are the absolute best! You can hear the show exclusively on Legion Podcasts, so be sure to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Google, Spotify, Android, Pandora, iHeartRadio, PocketCasts, Podchaser, or wherever podcasts are found. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Talc up and settle back in that Lasik chair, it's time for Final Destination 5 on the 31 Days of Halloween! Let's chat about the fundamentals of the franchise – you know: how people die, how they can survive, and the inevitable twist – and how this one stacks up against the rest of the franchise. Also, let's put these in order of quality! If you're not there already, join the discussion on our Facebook group, Twitter, Instagram, or Discord. You all are the absolute best! You can hear the show exclusively on Legion Podcasts, so be sure to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Google, Spotify, Android, Pandora, iHeartRadio, PocketCasts, Podchaser, or wherever podcasts are found. The post Legion Podcasts 31 Days of Halloween: Day 17 – Final Destination 5 first appeared on Legion.

Talc up and settle back in that Lasik chair, it’s time for Final Destination 5 on the 31 Days of Halloween! Let’s chat about the fundamentals of the franchise – you know: how people die, how they can survive, and the inevitable twist – and how this one stacks up against the rest of the franchise. Also, let’s put these in order of quality! If you're not there already, join the discussion on our Facebook group, Twitter, Instagram, or Discord. You all are the absolute best! You can hear the show exclusively on Legion Podcasts, so be sure to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Google, Spotify, Android, Pandora, iHeartRadio, PocketCasts, Podchaser, or wherever podcasts are found. The post Legion Podcasts 31 Days of Halloween: Day 17 – Final Destination 5 first appeared on Legion.

謙信的Mixerbox 訂閱節目：獨立思考，請大家多多捧場，支持謙信繼續提供好節目 謙信新書：戰國名女性，在Readmoo kobo 與google書店都有販售 業務合作請洽：japantraveler1@gmail.com athrunzhung@gmail.com 2023年4月4日，根據華爾街日報報導，世界市值最大保健品業者嬌生公司(Johnson & Johnson)表示，針對產品含滑石粉(Talc)致癌的訴訟案達成和解，擬支付至少89億元給數萬名索賠者，一旦破產法官批准，這將是有史以來最大的產品責任相關和解案之一。 很多朋友都知道，滑石粉是嬌生標誌性產品嬰兒爽身粉的關鍵成分，但這種產品竟然會導致癌症，真的令人無法接受。由於嬌生成立專門處理大量訴訟案的分公司LTL Management來處理這些問題，LTL於2021首次申請破產保護，原本打算以20億元和解，但都被駁回，上訴法院裁定，嬌生和LTL處境都不符合申請破產的「財務困境」。 被法院駁回隔天，嬌生將和解金額一口氣提高到四倍以上，嬌生表示6萬多名索賠者已同意接受，這回LTL二度申請破產保護，並尋求分25年支付這筆龐大和解金，有待法庭批准。那這回謙信就來說這件許多家長很關心的案子中嬌生怎麼掩蓋真相。…. fb專頁：https://www.facebook.com/historysquare/ FB社團：https://www.facebook.com/groups/873307933055348 Podcast : http://kshin.co​ Youtube:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2S-492vfSw&list=PLolto1Euzd4XcbP9oX9JXI3wOlrovdgcC twitter:@alexzhung 電子書著作 Amazon : https://reurl.cc/g8lprR​ Readmoo ：https://reurl.cc/jqpYmm​ Kobo : https://reurl.cc/GdDLgW​ Google : https://reurl.cc/9ZyLyn​ －－－－以下訊息由 SoundOn 動態廣告贊助商提供－－－－ 野灣，東台灣唯一的「非營利野生動物醫院」，首次嘗試透過Podcast，帶著大家用耳朵走進這間醫院，認識醫院裡面的每一個職務，開箱野生動物保育大小事，節目於每週三更新集數！ 野生動物保育，沒有人是局外人！ 收聽連結： https://bit.ly/3PXj821 -- 漢神巨蛋週年慶開跑囉！ 10/12~11/7化妝品3千送3百，首四日憑聯名卡+漢神APP 全館滿1萬送5佰；精品滿2萬送1仟；家用專櫃滿1萬送1仟2 消費滿額抽瑞士14日遊、台北漢來住宿券，還有ROBINMAY聯名來店禮等你領。 查看DM https://bit.ly/3LPFtff

OceanGate CEO threatened to sue employees who raised Titan Submarine safety concerns, Johnson & Johnson sues researchers who linked talc to cancer, and A Federal Judge writes an opinion piece in the New York Times regarding the ethical problems plaguing the Supreme Court.

Show is Sponsored by https://www.expressvpn.com/yaron & https://www.fountainheadcasts.comJoin this channel to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/@YaronBrook/joinLike what you hear? Like, share, and subscribe to stay updated on new videos and help promote the Yaron Brook Show: https://bit.ly/3ztPxTxSupport the Show and become a sponsor: https://www.patreon.com/YaronBrookShowOr make a one-time donation: https://bit.ly/2RZOyJJContinue the discussion by following Yaron on Twitter (https://bit.ly/3iMGl6z) and Facebook (https://bit.ly/3vvWDDC )Want to learn more about Ayn Rand and Objectivism? Visit the Ayn Rand Institute: https://bit.ly/35qoEC3 #economy #abortion #capitalism #Economy ​#Objectivism​ #AynRand #politics #individualismThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/3276901/advertisement

How did scientists explain theories of time travel to laypeople before the invention of paper napkins? This is just one of the many questions surrounding this week's topic of time travel (courtesy of Ben of Horsham) that the Beans simply don't touch. Talc makes an appearance though. Content warning: contains audio of the podcast's first partial nude.Join our PATREON for ad-free episodes and a monthly bonus episode: www.patreon.com/threebeansaladLive-stream tickets for our live shows at London Podcast Festival:16th September: https://www.kingsplace.co.uk/whats-on/comedy/online-streaming-three-bean-salad-16-09/17th September: https://www.kingsplace.co.uk/whats-on/comedy/online-streaming-three-bean-salad-17-09/Get in touch:threebeansaladpod@gmail.com@beansaladpod

Episode #79 of the Last Call Trivia Podcast begins with a round of general knowledge questions. Then, let's see how we rank with a round of Tests & Scales Trivia.Round OneThe game starts with a Cars Trivia question about the Subaru crossover station wagon that helped save the car manufacturer from going under.Next, we have an Instruments Trivia question about the woodwind instrument with a name that comes from the Italian word for “small.”The first round concludes with a People Trivia question about two historical figures that both passed away on January 30th, 1948.Bonus QuestionToday's Bonus Question is a follow-up to the People Trivia question from the first round.Round TwoIt's time to get meta and test ourselves about tests. In today's theme round, we're tackling Tests & Scales Trivia! The second round begins with a Health Trivia question about what the Apgar score is used to measure.Next, we have a Nature Trivia question about the Mohs scale, which spans from talc to diamonds.Round Two concludes with a Chemistry Trivia question that asks the Team to identify the term for a solution that can resist pH change upon the addition of an acid or base.Final QuestionWe've reached the Final Question of the game, and today's category of choice is Movie. Let's take a look back at some Oscar winners of the past!The Trivia Team is given a list of five Best Picture-winning movies and asked to identify the missing adjective from each movie title.Hey Trivia fans, we'd love to hear what you think about the Last Call Trivia Podcast! Share your thoughts with us in this short survey: https://forms.gle/9f5HqDV5CLPWkjoZ9To learn more about how Last Call Trivia can level up your events, visit lastcalltrivia.com/shop today!

Years ago, it was not uncommon for an employee to spend 30+ years working at the same company. Today, talent is a revolving door with employees averaging under 4 years before moving on in their field. Succession planning has become a key aspect of today's work environment and not only do businesses now constantly focus on attracting top notch talent, but they must also create a reputation for being a great place for future employees to spend a few years there. Host Jack Russo and Andrew Gardiner discuss sourcing tools that aid companies in their hunt for talented individuals.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy meets with the president of Taiwan—despite pressure from the Chinese regime. Former President Donald Trump responds to the charges against him, calling the case “election interference.” A new AI model developed by Facebook parent Meta can identify objects within an image. What's the significance? Artificial intelligence is on the rise, so where are the AI jobs? We take a look. The biggest product liability settlement in history is being proposed by Johnson and Johnson, over allegations its baby powder causes cancer. How much is it offering to pay? ⭕️ Watch in-depth videos based on Truth & Tradition at Epoch TV

If approved, the proposal would be one of the largest product liability settlements in the U.S.; JPMorgan Chase's Dimon says effects of banking crisis to linger for years; IRS extends filing deadline for storm-affected areas of U.S. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NTD Business News: 4/5/20231. McCarthy Meets Taiwan President Tsai2. Trump Indictment Analysis3. Trump Responds to Charges: DA Has 'No Case'4. Stormy Daniels Must Pay Trump $122K5. New Meta AI Tool Identifies Objects in Images

On this episode of Cut to the Chase:, legendary mass tort lawyer Rick Kuykendall comes on to discuss the recent appellate decision rejecting Johnson & Johnson's effort to use the Texas 2 Step Bankruptcy maneuver to minimize it's legal exposure in the 40,000 or so lawsuits involving claims that the company's baby powder causes cancer.    While some of you have danced the Texas 2 Step, it's use in the legal world has been highly controversial and alarming to plaintiffs allegedly harmed or even killed by products produced by some of the biggest corporations in the world.   But the 3rd Circuit rejected the Texas 2 Step petition. Further appeals might take place on the issue.   And reports of settlement talks are also surfacing.      In addition to Johnson & Johnson's Texas 2 Step, 3M's subsidiary also came up with a controversial bankruptcy maneuver to help 3M avoid it's financial exposure in the largest mass tort ever-the Combat earplug litigation involving 230,000 or so veterans who lost hearing or developed tinnitus due to allegedly defective earplugs 3M supplied to the Army for over a decade.   While it is not a Texas 2 Step, 3M's subsidiary move certainly looks like it came from the same playbook.  Listen to Rick explain it all on episode 109 of Cut to the Chase:.  

Hey Lovers, what a fun episode! This week I'm chatting about the shame name game-mostly for women's parts n stuff...no thank you I say, but society may tell me something different...John Lovitz on Howard Stern as George Santos as The Liar character almost "blew my mind up!" Talc, No-Bleedin' and some more scary stuff they like us to place up on our lady parts, also some fun throwback stories of Mama El and lil me being on set of The Last Resort directed by the awesome Zane Buzby with both Phil Hartman & John Lovitz as part of an amazing cast. Thinx panties are also on my chopping block...what the hell do they want from us? Well, in short-not to bleed or age...hmmmm. There's more and it's lotsa fun. Have a great time! If you can, please share with your friends xoxoxox Jess