Podcasts about ipcc

 Industrial water professionals work with chemistry, equipment, permits, and performance targets every day. Yet every gallon also moves through a framework of policy decisions: who can withdraw water, how it may be used, what quality must be returned, and whose needs are considered when systems are designed.  Sherine El-Wattar, a science network officer supporting the IPCC Working Group II Technical Support Unit, brings an engineering foundation and a human-centered perspective to those questions. Her work focuses on climate impacts, adaptation, vulnerability, and risk while helping connect scientific assessments with communities and professional groups beyond the traditional research environment.    Water Systems Are Never Neutral  Pipelines, treatment plants, reuse programs, and flood-control infrastructure solve technical problems. However, Sherine encourages engineers and decision-makers to ask additional questions: Who benefits from the system? Who might be harmed? Whose assumptions are built into the equations? What local realities might the numbers overlook?  Her master's research illustrates the importance of that lens. Sherine compared remote-sensing indicators of agricultural productivity with the day-to-day practices of farmers near Cairo. A digital map could classify land as productive or unproductive, but the view from the ground revealed practices shaped by long-term care for the soil and water. The lesson is not to dismiss data. It is to understand what the data may not capture.    Water Risk Depends on Context  Water scarcity, flooding, infrastructure resilience, and climate adaptation do not look the same in every region. Culture, institutions, belief systems, and lived experience shape how communities define risk and how they respond to water policy.  Sherine describes climate-related water risk through a straightforward frame: too much water or too little water. The solutions, however, require deeper attention to local conditions. A technically sound recommendation may still fall short if it overlooks the people affected by the decision.    Practical Steps for Water Professionals  For utilities, facilities, and water-sector businesses, Sherine recommends exploring water footprint concepts and water stewardship. She also emphasizes authentic connection: listen before trying to fix a problem, communicate without judgment, and build awareness through relationships.  Industrial water treaters already hold valuable knowledge. Sharing that expertise with operators, communities, policymakers, and professionals from other disciplines can improve the quality of future water decisions.  Listen to the full conversation above. Explore related episodes below. Stay engaged, keep learning, and continue scaling up your knowledge!    Timestamps 02:10 — Trace explains why water and policy are inseparable, even when daily work appears focused on equipment, chemistry, permits, and profitability. 05:10 — Upcoming industry events highlight opportunities to stay current on utility operations, infrastructure, compliance, data integration, and water-quality challenges. 08:50 — Sherine El-Wattar joins the conversation and clarifies the IPCC acronym before introducing her work in water governance and climate adaptation. 11:30 — Sherine reflects on the value of combining engineering problem-solving with water systems that serve society. 12:00 — Sherine describes her role supporting IPCC Working Group II and the two responsibilities she balances: science and networking. 14:10 — The discussion explores how expert reviewers can contribute perspectives from law, finance, health, youth organizations, Indigenous communities, and other fields. 15:30 — Sherine explains why communication must shift depending on whether the audience includes public communities or government representatives. 17:10 — Water is compared to language: local culture, institutions, and belief systems influence how risk and equity are understood. 19:50 — Sherine unpacks water as a story of people, power, and justice rather than only a network of pipes and treatment systems. 22:00 — A human-centric approach asks who benefits, who may be harmed, whose knowledge informs the system, and what the assumptions may cost. 24:40 — Sherine describes the Netherlands' Delta Works as an example of infrastructure shaped by risk, institutional capacity, and long-term water management. 27:10 — Sherine shares how her master's studies shifted her understanding of water from a technical discipline toward the science-policy interface. 29:40 — Her research compares remote-sensing indicators with farmers' lived practices near Cairo, revealing the limits of relying on aggregated data alone. 33:30 — Trace and Sherine explore how professionals can respect culture and tradition while still supporting education and improvement. 35:50 — Sherine recommends water footprint concepts and water stewardship as practical starting points for organizations planning for climate adaptation. 38:20 — The conversation examines the mismatch between climate risk and the depth of current responses to too much or too little water. 41:50 — Sherine encourages professionals to connect water awareness with personal reflection, professional networks, and conversations that influence behavior   Connect with Sherine El-Wattar  Phone: +31646914589  Email: selwattar@gmail.com  Website: IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change  https://www.linkedin.com/company/ipcc/  LinkedIn: Sherine El-Wattar | LinkedIn    Quotes "And I really liked how, you know, engineering is all about the numbers, solving problems, and finding a way to create a system that serves society." "I have been humbled enough to know you cannot force policymakers to think anything." "For us to balance these things, it's about, it starts with understanding." "I really hope I would live to see the day where taking care of water or being water conscious is the new trend."   Guest Resources Mentioned  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Working Group II IPCC Working Group II: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability  IPCC: What Is an Expert Reviewer of IPCC Reports? Engage with the IPCC The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard Alliance for Water Stewardship (AWS) Standard  IHE Delft: Water Governance  IHE Delft: Governance and Management Profile The History of the Delta Works FAO WaPOR: Remote Sensing for Water Productivity A Million Little Pieces by James Frey (Author) Paperback   Scaling UP! H2O Resources Mentioned  AWT (Association of Water Technologies)  Scaling UP! H2O Academy video courses  Submit a Show Idea  The Rising Tide Mastermind  What Is Water Footprint Assessment? UNU Institute for Water, Environment and Health: Global Water Bankruptcy   2026 Events for Water Professionals  Check out our Scaling UP! H2O Events Calendar where we've listed every event Water Treaters should be aware of by clicking HERE.   

「なぜ効率化しても、暮らしが楽にならないのか。IPCC執筆者ヤミナ・サヘブ氏との「サフィシエンシー」をめぐる対話」　なぜ効率化だけでは地球を救えないのか？IPCC執筆者のヤミナ・サヘブ氏にインタビュー。「効率か我慢か」という二択を超え、資源需要そのものをシステムとして避ける「サフィシエンシー」の重要性を説きます。消費者を降りて市民に戻り、自分たちの暮らしの主権を取り戻すための、新しい生存戦略を探ります。The post なぜ効率化しても、暮らしが楽にならないのか。IPCC執筆者ヤミナ・サヘブ氏との「サフィシエンシー」をめぐる対話 first appeared on IDEAS FOR GOOD.

"Das Klima”, der Podcast zur Wissenschaft hinter der Krise. Wir lasen den [sechsten Bericht](https://www.ipcc.ch) des Weltklimarats und erklären den aktuellen Stand der Klimaforschung. In Folge 172 gibt es was zu essen. Wir schauen uns eine Studie an, die Greenwashing in der globalen Fleisch- und Milchindustrie untersucht hat. Denn das ist etwas, was erstaunlich häufig ist. Wie häufig es stattfindet und was das bedeutet, erfahrt ihr in der neuen Folge. Wer den Podcast unterstützen will, kann das gerne tun: https://steadyhq.com/de/dasklima/ und https://www.paypal.me/florianfreistetter.

Episode 187.2: Upcoming Napa Trip, Rosebud, LA Mayoral Race, Monster Wolf Robots, IPCC, Celebrity Deaths, TrumpRX, and Short Barrel Single Barrel 8 Year

Menos de dois anos depois da última ocorrência do fenômeno meteorológico El Niño, que contribuiu para as enchentes históricas no Rio Grande do Sul de 2024 e as secas inéditas na Amazônia, o Brasil progrediu no combate a desastres, mas não aprendeu as lições para avançar na resiliência climática. Os impactos de mais um El Niño devem começar a aparecer no país no segundo semestre, estendendo-se até 2027. Lúcia Müzell, da RFI em Paris A configuração do fenômeno já está instalada nas águas do oceano Pacífico, salienta o doutor em meteorologia José Marengo, membro do IPCC (Painel Intergovernamental sobre Mudanças Climáticas da ONU) e coordenador-geral de pesquisas do Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alertas de Desastres Naturais (Cemaden). “Você vê o padrão de aquecimento no Pacífico Tropical, e está claro. O que nós não sabemos ainda é a intensidade”, frisa. “Estamos em início de junho, e fazer uma previsão em junho para um fenômeno cujo pico de intensidade seria mais ou menos novembro, é muito cedo.” Uma das interpretações dos modelos climáticos aponta para um aquecimento de 4°C das águas do Pacífico Central, o que seria um El Niño "super forte". A grande preocupação agora é se 2026 vai bater novamente os recordes globais de altas temperaturas, como tem ocorrido desde 2023. Os efeitos do fenômeno, que se repete no planeta há milhares de anos, são potencializados pelas mudanças do clima. Foi assim que, em 2024, o ano mais quente registrado na história até o momento, a ocorrência do El Niño impulsionou catástrofes climáticas ao redor do mundo. 'El Niño Godzilla' Mas apesar das perspectivas preocupantes, o coordenador do Cemaden rejeita os discursos alarmantes sobre o tema que, segundo ele, contribuem para desacreditar a ciência. “Você escuta na internet os influencers e qualquer pessoa falando sobre ‘El Niño Godzilla', ‘Super El Niño', fazem shows com nuvens caindo e o capeta aparecendo. Nós, cientistas, tentamos participar em todo tipo de debate possível, para convencer a população de que realmente é um fenômeno, mas que não é o fim do mundo”, afirma. Segundo ele, o discurso alarmista sobre o tema pode gerar o efeito contrário do desejado: o de imobilismo dos gestores. “Depende de nosso papel, como seres humanos, para poder enfrentar. Uma das coisas importantes é a percepção de risco de desastre. Não adianta ter os melhores modelos, os melhores supercomputadores, se as pessoas ainda não entendem a mensagem final”, argumenta Marengo. A memória dos recentes desastres no Brasil aumentou a tomada de consciência de governantes, comunidades e populações, principalmente nos estados mais afetados há dois anos. O Rio Grande do Sul acelera a conclusão de obras para combater novas enchentes, e a vizinha Santa Catarina está em alerta climático. Uma série de medidas para enfrentar incêndios florestais estão previstas pelos governos federal e estaduais no centro e norte do país, mas também no Sudeste, onde o maior problema tende a ser as altas temperaturas. Vulnerabilidade continua Entretanto, de forma geral pelo país, Marengo constata que pouco foi feito contra a vulnerabilidade das populações, que determina qual será a proporção de uma tragédia. É também o que afirma a professora de Urbanismo Maria Fernanda Lemos, da PUC-Rio. Membro do IPCC, ela coordenou um capítulo do último relatório do painel da ONU sobre as cidades. “Não adianta eu só focar num problema de drenagem para diminuir o impacto de chuvas intensas se eu não resolver o fato de que as pessoas moram em situações precárias”, ressalta Lemos. “Eu vou atuar sobre aquele alagamento específico naquele lugar, mas outras situações iguais vão se reproduzir pelo território todo, porque as pessoas continuam vulneráveis: continuam tendo que morar em áreas de risco, de maneira informal, sem acesso à tecnologia, à informação”, acrescenta. É por isso que, apesar de avanços importantes, como a adoção do Plano Clima de Mitigação e Adaptação, o Brasil “não aprendeu as lições” da última passagem do El Niño, avalia a especialista. A professora não vê ações transformativas à altura dos desafios, ou seja, que ajudem a diminuir a exposição das pessoas aos riscos climáticos. Maria Fernanda Lemos menciona a redução da precariedade e das desigualdades como um pilar fundamental da adaptação, assim como a educação ambiental e a inclusão das populações na tomada de decisões. “O que há de pior é que a gente continua fazendo cidade, infraestrutura, habitação e saneamento da mesma forma que a gente sempre fez, que não é resiliente, não é adaptado ao clima. E aí só gera mais vulnerabilidade ainda para esses ambientes, que já são muito ameaçados”, lamenta. “Não tem uma visão abrangente do problema. Só no longo prazo é possível fazer uma adaptação que vai ter resultados de fato concretos”, aponta. Para ouvir a entrevista completa, clique no podcast, acima.

On this week's Mean Age Daydream, Brian has no pity for the fired Scott Pelley of 60 Minutes fame, one of the most overrated shows ever in its modern incarnation. Also: Spencer Pratt advances into a finale vs. Karen Bass in Los Angeles, and the IPCC is exposed as charlatans. Buy my new card game: WOKE WORD WARS - https://www.amazon.com/Woke-Word-Wars-Ridiculously-Players/dp/B0FLF8Y16S

On this week's Mean Age Daydream, Brian has no pity for the fired Scott Pelley of 60 Minutes fame, one of the most overrated shows ever in its modern incarnation. Also: Spencer Pratt advances into a finale vs. Karen Bass in Los Angeles, and the IPCC is exposed as charlatans. Buy my new card game: WOKE WORD WARS - https://www.amazon.com/Woke-Word-Wars-Ridiculously-Players/dp/B0FLF8Y16S

On this week's Mean Age Daydream, Brian has no pity for the fired Scott Pelley of 60 Minutes fame, one of the most overrated shows ever in its modern incarnation. Also: Spencer Pratt advances into a finale vs. Karen Bass in Los Angeles, and the IPCC is exposed as charlatans. Buy my new card game: WOKE WORD WARS - https://www.amazon.com/Woke-Word-Wars-Ridiculously-Players/dp/B0FLF8Y16S

O Roda Viva recebe nesta segunda-feira (01/06) o físico Paulo Artaxo, diretor do Centro de Estudos da Amazônia Sustentável da USP e uma das maiores autoridades mundiais em clima.Laureado com o Planet Earth Award 2026 e autor-líder nos três últimos relatórios do IPCC, painel da ONU agraciado com o Nobel da Paz, Artaxo vai analisar o cenário de transição global rumo à sustentabilidade. Em debate, os impactos das mudanças climáticas, as vulnerabilidades e vantagens estratégicas do Brasil, o impacto do próximo El Niño, o ponto de não retorno da Amazônia e a resiliência das cidades.O Roda Viva vai ao ar toda segunda, a partir das 22h, na TV Cultura, no site da emissora e no YouTube!#RodaViva #TVCultura #SomosCultura #Amazônia #Sustentabilidade #CentroDeEstudosDaAmazôniaSustentável #SalvemAAmazônia #FlorestaAmazônica #PontoDeNãoRetorno

Aan tafel deze week: Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken Tom Berendsen, burgemeester van Nijmegen Hubert Bruls, Nobelprijswinnaar Paul Krugman, en sociaal wetenschapper Michelle Rasch. Presentatie: Maaike Schoon. Wil je meer weten over de gasten in Buitenhof? Op onze website vind je meer informatie. Daar kan je deze aflevering ook terugkijken en je vindt er natuurlijk nog veel meer gesprekken: https://bit.ly/buitenhof-31-mei-2026 Met een zware delegatie van het kabinet sprak minister Hans Vijlbrief van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid deze week in het Catshuis met werkgevers- en werknemersbonden over de bezuinigingen op de sociale zekerheid. Komt er een nieuw Sociaal Akkoord of krijgen we een hete zomer met veel stakingen, sociale onrust en acties tegen de plannen van het kabinet? Ondermijning is de betonrot in onze samenleving, aldus een rapport dat deze week uitkwam van het ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid. En na de veroordeling van Inez Weski en het muurvast zittende Marengo proces, rijst de vraag voor Minister van Justitie en Veiligheid, David van Weel: hoeveel grip heeft de overheid op de georganiseerde misdaad? Deze week werd Libanon opnieuw gebombardeerd door Israël. Premier Netanyahu gaf het bevel om de aanvallen te intensiveren, met als doel om Hezbollah te vernietigen. Een groot deel van Zuid-Libanon is nu een gevechtszone. Midden-Oosten-correspondent Daisy Mohr woont al bijna 25 jaar in de Libanese hoofdstad Beiroet, ze is nu een paar dagen in Nederland. Hoe ziet haar dagelijks leven eruit in het oorlogsgebied? En hoe sterk is Hezbollah nog nu Iran is aangevallen? Het is de warmste meimaand in de geschiedenis, met afgelopen weken temperaturen van dertig graden hier in Nederland, maar ook elders in Europa kampte men met hitte. Tegelijkertijd schrapte het IPCC - de internationale klimaatorganisatie - onlangs het meest extreme toekomstscenario. Zo erg zal het dus niet worden, dacht menigeen, maar anderen bestrijden dit. Gerrit Hiemstra is bij ons te gast, oud-weerman van de NOS en klimaatondernemer. Over hittekoepels, de scenario's en over hoe de politiek richting moet geven aan klimaatbeleid.

Send us Fan MailIn deze aflevering van Soul Session gaat psycholoog Huibrecht Boluijt in gesprek met Marcel Crock, wetenschapsjournalist. ‘Een wetenschapper pleegt nog liever zelfmoord dan dat ie z'n ongelijk bekent'. Met deze woorden geeft  de gedreven onderzoeker zijn reactie weer op de teleurstellende wijze waarop het IPCC (het klimaatpanel van de VN) en het KNMI, na erkent te hebben fouten te hebben gemaakt, het vervolgdebat weer uit de weg gaan.Wetenschap is volgens hem tegenwoordig een zaak van winnen in plaats van via inhoudelijk debat te komen tot vernieuwde inzichten. Gepassioneerd als altijd uit hij onderbouwd zijn kritiek.Hij ontmantelt de wolven in schaapskleren en legt uit hoe kunstmatig gecreëerde schaarste of dreiging van ziekte in de menselijke geschiedenis altijd hebben geleidt tot narratieven die (doods)angst aansturen.  Wat vervolgens mensen van de waarheid afhoudt ten faveure van macht en geld.Daarnaast leren we meer van de mens Marcel kennen.  Van hoe timide hij was als jongeman. En hoe hij zich ontwikkelde tot welbespraakte klimaatwetenschap-deskundige.In de opvoeding is wellicht ook de verklaring te vinden voor het feit waarom hij zich ontwikkelde tot een doorzetter. ‘Niet lullen maar poetsen', was het devies. Maar niet over alles werd gesproken erkent hij. Daarom is het wellicht dat hij niet de strijder werd om per se het eigen gelijk, maar eerder een voorvechter voor een open debat tussen mensen, waarbij een goed gesprek,  iedereen de ruimte biedt openlijk te delen wat men vindt van de dingen. Want het vrije woord en standpunten delen in een wederkerig respect dat is waardoor hij opbloeit.Support the showWaardeer je deze video('s)? Like deze video, abonneer je op ons kanaal en steun de onafhankelijke journalistiek van blckbx met een donatieWil je op de hoogte blijven?Telegram - https://t.me/blckbxtvTwitter -   / blckbxnews Facebook -   / blckbx.tv Instagram - ...

Aan tafel deze week: Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken Tom Berendsen, burgemeester van Nijmegen Hubert Bruls, Nobelprijswinnaar Paul Krugman, en sociaal wetenschapper Michelle Rasch. Presentatie: Maaike Schoon. Wil je meer weten over de gasten in Buitenhof? Op onze website vind je meer informatie. Daar kan je deze aflevering ook terugkijken en je vindt er natuurlijk nog veel meer gesprekken: https://bit.ly/buitenhof-31-mei-2026 Met een zware delegatie van het kabinet sprak minister Hans Vijlbrief van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid deze week in het Catshuis met werkgevers- en werknemersbonden over de bezuinigingen op de sociale zekerheid. Komt er een nieuw Sociaal Akkoord of krijgen we een hete zomer met veel stakingen, sociale onrust en acties tegen de plannen van het kabinet? Ondermijning is de betonrot in onze samenleving, aldus een rapport dat deze week uitkwam van het ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid. En na de veroordeling van Inez Weski en het muurvast zittende Marengo proces, rijst de vraag voor Minister van Justitie en Veiligheid, David van Weel: hoeveel grip heeft de overheid op de georganiseerde misdaad? Deze week werd Libanon opnieuw gebombardeerd door Israël. Premier Netanyahu gaf het bevel om de aanvallen te intensiveren, met als doel om Hezbollah te vernietigen. Een groot deel van Zuid-Libanon is nu een gevechtszone. Midden-Oosten-correspondent Daisy Mohr woont al bijna 25 jaar in de Libanese hoofdstad Beiroet, ze is nu een paar dagen in Nederland. Hoe ziet haar dagelijks leven eruit in het oorlogsgebied? En hoe sterk is Hezbollah nog nu Iran is aangevallen? Het is de warmste meimaand in de geschiedenis, met afgelopen weken temperaturen van dertig graden hier in Nederland, maar ook elders in Europa kampte men met hitte. Tegelijkertijd schrapte het IPCC - de internationale klimaatorganisatie - onlangs het meest extreme toekomstscenario. Zo erg zal het dus niet worden, dacht menigeen, maar anderen bestrijden dit. Gerrit Hiemstra is bij ons te gast, oud-weerman van de NOS en klimaatondernemer. Over hittekoepels, de scenario's en over hoe de politiek richting moet geven aan klimaatbeleid.

This episode is presented by Create A Video – The United Nations is officially retiring the most catastrophic climate model for its upcoming assessment report. In a classic example of "now it can be told," it turns out that scientists knew the model was impossible for almost a decade. But the incentives were so great to use the model to secure scientific grants and for headlines that it created a powerful feedback loop that captured an entire political party.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-kaliner-show--6946691/support.Subscribe to the podcast My preferred podcast platform: SpreakerAll the links to Pete's Prep are free!Get exclusive content here!Media Bias Check: GroundNews promo code!Advertising and Booking inquiries: Pete@ThePeteKalinerShow.com  

Are we underestimating our capacity for social change?...Today, Abbie and Karen discuss quanta, entanglement, and collapsing potential as they explore mattering and social change....Karen O'Brien is a Professor of Human Geography at the University of Oslo, Norway. She is also co-founder of cCHANGE, an organisation that supports deep and strategic engagement with transformations to sustainability. Her research on the human and social dimensions of environmental change emphasises integrative approaches, including how beliefs, values, worldviews, and paradigms influence systems change and social change. She is particularly interested in the relationship between adaptation and transformations to sustainability and in exploring how quantum social science can inform how we understand, engage with, and scale transformative change. In 2021, she was co-recipient of the BBVA Foundation's Frontiers of Knowledge Award for Climate Change. Karen's recent books include You Matter More Than You Think: Quantum Social Change for a Thriving World and Climate and Society: Transforming the Future (with Robin Leichenko). She has participated in four IPCC reports and is currently co-chair of the International Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) transformative change assessment. She also writes a weekly newsletter on quantum social change....Stories Lived. Stories Told. is created, produced & hosted by Abbie VanMeter.Stories Lived. Stories Told. is an initiative of the CMM Institute for Personal and Social Evolution....Music for Stories Lived. Stories Told. is created by Rik Spann....CMM Institute SubstackCMM Institute Events Page…⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Explore all things Stories Lived. Stories Told. here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.Explore all things CMM Institute here.

John Maytham speaks to Prof Laura Pereira of the Wits Global Change Institute and the Stockholm Resilience Centre about new research warning that current climate models are failing to address Africa’s realities and why scientists are calling for more just and locally grounded climate planning. Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30pm. CapeTalk fans call in, to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) to Afternoon Drive with John Maytham broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/BSFy4Cn or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/n8nWt4x Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In Episode 556 of District of Conservation, Gabriella discusses the IPCC retiring RCP 8.5 - the worst case climate change modeling scenario and the impact of this. Tune in to learn more!SHOW NOTESRCP8.5 Is Officially DeadClimate change's worst-case scenario is officially canceledNo, RCP8.5 Did Not Become Implausible Because of Climate PolicyThe Scenario Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7 (ScenarioMIP-CMIP7)

"Das Klima”, der Podcast zur Wissenschaft hinter der Krise. Wir lasen den [sechsten Bericht](https://www.ipcc.ch) des Weltklimarats und erklären den aktuellen Stand der Klimaforschung. In Folge 171 wird es heiß. Wir diskutieren über eine neue Arbeit, in der untersucht wird, ab wann Hitze wirklich tödlich für uns wird. Denn bisherige Modelle haben das ein wenig unterschätzt. Tatsächlich sind Hitzewellen viel gefährlicher für uns als wir gedacht hatten. Wer den Podcast unterstützen will, kann das gerne tun: https://steadyhq.com/de/dasklima/ und https://www.paypal.me/florianfreistetter.

Myself and Eddie blast this one out - full of Jewels! FULL Interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MQWVZH7LrYIf you'd like to join us all at our Heart and Chronic Disease Masterclass weekend event, just go to this link to book: https://www.weloveourheart.com/live2

Tom interviews Bernie Lewin about his 2017 book Searching for the Catastrophe Signal and his path from local environmentalism to blogging and writing for the Global Warming Policy Foundation. Lewin argues postwar “big science,” shifting religion's role in policy, and media narratives helped drive recurring environmental scares: DDT, ozone depletion tied to supersonic transport and CFCs, then 1970s global cooling amid energy crises. He claims funding incentives encouraged extreme atmospheric claims, and that policy often diverged from scientific uncertainty. The discussion covers the 1988 Hansen hearing as orchestrated, Thatcher and Bush support for expanded climate science, and IPCC early processes, focusing on the 1995 Second Assessment controversy where summaries and underlying text were allegedly altered around detection and “fingerprint” evidence.00:00 Meet Bernie Lewin00:28 From Environmentalism to Skepticism02:25 Science Replaces Religion04:30 Big Science After WWII06:05 Silent Spring and DDT Panic08:46 Supersonic Jets and Ozone Fears12:29 CFCs and the Ozone Hole18:29 Feedbacks and Funding Incentives21:33 Global Cooling Takes Off22:40 Energy Crisis and Climate Instability28:36 Coal vs Nuclear and CO2 Program36:12 Cooling to Warming Flip39:53 Hansen 1988 Hearing Moment41:32 Thatcher Bush and PoliticsSearching for the Catastrophe Signal: The Origins of The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: https://a.co/d/0bmYZdUXhttps://enthusiasmscepticismscience.wordpress.com/about/=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Climate Change Panic Was the Original Hoax, Tara Says SHORT TITLE The Climate Hoax Collapse EPISODE DESCRIPTION Tara and Lee react to what they describe as the unraveling of decades of climate change narratives after recent discussion surrounding IPCC extreme warming projections. The conversation explores energy policy, China's rise, America's industrial decline, and the geopolitical consequences of climate-driven regulations. They also debate nuclear power, AI competition, and whether the United States can still catch up to China in the global energy race. HOOK Tara says climate change fear was “the original hoax” — and now the same institutions that pushed it for decades are quietly backing away after America already paid the price. KEY TALKING POINTS Discussion surrounding IPCC “extreme warming pathway” projections Debate over climate policy and media coverage Al Gore predictions revisited Concerns over energy grid reductions and rising electricity prices Obama-era coal reductions discussed China's role in global energy competition Claims that climate regulations benefited Chinese manufacturing growth Ted Cruz hearings and China-linked energy lawsuits referenced Debate over nuclear power expansion in the US AI and energy infrastructure race between the US and China Concerns over America falling behind in industrial capacity Trump energy policy contrasted with Democrat climate policies Discussion about long-term geopolitical strategy and energy independence SEO KEYWORDS climate change debate, IPCC controversy, global warming predictions, China energy strategy, nuclear power America, AI energy race, Al Gore climate predictions, Obama coal policy, climate hoax debate, Trump energy policy, Tara Servatius, Lee Cunningham, conservative podcast, China vs America SOCIAL MEDIA POST

A stunning Fox News poll reveals only 31% of Americans believe the Trump assassination attempt was definitely real, sparking a deep dive into media distrust, AI manipulation, and political division. Tara and Lee expose growing concerns over Chinese influence in American politics, climate narratives unraveling, mRNA vaccine fears, and the Democrat Party's collapsing support among men. Plus: Iran tensions, censorship revelations tied to the Biden administration, and why some believe America is approaching a dangerous cultural breaking point. PODCAST SUMMARY Today's show unpacks what Tara calls “America's reality crisis” after polling shows a shockingly low number of Americans fully believe the Trump assassination attempt actually happened. The conversation explores collapsing trust in media, AI-driven misinformation fears, and the impact of hyper-partisan politics on public perception. The show then pivots to allegations of growing Chinese Communist Party influence inside the United States, including claims involving Democrat fundraising networks, activist organizations, and congressional politics. Tara and Lee also revisit the climate change debate following discussion around recent IPCC reporting and decades of controversial environmental predictions. Additional segments cover concerns surrounding mRNA vaccine development, censorship tied to COVID-era narratives, and accusations that media institutions suppressed dissenting voices. The hour closes with a look at Democrat approval ratings among male voters and the broader cultural divide shaping the 2026 political landscape. SEGMENT HIGHLIGHTS Reality Crisis in America Only 31% of Americans say the Trump assassination attempt “definitely happened” Discussion on media distrust and AI-generated misinformation Debate over conspiracy culture and social media influence China's Expanding Influence Claims of Chinese Communist Party infiltration into American politics Discussion of activist funding and alleged influence operations Concerns over China's role in shaping U.S. policy and energy dependence Climate Narrative Under Fire Hosts react to reports questioning “extreme warming pathways” Criticism of decades of climate predictions and energy policy Discussion of nuclear energy, infrastructure, and China's rise COVID, mRNA & Censorship Renewed skepticism over vaccine narratives and media suppression Discussion of Alex Berenson's legal victory and censorship claims Concerns about future virus outbreaks and public trust Democrats Losing Male Voters New polling shows collapsing approval among men Discussion of shifting political demographics Debate over whether the Democrat Party can reverse the trend KEY QUOTES “How do you hold together an America where only thirty-one percent can figure out what reality is?” “The Chinese Communist Party is the single biggest threat to this country.” “They don't need the climate lie anymore because China already won.” “Trust in media has completely collapsed.” SEO KEYWORDS Trump assassination poll, China influence America, climate change debate, IPCC controversy, Democrat approval men, AI misinformation, COVID censorship, mRNA vaccines, Trump news podcast, political commentary, American media distrust, China and Democrats, Iran tensions, Alex Berenson lawsuit, conservative podcast HASHTAGS #Trump #China #ClimateChange #Politics #Media #AI #COVID19 #Podcast #America #Democrats #Republicans #News #PoliticalPodcast #FreeSpeech #AmpersandWave

A fiery breakdown of climate politics, media narratives, and global policy claims—this episode revisits decades of warnings about global warming, challenges from political critics who say predictions failed to materialize, and accusations that climate messaging has been used to drive fear and expand government power. The conversation also touches on the IPCC, Al Gore's early climate projections, shifting terminology from “global warming” to “climate change,” and broader geopolitical implications involving China and global energy strategy. EPISODE SUMMARY Today's discussion centers on a sweeping critique of climate policy messaging over the past several decades. The host argues that climate predictions promoted by political figures and international organizations have repeatedly failed to match real-world outcomes, citing historical claims about rising sea levels, disappearing glaciers, and extreme global impacts that did not materialize as projected. The episode also explores how climate language evolved over time—from “global warming” to “climate change”—and questions whether this shift reflected scientific refinement or political repositioning. References are made to IPCC modeling, media amplification, and high-profile figures like Al Gore, alongside claims that worst-case climate scenarios were emphasized without sufficient grounding. Beyond environmental policy, the discussion expands into geopolitics, suggesting that global climate agreements may have disproportionately constrained Western energy development while benefiting strategic competitors. The episode closes by arguing that energy policy decisions over the past 20 years have had lasting economic and national security consequences. SEGMENT BREAKDOWN 1. The “Climate Narrative Shift” Claims that “global warming” was rebranded as “climate change” Argument that messaging evolved as predictions failed to materialize Assertion that fear-based framing was used to maintain political momentum 2. Predictions vs. Reality Florida sea-level warnings and population collapse predictions Glacier National Park “ice-free” claims Kilimanjaro snow disappearance forecasts Arctic ice projections compared to current conditions 3. Media, IPCC, and Messaging Critique Allegations that worst-case scenarios were overused Claims of selective modeling and amplified projections Wall Street Journal cited as revisiting historical climate claims 4. Political and Cultural Impact Discussion of climate anxiety influencing life decisions Claims that younger generations were shaped by climate fear messaging References to education systems incorporating climate curriculum 5. Global Energy and Geopolitics Argument that Western energy policy was constrained China positioned as strategic beneficiary of climate agreements Nuclear energy described as an underutilized alternative KEY TALKING POINTS Evolution of climate terminology and messaging strategies Historical climate predictions vs. present-day outcomes Role of international organizations in climate modeling Media amplification and political influence on science communication Energy policy decisions and global economic competitiveness Geopolitical implications involving China and industrial policy SEO KEYWORDS climate change debate, global warming predictions, Al Gore climate claims, IPCC models, climate fear politics, Wall Street Journal climate report, climate hoax discussion, energy policy China, nuclear energy debate, climate curriculum schools, Florida sea level rise prediction, Arctic ice trends, climate politics podcast, environmental policy critique SOCIAL MEDIA POST

Are Climate Policies & Energy Shifts Part of a Bigger Global Strategy? New Claims Spark Debate

FNs klimapanel (IPCC) skroter diskré sine mest katastrofale klima­prognoser. Scenariene som spådde 5–6 graders økning i jordens gjennom­snitts­temperatur ved slutten av århundret, er stille og rolig vraket – nærmest i forbi­farten – i en viten­skapelig artikkel fra klima­forskningens establishment.Nyheten burde vært en medie­sensasjon, men er nesten forbi­gått. En av «klima­skeptikerne» som har vært på krigsstien mot dommedags­prognosene, kunngjorde saken tre uker etter at den aktuelle artikkelen ble publisert i et fag­tidsskrift.Først da Trump uttalte seg om det forkastede scenariet for fire dager siden, kom medier som Washington Post på banen, men likevel er det fortsatt nokså stille om det hele.Klima­hysteriske medier og politikere er ikke kjempe­lystne på å gjøre noe tilbake­tog, til syvende og sist kanskje heller ikke forskerne. Hvordan kan man det etter å ha manet frem død og elendighet så lenge? Det finnes kanskje ikke noen verdig retrett for den som har levd av skremsler. Kanskje tryggest å ta tilbake kontrollen med hva folk blir fortalt?Men nå bør folk i stedet forlange avvikling av den radikale, grise­dyre og bort­kastede klima­politikken som har vært ført siden det uopp­nåelige målet om netto null­utslipp ble vedtatt, og med det pålagt folk tunge byrder for ingenting. Om vi fortsetter slik, blir Europa en fattiglus ved siden av USA, som har sluttet med tøvet.Velkommen til Dagsorden med Kent Andersen og Christian Skaug.

The American birthrate has cratered. And the DINKs (double income, no kids) don't seem to think that's a bad thing. The UN-backed IPCC (something something climate change) has adjusted its doomsaying model because Florida isn't underwater yet. It could also be because climate change is not a real thing and is only used to push a globalist agenda. Either way, Trump weighed in. GUEST: Josh Firestine Link to today's sources: https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/sources-may-18-2026 Let my sponsor American Financing help you regain control of your finances. NMLS #182334 nmlsconsumeraccess.org. APR for rates in the 5s start at 6.327% for well qualified borrowers. Call 800-974-6500 for details about credit, costs and terms. Visit www.AmericanFinancing.net/Crowder. Average savings based on borrowers who save over $199.99 Download Rumble Wallet now and enjoy the benefits of financial and personal freedom! https://rumblewallet.onelink.me/bJsX/crowder Share clips from the show & compete to get a mention on the show! Where to get clips: Telegram: http://t.me/LWCClips Discord: https://discord.gg/nfRAZxEbAV Submit link for tracking: https://forms.gle/HZwz7Q7C9hkHecxTA Foundation Daily is made up of premium ingredients to reduce inflammation and stress and promote clean energy and mental clarity. Subscribe now and receive 40% off for life. https://foundationdaily.com/ DOWNLOAD THE RUMBLE APP TODAY: https://rumble.com/our-apps Join Rumble Premium to watch this show every day! http://louderwithcrowder.com/Premium Get your favorite LWC gear: https://crowdershop.com/ Bite-Sized Content: https://rumble.com/c/CrowderBits Subscribe to my podcast: https://feeds.libsyn.com/576250/rss FOLLOW ME: Website: https://louderwithcrowder.com/ X: https://x.com/scrowder Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/louderwithcrowder Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/stevencrowderofficial Music by @Pogo

Waardeer je onze video's? Steun dan Café Weltschmerz, het podium voor het vrije woord: https://www.cafeweltschmerz.nl/doneren/CO2-taks maakt gas en benzine vanaf 2028 duurder: 'Hulp nodig voor armsten'In week 20 behandelen Jeroen en Willem hoe oude narratieven hun overtuigingskracht verliezen.Terwijl het bestuur en de media hand in hand het tempo van crisismanagement opvoeren.Het hantavirus kreeg deze week direct volle aandacht: nieuwe dreiging, vertrouwde reflex.De angstinfrastructuur staat inmiddels permanent aan en is verwerkt in wet- en regelgeving.Tegelijkertijd brokkelt het vertrouwen in de zwaarste IPCC-scenario's verder af.Het klimaatverhaal blijft dominant, maar de overtuigingskracht raakt zichtbaar beschadigd.De AZC-protesten houden aan en de politiek kiest voor nog harder optreden, terwijl de oorzaak onbehandeld blijft.De rechtbank moest de persvrijheid redden, terwijl het cassatievonnis in de zaak-Engel opnieuw werd uitgesteld.Een klassiek voorbeeld dat gevoelige dossiers het liefst zo lang mogelijk in de la blijven liggen.Internationaal bleef het rommelen tussen de VS en Iran, waardoor de geopolitieke motor blijft draaien op een gecontroleerde dreiging.De energieberoving dendert door, terwijl structurele verarming steeds vaker wordt verpakt als duurzaamheid.Opnieuw veel plotselinge overlijdens, met verklaringen die inmiddels zo breed inzetbaar zijn dat zelfs climate change als mogelijke oorzaak opduikt.Week 20 voelde vooral als een systeem dat zichtbaar piept en kraakt, maar weigert af te remmen.Deze video is geproduceerd door Café Weltschmerz. Café Weltschmerz gelooft in de kracht van het gesprek en zendt interviews uit over actuele maatschappelijke thema's. Wij bieden een hoogwaardig alternatief voor de mainstream media. Café Weltschmerz is onafhankelijk en niet verbonden aan politieke, religieuze of commerciële partijen.Wil je meer video's bekijken en op de hoogte blijven via onze nieuwsbrief? Ga dan naar: https://www.cafeweltschmerz.nl/videos/Wil je op de hoogte worden gebracht van onze nieuwe video's? Klik dan op deze link: https://bit.ly/3XweTO0

For years, the most extreme climate scenarios shaped headlines, policy debates, and public fear—despite growing evidence that many of those projections were increasingly detached from real-world energy and emissions trends. Now, in a major shift ahead of the IPCC's Seventh Assessment Report, climate modelers are quietly abandoning some of their most dramatic assumptions. In this episode of Sanity Check, David R. Legates breaks down the rise and fall of RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5, the “worst-case” climate pathways that came to dominate public discourse, and explains why CMIP7 is moving in a different direction. From coal projections and emissions trends to media narratives and scientific self-correction, this episode explores what these changes mean for climate science, public policy, and the future of the climate debate.https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/2627/2026/https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/rcp85-is-officially-deadhttps://www.theclimatebrink.com/p/emissions-are-no-longer-followinghttps://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-51281986https://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-the-high-emissions-rcp8-5-global-warming-scenario/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544217314597Visit our podcast resource page: https://cornwallalliance.org/listen%20to%20our%20podcast%20created%20to%20reign/Our work is entirely supported by donations from people like you. If you benefit from our work and would like to partner with us, please visit www.cornwallalliance.org/donate. 

CO2-taks maakt gas en benzine vanaf 2028 duurder: 'Hulp nodig voor armsten'In week 20 behandelen Jeroen en Willem hoe oude narratieven hun overtuigingskracht verliezen.Terwijl het bestuur en de media hand in hand het tempo van crisismanagement opvoeren.Het hantavirus kreeg deze week direct volle aandacht: nieuwe dreiging, vertrouwde reflex.De angstinfrastructuur staat inmiddels permanent aan en is verwerkt in wet- en regelgeving.Tegelijkertijd brokkelt het vertrouwen in de zwaarste IPCC-scenario's verder af.Het klimaatverhaal blijft dominant, maar de overtuigingskracht raakt zichtbaar beschadigd.De AZC-protesten houden aan en de politiek kiest voor nog harder optreden, terwijl de oorzaak onbehandeld blijft.De rechtbank moest de persvrijheid redden, terwijl het cassatievonnis in de zaak-Engel opnieuw werd uitgesteld.Een klassiek voorbeeld dat gevoelige dossiers het liefst zo lang mogelijk in de la blijven liggen.Internationaal bleef het rommelen tussen de VS en Iran, waardoor de geopolitieke motor blijft draaien op een gecontroleerde dreiging.De energieberoving dendert door, terwijl structurele verarming steeds vaker wordt verpakt als duurzaamheid.Opnieuw veel plotselinge overlijdens, met verklaringen die inmiddels zo breed inzetbaar zijn dat zelfs climate change als mogelijke oorzaak opduikt.Week 20 voelde vooral als een systeem dat zichtbaar piept en kraakt, maar weigert af te remmen.Wil jij speciale bonusuitzendingen ontvangen?Kan je geen genoeg krijgen van de diepgaande analyses van Jeroen en Willem?Word dan terugkerende donateur en ontvang exclusieve bonusuitzendingen!Als trouwe donateur krijg je toegang tot extra content die niet beschikbaar is voor de gemiddelde kijker.Of je nu kiest voor een maandelijkse of jaarlijkse terugkerende donatie, je ontvangt altijd de meest waardevolle inzichten en analyses die je niet wilt missen in de speciale bonus.www.dfacto.nu/steun

In Folge 217 des Dachthekenduetts hetzen Michael Werner und Sascha Koll über Schulpflicht, Privatisierung, Steuern, Klimapolitik, den Adenauer-Bus, Catcalling, Deepfakes und Medienblasen.Michael Werner auf X:https://x.com/DStahlfederMichael Werner bei freiheitsfunken.infohttps://freiheitsfunken.info/autor/michael-werner/Sascha Koll auf X:https://x.com/Unbasiert00:00:00 Intro00:02:06 Begrüßung und Höcke-Interview00:04:18 Feiertage, Schulpflicht und historische Seitenhiebe00:05:08 AfD, Schulpflicht und „unsere Demokratie“00:06:55 Schulzwang, Indoktrination und Talente00:10:35 Rahmenlehrpläne und linke Lehrer00:13:53 YouTube-Bildung, Privatschulen und Autodidakten00:16:11 Telekom-Privatisierung als Bildungsargument00:19:43 AfD greift Schulpflicht auf00:21:44 Steuern, Profitgier und Staatsversagen00:24:58 Gratis-Supermärkte und Aldi-Wohnungen00:27:57 Adenauer-Bus und Alice-Weidel-Aktion00:31:27 Rechte Gewalt und Mediennarrative00:33:32 Grüne, Umweltschutz und Reichsvergleiche00:34:58 Demokratie leben, Lisa Paus und Strafverfahren00:37:38 Friedrich Merz, DGB und BlueSky00:40:35 Bildung, Handwerk und Genderstudien00:44:04 Gendern, Selbstbestimmung und Frauenknast00:46:21 IPCC, Schulbücher und Klimagrafiken00:47:24 Hayek, Keynes und der Euro00:49:17 Kirche, Klima und Queerpolitik00:52:46 IPCC-Szenarien und Klimamodelle00:58:17 Treibhauseffekt, CO2 und Klimapolitik01:02:42 Medienblasen und politische Scheinwelten01:05:45 Catcalling-Verbot in Köln01:12:45 Deepfakes, Fernandes und HateAid01:16:12 Deepfake-Gesetze und Meme-Verbot01:20:08 Scheinrealität, Angst und Medienkonsum01:24:08 Hantavirus, Ansteckung und Leugnung01:26:18 Rückblick und EF-Konferenz01:28:49 Vatertagsgruß und OutroMöchten Sie unsere Arbeit unterstützen?––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Spenden Sie Werkzeuge für die libertäre GlücksschmiedePayPal (auch Kreditkarte) / Überweisung / Bitcoin / Monero:

Yael Potjer spreekt met econoom Han de Jong over het Nederlandse energiebeleid, de nieuwe inflatiegolf, overheidsschulden, de huizenmarkt, de lage rendementen van pensioenfondsen, Argentinië onder Javier Milei en de toekomst van de dollar.Volgens Han zijn de energieprijzen in Nederland veel te hoog en waarschuwt hij al langer dat dit de industrie steeds verder onder druk zet en bedrijven doet vertrekken. Tegelijk wil kabinet-Jetten de huidige energiecrisis oplossen door de energietransitie te versnellen, maar volgens Han is dat onrealistisch. Gaan politici hun beleid aanpassen nu het IPCC de rampscenario's voor het klimaat heeft geschrapt?Wat zijn de economische gevolgen van het conflict in het Midden-Oosten? Hogere olie- en gasprijzen werken volgens Han met vertraging door in bijvoorbeeld de voedselprijzen, waardoor de economische pijn later dit jaar nog duidelijker voelbaar kan worden. Verder gaat het over de woningmarkt. Han legt uit waarom hij wel afkoeling en mogelijk een correctie verwacht, maar geen grote crash van de huizenprijzen.Daarnaast bespreken ze de stijgende overheidsschulden. Hoe gaat dit zich de komende jaren uitwerken, nu overheden steeds meer geld uitgeven aan klimaatbeleid, defensie en rentebetalingen? Ook gaat het over Argentinië. Is het beleid van Javier Milei, die radicaal snijdt in de overheid en de economie wil dereguleren, tot nu toe succesvol?Tot slot gaat Han in op de lage rendementen van Nederlandse pensioenfondsen, de nieuwe Fed-voorzitter Kevin Warsh en de veranderende rol van de dollar en goud.Bekijk de website van Han de Jong en schrijf je in voor zijn verzendlijst: https://crystalcleareconomics.nl/Volg Han de Jong op Linkedin:   / han-de-jong-a843477   Overweegt u om goud en zilver aan te kopen? Dat kan via de volgende website: https://bit.ly/3xxy4sYTimestamps00:00 Intro02:00 Kabinet Jetten & Energiecrisis05:30 Energieprijzen en de-industrialisatie08:00 Energietransitie & einde klimaatalarmisme?18:18 Economische gevolgen oorlog Iran27:50 Huizenmarkt Nederland33:40 Stijgende staatsrentes41:00 Is Milei succesvol in Argentinië?50:10 Pensioenfondsen presteren slecht1:05:15 Kevin Warsh, Dollar & GoudTwitter:Yael Potjer: https://x.com/GoedWeerGeniete@Hollandgold:   / hollandgold  @paulbuitink:   / paulbuitink  Let op: Holland Gold vindt het belangrijk dat iedereen vrijuit kan spreken. Wij willen u er graag op attenderen dat de uitspraken die worden gedaan door de geïnterviewde niet persé betekenen dat Holland Gold hier achter staat. Alle uitspraken zijn gedaan op persoonlijke titel door de geïnterviewde en dragen zo bij aan een breed, kleurrijk en voor de kijker interessant beeld van de onderwerpen. Zo willen en kunnen wij u een transparante bijdrage en een zo volledig mogelijk inzicht geven in de economische marktontwikkelingen. Al onze video's zijn er enkel op gericht u te informeren. De informatie en data die we presenteren kunnen verouderd zijn bij het bekijken van onze video's. Onze video's zijn geen financieel advies. U alleen kunt bepalen hoe het beste uw vermogen kunt beleggen. U draagt zelf de risico's van uw keuzes.Bekijk onze website: https://www.hollandgold.nl

On today's AmperWave Daily, the hosts unpack a controversial claim making waves online and in political commentary: that major climate institutions have allegedly revised or scaled back long-standing worst-case climate scenarios. The discussion expands into media influence, political messaging, energy policy history, and how climate science has been used in public debate for decades. Note: This episode reflects commentary and claims made in the source transcript.

Tara and Lee tackle redistricting battles, climate controversy, soft-on-crime policies, and a shocking airport tragedy. HOOK From redistricting wars and Supreme Court rulings to explosive climate change claims and a horrifying airport incident, Tara says the political and cultural cracks in America are becoming impossible to ignore. DESCRIPTION Today's AMPERWAVE DAILY dives headfirst into multiple explosive stories dominating conservative conversation nationwide. Tara and Lee break down claims that Democrats are panicking over redistricting fights and census controversies, while South Carolina Republicans face mounting pressure over congressional maps involving Representative Jim Clyburn. The show then pivots into a fiery debate over climate change narratives after critics argued that revised IPCC modeling undermines decades of catastrophic predictions. Tara examines how climate policies shaped energy prices, coal production, manufacturing, and media messaging involving figures like Barack Obama and Al Gore. Later, the conversation turns emotional and intense with discussion surrounding violent crime, repeat offenders, subway attacks in New York City, and the consequences of criminal justice policy debates. The episode closes with reactions to a shocking runway tragedy at Denver International Airport involving a trespasser and a departing aircraft. KEY TOPICS Democrat concerns over redistricting battles Congressional seat and census controversy Supreme Court rulings on race-based districts South Carolina GOP infighting Climate change debate and IPCC revisions Coal production and energy policy Violent crime and repeat offender policies NYC subway attack controversy Denver airport runway tragedy Media narratives and political messaging SEGMENTS SEGMENT 1 — “Redistricting Panic” Tara opens by discussing reports that Democrats are increasingly worried about congressional redistricting and future elections. The conversation focuses on claims of census manipulation, race-based districts, and legal battles surrounding Supreme Court rulings. SEGMENT 2 — “South Carolina Civil War” The spotlight shifts to South Carolina politics, where Tara criticizes Republican leadership figures including Henry McMaster and Shane Massey over congressional map disputes and GOP strategy surrounding Donald Trump. SEGMENT 3 — “Climate Narrative Under Fire” The show explores claims that revised IPCC climate scenarios weaken earlier catastrophic projections. Tara argues climate policy reshaped America's economy through higher energy prices, manufacturing losses, and restrictions on domestic coal production. SEGMENT 4 — “Crime, Consequences & Public Safety” An emotional segment examines violent subway attacks in New York City, repeat offender policies, and debates surrounding criminal justice reform. Tara argues progressive policies are creating dangerous public safety outcomes. SEGMENT 5 — “The Denver Runway Horror” The episode closes with reactions to a disturbing incident at Denver International Airport after a trespasser reportedly walked into the engine path of a departing aircraft, leaving witnesses stunned. QUOTE OF THE DAY “When Democrats get desperate, they get crazy.” SOCIAL MEDIA TEASER

Tara breaks down why critics say the climate agenda is unraveling after new IPCC scenario revisions and growing political backlash. HOOK For decades, catastrophic climate predictions shaped energy policy, education, media coverage, and the global economy. Now critics claim the very institutions that promoted those warnings are quietly backing away from their most extreme scenarios — and Tara says the implications are enormous. DESCRIPTION A stunning debate erupts after new revisions from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change spark claims that the most catastrophic warming scenarios were never realistic to begin with. Tara argues the climate movement's “worst-case” predictions fueled massive economic damage, soaring energy costs, manufacturing decline, censorship campaigns, and fear-driven politics for years. The episode dives into how climate models influenced American energy policy under President Barack Obama, why critics say coal and manufacturing were deliberately gutted, and how media outlets are now shifting their messaging. Tara also revisits past predictions from Al Gore and questions how long climate change narratives will remain embedded in schools, politics, and public policy. KEY TOPICS IPCC revisions to extreme climate scenarios Debate over catastrophic climate predictions Energy policy and rising electricity costs Coal industry decline in America Manufacturing movement to China and India Climate change education in schools Media coverage and censorship allegations Political fallout from climate policy debates SEGMENTS SEGMENT 1 — “The Climate Narrative Shock” Tara opens with claims that the climate movement's most catastrophic predictions are quietly being abandoned. The discussion centers on recent IPCC scenario revisions and why critics view them as a major turning point in the climate debate. SEGMENT 2 — “The Cost of the Agenda” The episode explores how climate policy allegedly reshaped the American economy through energy regulations, rising electricity prices, and restrictions on coal production. Tara argues these policies accelerated the decline of U.S. manufacturing. SEGMENT 3 — “Media, Schools, and Fear” Attention turns to how climate change messaging spread through media coverage, education systems, and public institutions. Tara criticizes climate-focused curriculum in schools and argues generations were taught to fear environmental catastrophe. SEGMENT 4 — “The Political Reckoning” The show closes with discussion about changing political messaging around climate change and whether media organizations and Democratic leaders are beginning to retreat from earlier alarmist rhetoric. QUOTE OF THE DAY “It was their first big society-wide hoax.” SOCIAL MEDIA TEASER

Waardeer je onze video's? Steun dan Café Weltschmerz, het podium voor het vrije woord: https://www.cafeweltschmerz.nl/doneren/Moderna en Korea University ontwikkelen samen het hantavirusvaccinIn deze aflevering bespreken Jeroen en Willem hoe een nieuw virus opduikt terwijl de oude patronen gewoon blijven draaien. Media en autoriteiten reageren opnieuw met dezelfde urgentie als tijdens covid, inclusief de bekende vragen over timing en motieven.Tegelijk woeden natuurbranden die volgens bronnen verband houden met legeractiviteiten.Het onderwerp verdwijnt snel naar de achtergrond zodra het politiek gevoelig wordt.Internationaal blijven Trump en Iran elkaar provoceren in een geopolitiek ritueel.Deze schouwespel houdt de aandacht moeiteloos vast terwijl de echte problemen blijven liggen.Binnen Nederland loopt de druk verder op. De prijzen stijgen hard en steeds meer mensen krijgen het gevoel dat inflatie geen fout is, maar beleid. De haat campagne tegen FVD krijgt steun van Extinction Rebellion, waarmee activisme en politieke uitsluiting steeds dichter naar elkaar toegroeien.Ali B en Peter Gillis worden publiekelijk aan de schandpaal genageld in een mediaspektakel waar beeldvorming belangrijker lijkt dan waarheid. Ondertussen trekt het IPCC stilletjes een van zijn zwaarste rampscenario's terug, zonder de grote koppen die eerdere voorspellingen wel kregen.Loosdrecht groeit uit tot het moment waarop burgers aangeven dat de grens bereikt is.Week 18 laat zien hoe crises niet verdwijnen, maar telkens opnieuw worden ingezet. Het patroon verandert nauwelijks, alleen het decor wisselt.Deze video is geproduceerd door Café Weltschmerz. Café Weltschmerz gelooft in de kracht van het gesprek en zendt interviews uit over actuele maatschappelijke thema's. Wij bieden een hoogwaardig alternatief voor de mainstream media. Café Weltschmerz is onafhankelijk en niet verbonden aan politieke, religieuze of commerciële partijen.Wil je meer video's bekijken en op de hoogte blijven via onze nieuwsbrief? Ga dan naar: https://www.cafeweltschmerz.nl/videos/Wil je op de hoogte worden gebracht van onze nieuwe video's? Klik dan op deze link: https://bit.ly/3XweTO0

Climate Panic Collapse: New York Energy War, IPCC Walk-Back & the ‘Doomsday' Reversal

Thomas Kurz discusses his upcoming book, Why There Is No Climate Crisis (Kindle in May, print in June), and argues modest warming is largely natural, claiming the IPCC obscures evidence of past climate variability. He explains paleoclimate proxies (oxygen isotopes, carbon-14, beryllium-10) and links climate shifts to Milankovitch cycles, solar cycles, galactic cosmic rays influencing clouds, and ocean oscillations (AMO/PDO). Using temperature reconstructions, glacier, treeline, sea-level, historical freeze, agriculture, insect, and civilization records, he says warm periods brought prosperity while cold periods drove drought, famine, disease, and upheaval. He concludes about half of post-1850 warming is natural, warming is generally beneficial, and future cooling is likely.00:00 Guest And Book Intro00:24 Why He Dug In01:46 Focus On Climate Cycles03:44 Paleoclimate Proxies04:57 Isotopes And Temperature06:48 Cosmic Rays And Solar07:56 Milky Way Climate Cycle12:17 Milankovitch Ice Ages14:28 CO2 Follows Temperature17:10 Holocene Cooling Trend19:29 Schwabe Solar Cycles21:42 Millennial Solar Cycles23:14 Temperature Reconstructions25:04 Glaciers Treelines Seas28:44 Historical Freeze Evidence32:27 Farming And Wildlife Clues37:06 Warm Vs Cold Impacts41:28 Storm Evidence In Proxies44:44 Civilizations And Climate45:48 Holocene Optimum Prosperity47:42 2200 BC Collapse Event48:18 Minoan Warm Period Boom50:47 Greek Dark Ages Breakdown52:53 Roman Warm Period Growth54:23 Late Antique Cooling Plagues56:50 Medieval Warm Period Golden Age59:11 Little Ice Age Hardship01:06:46 Witch Hunts Climate Blame01:09:16 Modern Warming Attribution Debate01:12:17 Ocean Oscillations AMO PDO01:15:44 No Climate Crisis Wrap Up=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Håller samhällets utveckling på att stanna av? Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. Vi är marinerade i idén om att utvecklingen rusar framåt – att ny teknik och samhällsförändringar går snabbare än någonsin. Men det finns en växande skara forskare och experter som varnar för att den där bilden inte alls stämmer. Istället är vi på väg in i den stora stagnationen. Vad finns det som talar för att samhället faktiskt håller på att stagnera, och vilka konsekvenser skulle det i så fall få?Programledare och producent: Erik Petersson och Wendela AntepohlMedverkande:Karim Jebari - filosof och forskare på Institutet för framtidsstudier.Carl Benedikt Frey - ekonomisk historiker och biträdande professor på institutionen för AI och arbete på universitetet i Oxford.Russell Funk - professor på Carlson school of management på universitet i Minnesota.Ove Granstrand - professor emeritus i på Chalmers – han har forskat på innovation i många år.Diana Ürge-Vorsatz - professor i miljövetenskap på centraleuropeiska universitetet i Wien samt vice ordförande i FN:s klimatpanel IPCC.Böcker:How progress ends (Carl Benedikt Frey 2025)Where Is My Flying Car? (J. Storrs Hall, 2021)Abundance (Ezra Klein och Derek Thompson 2025)Människans skymning (Karim Jebari)The Great Stagnation, How America Ate All the Low-Hanging Fruit of Modern History, Got Sick, and Will (Eventually) Feel Better (Tyler Cowen 2011)Klipp i urval:Panel från World economic forum: How Can We Fix Our Productivity Crisis?Debatt på Oxford Martin School: Innovation or Stagnation?Den nya ekonomin: Varför kan Sverige inte bygga något?New York Times: Peter Thiel and the antichristClaude's cyclesAndra källor i urval:Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over timeInnovation leaders in 2025Are ideas getting harder to find?The machine breakers - Eric HobsbawmWant to avert the apocalypse? Take lessons from Costa Rica8 Google Employees Invented Modern AI. Here's the Inside StoryThe critical role of persistent disruption in advancing scienceQuality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed' by the millions publishedWhy There Is So Much Bullshit in ScienceWhy Wall Street is booming while Main Street is stagnatingThe Wealth of Stagnation: Falling Growth, Rising ValuationsPost-growth: the science of wellbeing within planetary boundariesPrepare developed democracies for long-run economic slowdownsDoughnut of social and planetary boundaries monitors a world out of balanceThe disruption index suffers from citation inflation and is confounded by shifts in scholarly citation practiceLabour productivity growth in the euro area and the United States: short and long-term developmentsMusik:Carbon Based Life Forms - AbiogenesisMarcus Bàgalà - Duco in Mara's RoomPaul Leonard-Morgan - Anderson's ThemeKid Loco - Theme from the Graffiti ArtistKyle Dixon, Michael Stein - ElevenBlue Dot Sessions - Thread of CloudsBlue Dot Sessions - Lobo LoboPaul Leonard-Morgan - Running to the LoopMarcus Bàgalà - Wires: WindchimesJustin Hurwitz - QuarantineMolchat Doma - Судно (Борис Рыжий)Alphaville - Big in JapanPaul Leonard-Morgan - A Touch of InsanityHans Zimmer - Afraid of TimeBen Salisbury, Geoff Barrow - Dream RealityMarcus Bàgalà - Frets: Problem, After ProblemJeff Beal - I Think I Smell GasCliff Martinez - Rubber HeadCliff Martinez - There's Nothing In ThereCliff Martinez - Never Read HimBlue Dot Sessions - Lemon and MelonCliff Martinez - Don't Blow ItGustavo Santaolalla - Forgotten MemoriesCliff Martinez - Save Some For UsCliff Martinez - I'm SickCliff Martinez - I Don't Do FraudMartin D Fowler - 1 Ships VIICliff Martinez - The Birds Are Doing ThatMartin D Fowler - 1 Ships IIIHelios - Even TodayFleetwood Mac - The Chain

Two experts, one question: Is climate risk already priced in? On this week’s episode of the ESG Currents podcast, Bloomberg Intelligence EMEA ESG integration analyst Grace Osborne hosts an Oxford-style debate. Dr. Jakob Thomae, co-founder and CEO of Theia Finance Labs, argues for the motion, while Dr. Ben Caldecott, founding director of the Oxford Sustainable Finance Group and a coordinating lead author on finance for the IPCC’s Seventh Assessment Report, argues against it. From green tech outperformance to central-bank stress tests, the signals are mixed. Greater information availability may help investors price climate risk, but radical uncertainty — from second-order effects to tipping points — remains far harder to capture. This episode was recorded on March 3.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Sea-level rise is often spoken about in centimetres, forecasts and future scenarios. But what if we understood it as a health emergency that is already reshaping lives, harming bodies and minds, and displacing entire communities?This week, as a landmark Lancet Commission launches, Christiana Figueres and Tom Rivett-Carnac argue that sea-level rise must be understood not just as a climate threat, but as a health crisis currently unfolding. And, as co-chair of the Lancet Commission on Sea-Level Rise, Health and Justice, Christiana brings us inside the thinking behind this urgent new effort.Christiana speaks to commissioners ‘Ofa Kaisamy, Professor Anne Poelina and Dr Sandro Demaio, who paint a vivid picture of what happens before and as the water arrives. This is a story of food insecurity, damaged clinics and hospitals, disease, displacement, trauma, and the loss of ancestral knowledge and cultural continuity. But it also points to an opportunity to finally see sea-level rise in fully human terms, with those on the frontlines shaping the response.What changes when we stop treating rising seas as a distant environmental problem and start recognising them as a present health emergency? And what might become possible if the people most affected are no longer treated as victims, but as leaders?Learn More:

Pandemic Risk Assessment is an emerging scientific toolkit designed to assess how pandemic risk is evolving over time. Rather than predicting the next outbreak, it integrates evidence across scientific disciplines to identify the drivers and estimate the probabilities of pandemic outbreaks. And in so doing, it can help policymakers prioritize prevention and preparedness investments before crises emerge. Pandemic Risk Assessment is still an emerging field, but there is growing momentum to institutionalize it, with discussions exploring a range of possible models, including options inspired by bodies such as the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which is the UN-backed scientific body that regularly updates policymakers on the latest findings on climate change. Joining me to discuss why pandemic risk assessment is needed, what a robust scientific process might look like, and how to make it a permanent feature of our global pandemic preparedness landscape are Serina Ng and Ben Oppenheim. Ben Oppenheim is a non-resident fellow at the Berkeley Risk and Security Lab and at the Center for Global Development. Serina Ng is a Director at the World Health Organization and Executive Head of the G20 Joint Finance Health Task Force Secretariat, which is hosted at the WHO. Today's episode is produced in partnership with the United Nations Foundation as a part of a series called Before the Outbreak, which examines the role of disease surveillance in stopping the next pandemic

Professor Demetris Koutsoyiannis presents a 2020 talk arguing the “climate change agenda” is political, tracing it to Henry Kissinger's 1974 UN speech and subsequent WMO, CIA, U.S. agency actions, leading to the CO2 program, world climate conferences, and the IPCC's 1988 creation. He reviews Time magazine's shifting narratives from global cooling to warming and CO2, then describes elite networks and philanthropy—especially Rockefeller-linked funding—aimed at moving climate from science to policy, promoting carbon pricing, and expanding global governance. He draws a historical analogy to Rockefeller-supported eugenics and warns of emergency politics limiting rights. In discussion, he contrasts Greek and U.S. belief levels and says COVID fears waned in Greece while climate remains influential.00:00 Intro and Talk Setup01:43 Roadmap and Sources03:15 1973-74 Power Players05:45 Kissinger Career Background06:44 Five Labors Overview10:16 Climate Alert at UN12:38 Cooling Scare and Agencies14:38 CO2 Program to IPCC Birth16:42 Climategate and IPCC Politics19:00 Time Magazine Narrative Shift19:30 From Ice Age to CO2 Villain22:57 Rio to Kyoto Green Industry24:47 Panic Marketing and Activism26:38 Greta and Climate Migration28:15 COVID vs Climate Messaging31:09 Part Three World Saviors31:30 Rockefeller Web of Influence33:34 Money Geography and Oil Roots35:32 Big Oil Meets Big Green37:11 Grantmaking and Consensus37:56 Rockefeller Climate Strategy39:29 Divestment and Multi Agenda Grants41:14 Foundation Funding Machine42:53 Podesta Emails Elite Coordination44:26 Big Green Mega Projects45:27 Climate Emergency State48:35 Climate as Global Governance Vehicle51:58 Supranational Solutions Go Mainstream55:12 Paris COP Influence Network56:53 Eugenics Historical Parallel59:25 From Consensus to State Policy01:02:31 Epilogue Doom Predictions01:04:09 COVID Pivot and World Order01:08:56 Closing Truth and Freedom01:11:22 Q and A Wrap UpHome page: https://www.itia.ntua.gr/en/dk/Substack: https://climath.substack.com/The political origin of the climate change agenda: https://www.itia.ntua.gr/en/docinfo/2035/=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Jules de Waart, an 84-year-old former geologist, Dutch parliamentarian, civil servant, and physical geographer, discusses returning to climate topics after retirement and writing his skeptical book, "Crisis or Hoax," after an article was refused. He describes translating it to English using translation software and later joining the CO2 Coalition. Using geological and satellite-temperature slides, he argues Earth's climate has long cycled through icehouse/greenhouse periods, the Holocene had earlier warm periods, and recent temperature spikes align with natural factors rather than CO2. He disputes claims of a strong scientific consensus, cites studies showing few papers explicitly quantify IPCC dominance, critiques alarmist messaging, and urges defending the scientific method and caution on geoengineering.00:00 Meet Jules de Waart02:49 Why He Wrote The Book03:08 Research And Translation Process06:13 Two Big Climate Questions10:26 Deep Time Climate History14:32 Holocene Warm Periods18:25 IPCC 1990 And Hockey Stick21:02 Satellites Spikes And Natural Drivers25:43 Debunking The 97 Percent Consensus30:59 Scary Messaging And White Lies34:19 Is The Narrative Cracking42:49 Power Politics And Global Reset Claims49:00 Closing Advice And Scientific MethodAmazon link for “Crisis or Hoax?: Climate change in science, media and politics”: https://a.co/d/0hF1DizdTilak Doshi: “This Book by a Dissenting Climate Scientist is the Perfect Red Pill for the Curious”: https://tilakdoshi.substack.com/p/this-book-by-a-dissenting-climate?publication_id=2241724=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

What if one university helped shape modern climate science? Discover how the University of Reading became synonymous with the field and why it remains at the centre of that story.This World Meteorology Day 2026, we trace the evolution of climate science, from the Antarctic ozone hole in 1985 to today's global challenges, and explore how Reading became a hub for the ideas, research and people driving the field forward.In this episode, Professor Hannah Cloke OBE from the University of Reading's Department of Meteorology speaks with Professor Keith Shine FRS, the UK's Regius Professor of Climate Science, and Dr Jolene Cook OBE, climate science advisor to the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero and the UK's representative to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).Together, they examine Reading's role in climate science and reflect on the field's growth and future. Their journeys, shaped in part by the university, offer insight into how the discipline has developed, how universities and government are preparing the next generation of climate scientists, and the opportunities ahead for early career researchers.CHAPTERS00:00 – Discover Reading, a global centre for climate science00:52 – Meet the voices, Keith Shine and Jolene Cook02:10 – Pathways into climate science, where it all began04:32 – 1985 and beyond, the ozone hole and growth of atmospheric science07:25 – A defining role, the UK's first Regius Professor of Climate Science09:00 – Learning at Reading, shaping a generation of scientists12:52 – From science to policy, the role of the IPCC17:00 – Preparing the next generation, universities, government and early career opportunities25:30 – Reading at 100, looking ahead to the next century of climate science

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is responsible for collating our shared scientific understanding of how global warming is impacting the planet. But the body now faces a challenge after the US withdrew funding for its scientists to participate. Professor Jim Skea, who chairs the IPCC, joins Akshat Rathi on Zero to talk about the body’s future, whether the organisation can survive the US pullback, and what questions the next set of reports are going to answer. Zero is a production of Bloomberg Green. Our producer is Oscar Boyd. Special thanks to Olivia Rudgard, Eric Roston, Sommer Saadi, Sharon Chen and Laura Millan. Thoughts or suggestions? Email us at zeropod@bloomberg.net. For more coverage of climate change and solutions, visit https://www.bloomberg.com/green.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

8. In this final segment, Cline summarizes the rankings of ancient societies based on resilience definitions from the IPCC. He distinguishes between those that "transformed" (the antifragile Phoenicians and Cypriots), those that "adapted" or "coped" (Egypt, Assyria, and Babylon), and those that failed (the Hittites). He emphasizes the importance of geography, noting that major river systems like the Nile and Euphrateshelped Egypt and Mesopotamia survive the collapse. Cline's work illustrates that resilience involves more than just survival; it requires the agility to innovate in response to extreme impact events, offering lessons for contemporary global stability. (8)

Photojournalist Bryan Anselm on Climate Change Photography, Storytelling & Changing Minds The 10 Frames Per Second podcast (new episodes every Tuesday) brings together photojournalists who turn complex stories into powerful images. In this episode, host Molly Roberts (Joe Giordano was out for this one) sits down with Bryan Anselm, a New‑York‑based photographer whose work chronicles the long‑term impacts of climate change across the United States. If you're a: Photojournalist looking for inspiration on climate‑related assignments Emerging visual storyteller seeking practical career advice Editor or curator interested in the intersection of documentary and fine‑art photography

Physician and health care reform advocate David K. Cundiff discusses his article "Ecovillages and organic agriculture: a scenario for global climate restoration." David challenges the IPCC's failure to model a fully organic global agricultural transition, presenting a scenario where converting 5 billion hectares to biointensive organic farming could sequester nearly 98 percent of projected greenhouse gas emissions. The conversation details how "GROW BIOINTENSIVE" methods, using hand tools, natural fertilizers, and closed nutrient loops, can outperform industrial agriculture in yield and carbon capture. David also proposes a radical alternative for Point Reyes National Seashore: replacing cattle ranch evictions with pilot ecovillages that solve housing needs while restoring the climate. Discover how a shift to community-based, chemical-free living might be humanity's only path between extinction and survival. Partner with me on the KevinMD platform. With over three million monthly readers and half a million social media followers, I give you direct access to the doctors and patients who matter most. Whether you need a sponsored article, email campaign, video interview, or a spot right here on the podcast, I offer the trusted space your brand deserves to be heard. Let's work together to tell your story. PARTNER WITH KEVINMD → https://kevinmd.com/influencer SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST → https://www.kevinmd.com/podcast RECOMMENDED BY KEVINMD → https://www.kevinmd.com/recommended

Climate concern is not the problem. Most people have it. What's missing is everything that turns concern into action - and understanding that gap turns out to be a lot more complicated than it looks.This week, Christiana Figueres, Tom Rivett-Carnac and Paul Dickinson sit down with Lorraine Whitmarsh, Professor of Environmental Psychology and Director of the Centre for Climate Change and Social Transformations at the University of Bath. Together they dig into the psychology behind catastrophe apathy: why understanding an existential threat doesn't always lead to action, and what the research says actually moves people.Lorraine shares real-world evidence - including renewable energy tariffs that shifted 90% of customers onto green power simply by making it the default - and explains why trusted everyday messengers, from hairdressers to taxi drivers, employers to community figures, often have more influence than expert voices in reshaping what feels normal.The conversation also revisits an uncomfortable history: how the personal carbon footprint, popularised by BP in the early 2000s, reframed climate responsibility around individual choices rather than systemic change. A framing so powerful that even environmental organisations adopted it. Who benefited most from that shift is a question the movement is still grappling with.If systemic change requires public consent, and public consent requires political will, and political will requires behaviour change - how do you break the climate Catch-22?With thanks to the University of Bath.Learn More:

Rejoice! The Great Reset is yesterday's news, and the great reject is upon us! What does it mean that the US is withdrawing from the IPCC? That the UN is on the ropes? That Davos was as big of a flop as last year's COP? Marc Morano of ClimateDepot.com joins us to discuss these issues and the sea change that has taken place in public opinion on global warming and globalism in the past year.

Andre Meloche joins us to talk about Canadian energy and politics, Alberta v Quebec separation, writing and philosophy, revolt and revolution and where his journey is leading him to.   We talk about Quebec and energy infrastructure in the different provinces, gas v electricity, what is actually green and clean - if anything, seeing the change of UN2030, the lockdowns and curfews splitting up the province, equalization payments, cultural and financial sovereignty, abiotic oil, natural gas generators and the end of the climate hoax.   In the second half we get deeper into the debate between fossil fuels and abiotic fuel, IPCC, space mining, going West is not just a song or a meme, the Indian Act and the chiefs, civil war, the clarity act, the Privy Council, the motto of communism, the Quiet Revolution, the book of The White Guard, and the amazing time we are in where everything is moving so fast.   Writer and "Philosopher". My personal interest, which is entirely my own, can be summed up in this sentence: to debunk the untruths that abound in our time.   Sites Internet - Website : https://andremeloche.wordpress.com/ https://substack.com/@lepoeterusse https://x.com/LePoeteRusse?s=20 Animateur du podcast « La Philosophie de l'Information » : https://www.youtube.com/@AndreiMedvedev-m7c   Coanimateur du podcast « Cerberus At The Gate » en compagnie de Timothy William  Knight (@twilliamknight) et de Peyman Askari (@PeymanAskari451)   To gain access to the second half of show and our Plus feed for audio and podcast please clink the link http://www.grimericaoutlawed.ca/support.   For second half of video (when applicable and audio) go to our Substack and Subscribe. https://grimericaoutlawed.substack.com/ or to our Locals  https://grimericaoutlawed.locals.com/ or Rokfin www.Rokfin.com/Grimerica Patreon https://www.patreon.com/grimericaoutlawed   Support the show directly: https://open.spotify.com/show/2punSyd9Cw76ZtvHxMKenI?si=ImKxfMHgQZ-oshl499O4dQ&nd=1&dlsi=4c25fa9c78674de3 Watch or Listen on Spotify https://grimericacbd.com/ CBD / THC Tinctures and Gummies https://grimerica.ca/support-2/ Our Adultbrain Audiobook Podcast and Website: www.adultbrain.ca Our Audiobook Youtube Channel:  https://www.youtube.com/@adultbrainaudiobookpublishing/videos Check out our next trip/conference/meetup - Contact at the Cabin www.contactatthecabin.com Other affiliated shows: www.grimerica.ca The OG Grimerica Show Join the chat / hangout with a bunch of fellow Grimericans  Https://t.me.grimerica grimerica.ca/chats   Discord Chats Darren's book www.acanadianshame.ca Eh-List Podcast and site: https://eh-list.ca/ Eh-List YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheEh-List www.Rokfin.com/Grimerica Our channel on free speech Rokfin Leave a review on iTunes and/or Stitcher: https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/grimerica-outlawed http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/grimerica-outlawed Sign up for our newsletter http://www.grimerica.ca/news SPAM Graham = and send him your synchronicities, feedback, strange experiences and psychedelic trip reports!! graham@grimerica.com InstaGRAM https://www.instagram.com/the_grimerica_show_podcast/  Purchase swag, with partial proceeds donated to the show www.grimerica.ca/swag Send us a postcard or letter http://www.grimerica.ca/contact/ ART - Napolean Duheme's site http://www.lostbreadcomic.com/  MUSIC Tru Northperception, Felix's Site sirfelix.bandcamp.com