Podcasts about argumentum

EPISODE 127 | Cognitive Biases: Thanks, Big Brain! (Because Reasons 12) This episode looks at the final two categories of biases in the Cognitive Biases Codex – what we tend to do when the information we're presented with doesn't contain enough meaning, and the brain's tendency to favor quick assessments over complete ones, because it feels it need to act quickly. Like what we do? Then buy us a beer or three via our page on Buy Me a Coffee. You can also SUBSCRIBE to this podcast. Review us here or on IMDb!  SECTIONS COMPLICATED SHADOWS- Confabulation, apophenia, illusory correlation, the clustering illusion, the illusion of validity and WYSIWTI, the anecdotal fallacy, inductive reasoning, the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, the recency illusion, the gambler's fallacy and hot hand fallacy Stereotyping, group attribution error, outgroup homogeneity, the  moral credential effect, authority bias, functional fixedness, the Just-World Hypothesis, the bandwagon effect, argument from fallacy (bad apple bias, fallacy fallacy), the placebo and nocebo effects The cross-race effect, the Halo and Horns Effect, the positivity effect, reactive devaluation, the cheerleader effect, the not invented here bias, the well-traveled road effect Mental accounting, Miller's Law (magic number 7 +/- 2), appeal to probability, survival bias, the subadditivity effect, the zero sum bias The illusion of transparency, the curse of knowledge, the illusions of asymmetric insight and of external agency Self-consistency bias, hindsight bias, moral luck, outcome bias, restraint bias, pro-innovation bias, declinism, pessimism bias, the planning fallacy, backward and forward telescoping ALARM CALL - Belief bias and syllogisms, Occam's Razor, the less-is-better effect, the Delmore effect, the conjunction fallacy (the Linda Problem), information bias, ambiguity bias, the Easton-Rosen Phenomenon (rhyme-as-reason effect) Status quo bias and ante, system justification, the decoy effect (asymmetric dominance effect), reverse psychology, social comparison bias, reactance The backfire effect, the sunk cost fallacy, the pseudocertainty effect, zero-risk bias, loss aversion, unit bias, irrational escalation (escalation of commitment), the endowment effect (divestiture aversion) and the IKEA effect, the generation effect The identifiable victim effect, hyperbolic discounting, Argumentum ad Novitatem (appeal to novelty) Effort justification, the defensive attribution hypothesis, trait ascription bias, the illusion of control, the optimism effect, risk compensation and the Peltzman effect, the egocentric bias (Illusory Superiority, the Lake Woebegone effect), the self-serving bias, the overconfidence effect, the Dunning-Kruger effect, the hard-easy effect, the false consensus effect, social desirability bias, the fundamental attribution error and the Actor-Observer bias Music by Fanette Ronjat Follow us on social: Facebook Twitter Other Podcasts by Derek DeWitt DIGITAL SIGNAGE DONE RIGHT - Winner of a 2022 Gold Quill Award, 2022 Gold MarCom Award, 2021 AVA Digital Award Gold, 2021 Silver Davey Award, 2020 Communicator Award of Excellence, and on numerous top 10 podcast lists.  PRAGUE TIMES - A city is more than just a location - it's a kaleidoscope of history, places, people and trends. This podcast looks at Prague, in the center of Europe, from a number of perspectives, including what it is now, what is has been and where it's going. It's Prague THEN, Prague NOW, Prague LATER 

NUNTII PRESCRIPTI’ ‘IN SERMONE LATINO’ ‘EX UNIVERSITATIS PANAMERICANAE DISCENTIBUS ET EX LUIS PESQUERA OLALDE’. News translated into Latin by the students of the Universidad Panamericana and by Luis Pesquera Olalde. ‘NUNTII IN LINGUA LATINA’ ‘INSTRUMENTUM’ ‘AD LATINUM DISCENDUM ET DOCENDUMQUE’ ‘EST’. In hoc Nuntii in Lingua Latina evento, quaeso, de orationibus secundariis relativis curam habet. ‘*NUNTII EX PERIÓDICIS HEBDOMADARIIS’ A 31-X-2024 AD 4-XI-2024 *SUNT. ‘NUNTII IN LINGUA LATINA’ ‘IN LINGUA LATINA ET ANGLICA’ ‘AUDIS’! CIVITATUM FOEDERATARUM AMERICAE COMITIA. TRANSLATIONES A CASANDRA FREIRE SUNT. ‘CIVITATES FOEDERATAE AMERICAE’. ‘*KAMALA HARRIS ET DONALD TRUMP’, [‘*QUI’ ‘ ELECTI CANDIDATI PRAESIDIS CIVITATUM FOEDERATARUM * SUNT’], ‘FINEM *FACIUNT ARGUMENTIS’ ‘PROPTER COMITIA QUINQUE NOVEMBRIS’. ‘*HARRIS’ ‘* DICIT [‘* DONALD TRUMP ’ ‘ FASCISTICEM *ESSE ’]’. ‘*TRUMP’ ‘ * DICIT [‘*HARRIS’ ‘SINISTRAE MARXISTAM * ESSE’]’. ‘*QUAESTIONES’ ‘PARES * SUNT ’ {De syntaxe. Orationem secundariam relativam prode, et de relativo genus et numerum ostende. ¿Aliae orationes secundarias relativas sunt?}. // ‘SANCTUS FRANCISCUS COMITATUS’. ‘SENTENTIA VITAE’: ‘*HOMO’, [‘*QUI’ ‘MARITO PRIOR PRAESIDIS CAMERAE REPRAESENTANTIUM, NANCY PELOSI, IN DUO MILIA VIGINTI DUO DAMNUM MALLEO *ATTULIT’] ‘HAC SEPTIMANA’ ‘IN CARCERE VITA’ *DAMNATUS EST’ {De syntaxe. Orationem secundariam relativam prode, et de verbo modum, tempus, numerum et personam ostende}. // ‘COLUMBOPOLIS, OHIO’. ‘ABORTUS *IURA’ ‘*VINCIT’: ‘*IUDEX COMITATUS’ ‘RESTRICTIONES AB ABORTUS OHIO SEX HEBDOMADE PRAETERITA SEPTIMANA *PERCUSSIT’. ‘CONTROVERSIAM *FINIVIT’, [‘*QUAE’ ‘QUINQUENNIUM LEGALE CERTAMEN *FUIT’] {De syntaxe. Orationem secundariam relativam prode, et de relativo genus et numerum ostende}. // NORVEGIA. TRANSLATIO A SAID RAYMUNDO DELGADO EST. OSLO. FINIS AETATIS AD RETES SOCIALES. '*NOVREGIA' ['AETATEM MINIMAM' 'USUS RETIUM SOCIALIUM PER PUEROS' 'AD QUINDECIM ANNOS' 'MINUTUM ‘*IRI’] '*NUNTIAVIT*'. // BRITANNIARUM REGNO. TRANSLATIO A SAID RAYMUNDO DELGADO EST. '*RACHEL REEVES, [‘*QUAE MINISTRA TRIBUTORUM BRITANNIARUM REGNI' ‘*EST’], 'PECUNIAE RATIONEM' ['QUAE*' 'IN TRIBUTA ET IMPENSAS' 'SE *EXTENDIT'] '*EXHIBET'. '*TRIBUTA' 'AD QUADRAGINTA MILIA DECIES CENTENA MILLIA PECUNIAE IN LIBRIS AUT QUINQUAGINTA DUO DECIES CENTENA MILLIA PECUNIAE IN DOLLARIIS' '*ACCRESCET'. {De syntaxe. Quaeso, ¿relativus secunudus, ad quod nomen se refertur?} //. ISRAELE. TRASLATIO AB ALISSA SOUZA EST. ‘JERUSALEM’. *‘LEGISLATORES ISRAELIANI’ ‘U-EN-ER-UU-A’, [‘*QUAE’ ‘AUXILIUM PALESTINENSIBUS’ ‘IN GAZA’ *‘DISTRIBUIT’], ‘IN LOCIS’ ‘A ISRAELE RECTIS’ *‘INTERDIXERUNT’ {De syntaxe. Orationem secundariam relativam prode; et de relativo genus; et numerum et de verbo modum, tempus, numerum et personam –quaeso– ostende}. // HIZBULLAH. ‘*HIZBULLA sive HEZBOLLAH, [*QUOD FACTIO POLITICA ET MILITARIS LIBANICA *EST],’ ‘NAIM QASSEM’. ‘SICUT’ ‘NOVUM DUCEM’ ‘*ELEGIT’ [‘QUIA’ ‘*ISRAEL’ ‘HIZBULLA DUCEM ANTERIOREM’ ‘*NECAVIT’] {De syntaxe. Orationes secundarias relativam et causalem invenite, et differentias in constructione explica}. // TURCIA. TRASLATIO AB ALISSA SOUZA EST. ‘TURCIA’. ‘*TURCIA’ ‘OBIECTIVA KURDICA’ ‘IN SYRIA ET IRAQ’ ‘*OPPUGNAVIT’, [POSTQUAM ‘PE-KA-KA’ DE ‘IMPETU MORTALI’ ‘IN ‘SOCIETATEM NATIONALEM AERONAUTICAM SUAM’ ‘PROXIMA HEBDOMADE’ ‘*ACCUSAVIT’] {De syntaxe. Quaeso, orationem secundariam causalem invenite et constructionem propriam expone}. ‘NUNTII IN LINGUA LATINA’ ‘IN LINGUA LATINA, ANGLICA ET ITALICA’ ‘AUDIS’! EX HEBDOMADA PAPAE. CUM VENIA EX DICASTERIO VATICANII AD COMUNICATIONEM. ‘PONTIFICIA COMMISSIO DE TUTELA MINORUM’ ‘PRIMUM DE ABUSIBUS IN ECCLESIA QUINQUE CONTIENTIUM COMMENTARIUM’ ‘EXHIBUIT’. // GAZA. TRASLATIO A FERNANDA SOLÍS EST. ‘HAMAS *DUCES’ ‘*DICUNT’: ‘SALTEM NONAGINTA TRES HOMINES, [QUI IN AEDIFICATIONE ‘GAZA SEPTENTRIONIS ‘*ERANT’], ‘*INTERFECTI SUNT’ {De syntaxe. Quaeso, relativus ad quae nomen refertur?}. // ISRAELE. ISRAELE. MILITES AD BELLANDUM NEGANTUR. ‘IN EPISTOLA AD REGIMEN’, ‘CENTUM TRIGINTA *MILITES’ ‘*NUNTIAVERUNT’ [‘QUOD’, ‘SINE CONVENIO’ ‘AD OBSES LIBERANDUM’, ‘NON *SERVIUNT’] {De syntaxe. Orationem secundariam relativam prode, et de relativo genus et numerum ostende}. // IAPONIA. TOKIO. PRIMUS MINISTER COMITIA ANTICIPATA AMITTET. ‘*SHIGERU ISHIBA’, [‘*QUI’ ‘NOVUS PRIMUS MINISTER’ ‘*EST’], ‘ERRORE MAGNO’ ‘AD COMITIA ANTICIPATA PROMOVENDUM’ ‘*FECIT’ [‘QUIA’ ‘*HOC’ ‘NON *VICIT’] {De syntaxe. Denuo, orationes secundarias relativam et causalem invenite, et differentias in constructione explica}. RE PUBLICA COREANA vulgo COREA MERIDIONALE. COREA MERIDIONALE. AD SOLITUDINEM VINCERE. ‘*SEULUM, [‘QUOD’ ‘CAPUT ET MAXIMA REIPUBLICAE COREANAE URBS’ ‘EST’],’ ‘CIRCA TRESCENTOS EURORUM’ ‘*COLLOCABIT’ ‘AD MORTES IN SOLITUDINE VITANDUM’ {De syntaxe. Orationem secundariam relativam prode, et de verbo modum, tempus, numerum et personam ostende}. // ‘NUNTII IN LINGUA LATINA’ ‘IN LINGUA LATINA, ANGLICA ET GALLICA’ ‘AUDIS’! GEORGIA. GEORGIA. VICTORIA PRO MOSCOVIA. ‘IN GEORGIAE COMITIBUS’, ‘*FACTIO’ ‘[*QUAE IN GEORGIA *GUBERNAT]’, ‘COMITIA’ ‘AD PARLAMENTUM ELIGENDUM’ ‘CUM QUINQUAGINTA QUATTUOR CENTESIMAS SUFFRAGIORUM’ ‘*VICIT’ {De syntaxe. Orationem secundariam relativam prode, et de relativo genus et numerum ostende}. // LIBANO. LIBANO. PAX CIVILIS SUSPENSA. ‘PLUS QUAM UNIUS MILIA MILIUM LIBANI *PERSONAE’ ‘AD CRISTIANAM ET SUNNITICA [*QUAE NOMEN A SECTA SUNNITICA *ASSUMIT] REGIONES’ ‘*FUGIUNTUR’ ET ‘TENSIONES’ ‘IN COMUNITATIBUS’ ‘IAM *PROVOCANT’ {De syntaxe. Orationem secundariam relativam prode, et de verbo modum, tempus, numerum et personam ostende}. IRANIA. ‘ISRAELIS *AEROPLANA INSECTATORIA, [*QUAE ‘COPIARUM AD ISRAELEM DEFENDENDUM’ *SUNT],’ ‘MISSILES’ ‘CONTRA IRANIAE DEFENSIONIS SYSTEMA ET MISSILIUM OFFICINAS’ ‘*DIREXERUNT’ {De syntaxe. Orationem secundariam relativam prode, et dic quia de relativo in numero plurale est}. // BOLIVIA. ‘IN BOLIVIA’, ‘*EVO MORALES, [‘*QUI’ ‘BOLIVIAE PRAESES ANTERIOR’ ‘*FUIT’],’ ‘*CLAMAT’ [‘QUOD’ ‘REGIMINIS INTELLIGENTIAE *ACTORES’ ‘NECARE EUM’ ‘*CONATI SUNT’] {De syntaxe. ¿Quot orationes secundarias sunt?}. // ‘NUNTII IN LINGUA LATINA’ ‘IN LINGUA LATINA, ANGLICA ET GERMANICA ‘AUDIS’! GERMANIA publice RES PUBLICA GERMANIAE. ¿QUOMODO VOLKSWAGEN PECUNIAM CONSERVARE VULT? ¿‘QUAM’ ‘GRAVIS’ ‘OPERARIORUM DIMINUTIO’ ‘*ERIT’? ‘VOLKSWAGEN *DUCES’ ‘VIGINTI CENTESIMAS’ ‘*COMPUNTANT’. // LIBANO. BELLUM IN ASIA OCCIDENTALE vel ORIENTI MEDIO. ‘LIBANI *PRIMUS MINISTER’ ‘AMRMISTITIUM’ ‘TANTUM DIEBUS’ ‘*SPECTACT’. // UCRÁINA. ‘*CIVITATES FOEDERATAE AMERICA ET RES PUBLICA COREANA’ ‘COREAE SEPTENTRIONALI’ ‘AD COPIAS AB UCRAINA REMOVENDUM’ ‘*INSISTUNT’. // ‘NUNTII IN LINGUA LATINA’ ‘IN LINGUA LATINA, ANGLICA ET HISPANICA’ ‘AUDIS’! HISPANIA. ‘INUNDATIONES’ ‘OB PLUVIAS FORTES’ ‘SALTEM NONAGINTA QUINQUE PERSONAS’ ‘CIRCUM VALENTIA, [QUAE CIVITAS VALENTIAE PROVINCIA IN HISPANIA EST],’ ‘NECAVERUNT’ {De syntaxe. Theoriam de orationibus secundariis relativis expone }. // MEXICO. TRASLATIO A LUCERO MAILLE EST. ‘*OCTO IUDICES SUPREMI TRIBUNALIS MEXICI’ ‘SUAS RENUNTIATIONES’ ‘*TRADIDERUNT’, ‘AD SIGNIFICANDUM’ ‘SE NON SUFFRAGATUROS’ ‘IN COMITIIS MENSE IUNIO ANNO DOMINI BIS MILLESIMO VIGINTI QUINQUE’. [SUB PRAECLARI NOVAE REFORMATIONIS IUDICIALES], ‘*IUDICES OMNIUM GRADUUM’ ‘IN MEXICO’ ‘SUFFRAGIO LEGENTUR’ ‘POTIUS QUAM *NOMINABUNTUR’. ‘*REFORMATIO’ ‘*STATUIT’ ‘SUAS PENSIONES’’ ‘PERICLITATURAS ESSE’ ‘NISI’ ‘AB OFFICIO’ ‘DEMISSIONEM’ ‘*FECERINT’, ET ‘SUFFRAGIO’ ‘*DEFICIANT’. ‘TRES *IUDICES’ , [‘*QUI’ ‘PROXIMI’ ‘*SUNT’ ‘PARTI REGENTI MORENA’], ‘IN OFFICIO’ ‘*MANENT’. {De syntaxe. Quaeso, orationem secundariam relativam invenite}. // ARGENTINA. ‘*XAVERIUS MILEI [‘*QUI’ ‘ARGENTINAE PRAESES’ ‘*EST’]’, ‘DIANA MONDINO [‘*QUI’ ‘ARGENTINAE MINISTER RERUM EXTERNARUM’ ‘*ERAT’]’’ ‘DIMISIT’ {De syntaxe. ¿Quot orationes secundarias sunt?}. // LEXICON: Abortus iura. Aeroplana intersectatoria. Argumentum, -i. Armistitium, -i. Camara repraesentantium. Candidatus, -i. Comitia anticipata. Defensionis systema. Fascismus, -i. Impetus mortalis. Intelligentiae actores. Interdico. Inundatio, inundationis. Malleus, mallei. Marxismus vel Placita Marxiana. Media socialia. Minister rerum externarum. Minister tributorum vel Minister ab aerario publico. Missilium officinae. Mortes in solitudine. Operariorum diminuitio. Restrictio, restrictionis. Secta sunnitica. Societas Nationalis Aeronautica. Supremum Tribunal. SI NUNTII IN LINGUA LATINA TRADUCTOR ESSE VOLUERIS, QUAESO LITTERAM ELECTRONICAM AD lpesquera@up.edu.mx MITTAS’. If you would like to collaborate as a translator in Nuntii in Lingua Latina, please send an email to lpesquera@up.edu.mx

durée : 00:07:15 - Argumentum e silentio de Paul Celan

Chris Smashing; Gedächtnisfähigkeiten; Alex‘ Zitatkünste und trügerische Erinnerungen.  Chris hält bald auf der SmashingConf einen Vortrag. Er hat auch am Smashing Buch 2 mitgewirkt, was uns dazu führt, dass Alex eine nicht so gut funktionierende Autorenseite über seinen Kollegen auf Amazon gefunden hat. „Handle nur nach derjenigen Maxime, durch die du zugleich wollen kannst, dass sie ein allgemeines Gesetz werde. “ - Silvio Berlusconi
Känguru - Mark-Uwe Klink Die Themensuche für unsere heutige Episode bringt uns zu Chris‘ Schwierigkeiten, teilweise ganz konkrete Erinnerungen abzurufen. Viel gelernt, wenig erinnert. Ein gutes Erinnerungsvermögen ist für uns jedenfalls oft ein Zeichen von Intelligenz. Informiert das Gelernte und „Vergessene“ die Intuition?Wie entscheidet unser Gehirn, was wichtig ist? Wir überlegen, wie kollektive Erinnerungen kulturell überliefert werden, wie es unsere Identität und unser gesellschaftliches Zusammenleben formt. Gesellschaftliches Vergessen ist evtl. ein Schutzmechanismus.Fotos helfen uns, unsere Erinnerungen zu rekonstruieren. Mit dem Internet, unserem digitalen Gedächtnis, bleibt aber so viel mehr Dokumentation als früher. Fehlt hier das Vergessen? Oder hält das Internet und das Digitale evtl. doch nicht ewig?Gerade von unseren Kindern wollen wir uns gerne alles merken. Alex‘ gehörte Theorie, dass du mit dem zwölften Lebensjahr deiner Sprösslinge schon 80 % der gemeinsamen Zeit abgeschlossen hast und der damit einhergehende Abnabelungsprozess.Lasst uns zusammen erinnern, wieder vergessen und das Gefühl behalten, eine schöne Reise geteilt zu haben.  SmashingBook 2 (2011): https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/02/smashing-book-2/Argumentum ad verecundiam: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_verecundiamRezenzeffekt: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/RezenzeffektFilm - Inside Out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inside_Out_(2015_film)aap - Faktencheck zu gefundenen Schriftrollen: https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/claim-of-10000-year-old-tibet-library-find-not-worth-paper-its-written-on/ ______ Chris live zuhören? Am 09.09.2024 auf der SmashingConfhttps://smashingconf.com/freiburg-2024/schedule#day2

In the one hundred and twenty third episode we explore the Argumentum ad Fastidium, or Argument from Disgust, starting with Trump dismissing kobe beef, railing against violent movies, and objecting to being asked about racism.In Mark's British Politics Corner we look at Angela Rayner being disgusted by Dominic Raab's behavior and then defending attack ads which others found disgusting, and Jacob Rees Mogg showing he's a man of the people by turning his nose up at baked beans.In the Fallacy in the Wild section, we check out examples from Friends, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, and The Imitation Game.Jim and Mark go head to head in a special edition of Fake News, in which Mark has to guess which three of nine Trump NFTs are actually ones Jim made.Then we talk about the Fox News/Dominion settlement and Tucker Carlson getting fired.And finally, we round up some of the other crazy Trump stories from the past week.The full show notes for this episode can be found at https://fallacioustrump.com/ft123You can contact the guys at pod@fallacioustrump.com, on Twitter @FallaciousTrump, or facebook at facebook.com/groups/fallacioustrumpSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/fallacious-trump/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

“Bu podcasti dinleyen ahmaktır” deseydim eğer, benden şikayetçi olup tazminat alabilir miydiniz? Bunu defalarca yapsam hapse girebilir miyim? Bir telefon hakkı vereyim size, avukatınızı arayın, görüşün bakalım ne diyor. Bir şeyin suç olması, çözdüğünden fazla soruna sebep oluyor mu olmuyor mu? Bu bölümde mevcut durumun yarattığı bazı sorunlardan bahsedeceğim, hakaretin tam olarak ne olduğundan bahsedeceğim, kamu hukuku ve özel hukuk ayrımını yapacağım ve sonra da mikrofonu size vereceğim(Podcast için yorum yazan herkese ve tüm Patreon destekçilerine teşekkürler).Bu podcast, Open English hakkında reklam içerir. Yeni yıl fıyatları gelmeden %65 indirim fırsatıyla ana dili İngilizce olan eğitmenlerle online sınırsız derslere katılmak ve Open English hakkında daha detaylı bilgi almak için tıklayın..Bölümler:(00:05) Hakaretin suç olmadığı yerler(01:00) Argumentum ad ana bacı(05:25) Kırmızı çizgiler: ABD seçim usülsüzlüğü kararları(07:15) Kişinin itibarı mı devletin itibarı mı daha önemli?(11:25) Cumhurbaşkanına hakaret kanunu(13:45) Tazminat Endüstrisi(18:00) Yasallık vs serbestlik(18:30) İftira(20:05) Sizden gelenler(21:35) HAGB(26:05) Hakaret sayılan kelimeler(28:25) Patreon Teşekkürleri..Kaynaklar:Rapor: Trump's judicial campaign to upend the 2020 electionMakale: How powerful people use criminal-defamation laws to silence their criticsMakale: Defamation law and free speechHaber: It shouldn't be a crime to insult someoneKitap: Hakaret Sözlüğü, Ahmet AslanSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

"OSCE chairmanship to pass from Poland to North Macedonia in 2023 TIRANA, December 2 – Russian aggression against Ukraine will remain a major priority during North Macedonia's chairmanship of the OSCE in 2023. The Minister of Foreign Affairs of North Macedonia, Bujar Osmani said this at a press con" "START AD- #TheMummichogblogOfMalta Amazon Top and Flash Deals(Affiliate Link - You will support our translations if you purchase through the following link) - https://amzn.to/3CqsdJH Compare all the top travel sites in just one search to find the best hotel deals at HotelsCombined - awarded world's best hotel price comparison site. (Affiliate Link - You will support our translations if you purchase through the following link) - https://www.hotelscombined.com/?a_aid=20558 “So whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets."""" #Jesus #Catholic. Smooth Radio Malta is Malta's number one digital radio station, playing Your Relaxing Favourites - Smooth provides a ‘clutter free' mix, appealing to a core 35-59 audience offering soft adult contemporary classics. We operate a playlist of popular tracks which is updated on a regular basis. https://smooth.com.mt/listen/ Follow on Telegram: https://t.me/themummichogblogdotcom Tumblr: https://www.tumblr.com/themummichogblogofmalta Blogspot: https://themummichogblogofmalta.blogspot.com/ END AD" "ference in Lodz, Poland, after the conclusion of the 29th OSCE Ministerial Council, according to according to Ukrinform on Friday. “Ukraine will remain our top priority, also other protracted conflicts,” Osmani said. He also said that Russia should stop its aggression against Ukraine. “Ahead of us is another difficult year – a year full of uncertainty and unpredictability. We all know the reasons behind this state of play. […] Let me once again be clear: the Russian aggression against Ukraine must stop,” Osmani said. According to him, North Macedonia stands ready to assume its share of the responsibility, being privileged to serve as the chair of this organization. The OSCE Ministerial Council was held in the Polish city of Lodz on December 1-2. The focus of the meeting was the issue of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine. In 2023, the OSCE chairmanship will pass from Poland to North Macedonia. During the summit, foreign ministers of Poland, Sweden and North Macedonia issued a joint statement, expressing their concern about “the use of force and coercion to change borders”, emphasising that such actions “have no place in the 21st century.” “We will find a way to work together, even if that means changing some procedural rules,” Michael Carpenter, U.S. Ambassador to the OSCE, said, referring to Russia's power of veto as a member of the organisation. According to him, it had been decided that the OSCE would not continue to be paralysed by Russian obstructionist attempts. “We will be creative, we will be determined and we will find ways to get things done,” he declared. Zbigniew Rau, Polish Foreign Minister and the outgoing OSCE chairman, assessed the coming years as being “extremely difficult” for the organisation due to the unpredictable military situation in Europe. /Argumentum.al https://www.argumentum.al/en/osce-chairmanship-to-pass-from-poland-to-north-macedonia-in-2023/ "

Vinte Falácias Bolsonaristas, Lulistas e Midiáticas Apoie o Canal: https://apoia.se/canaldosocran *Áudios Venda: -CONCEITO DE HISTÓRIA NA FILSOFIA EM ARENDT: https://go.hotmart.com/I73309280Y?dp=1 -O QUE É FASCISMO: https://go.hotmart.com/Y72077629D?dp=1 -CURSO DE DESENHO ANIMEART: https://go.hotmart.com/L72887216E?dp=1 Hoje falaremos sobre algumas falácias dos militantes Bolsonaristas, de direita, esquerdistas, lulistas e midiáticos. Veja que não estou comparando o Lula com o Bolsonaro, pois o primeiro é condenado e o segundo presidente do Brasil, estou apenas comparando as militâncias e a validade de seus argumentos. Seguem-se os temas abordados: 1) Falácia da Ocultação de Ambiguidade. 2) Falácia da Generalização Apressada. 3) Falácia do falso Dilema. 4) Falácia da Supressão de Dados. 5) Falácia Pictórica - Imagem Descontextualizada. 6) Falácia da Lealdade Irrefletida. 7) Falácia do Dualismo Ingênuo. 8) Falácia do Agente Suspeito. 9) Falácia do Agente Incauto. 10) Falácia da Analogia Gramatical: Por Composição ou Por Divisão. 11) Argumentum ad Populum. 12) Confusão de Ênfases e Prioridades. 13) Argumentum ad Misericordiam. 14) Falácia do Radicalismo Mentiroso. 15) Falácia do ataque por Analítica: Crítica = Ataque. 16) Falácia do Messianismo Político. 17) Falácia da Pergunta de questão múltipla. 18) Falácia do Equívoco. 19) Abordagem de Preenchimento imaginativo. 20) Falácia da Pecha de Isentão.

When someone isn't 100% confident in their argument, does that automatically mean they're wrong? Not necessarily... When you can recognize the foolishness, you won't get fooled by it! Special thank you to our sponsors, Classical Conversations! Interested in homeschooling? For more than 25 years, Classical Conversations has equipped parents just like you with the support and tools to home educate. Start your journey today and find your local Classical Conversations community of homeschool families at www.classicalconversations.com/gibbens. Send me any questions, comments or even the fallacies you're seeing around you! think@filteritthroughabraincell.com Or, tag me on Instagram: @filteritthroughabraincell Sign up for notifications: www.filteritthroughabraincell.com

It may seem like a made-up name, but it's not! This fallacy is actually a specific type of Guilt by Association fallacy. When you can recognize the foolishness, you won't get fooled by it! Special thank you to our sponsors, Classical Conversations! Interested in homeschooling? For more than 25 years, Classical Conversations has equipped parents just like you with the support and tools to home educate. Start your journey today and find your local Classical Conversations community of homeschool families at www.classicalconversations.com/gibbens. Send me any questions, comments or even the fallacies you're seeing around you! think@filteritthroughabraincell.com Or, tag me on Instagram: @filteritthroughabraincell Sign up for notifications: www.filteritthroughabraincell.com

[0:00] Intro[1:11] METABULLSHIT SOURCE [1:48] Dating the shroud with Xray bullshit - https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/cwn/2022/april/new-scientific-procedure-dates-shroud-of-turin-to-the-time-of-christs-deathSOURCE [2:38] Updating list of countries leaving and staying in Russia, likely spam - https://www.websiteplanet.com/blog/companies-boycotting-russia/SOURCE [4:55] Vladimir Putin Buttplug 3d model - https://thangs.com/designer/Sqeaky/3d-model/putin%20buttplug-57043?manualModelView=trueSUPPORT US [5:25] Dysevidentia on Patreon  - https://www.patreon.com/dysevidentiaCONTACT [5:28] Dysevidentia on Reddit - https://www.reddit.com/r/Dysevidentia/CONTACT [5:30] Dysevidentia on Twitter - https://twitter.com/dysevidentiaCONTACT [5:31] Dysevidentia on Discord - https://discord.gg/EZtcgdsCDACONTACT [5:32] Dysevidentia on YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBbU3rnK52CXUkK0cJ-o29gCONTACT [5:37] Dysevidentia by email - Contact@dysevidentia.com[5:55] MAIN DISCUSSION - 1 - DENIAL, NARCISSIST PRAYERSOURCE [6:48] Kurzegesagt on hopelessness about climate change - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxgMdjyw8uwSOURCE [7:16] The Narcissist's Prayer - https://www.thelifedoctor.org/the-narcissist-s-prayerSOURCE [7:47] Pete Rickets is a modern climate change denier - https://www.huffpost.com/entry/pete-ricketts-nebraska-30x30-american-stewards_n_6261dcd5e4b0ea625c04f0faSOURCE [9:01] Pete Ricketts, for example, has accepted more than $700,000 from "Energy & Natural Resources" including $65 from Koch - https://www.followthemoney.org/entity-details?eid=5723939SOURCE [9:49] Sen Jim Inhofe confused a snowball with evidence that winter could be 1 degree warmer - https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sen-jim-inhofe-climate-change-is-not-real-because-here-is-a-snowball/SOURCE [11:19] Fox and other news outlets often claim it is fake or downplay it - https://www.mediamatters.org/sean-hannity/11-dumbest-things-conservative-media-said-about-climate-change-2014SOURCE [12:09] Multiple versions of the big lie - https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/there-is-more-than-one-big-lie/SOURCE [12:12] 538 on how we are less polarized than we seem (the tribalism comment was from this or some episode near it) - https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/politics-podcast-americans-might-be-less-divided-than-you-think/SOURCE [14:24] Argument Ad Populum - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populumBULLSHIT SOURCE [15:41] One way to claim it isn't a big deal is through various lies about CO2 - https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/tz5iby/climate_change_is_designed_to_steal_your_money/SOURCE [17:29] Conspiracy Theorists hate aggregate science like what the IPCC assembles - https://www.ipcc.ch/reports/SOURCE [19:45] Volcanoes are insignificant CO2 sources compared to humans - https://skepticalscience.com/volcanoes-and-global-warming.htmSOURCE [19:46] On average humans make 60x more CO2 than volcanoes annually - https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/which-emits-more-carbon-dioxide-volcanoes-or-human-activitiesSOURCE [20:21] GOP Congressman: God Will 'Take Care Of' Climate Change If It Exists - https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tim-walberg-climate-change_n_592edc73e4b0540ffc837acfBULLSHIT SOURCE [20:38] Claiming humans couldn't cause climate change is the common way to claims “that's not my fault” - https://agrainofsalt.medium.com/man-made-global-warming-is-a-farce-f616fb4e6ef2SOURCE [21:49] Gravity tractor, just use it to send rock to Earth instead of away - https://www.inverse.com/article/13842-here-s-how-to-build-a-gravity-tractor-save-mankind-from-an-asteroid-apocalypseSOURCE [23:36] Ceres in a really cool NASA simulation - https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/dwarf-planets/ceres/overview/SOURCE [24:48] Much of the US is suffering drought conditions, Omaha is "abnormally dry" - https://www.drought.gov/SOURCE [25:40] Ukrainian invasion and wheat prices - https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/wheat-corn-prices-surge-amid-russias-invasion-ukraine-83226272SOURCE [27:16] Trump claimed climate change was a hoax right up until he could take credit for fighting it - https://time.com/5622374/donald-trump-climate-change-hoax-event/SOURCE [28:59] Trump claimed windmills caused cancer - https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/437096-trump-claims-noise-from-windmills-causes-cancer/SOURCE [32:44] Conservatives often claim others deserve climate disasters - https://www.huffpost.com/entry/god-and-natural-disasters-its-the-gays-fault_b_2068817SOURCE [33:06 ] One examples of the plausible claims that climate change made Sandy worse - https://www.theverge.com/2021/5/18/22436902/hurricane-sandy-climate-change-sea-level-rise-damages-studySOURCE [33:45] Pastor blames hurricane Katrina on gay people -

  https://square.link/u/8pNqPxKd?src=sheet   Wake the Faith up Slayer… This is Garth Heckman with the David Alliance and you can reach me at TDAgiantslayer@gmail.com    Brought to you by wellbuiltbody.com Gym Apparel for men and women that rocks and shocks and ain't for everybody - but just might be for you. wellbuiltbody.com   Hey your son or daughter ever get picked on by another kid? Do you or your sons a daughters get picked on verbally? What to do? THE WAR IS COMING, ARE YOUR KIDS READY? REGISTER NOW VIA EMAIL OR LOOK FOR OUR UPCOMING QR CODE ON OUR MEDIA… THIS WILL FILL UP FAST! July 9th - Saturday - A Father Daughter/Son conference called PROTECTOR! Speakers on how to protect your son and daughter Emotionally, physically, sexually, socially and spiritually. Ages 10 and up if you feel your student is mature enough. Price $100 per family. At HillSpring Church New prague south of the Twin Cities Just landed a speaker who will challenge you how to keep your kids safe from human trafficking… you say well my kid will never fall into that… oh not so fast. You obviously don't know what you are talking about… so get ready to sign up!   5 Fallacies a day - Day 1 Proverbs 26:4 Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you be like him yourself. Proverbs 18:2 A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion. Proverbs 29:9 If a wise man has an argument with a fool, the fool only rages and laughs, and there is no quiet. Proverbs 1:7 The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction. Proverbs 18:6 A fool's lips walk into a fight, and his mouth invites a beating.   The key to understanding a fair fight is stick to the topic at hand and stick to what scripture says - and here are 5 ways people try to trick you to do just the opposite.    Ad hominem This trick, literally translated as “to the man,” subtly or overtly distorts a person's character, destroying their credibility no matter how valid their argument is. “How can you believe what they believe, they bomb abortion clinics, they made fun of my Mother, they don't even have a job”   Appeal to authority Traditionally called Argumentum ad Verecundiam. People often listen to someone famous or powerful, even to a celebrity who has no connection with what's being endorsed. You might hear or see it like this… Well Brad Pitt thanks God for blessing him and says he loves God and he thinks abortion is right” All that matters is what God thinks and by that I mean what he says in his word.   Appeal to fear This trick causes your audience to fear others and seek your protection. "Politician X will take away your freedom of speech!" Well if you don't believe in climate change your kids will starve, freeze or burn up from the heat… thats what Bill Gates says! You better recycle like me and drive a hybrid and not use anything plastic.   Appeal to pity (or sympathy) "I know I made a poor decision. But let's just look at how hard this is." This allows manipulators to avoid responsibility for something. I am not saying abortion is right or the best choice… but she was raped, she is in college, her boyfriend took off… We can empathize and still stick to Gods word in a loving and accepting way.    Appeal to popular passions Traditionally called Argumentum ad Populum. This trick implies that the manipulator shares the same views as the audience. "I know you'll all agree with this, ladies and gentlemen." This might be thrown at you like this… well we all know God forgives right? And boy am I glad he does, we all mess up… who here hasn't messed up. Right, see all the hands up in the air…so I can live with people committing crimes to promote an issue, they are just like us. we all have our own sins and we all need forgiveness. 

Ledwie trzy dni po Międzynarodowym Dniu Pamięci o Ofiarach Holokaustu rosyjski minister spraw zagranicznych Siergiej Ławrow w wywiadzie dla włoskiej telewizji zasugerował, że Adolf Hitler mógł mieć żydowskie korzenie. W ten sposób odniósł się do opinii, że rosyjska narracja o „denazyfikacji” Ukrainy nie ma sensu, gdyż ukraiński prezydent Wołodymyr Zełeński jest Żydem. Słowa Ławrowa spotkały się z krytyką wielu izraelskich polityków i pojawiły się też sygnały, że Izrael przekaże wyposażenie obronne Ukrainie. Dlaczego Rosjanie mówią o „denazyfikacji” Ukrainy? Czy ten kryzys oznacza koniec dobrych relacji rosyjsko-izraelskich? Dlaczego Izrael wciąż nie przekazał Kijowowi systemu obrony przeciwrakietowej Żelazna Kopuła? Na moje pytania odpowiada dr Agnieszka Bryc z Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Stosunkowo Bliski Wschód to podcast wspierany przez słuchaczy za pośrednictwem Patronite.pl. To właśnie dzięki Waszej pomocy możemy trzymać rękę na pulsie i co tydzień przyglądać się wydarzeniom na Bliskim Wschodzie. Serdecznie Wam za to dziękujemy!

UP Factory, c'est le programme de pré-incubation, impulsé par respect, MOUVEMENT UP, Pulse, la Mairie de Paris et Accenture, qui détecte les nouveaux talents de l'innovation sociale et environnementale en les aidant à concrétiser leur idée entrepreneuriale. Dans cet épisode spécial, découvrez une de nos jeunes pousses 2022 au début de ses 6 mois d'accompagnement.

Dzisiaj pochylimy się nad niemerytorycznym sposobem argumentacji w postaci chwytu erystycznego, o nazwie argumentum ad verecundiam.Muzyka w tle:Utwór The Life and Death of a Certain K. Zabriskie, Patriarch autorstwa Chris Zabriskie jest dostępny na licencji Licencja Creative Commons – uznanie autorstwa 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Źródło: http://chriszabriskie.com/vendaface/Wykonawca: http://chriszabriskie.com/

Questa settimana Parlanodm vi propone il meglio della filosofia per grandi e piccini. Tra abitudini e retorica si parla di ETHOS!| Libro:Me -> Piantala, Riciclaudio! Come coltivare abitudini ecologiche e combattere i cambiamenti climatici. Ediz. illustrata - Agnese Baruzzi - 2008 - Coccole e Caccole |Pi -> Eros/Ethos - Sergio Givone || Canzone:Me -> I belong to you - Eros Ramazzotti ft. Anastacia -> https://spoti.fi/3nBJ6JQ |Pi -> Ethic Metal - Vaterhead -> https://vaterhead.bandcamp.com/releases || Film:Me -> Falling down - diretto da Joel Schumacher |Pi -> The Great Debaters - Il potere della parola diretto e interpretato da Denzel Washington |Siamo su• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/parlandompodcast• Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/parlandom_podcast/• Telegram: https://t.me/parlandom| Fonti: https://www.treccani.it/vocabolario/ethos/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2-UjjeVCHc, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7N6OaVONbU, https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethos, https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_hominem, https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_Hitlerum, https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legge_di_Godwin| || Sigla: Whiskey Blues - Ilya Truhanov - https://icons8.com/music/author/ilya-truhanov-1

Welcome to the nonlinear library, where we use text-to-speech software to convert the best writing from the rationalist and ea communities into audio. This is: Technological stagnation: Why I came around, published by jasoncrawford on the effective altruism forum. This is a linkpost for “We wanted flying cars, instead we got 140 characters,” says Peter Thiel's Founders Fund, expressing a sort of jaded disappointment with technological progress. (The fact that the 140 characters have become 280, a 100% increase, does not seem to have impressed him.) Thiel, along with economists such as Tyler Cowen (The Great Stagnation) and Robert Gordon (The Rise and Fall of American Growth), promotes a “stagnation hypothesis”: that there has been a significant slowdown in scientific, technological, and economic progress in recent decades—say, for a round number, since about 1970, or the last ~50 years. When I first heard the stagnation hypothesis, I was skeptical. The arguments weren't convincing to me. But as I studied the history of progress (and looked at the numbers), I slowly came around, and now I'm fairly convinced. So convinced, in fact, that I now seem to be more pessimistic about ending stagnation than some of its original proponents. In this essay I'll try to capture both why I was originally skeptical, and also why I changed my mind. If you have heard some of the same arguments that I did, and are skeptical for the same reasons, maybe my framing of the issue will help. Stagnation is relative To get one misconception out of the way first: “stagnation” does not mean zero progress. No one is claiming that. There wasn't zero progress even before the Industrial Revolution (or the civilizations of Europe and Asia would have looked no different in 1700 than they did in the days of nomadic hunter-gatherers, tens of thousands of years ago). Stagnation just means slower progress. And not even slower than that pre-industrial era, but slower than, roughly, the late 1800s to mid-1900s, when growth rates are said to have peaked. Because of this, we can't resolve the issue by pointing to isolated advances. The microwave, the air conditioner, the electronic pacemaker, a new cancer drug—these are great, but they don't disprove stagnation. Stagnation is relative, and so to evaluate the hypothesis we must find some way to compare magnitudes. This is difficult. Only 140 characters? “We wanted flying cars, instead we got a supercomputer in everyone's pocket and a global communications network to connect everyone on the planet to each other and to the whole of the world's knowledge, art, philosophy and culture.” When you put it that way, it doesn't sound so bad. Indeed, the digital revolution has been absolutely amazing. It's up there with electricity, the internal combustion engine, or mass manufacturing: one of the great, fundamental, transformative technologies of the industrial age. (Although admittedly it's hard to see the effect of computers in the productivity statistics, and I don't know why.) But we don't need to downplay the magnitude of the digital revolution to see stagnation; conversely, proving its importance will not defeat the stagnation hypothesis. Again, stagnation is relative, and we must find some way to compare the current period to those that came before. Argumentum ad living room Eric Weinstein proposes a test: “Go into a room and subtract off all of the screens. How do you know you're not in 1973, but for issues of design?” This too I found unconvincing. It felt like a weak thought experiment that relied too much on intuition, revealing one's own priors more than anything else. And why should we necessarily expect progress to be visible directly from the home or office? Maybe it is happening in specialized environments that the layman wouldn't have much intuition about: in the factory, the power plant, the agricultural field, the hospital, the oil rig, the cargo ship, the research lab. No progress except for all the progress ...

Tuesday

When contending for the historic liturgy of the church, we often hear the same arguments trotted out with a gotcha mic drop. In this episode, we look at a blog post by Larry Beane and build upon it to talk about how one responds to these same arguments. Read the blog post here: Argumentum ad Repititium    Host: Fr. Jason Braaten Regular Guest: Fr. Larry Beane Become a Patron! You can subscribe to the Journal here: https://www.gottesdienst.org/subscribe/ You can read the Gottesblog here: https://www.gottesdienst.org/gottesblog/ You can support Gottesdienst here: https://www.gottesdienst.org/make-a-donation/ As always, we, at The Gottesdienst Crowd, would be honored if you would Subscribe, Rate, and Review. Thanks for listening and thanks for your support. 

Argumentum ad Repetitium When I get into discussions with people over the liturgy and traditional hymnody (over and against so-called “contemporary worship,”) a lot of the same arguments and assertions pop up. First is the charge that I just want traditional worship because it is “just what I like.” In other words, it's a matter of personal preference and taste. This accusation is more a revelation about what the one making the accusation believes, for “contemporary worship” is typically based on pop-music forms that are, well, popular. People want pop music because it is what they like, not because of its theology or particular confession, not because it reflects what God prefers from the Scriptures, or because it promotes the Word of God. No, people like pop music in worship because they like pop music elsewhere. If it's good enough for listening to while driving to work, it's good enough to listen to in the church service. So the charge that traditional church music is “just what you like” sounds like a projection. For are there any people arguing that they don't really like pop music, but it is the best music for worship? Is there anyone who champions guitars and drums in the chancel who leaves church and turns on the radio to listen to organ music and chorales? Admittedly, this is just a hunch, but I suspect that most proponents of “contemporary worship” actually prefer those music forms, and listen to them outside of the church service as well. In other words, “It's what they like.” One finger pointed at me, three fingers pointing back at thee. To the contrary, my desire to uphold the traditional liturgy and hymnody of the church has nothing to do with my musical tastes. In fact, the vast majority of the music that I listen to is pop music. I like what is today called “classic rock.” I like hard rock and 1980s heavy metal. I do listen to some classical music as well, but the vast majority of my musical tastes are the very types of music that I would loath in the Divine Service, and would consider its use to be blasphemous against the Lord and a degradation to rock and roll. As the cartoon character Hank Hill famously told a Christian rocker, “You're not making Christianity better, you're making rock and roll worse.” I'm a stickler for traditional liturgy and hymnody for several reasons. One of them is that this is what God likes. He is a God of order. He is a God of dignity. He is a God of beauty. He is a God of sacrifice, atonement, and forgiveness. One would be hard-pressed to find the self-serving desire to be entertained in Biblical examples of worship. In fact, after recording God's worship style preferences over the course of seven chapters (Exodus 25-31): the beautiful tabernacle covered in magnificent fabric, an altar of bronze followed by a courtyard also outfitted with beautiful textiles and precious metals, exquisite priestly garments (as well as rubrics for ordination), the altar of incense, the bronze basin for ceremonial washing, the anointing oil and incense, and specific instructions for fine craftsmanship, we come to chapter 32: the rejection of all of this for a more entertaining worship style around the golden calf, “and the people sat down to eat and drink and rose of to play.” They played at their worship. There was no indication that God wanted the priests to “play” in the holy of holies, or that the laity should “play” while sacrificing animals as a type of the Lamb to come. Some believe the word translated as “play” may be a euphemism for erotic overtones in this worship service - something that comes to the fore in many popular “praise and worship” songs, many of which that can be embarrassing to read the lyrics out loud or to watch the gyrations of the often-female performers - or “ministers of music", “worship leaders”, or “worship pastors” as they are sometimes called. By contrast, we see the Israelites who worshiped the true God repeating their ritual and liturgical actions of remembrance each year - and they were commanded to keep various feasts as a memorial. And to be a memorial, there must be continuity, both in ritual, and in the passing along of those rituals through the generations. Every year, a lamb was slaughtered and it was cooked with bitter herbs. It was eaten on the same day each year, and the same ceremony was repeated again and again, century after century. There were readings, there were hymns, there were psalms to be chanted. Why? Because God commanded that it should be done each year. Why should it change, since ultimately, the Passover meal was a type of Christ, pointing us to the Eucharist and to the cross? The message doesn't change, and therefore the rubrics of the meal do not change. For if they were to change even a little every year, in a hundred years it would look nothing like what it was supposed to remember. And when God interacts with mankind, there is a coming of heaven down to earth. Something otherworldly, something holy is happening. “Holy” means “set apart.” So when Jacob saw the vision of the angels ascending and descending on the ladder, he set apart that place as holy, and marked it with a pillar that was anointed with oil. That place was no longer just a spot to bed down for the night, it was the gate of heaven. God is also a God who is concerned with esthetics. He is the author of beauty. He is not indifferent about matters of style. For again, when God tabernacled with the children of Israel, he commanded a tent to be made up to His standards, with magnificent furniture, with gold and silver and fine-twined linen, beautifully woven fabrics of purple and scarlet. His tabernacle, and later his temple, was epitomized by exquisite beauty beyond what one normally had in his house and daily life. God ordered the priests to be vested, also in beautifully crafted textiles, rare jewels, and fine detailed ornamentation. This is not my idea or preference. This was not the preference of the priests or architects of the House of the Lord. This was done according to God's order. And God likes beautiful art - the cherubim above the mercy seat, the intricate carvings of almond flowers, palm trees, and pomegranates. Why? Because God likes this design. It's what He wanted. It is not because the congregation liked it, or the priests, or the leaders. God also likes bells and incense. Why? I don't know. He just does. He likes craftsmanship and high art. And this level of ornateness was not how ordinary people lived in their day to day life. The place where God made Himself present for, and with, mankind, this holy place, was set apart and beautiful. How anyone can actually read the Bible and come away thinking that God prefers people to just “come as you are” and “don't go to any trouble to make things nice” when they come into His presence? Or how can anyone conclude that God's attitude is “do whatever makes you happy, whatever you like,” or “do whatever is cheap.” This is not the God of the Bible. And related to this idea of God becoming present with His people, this is one major difference we have with Protestantism. We, along with the historic communions of Christianity, confess that a miracle happens on our altars when we celebrate the Mass, that Christ, the living God and King and Creator of the Universe, the Man who is perfect, comes to us literally and in incarnate form, as the bread and wine that are blessed by His Word are truly His body and blood. And so, that Presence takes us out of our ordinary, pedestrian existence and places us at the table with God. So is informality called for in times like these? Did Isaiah behave casually when he found himself in the throne-room of God, when the angels purged away his sin by bringing him a coal from the altar and placing it upon his lips? Did Peter, James, and John behave the same as they always did when Jesus transfigured before them on the mountain? Do military men behave differently around an officer than when they are hanging out with their fellow soldiers, sailors, airmen, or marines? What about when a general enters the room? How about the president? Are there different protocols and ways of behaving around one's superiors? And how would it be received if a soldier did not treat officers differently than their friends? Do these rituals and ways of carrying oneself communicate something? Are they for the good of the entire corps, the whole body of men united in service? What if you were invited to a banquet at Buckingham Palace? Would you comport yourself the same as if you were at home in front of the TV with a bucket of KFC? Or would you maybe be more formally dressed, perfectly groomed, more aware of those around you, especially those of high social rank? Would you like to know what the rubrics for such an important meal are? Or would you be content to carry on the same way that you do at home? Our formality in worship as Lutherans is crucial, because it is a confession that we do confess that Christ is miraculously present with us. We do not confess, as do many Protestants, that the Lord's Supper is a symbol, or that our Lord's flesh is far off in the heavens, leaving us with mere tokens that are at best some kind of “spiritual” presence. No, we confess that this is the eternal banquet that Jesus is always talking about, or at least a foretaste of it. The Divine Service is eschatological and brings us into contact with eternity. He is present under our roof, though we are unworthy. He says the Word, and we are healed. The King, God Himself, deigns to dine with us! This is not watching TV with KFC eaten out of a plastic container with a spork. Rather, this is the Holy of Holies, and Christ incarnate is present with us. And we not only eat with Him, but we feed miraculously on the true Passover Lamb, even as His blood is poured into us to mark us as His own, protected and saved from condemnation, from the Angel of Death. And so, our worship is different than our day to day lives. The hymnody comes from our rich tradition and is unbounded by fads or notions of what is popular today, but may well fall out of favor tomorrow. Our hymns not only praise God, but confess our faith rigorously and boldly. Our worship is dignified, and like the liturgical actions of remembrance of the children of Israel, it doesn't change again and again, becoming unrecognizable in just a few years. Nor is it play - whether motivated by a desire for fun, or even tinged with eroticism. Jesus said, “Do this in memory of Me.” He did not order us to change the liturgical action to bend it to our standards of entertainment, or to prevent it from not being “special.” And this is why the Church's liturgy remains the same. It is a remembrance, just as the liturgical actions of the Old Testament Church were. Any changes are not made to reflect theological change, but perhaps to accommodate linguistic or technological shifts. And over the centuries, we have developed a corpus of the very best that the Church has in terms of liturgy and hymnody, not subject to fads and fashions. Our progressive culture routinely gets rid of the old in search of the ever-new. Our church's heritage is a blend of the old and the new, not subject to “chronological snobbery” or Critical Theory that denigrates our own forbears. And as a pastor, I want people to be taught (as ceremonies teach the people what they need to know about Christ, as our confessions teach us). I want my parishioners to have no doubts about what it is that we Lutherans confess about Jesus, and about what He Himself says in Scripture. This is communicated verbally in what is said, and nonverbally in what is done. Research suggests that 60% of what is communicated between people is non-verbal - meaning what we do and how we speak is as important, and perhaps even a bit more, than what is said in words alone. An informal liturgy belies what is really happening: the miracle of heaven meeting earth and of Christ tabernacling with us. Pop music lowers the level of dignity, perhaps to the depths of frivolity and impropriety. And when we have centuries of magnificent hymnody, to settle for what is sung in Pentecostal or non-denominational churches is like choosing to eat cold Vienna sausages instead of the luxurious spread of delectable delicacies that you have been invited to partake of at the feast. So far from being a matter of personal taste, the traditional liturgy and hymnody is what God wants, is a confession of who Jesus is and what He does, and is good pastoral care in terms of teaching and confessing our faith. And this is why our forbears included Article 24. They did not just say, “Do whatever you like.” For while our Roman opponents were lumping us in with radical reformers that abolished the Mass, we vociferously deny such a scurrilous charge. To even suggest it is a gross insult, and resulted in an angry retort by Melanchthon, as well as a master class on what real worship is all about in the Augsburg Confession and the Apology. It all boils down to Jesus, and what you believe about Him. Do you believe the Bible when it confesses that Christ is present with us? Do you take Jesus at His word when He says, “Do this in memory of Me?” Are you humbled at the Lord's miraculous presence with us, like Moses, like Isaiah, like Peter, James, and John? Do you believe, teach, and confess that the presence of Jesus is the fountainhead of holiness, and so our worship in the holy place must itself be holy - as opposed to common and ordinary? Are you willing to sacrifice your own personal tastes and desire to be entertained in the style to which you were accustomed in order to submit to Him and to receive His gifts - and to give Him thanks in return in the setting of His choosing? Do you actually believe what He says, and what the Church says about Him? Or do you hold the faith of another tradition, whose informal and casual worship is more fitting?

Argument odwołujący się do strachu czyli argumentum ad terrorem

Toralf und JP gehen in dieser Episode auf Themen ein, die von Zuhörer*innen vorgeschlagen wurden. Außerdem wird der Frage nachgegangen, wer Jesus wirklich war. Messias oder einfach nur nerviger Surfer Dude? Es gibt noch einen spannenden Fact über JP und ihr erfahrt, was ein Argumentum ad hominem ist, wenn ihr es nicht schon wusstet oder jetzt danach googelt.

In the sixty-seventh episode we explore the Argumentum ad Lunam, starting out with Trump claiming that we can give every child school choice since we put a man on the moon. In Mark's British Politics Corner we look at Boris Johnson claiming we can solve Brexit since we put a man on the moon. In the Fallacy in the Wild, we check out examples from The Garbage Pail Kids Movie, Scott Pilgrim vs The World, Antz, and Seinfeld. Jim and guest host Frank go head to head in Fake News, the game in which Frank has to guess which of three Trump quotes Jim made up. Then we talk about the glorious Inauguration day. And finally, we round up some of the other crazy Trump stories from the past week. The full show notes for this episode can be found at http://fallacioustrump.com/ ( http://fallacioustrump.com/ft67 ) ft67 ( http://fallacioustrump.com/ft67 ) You can contact the guys at pod@fallacioustrump.com ( http://mailto:pod@fallacioustrump.com/ ) , on Twitter @FallaciousTrump ( https://twitter.com/fallacioustrump ) , or facebook at facebook.com/groups/fallacioustrump ( https://facebook.com/groups/fallacioustrump )  P.S. Mark is taking a break from the podcast for a few episodes due to work commitments, but he will return - promise! Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Argumentum ornithologicum - Jorge Luis Borges --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/angela-lopez4/message

Post by Skyler J. Collins (Editor). Episode 028 looks at the logical fallacy Argumentum ad Populum (Appeal to Popularity, and it's many children) and the cognitive bias Neglect of Probability.

Archivo de la audiobiblio.

Crónicas Lunares es un programa donde me da hablar de textos variados, por comentar cosas que la actualidad, o viajamos en el tiempo para visitar a diferentes personajes que han hecho historia y que suelen acompañarnos en esta cabina. Si te gusta lo a que a mí me gusta hacer puede acompañarme en mis viajes por el tiempo dándole "like", comentando o siguiéndome en mis redes sociales. https://www.facebook.com/cronicalunar/?modal=admin_todo_tour https://www.instagram.com/isun_1/ https://twitter.com/isun_g1 https://anchor.fm/irving-sun https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy9lODVmOWY0L3BvZGNhc3QvcnNz https://open.spotify.com/show/4x2gFdKw3FeoaAORteQomp https://www.breaker.audio/cronicas-solares https://overcast.fm/itunes1480955348/cr-nicas-lunares https://radiopublic.com/crnicas-lunares-WRDdxr https://tunein.com/user/gnivrinavi/favorites https://mx.ivoox.com/es/s_p2_759303_1.html --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/irving-sun/message

"Argumentum ornithologicum", maravilloso relato de Jorge Luis Borges (1899 - 1986), publicado en su libro "El Hacedor" (1960).

Hey Leute, Da sind wir nun wieder, wenn auch mit leichter Verspätung aus der überraschenden Pfingstpause zurück! Dieses mal geht es uns um Bill Gates geheime und diabolischen Pläne die Welt zu unterjochen und ins Chaos zu stürzen. Wir meinen dabei nicht Windows Vista, sondern angebliche Microchips, Zwangsimpfungen und eine ganze Covid-Pandemie. Aber was macht so eine Verschwörungstheorie eigentlich so albern und unglaubwürdig? Warum argumentieren Verschwörerlies so wie sie das halt tun und was hält Karl „Wissenschaftsdaddy“ Popper da eigentlich von? Wir machen diesmal zwei Dinge anders: erstens gibt es eine zweite Verschwörungstheorie direkt hinter der lezten und zweitens betrachten wir diesmal die Verschwörungstheorie selbst durch die Brille einer wissenschaftlichen Theorie anstatt nur Thesen der Verschwörer zu checken. Wollten da einfach mal was anderes ausprobieren, wird vielleicht auch eine dauerhafte Ergänzung (falls wir Spaß dran haben) Viel Vergnügen beim Hören! https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_ignorantiam https://praxistipps.chip.de/verschwoerungstheorie-und-vermoegen-was-bill-gates-mit-dem-coronavirus-zu-tun-hat_120889 https://www.vice.com/de/article/9359vv/bill-gates-coronavirus-mikrochip-impfzwang-ken-jebsen-verschwoerungstheorie https://www.chip.de/news/Bill-Gates-und-der-Impf-Zwang-Corona-Theorien-im-Faktencheck_182710227.html https://www.pharma-fakten.de/news/details/931-die-wahrheit-ueber-bill-gates/ https://www.welt.de/satire/article208006569/Kein-Verlass-auf-Bill-Gates-Deutsche-impfen-sich-selbst-mit-Chips.html https://www.presseportal.de/pm/133833/4581365 Patrick Körner: Zur Beurteilung von Verschwörungstheorien Quelle: http://www.mythos-magazin.de/ideologieforschung/pk_verschwoerungstheorien.pdf

การอ้างเหตุผลแบบวิบัตินั้นพบเจอได้บ่อยๆในชีวิตประจำวัน รายการตอนนี้พาไปรู้จักการอ้างเหตุผลแบบวิบัติที่ควรศึกษาไว้เพื่อไม่ให้คล้อยตาม ได้แก่ 1. Argument from authority การอ้างว่าสิ่งนั้นเป็นจริงเพราะ บุคคลผู้เชี่ยวชาญ ผู้น่าเชื่อถือ คิดเห็นว่ามันจริง 2. Argumentum ad populum การอ้างว่าสิ่งนี้จริง เพราะ คนส่วนมากเชื่อกันว่าจริง 3. Argumentum ad antiquitatem การอ้างเหตุผลว่าสิ่งนี้ถูกต้องเพราะทำกันมานานแล้ว หรือทำกันอยู่เป็นประจำ 4. Post hoc ergo propter hoc คือ ความเชื่อว่าสิ่งที่เกิดก่อน เป็นเหตุของสิ่งที่เกิดทีหลัง อย่างแน่นอน 5. Argument from Ignorance การอ้างว่าสิ่งนี้จริง เพราะยังไม่มีการพิสูจน์หักล้างว่ามันไม่จริง (และในทางกลับกันด้วย) ส่วนรายละเอียดและตัวอย่างลองรับฟังในรายการตอนนี้ได้เลยครับ

An argumentum ad ignoratum is Latin old Latin for an argument against ignorance. The argument is judgment. Reactive judgments can be as simple as naming a thing to be a thing. Such reactive judgements cause conflict. Whiles some conflict is good other conflict is unhealthy. Good conflict can be described as building muscle by causing yourself pain. Negative conflict can be described as fearing and uncertain future.Constantly naming things is just constantly judging things to be those things that you name them to be because you imply that they are not what you have named them to be as concerning the law of opposites, diametrically opposed opposites.

Co o błędach logicznych mówił Arystoteles i Schopenhauer? Czym jest sofizmat?Jak rozpoznać argumentum ad personam?

Pílula Filosófica  #11 | Falácia Argumentum ad Hominem   Neste episódio vamos estudar sobre a falácia Argumentum ad Hominem, por meio dos discursos proferidos pelo filósofo Olavo de Carvalho e pelo historiador Marco Antonio Villa. Depois, será mostrado um exemplo de como não cometer esta falácia, mediante análise da entrevista do ex-embaixador Sergio Amaral concedida a economista Miriam Leitão.   //——————————————————// Episódios sobre Falácias:    Pílula Filosófica  #10 | Falácia da Analogia Abusiva https://youtu.be/pBaZY1G83dY   Pílula Filosófica  #04 | Falácia da Petição de Princípio https://youtu.be/yF8sXaZLO8A //——————————————————// Apoie a educação filosófica gratuita:  * PATREON - https://www.patreon.com/borapensar //——————————————————//

En este episodio de Value Investing FM trataremos un tema esencial a la hora de tomar decisiones de inversión en bolsa, los sesgos cognitivos. Explicaremos qué son, su importancia y haremos un doble top 10 de los que más nos afectan a la hora de invertir con sus ejemplos correspondientes. Top 10 Sesgos Cognitivos de Adrián Godás 1. Comparación por contraste 2. Cámara de eco 3. Consistencia 4. Anclaje 5. Narrativas( sensemaking) 6. Autoridad 7. Sesgos de falso consenso 8. Simpatía 9. Disponibilidad 10. Statu quo Top 10 Sesgos Cognitivos de Paco Lodeiro 1. Argumentum ad antiquitatem 2. Falacia por asociación 3. Generalización inapropiada o prueba con ejemplo 4. Argumentum ad verencundiam 5. Falacia de los costes hundidos 6. Argumentum verbosium 7. Muestra sesgada 8. Causa Simple 9. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc y Cum Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc 10. Falso dilema

En este episodio de Value Investing FM trataremos un tema esencial a la hora de tomar decisiones de inversión en bolsa, los sesgos cognitivos. Explicaremos qué son, su importancia y haremos un doble top 10 de los que más nos afectan a la hora de invertir con sus ejemplos correspondientes. Top 10 Sesgos Cognitivos de Adrián Godás 1. Comparación por contraste 2. Cámara de eco 3. Consistencia 4. Anclaje 5. Narrativas( sensemaking) 6. Autoridad 7. Sesgos de falso consenso 8. Simpatía 9. Disponibilidad 10. Statu quo Top 10 Sesgos Cognitivos de Paco Lodeiro 1. Argumentum ad antiquitatem 2. Falacia por asociación 3. Generalización inapropiada o prueba con ejemplo 4. Argumentum ad verencundiam 5. Falacia de los costes hundidos 6. Argumentum verbosium 7. Muestra sesgada 8. Causa Simple 9. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc y Cum Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc 10. Falso dilema

I read from afore to African gray. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_a_fortiori https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ifrit dictionarypod@gmail.com https://www.facebook.com/thedictionarypod/ https://twitter.com/dictionarypod https://www.patreon.com/spejampar

Simak keresahan David yang meracau soal emansipasi wanita, tindak pelecehan seksual, dilihat dari sudut pandang lelaki yang kurang kasih sayang. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/aneh-podcast/support

Dilihat dari sudut pandang sobat miskin yang tidak sanggup membayar sekolah dan bimbel mahal. Simak keresahan Esra soal pendidikan, yang notabene kurang riset. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/aneh-podcast/support

In the fifteenth episode we explore the Argumentum Ad Nauseam Fallacy, with examples from Trump talking about his yuge tax cut and his yuge border wall.In Mark's British Politics Corner we look at Ed Miliband repeating himself in an interview and Brexit meaning Brexit.In The Fallacy in the Wild, we check out an amazing example from Ramsey's Kitchen Nightmares.Jim and Mark go head to head in Fake News, the game where Mark has to guess which of three Trump quotes Jim made up.And finally we talk about the difficulty recruiting a new Chief of Staff, and round up some of the other crazy Trump stories from the past week.You can contact the guys at pod@fallacioustrump.com , on Twitter @FallaciousTrump, or facebook at facebook.com/groups/fallacioustrump and you can support the show on Patreon at http://patreon.com/ftrumpSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/fallacious-trump/donations

David marah-marah soal televisi! Ada apa? Simak alasannya di seri terbaru Aneh Podcast, Argumentum A Contrario. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/aneh-podcast/support

(También conocido como: argumento de autoridad, ipse dixit) Descripción: Insistir en que un reclamo es verdadero simplemente porque una autoridad o experto válido en el tema dijo que era cierto, sin ninguna otra evidencia de respaldo ofrecida. También vea la apelación a la autoridad falsa. Forma lógica: Según la persona 1, quien es un experto en el tema de Y, Y es cierto. Por lo tanto, Y es verdad. Ejemplo 1: Richard Dawkins, un biólogo evolutivo y quizás el experto más destacado en el campo, dice que la evolución es verdadera. Por lo tanto, es verdad. Explicación: Richard Dawkins ciertamente sabe acerca de la evolución, y puede decirnos con confianza que es cierto, pero eso no lo hace verdadero. Lo que lo hace cierto es la preponderancia de la evidencia para la teoría. Ejemplo # 2: ¿Cómo sé que la industria del cine para adultos es la tercera industria más grande de los Estados Unidos? Derek Shlongmiester, la estrella de cine para adultos de más de 50 años, dijo que sí. Así es como lo sé. Explicación: Shlongmiester puede ser un experto en la industria, además de tener un gran talento, pero una afirmación como la que requeriría una evidencia de apoyo. Para el registro, la industria del cine para adultos puede ser grande, pero en una escala de 0 a 12 pulgadas, es solo una fracción de pulgada. Excepción: ten mucho cuidado de no confundir ""aplazar a una autoridad sobre el tema"" con la apelación a la falacia de la autoridad. Recuerda, una falacia es un error de razonamiento. El despido del consejo de expertos y autoridades legítimos convierte el buen escepticismo en negación. La apelación a la autoridad es una falacia en la argumentación, pero aplazar a una autoridad es una heurística confiable que todos usamos virtualmente todos los días en temas de relativamente poca importancia. Siempre existe la posibilidad de que cualquier autoridad pueda estar equivocada, por eso el pensador crítico acepta los hechos provisionalmente. No es en absoluto irrazonable (o un error en el razonamiento) aceptar la información como provisionalmente cierta por parte de autoridades creíbles. Por supuesto, la razonabilidad es moderada por el reclamo que se realiza (es decir, qué extraordinario, qué tan importante) y la autoridad (qué tan creíble, qué tan relevante es el reclamo). La apelación a la autoridad es más sobre reclamos que requieren evidencia que sobre hechos. Por ejemplo, si tu guía turístico te dijo que la Ciudad del Vaticano se fundó el 11 de febrero de 1929 y tu aceptas esa información como verdadera, no se compromete con el fracaso (porque no está en el contexto de la argumentación) ni está siendo irrazonable. Consejo: cuestiona la autoridad o conviértete en la autoridad que las personas buscan para obtener respuestas. En el próximo episodio hablaremos de como crecer una tlapaleria. Bueno ventajoso esto es todo por hoy. Recuerda dejar tu comentario en tu plataforma favorita. Y recuerda: ¡Rífate como los grandes!" --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/ventaja/message

Ivan Herselman is 'n prokureur by Argumentum. Hulle unieke waarde as prokureurs en advokate wat saamwerk onder een dak, is dat hul 'n baie sterk projek bestuur fokus het, maak koste beramings vooruit vir kliente sodat hul ingeligde besluite neem en hulle werk 99.9% papierloos. 'n Regsfirma met 'n verskil. Webwerf

Ivan Herselman is 'n prokureur by Argumentum. Hulle unieke waarde as prokureurs en advokate wat saamwerk onder een dak, is dat hul 'n baie sterk projek bestuur fokus het, maak koste beramings vooruit vir kliente sodat hul ingeligde besluite neem en hulle werk 99.9% papierloos. 'n Regsfirma met 'n verskil.

CliffCentral.com — Ivan Herselman is 'n prokureur by Argumentum. Hulle unieke waarde as prokureurs en advokate wat saamwerk onder een dak, is dat hul 'n baie sterk projek bestuur fokus het, maak koste beramings vooruit vir kliente sodat hul ingeligde besluite neem en hulle werk 99.9% papierloos. 'n Regsfirma met 'n verskil.

Jacques Basson — Ivan Herselman is 'n prokureur by Argumentum. Hulle unieke waarde as prokureurs en advokate wat saamwerk onder een dak, is dat hul 'n baie sterk projek bestuur fokus het, maak koste beramings vooruit vir kliente sodat hul ingeligde besluite neem en hulle werk 99.9% papierloos. 'n Regsfirma met 'n verskil.

Episode 7 - The Question of Shakespeare Authorship We've all studied Shakespeare. You read him in school. You performed a soliloquy in drama class. You've watched all the bad coming of age teen remakes. Did you know, though, that Shakespeare didn't actually write any of his works? At least, that's the theory, and we discuss the historical thought of the day that inspired this hotly debated and contemptuous accusation. We also explore an area of pursuasive argument known as the Argument of Authority, that just might explain why people today continue to jump on the band wagon of Shakespeare "doubters" whether they have a literary background or not. www.conspiracytheoryology.com email - contact@conspiracytheoryology.com Twitter - @TheoryologyPod Facebook - @TheoryologyPodcast Music is by adamhenrygarcia.bandcamp.com Links: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare_authorship_question http://realunexplainedmysteries.com/the-william-shakespeare-conspiracy-theory https://www.doubtaboutwill.org/declaration http://ourfakehistory.com/index.php/season-1/episode-5-did-shakespeare-write-the-plays/#more-131 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/theatre/playwrights/shakespeare-the-conspiracy-theories/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority#Fallacious_appeal_to_authority https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Reasonable_Doubt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_criticism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delia_Bacon

For the last time, Starr's Mill High School's two brightest, greatest, sexiest minds come together for the ultimate finale. Listen in on this episode of “Real Talk” as the Argumentum forefathers, seniors Walker Allen and Liam O'Connell, get together and discuss freshman year, senior year, college, and everything in between. It's been a wild ride for the past two years, and we're glad we could keep it real.

An episode about the best way to inoculate yourself against irrational ideas. Show Notes: Become a Patron of The Voluntary Life for bonus episodes! Argumentum ad Absurdum The Candlemakers' Petition by Frederic Bastiat TVL Episode 225 Comparative Advantage Is Mind-blowing  

Falo um pouco sobre a relação do Argumentum ad populum e os investimentos

Cette semaine, pour notre 66ème épisode de “Que dit la Bible ?“, nous donnons la parole à Guillaume Bignon pour son tout dernier podcast sur les sophismes que l'on peut rencontrer dans l'évangélisation. Cette semaine, Guillaume aborde “l'appel au peuple” ou Argumentum ad populum, un argument d'autorité qui affirme implicitement ou explicitement qu'un énoncé est valide dès l'instant qu'une majorité y adhère. Guillaume explique plus en détail ce sophisme, et nous donne quelques pistes pour pouvoir le déceler, l'évaluer, et y répondre :) Bonne écoute ! -- “Que dit la Bible ?” est l'émission hebdomadaire du blog Le Bon Combat + de ressources : www.leboncombat.fr

Welcome to This Is Fine, episode 1.2: argumentum ad populum. Thank you very much for listening, Finers. In this week’s podcast, we share our origin story in Southern California; explore what populism is and if it can turn left (verdict: not an ambi-turner); make the case that a Nazi political theorist is not in the best position to diagnose liberalism's faults; and sketch out our visions of protest in the Trump era. Articles discussed in this episode: Jedediah Purdy, "Populism's Two Paths" in The Nation https://www.thenation.com/article/the-two-populisms/ Malloy Owen, "Don't Mourn, Repoliticize" in The Point Magazine https://thepointmag.com/2016/politics/dont-mourn-repoliticize

Argumentum ad hominem. Woh, latin boy! What you speaky? Okay, if you’re not familiar with logic and the fallacies that exist when trying to make a logical argument, let me introduce you to the Argumentum ad hominem, commonly referred to as ad hominem. It’s basically the, “you’re ugly”, come back you might receive when you’re […]

There are those who believe that middle of the pack runners should never be allowed to run a marathon.  Twice a year, so called journalists and essayists embark on a controversial attempt to discredit our fellow runners, and ridicule our efforts on the road.  In this episode, we dissect one such attempt from a writer “wanna-be‿ and give him a piece of his own medicine.