Podcasts about ipcc

This year, most of the coral on the planet went through heat stress severe enough to bleach it. That's not a rounding error: 84 percent of the world's reef area, across the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian Oceans, and NOAA had to add three brand-new alert levels to its Coral Reef Watch scale because the existing one had no category for what was happening. In this episode, Andrew breaks down exactly where global coral reefs stand right now: how the fourth global mass bleaching event on record got declared, why NOAA waited until 2026 to confirm it had actually ended, and why every global bleaching event on record has been worse than the one before it. From there, Andrew tackles the harder question: if the IPCC's own projections show most reefs disappearing even in a best-case warming scenario, is coral restoration just decoration on a dying patient? He walks through the honest case for restoring reefs anyway, then surveys the full toolkit practitioners actually use beyond planting fragments, including larval propagation ("coral IVF"), selective breeding for heat tolerance, cryopreservation and biobanking, coral probiotics, and engineered substrates like biorock and 3D-printed reef tiles. He digs into the peer-reviewed evidence for whether any of it works (short answer: yes, locally, and not yet at global scale), and closes with a fast history of how restoration itself evolved, from 1970s hand-transplanting to a 2012 lab accident that unlocked 25-to-40-times faster coral growth. This is episode one of a four-part week built around Andrew's interview with Mike Goldberg, co-founder of ICARE, a coral restoration group in the Florida Keys. The rest of the week digs into specific pieces of Mike's own story before his full interview airs Friday. Takeaways: Coral reefs just came through the most severe global bleaching event ever recorded: 84 percent of the world's reef area affected between 2023 and 2025, and NOAA only confirms an event over after months of monitoring show it's genuinely done, not just cooling off temporarily. Even the IPCC's best-case warming scenario still projects most reefs lost, which is the strongest argument for restoring reefs now, not a reason to skip it. Fragment-based coral gardening is just one tool. The field also includes selective breeding for heat tolerance, cryopreservation and biobanking, probiotics, engineered substrates like biorock and 3D-printed tiles, and protecting the herbivorous fish and water quality reefs depend on. It's genuinely working at the local scale: peer-reviewed studies show restored reefs regaining their coastal-protection function within four years and fish populations rebounding two to three times over fifteen years. It is not, on current evidence, a global-scale fix on its own. Restoration investment so far covers a tiny fraction of what's been lost, which is exactly why a "one coral cluster at a time" mindset matters. The practice itself has moved fast: hand-transplanting coral in the 1970s, a lab accident in 2012 that unlocked dramatically faster growth, and today's diversified, partnership-driven restoration models. Support Independent Podcasts: https://www.speakupforblue.com/patreon Need help with your ocean non-profit, company, or project? Get the help you need with Pisces Oceans Inc.: https://www.piscesoceans.ca Connect with Speak Up For Blue Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc YouTube: www.speakupforblue.com/youtube  

Paid Subscribers are invited to tonight's weekly SUPD hangout at 8pmEST! I will send the link at 7EST Subscribe and Watch Interviews LIVE : On YOUTUBE.com/StandUpWithPete ON SubstackStandUpWithPete Stand Up is a daily podcast. I book,host,edit, post and promote new episodes with brilliant guests every day. This show is Ad free and fully supported by listeners like you! Please subscribe now for as little as 5$ and gain access to a community of over 750 awesome, curious, kind, funny, brilliant, generous souls Subscribe now Dr. Michael E. Mann is Presidential Distinguished Professor in the Department of Earth and Environmental Science at the University of Pennsylvania, with a secondary appointment in the Annenberg School for Communication. He served as Penn's inaugural Vice Provost for Climate Science, Policy, and Action, and currently serves as Director of the Penn Center for Science, Sustainability, and the Media (PCSSM). Dr. Mann received his undergraduate degrees in Physics and Applied Math from the University of California at Berkeley, an M.S. degree in Physics from Yale University, and a Ph.D. in Geology & Geophysics from Yale University. His research interests include the study of Earth's climate system and the science, impacts and policy implications of human-caused climate change. Dr. Mann was a Lead Author on the Observed Climate Variability and Change chapter of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Scientific Assessment Report in 2001 and was organizing committee chair for the National Academy of Sciences Frontiers of Science in 2003. He has received a number of honors and awards including NOAA's outstanding publication award in 2002 and selection by Scientific American as one of the fifty leading visionaries in science and technology in 2002. He contributed, with other IPCC authors, to the award of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. He was awarded the Hans Oeschger Medal of the European Geosciences Union in 2012 and was awarded the National Conservation Achievement Award for science by the National Wildlife Federation in 2013. He made Bloomberg News' list of fifty most influential people in 2013. In 2014, he was named Highly Cited Researcher by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) and received the Friend of the Planet Award from the National Center for Science Education. He received the Stephen H. Schneider Award for Outstanding Climate Science Communication from Climate One in 2017, the Award for Public Engagement with Science from the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 2018 and the Climate Communication Prize from the American Geophysical Union in 2018. In 2019 he received the Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement and in 2020 he received the World Sustainability Award of the MDPI Sustainability Foundation. He was elected to the U.S. National Academy of Sciences in 2020. He received the Leo Szilard Award of the American Physical Society in 2021 and was named Humanist of the Year by the American Humanist Association in 2023. He was elected a Foreign Member of the Royal Society in 2024 and was elected to the American Academy of Arts & Sciences in 2026. He is a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union, the American Meteorological Society, the Geological Society of America, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. He is also a co-founder of the award-winning science website RealClimate.org. Listen rate and review on Apple Podcasts Listen rate and review on Spotify Pete On Instagram Pete on Blue Sky Pete on Threads Pete on Tik Tok Pete on Twitter Pete Personal FB page Stand Up with Pete FB page All things Jon Carroll Gift a Subscription https://www.patreon.com/PeteDominick/gift Send Pete $ Directly on Venmo May I be safe and protected from harm. May I be happy in the midst of how things are. May I be healthy, strong, and whole. May I live with ease of well-being

Can our economy keep growing forever on a finite planet?In this third installment of Finding Crazy Town, we explore the idea of exponential economic growth, why economists and politicians have become so committed to it, and what happens when our economic models fail to account for the environmental systems that make the economy possible.Along the way, Jason, Rob, and Asher revisit the problems they see in conventional economics, Jason recounts the experience that sent him down the rabbit hole of Limits to Growth and ecological economics, and the trio asks whether growth and progress really mean the same thing.From Robert Wadlow to Ronald Reagan, Donella Meadows to Julian Simon, the IPCC to the three musketeers, we follow the clues—and discover that sometimes limits aren't the enemy of creativity. They're what make creativity possible. Originally recorded on 7/21/26 with archival episodes.Related EpisodesEpisode 2, “Punching Ronnie in the Mouth”Episode 8, “Mosquito-Flavored Popcorn, or What Climate Scientists Are Getting Wrong”CreditsProduction and editing by Alex Leff. Editorial assistance and transcripts by Taylor Antal.Theme music is “Way Huge” and “Don't Give Up” by Midnight Shipwrecks, used with permission.Thanks to all the Crazy Townies, our listeners who are trying to understand humanity's overshoot predicament and do something about it.

"Das Klima”, der Podcast zur Wissenschaft hinter der Krise. Wir lasen den [sechsten Bericht](https://www.ipcc.ch) des Weltklimarats und erklären den aktuellen Stand der Klimaforschung. In Folge 177 gehen wir shoppen und schauen auf das Leben des österreichischen Architekten Victor Gruen, der in den USA das Einkaufszentrum erfunden hat und damit nicht wirklich glücklich geworden ist. Warum seine Idee aus Klimasicht aber trotzdem schlau sind, erklären wir in der aktuellen Folge. Wer den Podcast unterstützen will, kann das gerne tun: https://steadyhq.com/de/dasklima/ und https://www.paypal.me/florianfreistetter.

Watch every episode ad-free & uncensored on Patreon: https://patreon.com/dannyjones Henrik Svensmark is a Danish physicist and professor of Solar System Physics at the Danish National Space Institute. He is best known for his hypothesis that cosmic rays are one of the main drivers of earth's climate. The CERN CLOUD experiment is based on Henrik's theory. SPONSORS http://kalshi.com/r/dannyjones - Use code DANNYJONES to get $10 when you trade $10. https://shopify.com/dannyjones - Turns out you don't need a real job. Start your free trial today. https://capl.onelink.me/vFut/zralgyl0 - Download Cash App today. https://upwork.com - Connect with top talent ready to help your business grow. https://whiterabbitenergy.com/?ref=DJP - Use code DJP for 20% off. EPISODE LINKS henrik.svensmark@mail.huji.ac.il FOLLOW DANNY JONES https://www.instagram.com/dannyjones https://twitter.com/jonesdanny OUTLINE 00:00 - Solar activity is changing Earth's cloud cover 04:16 - Galactic cosmic rays 07:31 - How cosmic rays create clouds 13:59 - Clouds might responsible for climate change 18:08 - Measuring historic cosmic ray activity 23:24 - Henrik's early experiments on cosmic rays 26:27 - Earth's historical temperature cycles 33:29 - The Sun's magnetic field has doubled 35:51 - Earth's trip through the Milky Way Galaxy 41:50 - How stars are formed 47:11 - Supernova activity correlation to Earth's temperature 51:55 - Earth is in a glaciation period 56:14 - Temperature changes vs. amount of life on Earth 01:04:54 - IPCC report on climate influence 01:10:28 - Bill Gates changes tune on geo-engineering 01:18:13 - Scientists fail to disprove Henrik 01:21:44 - Coronal mass ejections 01:25:40 - South Atlantic Anomaly 01:28:08 - How Earth's magnetic poles are moving 01:32:51 - Humans affect climate less than we're told 01:34:33 - When galaxies collide 01:37:05 - New revision on the Big Bang Theory 01:44:04 - How climate influences evolution 01:51:04 - Why Earth is the only planet with life 01:55:26 - The current climate forecast model is WRONG 02:01:11 - Difficulty funding climate research 02:11:44 - CERN's climate project 02:19:06 - CO2 is the gas of life Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Jim Lakely, EVP and communications director at The Heartland Institute, describes Heartland's free-market mission and its global role “pushing back on climate alarmism,” plus his weekly Climate Realism Show. He recounts Heartland's 16 climate conferences since 2008 (300+ speakers, videos online), efforts to invite opposing views, and claims the IPCC's mandate is to emphasize human influence. They discuss natural forcings, scientific uncertainty, warming since the Little Ice Age, and skepticism about “global average temperature.” Lakely cites funding pressures in academia, conference disruptions by Climate Defiance, and notes Roy Spencer's satellite data work. He recounts “Fakegate,” alleging Peter Gleick stole documents and forged a memo. They also discuss COPs, social-media throttling, and AI's energy demands weakening climate media funding.00:00 Meet Jim Lakely00:32 Heartland Climate Mission01:34 Inside Climate Conferences04:25 Debate And The IPCC07:06 Natural Forcings Focus09:32 Warming And Perspective12:23 Young Skeptics Rising15:40 Disruptions And Threats20:44 Will Happer Spotlight23:25 Models Funding And Media28:01 Journalism Background29:13 Congress Reality Check30:39 Oval Office With Bush32:44 Climate Beat Back Then35:09 Momentum After 202438:32 AI Needs Real Energy40:24 Fakegate Scandal Recap47:03 Inside UN COP Meetings48:57 Social Media Censorship51:38 YouTube UN Banners53:02 Closing Thoughts Freedomhttps://x.com/jlakelySee all Heartland “International Conference on Climate Change” videos here: https://climateconferences.heartland.org/=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Thomas Kurz discusses chapters from his book Why There Is No Climate Crisis, citing positive reviews, then explains the greenhouse effect and argues CO2's warming is limited and logarithmic. He claims doubling CO2 yields about 3 W/m² effective forcing, or ~0.9°C via Stefan–Boltzmann calculations, and says even burning all known fossil fuel reserves would add under ~1°C. He argues “climate crisis” claims rely on compounded positive feedbacks in IPCC models, but says observations show models overpredict warming, relative humidity aloft is declining, and a predicted tropical hotspot is missing. He attributes discrepancies to cloud/aerosol cooling, proposing an Earth “thermostat” and net slightly negative feedback.00:00 Guest and Book Update02:31 Greenhouse Effect Basics04:53 CO2 Absorption and Saturation07:38 Four Ways to Calculate Forcing17:11 Convert Forcing to Temperature21:19 Logarithmic Warming Limits24:20 Fossil Fuels and Max Warming28:13 Feedbacks Behind the Crisis32:55 Models vs Observations41:30 Clouds and Cooling Evidence55:51 Earth Thermostat Conclusion57:52 Q&A and Scientific Method01:01:33 Wrap Up and Farewell“Why There is No Climate Crisis: The Surprising Evidence You Should Know”: https://a.co/d/05rKxsYUhttps://www.whynoclimatecrisis.com/Email: info@WhyNoClimateCrisis.com=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Neste episódio do Vozes do Planeta, Paulina Chamorro conversa com Paulo Artaxo, cientista referência mundial em mudanças climáticas e membro do IPCC. A entrevista aborda os impactos do aquecimento do oceano na intensificação do El Niño em 2026 e 2027, os riscos para a Amazônia e para o agronegócio brasileiro, além da vulnerabilidade das cidades diante de enchentes e ondas de calor cada vez mais mortais.Artaxo destaca a necessidade urgente de adaptação econômica e social, a responsabilidade do poder público e da comunicação em engajar a sociedade, e o papel das eleições na defesa de políticas ambientais. Um episódio essencial para entender como ciência, política e justiça climática se entrelaçam no futuro do Brasil.Apresentação Paulina ChamorroProdução: Andre CaséTrabalhos Tecnicos: Compasso Colab

Publish Date: 8-5-2026 Original Air Date: 8–13-2021 Today we dig through the archives to give context to the news of the 2021 IPCC report ringing the alarm bells for the climate crisis. Full Show Notes Transcript Be part of the show! Leave a voice message, message us on Signal at the handle bestoftheleft.01, or email Jay@BestOfTheLeft.com BestOfTheLeft.com/Support (Members Get Bonus Shows + No Ads!) Use our links to shop Bookshop.org and Libro.fm for a non-evil book and audiobook purchasing experience! Join our Discord community! SHOW NOTES Ch. 1: The IPCC's new report - @greennewsreport - Air Date 4-3-14 Ch. 2: Green News Report w/ Brad Friedman & Desi Doyen - Air Date 8-10-21 Ch. 3: Global Water Shortages Pose Threat of Terror & War - @davidpakmanshow - Air Date 02-16-14 Ch. 4: The World's On Fire and There's Money in the Flames - The Muckrake Political Podcast - Air Date 8-10-21 Ch. 5: Why humans are so bad at thinking about climate change - Vox - Air Date 4-19-17 Ch. 6: Report confirms the effect of climate change happening today, spurs action - @greennewsreport - Air Date 5-6-14 Ch. 7: When Republicans believed in climate change - @allinwithchris Hayes - Air Date 04-22-14 Ch. 8: Geoff Mann: Transforming and Democratizing Institutions to Address Climate Change - Economics & Beyond with Rob Johnson - Air Date 8-9-21 Ch. 9: Climate crisis and jobs with Naomi Klein - What Comes After What Comes Next - Air Date 6-11-20 Ch. 10: Extreme Heat in the News, Naming Heat Waves, Thermal Equity and more with Dr. Ladd Keith - America Adapts the Climate Change Podcast - Air Date 7-5-21 Ch. 11: Putting the Freeze on Global Warming - @BillMoyersHQ And Company - Air Date 4-25-14 Produced by Jay! Tomlinson Visit us at BestOfTheLeft.com Listen Anywhere! BestOfTheLeft.com/Listen Follow BotL: Bluesky | Mastodon | Threads | X Like at Facebook.com/BestOfTheLeft Contact me directly at Jay@BestOfTheLeft.com

Get in touch - leave me a messageCheap solar, batteries and EVs are no longer merely cleaner alternatives. Their falling costs are undermining fossil-fuel economics, and leaders may be misjudging the speed of that shift.My guest is Peter Newman, Professor of Sustainability at Curtin University and a long-time IPCC contributor whose work has focused on cities, transport and automobile dependence. We examine how China's manufacturing scale is turning clean technology from a policy ambition into mass-market competition, while tariffs and legacy planning risk slowing adoption elsewhere.We look at why cities are the decisive arena: where renewable power, transit, density and affordable housing either reinforce one another or remain disconnected. We also challenge the assumption that EV charging will remain the infrastructure problem, and ask when petrol and diesel networks themselves become the constraint.Listen now to understand how clean-technology economics is changing fossil-fuel risk, and what cities, businesses and policymakers need to get right before the shift accelerates. Sign up to Climate Confident+ for deep dive analysis of the major climate and energy stories of the day.Support the showPodcast subscribersI'd like to sincerely thank this podcast's amazing subscribers:Anita KrajncCecilia SkarupaBen GrossJerry SweeneyAndreas WernerStephen CarrollRoger ArnoldAnd remember you too can Subscribe to the Podcast  - it is really easy and hugely important as it will enable me to continue to create more excellent Climate Confident episodes like this one, as well as give you access to the entire back catalog of Climate Confident episodes.

Ausgabe 138 des Science Busters Podcasts ist Teil 5 unserer Sommerserie. Halbzeit. Anhand von 10 Ausgaben von "Frag die Science Busters", unserer monatlichen Frage & Antwortsendung auf Radio FM4, wollen wir in den kommenden Wochen dokumentieren, wie viel besser unsere Chancen vor 2 Jahren noch waren, etwas gegen die laufende Klimakatastrophe zu unternehmen. Und wir sehr wir es vergeigt haben und noch immer vergeigen. Kabarettist Martin Puntigam, Florian Freistetter, Astronom und Andreas Jäger, Meteorologe und Moderator besprechen u.a. wohin die alten Windräder kommen, wie Insekten eine Rezession auslösen können, ob es den Golfstrom auch als Cabrio gibt, ab wann wir das Klima AMOC laufen lassen, ob Landschaftschutz Klimaschutz wirklich ersetzen kann, was besser ist, IPCC oder IPBES, was „Dead Species Walking“ bedeutet, warum Klimakatastrophe und Artensterben einander befeuern, wo Österreichs zehntes Bundesland liegt, warum Desinformation eines der Hauptprobleme im Kampf gegen die Klimakatastrophe ist, was man mit Sverdrup beschreibt, warum auch Meerestiere den Golfstrom brauchen, wieso jedes Zehntelgrad zählt, weshalb in Sachen Klima- und Artenschutz nichts zu tun am schlechtesten ist, dass Klimaaktivismus wesentlich konstruktiver ist als die Denunzierung desselben, warum es trotzdem auch gute Nachrichten gab, wieso Lautstärke manchmal über Stärke der Argumente täuscht, was Industrieschnee ist, warum man ihn nicht essen sollte, was an unter Dead-Cat-Strategy versteht, wieso Katzen gefährlicher sind als Windräder, weshalb Kühlschränke beim Infraschall jedes Windrad weit hinter sich lassen und wieso beim Feinstaub Autos fast immer die Goldmedaille gewinnen.

"Das Klima”, der Podcast zur Wissenschaft hinter der Krise. Wir lasen den [sechsten Bericht](https://www.ipcc.ch) des Weltklimarats und erklären den aktuellen Stand der Klimaforschung. In Folge 176 wird gespielt. Claudia hat sich das Klima-Brettspiel “Daybreak” angesehen und berichtet von ihren Erfahrungen und von der Erforschung der Klimaspiele. Außerdem feiern wir mit dieser Folge unseren 5jährigen Podcastgeburtstag. Wer den Podcast unterstützen will, kann das gerne tun: https://steadyhq.com/de/dasklima/ und https://www.paypal.me/florianfreistetter.

100 Folgen Vegan Performance Podcast: Wir blicken zurück auf unsere wichtigsten Erkenntnisse, kontroversesten Aussagen und spannendsten Gespräche rund um Ernährung, Training, Gesundheit und Veganismus. Welche Themen sind heute noch relevant – und wo hat sich unsere Sicht verändert? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dominiks Buch zur pflanzenbasierten Sporternährung im UTB-Verlag: https://www.utb.de/doi/book/10.36198/9783838560328 Dominiks Gesundheitscommunity: www.gsundes-hannover.de Dominiks Online-Knie-Kurs: https://gsundes-hannover.de/knieschmerzen/ Dominiks Online-Rücken-Kurs: https://copecart.com/products/34bd5abb/checkout Marcs veganes Online-Fitness-Coaching: https://vegainer-academy.com/ Marcs Online-Kurs: https://www.copecart.com/products/a50f88f2/checkout ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Werbung: Dieser Podcast wird unterstützt von der Firma Watson Nutrition. Die Firma bietet als einzige umfassend laborgeprüfte Nahrungsergänzungsmittel für eine optimierte Nährstoffversorgung. Zum Angebot zählen Multi-Supplemente, Mono-Supplemente, Sportsupplemente wie Kreatin oder auch Proteinriegel, Shakes und essenzielle Aminosäuren Mit dem Code veganperformance erhältst du 5 % Rabatt auf deine Bestellung.  Zur Firmenwebseite: Watson Nutrition ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Redaktionelle Anmerkungen Zum Thema intuitive Ernährung und langfristige Gewichtsabnahme – ab 00:18:08 Intuitive Ernährung ist nicht grundsätzlich „größtenteils unerforscht“. Es liegen systematische Übersichtsarbeiten vor, insbesondere zu Essverhalten, Körperbild und psychischem Wohlbefinden. Begrenzter ist die Evidenz dafür, dass intuitive Ernährung langfristig zu einer relevanten Gewichtsabnahme oder automatisch zum Normalgewicht führt. Auch die Aussage, dass nach fünf Jahren über 90 Prozent der Menschen wieder ihr Ausgangsgewicht erreichen oder darüber liegen, ist in dieser Allgemeingültigkeit nicht ausreichend belegt. Gewichtszunahmen nach Diäten sind häufig, die Ergebnisse unterscheiden sich aber je nach Intervention, Personengruppe und Nachbetreuung deutlich. Zum Einfluss von Alkohol auf die Muskelproteinsynthese – ab 00:27:33 Die im Podcast genannten 10 bis 20 Prozent stimmen nicht mit der vermutlich gemeinten Studie überein. Nach einer sehr hohen Alkoholzufuhr von 1,5 Gramm pro Kilogramm Körpergewicht war die Muskelproteinsynthese trotz Proteinzufuhr etwa 24 Prozent und bei Alkohol plus Kohlenhydraten etwa 37 Prozent geringer. Untersucht wurde die kurzfristige Muskelproteinsynthese, nicht der langfristige Muskelaufbau. Ein einzelnes Bier macht eine Trainingseinheit dennoch nicht wertlos. Zum Zusammenhang zwischen Schlafmangel und Energieaufnahme – ab 01:33:50 Die genannten 300 bis 400 zusätzlichen Kilokalorien beziehen sich nicht auf jede einzelne Stunde Schlafmangel. Eine Meta-Analyse zeigte unter experimentell verkürzten Schlafbedingungen im Durchschnitt eine etwa 385 Kilokalorien höhere tägliche Energieaufnahme als unter normalen Schlafbedingungen. Zum Einfluss von Hormonen auf das Abnehmen – ab 01:50:36 Hormone sind nicht lediglich eine Folge des Lebensstils. Besonders während der Menopause können hormonelle Veränderungen Körperzusammensetzung, Fettverteilung, Appetit und möglicherweise den Energieverbrauch beeinflussen. Sie setzen die Energiebilanz jedoch nicht außer Kraft, können die Gewichtskontrolle aber erschweren. Quellenverzeichnis Al Khatib, H. K., Harding, S. V., Darzi, J., & Pot, G. K. (2017). The effects of partial sleep deprivation on energy balance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71(5), 614–624. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2020). Physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period: ACOG Committee Opinion No. 804. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 135(4), e178–e188. Babbott, K. M., Cavadino, A., Brenton-Peters, J., Consedine, N. S., & Roberts, M. (2023). Outcomes of intuitive eating interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eating Disorders, 31(1), 33–63. Barbaresko, J., Bröder, J., Conrad, J., Szczerba, E., Lang, A., & Schlesinger, S. (2025). Ultra-processed food consumption and human health: An umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 65(11), 1999–2007. Crimarco, A., Springfield, S., Petlura, C., Streaty, T., Cunanan, K., Lee, J., Fielding-Singh, P., Carter, M. M., Topf, M. A., Wastyk, H. C., Sonnenburg, E. D., Sonnenburg, J. L., & Gardner, C. D. (2020). A randomized crossover trial on the effect of plant-based compared with animal-based meat on trimethylamine-N-oxide and cardiovascular disease risk factors in generally healthy adults: Study With Appetizing Plantfood-Meat Eating Alternative Trial. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 112(5), 1188–1199. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung & Österreichische Gesellschaft für Ernährung. (2025). Referenzwerte für die Nährstoffzufuhr (3. Aufl.). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung. Eaton, M., Probst, Y., Foster, T., Messore, J., & Robinson, L. (2024). A systematic review of observational studies exploring the relationship between health and non-weight-centric eating behaviours. Appetite, 199, Article 107361. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies. (2016). Dietary reference values for choline. EFSA Journal, 14(8), Article 4484. Fernández-Rodríguez, R., Bizzozero-Peroni, B., Díaz-Goñi, V., Garrido-Miguel, M., Bertotti, G., Roldán-Ruiz, A., & López-Moreno, M. (2025). Plant-based meat alternatives and cardiometabolic health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 121(2), 274–283. Forschungsinstitut für pflanzenbasierte Ernährung & Veganuary. (2026). Gießener vegane Lebensmittelpyramide. Greendale, G. A., Sternfeld, B., Huang, M., Han, W., Karvonen-Gutierrez, C., Ruppert, K., Cauley, J. A., Finkelstein, J. S., Jiang, S.-F., & Karlamangla, A. S. (2019). Changes in body composition and weight during the menopause transition. JCI Insight, 4(5), Article e124865. Grider, H. S., Douglas, S. M., & Raynor, H. A. (2021). The influence of mindful eating and/or intuitive eating approaches on dietary intake: A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 121(4), 709–727.e1. Hartmann-Boyce, J., Theodoulou, A., Oke, J. L., Butler, A. R., Bastounis, A., Dunnigan, A., Byadya, R., Cobiac, L. J., Scarborough, P., Hobbs, F. D. R., Sniehotta, F. F., Jebb, S. A., & Aveyard, P. (2023). Long-term effect of weight regain following behavioral weight management programs on cardiometabolic disease incidence and risk: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 16(4), Article e009348. Hevia-Larraín, V., Gualano, B., Longobardi, I., Gil, S., Fernandes, A. L., Costa, L. A. R., Pereira, R. M. R., Artioli, G. G., Phillips, S. M., & Roschel, H. (2021). High-protein plant-based diet versus a protein-matched omnivorous diet to support resistance training adaptations: A comparison between habitual vegans and omnivores. Sports Medicine, 51(6), 1317–1330. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report (H. Lee & J. Romero, Eds.). IPCC. Kalhoff, H., Rudloff, S., Ensenauer, R., Hensel, K., Kauth, T., Posovszk, C., & Weihrauch-Blüher, S., für die Ernährungskommission der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin. (2026). Vegetarische und vegane Ernährung bei Kindern und Jugendlichen – ein Update. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde. Advance online publication. Klug, A., Barbaresko, J., Alexy, U., Kühn, T., Kroke, A., Lotze-Campen, H., Nöthlings, U., Richter, M., Schader, C., Schlesinger, S., Virmani, K., Conrad, J., & Watzl, B. (2024). Update of the DGE position on vegan diet—Position statement of the German Nutrition Society. Ernährungs Umschau, 71(7), 60–84. Kreider, R. B., Kalman, D. S., Antonio, J., Ziegenfuss, T. N., Wildman, R., Collins, R., Candow, D. G., Kleiner, S. M., Almada, A. L., & Lopez, H. L. (2017). International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: Safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14, Article 18. Mountjoy, M., Ackerman, K. E., Bailey, D. M., Burke, L. M., Constantini, N., Hackney, A. C., Heikura, I. A., Melin, A., Pensgaard, A. M., Stellingwerff, T., Sundgot-Borgen, J. K., Torstveit, M. K., Jacobsen, A. U., Verhagen, E., Budgett, R., Engebretsen, L., & Erdener, U. (2023). 2023 International Olympic Committee's consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 57(17), 1073–1097. Parr, E. B., Camera, D. M., Areta, J. L., Burke, L. M., Phillips, S. M., Hawley, J. A., & Coffey, V. G. (2014). Alcohol ingestion impairs maximal post-exercise rates of myofibrillar protein synthesis following a single bout of concurrent training. PLOS ONE, 9(2), Article e88384. Reed, K. E., Camargo, J., Hamilton-Reeves, J., Kurzer, M., & Messina, M. (2021). Neither soy nor isoflavone intake affects male reproductive hormones: An expanded and updated meta-analysis of clinical studies. Reproductive Toxicology, 100, 60–67. Richter, M., Tauer, J., Conrad, J., Heil, E., Kroke, A., Virmani, K., & Watzl, B. (2024). Alcohol consumption in Germany, health and social consequences and derivation of recommendations for action—Position statement of the German Nutrition Society. Ernährungs Umschau, 71(10), 125–139. Thomas, D. T., Erdman, K. A., & Burke, L. M. (2016). American College of Sports Medicine joint position statement: Nutrition and athletic performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 48(3), 543–568. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services & U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2026). Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030 (10th ed.). Weidlinger, S., Winterberger, K., Pape, J., Weidlinger, M., Janka, H., von Wolff, M., & Stute, P. (2023). Impact of estrogens on resting energy expenditure: A systematic review. Obesity Reviews, 24(10), Article e13605.

Scientific Sense ® by Gill Eapen: Prof. Andrew Weaver is Professor of Earth and Ocean Sciences at the University of Victoria. He was the lead author to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessments. In 2007, the IPCC was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about human-induced climate change and to lay the foundations for measures needed to counteract such change.Please subscribe to this channel:https://www.youtube.com/c/ScientificSense?sub_confirmation=1

Willie Soon and Jonathan Cohler argue the rise in atmospheric CO2 is mostly natural, challenging claims it is 100% manmade from hydrocarbon burning. They cite analyses using bomb-produced carbon-14 showing a single-exponential decay and a short CO2 atmospheric residence time (~3.8 years), contrasting with IPCC claims of thousands of years and criticizing undefined terms like “adjustment time.” They say their work falsifies the Suess effect and that delta-13C of atmospheric change stays near -13‰ from 1978–2022 and in proxies over 500 years, inconsistent with a dominant fossil-fuel signature (~-28‰). They discuss ocean/land cycling, solar/energy imbalance hypotheses, and skepticism of ice-core CO2 constancy claims.00:00 Big CO2 Claim Questioned01:30 Decades of Doubt02:16 Researchers Who Challenged It04:13 Natural Rise Hypothesis05:14 Suess Effect Origins07:35 Bomb Pulse Carbon-1412:39 Short Residence Time14:22 Word Games vs Definitions16:44 3.8 Years Explained21:21 Bridge Equation Breakthrough25:34 Peer Pushback and Talks29:43 Physical Tether Theorem34:01 Koutsoyiannis Delta13C Test42:46 Why Delta13C Still Drops44:23 Lineage and Credit45:43 Cycle Time vs IPCC49:14 Debunking Net Sink51:06 Biosphere Expansion Idea51:48 Satellite Imbalance Fraud56:17 Outgassing Explains CO2 Rise01:01:40 Proxy Limits and Ice Cores01:09:26 Future CO2 and Benefits01:13:18 C14 Tracers and Dating01:15:02 Suez Effect Model Critique01:21:15 Wrapping Up and LinksJonathan Cohler – “The IPCC Circle of Lies: Five Papers Falsify the Entire Framework”https://x.com/cohler/status/2081407310493081791Willie Soon – “From Demon to Dinner: The Scientific Case for CO₂ and Fossil Fuels”https://x.com/cohler/status/2081408758308077952Slides:Jonathan Cohler: https://x.com/cohler/status/2081410426147938599Willie Soon: https://x.com/cohler/status/2081410908392133048CERES-Science: https://www.ceres-science.com/=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Worden we door media en politiek te bang gemaakt voor klimaatverandering? En wie financiert eigenlijk het klimaatactivisme? In deze aflevering spreekt Yael Potjer met wetenschapsjournalist Marcel Crok over klimaatfeiten versus klimaatalarmisme, de economische gevolgen van het klimaatbeleid en de schade aan onze welvaart.Crok erkent dat de aarde sinds 1850 opwarmt en dat CO₂ daarbij een rol speelt, maar plaatst grote vraagtekens en nuances bij de manier waarop klimaatscenario's worden gepresenteerd. Zo waarschuwde hij jaren geleden al dat het veelgebruikte rampscenario RCP8.5 niet realistisch was. Crok kreeg recent op dit punt gelijk: RCP8.5 keert niet terug in de scenario's voor het volgende IPCC-rapport. Ook stelt Crok dat er geen duidelijke toename is in extreem weer, zoals het aantal en de kracht van orkanen. Waarom zijn we jarenlang bang gemaakt voor een onrealistisch rampscenario?Ook bespreken ze de gevolgen van net zero voor onze energievoorziening, industrie en welvaart. Volgens Crok maakt Europa zijn eigen bedrijven kansloos door hoge energieprijzen, CO₂-heffingen en onhaalbare klimaatdoelen. Pleegt Europa met zijn klimaatbeleid economische zelfmoord?Tot slot volgen ze de geldstromen van Amerikaanse miljardairs en fondsen, die via een Nederlandse stichting honderden miljoenen naar Europese klimaatorganisaties zouden laten stromen. Wie financiert de Europese klimaatbeweging en waarom? En welke rol speelt de in Nederland gevestigde European Climate Foundation? Waarom horen we zo weinig kritische geluiden in de reguliere media? Koop tickets voor het Holland Gold evenement op 8 oktober: https://www.hollandgold.nl/evenement/Lees het artikel van Marcel Crok: https://clintel.org/european-climate-...Volg Marcel Crok op X: https://x.com/marcelcrokMarcel Crok op Linkedin:   / marcelcrok  Timestamps00:00 Intro02:35 Bias in de Media05:55 Klimaatalarmisme vs. Klimaatfeiten12:55 Extreem weer18:45 Bosbranden21:40 El Niño 2026 & gevolgen extreem weer nemen af26:22 CO2 en de rol van de mens33:33 Klimaatactivisten en net zero39:00 Economische zelfmoord47:33 Klimaatbeleid en ongelijkheid50:33 Einde rampscenario 58:44 Staat van de wetenschap, klimaatdebat & cancelcultuur1:07:05 Amerikaanse Miljardairs, European Climate Foundation & JournalistiekOverweegt u om goud en zilver aan te kopen? Dat kan via de volgende website: https://bit.ly/3xxy4sYTwitter:@Hollandgold:   / hollandgold  @paulbuitink:   / paulbuitink  Yael Potjer op X: https://x.com/GoedWeerGenieteLet op: Holland Gold vindt het belangrijk dat iedereen vrijuit kan spreken. Wij willen u er graag op attenderen dat de uitspraken die worden gedaan door de geïnterviewde niet persé betekenen dat Holland Gold hier achter staat. Alle uitspraken zijn gedaan op persoonlijke titel door de geïnterviewde en dragen zo bij aan een breed, kleurrijk en voor de kijker interessant beeld van de onderwerpen. Zo willen en kunnen wij u een transparante bijdrage en een zo volledig mogelijk inzicht geven in de economische marktontwikkelingen. Al onze video's zijn er enkel op gericht u te informeren. De informatie en data die we presenteren kunnen verouderd zijn bij het bekijken van onze video's. Onze video's zijn geen financieel advies. U alleen kunt bepalen hoe het beste uw vermogen kunt beleggen. U draagt zelf de risico's van uw keuzes.Foto thumbnail Marcel Crok: berten.beBekijk onze website: https://www.hollandgold.nl

Orit Halpern on Knowledge, Data and Democracy Shownotes Orit Halpern Prof. Dr. Orit Halpern at TU Dresden: https://tu-dresden.de/gsw/slk/germanistik/digitalcultures/die-professur/inhaber-in Orit Halpern's website: https://orithalpern.net/ Halpern, O. (2015). Beautiful data: A history of vision and reason since 1945. Duke University Press. https://www.dukeupress.edu/beautiful-data Halpern, O., & Mitchell, R. (2023). The smartness mandate. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262544511/the-smartness-mandate/  Hayek, F. A. (2013). The use of knowledge in society. In Modern understandings of liberty and property (pp. 27-38). Routledge. https://home.uchicago.edu/~vlima/courses/econ200/spring01/hayek.pdf  Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. The atlantic monthly, 176(1), 101-108. https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/reso/005/11/0094-0103  on CERN: https://home.cern/about/who-we-are/ on the Event Horizon Telescope: https://eventhorizontelescope.org/ on the IPCC: https://www.ipcc.ch/ on critiques of the Enlightenment: https://polsci.institute/modern-political-philosophy/critiques-enlightenment-modernity/ Horkheimer, M., Adorno, T. W., & Noeri, G. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment. Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/books/theory-and-philosophy/dialectic-enlightenment  on Keynesianism: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesianismus on MAGA: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_America_Great_Again  on the Frankfurt School: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frankfurt-School on high modernism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_modernism on totalitarianism according to Hannah Arendt: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Origins_of_Totalitarianism Friedrich Hayek: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_August_von_Hayek  on strict constitutionalism/constructionism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_constructionism on the Electoral College: https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/about on Stafford Beer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stafford_Beer https://www.kybernetik.ch/en/fs_beer.html  on post-sovereign planning: Mohammed, S. Z. (2025). Post-sovereign planning? Nature, culture and care in the new socialist calculation debate. In Creative Construction (pp. 265-278). Bristol University Press. https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/edcollchap/book/9781529235142/ch014.xml Latour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Harvard university press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674948396  on the cultural revolution: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Revolution on the Belt and Road initiative: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_and_Road_Initiative on Mao Zedong: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Zedong on Planetary Experiments: https://orithalpern.net/planetaryexperiments Halpern, O. (2019). The Planetary Test. Zeitschrift für Medien and Kulturforschung, Vol 10. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e2c7ee53de3f756cfd6cbbc/t/65a808813c02ca697d90089a/1705511045522/planetarytestarticleZMK.pdf Halpern, O. (2020). Planetary intelligence. In The cultural life of machine learning: An incursion into critical AI studies (pp. 227-256). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-56286-1_8 on Large Language Models (LLMs): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Language_Model  on Victor Papanek: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Papanek Groos, J., & Sorg, C. (Eds.). (2025). Creative construction: Democratic planning in the 21st century and beyond. Bristol University Press. https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/creative-construction  on Terraforming: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terraforming on Geoengineering: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoengineering on NVIDIA Earth 2: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/high-performance-com on Destination Earth: https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Destination_Earth on Piketty's inequality equation r > g: https://equitablegrowth.org/pareto-distribution-r-g/ Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674430006  the mentioned quote on the ‘weak cyborg dream' in Orit Halpern (2019, p. 22):  https://publish.fid-media.de/server/api/core/bitstreams/73aba255-56d2-4595-83b5-bfdad3740ffb/content Against Catastrophes: https://againstcatastrophe.net/ Orit Halpern on resilience: Halpern, O. (2025). The geo-politics of resilience: On the historical convergence between ecology, artificial intelligence, and corporate strategy. new media & society, 27(8), 4581-4605. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/14614448251336420  on Ground Truth: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_Truth  on benchmark data: https://brilliantfuture.se/en/glossaries/benchmark-data Related Episodes of Future Histories S03E34 | Cecilia Rikap on Intellectual Monopoly Capitalism and Corporate Power in the Age of AI https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e34-cecilia-rikap-on-intellectual-monopoly-capitalism-and-corporate-power-in-the-age-of-ai/ S02E44 | Evgeny Morozov on Discovery Beyond Competition https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e44-evgeny-morozov-on-discovery-beyond-competition/ S02E43 | Samia Mohammed zur Zukunft jenseits des Marktes https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e43-samia-mohammed-zur-zukunft-jenseits-des-marktes/ — Future Histories Contact & Support If you like Future Histories, please consider supporting us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/join/FutureHistories Contact: office@futurehistories.today  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/futurehpodcast/ Mastodon: https://mstdn.social/@FutureHistories English webpage: https://futurehistories-international.com Episode Keywords #OritHalpern #JanGroos, #Interview, #TUDresden, #FutureHistoriesInternational, #FutureHistories, #Knowledge, #Data, #Democracy, #Technology, #Society, #ArtificialIntelligence, #AI, #Data, #Capitalism, #Neoliberalism, #PlanetaryExperiments, #PostSovereignPlanning, #DemocraticPlanning, #Alternatives

Gianluca Alimonti discusses three “climate matrix” papers: a 2022 review of extreme weather time series and response indicators that found no clear worsening trends (later retracted, which he argues lacked specific scientific grounds and reflected political pressure); a 2023 analysis of EM-DAT natural-disaster records concluding the post-1970 rise is largely improved reporting, with trends stable since about 2000 and disaster deaths decreasing; and a recent framework proposing 43 IPCC-aligned impact-driver and response indicators to assess “climate crisis,” finding most show no worsening, many improve, and few worsen. He criticizes media/official claims of rapidly rising disasters and emphasizes adaptation and prevention.00:00 Meet Gianluca Alimonti00:02 Climate Matrix Trilogy Overview01:31 Paper One Extreme Events03:11 Hurricanes Rain Tornado Data05:31 Retraction Controversy09:50 Paper Two Disaster Claims12:36 EM-DAT Reporting Bias17:27 Stable Trends Since 200021:42 Paper Three Defining Crisis23:12 Media Term And Search Trends27:05 Building A Crisis Framework28:20 Drivers Floods Cyclones Fires31:53 Response Indicators Scorecard35:59 Adaptation Beats Mitigation37:49 Conclusions Media Distortion39:38 Q&A Retraction And Outreach41:40 Where To Find Work44:05 Closing Thanks And FarewellHome page: https://www0.mi.infn.it/~alimonti/homepage/indexEn.htmPielke Jr on “The Alimonti Addendum”: https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/the-alimonti-addendum=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Nicola Scafetta discusses his book, "The Frontier of Climate Science," a review based on about 650 peer‑reviewed papers arguing that IPCC global climate models have serious limitations because they fail to capture multi‑scale natural variability (oceanic, solar, astronomical, and tidal cycles). He says model claims that nearly all warming since 1850 is anthropogenic are not experimentally validated, climate sensitivity remains highly uncertain, and many models run too hot, with possible surface-record warm bias from urban heat islands. He cites past warm periods and correlations between climate and solar/cosmic-ray proxies, proposes empirical/semi‑empirical cycle-based modeling, and concludes warming risk is moderate, SSP2 could meet Paris targets, net zero is unnecessary, and adaptation should be prioritized.00:00 Introducing Scafetta's New Book06:03 Earth's Deep-Time Climate Swings11:06 IPCC Attribution to Humans14:44 Why Model Proof Falls Short17:27 Paris Targets and Net Zero Logic24:33 Are IPCC Scenarios Realistic29:04 Model Uncertainty and Sensitivity34:57 Satellites vs Surface Warming38:42 Missing Past Warm Periods43:21 Millennial Solar Climate Cycles46:00 Forests Beneath Glaciers46:59 Solar Records vs Climate49:18 TSI Reconstructions Debate52:09 Cosmic Rays and Clouds56:07 Empirical Models Challenge IPCC59:18 Policy Implications and Adaptation01:01:12 Planetary Cycles Climate Theory01:05:37 Matching Climate Spectral Cycles01:12:51 Future Hiatus and Sensitivity01:19:43 Next Glaciation Long View01:24:01 Book Wrap Up and ThanksThe Frontier of Climate Science: Solar variability, natural cycles and model uncertainty: https://a.co/d/0flzOYJ3=========Brochure for Nicola's “The Frontier of Climate Science” book, along with slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Anika Sweetland argues the IPCC was created through politics, funding, and elite influence, tracing its origins to the 1985 Villach Conference and alleging it advances centralized global governance. She says media-driven fear shifted from 1970s “ice age” stories to 1988 “global warming,” citing sea-level warnings that did not occur. Sweetland claims climate finance and clean-energy investment incentives benefit IPCC-linked officials. She highlights Climategate emails as evidence of strategic data presentation (“hide the decline”), message management, and peer-review gatekeeping (“PAL review”), plus an alleged journal blacklist. She says her climate studies education omitted Climategate, emphasized policy “solutions,” and discouraged debate.00:00 IPCC Exposed Intro01:01 Ice Age Media Panic02:06 Fear as Control Tool03:36 Global Warming Rebrand05:23 Sea Level Scare Claims07:28 Villach Birth of IPCC09:31 Global Governance Agenda10:31 Trillions and Incentives12:20 Climategate Data Tricks18:57 Peer Review Gatekeeping21:44 Blacklists and Ideology23:31 Personal Wake Up Call25:16 Who Controls Science26:34 What We Can Do Next27:23 Host Reacts and Questions27:36 Climategate Not Taught30:10 Policy Impacts UK Europe33:15 Witch Hunts Parallel37:22 Climate Degree Brainwashing40:42 Only Graduate Story43:15 Today's Model Driven Teaching45:19 Books and IPCC Origins46:17 Closing Thanks and Wraphttps://x.com/anika_climate=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

In this special episode of America Adapts (256), host Doug Parsons brings together leading voices from journalism, filmmaking, philanthropy, research, and climate practice to explore one of the biggest challenges facing climate adaptation: how do we communicate it? These conversations, sparked by a communications panel at the National Adaptation Forum, examine why adaptation remains "the greatest story never told," how to connect with audiences beyond the adaptation community, and what it will take to build a stronger culture of climate resilience. Along the way, an unexpected communications framework begins to emerge, with each guest offering a distinct principle for making adaptation more visible, relatable, and actionable. The conversations also point to an often-overlooked challenge: communications must be funded, prioritized, and approached with the same creativity and innovation we bring to adaptation itself. This episode was generously supported by the CO2 Foundation, whose commitment to advancing climate adaptation communications helped make these conversations possible. Experts in this Episode: Karen Wolfgang – Executive Director of the CO2 Foundation - Transcript Olga Loginova - Documentary Filmmaker and Podcaster  - Transcript Beth Gibbons – Director, Resiliency Office, Washtenaw County - Transcript Shaun Martin - Director of Adaptation, WWF-US  - Transcript Pearl Marvell - Yale Climate Connections, Editora de YCC en español - Transcript Dr. Deb L. Morrison - Learning Scientist focused on climate adaptation and Lead Author for the IPCC's Seventh Assessment Report on Climate Information and Services - Transcript  Memorable Quotes from This Episode Doug Parsons, America Adapts "Does adaptation have an awareness problem, a language problem, or an identity problem? Karen Wolfgang, CO2 Foundation "We need to tell a similar story—that there's something worth adapting for." Shaun Martin, World Wildlife Fund "People hear what they want to hear—not necessarily what I want them to hear, which is the adaptation story." Olga Loginova, Filmmaker & Journalist "I love people. And I'm fascinated with the stories that people tell." Pearl Marvell, Yale Climate Connections "One of the best things you can do when it comes to climate change and climate action is just to start a conversation about it." Dr. Deb Morrison, University of Washington "Just speaking to people about your message is, in fact, not communication." Beth Gibbons, Washtenaw County Resiliency Office "You're not leading with adaptation. You're leading with what people locally care about, but you're bringing the adaptation story into that topic." Panel Communication Framework 1. Communications is Critical Infrastructure (Doug Parsons) Adaptation only scales if successful ideas are communicated, shared, and put into action. 2. Actionable Knowledge Transfer (Karen Wolfgang) Share what works—and what doesn't—so communities can learn faster and adaptation can spread. 3. Keep Adaptation Visible (Shaun Martin) Don't let adaptation disappear inside conservation, disasters, AI, or other compelling narratives. 4. Tell Human Stories (Olga Loginova) People connect with people, trust, identity, and lived experience—not reports.5. Know Your Audience (Pearl Marvel) Different audiences require different messages, framing, platforms, and storytellers. 6. Co-Produce Communication (Dr. Deb L. Morrison) Build understanding with communities, not just messages for communities. 7. Treat Communications Strategically (Beth Gibbons) Meet people where they are, work with trusted partners, and make communications part of every adaptation effort—not an afterthought. Key Themes Covered in This Episode Why Climate Adaptation May Be the Greatest Story Never Told Building Climate Adaptation Through Better Communications Knowledge Transfer as the Key to Scaling Adaptation The Power of Human Stories and Community Voices Knowing Your Audience and Communicating with Purpose Why Communications Should Be Core Adaptation Infrastructure Funding, Innovation, and the Future of Climate Adaptation Communications  For Educators & Students Climate Adaptation Communications Science Communication & Public Engagement Environmental Journalism & Storytelling Community Engagement & Co-Production Adaptation Planning & Knowledge Transfer Strategic Communications for Climate Action Philanthropy, Funding & Scaling Adaptation Who Should Listen to This Episode  Climate Adaptation & Resilience Professionals Climate Communicators & Journalists Grantmakers & Philanthropic Leaders Government & NGO Climate Practitioners Researchers, Academics & Students Community Engagement & Outreach Professionals Anyone Working to Scale Climate Adaptation Check out the America Adapts Media Kit here! Subscribe to the America Adapts newsletter here. Donate to America Adapts Facebook, Linkedin and Twitter: https://www.facebook.com/americaadapts/ @usaadapts https://www.linkedin.com/in/doug-parsons-america-adapts/ Links in this episode: National Adaptation Forum https://www.nationaladaptationforum.org/ Yale Climate Connections https://yaleclimateconnections.org/ Doug Parsons and Speaking Opportunities: If you are interested in having Doug speak at corporate and conference events, sharing his unique, expert perspective on adaptation in an entertaining and informative way, more information can be found here! Facebook, Linkedin and Twitter: https://www.facebook.com/americaadapts/ https://bsky.app/profile/americaadapts.bsky.social https://www.linkedin.com/in/doug-parsons-america-adapts/ Donate to America Adapts Follow on Apple Podcasts Follow on Android Now on Spotify! List of Previous Guests on America Adapts Follow/listen to podcast on Apple Podcasts. Donate to America Adapts, we are now a tax deductible charitable organization! The 10 Best Sustainability Podcasts for Environmental Business Leadershttps://us.anteagroup.com/news-events/blog/10-best-sustainability-podcasts-environmental-business-leaders Join the climate change adaptation movement by supporting America Adapts!  Please consider supporting this podcast by donating through America Adapts fiscal sponsor, the Social Good Fund. All donations are now tax deductible! For more information on this podcast, visit the website at http://www.americaadapts.org and don't forget to subscribe to this podcast on Apple Podcasts.   Podcast Music produce by Richard Haitz Productions Write a review on Apple Podcasts ! America Adapts on Facebook!   Join the America Adapts Facebook Community Group. Check us out, we're also on YouTube! Subscribe to America Adapts on Apple Podcasts Doug can be contacted at americaadapts @ g mail . com

Convidados: Carlos Nobre, climatologista e cientista sênior da USP, ele integrou o Painel Intergovernamental sobre Mudanças Climáticas da ONU (IPCC) que recebeu o Prêmio Nobel da Paz em 2007; e Lincoln Muniz Alves, coordenador-geral do Ministério do Meio Ambiente e Mudança do Clima, pesquisador do INPE e autor-líder do IPCC. Os sinais já são assustadores: uma onda de calor sem precedentes na Europa e as temperaturas mais altas já registradas nos oceanos. O alerta é de que isso pode ser apenas o início dos impactos que o El Niño terá ao redor do planeta – a Administração Oceânica e Atmosférica dos EUA estima que o fenômeno climático tem 68% de probabilidade de ser “muito forte” e climatologistas afirmam que este pode ser o mais poderoso dos últimos 140 anos. No Brasil, o fenômeno deve provocar mais chuvas na região Sul e estiagem nas regiões Norte e Nordeste, além de aumentar a temperatura em praticamente todo o território, principalmente entre novembro e janeiro. O Governo Federal anunciou um pacote de quase R$ 10 bilhões e um sistema nacional de alerta para lidar com as áreas mais vulneráveis. Eventos climáticos extremos são cíclicos, mas os cientistas alertam que eles estão ocorrendo com mais frequência e com mais potência. E o motivo disso são as mudanças climáticas provocadas pela ação humana. Neste episódio, Natuza Nery entrevista dois especialistas em clima. Primeiro, ela conversa com Carlos Nobre sobre o momento que o planeta vive no que diz respeito às mudanças climáticas. Nobre aponta quem são os responsáveis para enfrentar o desafio climático e o que pode ser feito. Depois, participa o pesquisador do INPE Lincoln Alves, que detalha de que modo o El Niño vai atingir o território brasileiro.

VOV1 - Chính quyền Mỹ ngày 30/6 khẳng định các chính sách kiểm soát nhập cư không làm giảm sức hút của World Cup 2026, đồng thời cho rằng giải đấu đang chứng minh nước Mỹ vẫn là điểm đến hấp dẫn đối với người hâm mộ bóng đá trên toàn thế giới. Phát biểu tại Trung tâm Hợp tác Cảnh sát Quốc tế (IPCC) ở bang Virginia, Giám đốc điều hành Lực lượng đặc nhiệm Nhà Trắng về World Cup 2026 Andrew Giuliani cho biết trước giải đấu đã xuất hiện nhiều ý kiến cho rằng các chính sách nhập cư của Tổng thống Donald Trump có thể khiến người hâm mộ quốc tế e ngại đến Mỹ. Tuy nhiên, theo ông, thực tế diễn ra hoàn toàn trái ngược.Ông Giuliani cho biết các sân vận động hiện đạt tỷ lệ lấp đầy trên 99%, trong khi World Cup 2026 đã vượt các kỳ World Cup trước về số lượng khán giả đến sân ở cùng giai đoạn. Theo ông, những con số này là minh chứng rõ ràng nhất cho thấy nước Mỹ vẫn thu hút đông đảo người hâm mộ từ khắp nơi trên thế giới.Để tạo điều kiện cho du khách quốc tế, chính quyền Mỹ đã phối hợp giữa Bộ Ngoại giao, Bộ An ninh Nội địa và các cơ quan liên quan nhằm đẩy nhanh quá trình cấp thị thực và giấy phép nhập cảnh. Riêng đối với 19 quốc gia thuộc Chương trình miễn thị thực (ESTA) có đội tuyển tham dự World Cup, hơn 5 triệu giấy phép nhập cảnh điện tử đã được xử lý chỉ trong nửa đầu năm tài khóa.Đối với các quốc gia phải xin thị thực, thời gian chờ cũng được rút ngắn đáng kể. Tại Brazil, thời gian chờ cấp thị thực du lịch từ khoảng 700 ngày trước đây đã giảm xuống còn dưới một tháng, trong khi tại Argentina chỉ còn khoảng một ngày. Theo Nhà Trắng, đây là kết quả của chiến dịch tăng cường nhân lực lãnh sự và cải cách quy trình xét duyệt nhằm đáp ứng nhu cầu đi lại tăng cao trong dịp World Cup.Ông Giuliani nhấn mạnh Mỹ vẫn duy trì lập trường kiểm soát chặt chẽ đối với nhập cư bất hợp pháp, song luôn tạo điều kiện thuận lợi cho những người nhập cảnh hợp pháp đến theo dõi World Cup. Theo ông, mục tiêu của chính quyền là vừa bảo đảm an ninh quốc gia, vừa chào đón hàng triệu cổ động viên quốc tế đến trải nghiệm giải đấu.Quan chức Nhà Trắng cũng cho rằng World Cup 2026 là cơ hội để thế giới có cái nhìn trực tiếp về nước Mỹ thông qua các thành phố đăng cai, con người và văn hóa địa phương. Ông bày tỏ kỳ vọng những trải nghiệm tích cực của người hâm mộ sẽ góp phần thúc đẩy du lịch, đầu tư và củng cố hình ảnh nước Mỹ sau khi giải đấu kết thúc.Quang Trung/VOV- WashingtonÔng Andrew Giuliani Giám đốc điều hành Lực lượng đặc nhiệm Nhà Trắng về World Cup 2026 (Ảnh: QT)

Most net zero policies and major scientific models rely on carbon dioxide removal (CDR) to limit global heating to 2℃. The most commonly known methods include afforestation, bioenergy with carbon capture, and direct air capture - but various proposals are emerging for ocean-based CDR technologies. Could marine CDR offset emissions from sectors that cannot easily decarbonise, or are the costs and risks too great? Bertie sat down with oceanographer David Ho to discuss these questions, shortly after he returned from the 4th International Conference on Carbon Dioxide Removal in Milan. David Ho is a professor at University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, and a lead author on the upcoming IPCC methodology report on carbon dioxide removal and carbon capture, utilisation and storage. His 2023 article for Nature criticising overreliance on CDR has been downloaded more than 100,000 times.Further reading: 'Three challenges to marine carbon dioxide removal', npj Ocean Sustainability, November 2025Principles for responsible and effective marine carbon dioxide removal development and governance, 2025'Marine carbon dioxide removal may be a future climate solution', Dialogues on Climate Change, November 2024'Can coastal and marine carbon dioxide removal help to close the emissions gap? Scientific, legal, economic, and governance considerations',  Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, August 2024'Deployment expectations of multi-gigatonne scale carbon removal could have adverse impacts on Asia's energy-water-land nexus', Nature Communications, July 2024'Carbon dioxide removal is not a current climate solution — we need to change the narrative', Nature, April 2023Send us Fan MailFind all our latest investigations, features and interviews at www.landclimate.org

Title: The Mysterious Cold Blob & the Looming Heatwave Timestamp Breakdown: 00:00 Introduction: The Washington Post article on heat domes and a cold blob. 00:58 How the cold blob connects to weaker jet stream winds and European heat domes. 02:02 Shifting focus to the upcoming US heatwave, potentially Chicago's worst in 14 years. 02:59 Deeper dive into the North Atlantic cold blob and its potential impact on ocean currents (AMOC). 04:15 Explaining the AMOC's critical role in northern European climate. 05:07 The "cold blob" as a potential sign of AMOC weakening and its national security implications (50 below zero winters!). 06:21 Research on AMOC weakening, the IPCC's medium confidence, and the cold blob's significance. 07:46 Natural climate patterns (AMO) and human-driven warming contributing to the cold blob. 09:16 Climate models predict the cold blob will linger, but the "doomsday scenario" is still uncertain. 09:56 Why the Washington Post isn't covering the upcoming US heatwave more prominently. 11:03 The Strawberry Moon and the difficulty finding US heatwave info in the Washington Post. 11:59 European computer model shows Chicago south of the 588 line – extreme heat for the Midwest. 13:00 Forecast details for Chicago: 90s, high dew points, and the "Ring of Fire" possibility. 14:04 High dew points and potential 14-year record heatwave for Chicago. 15:06 Heat indices for Monday and Tuesday in the Midwest (above 100-105 degrees). 16:03 The complex effect of wind on heat index and very high temperatures on the East Coast. 17:09 Forecasted triple-digit heat for Washington D.C. (106-109 degrees) and the extended nature of the heatwave. 18:18 Continuation of heat in the Desert Southwest and a massive European heat dome. 18:48 Acknowledging the blessing of AC and the overlooked health benefits of heat (with caution). 19:35 Mississippi River and Lake of the Ozarks water temperatures as heat indicators. 20:10 Outro and preview of "Weather with Enthusiasm." 20 Hashtags: #ColdBlob #Heatwave2024 #ClimateChange #WashingtonPost #AMOC #NorthAtlantic #JetStream #EuropeanHeatwave #MidwestHeat #ChicagoWeather #NationalSecurityRisk #ExtremeWeather #GlobalWarming #OceanCurrents #ElNino #WeatherForecast #HeatDome #TripleDigitHeat #ClimateScience #WeatherEnthusiasmBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/weather-with-enthusiasm--4911017/support.Weather with Enthusiasm is produced by Kol Simcha Productions.New episodes drop daily (B'N)— a morning forecast at 7 AM and historical deep dives Tuesdays and Thursdays. Contact: kolsimchaproductions@outlook.comHistorical content is thoroughly researched and factually verified. After it has been factually verified it often will say so in the description. Should you find any mistakes, please email kolsimchaproductions@outlook.com so we can look into it and correct it. Not affiliated with any government agency or academic institution. Presented for educational and entertainment purposes — with meaning.Support the show — exclusive bonus episodes available to subscribers for just $2/month at spreaker.com/organization/kol-simcha

Since Donald Trump returned to the Presidency in 2025, the US has become increasingly isolationist. It has pulled out of the Paris climate agreement and the IPCC, left the World Health Organisation, as well as a whole host of other international organisations and agencies. So, when President Trump leaves the White House, will the US be able to rebuild trust on the international stage? This week on Cleaning Up, former US Secretary of State and Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry sits down with Michael Liebreich and reflects on some of the defining diplomatic efforts of his career, from negotiating the Iran nuclear deal to helping secure the Paris Climate Agreement. Secretary Kerry explains how years of relationship-building and behind the scenes diplomacy helped bring Iran to the negotiating table and why he believes the original nuclear agreement succeeded in limiting Iran's nuclear programme. He also shares his frustration at what he sees as the dismantling of agreements and relationships that took years to build, and the challenge of restoring trust in US leadership on the global stage.  Secretary Kerry also shares his perspective on working with China, the importance of international cooperation, and the role diplomacy still has to play. They also discuss rebuilding trust in US leadership, and the shifting balance between the US and China in clean energy. Topics Include: How the Obama administration negotiated limits on Iran's nuclear programme The diplomacy behind the Paris Climate Agreement The meaning of "common but differentiated" in climate diplomacy Lessons from Kyoto, Paris and Dubai on international climate agreements Why engaging adversaries matters more than isolating them How can the U.S. rebuild trust on a global stage? Petrostate vs electrostate: the shifting US-China dynamic Leadership Circle: Cleaning Up is proud to be supported by its Leadership Circle. The members are Actis, Alcazar Energy, Arup, Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, Cygnum Capital, Davidson Kempner, Ecopragma Capital, EDP, Eurelectric, the Gilardini Foundation, KKR, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, National Grid, Octopus Energy, Quadrature Climate Foundation, Schneider Electric, SDCL and Wärtsilä. For more information about the Leadership Circle, visit cleaningup.live Links: John Kerry's bio: https://galvanizeclimate.com/team/secretary-john-kerry Galvanize https://galvanizeclimate.com/ Our Ocean Conference https://www.ouroceanconference.org/ Todd Stern on Cleaning Up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffnZzO6CMI8 Ernie Moniz on Cleaning Up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0shzlRv4MTY Acronyms: ADNOC - Abu Dhabi National Oil Company LNG - Liquified Natural Gas OPCW - Organisation for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons ESG - Environment, Social and Governance IRGC - Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps

Tom interviews Anika Sweetland, who argues Earth's climate changes in predictable natural cycles and that today is relatively cool in a 65‑million‑year context. Using graphs and books by Gregory Wrightstone, she describes ice-age rhythms linked to Milankovitch cycles and 1,500‑year Dansgaard–Oeschger cycles, including the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age, and claims solar activity and cosmic rays better correlate with temperature than CO2. She says the IPCC smooths data and governments use fear for control, while net-zero policies are wasteful and geoengineering in the UK is concerning. Sweetland recounts university climate studies as CO2-focused indoctrination, discusses backlash and support online, and previews a part two on the IPCC.00:00 Meet Anika Sweetland04:40 Ice Ages and Long Cooling07:18 Milankovitch Cycles Explained09:14 Dansgaard Oeschger Cycles11:04 Medieval Warmth and Little Ice Age14:01 Sun Cosmic Rays and Clouds18:21 CO2 Claims and Propaganda21:07 Her Climate Degree Experience23:22 Education Debate and Models27:47 Conference Disruption and Activism30:34 Social Media Pushback34:54 Part Two and Wrap Up35:22 Energy Policy and Geoengineering39:18 Final Thanks and Goodbyehttps://x.com/anika_climateThe 16th International Conference on Climate Change: https://climateconference.heartland.org/Anika on being bombarded with global warming propaganda: https://x.com/anika_climate/status/2037550091544785239=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Tohle je zkrácená verze rozhovoru. Pusť si celý díl a Předplať si náš obsah a dostávej díly v celé jejich délce, dřív a bez reklam. Jen za 100,-/měsíc. https://open.spotify.com/episode/3NWDdclBFk4GUSwgVlal0Q?si=bc031e72a101465bTohle je deep dive do vědy za klimatem, jeho změnou a vývojem během planetární historie.Klima se dnes často láme mezi dvě špatné strategie. Na jedné straně panika. Na druhé cynismus. Tenhle rozhovor jde jinudy.S Danielem Kortusem rozebíráme, co vlastně znamená klimatická změna v měřítku planety, civilizace i každodenního života.Proč je dnešní situace bezprecedentní ne proto, že by se klima nikdy neměnilo, ale proto, že jsme během pár generací otevřeli geologickou banku uhlíku, která se jinak hýbe v horizontech milionů let.Proč každá desetina stupně dává smysl. Proč technologie nejsou zázračné řešení, ale zároveň ani není pravda, že se nic nedaří. A proč největší problém klimatu možná není jen fyzický, ale i psychologický a komunikační: je příliš velké, příliš dlouhé a příliš abstraktní na to, aby bylo přirozeně na prvním místě.Parťák dílu:Vilgain - Aktin.cz a tady je náš link essentials ⁠⁠Aktin.cz/bwa⁠⁠ pro slevu zadej kód BWA a objednej si kvalitní produkty s čistým složením. Tady máš seznam našich essentials ⁠⁠Aktin.cz/bwa⁠⁠⁠ Fondee.cz - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.fondee.cz/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Unikátní platforma na investování v ČR, kterou sami používáme. Navštiv ⁠⁠⁠www.Fondee.cz⁠⁠⁠ a zadej kód "BWA" pro 3 měsíce investování zdarma! Začni třeba už s 1000,- // Investování se pojí s riziky. Minutáž:00:00 Představení hosta a projektu Klimatomluva04:33 Jak vypadala klimatická změna před průmyslovou revolucí a po ní?11:41 Co jsou Milankovičovy cykly a jak přepínají doby ledové?13:59 Karbonový puls: Jak člověk otočil regulátorem oxidu uhličitého20:46 Mechanismus skleníkového efektu a role vodní páry28:23 Předpověď počasí vs. modelování klimatu: Jak vznikají scénáře IPCC?34:03 Co by globální oteplení reálně znamenalo pro Českou republiku?41:26 Techno-optimismus: Proč se nám daří rozvíjet obnovitelné zdroje?54:39 Má smysl, aby Evropa omezovala emise, když dělá jen 5%?56:30 Oceán jako chemický pufr planety a riziko jeho nasycení01:11:37 Jak vyčištění síry z paliv lodí paradoxně ohřálo Atlantik01:17:06 Klimatická úzkost a role jednotlivce proti korporacím01:23:37 Jak dostat téma k lidem skrze adaptaci a příběhy (např. v seriálu Ulice)01:33:26 Informační ekologie a Princip asymetrie bullshitu (Brandoliniho zákon)Přechod do VIP části- Koncept Velkého zjednodušení a enormní energetický hlad AI- Albedo efekt, tání Arktidy a závěrečné shrnutí

 Industrial water professionals work with chemistry, equipment, permits, and performance targets every day. Yet every gallon also moves through a framework of policy decisions: who can withdraw water, how it may be used, what quality must be returned, and whose needs are considered when systems are designed.  Sherine El-Wattar, a science network officer supporting the IPCC Working Group II Technical Support Unit, brings an engineering foundation and a human-centered perspective to those questions. Her work focuses on climate impacts, adaptation, vulnerability, and risk while helping connect scientific assessments with communities and professional groups beyond the traditional research environment.    Water Systems Are Never Neutral  Pipelines, treatment plants, reuse programs, and flood-control infrastructure solve technical problems. However, Sherine encourages engineers and decision-makers to ask additional questions: Who benefits from the system? Who might be harmed? Whose assumptions are built into the equations? What local realities might the numbers overlook?  Her master's research illustrates the importance of that lens. Sherine compared remote-sensing indicators of agricultural productivity with the day-to-day practices of farmers near Cairo. A digital map could classify land as productive or unproductive, but the view from the ground revealed practices shaped by long-term care for the soil and water. The lesson is not to dismiss data. It is to understand what the data may not capture.    Water Risk Depends on Context  Water scarcity, flooding, infrastructure resilience, and climate adaptation do not look the same in every region. Culture, institutions, belief systems, and lived experience shape how communities define risk and how they respond to water policy.  Sherine describes climate-related water risk through a straightforward frame: too much water or too little water. The solutions, however, require deeper attention to local conditions. A technically sound recommendation may still fall short if it overlooks the people affected by the decision.    Practical Steps for Water Professionals  For utilities, facilities, and water-sector businesses, Sherine recommends exploring water footprint concepts and water stewardship. She also emphasizes authentic connection: listen before trying to fix a problem, communicate without judgment, and build awareness through relationships.  Industrial water treaters already hold valuable knowledge. Sharing that expertise with operators, communities, policymakers, and professionals from other disciplines can improve the quality of future water decisions.  Listen to the full conversation above. Explore related episodes below. Stay engaged, keep learning, and continue scaling up your knowledge!    Timestamps 02:10 — Trace explains why water and policy are inseparable, even when daily work appears focused on equipment, chemistry, permits, and profitability. 05:10 — Upcoming industry events highlight opportunities to stay current on utility operations, infrastructure, compliance, data integration, and water-quality challenges. 08:50 — Sherine El-Wattar joins the conversation and clarifies the IPCC acronym before introducing her work in water governance and climate adaptation. 11:30 — Sherine reflects on the value of combining engineering problem-solving with water systems that serve society. 12:00 — Sherine describes her role supporting IPCC Working Group II and the two responsibilities she balances: science and networking. 14:10 — The discussion explores how expert reviewers can contribute perspectives from law, finance, health, youth organizations, Indigenous communities, and other fields. 15:30 — Sherine explains why communication must shift depending on whether the audience includes public communities or government representatives. 17:10 — Water is compared to language: local culture, institutions, and belief systems influence how risk and equity are understood. 19:50 — Sherine unpacks water as a story of people, power, and justice rather than only a network of pipes and treatment systems. 22:00 — A human-centric approach asks who benefits, who may be harmed, whose knowledge informs the system, and what the assumptions may cost. 24:40 — Sherine describes the Netherlands' Delta Works as an example of infrastructure shaped by risk, institutional capacity, and long-term water management. 27:10 — Sherine shares how her master's studies shifted her understanding of water from a technical discipline toward the science-policy interface. 29:40 — Her research compares remote-sensing indicators with farmers' lived practices near Cairo, revealing the limits of relying on aggregated data alone. 33:30 — Trace and Sherine explore how professionals can respect culture and tradition while still supporting education and improvement. 35:50 — Sherine recommends water footprint concepts and water stewardship as practical starting points for organizations planning for climate adaptation. 38:20 — The conversation examines the mismatch between climate risk and the depth of current responses to too much or too little water. 41:50 — Sherine encourages professionals to connect water awareness with personal reflection, professional networks, and conversations that influence behavior   Connect with Sherine El-Wattar  Phone: +31646914589  Email: selwattar@gmail.com  Website: IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change  https://www.linkedin.com/company/ipcc/  LinkedIn: Sherine El-Wattar | LinkedIn    Quotes "And I really liked how, you know, engineering is all about the numbers, solving problems, and finding a way to create a system that serves society." "I have been humbled enough to know you cannot force policymakers to think anything." "For us to balance these things, it's about, it starts with understanding." "I really hope I would live to see the day where taking care of water or being water conscious is the new trend."   Guest Resources Mentioned  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Working Group II IPCC Working Group II: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability  IPCC: What Is an Expert Reviewer of IPCC Reports? Engage with the IPCC The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard Alliance for Water Stewardship (AWS) Standard  IHE Delft: Water Governance  IHE Delft: Governance and Management Profile The History of the Delta Works FAO WaPOR: Remote Sensing for Water Productivity A Million Little Pieces by James Frey (Author) Paperback   Scaling UP! H2O Resources Mentioned  AWT (Association of Water Technologies)  Scaling UP! H2O Academy video courses  Submit a Show Idea  The Rising Tide Mastermind  What Is Water Footprint Assessment? UNU Institute for Water, Environment and Health: Global Water Bankruptcy   2026 Events for Water Professionals  Check out our Scaling UP! H2O Events Calendar where we've listed every event Water Treaters should be aware of by clicking HERE.   

Episode 187.2: Upcoming Napa Trip, Rosebud, LA Mayoral Race, Monster Wolf Robots, IPCC, Celebrity Deaths, TrumpRX, and Short Barrel Single Barrel 8 Year

On this week's Mean Age Daydream, Brian has no pity for the fired Scott Pelley of 60 Minutes fame, one of the most overrated shows ever in its modern incarnation. Also: Spencer Pratt advances into a finale vs. Karen Bass in Los Angeles, and the IPCC is exposed as charlatans. Buy my new card game: WOKE WORD WARS - https://www.amazon.com/Woke-Word-Wars-Ridiculously-Players/dp/B0FLF8Y16S

On this week's Mean Age Daydream, Brian has no pity for the fired Scott Pelley of 60 Minutes fame, one of the most overrated shows ever in its modern incarnation. Also: Spencer Pratt advances into a finale vs. Karen Bass in Los Angeles, and the IPCC is exposed as charlatans. Buy my new card game: WOKE WORD WARS - https://www.amazon.com/Woke-Word-Wars-Ridiculously-Players/dp/B0FLF8Y16S

O Roda Viva recebe nesta segunda-feira (01/06) o físico Paulo Artaxo, diretor do Centro de Estudos da Amazônia Sustentável da USP e uma das maiores autoridades mundiais em clima.Laureado com o Planet Earth Award 2026 e autor-líder nos três últimos relatórios do IPCC, painel da ONU agraciado com o Nobel da Paz, Artaxo vai analisar o cenário de transição global rumo à sustentabilidade. Em debate, os impactos das mudanças climáticas, as vulnerabilidades e vantagens estratégicas do Brasil, o impacto do próximo El Niño, o ponto de não retorno da Amazônia e a resiliência das cidades.O Roda Viva vai ao ar toda segunda, a partir das 22h, na TV Cultura, no site da emissora e no YouTube!#RodaViva #TVCultura #SomosCultura #Amazônia #Sustentabilidade #CentroDeEstudosDaAmazôniaSustentável #SalvemAAmazônia #FlorestaAmazônica #PontoDeNãoRetorno

Aan tafel deze week: Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken Tom Berendsen, burgemeester van Nijmegen Hubert Bruls, Nobelprijswinnaar Paul Krugman, en sociaal wetenschapper Michelle Rasch. Presentatie: Maaike Schoon. Wil je meer weten over de gasten in Buitenhof? Op onze website vind je meer informatie. Daar kan je deze aflevering ook terugkijken en je vindt er natuurlijk nog veel meer gesprekken: https://bit.ly/buitenhof-31-mei-2026 Met een zware delegatie van het kabinet sprak minister Hans Vijlbrief van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid deze week in het Catshuis met werkgevers- en werknemersbonden over de bezuinigingen op de sociale zekerheid. Komt er een nieuw Sociaal Akkoord of krijgen we een hete zomer met veel stakingen, sociale onrust en acties tegen de plannen van het kabinet? Ondermijning is de betonrot in onze samenleving, aldus een rapport dat deze week uitkwam van het ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid. En na de veroordeling van Inez Weski en het muurvast zittende Marengo proces, rijst de vraag voor Minister van Justitie en Veiligheid, David van Weel: hoeveel grip heeft de overheid op de georganiseerde misdaad? Deze week werd Libanon opnieuw gebombardeerd door Israël. Premier Netanyahu gaf het bevel om de aanvallen te intensiveren, met als doel om Hezbollah te vernietigen. Een groot deel van Zuid-Libanon is nu een gevechtszone. Midden-Oosten-correspondent Daisy Mohr woont al bijna 25 jaar in de Libanese hoofdstad Beiroet, ze is nu een paar dagen in Nederland. Hoe ziet haar dagelijks leven eruit in het oorlogsgebied? En hoe sterk is Hezbollah nog nu Iran is aangevallen? Het is de warmste meimaand in de geschiedenis, met afgelopen weken temperaturen van dertig graden hier in Nederland, maar ook elders in Europa kampte men met hitte. Tegelijkertijd schrapte het IPCC - de internationale klimaatorganisatie - onlangs het meest extreme toekomstscenario. Zo erg zal het dus niet worden, dacht menigeen, maar anderen bestrijden dit. Gerrit Hiemstra is bij ons te gast, oud-weerman van de NOS en klimaatondernemer. Over hittekoepels, de scenario's en over hoe de politiek richting moet geven aan klimaatbeleid.

This episode is presented by Create A Video – The United Nations is officially retiring the most catastrophic climate model for its upcoming assessment report. In a classic example of "now it can be told," it turns out that scientists knew the model was impossible for almost a decade. But the incentives were so great to use the model to secure scientific grants and for headlines that it created a powerful feedback loop that captured an entire political party.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-kaliner-show--6946691/support.Subscribe to the podcast My preferred podcast platform: SpreakerAll the links to Pete's Prep are free!Get exclusive content here!Media Bias Check: GroundNews promo code!Advertising and Booking inquiries: Pete@ThePeteKalinerShow.com  

Are we underestimating our capacity for social change?...Today, Abbie and Karen discuss quanta, entanglement, and collapsing potential as they explore mattering and social change....Karen O'Brien is a Professor of Human Geography at the University of Oslo, Norway. She is also co-founder of cCHANGE, an organisation that supports deep and strategic engagement with transformations to sustainability. Her research on the human and social dimensions of environmental change emphasises integrative approaches, including how beliefs, values, worldviews, and paradigms influence systems change and social change. She is particularly interested in the relationship between adaptation and transformations to sustainability and in exploring how quantum social science can inform how we understand, engage with, and scale transformative change. In 2021, she was co-recipient of the BBVA Foundation's Frontiers of Knowledge Award for Climate Change. Karen's recent books include You Matter More Than You Think: Quantum Social Change for a Thriving World and Climate and Society: Transforming the Future (with Robin Leichenko). She has participated in four IPCC reports and is currently co-chair of the International Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) transformative change assessment. She also writes a weekly newsletter on quantum social change....Stories Lived. Stories Told. is created, produced & hosted by Abbie VanMeter.Stories Lived. Stories Told. is an initiative of the CMM Institute for Personal and Social Evolution....Music for Stories Lived. Stories Told. is created by Rik Spann....CMM Institute SubstackCMM Institute Events Page…⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Explore all things Stories Lived. Stories Told. here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.Explore all things CMM Institute here.

John Maytham speaks to Prof Laura Pereira of the Wits Global Change Institute and the Stockholm Resilience Centre about new research warning that current climate models are failing to address Africa’s realities and why scientists are calling for more just and locally grounded climate planning. Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30pm. CapeTalk fans call in, to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) to Afternoon Drive with John Maytham broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/BSFy4Cn or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/n8nWt4x Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In Episode 556 of District of Conservation, Gabriella discusses the IPCC retiring RCP 8.5 - the worst case climate change modeling scenario and the impact of this. Tune in to learn more!SHOW NOTESRCP8.5 Is Officially DeadClimate change's worst-case scenario is officially canceledNo, RCP8.5 Did Not Become Implausible Because of Climate PolicyThe Scenario Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7 (ScenarioMIP-CMIP7)

Myself and Eddie blast this one out - full of Jewels! FULL Interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MQWVZH7LrYIf you'd like to join us all at our Heart and Chronic Disease Masterclass weekend event, just go to this link to book: https://www.weloveourheart.com/live2

Climate Change Panic Was the Original Hoax, Tara Says SHORT TITLE The Climate Hoax Collapse EPISODE DESCRIPTION Tara and Lee react to what they describe as the unraveling of decades of climate change narratives after recent discussion surrounding IPCC extreme warming projections. The conversation explores energy policy, China's rise, America's industrial decline, and the geopolitical consequences of climate-driven regulations. They also debate nuclear power, AI competition, and whether the United States can still catch up to China in the global energy race. HOOK Tara says climate change fear was “the original hoax” — and now the same institutions that pushed it for decades are quietly backing away after America already paid the price. KEY TALKING POINTS Discussion surrounding IPCC “extreme warming pathway” projections Debate over climate policy and media coverage Al Gore predictions revisited Concerns over energy grid reductions and rising electricity prices Obama-era coal reductions discussed China's role in global energy competition Claims that climate regulations benefited Chinese manufacturing growth Ted Cruz hearings and China-linked energy lawsuits referenced Debate over nuclear power expansion in the US AI and energy infrastructure race between the US and China Concerns over America falling behind in industrial capacity Trump energy policy contrasted with Democrat climate policies Discussion about long-term geopolitical strategy and energy independence SEO KEYWORDS climate change debate, IPCC controversy, global warming predictions, China energy strategy, nuclear power America, AI energy race, Al Gore climate predictions, Obama coal policy, climate hoax debate, Trump energy policy, Tara Servatius, Lee Cunningham, conservative podcast, China vs America SOCIAL MEDIA POST

A stunning Fox News poll reveals only 31% of Americans believe the Trump assassination attempt was definitely real, sparking a deep dive into media distrust, AI manipulation, and political division. Tara and Lee expose growing concerns over Chinese influence in American politics, climate narratives unraveling, mRNA vaccine fears, and the Democrat Party's collapsing support among men. Plus: Iran tensions, censorship revelations tied to the Biden administration, and why some believe America is approaching a dangerous cultural breaking point. PODCAST SUMMARY Today's show unpacks what Tara calls “America's reality crisis” after polling shows a shockingly low number of Americans fully believe the Trump assassination attempt actually happened. The conversation explores collapsing trust in media, AI-driven misinformation fears, and the impact of hyper-partisan politics on public perception. The show then pivots to allegations of growing Chinese Communist Party influence inside the United States, including claims involving Democrat fundraising networks, activist organizations, and congressional politics. Tara and Lee also revisit the climate change debate following discussion around recent IPCC reporting and decades of controversial environmental predictions. Additional segments cover concerns surrounding mRNA vaccine development, censorship tied to COVID-era narratives, and accusations that media institutions suppressed dissenting voices. The hour closes with a look at Democrat approval ratings among male voters and the broader cultural divide shaping the 2026 political landscape. SEGMENT HIGHLIGHTS Reality Crisis in America Only 31% of Americans say the Trump assassination attempt “definitely happened” Discussion on media distrust and AI-generated misinformation Debate over conspiracy culture and social media influence China's Expanding Influence Claims of Chinese Communist Party infiltration into American politics Discussion of activist funding and alleged influence operations Concerns over China's role in shaping U.S. policy and energy dependence Climate Narrative Under Fire Hosts react to reports questioning “extreme warming pathways” Criticism of decades of climate predictions and energy policy Discussion of nuclear energy, infrastructure, and China's rise COVID, mRNA & Censorship Renewed skepticism over vaccine narratives and media suppression Discussion of Alex Berenson's legal victory and censorship claims Concerns about future virus outbreaks and public trust Democrats Losing Male Voters New polling shows collapsing approval among men Discussion of shifting political demographics Debate over whether the Democrat Party can reverse the trend KEY QUOTES “How do you hold together an America where only thirty-one percent can figure out what reality is?” “The Chinese Communist Party is the single biggest threat to this country.” “They don't need the climate lie anymore because China already won.” “Trust in media has completely collapsed.” SEO KEYWORDS Trump assassination poll, China influence America, climate change debate, IPCC controversy, Democrat approval men, AI misinformation, COVID censorship, mRNA vaccines, Trump news podcast, political commentary, American media distrust, China and Democrats, Iran tensions, Alex Berenson lawsuit, conservative podcast HASHTAGS #Trump #China #ClimateChange #Politics #Media #AI #COVID19 #Podcast #America #Democrats #Republicans #News #PoliticalPodcast #FreeSpeech #AmpersandWave

A fiery breakdown of climate politics, media narratives, and global policy claims—this episode revisits decades of warnings about global warming, challenges from political critics who say predictions failed to materialize, and accusations that climate messaging has been used to drive fear and expand government power. The conversation also touches on the IPCC, Al Gore's early climate projections, shifting terminology from “global warming” to “climate change,” and broader geopolitical implications involving China and global energy strategy. EPISODE SUMMARY Today's discussion centers on a sweeping critique of climate policy messaging over the past several decades. The host argues that climate predictions promoted by political figures and international organizations have repeatedly failed to match real-world outcomes, citing historical claims about rising sea levels, disappearing glaciers, and extreme global impacts that did not materialize as projected. The episode also explores how climate language evolved over time—from “global warming” to “climate change”—and questions whether this shift reflected scientific refinement or political repositioning. References are made to IPCC modeling, media amplification, and high-profile figures like Al Gore, alongside claims that worst-case climate scenarios were emphasized without sufficient grounding. Beyond environmental policy, the discussion expands into geopolitics, suggesting that global climate agreements may have disproportionately constrained Western energy development while benefiting strategic competitors. The episode closes by arguing that energy policy decisions over the past 20 years have had lasting economic and national security consequences. SEGMENT BREAKDOWN 1. The “Climate Narrative Shift” Claims that “global warming” was rebranded as “climate change” Argument that messaging evolved as predictions failed to materialize Assertion that fear-based framing was used to maintain political momentum 2. Predictions vs. Reality Florida sea-level warnings and population collapse predictions Glacier National Park “ice-free” claims Kilimanjaro snow disappearance forecasts Arctic ice projections compared to current conditions 3. Media, IPCC, and Messaging Critique Allegations that worst-case scenarios were overused Claims of selective modeling and amplified projections Wall Street Journal cited as revisiting historical climate claims 4. Political and Cultural Impact Discussion of climate anxiety influencing life decisions Claims that younger generations were shaped by climate fear messaging References to education systems incorporating climate curriculum 5. Global Energy and Geopolitics Argument that Western energy policy was constrained China positioned as strategic beneficiary of climate agreements Nuclear energy described as an underutilized alternative KEY TALKING POINTS Evolution of climate terminology and messaging strategies Historical climate predictions vs. present-day outcomes Role of international organizations in climate modeling Media amplification and political influence on science communication Energy policy decisions and global economic competitiveness Geopolitical implications involving China and industrial policy SEO KEYWORDS climate change debate, global warming predictions, Al Gore climate claims, IPCC models, climate fear politics, Wall Street Journal climate report, climate hoax discussion, energy policy China, nuclear energy debate, climate curriculum schools, Florida sea level rise prediction, Arctic ice trends, climate politics podcast, environmental policy critique SOCIAL MEDIA POST

Are Climate Policies & Energy Shifts Part of a Bigger Global Strategy? New Claims Spark Debate

The American birthrate has cratered. And the DINKs (double income, no kids) don't seem to think that's a bad thing. The UN-backed IPCC (something something climate change) has adjusted its doomsaying model because Florida isn't underwater yet. It could also be because climate change is not a real thing and is only used to push a globalist agenda. Either way, Trump weighed in. GUEST: Josh Firestine Link to today's sources: https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/sources-may-18-2026 Let my sponsor American Financing help you regain control of your finances. NMLS #182334 nmlsconsumeraccess.org. APR for rates in the 5s start at 6.327% for well qualified borrowers. Call 800-974-6500 for details about credit, costs and terms. Visit www.AmericanFinancing.net/Crowder. Average savings based on borrowers who save over $199.99 Download Rumble Wallet now and enjoy the benefits of financial and personal freedom! https://rumblewallet.onelink.me/bJsX/crowder Share clips from the show & compete to get a mention on the show! Where to get clips: Telegram: http://t.me/LWCClips Discord: https://discord.gg/nfRAZxEbAV Submit link for tracking: https://forms.gle/HZwz7Q7C9hkHecxTA Foundation Daily is made up of premium ingredients to reduce inflammation and stress and promote clean energy and mental clarity. Subscribe now and receive 40% off for life. https://foundationdaily.com/ DOWNLOAD THE RUMBLE APP TODAY: https://rumble.com/our-apps Join Rumble Premium to watch this show every day! http://louderwithcrowder.com/Premium Get your favorite LWC gear: https://crowdershop.com/ Bite-Sized Content: https://rumble.com/c/CrowderBits Subscribe to my podcast: https://feeds.libsyn.com/576250/rss FOLLOW ME: Website: https://louderwithcrowder.com/ X: https://x.com/scrowder Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/louderwithcrowder Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/stevencrowderofficial Music by @Pogo

For years, the most extreme climate scenarios shaped headlines, policy debates, and public fear—despite growing evidence that many of those projections were increasingly detached from real-world energy and emissions trends. Now, in a major shift ahead of the IPCC's Seventh Assessment Report, climate modelers are quietly abandoning some of their most dramatic assumptions. In this episode of Sanity Check, David R. Legates breaks down the rise and fall of RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5, the “worst-case” climate pathways that came to dominate public discourse, and explains why CMIP7 is moving in a different direction. From coal projections and emissions trends to media narratives and scientific self-correction, this episode explores what these changes mean for climate science, public policy, and the future of the climate debate.https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/2627/2026/https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/rcp85-is-officially-deadhttps://www.theclimatebrink.com/p/emissions-are-no-longer-followinghttps://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-51281986https://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-the-high-emissions-rcp8-5-global-warming-scenario/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544217314597Visit our podcast resource page: https://cornwallalliance.org/listen%20to%20our%20podcast%20created%20to%20reign/Our work is entirely supported by donations from people like you. If you benefit from our work and would like to partner with us, please visit www.cornwallalliance.org/donate. 

On today's AmperWave Daily, the hosts unpack a controversial claim making waves online and in political commentary: that major climate institutions have allegedly revised or scaled back long-standing worst-case climate scenarios. The discussion expands into media influence, political messaging, energy policy history, and how climate science has been used in public debate for decades. Note: This episode reflects commentary and claims made in the source transcript.

Tara and Lee tackle redistricting battles, climate controversy, soft-on-crime policies, and a shocking airport tragedy. HOOK From redistricting wars and Supreme Court rulings to explosive climate change claims and a horrifying airport incident, Tara says the political and cultural cracks in America are becoming impossible to ignore. DESCRIPTION Today's AMPERWAVE DAILY dives headfirst into multiple explosive stories dominating conservative conversation nationwide. Tara and Lee break down claims that Democrats are panicking over redistricting fights and census controversies, while South Carolina Republicans face mounting pressure over congressional maps involving Representative Jim Clyburn. The show then pivots into a fiery debate over climate change narratives after critics argued that revised IPCC modeling undermines decades of catastrophic predictions. Tara examines how climate policies shaped energy prices, coal production, manufacturing, and media messaging involving figures like Barack Obama and Al Gore. Later, the conversation turns emotional and intense with discussion surrounding violent crime, repeat offenders, subway attacks in New York City, and the consequences of criminal justice policy debates. The episode closes with reactions to a shocking runway tragedy at Denver International Airport involving a trespasser and a departing aircraft. KEY TOPICS Democrat concerns over redistricting battles Congressional seat and census controversy Supreme Court rulings on race-based districts South Carolina GOP infighting Climate change debate and IPCC revisions Coal production and energy policy Violent crime and repeat offender policies NYC subway attack controversy Denver airport runway tragedy Media narratives and political messaging SEGMENTS SEGMENT 1 — “Redistricting Panic” Tara opens by discussing reports that Democrats are increasingly worried about congressional redistricting and future elections. The conversation focuses on claims of census manipulation, race-based districts, and legal battles surrounding Supreme Court rulings. SEGMENT 2 — “South Carolina Civil War” The spotlight shifts to South Carolina politics, where Tara criticizes Republican leadership figures including Henry McMaster and Shane Massey over congressional map disputes and GOP strategy surrounding Donald Trump. SEGMENT 3 — “Climate Narrative Under Fire” The show explores claims that revised IPCC climate scenarios weaken earlier catastrophic projections. Tara argues climate policy reshaped America's economy through higher energy prices, manufacturing losses, and restrictions on domestic coal production. SEGMENT 4 — “Crime, Consequences & Public Safety” An emotional segment examines violent subway attacks in New York City, repeat offender policies, and debates surrounding criminal justice reform. Tara argues progressive policies are creating dangerous public safety outcomes. SEGMENT 5 — “The Denver Runway Horror” The episode closes with reactions to a disturbing incident at Denver International Airport after a trespasser reportedly walked into the engine path of a departing aircraft, leaving witnesses stunned. QUOTE OF THE DAY “When Democrats get desperate, they get crazy.” SOCIAL MEDIA TEASER

Tara breaks down why critics say the climate agenda is unraveling after new IPCC scenario revisions and growing political backlash. HOOK For decades, catastrophic climate predictions shaped energy policy, education, media coverage, and the global economy. Now critics claim the very institutions that promoted those warnings are quietly backing away from their most extreme scenarios — and Tara says the implications are enormous. DESCRIPTION A stunning debate erupts after new revisions from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change spark claims that the most catastrophic warming scenarios were never realistic to begin with. Tara argues the climate movement's “worst-case” predictions fueled massive economic damage, soaring energy costs, manufacturing decline, censorship campaigns, and fear-driven politics for years. The episode dives into how climate models influenced American energy policy under President Barack Obama, why critics say coal and manufacturing were deliberately gutted, and how media outlets are now shifting their messaging. Tara also revisits past predictions from Al Gore and questions how long climate change narratives will remain embedded in schools, politics, and public policy. KEY TOPICS IPCC revisions to extreme climate scenarios Debate over catastrophic climate predictions Energy policy and rising electricity costs Coal industry decline in America Manufacturing movement to China and India Climate change education in schools Media coverage and censorship allegations Political fallout from climate policy debates SEGMENTS SEGMENT 1 — “The Climate Narrative Shock” Tara opens with claims that the climate movement's most catastrophic predictions are quietly being abandoned. The discussion centers on recent IPCC scenario revisions and why critics view them as a major turning point in the climate debate. SEGMENT 2 — “The Cost of the Agenda” The episode explores how climate policy allegedly reshaped the American economy through energy regulations, rising electricity prices, and restrictions on coal production. Tara argues these policies accelerated the decline of U.S. manufacturing. SEGMENT 3 — “Media, Schools, and Fear” Attention turns to how climate change messaging spread through media coverage, education systems, and public institutions. Tara criticizes climate-focused curriculum in schools and argues generations were taught to fear environmental catastrophe. SEGMENT 4 — “The Political Reckoning” The show closes with discussion about changing political messaging around climate change and whether media organizations and Democratic leaders are beginning to retreat from earlier alarmist rhetoric. QUOTE OF THE DAY “It was their first big society-wide hoax.” SOCIAL MEDIA TEASER

Climate Panic Collapse: New York Energy War, IPCC Walk-Back & the ‘Doomsday' Reversal

8. In this final segment, Cline summarizes the rankings of ancient societies based on resilience definitions from the IPCC. He distinguishes between those that "transformed" (the antifragile Phoenicians and Cypriots), those that "adapted" or "coped" (Egypt, Assyria, and Babylon), and those that failed (the Hittites). He emphasizes the importance of geography, noting that major river systems like the Nile and Euphrateshelped Egypt and Mesopotamia survive the collapse. Cline's work illustrates that resilience involves more than just survival; it requires the agility to innovate in response to extreme impact events, offering lessons for contemporary global stability. (8)