Podcasts about fallacious

Warren McGrew joins me again to respond to another really bad argument by a rogue Calvinist. We will specifically address the Calvinistic interpretation of Romans 8:7-9 as it relates to the "ordo salutis" (logical order of events in salvation) from the Reformed/Calvinistic perspective, which is based on logic that goes something like this:   1. If you're in the flesh you cannot please God 2. Believing in Christ would please God 3. Therefore, you cannot believe in Jesus because that would please God   Which is a non-sequitur. This example makes the fallacy very clear:   1. If you're playing in mud you cannot please mom. 2. Leaving the mud and cleaning up would please mom. 3. Therefore, you cannot leave the mud and clean up because that would please mom.    The Calvinist comes to the text with presumptions that simply are not supported by this text, or any other.     To get your copy of Dr. Flowers new book, Drawn By Jesus, go here: https://a.co/d/6s767Ey   To SUPPORT this broadcast, please click here: https://soteriology101.com/support/   Subscribe to the Soteriology 101 Newsletter here: www.soteriology101.com/newsletter   Is Calvinism all Leighton talks about? https://soteriology101.com/2017/09/22/is-calvinism-all-you-talk-about/   DOWNLOAD OUR APP: LINK FOR ANDROIDS: https://play.google.com/store/apps/de... LINK FOR APPLE: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/soterio...   Go to www.ridgemax.co for all you software development needs! Show them some love for their support of Soteriology101!!!   To ORDER Dr. Flowers Curriculum “Tiptoeing Through Tulip,” please click here: https://soteriology101.com/shop/   To listen to the audio only, be sure to subscribe on iTunes, Stitcher, Google Play, or one of the other podcast players found here: https://soteriology101.com/home/   For more about Traditionalism (or Provisionism), please visit www.soteriology101.com   Dr. Flowers' book, “The Potter's Promise,” can be found here: https://a.co/d/iLKpahj   Dr. Flowers' book, “God's Provision for All” can be found here: https://www.amazon.com/Gods-Provision...   To engage with other believers cordially join our Facebook group: https://m.facebook.com/groups/1806702...   For updates and news, follow us at:  www.facebook/Soteriology101   Or @soteriology101 on Twitter   Please SHARE on Facebook and Twitter and help spread the word!   To learn more about other ministries and teachings from Dr. Flowers, go here: https://soteriology101.com/2017/09/22...   To become a Patreon supporter or make a one-time donation: https://soteriology101.com/support/   #LeightonFlowers #Calvinism #Theology

I read from fallacious to fall line.   Fall line: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_line     The word of the episode is "fallal".     Use my special link https://zen.ai/thedictionary to save 30% off your first month of any Zencastr paid plan.    Create your podcast today! #madeonzencastr     Theme music from Tom Maslowski https://zestysol.com/     Merchandising! https://www.teepublic.com/user/spejampar     "The Dictionary - Letter A" on YouTube   "The Dictionary - Letter B" on YouTube   "The Dictionary - Letter C" on YouTube   "The Dictionary - Letter D" on YouTube   "The Dictionary - Letter E" on YouTube   "The Dictionary - Letter F" on YouTube     Featured in a Top 10 Dictionary Podcasts list! https://blog.feedspot.com/dictionary_podcasts/     Backwards Talking on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLmIujMwEDbgZUexyR90jaTEEVmAYcCzuq     https://linktr.ee/spejampar dictionarypod@gmail.com https://www.facebook.com/thedictionarypod/ https://www.threads.net/@dictionarypod https://twitter.com/dictionarypod https://www.instagram.com/dictionarypod/ https://www.patreon.com/spejampar https://www.tiktok.com/@spejampar 917-727-5757

Send us a textEpisode 67 of 'The Open Forum' A special edition in review of the recent debate 'Islam v Christianity' on the FreshandFit YouTube channel featuring Ijaz the Trini & Daniel Haqiqatjou V Sam Shamoun & Jay Dyer. Christians are welcomed to join in the discussion. Guests will be invited on a first come first serve basis. Please note we can only have a maximum of 10 panelists (including efdawah panelists) at any one time.Link to join the panel: TEARS OF GAZA Donation Link: https://givebrite.com/gazacrisis© 2024 EFDawah All Rights ReservedWebsite : https://efdawah.com/https://www.patreon.com/EFDawahhttps://gofund.me/7cb27d17https://www.paypal.me/EFDawahhttps://www.cashbackmycharity.co.uk/?...https://www.facebook.com/efdawah/Timestamps:00:00 - Intro00:53 - EF Dawah Panel join: Format of the Stream03:09 - Background of the Debate04:33 - Impressions of the Debate07:30 - Problems with the tactics of the Christians11:38 - Scrutinizing the arguments for the Trinity21:48 - Issues with the arguments of Christians27:32 - Refuting Sam's claim about the spirit of Allah ﷻ 36:33 - Jesus not teaching the Trinity in the Bible38:38 - Debunking the claim of multiple divine beings in Islam44:30 - Clarifying the Islamic belief about Allah ﷻ's nature48:10 - Problems with the concept of the Trinity51:05 - Illogical inconsistencies in the Trinity54:30 - Understanding God through his communication 56:34 - Addressing the Christians57:37 - Refuting Sam's claims about Allah ﷻ's attributes1:00:45 - Issues with Jay's arguments1:04:18 - Dismantling Jay's arguments against Islam1:10:14 - Fallacious arguments from Sam & Jay1:12:24 - Message for the Christians & inviting them1:16:19 - Frank (Christian) joins & shares his views1:17:53 - Dr. Michael Bird on "No Trinity in the Bible"1:20:10 - Discourse on the Trinity & its contradictions 1:25:52 - History of the Trinity in Christianity1:28:45 - Analysing the necessity for Trinity in Christianity 1:32:11 - Examining Forgiveness in Christianity1:36:01 - Concept of Forgiveness in Islam1:37:01 - Pagan influence on Christian theology1:38:59 - Abraham's sacrifice: Christianity vs Islam1:42:37 - Discrepancies in the concept of the Trinity1:43:39 - Problems with Christian Theology1:47:12 - Adam (Christian) joins & shares his views1:49:51 - No arguments for the Trinity in the debate1:51:04 - Contradiction in God's name in the Bible1:54:08 - Discussing Morality in Christianity vs Islam1:56:35 - Reliability of the Qur'an vs the Bible1:59:50 - The Concept of the Fitrah in Islam2:01:25 - Defending Prophet Muhammad ﷺ's character2:08:34 - Pacifism in Christianity vs Islam2:10:25 - Assessing & debunking Adam's claims 2:20:25 - Moral acceptability of actions sanctioned by God 2:23:46 - The Miraculous Nature of the Qur'an 2:28:36 - Discourse on Irish culture & Islam in Ireland2:31:30 - The Rise of Islam in Europe2:33:16 - Engaging in respectful debates 2:34:16 - Link b/w Christianity & the Far Right2:35:29 - Uniqueness & inimitability of the Qur'an 2:40:21 - Getting shadow banned for speaking up for

Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for August 26, 2024 is: fallacious • fuh-LAY-shus • adjective Fallacious is a formal word that typically describes something, such as an argument or assumption, that is false or inaccurate and that tends to mislead or deceive others. // The notion that disease is caused by malign spirits was known to be fallacious long before the advent of germ theory. See the entry > Examples: "Bad legislation and fallacious arguments are threatening our most renowned educational institutions, which have made major contributions to our understanding of science and society and to our health and economic well-being, institutions that are the envy of the world." — Burton G. Malkiel, The Wall Street Journal, 19 Oct. 2022 Did you know? It will come as no surprise that fallacious is related to the noun fallacy, meaning “delusion” or “falsehood.” Both words come from the Latin word fallacia, which in turn comes from fallere, meaning “to deceive.” (Other descendants of fallere in English include fail, false, and fault.) Fallacious arguments are a hot topic among philosophers, and some classic examples include the “ad hominem” fallacy, the “slippery slope” fallacy, and the “red herring” fallacy.

In this episode we answer emails from Stuart, George and MyContactInfo.  We discuss a follow-up on another listener's accumulation portfolio, the foibles of trying to predict future interest rates and common fallacious reasoning, levered inverse treasury bond funds and other funds that do well in rising interest rate environments, and a follow up on our target date fund rant episode (#333).Links:Portfolio Visualizer Analysis of UPRO and synthetic alternatives:  Backtest Portfolio Asset Allocation (portfoliovisualizer.com)TestFol Analysis with an inverse treasury bond exposure:  testfol.ioSupport the Show.

Dive into Episode 13 of The Chicago View Podcast as hosts Lexi, DeAngelo, and Rita unpack a week filled with drama and debate. The episode opens with Kelly Rowland's unexpected confrontation with a female security guard at the Cannes Film Festival. Our hosts analyze the incident, exploring the reactions and what it might mean for celebrity-public interactions at high-profile events.Rita takes the conversation deeper with a discussion on "pretty privilege" – examining how beauty impacts social treatment and opportunities, sparked by recent events and general observations in the entertainment industry.The episode heats up with the shocking news of Nicki Minaj's arrest in Amsterdam after authorities found illegal substances in her bag. The team breaks down the details of the arrest, the legal implications, and what this could mean for Nicki's international tours and brand.#FreeNickiTune in to Episode 13 for these hot topics and more as The Chicago View Podcast continues to provide sharp insights, expert analysis, and the engaging discussions you love. Join us to get the full scoop on these unfolding stories and their wider cultural impacts.Special Thanks to Our Sponsors:This episode is brought to you with support from the Women's Business Development Center and Cook County Small Business Source, the real MVPs behind the scenes.Visit wbdc.org and cookcountysmallbiz.org to discover the impactful work they're doing to support and empower entrepreneurs and small businesses.Revoc Productions ™️

In this episode, we discuss logical fallacies and how they apply to science education reform efforts. Some resources from this episode include: Audible Reckoning: How top political podcasters spread unsubstantiated and false claims (Brookings Institute, 2023) (https://www.brookings.edu/articles/audible-reckoning-how-top-political-podcasters-spread-unsubstantiated-and-false-claims/) Some logical fallacies (https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/fallacies/) Things that bring us joy this week: Hidden Potential by Adam Grant (https://adamgrant.net/book/hidden-potential/) Make Stuff (http://www.make-stuff.com/) Intro/Outro Music: Notice of Eviction by Legally Blind (https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Legally_Blind)

I discuss the ever-present existence of sophistry within society, in particular within the ongoing war, and I reference current examples in politics, education and the criminal medical industry.  I also, at the end, highlight the infiltration of Mossad within NIAID and the NIH for the purposes of depopulation from an insider.  Link below to the article.

In this episode, Dr. T. Michael W. Halcomb offers the "Fallacy of the Week." He considers when liberals try to define "Christianity." Tune in! #fallacy #logicalfallacy #logic #logicfail #fallacious #error #christianity #liberal #progressive Fallacy, Logical Fallacy, Logic, Logic Fail, Fallacious, Error, Christianity, Liberal, Progressive, --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/glossahouse/message

This week apologetics expert, Sandy Simpson, gives us two more teachings concerning false doctrines within the church.

We are often told that schools are where you learn how to think, not what to think. Sadly, almost no school curriculum deals directly with logic and the closely related subject of logical fallacies.  Fallacies are all around us. Just read something online or watch a few minutes of television and you'll probably encounter examples of people using fallacious reasoning and logical fallacies. In fact, you've probably engaged in it yourself. We're all guilty of it.  Learn more about some of the common logical fallacies on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily.  Subscribe to the podcast!  https://link.chtbl.com/EverythingEverywhere?sid=ShowNotes -------------------------------- Executive Producer: Charles Daniel Associate Producers: Peter Bennett & Thor Thomsen   Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere Update your podcast app at newpodcastapps.com Discord Server: https://discord.gg/UkRUJFh Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everythingeverywheredaily Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week's episode contains two teachings from Sandy Simpson. The first is, “The Fallacious Arguments of Neo-Universalists” is from a DVD Sandy produced in the early to mid-2000's. In it, he discusses some of the beliefs from the Emerging. Some of the leaders of the Emerging  church are Brian McLaren, Leonard Sweet, Rick Warren, Tony Campolo, and even Billy Graham. The second teaching in this episode is from an article Sandy wrote in 2005 called, “The Fallacies of the Third Wave Spiritual Warfare Teachings”.  Sandy discusses the book, “Portals to Cleansing” by Dr. Henry Malone and why it's in error compared to the Scriptures.The article Sandy mentions can be found on his website: DeceptionInTheChurch.com.

Fellow travelers ask Dr. Stu to comment on a popular Social Media influencer's video. Dumb Doctor Dogma is everywhere, and Blyss and Dr. Stu are here to break down the fallacies in arguments made by non-experts on home birth. They also talk about the lack of acknowledgment of midwives' credentials, how birth is not inherently a dangerous experience for low-risk moms, and why we should not equate the level of training with quality of care.In this episode of Birthing Instincts:Pervasive bias for doctors over midwivesPrevalence of personal bias in papers & poorly controlled research Fallacious arguments on home birth by non-expertsWhy level of training does not equal quality of careDr. Stu's travels in Yellowstone & the Tetons This show is supported by:LMNT | Go to drinklmnt.com/birthinginstincts to get a free sample pack!Resources:The Highwire with Del Bigtree: SEPTIC SCIENCEZDoggMD: The Truth About Home Birth w/Dr. Blair Duddy | Incident Report 225Against the Wind with Dr. Paul: EPISODE 067Article: Maternal Healthcare PanelConnect with Dr. Stu:Instagram: @birthinginstinctsWebsite: birthinginstincts.comConnect with Blyss:Instagram: @birthingblyssWebsite: birthingblyss.comThis show is produced by Soulfire Productions

Stuart Langridge, Jono Bacon, and Jeremy Garcia present Bad Voltage, in which Victorian Tumblr is a thing, you should probably check out Lethality, Jono’s band’s latest, and: [00:00:00] Intro [00:04:11] USB Type-C EVERYTHING [00:17:33] Firefox and Google are arguing about extension APIs that ad blockers use [00:34:00] Spotify comes for audiobooks [00:57:15] Outro Come chat […]

A new MP3 sermon from Midway Bible Baptist Church is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Fallacious Reasoning (cont) Subtitle: Colossians 2:8 Speaker: Pastor Richard Owen Broadcaster: Midway Bible Baptist Church Event: Sunday - PM Date: 6/5/2022 Bible: Colossians 2:8 Length: 60 min.

A new MP3 sermon from Midway Bible Baptist Church is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Fallacious Reasoning Subtitle: Colossians 2:8 Speaker: Pastor Richard Owen Broadcaster: Midway Bible Baptist Church Event: Sunday - AM Date: 5/1/2022 Bible: Colossians 2:8 Length: 49 min.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: “Pivotal Act” Intentions: Negative Consequences and Fallacious Arguments, published by Andrew Critch on April 19, 2022 on The Effective Altruism Forum. tl;dr: I know a bunch of EA/rationality-adjacent people who argue — sometimes jokingly and sometimes seriously — that the only way or best way to reduce existential risk is to enable an “aligned” AGI development team to forcibly (even if nonviolently) shut down all other AGI projects, using safe AGI. I find that the arguments for this conclusion are flawed, and that the conclusion itself causes harm to institutions who espouse it. Fortunately (according to me), successful AI labs do not seem to espouse this "pivotal act" philosophy. [This post is also available on LessWrong.] How to read this post Please read Part 1 first if you're very impact-oriented and want to think about the consequences of various institutional policies more than the arguments that lead to the policies; then Parts 2 and 3. Please read Part 2 first if you mostly want to evaluate policies based on the arguments behind them; then Parts 1 and 3. I think all parts of this post are worth reading, but depending on who you are, I think you could be quite put off if you read the wrong part first and start feeling like I'm basing my argument too much on kinds-of-thinking that policy arguments should not be based on. Part 1: Negative Consequences of Pivotal Act Intentions Imagine it's 2022 (it is!), and your plan for reducing existential risk is to build or maintain an institution that aims to find a way for you — or someone else you'll later identify and ally with — to use AGI to forcibly shut down all other AGI projects in the world. By “forcibly” I mean methods that violate or threaten to violate private property or public communication norms, such as by using an AGI to engage in. cyber sabotage: hacking into competitors' computer systems and destroy their data; physical sabotage: deploying tiny robotic systems that locate and destroy AI-critical hardware without (directly) harming any humans; social sabotage: auto-generating mass media campaigns to shut down competitor companies by legal means, or threats: demonstrating powerful cyber or physical or social threats, and bargaining with competitors to shut down “or else”. Hiring people for your pivotal act project is going to be tricky. You're going to need people who are willing to take on, or at least tolerate, a highly adversarial stance toward the rest of the world. I think this is very likely to have a number of bad consequences for your plan to do good, including the following: (bad external relations) People on your team will have a low trust and/or adversarial stance towards neighboring institutions and collaborators, and will have a hard time forming good-faith collaboration. This will alienate other institutions and make them not want to work with you or be supportive of you. (bad internal relations) As your team grows, not everyone will know each other very well. The “us against the world” attitude will be hard to maintain, because there will be an ever weakening sense of “us”, especially as people quit and move to other institutions and conversely. Sometimes, new hires will express opinions that differ from the dominant institutional narrative, which might pattern-match as “outsidery” or “norm-y” or “too caught up in external politics”, triggering feelings of internal distrust within the team that some people might defect on the plan to forcibly shut down other projects. This will cause your team to get along poorly internally, and make it hard to manage people. (risky behavior) In the fortunate-according-to-you event that your team manages to someday wield a powerful technology, there will be a sense of pressure to use it to “finally make a difference” or other argument that boils down to ac...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: “Pivotal Act” Intentions: Negative Consequences and Fallacious Arguments, published by Andrew Critch on April 19, 2022 on The AI Alignment Forum. tl;dr: I know a bunch of EA/rationality-adjacent people who argue — sometimes jokingly and sometimes seriously — that the only way or best way to reduce existential risk is to enable an “aligned” AGI development team to forcibly (even if nonviolently) shut down all other AGI projects, using safe AGI. I find that the arguments for this conclusion are flawed, and that the conclusion itself causes harm to institutions who espouse it. Fortunately (according to me), successful AI labs do not seem to espouse this "pivotal act" philosophy. [This post is also available on the EA Forum.] How to read this post Please read Part 1 first if you're very impact-oriented and want to think about the consequences of various institutional policies more than the arguments that lead to the policies; then Parts 2 and 3. Please read Part 2 first if you mostly want to evaluate policies based on the arguments behind them; then Parts 1 and 3. I think all parts of this post are worth reading, but depending on who you are, I think you could be quite put off if you read the wrong part first and start feeling like I'm basing my argument too much on kinds-of-thinking that policy arguments should not be based on. Part 1: Negative Consequences of Pivotal Act Intentions Imagine it's 2022 (it is!), and your plan for reducing existential risk is to build or maintain an institution that aims to find a way for you — or someone else you'll later identify and ally with — to use AGI to forcibly shut down all other AGI projects in the world. By “forcibly” I mean methods that violate or threaten to violate private property or public communication norms, such as by using an AGI to engage in. cyber sabotage: hacking into competitors' computer systems and destroy their data; physical sabotage: deploying tiny robotic systems that locate and destroy AI-critical hardware without (directly) harming any humans; social sabotage: auto-generating mass media campaigns to shut down competitor companies by legal means, or threats: demonstrating powerful cyber or physical or social threats, and bargaining with competitors to shut down “or else”. Hiring people for your pivotal act project is going to be tricky. You're going to need people who are willing to take on, or at least tolerate, a highly adversarial stance toward the rest of the world. I think this is very likely to have a number of bad consequences for your plan to do good, including the following: (bad external relations) People on your team will have a low trust and/or adversarial stance towards neighboring institutions and collaborators, and will have a hard time forming good-faith collaboration. This will alienate other institutions and make them not want to work with you or be supportive of you. (bad internal relations) As your team grows, not everyone will know each other very well. The “us against the world” attitude will be hard to maintain, because there will be an ever weakening sense of “us”, especially as people quit and move to other institutions and conversely. Sometimes, new hires will express opinions that differ from the dominant institutional narrative, which might pattern-match as “outsidery” or “norm-y” or “too caught up in external politics”, triggering feelings of internal distrust within the team that some people might defect on the plan to forcibly shut down other projects. This will cause your team to get along poorly internally, and make it hard to manage people. (risky behavior) In the fortunate-according-to-you event that your team manages to someday wield a powerful technology, there will be a sense of pressure to use it to “finally make a difference” or other argument that boils down to actin...

Drink up. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/bling-viera/message

Virology On Trial Series: https://odysee.com/virology-on-trial:6f65e1c3585e535f2396c0d7ac82f1514723ff36?lid=e755dec937d33f5cf0e1e1f3a3636412c9e279b6 Part 1: https://www.bitchute.com/video/a5ANTtqFaLTs/ Part 2: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ngvvq819u8yG/ Part 3: https://www.bitchute.com/video/QZ1R488qwjHp/ Part 4: https://www.bitchute.com/video/eoAgmCbIcXFx/ Part 5: https://www.bitchute.com/video/59dvZQtpNhvw/ Part 6: https://www.bitchute.com/video/RckOAckiSmTG/ Part 7: https://www.bitchute.com/video/yLKpcKIw3zGN/ NEW Rokfin Channel LAUNCHED: https://rokfin.com/timtruth (join me there for exclusive reports & call in shows) Join the leading researchers on https://GroupDiscover.com to find the best videos from across the censorship-resistant internet platforms like Odysee, Rumble, LBRY, Bitchute & Brighteon. Add me on these great platforms: https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/ https://rumble.com/timtruth https://bitchute.com/timtruth/ https://GroupDiscover.com and https://flote.app/timtruth1 --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/tim-truth/support

Politicians love logical fallacies.  Usually they appear in the hot button issues of the day.  In this episode I give you two good examples.

Logical fallacies or, in plain language, baloney arguments, are everywhere these days. With the rise of social media, everyone is an expert. Dry Toast and Dan Fondo take you on a voyage of discovery into the world of fallacious arguments. Learn how to spot the many phony arguments in use these days along with some tips on how to argue properly in a fair and accurate manner.Support the show (https://www.buymeacoffee.com/factofthematter)

#NarcissisticAbuse #FlyingMonkeys #Scapegoating #AbusebyProxy #Cyberbullying #Cybermobbing #DigitalMobbing #Mobbing #Heckling #Cyberstalking #Heyoka #EmpathNarcissistDynamic #DamageControl #Karma #Judgment #SuperEmpaths #DemonsinDeathThroes #DogsReturningtoVomit #HitDogsHoller #KarmicKonnection #Karmics #KarmicReaders #BamboozledbyBeelzebub #EnergyHarvesting #EnergyVampirism #EnergyVampires #BlackMagic #SpiritualAttack #PsychicAttack ☆☆☆☆

Have you been taught about different spirits that are not apparent in Scripture? Have you been plagued with the thought that you may have a religious spirit, an orphan spirit, or even a Jezebel spirit? ​I find it interesting now that all of this talk of demonic indwelling, demonology, and erroneous spirits operating in people is not said of the world necessarily, but it is said to Christians concerning fellow brothers and sisters in Christ. I began to notice a few years ago while reading the Bible that I could not find some of these spirits mentioned though dozens of books can be purchased that are dedicated to extrabiblical knowledge concerning them. There are entire doctrines being built upon the presence of these spirits. Rather than going on personal experience, we should be asking if this is Biblical or if people are being led off into myths. Join me today as we look at some of these teachings and test them against Scripture. There is great freedom found in the Word of God! Subscribe to my blog at lovesickscribe.com Find me on Facebook and Instagram (Lovesick Scribe)

Dr. Flowers plays a video from a Calvinistic believer on youtube who is making a common fallacious argument (see here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGJy7...​) Join us for a live discussion! To SUPPORT this broadcast please click here: https://soteriology101.com/support/​ DOWNLOAD OUR APP: LINK FOR ANDROIDS: https://play.google.com/store/apps/de​... LINK FOR APPLE: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/soterio​... Go to www.ridgemax.co for all you software developing needs! Show them some love for their support of Soteriology101!!! To ORDER Dr. Flowers Curriculum “Tiptoeing Through Tulip” please click here: https://soteriology101.com/shop/​ To listen to the audio only be sure to subscribe on iTunes, Stitcher, Google Play or one of the other podcast players found here: https://soteriology101.com/home/​ For more about Traditionalism (or Provisionism) please visit www.soteriology101.com Dr. Flowers’ book, “The Potter’s Promise” can be found here: https://www.amazon.com/Potters-Promis​... Dr. Flowers’ book, “God’s Provision for All” can be found here: https://www.amazon.com/Gods-Provision​... To engage with other believers cordially join our Facebook group: https://m.facebook.com/groups/1806702​... For updates and news follow us at: www.facebook/Soteriology101 Or @soteriology101 on Twitter Please SHARE on Facebook and Twitter and help spread the word! To learn more about other ministries and teachings from Dr. Flowers go here: https://soteriology101.com/2017/09/22...​ To become a Patreon supporter or make a one time donation: https://soteriology101.com/support/​

The Biden Administration has just announced $51/ton "Social Cost of Carbon." On this week's Power Hour, Alex Epstein interviews David Kreutzer, Senior Economist at the Institute for Energy Research, about the many methodological and moral problems with this metric, including: - How the SCC overestimates negative climate impacts - How the SCC underestimates positive climate impacts - How the SCC underestimates adaptation - How the SCC ignores the unique cost-effectiveness of fossil fuels - How the SCC is radically changed by arbitrary decisions about its "discount rate"

In this bonus episode, we welcome Jim Cliff, show host of the superb 'Fallacious Trump' podcast and expert on logical fallacies (errors in reasoning which result in invalid arguments). Jim kindly takes the time to help Eggs see the wide and varied ways in which Margo engages in logical fallacies, including the 'Straw Man', 'appeal to emotion' and 'ad hominem' to name but a few! Check out and subscribe to Fallacious Trump wherever you get your podcasts, and if you like what you hear, buy Jim's book (available on Amazon - click for link ( https://www.amazon.com/Fallacious-Trump-Donald-Logical-Fallacies/dp/1976933927 ) ) #saddo #goodlife #fallacioustrump #logicalfallacies Check out the corresponding show notes page at https://saddo.club ( https://saddo.club/s01e23-5-fallacious-margo ) Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/sitcom-archive-deep-dive-overdrive/donations

There is a growing theme, specifically among those who are seeking to justify their reconciliation of their political persuasions that support a political ideology and the genocidal reality of abortion, by claiming that pro-life needs to comprehensively include all aspects of life. On the surface, caring for all life “from womb to tomb” sounds right and noble. And it is. But caring for life from womb to tomb can't even be a thought if life itself is terminated within the womb. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/shawn-barnard/support

There is a growing theme, specifically among those who are seeking to justify their reconciliation of their political persuasions that support a political ideology and the genocidal reality of abortion, by claiming that pro-life needs to comprehensively include all aspects of life. On the surface, caring for all life “from womb to tomb” sounds right and noble. And it is. But caring for life from womb to tomb can't even be a thought if life itself is terminated within the womb. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/shawn-barnard/support

This week, we're discussing a haunted Florida tavern and a particularly enjoyable creepypasta from Kentucky! Here's what we're drinking this week:Brown Ale - 9/10Dr. Stoner's Smoky Herb Flavored Whiskey - 9.75/10 Did we get anything wrong? Want to tell us about a personal experience or give us some alcohols to try? Send us an email to southernspiritspodcast@gmail.com!Send us a postcard to P.O. Box 1743, Hartselle, AL 35640!Rate and review us on iTunes!Like us on Facebook and InstaGram @SouthernSpiritsPodcast! Follow us on Twitter @SSpiritsPodcast!Visit our website www.southernspiritspodcast.com!Become a Patron at patreon.com/southernspiritspodcast!Our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzbj2jKlDbX2zTVXQtP2fAw A Trash Adjacent Production.

Ted Cruz asked Jack Dorsey if Twitter can influence the election. Jack Dorsey's response was logically absurd. “Trump Campaign Celebrates Massive GDP Increase” - But is it justified? And the Gateway Pundit runs with a very misleading headline about Hunter Biden's affair with a Russian passport holder. If you like the show, consider donating. :-) Website: https://www.adamspeaking.com/zeropolitics/ Donate via the CashApp: https://cash.app/$adamangst Donate via LiberaPay: https://liberapay.com/AdamNaranjo/donate Twitter: https://twitter.com/zero_politics SUBSCRIBE: RSS feed link: https://anchor.fm/s/39a6bd80/podcast/rss iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/zero-politics/id1534976281 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0zFCjXTgFOe9cDqW8PdtrO Pocket Cast: https://pca.st/ff3h13c5 Google Podcasts: https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8zOWE2YmQ4MC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw== Overcast: https://overcast.fm/itunes1534976281/zero-politics RadioPublic: https://radiopublic.com/zero-politics-6LlvML Breaker: https://www.breaker.audio/zero-politics Anchor: https://anchor.fm/zeropolitics --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/zeropolitics/message

We are often told that schools are where you learn how to think, not what to think. Sadly, almost no school curriculum deals directly with logic and the closely related subject of logical fallacies.  Fallacies are all around us. Just read something online or watch a few minutes of television and you’ll probably encounter examples of people using fallacious reasoning and logical fallacies. In fact, you’ve probably engaged in it yourself. We’re all guilty of it.  Learn more about some of the common logical fallacies on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. http://www.audibletrial.com/EverythingEverywhere -------------------------------- Executive Producer James Makkyla Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/EEDailyPodcast/ Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/everything-everywhere-daily-podcast/

Waco. Texas. FBI. Guns. Jesus. Fire. The Bible. This Netflix show is good. And scary as heck. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/grevocab/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/grevocab/support

Crank Playthings 14800:00 - darkroom live 20191219 - notv 25:25 - Improvisation 1 - Matt Nish-Lapidus and Karen Ng 46:30 - Exercise A - Screens 8K

Fallacious (adjective) Definition: 1. based on an illogical, unsound premise; 2. false, yet deceptive and tending to mislead Example Sentences: – Your hasty generalization is fallacious because you didn’t take time to do adequate research.... The post JV739 (fallacious and bequeath) appeared first on Just Vocabulary Podcast | ESL Podcast to Improve your English Vocabulary.

Dr. Jurgen Kremer is an Author and Professor of Behavioral Sciences at Santa Rosa Junior College where he’s focused on Abnormal and General Psychology as well as Transformations of Consciousness. https://profiles.santarosa.edu/jurgen-w-kremer ******* Simulation interviews the greatest minds alive to inspire you to build the future ► http://simulationseries.com Design Merch, Get Paid, Spread Thought-Provoking Questions ► https://yoobe.me/simulation ******* Subscribe across platforms ► Youtube ► http://bit.ly/SimYoTu iTunes ► http://bit.ly/SimulationiTunes Instagram ► http://bit.ly/SimulationIG Twitter ► http://bit.ly/SimulationTwitter Spotify ► http://bit.ly/SpotifySim BiliBili ► http://bit.ly/SimBiliBili ******* Facebook ► http://bit.ly/SimulationFB Soundcloud ► http://bit.ly/SimulationSC LinkedIn ► http://bit.ly/SimulationLinkedIn Patreon ► http://bit.ly/SimulationPatreon Crypto ► http://bit.ly/CryptoSimu PayPal ► https://paypal.me/simulationseries ******* Nuance-driven Telegram chat ► http://bit.ly/SimulationTG Allen's TEDx Talk ► http://bit.ly/AllenTEDx Allen's IG ► http://bit.ly/AllenIG Allen's Twitter ► http://bit.ly/AllenT ******* List of Thought-Provoking Questions ► http://simulationseries.com/the-list Get in Touch ► simulationseries@gmail.com

In this episode, Virgil goes over the concept of logical fallacies and the different types used in discourse. Logical fallacies work on people because they make messages feel more persuasive. Ultimately fallacies hurt the trust and credibility of a person making an argument; therefore, the truth isn't the focus. This episode focuses on what logical fallacies are, the negative aspects of using them, and their overall effect on the way we interact with others.

10-23-19 Hour 1 Guest: Councilman Anthony Piagentini

Dee McCullay is a Canadian born filmmaker, seen on Travel & Escape, Destination America, & TruTV (Paranormal Survivor). He is one of the leading Canadian paranormal documentarians having produced both Television and web series including Dark History. Dee is also a horror filmmaker, his multi-nominated horror films include Fallacious, Border Patrol, & Scars. He is also the Producer Director of the viral hit Sasquatch on Lake Superior I & II.. Dee joins BEYOND the DARKNESS today to talk about his encounters with Sasquatch and with these aliens from other places and what he thinks they may be.... PLUS: A brand new Theater of the Mind that is definitely NSFW or prying ears...Listener Discretion Advised Support our sponsors for great deals! TRUE CASH from TRUECAR is something you need to check out for yourself. It has never been easier or faster to get a TRUE VALUE on your car and you can do it from the comfort of home at www.TrueCar.com Trying to solve your own life's mysteries? Psychic Source is a 24/7 phone, online chat and video psychic service. Your first three minutes are free plus it's only .83 cents a minute for a reading up to 30-minutes. Just mention promo code DARKNESS when you call 1-800-355-9214 or sign up online at psychic source dot com. Digestive troubles? Weight gain? Low energy? Achy Joints? If you've been struggling with any of these, Dr. Steven Gundry says you're not alone And he knows the real cause! Watch the free video at totalrestore2.com to find out more! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dee McCullay is a Canadian born filmmaker, seen on Travel & Escape, Destination America, & TruTV (Paranormal Survivor). He is one of the leading Canadian paranormal documentarians having produced both Television and web series including Dark History. Dee is also a horror filmmaker, his multi-nominated horror films include Fallacious, Border Patrol, & Scars. He is also the Producer Director of the viral hit Sasquatch on Lake Superior I & II.. Dee joins BEYOND the DARKNESS today to talk about his encounters with Sasquatch and with these aliens from other places and what he thinks they may be.... PLUS: A brand new Theater of the Mind that is definitely NSFW or prying ears...Listener Discretion Advised Support our sponsors for great deals! TRUE CASH from TRUECAR is something you need to check out for yourself. It has never been easier or faster to get a TRUE VALUE on your car and you can do it from the comfort of home at www.TrueCar.com Trying to solve your own life’s mysteries? Psychic Source is a 24/7 phone, online chat and video psychic service. Your first three minutes are free plus it’s only .83 cents a minute for a reading up to 30-minutes. Just mention promo code DARKNESS when you call 1-800-355-9214 or sign up online at psychic source dot com. Digestive troubles? Weight gain? Low energy? Achy Joints? If you’ve been struggling with any of these, Dr. Steven Gundry says you’re not alone And he knows the real cause! Watch the free video at totalrestore2.com to find out more! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode 7 - The Question of Shakespeare Authorship We've all studied Shakespeare. You read him in school. You performed a soliloquy in drama class. You've watched all the bad coming of age teen remakes. Did you know, though, that Shakespeare didn't actually write any of his works? At least, that's the theory, and we discuss the historical thought of the day that inspired this hotly debated and contemptuous accusation. We also explore an area of pursuasive argument known as the Argument of Authority, that just might explain why people today continue to jump on the band wagon of Shakespeare "doubters" whether they have a literary background or not. www.conspiracytheoryology.com email - contact@conspiracytheoryology.com Twitter - @TheoryologyPod Facebook - @TheoryologyPodcast Music is by adamhenrygarcia.bandcamp.com Links: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare_authorship_question http://realunexplainedmysteries.com/the-william-shakespeare-conspiracy-theory https://www.doubtaboutwill.org/declaration http://ourfakehistory.com/index.php/season-1/episode-5-did-shakespeare-write-the-plays/#more-131 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/theatre/playwrights/shakespeare-the-conspiracy-theories/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority#Fallacious_appeal_to_authority https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Reasonable_Doubt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_criticism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delia_Bacon

Sunday, June 24, 2018 - Apostle Donnie Clark expounds on the awry use of tolerance and the Kingdom mandate to appropriate it correctly 

How to address afflictions One is to seek a tranquil mind, not a confined mind. On the pursuit of a tranquil mind, some find that the more they do, the more confined their minds become as they only enjoy solitude. Such tranquility is rather superficial and fallacious. Superficial speaks to the narrow-minded nature as one is incapable of dealing with more people and taking more responsibilities. Fallacious speaks to the deceptive nature as it is not that one truly addresses afflictions, it is the lack of external conditions causing afflictions. 如何调伏烦恼 心要静，但不要小。 有的人越追求静心，心越封闭，只愿独处自得， 这种“静”未免肤浅、虚诳。 肤浅，是言心之狭窄，没有能力去应对、承担更多人与事； 虚诳，是因为这种静是假的，只是没有外境引发内心的烦恼， 而不是真正调伏了烦恼。

In this episode, I explain the logical fallacies and misinformation used in social media, and how we can determine how to counter it.

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 237. At Libertopia 2012, I delivered a 45-minute talk , "Intellectual Nonsense: Fallacious Arguments for IP," the slides for which are below. I spoke for 45 minutes—well, 40, then the last 5 were taken up by a question from J. Neil Schulman—but only covered the first 25 slides. For more details, see Part 1, at KOL236 | Intellectual Nonsense: Fallacious Arguments for IP (Libertopia 2012). Youtube, Slides, and Transcript below. This podcast is Part 2, covering most of the remaining 41 issues, some of which are noted below. ❧ Topics discussed: IP by Contract It's in the Constitution! Utilitarian arguments for IP Commerce Dept. Study Prize system Venture Capital/startup funding Questions as Arguments You want something for free! IP abolitionists are not successful creators But you're a patent lawyer… Okay, I'll take your stuff and sell it! The plague of plagiarism No innovation without IP Tabarrok: Patent Policy on the Back of a Napkin You can't make money without IP Identity theft Argument by grammar/semantics/emotion IP infringement is: knocking off, ripping off, stealing, taking, theft, piracy (“because” IP is “property”) Argument by possessive: it's “your” idea; whose else would it be? IP used to work well, but now it's “broken” The perils of “reform” Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater Intuition How would s/he get paid? Randian: Man's purpose is to "create values", so he needs to own the “products of his creation”. Perils of argument by metaphor Anti-IP is Anti-Intellect, anti-creativity you own the fruits of your labor IP is/is not about protecting “ideas” Odd distinctions between “implementations” of ideas or “innovation” and “ideas” Patents: Innovation vs. Disclosure Only leftists would oppose IP Patent and Copyright could exist under anarchy/at common law Pharmaceuticals! We need IP to stop piracy! Conflict over ideas/Good ideas is scarce! EM spectrum and IP Computer Hacking and IP ❧ Intellectual Nonsense: Fallacious Arguments for IP—Part 2 by Stephan Kinsella (Transcript for the unfinished a speech delivered at Libertopia 2012 (San Diego, Oct. 12, 2012), Oct. 18, 2012) [transcript for Part 1] 00:00:02 STEPHAN KINSELLA: So this is Stephan Kinsella.  It's Thursday, October 18.  I intend this to be part two, or the conclusion of my Libertopia lecture.  In Libertopia, I gave a talk, about a 45-minute talk on – well, it would have been 45 minutes.  It was about 40 minutes because there was a question at the end by Neil Schulman the last five minutes.  Anyway, the talk was on Intellectual Nonsense: Fallacious Arguments for Intellectual Property, or IP, and I had about 65 or 6 slides prepared of notes for myself of topics to discuss.  I got to about slide 25, so there's several topics left to discuss.  I thought what I would do is just go through those slides now, so I've already put the slides up on my website, c4sif.org, and you can view them there, download them, look them in Google Docs, etc.  The – and there are several hyperlinks embedded in there. 00:01:08 So the next topic I wanted to talk about is the common argument you hear quite often, which is that we could form intellectual property by contract or that intellectual property like patent and copyright are justified as a type of breach of contract.  And I am on slide 26 of my set of slides right now, by the way.  The title is “IP by Contract.”  So the basic argument, which I've addressed already, by the way, in my long IP article from 2001 in the reference given there.  The basic argument is that imagine that imagine that you sell a book to someone or you sell a ticket to a movie to a customer. 00:01:55 And you put on there some fine print or you make someone even sign a contract saying I promise not to do certain thing...

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 237. At Libertopia 2012, I delivered a 45-minute talk , "Intellectual Nonsense: Fallacious Arguments for IP," the slides for which are below. I spoke for 45 minutes—well, 40, then the last 5 were taken up by a question from J. Neil Schulman—but only covered the first 25 slides. For more details, see Part 1, at KOL236 | Intellectual Nonsense: Fallacious Arguments for IP (Libertopia 2012). This podcast is Part 2, covering most of the remaining 41 issues.  

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 236. [Update: a transcript is now available.] At Libertopia 2012, I delivered a 45-minute talk , "Intellectual Nonsense: Fallacious Arguments for IP" (Oct. 12, 2012), the slides for which are below. I spoke for 45 minutes—well, 40, then the last 5 were taken up by a question from J. Neil Schulman—but only covered the first 25 slides. I covered most of the remaining 41 in a separate recording, Part 2: KOL237. This episode covers issues in the first 25 slides, including: Overview of case against IP: purpose of property patent and copyright: as negative servitudes Absurd Arguments for IP “Serious” Arguments for IP Libertarian Property “Creationism” Rand on rearrangement Good ideas are scarce! IP is just like “property”! All property rights are limited/no property rights are “absolute” Absolute property rights We should “balance” innovation/IP vs. free speech Roots of copyright: censorship Balance: between copyright and freedom of speech Hollywood blockbuster movies vs. Youtube/Internet freedom We should “balance” innovation/IP vs. free speech IP is not a monopoly! Origin of modern patents Liberty is good, but not our “only value” (Previously posted as here: Intellectual Nonsense: Fallacious Arguments for IP (Libertopia 2012) (Oct. 13, 2012). See also See also:  There are No Good Arguments for Intellectual Property.) At Libertopia, I also participated in an hour-long IP panel with Charles Johnson, moderated by Butler Shaffer. It is presented in Part 3, KOL238. Update: I thought of one more argument that I forgot to cover in the slides and talk. It is the argument made by Silas Barta that (a) some libertarians support rights in airwaves (electromagnetic spectra); but (b) if you support airwave rights you have no basis to object to rights in other nonscarce resources like inventions or patterns of information (see Why Airwaves (Electromagnetic Spectra) Are (Arguably) Property). [Update: See also Silas Barta: The shortest, safest libertarian case [sic] for IP] There are several problems with this argument. First, not all libertarians support rights in EM spectra. So they are not committed to favor IP rights, even by Barta's argument. Second, even if EM spectra ought to be homesteadable, it does not mean that patterns of information ought to be. This is because EM spectra are actually scarce resources, while patterns of information are not. IP proponents typically grudgingly admit, when pressed, that EM spectra are  scarce but patterns of information—knowledge—is not, but they then shift to the argument that the monopoly over information leads to a "right to exploit" the monopoly, which leads to acquisition of profit (money), which is a scarce resource. The problem with the latter maneuver is that the profit comes from money voluntarily handed over to a seller by a customer. But the customer owns his money until he chooses to spend it. No other person has any property right claim in other people's money or, thus, in any possible future income stream or profits. Third, even if support of airwave property rights were to imply some type of possible rights in information or the right-to-exploit information, it does not imply that legislated IP rights systems like patent and copyright are justified (see, e.g., Legislation and Law in a Free Society). The advocate of an IP system that is somehow compatible with EM spectra rights has the burden of making a positive obligation for this system, and specifying its details. He can't just say that IP is justified just because some of its opponents favor EM rights or are confused on the EM issue. Finally, and to complement the previous point: even if you can argue that EM rights are valid, and do somehow impinge on normal property rights in scarce resources (which I disagree with), this does not mean that "anything goes",

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 236. At Libertopia 2012, I delivered a 45-minute talk , "Intellectual Nonsense: Fallacious Arguments for IP," the slides for which are below. I spoke for 45 minutes—well, 40, then the last 5 were taken up by a question from J. Neil Schulman—but only covered the first 25 slides. I covered most of the remaining 41 in a separate recording, Part 2: KOL237. (Previously posted as here: Intellectual Nonsense: Fallacious Arguments for IP (Libertopia 2012) (Oct. 13, 2012). See also See also:  There are No Good Arguments for Intellectual Property.) At Libertopia, I also participated in an hour-long IP panel with Charles Johnson, moderated by Butler Shaffer. It is presented in Part 3, KOL238 (forthcoming). Update: I thought of one more argument that I forgot to cover in the slides and talk. It is the argument made by Silas Barta that (a) some libertarians support rights in airwaves (electromagnetic spectra); but (b) if you support airwave rights you have no basis to object to rights in other nonscarce resources like inventions or patterns of information (see Why Airwaves (Electromagnetic Spectra) Are (Arguably) Property). There are several problems with this argument. First, not all libertarians support rights in EM spectra. So they are not committed to favor IP rights, even by Barta's argument. Second, even if EM spectra ought to be homesteadable, it does not mean that patterns of information ought to be. This is because EM spectra are actually scarce resources, while patterns of information are not. IP proponents typically grudgingly admit, when pressed, that EM spectra are  scarce but patterns of information—knowledge—is not, but they then shift to the argument that the monopoly over information leads to a "right to exploit" the monopoly, which leads to acquisition of profit (money), which is a scarce resource. The problem with the latter maneuver is that the profit comes from money voluntarily handed over to a seller by a customer. But the customer owns his money until he chooses to spend it. No other person has any property right claim in other people's money or, thus, in any possible future income stream or profits. Third, even if support of airwave property rights were to imply some type of possible rights in information or the right-to-exploit information, it does not imply that legislated IP rights systems like patent and copyright are justified (see, e.g., Legislation and Law in a Free Society). The advocate of an IP system that is somehow compatible with EM spectra rights has the burden of making a positive obligation for this system, and specifying its details. He can't just say that IP is justified just because some of its opponents favor EM rights or are confused on the EM issue. Finally, and to complement the previous point: even if you can argue that EM rights are valid, and do somehow impinge on normal property rights in scarce resources (which I disagree with), this does not mean that "anything goes", that just any limits on property rights in scarce resources are justified (and this is a point I emphasized in the lecture—see slides 14-15, and my posts The Non-Aggression Principle as a Limit on Action, Not on Property Rights; IP and Aggression as Limits on Property Rights: How They Differ). Again, the IP proponent would need to put forth a positive argument for IP rights. It cannot be established by criticizing its critics. As an analogy: suppose someone believes conscription is justified, but also opposes rape. You cannot show that rape is justified just because some people are wrong on conscription; you cannot even show that rape is justified if conscription is justified. Another argument I sometimes hear is exemplified here: By such a viewpoint there’s nothing wrong with raiding an online bank account – how can the account holder claim to own something as arcane as electronic digits? People can’t claim to own electricity or numbers hence they can...

Our guest Heads Cocked will teach you how to please your man. Check out her classes here: headscocked.comFollow us on Facebook and ask your relationship questions in our Group. (https://www.facebook.com/groups/relationshipquestions/)Call in at 607-203-5378 or text if you're shy at 484-840-3627

This unique 'Bootleg Broadcast' episode of the show is a live recording of a recent talk I gave in West Hollywood California, to celebrate my 100th episode of The Life Stylist Podcast. Having devoted the past twenty-plus years of my life to spiritual growth and metaphysical understanding, it seems that the next phase of my journey is naturally guiding me down the path of sharing my experiences with live audiences, as an inspirational (albeit reluctant) teacher of sorts. This raw, unedited live recording is my second-ever public talk, witch attempts to tackle the sometimes challenging topics of god, ego, and spiritual liberation.  After receiving such an abundance of positive feedback on my recent debut presentation at Cap Beauty in NYC, and constant requests for more spiritually-based content, I've decided to put this show out as an exercise of courage and vulnerability. If there's one thing I've learned in my first year as a podcast host, it's that people want the truth. They want something real. And the paradox of that fact is that the more open I become about my spiritual life, the more people relate to it and derive hope and inspiration from my experience on the path to enlightenment. But why should we care about the spiritual part of life anyway? What's the point? Ask yourself the following questions, and you may arrive at a place of curiosity, if not a legitimate desire to know more. Are you able to find peace in your pain? Can you reach and maintain a level of surrender in your life to the point that you rarely get rattled by the day to day stresses of the human experience? Do you control your mind, or does it control you? These are but a few of the questions I attempt to tackle in this introspective episode. Although this particular lecture is highly spontaneous and meandering, there are a couple of consistent themes, such as: How to escape the pain of the ego mind by walking through the inevitable pain in life The importance of strictly avoiding negative, thoughts, deeds and actions The  immense power of self-love and acceptance How and why I started the podcast, and how it has served my personal development and evolution I hope that this talk and ones like it which are likely to follow can provide a light-hearted and accessible approach to living a spiritually-centered life. The beautiful thing about finding salvation is that we are each free to do it in our way, and are open to choose whichever path best suits our current level of development and understanding. May you find god in whatever form gives your life meaning and fulfillment. Luke For more about this episode Topics Discussed: I begin by taking the crowd through Breath of Fire warm up- one of my top Kundalini yoga practices We do what I call Alpha wave “surfing" to encourage production of flow state, bliss and positive emotions How my own suffering gave me the willingness to change, and my journey from rebellion to humility How this  podcast became my vehicle for sharing my experience, but most of all, my personal growth and expansion The difference between the higher self vs. ego self, and how to determine who’s controlling your life The fantasmagoria of the mind, and how most of what it tells you isn't even real How to curb neurosis and knowing that you must understand how the mind works, and learn to see through it’s falLacious beliefs Unplugging from the mind matrix and how the key to freedom begins with awareness The concept of thought-fasting and other perspective-changing techniques to deflect negative thoughts, blame, and self deception How to build your own internal gym for mental fitness, using mindfulness, meditation and self-awareness Why it’s so important to feel our painful feelings, and how to process them quickly, and with intention The fact that positive influence happens through attraction, not promotion, and how it’s pointless to try and control or influence others Q&A with audience   MY 90-DAY LIFESTYLE DESIGN COACHING PROGRAM Your opportunity to work with me one-on-one. Upgrade your life through my proven system of revolutionary mental, physical and emotional transformation. Only 5 spots available. Apply now for a 15-minute assessment call.    HELP SUPPORT THIS SHOW! Starting and growing a podcast requires a ton of time, energy, and money. Do you appreciate this information, and want to support my mission to deliver as much life enhancing information as possible to as many people as possible? The easiest, and most effective way you can help is to do this: 1. Go to Lukestorey.com/support and donate towards show production costs 2. Subscribe to the show by clicking “subscribe” in iTunes 3. Write us a review in iTunes 4. Share this show with 1 friend right now You’d be amazed how much these four simple steps do to help us grow! Here’s the magic link for reviews. Thank you from the bottom of my heart for listening, and joining me on this journey we call life.

A straw man, a Scotsman, and literally Hitler walk into a bar. Is it a joke (punchline: something something “unnatural”), or are they our top picks for the finest logical fallacies?

The words for today are: Meretricious, Fallacious, Restive, Deface Poem of the day: Annabel Lee by Edgar Allen Poe VictorPrep's vocab podcast is for improving for English vocabulary skills while helping you prepare for your standardized tests! This podcast isn't only intended for those studying for the GRE or SAT, but also for people who enjoy learning, and especially those who want to improve their English skills. I run the podcast for fun and because I want to help people out there studying for tests or simply learning English. The podcast covers a variety of words and sometimes additionally covers word roots. Using a podcast to prep for the verbal test lets you study while on the go, or even while working out!  If you have comments or questions and suggestions, please contact me at @SamFold or send me an email at sam@victorprep.com Check out the podcast website at VictorPrep.com or the Facebookpage at Facebook.com/victorpreplearning

LINK TO ORIGINAL VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Gu3gfe1hsQ In this video Drake demonstrates, out of the mouth of one of their own scientists, that the scientific method is all based upon the fallacy of induction, as the conclusion is never necessitated from the premises (and thus is always invalid), and also commits the formal fallacy of affirming the consequent (if A, then B. B, therefore A. If this is true, then that is true. That is true, therefore this is true. The problem is that B does not justify itself but you justified it with the assumption A as the only possible explanation when there could be another correct answer; assumption A being one possibility out of an infinite number, thus reducing your probability of knowledge to 0%), thus collapsing all of scientific inquiry or any materialist or atheist worldview. The proof for Yah's existence is that without Him one could not prove anything. Proof requires logic. Unless one can account for the laws of logic, the proof ends in an infinite regress of "how do you know that?" If you cannot account for the laws of logic (which are abstract, invariant, and universal), you cannot prove anything. Due to causality also being unable to be established outside of revelation (due to the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, or "after this, therefore because of this"), this is proof of God by way of impossibility of the contrary and reduction ad absurdum (all other attempts at knowledge being impossible and reducing to the absurd), as for any knowledge to be possible it requires revelation from God and valid deduction (and thus necessitated conclusions) therefrom.

Don McCauley/ Dee McCullay is a Canadian born film maker. While contemplating between funeral director and film production, he went to one of the film festivals in 2010, and after leaving the festival he decided on film production. He self taught techniques and editing, and began creating short films, while landing a part in Rodney Dwira's 10-57 (2010) as a SWAT team member. He then landed a part in Trevor Zurkan's Quiver (2010) - Uncredited Police Officer. Next he produced Thunder Bay Paranormal Society episodes 1 - 3 for SHAW TV (2011 - 2012.) Upon finishing the 3 episodes, he created Dark History (2012 to present) a paranormal series and has traveled into the US and has worked with a well known TV personality. He has also contributed VFX to Grant Johnson's Stick to Your Guns (2015.) He continues on in the paranormal field shooting Dark History episodes with his production company Thunderstryker Films. Current productions include Fallacious and Border Patrol.

Don McCauley/ Dee McCullay is a Canadian born film maker. While contemplating between funeral director and film production, he went to one of the film festivals in 2010, and after leaving the festival he decided on film production. He self taught techniques and editing, and began creating short films, while landing a part in Rodney Dwira's 10-57 (2010) as a SWAT team member. He then landed a part in Trevor Zurkan's Quiver (2010) - Uncredited Police Officer. Next he produced Thunder Bay Paranormal Society episodes 1 - 3 for SHAW TV (2011 - 2012.) Upon finishing the 3 episodes, he created Dark History (2012 to present) a paranormal series and has traveled into the US and has worked with a well known TV personality. He has also contributed VFX to Grant Johnson's Stick to Your Guns (2015.) He continues on in the paranormal field shooting Dark History episodes with his production company Thunderstryker Films. Current productions include Fallacious and Border Patrol.

We do a commentary of Fallacious and Border Patrol then talk with Dee McCullay creator of Fallacious and Border Patrol Border Patrol https://youtu.be/QkDrtEy15wg Fallacious https://youtu.be/rL9Qgn5uIDs Dee McCullay Twitter https://twitter.com/dee_mccullay?s=09 Become a Patreon www.patreon.com/tnhorrornews Visit our site please www.tnhorror.com Big Rock" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/tennessee-horror-news-the/support

The Catholic Man Show This week Adam and David talk about fallacious arguments. It seems many arguments could be eliminated if we all recognized fallacious remarks or illogical thinking. We hope to bring to light some of the fallacies used today so you can be aware of them when talking with peers.  We also enjoy a very nice Japanese whisky and talk about a pipe travel bag.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEv_C1YJZEY ( David made a video of the bag for you to view). Email us at thecatholicmanshow@stmichaelradio.com to get into The Friend of the Show Club.  Also, if you haven't already check out https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5MhmMZZhEnrapVYUIkFHLg (The Catholic Man Show Youtube Channel!) We would love to hear from you so reach out to us on our Facebook page! We are on the Lord's team. The winning side. So raise your glass! Cheers to Jesus! Man Drink: Hibiki Japanese Whisky Man Gear: Pipe Travel Bag https://www.facebook.com/thecatholicmanshow/photos/a.1760750347477616.1073741828.1758346711051313/1853339341552049/?type=3 ()Man Topic: Fallacious Arguments http://thecatholicmanshow.com/catholic-man-show-sponsor/ (Want to support The Catholic Man Show and get some manly gear?) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FltkTkcPTg (Did you see the video of Fr. Brian O’Brien and Adam talking about ways to keep your kid Catholic?) The Catholic Man Show is hosted by Adam Minihan and David Niles from Tulsa, OK. They provide a raw, comical, and insightful conversation about ways Catholic men should live their lives in a secular world.   Feel free to check out our website on http://thecatholicmanshow.com/show/catholic-man-show/ (St. Michael Catholic Radio) or see our podcasts on http://www.breadboxmedia.com/the-catholic-man-show.html (Breadbox Media). #CheerstoJesus Support this podcast

From Part 2, "Nationalism". This audio book is made available through the generosity of Mr. Tyler Folger. Narrated by Millian Quinteros.

1) Real football starts this weekend! 2) More surprising; Yankees or Mets? 3) Fallacious reporting on Jameis Winston 4) A little John Saunders and Terry Bowden bashing to take us into hour 2...

Lecture 6 of 6 in Marianne Talbot's series on critical reasoning for beginners.

Lecture 6 of 6 in Marianne Talbot's series on critical reasoning for beginners.

Lecture 6 of 6 in Marianne Talbot's series on critical reasoning for beginners.

Lecture 6 of 6 in Marianne Talbot's series on critical reasoning for beginners.

Matt and Andy are back together this week, welcoming British writer/comedian Humphrey Ker (twitter.com/thehumphreyker) and American writer/comedian Bryan Cook (twitter.com/bryancooking) on the program to discuss: Going on strike against Joan Rivers! Fallacious labor dispute arguments! The hilarious Competitive Erotic Fan Fiction show! Moving someone else's hand with your mind! Swedish fish -- not the candy ones, the testicle-biting ones! The Sharknado finale! Asylum movies! Andy's summer adventures with fleas and nearly dead roommates! Being able to listen to and/or tune out your spouse's voice! The curse of having a posh accent! British comedians learning to ski! Attributing Hitler quotes to Taylor Swift! The new Kit Kat-named Android OS! American Gladiators! A lengthy explanation of pantomimes!

In this episode, I talk to Don Lindsay who has produced an amazing resource on his website about fallacious arguments. He describes how to recognise fallacious arguments and the common ones you are likely to encounter which will help improve your critical reading and writing.

Travis Jensen, @SoftwareMaven, Product Manager and Founder of ClickLock, Discusses Why Awesome Technology Is Not Enough Co-hosts Cindy F. Solomon @cindyfsolomon @prodmgmttalk and @ValWorkman   Travis says, "From the first day I realized that figuring out what to build was a far more difficult problem than just building something, I knew my days of coding were coming to an end. Since then, I've done everything I can to learn from my peers in the product management community with the hope that, together, we can increase the value of our products, our companies, and our careers. Kudos to The Global Product Management Talk for providing a forum to accomplish that!" Background resources: http://bit.ly/xo2QFx

Notes, References, and Links for further study: Invitation to the Tragedy and Hope online community Log in page for the Tragedy and Hope online community Peace Revolution primary site (2009-2012) Peace Revolution backup stream(2006-2012) Includes the 9/11 Synchronicity Podcast (predecessor to Peace Revolution) Tombstone (on Youtube) “Bianca you animal, shut up!” (end of lecture) by John Taylor Gatto “Proverbs from Plymouth Pulpit” by Henry Ward Beecher 1877 (on Google Books) “Who is John Galt” entire speech from Atlas Shrugged Mark Passio, What On Earth Is Happening, podcast # 89 Mark Passio, What On Earth is Happening, podcast # 84 with Larken Rose Larken Rose dot com The Most Dangerous Superstition by Larken Rose “The Philosophic Corruption of Reality” outline presented on The Meria Heller Show “Liberty or Death” speech written by Patrick Henry, 1775 St. John's Church, Richmond, Virginia (National Landmark) Solipsism: Solipsism ( /ˈsɒlɨpsɪzəm/) is the philosophical idea that only one's own mind, alone, is sure to exist. The term comes from Latin solus (alone) and ipse (self). Solipsism as an epistemological position holds that knowledge of anything outside one's own mind is unsure. The external world and other minds cannot be known, and might not exist outside the mind. As a metaphysical position, solipsism goes further to the conclusion that the world and other minds do not exist. Although the number of individuals sincerely espousing solipsism has been small, it is not uncommon for one philosopher to accuse another's arguments of entailing solipsism as an unwanted consequence, in a kind of reductio ad absurdum. In the history of philosophy, solipsism has also served as a skeptical hypothesis. Reason: Reason is a term that refers to the capacity human beings have to make sense of things, to establish and verify facts, and to change or justify practices, institutions, and beliefs.[1] It is closely associated with such characteristically human activities as philosophy, science, language, mathematics, and art, and is normally considered to be a definitive characteristic of human nature.[2] The concept of reason is sometimes referred to as rationality and sometimes as discursive reason, in opposition to "intuitive reason".[3] Reason or "reasoning" is associated with thinking, cognition, and intellect. Reason, like habit or intuition, is one of the ways by which thinking comes from one idea to a related idea. For example, it is the means by which rational beings understand themselves to think about cause and effect, truth and falsehood, and what is good or bad. In contrast to reason as an abstract noun, a reason is a consideration which explains or justifies some event, phenomenon or behaviour.[4] The ways in which human beings reason through argument are the subject of inquiries in the field of logic. Reason is closely identified with the ability to self-consciously change beliefs, attitudes, traditions, and institutions, and therefore with the capacity for freedom and self-determination.[5] Fallacies: In logic and rhetoric, a fallacy is usually an improper argumentation in reasoning resulting in a misconception or presumption. By accident or design, fallacies may exploit emotional triggers in the listener or interlocutor (appeal to emotion), or take advantage of social relationships between people (e.g. argument from authority). Fallacious arguments are often structured using rhetorical patterns that obscure any logical argument. Fallacies can be used to win arguments regardless of the merits. Among such devices, discussed in more detail below, are: "ignoring the question" to divert argument to unrelated issues using a red herring, making the argument personal (argumentum ad hominem) and discrediting the opposition's character, "begging the question" (petito principi), the use of the non-sequitor, false cause and effect (post hoc ergo propter hoc), bandwagoning (everyone says so), the "false dilemma" or "either-or fallacy" in which the situation is oversimplified, "card-stacking" or selective use of facts, and "false analogy". Another favorite device is the "false generalization", an abstraction of the argument that shifts discussion to platitudes where the facts of the matter are lost. There are many, many more tricks to divert attention from careful exploration of a subject.[1] Fallacies can generally be classified as informal (premises fail to support the proposed conclusion, but the argument is structured properly) or formal (logical structure is flawed). List of Fallacies and Intellectual Self-Defense (on Scribd) Gene Odening interview #4 on the Gnostic Media Podcast Trivium Interviews with Gene Odening: www.TriviumEducation.com Peace Revolution partner podcasts: Corbett Report dot com Media Monarchy dot com Gnostic Media Podcast School Sucks Project Podcast Remedy Radio Podcast Meria dot net Other productions by members of the T&H network: The Ultimate History Lesson: A Weekend with John Taylor Gatto (2012) a journey into the dark heart of public schooling, revealing how America became incoherent, one student at a time. Navigating Netflix (2011) our video series wherein we conduct a critical analysis of films you might have missed; Navigating Netflix is available for free on YouTube. "Memories of a Political Prisoner", an interview with Professor Chengiah Ragaven, graduate of Oxford, Cambridge, and Sussex; AFTER he was a political prisoner, who was exiled from South Africa, during Apartheid. (2011) What You've Been Missing! (2011) is our video series focusing in on the history of corruption in our public education system. Top Documentary Films dot com: Hijacking Humanity by Paul Verge (2006) Top Documentary Films dot com: Exposing the Noble Lie (2010) Top Documentary Films dot com: The Pharmacratic Inquisition by Jan Irvin (2007) THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT! If you would like to donate so that we can continue producing independent media without commercial advertising, simply click the button below for a one-time donation: Alternatively, You can become a Member and Support our ability to create media for the public (while You make new friends and enjoy educating yourself along the way) by subscribing to the Tragedy and Hope Community: Monthly @ $14.95 / month Yearly @ $120.00 / year *Subscription details on Subscribe page in the Top Menu.

Notes, References, and Links for further study: Invitation to the Tragedy and Hope online community Log in page for the Tragedy and Hope online community Peace Revolution primary site (2009-2012) Peace Revolution backup stream (2006-2012) Includes the 9/11 Synchronicity Podcast (predecessor to Peace Revolution) Use the backup stream if the podOmatic bandwidth has been exceeded. Tombstone (on Youtube) “Bianca you animal, shut up!” (end of lecture) by John Taylor Gatto The Utimate History Lesson dot com “Proverbs from Plymouth Pulpit” by Henry Ward Beecher 1877 (on Google Books) “Who is John Galt” entire speech from Atlas Shrugged Mark Passio, What On Earth Is Happening, podcast # 89 Mark Passio, What On Earth is Happening, podcast # 84 with Larken Rose Larken Rose dot com The Most Dangerous Superstition by Larken Rose “The Philosophic Corruption of Reality” outline presented on The Meria Heller Show “Liberty or Death” speech written by Patrick Henry, 1775 St. John's Church, Richmond, Virginia (National Landmark) Solipsism: Solipsism ( /ˈsɒlɨpsɪzəm/) is the philosophical idea that only one's own mind, alone, is sure to exist. The term comes from Latin solus (alone) and ipse (self). Solipsism as an epistemological position holds that knowledge of anything outside one's own mind is unsure. The external world and other minds cannot be known, and might not exist outside the mind. As a metaphysical position, solipsism goes further to the conclusion that the world and other minds do not exist. Although the number of individuals sincerely espousing solipsism has been small, it is not uncommon for one philosopher to accuse another's arguments of entailing solipsism as an unwanted consequence, in a kind of reductio ad absurdum. In the history of philosophy, solipsism has also served as a skeptical hypothesis. Reason: Reason is a term that refers to the capacity human beings have to make sense of things, to establish and verify facts, and to change or justify practices, institutions, and beliefs.[1] It is closely associated with such characteristically human activities as philosophy, science, language, mathematics, and art, and is normally considered to be a definitive characteristic of human nature.[2] The concept of reason is sometimes referred to as rationality and sometimes as discursive reason, in opposition to "intuitive reason".[3] Reason or "reasoning" is associated with thinking, cognition, and intellect. Reason, like habit or intuition, is one of the ways by which thinking comes from one idea to a related idea. For example, it is the means by which rational beings understand themselves to think about cause and effect, truth and falsehood, and what is good or bad. In contrast to reason as an abstract noun, a reason is a consideration which explains or justifies some event, phenomenon or behaviour.[4] The ways in which human beings reason through argument are the subject of inquiries in the field of logic. Reason is closely identified with the ability to self-consciously change beliefs, attitudes, traditions, and institutions, and therefore with the capacity for freedom and self-determination.[5] Fallacies: In logic and rhetoric, a fallacy is usually an improper argumentation in reasoning resulting in a misconception or presumption. By accident or design, fallacies may exploit emotional triggers in the listener or interlocutor (appeal to emotion), or take advantage of social relationships between people (e.g. argument from authority). Fallacious arguments are often structured using rhetorical patterns that obscure any logical argument. Fallacies can be used to win arguments regardless of the merits. Among such devices, discussed in more detail below, are: "ignoring the question" to divert argument to unrelated issues using a red herring, making the argument personal (argumentum ad hominem) and discrediting the opposition's character, "begging the question" (petito principi), the use of the non-sequitor, false cause and effect (post hoc ergo propter hoc), bandwagoning (everyone says so), the "false dilemma" or "either-or fallacy" in which the situation is oversimplified, "card-stacking" or selective use of facts, and "false analogy". Another favorite device is the "false generalization", an abstraction of the argument that shifts discussion to platitudes where the facts of the matter are lost. There are many, many more tricks to divert attention from careful exploration of a subject.[1] Fallacies can generally be classified as informal (premises fail to support the proposed conclusion, but the argument is structured properly) or formal (logical structure is flawed). List of Fallacies and Intellectual Self-Defense (on Scribd) Gene Odening interview #4 on the Gnostic Media Podcast Trivium Interviews with Gene Odening: www.TriviumEducation.com Peace Revolution partner podcasts:Corbett Report dot comMedia Monarchy dot comGnostic Media PodcastSchool Sucks Project PodcastRemedy Radio PodcastMeria dot netOther productions by members of the T&H network:The Ultimate History Lesson: A Weekend with John Taylor Gatto (2012) a journey into the dark heart of public schooling, revealing how America became incoherent, one student at a time.Navigating Netflix (2011) our video series wherein we conduct a critical analysis of films you might have missed; Navigating Netflix is available for free on YouTube."Memories of a Political Prisoner", an interview with Professor Chengiah Ragaven, graduate of Oxford, Cambridge, and Sussex; AFTER he was a political prisoner, who was exiled from South Africa, during Apartheid. (2011)What You've Been Missing! (2011) is our video series focusing in on the history of corruption in our public education system.Top Documentary Films dot com: Hijacking Humanity by Paul Verge (2006)Top Documentary Films dot com: Exposing the Noble Lie (2010)Top Documentary Films dot com: The Pharmacratic Inquisition by Jan Irvin (2007)THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT! If you would like to donate so that we can continue producing independent media without commercial advertising, simply click the button below for a one-time donation: Alternatively, You can become a Member and Support our ability to create media for the public (while You make new friends and enjoy educating yourself along the way) by subscribing to the Tragedy and Hope Community: Monthly @ $14.95 / month Yearly @ $120.00 / year *Subscription details on Subscribe page in the Top Menu.

The root words fall and fals come from a Latin word that means to ‘trick.’ Some common words derived from this root word are false and fault. Watch out for the ‘tricks’ this root can play, for the word faucet (tap) is also derived from this root word, and you’ll probably be surprised to learn why.Like this? Build a competent vocabulary with Membean.

In this season of gift giving, listen in as Adam redirects attention to the Gift Within, the one that is oftentimes overlooked in modern thought. In another thought-provoking discourse, he examines several revered scientific concepts and shows how they skew our perception of our reality, Self-Worth, and maintain unnecessary blindness to the Gift. (www.phaelos.com) … Read more about this episode...