Podcasts about Post hoc

Dr. Gennaro Pagano discusses the findings of the post-hoc analysis of the PASADENA trial, a study using the monoclonal antibody Prasinezumab directed at aggregated α-synuclein, where motor progression trajectories differed between active and placebo groups. Read article »

Send us a Text Message.Diesesmal geht es im Journal Club um eine Sekundäranalyse des CLASSIC Trials von Ahlstedt et al. aus Intensive Care Med: Effects of restrictive fluid therapy on the time to resolution of hyperlactatemia in ICU patients with septic shock. A secondary post hoc analysis of the CLASSIC randomized trial (doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07385-9). Geklärt werden sollte dabei die Frage, inwiefern die Flüssigkeitsmenge in der Behandlung des septischen Schocks die Laktatclearance beeinflusst. Mit im Studio dabei: Dr. Mona Jung-König, wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin der Klinik für Anästhesiologie am UKHD.

Lilli Gruber durante la puntata di ieri sera di Otto e mezzo ha attaccato duramente (senza mai citarlo) il direttore del TgLa7 Enrico Mentana per aver concluso tardi il suo telegiornale, e dichiarando che “l'incontinenza è una brutta cosa”.Oggi Enrico Mentana ha replicato alla giornalista, vantando i risultati di share del suo telegiornale e lamentandosi per l'assenza di reazioni da parte dei vertici de La7.In tutto questo: quali tecniche di comunicazione hanno utilizzato entrambi per sostenere le proprie posizioni?Ne parlo in questo episodio.

This week; Jack Smith responds sharply to Judge Cannon's order to write jury instructions based on the Presidential Records Act (PRA); Cannon denies Trump's Motion to Dismiss based on the PRA, but doesn't rule that he cannot try to use it as a defense.The American College of Trial Lawyers release a statement condemning Trump's dangerous rhetoric as a risk to democracy.Plus, a couple of listener questions, and more!Could the Special Counsel Challenge Judge Cannon's Jury Instructions Before They're Delivered? | Lawfarehttps://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/could-the-special-counsel-challenge-judge-cannon-s-jury-instructions-before-they-re-delivered Brian Greer's Quick Guide to CIPAhttps://www.justsecurity.org/87134/the-quick-guide-to-cipa-classified-information-procedures-act/ AMICI CURIAE to the District Court of DC https://democracy21.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Attachment-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-in-Support-of-Governments-Proposed-Trial-Date.pdfGood to know:Rule 403bhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_40318 U.S. Code § 1512https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512 Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady MaterialBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJenksJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Gigliohttps://definitions.uslegal.com/g/giglio-information/Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

PCI or CABG versus Medical Therapy in the ISCHEMIA Trial: A Post Hoc Analysis (AHA 2023)

Commentary by Associate Editor Anita Deswal

We discuss a post-hoc study comparing the efficacy of Syfovre (pegcetacoplan) and Izervay (avacincaptad pegol) with Paul Hahn, MD, PhD, of NJ Retina.

As noted on Episode 144, there has been a steady decline in certified DRE officers over the past decade. As a result, in some jurisdictions there has been an increased use of DRE officers to provide testimony in drug impaired DWI cases where no DRE was utilized at the time of the initial DWI investigation. In this episode, Jake reviews two recent unpublished cases from the Court of Appeals on DRE Testimony, State v. Lewis and State v. Williams.   Highlights: ·      Discover how State v. Lewis and State v. Williams, when read together, make it difficult for any officer to provide opinion testimony in a drug impaired driving case at trial. ·      Understand the collective importance of defense attorneys statewide to object to post hoc DRE testimony. ·      Learn attack points to post hoc DRE testimony if it is allowed to come into evidence over defense counsel's objection.

Commentary by Associate Editor Paul Heidenreich

Alternative title: Dotaholics Danonymous Halfway through we also grunge on about drinking from a poison lake, so skip forward to what feels like a good spot if you want to experience that. Please leave a message on any words/phrases/people you didn't understand during the episode. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/rightonlysometimes/message

The Journal RETINA is devoted exclusively to diseases of the retina and vitreous. These podcasts are intended to bring to its listeners summaries of selected articles published in the current issue of this internationally acclaimed journal.

In this episode, host Dr. Doug Reh speaks with Dr. Stella Lee. They will discuss article: Omalizumab and quality of life in nasal polyps: A post hoc analysis. Read the article in International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology. Listen and subscribe for free on Apple Podcasts , Google Podcasts and Subscribe on Android.

Frankie and Bobby discuss the election and its fallout. Ashley was invited, but she had a previous engagement (she was working her day job that pays far better than Muddy River News, LLC).

https://psychiatry.dev/wp-content/uploads/speaker/post-10592.mp3?cb=1666996313.mp3 Playback speed: 0.8x 1x 1.3x 1.6x 2x Download: Reduction in Multiple Cardiometabolic Risk Factors With Combined Olanzapine/Samidorphan Compared With Olanzapine: Post Hoc Analyses From a 24-Week Phase 3 StudyFull EntryReduction in Multiple Cardiometabolic Risk Factors With Combined Olanzapine/Samidorphan Compared With Olanzapine: Post Hoc Analyses From a 24-Week Phase 3 Study –

Business storytelling techniques: 2/30 FLOW Season 1, Episode 2 of The West Wing is titled "Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc". After this, therefore because of this. The episode opens with President Bartlet complaining that his staff are falling for this logical fallacy – assuming that one thing led to another just because it came first... Humans seem especially vulnerable to this mistake: She's angry because I said that thing. The vaccine caused my illness. I scored because of my lucky shirt. The critical insight for storytellers and persuaders is this... We are drawn to simple stories powered by cause and effect. Good stories FLOW. This > led to this > led to this > led to this. When we leverage causation, we create persuasive chains that are hard to resist. Here's Yoda: “Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.” See how that feels? Powerful, right? Whether we are building an argument or a story, we want to build it brick upon brick. It's not just better persuasion, it's better thinking. In 2004, Jeff Bezos banned PowerPoint... "... The reason writing a 4 page memo is harder than 'writing' a 20 page powerpoint is because the narrative structure of a good memo forces better thought and better understanding of what's more important than what, and how things are related." This is Business Storytelling Technique 3/30. Follow me to get the daily series. Challenge: Try a chain of persuasion for your business. Here's my example. "Story skills build better stories, stories build persuasion, persuasion builds success." ------------------- The Stories Mean Business podcast with Nick Warren. One Idea A Day, Every Day. Get deeper into business storytelling: https://storiesmeanbusiness.com/storybusiness/ https://storiesmeanbusiness.com/podcast

Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2022.10.10.511642v1?rss=1 Authors: Azzouz, S., Walker, L. A., Doerner, A., Geisel, K., Rodriguez-Rivera, A. K., Li, Y., Roossien, D. H., Cai, D. Abstract: Over the last decade, the advances in Brainbow labeling allowed labeling hundreds of neurons with distinct colors in the same field of view of a brain [1, 2]. Reconstruction (or "tracing") of the 3D structures of these images has been enabled by a growing set of software tools for automatic and manual annotation. It is common, however, to have errors introduced by heuristics used by tracing software, namely that they assume the "best" path is the highest intensity one, a more pertinent issue when dealing with multicolor microscope images. Here, we report nCorrect, an algorithm for correcting this error by reanalyzing previously created neuron traces to produce more physiologically-relevant ones. Specifically, we use a four dimensional minimization algorithm to identify a more-optimal reconstruction of the image, allowing us to better take advantage of existing manual tracing results. We define a new metric (hyperspectral cosine similarity) for describing the similarity of different neuron colors to each other. Our code is available in an open source license and forms the basis for future improved neuron tracing software. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info Podcast created by PaperPlayer

In this Roundtable episode Cyrus presents us his hypothesis for how the outcome of the latest Tour de France could mean a big change for the type of rider winning it in the future. Join us as we discuss the race winning move, carbohydrate metabolism & ingestion, and whether we’ll see more riders like Jonas Vingegaard wearing yellow in future Tour de Frances. Don’t forget, TCPCP listeners get an exclusive 20% discount off the InfoCrank Road or the InfoCrank Track (and any accessories!). Simply use the discount code performance20 at checkout on the InfoCrank website (www.infocrank.cc). This deal ends on 30-Sep-2022, so don’t hesitate to get yourself the most accurate power meter on the market and show support for the show! Episode References:CHO periodisation in cycling Case Study: The application of daily carbohydrate periodisation throughout a cycling Grand Tour Team DeRave Twitter thread The Use of Carbohydrates During Exercise as an Ergogenic Aid This is a listener supported podcast, and we would be stoked if you supported us by becoming a member of The Cycling Performance Club! With your backing we can continue our mission to deliver the best in cycling performance knowledge and practical advice to you and the greater cycling community. Support The Club by clicking here! Co-hosts:Jason Boynton, Ph.D.boyntoncoaching.com Cyrus Monkcyclistscientist.com Producer & co-host:Damian Rusesemiprocycling.com Website: cyclingperformanceclub.comInstagram: @cyclingperformanceclubFacebook: @cyclingperformanceclubTwitter: @cyclingclubpodLinkedIn: The Cycling Performance Club Podcast

In this Roundtable episode Cyrus presents us his hypothesis for how the outcome of the latest Tour de France could mean a big change for the type of rider winning it in the future. Join us as we discuss the race winning move, carbohydrate metabolism & ingestion, and whether we’ll see more riders like Jonas Vingegaard wearing yellow in future Tour de Frances. Don’t forget, TCPCP listeners get an exclusive 20% discount off the InfoCrank Road or the InfoCrank Track (and any accessories!). Simply use the discount code performance20 at checkout on the InfoCrank website (www.infocrank.cc). This deal ends on 30-Sep-2022, so don’t hesitate to get yourself the most accurate power meter on the market and show support for the show! Episode References:CHO periodisation in cycling Case Study: The application of daily carbohydrate periodisation throughout a cycling Grand Tour Team DeRave Twitter thread The Use of Carbohydrates During Exercise as an Ergogenic Aid This is a listener supported podcast, and we would be stoked if you supported us by becoming a member of The Cycling Performance Club! With your backing we can continue our mission to deliver the best in cycling performance knowledge and practical advice to you and the greater cycling community. Support The Club by clicking here! Co-hosts:Jason Boynton, Ph.D.boyntoncoaching.com Cyrus Monkcyclistscientist.com Producer & co-host:Damian Rusesemiprocycling.com Website: cyclingperformanceclub.comInstagram: @cyclingperformanceclubFacebook: @cyclingperformanceclubTwitter: @cyclingclubpodLinkedIn: The Cycling Performance Club Podcast

Why does proto-feminist Hrishi keep forgetting about Mandy? We discuss Josh's strict adherence to proper English and how Sorkin gets us to care so much about a minor character. Kenny and Jose do their impressions of the jarring credits music from the West Wing. Kenny does an impression of President Bartlet. Big Block of Cheese – Hrishi or Josh: who has the right personality type for being allowed to launch nuclear weapons? Jose tries to justify having an occasional potty mouth and it somehow turns into a discussion about racial/cultural identity. Links These Crackpots and These Women podcast Song Exploder w/ House of Cards

Commentary on the misconception that anyone can earn their own salvation.

On this Saturday episode of THE POLITICRAT daily podcast: Omar Moore on the bizarre and inexplicable intransigence of the state of California, which refuses to reinstate mask wearing protections in the face of increasing rates of the highly contagious BA2 variant. April 16, 2022. FREE: SUBSCRIBE NOW TO THE BRAND NEW POLITICRAT DAILY PODCAST NEWSLETTER!! Extra content, audio, analysis, exclusive essays for subscribers only, plus special offers and discounts on merchandise at The Politicrat Daily Podcast online store. Something new and informative EVERY DAY!! Subscribe FREE at https://politicrat.substack.com Buy podcast merchandise (all designed by Omar Moore) and lots more at The Politicrat Daily Podcast Store: https://the-politicrat.myshopify.com The Politicrat YouTube page: bit.ly/3bfWk6V The Politicrat Facebook page: bit.ly/3bU1O7c The Politicrat blog: https://politicrat.politics.blog Join Omar on Fanbase NOW! Download the Fanbase social media app today. PLEASE SUBSCRIBE to this to this podcast! Follow/tweet Omar at: https://twitter.com/thepopcornreel

Rhetoric-O-Rama is a fun and educational introduction to rhetoric by two college professors, Dr. David R. Dewberry and Dr. Tim "As Seen on TV" McGee (Tim was on Wheel of Fortune in the early 80s). You can find us at www.rhetoric.fun and email us at rhetoric.fun@gmail.com Find out more at http://rhetoric.fun

Neste episódio definimos a expressão Post hoc ergo propter hoc e aplicamos o seu significado na correlação, mais especificamente na relação de causa e efeito

Materiał o tym, jak za pomocą błędu rozumowania powstają religie, a zarazem wyjaśnienie niezrozumiałych nawiązań w opowiadaniu "Ta cholerna tesla 2". Pierwszy odcinek nowego cyklu na kanale, czyli przypowieści.

Materiał o tym, jak za pomocą błędu rozumowania powstają religie, a zarazem wyjaśnienie niezrozumiałych nawiązań w opowiadaniu "Ta cholerna tesla 2". Pierwszy odcinek nowego cyklu na kanale, czyli przypowieści.

The fallacy we're discussing today is the Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc fallacy, also called simply: Post Hoc. Send me any questions, comments or even the fallacies you're seeing around you! think@filteritthroughabraincell.com Or, tag me on Instagram: @filteritthroughabraincell Sign up for notifications: www.filteritthroughabraincell.com

Avrupa ve Amerikan spor endüstrilerinin kıyasını yaptığımız serinin 2. bölümünde artık serbest piyasa düzenine geçiyoruz: Bosman Davası, AB-UEFA kavgası ve rekabetteki değişim.Kullandığım kaynaklar aşağıda linkli. Gelecek bölümde medyanın etkisine ve oligarkların sahneye çıkışına bakacağız. Keyifli dinlemeler.Bölümler:(00:25) Önceki bölümün özeti(01:45) Sene 1990: Bosman davasının öncesi(03:55) AB-UEFA çekişmesi(06:50) Kitap: From Boot Money to Bosman(07:30) Serflik bitiyor (100 sayfalık Bosman tezi)(10:50) Yabancı oyuncu kısıtı kalkıyor(12:15) Bandwagon etkisi(14:30) Trajik bir figür (Belgesel: The Player Who Changed Football)(15:55) Durum özeti.(16:35) Değişen rekabet: Şampiyonlar Ligi ve ulusal ligler(19:10) 88 bin maçlık çalışma. (Alman ligi verileri)(20:05) Üç mucize.(21:05) Rekabet ve tahmin edilebilirlik arasındaki ilişki.(22:05) Almanlık gibisi yok. (Taraftar verileri)(25:30) Post-Hoc tuzağı ve gelecek bölüm.(27:30) Patreon Teşekkürleri.Kendi Kendime Reklam: Safsatalar AnsiklopedisiSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode, Dave and Jamison answer these questions: Listener Sara asks, How can I deal with favoritism towards informal leaders in a group? The group is losing group intelligence because the informal leader's reasoning and direction is favored. Example: when member A propose an argument is dismissed, but when the informal leader proposes the same argument it is cherished. How do I react to the question “why didn't you do it this way” for features already in production? I am frustrated by being asked that. I got scolded for an idea that turned out to be bad after I implemented it (in production), although I asked the Lead for his opinion ahead of time. As soon as trouble came up a.k.a performance issue in production, he pointed the finger at me. Lost all kinds of respect for him.

When your intuitive mind senses a pattern and begins to search for the completion of that pattern, we call this, “curiosity”. But sometimes our searching for the completion of a pattern goes sideways, takes a shortcut, gets it wrong. The false logic that springs to mind as a result of this wrong turn is so common that it has a Latin name, “Post Hoc, ergo Propter Hoc.” Blame Isaac Newton. Newton taught us to think of cause and effect as sequential: a pool cue strikes a ball, which strikes another ball. As a result of our trust in Newtonian physics, the often-wrong logic of Post Hoc ergo Propter Hoc is almost irresistibly seductive because it begins with the observation that two events occurred in sequence. Remember a TV show called The West Wing? Jed Bartlet: C.J., on your tombstone it's going to say Post Hoc ergo Propter Hoc. C.J.: Okay, but none of my visitors are going to be able to understand my tombstone. Jed Bartlet: It means, “One thing follows the other, therefore it was caused by the other.” But it's not always true. In fact, it's hardly ever true. We did not lose Texas because of the hat joke. Do you know when we lost Texas? C.J.: When you learned to speak Latin? Do you remember The Big Bang Theory? In a 2009 episode, Sheldon Cooper was speaking to his mother on the phone: “The Arctic expedition was a remarkable success, I'm all but certain there's a Nobel prize in my future. Actually, I shouldn't say that. I'm entirely certain… (audience laughter) No, Mother, I could not feel your church group praying for my safety… (audience laughter) The fact that I'm home safe does not prove that it worked. That logic is Post Hoc ergo Propter Hoc… (audience laughter) No, I'm not sassing you in Eskimo talk.” Similar to “Post Hoc” is the broken logic of simultaneous occurrences, Cum Hoc ergo Propter Hoc, “With this, because of this.” “The bigger a child's shoe size, the better the child's handwriting. Therefore, having big feet makes it easier to write.” The mental sleight-of-hand of “Post Hoc” and “Cum Hoc” are what make advertising – and conspiracy theories ­– so easy to believe. @WardQNormal writes, “The trouble with conspiracy theories is that a lack of evidence is taken as proof that the conspiracy is everywhere. This is like thinking that the reason you never see elephants hiding up in treetops is because they're good at it.” Seeing patterns where they don't exist can be costly and dangerous. But still, I am wildly in favor of curiosity.Zora Neale Hurston wrote, “Research is formalized curiosity. It is poking and prying with a purpose.” Albert Einstein said, “Curiosity has its own reason for existing. One cannot help but be in awe when he contemplates the mysteries of eternity, of life, of the marvelous structure of reality. It is enough if one tries merely to comprehend a little of this mystery every day. Never lose a holy curiosity.” Gemma Stone, “When we enter a conversation with curiosity, we allow ourselves to see things differently and to be surprised by what we discover.” Tom Robbins, “Curiosity, especially intellectual inquisitiveness, is what separates the truly alive from those who are merely going through the motions.” Dorothy Parker, “The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity.” And none other than Daniel Boone – yes, THAT Daniel Boone – said, “Curiosity is natural to the soul of man and interesting objects have a powerful influence on our affections.” Like I said, I am wildly in favor of curiosity. If I could, I would inject it into your arm with a needle. Curiosity will take you on trips like no other drug. Roy H. Williams

This episode follows S2 E43 in discussing the possible role of NASH cirrhosis clinical trials in the transition from biopsy as gold standard to a post-biopsy world. Stephen Harrison starts this conversation by reviewing a post hoc analysis of Phase 2 belapectin data from Galectin Therapeutics, followed by a review of the FALCON 2 stud of pegbelfermin in NASH cirrhosis, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb. Jörn Schattenberg, Mazen Noureddin and Roger Green add their perspectives to the conversation.Stephen's primary point from the belapectin post hoc analysis is a practical one: the high correlation between an AST:ALT ratio>1 and HVPG levels can help clinicians suspect which patients have cirrhosis and possibly define candidates for NASH cirrhosis clinical trials. Mazen states that given the lack of trial data in this area, any secondary data that can be interpreted or integrated into a broader analysis is exceptionally helpful. Stephen asks what the ideal design would be for a NASH cirrhosis trial starting today. While answers vary, they all rely heavily on non-invasive tests to provide richness to the data and possibly set a foundation to become primary endpoints over time. This leads Roger to observe how much more complex and disease-focused trial design discussions have become over just the past two or three years.

Arts commentator Nina Tonga joins Lynn to talk about how galleries around the country have reopened their doors at level two - and got creative online. She'll look at Dane Mitchell's installation Post Hoc, which he reimagined as a new daily radio show, which listeners can tune into here at 5pm NZ time. Tai Moana Tai Tangata is a solo exhibition by Brett Graham which opened at City Gallery in early August, and If you're stuck in Auckland you can take the virtual tour of his exhibition at Govett Brewster, which launched late last month. Nina will also share her wish list of events happening around the country for the rest of the year.

Writer/Producer Anupam Nigam is back on the feed to talk about the second episode of The West Wing, "Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc".In this episode, we discuss the poorly aged Sam Seaborn subplot of 'rescuing' a call girl, as well as some of the shameful gender roles at play. We also contemplate how this show changed the American view of politics, and how much we expect from our political leaders. Find Anupam at: twitter.com/anupamnigamPatreon: patreon.com/podcastlikeits1989Twitter: twitter.com/podcastlikeitsInstagram: instagram.com/podcastlikeitsReddit: reddit.com/r/PodcastLikeIts See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Drs. Avni Finn, Safa Rahmani, and Yoshihiro Yonekawa join for a journal club reviewing four recent publications in major ophthalmology journals:Pneumatic Vitreolysis for VMT with or without Macular Hole (https://www.aaojournal.org/article/S0161-6420(21)00353-5/fulltext)Post-Hoc Analysis of Protocol AB (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/article-abstract/2779735)Retinal Detachment Reoperation (https://www.ajo.com/article/S0002-9394(21)00198-7/fulltext)PIVOT Study Post-Hoc OCT Analysis (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/article-abstract/2778783)Relevant Financial Disclosures: Dr. Sridhar has consulted for Regeneron, Genentech, Alcon, Dorc, and Oxurion. Dr. Finn has consulted for Genentech and Allergan. Dr. Yonekawa has consulted for Alcon, Alimera, Allergan, and Genentech. Dr. Rahmani has no relevant disclosures. You can now claim CME credits via the AAO website. Visit https://www.aao.org/browse-multimedia?filter=Audi

Protocol W (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/2778074) Post-Hoc Analysis of CLARITY (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/2777497?resultClick=1) Racial and Socioeconomic Differences in DME Treatment (https://www.aaojournal.org/article/S0161-6420(21)00196-2/abstract) Anti-VEGF for Wet AMD Prophylaxis (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/2777577?resultClick=1)

Dr. Steven E. Nissen of Cleveland Clinic discusses the results of a post hoc analysis of data from the STRENGTH trial with Dr. Ron Waksman. The analysis, presented as a late-breaking trial at ACC.21 Virtual, showed no association of benefit or harm with the use of high-dose omega-3 fatty acids in patients at high cardiovascular risk.

Adam and Darren are reunited and happily hijack this week’s show. Darren breaks down the post hoc fallacy, aka ‘after this, therefore because of this’, and examines it in the context of COVID vaccines. Adam goes deep on the mysterious so-called monoliths making headlines over the last year, giving new meaning to the saying, ‘What’s up, Cuboids?’

In this episode we talk about mini tater tots and the true meaning of Pole Stock, Lego 'Copter Sock's. Email: Yourshowmyshow@gmail.com Twitter: @yourshowmyshow

Today on The McCarthy Report, Andy and Rich discuss the impending impeachment, Trump's new lawyer, and the pardons enacted by Trump in his final days as president.

This episode we play a game called"Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc," where Brenna has to come up with definitions for words that Will did or did not definitely make up or crib from the internet. It goes about as well as you expect.Written and recorded by William Phelps & Brenna CrottyMusic and sound editing by Wes PriceArt by Evan Graff (@ejgraffics)WordsBricoleur /ˌbrikəˈlər/Chafe /CHāf/Chauffeur /SHōˈfər/Sonder /sän-dər/Kummerspeck /koom-uh-shpek/Opia /ō-pē-ə/Monachopsis /MON-a-COP-sis/Scientist /ˈsī-ən-tist/Énouement /ˌā-ˌnü-ˈmäⁿ/Ennui /ˌän-ˈwē/Snake Oil /ˈsnāk ˈȯi(-ə)l/Mauerbauertraurigkeit

This is the confessional episode! Mike confesses to never ever wanting to be president and Dan confesses to not knowing the difference between a call girl and a prostitute. Segment Timecodes: Intelligence Briefing - 00:56 State of the Union - 01:34 Filibuster - 05:15 The Caucus - 23:22 On the Record - 26:00 Contact Us - 28:15 Don't forget about our quote game. Throughout the entire podcast, Mike will be inserting quotes from the episodes we are discussing. He attempts to say them in a way that the other host/s are unaware of. Sometimes he is sneaky and other times it is just awkward, but all the time it is a ton of fun! Come and play along. rerunretrospect@gmail.com @rerunretrospect https://twitter.com/RerunRetrospect (https://twitter.com/RerunRetrospect) https://www.samuelmyers.org/ (Music by https://www.samuelmyers.org)

Guidelines recomendam que a avaliação da resposta após tratamento com RT/QT para CEC de canal anal seja feita entre 6 a 12 semanas após o início do tratamento. Usando dados do estudo ACT II, os autores desse paper ​​determinaram o que seria “o momento ideal” para avaliar a resposta clínica do tumor após a quimiorradioterapia.Mesmo sendo um estudo questionável (em se tratando de métodos), essa análise foi pré planejada e tem muita aplicabilidade prática diária.Não perca a discussão deste artigo, com os colegas Ranyell Spencer, Tiago Biachi e Allan Pareira.Sejam bem-vindos a mais um episódio do Clinical Papers Podcast! Para saber mais sobre o paper, acesse: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28209296/

Premiere Episode post hoc OPEN MIC Wednesday Night Our truth is formed through our experience as a people, mass incarceration of our Brother and Sisters; intentional miseducation of our children, state-sanctioned and legal murdering under law; medical, environmental and employment justice. The duality of our citizenship, agency requires specialized filters honed from living, studying and listening. We see Amerikka, and we have been its dilemma, savior and visionary. We call what we speak, "Black Truth". Wednesday, November 18, 2020 ::: 10 pm EST ::: LIVE Check- out our podcast PowerView http://bit.ly/Powerview at TruthWorks Network Web     Facebook  Twitter  OCG Exchange Instagram

Westlee and Collin break down Season One Episode Two Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc Follow The West Wing Fandom Twitter: @WestWingFandom Instagram: @WestWingFandom Merch Teespring.com/stores/TheWestWingFandom.com

#167: What do me and Roger Federer have in common? You're about to find out. To learn more about the show, please visit https://mappedoutmoney.com

I chat with Razib Khan as we look at COVID-19 after 7 months. What lessons can be learnt from this crisis? How effective were the lockdowns? What if we are hit with a virus that is extremely dangerous in the future? You can check out all of Razib's work here https://www.razib.com/bio/wordpress/ You can follow me on Twitter @kushal_mehra You can become a member of the Carvaka Podcast https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKPxuul6zSLAfKSsm123Vww/join You can support the Carvaka Podcast on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/carvaka You can follow me on Facebook @KushalMehraOfficial

Seriously, no real joy in this episode and some things discussed could trigger distress or trauma. Ranty. #BLACKLIVESMATTER #TERRORISM #READING #CONSPIRACYTHEORIES #DISTRACTION #BILLYSHEARS #WINGS #ROCKSTAR #THEWHO #POSTHOCERGOPROPTERHOC #JOURNALISM #JONSOPEL #BBC #PODCAST #TOPCONTENTPOD #LISTENINGTOGETHER

Correlation is not causation. In today's episode, we're talking about how we get twisted around, thinking data correlation equals causation.

Two great lectures for one low low price! Music 'Highway' by Gone For Good

The assumption of cause and effect.

In what will probably be our last podcast of 2019, Ian and Simon discuss how things went locally and nationally in Thursday's General Election. With Stephen Morgan bucking the disastrous national trend for Labour to retain the seat in Portsmouth South.

David L. Streiner, PhD, of McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., and the University of Toronto, joins Blood & Cancer host David Henry, MD, of Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, to explain what a post hoc analysis is and why it should be interpreted with caution. Plus, in Clinical Correlation, Ilana Yurkiewicz, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University, explores what to tell patients when it comes to prognostic scoring system results. * * *  Help us make this podcast better! Please take our short listener survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/podcastsurveyOct2019 * * *  This week in Oncology: In rectal cancer, fragmented care linked to lower survival by Jim Kling, reporting from Clinical Congress 2019. Post hoc analyses What is a post hoc analysis? Analyzing data after a study has already had conclusions made and looking for patterns that were not prespecified. Dr. Streiner’s advice for researchers: Pick a small number of primary outcomes and develop a narrow hypothesis. Then use post hoc analysis as a means of assessing future questions that can be investigated in a subsequent study. Dr. Streiner’s advice for clinicians: Treat a post hoc analysis as a hypothesis that requires further study. It should be viewed with some degree of suspicion because it may have been significant only by chance. Show notes by Ronak Mistry, DO, resident in the department of internal medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.   References Marcus R et al. Obinutuzumab for the first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1331-44. Crawford ED et al. Comorbidity and mortality results from a randomized prostate cancer screening trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:355-61. Streiner DL et al. Size, follow-up, data analysis – good; post hoc analysis, interpretation – not so good. Commun Oncol. 2011;8:379-80.   For more MDedge Podcasts, go to mdedge.com/podcasts Email the show: podcasts@mdedge.com Interact with us on Twitter: @MDedgehemonc David Henry on Twitter: @davidhenrymd Ilana Yurkiewicz on Twitter: @ilanayurkiewicz  

New Zealand artist Dane Mitchell‘s artwork – Post Hoc, is currently on as part of the Venice Biennale in Italy. Known as the Olympics of art, the Venice Biennale is pretty much the ‘top’ for artists. New Zealand’s 2019 representative is Dane Mitchell, whose project delivers cryptic lists of the vanished, the lost, or the destroyed. Mitchell’s work broadcasts a vast inventory of bygone things to locations throughout the city via fake tree cell towers, providing smartphone access via hotspot which you can hear the lists. At the Palazzina Canonica – the epi-center of the work, scrolling lengths of paper lists emerge from a printer placed high upon a structural frame, they cascade down settling in ripples on the floor, forming an elegantly minimal installation of all that which has been lost.

New Zealand artist Dane Mitchell‘s artwork – Post Hoc, is currently on as part of the Venice Biennale in Italy. Known as the Olympics of art, the Venice Biennale is pretty much the ‘top' for artists. New Zealand's 2019 representative is Dane Mitchell, whose project delivers cryptic lists of the vanished, the lost, or the destroyed. Mitchell's work broadcasts a vast inventory of bygone things to locations throughout the city via fake tree cell towers, providing smartphone access via hotspot which you can hear the lists. At the Palazzina Canonica – the epi-center of the work, scrolling lengths of paper lists emerge from a printer placed high upon a structural frame, they cascade down settling in ripples on the floor, forming an elegantly minimal installation of all that which has been lost. This podcast was made with the help of Liquid studios. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/art-ache/message

Statistics is key to demonstrating the effectiveness of new advancements in science and medicine, but when statistical significance is not achieved, is post-hoc power a valid justification? --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/databytes/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/databytes/support

En este episodio de Value Investing FM trataremos un tema esencial a la hora de tomar decisiones de inversión en bolsa, los sesgos cognitivos. Explicaremos qué son, su importancia y haremos un doble top 10 de los que más nos afectan a la hora de invertir con sus ejemplos correspondientes. Top 10 Sesgos Cognitivos de Adrián Godás 1. Comparación por contraste 2. Cámara de eco 3. Consistencia 4. Anclaje 5. Narrativas( sensemaking) 6. Autoridad 7. Sesgos de falso consenso 8. Simpatía 9. Disponibilidad 10. Statu quo Top 10 Sesgos Cognitivos de Paco Lodeiro 1. Argumentum ad antiquitatem 2. Falacia por asociación 3. Generalización inapropiada o prueba con ejemplo 4. Argumentum ad verencundiam 5. Falacia de los costes hundidos 6. Argumentum verbosium 7. Muestra sesgada 8. Causa Simple 9. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc y Cum Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc 10. Falso dilema

En este episodio de Value Investing FM trataremos un tema esencial a la hora de tomar decisiones de inversión en bolsa, los sesgos cognitivos. Explicaremos qué son, su importancia y haremos un doble top 10 de los que más nos afectan a la hora de invertir con sus ejemplos correspondientes. Top 10 Sesgos Cognitivos de Adrián Godás 1. Comparación por contraste 2. Cámara de eco 3. Consistencia 4. Anclaje 5. Narrativas( sensemaking) 6. Autoridad 7. Sesgos de falso consenso 8. Simpatía 9. Disponibilidad 10. Statu quo Top 10 Sesgos Cognitivos de Paco Lodeiro 1. Argumentum ad antiquitatem 2. Falacia por asociación 3. Generalización inapropiada o prueba con ejemplo 4. Argumentum ad verencundiam 5. Falacia de los costes hundidos 6. Argumentum verbosium 7. Muestra sesgada 8. Causa Simple 9. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc y Cum Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc 10. Falso dilema

Post Hoc is an alternative/indie band from Phoenix whose most recent album, “Wilderness the Villain” just came out! Hear it everywhere now 

Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc, in which the left wing gets screwed, the delightful friendship of Sam and the sex worker continues, and a very bad thing happens.

Post hoc tests and transformations Music ‘More’ by Amerikan Made

THE HOME FOR PROGRESSIVE POLITICS This Week’s Discussion: In this week’s episode we address the latest indications that the House may soon have no choice but to impeach. The latest defections from Trump.  Did you know the deadline to get coverage under the ACA is approaching?  That's because the White House doesn't want you to.  The Post Hoc fallacy and the Trump economy.  Why George H.W. Bush, despite his many flaws, is the "best" the GOP has had to offer for  a long time.  In other words, the least stinky turd in the sewer. The GOP's latest assaults on democracy, and its leadership warranting prosecution and long internment.  The existential threat posed to the US by the GOP's dismantling of what's left of US democracy.  Was Labor Secretary Alex Acosta an enabler of child sex trafficking, and is he thus the Mississippi of Trump cabinet officials?    *Also available on Spotify, iTunes, and YouTube -Please SUBSCRIBE   THE HOME FOR PROGRESSIVE POLITICS Forward Nation Radio with Professor David Leventhal    Visit forwardnationradio.com for all shows, fun toons, stats, and more. If you love what you heard, Like Us and share on Facebook - Instagram - Twitter

E @magrolima e @lucianopotter estão de volta com sua saga: acompanhar todos os capítulos da série The West Wing e comentá-los. Mas comentar as cenas, a série em si? Não. Falar sobre os assuntos de cada episódio. O roteirista/criador Aaron Sorkin é gênio nisso. Portanto, neste episódio, o segundo da primeira temporada, assuntos como o latim post hoc ergo propter hoc (ação que você já realizou, certamente), as famosas eleições Midterms (diferentes das nossas), como se constrói uma President nomination, a ópera Nessun dorma (de Puccini ou de Wagner?), feminismo ou não feminismo a expressão "You got spunk", quem são Regis And Cathie Lee, o que quer dizer "beber o keg of glory" e como e onde usar, os golfistas da Ryder Cup, os chapéus engraçados dos texanos, o famoso Secret Service, The Wall Street Journal gosta do Bolsonaro, Amway é pirâmide?, a casa do presidente dentro da Casa branca, o Leader of the Free World, Article 2 of the Constitution, por que os presidentes americanos têm apelidos, a Situation Room onde as maiores tretas são definidas etc. Não falta assunto interessante. Escute. É um prazer gravar esse podcast.

In the thirteenth episode we explore Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc, with examples from Trump talking about how he singlehandedly stopped planes crashing, while Obama was responsible for thousands of deaths in Chicago.In Mark's UK Politics Corner we look at Boris Johnson's claims about the legacy of the London Olympics, and Paul Nuttall's theory on immigration and unemployment.In The Fallacy in the Wild, we check out examples from Friends and Sesame Street, and discuss superstition and pigeons in boxes.Jim and Mark go head to head in Fake News, the game where Mark has to guess which of three Trump quotes Jim made up.And finally we talk about Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman's plot to smear Mueller, and round up some of the other crazy Trump stories from the past week.You can contact the guys at pod@fallacioustrump.com or on Twitter @FallaciousTrump, or facebook at facebook.com/groups/fallacioustrumpSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/fallacious-trump/donations

This week we interview the band Post Hoc as well as a quick review of Panic At The Disco! Pray For The Wicked and Dance Gavin Dance Artificial Selection. metalloud_podcast_episode_7_-_post_hoc.mp3File Size: 75393 kbFile Type: mp3Download File [...]

We all seek to explain our gardening successes and failures to get better results in the future, but our reasoning is not always sound. In this episode I'm going a little outside the gardening world to talk about logic and reasoning, and how to apply some basic logic and scientific method to solving problems in …

The third episode of Life Lab Notes' quirky little alien series, "H.A.B.I.T." This one's called Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc. (Don't worry, there is no Latin in the actual episode.) Krraz and L'Seth Navi have some technical issues, but they don't immediately turn to logic and reason for the solution. Featuring the voice talents of Keith Ferguson and Silvie Zamora, and the underscoring and SFX talents of Phil Ward, the H.A.B.I.T. series is written and produced for Life Lab Notes by Silvie Zamora. Look for @LifeLabNotes on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter; and @HABITcrew on Instagram.

Annabelle writes an ode to condensed milk and shares a story of a fierce woman and a book manuscript, while Gillian recounts the making of a wedding cake for a young couple in Sweden, under very trying circumstances. Dispatch to a Friend Website: https://www.dispatchtoafriend.com/

Two exciting topics for one low low price! Music 'A Little Bit More' by Uncle Seth

Click here to Watch on YouTubeHappy New Year 2018!Welcome sa lain na pud nato nga episode sa atong podcast nga gitawag ug Bag-ong Dan-ag. Kini nga podcast gi-dedicate ni nato para sa pag-promote ug critical thinking ug skepticism, especially na gyud sa atong mga kabatan-unan karon. Tungod kay nag dako ko sa Cebu as a Catholic, usa sa atong pinaka major nga topic kay ang religion, particularly ang Christian nga religion. So mag hisgut-hisgut kita bahin sa mga simbahan parehas sa Katoliko Romano, Saksi ni Jehovah, Sabadista ug uban pa.  Ang critical thinking ug skepticism dili lang para sa religion. Ma-apply ni nato sa lain-laing area sa atong kinabuhi. So mag hisgut pud ta pananglit sa financial, political, economics, health or medicine ug uban pa.So kung kinsa tong interesado nga mo explore niining mga butanga uban nako, palihug ug subscribe sa atong podcast, add mo sa inyong mga comments, questions, suggestions or mga reactions. Akong paninguhaon nga maka post ko dinhi regularly, at the moment kay weekly, matag adlaw nga Byernes o Sabado.Post Hoc or Faulty CausalityAng fallacy nga “post hoc, ergo propter hoc,” nga literally nagpasabot ug “human ani, mao nga tungod ani” - “after this, therefore because of this.”Mao ni ang fallacy kung diin nasipyat ta ug hubad sa mga nahitabo nga nagsunod. Unya tungod kay nagsunod ang panghitabo, ato dayun nga gi-conclude nga ang nag-una ug kahitabo, mao ang hinungdan sa nagsunod nga nahitabo.Uso kaayo ni nga fallacy sa mga personal nga mga experyensya. Especially na gyud ning bahin sa mga sakit ug balati-an.Example 1:Na-diagnose ko ug colon cancer. Human ning agi ko ug pila ka sessions sa chemotherapy. Wala gyud ko naayo. Gipasulay pa gani ko ug radiation therapy. Wala gihapon. Naluya na gyud ko ug balik-balik sa hospital. Hangtud nga ning-attend ko ug prayer healing session sa St. Thomas. Ila kong gi pray-overan. After pila ka semana, nawala ang akong cancer. Naayo na gyud ko. Ang pray-over ra gyud ang naka-ayo nako.Kinsa may nakadungog na ug pro-pareha ani nga estorya? Gi-pray-overan siya, human milabay ang pila ka semana, naayo siya. Mao nga ang naka-ayo daw niya, kay ang pray-over. Gikalimtan nalang ang ubang detalye nga nag-chemotherapy siya ug pila ka sessions. Nag radiation therapy pa gyud. Unya human sa pray-over, ning lanat pa ug pila ka semana una na-deklarar nga naayo na siya. Unsa may nahitabo aning pila ka semana nga milabay? Nagpadayun ba kaha ang iyang mga therapy sa hospital? Maskin pag wala, most likely, ning-epekto na ang mga tambal nga gidapat sa iyang lawas.Pwerteng dali-a ra gyud sa uban mo-conclude nga mo-work ang pray-over. Mao bitaw gi-sige pa ni ug buhat hangtud karon. Apan wala gyuy mo-hinumdom sa pila na ka daghang cases sa pray-over nga wala naayo ang masakiton. Kung dili maayo, aw hilom lang ta bahin sa pray-over. Kung maayo gani, “yes, ang pray-over ang naka-ayo niya! Mo-work gyud ning pray-over!”Ang kaning post-hoc nga fallacy, mao ni ang higayon kung diin na-confuse nato ang “correlation” for “causation.” Nag-tuo ta nga “causation” ang atong nakita, apan “correlation” lang diay. Unsa man ni sila?Ang “causation” kay ang aksiyon nga naka-ingon ug usa ka butang. Mao ni ang cause ug effect nga scenario. Pananglit, ning-tayhop ko ug hangin aron pagpaburot sa balloon, mao nga ning-burot ang balloon. Sa kani nga example, maka-angkon lang ta ug “causation” kung ma-demonstrate nato nga dunay cause-effect nga nahitabo.Ang “correlation” kay ang pag-connect lang nato sa duha kabutang. Kita ang nag-connect, ug sa kani nga example, tungod lang kay nagsunod ang mga panghitabo.Pananglitan, akong usbon ang akong gibuhat, ning-tayhop na pud ko ug laing balloon ug miburot gihapon. Human gi-usab na pud nako sa laing balloon. Every time ako ning gibuhat, mao gyud pirmi ang epekto. So sa kani lang daan, kus-gan na nga ebedensiya nga ang akong pagtayhop sa balloon mao ang cause, unya ang epekto kay ang pagburot sa balloon.Syempre, mopadayun ta ug embestigar niini hangtud na sa chemistry ug physics sa mao nga scenario. Ma-demonstrate man nato nga ang hangin, ang mga gas molecules sa hangin, maka cause ug pressure kung imo silang tapokon. Maskin gani sa atong baba, kung magtigum ta ug hangin, ma-feel nato ang pressure sa atong aping. Mao kini ang explanation, ang demonstration kung gi-unsa pag-cause sa pagtayhop nako ug hangin sa balloon nga maoy naka-ingon nga ning-burot ang balloon.Sa atong example sa pray-over, kung balikon nato ug buhat ang pray-over sa laing masakiton, klaro man kaayo nga usahay ang masakiton dili maayo, usahay maayo. In fact dunay pipila na ka mga studies nga gi-conduct aron pag-susi kung duna bay epekto ang prayer. Usa sa pinaka-sikat kay ang Templeton Foundation prayer study. Kung diin na-conclude nga walay nakita nga klaro nga epekto ang prayer. Dunay lapas sa usa ka libo ka mga participants sa maong study.Apan ang mas dako nga problema bahin sa prayer, kay ang pag-demonstrate sa cause-effect. Maskin pa ug ma-correlate nato nga every time mag-pray-over, mamaayo gyud ang masakiton. Unsaon man nato pagdemonstrate sa causation? Gi-unsa man sa mga pagbatbat ug mga pulong, ug pagbutang sa mga kamot ibabaw sa masakiton, pag-cause nga mamaayo ang masakiton?Although ang challenge nako dinhi sa mga mo-tuo sa prayer. Kung tinuod gyud nga dunay epekto ang prayer, nganong mo-adto pa man sila ug doktor? Ngano mo-gamit pa man sila ug medisina? Para unta sa bisan unsa nga sakit o balati-an, prayer ra dayun ang gamiton aron mawagtang. Ngano maggasto-gasto pa man gyud sa doktor ug medisina?Examples:Additional examples sa post-hoc nga fallacy:Human na elect si Carlos isip Mayor sa syudad, ning-ubos ang mga reports sa kawat ug patay. Maayo gyud ni nga mayor si Mayor Carlos.Ang pagka-mayor ni Carlos, dili maoy hinungdan nga ming-ubos ang reports sa kawat ug patay. Basin ning gamay ang mga reporters? Basin dunay private army si mayor nga maoy gikahadlokan sa mga tawo mao nga wala na kaayoy nagpabadlong?Tungod kay wala ko naligo karong adlawa, daghan kaayo ko ug nabuhat sa opisina. Mao nga sunod kung gusto ko nga daghan ko ug mabuhat sa opisina, dili lang ko maligo.Posibli nga tungod wala siya naligo, naka-save siya ug time, mao mas dako siya ug time sa opisina. Pero dili ang aksiyon o ang wala pag aksiyon sa ligo ang naka-ingon nga mas daghan siya ug nabuhat sa opisina.Human mag-wild ang mga manok, nag-sige silag saba ug pakpak sa ilang mga pako, duna dayuy mosulod nga kusog nga bagyo. Ang kaning pagkaguliyang sa mga manok ang hinungdan sa mga kusog nga bagyo.Ang pagkaguliyang sa mga manok kaha ang most like hinungdan sa mga kusog nga bagyo? Tungod lang kay kasagaran, mao ni ang ilahang behavior. O ba kaha, basin tungod sa instinc sa mga manok, maka-matikod dayun sila ug kausaban sa panahon?So mao to ang “post hoc, ergo propter hoc” nga fallacy. I hope klaro na ni.Straw Man FallacyPadayun ta, lain na pud nga common kaayo nga logical fallacy, kaning gitawag ug “Straw Man Fallacy.” Mao ni ang pag presentar ug huyang nga argumento nga propareha sa argumento nga mao untay itulisok. Pero gi-presentar ang huyang nga argumento aron sayun ra pildihon, unya, human mapulpog ang huyang nga argumento, mo-ingon dayun ang nangatarungan nga napildi na pud niya ang orihinal nga argumento.Example:So pananglit sa usa ka panag-estorya sa duha ka tawo nga si Efren ug si Gadot:Efren: Unsay huna-huna nimo ni Allah?Gadot: Dili man ko mo-tuo aning mga ginoo, maskin si Kristo pa, si Allah, si Bramah ug kinsa pa na dinha.Efren: Mao ba? Gi-unsa gud nimo pag-segurado nga walay ginoo nga nagbuhat nato? Unsa, ningtungha lang ta dinhi ug kalit?Sa maong panagbangi, ning-deklarar si Gadot nga dili siya mo-tuo ug ginoo, ma Allah man o ma Kristo ug uban pa. Mao ra ni iyang gisulti. Apan si Efren, human nakadungog niini, namingwit ug laing argumento nga wala na-apil sa ilahang panagbangi. Ang argumento nga “segurado si Gadot nga walay ginoo nga nagbuhat nato UG nga nitungha lang ta sa kalibutan ug kalit.”Una, walay usa ani nga mga argumento, maskin tipik man lang ani nila, nga gisulti ni Gadot.Ika-duha, walay “claim” nga gihimo si Gadot, igo lang siya nag express sa iyahang stand nga wala siyay ginoo nga gituho-an.So ang orihinal nga argumento ni Gadot, actually, expression ra gani ni sa iyahang posisyon sa pag-tuo, nga wala siyay ginoo nga gituho-an. Mao ni dapat ang itulisok ni Efren.Ang sayop nga pag-representar sa position sa usa ka tawo kay lain sad nga porma sa Straw Man Fallacy. Kung gi-lahi ug sabot o di ba nasayop lang ug sabot ang usa.Example:Sa usa ka session sa senado nga naghisgut bahin sa budget sa nasud, ning-ingon ang usa ka senador (itago nato sa pangalan nga “Bob”) nga maayo kuhaan nato ang budget alang sa edukasyon unya idugang kini sa budget sa health. Ning sabat pud dayun ang usa ka senador nga nag-ingon: “Dili ko makatuo nga si senador Bob ganahan diay ni siya nga makulangan ang edukasyon sa atong nasud.”Sayop nga pagka-represent sa position ni senador Bob. Igo ra man siya ning-ingon nga kuhaan ang budget sa edukasyon aron i-puno ngadto sa budget sa health. Apan ang usa ka senador, ming-ambak ug laing topic. Nga ganahan kuno si Bob nga makulangan ang edukasyon sa nasud.Susihon usa nato kung unsay argumento ni Bob. Basin diay mapakita niya nga nag-sige lang ug ka surplus ang budget sa edukasyon sa mga milabay nga tuig. So sa pag-anticipate sa surplus, ming-suggest si Bob nga kuhaan ang budget kay basin pud nga nagkulang ang budget sa health. Tungod ba ron kay dunay kalamidad nga nahitabo ug nga nagkinahanglan ug mas dako-dako nga pundo ang health.Importante nga maminaw ta sa usag-usa kung mag-estorya ta. Labaw na gyud kung magkabangi ang atong mga opinyon ug panabot. Labi na gyud sa mga dagko ug kritical nga mga topic sa atong katilingban. Usahay, tungod sa atong emosyon, kung naglagot na ba ta o nasubo, masapawan dayun ang atong critical thinking. Unya, pun-an pa gyud nga wala tay bansay-bansay sa atong critical thinking, mosamot pa gyud nga dili ta makapangatarungan ug maayo o ba kaha, masayop ta ug sabot sa uban.Kasagaran kung maglantugi, ang isig ka kampo kay pulos lang naghulat nga makabatbat sa ilahang side nga dili na sila makapaminaw sa pikas side. Mag-isig hinulatay lang sa ilahang turno. Atong hinumdoman, kung ming-apil ta ug dialogue, duna tay duha ka responsibilidad. Una ang pagsaysay sa atong opinyon sa matinud-anon nga paagi (intellectually honest). Ug ika-duha, ang pagpaminaw, with an open mind, sa opinyon sa atong ka-estorya. Molalis pa gani gyud ko, nga kung dili ka uyon ug andam nga mosagup niing duha ka responsibilidad, sa ato pa, dili nalang ta maglantugi kay mamahimong walay pulos ug usik lang sa panahon ang atong pagpa-ugnat.Kini ug uban pa, ang atong hisgutan sa sunod nga mga episodes dinhi sa atong podcast.Kung intersado mo sa pag explore niini, ayaw kalimot ug Subscribe ug share sa atong podcast. Para ato ning tanan.Dinhi lang usa, hangtud sa sunod higayon. Daghang salamat.Question everything. 

In this episode of West Winging It, Trevor, Logan, and Quinten continue our introduction to the Bartlet Administration; meeting Vice President Hoynes and getting a brief lesson in Latin.

Ever heard of deaf flights? You have now.

Aidan has been swallowed by the time-space continuum — AND HIS OWN HUBRIS! Fortunately, Shawna Oochoo of White Pony Lodge takes his seat in the sub-basement for an interview with Hanna Hudson-Plante and Melanie Metcalf of the Regina Folk Festival about their 2017 event. Plus, taxi drivers declare a partial victory while a Sanctuary City motion fails at city council. Music by Guidewire (aka Ryan Hill). Originally broadcast on 91.3 CJTR, Regina community radio.

Aidan has been swallowed by the time-space continuum — AND HIS OWN HUBRIS! Fortunately, Shawna Oochoo of White Pony Lodge takes his seat in the sub-basement for an interview with Hanna Hudson-Plante and Melanie Metcalf of the Regina Folk Festival about their 2017 event. Plus, taxi drivers declare a partial victory while a Sanctuary City motion fails at city council. Music by Guidewire (aka Ryan Hill). Originally broadcast on 91.3 CJTR, Regina community radio.

Phil & Matt talk about cooking. Matt tells us his secret ingredient to making a killer bechamel sauce and Phil gives us his take on sweet n’spicy BBQ chicken and homemade turkey stock. Warning: this intro will make you hungry! Admittedly, it was a meat heavy conversation. Phil’s pasta sauce can be made vegan, which is how he normally likes it.    Logical Fallacies & Fantasy Politics (15:09) Mel settles in to talk about logical fallacies, truth tables & syllogisms. Matt & Phil find out that they could either be a podcast, be on the internet or are the internet. It got a bit confusing to the non-initiated, but Mel does a good job at walking us through the details of logically sound v.s. empirically false arguments. Our baseball team fandom differences are put aside as we go off the rocker and talk fantasy fiction and politics in the era of Trump. Mel brings up The West Wing episode titled Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc as we go down the rabbit hole on this one. Aye yai yai! Mel’s favorite fallacy is Ad hominem (Tu quoque), which is the “you too” argument. Matt goes meta on us, Phil wants to see more civility in arguments and Mel simmers us down, bringing the conversation back on point. We make connections around emotions, oratory and politics, revealing the shortcomings and limits of truth tables and logical expressions. Mel makes a strong argument that all undergraduates should take a course in philosophy to hone critical reasoning and argumentation skills. Stronger writing will result. Matt & Phil couldn’t agree more, especially in the current political climate. We end on a connection between works of fiction and logic. Phil asks how logic can operate in a fantasy world. Mel sheds light on how the world building that is done in fantasy (and high fantasy) needs to create the conditions for logical arguments, while not being factually or empirically true according to our earthly world. Sarah J. Maas’s ‘Throne of Glass’ series is an excellent example of this, according to Mel. Phil realizes that Plato and Aristotle had creativity and the arts in mind the whole time. Mel’s tips: find a passion, discuss a counter point, debate openly and follow a sound structure. This, especially in writing and arguing, is a good thing. Trust us. Links Purdue OWL has a good primer on fallacies: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/03/ “Brief” description from Stanford on Syllogisms: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-logic/#SubLogSyl There is so much about truth tables on so many places. This Wikibooks page is the most succinct, if you accept that: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Formal_Logic/Sentential_Logic/Truth_Tables Recommendations (1:07:43) Delhi2Dublin, the song we played was Apples (They’re Canadian too, ey!): http://www.delhi2dublin.com/ Riverdale, a show based on the Archie comics that Mel loved as a youngin: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riverdale_(2017_TV_series) Sarah J. Maas’s ‘Throne of Glass’ series: http://sarahjmaas.com/throneofglass/ Girl Guides Canada: https://www.girlguides.ca/web/ International Organizations: https://www.wagggs.org/en/ Bath & Body Works lotion: http://www.bathandbodyworks.com/p/eucalyptus-tea-body-lotion-021720066.html Concluding thought: Slippery slopes are greased with logical fallacies. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Follow Semi-Intellectual Musings on Twitter: @The_SIM_Pod Email Matt & Phil: semiintellectual@gmail.com Subscribe to the podcast: https://thesim.podbean.com/feed/ For full show notes: https://thesim.podbean.com/e/Logical-Fallacies-Fantasy-Politics iTunes: https://goo.gl/gkAb6V Stitcher: https://goo.gl/PfiVWJ GooglePlay: https://goo.gl/uFszFq Please leave us a rating and a review, it really helps the show!   Music: Song "Soul Challenger" appearing on "Cullahnary School" by Cullah Available at: http://www.cullah.com Under CC BY SA license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Post hocs and, hey, kid, is that a transformer? Music ‘Highway’ by Gone For Good

Welcome to Episode 79 of Brain Software with Mike Mandel and Chris Thompson! Technical difficulties abound! Something went horribly wrong, but here’s the podcast anyway… (it’s not that big a deal) Check out the show notes below and scroll down to listen to the podcast directly on this page. Keep sending us topic suggestions and show feedback. We love hearing from all of you! Here are the show notes for this episode: Podcast #80 is next! Mike wants to bring in some booze! Mike starts with a Gerry Kein cough, and mentions the Generation of Morons we see everywhere. Let’s talk about logical fallacies, children! You’ll hear these in politics, advertising, etc. Only 2 groups of people in the world… Upcoming stuff! Karl Smith arrives in April to teach the Kinetic Shift! Chris and Mike will be students in the class, so come and join them. Architecture of Hypnosis is nearly sold-out for May 2017. Get in now, or wait until June…Then there’s only November left… Mike does his really stupid old British guy voice, purely for his own amusement. Bandwagon is the first logical fallacy in the podcast. Mike admits that he used to be a telephone operator. Bell Canada sent a salesman to Mike’s house to sell him an upgrade. Note to Bell: It didn’t work. We all want to be part of a Tribe! Groups are safer than lone wolves. Chris invokes Robert Cialdini, who’s an awesome author! Mike’s wife decides by committee… Being a Brit, Mike manages to bring the Germans into the discussion.  Let’s invade France! Strawman! When losing an argument, redefine the terms of the argument and then attack the new definition. We must respect the elderly, because Mike’s getting close… A Red Herring is often used if you’re winning the argument. It’s pure distraction. Chris brings up reciprocity at this point, which is a good addition. Mike tells the tale of the patient NLP Trainer who kept spatially anchoring the point of interruption… Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc! (The Great Courses are awesome! Google them.) I got my car washed and it made it rain! Mike invokes Magical Thinking! Mike’s friend of 53 years, Brian McDowell thinks carpet fluff can change the course of a hockey game that’s happening elsewhere. Check cause and effect, and listen for Post Hoc! The No True Scotsman fallacy. Just keep redefining things until it works for you. Mike mentions Occam’s Razor. Friction doesn’t exist! It’s all about demons… The Gambler’s Fallacy or the Law of Independent Events. The dice and cards have no memory! There is no equilibrium to be restored. Chris talks about the stock market…he knows what he’s talking about. The taxi driver Webb, and the lottery tickets. Sound is getting weird now! Keep listening though, and just pretend someone’s tapping his fingers on the table in a senseless rhythm, and you’ll be okay! Being hit by lightning is more likely than winning the lottery! Would you pick the numbers that won last week? Human Givens says that strong emotions make us stupider! Even really good emotions do it. When you’re in love, you’re stupid. Seriously. Stupid. Mike says that good hypnotherapy gets the emotions involved. He invokes the example of a stupid inlaw he had to deal with. You can’t use logic to say that you can’t use logic! Thanks Aristotle! Circular Reasoning A proves B because B proves A… Chris makes a tedious point about spreadsheets, and Mike pretends to be interested. Ad Hominem is to attack the person, rather than refuting what they’re saying. “Your hat looks stupid, so I don’t have to listen to you!” Mike says that white dudes lie all the time! They don’t. Neither do other races, although Martians might… Get somebody angry and flustered and then point it out to win the argument! (It’s a cheap shot. Don’t do it.) False Dilemma is related to the double-bind. Sometimes there are gray areas…Politicians are great at this one. Empowering Question: How will I become more ruthlessly logical to see through all attempts to manipulate? Gus Grissom Update! Grissom has clearly gone into hiding. No sightings in awhile… Send your sightings to gusgrissom@mailinator.com Empowering Metaphor: Fred Penner and Melanie Haber… Ending: Come on along with the Black Rider! Please leave a rating in iTunes, and send in your questions by email to info(at)mikemandelhypnosis.com

Latin, the Vice President, Morris Tolliver, and more.

“After Hoc, Therefore, Something Else Hoc.” Got it, thanks Josh! After the pilot acquainted us well with the White House staffers, Episode 2 gives us a deeper view into President Bartlet himself. By episode’s end the boys discuss the tragic question “Post Hoc…” asks.

As Professor C.H. Arles’s students sweat over his famously difficult final exam, Arles himself is faced with the disappearance of his oldest friend... --- Find us on the web! Official site: duotangmysteries.com Facebook: duotangmysteries Twitter: @DuotangMystery

In this episode Matt takes a look at West Wing S1E02 “Post Hoc Ergo Procter Hoc”.Don’t forget that Matt will answer any feedback submitted for this episode in SC0012, after the review of West Wing S1E11. Get yours in now! Send e-mails to sorkincast@gmail.com, tweet @sorkincast, or call 314-669-1840 to offer that feedback. Please leave the podcast a written review in iTunes, and find all back episodes and links at sorkincast.wordpress.commp3

In this episode Matt takes a look at West Wing S1E02 "Post Hoc Ergo Procter Hoc".Don't forget that Matt will answer any feedback submitted for this episode in SC0012, after the review of West Wing S1E11. Get yours in now! Send e-mails to sorkincast@gmail.com, tweet @sorkincast, or call 314-669-1840 to offer that feedback.Please leave the podcast a written review in iTunes, and find all back episodes and links at sorkincast.wordpress.commp3

Two mini lectures in one Music “Today” by Dan Brodbeck and Corey Thompson

Do you believe in magical amulets? Apparently, in 2011, enough people did to allow one company to earn $34 million making and selling them to professional athletes, celebrities, and even a former president...all thanks to the post hoc fallacy. In this episode you'll learn more about how this fallacy led to the rise and fall of the Power Balance bracelet, and whether or not you might believe in a little magic yourself. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Post hoc tests video

Two mini topics, transformations and post hoc tests Music "More" by Amerikan Made

Adventures of a Pus Whisperer.

Two small topics, but important ones. Music "Contact" by Random Sample

Post hoc comparisons

SHOW NOTE - ทำไมกลางคืนถึงมืด? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxJ4M7tyLRE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFwtJC9_dXs - โฆษณานาฬิกา 5 แถว ตัวที่ผมเอามาล้อในรายการมันไม่มีใน youtube แล้วนิ อันนี้เวอร์ชั่นอื่นๆ ซึ่งก็เบร้อใช้ได้ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBx0a4p_txQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbFU7agT1uI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGd2N6Wlx2g - Post Hoc Fallacy -1,2,3,4,5,6 - นกพิราบของ Skinner และพฤติกรรมโชคลาง superstition -1,2,3,4,5 คลิปน่าสนใจเกี่ยวกับการทดลองของ skinner http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_ctJqjlrHA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGazyH6fQQ4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6zS7v9nSpo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uPmeWiFTIw WiT Quizzzz https://www.facebook.com/witcastthailand/posts/486916094663388

Adventures of a Pus Whisperer.

Transformations and Post hoc tests. Music "Contact" by Random Sample

Post hoc tests, a VERY brief overview

And the men of The Spoon wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer. Thus, on the second day of the first month in the year of our lord two thousand and twelve, they turned the full glare of their conversational lens in toward one another, and began upon a campaign of self-promotion and self-destruction, largely centered around what kind of bands they dig. Will this righteously indignant kick-off lead them to madness or perdition? Only time will tell. Music by Nice Guy Eddie,Sons Of Nothing, and Wonderboy.

Post hoc tests