Podcasts about schopenhauer

Jacob McMillan is a philosophy graduate working on Mainlander and Schopenhauer.Jacob's blog: https://jacobmcmillan.substack.com/p/eternism-death-and-individuation?r=1lkcnt&triedRedirect=true---Become part of the Hermitix community:Hermitix Twitter - /hermitixpodcast Support Hermitix:Patreon : www.patreon.com/hermitix Donations: https://www.paypal.me/hermitixpodHermitix Merchandise - http://teespring.com/stores/hermitix-2Bitcoin Donation Address: 3LAGEKBXEuE2pgc4oubExGTWtrKPuXDDLKEthereum Donation Address: 0x31e2a4a31B8563B8d238eC086daE9B75a00D9E74

In this extended extract from their series 'Conversations in Philosophy', part of the LRB's Close Readings podcast, Jonathan Rée and James Wood look at one of Friedrich Nietzsche's early essays, 'Schopenhauer as Educator'. For Nietzsche, Schopenhauer's genius lay not in his ideas but in his heroic indifference, a thinker whose value to the world is as a liberator rather than a teacher, who shows us what philosophy is really for: to forget what we already know. ‘Schopenhauer as Educator' was written in 1874, when Nietzsche was 30, and was published in a collection with three other essays – on Wagner, David Strauss and the use of history – that has come to be titled Untimely Meditations. Jonathan and James consider the essays together and their powerful attack on the ethos of the age, railing against the greed and power of the state, fake art, overweening science, the triviality of universities and the deification of success.James Wood is a contributor to the LRB and staff writer at The New Yorker, whose books include The Broken Estate, How Fiction Works and a novel, Upstate.Jonathan Rée is a writer, philosopher and regular contributor to the LRB whose books include Witcraft and A Schoolmaster's War.To listen to the rest of this episode and all our other Close Readings series, sign up;In Apple Podcasts: https://lrb.me/nietzscheapplecrIn other podcast apps: https://lrb.me/nietzschesccr Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In philosophy of mind, panpsychism is the view that the mind or a mind-like aspect is a fundamental and ubiquitous feature of reality. It is also described as a theory that "the mind is a fundamental feature of the world which exists throughout the universe". It is one of the oldest philosophical theories, and has been ascribed in some form to philosophers including Thales, Plato, Spinoza, Leibniz, Schopenhauer, William James, Alfred North Whitehead, and Bertrand Russell. In the 19th century, panpsychism was the default philosophy of mind in Western thought, but it saw a decline in the mid-20th century with the rise of logical positivism. Recent interest in the hard problem of consciousness and developments in the fields of neuroscience, psychology, and quantum mechanics have revived interest in panpsychism in the 21st century because it addresses the hard problem directly.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/monster-fuzz--4349429/support.

Wenn einem die Argumente ausgehen, sollte man zur Beleidigung greifen, meinte schon der alte Schopenhauer und den hat Donald Trump bestimmt nicht gekannt. Beleidigen kann er trotzdem. Wer diesmal dran glauben musste? Bruce Springsteen und das hat WDR 2 Kabarettist Fritz Eckenga überhaupt nicht gefallen. Von Fritz Eckenga.

Não há narrativa ou estratégia que resista a fatos, ainda mais a fatos consistentes. E o governo Lula está se enredando, cada dia mais, pela forma com que trata o escândalo do INSS.

En el programa de hoy se aborda la vida y enseñanzas de Siddharta Gautama, conocido como Buda, y el surgimiento del budismo como un fenómeno espiritual y cultural de enorme influencia global. Se explica su evolución desde una filosofía hasta convertirse en una religión seguida por más de mil millones de personas, explorando conceptos esenciales como las Cuatro Nobles Verdades, el Óctuple Sendero, el desapego, la meditación y la ilusión del yo. Además, se comparan sus postulados con pensamientos filosóficos occidentales, como los de Schopenhauer, Nietzsche y los epicúreos, y se destacan los beneficios prácticos del desapego y la meditación en la vida cotidiana. Para acceder al programa sin interrupción de comerciales, suscríbete a Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/elvillegas Temas principales y sus minutos: 00:02:00 - Origen del Budismo 00:03:34 - Vida de Siddharta Gautama 00:12:59 - Las Cuatro Nobles Verdades 00:18:12 - Influencia del Budismo en Occidente 00:25:13 - La Meditación Budista 00:32:42 - Beneficios del Desapego

Nesse episódio falo sobre o filme Tár (2022), dirigido por Todd Field e estrelado por Cate Blanchett. O filme faz uma menção a Schopenhauer e quero explorar aqui alguns dos aspectos que são discutidos pelo filósofo alemão e que aparecem na história da protagonista deste longa. Mais informações sobre mim e sobre as coisas que produzo: marcosramon.net

In this episode we discuss the history of thinking about leisure from Aristotle, Epicurus, Seneca, and Cicero to St. Paul, Gregory I, St. Benedict, Thomas Aquinas, Dante, and John Calvin to Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. Leisure was once seen as a time for debating philosophy or studying the universe, before giving way to slothful bread and circuses. Christian thought hit back hard against Roman excess, teaching leisure was a sinful waste of God's time. In modern times, thinkers are trying to discover what leisure is good and how much is too much. In the face of the AI revolution, will we choose a future of constant passive entertainment, or will we continue to find meaning in our leisure or at the very least more work to do?

ORIGINALLY RELEASED Feb 3, 2022 In this episode, Alyson and Breht introduce, teach, and discuss the philosphy of two giants in western philosophy: Arthur Schopenhaur and Friedrich Nietzsche.  They discuss their respective philosophies, how they relate, how they differ, the subsequent thinkers and movements they inspired or influened, their relation to politics right, left and center, their connection to eastern philosophies and religions, and much more!  ---------------------------------------------------- Support Rev Left and get access to bonus episodes: www.patreon.com/revleftradio Make a one-time donation to Rev Left at BuyMeACoffee.com/revleftradio Follow, Subscribe, & Learn more about Rev Left Radio HERE

Estremamente prolifica, fanaticamente ostinata e terribilmente fastidiosa, si posa ovunque… e non sto parlando della tua ex, ma della mosca. Quella che per Schopenhauer (ma anche per noi) era un animale simbolo di insolenza e stupidità per gli antichi Egizi era invece un animale sacro che adornava le vesti di Faraoni ed eroi.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

******Support the channel******Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenterPayPal: paypal.me/thedissenterPayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: https://tinyurl.com/yb3acuuyPayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9lPayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpzPayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9mPayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao ******Follow me on******Website: https://www.thedissenter.net/The Dissenter Goodreads list: https://shorturl.at/7BMoBFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/thedissenteryt/Twitter: https://x.com/TheDissenterYT This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/ Dr. Patrick Hassan is a Senior Lecturer at the School of English, Communication and Philosophy at Cardiff University. His primary areas of interest are moral and existential philosophy. Currently, I work on 19th century philosophy (particularly Nietzsche and Schopenhauer), ethics and its relation to aesthetics, and environmental philosophy. He is the author of Nietzsche's Struggle against Pessimism. In this episode, we talk about the philosophy of suicide. We start by discussing what it is, and how it compares to scientific approaches to suicide. We talk about what is suicide, how old the philosophy of suicide is, how suicide was approached morally before the 19th century, and a shift in the 19th century toward a more psycho-sociological and biological approach to suicide. We discuss how pessimism relates to suicide, whether pessimists are against suicide, and what they think about the medicalization of suicide. We talk about how pessimism compares to traditional and progressive approaches to suicide. We discuss James Sully's psychological reduction of philosophical pessimism and challenges to it. Finally, we talk about the current state of the philosophy of suicide.--A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: PER HELGE LARSEN, JERRY MULLER, BERNARDO SEIXAS, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, PHIL KAVANAGH, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, FERGAL CUSSEN, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, ROMAIN ROCH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, NELLEKE BAK, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, SUNNY SMITH, JON WISMAN, WILLIAM BUCKNER, PAUL-GEORGE ARNAUD, LUKE GLOWACKI, GEORGIOS THEOPHANOUS, CHRIS WILLIAMSON, PETER WOLOSZYN, DAVID WILLIAMS, DIOGO COSTA, ALEX CHAU, AMAURI MARTÍNEZ, CORALIE CHEVALLIER, BANGALORE ATHEISTS, LARRY D. LEE JR., OLD HERRINGBONE, MICHAEL BAILEY, DAN SPERBER, ROBERT GRESSIS, JEFF MCMAHAN, JAKE ZUEHL, BARNABAS RADICS, MARK CAMPBELL, TOMAS DAUBNER, LUKE NISSEN, KIMBERLY JOHNSON, JESSICA NOWICKI, LINDA BRANDIN, GEORGE CHORIATIS, VALENTIN STEINMANN, ALEXANDER HUBBARD, BR, JONAS HERTNER, URSULA GOODENOUGH, DAVID PINSOF, SEAN NELSON, MIKE LAVIGNE, JOS KNECHT, LUCY, MANVIR SINGH, PETRA WEIMANN, CAROLA FEEST, MAURO JÚNIOR, 航 豊川, TONY BARRETT, BENJAMIN GELBART, NIKOLAI VISHNEVSKY, STEVEN GANGESTAD, TED FARRIS, AND ROBINROSWELL!A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, TOM VANEGDOM, BERNARD HUGUENEY, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, THOMAS TRUMBLE, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, JONCARLO MONTENEGRO, NICK GOLDEN, CHRISTINE GLASS, IGOR NIKIFOROVSKI, AND PER KRAULIS!AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, ROSEY, AND GREGORY HASTINGS!

Trong tác phẩm cuối cùng của ông “The wisdom of life” (Tạm dịch: Trí tuệ đời người), ông lần đầu bàn về hạnh phúc, và khẳng định: “Muốn sống cuộc đời hạnh phúc, không phải là theo đuổi hạnh phúc, mà là thoát khỏi khổ đau”. Vậy làm cách nào để thoát khỏi khổ đau? Con đường ít người đi này chỉ dành cho những tâm hồn muốn tỉnh thức sẵn lòng giữ khoảng cách với sự ồn ào, khoái cảm và phù hoa. Cuốn sách này được viết từ thế kỷ 19, nhưng triết lý ở đây vẫn đúng với thời đại bây giờVà hôm nay, chúng ta sẽ cùng lắng nghe chia sẻ mang tên “Người có nội tâm càng phong phú càng khó hoà đồng” qua tác phẩm triết học kinh điển “The wisdom of life” của triết gia Arthur Schopenhauer.-------------------------Nếu bạn muốn mua sách giấy để đọc, có thể ủng hộ Better Version bằng cách mua qua đường link này nhé, cám ơn các bạn! ❤️ Link tổng hợp các cuốn sách trong tất cả video: https://beacons.ai/betterversion.vn/b... ❤️ ỦNG HỘ KÊNH TẠI: https://beacons.ai/betterversion.donate

Aprender a jogar com os horrores da vida, poucos são capazes disso, preferem virar os olhos para não ver, mas sem perceber que assim se tornam incapazes de lidar com as dificuldades que o destino reserva. Esta é nossa sina, realizar uma luta livre de ressentimento e má consciência, romper o sólido céu cinza com um raio de luz, sustentar o olhar sobre os algozes que querem enterrar nossos sonhos em covas rasas. Conversamos sobre este tema nesta sexta feira e concluímos que é necessário aprender a jogar “capoeira com o absurdo”.ParticipantesBru AlmeidaMatheus GuimarãesRafael LauroRafael TrindadeLinksTexto lidoOutros LinksFicha TécnicaCapa: Felipe FrancoEdição: Pedro JanczurAss. Produção: Bru AlmeidaTexto: Rafael TrindadeGosta do nosso programa?Contribua para que ele continue existindo, seja um assinante!Support the show

Edgar Hita lanza un mensaje claro a Pedro Sánchez: es necesario acabar con las hamburguesas campeonas de España, con pan de donut y smash burguer. Luismi Pérez, desde su Observatorio Meteorológico de Rubí, nos explica un fenómeno típico de la primavera: los arco iris. Repasamos la prensa y la actualidad deportiva. Cerramos con Adriana Mourelos un lunes de rutina, con una situación política que se parece mucho a la que dejamos la semana pasada. 

Nghe trọn sách nói Những Nhà Tư Tưởng Lớn – Schopenhauer Trong 60 Phút trên ứng dụng Fonos: https://fonos.link/podcast-tvsn --Về Fonos:Fonos là Ứng dụng âm thanh số - Với hơn 13.000 nội dung gồm Sách nói có bản quyền, PodCourse, Podcast, Ebook, Tóm tắt sách, Thiền định, Truyện ngủ, Nhạc chủ đề, Truyện thiếu nhi. Bạn có thể nghe miễn phí chương 1 của tất cả sách nói trên Fonos. Tải app để trải nghiệm ngay!--Arthur Schopenhauer (22 tháng 2 năm 1788 – 21 tháng 9 năm 1860) là một nhà triết học duy tâm người Đức, nổi tiếng với trước tác Thế giới như là ý chí và biểu tượng xuất bản năm 1818. Xây dựng trên nền tảng triết học duy tâm siêu nghiệm của Immanuel Kant, ông đã phát triển một hệ thống luân lý và siêu hình vô thần bác bỏ những ý tưởng thời thượng lúc bấy giờ của trào lưu duy tâm Đức. Schopenhauer là một trong những trí thức phương Tây thế hệ đầu chia sẻ nhiều tư tưởng chung với triết học Ấn Độ, chẳng hạn như sự khổ tu, sự chối bỏ bản thân, và ý niệm cho rằng thế giới là sự phô chiếu ảo ảnh. Lý thuyết siêu hình của ông chính là nền tảng cho các tác phẩm về đề tài tâm lý học, mỹ học, đạo đức học và chính trị học, Phật học... những tác phẩm đã để lại tầm ảnh hưởng tới các danh nhân sau này như Friedrich Nietzsche, Wagner, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Sigmund Freud và nhiều người khác. Sách nói Những Nhà Tư Tưởng Lớn - Schopenhauer Trong 60 Phút sẽ cung cấp cho bạn những thông tin ngắn gọn và dễ hiểu nhất về Schopenhauer cùng tư tưởng triết học của ông.--Tìm hiểu thêm về Fonos: https://fonos.vn/Theo dõi Facebook Fonos: https://www.facebook.com/fonosvietnam/

Dear Stef I was recently having some fun with ChatGPT and I was asking it if various historical figures such as Kant, Schopenhauer and Churchill are sexist to which it replied ‘Yes'. I then asked it ‘Is Stefan Molyneux sexist?' to which it replied (quoting):‘Yes, Stefan Molyneux, a controversial figure known for his online videos and advocacy of various far-right and anti-feminist viewpoints, has been widely criticized for promoting sexist ideas. His views on gender are often seen as regressive and aligned with traditionalist, anti-feminist beliefs.Here are some ways in which Molyneux has expressed sexist views:1. Misogyny and Gender Essentialism: Molyneux often promotes a rigid view of gender roles, suggesting that men and women have inherently different, and complementary, roles in society. He believes that men are naturally suited to leadership, rational thinking, and public life, while women are biologically inclined toward nurturing, domesticity, and emotional roles. These views align with an essentialist understanding of gender, where biological differences are used to justify inequalities in power and opportunity.2. Criticism of Feminism: Molyneux has been an outspoken critic of feminism, frequently claiming that it has "ruined" society by promoting the idea of gender equality and undermining traditional family structures. He dismisses feminism as a harmful ideology, accusing it of promoting victimhood and entitlement among women, while downplaying issues like domestic violence against men.3. Views on Relationships and Marriage: Molyneux often espouses a controversial view of relationships between men and women, promoting the idea that women are hypergamous (i.e., they are primarily interested in marrying men of higher status or resources) and that men should be wary of women's desires for financial support and social status. He has also advocated for "alpha male" behavior, claiming that men should assert dominance in relationships to maintain control and avoid being exploited by women.4. Denial of Gender Equality: Molyneux rejects the idea that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities in many areas of society, often citing his belief in traditional gender roles. For example, he has suggested that women are not suited for leadership roles in politics or business because they are driven by emotionality rather than reason.Molyneux's views are deeply controversial and are considered by many to be deeply sexist and out of step with contemporary gender equality movements. His rhetoric has been widely criticized for promoting harmful stereotypes about both women and men and for encouraging a backlash against feminist progress.'There seems to be an acknowledgment of some of your beliefs & truthful statements you have made but there also seems to be an unusual framing of your philosophy around women. Anyhow if you believe that ChatGPT is misrepresenting your views what would be your response to it?GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!https://peacefulparenting.com/Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows!You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more!See you soon!https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2025

On The Basis of Morality (1840), Part III: "The Founding of Ethics," Ch. 5: "Statement and Proof of the Only True Moral Incentive." Everything up to this point in the book has been negative: Morality can't be founded on pure reason as Kant thinks, or on the idea of the good life (eudaimonia) per Aristotle. Schopenhauer tells us that all actions are motivated by someone's "weal" or "woe." We are naturally self-interested (motivated by own own weal and woe), but such actions will not be moral. So Schopenhauer's puzzle is: How can I be effectively motivated by someone else's weal and woe? I must somehow identify with that person so that the Other's suffering induces my compassion. This is the only source of moral value. Read along with us, starting on p. 165 (PDF p. 193). You can choose to watch this on video. To get future parts, subscribe at patreon.com/closereadsphilosophy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Japanese philosopher Yujin Nagasawa says the majority of people are what he calls ‘existential optimists'. What does this mean for ideas about evil and the creation of life? Jack Symes' essay takes us through the views of thinkers including Schopenhauer, Stephen Law and Camus. Jack Symes is a New Generation Thinker on the scheme run by the Arts and Humanities Research Council and the BBC to put academic research on radio. He is based at Durham University. His books include Philosophers on Consciousness: Talking about the Mind and Talking about Existence and Defeating the Evil-God Challenge and he is working on a book about morality. Producer: Luke Mulhall

Genug Geld, genug Kalorien, genug Dopamin, genug Weltuntergang. Und immer wieder Elon Musk, diesmal als Gamingposer. Wann ist genug genug? Und was passiert im Fenster der Genügsamkeit? Im Deeptalk des Mutmachpodasts philosophieren Suse, Paul und Hajo Schumacher am Küchentisch über Produktivitätsdämonen und die Unersättlichkeit des Willens, die hedonistische Tretmühle und Erich Fromm, Impulsgeber im Neandertal und Seneca, über Teilen, Herrschen, Schopenhauer und Wutz, die von Urmel. Plus: Braucht eine Gemeinschaft immer einen, der voran marschiert? Folge 918. Literaturempfehlungen: Suse SchumacherDie Psychologie des Waldes, Kailash Verlag, 2024Michael Meisheit + Hajo Schumacher Nur der Tod ist schneller – Laufende Ermittlungen, Kriminalroman, Droemer Knaur Verlag.Kathrin Hinrichs + Hajo SchumacherBuch: "Ich frage für einen Freund..." Das Sex-ABC für Spaß in den besten JahrenKlartext Verlag.Kostenlose Meditationen für mehr Freundlichkeit (Metta) und Gelassenheit (Reise zum guten Ort) unter suseschumacher.deDem MutMachPodcast auf Instagram folgen Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Os convidados do programa Pânico dessa quarta-feira (12) são Eduardo Sterblitch e Ricardo Ventura.Eduardo SterblitchLuiz Eduardo Sterblitch Páschoa é humorista, ator, roteirista, cantor e apresentador de TV que se tornou conhecido nacionalmente quando se juntou ao Pânico na TV, exibido de 2003 a 2012 pela RedeTV! e posteriormente pela Rede Bandeirantes, exibido entre 2012 e 2017. É casado com a atriz Louise D'Tuani.De origem judaica, Eduardo começou a estudar teatro aos três anos de idade, quando sua mãe, Jacqueline Sterblitch, matriculou-o em um curso livre na Casa de Cultura Laura Alvim, no RJ. Aos três anos de idade, ficou fascinado com a tradicional dupla de palhaços Xuxu e Xuxuzinho, que foi contratada por sua família para seu aniversário.A partir daí, por muitos anos exigia a presença desta dupla de artistas, que foram a primeira grande influência em sua futura carreira. Além destes, recebeu influência de referências como Antonin Artaud, Samuel Beckett, Eugène Ionesco, Jim Carrey, Mr. Bean, Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, Monty Python, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Harold Lloyd, Andy Kaufman e diversos nomes igualmente importantes. Mais tarde, aos 8 anos, ingressou no Teatro O Tablado, onde sua tia avó era diretora.Eduardo Sterblitch, estreou no gênero musical com o premiado “Beetlejuice”, eleito o musical do ano em 2024 e que o consagrou como melhor ator de musicais nos prêmios PRIO do Humor, Bibi Ferreira e Destaque Imprensa Digital. Recentemente, sua atuação na temporada carioca de "Uma Babá Quase Perfeita" garantiu a ele uma nova indicação ao Prêmio PRIO do Humor, reafirmando sua capacidade de se reinventar e surpreender. O musical está em cartaz em São Paulo, no Teatro Liberdade.Redes Sociais:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sterblitch/Instagram musical: https://www.instagram.com/umababaquaseperfeitaomusical/Ricardo VenturaRicardo Ventura é psicanalista, cientista comportamental, autor e criador do canal “Não Minta Pra Mim” no YouTube. Ele é pioneiro na aplicação da Programação Neurolinguística (PNL) e escreveu cinco livros de sucesso, incluindo “Crenças”, “Comunicar, Vender e Negociar com PNL” e “Espero que Você Morra”, que se tornaram best-sellers na Amazon.Redes Sociais:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/naomintapramimoficial/YouTube: Não Minta Pra Mim

Dr Peter Sjöstedt-Hughes is a Philosopher of Mind and Metaphysics who specializes in the thought of Whitehead, Nietzsche, Bergson, and Spinoza—and in fields pertaining to panpsychism, pantheism, mental causation, and altered states of consciousness. He is a lecturer at The University of Exeter. Peter is the author of Noumenautics (2015), Modes of Sentience (2021), co-editor and contributor of Bloomsbury's Philosophy and Psychedelics (2022), the TEDx Talker on ‘psychedelics and consciousness‘, and he is inspiration to the recreation of inhuman philosopher Marvel Superhero, Karnak. TIMESTAMPS:(0:00) - Introduction (1:00) - The Mind-Body Problem(4:00) - Idealism vs Panpsychism(6:45) - Defining Consciousness (15:30) - Spinozism & Whiteheadian Panpsychism(19:30) - Kastrup's Analytic Idealism(24:07) - Naïve Realism(29:30) - Huxley, James, Whitehead, Nietzsche, Spinoza, Schopenhauer, Bergson & Kant(35:15) - What is the Philosophy of Psychedelics?(41:38) - Evidence of Psychedelic Research(45:35) - Psychedelics & Consciousness(53:10) - Defining Psychedelics(59:50) - Metaphysical Shifts & Consensus Reality(1:04:30) - Peter's most Psychoactive Experience(1:09:40) - Psychedelic Research Criticism(1:13:14) - From Therapeutics to Metaphysics(1:16:18) - Mind At Large & Exogenous Mind Theory(1:23:08) - Free Will(1:27:40) - Panpsychisms(1:35:40) - Peter's Philosophical Heroes(1:40:02) - Final Thoughts(1:41:10) - Conclusion EPISODE LINKS:- Peter's Lecture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4yCrqS0dCY- Peter's Website: https://www.philosopher.eu/- Peter's X: https://twitter.com/PeterSjostedtH- Peter's Instagram: https://instagram.com/petersjostedth- Peter's LinkedIn: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/dr-peter-sjöstedt-hughes-2b7a2927- Peter's BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/petersjostedth.bsky.social- Peter's YouTube: https://youtube.com/@Ontologistics- Peter's Analytic Idealism Critique: https://www.feedyourhead.blog/p/flights-in-the-mindscapeCONNECT:- Website: https://tevinnaidu.com - Podcast: https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/mindbodysolution- YouTube: https://youtube.com/mindbodysolution- Twitter: https://twitter.com/drtevinnaidu- Facebook: https://facebook.com/drtevinnaidu - Instagram: https://instagram.com/drtevinnaidu- LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/drtevinnaidu=============================Disclaimer: The information provided on this channel is for educational purposes only. The content is shared in the spirit of open discourse and does not constitute, nor does it substitute, professional or medical advice. We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of listening/watching any of our contents. You acknowledge that you use the information provided at your own risk. Listeners/viewers are advised to conduct their own research and consult with their own experts in the respective fields.

Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for March 4, 2025 is: schadenfreude • SHAH-dun-froy-duh • noun Schadenfreude refers to a feeling of enjoyment that comes from seeing or hearing about the troubles of other people. // Schadenfreude was felt by many viewers when the arrogant contestant was voted off the show. See the entry > Examples: “In 1995, Sox fans were overjoyed to see the Yankees get knocked out of the playoffs in a thrilling divisional series.... It was Boston schadenfreude, to be sure ...” — Chris Young, The Sun Chronicle (Attleboro, Massachusetts), 13 Sep. 2024 Did you know? Ever a popular lookup on our site, schadenfreude refers to the joy you might feel at another person's pain. It's a compound of the German nouns Schaden, meaning “damage,” and Freude, meaning “joy.” Schadenfreude was a favored subject in Germany by the time it was introduced to English in the mid-1800s; discussed by the likes of Schopenhauer, Kant, and Nietzsche, schadenfreude was showing up in psychology books, literature for children, and critical theory. In English, the word was used mostly by academics until the early 1990s, when it was introduced to more general audiences via pop culture. In a 1991 episode of The Simpsons, for example, Lisa explains schadenfreude to Homer, who is gloating at his neighbor's failure; she also tells him that the opposite of schadenfreude is sour grapes. “Boy,” he marvels, “those Germans have a word for everything.”

Paola Rumore"Le ragioni di Kant"Anders / Solferinowww.solferinolibri.itA trecento anni dalla nascita di Kant, vale ancora la pena occuparsi della sua filosofia?Quali conti si possono fare oggi con un uomo del Settecento che, in tutta franchezza, non godrà mai della simpatia accordata a Nietzsche o a Schopenhauer? Perché se da una parte, per numerose generazioni di studenti, Kant è stato il simbolo della complessità stessa della speculazione filosofica e del pensiero trascendentale, dall'altra il maestoso Immanuel rimane nell'immaginario collettivo l'incarnazione più ovvia della filosofia, il nome che viene in mente subito dopo quello di Platone.Paola Rumore ci conduce tra le pieghe delle riflessioni kantiane, entro le tante implicazioni di una proposta filosofica profonda e vertiginosa come poche altre nella storia del pensiero occidentale, per annunciarci che i Lumi e l'approccio critico non sono in realtà mai stati così attuali, così urgentemente necessari e per nulla superati. E lo fa mentre ribadisce l'idea kantiana di una filosofia che esalta la dignità umana e serve da guida ragionevole nella conduzione dell'esistenza pubblica e privata.Un trionfo del Kant illuminista, quello contenuto in questo libro: di un gigante del pensiero che attraverso la sua prosa – non inarrivabile, ma semmai garbata, ironica e brillante – ha celebrato il valore intrinseco dell'umanità e la promozione degli strumenti per la sua piena realizzazione.Paola Rumore (1976) è professoressa ordinaria di Storia della filosofia moderna all'Università di Torino. È presidente della Società Italiana di Studi Kantiani e vicepresidente della European Society for Early Modern Philosophy (ESEMP). Si occupa principalmente di Kant e della storia della filosofia tedesca del XVIII secolo, ed è autrice di numerose pubblicazioni scientifiche internazionali.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

Rejoignez-moi sur Patreon pour accéder à mon contenu exclusif : https://www.patreon.com/leprecepteurpodcastSchopenhauer était connu pour sa misogynie. Pour lui, la condition des femmes est marquée par la faiblesse, la dépendance et la passivité. Mais en quoi ce jugement sur les femmes nous éclaire-t-il sur la vision du monde de Schopenhauer ? C'est ce que je vous propose de découvrir dans cet épisode. Vous pouvez me soutenir : ★En devenant contributeur sur Patreon : https://www.patreon.com/leprecepteurpodcast Vous pourrez ainsi accéder au podcast sans pub et en avant-première et surtout à mon contenu inédit ! ★Ou en faisant un don ponctuel sur PayPal : http://paypal.me/leprecepteurpodcast Pensez à laisser une note et un avis sur la plateforme de podcast où vous m'écoutez. Cela prend quelques secondes, et c'est un geste très utile pour le référencement du podcast ! Et bien sûr, continuez à partager les émissions que vous préférez sur vos réseaux sociaux. Le Précepteur Podcast a été créé pour vous et continuera d'exister grâce à vous. (Pour toute demande : leprecepteurpodcast@gmail.com)

Platón y el amor idealista. Montaigne y la lujuria. Kant y la abstinencia. Schopenhauer y la trampa de la procreación. ¿Qué han dicho los filósofos sobre el amor? ¿Es cierto que apenas se han preocupado por él? ¿Y qué relación han tenido con el sexo, o el matrimonio? Lo debatimos, a cuenta de la novedad editorial ‘Los filósofos y el amor', con Carlos Alsina, Rubén Amón, Rosa Belmonte, Guillermo Altares, Sergio del Molino y Nacho Vigalondo. Además, anticipamos opinión sobre ‘Daniela Forever', la película de Vigalondo que se estrena la semana que viene y de cuyo rodaje nos da detalles. ¿Con qué formato de imagen la ha filmado y por qué?

Platón y el amor idealista. Montaigne y la lujuria. Kant y la abstinencia. Schopenhauer y la trampa de la procreación. ¿Qué han dicho los filósofos sobre el amor? ¿Es cierto que apenas se han preocupado por él? ¿Y qué relación han tenido con el sexo, o el matrimonio? Lo debatimos, a cuenta de la novedad editorial ‘Los filósofos y el amor', con Carlos Alsina, Rubén Amón, Rosa Belmonte, Guillermo Altares, Sergio del Molino y Nacho Vigalondo. Además, anticipamos opinión sobre ‘Daniela Forever', la película de Vigalondo que se estrena la semana que viene y de cuyo rodaje nos da detalles. ¿Con qué formato de imagen la ha filmado y por qué?

Assisti a "A Substância", novo filme da diretora Coralie Fargeat e estrelado por Demi Moore. Neste episódio, explico porque me arrependi profundamente.

Há 25 anos, em 13 de fevereiro de 2000, o mundo se despediu de Charlie Brown, Snoopy e de toda a turma dos Peanuts com a publicação daúltima tira de Charles Schulz, que faleceu na noite anterior. Neste episódio, exploro o legado filosófico dos Peanuts, a genialidade de Schulz e as complexas questões sobre a continuação de sua obra após sua morte. Em homenagem aos 25 anos da última tira dos Peanuts, meu livro "A estética da angústia: uma aproximação entre Schopenhauer e os Peanuts" estará gratuito na Amazon entre 14 e 18 de fevereiro. Se você ainda não leu, recomendo

Agradece a este podcast tantas horas de entretenimiento y disfruta de episodios exclusivos como éste. ¡Apóyale en iVoox! Hay lugares que nunca deberían construirse... y el manicomio del Sr. Locrian es uno de ellos. Un relato de horror inquietante, donde la locura es solo el principio. ¿Me acompañan?. La vida de Ligotti no es la de un ser humano normal, por lo que nuestra comprensión de su trabajo en ficción y filosofía especulativa debe tener en cuenta sus experiencias de vida, de lo contrario nos perderemos la importancia central de su visión de la vida como el horror de la conciencia. Como le dijo a un entrevistador: “Schopenhauer habla de la conciencia humana como el resultado de que los seres humanos “abusan” de sus cerebros y los budistas simplemente quieren eliminarla. Se vislumbra, dentro de la abyección, una de esas revueltas violentas y oscuras del ser, dirigida contra una amenaza que parece emanar de un exterior o un interior exorbitantes, expulsada más allá del alcance de lo posible, lo tolerable, lo pensable. Está ahí, bastante cerca, pero no se puede asimilar.—Julia Kristeva. Thomas Ligotti, el maestro del terror. Una producción de Historias para ser Leídas. La música de esta historia pertenece a Epidemic Sound con Licencia autorizada para este Podcast. (Imagen Autor desconocido DR.) Disfruten de esta apabullante historia, muchas gracias a los Taberneros Galácticos que apoyan este podcast con su aportación económica. 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Este podcast se sostiene gracias a tu apoyo y a tus aportaciones, puedes aportar si lo deseas desde 1,49€ en la página de inicio de este podcast y hacer clic en el botón azul apoyar 💀😍Por todas las horas de diversión: ✨ Gracias por tu escucha y hasta el próximo audio 🚀 🖤 Más de Thomas Ligotti 'El sueño de un maniquí': https://go.ivoox.com/rf/119713174 📌Más contenido extra en nuestro canal informativo de Telegram: ¡¡Síguenos!! https://t.me/historiasparaserleidas Voz y sonido Olga Paraíso BIO Olga Paraíso: https://instabio.cc/Hleidas Enlace a un café y una charla entre fantasmas 🕯 en Youtube: https://youtu.be/hQfUWte2bFU ☕️ Creado y producido por Olga Paraíso, "Un Beso en la Taza" es ese rincón cálido que te acompaña en tu día. Si disfrutas de las pausas significativas, las palabras que llegan al alma y el encanto de los pequeños momentos, este es tu lugar. PODCAST creados por OLGA PARAÍSO 🚀Historias para ser Leídas https://go.ivoox.com/sq/583108 ☕Un beso en la taza en todas las plataformas https://go.ivoox.com/sq/583108 y en Youtube: https://youtu.be/hQfUWte2bFU Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

Se você tem preocupação com a censura e o acesso restrito a conteúdos internacionais, a solução é usar uma VPN. Ao buscar liberdade e segurança na navegação, use a NordVPN, que permite acessar conteúdos globais, encontrar melhores preços e navegar sem rastros. Acesse https://nordvpn.com/cafebrasil para obter um desconto e quatro meses extras grátis, além da opção de reembolso em 30 dias. A Board Academy, referência na formação de conselheiros, tem o Board Club, maior ecossistema de conselheiros da América Latina, que oferece networking, conteúdos exclusivos e eventos conectados às melhores oportunidades. Acesse https://BoardBr.com/CafeBrasil e descubra como dar o próximo salto na sua carreira. Alan Turing foi um gênio matemático que ajudou a vencer a Segunda Guerra Mundial, mas sua inteligência o isolava socialmente. Schopenhauer dizia que pessoas muito inteligentes tendem à solidão, pois enxergam o mundo em profundidade enquanto muitos permanecem na superfície. Será que Turing enfrentou esse dilema? Neste episódio, exploramos como a genialidade pode afastar as pessoas e refletimos sobre a solidão dos cimos: o preço de enxergar além da névoa. Bem-vindo ao Café Brasil.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

En el programa de hoy se comentaron diversas temáticas internacionales y nacionales, comenzando con los decretos ejecutivos de Donald Trump, sus implicancias económicas, políticas y sociales tanto para Estados Unidos como para el mundo, incluyendo medidas contra la inmigración, reformas energéticas y tensiones comerciales. En el ámbito local, se discutió la acusación contra el gobierno venezolano por el asesinato de un exoficial, junto con las reacciones evasivas de figuras políticas chilenas, destacando su relación con el régimen de Caracas. Además, se analizó la reforma previsional en Chile y las declaraciones del ministro Marcel, cuestionando su efectividad económica y las inversiones extranjeras en el país. Finalmente, se exploraron temas filosóficos con la biografía de Arthur Schopenhauer, resaltando su influencia en la filosofía moderna. Para acceder al programa sin interrupción de comerciales, suscríbete a Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/elvillegas Temas Principales y sus Minutos: 00:03:13 - Políticas de Donald Trump. Análisis de sus decretos ejecutivos, impacto global y cambios internos en Estados Unidos. 00:20:03 - Asesinato y vínculo con Venezuela. Investigación sobre el crimen del exoficial venezolano y reacciones políticas chilenas. 00:30:14 - Reforma Previsional y Economía. Críticas a las declaraciones del ministro Marcel y análisis de inversiones extranjeras en Chile. 00:42:00 - Biografía de Schopenhauer. Reflexión sobre su vida, obra y relevancia en el pensamiento filosófico.

Tenemos una newsletter repleta de conocimientos atemporales e ideas reflexivas que podrás utilizar para mejorar tu vida: ⁠⁠https://elrincondeaquiles.substack.com/⁠⁠ Notas del episodio: https://elrincondeaquiles.com/podcast/carlos-javier-gonzalez-resistencia/ En este episodio nos acompaña Carlos Javier González Serrano, filósofo, profesor y presidente de la Sociedad de Estudios sobre Schopenhauer en español. Exploramos cómo recuperar nuestra capacidad de contemplar y resistir las dinámicas del mundo moderno desde una perspectiva filosófica. Ponemos sobre la mesa el impacto de la aceleración social en nuestra capacidad de reflexionar y cómo la alienación nos desconecta de nuestras emociones y las de los demás. Desde la importancia de la empatía hasta la crítica al desarrollo personal como industria, Carlos nos invita a redescubrir lo esencial. Charlamos sobre cómo la filosofía puede ser una herramienta práctica para vivir mejor, cómo construir relatos compartidos que fomenten la solidaridad y por qué necesitamos detenernos a “mirar” para comprendernos como individuos y como sociedad. Temas que tocamos en este episodio: • La importancia de "reaprender a mirar" y recuperar nuestra imaginación. • Cómo la aceleración de la modernidad impacta nuestra capacidad de reflexionar. • El papel de la contemplación como resistencia frente a la alienación. • La empatía como acto revolucionario: más allá de ponernos en el lugar del otro. • Qué podemos aprender del canto 24 de La Ilíada sobre la conexión humana. • La trampa de la industria del desarrollo personal y cómo identificar sus narrativas dañinas. • Construir una filosofía de vida basada en valores auténticos, lejos del consumismo emocional. • La necesidad de detenernos para hablar y emocionarnos juntos en una sociedad hiperindividualista.

Neste episódio, falo sobre o utilitarismo, uma teoria ética que avalia ações com base em suas consequências para o bem-estar coletivo, e mostro como ela pode se aplicar à análise das redes sociais. Para exemplificar, cito a decisão recente da Meta, de retirar o programa de checagem de fatos de seus produtos. Mencionado no episódio: Mark Zuckerberg's end to Meta factchecking is a desperate play for engagement: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/10/mark-zuckerberg-meta-factchecking

Cioran is notorious as the depressive philosopher par excellence. While figures such as Schopenhauer, Ligotti and Benatar have advanced logical arguments for their pessimistic outlook, Cioran's work is completely missing any such justification for his depressive feeling for life. Instead, his work is a lyrical outpouring of his inner life. In this episode we're taking a look at his first and most infamous book, "On the Heights of Despair", written during a bout of insomnia. As his translator, Zarifopol-Johnston argues, the book was an attempt to preserve Cioran's real self by "killing" a literary version of himself. We explore this interpretation of Cioran's work: that it is a means of coping with the madness and sorrow he finds within himself, through lyricism. Ironically, a text that was rumored to have caused many suicides may have preserved Cioran's life.

James Wood and Jonathan Rée introduce their new Close Readings series, Conversations in Philosophy, running throughout 2025. They explain the title of the series and why they'll be challenging a hundred years of academic convention by reuniting the worlds of literature and philosophy. The first episode will come out on Monday 6 January, on Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling.James Wood teaches literature at Harvard University and is a staff writer for the New Yorker as well as a contributor to the London Review of Books. His books include How Fiction Works, The Broken Estate and The Irresponsible Self.Jonathan Rée is a frequent contributor to the London Review of Books and a freelance writer and philosopher. His most recent book on philosophy is Witcraft: The Invention of Philosophy in English.The full list of texts for the series:Søren Kierkegaard, Fear and TremblingLudwig Feuerbach, Essence of Christianity, translated by George EliotRalph Waldo Emerson, ‘Circles' and other essaysJohn Stuart Mill, An AutobiographyA.C. Bradley, ‘My station and its duties'Friedrich Nietzsche, ‘Schopenhauer as Educator'William James ‘The Will to Believe'Martin Heidegger, ‘The Thing'Jean-Paul Sartre, Theory of the EmotionsSimone de Beauvoir, Ethics of AmbiguityAlbert Camus, The FallIris Murdoch, Sovereignty of Good Virginia Woolf, To the Lighthouse Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Esto es HistoCast. No es Esparta pero casi. Nos hundimos en las profundidades de la Historia alemana para buscar el origen de la ideología nazi y por qué fue aceptada por los germanos. Nos lo relata @EmilioAblanedo y acompañado de @goyix_salduero. Os recordamos que nos podéis seguir a través de nuestra cuenta de twitter @histocast y en facebook. Presentación de Emilio: histocast.com/OrigenesNazismo Secciones Historia: - Introducción - 11:21 - Contexto histórico germano - 11:21 - Tendencia al idealismo - 1:21:36 - Schopenhauer & Nietzsche - 2:55:43 - Wagner y El anillo del nibelungo - 3:01:41 - Ocultismo y ciencia - 3:35:50 - Literatura antisemita - 4:42:06 - Protocolos de los sabios de Sión - 5:14:36 - Conclusión - 5:35:25 - Bibliografía (patrocinada por Ediciones Salamina) - 5:48:58 Bibliografía: - El misterioso caso alemán: Un intento de comprender Alemania a través de sus letras - Rosa Sala Rose - Diccionario crítico de mitos y símbolos del nazismo - Rosa Sala Rose - Los orígenes intelectuales del Tercer Reich: Historia de una crisis ideológica - George L. Mosse - Historia del fascismo - Stanley Payne - Los orígenes del totalitarismo - Hannah Arendt - Eslavos, judíos y bolcheviques en la ideología nacionalsocialista. Perspectivas históricas - Ernst Nolte - Después del comunismo: aportaciones a la interpretación de la historia del siglo XX - Ernst Nolte - El Wagner de las ideologías: Nietzsche-Wagner - Eduardo Pérez Maseda Soundtrack (CC BY 3.0): _ghost - Reverie (small theme) Ivan Chew - I have often told you stories Onlymeith - Quiet rain Pitx - Chords for David Doxent - Forgotten land Snowflake - Ethereal space Kirkoid - Space bazooka Gurdonark - Plains Ivan Chew - Nanyang journey Flatwound - The long goodbye Pitx - Hidden blues Javolenus - Ianiscus _ghost - Two swords Alxd - Epic trailer 2 Stephane Lorello - Epic fantasy Peritune - Material epic Marc Fussing Rosbach - Epic greenland - Hourglass Alex Beroza - Improvisation on friday... Ivan Chew - Dark woods II Soundtrack (CC BY-NC 3.0) y autorizado por el autor: Ruin roads - On the edge Ruin roads - Diamond white

durée : 01:23:17 - Toute une vie - par : Gérard Gromer - On a fait de lui un bouddhiste allemand, un misanthrope, un mélancolique. On a prétendu que lorsqu'il parlait, "on avait l'impression de voir la bouche du néant s'entrouvrir". Schopenhauer est célèbre, mais qui est-il ? Et est-il de notre temps ? - réalisation : Jacques Taroni - invités : Christian Jambet Directeur d'études à l'Ecole pratique des Hautes Etudes, à la chaire "Philosophie en islam".; Elisabeth de Fontenay Philosophe; Roger-Pol Droit Philosophe, auteur

Neste episódio (que ficou longo, desculpe

Por que nos importamos tanto com a Black Friday? Mencionado no texto: "Uma Black Friday pra chamar de sua": https://marcosramon.net/uma-black-friday-pra-chamar-de-sua

Le "dilemme du hérisson," proposé par le philosophe Arthur Schopenhauer, illustre parfaitement le paradoxe des relations humaines, et pourquoi elles peuvent souvent nous pousser à la solitude. Dans son ouvrage Parerga und Paralipomena, publié en 1851, qui est un recueil d'essais et de réflexions philosophiques, le dilemme apparaît dans la deuxième partie, intitulée Paralipomena. C'est un texte relativement bref, mais il résume bien la vision pessimiste de Schopenhauer sur les relations humaines et la nature de la proximité. Plus précisément, Schopenhauer décrit une scène où des hérissons, par une froide journée d'hiver, tentent de se rapprocher les uns des autres pour se réchauffer. Mais, plus ils s'approchent, plus ils se piquent avec leurs épines, les obligeant à se tenir à une distance inconfortable. Cette métaphore illustre les défis de l'intimité humaine : nous désirons tous la connexion et la chaleur de la proximité, mais cette intimité peut aussi engendrer des blessures. Dans les relations humaines, les "épines" représentent les aspects de notre personnalité, nos défauts, nos insécurités, et nos différences, qui rendent parfois la proximité inconfortable, voire douloureuse. Quand nous nous rapprochons trop, nous risquons de nous blesser mutuellement. Cela peut se traduire par des disputes, des malentendus, ou des tensions. Face à ce constat, certains choisissent d'éviter cette douleur en se tenant à distance, ou même en choisissant la solitude. Schopenhauer voyait cette solitude comme une conséquence inévitable de notre nature humaine. Pour lui, la plupart des gens préfèrent garder une certaine distance émotionnelle pour se protéger, même si cela les empêche d'atteindre une intimité véritable. En choisissant la solitude, on évite la souffrance, mais on renonce aussi à une partie de ce qui rend la vie humaine si riche. En psychologie moderne, ce dilemme est souvent relié au concept d'attachement et à la peur de la vulnérabilité. Certaines personnes préfèrent être seules par peur d'être rejetées ou blessées. Pour Schopenhauer, cette tendance humaine était inévitable et révélait notre condition d'individu profondément marqué par l'isolement. Même dans un monde social, le dilemme du hérisson nous rappelle que la vraie intimité est rare et difficile à maintenir. Ainsi, ce dilemme ne nous pousse pas nécessairement à la solitude par choix, mais par protection. En fin de compte, le dilemme du hérisson de Schopenhauer nous enseigne que la solitude n'est pas simplement un choix personnel, mais un compromis entre le désir de connexion et la peur de la douleur. Cela éclaire pourquoi, pour beaucoup, la solitude reste une option plus simple et moins risquée que la proximité. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Sevsek de sevmesek de alışveriş hayatımızın parçalarından biri. Hepimiz markete gidiyor, reklam izliyor, internetten bir şeyler satın alıyoruz. İyi ama tercihlerimizi neye göre belirliyoruz? Neyi neden aldığımızın, neyi sevip neyi sevmediğimizin, neden o markayı değil de diğerini tercih ettiğimizin farkında mıyız? Daha da önemlisi, tüm kararlarımızı gerçekten özgür irademizle mi veriyoruz? 111 Hz'in bu bölümünde nöro-pazarlamanın ne olduğunu ve bizi manipüle edip edemeyeceğini konuşuyor, özgür irademiz üzerine bir sorgulama yapıyoruz.Sunan: Barış ÖzcanHazırlayan: Kevser Yağcı BiçiciSes Tasarım ve Kurgu: Metin BozkurtYapımcı: Podbee Media------- Podbee Sunar ------Bu Podcast, Hiwell hakkında reklam içerir..Pod50 kodumuzla Hiwell'de ilk seansınızda geçerli %50 indirimi kullanmak için Hiwell'i şimdi indirin. 1500'ü aşkın uzman klinik psikolog arasından size en uygun olanlarla terapi yolculuğunuza kolaylıkla başlayın.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Nesse episódio eu abordo o conceito de capitalismo de vigilância, popularizado por Shoshana Zuboff, a partir de suas implicações éticas e sociais, usando o caso Cambridge Analytica e o uso de dados para treinamento de ferramentas de IA como exemplo. Entenda o escândalo de uso político de dados que derrubou valor do Facebook e o colocou na mira de autoridades: https://g1.globo.com/economia/tecnologia/noticia/entenda-o-escandalo-de-uso-politico-de-dados-que-derrubou-valor-do-facebook-e-o-colocou-na-mira-de-autoridades.ghtml

Le "dilemme du hérisson," proposé par le philosophe Arthur Schopenhauer, illustre parfaitement le paradoxe des relations humaines, et pourquoi elles peuvent souvent nous pousser à la solitude. Dans son ouvrage Parerga und Paralipomena, publié en 1851, qui est un recueil d'essais et de réflexions philosophiques, le dilemme apparaît dans la deuxième partie, intitulée Paralipomena. C'est un texte relativement bref, mais il résume bien la vision pessimiste de Schopenhauer sur les relations humaines et la nature de la proximité. Plus précisément, Schopenhauer décrit une scène où des hérissons, par une froide journée d'hiver, tentent de se rapprocher les uns des autres pour se réchauffer. Mais, plus ils s'approchent, plus ils se piquent avec leurs épines, les obligeant à se tenir à une distance inconfortable. Cette métaphore illustre les défis de l'intimité humaine : nous désirons tous la connexion et la chaleur de la proximité, mais cette intimité peut aussi engendrer des blessures. Dans les relations humaines, les "épines" représentent les aspects de notre personnalité, nos défauts, nos insécurités, et nos différences, qui rendent parfois la proximité inconfortable, voire douloureuse. Quand nous nous rapprochons trop, nous risquons de nous blesser mutuellement. Cela peut se traduire par des disputes, des malentendus, ou des tensions. Face à ce constat, certains choisissent d'éviter cette douleur en se tenant à distance, ou même en choisissant la solitude. Schopenhauer voyait cette solitude comme une conséquence inévitable de notre nature humaine. Pour lui, la plupart des gens préfèrent garder une certaine distance émotionnelle pour se protéger, même si cela les empêche d'atteindre une intimité véritable. En choisissant la solitude, on évite la souffrance, mais on renonce aussi à une partie de ce qui rend la vie humaine si riche. En psychologie moderne, ce dilemme est souvent relié au concept d'attachement et à la peur de la vulnérabilité. Certaines personnes préfèrent être seules par peur d'être rejetées ou blessées. Pour Schopenhauer, cette tendance humaine était inévitable et révélait notre condition d'individu profondément marqué par l'isolement. Même dans un monde social, le dilemme du hérisson nous rappelle que la vraie intimité est rare et difficile à maintenir. Ainsi, ce dilemme ne nous pousse pas nécessairement à la solitude par choix, mais par protection. En fin de compte, le dilemme du hérisson de Schopenhauer nous enseigne que la solitude n'est pas simplement un choix personnel, mais un compromis entre le désir de connexion et la peur de la douleur. Cela éclaire pourquoi, pour beaucoup, la solitude reste une option plus simple et moins risquée que la proximité. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Rejoignez-moi sur Patreon pour accéder à mon contenu exclusif : https://www.patreon.com/leprecepteurpodcastMes épisodes retour sont des épisodes spéciaux dans lesquels je reviens, à chaud, sur le dernier épisode publié sur ma chaîne. Ils sont réservés à mes abonnés Patreon. Aujourd'hui et pour une durée d'une semaine, je vous donne accès à mon dernier épisode retour sur Schopenhauer.Ma page Patreon : https://www.patreon.com/leprecepteurpodcast

Rejoignez-moi sur Patreon pour accéder à mon contenu exclusif : https://www.patreon.com/leprecepteurpodcastQuatre ans après mon premier épisode sur "L'Art d'avoir toujours raison" de Schopenhauer, je reviens sur ce livre pour analyser cinq nouveaux stratagèmes rhétoriques. L'occasion de reparler de l'art de la joute oratoire, et de montrer en quoi vérité et persuasion ne sont pas toujours synonymes. - Introduction - 00:00 - Stratagème 1 : "L'extension" - 04:48 - Stratagème 30 : "L'argument d'autorité" - 10:27 - Stratagème 16 : "Pointer une contradiction" - 16:36 - Stratagème 29 : "Faire diversion" - 22:27 - Stratagème 38 : "Soyez personnel, insultant, malpoli" - 26:26 - Conclusion - 32:36 POUR REGARDER CET ÉPISODE EN VIDÉO, C'EST ICI

Rejoignez-moi sur Patreon pour accéder à mon contenu exclusif : https://www.patreon.com/leprecepteurpodcastExtrait de l'épisode SCHOPENHAUER - L'art d'avoir toujours raison (Analyse de cinq nouveaux stratagèmes)Cet épisode sera publié sur YouTube et en podcast vendredi prochain le 11 octobre Il est d'ores et déjà disponible en intégralité sur ma page Patreon : https://www.patreon.com/posts/avant-premiere-113151983

This is Episode 2 of Theories of Everything's "Rethinking the Foundations of the Academy: How to improve scientific inquiry?" series featuring Raphaël Liogier. Raphaël Liogier of the Institute for Advanced Studies is a distinguished sociologist and philosopher, specializing in the study of beliefs, secularization, and the relationship between spirituality and modernity. SPONSOR: As a listener of TOE, you can now enjoy full digital access to The Economist. Get a 20% off discount by visiting: https://www.economist.com/toe LINKS: - Raphaël Liogier's Book Khaos - https://amzn.to/4bWc7pQ - Raphaël Liogier's Website - https://www.raphaelliogier.com - Rethinking the Foundations (YouTube Playlist) - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZ7ikzmc6zlOYgTu7P4nfjYkv3mkikyBa - First episode with Raphaël: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6PTsA8T1m8 - Curt on Julian Dorey's podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1mKNGo9JLQ - Gregory Chaitin on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMPnrNL3zsE - Iain McGilchrist on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-SgOwc6Pe4 - The Master and His Emissary (book): https://amzn.to/3TkDofc - The Matter With Things (book): https://amzn.to/3z9JxDY - John Vervaeke on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVj1KYGyesI Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e Become a YouTube Member Here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWIQh9DGG6uhJk8eyIFl1w/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal (early access to ad-free audio episodes!) Join TOEmail at https://www.curtjaimungal.org Timestamps: 00:00 - Intro 00:24 - Raphael's Background 06:10 - Meditation 15:35 - Materialism 28:57 - Future of Humanity 36:30 - Beauty and Love 43:39 - Transcendence 46:58 - Main Challenge of Our Time 50:18 - Transcendence (continued) 53:33 - Modernity 01:03:58 - Schopenhauer and the Jesuits 01:11:51 - Mystics and Alchemy 01:21:34 - Reaching ‘God' 01:26:18 - Zeno's Paradox 01:35:03 - Outro / Support TOE Support TOE: - Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal (early access to ad-free audio episodes!) - Crypto: https://tinyurl.com/cryptoTOE - PayPal: https://tinyurl.com/paypalTOE - TOE Merch: https://tinyurl.com/TOEmerch Follow TOE: - NEW Get my 'Top 10 TOEs' PDF + Weekly Personal Updates: https://www.curtjaimungal.org - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theoriesofeverythingpod - TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@theoriesofeverything_ - Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt - Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs - iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/better-left-unsaid-with-curt-jaimungal/id1521758802 - Pandora: https://pdora.co/33b9lfP - Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e - Subreddit r/TheoriesOfEverything: https://reddit.com/r/theoriesofeverything Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWIQh9DGG6uhJk8eyIFl1w/join #science #philosophy #consciousness Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

“The whole of human existence is like some sweet parable told in the most improbable place and circumstances. … God values our humanity. … One of the things that's fascinating about the Hebrew Bible is that it declared and was loyal to the fact that God is good and creation is good.”Novelist and essayist Marilynne Robinson joins Miroslav Volf to discuss her latest book, Reading Genesis. Together they discuss why she took up this project of biblical commentary and what scripture and theological reflection means to her; how she thinks of Genesis as a theodicy (or a defense against the problem of evil and suffering); the grace of God; the question of humanity's goodness; how to understand the flood; the relationship between divine providence and working for moral progress; and much more.About Marilynne RobinsonMarilynne Robinson is an award-winning American novelist and essayist. Her fictional and non-fictional work includes recurring themes of Christian spirituality and American political life. In a 2008 interview with the Paris Review, Robinson said, "Religion is a framing mechanism. It is a language of orientation that presents itself as a series of questions. It talks about the arc of life and the quality of experience in ways that I've found fruitful to think about."Her novels include: Housekeeping (1980, Hemingway Foundation/Pen Award, Pulitzer Prize finalist), Gilead (2004, Pulitzer Prize), Home (2008, National Book Award Finalist), Lila (2014, National Book Award Finalist), and most recently, Jack (2020). Robinson's non-fiction works include Mother Country: Britain, the Welfare State, and Nuclear Pollution (1989), The Death of Adam: Essays on Modern Thought (1998), Absence of Mind: The Dispelling of Inwardness from the Modern Myth of the Self (2010), When I was a Child I Read Books: Essays (2012), The Givenness of Things: Essays (2015), and What Are We Doing Here?: Essays (2018). Her latest book is Reading Genesis (2024).Marilynne Robinson received a B.A., magna cum laude, from Brown University in 1966 and a Ph.D. in English from the University of Washington in 1977. She has served as a writer-in-residence or visiting professor at a variety universities, included Yale Divinity School in Spring 2020. She currently teaches at the Iowa Writers' Workshop at the University of Iowa. She has served as a deacon for the Congregational United Church of Christ. Robinson was born and raised in Sandpoint, Idaho and now lives in Iowa City.Show NotesGet your copy of Reading Genesis by Marilynne RobinsonMarilynne Robinson's New York Times article, “What Literature Owes the Bible” (2011)Reading Genesis as the singular ancient literature that it isThe Bible (and Genesis) as theodicyHow Calvin and Luther influenced Robinson's approach to GenesisThe benefit of reading Genesis as a wholeThe story of JosephThe fractal nature of the bibleUnsparing, honest descriptions of the characters“I think that the fact that they are recognizably flawed creatures is, what that reflects is the grace of God. He is enthralled by these people that must have been a fairly continuous disappointment, you know? We have to understand humankind better, I think, in order to understand what overplus there is in a human being that God loves them despite their being so human.”“An amazing little theater of domestic dysfunction.”Abraham and Isaac: “Poor Isaac … or he could just be a plain old disappointing child.”“The Bible is a theodicy.”God's goodness, and a defense of GodGod's value of humanity and the conservation of the human self“God stands by creation.”Humanism in Genesis“Humanity sinks so deep into evil. that they become near incarnations of evil.”Genesis 6: “Every inclination of the thoughts of their hearts was Only evil and continually.”Total depravity and the bleak view of humanityNoah and the Flood“… there's a kind of a strange lawlessness of Genesis.”“When God remakes the world after Noah, after the flood, he does not change human beings. He gives them exactly the same blessings and instructions that he did originally, which is simply another statement of his very deeply tested loyalty to us as we are.”“Finding a humane way to deal with the inhumanity of human beings.”Genesis 8: “Because human beings are evil, I will never destroy them.”Grace as a condition of possibility for all lifeThe similarities between Hebrew Bible as a philosophic text, drawing influences from cultures around them“what is a greater question of theodicy than the fact that populations are wiped off the face of the earth every so often—it must have been so common in the ancient world with plagues and wars and all the rest of it.”“Every human, every thought, all the time: evil.”“Genesis is a preparation for Exodus because the solution to human wickedness, which nevertheless does not violate human nature, is law.”What is the moral purpose of humanity?The roaring cosmos and modern atheisms: Schopenhauer and Nietzsche on moral purpose is gone, humanity is just a little boat amidst a storm“The whole of human existence is like some sweet parable told in the most improbable place and circumstances.”Charles Taylor's Cosmic Connections: Poetry in the Age of DisenchantmentProvidence and moral progress“We're still terribly violent. Terribly violent people.” “And terribly blind to our violence.”Revelation and God's control of an otherwise nasty worldThe possibility of human encounterProduction NotesThis podcast featured Marilynne Robinson and Miroslav VolfEdited and Produced by Evan RosaHosted by Evan RosaProduction Assistance by Emily BrookfieldA Production of the Yale Center for Faith & Culture at Yale Divinity School https://faith.yale.edu/aboutSupport For the Life of the World podcast by giving to the Yale Center for Faith & Culture: https://faith.yale.edu/give

Schopenhauer wrote, “Fate shuffles the cards, and we play.” Every day, every decision we make sparks a chain reaction of others, leading us down a particular path. And with every choice, a universe of other un-choices spins away behind us, forgotten. We all like to think we're the master of our own destiny, but sometimes…we fall to the whims of chance instead. This is one of those stories—of two boys whose monster egos sent them down a path of destruction, and two innocent victims whose only crime was being there.Sources:Judgment Ridge by Lehr and ZuckoffFollow us, campers!Patreon (join to get all episodes ad-free, at least a day early, an extra episode a month, and a free sticker!): https://patreon.com/TrueCrimeCampfirehttps://www.truecrimecampfirepod.com/Facebook: True Crime CampfireInstagram: https://gramha.net/profile/truecrimecampfire/19093397079Twitter: @TCCampfire https://twitter.com/TCCampfireEmail: truecrimecampfirepod@gmail.comMERCH! https://true-crime-campfire.myspreadshop.com

Sam Harris speaks with John Gray about the possibility of moral and political progress. They discuss historical and current threats to freedom of thought, the limits of law, the spread of dangerous technology, failures of convergence on norms and values, Arthur Koestler, de-industrialization in Europe, fellow travelers and the progressive embrace of barbarism, Bertrand Russell, the absurdity of pacifism, utilitarianism, the moral landscape, George Santayana, moral and scientific realism, pragmatism, atheism, Schopenhauer, liberalism as an historical accident, and other topics. If the Making Sense podcast logo in your player is BLACK, you can SUBSCRIBE to gain access to all full-length episodes at samharris.org/subscribe. Learning how to train your mind is the single greatest investment you can make in life. That's why Sam Harris created the Waking Up app. From rational mindfulness practice to lessons on some of life's most important topics, join Sam as he demystifies the practice of meditation and explores the theory behind it.