Podcasts about schopenhauer

On this episode of Philosophy vs. Improv, we talk transcendental idealism and Schopenhauer with Cole, who teaches philosophy at the College of Southern Nevada. Also, the least effective confidential informant! Mark philosophizes at partiallyexaminedlife.com. Bill improvises (and teaches) at chicagoimprovstudio.com. Hear more at philosophyimprov.com. Support the podcast to get all our post-game discussions, video versions of recent episodes, and other bonus stuff.

We talk transcendental idealism and Schopenhauer with Cole, who teaches philosophy at the College of Southern Nevada. Also, the least effective confidential informant! Mark philosophizes at partiallyexaminedlife.com. Bill improvises (and teaches) at chicagoimprovstudio.com. Hear more at philosophyimprov.com. Support the podcast to get all our post-game discussions, video versions of recent episodes, and other bonus stuff.

Any suggestions for dealing with overthinking and performance anxiety?In 5120 you mention men talking women out of their neuroses. Do you have any advice for how I can be more effective at this?Hi Stef, My prisoner pen pal in CA, who is 33 years old, got released from prison four months ago having served his seven year sentence for burglary (baloney theft) and abruptly went off the radar. He doesn't know anybody except me and his sister. I'm pretty sure he has a touch of autism, he's not socially outgoing. He is still alive; I found his arrest warrant for vandalism last week. Also, he decided he was a girl and went on transgender hormones last year and I believe he is shooting meth daily now too. I miss him. I have no idea / can't imagine what is going on in his head. What do you think is going on with him? Where is he going with this?Hey Stef, when's the Nietzsche and Schopenhauer philosophy episodes coming? I hope you don't have some sort of prejudice towards old German guys with moustaches, I hope it's because your preparing to deliver the richest and deepest insight into the philosophy of these two guys ever and that is the reason your taking so long to get around to them. If so I understand Stef, take your time. Make sure to include Nietzche's idea of ‘eternal recurrence'. Imagine being born in the same life in the exact same circumstances over and over again forever!In general how much do you think a woman cares about the prestige/social value of a man's job versus his earnings? For example a plumber making a few hundred k a year versus a more white collar job making far less but with a more “impressive” title.Although I do feel the blue collar man is due for a big comeback in the years ahead.Hi Stef, I'm current listening to the UPB audiobook and I have a question.If two universally preferable behaviors contradict one another, which one do we default to? Take this example discussed at the 2:25:40 time stamp. https://odysee.com/@freedomain:b/universally-preferable-behaviour-a-2:a?src=embed1. Everyone would rather steal an apple than starve to death.2. Thus everyone universally prefers stealing apples to death by starvation.3. Thus it is universally preferable to steal apples rather than starve to death.4. Thus survival is universally preferable to property rights.5. Thus what is good for the individual is the ultimate moral standard.Here the contradiction is between survival and property rights. You've used biological mutations not disproving biological classifications as a rebuttal, but usually biological mutations don't contradict the essence of a biological classification.You have also said, that a survival based morality doesn't offer answers to questions such as "If it is morally permissible to steal food when you are starving, how much food can you steal? How hungry do you have to be? Are you allowed to steal meals rather than look for work or appeal to charity?"However, if according to UPB self defense is justified, surely there are also similar questions such as " How do you know whether or not a threat is eliminated? Can you preemptively defend yourself or is self defense only reactive?" So surely the complexity or potential for abuse exists in both cases.You have also said, survival based behaviors use "mere biological drives as justifications for behaviour... It is an explanation of a behavior rather than a proposed moral theory."UPB however, is also driven by the biological drive to live and it is also an explanation of behaviors so I don't understand how on a technical level the desire to survive as a UPB, is less valid than other UPBs.If the desire to survive isn't a UPB, can you talk more about why? If it is a UPB, how do we organise it into a hierarchy with all the other UPBs?Thank you in advanceDo you follow much politics and just not talk about it on the show or have you cut out most of it from your life?Just a "humble" request: never speak about or answer questions about (boomer

From all accounts, Nietzsche did not read nor comment upon the work of Ibn Khaldun, outside of a few remarks from Schopenhauer in one of his essays that Nietzsche might have read. But what we find in his Muqaddimah is a theory of cyclical history, in which many of the key principles of Nietzsche's political philosophy would find agreement. Ibn Khaldun was a historian from North Africa whose work sought to explain why it was that the same pattern seemed to repeat ad infinitum. The Bedouin desert tribes would overwhelm one of the settled cities of the Mediterranean, from time to time, then establish a new city there. For a time, the culture of the new city would be like that of the Bedouins in the desert. But, eventually, a sedentary culture set in, over the course of several generations, and the inhabitants grew complacent, became incompetent, and eventually found themselves overthrown by another desert tribe, and the process would then repeat. In his studies, Khaldun arrives at the concept of asabiya, or the capacity for collective power, which can be very useful for a Nietzschean perspective on social power structures. This concept of asabiya means, literally, 'group feeling', and describes the extent to which the individuals feel themselves to part of a unified, coherent group, and are thus able to act as instruments of the group, and coordinate their actions as a team. Asabiya increases in harsh conditions, and declines in conditions of luxury, and thus the cycle of empires is set into motion - "This is how God proceeds with His creatures." Just as Nietzsche suggests the idea of all things returning eternally, Khaldun's writing brings this idea into the historical and political sphere. But Ibn Khaldun is significant because he presents this not only as a poetical idea, but as a pattern based on observable facts. There are many, many observations and anecdotes in the Muqaddimah, and we will not be able to cover it all, so we shall focus on the points most relevant to the ideas covered this season. This will be our first journey into a work outside the Western Canon, into one of the most important thinkers of the Near East. Join me in exploring the dynamics of history, as we jump into the basic ideas of the Muqaddimah. 

"It is difficult to find happiness within oneself," said the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860), "but it is impossible to find it anywhere else." In spite of his pessimism - or perhaps because of it - Schopenhauer, who was virtually unknown until the last few years of his life, went on to influence generations of writers, artists, philosophers, and composers. In this episode, Jacke looks at the life, legacy, and worldview of this darkest of men, including some thoughts on what it feels like to read Schopenhauer today. Additional reading: 463 Friedrich Nietzsche (with Ritchie Robertson) 155 Plato 465 Greek Lit and Game Theory (with Josiah Ober) 164 Karl Marx Help support the show at patreon.com/literature or historyofliterature.com/donate. The History of Literature Podcast is a member of Lit Hub Radio and the Podglomerate Network. Learn more at www.thepodglomerate.com/historyofliterature. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

durée : 00:58:29 - Avec philosophie - par : Aïda N'Diaye - Comment Thomas Mann parvient-il, à partir des philosophies de Nietzsche et de Schopenhauer, à proposer une réflexion philosophique sur l'idéal, sur le temps et sur la maladie, tout en nous livrant une réflexion politique symbolique sur l'état de la civilisation allemande au début du XXème siècle ? - invités : Yannis Constantinidès professeur de philosophie (Humanités modernes) à l'Ecole Boulle et d'éthique appliquée à l'Espace éthique Île-de-France; Philippe Zard professeur de littérature comparée à l'Université Paris Nanterre

SK welcomes Robert Pearce, an ex-New Ager turned follower of Jesus. In this special bonus episode, we will unpack topics ranging from greek mythology, Christianity and the early church, and Robert's journey from unbelief to sonship.Plato on Socrates: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato/Schopenhauer: https://iep.utm.edu/schopenh/"The Replacement gODS" (Documentary): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxHM7FeN1k8For apologetics and more: https://4campus.org/questionsScriptures: John 8:34, 8:36, Romans 5:15-21, Genesis 50:20

Frédéric Lenoir est sociologue, écrivain et journaliste très connu du grand public, c'est également l'auteur de nombreux ouvrages dont dernièrement "Le désir: une philosophie" aux éditions Flammarion. Je sais que nous sommes à 1 semaine pile poil de la Saint Valentin, vous savez cette fête commerciale de l'amour que tout le monde déteste mais que personne n'a le droit d'oublier s'il est en couple? Nous sommes des êtres de désirs mais comment désirer ce que l'on a déjà? C'est un peu la problématique que l'on rencontre toutes et tous quelque soit le sujet de notre désir d'ailleurs. C'est un sujet qui est au coeur de nos conversations du quotidien et avec Frédéric on va parler de la différence entre le désir, le besoin, l'envie. On va aborder les différents courant philosophiques, on va discuter de la manière dont les grandes religions ont abordés la question du désir. Comment bien orienter ses désirs? C'est quoi le désir précisément? Frédéric réponds aux questions suivantes : Quelle est l'étymologie du mot "désir"? Qu''est ce qui nous fait bouger? Quelle vision avez vous de la société de la consommation? Que pensez vous de la phrase de Schopenhauer, "toute sa vie on oscille comme un pendule entre la souffrance et l'ennui"? Pourriez vous distinguer le désir, le besoin et l'envie? Pourquoi ne pas croire dans le mythe de l'âme soeur? Qu'est ce que la passion amoureuse? Qu'est ce que l'amour véritable? Comment y accéder? Qu'est ce que l'amour platonique? Quel est l'impact du porno sur le désir sexuel? Quelle est la place du désir dans les différentes grandes religions monothéistes? Quel est le lien entre Jesus Christ et Spinoza? Le désir est-il relatif à celui de mes voisins? Est-ce que ce sont des désirs mimétiques? Comment faire pour se reconnecter avec ses désirs propres? Comment utiliser ses désirs pour développer sa puissance intérieure? Comment faire pour désirer ce que l'on déjà en particulier dans le couple? Suggestion d'autres épisodes à écouter : [Rediff] Comment réussir vos relations amoureuses en 2020? avec Esther Perel (https://audmns.com/wiTTUzn) Vlan #129 Couple, sexe et confinement avec Alain Héril (https://audmns.com/WtjavWo) Vlan #97 La galanterie: comprendre le mythe et les débats avec Alain Viala (https://audmns.com/HCyVfRO)

The ladies get drunk on Zoom with Michel Houellebecq and discuss his new article on euthanasia and assisted suicide for Harper's Magazine.   Special thanks to Giulia Melucci, John R. MacArthur, Lysis Li, Eli Keszler and Mathieu Malouf for making it happen!

(NOTAS Y ENLACES DEL CAPÍTULO AQUÍ: https://www.jaimerodriguezdesantiago.com/kaizen/153-persuasion-iv-vendiendo-burras-y-derribando-barreras/)Estas pasadas navidades, encontré una noticia de marzo de 2002 que contaba cómo, en un alarde de modernidad, la Real Academia Española de la lengua había decidido “hacerse eco del lenguaje de la calle” -así lo decía literalmente la noticia- e iba a incluir en el diccionario expresiones coloquiales como “pasárselo cañón”, “meter la gamba” o “fauna nocturna”. A ver, ha pasado mucho tiempo desde entonces -yo no había ni empezado la universidad cuando aquella noticia- pero diría que eso de “pasárselo cañón” ya sonaba bastante casposo en aquellos años. También es cierto que aún no se habían decidido a incluir la palabra «internet» en el diccionario… así que no le pidamos peras al olmo.Ahora bien, si llegué a esa noticia fue porque me dio por buscar el origen de una expresión que creo que sigue usándose hoy, aunque también puede que ahora sea yo el que se ha quedado desfasado. Y es que en esa noticia se contaba que la RAE había decidido incluir también la expresión: “vender la burra”, que es de lo que vamos a hablar hoy.Para los oyentes de países donde tal vez no se use esta frase o, quizás para aquellos que sean jóvenes y modernos, “vender la burra” significa simplemente “engañar a alguien haciéndole creer algo que es falso”. En España también se suele decir “vender la moto” y es que, en un tirabuzón del lenguaje, “burra” también puede significar “moto”. En fin, que todo este rollo es para decirte que he investigado a fondo el tema pero he sido incapaz de encontrar el auténtico origen de la expresión. No sé por qué usamos la moto o la burra como símbolo del engaño, me imagino que viene de alguien que vendió una en no muy buenas condiciones. Pero lo importante no es saber dónde tiene su origen, sino por qué y cómo nos venden la burra. O cómo hacerlo nosotros, porque lo que para uno es una burra, para otro es una idea brillante. Y de eso es de lo que vamos a hablar hoy. 

This episode concerns the least celebrated aspect of one of the most celebrated philosophers of the European Enlightenment: Kant's politics. Immanuel Kant is responsible for launching the thread of philosophic inquiry known as German Idealism. At the time, perhaps Kant was merely trying to address the skepticism of those such as Hume. Nevertheless, his philosophical attempt to delimit the bounds of reason - to reveal to humanity what we can, in fact, know by use of our reason - launched a revolution in philosophy. It continues through Hegel, Fichte, Schopenhauer, and, yes, Nietzsche. We have avoided a comprehensive episode on Kant's philosophy because that would require not an episode, but a podcast, and have limited our inclusion of Kant to a few important aspects insofar as they've related to past topics. While Kant's politics are generally considered among his lesser contributions to the philosophical world, I will advance the case here that we see his ideas reflected in the political ideologies of the modern world: his political optimism, his belief in reason as a governing principle, and his belief in perpetual peace. While Rousseau may have been about as far apart from Nietzsche as possible while sharing his romantic orientation towards history, Kant and Nietzsche are diametrically opposed in terms of their starting principles. Kant is arguably a match for Rousseau in terms of Nietzschean antipodes, but as to which is more opposed to Nietzsche than the other, I'll leave that to the audience to decide.

Você já parou para pensar se você possui uma vida feliz? Do que se trata isso, afinal? Podemos dizer, como afirmava Schopenhauer, que a vida gira em torno de um eterno sofrer pela necessidade de satisfazer-se? Ou será que basta que os tais anseios sejam sempre supridos para se alcançar a felicidade? O que é necessário, de fato? Embora a resposta possa ser subjetiva subjetiva, nosso convidado de hoje trouxe uma abordagem do tema com base na divisão da vida em 5 áreas. E, de acordo com Agostinho, a vida feliz é construída com base na sabedoria - a qual, por sua vez, encontra-se na medida; na proporção. Diante disso, por meio da análise das 5 áreas somada às suas experiências lidando, desde muito jovem, com problemas sociais e individuais e a partir de um profundo conhecimento literário e filosófico, Samer Agi mostrou soluções voltadas para a manutenção e para a conquista de uma vida que podemos ter por feliz. Por isso, para saber quais são estas áreas e aprender a construir o caminho que pode te conduzir de maneira prática até lá, não perca o episódio nº 112 do podcast Os Sócios. Hosts: Bruno Perini @bruno_perini e Malu Perini @maluperini Convidado: @sameragi

Benedetta Santini"Platone, c'ho l'ansia"8 filosofi per trovare il tuo posto nel mondoMondadorihttps://mondadori.itQuesto libro è per chi si sente fuori posto o, come si dice in greco, atopos. Pare che uno dei primi a essere definito così sia stato Socrate, giudicato troppo strano, a volte anche fastidioso. Dopo di lui, tutti i filosofi vennero considerati atopoi. Le loro vite erano tormentate dalla ricerca di qualcosa che continuava a sfuggire e osservavano il mondo dall'esterno, senza farne mai davvero parte.Chi si sente fuori posto prova ogni giorno il doloroso desiderio di trovare un luogo da chiamare casa e vive la vita col fiato sospeso, sperando di riuscire un giorno a respirare. Viaggia per trovare il suo posto nel mondo, ma la strada sembra non avere mai fine e, nei momenti bui, si chiede se davvero esista un luogo in cui potrà essere se stesso. Si sente diverso dagli altri ma, nel contempo, teme di non avere niente di speciale. A volte il peso che gli opprime il petto può essere tanto forte da fargli credere che valga la pena di rinunciare a una parte di sé pur di sentirsi a proprio agio con gli altri, a volte invece fa di tutto per rimanere fedele a se stesso e si arrabbia con un mondo che sembra essere piatto, banale e crudele. È una guerra difficile da vincere, se si combatte da soli.In Platone c'ho l'ansia Benedetta Santini ci svela con chiarezza e semplicità i pensieri complessi e le vite complicate di otto grandi filosofi, in un percorso di crescita psicologica che aiuta il lettore a trovare esempi e strumenti per superare le difficoltà che a volte ingabbiano le nostre vite: sapersi perdonare, trovare la felicità, superare l'ansia del giudizio altrui, imparare a fare una sceltaDa Platone a Nietzsche, da Socrate a Schopenhauer, otto storie di atopoi che dovettero lottare contro uomini potenti, contro delusioni, abbandoni e anche contro se stessi. Il loro modo di pensare atipico, causa della emarginazione, fu proprio la loro salvezza. Sono filosofi, ma soprattutto persone che hanno trovato un posto nel mondo e, oggi, possono aiutarci a trovare il nostro.Benedetta Santini è un'insegnante e una psicologa. Stanca di sentirsi ripetere frasi come “la filosofia è inutile” e “Hegel è troppo difficile”, nel 2020 ha fondato il profilo social “Filosofia e Caffeina” con lo scopo di fare divulgazione filosofica. È stata speaker per TEDx e per il festival “Parole ostili” e ha totalizzato 1.5 milioni di like su TikTok. Ha collaborato con Mondadori e Città della Scienza, ma la sua soddisfazione più grande resta sempre quella di aver spiegato Socrate ai bambini.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEAscoltare fa Pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it

Alexander Nehamas is a professor of philosophy and comparative literature at Princeton University. In this episode, we discuss some of the main themes of his book Only a Promise of Happiness. 

Leo TolstoyNo Nobel Prize for himLacks sensitivitySacrifices all that is HumanThe want for Land will kill youGambling problemDenounce wealth & IncomeDark as PutinDark as Schopenhauer

Repasamos la actualidad de la semana con Hans-Günter Kellner, Sarah Morris, Ana Fuentes y Mathieu de Taillac. Nos preguntamos hasta qué punto el optimismo es necesario para encarar nuestras vidas y encontrar respuestas y, para ello, sumamos a la charla a Carlos Javier González-Serrano que, entre otras cosas, es Presidente de la Sociedad de Estudios en Español sobre Schopenhauer o miembro del Comité Directivo de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Estudios sobre Pesimismo, además de profesor de instituto de Filosofía y Psicología y orientador de Bachillerato.

La historia de la filosofía occidental en El Abrazo del Oso sigue su curso, podríamos decir que, inevitable. Llegamos al Siglo XIX para pasar del idealismo al materialismo; de Hegel y su dialéctica que marcará de forma total la filosofía hasta el Siglo XX, a Feuerbach y Marx que será quien abandere principalmente esta influencia en el pensamiento de Occidente y más allá durante mucho tiempo. Conoceremos la evolución de sus ideas pasando después por la praxis leninista y estalinista hasta llegar, en el final del episodio, a la destrucción total del pensamiento con las figuras de Schopenhauer y Nietzsche. Junto a Francisco J. García seguimos por tanto acercándonos al pensamiento occidental en nuestra serie sobre historia de la Filosofía. Si te gusta el Abrazo del Oso y quieres acceder a más contenidos extra, puedes ayudarnos pinchando en el botón 'apoyar' aquí en iVoox. O pásate por www.patreon.com/elabrazodeloso ¡GRACIAS! www.elabrazodeloso.es Programa realizado por videoconferencia y publicado originalmente el 20 de noviembre de 2022. www.latostadora.com/elabrazodeloso Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

Il monologo di Maurizio Crozza su La Russa, Fontana e non solo in occasione di una puntata di Fratelli di Crozza. Guarda Fratelli di Crozza senza pubblicità qui: https://bit.ly/3gS5JXwSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This lecture discusses the 19th century German Idealist philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer's work, On The Basis of Morality, and focuses on his views on the positive or negative moral value of lying. Usually lyric is wrong, because it deprives someone of the truth and leads them to act upon false information. Schopenhauer argues, however, that in some cases, we are entirely justified in lying to another person To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO You can find over 2000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Schopenhauer's On The Basis of Morality - amzn.to/3P6c9Qk

This lecture discusses the 19th century German Idealist philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer's work, On The Basis of Morality, and focuses on his views on justice and injustice in terms of quantity and quality. All justice or injustice is more or less equal in terms of quality, but can very considerably in terms of quantity. One of the main factors we have to consider, according to Schopenhauer is the amount of harm or benefit involved To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO You can find over 2000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Schopenhauer's On The Basis of Morality - amzn.to/3P6c9Qk

This lecture discusses the 19th century German Idealist philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer's work, On The Basis of Morality, and focuses on his views on what fulfilling one's moral duty (Pflicht) involves. Schopenhauer also criticizes the notion of imperfect duties, restricting the concept of duty to actions whose omission constitutes a wrong. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO You can find over 2000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Schopenhauer's On The Basis of Morality - amzn.to/3P6c9Qk

This lecture discusses the 19th century German Idealist philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer's work, On The Basis of Morality, and focuses on his views on justice, in particular about wrongs or instances of injustice, which are a matter of harming another and can be understood positively, and rights of persons, which Schopenhauer asserts are understood negatively, in relation to wrongs. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO You can find over 2000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Schopenhauer's On The Basis of Morality - https://amzn.to/3P6c9Qk

De tout temps, les philosophes ont essayé de penser l'Homme dans sa globalité. Certains d'entre eux ont, cependant, manifesté un cruel sarcasme à l'égard des femmes. Ouvertement misogyne, Arthur Schopenhauer fait tristement partie de cette catégorie de penseurs pour qui l'humanité est foncièrement impaire.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

An analysis of Schopenhauer's essay, "The Wisdom of Life". Outro provided by Brock Tanya. Read essay here: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/10741/10741-h/10741-h.htm

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Minimalist extended very repugnant conclusions are the least repugnant, published by Teo Ajantaival on October 24, 2022 on The Effective Altruism Forum. This is part four of a series on minimalist axiologies (i.e. axiologies that essentially say “the less this, the better”). Every part of this series builds on the previous parts, but can also be read independently. Summary Population axiology matters greatly for our priorities. Recently, it has been claimed that all plausible axiological views imply certain “very repugnant conclusions” (defined below). In this response, I argue that minimalist views avoid these “very repugnant conclusions”, and that they face less repugnant conclusions than do contrasting offsetting views. 1. Are repugnant implications inevitable? In population axiology, certain offsetting views, according to which independent bads can be offset by a sufficient amount of independent goods, face the Very Repugnant Conclusion (VRC): A population of arbitrarily many lives with arbitrarily high welfare is worse than a population of arbitrarily many arbitrarily negative lives plus sufficiently many ε-lives that each have an arbitrarily small quantity of positive welfare (Figure 1). Offsetting views also allow the ε-lives in the VRC to be rollercoaster lives that all contain unbearable suffering (purportedly counterbalanced by a sufficient amount of bliss). In particular, symmetric classical utilitarianism implies interchangeability between a non-suffering ε-life and the rollercoaster life illustrated in Figure 2 (provided that the “overall welfare” of the rollercoaster life equals ε). Additionally, one may replace each non-suffering ε-life in the original VRC with an intrapersonal VRC life (Figure 3). Recently, Budolfson and Spears (2018) have argued that all plausible views in population ethics imply similarly repugnant conclusions, namely that they imply either the VRC or a closely analogous Extended VRC (XVRC), which I illustrate shortly at the beginning of Section 2. The purpose of this essay is to argue that this claim does not apply to minimalist views. In a nutshell: minimalist views avoid the VRC, can avoid repugnant XVRCs, and, at any rate, face XVRCs that are less repugnant than are the comparable conclusions faced by offsetting views. Three claims Budolfson and Spears (2018, pp. 31–32) make the following three claims: Claim 1: No leading welfarist axiology can avoid the VRC. Claim 2: No other welfarist axiology in the literature can avoid the XVRC. Claim 3: The XVRC is just as repugnant as the VRC. The authors conclude that: Repugnant implications are an inevitable feature of any plausible axiology. If repugnance cannot be avoided, then it should not be. We believe this should be among the guiding insights for the next generation of work in value theory. Claim 1 does not apply to minimalist axiologies The scope of Claim 1 (“No leading welfarist axiology can avoid the VRC”) is limited to ‘leading' welfarist axiologies, that is to views that, according to the authors, are commonly-held in the axiological literature (p. 8). These do not cover minimalist axiologies, although axiologies that are essentially minimalist have been defended, for instance, by Schopenhauer (1818/1819, 1851), Wolf (1996, 1997, 2004), Fehige (1998), Breyer (2015), and Knutsson (2021b, “axiological claim”). To the extent that the VRC seems repugnant, it is worth noting that all minimalist axiologies do avoid the VRC, and can do so neatly without relying on arbitrary or ad hoc assumptions. Claim 2 requires that we extend the XVRC Claim 2 (“No other welfarist axiology in the literature can avoid the XVRC”) is not straightforward to evaluate, because the original XVRC, as the authors define it, applies strictly only to views that make the assumption of independently aggregable ...

This lecture discusses the 19th century German Idealist philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer's work, On The Basis of Morality, and focuses on the reasons he presents for people being skeptical about the existence of genuine morality. Schopenhauer does not think that these are ultimately correct or convincing, but he does view them as needed to be taken seriously. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO You can find over 2000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Schopenhauer's On The Basis of Morality - https://amzn.to/3P6c9Qk

Welcome folks once again as Danny and Nesso will you to take in another serving of German thought! This time Schopenhauer is on the menu along with a side order of Eastern thinking. Sit back and relax as we take you into hitherto unreached corners of your mind and leave our earthly plain only to return to order another beer at the bar.

"Die Vernunft und ihre Feinde: Irrtümer und Illusionen ideologischen Denkens", so heißt das neue Buch von Thilo Sarrazin. Über dieses Buch spricht Gerd Buurmann mit dem Autor und reist dabei durch die Philosophiegeschichte von David Hume über Immanuel Kant bin Karl Popper. Es stellt sich die Frage: Befindet sich unsere Gesellschaft wieder in einem dogmatischen Schlummer?

PRÉCOMMANDEZ MA BANDE DESSINÉE "PHILORAMA" SUR ULULE : https://fr.ulule.com/philorama

Greg and Bella are back with a brand-new term of teachers teaching their favourite lesson! To kick us off we have RE teacher Mr Bonfield with a lesson about sadness – why do we need it? To mark World Mental Health Day, Mr Bonfield looks to 3 great philosophers - Aristotle, Nietzsche and Schopenhauer - to see what they thought the point of sadness was. Wouldn't the world be a happier place without sadness? Or could understanding sadness be the secret to unlocking happiness? As the lesson unfolds, Greg and Bella find out what Pixar films, superheroes, and pop songs can teach us about sadness - and find out why a whale called Blue 52 might be the saddest animal on the planet. They'll explore why the colour blue is linked with sadness, discuss the things that make them cry and talk about the historical heroes who lead their best lives despite the challenges they faced. Greg also reflects on how the poem Guesthouse by the ancient poet Rumi changed how he thinks about sadness, and Bella talks about her own experiences with anxiety. Mr Bonfield ends the lesson by finding out what Greg and Bella's strategies are for beating the blues – from exercise to laughing with friends, being creative to having a hug. Bad students of all ages are welcome. Expect brilliant teachers, captivating subjects but absolutely no homework. Get in touch with the podcast - email us at teachme@bbc.co.uk

De weg terug: Schopenhauer voor een dolende wereld van Joris van Rossum geeft een commentaar op het werk van de Duitse filosoof Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) in dialoogvorm. Van Rossum (1970) studeerde biologie en promoveerde in de wijsbegeerte. Hij is, net als Cliteur, een levenslange bewonderaar van de filosofie van Schopenhauer. Van Rossum's diagnose van de wereld en de tijd waarin hij leeft zijn overigens net zo eigenzinnig als die van zijn grote voorbeeld. Zo schrijft hij: “De gehele publieke sfeer in de westerse wereld is in de ban geraakt van een geleidelijke stijging van de gemiddelde temperatuur op aarde. Doemscenario's over het einde der tijden domineren het nieuws en een paniekerig schoolmeisje uit Zweden zet de toon voor het debat”. De bioloog in hem zegt: “Ook biologische zekerheden worden in een mum van tijd overboord gegooid. Verschillen tussen man en vrouw en hun seksuele voorkeuren blijken plotseling ‘sociale constructen' te zijn, in het leven geroepen door de blanke man met als doel om zijn dominante positie in de samenleving in stand te houden”. Wie echter zou denken dat De weg terug een serie sweeping statements is over de obsessies van deze tijd komt bedrogen uit. Van Rossum's boek bevat een lange dialoog over de merites van de grote Duitse filosoof en dat tegen de achtergrond van de vraag: biedt Schopenhauer een uitweg? Het antwoord is: ja. Titel: De weg terug Subtitel: Schopenhauer voor een dolende wereld Auteur: Joris van Rossum Uitgever: Uitgeverij De Blauwe Tijger Verkrijgbaar: Joris van Rossum ~ De weg terug. Schopenhauer voor een dolende wereld - Uitgeverij De Blauwe Tijger ISBN: 9789493262133 Onze beoordeling: Aantal bladzijden: 188 Prijs: € 21,95 --- Deze video is geproduceerd door Café Weltschmerz. Café Weltschmerz gelooft in de kracht van het gesprek en zendt interviews uit over actuele maatschappelijke thema's. Wij bieden een hoogwaardig alternatief voor de mainstream media. Café Weltschmerz is onafhankelijk en niet verbonden aan politieke, religieuze of commerciële partijen. Waardeer je onze video's? Help ons in de strijd naar een eerlijker Nederland, vrij van censuur en Steun Café Weltschmerz en word Stamgast! https://cafeweltschmerz.nl/register/ Wil je onze nieuwsbrief ontvangen in je mailbox? https://cafeweltschmerz.nl/nieuwsbrief/ Wil je op de hoogte worden gebracht van onze nieuwe video's? Klik hierboven dan op Abonneren!

With special guest Longinus, P&C drink and review Warsteiner Dunkel, then discuss the philosophy of Nietzsche. He's famous for his declaration of the death of God -- which is not the smirky, triumphalist statement of a modern atheist, but a lament at the loss of traditional foundations of meaning, morality, and purpose. Once you've pulled out the foundations that come along with belief in God, what do you have left? Nietzsche is considered one of the early existentialists. He says that since our lives have no inherent meaning or any meaning imposed from outside, we need to create our own meaning. He tries to avoid the nihilism and pessimism of Schopenhauer by building his own ideas about how to find meaning in a meaningless world. He criticizes Christianity as slave morality and urges a more aggressive form of self-assertion. Nietzsche sees "will to power" as the essential element of who we are, and rather than suppress that, we should recognize and rejoice in it.

The Art of Controversy (or - The Art of Being Right) by Arthur Schopenhauer audiobook. The Art of Controversy (or The Art of Being Right) (Die Kunst, Recht zu Behalten) is a short treatise written in 1831 by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer in which he presents thirty-eight methods of gaining an unfair advantage in a debate and thereby being right even if you are wrong. Schopenhauer champions the virtue of dialectical argument, in his view wrongly neglected by philosophers in favour of logic, and goes on to discuss the distinction between our conscious intellectual powers and our will. The text is a favourite of debaters including the philosophers AC Grayling and Mary Warnock, and the Mayor of London Boris Johnson.

In this episode, we discuss the history of rationalism and irrationalism within philosophy. We also talk about the perils of being overly rational! 

Simonetta Tassinari"Contro filosofia dell'amicizia"Vivere, riconoscere e mantenere un legame specialeFeltrinelli Editorehttps://www.feltrinellieditore.it/Si dice che Talete, per osservare il cielo, fosse caduto in una buca perché aveva perso di vista la terra su cui posava i piedi. Lo facciamo un po' tutti quando, in fatto di amicizia, abbiamo in mente l'amico ideale – presente, comprensivo, premuroso, allegro – e lo rapportiamo ai nostri amici in carne e ossa, perdendo il polso della nostra (e loro) umanità.I primi a costruire questo “mito” furono i filosofi antichi, da Aristotele a Cicerone, da Seneca a Marco Aurelio, per i quali l'amicizia era però un sentimento elitario e virtuoso, superiore a ogni altro legame. Oggi, mentre l'amicizia assume nuove forme in nuovi contesti di vita, gli elevati modelli del passato, illusori e un po' anacronistici, alimentano i nostri desideri e ci inducono a incorporarli nelle persone che incontriamo, esponendoci non di rado a cocenti delusioni. Peggio: l'idealizzazione dell'amico confonde quali siano i valori non negoziabili che invece ci devono unire e sui quali non sono ammessi sconti.Gli amici “perfetti” non esistono, ma quelli “veri” sì: la certezza che i nostri amici, esattamente come noi, non sfuggano dall'accumulare difetti, più o meno nella stessa misura in cui accumulano pregi, non significa rinunciare a vivere autenticamente l'amicizia. Al contrario, proprio calandoci consapevolmente nel presente e supportati da ciò che ancora ha valore della saggezza antica, riusciremo a vivere l'amicizia profonda e ad apprezzarla come la più salda e duratura forma di essere uomini tra gli uomini, e a dare nel contempo il benservito, senza rimorsi né alibi, agli amici che sono solo sbiadite – e talvolta addirittura pericolose – imitazioni degli amici “veri”.Simonetta Tassinari è una prof di Storia e Filosofia nei licei. Ha insegnato “Laboratorio di didattica della filosofia” presso l'Università del Molise, è stata tutor universitario del TFA (Tirocinio Formativo Attivo), da anni coltiva la Psicologia relazionale, la Psicologia dell'età evolutiva, il counseling filosofico e la divulgazione filosofica per bambini e ragazzi. È l'animatrice di partecipati “Caffè filosofici” e tiene conferenze e presentazioni in tutta Italia. Ha pubblicato romanzi per Giunti, Meridiano zero e Corbaccio, testi di argomento storico e filosofico (tra gli altri, per Einaudi scuola) e il saggio “brillante” – sull'insegnamento della filosofia nelle scuole – La sorella di Schopenhauer era una escort (Corbaccio). Per Feltrinelli ha pubblicato nel 2019 Il filosofo che c'è in te, alla terza edizione e uscito in edizione speciale come supplemento al quotidiano “la Repubblica”; S.O.S. filosofia. Le risposte dei filosofi ai ragazzi per affrontare le emergenze della vita, rivolto agli adolescenti; Il filosofo influencer. Togliersi i paraocchi e pensare con la propria testa (2020); per Gribaudo Instant Filosofia (2020) e Le 40 parole della filosofia (2021)IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEAscoltare fa Pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

Una reflexión sobre algunas ideas sumamente cuestionables de los fragmentos de Arthur Schopenhauer, tomado del Parágrafo 366 “Sobre las mujeres” de Parerga y Paralipomena, Volumen II. Comentarios: Ernesto Priani Saisó. Producción: Ignacio Bazán Estrada. Voces: María Sandoval y Juan Stack. Controles técnicos: Miguel Ángel Ferrini. 

“Once you have reached an advanced age, as I have, as you look back over your life, it can seem to have a plot, as though composed by a novelist.”   What a beautiful take that Joseph Campbell shared from Schopenhauer in Campbell's book The Hero's Journey.   If you are anything like me (a human), we have all gone though phases in our lives where things seem to have an impossible ending.   I encourage you to be honest for a moment and reflect back on all of the ‘suck' that you have already had to overcome in your life.   Chances are, there are moments that you are able to pull back into. Consider those moments and reflect on how far you've come. While it might have seemed like there was no way out of whatever it was that you went through, you did.   And I will venture to guess that there's a list of reasons why you are a better person as a result.   In today's episode, Coach Ashlie Walton and Detective Walton break down why understanding the novelist approach can help you to trust that things WILL get better.   ⩥ PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL ⩤ https://bi3xbvVont.ly/   CLICK HERE for our best-selling products: https://amzn.to/3xaG3xw and https://rdbl.co/3DIQVUC   CLICK HERE to join our free Police, Fire, Military and Families Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/38w2e7r   Check out our website and learn more about how you can work with LEO Warriors by going to: https://www.leowarriors.com/   Like what you hear? We are honored. Drop a review and subscribe to our show.    The Tactical Living Podcast is owned by LEO Warriors, LLC. None of the content presented may be copied, repurposed or used without the owner's prior consent.   For PR, speaking requests and other networking opportunities, contact LEO Warriors:   EMAIL: ashliewalton555@gmail.com.   ADDRESS: P.O. Box 400115 Hesperia, Ca. 92340   ASHLIE'S FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/police.fire.lawenforcement   ➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤ This episode is NOT sponsored. Some product links are affiliate links which means if you buy something by clicking on one of our links, we'll receive a small commission.

This episode I'm joined by Roel Theeuwen to discuss the philosophy of Philipp Mainländer, alongside discussions on Schopenhauer, death, pessimism, and God. --- Become part of the Hermitix community: Hermitix Twitter - https://twitter.com/Hermitixpodcast Support Hermitix: Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/hermitix Donations: - https://www.paypal.me/hermitixpod Hermitix Merchandise - http://teespring.com/stores/hermitix-2 Bitcoin Donation Address: 3LAGEKBXEuE2pgc4oubExGTWtrKPuXDDLK Ethereum Donation Address: 0x31e2a4a31B8563B8d238eC086daE9B75a00D9E74

In the second episode of this Integral Stage reboot of Point/Counterpoint, Bonnitta Roy challenges Layman Pascal again to a debate, this time on the nature and existence of free will. Inspired by Rick Repetti's writings on free will, they take up the philosophical question of determinism vs. indeterminism, and consider what possibilities might exist beyond that impasse. Bonnitta and Layman fail pretty badly to have an actual ("side-taking") debate, but they do have a great discussion on free will in light of complexity science; Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and Reich; contemplative experience; integrative metaphysics; magickal practice, and more.

durée : 00:05:11 - La chronique langue de Laélia Véron - par : Laéila Véron - On passe en revue la rhétorique des polémiques de rentrée grâce à Schopenhauer. Caricaturer, détourner le sujet, clamer victoire malgré la défaite, découvrez tous les stratagèmes pour (avoir l'air) d'avoir toujours raison.

Bernardo Kastrup is the executive director of Essentia Foundation. His work has been leading the modern renaissance of metaphysical idealism, the notion that reality is essentially mental. He has a Ph.D. in Philosophy (ontology, philosophy of mind) and another Ph.D. in Computer Engineering (reconfigurable computing, artificial intelligence). As a scientist, Bernardo has worked for the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) and the Philips Research Laboratories (where the 'Casimir Effect' of Quantum Field Theory was discovered). Formulated in detail in many academic papers and books, his ideas have been featured on 'Scientific American,' the 'Institute of Art and Ideas,' the 'Blog of the American Philosophical Association' and 'Big Think,' among others. CONNECT: - Website: https://tevinnaidu.com - Instagram: https://instagram.com/drtevinnaidu - Facebook: https://facebook.com/drtevinnaidu - Twitter: https://twitter.com/drtevinnaidu - LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/drtevinnaidu TIMESTAMPS: (0:00) - Introduction (0:10) - Subjective (qualitative) vs objective (quantitative) experience (3:34) - The false mind-matter dichotomy (10:26) - Scientism & Religion (16:32) - Analytic Idealism (21:41) - Objective Idealism vs [Goff's] Panpsychism & other forms of Idealism (e.g. quasi-Berkleyan Idealism etc.) (29:39) - [Karl Popper's] Falsifiability theory (science vs pseudoscience) & its implications for Objective Idealism's explanatory power (41:07) - Idealism vs Illusionism [Seth, Frankish, Graziano, Dennett] (52:41) - Bernardo's Philosophical history of the Mind-Body Problem [Berkeley, Kant, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Jung] (1:00:29) - Decoding Carl Jung & Arther Schopenhauer's metaphysics (1:12:03) - Applying Idealism practically in a clinical setting (1:22:58) - Idealism's impact on ethics, morality, spirituality & life after death (1:35:30) - Best counter arguments to Idealism (1:44:00) - How can we take one step closer to the Mind-Body Solution (1:51:42) - Conclusion Website · YouTube

Bernardo Kastrup is the executive director of Essentia Foundation. His work has been leading the modern renaissance of metaphysical idealism, the notion that reality is essentially mental. He has a Ph.D. in Philosophy (ontology, philosophy of mind) and another Ph.D. in Computer Engineering (reconfigurable computing, artificial intelligence). As a scientist, Bernardo has worked for the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) and the Philips Research Laboratories (where the 'Casimir Effect' of Quantum Field Theory was discovered). Formulated in detail in many academic papers and books, his ideas have been featured on 'Scientific American,' the 'Institute of Art and Ideas,' the 'Blog of the American Philosophical Association' and 'Big Think,' among others. CONNECT: - Website: https://tevinnaidu.com - Instagram: https://instagram.com/drtevinnaidu - Facebook: https://facebook.com/drtevinnaidu - Twitter: https://twitter.com/drtevinnaidu - LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/drtevinnaidu TIMESTAMPS: (0:00) - Introduction (0:10) - Subjective (qualitative) vs objective (quantitative) experience (3:34) - The false mind-matter dichotomy (10:26) - Scientism & Religion (16:32) - Analytic Idealism (21:41) - Objective Idealism vs [Goff's] Panpsychism & other forms of Idealism (e.g. quasi-Berkleyan Idealism etc.) (29:39) - [Karl Popper's] Falsifiability theory (science vs pseudoscience) & its implications for Objective Idealism's explanatory power (41:07) - Idealism vs Illusionism [Seth, Frankish, Graziano, Dennett] (52:41) - Bernardo's Philosophical history of the Mind-Body Problem [Berkeley, Kant, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Jung] (1:00:29) - Decoding Carl Jung & Arther Schopenhauer's metaphysics (1:12:03) - Applying Idealism practically in a clinical setting (1:22:58) - Idealism's impact on ethics, morality, spirituality & life after death (1:35:30) - Best counter arguments to Idealism (1:44:00) - How can we take one step closer to the Mind-Body Solution (1:51:42) - Conclusion Website · YouTube · YouTube

Approaching and facing some essential life questions and leaving them in a written “ethical will” will benefit our loved ones after we have passed and might be more important than any material things we pass on at our death. It will also be helpful in shedding light on our own deepest beliefs and dreams. Steve Leder is senior Rabbi of Wilshire Boulevard Temple in Los Angeles. After receiving his degree in writing and graduating cum laude from Northwestern University, studying at Trinity College, Oxford University, Leder received a master's degree in Hebrew letters in 1986 and rabbinical ordination in 1987 from Hebrew Union College. He is the author of many books including The Extraordinary Nature of Ordinary Things (Behrman House 1999), More Money Than God: Living A Rich Life Without Losing Your Soul (Volt Press 2003), More Beautiful Than Before: How Suffering Transforms Us (Hay House 2017), The Beauty of What Remains (Avery 2021) and For You When I Am Gone: Twelve Essential Questions to Tell a Life Story Interview Date: 6/20/2022 Tags: Steve Leder, ethical will, living legacy, estate planning, grief, abracadabra, regret, Schopenhauer, Max Planck, compassion, Seventh generation, good and evil, Writing, Personal Transformation, Philosophy

Not unnatural,Suffering is only change.It's not personal.* * *Continuing where we left off last time, in this segment we will look at the intersection of the Natural sphere with Buddhism's Origin of suffering. The graphic illustrating correlations between the Four Spheres — Universal, Natural, Social, and Personal; and the Existence, Origin, Cessation, and Eightfold Path to cessation of suffering — is included again for your convenience and reference.In the Repentance verse of Soto Zen liturgy we chant:All my past and harmful karma Born of beginningless greed, hate and delusion Through body mouth and mind I now fully avow“Avow” does not commonly appear in our daily vernacular, but it simply means to admit openly, or to confess. Monastics apparently had a more rigorous routine for confessing and repenting specific transgressions they may have committed, violations of what were known in India as Vinaya, in Japan as Shingi, basically the rules and regulations of conduct in the monastic setting. We have Master Dogen's version, as well as Master Keizan's from a few generations later, the two being known respectively as the “father and mother” of Soto Zen in Japan. One factoid that people like to point out is that there were hundreds more rules for nuns than there were for monks. Interpret that however you like. Or do your research. Usually the Three Treasure Refuges verse follows on the heels of Repentance:I take refuge in BuddhaI take refuge in DharmaI take refute in SanghaI take refuge in Buddha the fully awakened oneI take refuge in Dharma the compassionate teachingsI take refuge in Sangha the harmonious communityI have completely taken refuge in BuddhaI have completely taken refuge in DharmaI have completely taken refuge in SanghaThe condensation of repentance into a catchall phrase represents not just our usual laziness, I think, but a recognition that we may be engaging in karmic actions without knowing it. So just in case, we fess up to whatever we may have done, and “accept all consequence with equanimity,” as another version has it. And then we take refuge in the Three Treasures, just for good measure.The line that indicates the connection between Origin and Natural is that bit about karmic consequences stemming from our very body, mouth and mind, the “Three Actions” of Buddhism. Another version has “born of body, mouth and mind,” which I think captures the meaning more precisely. That is, most of our desires, attachments and aversions, some of which get us into trouble, come with the territory of being born as a human being. As such, they are not exactly our fault. But what we do about it is our fault, or may be to our credit. There is the implication that we can “pay off” our accumulated karma, like a bad debt. The good news is that if we recognize that we did not create, or design, this situation in which we find ourselves, we can perhaps redesign our approach to it, embracing its seeming contradictions. Its “Designer” may not be so “Intelligent” as some would have us believe.When you take an unbiased look at the Natural conditions of our birth and growth as part of a species, certain obvious limitations and undesirable aspects emerge. Does it really have to be so messy? Buddha identified these causes and conditions of circumstance, the matrix of existence, variously, such as: the reification of self emerging through the process of individuation as a child; the conventional wisdom of the social milieu into which we are born; and the predations of aging, sickness and death to which we are all subject. The necessity for survival of the species is not a personal goal, but one of the species itself, as Schopenhauer points out in “The World as Will,” his treatise on how we usually get it all wrong. That we are fulfilling our heart's desire in pursuing the loves of our life is a kind of category error, based on a primordial ignorance of how this existence thing really works. Very Zen.That the Origin of our suffering may thus be regarded as Natural should precipitate a sigh of relief. But these biological facts do not relieve us of the necessity of now dealing with the actual experience of our desires, and the onset of angst, regret, hope, and disappointed expectations, that ensue. The rollercoaster of Social life inserts itself into the mix with little regard to our opinion. Once we have experienced all the highs and lows, however, they average out when we slow to a stop, and step off of the train.One of the unfortunate dimensions of life in modern society, vis-à-vis these known issues of Buddhism, is that they are not widely recognized as such, nor are they ordinarily part of the early curriculum in Western countries. We do not expose our youngsters to practicing meditation. Usually a young person begins hearing about Eastern wisdom when they are in their late teens or early twenties, when the onslaught of hormones has long since had its sometimes deleterious, and even disastrous, effects. Especially with the advent of widespread online accessibility to what we call “pornography.” As one of the Supremes famously intoned, I don't know how to define it, but I recognize it when I see it.It is ironic that the most natural of functions in the Natural sphere — that of reproduction of the species — becomes so distorted in its intersection with the Social realm of human behavior. But that discussion may be better left to the next segment, on the conflation of the Noble Eightfold Path with the Social sphere. For now let us just shake our heads at the willful blindness built into our concept of childhood, and our feckless efforts to control the process of maturation into an adult. It is a compelling example of the Social sphere interfering with the Natural sphere — the biological facts of existence — thereby exacerbating the Origin of suffering, our ignorance-fueled craving. What's the matter with kids today?One could argue that the Origin of our suffering is Universal, as is its existence. The role of Nature in the Universal scheme of things is intricately intertwined with the origin of life on this planet, and the possibility of life on others, in the “Goldilocks Zone” near — in astronomical units — to another star. Speculations as to the arrival of intergalactic spermatozoa in the form of ancient comets or meteors, delivering the foundational chemistry of organisms to our waiting, fertile planet, like sperm to egg, model the entire cosmos as analogous to a kind of organism, giving birth to stars, as in the famous “pillars of creation” image from NASA's Hubble telescope, to the spark of life itself. These analogies are examples of our proclivity to find familiar patterns in the strangest of new information, now flooding in as images from the far reaches of science, thanks to the Hubble, and now the Webb, telescopes. Another is the familiar trope about developing fins at one stage of the fetus in the womb:More than just a catchy phrase, “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny” is the foundation of recapitulation theory. Recapitulation theory posits that the development of individual organisms (ontogeny) follows (recapitulates) the same phases of the evolution of larger ancestral groups of related organisms (phylogeny).These cultural memes also indicate the comprehensive nature of the Ignorance, capital I, into which we are born, rather than into sin, according to Buddhism. Not the kind of willful ignorance that we have to learn, which can be considered a kind of sin, I suppose, if not against God, then against our original buddha-nature. Willfully ignoring the “compassionate teachings,” for example, as the Buddha's legacy is characterized. They are compassionate in that they consist of descriptions of the suffering innate in existence, as well as our tendency to make it worse; as well as prescriptions for what to do about it, such as the Noble Eightfold Path. Which will be the subject of our next segment, in its relationship to the Social sphere.Meanwhile, wrapping up our meditation on the Natural Origin of suffering, it is, or should be, transparent that there is no Existence without change, and so “change” is interchangeable with “suffering.” Everything that we see, hear, smell, taste, feel — and yes, everything we think — is the effect of change. We are literally hearing the sound of suffering, like Avalokiteshvara. And we are seeing it as well as feeling it at all times, in every moment. If nothing were changing, we could not perceive it. We never breathe the same breath twice, and we can never have the same thought, twice, though it may seem that we do. This is natural, and this inexorable, instantaneous change, is the true source of our suffering. Get used to it.The fact that some forms of change provide welcome relief in our lives, while others seem to deliver more stress, should make it clear that dukkha is neutral. Suffering is not being inflicted upon us as a kind of punishment, though it may be considered a kind of test. Zen recommends embracing what life brings us as a natural consequence of our existence as a sentient being, even though we may not enjoy it at the time. Don't worry, it will change. This does not mean, however, that we should not do anything about it, to improve our circumstances. This and other dimensions of behavior in the Social realm will be one focus of the next segment, reviewing the Path in its eight dimensions. Stay tuned.* * *Elliston Roshi is guiding teacher of the Atlanta Soto Zen Center and abbot of the Silent Thunder Order. He is also a gallery-represented fine artist expressing his Zen through visual poetry, or “music to the eyes.”UnMind is a production of the Atlanta Soto Zen Center in Atlanta, Georgia and the Silent Thunder Order. You can support these teachings by PayPal to donate@STorder.org. Gassho.Producer: Kyōsaku Jon Mitchell

¿Qué hay para mi dentro del libro de lecturas recomendadas del programa conocimiento experto El Arte de la Sabiduria Mundial de Baltasar Gracián y Morales? Descubre Los Patrones de Comportamiento que te ayudarán a construir tu Reputacion Personal, evitar ser Manipulado y alcanzar Poder.Adquiere el Libro: https://amzn.to/3Oys7DcAccede a nuestro grupo privado en Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/conocimientoexpertoMonetiza tus Redes Sociales: https://impactoexperto.com/Participa del Reto 60/100 para ser una Mejor Versión: https://conocimientoexperto.com/reto60100Accede a mi sito oficial y desarrolla tu modelo de negocio:https://www.salvadormingo.com/Accede al Programa Principios Experto: https://conocimientoexperto.com/principiosObtén mi libro: https://amzn.to/2KmHMXaMis programas:* Programa Principios Experto: https://conocimientoexperto.com/principios* Libro Conocimiento: https://www.conocimientoexperto.org/unavidaconproposito* Programa Posicionamiento de Expertos en Internet: https://conocimientoexperto.com/programaexperto* Más contenidos gratuitos: https://www.conocimientoexperto.org* Aplicación Móvil Conocimiento Experto: https://www.conocimientoexperto.org/apps/* Programa Conocimiento Experto Elite: https://conocimientoexperto.com/eliteMis redes:* Sígueme En Instagram en: https://www.instagram.com/salvadormingo/* Sígueme en Facebook en: https://www.facebook.com/Conocimientoexperto* Sígueme en Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/SalvadorMingoConocimientoExperto* Sígueme en Twitter en: https://twitter.com/s_mingoEl Arte de la Sabiduría Mundial (1647) es un clásico que permanece en el tiempo sobre los Patrones del Comportamiento Humano. Compuesto por 300 máximas breves pero brillantes, arroja luz sobre cómo vivir la vida, alcanzar el éxito y ganarse el respeto. Ha mantenido su vigencia a lo largo de sus casi 400 años de publicación, inspirando a personajes como Arthur Schopenhauer y Friedrich Nietzsche.A lo largo de la historia hay ciertos principios que se repiten una y otra vez, a veces estos pueden resultar incomodos, sin embargo no dejan de formar parte de nuestra realidad, y más vale ser consciente de los mismos, si es que queremos aumentar nuestras probabilidades de éxito en la vida, tanto para la ejecución como para nuestra protección. Por lo que si quieres saber algunos de estos principios que te ayuden asimilar parte de la sabiduría del mundo en los ámbitos del éxito y el poder, te invito a que te quedes.Edicion: Diciembre 1991Baltasar Gracián y MoralesFue un jesuita, escritor español del Siglo de Oro que cultivó la prosa didáctica y filosófica. Entre sus obras destaca El Criticón —alegoría de la vida humana—, que constituye una de las novelas más importantes de la literatura española, comparable por su calidad al Quijote o La Celestina. Es considerado un precursor del existencialismo y de la postmodernidad. Influyó enn la filosofía de Schopenhauer y Nietzsche. Sin embargo, su pensamiento vital es inseparable de la conciencia de una España en decadencia, como se advierte en su máxima «floreció en el siglo de oro la llaneza, en este de yerro la malicia».3Enfoque La Psicologia del PoderSe FirmeSalvador MingoConocimiento Experto#SerManipulado#las48leyesdelpoder#BaltasarGracian

¿Qué hay para mi dentro del libro de lecturas recomendadas del programa conocimiento experto El Arte de la Sabiduria Mundial de Baltasar Gracián y Morales? Descubre Los Patrones de Comportamiento que te ayudarán a construir tu Reputacion Personal, evitar ser Manipulado y alcanzar Poder. Adquiere el Libro: https://amzn.to/3Oys7Dc Accede a nuestro grupo privado en Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/conocimientoexperto Monetiza tus Redes Sociales: https://impactoexperto.com/ Participa del Reto 60/100 para ser una Mejor Versión: https://conocimientoexperto.com/reto60100 Accede a mi sito oficial y desarrolla tu modelo de negocio: https://www.salvadormingo.com/ Accede al Programa Principios Experto: https://conocimientoexperto.com/principios Obtén mi libro: https://amzn.to/2KmHMXa Mis programas: * Programa Principios Experto: https://conocimientoexperto.com/principios * Libro Conocimiento: https://www.conocimientoexperto.org/unavidaconproposito * Programa Posicionamiento de Expertos en Internet: https://conocimientoexperto.com/programaexperto * Más contenidos gratuitos: https://www.conocimientoexperto.org * Aplicación Móvil Conocimiento Experto: https://www.conocimientoexperto.org/apps/ * Programa Conocimiento Experto Elite: https://conocimientoexperto.com/elite Mis redes: * Sígueme En Instagram en: https://www.instagram.com/salvadormingo/ * Sígueme en Facebook en: https://www.facebook.com/Conocimientoexperto * Sígueme en Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/SalvadorMingoConocimientoExperto * Sígueme en Twitter en: https://twitter.com/s_mingo El Arte de la Sabiduría Mundial (1647) es un clásico que permanece en el tiempo sobre los Patrones del Comportamiento Humano. Compuesto por 300 máximas breves pero brillantes, arroja luz sobre cómo vivir la vida, alcanzar el éxito y ganarse el respeto. Ha mantenido su vigencia a lo largo de sus casi 400 años de publicación, inspirando a personajes como Arthur Schopenhauer y Friedrich Nietzsche. A lo largo de la historia hay ciertos principios que se repiten una y otra vez, a veces estos pueden resultar incomodos, sin embargo no dejan de formar parte de nuestra realidad, y más vale ser consciente de los mismos, si es que queremos aumentar nuestras probabilidades de éxito en la vida, tanto para la ejecución como para nuestra protección. Por lo que si quieres saber algunos de estos principios que te ayuden asimilar parte de la sabiduría del mundo en los ámbitos del éxito y el poder, te invito a que te quedes. Edicion: Diciembre 1991 Baltasar Gracián y Morales Fue un jesuita, escritor español del Siglo de Oro que cultivó la prosa didáctica y filosófica. Entre sus obras destaca El Criticón —alegoría de la vida humana—, que constituye una de las novelas más importantes de la literatura española, comparable por su calidad al Quijote o La Celestina. Es considerado un precursor del existencialismo y de la postmodernidad. Influyó enn la filosofía de Schopenhauer y Nietzsche. Sin embargo, su pensamiento vital es inseparable de la conciencia de una España en decadencia, como se advierte en su máxima «floreció en el siglo de oro la llaneza, en este de yerro la malicia».3 Enfoque La Psicologia del Poder Se Firme Salvador Mingo Conocimiento Experto #SerManipulado #las48leyesdelpoder #BaltasarGracian

In this episode, we complete our series on "The Genealogy of Morals." We talk about the heritage of Schopenhauer and how that has affected Freddy's philosophy.

------------------Support the channel------------ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter PayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: https://tinyurl.com/yb3acuuy PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/ Dr. Bernard Reginster is Professor of Philosophy at Brown University. Dr. Reginster's research has focused mostly on issues in ethics, metaethics, and moral psychology in 19th century German philosophy. His new research interests include the topics of identity and intersubjectivity, for which he considers ideas from psychoanalytic theory, 20th century Continental philosophy, and contemporary Anglo-Saxon philosophy. He is the author of The Affirmation of Life: Nietzsche on Overcoming Nihilism, which offers a comprehensive interpretation of Nietzsche's ethical thought and includes substantial new interpretations of some of his immediate predecessors, particularly Schopenhauer. In this episode, we talk about The Affirmation of Life. We start by asking if Nietzsche's philosophy was systematic at all. We get into nihilism, its relationship with pessimism, where our values stem from, how we can revaluate them, and life-negating and life-affirming values. We talk about happiness, suffering, meaningfulness, and master and slave morality. -- A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: KARIN LIETZCKE, ANN BLANCHETTE, PER HELGE LARSEN, LAU GUERREIRO, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, HERBERT GINTIS, RUTGER VOS, RICARDO VLADIMIRO, CRAIG HEALY, OLAF ALEX, PHILIP KURIAN, JONATHAN VISSER, JAKOB KLINKBY, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, JOHN CONNORS, PAULINA BARREN, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ARTHUR KOH, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, SUSAN PINKER, PABLO SANTURBANO, SIMON COLUMBUS, PHIL KAVANAGH, JORGE ESPINHA, CORY CLARK, MARK BLYTH, ROBERTO INGUANZO, MIKKEL STORMYR, ERIC NEURMANN, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, BERNARD HUGUENEY, ALEXANDER DANNBAUER, FERGAL CUSSEN, YEVHEN BODRENKO, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, DON ROSS, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, OZLEM BULUT, NATHAN NGUYEN, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, J.W., JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, IDAN SOLON, ROMAIN ROCH, DMITRY GRIGORYEV, TOM ROTH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, ADANER USMANI, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, AL ORTIZ, NELLEKE BAK, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, NICK GOLDEN, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS P. FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, DENISE COOK, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, TRADERINNYC, AND MAX BEILBY! A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, IAN GILLIGAN, LUIS CAYETANO, TOM VANEGDOM, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, VEGA GIDEY, THOMAS TRUMBLE, AND NUNO ELDER! AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MICHAL RUSIECKI, ROSEY, JAMES PRATT, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, AND BOGDAN KANIVETS!